No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1111 CAMELBACK_MINI STORAGE11111111 lill 11111111111111111111111111 lill III *NEW FILE* 1111 Camelback 12197/1994 13:23 7144589058 RPM PALEO ASSOC. PAGE 02 RMW PakoAmkxiateti 97-1103 28 October 1997 Mr. Don Skelly S. ,ior Building Inspector Cil; of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 RE: Paleontological Services for Newport Beach Mini U-Storage #2 job # 6409013 Dear Mr. Skelly: , , • .. r ,l ri,'ti' r RMW Paleo Associates, Inc. has been performing the paleontological monitoring at the above - referenced project. No significant fossil remains have been located during excavations for the pads or the trenching activities. Dahn Corporation is cleared to excavate the footings. Please contact us if you have any questions. Respectfully, Marilyn, rgan Principal 10,0060917 Caot*2llux p a April 1, 1997 TO: MARC MYERS PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MANAGER SUBJECT: Fair Share Fee Calculation - Camelback Mini -Storage II 1133 Camelback Street The Fair Share Fee for this project is $28, 590.38, based on the following information: The new 87,000 sq ft mini -storage project will be built on a vacant, paved parcel currently operated by the U.S. Postal Service. As this is a vacant parcel, there is no credit for Fair Share Fee purposes. 2. The new use will produce 222 trips assuming the NBTAM Update trip generation rate of 2.61 trips/1000 sq ft. 2.61 trips x 85,000/1000 sq ft = 222 trips 3. The current fee is $125.91/trip. The Fair Share Fee calculation is 222 trips x $125.91/trip = $28, 590.38. Please let me know if you have any questions about the fee. Richard M. Edmonston Transportation and Development Services Mgr. cc: Robert Bradley Jr., Dahn Corporation \jdivan\fairshar\memos\minstor2 4.1.97 s, �EwroRf CITY OF NEC MT BEACH Heari2 Date: March 24, 1997 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Agenda Item No.: (7 V'S PLANNING DEPARTMENT Staff Person: Javier S. Garcia „.� Mo NEWPORT BOULEVARD (714) 644-3206 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92656 (74) 644-3200, FAX (714) 64 -3250 REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PROJECT: CamelbackMini-Storage II (Dahn Corporation, applicant) 1133 CamelbackStreet SUMMARY: Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the property for Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities/General Industry use and establish the permitted intensity of development and amend the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Text to allow for the development of an 86,000 square foot mini -storage facility subject to the approval of a site plan review. Also included with the applications is the acceptance of an Environmental Document. SUGGESTED ACTION: If desired, adopt Resolutions No. 97- and No. 97- approving the following, as recommended by the Planning Commission. General PlanAnnendmentNo. 96-3 (E); Amendment No. 850 (North Ford/San: Diego Creek Planned Community Regulations); Sustain or modify the decision of the Planning Commission in regard to: Site Plan Review No. 76, and the acceptance of an environmenntaldocumeut-NegativeDeclaration. LOCATION: A portion of Lot No. 4 of Tract No. 6680, located on the southwesterly side of Camelback Street between Bison Avenue and Jamboree Road. / ZONE: PC (Planned Community). The North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District. OWNER: United States Postal Service, Denver t '' Planning Commission Recommendation At its meeting of March 6, 1997, the Planning Commission considered this amendment to the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Text to allow for the development of an 86,000 square foot mini -storage facility subject to the approval of a site plan review, and recommended its approval to the City Council. Revisions to the project presented by supplement to the Planning Commission staff report have been incorporated into the attached revised staff report (increase in the project size from 85,000 sq.ft. to 86,000 sq.ft.), which includes the complete staff analysis. The Planning Commission discussion for this proposal focused on one particular area of concern, the aesthetics of the project as viewed from Camelback Street. The Planning Commission, in making its recommendation to the City Council, determined that additional landscaping beyond that depicted on the site plan was necessary to soften the visual bulk of the structure as viewed from Camelback Street. The amended conditions of approval provided for enhanced vertical landscape treatment by way of additional trees in the landscape area adjacent to the Camelback Street frontage. Proposed Amendments General Plan Amendmen The Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan currently designates the site for "Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities" (more specifically, as a portion of the Postal Facility). The proposed amendment will change the site's designation to "Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities/General Industry" to allow for a mixture of governmental and industrial uses, and will increase the North Ford Area 2 density by 86,000 sq.ft. and establish a density limit for the newly created "Site 2b" (a sub -portion of Area 2) to accommodate the proposed mini -storage facility. On the basis of the facts presented in the analysis of the attached Planning Commission staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed use is appropriate for the site and compatible with the surrounding development. The complete text of the General Plan Land Use Element amendment is included in the attached Planning Commission staffreport dated March 6, 1997. Amendment to the North Ford Planned Communit District Regulations The proposed Amendment No. 850 will increase the site's density allocation to allow for the proposed additional mini -storage development. Staff believes that the proposal for the increased density fora mini -storage facility is a reasonable use of the property, since such a use is generally a low traffic generator and will have a minimal traffic impact on the surrounding uses, more specifically, post office, office and industrial uses or residential uses in the vicinity. In order to ensure the implementation of the proposed mini -storage facility is compatible with the surrounding area, staff has recommended that design characteristics of the project be evaluated concurrently with proposed amendments. To accomplish this, the proposed PC text regulations include a provision which requires review of the site plan for development of mini -storage GPA 96.3E and Amendment No. 650 Page 2 facilities. This procedure is set forth in Section 20.01.070 of the Municipal Code and is consistent with the procedure applied to the other mini -storage facility also located on Camelback Street. This requirement allows the City to apply specific standards in evaluation of the proposed project related to setbacks, height, site plan layout and landscaping. The discussion of the complete text of the amendment to the Planned Community Regulations and the site plan review is also included in the attached Planning Commission staff report dated March 6, 1997. Submitted by: SHARONZ. WOOD Prepared by: JAVIER S. GARCIA, AICP Assistant City Manager Senior Planner Attachments: Draft Minutes of the Planning Commission- March 6, 1997 Staff Report to the Planning Commission (Revised) - March 6, 1997 Draft Resolution No. 97- _ (GPA 96-3E) Draft ResolutionNo. 97- _ (A850) GPA 96-3E and Amendment No. 850 Page 3 City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 DRAFT INDEX 1. SUBJECT: CamelbackMini-Storagell (DahnCorporafIon, applicant) Item No.1 1133 CamelbackStreef GPA 96.3 (E) General Plan Amendment No. 96.3 (E), A 360 • Amendment No. 850 (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Site Plan Review Community Regulations), No. 76 • Site Plan Review No. 76 and Negative Decla- • the acceptance of an environmental document- Negative ration Declaration. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the property for Approved Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities/General Industry use and establish the permitted intensity of development and amend the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Text to allow for the development of an 86,000 square foot mini -storage facility subject to the approval of a site plan review. Also included with the applicationsis the acceptance of an Environmental Document. Mr. Jay Garcia, Senior Planner presented a summation of the staff report as well as the supplemental report distributed this evening. He explained the Increase from 85,000 to 86,000 square foot mini -storage facility (the caretaker's unit was not included in the square footage). The size and modification of the proposed project being reduced from the original square footage of 99,900. Revised plans and changes to the facility are attached as on Addendum. The General Plan Amendment was reviewed by staff and is similar in nature as the project at 1177 Comelback St. which is compatible to the surrounding uses. The mini -storage facility is located on a portion of the postal service facilities. There is no map involved and they will share access. The Site Plan is also included for approval to ensure compatibility with the aesthetics of the surrounding area. Parking is not an issue for the mini -storage since the facility has areas were vehicles can park in front of the storage areas or the stairways. There is a request to delete condition of approval #II which calls for the Water Capital Improvement fee to be paid. Research of Public Works records indicates that the fee has already been paid in cohjunctionwith the originalTract. Commissioner Ridgeway asked for and received clariffcailon of the living quarters situated over the office area. Floor plans were referred to showing the location of the manager's residence on the =and floor of Building A and the first floor as the office and garage. He then asked about the landscape at the front elevation that faces the street. Mr. Garcia reviewed the landscaping provisions on the site plan as means to soften the view from the street. The depth of the landscape is 20 feet and will include trees. At Commission request, the amount of landscape will be increased with the use of mature trees thotwill soften the building height of 28 feet from grade level. Commissioner Fuller asked about the site distance on the radius. He continued by expressing safety concerns with posted sighs. Mr. Rich Edmonton answered that the conditions on the site evolved from the 2 h� k City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 INDEX shopping center development and the changes that were created on Cameiback as a result of that development. This driveway would be close to the Post Office and would have many of those some concerns but at this point there is no indication that there would be any similar types of turn restrictions on the driveway. Reference was made to Condition No. 8 that addresses site distances and it was proposed by Rich DRAFT Edmonston to change the distance for a speed of 45 miles per hour that would more closelyreflect the conditions that exist. Ms. Temple stated that in reviewing the staff report, the applicant raised a concern regarding Mitigation Measure No: 4 regarding the paleontological monitoring. Staff has requested this mitigation measure due to past experience in the area. The applicant has indicated that the actual cut grading may not exceed that which has previously occurred on site. Ms. Temple suggested that this condition be prefaced by the following language: "Should grading occur in such a manner that the 'soil is disturbed beyond that which has already occurred in association with prior construction or grading on the site, the following measure shall be applied:" Public Hearing was opened. Bob Bradley, Executive Vice President of Dahn Corporation, 18552 MacArthur Boulevard, Irvine - stated that Dahn Corporation is a privately held company that specializes in developing and operating self -storage properties around the country. At the corner of Cameiback and Bison, Dahn Corporation developed a storage facility several years ago. This facility is completely leased and has left a demand for more self -storage. The land at 1133 Camelback became available from the post office and was obtained on a long term ground lease (55 years). This lease is to develop a self -storage property identical to the other storage property on the corner. Mr. Bradley then referred to an exhibit and explained the proportions of development to land. He stated that he has reviewed the staff report and the findings and conditions and agrees to all of them as presented. Commissioner Ridgeway asked about the rear portion of the property and ownership. He was answered that the entire fee ownership will remain with the Post Office. It will be left as somewhat a semi -developed parking lot, with some area to be used for truck storage directly behind the Post Office. Commissioner Fuller asked about the design of the lighting, hours and soil contamination. He was answered that the lights will be wall mounted, directed downward so there is no outward spillage and are motion sensitive so they are off at night except if a tenant drives by the office, the motion sensor would turn the light on. The lights are on a 15-20 minute timer, office hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The gate hours are 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and tenants access through a code system that allows them entrance onto the property. The monument sign is internally illuminated and is on a timer as well. Monitoring wells have been placed on this site in conjunction with the Ford Development on Jamboree and the studies are still taking place. 3 City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 At Commission inquiry, Mr. Bradley acknowledged that the City Traffic Engineer is recommending that Condition No. 8, the site distance be designed for 45 miles. He stated that he does not know what that does to the driveway location, but it will be looked at to be sure It works. He acknowledged the recommended change to Mitigation No. 4 regarding the paleontological study. Public Hearing was closed. Motion was made by Commissioner Ridgeway to -adopt Resolution 1449, recommending to City Council the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E), adopt Resolution 1450 recommending to City Council the approval of Amendment No. 850 (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Regulations), Site Plan Review No. 76 and the acceptance of an environmental document - Negative Declaration subject to the findings and conditionswith the noted changes: • Condition No. 8 to be changed from 35 to 45 miles, • Condition No. 11. referencing that -the Water Capital Improvement fee be paid, to be deleted, • Condition No.16 to be changed to double the trees on the plan, • Condition No. 17 to include the additional verbiage of 'use of motion sensitive area lighting, *lighting wall mounted directed downwards, •iighfing of signage off at 10:00 p.m., and • Mitigation Measure #4 to be prefaced by "Should grading occurin such a manner that the soil is disturbed beyond that which has already occurred in association With prior construction or grading on the site, the following measure shall be applied:.:' Commissioner Gifford clarified and It was agreed upon that the motion would read that there will be no lighting offer 10:00 p.m. except for lighting activated by motion sensors. The monument and wall sign shall be off after 10..00 p.m. Motion was voted on and approved: Ayes: All Noes: none Absent: none Abstain: none ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT, Accept the environmental document, making the following findings and requiring the following mitigation measures: Findings 1. That based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, comments received, and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project, as conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures Identified in the Initial Study, could have a significant effect on the environment, therefore a =9 A IrI� City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 INDEX Negative Declaration has been prepared. The Negative Declaration adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the project, and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA. The Negative Declaration was considered prior to approval of the project. DRAFT 2. An Initial Study has been conducted, and considering the record as a whole there is no evidence before this agency that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. On the basis of the evidence in the record, this agency finds that the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) has been rebutted. Therefore, the proposed project qualifies for a De Minimis Impact Fee Exemption pursuantto Section 753.5(c) of Title 14, CCR. Mitigation Measures: 1. The Applicant will comply with the erosion and siltation control measures of the City's grading ordinance and all applicable local and State building codes and seismic design guidelines. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide written certification acceptable to the City's Building Department signed by a licensed engineer that the area has undergone a soil clean-up process and any gasoline leakage or soil contamination has been cleared. 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning Department that the lighting system is designed, directed, and will be maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to neighboring residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer, with a letter from the engineerstating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 4. Should grading occur in such a manner that the soil is, disturbed beyond that which has already occurred in association with prior construction or grading on the site, the following measure shall be applied: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Newport Beach that a qualified paleontologist has been retained to observe grading activities and salvage and catalogue fossils as necessary. The paleontologist shall be present at the pre -grading conference, shall establish procedures for paleontological resource surveillance, and shall establish, in cooperation with the project developer, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of the fossils. If major paleontological resources are discovered, which require long-term halting or redirecting of grading, 5 4 City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Mlnufes March 6, 1917 the and to the City of Newport Beach. The pdieontologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the project developer, which ensure proper exploration and/or salvage. Excavated finds shall be offered to the City of Newport Beach, or its designee, on a first -refusal basis. The applicant may retain said finds if written assurance is provided that they will be property preserved in Orange County, unless said finds are of special significance, or a museum in Orange County Indicates a desire to study and/or display them at the time, in which case items shall be donated to the City, or designee. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the City of Newport Beach. Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit, the paleontologistsholl submit follow-up report for approval by the City which shall include the period of inspection, a catalogue and analysis of the fossils found, and present repository of the fossils. B, General Plan Amendment No, 96-31E1: Adopt Resolution No.-._-_ (attached) recommending to the City Council the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E). C. Adopt Resolution No._ (atta& adoption of Amendment No. 850. Q Site Plan Review No. 76: Findings recommending to the City Council That the proposed action is part of the project evaluated in the Negative Declaration prepared for GPA 96-3(E) and Amendment No. 850. That Negative Declaration adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the project, and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA. The Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission and was reviewed and considered prior to recommending approval of the project. 2. That all applicable standards for the approval of a Site Plan Review are met as established by Section 20.01.070 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code since: The development is consistent with surrounding land uses and with the goals and policies of the General Plan as recommended for City Council approval by the Planning Commisslonin GPA 96-3(E). The development is an extension of existing uses in the block which are compatiblewith the characterof the neighborhood and which will contribute to the orderly and harmonious INDEX I City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6,1997 development of surrounding properties and the City, since the project is designed in accordance with permitted height and site area coverage limitations specified by the North Ford Planned Community Development Regulations which apply to other properties in this block of Camelback Street. • The development has been designed to maximize protection of public views from Bison Avenue which will not be adversely impacted by the height of the proposed buildings. • There are no environmentally sensitive areas on -site or in the vicinity of the subject property. The project is not located, in an area of unique geologic hazards. The proposed project is not a residential project and will meet City noise standards for the proposed manager's residential unit. The site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas and pedestrian and vehicular access are functional in that the .project has.been.designed with increased setbacks which add to the functional efficiency of the traffic and pedestrian circulation of the project. The proposed development fully conforms to the established development standards for the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District, as recommended for City Council approval by the Planning Commission in Amendment No. 850. Further, that the proposed development in the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District will not preclude implementation of specific General Plan objectives and policies. Electrical and similar mechanical equipment and trash areas, as conditioned by this approval, will be concealed from view to prevent any potential aesthetic nuisance or impact. There are no known archeological or historical resources on -site and mitigation measures included with this approval will preserve any sites which may be uncovered. The commercial development proposed is an extension of existing uses in the block and the project as conditioned by this approval will not have a significant adverse effect on the residential uses in the vicinity. 3. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of propertywithin the proposed development. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.01.070 of the Municipal Code. INDEX DRAFT N City of Newport beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 Conditions: 1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial compliance with the approved site plan, floor plans and elevations, except as noted below. 2. ThatSite Plan Review No. 76 will not become effective unless and until General Plan Amendment 96.3(E) and Amendment No. 850 are approved by the City Council. 3. That all conditions of approval of Amendment No, 850 and related mitigation measures of the environmental document shall be fulfilled. 4. That the hours of operation of the mini -storage faciliiyshali be limited between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., daily. 5. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 6. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 7. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be designed in accordance with Newport Beach Standard Drawings, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department (City Traffic Engineer). 8. That the intersection of the private drive and Comelback Street be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 45 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls, the monument sign and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requkemehis. Landscaping within the sight line as defined by City Standard 110•L. 9. That the security gate of the entrance shall be designed to provide a turnaround prior to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Deportment and Fire Department. 10. That the on -site drainage be conveyed to the public right-of-wayin a manner acceptable to the Public Works Department, That any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain system shall be the responsibility of the developer. 11. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transporfationofequipment and INDEX DRAFT 0 C� City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 INDEX materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. There shall be no construction storage or delivery of materials within the CamelbackStreet right-of-wayunless otherwise approved DRAFT by the Public Works Department. 12. That overhead utilities rserving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code, unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. 13. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from public streets and adjoining properties. 14. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designed within the on -site parking area and shall be used solely for handicapped self - parking. One handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign on the pavement shall be required for each handicapped space. 15. That a landscape and irrigation plan for the site shall be approved by the Public Works and Planning Departments. Landscaping shall be provided along the street frontage of CamelbackStreet to provide adequate screening from the neighboring residential uses. The landscaping shall be installed in accordance with twice the amount of mature trees as shown on the prepared plans. 16. That the project shall be designed to eliminate light and glare spillage on adjacent streets and uses by: • use of motion sensitive area lighting • lighting wall mounted directed downwards • lighting of signage off at 10:00 p.m. 17. That no outdoor loudspeaker or paging system shall be permitted in' conjunctionwith the proposed operation. 18. That this Site Plan Review shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.01.070 K of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 2.--SUBJECT: Joe Moreira'sJiu-JitsudeBrasil Item - .2026 Quail Street UP No. 3602 • Use Permit No. 3602 Request to permit a martial arts studio in an existing commercial structure. Approved Ms. Temple stated this type of facility will not impact the parking supply within the 0 ��Iwvgtf CITY OF NEA •FLT BEACH COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ��,,,o�r.• 33oo NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 9160 (74) 644•000; FAX (74) 644-P50 .9 Agenda Item No,: Staff Person: Council Review: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Javier S. Garcia 644-3206 REVISED REPORT PROJECT: CamelbackMini-Storagell (Dahn Corporation, applicant) 1133 CamelbackStreet SUMMARY: Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the property for Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities/General Industry use and establish the permitted intensity of development and amend the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Text to allow for the development of an 86,000 square foot mini -storage facility subject to the approval of a site plan review. Also included with the applications is the acceptance of an Environmental Document. SUGGESTED ACTIONS: Adopt Resolutions (attached) recommending to the City Council the approval of: General PlanAnrendmentNo. 96-3 (F), Amendment No. 850 (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Contntunity,Regulations), Approve, modify or deny: • Site Plan ReviewNo. 76 and • the acceptance ofaneuviroiu7tettialdocrrnlent-Negative Declaration, LOCATION; A portion of Lot No. 4 of Tract No. 6680, located on the southwesterly side of Camelback Street between Bison Avenue and Jamboree Road. ZONE: PC (Planned Community). The North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District. OWNER: United States Postal Service, Denver la r rk VICINITY MAP Camelback Mini -Storage III I Subiect Property and Surrounding Land Uses Current Development: The site is currently developed with a United States Postal Service local distribution facility and a portion is occupied by a paved parking area which is proposed to be developed with a mini -storage facility. To the north: are industrial and office uses, including automobile repair and an interior designer's school. To the east: across Camelback Street, are residential uses. To the south: is The Newport Beach Post Office. To the west: Mariner's Church and the Calty Toyota Research Facility. 