HomeMy WebLinkAbout3014 BREAKERS DR11111111 lill 11111111111111111111111111 ICI 1111111
*NEW FILE*
3014 Breakers Dr
Required Parking: clear inside minimum dimension ,
9'-4" x 19' single space
_ 17'-6" x 19' two spaces ^S /
8' x 16, third/fourth space(s) 'f10M' �p%.�GL^j� �GL�•c�/
Label clear inside dimensions of provided parking spaces
Is demolition proposed? No.
Number of units to be demolished
Fairshare Contribution�,S'S4'
vl San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee
SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH:
Please indicate any discretionary
approval numbers
Minutes a rson the
plans
of and incorporndingsate
and
the attached; excerpt
conditions into the blueline drawings
Modifications Committee:
Modification required fc
approval letter into the blueline drawings
Indicate Approval No. on Plans
Planning Commission/City
Council:
Use Permit:
No.
Variance:
No.
32
No.
Site Plan Rev/Tract:
Site Plan Review:
No. /0 5
Amendment:
No.
other
GO✓I rr +rf' 'T�A(�f G Gyy 33�
O'YjGA Qini4lPc bt�0/IGS (o4'f-33�
•i-0 -5�Vf y •ke- IY-
Cv�,d, +terns
Public Works: 0.� Apprava Y
Easement/Encroachment Permit
_ Subdivision Engineer PR 6oeld • (, 2, �� S;
_ Traffic Engineer • L�Q,� _ �Csoioq y g
Approval of Landscape Plans
Significant Links
Buling Department:
Grididng Engineer
Parks Department:�y�•� �pp
J Approval of Landscape Plans Con 4J-4r t0 Yi✓VYl/ 4
��CL1 coastal Approval Required: 14eprIv�
Exempt, Because
a-5 rY'.Y Categorical Exclusion No. (C.E.O.) Effective Date
/ (Note: Building permits may be issued 10 days following issuance of
3-23-q C.E.Q. ) 22� r� -GT-3
Approval In Concept (AIC) No.
(Note: File 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and elevations)
Waiver # Effective Date
Coastal Development Permit No. Effective Date
Miscellaneous
3. Chimney (and chimney caps etc.) heights permitted only as required by U.B.C.
or manufacturer specifications plus additional 12" maximum for cap/spark
arrestor.
NOTE ON PLANS: Pools, spas, walls, fences, patio covers and other
reestanding structures require separate reviews and permits.
L.6. Association Approval Advisory Issuance of a Building Permit by the City
does not relieve appli�f legal requirement to observe covenants, condi-
tions and restrictions which may be recorded against the property or to
obtain community association approval of plans. 27a
e� l:[Q(pl<
I _ :
REMARKS:
t:�'b/1 Avi
5,o-� A H7,t &ked
NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the
necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your
application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200.
�Zec ord c�'a c_UtM_e+ �i Y ( FORMS\RES-20N.COR Rev. 2/94
6k l 1 C- is f M s ala ids k +I/L4, P (01 -j7z? r ' fLVH.' �
i a(01 1,4-y re -so 1 f'rvv" pew rAt5-ss'0, 4-o [ov!i
RESIDENTIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS 1
Telephone: (7141 644-3200 Plan Check No: TJ Z- 94'
Byi enia Garcia, Associate Planner By rChristry Teaa Associate Planner
a
By:Marc Myers, Associate Planner By:
Date: 3- It, - q�j Addreses elf 1 °-I far ��" i'S �✓
Districting Map No. Land Use Element Page No.
Corrections Required:
R7r.
Legal Description: Lot 30,325gBlock A -3 6 Section Tract �d M
verify legal description with Public Works
covenant required. Please have owner's signature notarized on the attached
document and return to me.
Lot Size (Pq 7 % -t
Zone R-I-rpm' 4 fl`o Zncl( ( la�:f
No. of Units Allowed j "Y ""Fl4. 122µ
Proposed I n,r1 4-7
Maximum �7-7 (i�
9�. Buildable Area ., Pi-/ q D Lot Coverage
Maximum Structural Area 7 7 g 5 (Area including exterior walls,
stairway(s) on one level and required parking), 1• S x buildable area.