13 General Plan Amendment No. 96.3 (E), Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Page 2 (revised) r Points and Authority Environmental Compliance (California Environmental Quality Act) In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and City Policy K-3, an Initial Study has been prepared for the project. Based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, it has been determined that if the proposed mitigation measures are incorporated, the project would not have a significant effect on the environment. As required by CEQA, certain fmdings must be adopted prior to a project's approval. A Negative Declaration was prepared for the project and is submitted for approval by the Planning Commission. A copy of the Negative Declaration is attached for the Commission's information. Conformance with the General Plan. The proposed project is located in General Plan Statistical Area L3. The Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan currently designates the site for "Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities." The project is not consistent with the General Plan and an amendment is required. The amendment will change the site's designation to "Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities/General Industry" to allow for a mixture of governmental and industrial uses. The amendment will establish additional development intensity to allow additional general industry use for the establishment of a mini -storage facility on a portion of the Postal Service property. Compliance with Title 20 of the Municipal Code. The proposal also requires an amendment to the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations to allow the constructionof a second mini -storage warehouse facility. Staff has also recommended that a site plan review be required for such a use and have included such requirements in the proposed amendment to the Planned Community District Regulations. Procedures for amendments to the General Plan are set forth in Council Policy K-1 and amendments to the Planned Community District are set forth in Chapter 20.84 and Chapter 20.51 of the Municipal Code. • Site Plan Review procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.01.070 of the Municipal Code. General Plan Amendment No. 96.3 (E), Amendment No. $50 and SPR 76 Page 3 (revised) i •4- Project Description (Revised) Land Area: 87,120 sq.ft. (2 acres) Buildable Area: 87,120 sq.ft. Permitted Gross Structural Area: 86,000 sq.ft. Dwelling Units: One manager's dwelling unit Hours of Operation: 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., daily' Proposed Gross Structural Area: Building "A": 50,300 gross sq.ft. Building "B": 35,500 dross soft. TOTAL 85,800 gross sq.ft. Proposed Floor Area Ratio: 0.97'x Site Area Proposed Site Coverage: 49% Building Setbacks: Required Pronosed Front: (Camelback Street) 30 ft. Varies between 55 ft. and 76 ft. for Bldg "A'; and between 175 ft. and 185 $. for Bldg "B." Rear: (Westerly property line) 0 ft. 270 ft. to the property line; 25 ft. To the fence at the rear of the project. Sides: (Northerlyand Southerly property lines): 10 ft. 25 to 45 ft. Distance between buildings: 0 ft. 30 ft. Off -Street Parking (per dwelling unit): 2 spaces 2 garage spaces for manager; and 4 (There are no specific parking parking spaces for customers, requirements for this type of use) including 1 handicapped parking space. Signs: Monument Sign: one only; within the 20 ft. One, within the 20 ft. Front setback; Setback limited to 150 area of 30 sq.ft. per face; 4 feet to the sq.ft. (per face); highest point. maximum of 4 feet in height measured from natural grade. Wall'Signs One per street frontage; One, located on the easterly face of maximum area 10% of Building "A" facing Camelback building elevation. Street and measures 44 square feet. Permitted Building Height: 32 ft. average roof height; 37 ft. maximum ridge height. Proposed Building Height: 28 ft. to the top of parapets, for both buildings. 2 The development limit proposed by the Amendment to the Planned Community District Regulations. 3 Consistentwith the hours of operation approved with the other mini -storage facility at 1177 Camelback Street. 15 General Plan Amendment No. 96.3 (E), Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Page 4 (revised) Background On November 12, 1996, at the request of the Dahn Corporation, the City Council initiated General Plan Amendment 96-3(E) to amend the General Plan Land Use Element to change the Postal Service site land use designation to allow a mixture of Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities and General Industry. Analysis General Plan Amendment The Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan currently designates the site for "Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities" (more specifically, as a portion of the Postal Facility), A General Plan Amendment is required to change the current land use designation and to increase the site's density allocation from 285,440 sq.ft. to 370,440 sq.ft. for the proposed mini -storage development. The proposed amendment will change the site's designation to "Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities/GeneralIndusV' to allow for a mixture of governmental and industrial uses, and will increase the North Ford Area 2 density by 86,000 sq.ft. and establish a density limit for the newly created "Site 2b" (a sub -portion of Area 2) to accommodate the proposed mini -storage facility. The developmentin the vicinity of the proposed project is a combinationof industrial -type uses and institutional facilities. Specific development includes two churches, a mini -storage facility, a postal facility, a research and development facility and the corporation yard of The Irvine Company. The proposed storage facility is consistent with the character and nature of these uses. The existing plan for this site would provide for an expansion of the postal facility. If so developed, the improvements would most likely be similar to the existing post office. The proposed project is of a design which is similar to an expanded postal facility, although it is probably higher and contains more floor area than would be anticipated from an expansion of the existing post office. Conversely, the traffic generated by the mini -storage use will be substantially lower than would be expected from additional postal facilities. On the basis of the facts presented in this section of the analysis, staff is of the opinion that the proposed use is appropriate for the site and compatible with the surrounding development. The complete text of the General Plan Land Use Element amendment is included in the attached Appendix. Amendment to the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations The zoning for this project is Planned Community, more specifically, the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District. Currently, the Planned Community Text provides for 110,600 sq.ft. of mini -storage facility use which is currently built out. Under the existing Planned Community District Regulations, the site is designated as a part of the Postal Service Facility Site General Plan Amendment No.%-3(E), 16 AmendmenlNo. 850 and sPk 96 Page 5 (revised) and no provision for mini -storage is currently provided. An Amendment to the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations is necessary to maintain consistency of land use classifications and permitted intensities between the General Plan Land Use Element and the Zoning Code site's density allocation, should the Commission determine the General Plan Amendment should be approved. The proposed Amendment No. 850 will increase the site's density allocation from 150,600 sq.ft. to 235,600 sq.ft. and will allow for the proposed additional mini -storage development. Staff believes that the proposal for the increased density for a mini -storage facility is a reasonable use of the property, since such a use is generally a low traffic generator and will have a minimal traffic impact on the surrounding uses, more specifically, post office, office and industrial uses or residential uses in the vicinity. In order to ensure the implementation of the proposed mini -storage facility is compatible with the surrounding area, staff has recommended that design characteristics of the project be evaluated concurrently with proposed amendments. To accomplish this, the proposed PC text regulations include a provision which requires review of the site plan for development of mini -storage facilities. This procedure is set forth in Section 20.01.070 of the Municipal Code and is consistent with the procedure applied to the other mini -storage facility also located on Canielback Street. This requirement allows the City to apply specific standards in evaluation of the proposed project related to setbacks, height, site plan layout and landscaping The complete text of the amendment to the 'Planned Community Regulations is included in the attached Appendix. Site Plan Review In accordance with the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E) and requirements proposed by AmendmentNo. 850, the applicant is also requesting approval of a site plan review for construction of a mini -storage warehouse facility. The project is more specifically described in the table found on page 4 of this report. Required Standards for Site Plan Review Section 20.01.070 F, of the Newport Beach Municipal Code sets forth specific standards which must be addressed in the review of site plans, when applicable. These standards are intended to ensure that the projects approved pursuant to the Site Plan Review meet the findings adopted by the City Council when it established the procedure. Each standard is listed below, with a brief discussion of the project as it relates to each. 1. Sites subject io Site Plan Review under the provisions of Section 20.01.070 of the Municipal Code shall be graded and developed with due regard for the aesthetic qualities of the natural terrain, harbor, and landscape, giving special consideration to waterfront resources and unique landforms such as coastal bluffs or other sloped areas; trees and shrubs shall not be indiscriminatelydestroyed.• The consideration of the project in regard to the harbor, waterfront.resources and coastal bluffs is not applicable given its location. The project by its design as submitted, provides due regard to aesthetic qualities of the natural terrain and landscaping which are accommodated by relocation or replacement of existing General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E), Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Page 6 (revised) trees and shrubs and maintenance of the landscaping proposed with the project. In addition, no extensive excavation or grading is proposed on the subject property due to its existing grading as a parking and storage lot, 2. Development shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood and surrounding sites and shall not be detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the surroundings and of the City: The proposed development as designed is in keeping with existing development along Camelback Street and will not be detrimental to the orderly and harmonious development of the surrounding area, since this facility is similar in nearly every respect to the mini -storage project located in the same block. The project is designed in accordance with permitted height and site area coverage limitations specified by North Ford Planned Community DevelopmentRegulations. Therefore, the project is considered to be physically compatible with regard to height and bulk of neighboring structures which are governed by the same limitations. 3. Development shall be sited and designed to maximize protection of public views, with special consideration given to views from public parks and from roadways designated as Scenic Highways and Scenic Drives in the Recreation and Open Space Element of the General Plan: There are no significant public views available from the upper portion of Bison Avenue which looks over the subject property. Therefore, this standard is not applicableto this development. 4. Environmentally sensitive areas shall be preserved and protected. No structures or landform alteration shall be permitted in environmentally sensitive areas unless specific mitigation measures are adopted which will reduce adverse impacts to an acceptable level or the Planning Commission or City Council, on review or appeal, finds that the benefits outweigh the adverse impacts: The site is not located within nor does it contain any environmentally sensitive areas. Therefore, this standard is not applicable to this development. 5. No structures shall be permitted in areas of potential geologic hazard unless specific mitigation measures are adopted which will reduce adverse impacts to an acceptable level or the Planning Commission or City Council, on review or appeal, finds that the benefits outweigh the adverse impacts: The site is not located in an area of particular geologic hazard, other than the seismic hazards common to the Southern California area. Therefore, this standard is not applicable to this development. 6. Residential development shall be permitted in areas subject to noise levels greater than 65 CNEL only where specific mitigation measures will reduce noise levels in exterior areas to less than 65 CNEL and reduce noise levels in the interior of residences to 45 CNEL or less: The project is nota residential development although a manager's dwelling unit is provided on -site. The subject property is not located within an area subject to noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL which will affect the proposed manager's dwelling unit. Site plan and layout ofbuildings, parking areas, pedestrian and vehicular access ways, and other site features shall give proper consideration to functional aspects ofsite development. I t Gencral Plan Amendment No.96.3 (8), O Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Pagel (revised) The project site plan and layout, as designed, has setbacks greater than those required by the Planned Community District Regulations. This allows for increased aisle width which improves the functional vehicular and pedestrian access and circulation through the project. The project is also a low traffic generator and generally has a lower parking demand than other uses in the vicinity which minimizes impacts on vehicular and pedestrian traffic outside of the project. 8. Development shall be consistent with specific General Plan and applicable Specific Area Plan policies and objectives, and shall not preclude the implementation of those policies and objectives: The project is currently not consistent with the General Plan; however, a General Plan Amendment has been submitted for concurrent review. The Site Plan Review will not become effective unless GPA 96-3 (E) is approved by the City Council. 9. Development shall be physically compatible with the development site, taking into consideration site characteristics including, but not limited to, slopes, submerged areas, and sensitive resources: The site area is generally flat and site characteristics do not include slopes, submerged areas or sensitive resources. Therefore this standard•is not applicable to this development. 10. When feasible, electrical and similar mechanical equipment and trash and storage areas shall be concealed. Conditions of approval have been imposed on the project which will mandate the screening of electrical and mechanical equipment, and concealing of trash within an enclosure, which ensure compliance with this standard. 11. Archaeological and historical resources shall be protected to the extent feasible: The mitigation measures specified in the negative declaration and as included as conditions of approval of the project, will protect, to the greatest extent possible, any archeological or historical resources which may be found on -site. 12. Commercial development shall not have significant adverse effects on residences in an abutting residential district: No residential uses directly abut the subject property. In addition, landscaping proposed along the street frontage will provide adequate screening from the residential uses in the vicinity. SPECIFIC FINDINGS The adoption and amendment of the General Plan is considered a legislative act on the part of the City, and State Planning Law does not set forth any required findings for either approval or denial of a General Plan Amendment. This also applies to amendments to the Zoning Ordinance which includes amendments of the Planned Community District Regulations (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District Regulations). As shown on the Vicinity Map, the block in which the property is located is zoned PC and is developed with commercial, religious and governmental, and a mini -storage warehouse facility (approved in 1994). Staff believes that the project proposed in conjunction with the General Plan n �n General Plan Amendment No. 96.3 (E), Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Page 8 (revised) Amendment, the amendmentto the Planned Community District Regulations and Site Plan Review Is a logical extension or continuationof uses in the area. Section 20.01.070(F) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code sets forth the standards by which the Commission is to evaluate Site Plan Reviews. Staff believes that the project has been designed to comply with these standards, based upon the analysis contained in this report. Should the Planning Commission wish to approve the project, actions, findings and conditions of approval set forth in the attached exhibit for approval are suggested. Staff cannot reasonably conceive of findings for denial since the proposed project is a logical use of the property and consistent with other developments in the area. Therefore, staff has not included an exhibit for denial. However, the possibility remains that information may be provided at the public hearing which may provide adequate basis for denial of the project should the Planning Commission wish to take such an action Submitted by: Prepared by: PATRICIA L. TEMPLE JAVIER S. GARCIA, AICP Planning Director Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit" A" Appendix Resolution- General Plan AmendmentNo. 96-3 (E) Resolution - Amendment No. 850 (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned CommunityText), Land Use Plan - North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Negative Declaration Site Plan/ Landscape Plan and Elevations F:%USERSWLWHAREb11 CITYCNL%199710324U150-KEV.DOC General Plus Amendment No. 963 (E), U Amendment No. $50 and SPR 76 Page 9 (revised) EXHIBIT "A" ACTIONS FOR General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E), AmendmentNo. 850 (North Ford/SanDiego Creek Planned Community Text), Site -Plan Review No. 76 and the acceptance of an environmental document A. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Accept the environmental document, making the following findings and requiring the following mitigation measures: Findings: 1. That based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, comments received, and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project, as conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study, could have a significant effect on the environment, therefore a Negative Declaration has been prepared. The Negative Declaration adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the project, and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA. The Negative Declaration was considered prior to approval of the project. 2. An Initial Study has been conducted, and considering the record as a whole there is no evidence before this agency that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. On the basis of the evidence in the record, this agency finds that the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) has been rebutted. Therefore, the proposed project qualifies for a De Minimis Impact Fee Exemption pursuant to Section 753.5(c) of Title 14, CCR. Mitigation Measures 1. The Applicant will comply with the erosion and siltation control measures of the City's grading ordinance and all applicable local and State building codes and seismic design guidelines. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide written certification acceptable to the City's Building Department signed by a licensed engineer that the area has undergone a soil clean-up process and any gasoline leakage or soil contamination has been cleared. 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning Department that the lighting system is designed, directed, and will be maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to neighboring residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer, with a letter from the engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. General Plan Amendment No.96.3 (E). Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Page 10 (revised) i 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Newport Beach that a qualified paleontologist has been retained to observe grading activities and salvage and catalogue fossils as necessary. The paleontologist shall be present at the pre -grading conference, shall establish procedures for paleontological resource surveillance, and shall establish, in cooperation with the project developer, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of the fossils. If major paleontological resources are discovered, which require long-term halting or redirecting of grading, the paleontologist shall report such findings to the project developer and to the City of Newport Beach. The paleontologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the project developer, which ensure proper exploration and/or salvage. Excavated finds shall be offered to the City of Newport Beach, or its designee, on a first -refusal basis. The applicantmay retain said finds if written assurance is provided that they will be properly preserved in Orange County, unless said finds are of special significance, or a museum in Orange County indicates a desire to study and/or display them at the time, in which case items shall be donated to the City, or designee. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the City of Newport Beach. Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit, the paleontologist shall submit a follow-up report for approval by the City which shall include the period of inspection, a catalogue and analysis of the fossils found, and present repository of the fossils. B. General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 Q: Adopt Resolution No. (attached) recommendingto the City Council the adoption of General Plan AmendmentNo. 96.3 (E). C. Resolution No. (attached) recommending to AmendmentNo. 850. D. Site Plan ReviewNo. 76: Findings: coed Community Text: Adopt City Council the adoption of 1. That the proposed action is part of the project evaluated in the Negative Declaration prepared for GPA 96-3(E) and AmendmentNo. 850. That Negative Declaration adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the project, and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA. The Negative Declaration reflects the independentjudgment of the Planning Commission and was reviewed and considered prior to recommending approval of the project. 2. That all applicable standards for the approval of a Site Plan Review are met as established by Sectlon20.01.070 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code since: The development is consistent with surrounding land uses and with the goals and policies of the General Plan as recommendedfor City Council approval by the Planning Commissionin GPA 96.3(E). Genenl Plan Amendment No. 96.3 (E), Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Page 11(revised) N A10- • The development is an extension of existing uses in the block which are compatible with the character of the neighborhood and which will contribute to the orderly and harmonious development of surrounding properties and the City, since the project is designed in accordance with permitted height and site area coverage limitations specified by the North Ford Planned Community Development Regulations which apply to other properties in this block of Camelback Street. • The development has been designed to maximize protection of public views from Bison Avenue which will not be adversely impacted by the height of the proposed buildings. • There are no environmentally sensitive areas on -site or in the vicinity of the subject property. • The project is not located in.an area of unique geologic hazards. • The proposed project is not a residential project and will meet City noise standards for the proposed manager's residential unit. • The site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas and pedestrian and vehicular access are functional in that the project has been designed with increased setbacks which add to the functional efficiency of the traffic and pedestrian circulation of the project. • The proposed development fully conforms to the established development standards for the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District, as recommended for City Council approval by the Planning Commission in Amendment No. 850. Further, that the proposed development in the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District will not preclude implementation of specific General Plan objectives and policies. • Electrical and similar mechanical equipment and trash areas, as conditioned by this approval, will be concealed from view to prevent any potential aesthetic nuisance or impact. • There are no known archeological or historical resources on -site and mitigation measures included with this approval will preserve any sites which may be uncovered. • The commercial development proposed is an extension of existing uses in the block and the project as conditioned by this approval will not have a significant adverse effect on the residential us6s in the vicinity. 3. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.01.070 of the Municipal Code. General Plan Amendment No. 96.3 (E), Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Page 12 (revised) ConditiME 1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial compliance with the approved site plan, floorplans and elevations, except as noted below. 2. That Site Plan Review No. 76 will not become effective unless and until General Plan Amendment96.3(E) and Amendment No. 850 are approved by the City Council. 3. That all conditions of approval of Amendment No. 850 and related mitigation measures of the environmental document shall be fulfilled. 4. That the hours of operation of the mini -storage facility shall be limited between the hours of 6.00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., daily. 5. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department, 6. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 7. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be designed in accordance with Newport Beach Standard Drawings, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department (City Traffic Engineer). 8. That the intersection of the private drive and Camelback Street be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 35 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls, the monument sign and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line as defined by City Standard I I0-L, 9. That the security gate at the entrance shall be designed to provide a turnaround prior to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Fire Department. 10. That the on -site drainage be conveyed to the public right-of-way in a manner acceptable to the Public Works Department. That any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain system shall be the responsibilityof the developer. 11. That the Water Capital Improvement fee be paid. 12. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimizedby proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. There shall be no construction storage or delivery of General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E), AmendmentNo. 650 and SPR 76 Page 13 (revised) Ii f E materials within the Camelback Street right-of-way unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 13. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code, unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. 14. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from public streets and adjoining properties. 15. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designed within the on - site parking area and shall be used solely for handicapped self -parking. One handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign on the pavement shall be required for each handicapped space. 16. That a landscape and irrigation plan for the site shall be approved by the Public Works and Planning Departments. Landscaping shall be provided along the • street frontage of Camelback Street to provide adequate screening from the neighboring residential uses. The landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the prepared plans. 17. That the project shall be designed to eliminate light and glare spillage on adjacent streets and uses. 18. That no outdoor loudspeaker or paging system shall be permitted in conjunction with the proposed operation. 19. That this Site Plan Review shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.01.070 K of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, A5 General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E), Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Page 14 (revised) APPENDIX (revised) Proposed AmendmentText Chances: Proposed General Plan AmendmentNo. 96.3 0: The proposed amendment to the Land Use Element will provide entitlement of 86,000 sq.ft. for the development of a mini -storage facility as proposed by the accompanying site plan review application. The Land Use Element will be revised as follows: Land Ilse Element &W 74-75: 2-2. NF Area 2. This area is designated Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities, and General Industry, [GPA 90-1(G)] [GPA 93-3(B)] [GPA 96-1(B)]. The development allocation is as follows: Synagoguesite: 71,150 sq.ft. Utility Station: 1,000 sq.ft. TIC Corp. Yard: 33,940 sq.ft. General Industry: (Site 2a: Mini Storage Facility) 110,600 sq.R. Postal Facility: 55,200sq.ft. (Site2b: Mini Storage Facility) $6,000sa.ft. ESTIMATED GROWTH FOR STATISTICAL AREA L3 Residential (in du's) Commercial (in sq.fL) Existing Gen.Pla Project Existing Gen.Plan Projected 111187 Projecti Growth 111187 Projecto Growth 1-1.AF Area 1 50 50 -0- -0- -0- -0- 1-2.AF Area 2 53 53 -0- -0- -0- -0- 1.4.AFArea 4 -0- Soo Soo -0- -0- -0- 1-S.AFAreaS 39 39 -0- -0- -0- -0- 1-6 AF Area 6 54 54 -0- -0- -0- -0- 1-7.AF Area 7 59 59 -0- -o- -o- -0- 1-SAFAreae 168 leo -0- -0- -0- -0- 2-1.NF Area 1 40- 40- -0- 74,092 148,041 73,349 2-2.NF Area 2 -0- -4- -4- 100,030 286,440 404.640 -2- -2- 371,440 270.510 2-3.NFArea3 4)- -0- 40- -0- 50,000 60,000 2-4.NFArea4 -0- 300 300 40- -0- 40- 2-S.NFAreaS 849 849 -0- -0- -0- -0- 2-6.NF Area 6 4- 40- -0- -0- -0- -0- 3. San Diego Creek -0- 41- -0- -0- 200,000 200,000 4. -0- -0- -0- -0- 500000 50,000 TOTAL 1,272 arm 804 f75,822 733,484 667,669 Z&N 802 819,481 643.859 Population 2,519 4,669 2,040 2 042 Revised 0219798198 General Plan AmendmemNo. 96.3(E), Amendment No. $50 and Pit 76 Page 15 (revised) M Amendment No 850 (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Text): The proposed Amendment No. 850 will amend sections of the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Text, more specifically, the Statistical Analysis, Section I; and the text in Section V (A), (B3) and (E) to read as follows: SECTION I. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS North Ford Approximate Additional Additional Gross Allowable Allowable Area Acres sq.8. DU's General Industry--GEIF 1 16.7 -0- -0- General Industry--GEIF 2 20.7224 40,000 -0- General Industry (mini -storage): 2a 2.8 110,600 -1- 2b 2_0 86,000 -1- TOTAL 42.2 236,600150,609 -2-1- Commercial 3 5.0 50,000 -0- Multi-family Residential 4 18.6 undetermined 300 Open Space 4a 2.4 Residential 5 79.0 -0- 888 Park 6 12.0 -0- 0=0 TOTAL 117.0 50,000 1190' The above statistics are based on gross acreage and do not account for buildable area. In Area 2a, development is limited to mini -storage facility use with a maximum floor area of 110,600 sq.ft. Development may include one dwelling unit for an owner/manager including two garage spaces, provided that such residential use will be incidental to the mini -storage use and will not alter the character of the premises. In Area 2, the additional allowable square footage is allocated for the expansion of the Synagogue site. In Area 2b development is limited to mini storage facility use with a maximum floor area of 86,000 soft Development may include one dwelling unit for an owner/manager General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E), Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Page 16 (revised) Including two garage spaces provided that such residential use will be incidental to the mini -storage use and will not alter the character of the premises SECTIONV. GENERAL INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENTAL, EDUCATIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES AREA 2; GENERAL INDUSTRY, AREA 2a and 2 (Mini-StorageUse) A. Wien It is the intent of this district to permit the location of a combination of General Industrial and Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities uses may engage in the sales of products and services relating to and supporting the development plan, provided such uses are confined within abuilding or buildings, and do not contribute excess noise, dust, smoke, or vibration to the surrounding environment nor contain a high hazard potential due to the nature of the products, material or processes involved. The General Industrial use of Site 2a pnd 2b shall be restricted to the operation of a mini -storage faei% facilities with an incidental dwelling unit for owner/manageroccupancy. Ancillary activities, i.e., vehicle and bulk storage, associated with the above permitted uses may be located outside a structure provided screening requirements as set forth in this document are observed. B. Permitted Uses The following uses and other uses which in the opinion of the Planning Director are compatible shall be permitted: 1. General industrial Uses primarily engaged in industrial activities that involve some degree of on -site production, assembly, repair, maintenance, etc., of the product sold or products related to the service rendered, such as, but not limited to, the following list of examples: a. Appliance repair b. Fumiturerepair c. Equipment rental centers d. Nursery and garden stores C. Warehousing f. Service and Maintenance Facilities 2. public and uasi-Public Uses a. Post Office b. Public and quasi -public utility business office and related service facilities c. Utility substation d. Service and maintenance facilities h � Gemnd Plen Amendment No. 96.3{E), Amendment No. DSO and 5PR 76 . Page 17 (revised) Y e. Institutions f. Schools g. Churches 3. General Industry (Site 2a and 2b) a. Area 2a: Development within Site 2a is limited to mini -storage use with an incidental dwelling unit for owner/manager occupancy. The site plan for the mini -storage facility shall be designed so as to locate the office and caretaker's residence as far from the electrical substation and high -voltage transmission lines as is feasible in order to minimize long-term exposure to electro-magnetic fields. b. Area 2b: Development within Sitd 2b is limited to mini -storage use with an incidental dwelling unit for owner/manageroccupanev. Mini storage warehouse developments shall be subiect to the approval of a site plan review. E. Site Coverage Maximum building coverage of 50 percent is allowed. Parking Structures shall not be calculated as building area; however, said structures shall be used for parking of company vehicles, employee vehicles, or vehicles belonging to persons visiting the subject firm or utility. Maximum building coverage at sites 2a and 2b (for mini -storage use) may exceed 50 percent subiect to the approval of a site plan review. General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E). Amendment No. 850 and SPR 76 Page 18 (revised) RESOLUTION NO.97- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORTBEACH RECOMMENDINGTO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.96-3(E) AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN SO AS TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1133 CAMELBACK STREET FROM "GOVERNMENTAL, EDUCATIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES" TO "GOVERNMENTAL, EDUCATIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL) GENERALINDUSTRY"USE [GPA No. 96-3 (E)] WHEREAS, as part of the development and implementation of the City's General Plan, the Land Use Element has been prepared; and WHEREAS, said element of the General Plan sets forth objectives and supporting policies which serve as a guide for future developmentof the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Element designates the general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of land and building intensities in a number of ways, including residential land use categories and population projections, commercial floor area limitations, and the floor area ratio ordinances; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 707 of the Charter of the City of Newport Beach, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a certain amendment to the above referenced element of the Newport Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City prepared a Negative Declaration with supporting Initial Study for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines; and ho AM WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the environmental document in making its decision on the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach does hereby recommend that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 96-3(E) with the proposed amendment to read as follows: That the property located in the 1100 Block of Camelback Street, between Bison Avenue and Jamboree Road on the westerly side of Camelback Street (1133 Camelback Street), more particularly described as a portion of Lot No. 4 of Tract No. 6680, redesignating from "Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities" to " Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities/General Industry" use. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach does hereby recommend that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 96-3(E) with the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element to read as follows: Land Use Element Pages 74-75: 2-2. NFArea 2. This area is designated Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities, and General Industry. [GPA 90-1(0)] [GPA 93-3(B)] [GPA 96-1(B)]. The development allocation is as follows: Synagogue site: 71,150 sq.ft. Utility Station: TIC Corp. Yard: 33,940 sq.ft. General Industry: (Site 2a: Mini Storage Facility) Postal Facility: 55,200 sq.ft. (Site 2b: Mini Storage Facility) -2- 1,000 sq.ft. 110,600 sq.ft. 85,000 sq.ft. 5t ESTIMATEDGROWTH FOR STATISTICALAREA W Residential (in du's) Commercial(insq.ft.) Existing Gen.Plan Projected Existing Gen.Pian Projected I/i/87 Projectio Growth 1/1187 Projection Growth 1-1. AF Area 1 50 50 4- -0- -0- -0- 1.2. AF Are42 53 53 -0- -0- -9- 40- 14. AF Area4 -0- 500 500 -0- 40- -0- I-5. AF Area 5 39 39 -0- -0- -0- -0- 1-6 AF Area 6 54 54 -0- 41- -0- -0- 1-7. AF Area 7 59 59 -0- -0- -0- -0- I-S. AF Area 8 168 168 -0- -0- -0- -0- 2-1.NFArea 1 -0- 4- -0- 74,692 148,041 73,349 2-2.NFArea 2 -0- -1- 4- 100,930 295,440 114,$! :2- -2- 370,440 16�9 10 2-3.NFArea3 .0. -0- -0. -0- 50,000 50,000 2.4.NFArea 4 -0- 300 300 -0- -0- -0- 2-5. NF Area S 849 849 .0. -0- .0. •0- 2-6.NFArea 6 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 3. San Diego Creek -0- -0- -0- -0- 200,000 200,000 4. Jamboree/MacArthur -0- -0- 10• -0- $0,000 50,000 TOTAL 1,272 arum S" 175,622 793,484 $57.8;9 2.074 802 8t8 8 642.859 Population 2,S19 4;559 2;040 ADOPTED this day of .1997, by the following vote, to wit: AYES NOES ASSENT -3- BY GAROLD B. ADAMS, CHAIRMAN LOW' ED SELICH, SECRETARY -4- F.\USERS\PLN\SHARED\I PLANCOM\1997\0306\ASSDGPA.DOC RESOLUTIONNO.97- _ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING THE NORTH FORD/SAN DIEGO CREEK PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO ALLOW FOR TIME ESTABLISHMENT OF A MINI -STORAGE FACILITY. (AMENDMENT NO.850) WHEREAS, as part of the development and implementation of the Newport Beach General Plan the Land Use Element has been prepared; and WHEREAS, the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides specific procedures for the implementation of Planned Community zoning for properties within the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS, an amendment to the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District Regulations is necessary in order to maintain consistency between the Newport Beach General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City prepared a Negative Declaration with supporting Initial Study for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the environmental document in making its decision on the proposed amendment to the Laird Use Element of the NewportBeach General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission desires to amend the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District Regulations to allow for the establishment of a mini - storage facility in conjunctionwith the approval of a site plan review. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach does hereby recommend that the City Council approve Amendment No. 850 (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Text), with the proposed amendment to the Statistical Analysis, Section I; and the text in Section V (A), (B3)'and (E) to read as follows: SECTION I. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS North Ford Approximate Additional Additional Gross Allowable Allowable Area Acres sq.ft. DU's General industry--GEIF 1 16.7 -0- -0- General Industry--GEIF 2 20.72Q.4 40,000 -0- General Industry (mini -storage): 2a 2.8 110,600 4- 2b 2_0 85y000. -]- TOTAL 42.2 235,600150,600 -2-1- Commercial 3 5.0 50,000 -0- Multi-family Residential 4 18.6 undetermined 300 Open Space 4a 2A Residential 5 79.0 -0- 888 Park 6 12.0 -0- 0_0 TOTAL 117.0 50,000 1,190+1189 The above statistics are based on gross acreage and do not account for buildable area. In Area 2a, development is limited to mini -storage facility use with a maximum floor area of 110,600 sq.ft. Development may include one dwelling unit for an owner/manager including two garage spaces, provided that such residential use will be incidental to the mini -storage use and will not alter the character of the premises. In Area 2, the additional allowable square footage is allocated for the expansion of the Synagogue site. In Area 2b development is limited to mini storage facility use with a maximum floor area of 85,000 soft. Development may include one dwelling unit for an owner/manager including two garage spaces, provided that such residential use will be incidental to the mini -storage use and will not alter the character of the premises. ' -2- SECTION V. GENERAL INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENTAL, EDUCATIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIESAREA2;GENERALtNDUSTRY,AREA2a nL d2b(Mini-StorageUse) A. me It is the intent of this district to permit the location of a combination of General Industrial and Governmental, Educationaland Institutional Facilities uses may engage in the sales of products and services relatingto and supporting the development plan, provided such uses arc confined within a building or buildings, and do not contribute excess noise, dust, smoke, or vibration to the surrounding environment nor contain a high hazard potential due to the nature of the products, material or processes involved. The Ooneral Industrial use of Site 2a na d 2b shall be restricted to the operation of a mini-storagefaoilhy facilities with an Incidental dwelling unit for owner/managetoccupancy. Ancillary activities, I.e., vehicle and bulk storage, associated with the above permitted uses may be located outsides structure provided screeningrequirementsas setforth in this doeumentare observed. B. Permitted Uses The following uses and other uses which in the opinion of the Planning Director are compatible shall be permitted: I. General Industrial Uses primarily engaged in industrial activities that involve some degree of on -site production, assembly, repair, maintenance, etc., of the product sold or products related to the service rendered, such as, but not limited to, the following list of examples: a. Appliancerepair b. Furniturerepair c. Equipmentrental centers d. Nursery and garden stores e. Warehousing f. Service and Maintenance Facilities 2. Public andOuasi-PublicUses a. Post Office b. Publicand quasi -public utility business office and related service facilities c. Utilitysubstation d. Service and maintenance facilities e. Institutions E Schools g. Churches 3. General induftry,(Site 2aand 2b2 A. Area 2a: Development within Site 2a is limited to mini storage use with an incidental dwelling unit for owner/manager occupancy. The site plan for the mini -storage facility shall be designed so as to locate the office and caretaker's residence as far from the electrical substation and high -voltage transmission lines as is feasible in order to minimize long -terns exposure to electro-magneticfields. b. Arta2b.- Development within Site 2b is limited to mini -storage use with an incidental dwelllntr unit for owner/ma naeeroccunancy. Mini storagewarehousedevelopmentsshall be subiect to the approval of a site plan review. E. Site Coverage M Maximum building coverage of 50 percent is allowed. Parking Structures shall not be calculated as building area; however, said structures shall be used for parking of company vehicles, employee vehicles, or vehicles belonging to persons visiting the subject film or utility. _Maximum building coverage at sites 2a and 2b (for mini -storage use) may exceed 50 percent subiect to the approval of a site plan review. Rtttttl ADOPTED this day of J997, by the following vote, to wit: GAROLD B. ADAMS, CHAIRMAN BY ED SELICH, SECRETARY -4- AYES NOES ABSENT F:\USERS\PLM4HARED\I PLANCOW 1997\0306\A850RES.DOC .0� 0,�'• 0 MEGENERAL INDUSTRY __+ r�0VERNMENf, EDUCATION & 1NSTITUfIONAL FACILITIES MIMI 2a/2 GENERAL INDUSTRY 1 MINI -STORAGE USE S COMMERCIAL SPECIAL LANDSCAPED T STREET RESIDENTIAL .�� PARK i OPEN SPACE North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community LAND USE PLAN REVISED LAID USE PLAN : AMENDMENT ND, 790 City of Irvine F NORTH February 6,1997 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: { CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH. CA 9265E-8915 PLANNING DEPARTMENT County Clerk Public Services Division Old County Courthouse 211 W. Santa Ana Boulevard PO Box 22013 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Planning Department City of Newport Beach FILED FEB 0 7 1997 CARYL. GRAWUE, C10rk•RMd* By DEPM NEGATIVE DECLARATION FILING POSTED FEB 0 7 1997 GARY L. GRANVILLE, Clerk-fkorder BP-- DEPUTY Enclosed are two copies of a Negative Declaration for posting along with the S38 filing fee. Please stamp one cony "Posted/Filed" and return with the fee receipt to the undersigned at the address shown on the Negative Declaration. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 644-3200. tuW JAVIER S. CAIRCIA Senior Planner F:U: SERSBLN\SHARED\ I PLANCON'PENDI\GNESODAFLN%ND{OVR.DOC 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach. ,5A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH i 1 3300 Newport Boulevard • P.O. Boer 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658.8915 (714) 644.3225 NEGATIVE DECLARATION To: ElOffice of Pimina and Research 1400 Tenth Street. Room 121 Sacrament%CA 9$114 ElCounty Clark County of Orange Public Services Division P.O. Box 131 Santa Ana. CA 92702 From: City of Newport Bead 3300 Hewpat BwkvW - P.O.11M 1766 Newport Beads, CA 926SMIS (Omge Canty) Date received for filing of OPRaCounty Clerk: Public review period: February 14, 1997 to March 6,1997 Name of Project: Camelback Mini -Storage 11(Portion of Postal Service Site) 1133 Camelback Street, located on the southwesterly side of the street Avenue and Jamboree Road. Project J7escripfion: The project involves the construction of an 85,000 square foot Iejnist011119e facility and the approval of General Plan AmendmentNe. 96-3 (E), Amendment No. 850 (North Ford Planned CommunityText),and Site Plan ReviewNo. 76. Finding: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council W pertaining, to procedures and guidelines to implement the Califomis Environmental Quality Act, the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the propmed.projeet and drtermined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study containing the analysis supporting this finding is © aruched ❑ on flit at the Pluming Department. the Initial Study may include mitigation measures that would eliminate or reduce potential environmental impocu. This document will be considered by the decision•msker(s) prior to renal action on the proposed project. If a public hearing will beheld to consider this project, a notice of the time and location is attached. Additional plans, studies and/or exhibits relating to the proposed project may be available for public review. if you would like to examine these materials, you are invited to contact the undersigned. if you wish to appeal the appropriateness or adequacy of this document, your comments should be submitted in writing prior to the close of the public review period. Your comments should spccifieally identify what environmental Impacts you believe would result tram the project, why they are significant, and what cbanges or mitigation measumi you believe should be adopted to eliminate or reduce these impacts. There is no fee for this appeal- If a public hearing wit' be held, you are alto invited to attend and tesdrq as to the appropriateness of this document. If you have any questions or would like further information, please contact the undersigned at (714) 644.3200. JAVIE S.GARCIA Date January 23, 1"? Senior Planer F:WSERSVf?A KAREMIFOM1sWEaDE(103NEGDECAOC ENVIRONMENTALANALYSir CHECKLIST EXPLANATIONS- Camelback Ministorage II 1133 Camelback Street General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E), AmendmentNo. 850 (North Ford Planned Community Text), and Site Plan Review No. 76 Project Description The project involves the construction of a 85,000 square foot mini -storage facility. The project requires the approval of a General Plan Amendment, an amendment to the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations and a site plan review. The site measures approximately 2 acres and Is currently utilized by the United States Postal Service as a driver training area and overflow parking lot. In accordance with the proposed amendment to the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations, the approval of a site plan review will be required for such a use. ANALYSIS The following discussion provides explanations for the conclusions contained in the Environmental Analysis Checklist regarding the proposed project's environmental Impacts. I. Land Use and Planning The site is designated for Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities by the City's General Plan Land Use Element and the North Ford Planned Community District designates the site for General Industry and Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities. The existing postal service facility is a permitted use within these designations. The proposed GeneralPlan Amendment will change the designation to a combination of Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities/General Industry which will allow for the proposed construction of a mini - storage facility on a portion of the postal service property without the necessity of a parcel map. This project is located outside the Coastal Zone Boundary and a Coastal Permit is not required The proximity of residential uses will not be significantly impacted by the traffic generated by the proposed use, since the proposed use does not share street frontage with the residential development. II. Population and Housing Population: The proposed project is generally non-residential and therefore will not cause any growth or reduction in the area's population, with the exceptionof the caretaker who will live on -site. 4` i/ " Housing; —,Po additional housing demand would�t from the project sirx4 only a minor employment increase is cipated in the form of one dwelling unit with an on -site care taker. III. Geologic Problems (Earth) The proposed project will be built on a level developed site. The earthwork on site will be minimal and plan to utilize existing on site material with no import or export. Total earth movement will be approximately 1,000 cubic yards. Compliance with the City Excavation and Grading Code (NBMC Sec.15.04.140) would reduce the impacts to an insignificantlevel. Mitigation Measure No. 1 That erosion and siltation control measures of the construction operations shall comply with the City Excavation and Grading Code (NBMC Section 15.04.140 or applicable sections). IV. Water The proposed project would take place on a site that is partially developed and future site improvements will not increase water runoff. Drainage impacts will be addressed by the provisions for drainage requirements contained in the City Excavation and Grading Code. The project is located outside flood hazard area. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. V. AirQuality Construction Impacts: During the course of construction some dust and objectionable odor from diesel exhaust and asphalt paving may be created. However, dust will be minimized as it result of site watering required by The City and Air Quality Management District regulations. Odor effects shall be eliminated upon the completion of the project. No additional stationary equipment is proposed that could generate additional emission as part of the project. The construction should be accomplished in approximately six to seven months from the onset. Operational impacts: Traffic analysis by the City Traffic Engineer indicates that the project will generate approximately 182 trips or 2,13 trips per thousand square fat, which is below the threshold of significance as determined by the South Coast Alt Quality Management District and which is also below the threshold which would require a comprehensive traffic study. No other air quality impacts are anticipated. CHECKLIST EXPLANATION: Page 2 as V.I, Transp�,^7tion/Cimulation/parking Traffic impact: Currently the parcel is occupied by a paved fenced area utilized by the Postal Service. Additional vehicular movement will be generated as a result of the proposed development. The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposal and determined that based on traffic data of published sources, trip generation rate for the proposed expanded facility would generate an increase of less than approximately 182 trips per day. Therefore, a comprehensive traffic study is not required since the traffic increase of the proposed development does not exceed the trip generation threshold requirement (300 or more trips per day) of the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. Although the increase in the vehicular trips may be potentially significant, the traffic analysis did not identify any significant traffic impacts associated with the proposed project. Therefore, no mitigation measures have been recommended nor required in conjunction with the project. Site access: The existing single access driveway will be removed and a new drive access will be constructed and located along Camelback Street, subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer during the project design plan check review of construction drawings. Parking and Internal Circulation: The proposed project provides for a total of four parking spaces which include three standard spaces, one handicap space and two covered parking spaces for the on -site caretaker. The mini -storage facility tenants would be required to load and unload their vehicles in front of their individual storage space or near the elevators. The parking spaces provided on the proposed site plan are considered adequate to accommodate the proposed use and a greater parking demand is not anticipated. The layout of the proposed facility site plan indicates that adequate internal circulation is -provided. VII. Biological Resources (Plant and Animal Life) Plant Life: The proposed site is located in a developed area of the City and the project will not affect any natural vegetation. Animal Life: The project is located in an urbanized area of the community and no significant impact to wildlife would be anticipated. VIII. Energy and Mineral Natural Resources trier : No significant increase in the use of energy is anticipated. CHECKLIST EXPLW ATIONS Page 3 t�3 #; The use of natural resour� will not be signr�iffected by this project. ° IX, Hazards Human Health: The proposed project does not Win hazardous materials on -site, no adverse affect on human health is anticipated. However, there is the potential that soil contamination may be present and in the Absence of a comprehensive geotechniclal report stab' has included the following mitigation measure to address this issue. Risk of Vj= The applicant has indicated that the rental agreement will prohibit the storage of toxins, hazardous chemicals, explosive material and flammable liquids.' Based on this requirement, the risk of any untoreseablehazard to public health and safety would be reduced below the level of significance. Mitigation Measure No. 2 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide written certification acceptable to the City's Building Department signed by a licensed Engineer that the area has undergone a soil clean-up process and any gasoline leakage or soil contamination has been cleared. X. Noise Existing noise levels are anticipated to be increased during the construction period primarily due to construction related activities. Construction noise is short term and insignificant since construction time is expected to be short due to the scope of the project and construction hours are limited to the hours of operation regulated through the provisions contained in the City Noise Control Regulations(NBMC Chapter 10.28). XL Publie Services There are sufficient public or governmental services that serve the area and the project would not create additional demand for these services. XIL Utilities and Service Systems The site has already been served by the utility System and no significant alteration or expansion of existing utility system is anticipated. CHECKLtSTexrtrwATnONS Page 4 XIII. Aesthete ! The site is located in an area approved for Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities and for General Industry by the CiVs General Plan Land Use Element and the Zoning is PC (Planned Community). The North Ford -Planned Community District designates the site for the existing postal service facility and the proposed amendment will allow for ministorage which not result in any significant aesthetic impacts as compared to other adjacent commercial uses. Light and Glare: The proposed project will use exterior mounted utility and security lighting. 'If exterior lighting is required, the proposed project could produce light and glare that could adversely affect the neighboring residential properties.' However, since those residential uses are located below the bluff across Camelback Street, it is anticipated that the lighting will not be visible to any of the neighboring residential properties. The, site plan review will include standard conditions of approval to ensure that any exterior lighting is designed such that direct rays are confinedio the site to the greatest extent feasible which will reduce any effects below a level of significance. Mitigation Measure No. 3 That prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning Department that the .lighting system is designed, directed, and will be maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the neighboring residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed Electrical Engineer, with a letter from the engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. XIV. Cultural Resources The parcel has been partially developed previously and no paleontological resources are expected to exist on this site. However, given the amount of excavation proposed, the potential to uncover paleontologisal resources must be addressed and can be reduced to a level below significance with the following mititgation measure which requires that a qualified paleontologist be retained to observe and monitor grading activities and salvage and catalogue fossils as necessary. Mitigation Measure No. 4: That prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Newport Beach that a qualified paleontologist has been retained to observe grading activities and salvage and catalogue fossils as necessary. The paleontologist shall be present at the pre -grading CHECKLIST EXPLANATIONS Page 5 45 conferenc"hall establish procedures for paleontological resourcesurveillant.., and shall establish, in cooperation I A the project developer, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of the fossils. if major paleontological resources are discovered, which require long• term halting or redirecting of grading, the paleontologist shall report such findings to the project developer and to the City of Newport Beach. The paleontologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the project developer, which ensure proper exploration and/or salvage. Excavated finds shall be offered to the City of Newport Beach, or its designee, on a first-refirsal basis. The applicant may retain said finds if written assurance is provided that they will be properly preserved in Orange County, unless said finds arc of special significance, or a museum in Orange County indicates a desire to study and/or display them at the time, in which can items shall be donated to the City, or designee, These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the City of Newport Beach. Prior to the issuance of precise grading permit, the paleontologist shall submit a follow-up report for approval by the City which shall include the period of inspection, a catalogue and analysis of the fossils found, and present repository of the fossils. XV. Recreation Recreational activities and opportunities would not be affected by the project. XVI. Mandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of the foregoing analysis, the proposed project does not have the potential to significantly degrade the quality of the environment upon compliance with mitigation measures, 2. There are no long-term environmental goals that would be compromised by the project. 