_ 'I Proposed Structural Areas 7 I 1.1!5 x buildable area.
Ask Provide tissue overlay of calculations verifying proposed square footage.
944 Open Space Area `Sq l.T cu.ft. (Volume of space equal to buildable width
x height limit x six). Thin area must be at least six feet in ADy direction (6'x
61x 61), and open on at least two sides, or one side and one and, unless
otherwise specified in Zoning Code.
Recurred Setbacks
- Front / O 1
Rear l 0 1 •�r)V K/ *Vn
Right Side, s (Sno11
h•7� Left Side y
eAlerl ) P,-°e C r4 y /, ` -C
Note: The following may not be permitted to encroach into required setback:
Balconies
Decks
Other
Remarks:
Fireplaces
Bay/Garden Windows
- 1. Provide floor plan(s), fully dimensioned, showing all room uses.
2. Provide plot plan, fully dimensioned, showings ✓IS Ave. r.OdeR-v1 131vd
location of all buildings, and distance to property lines.
VIL distance from face of curb to front property line (verify with
Public Works)
74 second and third floor footprints (if applicable)
_ all projections (i.e fireplacee� bay windows), label distance(s) to
PL(s)
KIIA distance between buildings
mo-tumolnu •e
Measured from natural grade to mid -point of roof. Code allows an additional 510"
to the peak of the ridge height.
Allowable midpoint zq) Allowable ridge height 2611 G� .SpRI
_ Dimension all elev tions from natural grade tot
Label�r�atura[ gradde" �,n,�dj f#si� (ye�d rode n all a suet ,oh ,
y y1p� Vl @U L�W11 �)B� i �t Vlq G CAa t ef"^4-► o i1
1�Id Ma be n Flo d Hatard Area. heck with ui din De artment for minimum
finish floor elevations. /
Remarks: �7YI�J/VrN�_��VL) �ilr� rG�,✓Y.YLGQS
-sko !N i 41 4 Y0 CC 1
COMMISSIONERS July 19, 1990MINUTES
,o
o`�s �P s° o'
W CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
construction storage or delivery of materials shall e store
`
within the Ocean Boulevard or Corona del Mar Beach
access ramp rights -of -way. Prior to issuance of any grading
permits, a parking plan for workers must be submitted and
approved by the Public Works Department.
8. That arrangements be made with the Public Works
Department to guarantee satisfactory completion of the
public water and sewer services serving the subject project,
including pavement repair prior to the issuance of any
grading or building permits.
9. That permitted development shall be designed to minimize
the alteration of natural land forms along bluffs. It is also
required that the applicant shall sign a waiver of all claims
against the public for future liability or damage resulting
from permission to build. All required waiver documents
shall be recorded with the County of Orange Recorder's
Office.
10. That a geologic report that will determine areas of potential
instability or hazard along with a map indicating such
information must be submitted to the City Grading
Engineer.
11. That a park dedication fee for one dwelling unit shall be
paid in accordance with Chapter 19.50 of the Municipal
Code.
12. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission
approval of this application prior to the recordation of the
parcel map.
13. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been
recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an
extension is granted by the Planning Commission.
-18-
/0 1
COMMISSIONERS
s�
.o c
n �
-% o 14 t- -5 Arply 19, 1990MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
lNOEX
residential units, as are a majority of the other lots along
Breakers Drive.
7. That the granting of the requested exception will not be
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
properties in the vicinity, inasmuch as the proposed average
width of 46.35± feet for Parcel 2 is greater than the average
width of the existing Lot 1 which is only 41.41± feet.
onditions:
1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to occupancy, and that
the Parcel Map be prepared using the State Plane
Coordinate System as a basis of bearing.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
3. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water
and sewer lateral connection to the public water and
service
sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department.
4. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to
issuance of any building permits.