3. No cumulative impacts are anticipated in connection with this or other projects. 4. That there are no known substantial adverse effects on human beings that would be caused by the proposed project. p:1uSEP"LVSHARED%IPL 4kKOk�PENDNMISODAHNMCKE.(P DOC CHECKLISTEXM ANATIOMS Page 6 �(p "`Ly110,GVr1Vo"%_li llL1l�. V Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Newposeach will hold a public heating on the application of Gamelback Mini -storage II Mahn Corporation, applicantl for General Plan Amendment No 96-3 (E) Amendment No..850 (North Ford Planned Community Text), Site Plan Review No 76 and the acceptance of an environmental document on property located at JW GamelbackStreef The applications being considered will if approved: redesignate the property for Governmental. Ed rational and institutional Facilities/General Industry use and establish the permitted intensity of an EnvironmentalDocumenL NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Negative Declaration has been prepared by the City of Newport Beach in connection with the application noted above. The Negative Declaration states that, the subject development will not result in a significant effect ontthe environment. It is the present intention of the City to accept the Negative Declaration and supporting documents. This is not to be construed as either approval or denial by the City of the subject application. The City encourages members of the general public to review and comment on this documentation. Copies of the Negative Declaration and supporting documents are available for public review and inspection at the Planning Department, City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92659-1768 (714) 644-3225. Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing will be held on the 6th day of March 1997at the hour of 7.00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and be heard thereon. If you challenge this projectin-court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice -or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. For information call (714) 644-3200. Edward Selich, Secretary, Planning Commission, City of Newport Beach. NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. q1 MITIOCON MONiTORINOAND REPOR7rROGRAM Camelbaek Miubtorage ll 1133 CamelbackStmet Geneml Plan Amendment No. WS (L)# Amendment No. 850 (North Ford Planned CommunkTvt% and Site Plan Review No. 76 J. OVERVIEW This mitigation monitoring program was prepared in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21086.6 (AB 3190 of 1988). It describes the requirements and proeeduta to be followed by the applicant and the City to ensure that ail mitigation measures adopted as part of this project will be carried out. Attachment 1 summarizes the adopted mitigation measures, implementing actions, and veriticationprocedums for this project. II. MITIGATION MONITORING PROCEDURES Mitigation measures can be implemented in three ways: (1) through project design, which is verified by plan check and inspection; (2) through compliance with various codes, ordinances, policies, standards, and conditions of approval which are satisfied prior to or during construction and verified by plan check and/or inspection; and (3) through monitoring and reporting after construction is completed. Compliance monitoring procedures for these three types of mitigation measures are summarized below. A. Mitigation measures implemented through project design. Upon project approval, a copy of the approved project design will be placed in the official project file. As pan of the review process for all subsequent discretionary or ministerial permits, the file will be checked to verify that the requested permit is in conformance with the approved project design. Field inspections will verify that construction conforms to approved plans. B. Mitigation measures implemented through compliance with codes, ordinances, policies, standards, or conditions of approval: Upon project approval, a copy of the approved project description and conditions of approval will be placed in the official project rile. As pan of the review process for all subsequent discretionary or ministerial permits, the file will be checked to verify that the requested permit is in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, policies, standards and conditions of approval. Field inspections will verify that construction conforms to all applicable standards and conditions. C. Mitigation measures implemented through post-constructionmoultoring. If any mitigation measures require verification and reporting after construction is completed, the City will maintain a log of these mitigation monitoring and reporting requirements, and will review completed monitoring reports. Upon submittal, the City will approve the report, request additional information, or pursue enforcement remedies in the event of noncompliance. Final monitoring reports will be placed in the official file. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAMSUMMARY NEGATIVEDECLARATION CAMELBACK MINI -STORAGE 1133 CAMELBACKKSTREkr January 15, 1997 Implementation Method of Timingof Responsible Verification Mitigation Measures Action Verification Verification Person Date Ill. GEOLOGICPROBLEMS 1. The Applicamwill comply with the crosionand siltation Conditionof PImChmk Prortutheissuanceor Planning Deprtar"A control measues of the Citys grading ordinance and all applicable approval anybuildingpermit and Bullding Dept loesi and State buildingeodes and seismic design guidelines. XI. HAZARDS. 2. Prior to the Issuance of a building pemtit.the applicant Conditionof Plan Check Prior to thelssuanceof Public Works "I provide written certification s=ptable to the City's Building approval any gradingor DepatUnan, and Department signed by a licensed Engineer that the area has buildingpermlt BulldingDeprtnwll undergone a soil cien-up process and any gasoline leakage or soil eommilr ttonhasbeentiered. XHL AESTHETICS Ughtesd Glare 3. That prior to the Issuance of any building permit the Conditionof Building Permits Prbrtotheluunuof Manning Dapruaast applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning Department that the approval Plan Check, Field any bulidingptemit "Building Dept llghlingsystenr is designed.directed.and will be maintalocdin such Impaction as a spanner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light necessary splllsga and glare to the neighboring residential uses. The plans shall be prcpred and signed by a licensed Electrical F.ngineer.with _ a letter Qom the engineer sitting that, in his opinion. this requImmenthes been met. XIV. CULTIIRALRESOIIRCFS 4. Prior to the luumcc of a grading permit, the project Condwonof Pre -grading. Priortotheiswroeof Plannins Depertrasart applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Newport approval trading operations anygradingor sand Bulldit Dept Beach that a quaiirecd paleontologist has been retained to observe monitoring, buildingpermil grading activities and salvage and catalogue fossils as necessary. The paleontologist shall be present at the pre -grading conference, shall establish procedures for pateontologlciiresouree surveillance. and shall establish, in cooperation with the project dentop rr. procedures for temporarily baiting or redirecting work to permit sampllns.1demllicstion, and evaluation or the fmsib. Ir me* pslcw$ologicsl resources are discovered. which require lung -term hallingor rodirectingofgrading.the paleontolugbtshsll report such findingsto the projectdeveloperand to the City of Newportllesch. The paeomologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the project developer, which ensure proper Page i MITIGATION MONITORINGAND REPORTING PROGRAM SUMMARY NEGATIYEDEC ARATIOH CAMELEACKMINI-MRAGE I173 CAIMRLaACKKSTREEC imary IS, 1997 Iwpkwaelatka 1"b of Tiwtftef Yerilintlea M[ tkaMa+sae+s Aatlea Varilkatka Yeeilkatka DNs aylw.smmd ra�r�r. Eacarrsetna�sbsaKNknNrtas clWormewpmeockcrlbdd/iw ea atbsatofndbatk. The .p.Ikawway rebk fait tiaY {fwrlsearsstwsrk pla.tA[ddma vWvMbepopwlrpowrdbO C wAT-wA sssWfaib a debebd7atllwdsplrylbewtl4onw.1mwhkLpssikm s}a1t fe Joealst b Mt Ciry.xtks{par. Tbtse asW�a,a wdl to (fastwk{ptbaas/ mw. oftbtnssoaiees,shsabasrb)wlo WesppawtioramirsslY904 *pmsep& Riwiedwisrraeaf •pobelVsAaLp�.�i ��ssbwitabltea+P WpodisbasIMWSMMdMa iY$bd kaibhWok appioaa imp") f3USEn3VI] OLMLEMIMANCOM%MDL40A MMI MMiLMSXTAS ti d Page 2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Project Title: Camelback Ministorage II 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Newport Beach Planning/Building Department 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 3. Contact Person and Phone Number. Javier S.'Garcia, Senior Planner (714)644-3200 4. Project Location: 1133 Camelback Street located on the southwesterly side of the street between Bison Avenue and Jamboree Road. 5. 6. 7. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Dahn Corporation 18552 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 495 Irvine, CA 92612 General Plan Designation: Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities and for General Industry by the City's General Plan Land Use Element and the Zoning: Zoning is PC (Planned Community). The North Ford Planned Community District designates the site for the existing postal service facility. 8. Description of Project: The project involves the approval of a General Plan Amendment, Amendment to the North Ford Planned Community District Regulations, a site plan review to allow for the construction of an 85,000 square foot ministorage facility. The site is currently occupied by the United States Postal Service as a part of their distribution facility. The existing facility is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning requirements. The proposed General Plan Amendment will allow for the proposed construction of a mini -storage facility. This project is located outside the Coastal Zone Boundary and a Coastal Permit is not required. The proximity of residential uses will not be significantly impacted by the traffic generated by the proposed use, since the proposed use does not share street frontage with the residential development. A850.NegDccCHECKUST Page 1 4. Surrounding Land ,ses and Setting: (Brielly describe then jest's surroundings.) Current The site is currently developed with a United States Postal Service Development: local distribution facility and a portion Is occupied by a paved parking area which b proposed to be developed with miablomp facility. To the north: are industrial and office uses, including automobile repair and an Interior designers school. To the east: across Camelback Street and below the bluff, are residential uses. To the south: h a minhtoragefacitlty. To the west: Mariner's Church and the Calty Toyota Research Facility. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) South Coast Air Quality Management District, Orange County Health Department ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the follo%ing pages. ❑ Land Use Planning ❑ 'Transportation/ ❑ Public Services Circulation ❑ Population do Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities dt Service Systems 0 Geological Problems ❑ Energy & Mineral 9 Aesthetics Resources ❑ Water 0 Hazards 11 Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance AI50.14tI CCHEC►:UST Page 2 3af� DETERMINATION 'k Yo be completed by the Lead Agency.) ` On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed, project. D t ''• I Sig ature Javier S. Garcia Printed Name Date l 1}47 F:WSERSPLNMRAREDIIPL NCOWENDMGUBSODAIMND-CKLST DOC AE50 • Nc&Dec CHECKLIST Page 3 I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal; a) conAktwith general Alen designation or toning? ( ) b) conflict with applicable environ- mental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the proles ( ) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( ) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from Inwrnpatith land uses)? ( ) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established commonly (including a low-income unity)? or (ninodly community)? ( 1 II, POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal; a) cumulatively exceed official regional of local population Projections?( ) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or Indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( 1 r Lou 11" No i !qd MnPuel tMW C] 13 ❑ 13 ❑ (] ❑ R( ❑ ❑ ❑ la ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ is ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A15O.Mce/DeeCHECKLIST Page 4 i ! Potends"y Po ..Mp Lon Von NO signMc" SlpnMcant Elpnineant knpoat knp6d unba knp6d mmPtron lowwponded III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture?( ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Seismic ground shaking() ❑ ❑ ❑ C) Seismic ground failure, including ❑ ❑ ❑ liquefaction? ( ) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 hazard? ( ) e) Landslides or mudflows? () ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 Erosion, changes in topography or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) g) Subsidence of the land? () ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 h) Expansive soils? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 1) Unique geologic or physical ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 features? ( ) IV. WATER.: Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) c) Discharge into surface waters or ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( ) d) Changes in the amount of surface ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 water in any water body? ( ) A150-NegDec CHECKLIST Page 5 e) Changes to currents, or the oourN or direction of water movernents? Q Change in tls quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquller by arts or excavations or "h substantial loss of groundwater recharge cape ( ) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) 1) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Palate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate?( ) d) Create objectionable odo(s? ( ) VI. TRANSPORTATIONICIRCULATION Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Increased vehicle trips or tratlto congestion? ( ) tlkki+Me�«+► O O O Mnprat ❑ ❑ (] 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 13 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 13 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ O 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ A$J0•NcaDt CNECxLIST Page 6 b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment? ( ) C) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? ( ) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) n Conflicts with adopted policies supporting altemative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts?( ) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? ( ) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ( ) d) Welland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? ( ) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) VIII. ENERGY 6 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) Powntlany Poa...,Ay Lau tlwf No signtlkant sipntsaane slprknant M+pod knead unNa knpad waro,tlon kworporated ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ASSO-NezDeCCHECKLISr Page 7 5� � ' { k { lmpat Nau�nt alpnln �� MMergae� kxo�p6n b) Use non-renewable nsouroes in a ❑ ❑ ❑ 63 wasteful and inamicient manner? ( ) c) Result in tM loss of availability of a ❑ O ❑ 0 known mineral resource that would be or future vskre to I* (wbn and the residents; of Cue slate? ( ) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 release of hazardous substance$ (includkv, but not limited to: ON, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? ( ) b) Possible interference with an ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) c) The creation of any health hazard or ❑ d ❑ 0 potential health hazard? ( ) d) Exposure of people to existing ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased lire hazard in areas with ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 flammable brush, grass, or trees? X, NOISE. Would the proposal result In: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ❑ ❑ 13 0 b) Exposure of people to severe noise ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 levels? ( ) XI, PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services In any of the following areas: ALSO • Ne&rkc CHECKLIST Pa�ge� 8 1 potsntraly pota� Le" than No slgntneant slgnlfleaat algnMc&M Impad Impact Unle" Imped MlHgatkm IncorporaW a) Fire protection? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Police protection? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 c) Schools? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 d) Maintenance of public facilities. ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 including roads? ( ) e) Other governmental services? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 XIL UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies. or substantial'alterations to the following utilities? a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 b) Communications systems? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 c) Local or regional water treatment or ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 distribution facilities? ( ) d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ❑. ❑ ❑ 0 e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 g) Local or regional water supplies? () ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 highway? ( ) b) Have a demonstrable negative ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ d) Affect a coastal bluff? ( ) ❑' ❑ ❑ 0 A850-NcgDccCHECKLIST Page 9 5q l f; Potonualryr a12nlAcant Potion � / signMoant ua. uw, l eracont No Impact Impact M 01 Impact Incogmrstod XtV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ b) Disturb archaeologicafresources? ❑ ❑ C] Ea c) Affect historical resources? ( ) ❑ ❑ (3 d) Have the potential to cause a ❑ ❑ ❑ physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 uses within the potential impact area? ( ) XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for' ❑ ❑ ❑ neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) b) Affect existing recreational ❑ ❑ 11 0 opportunities? ( ) M, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. A) Does the project have the potential ❑ Cs7 ❑ ❑ to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major period of California history or prehistory? A150•N«bwCHECKUST Page 10 �� /, s;r b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to fhe disadvantage of "-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIL EARLIER ANALYSES. Potentially SlgnMcant knpaet 0 �4 PoteriLy SlgnMkant Unless Mitigation incorporated 0 L n Lssa than No Significant Impact knpact a W EME 2 Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based -on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project Atso•t gD"ctnicxr.lsr Page 11 u.. RESOLUTCONNO, 97� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 96-3(E) AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN SO AS TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1133 CAMELBACK STREET FROM "GOVERNMENTAL, EDUCATIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES" TO "GOVERNMENTAL, EDUCATIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL/ GENERAL INDUSTRY" USE [CPA No. 96-3 (E)] WHEREAS, as part of the development and implementationof the City's General Plan, the Land Use Element has been prepared; and WHEREAS, said element of the General Plan sets forth objectives and supporting policies which serve as a guide for future development of the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Element designates the general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of land and building intensities in a number of ways, including residential land use categories and population projections, commercial floor area limitations, and the floor area ratio ordinances; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 707 of the Charter of the City of Newport Beach, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a certain amendment to the above referenced element ofthe Newport Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City prepared a Negative Declaration with supporting Initial Study for the project in compliancewith the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the environmental document in malting its decision on the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. �a NOW, THEREF02, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that General Plan AmendmentNo. 96-3(E) is hereby approved to read as follows: That the property located in the 1100 Block of Camelback Street, between Bison Avenue and Jamboree Road on the westerly side of Camelback Street (1133 Camelback Street), more particularly described as a portion of Lot No. 4 of Tract No. 6680, redesignating from "Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities" to " Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities/General Industry" use. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach.does hereby approve General Plan Amendment No. 96-3(E) with the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element to read as follows: Land Use Element Paces 74-75: 2-2. NF Area 2. This area is designated Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities, and General Industry. [GPA 90-1(G)] [GPA 93-3(B)] [GPA 96-1(B)]. The development allocation is as follows: Synagogue site: TIC Corp. Yard: 71,150 sq.ft. 33,940 sq.ft. Postal Facility: 55,200 sq.ft. Utility Station: 1,000 sq.ft. General Industry: (Site 2a: Mini Storage Facility) 110,600 sq.ft. (Site 2b: Mini Storage Facility) 86,000 sg.ft. -2- 0 ESTIMATED GROWTH FOR STATISTICALAREA L3 Residential(in du's) Commerciai(in sq.ft.) Existing Gen.Plan Projected Existing Gen.Plan Projected I/I/87 Projecteo Growth 1/1187 Projection Growth I.I. AF Area 1 50 50 -0- -0- -0• -0- 1-2.AFArea2 53 53 -0. -0- .0- .0- 1-4. AF Area 4 .0• 500 500 .0. -0- .0- I-S. AF Area 5 39 39 -0- .0- •0- -0- 1-6 AFArea 6 54 54 -0- -0- .0- .0- 1-7. AF Area 7 59 59 -0- -0- -0- -0. 1-8. AF Area 8 168 168 -0- -0- -0- .0- 2-I. NF Area 1 -0. .0- -0- 74,692 148,041 73,349 2-2. NF Area 2 -0- 4- 4- 100,930 995,440 184,;19 -2- -Z_ 371,440 70 51 2-3. NF Area 3 .0- .0- -0- -0- 50,000 50,000 2.4.NFArea4 -0- 300 300 •0- -0- .0- 2.5, NF Area 5 849 849 -0- .0. .0- -0- 2.6. NP Area 6 -0- -0- -0- .0. -0- .0- 3. San Diego Creek -0. .0- -0- .0- 200,000 200,000 4. Jamboree/MacArthur .0- .0. .0- .0- 50,000 50,000 TOTAL 1,272 21M 90 175,622 a33;481 5319 2.074 902 819,491 643,959 Population 2,519 4r339 3;M 4_,561 2,042 Revised 02/97 OM ATTEST: CITY CLERK ADOPTED this day of .1997: MAYOR F:\USERS\PLN\SHARED\ICITYCNL\1997\0324\ASSORESI.DOC -3. W� RESOLUTION NO.97- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING THE NORTH FORD/SAN DIEGO CREEK PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO ALLOW FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT' OF A MINI -STORAGE FACILITY. (AMENDMENT NO.850) WHEREAS, as part of the development and implementation of the Newport Beach General Plan the Land Use Element has been prepared; and WHEREAS, the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides specific procedures for the implementation of Planned Community zoning for properties within the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS, an amendment to the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District Regulations is necessary in order to maintain consistency between the Newport Beach General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City prepared a Negative Declaration with supporting Initial Study for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the environmental document in making its decision on the proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District Regulations to allow for the establishment of a mini -storage facility in conjunction with the approval of a site plan review. �05 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach does hereby approve Amendment No. 850 (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Text), with the proposed amendment to the Statistical Analysis, Section I; and the text in Section V (A), (B3) and (E) to read as follows: SECTION 1. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS North Ford Approximate Additional Additional Gross Allowable Allowable Area Acres sq.tt. DU's General Industry--GEIF I - 16.7 -0- -0- General lndustry--GEIF 2 20.7224 40,000 -0- General Industry (mint -storage): 2a 2.8 110,600 -1- 2b 220 86,000 -1- TOTAL 42.2 236,600150,600 -2-1- Commercial 3 5.0 50,000 -0- Multi-family Residential 4 18.6 undetermined 300 Open Space 4a 2.4 Residential 5 79.0 -0- 888 Fads 6 12.0 -0- 0-0 TOTAL 117.0 50,000 111904-.W The above statistics are based on gross acreage and do not account for buildable area. In Area 2a, development is limited to mini -storage facility use with a maximum floor area of 110,600 sq.ft. Development may include one dwelling unit for an owner/manager including two garage spaces, provided that such residential use will be incidental to the mini -storage use and will not alter the character of the premises. In Area 2, the additional allowable square footage is allocated for the expansion of the Synagogue site. premises. -2- SECTION V. GENERAL INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENTAL, EDUCATIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES AREA 2; GENERAL INDUSTRY, AREA 2a and 2b (Mini-StorageUse) A. Intent It is the intent of this district to permit the location of a combination of General Industrial and Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities uses may engage in the sales of products and services relating to and supporting the development plan, provided such uses are confined within a building or buildings, and do not contribute excess noise, dust, smoke, or vibration to the surrounding environment nor contain a high hazard potential due to the nature of the products, material or processes involved. The General Industrial use of Site 2a and 2b shall be restricted to the operation of a mini-storage€aeility facilities with an incidental dwelling unit for owner/manageroccupancy. Ancillary activities, i.e., vehicle and bulk storage, associated with the above permitted uses may be located outside a structure provided screeningrequirementsas set forth in this document are observed. B. Permitted Uses The following uses and other uses which in the opinion of the Planning Director are compatible shall be permitted: I. General Industrial Uses primarily engaged in industrial activities that involve some degree of on -site production, assembly, repair, maintenance, etc., of the product sold -or products related to the service rendered, such as, but not limited to, the following list of examples: a. Appliancerepair b. Furniturerepair c. Equipmentrental centers d. Nursery and garden stores e. Warehousing f. Service and Maintenance Facilities 2. Public and Quasi -Public Uses a. Post Office b. Publicand quasi-publicutility business office and related service facilities c. Utility substation d. Service and maintenance facilities e. Institutions f. Schools g. Churches 3. General Industry (Site 2aand 2b) a. Area2a: Development within Site 2a is limited to mini -storage use with an incidental dwelling unit for owner/manager occupancy. The site plan for the mini -storage facility shall be designed so as to locate the office and caretaker's residence as far from the electrical substation and high -voltage transmission lines as is feasible in order to minimize long-term exposure to electro-magneticfields. b. Area 2b: Development within Site 2b is limited to mini -storage use with an incidental dwelling unit for owner/manaeeroccupancy. 0 -3- Mini-storogewarehouse developments shall be subject to the approval of a site plan review, E. Site Coverage Maximum building coverage of SO percent is allowed. Parking Structures shall not be calculated as building area; however, said structures shall be used for parking of company vehicles, employee vehicles, or vehicles belongingto persons visiting the subject Cum or utility. ATTEST: CITY CLERK ADOPTED this day of .1997; -4. uYNMet FtiUSERS1PLMSHAPEIAICITYCNL11"710724W$O ,ES2.DOC (:a RMW Paleo Associates 97-1103 June 23, 1997 Mr. Marc Myers Associate Planner, Planning Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 RE: Paleontological Monitoring for Newport Beach Mini U-Storage #2. Dear Mr. Myers: Paleontology Archaeology History 23392 Madero, Suite L Mission Viejo, CA 92691 (714) 770-8042 FAX (714) 458-9058 RMW Paleo Associates has been retained by Dahn Corporation to perform paleontological monitoring at the above referenced project. Grading is cleared to begin. Respectfully, Diana Weir Caro! 814dum Principal Orange County Certified Paleontologist cc: Byron Burden, Dahn Corporation G City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 1. SUBJECT: CamelbackMini-Storagell (Dahn Corporation, applicant) 1133 CamelbackStreet • General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E), • Amendment No. 850 (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Regulations), • Site Plan Review No. 76 and the acceptance of an environmental document- Negative Declaration. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Element to redesignate the property for Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities/General Industry use and establish the permitted intensity of development and amend the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Text to allow for the development of an 86,000 square foot mini -storage facility subject to the approval of a site plan review. Also includedwith the applicationsis the acceptanceof an Environmental Document. Mr. Jay Garcia, Senior Planner presented a summation of the staff report as well as the supplemental report distributed this evening. He explained the increase from 85,000 to 86,000 square foot mini -storage facility (the caretakers unit was not included in the square footage). The size and modification of the proposed project being reduced from the original square footage of 99,900. Revised plans and changes to the facility - are attached as an Addendum. The General Plan Amendment was reviewed by staff and is similar in nature as the project at 1177 Cameiback St. which is compatible to the surrounding uses. The mini -storage facility is located on a portion of the postal service facilities. There is no map involved and they will share access. The Site Plan is also included for approval to ensure compatibility with the aesthetics of the surrounding area. Parking is not an issue for the mini,storage since the facility has areas were vehicles can park in front of the storage areas or the stairways. There is a request to delete condition of approval #II which calls for the Water Capital Improvement fee to be paid. Research of Public Works records indicates.that the fee has already been paid in conjunctionwith the original Tract. Commissioner Ridgeway askedfor and received clarification of the living quarters situated over the office area. Floor plans were referred to showing the location of the managers residence on the second floor of Building A and the first floor as the office and garage. He then asked about the landscape at the front elevation that faces the street. Mr. Garcia reviewed the landscaping provisions on the site plan as means to soften the view from the street. The depth of the landscape is 20 feet and will include trees. At Commission request, the amount of landscape will be increased with the use of mature trees that will soften the building height of 28 feet from grade level. Commissioner Fuller asked about the site distance on the radius. He continued by expressing safety concernswith posted signs. Mr. Rich Edmonston answered that the conditions on the site evolved from the INDEX Item No. 1 GPA 96-3 (E) A 850 Site Plan Review No. 76 Negative Decla- ration Approved City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 shopping center development and the changes that were created on CamelbacK as a result of that development. This driveway would be close to the Post Office and would have many of those same concerns but at this point there is no indication that there would be any similar types of turn restrictions on the driveway. Reference was made to Condition No. 8 that addresses site distances and it was proposed by Rich Edmonton to change the distance for a speed of 45 miles per hour that would more closely reflect the conditions that exist. Ms. Temple stated that in reviewing the staff report, the applicant raised a concern regarding Mitigation Measure No. 4 regarding the paleontological monitoring. Staff has requested this mitigation measure due to past experience in the area. The applicant has indicated that the actual cut grading may not exceed that which has previously occurred on site. Ms. Temple suggested that this condition be prefaced by the following language: "Should grading occur in such a manner that the soil is disturbed beyond that which has already occurred in association with prior construction or grading on the site, the following measure shall be applied:' Public Hearing was opened. Bob Bradley, Executive Vice President of Dahn Corporation, 18552 MacArthur Boulevard, Irvine - stated that Dahn Corporation is a privately held company that specializes in developing and operating self -storage properties around the country. At the corner of Camelback and Bison, Dahn Corporation developed a storage facility sevefal years ago. This facility is completely leased and has left a demand for more self -storage. The land at 1133 Camelback became available from the post office and was obtained on a long term ground lease (55 years). This lease is to develop a self -storage property identical to the other storage property on the corner. Mr. Bradley then referred to an exhibit and explained the proportions of development to land. He stated that he has reviewed the staff report and the findings and conditions and agrees to all of them as presented. Commissioner Ridgeway asked about the rear portion of the property and ownership. He was answered that the entire fee ownership will remain with the Post Office. It will be left as somewhat a semi -developed parking lot, with some area to be used for truck storage directly behind the Post Office. Commissioner Fuller asked about the design of the lighting, hours and soil contamination. He was answered that the lights will be wall mounted, directed downward so there is no outward spillage and are motion sensitive so they are off at night except if a tenant drives by the office, the motion sensor would turn the light on. The lights are on a 15-20 minute timer, office hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The gate hours are 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and tenants access through a code system that allows them entrance onto the property. The monument sign is internally illuminated and is on a timer as well. Monitoring wells have been placed on this site in conjunction with the Ford Development on Jamboree and the studies are still taking place. INDEX City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6,1997 INDEX At Commission inquiry, Mr. Bradley acknowledged that the City Traffic Engineer is recommending that Condition No. 8, the site distance,be designed for 45 miles. He stated that he does not know what that does to the driveway location, but it will be looked at to be sure it works. He acknowledged the recommended change to Mitigation No. 4 regarding the poleontologicalstudy. Public Hearing was closed. Motion was made by Commissioner Ridgeway to adopt Resolution 1449, recommending to City Council the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E), adopt Resolution 1450 recommending to City Council the approval of Amendment No. 850 (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Regulations), Site Plan Review No. 76 and the acceptance of an environmental document - Negative Declaration subject to the findings and conditions with the noted changes: • Condition No. 8 to be changed from 35 to 45 miles, • Condition No.11, referencing that the Water Capital improvement fee be paid, to be deleted, • Condition No. 16 to be changed to double the amount of trees on the plan and to work with staff • Condition No. 17 to include the additional verbiage of *use of motion sensitive area lighting, *lighting wall mounted directed downwards, *lighting of signage off at 10:00 p.m., and • Mitigation Measure #4 to be prefaced by "Should grading occur in such a manner that the soil is disturbed beyond that which has already occurred in association with prior construction or grading on the site, the following measure shall be applied:.:' Commissioner Gifford clarified and it was agreed upon that the motion would read that there will be no lighting after 10:00 p.m. except for lighting activated by motion sensors. The monument and wail sign shall be off after 10:00 p.m. Motion was voted on and approved: Ayes: All Noes: none Absent: none Abstain: none A. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Accept the environmental document, making the following findings and requiring the following mitigation measures: Findings: That based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, comments received, and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project, as conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the 4 •City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes INDEX March 6, 1997 Initial Study, could have a significant effect on the environment, therefore a Negative Declaration has been prepared. The Negative 'Declaration adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the project, and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA. The Negative Declaration was considered prior to approval of the project. 2. An Initial Study has been conducted, and considering the record as a whole there is no evidence before this agency that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. On the basis of the evidence in the record, this agency finds that the presumption of adverse effect contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) has been rebutted. Therefore, the proposed project qualifies for a De Minimis Impact Fee Exemption pursuant to Section 753.5(c) of Title 14, CCR. Mitigation Measures. 1. The Applicantwill comply with the erosion and siltation control measures of the City's grading ordinance and all applicable local and State building codes and seismic design guidelines. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide written certification acceptable to the City's Building Department signed by a licensed engineer that the area has undergone a soil clean-up process and any gasoline leakage or soil contamination has been cleared. 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning Department that the lighting system is designed, directed, and will be maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to neighboring residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer, with a letter from the engineerstating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 4. Should grading occur in such a manner that the soil is disturbed beyond that which has already occurred in association with prior construction or grading on the site, the following measure shall be applied: - Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Newport Beach that a qualified paleontologist has been retained to observe grading activities and salvage and catalogue fossils as necessary. The paleontologist shall be present at the pre -grading conference, shall establish procedures for paleontological resource surveillance, and shall establish, in cooperation with the project developer, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of the fossils. If major paleontological resources are City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 discovered, which require long-term halting or redirecting of grading, the paleontologist shall report such findings to the project developer and to the City of Newport Beach. The paleontologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the project developer, which ensure proper exploration and/or salvage. Excavated finds shall be offered to the City of Newport Beach, or its designee, on a first -refusal basis. The applicant may retain said finds if written assurance is provided that they will be properly preserved in Orange County, unless said finds are of sp-ecial significance, or a museum in Orange County indicates a desire to study and/or display them at the time, in which case items shall be donated to the City, or designee. These actions, as well as final mitigation and disposition of the resources, shall be subject to the approval of the City of Newport Beach. Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit, the paleontologist shall submit a follow-up report for approval by the City which shall include the period of inspection,,a catalogue and analysis of the fossils found, and present repository of the fossils. B. General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (EI: Adopt Resolution No._ (attached) recommending to the City Council the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 (E). C. Amendment No 850 (North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community Text): Adopt Resolution No._. (attached) recommending to the City Council the adoption of Amendment No. 850. D. Site Plan Review No. 76: Findings: That the proposed action is part of the project evaluated in the Negative Declaration prepared for GPA 96-3(E) and Amendment No. 850. That Negative Declaration adequately addresses the -potential environmental impacts of the project, and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA. The Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission and was reviewed and considered prior to recommending approval of the project. 2. That all applicable standards for the approval of a Site Plan Review are met as established by Section 20.01.070 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code since: The development is consistent with surrounding land uses and with the goals and policies of the General Plan as recommended for City Council approval by the Planning Commission in GPA 96-3(E). The development is an extension of existing uses in the block which are compatible with the characterof the neighborhood INDEX City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 and which will contribute to the orderly and harmonious development of surrounding properties and the City, since the project is designed in accordance with permitted height and site area coverage limitations specified by the North Ford Planned Community Development Regulations which apply to other properties in this block of CameibackStreet. • The development has been designed to maximize protection of public views from Bison Avenue which will not be adversely impacted by the height of the proposed buildings. • There are no environmentally sensitive areas on -site or in the vicinity of the subject property. The project is not located in an area of unique geologic hazards. The proposed project is not a residential project and will -meet City noise standards for the proposed manager's residential unit. The site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas and pedestrian and vehicular access are functional in that the project has been designed with increased setbacks which add to the functional efficiency of the traffic and pedestrian circulation of the project. • The proposed development fully conforms to the established development standards for the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District, as recommended for City Council approval by the Planning Commission in Amendment No. 850. Further, that the proposed development in the North Ford/San Diego Creek Planned Community District will not preclude implementation of specific General Plan objectives and policies. • Electrical and similar mechanical equipment and trash areas, as conditioned by this approval, will be concealed from view to prevent any potential aesthetic nuisance or impact. • There are no known archeological or historical resources on -site and mitigation measures included with this approval will preserve any sites which may be uncovered. • The commercial development proposed is an extension of existing uses in the block and the project as conditioned by this approval will not have a. significant adverse effect on the residential uses in the vicinity. 3. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property Within the proposed development. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Sectior 20.01.070 of the Municipal Code. INDEX r_- City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 INDEX Conditions: 1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial compliance with the approved site plan, floor plans and elevations, except as noted below. 2. That Site Plan Review No. 76 will not become effective unless and until General Plan Amendment 96-3(E) and Amendment No. 850 are approved by the City Council. 3. That all conditions of approval of Amendment No. 850 and related mitigation measures of the environmental documentshall be fulfilled. 4. That the hours of operation of the mini -storage facility shall be limited between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., daily. 5. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 6. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to' guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 7. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be designed in accordance with Newport Beach Standard Drawings, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department (City Traffic Engineer). 8. That the intersection of the private drive and Camelback Street be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 45 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls, the monument sign and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line as defined by City Standard 110-L. 9. That the security gate at the entrance shall be designed to provide a turnaround prior to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Fire Department. 10. That the on -site drainage be conveyed to the public right-of-wayin a manner acceptable to the Public Works Department. That any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain system shall be the responsibilityof the developer. 11. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control f7 rf City of Newport Beach Planning Commission Minutes March 6, 1997 INDEX equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. There shall be no construction storage or delivery of materials within the Camelback Street right-of-wayunless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 12. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code, unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. 13. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from public streets and adjoining properties. 14. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designed within the on -site parking area and shall be used solely for handicapped self - parking. One handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign on the pavement shall be required for each handicapped space. 15. That a landscape and irrigation plan for the site shall be approved by the Public Works and Planning Departments. Landscaping shall be provided along the street frontage of CamelbackStreet to provide adequate screening from the neighboring residential uses. The landscaping shall be installed in accordance with twice the amount of mature trees as shown on the prepared plans. 16. That the project shall be designed to eliminate light and glare spillage on adjacent streets and uses by: • use of motion sensitive area lighting • lighting wall mounted directed downwards • lighting of signage off at 10:00 p.m. 17. That no outdoor loudspeaker or paging system shall be permitted in conjunction with the proposed operation. 18. That this Site Plan Review shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.01.070 K of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 2. Joe Moreira'sJiu-Jitsu de Brasil Item 2 uail Street UP No. 3602 • Use Per 02 Approved Request to permit a martial arts studio in an existing commercia re. June 24, 1997 `G Mr. Marc Myers 'N Associate Planner City of Newport Beach Planning/Building Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 RE: Mitigation Measure #4 Mini U Storage II, 1111 Camelback Street, Newport Beach, CA Dear Myers: Dahn Cdrporation has retained RMW Paleo Associates, Inc. to attend the pre -construction conference. RMW will also prepare the required documents, visit the site during grading operations, salvage any significant fossils exposed by grading, and prepare a final report. Any fossils found will be distributed to the City of Newport Beach or its designee on a first refusal basis. Prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit, the paleontologist will submit a follow up report for approval by the City which shall include the period of inspection, a catalogue and analysis of the fossils found and presented to the repository of fossils. Hopefully this will meet with the City requirements. Sincerely, p.r MTTN��.•_�.. 111� Byron D. Burden Project Manager cc: Michael A. Murphy & Associates 18552 MacArthur Blvd., #495, Irvine, CA 92612 (714) 752-1282 • FAX (714) 752-0301 .( i I COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS Telephonea'_(714)' 644-3200 By:Genia Garcia, Associate Planner y:Marc Myers, Associate Planne Plan Check No: L 2 y • R By:Christy Teague, Associate Planner By: Date: 6, - Z-4-" -14. Address: 1111 6414^GI b.w4C Districting Map No. Zone\General Plan Land Use �� cription of Project: Proposed Use I ��+�ti1fr {cil�fi} Corrections Required: 10o . AI&I Legal Description: Lot 'T Block Section Tract G44_8_0 Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $20,480. -07v A, Covenant required. Please have owner's signature notarized on the attached document and return to me. AA✓_ Lot Size/Tenant Sq. Footage gi /20 #- /'FGi 04>0 ¢ ♦»�X Required Setbacks _ 4__ Front -34 _ Right Side Left Side / 0 t Rear 6 , Remarks • t t& Q — FLOOR AREA/5TORY 4t, IkAdti M fJ 411� BLD. A' 15T FLOOR = 25,630 50. FT., BLD. A' 2ND FLOOR = 25,630 50. FT. I +` r fk'A4 4- Cl"A� OLD. 'B' 15T FLOOR = 17,600 5a FT. ; �,Y•�` BLO. 'B' 2NO FLOOR = 17,600 5Q. FT. I OFFICE/APARTMENT FIRST FLOOR = 1,137 5Q. FT. —� OFFICE/APARTMENT SECONO FLOOR = 1,137 50.FT. TOTAL FLOOR AREA: --------- -------------- FAR WORKSHEET Lot area (site area sq.ft.): 8j 7-sq.ft. Base Development Allocation (BDA): m sq.ft. (0.5 x site area sq.ft., unless otherwise specified in Land Use Element] FAR permitted, with/without variance: (A) . Jam' comm res pkq Square footage permitted: comm res pkg sq.ft. ((A) x site area sq.ft.] PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: (C) Base FAR use sq.ft. (D) Reduced FAR use sq.ft. (E) Maximum FAR use sq.ft. (F) TOTAL SQ.FT. [C+D+E] Sq.ft. sq.ft. O t btro sq. ft. sq.ft. PROPOSED FAR: • F = site area sq.ft. ] PROPOSED WEIGHTED DEVELOPMENT: FAR Use Category Weighting Factor Weighted Sq.Ft. (G) (H) ( G x H ) sq.ft. Base x 1.00 sq.ft. sq.ft. Reduced x 1.67 sq.ft. sq.ft. Maximum x 0.50 sq.ft. t 64,734 50. FT TOTAL WEIGHTED SQ.FT.(May not exceed BDA) u►(/ Provide tissue overlay of calculations to vefify provided square footage. ParkeT,, ('Indicate numb of stalls rovided G W On -Site Parking Required Provided 4, 014p. `i�'1 "If / 5' "rA iATeuc C44- 41.hh - Dimension building height as me,d from natural grade to midpoint and QQ-- maximum ridge roof height�32'��i� 1 2�' _)° '/+'n O.F pares e i Show natural grade line on all elevations Show all rooftop mechanical equipment an¢ dimension frA� grade directly below. Indicate location of trash containers on -site plan. �G4��.u..�w 34,' -A� 44-4- nm-d- �) 44" Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. , Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location f all buildings, fences, etc. in elation to the property line. �I+t. �F r Fair Share Contribution "1c (ot e'A*AA a bw T'%'* ..,. San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fe , -* 3 . ( H � up 16Z, 4e b h 3• ``` w Z4 �V SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: 26 3, 044 •t. Q + 2A i I. " = I Z C 6.9E . 4= _ Please indicate any discretionary approval numbers on the plans and incorporate the attached; -7*_ excerpt of minutes and list of findings and co itions into the ueline drawings �6 P� rr� � 7-G� approval lette into the he blueline drawings Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No. on Bluelines Modification required for Planning Commission/City Council: Use Permit: No. Variance: No. Resubdivision/Tract: No. Site Plan Review: No. Amendment: No. Other Public Works: Easement/Endioachment Permit vv Subdivision Engineer n Traffic Engineer— Approval of Landscape an$ ae Pew - Building Department: Grading Engineer -Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans -A, dlo Coastal Development Permits: Approval In Concept (AIC) No. (Note: File 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and elevations) Coastal Development Permit: No. Effective Date: Waiver/Exemption: No. Effective date: REMARKS: NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate his plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644- 3200. r0wu\C0wat0:X0k Rev. 1/95 DATE: TO: FROM: FAIR SHAREFEE MEMO Rich Edmonston, Traffic Engineer Marc Myers,A.ssociate Planner Please provide a Fair Share Fee for located at A Traffic Study No. was approved on Other approvals: G P4 q o 3 L�=) SP?— # 7-G This project ✓is _ is not in lan check. Other comments: July 7, 1997 TO: MARC MYERS PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MANAGER SUBJECT: Revised Fair Share Fee Calculation - Camelback Mini -Storage II 1111 & 1133 Camelback Street This memo supercedes my memo dated April 1 1997 for the proposed oroiect The earlier memo calculations were based on 85,000 square feet of mini -storage; the final project will be 84, 734 square feet of mini -storage. Also, effective 7/1/97, the Fair Share Fee was adjusted from $125.91/trip to $127.67/trip, per City Ordinance 94-19. The Fair Share Fee for this project is $28,215.07 based on the following information: 1. The new mini -storage project will be built on a vacant, paved parcel currently operated by the U.S. Postal Service. As this is a vacant parcel, there is no credit for Fair Share Fee purposes. 2. The new use will produce 221 trips assuming the NBTAM Update trip generation rate of 2.61 trips/1000 sq ft. 2.61 trips x 84,734/1000 sq ft = 221 trips 3. The current fee is $127.67/trip. The Fair Share Fee calculation is 221 trips x $127.67/trip = $28,215.07. Please let me know if you have any questions about the fee. Richard M. Edmonston Transportation and Development Services Mgr. .\jdiven\feirsher\memos\min1sto2 Rev 7.7.97 DATE: TO: FROM: FAIR SHARE FEE MEMO 6.z4• III Rich Edmonston, Traffic Engineer Marc Myers ,Associate Planner Please provide a Fair Share Fee for Cw+��l 5-&W,-3.e, located at A Traffic Study No. was approved on Other approvals: � q v 3 Lam) , sPA-# This project - L--'is _ is not in pl^ an check. Other comments: De-C'. DGM & ASSOCIATES 11IELE.M.AL EENGINEERING A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION M E M O F A C S I M I L E to: Mr. Larry Frapwell HILL PARTNERSHIP fax #: (714) 675-4543 from: Benjamin A. Mascardo, P.E. re: DAHN/CAMELBACK MINI STORAGE II - NEWPORT BEACH, CA DGM # 103-25 date: July 11, 1997 pages: 1 , including this cover sheet. Dear Larry: We have reviewed our site plan. The outside lighting system was designed to be maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and minimize lighting spillage and glare to the neighboring residential areas. Sincerely, G:\MEMO\W7058.WPD From the desk of... Shannon M. Weber (714) 546-3251, ext. #10 125 E. Baker Street, Suite 150 • Costa Mesa, CA 92626 • (714) 546-3251 • FAX (714) 546-3252 ' ANNE MARIE BROWN Environmental Management Consulting PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 3.24 Acre Undeveloped Lot 1133 Camelback Street Irvine, California Prepared for: DAHN CORPORATION c/o Mr. Robert Bradley, Vice President 18552 MacArthur Blvd., #495 Irvine, California 92612 Prepared by: ANNE M. BROWN, R.E.A. #201 Environmental Management Consulting 1979 Port Cardigan Place Newport Beach, California 92660 March,1997 I `1 1979 Port Cardigan Place, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 760-8014 II r 11 ANNE MARIE BROWN Environmental Management Consulting March 22, 1997 Dahn Corporation c/o Mr. Robert Bradley, Vice President 18552 MacArthur Blvd., #495 Irvine, California 92612 Subject. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment. 3.24 Acre Vacant Lot 1133 Camelback Street Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Bradley: This report provides the results of a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment of the subject property. This assessment was conducted in general accordance with ASTM Standard Practice E-1527-94 for Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments. Objective The object of this assessment is to identify, to the extent feasible pursuant to the processes prescribed herein, recognized environmental conditions on the subject property. The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or likely presence of a hazardous substance or petroleum product on a property under conditions that indicate an existing or past release, or a material threat of a release of a hazardous substance or petroleum product into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term is not intended to include de minimis (minor) conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment, and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Warranty This consultant's professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable environmental assessors practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made as to the professional advice included in this report. No liability for direct or L 1979 Port Cardigan Place, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 760-8014 consequential loss or damage is assumed by this consultant resulting from use of the information or recommendations contained herein. Limitations The results of the assessment provided herein are in no way intended to represent a guarantee that the subject property is free from past, present or future hazardous substances contamination, but only that a reasonable inquiry has been conducted to ascertain the potential for contamination under current applicable law. There is a possibility that even with proper application of these methodologies, there may exist on the subject property conditions that could not be identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not reasonable identifiable from the available information. This consultant believes that the information obtained from the regulatory agency database search and interviews concerning the property is reliable. However, this consultant cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is accurate or complete. Third Parry Use This report has been prepared for the Dahn Corporation and their lender's use concerning the subject property, and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or other uses. I trust that the information presented in this report satisfies your current requirements. Should you require additional information or if I may be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 760-8014. Very truly yours, Anne M. Brown, R.E.A. #201 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 Property Location & Description 1 1.2 Summary of Findings 1 1.3 Conclusions & Recommendations 2 2.0 HISTORICAL OWNERSHIP AND USE OF THE PROPERTY 2.1 Historical Ownership 2.2 Historical Use 2.3 Historic Aerial Photo Review 3.0 PROPERTY SURVEY 3.1 Description and Condition of Property 3.2 Hazardous Materials Use/Storage/Contamination 3.3 Underground & Aboveground Storage Tanks & Containment 3.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Containing Electrical Equipment 3.5 Asbestos Containing Materials 3.6 Lead -Based Paint 3.7 Radon 3.8 Environmental Permits & Disclosures 3.9 Area Reconnaissance 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 4.0 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROPERTY AREA 9 4.1 Topography 9 4.2 Geology 9 4.3 Hydrology 9 4A Sewage and Domestic Water Supply 9 5.0 REGULATORY AGENCY DATABASE SEARCH REVIEW 10 5.1 Subject Property 10 5.2 Surrounding Properties 10 II APPENDIX Maps & Illustrations: Vicinity Map Topographic Survey, Sun Surveying U.S.G.S. Topographical Map Site Photos Documents & Records: Commitment for Title Insurance, First American Title Insurance Company Groundwater Monitoring Well Data from Ford Motor Company Letter from Regional Water Quality Control Board to Ford Motor Co. Regulatory Agency Database Search Report: Vista Site Assessment Plus Report Qualifications of Assessor: California Registration as Registered Environmental Assessor Environmental Acronyms: List of Environmental Acronyms M I 1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Prgizer& Location & Descri t! The subject property is a 3.24 acre unimproved lot north of the Newport Beach Post Office at 1133 Camelback Street in the City of Newport Beach, Orange County, I California. See Vicinity Map in the Appendix of this report. The lot is separated from the post office portion of the parcel by a block wall running the length of the property in an east -west direction. Between 1972 and 1978, the subject lot was used as a temporary post office station, thus the few minor structures, such as the concrete footings and loading dock portrayed in the site photos. See Site Photos in the Appendix of this report. The Assessor Parcel Number for the property is 442-041-15. The property is further described as Lot 4 of Tract No. 6680, as per map recorded in Book 260, Pages 1, 2, and 3 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. See Commitment for Title Insurance prepared by First American Title Insurance Company in the Appendix of this report. 12 Summaaj!fFinding� This report provides the results of a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment of the subject property performed by Anne M. Brown, Environmental Management Consulting (consultant) for Dahn Corporation, (client). The assessment was performed in accordance with this consultants' proposal dated January 30, 1997. Performance of this assessment is limited to the duties, liabilities, obligations and the Scope of Work set forth in the proposal and Professional Services Agreement executed March 7, 1997. ' Following is a summary of findings: ' • The subject property is an unimproved lot comprised of 3.24 acres of land owned by the United States Postal Service. The lot is currently being used by the post office for storage, vehicle parking and postal driver education. • No hazardous materials/wastes were observed in use or storage on the subject lot, however, the post office uses and stores motor oil and unleaded gasoline on their portion of the parcel. Three empty 55 gallon drums were observed on the subject lot. No evidence of significant hazardous substances contamination was observed on site soils on the subject lot at the time of the site visit. • At the time of the site visit, evidence of underground and aboveground storage tanks and containment was not observed on the subject lot, and none are registered there according to Water Quality Control Board and Orange County Health Care Agency I 1 records. A 10,000 gallon unleaded fuel tank is registered at the adjacent Post Office address. To date, no evidence of fuel releases have occurred at this site. • Two groundwater monitoring wells exist on the subject lot. These wells were installed in 1994 by contractors for the Ford Motor Company in connection with an investigation of the former Ford site located approximately .80 mile southeast of the subject property. At this writing, the wells are sampled/analyzed annually for the presence of volatile compounds associated with releases on the Ford site. • No electrical equipment suspected of containing polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) dielectric fluid was observed.on the subject lot at the time of the site visit. • No suspect asbestos containing building materials were observed on the subject lot at the time of the site visit. • No permanent building structures suspected of containing lead -based paint were observed on the subject lot at the time of the site visit. • A literature review was conducted to determine the potential existence of radon in soil in the area of the subject property. Based on currently available information, the potential for the existence of radon in the area of the subject property is expected to be beneath EPAs lowest recommended action level. • A review of regulatory agency files did not reveal any known contamination problems on the subject property. • Within a one mile radius of the subject property, two (2) sites were identified in regulatory agency records as having experienced an environmental contamination problem. One of the sites has been closed with cleanup complete. The remaining site, Ford Motor Co., is continuing to conduct investigation, remedial activities and groundwater monitoring. See Section 5.0, Regulatory Agency Records Review for further information. 1.3 Conclusions & Recommendations • In connection with the closure of the former Ford Aerospace/Loral facility located approximately .80 mile southeast and upgradient of the subject property, Ford installed groundwater monitoring wells in various locations on properties downgradient of their site. Two such wells were installed on the subject unimproved lot north of the post office on Camelback Street. These wells have been monitored since their installation in 1994, and have consistently shown either non detect or very low concentrations of the volatile compounds analyzed for. The wells will continue to be monitored until such time that Ford is released from this obligation by E regulatory agencies involved. The existence of these wells on the subject property should not present a problem for future uses or development since they are at grade, and can be closed and moved if necessary. There is a potential for contaminated groundwater emanating from the Ford site to have impacted groundwater quality in the area of the subject property. Groundwater contamination from this source is not expected to present a health and safety or environmental liability risk for the subject property since (1) groundwaters will not be pumped for potable use at the property, (2) groundwaters will not be in contact with future uses at the property , (3) the principal responsible party has been identified and is causing investigation and remediation at the source, and (4) there have been no known illegal use or discharge sources involving chemical contaminants at the subject property, and in particular those involved in the Ford releases. We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-94 of the subject property. Based on the history of the subject property there is no record of unauthorized hazardous substances discharges or underground storage tanks which might contribute to soils and/or ground water contamination. Further environmental assessment of the property is not indicated at this time. 2.0 HISTORICAL OWNERSHIP AND USE OF THE PROPERTY 2.1 HistoricalOwnership Historically, the subject property was a part of the 120,000 acre Irvine ranch owned by the Irvine family since 1869. In 1894, the holdings were incorporated as The Irvine Company. In May, 1972, the Irvine Industrial Complex, a California Corporation, a holding entity for The Irvine Company sold the subject property to the United States Postal Service. For further information, see Commitment for Title Insurance prepared by First American Title Insurance Company in the Appendix of this report. 2.2 Historical Use Historically, the Irvine Ranch has been used for agricultural purposes. According to Irvine Company records, and an interview with Peter Changala, Manager of the Irvine Company's Agriculture Division, the area of the subject property was used for livestock grazing. Mr. Bruce Ward, Maintenance Supervisor, and Ed Van Wouden with the Postal Service were interviewed to ascertain current and prior uses of the subject lot. According to these individuals, following purchase of the property by the Postal Service, a temporary postal facility was located on the subject lot. The temporary facility was in use from approximately 1972 until 1978 when the permanent post office building was constructed on the southern portion of the parcel. The lot is currently being used by the post office for storage, vehicle parking and postal driver education. 2.3 Historic Aerial Photo Review An aerial photo search was conducted at Continental Aerial Photo in Los Alimitos, California. Aerial photos dating back to 1952 were reviewed for the subject property. Photo's taken during the 1950's show the property in natural vegetation. Between 1959 and 1970, air photos show the property to be undeveloped and graded. The temporary post office structure was observed on air photos dating from 1975. The temporary structure was removed following construction of the post office building in 1978. The Ford Aerospace facility, approximately .80 mile southeast of the property was observed in all air photos dating back to 1959. Air photos showed that the original Ford land lease included property north to Bison Ave. 4 i1 3.0 PROPERTY SURVEY A site survey was conducted on March 13, 1997 by Anne M. Brown, Registered Environmental Assessor. All accessible portions of the property were inspected. 3.1 Description and Condition of Property The subject property is an unimproved lot. The rear portion of the lot is dirt with grassy vegetation. The remainder of the lot is largely covered with gravel to accommodate vehicle driving and parking. A rectangular shaped concrete footing exists in the approximate center of the lot, along with a concrete loading dock. One portable office structure and one metal storage shed exists on the site. The post office uses the lot for equipment storage, vehicle parking and post office vehicle driver training. Three empty 55-gallon drums were observed on the property at the time of the site visit. These were located near the front gate on Camelback Street. See Site Photos and Topographic Survey prepared by Sun Surveying in the Appendix of this report. Groundwater Monitoring Wells In connection with the closure of the former Ford Aerospace/Loral facility located approximately .80 mile southeast and upgradient of the subject property, Ford installed groundwater monitoring wells in various locations on properties downgradient of their site. Two such wells were installed on the subject lot north of the post office property on Camelback. See map entitled Monitoring Well Locations Near Post Office and Topographic Survey by Sun Surveying in the Appendix of this report. These wells have been monitored since their installation in 1994, and have consistently shown non detect or very low concentrations of the volatile compounds analyzed for. See Table 1. Quarterly Groundwater Sampling Results Near Post Office, Selected Volatile Compounds, Former Ford Aeronutronic Facility, Newport Beach, California in the Appendix of this report. Although a significant portion of the remedial work being conducted on the former Ford site has been completed, further work in being conducted, and existing monitoring wells, including those on the subject post office lot will continue to be monitored until such time that they are released from this obligation by regulatory agencies involved. 3.2 Hazardous Materials Use/Storage/Contamination No apparent chemical use or storage was observed on the subject lot during the site visit. No evidence of significant hazardous substances contamination was observed on site soils at the time of the site visit. 5 3.3 Underground & Aboveground Storage Tanks & Containment Owners and operators of certain underground storage tanks (USTs) are required to register those USTs with the State Water Quality Control Board which is responsible for administering the federally mandated UST program. No evidence of underground storage tanks was observed on the unimproved lot at the time of the site visit. however, according to City of Newport Beach Fire Department records, Water Quality Control Board records, and Bruce Ward, Maintenance Supervisor with the Postal Service, one 10,000 gallon unleaded gas tank currently exists behind the post office building. This tank was installed in 1992, and is described as a double wall fiberglass tank with a leak detector. According to Mr. Ward, there has been no indication of a fuel leak/release since the tank has been in ground. Prior to installation of the current post office UST, another UST existed in the same area. According to Mr. Ward, and Newport Fire Department, and Building Department records, no soils or groundwater contamination was found during its removal in 1992. No clarifiers, separators or sumps were observed on the subject lot. No above ground storage tanks were observed on the subject lot. 3.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Containing Electrical Equipment Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are chlorinated aromatic compounds primarily used in electrical equipment, but have also been found in hydraulic systems and oil -filled heat transfer systems. Due to their persistence, toxicity, and potential for causing ecological damage, PCB manufacture was discontinued in the U.S. in 1976. Regulations issued pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) require labeling of electrical equipment containing PCBs by their owner. No suspect PCB containing equipment was observed on the subject lot. 3.5 Asbestos Containing Materials Asbestos is a commercial term for a group of fibrous minerals which have been used in many different products and materials largely for its fire resistant, filler and reinforcement characteristics. Inhalation of asbestos fibers has been associated with the development of pulmonary interstitial fibrosis (asbestosis), lung cancer, and malignant mesothelioma. No permanent building structures currently occupy the subject lot. No suspect asbestos containing materials were observed there during the site visit. Lead was a major ingredient in many types of paint for years prior to and through World War II. In the early 1950s, other pigment materials became more popular, but lead compounds were still used in some pigments and as drying agents. Medical evidence shows that exposure to lead can cause adverse health effects at levels significantly lower than previously considered harmful. Children are particularly susceptible to lead dust exposure from deteriorating lead -based paint, and from improper removal or disturbance of intact lead -based paint. No permanent building structures suspected of containing lead -based paints exist on the subject lot. 3.7 Radon Radon is a colorless, odorless radioactive gas which comes from the natural breakdown of radium, which is itself a decay product of uranium. Uranium and radium are both common elements in the soil. Based on available data, the major sources of high levels of radon is soil containing uranium, granite, shale and phosphate. Radon gas can enter homes and other structures through dirt floors, hollow -block walls, cracks in the foundation floor and walls, and openings around floor drains and pipes. In 1990, the California Department of Health Services participated in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA's) State Radon Survey. The California Statewide Radon Survey Interim Results report and USEPA's Radon Reference Manual were reviewed for this site assessment. According to the California survey report, "no regions having highly elevated concentrations of radon were found during this survey". Of the 34 states surveyed to date, California ranks low as number 32 in terms of quantity of radon found. In Orange County, 0.5 percent of homes are predicted to contain over 4 Pico Curies/Liter radon (USEPA's lowest recommended action level). Although the potential for radon to present an imminent health risk at the subject property appears to be low, concentrations of radon which may be found in a building are dependent on a number of factors, therefore, the only way to determine the amount of radon present in a particular building is to test it for radon using a radon detector. No permanent building structures currently occupy the subject lot. 3.8 Environmental Permits & Disclosures No environmental permits or disclosures are required for the current use of the property. 3.9 Area Reconnaissance The subject property is located in an area of residential and commercial uses. The lot is bounded to the south by a Newport Beach Post Office to the north and east by commercial office buildings, and the west by Camelback Street, beyond which is a residential development and local shopping center. 7 A visual survey of adjacent properties revealed no evidence of surface hazardous substances contamination threatening the subject property. 4.0 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROPERTY AREA The property is essentially level and graded for drainage to the adjacent roadway. Elevation of the property is approximately 150 feet above sea level. Area topography is illustrated on a U.S. G.S. Tustin Quadrangle Topographical Map in the Appendix of this report. The property is located in the northwest portion of the San Joaquin Hills, which are part of the Peninsular Range Province of Southern California. Bedrock underlying the area consists of middle Miocene to late Pliocene age Marine deposits including sandstone, siltstone and shale of the Topanga, Monterey and Niguel Formations, with portions of the Topanga Formation interbeded and intertongued with hard Andesite Flows and Flow Breccias. The property is located in the Bonita Canyon watershed. This watershed is one of several tributary drainage areas to the larger 93,000 acre San Diego Creek watershed which discharges to Upper Newport Bay. Bonita Canyon drains approximately 3280 acres of the San Joaquin Hills. The general direction of drainage is northwesterly. 4.4 Sewage and Domestic Water Suonly Area sewer and water services are provided by the City of Newport Beach. Water supply is obtained principally from the Metropolitan Water District. 6 5.0 REGULATORY AGENCY DATABASE SEARCH REVIEW F Y1��711�' ,�•, A search of current Federal, State, and Local regulatory agency databases was conducted by VISTA Environmental Information Inc., San Diego, CA. See VISTA Site Assessment Plus Report in the Appendix of this report. VISTA has conducted their environmental records search in accordance with ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-94 guidelines. According to the VISTA Site Assessment Plus Report, the subject property is not identified in any of the databases reviewed as having experienced a known environmental contamination problem 5.2 Surrounding Properties A search of current Federal, State and Local regulatory agency databases was conducted by VISTA Environmental Information Inc., San Diego, CA. for nearby properties in accordance with distances outlined in ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-94. See VISTA Site Assessment Plus Report in the Appendix of this report. Following are the results of this records review: Toyota Motor Distributors Inc. 2800 Jamboree Rd., Newport Beach, CA. Problem: Leaking underground fuel tank Status: Case Closed/Cleanup Complete Ford Motor Co. 1000 Ford Road, Newport Beach, CA. Problem: Soils/groundwater contamination Status: Remediation and groundwater monitoring continuing Discussion: Based on this consultant's telephone conversations with and information provided by Gary Boettcher of Geraghty and Miller, contractors for Ford Motor Co., the main area of the site has been substantially addressed, and remediation has ceased in this area. Off -site groundwater monitoring is continuing, and remediation and monitoring of an area down -gradient of the main area is continuing. See copy of letter to Mr. Culek (Ford Motor) from the Regional Water Quality Control Board in the Appendix of this report. I 10 L Two properties are identified as havingunderground nderground storage tanks: U.S. Post Office 1133 Camelback, Newport Beach Chevron Station 1240 Bison Ave., Newport Beach, CA. ies are identified as beine hazardous waste eenerat U.S. Post Office 1133 Camelback, Newport Beach, CA. Newport North Cleaners 1280 Bison Ave., Newport Beach, CA. APPENDIX 1 1 ' MAPS & ILLUSTRATIONS I� 41* Jiro Ih IN AMALFI / Ia♦• + r 01,0 \90q of NMA i r \me ."♦� i ✓� MALLORCA �TIERpA Ck- ON TE / s BISON oleea oR L eELLI I _ OR 6 5m$ Alex t— " .VISTA \ ""•,, �' v: EWPORT3 A RD m``,� B�N,ZPC - 2� Y �G ®1996 Thomas Bros. Maps VICINITY MAP * Location of Subject Property m m m m � � m m m m m m m m TOORAPHOC SURWEV \ 09 THE CITY of NEWPORT SPACH, COUNTY OF oRm(m, s4dlTL OF CAQ FomouL\\ a u frfr wwrwfrrelrwwe fYrwr wfeer�YwlrlrYl�ri rf/f iYlawillf r �ewwiiYalr iiflYs �e-/el i wawfwewfriofY wYf>:eei of i��irir weir �rriri�wlrMe YwfrYreeiw rYlaarfrrwrrr eYrwrwwrYrrr fwnfrr� irrra e�rwerwrwrrw fwYwiwrf rarr. iwwwrwiarref r eiwYrxariw �wwswfawrrfY �ae.rrfewfwrrYi wlrwwrrrrer• rrswfara lerrfR rr s �wfrro I I I Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey N3337.5—W11745/7.5 Control by USGS. NOS/NOAA, and Orange County. 1965 PHOTOREVISED 1981 DMA 2651 III NE -SERIES V895 Topographical Map R n 1 SITE PHOTO KEY 3.24 Acre Lot Newport Beach Post Office Property 1133 Camelback Street Newport Beach, CA. March 13, 1997 The subject property is a 3.24 acre lot adjacent to the Newport Beach Post Office. It is separated from the post office by a block wall running the length of the property in an east -west direction. The lot is currently being used by the post office for storage, vehicle parking and driver education. Before the post office building on the adjacent lot was constructed, the subject lot was used as a temporary post office station, thus the few minor structures, such as the concrete footings and loading dock portrayed in the site photos. 1. Frontage view along Camelback Street, view to northwest 2. View of rear of adjacent post office site, view from inside rear gate of subject lot 3. Rear of lot, view to northwest, note ground level monitoring well 4. View of existing concrete footing in central portion of lot, view to east 5. Gravel driveway along northern boundary of lot, view to east 6. Gravel driveway along east side of property, view to south 7. View of former loading dock, east side of lot 8. View of three empty 55-gallon drums located on•east side of lot near front gate 9. View of south portion of lot, shows post office vehicle parking area, view to southwest 10. Interior portion of property, shows vehicle training area, view to west 11. View of temporary office structure (used for vehicle training classes), south side of lot 12. View of temporary storage container, west side of lot west of concrete footing 4v f :,"97 o or I rd w w =;goo yeti IS'_7 I Form No. 1068.2 (Rev. , /8 Exhibit A to Commitment 1 1 U u 4caI AMERIC9 Commitment For Title Insurance 0 First American Title Insurance Company Alta Plain ' Language Commitment First American Title Insurance Company 114 East Fifth Street, (P.O. Box 267) Santa Ana, California 92702 (714) 558-3211 OR-9616502 TITLE OFFICER - LOPEZ The Title Insurance Commitment Is a legal contract between you and the company. It Is issued to show the basis on which we will Issue a Title Insurance Policy to you. The Policy will insure you against certain risks to the land title, subject to the limitations shown in the Policy. The Company will give you a sample of the Policy form, if you ask. The Commitment is based on the land title as of the Commitment Date. Any changes in the land title or the transaction may affect the Commitment and the Policy. The Commitment is subject to its Requirements, Exceptions and Conditions. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PART OF THE TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY CONDITIONS SCHEDULEA 1. Commitment Date 2. Policies to be issued, Amounts and Proposed Insureds 3. Interest in the Land and Owner a 4. Description of the Land SCHEDULE B-1 —Requirements SCHEDULE B-2 -- Exceptions YOU SHOULD READ THE COMMITMENT VERY CAREFULLY. If you have any questions about the Commitment, please contact the issuing office. Page 1 2 3 3 3 3 Alta Plain Language Commiunent COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY OR-9616502 TITLE OFFICER - LOPEZ We agree to issue a policy to you according to the terms of this Commitment. When we show the policy amount and your name as the proposed Insured in Schedule A, this Commitment becomes effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A. If the Requirements shown in this Commitment have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, our obligation under this Commitment will end. Also, our obligation under this Commitment will end when the Policy is issued and then our obligation to you will be under the policy. Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the following: The Provisions in Schedule A. The Requirements In Schedule B-1. The Exceptions in Schedule B-2. The Conditions on Page 2. The Commitment is not valid without SCHEDULE A and Sections I and 2 of SCHEDULE B. First American Title Insurance Company BY PARKER S. KENNEDY - PRESIDENT BY MARK R.ARNESEN- SECRETARY t &/a4 BY JOSEPHINE M. LOPEZ - TITLE OFFICER DIRECT TELEPHONE NUMBER -(714) 647-4454 FAX NUMBER - (714) 550.7195 I Alta Plain ' Lanauge Commitment OR-9616502 TITLE OFFICER - LOPEZ 1 1. ) -M DEFINITIONS (a (a) Mortgage" means mortgage, deed of trust or other security insttumenL (b) "Public Records" means title records that give constructive notice of matters affecting the title according to the state law where the land is located. ' 2. LATER DEFECTS The Exceptions in Schedule B - Section 2 may be amended to show any defects, liens or encumbrances that appear for the first time In the public records or are created or attached between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements (a) and (c) of Schedule B - Section I are met. We shall have no liability to you because of this amendment. ' 3. EXISTING DEFECTS It any defects, liens or encumbrancesexisting at Commitment Date are not shown in Schedule B, we may amend Schedule B to show them. If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects, liens or encumbrances, we shall be liable to you according to Paragraph 4 below unless you knew of this information and did not tell us about it in writing. 4. LIMITATION OF OUR LIABILITY ' Our only obligation is to issue to you the Policy referred to in this Commitment, when you have met its Requirements. If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this Commitment, our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this Commitment when you acted in good faith to: ' comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B - Section I or ' eliminate with our written consent any Exceptions shown in Schedule B - Section 2. We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A of this Commitment and our liability is subject to the ' terms of the Policy form to be issued to you. 3. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT Any claim, whether or not based on negligence, which you may have against us concerning the title to the land must be based on this Commitment and is subject to its terms. P PAGE Alut Plain OR-9616502 Language Commitment TITLE OFFICER - LOPEZ ' RE: APN442-041-15 SCHEDULE A 1. COMMITMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1996 AT 7:30 A.M. 2. POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: OWNERS POLICY: ' AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS ' (M9 ON COMMITMENT COVER) POLICY AMOUNT: $(TO BE DETERMINED) PREMIUM AMOUNT: $(TO BE DETERMINED) ' PROPOSEDINSURED: 1 (TO BE DETERMINED). 3. (a) THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THIS COMMITMENT IS: A FEE. ' ' 3. (b) TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. 4. t THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1 PAGE r Alta Plain OR-9616502 Language Commitment TITLE OFFICER - LOPEZ ALL THAT CERTAIN LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 4 OF TRACT NO. 6680, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 260, PAGES 1, 2 AND 3 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 4 LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4 THAT BEARS SOUTH 22e 48' 35" EAST, 66.08 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF, THENCE NORTH 63e 56' 00" EAST 507.32 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF CAMELBACK STREET, 60 FEET WIDE, SAID POINT BEING IN A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1170.00 FEET IN THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 63e 15' 18" EAST, SAID POINT DISTANT 145.00 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID CURVE, FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 4. EXCEPT ALL OIL, OIL RIGHTS, MINERALS, MINERAL RIGHTS, NATURAL GAS RIGHTS, AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS BY WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN THAT MAY BE WITHIN OR UNDER THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT OF DRILLING, MINING, EXPLORING AND OPERATING THEREFOR AND STORING IN AND REMOVING THE SAME FROM SAID LAND OR ANY OTHER LAND, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO WHIPSTOCK OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILL AND MINE FROM LANDS OTHER THAN SAID LAND, OIL OR GAS WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS INTO, THROUGH OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND, AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER AND BENEATH OR BEYOND THE EXTERIOR LIMITS THEREOF, AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN AND OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS OR MINES, WITHOUT, HOWEVER, THE RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, STORE, EXPLORE AND OPERATE THROUGH THE SURFACE OF THE UPPER 500 FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM THE IRVINE COMPANY, A WEST VIRGINIA CORPORATION, RECORDED JULY 2, 1968 IN BOOK 8648 PAGE 708 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE Alm Plain ' Language Commitment WARNING OR-9616502 TITLE OFFICER - LOPEZ "THE MAP ATTACHED HERETO MAY OR MAY NOT BE A SURVEY OF THE LAND DEPICTED THEREON. YOU SHOULD NOT RELY UPON IT FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN ORIENTATION TO THE GENERAL LOCATION OF THE PARCEL OR PARCELS DEPICTED. FIRST AMERICAN EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY LIABILITY FOR ALLEGED LOSS OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY RESULT FROM RELIANCE UPON THIS MAP". F F 0 PAGE 11 Alta Plain Language Commitment SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS OR-9616502 TffLE OFFICER - LOPEZ THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MEP: (A) PAY THE AGREED AMOUNTS FOR THE INTEREST IN THE LAND ANDIORTHE MORTGAGE TO BE INSURED. (B) PAY US THE PREMIUMS, FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE POLICY. (C) DOCUMENTS SATISFACTORY TO US CREATING THE INTEREST IN THE LAND AND/OR THE MORTGAGE TO BE INSURED MUST BE SIGNED, DELIVERED AND RECORDED. (D) YOU MUSTTELL US IN WRITING THE NAME OF ANYONE NOT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WHO WILL GET AN INTEREST IN THELAND OR WHO WILL MAKEA LOAN ON THE LAND. WE MAY THEN MAKE ADDITIONALREQUIREMENTS OR EXCEPTIONS. (E) RELEASE(S) OR RECONVEYANCE(S) OF ITEM(S) (F) OTHER- (0) YOU MUST GIVE US THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: x I. ANY OFF RECORD LEASES. SURVEYS, ETC. x 2. STATEMENT(S) OF IDENTITY, ALL PARTIES, x 3. OTHER- WE WILL REQUIRE A CERTIFIED RENT ROLL AND FULL COPIES OF ALL UNRECORDED LEASES AFFECTING THE LAND. 0 PAGE 6 Alm Plain Lan{Uaye CammiOnem 1 OR-9616502 TITLE OFFICER - LOPEZ SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 ANY POLICY WE ISSUE WILL HAVE THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS UNLESS THEY ARE TAKEN CARE OF TO OUR SATISFACTION. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF THE POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A ATTACHED. COPIES OF THE POLICY FORMS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS COMMITMENT. 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-1997, NOW A LIEN NOT YET DELINQUENT. FIRST INSTALLMENT: $NONE DUE. SECOND INSTALLMENT: $NONE DUE. CODE AREA: 07-051. A. P. NOS.: 442-041-15 AND 17. 2. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. 3. A PERPETUAL AVIGATION EASEMENT IN AND THROUGH THE AIR ABOVE THE HEREIN DESCRIBED AND OTHER LAND, AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE BY THE IRVINE COMPANY, BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 6965, PAGE 721 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH IN SAID DEED TO WHICH RECORD REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE FOR ALL PARTICULARS. 4. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IN AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 8868, PAGE 805 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH PROVIDE THAT A VIOLATION THEREOF SHALL NOT DEFEAT OR RENDER INVALID THE LIEN OF ANY FIRST MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST MADE IN GOOD FAITH AND FOR VALUE, BUT DELETING ANY COVENANT, CONDITION OR RESTRICTION INDICATING A PREFERENCE, LIMITATION OR DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN TO THE EXTENT SUCH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS VIOLATE TITLE 42, SECTION 3604(c), OF THE UNITED STATES CODES. 5. THE AFFECT OF THE RECITAL ON THE MAP OF SAID TRACT AS FOLLOWS, "AN EASEMENT RESERVED FOR PUBLIC UTILITY", OVER THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 4; AND THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 5, AS SPOWN ON THE MAP OF SAID TRACT. 6. AN EASEMENT FOR EITHER OR BOTH POLE LINES, CONDUITS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, AS SET FORTH IN AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 9168, PAGE 938 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. OVER: 2 STRIPS OF LAND INTENDED FOR USE AS PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESIGNATED AND DELINEATED AS "4' X 22' EASEMENT RESERVED FOR PUBLIC UTILITY" ON MAP OF SAID TRACT NO.6680, RECORDED IN BOOK 260, PAGES 1, 2 AND 3 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. PAGE 1 ' ut L+nguamgege commitment OR-9616502 nTLE OFFICER - LOPEZ 7. ANY RIGHTS INTEREST OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS DISCLOSED BY A SURVEY AND INSPECTION OF SAID LAND. A. THE FACT THAT A SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR THIS, AND PROPERTY ADJOINING ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH EXTENDS ACROSS SAID LAND AND ADJOINING LAND AT THE TOE OF ' THE SLOPE APPROXIMATELY 45 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LAND, SAID WEST LINE BEING THE APPROXIMATE TOP OF SAID TRACT. B. THE FACT THAT A DRAINAGE OVERFLOW SYSTEM EXISTS OVER THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF SAID LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISPERSING WATERS AND LANDS ADJOINING ON THE WEST. REFERENCE FURTHER BEING MADE TO ITEM 9 ON SAID SURVEY, FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. ' 8. RIGHTS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION OF THE LAND BY REASON OF UNRECORDED LEASES, IF ANY. FLP PLATS (CC&R-S, IF ANY) ENCLOSED. NOTE: WIRING INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUB -ESCROW DEPOSITS ARE AS FOLLOWS: FIRST INTERSTATE BANK ACCOUNT #180721037 1018 NORTH MAIN STREET ABA #122000218 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 CREDIT TO FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO. OR-9616502 TITLE OFFICER - JOSEPHINE M. LOPEZ DISREGARD IF FIRST AMERICAN IS YOUR ESCROW SETTLEMENT AGENT - CONTACT ESCROW OFFICER FOR WIRING INSTRUCTIONS COPY WITH PLAT (AND CC&R, IF ANY) TO: ' FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE 114 EAST 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 ATTN: RICK HOPCRAFT PAGE II Alta Plain ' Language Commitment I r,. iu I L� 1 '1 OR-9616502 7117.E OFFICER - LOPEZ NOTICE SECTION 12413.1 OF THE CALIFORNIA INSURANCE CODE, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1990. REQUIRES THAT ANY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNDERWRITTEN TITLE COMPANY, OR CONTROLLED ESCROW COMPANY HANDLINGFUNDS IN AN ESCROW OR SUB -ESCROW CAPACITY, WAIT A SPECIFIED NUMBER OF DAYS'AFTER DEPOSITINGFUNDS, BEFORE RECORDING ANY DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANSACTION OR DISBURSING FUNDS. THIS STATUTE ALLOWS FOR FUNDS DEPOSITED BY WIRE TRANSFER TO BE DISBURSED THE SAME DAY AS DEPOSIT. IN THE CASE OF CASHIER'S CHECKS OR CERTIFIED CHECKS, FUNDS MAYBE DISBURSEDTHE NEXT DAY AFTER DEPOSIT. IN ORDER TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DELAYS OF THREE TO SEVEN DAYS, OR MORE, PLEASE USE WIRE TRANSFER, CASHIER'S CHECKS, OR CERTIFIED CHECKS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EFFECT OF THIS NEW LAW, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR LOCAL FIRST AMERICAN OFFICE FOR MORE DETAILS. •* * Ia.0a a 0 * * 4 * NOTICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 18662 AND 18668 OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE, A BUYER MAY BE REQUIRED TO WITHHOLDAN AMOUNT EQUALTO THREE AND ONE-THIRD PERCENT OFTHESALES PRICE INTHE CASE OF THE DISPOSITION OF CALIFORNIA REAL PROPERTY INTEREST BY EITHER: 1. A SELLER WHO IS AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A LAST KNOWN STREET ADDRESS OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA OR WHEN THE DISBURSEMENT INSTRUCTIONS AUTHORIZE THE PROCEEDS BE SENT TO A FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARY OF THE SELLER, OR 2. A CORPORATE SELLER WHICH HAS NO PERMANENT PLACE OF BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA. THE BUYER MAY BECOMESUBJECT TO PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO WITHHOLD AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE GREATER OF 10 PERCENT OF THE AMOUNT REQUIRED TO BE WITHHELD OR FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($S00). HOWEVER, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION INCLUDED IN THE CALIFORNIA STATUTES REFERENCED ABOVE, NO BUYER WILL BE REQUIRED TO WITHHOLD ANY AMOUNT OR BE SUBJECT TO PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO WITHHOLD IF: 1. THE SALES PRICE OF THE CALIFORNIA REAL PROPERTY CONVEYED DOES NOT EXCEED ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS (SI00.000),OR 2. THE SELLER EXECUTES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATE, UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY, CERTIFYING THATTHE SELLER IS A RESIDENTOF CALIFORNIA, OR IF A CORPORATION. HAS A PERMANENT PLACE OF BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA. OR 3. THE SELLER. WHO IS AN INDIVIDUAL, EXECUTES A WRITTEN CERTIFICATE, UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT THE CALIFORNIA REAL PROPERTY BEING CONVEYED IS THE SELLER'S PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 1034 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE). THE SELLER IS SUBJECT TO PENALTf FOR KNOWINGLY FILING A FRAUDULENT CERTIFICATE FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING THE WITHHOLDING REQUIREMENT. THE CALIFORNIA STATUTES REFERENCED ABOVE INCLUDE PROVISIONS WHICH AUTHORIZE THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD TO GRANT REDUCED WITHHOLDING AND WAIVERS FROM WITHHOLDING ON A CASE -BY -CASE BASIS. THE PARTIES TO THIS TRANSACTION SHOULD SEEK AN ATTORNEYS, ACCOUNTANT'S, OR OTHER TAX SPECIALIST'S OPINION CONCERNING THE EFFECT OF THIS LAW ON THIS TRANSACTION AND SHOULD NOT ACT ON ANY STATEMENTS MADE OR OMITTED BY THE ESCROW OR CLOSING OFFICER. PAGE 9 s;•.� s :3T - C t¢+:-.I rry. �-'. ..:�'� -s. K:� ., ...,:iWsYa� 1 . h - S i • TRACT; / "a o !Q!+ 405 `r1" i�' ti fra$„�ynt , w {'F<.y �rr�aT�s��l� �• u �.�•k . o V Q 'e •'r'-/�/I9 K. ,� rya Wy l ��' v4� 'ry�il•'�•i _` Y`NFl�iy.FF. Q : ♦eM-/. O / �j 1. �'a/ >'t'h't � 1� .--f\Ti yl�* i ZE / P �S ! ` / - ,t;s'yF3-y t F s }s } - ✓ `./,y"-'TN' 01 J.OI AC. P.R. / -•'�. Pr 4/-16 sy ra�TQO9AC'} N W. 19 .. > 389 AC(C/ [of J la-.:. c ♦ ; ` [, a ypS� �L _ tn N K, y...J h F. Q �4� I3974G • fe,-.. t�j fia. f1✓ ut .Vi�4 a a/ r Q a ��5. O i A'IIIIP,. � ♦�i �pa�9 � < [ C, y . t _ PARS ♦rw.e�-< LIII 9rzOAC a 80 ClCI zrsr AQ A AVEMU t r S x . �«Ava x mflmR9 nR - tl 29 03 1 AanR , [ MARCH /970 NOTE -ASSESSORS BLOCK e. ASSESSOR'S MAP:{" TRACT NO. 6680 M260-(2,3 PARCEL- MLWOERS -'.- ROOK442PAGE .M. 7RACT NO. /2309 MM 550-/TO61MC. �Y _ PARCEL MAPS PM.. I/-27 4' -M SHOWN W CIRCIES COUNTr Of ORANGE 4tp .r '.a I+ -,Iiir 4 / 0 it Y 7 1 I i rf ��r� 111 it" .,�., �I�ie'li�e +jJ q 9 ,.�i R=oRi REBORN TO RTCT'ENOTSIEER, MRCOaO Ay1�W�Rat ! 1 I' Ste ANCXLE9 DISTRICT,' C01t S OP TIMDTNEH 1fILi ' E ���rtrttgpBuK Ce ''Po OX 2711 -IM ayryeuL al�eilgR ••�LOS ANGEL'ES, CALIFORNEA 9005'3',. r OeA(laC tOUdd�.(r.� r. 5{"'i777y"""y+` CLOSING .OFFICER. + SAO MM•M�Y:I'Br.�TZrY 9Y' fit Ir x^• '� 1�CtilrLC�bwNM�M'• CRAFT DEAD n �In lonoidesatlonlb'f ,Che-evm qI :FOD><71gNDRED FIFTY EVM T80NSANDAND" 'NO)i0O DOLLARS ($457,000 00)r tha'reoeipt ana sufficiency df'whlch LB q,^, Hdr.by acknpwledgeN, the•TRViNE INDdSTdIAG CdMPLE%� a•CalifolnSa' +m .dl r"e. 't Car oratl'oh, doeo hereby grant to tNe gN1TE➢ STATES P09TAfSERYiCE anbr its asei ne the re 1� property in the Count of-oran i, 3tete ef:Crllfasnla• I e, S ,. 4 P P, Y Y R r �., y-� described in Exhibit."x", whiah Se ait4dhed herotoland•ma�e part'heseof. JA I The�Grantee conveys the said land together with girl bdild L1%RV4gd,•impxovements shereon, and all right, ciila, and dntereat, if anr,'of Grantak, in and to'. J, I onylecroete, re'edr, glreame, al)aye, way., !trips, 8azea,, or .railroad :t •: �t- 1, 'tight-of-way.abutting,or ndloLning eaid land, a d in any means of ingress tLj .f cr•egroso appurtenant thereto: �, '• , '_I• '.:i Thif.conveyanna is made subJeet' to: `�• 1. Exiocfng eaadmento for public raaga and hLSh%1xyo,,pubL1 militia., sailfoade, and pipalinee,' ...,,,y✓✓✓ 2. A perpetual Air -or flight Basement, . sanletimea referred to as. ✓j it ev Ltatlon rights,•in and to all, the aitspa" 'bov4 that* portione of , articular planes or imaginary surface. ghat o .ilia laid lend for use by I• p ul r p a g ry giro;aft, present or future,'fsem or to the 0r nge'Caunty Airport, ■aid i ••, earimen," and rights being moil particularly d�aeribad and'defined in and . 9'•" ;'.',; Srantod,to the County of 'Orange by need record Ad I March 17, 196G.in Book 6965. �• pegi 721, Official records, upon cho terms, cavt8agqto end cendtifons eodsained y the}cLn. The ¢lanesrAbove vhU;h Bald 4esemshe'l Bl are more -particularly S` 'described 1n said deed anmw d sho,•on isp thetas eforr4d to, 'r.7 1'� 9. Covenants, condlllona Ana reaexietione .4 aeorded in Book 8866, I t Page05, Offigfal Records. 4' ' TO •PANS AND To HOLD that above-d Bier,Gbed 16pd andip smile# eo-the,eald Grantee I' y and ice arsfens forever, subject iva'tha matters' 'tidye Olt rorth.. � r �.a I. ExeGueod this 3rd :day of May. ' 'YSIYINE INDUSTR L'CCMFLEX estflel NCORPORATm ° 1 Y.- .'.QOLFF,.y g. p d i ': ,•; 1 PRIL 27, 1964 CParate De ) IIyoil •t , �P r CRCE` .'Xh SEA; Aasistz t•Seera[s sly, EDI A"� gLlFORN a �, 'f7:r.�5%.9iiarWlAtuna..owr•.�a�ai•� . y I I I I I 1-1 I (1, t V:; 7-, 1 4 6EF99,11ED 701 ;A, lmis'P,ol-lcy ACH LOTS '4 = AND 5 OF',TAACT,NO-' 66BO IN 'THE 'MA' CO P 4 :t 5TATE OF CAL FORK; ki,�AS PER. covN-ii OF ORANGE S "IN, fir F1 '260) „I N dQC PAGES In 2, AND OF•'THE.COIJNTY RCCCftO8R OF SA,9 0 COUN y 11 . I t" . . . h gwojt LY, F' 'HAT',Po0'ION.6r SAID Wa.y; j LYING -NbOYAWOT,, q.� THEREOR I EplING T DESCRIBED L: NE I OF. THE FOLLOWING LI ME qV SAI I D,'L T44 . pDZNT IN T�t WCkThLy STERLY' [JEC I NNING AT 46.00 F�ET $00HEAS,:561, (ICAPS SFROM OUTH 220 1 401 W' CAST,' a RTHWESTCRLY CORNER THCIEOF1 fHCV4C NORTH i 11 THE N� 'DINT IN j;jC,�OUY11yC-sTu11LY IOOUN od NO CA40T '07•32 FIEV TO -A R SkID 90INT' IN, c IN p.CAjtE6ACK $TntV 1.60 FEE:T 14.1 DC 111 '61US OF 1176-0 recy -7 RA 'A SOWT01ISTtRLY OAVImd A 'A RA�IAL �TO SAIJ) Pal, r 4, NY 14540 IF Y Lj)�L DF SAID, LOT. oj.'Ij��uEJNVDISTA ANORTH 030 0 1 ie-1 EASTI SA�l D P CORNER, OF SAI IMEASU ED ALONG 3 At D,CQ R VE FROM F�e NORTHERLY COR.. 'LOT 4 NATORAV CXCE�P), ALL 11 IL MINERAL.RIGO" .ARBONS By WHA.T�OEVER- �ATURAL GAS RI,GHTSt`AND1OTJ4ER,HYDROr )ER SAID LKNO, TOGETHER Y,BC WITHIN OR UNC txpL.Of�tNG AND NAME rNOWN THAT. MA F DRILLINGoI,NGp-! RPC.TUA� RIGHT' 0 S,AjDA.AND OR HE PE RCHOVING THE SAME FROM DPW ING THEREFORE.,AND fe RIGHT TOP,�%,mlp,STOCK,'.OR.DIRECTIO@ALLY ANY 0 HER LAND' INCLUDING ' uDING T� S H�REINABOVt DESCRIBED' I LANDS OTHER THAN THO� DRILL AND MjmE'FRO� I - LOH CA.,ACAOW O:L:Q GAS wE�L,St TUNNrLS AND SHAFTS IN7 THRO' H WHIP5TOCKCD. �ACE OF SAID LAND AND TO S0710M� 'UZiAFTS UNDER "AND THE * $1EISURf LS, TUNNELS AND r AMD TO, REOR10-1 a, 011EITIOIA11 I Y DRILL11 114 , 2RATE-ANY. SUCH BENEATH OR BEYOND -THE EXTERIOR LIMITS THEREOF- 1AIAj DCRPEN AND OP coulPt MAIN`TAIN� REF� THE, To DRILL, MINEs EXPLORE PETVN �Ok MINCE, WITHOUT HOWEVER R'600 FEET.OF.THE ILE SURFACEPE uIG '4 ERATE THROUGH E IRVI'NE CWIPAN , I ! T 6UBSV?�FACE OF SAID LAND " RE 6VIN BOO& 0646 �A CnRPORATI IN THE DEED RECV-6- 19 X.1-IMIT. A 7- 9, 4- k" 14 I �I 11 Ford Motor Land Development Corporation Dahn Corporation 18552 MacArthur Suite 495 Irvine, CA 92612 Attention: Mr. Bob Bradley Subject: Data Request Groundwater Monitoring Data U. S. Post Office 3311 Camelback Road Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Bradley: One Parklane Boulevard Sulte 1500 East Dearborn, Ml48126-2477 March 12, 1997 Enclosed is the information you requested regarding the status of groundwater monitoring wells (PO-1 and PO-3) located on the subject property. Both monitoring wells are located north of the Post Office building and were installed in May, 1994. The California survey coordinates are: PO-1 N 540105.79 E 1508671.65 PO-3 N 539969,38 E 1508320.09 Since installation, the monitoring wells were periodically sampled and analyzed for volatile organic compounds. The historical data for PO-1 and PO-3 is presented in Table 1. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 313-390-3145. Sincerely, NN �� l:/�C_. Thomas E. Culek Environmental Control Engineer 81 ;I C� 1.9 o sisoll 0 KEY' PO-10 PIEZOMETER LOCATION AND DESIGNATION W203 11 PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED WELLS pt or-11" POST OFFICE GERAGHTY MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS FIGURE Ir MILLER, INC. NEAR POST OFFICE 1 1133 CAMEL13ACK STREET OT OCALE NEWPORT BEACH, CA low ON M M M so � am Table 1. Quarterly Groundwater Sampling Results Near Post Office, Selected' Volatile Compounds, Former Ford Aeronutronie Facility, Newport Beach, California (Page 1 of 1) 1,2-DCE Well I Date Sampled I 1,1-DCE (totag2 I 1,1-DCA 1,1,1-TCA Benzene TCE Toluene PCE Xylenes Location µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L ATC AND OFF-SM (SOU' M WELLS AND PIEZOMETERS PO-1 6/1/94 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 26 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 917/94 . ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 23 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 12/6/94 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 27 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 319195 ND (<2) ND (<2) ND (<2) ND (<2) ND (<2) 25 ND (<2) ND (<2) ND (<2) 6/9/95 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 32 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 9/8/95 _ 12/15/95 — — _ _ 3/21/96 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 56 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 6/19/96 _ _ 9/23/96 12/6/96 PO-3 6/1/94 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 9/7/94 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 12/6/94 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 3/9/95 ND (<2) ND (<2) ND (<2) ND (<2) ND (<2) 2.2 ND (<2) ND (<2) ND (<2) 6/9/95 — — 9/8/95 12/15/95 — 3/21/96 ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) ND (<5) 6/19/96 9/23/96 _ — — — — 12/6/96 1 1— — Data souse: Geraghty & Miller, Inc., 1997. Technical Memorandum #35, Fourth Quarter 1996 Quarterly Groundwater Sampling, Former Ford Aeronutronic Facility, Newport Beach, California, January 16. 'Only detected analytes am reported in table; analyzes not included in table are: carbon disulfide, chloroform, and 1,2-DCA (January 1994 only), chlorobemcne, ethylbenzene, and 1,1,2-tricblor-1,2,2-trifluotoedmm. zPorel 1,2-DCE is the sum of detectable concentrations of cis-1,2-DCE and vans-1,2-DCE. ND Not detected at or above detection limit shown in parentheses. pg/L Micrograms per liter Well not sampled DCE Dichloroethene TCE Trichloroethene DCA Dichlometharne PCE Tettachlomethene MTN AdONCY CAupORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL OoARD SANTA ANA REGION 07" 4A N eTMST, subs soo RVY1146e1. CA 22lotd031 MMONE; ive) 702d100 PAX, ism) 701•Rsr tNovember A, 1996 11 li I Mr. Thomas Culek Ford Motor Land rievelopment Corporation One Parklans Boulevard, Suite 1 Soo Falst Dearborn, MI FORMER FORD AERONTUONIC PACIIdTI', NOV o 61996 MAIN AREA PEMEDIATION, NEWPOIIT REACH pear Mr, Culek; ' This is in follow•up to your October 16, 1996, meeting with Hoard star regarding the above.' project. > luring the meeting You presented a summary of the results of the groAchieved undwater cleanup and the Sault, mats �ovaalnrat toot ofvolatiletorp nice compounds datornitne the (VOCI to fr000 of m the stltu at the Main the rebound test Indicates that the objective of the remedial action has :one had leveled off Also the remedial system has been shut down. At the meeting, you also been achieved. Curreldly+ requested relief &OM fbtthar cleanup action at the Main Area. dual Glroundwstir'remedial action was lnitisted site the Milt Areas Janus SIVO f6medialt�rt iinvc involved soft vapor extractionigroundwater extraction welts, This l vapor dewatering of the saturated zone and extraction of soil vapor ham thore vo umes of oil Approximately six p"volumes ofgroundwater and three hundred and seventy p as vapor were exchanged during the six months that the romediati rimular activated vated carbonIII cyst ms vapor and groundwater recovered f om the wells were treated by g The roil vapor extraction removed a total of six hundred and tw8ft VOC ,1Wo pounds of VOCs. The groundwater Wraetion removed a totst of thirty-twp pounds It appetra that the remedial nation was practicable. In rtherrer ►edia on action is not expected o saturated zone to the maximum exteniss Of VOC11 In the shallow t prectiosbia. an the remove a G e nt �s of VOCs in the loll or groundwater.6Therys fe sting conditions, o forthar lnfbrmntion provided to this apencY wb ° 0 srrd represents remediatlon action related to soil and groundwater is required at the Main Area s in site. nc have no objeadon to the destnraion of the dual sail vapor/groundwater extraction vvetls in accordance with apppl;eable r+sg<ttations, However, we request that extraction wells �'-ol+ �W'o2, H'�"o3A' HW-� �d Llo ba press wra.. These wetle etauld ba utptzed in cory'unotien with future activities planned SW for the off argde p Ace �Q°� we wil not object to theft destlucton, providedh at with the Tad Mr. Thomas Culek Page 2 of 2 November 4, 1996 An sdequ&te number of wells will be installed to replace these wells upon completion orthe grading sotivities. As discussed at the October 16, 1996 meeting, we request that you submit a feasibility study report Addressing groundwater inveatigstion and remedlatlen action fbr the area immediately downgradlent of the Main Area. We are concerned about the potential fbr migrstion of highly impActed Sroundwater froth this off -site area. The report should be submitted to us for review by January 31, 1997, please be &wars that all existing groundwater monitoring wells on and off aite Ara to be maintained and monitored to verity the long-term sfrectiveness of the cleanup. If you hsve Any questions on this matter, pleas contact Robert L. Holub at (909) 792.3299 or Augustine A4 1810 at (909) 782.3292. Sincerely, axba-4*4 . Thi beault Executive Officer cc; Luis Lodrigueza - Orange County Health Care Agency Roy Herndon • Orange County Water District Geraghty and Miller, Inc, - Gary iJoettcher City of Newport Beach - John Douglas Environmental Services Consortium, Inc. - Lyne Hethrington .6 REGULATORY AGENCY DATABASE RFAR('A-P'Fp 1DT SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT PROPERTY INFORMATION CLIENT INFORMATION Project Name/Ref#: N.B. POST OFFIC ANNE BROWN N.B. POSTOFFICE SITE ANNE M BROWN-NEWPORT BEACH 1133 CAMELBACK ST 1979 PORT CARDIGAN PL NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Cross Street: MACARTHUR Latitude/Longitude: 33.640238, 117.864SB3 Site Distribution Summary Agency / Database - Type of Records widiln 118 mile 1/dto 114 mile 114 to 1/2 mile 112 to 1 mile A) Databases searched to 1 mile: US EPA NPL National Priority List 0 0 0 0 US EPA CORRACTS RCRA Corrective Actions 0 0 0 1 US EPA TSD RCRA permitted treatment, storage, disposal facilities 0 0 0 1 STATE SPL State equivalent priority list 0 0 0 0 B) Databases searched to 112 mile: US EPA CERCLIS Sites under review by US EPA 0 0 0 STATE SCL State equivalent CERCLIS list 0 0 0 - STATE LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks REG CO 0 1 0 - STATE/ SWLF Permitted as solid waste landfills, REG/CO incinerators, or transfer stations 0 0 0 - STATE DEED Sites with deed restrictions RSTR 0 0 0 - STATE CORTESE State index of properties with hazardous waste 0 0 0 STATE TOXIC PITS Toxic Pits cleanup facilities 0 0 0 C) Databases searched to 1/4 mile: US EPA RCRA Viol RCRA violations/enforcement actions 0 0 US EPA TRIS Toxic Release Inventory database 0 0 STATE UST/AST Registered underground or aboveground storage tanks 2 0 COUNTY UNIQUE Unique county databases CO 0 0 D) Databases searched to 118 mile: US EPA ERNS Emergency Response Notification System of spills 0 US EPA GNRTR RCRA registered small or large generators of hazardous waste 3 For more information call VISTA Informatipn Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800.767 - 0403. Report ID:128316-001 Date of Report: March 13, 1997 Version 2.4.1 Page #1 1 This geographic database search meets the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) standards for a government records review. A (-) indicates the search distance exceeds ASTM search parameters. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Customer proceeds at Its own risk in choosing to rely on VISTA services, in whole or in part, prior to proceeding with any transaction. VISTA cannot be an Insurer of the accuracy of the information, errors occurring in conversion of data, or for customer's use of data. VISTA and Its affiliated companies, officers, agents, employees and independent contractors cannot be held liable for accuracy, ' NOTES For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID:128316-001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Version 2.4.1 Page #2 SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT Map of Sites within One Mile t �1 EjP\r \'lDrE RD h_ Y RIETA �� i� NTH S�IE� c ' i2 `URY ' ✓'y%0 I aFR / '� _CHESMI E CT �F h rr f ERR ER \T � — L BELCOIIRT DR S O OAK �CRREST W " 5 ^ \ m0 /D.25�a.s i Category: A B C D Subject Site Databases Searched to: 1 mi. 1/2 mi. 1/4 mi. 1/8 mi. Single Sites ♦ ® Q r) Multiple Sites ♦ ® 0 0 Roads NPL, SPL, CERCLIS, TRIS, ERNS, Highways TSD, SCL, LUST, UST GENERATORS ` Railroads CORRACTS SWLF U�- Rivers or Water Bodies 11'addillonal dalabases are listed in the cover page of the report they are also displayed �• •�� Utilities on this map. The map symbol used corresponds to the database category letter A,B,C,D, For More Information Call VISTA Information Solutions_ lnr. ar 1 _ snn _ 7a7 _ neni Report ID:128316-001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Page #3 ft P� SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT F/ Map of Sites within Quarter Mile g CrI.IMAD uRca: 0 0.05 0.1 Miles i Category: A B C D Subject Site Databases Searched to: 1 mi. 1/2 mi. 114 mi. 1/8 mi. Single Sites ® ' \ ..� Multiple Sites ♦ ■ U /_\� Roads NPL, SPL, CERCLIS, TRIS, ERNS, Highways TSD, SCL, LUST, UST GENERATORS Railroads CORRACTS SWLF Rivers or Water Bodies If addillonal databases are listed in the cover page of the report they are also displayed Utilities onthismap. The map symbol used corresponds to the database category lefterA,D,C,D. For More Information Call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403 Report ID: 128316-001 Date of Report: March 1'% 9977 SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT Street Map I'Ir a � �i/ � /\ aln � 0 6D S '\ AT^� � _ ��a •SS FC 5 � i / yid � .,.✓ \�/ �:D , _ - Ue �� �• \'0 r0.25— �/ Subject Site Roads, Highways, Rivers, Water Bodies Railroads, Utilities For More Information Cali VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403 Report ID: 128316-001 Date of Report: March 11 1997 1#5 SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT SITE INVENTORY A B C D PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA y D: y J O MAP (within 1/8 mile) v y wi v a ID VISTA ID J x p J M -Ih J W� X¢ q to N w a z� DISTANCE D- O 1D G. W G 0 3 W 0 0 0 tY 1D 2 lY 2 DIREC77ONZ0 W 00)-J QUF0:F00 W (9 USPS NEWPORT BEACH MAIN OFFICE 295731 1 1133 CAMELBACK 0.00 MI ADJACENT X NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 U S POST OFFICE 3491267 1 1133 CAMELBACK O.00 MI ADJACENT X NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 CHEVRON STATION 201093 3193145 2 1240 BISON AVE 0.09 MI X X NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 NEWPORTH NORTH CLEANERS 3593973 2 1280 BISON AVE 0.10 MI X NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA A 8 C D 0 0 MAP (within 118 -1/4 mile) F v w w W a. O ID VISTA ID J W O J J fA J W� X¢ > 44 W Imo- lu =1 2 ir a DISTANCE C.O w IL W UO3 W 000rx V)26'Z DIRECTION 2 U F- w 0 0) ..1 0) O Q F- W F- 0 0 W a TOYOTA MOTOR DISTRIBUTORS INC 428279 3 2800 JAMBOREE RD 0.1 NMI X NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA A B C D J OMAP (within 1/4 -1/2 mile) y y W F O F 0ID VISTA ID Id p J K J U -1 X W Lu W x N f'lDISTANCE >lumil to D. W U0� W OU�2DIRECTION I-W Q 10 J 0)GUFKI->> No Records Found SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA A B C D 0 MAP (within 1/2 -1 mile) F V in w O ID J o:GJ� ILL)O)J J w W�X�Na�ZDISTANCE wa j NwVISTA D.O wa. W 003 W OQ0 r0:2DIREC77ONZ0 FID W 00RxI-70 W C7 FORD MOTOR CO 3195713 4 1000 FORD RD 0.50 EI X X NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 X = search criteria; • = tag -along (beyond search criteria). For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 128316-001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Version 2.4.1 Page 86 I! I �J 11 Uri r-, ft SITESW A B C a jyu.0 ¢aOr�aw��3wOpt��vrizNSTA/D=V J-DOVUNMAPPED rrq U rO J rq O Ur a: = FORD AERONUTRONIC FACILITY (FORMELY) 4984467 BELCOURTTERRACE X NEWPORT BEACH, CA X = search criteria; - = tag -along (beyond search criteria). For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 128316-001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Version 2.4.1 Page #7 ft SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT DETAILS PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 118 mile) VISTA NEWPORT BEACH MAIN OFFICE VISTA ID#: 295731 Mep ID Address": 1USPS 1133 CAMELBACK Distance/Direction: 0.00 MI ! NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 ADJACENT Plotted as: Point RCRA-SmGen - RCRASmall Generator / SRC# 3284 EPA ID: CA7180090469 Agency Address: USPS NEWPORT BEACH MAIN OFFICE 1133 CAMELBACK NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Generator Class: GENERATORS WHO GENERATE 100 KG/MONTH BUT LESS THAN 1000 KGJMONTH OF NON -ACUTELY HAZARDOUS WASTE VISTA U S POST OFFICE VISTA ID#: 3491267 Mep Io Address*: 1133 CAMELBACK Distance/Direction: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 ADJACENT '' Plotted as: Point STATE UST - State Underground Storage Tank / SRC# 1612 EPA/Agency ID: N/A Agency Address: U S POST OFFICE 1133 CAMELBACK NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Underground Tanks: 2 Aboveground Tanks: NOT REPORTED Tanks Removed' NOTREPORTED Tank ID: IV Tank Status: CLOSED REMOVED Tank Contents: REPORTED AS "UNKNOWN'BY Leak Monitoring: MONITOR PRESENT AGENCY Tank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: BARE STEEL P g: Tank Size (Units): 10M(GALLONS) Tank Material: FIBERGLASS Tank ID: 2U Tank Status: ACTIVEnN SERVICE Tank Contents: UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: UNKNOWN Tank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: FIBERGLASS Tank Size (Units): 10000(GALLONS) Tank Material: FIBERGLASS VISTA CHEVRON STATION 201093 VISTA IDA, 3193145 Map ID Address.: 1240 BISON AVE Distance/Direction: 0.09 MI / S Plotted as: Point NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 2 RCRASmGen - RCRA-Small Generator / SRC# 3284 EPA ID: CAD983637919 Agency Address: SAME AS ABOVE Generator Class: GENERATORS WHO GENERATE 100 KGJMONTH BUT LESS THAN 1000 KG/MONTH OF NON-ACUTELYHAZARDOUS WASTE STATE UST - State Underground Storage Tank / SRC# 1612 EPA/Agency ID: N/A Agency Address: CHEVRON 1240 BISON NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Underground Tanks: NOTREPORTED Aboveground Tanks: NOTREPORTED Tanks Removed: NOTREPORTED " VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 128316-001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Vemmn 2.4.1 1 page p8 PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile) CONT. Tank ID: IU Tank Status: NOTAVAILABLE Tank Contents: NOTREPORTED Leak Monitoring: UNKNOWN Tank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: NOTAVAILABLE Tank Size Units: NOTREPORTED(NOTAVAILABLE) Tank Material: NOTAVAILABLE VISTA Address': NEWPORTH NORTH CLEANERS 1280 BISON AVE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 VISTA ID#: 3593973 Map ID 2 Distance/Direction: Plotted as: Point rt�mven - m mm-oman benermori zKuff szu4 tF'H IU: I:HUtlBsbCtlL'Ly Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE Generator Class: GENERATORS WHO GENERATE 100 KGJMONTH BUT LESS THAN 1000 SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/8 -114 mile) VISTA TOYOTA MOTOR DISTRIBUTORS INC VISTA ID#: 428279 Map ID Address': 2800 JAMBOREE RD Distance/Direction: 0.14 MI / NW Plotted as: Point NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 3 STATE LUST - State Leaking Underground Storage Tank / SRC# Agency ID: 083000412T 3343 Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE Tank Status: NOTAVAILABLE Media Affected: SOIL/SANDMND Substance: UNLEADED GAS Leak Cause: UNAVAILABLE Remedial Action: EXCAVATE DISPOSE Remedial Status 1: CASE CLOSED/CLEANUP COMPLETE Remedial Status 2: NOTAVAILABLE Fields Not Reported: Discovery Date, Quantity (Units), Leak Source Regional LUST - Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank / Agency ID: 083000412T SRC# 3341 Agency Address: TOYOTA MOTOR DISTRIBUTORS 2800 JAMBOREE ROAD NEWPORT BEACH, CA Tank Status: NOTAVAILABLE Media Affected: SOILISANDILAND Substance: UNLEADED GAS Leak Cause: UNAVAILABLE Remedial Action: EXCAVATE DISPOSE Remedial Status 1: CASE CLOSEDICLEANUP COMPLETE Remedial Status 2: NOTAVAILABLE Fields Not Reported: Discovery Date, Quantity (Units), Leak Source • SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 114 -1/2 mile) No Records Found * VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 128316.001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Version 2.4.1 Page #9 ft SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 112 -1 mile) VISTA Address": FORD MOTOR CO 1000 FORD RD NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658 VISTA ID#: 3195713 Map ID 4 Distance/Direction: 0.80 MI / SE Plotted as: Point ' 1000 FORD RD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926588900 Prioritization Status: LOW RCRA Facility Assessment Completed: NO Notice of Contamination: No Determination of need For a RFI (RCRA NO Facility Investigation): RFI Imposed: NO RFI Workplan Notice of Deficiency NO Issued: RFI Workplan Approved: NO RFI Report Received: NO RFI Approved: NO No Further Corrective Action at this YES Stabilization Mesaures Evaluation: YES CMS (Corrective Measure Study) NO Imposition: CMS Workplan Approved: NO CMS Report Received: NO CMS Approved: No Date for Remedy Selection (CM No Imposed): Corrective Measures Design Approved: NO Corrective Measures Investigation No' Workplan Approved: Certification of Remedy Completion: NO Stabilization Measures Implementation: NO Stabilization Measures Completed: NO Corrective Action Process Termination: NO RCRA-TSD / SRC# 3284 1 EPA ID: ICAD041330077 Ite Waste Received: NO Disposal: No wator: NO ge/Treatment: YES "VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 128316-001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Version 2.4.1 Page #10 'u J UNMAPPED SITES Records Found, No Details Displayed " VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 128316-001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Vefeon Z4.1 Page 1111 SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DATABASES SEARCHED A) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1 MILE NPL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property. SRC#: 3064 The agency release data for NPL was June, 1996. The National Priorities List (NPL) is the EPA's database of uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for priority remedial actions under the Superfund program. A site must meet or surpass a predetermined hazard ranking system score, be chosen as a staWs top priority site, or meet three specific criteria set jointly by the US Dept of Health and Human Services and the US EPA in order to become an NPL site. SPL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property. SRC#: 3172 The agency release date for Calsites Database: Annual Workpian Sites was July, 1996. This database is provided by the Cal. Environmental Protection Agency, Dept. of Toxic Substances Control. CORRACTS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property. SRC#: 3284 The agency release date for RCRA Corrective Action Sites List was August, 1996. The EPA maintains this database of RCRA facilities which are undergoing "corrective action". A "corrective action order" Is issued pursuant to RCRA Section 3008 (h) when there has been a release of hazardous waste or constituents into the environment from a RCRA facility. Corrective actions may be required beyond the facility's boundary and can be required regardless of when the release occurred, even if it predates RCRA. RCRA-TSD VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property. SRC#: 3284 The agency release date for RCRIS was August, 1996. The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA TSDs are facilities which treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste. B) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/2 MILE CERCLIS SRC#: 2976 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for CERCLIS was March, 1996. The CERCLIS List contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List(NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The information on each site includes a history of all pre -remedial, remedial, removal and community relations activiies or events at the site, financial funding information for the events, and unrestricted enforcement activities. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID:128316.001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Version 2.4.1 Page #12 ' NFRAP SRC#:2977 Cal Cerclis ' SRC#:2462 ' SCL SRC#:3171 ' SWLF SRC#:2882 Orange County Landfill SRC#:3369 WMUDS SRC#:3373 LUST SRC#:3272 LUST SRC#:3273 LUST SRC#:3343 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for CERCLIS-NFRAP was March, 1996. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for Ca Cerclis w/Regional Utility Description was June,1995. This database is provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. These are regional utility descriptions for California CERCLIS sites. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for Calsites Database: All Sites except Annual Workplan Sites (incl. ASPIS) was July, 1996. This database is provided by the Department of Toxic Substances Control. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for Ca Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) was March, 1996. This database is provided by the Integrated Waste Management Board. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for Orange County Landfills was June, 1996. This database is provided by the Orange County Health Care Agency. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for Waste Management Unit Database System (WMUDS) was November, 1996. This database is provided by the State Water Resources Control Board. This is used for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. This system contains information from the following eight main databases: Facility, Waste Management Unit, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15), TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information; also some information from the WDS (Waste Discharge System). VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for Region #8-SLIC List was March, 1996. This database is provided by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region #8. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for Region #9-SLIC List was March,1994. This database is provided by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region #9. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for Lust Information System (LUSTIS) was October, 1996. This database is provided by the California Environmental Protection Agency. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID:128316.001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Version Z4.1 Pegs #13 7 �I 1 LUST RG9 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. SRC#: 2881 The agency release date for Region #9 Leaking Underground Storage Tank List was February, 1996. This database is provided by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region #9. LUST RG8 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. SRC#: 3341 The agency release date for Region #8-Santa Ana Regional Underground Tank Database List was October, 1996. This database is provided by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region #8. CORTESE VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. SRC#: 2298 The agency release date for Cortese List -Hazardous Waste Substance Site List was February,1995. This database is provided by the Office of Environmental Protection, Office of Hazardous Materials. Deed VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. Restrictions The agency release date for Deed Restriction Properties Reportwas April,1994. SRC#: 1703 ' This database is provided by the Department of Health Services -Land Use and Air Assessment. These are voluntary deed restriction agreements with owners of property who propose building residences, schools, hospitals, or day care centers on property that is "on or within 2,000 feet of a significant disposal of hazardous waste". Toxic Pits VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. SRC#: 2229 The agency release date for Summary of Toxic Pits Cleanup Facilities was February, 1995. This database is provided by the Water Quality Control Board, Division of Loans Grants. C) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/4 MILE RCRA-Viols/En VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property. SRC#: 3284 The agency release date for RCRIS was August, 1996. UST's SRC#: 1612 AST's SRC#: 3370 The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Violators are facilities which have been cited for RCRA Violations at least once since 1980. RCRA Enforcements are enforcement actions taken against RCRA violators. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 114 mile of your property. The agency release date for Underground Storage Tank Registrations Database was January,1994. This database is provided by the State Water Resources Control Board, Office of Underground Storage Tanks; Caution -Many states do not require registration of heating oil tanks, especially those used for residential purposes. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 114 mile of your property. The agency release date for Aboveground Storage Tank Database was November, 1996. This database is provided by the State Water Resources Control Board. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 128316-001 Date of Report: March 13, 1997 Version 2.4. t Page #14 II ORC-Gwtr VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property. Clean The agency release date for Orange County -Groundwater Cleanup Program was SRC#: 3366 October, 1996. This database is provided by the Orange County Health Care Agency. ORC-Indl VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property. Clnup The agency release date for Orange County -Industrial Cleanups was October, 1996. SRC#:3367 This database is provided by the Orange County Health Care Agency. TRIS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property. SRC#: 2687 The agency release date for TRIS was May,1995. Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act (also known as SARA Title III) of 1986 requires the EPA to establish an inventory of Toxic Chemicals emissions from certain facilities( Toxic Release Inventory System). Facilities subject to this reporting are required to complete a Toxic Chemical Release Form(Form R) for specified chemicals. D) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/8 MILE ERNS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property. SRC#: 3006 The agency release date for ERNS was March, 1996. The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) is a national database used to collect information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. The database contains information from spill reports made to federal authorities including the EPA, the US Coast Guard, the National Response Center and the Department of transportation. A search of the database records for the period October 1986 through March 1996 revealed information regarding reported spills of oil or hazardous substances in the stated area. RCRA-LgGen VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property. SRC#: 3284 The agency release date for RCRIS was August, 1996. The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Large Generators are facilities which generate at least 1000 kg./month of non -acutely hazardous waste (or 1 kg./month of acutely hazardous waste). RCRA-SmGen VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property. SRC#: 3284 The agency release date for RCRIS was August, 1996. The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation, storage, • transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Small and Very Small generators are facilities which generate less than 1000 kg./month of non -acutely hazardous waste. Efl&of Report For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID:128316-001 Date of Report: March 13,1997 Version 2.4.1 Page #15 QUALIFICATIONS II `J ILl I m m = = = = m = = = = m = i = = m jj �::�' rii�^ �-•�lir.(r7/!(r�\�I ji��\�i i'MM';;:;(:I�!-y '" �'.\IliilSjiii: •�.:�V�ii/j �A\^.�'�ii{:�y Tilij.MTrl ri{rji1� ..r ��`t� _:�,i.\ r::y�l. Lilb?'.•.� .ir„-.,.�• !r,�i .r.%`:J�•1\U'1 '-''?:`a� '.%7: \ i:y,�t f.y..�'\ I%^�:\ 4'•••��t�• I'+.. /y..�\ Jt /. I \� �_ � CfIA,_ ..AQl:f/b„ `)Q_. ��N91J.,-y�,\L7/D _-�l\\L7b Dr�_.� IJ7A/. �\�li.. _`�1Wbr�.•�i\L'lb�: `=�R'JCy..y=L1A: ��\0?di :.�.pLMbry::':- \6'U!i/.^y�\\L7`y:'�` 17A "•� ice'Gil•,r�`a•;'Tl'a7itiL+;(l:rY:\rJ(u �:�arll:Y�.r.;T�l.:•�a;�l::riri hr,�; �l:�e�rl.r\a,/1.I�ar�1,\�vyth�ar�1,��\r;�Ll:.�i�r;�� :�_\r;��afiiii�r;��2rar�;,� 3` ir- _.st t-r. -F CAL Jc f-�1 � �alifc�riia Fs•LvuaIImentaT�ratectiorLAQency '=�-� r Anne Hiffe-SrUwn= has ful filled the• requiremenCsFoF Feist=-OrL aS a _ ppgm € = REGISTERED-ENvWEii"F�L ASSESSOR n- r 7fyr�, Sc==y for E:ay4cnm==ai Prow ms_ - _ - _ _• - CaucalimmVil.meanLPmreeiaatlgcxr " -_- D December— 1967 t lak C- Oliver; Senior attorney Caiifamim F=Yummieual F.vfecon Ag==:t , t Jr, I' 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ACRONYMS r- L 1 1 n 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ACRONYMS ACBM Asbestos Containing Building Materials ACM Asbestos Containing Materials AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, 1986 AQMD Air Quality Management District BTEX Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene CAUEPA California Environmental Protection Agency CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Comprehensive Liability Act of 1980 (Federal Superfund) 42 USC 9601 et seq. CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CFR Code of Federal Regulations EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA # RCRA Hazardous Waste Generator number for manifesting LUFT Leaking Underground Fuel Tank LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System NPL National Priority List (Federal Superfund) OSHA Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration PCB Polychlorinated biphenyl PCE Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene), a•chlorinated solvent POTW Publicly Owned Treatment Works ppb parts per billion ppm parts per million PRP Potentially Responsible Party RAP Remedial Action Plan RCRA Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (40 CFR) REA Registered Environmental Assessor RG Registered Geologist RP Responsible Party (CERCLA) RQ Reportable Quantity under DOT, CERCLA and SARA Title III) RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 SWAT Solid Waste Assessment Test TCE Trichloroethylene, a chlorinated solvent TSCA Federal Toxic Substance Control Act (15'USC 2601 et seq.) TSDF Treatment,, Storage, Disposal Facility USEPA Federal Environmental Protection Agency UST Underground Storage Tank VOC Volatile Organic Compound TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.' N Yp a W .6 ACf M1pRK TA W Rfe®F R XLIIQS L S /p ] a N9IIW(p6 wlLp M ail¢ a M tp•(! 4fO¢A 6 W10FIi. CIDIK MfRld Ml MIR 6 YG lOr . LfAe IaI1MEilpll a M raapic ¢5¢m L[(+ Q.11•G r[ L 1a1 F M 1LSiR! tCE 6 Yl ICI . IM11 fIR SLIM ST.IBIKLrfa pp blMKip,! rM M pIME1M! pwq MRa.Ml[ WIM V YA[K! 4/S I¢S fi L glrr F M sUmS[5.0.r ma0wr Lv( a LMY6 SiRr.N S¢! rIf.LO FA! a)f F L pR.0 roan IDinLSSR0.L wa4.L MCL5 a Ipv RLI p M 1PMKiR! LCf 6 WI WI LL MpL RI Lp FFI euK qIM 6Ta a'USG ya Apr pSfw1 IK� RFi..f/91fp •O<Sra NM.lgl M 41NR! Lqq 6 SLp L0! l om! ru m.m narsawswoeL wnswnwL rx rmi¢•o oMn xrowms er wrspr¢ orc oqw Mr tir e tliFF W YfP rrt IL7a 6lMC IERMtl2IX9AV01afliQ vIM M IWiNY 9M�r 6 P4P4 tt!'J4pRpd4 eq aaMrK IMRa19G $IalY. p M RMh11G l.E YI( rq. YO LM q art OIrtR Iw¢C¢�OL M Cbit m rsrrcr.v W OSHA 1Wp.1E 3RIS a TE:/gl :LI R[' p69a.¢ a Y9 VC K 4DFLC W -rt pID rrp cw.v✓.ar .F:w sN+raL¢::>m Jar L:r eu xu=.¢ ;».s aru.L nLaos 1PM 4pC'K 2Y'LgCL 6!Y(WI<$YE! �L\ .rt(N � / K9MM1lICi tuEMRXL) \\nss, t • y j � ILL �if ,s.� l � m {' iMW'FIICeKZ Mp K.�pal A S �rpa• � 0. • TJMXE III INC? ppIm11L1R L�lp pIRi M 3TTIL SunMSur�er lei �9 roL lFfiNl im �L N i -Atgnr rMnnr6 nr xfr+Y - �rsrrav ro cr'ex) • 'tst'41Wr UW csa ) o' � av�� unR� ,/�• � w'rr-�annw. �'su� r..e.r .per. L+uT �� � „t�.y-K '• r� w.rr wr � '•u•rv� r.. ace rx•w i Y- Nst qle�• � sp w io•-e �o.wr � �� b•ae+non snr.s OVb ,, OT1� ^et•rro � �---. �eoeny •'nnc �u mr - / �--• k�ar euw yner•L mie-sra I••ev� t �-. O%.N RY�D-i,M1 C56+�) ye - roved � �• rapt . H` °e �, Greo rcc� � � b�f+" �Yn•Mb'��O w�p ` r _ p'n5n o.Nn- 3 1 to f0'V- Jr�!'CG \1` • .- 5•pI�Y WM:C f�-6 t f ' e^I"w�wnrt'6 ~iy 1 bLL\j b .io LOt9t0 sr l 11 -- ns.•oosr I I i sD� 11 �cs �7,rsr�ir t , r+•cn^neW M Mva9 gvvb y � � C r rf QJSonrn W iw�•ros•. W'a,'aa K d � ur owwset •broad .r ' t _ � _ y t ��-�_b�1Y.1Mb rnN11 q.V ML6 4araiot - b•nro• ce..-.-.P -.:o�. w.� ers. - +yen .s"�'ee, w�.•nr+cn ..rs MM.-u.nro ✓ .MwnT 64�b.�e1 Jannb T b► ' Y�•1•�.-m K amoeUil D.r' Nff•N- SITE PLAN / FLOOR PLAN INNS THE NUNN HILL BONN PARTNERSHIP MEMO INC. NEW �t•am�uo sir I reacnr srnw rwus•s n.tvs..Q m MN-U-STORAGE 2 Greav,¢ sr IENKrI1 PE�bt CN•CIM.� DAMN CORPORATION imv'�twn••.•t•3 t+.. urm.evnu nor wn mrs,wc,tw, Z 0i T1 VIM NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION SIMILAR I F -IFIFIFIF 71FIDFIF-1 TYPICAL INTERNAL DRIVE -ELEVATION uW&T V@- XF PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION MONUMENT SIGN INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED ANNE THE OMER HILL SOME PARTNERSHIP 0000 INC. mompr MM-U-STORAGE 2 DAM CORPORATION 2 �� N H H H H N � N � X v F rF F� eF BLDG.B BLDG A SECOND FLOOR PLAN BLDG. B BLDG A FIRST FLOOR PLAN HE NOE HILL OWN PARTNERSHIP �q F INC. a Mem�oo anar H9M�Le1! sw+ vva.n M/f1SWi ei0 MINhU-STORAGE 2 ". ` FLOOR PLANS F Isu�:r-mat e,or san� 1 ti i VIM r ctWC- b I A tl 1V..9ir IMETIM ,x \ek Miw iwlraw9YIR®www a9P4L � - � l�LrwUdlwtaxaQ6xsnema 1 \� �_ws®use rsur�rsr®>, /) �ew.srxear�rra ur•wrrr. � , srararacuar s.osw+nrx jai w .em.>s s v r> r ra rm w • rrrr x under arrr r r { � mrr wax rrwrtvrrrn osr.arc n sr a�arn�..re r nwvtm • x aN.tmru[wrew �.s 9Lrrmm ar ve r rra rr.rrr ®tm iwc m� � - ` rswacnrxo.ar®wratnr♦ \� ®roanai¢sra area rarsa rr¢rs.vluwrw��rwrre e.r.v s w na x as r urmrr ®®. 9ew s x iac.n err w mnc t� vreeo r ras.eer r sae • rmee N fs[ rs wr trrrswwrsxrc9eDrma sear s r a: wnusnN w ve s a nasr•arrrn ma: +ro,rmx strr.¢ v 9r u.a r 9 rrr w wew® o \ / \`J \� rwai Now_x vrnwxure_arm6x J � � f�.Eff 9wlM aWtp AID®Y Lrar \ amok oasni� _ °aaw �ma� rn za r o.n urn m°m. �/ e� � ., tmsn�� l \�• � �s-rw ur wta .� pea C if- J-�_ Darn; �•• my. "' F-- rt5' T ^. S. y . . - -- � .- •, rwrryr wf Car�wq - - -. - - � � �/ � vow i+enn�+. •+�uw� .+Ln. w.uw� p.ie� PM�« IJw4 _ r Jet( wT �/W' � lemV� M.w4 - � - - � t�•n��aii ��o d w ' - t � raF�w+Yu.a Cw? �11G� T '1PiVf^ "EAST ELEVATION J WEST ELEVATION SMLAR - v�a+r winoowr x a ANo THE NOSE HILL MEMO PARTNERSHP 0000 tNC. sour °6 AT PLrn (138.2 5 f` 131.92 [ro1.4ah��`- \ DIRT �3\ 130.23 S / (128.2HiFS/ �27.41)F5/ - V AC PAVEMENT �\31.8 131.1 Nit , K�.,v ELECT. COND. STUB \ J t ; - . AC RAMP \ 13L57 F DIRT 131.56 4" RISER �13271 '-t 131.63 It 131.9 DIRT ELECT, COND.'STUB l ro 1, \.?? \ \ � \ L DIRT y 4 r„ 127,41 o� 125,77 TC 1 131.84 ZCT 1/ L `� S` 125.13 FL 131.5 t 129 131.6 Jj ' 127.i4 " n- \ �\'sr`\\ i\ \\ ` \',; �`�f� 131.80 r O£Z 128,31 + `� �. itl,' t l \ \ '1\\.:�1`•t\ +., .t- I iP2.48 132 5 „i 132,0 \'! 1 \4 1 , 733. / ` \ u�YW (` 1' \(130.14 5 f " YUCCA TREE t�' AC'PAVEMENT\�129.44iFS +i 131.58E too 6 \130.42 166,53 TC ? t 1 } }�j t' A V ' VSZ�1 0 131.81 i ` ` ,< i t s ' �,�t �`ti"}, - 131,74E DIRT%GRAVEL y\ '• ti+ r .� ,t j :.� } 1 A-� t`\ti �` /`� AC PAVEMENT 0 P + 125.58 TC c��. t 1 b, } t i ...r •^ j _ 130.4b 124,91 ft . ti E t 127.8tL i sA 124.72 IIs 1 1 1 }.t. DIRT - ��� GRAVEL - - �t ;�/Zg0 \ . DIRTY 129.18 S �4 �� +' (124.73 NI t�t rtlf 1s' t t} �- �' 1"� A{131,37 C 128.9 M 't}`�'t�'0�1 s�(}j it.. _ A`--�,� �` �+ 124.71FL -_a , , t A V I+fit t 'C'� V .1 - •.+ - i� 132,9H ''� -� - - - - "�....✓'.- - ; _ - _- . 132.5 \ T31.7 36.03 IT ^c i #2S3 t2LECT, METER BOX IT ING, WELL i -. 1 \ ' AC PAVEMENT : .. N7 V6439 5959 t33.01 - i ,�51 .. - S'i 127.4 OCT 1�E 4 (17• t 124.79 FL' t s• �E � i :t evl Ty; 130.4 DIR ^ e i?6o 3 AC `PAVEMENT 1 \ T GRAVEL l' \: � 1,• VENT #' V64� 0S959 BS2199 } t•'} ' } • f 4 , 1 1 i i' jj" ' +[, `` �., • 7-C\, . _ _ 133.9 128.2 {•1 , . •' 133.3 _ � 'ti3� 4' -�� tt 1 129 4 540.0 1 TEL. CONNEC ON BOX 4." 1' E 132.4 �^ �__ AC PARKING LOT + } ' 1 . } ! f ( 134.2 I ' L 5.60 7 2b.39 TC } a ,1 1, , i ! t to �-v DIRT GRAVE ., tt t L i (�i ! { :'.:..r r 12 W 124. 7 EL- 4 134.46 / 131.5 129,26 to 134.8 130.09 G LOT i 1AC P a , -\ ARKAS �. 135,0 133.6 ' 125.29 �' 4- 130.42 117.2 FL it k 134.12 130.95 AC PAVEMENT },; t' t,. '_" i /," t l � 135.0 33.491F5 `!-� R--dIQ!'�. U?1-15ttT' 'Si£�I'+ I._ibt•tT" 4 WAT i L^'Af= I rIXT�I/ • Sf G�= ? n L-D n4C-�,, r} Smr•'Z- a� � -�i T` 6VM 5�15 �f•O�l•— �D% G!c ��.7't N OTC G ©N r`'ZU �!r�•C] N 0 F a H?, I I�i - ^7 urn :`l �L^eV^7.1 O 111 _EJAST_ ELEVATION / :.,WEST ELEVATION SIMILAR- ------• Z)!-L-I, �=^cp=z co rcw_=__r-= �I.-a�. I�l~� -I - . f, o C.pl Rc 6` �L.c�t�. . __ .. -- — z_ _ T� ... - - - - --- -` --- — :--_-..: .=L �� _ xr.-_ = ,.--� = 5 - _ ,_�-:.: - -may,_- -.E-- � __ �-',._` - - .-„- - _ _ '_._ .. ,•. - - - - - . -" ----, -> - _ _--- _ -- - r — _ — — -- -�— __ ___ : _ - - - - - -- - - - - '- . -- - , - - - - -- - -_ - - - - - -- - -- .. _ A 1� ",_q -- - ___ - - -_ -_ -_ ___ - - ._.—___ _- - _._ - — - - —_- - _ - _ - ____ - - - -- _-_.- ___ , , ,- ,._ -. - - �y �,i c _ul i At ----___ -- '--------- - --- -- - - _- - --- - . -- - - - - - - - _ - - _ - .. _ - --. -" , - -- --- . -- _. -- - __ w,. -711T, - _ - .,: -�� ,_ _.. r.. .- .-. a. _ -I - .a, 4 5.•-,s- - ry CZ`f }-S�: y j. -,F M.[^!I. -- S • _ V ., - - � - - - - - - � 1_� , _� - , - , - � , -__,__ '! - � v --- — " �� � , — � �_ -lu -I., - L __l: � 1� In - ,� � - ,�. 7 - - , - - -- -- ---- I - , -� , � � � _- - ­- - - - I .- - - - �_l _ - I � �_�,,�, ­�-�=� �, _'��_=_ .. - � � ---- - - T --- _ -- _ -c - -f _ - _ -xsiii�� __.__ __ - — �H'FT�I- 3_-—_' —. ---_ _ _ _ —__—___- I----_ -- __ __ _ _ — - _ t' . , ,—_ _ __ _ _ o- ,.- i - _- _ - - _.-_ - _ .��/�tt- ______ -_ i 1 _ _ _ _ '_ __��u}.L- - I i _ _ _ ��}yF1 -- - - - I I _ _ - _ (N= 9 oWCll FCY G"iL.^.N , - trls �"'oJv,-t lc)--? o=-:Mr,;, " tON _ -- — - - _ _ ,_ __ ----- - - - _�`, - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - _ ,. - - - --- - - -- �_ - �_ - - - - -- --- - _ - - - - _ - -_- _--- - - -- ' -_ _ _ I _ - - - - - - __--`- --- - _ .._, - - - - - - --- - -- - - - ----- - - - -- -- - - - -_ -- —_- _.. , -• - - _ --- -« ' -- -- _ _ - - _ _- -__ -.---- -- -- - �- - -- - ^- _ _ _ - _" _- __ ---- __-- -- - I -_ - - -- - - - - - -- - -- - --------- -- - ----- -------------- - - - - -` - -- - - - ------------ - ------ - - ---- - --- - _- ---__ --- - - - - -'---- ---- --- -'- ------ - -- - - - --- _ ----- . - - - -- - - - - _ .. - - . , _.. -_ --._ --_ _ -- _-_ --- - -- -- -- --"---,------------------------,-I- -"-- - -- - - ---- - - - - - - - - - --_ -- -- ------ - - - - `- - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -_ _ .- - - - - - - - ----- - -- ---- - -- _ - -- __ - __ - _ ----------I..---` -- -- `- - - - ---------.I- - - - -- - -- - _ --' - � - - - -- -- --- -- - r._ __ __---- - --- - - ----- -- ---- -- - - - - -- - - - --- - - - - - .__ _ - .__ 1In1 c"1��;-,. �-LI: _ - ,I �mlI I coiI.IIIIIII. I -D, I 1., rIII I I _4EIII -,I ^I I _-_r_ --. FI--, Ii 'i . [I ,-I� �-�____-�­� ­ — _ _-._ — �. .__ --_ �..� - - - = .— --. �.. - .. _ - ':r - - - _ - --- -- ._ - _ _ - __-_ - i _I4_"I I __� _-_­_�-­I-_­-­-I_l, ­_I-__-11 _-!--I - �I-­.-11-_- J.LL I_,L_11 ��_�- _-T .. __, . __� ___- —­.',�1-_1, tY✓ 2 -. w ._.:.. _ - _- 7N_� sue. ., ._ - - -i g-F .- -- - - - - - - _.rU' - �" :x _�.-_ - - - I F L- Y �_ .._._ _ - - F �- I- . - - - - -- - _ - _ _ .. _ _. :r - _ - -_ --- -_ _ - - ... - _.-. - - - — - t�l _ - LL-- - = - - _ -- 1 -r , _ _ _ - ____-- .___ --' _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _— r.-. _-_ ___ _ ____. ___ _,_ _._.._ _,_-- _ .____. , - z - - __ ._- __ _ __ _ _ -_ _. _ - _ _ _ _ - . , . _ - _ _ _a _ _ _ - �,,,� - ___ - _ _ .- _ - - - - - h - - Yr-. �N,� - - - - r - -- - - -- - ----- _ - - Y ---- -- ---­- - - - - raw ----- --•-----_- ------ ----- -----•----- ---- - -- - h _ - - --- -- - - -- i --- - - - W 1 - - -- -- - - - - - ---- - .I - . = i , Il �NCL-C)�>V - h -- --- - -- - =r^O iGEN Ty r __NORTH ELEVATION �. SOUTH ELEVATION SIMILAR , __-._ row N WINIII - & O i� - R I I I I I 1. sc,.i4_E Ilb"= I'-pn Ire 6t! &Ft G �t IN L.1 N r" �� l,f ER_Z�. - G ftf - , 116> - II :-C�l ;�xlilN -_—.---- CiO`N`C Fi �g� �i / 5GGI, S1 1..—I T-r 1 ('ViL3.O CGOI`4CIF—aT-I {j L-CCKG IIII) is I 1 I . ' fl ---- --- - -- --_--- --------------- -- `--- ---- - ---- — `- == - - _ `'"' -� _ -_ - T' - - -_ -. -- -______ _ ._• _ _ -- I. 11 -- _ _ Y___!_ _ I I3 Ea �� _ - ?�Y `Y_ - __� _C-_ a _i _ .- i _r•_ i �� - _�_ 1 - - ­ - _____ --.----- r � _,�­ - - - __ __ -.1. — e I __ ­7F_ `- E- - --`v im-_ = __ ~_ . --411 HIe+`! (Z�v�5E' f AN - 0 "J , I C1 �La L.�r_raFlI II _ - . - - . r..'-_-- r- - _ _ _._.. __ - ���llljjj��� {�j{'jl�;j�!'rjI 1(f(j{ { (f',�� IF�. --,-- ---- _ -- ' -- _ -, »._,-.—_-.-._ ---- _ - - � L1 M u A V T� O 1J � Ll t -_ - ._. _ ------------------------------ --'------------------ ----..---------------------------- - - ---T__.--_ _-___ _—.---- --- --_- ._ _-__---___._._ _. __-_,_ -I,---------- --,_-_-_ -- -- _-- - -------- - ---- ---- - -------_-,_---__---.-_.------.--'- _ ---- - ---^ - {) .- - -' - -- - - --- --------._— ______________________ - ----- ---- -`_____-----_____ --------------___---=------------------- --- - ---- -----'----------- --- ------ .--:.:..._- ' ----'----------'-------.-"-------..-`--- - -__ ' ---- - -- 14 _ --_ -,- - -- - - - _.-__ - ._- -. __- . _ _ _ - - - ^�-cam-_ . - . - '- - - ---- - - _- - 11 _ �` --=---�- - .."-'-- - ` -- -- -----'- - -- -- ---- - ---,--_..,.r-u_-.._._,_. ..�.- _..,-___. __....__ _-_� - _' _ I . _ - - �. -- . -, -=. _ - - _ -- - - - - - - -- -------__.. _-_ —__ �-= _ - - - -== �=:_ '=' _-� -- - - - _ -- - - - - _ ___. - ___ =.-_ _ - -- - ' IA 1, T _ . LEVATION ; MONUMENT. SIGN � INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED. , _ - . —1I- 11 II I.. I1. ■ r �I■■■ �THE�'�=' ■®®® HILL ■ ■■ .PARTNERSHIP ® ®® INC. , '®■■/ .- '' ARCHITECTURE - a . PLANNING 11 I INTERIORS ` 115 TWENTY-SECOND STREET . NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA 11 714 /675-6442 . '-' . < ;92663 CONSULTANTS - _- • - I I .. SEALS / APPRDVALS , , ,I, ,. . . , . PROJECT TITLE I r j ti X MIN(=U STORAGE 2 CAMELBACK ST. " - ' ` r NEWPORT,BEAC►-{, CA0E-bRNI4'- :: ­' ; , A I- "Ill ;; ' , - ... _ - n -i _ ._K -., ten' V I a - - , �- ­ _ ` fY ;i:, - - , , DAHN CORPOR `ION ,,;J8552 N1oI6 Arthur Blvd., #495 i Irvine;-Californ3o 92715, •" , .: -, ." � :� ,11 - ' :f { REVI•SIONS . I - • - PROJECT IDENTIFICATION - - I I I I. DATE. DRAWN BY - CHECKED BY - . - - THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT DE USED ON .- ANY,'OTHER PROJECT 00 LOCATIONS EXCEPT AS DESCRISE0 ON THE DRAWINGS, WITHOUT WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITN THE ARCH. - - , © THE HILL PARTNERSHIP INC. 1996 SHEET TITLE - I - - ' SHEET NUMBER - r - ti L, :. ' ;, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DEC 24 16