5. That a minimum 18 foot clear width driveway be provided
with a reciprocal easement dedicated for ingress and egress,
and that a minimum of 24 feet be provided for backing from
garages. The design shall be approved by the Public Works
Department prior to the issuance of building permits.
6. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and
pedestrian circulation systems shall be subject to further
review by the City Traffic Engineer.
7. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and
by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by
proper use of traffic control equipment and flagman.
Traffic control and transportation of equipment and
shall be conducted in accordance with state and
materials
local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed
and approved by the Public Works Department. No
-17-
y
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED
PLEASE RETURN TO:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH i
Planning Department
3300 Newport Boulevard
P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE)
WAIVER OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE PUBLIC FOR FUTURE LIABILITY OR DAMAGE
RESULTING FROM PERMISSION TO BUILD
This Waiver of Claims against the public for future liability or damage resulting from
permission to build is entered into on the _day of , 1994, by Old World Craftsman
Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "OWC") for the benefit of the City of Newport Beach, California
(hereinafter referred to as "NB") as a condition of Resubdivision No. 932.
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, OWC is the owner of that real property described on Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated by this reference; and
B. WHEREAS, NB is the municipality of location of that real property described on Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference; and
C. WHEREAS, OWC and NB have processed and approved Resubdivision No. 932,
containing Condition #9.
IT IS THEREFORE AGREED:
1. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. OWC, per Condition #9 of Resubdivision No. 932, waives all
claims against the public for future liability or damage resulting from permission to build.
2. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event either party hereto shall commence legal proceedings
against the other to enforce the terms hereof, or to declare rights hereunder, as the result of
a breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, the prevailing party in any such
proceeding shall be entitled to recover from the losing party its costs of suit, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, as may be fixed by the court.
3. GOVERNING LAW. This agreement has been entered into and executed in the State
of California and shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of said State.
4. NOTICES. Any notice or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall
be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given by placing in the United States mail,
registered or certified, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or personally delivered,
addressed as follows:
NB: OWC:
City of Newport Beach Old World Craftsman Inc.
P.O. Box 1768 14914 Via La Sande
Newport Beach, Ca 92658-8915 Del Mar, CA 92014
Each of the foregoing shall be entitled to specify a different address by giving notice of the
aforesaid to the other.
5. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, negotiations and discussions, whether oral or
written, of the parties in connection the subject matter hereof, except as specifically set forth
herein. No supplements or modifications or waivers or terminations of this Agreement shall
be binding unless executed in writing by the parties to be bound thereby. No waiver of any
provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other
provision herein (whether or not similar), nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver
unless otherwise expressly provided.
6. INTERPRETATION. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each has been
given the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel, and/or has
the requisite experience and sophistication to understand, interpret, and agree to the particular
language of the provisions hereof.
7. AUTHORITY. The undersigned individuals an/or entities executing this Agreement on
behalf of their respective parties represent and warrant that said individuals are authorized to
enter into this Agreement on behalf of such parties, the appropriate corporate or other
resolutions have been passed and obtained, and that this Agreement shall be binding on same.
8. EXHIBITS. The documents referred to hereinabove and Exhibits attached hereto are
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.
9. EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS. Each party agrees to execute and deliver such other
documents and instruments and to take such further actions as may be reasonably necessary
to fully carry out the intent and purposes of this Agreement.
10. HEADINGS. The headings contained in this Agreement have been inserted for
convenience only and in no way define or limit the scope or interpretation of this Agreement.
11. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit or the heirs, legatees, estate, executors, legal representatives, successors and assigns
of the parties hereto.
12. EXECUTION. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be
entered into as of the date first written above.
OWC: NB:
Old World Craftsman Inc. City of Newport Beach
BY: BY:
Kim Campbell
ITS: President ITS:
2
EXHIBIT A
The land referred to is situated in the State of California, County of Orange, and is
described as follows:
Lots Thirty, thirty-two, and Thirty-four in Block A-36 of "Corona Del Mar", in the
City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a Map
recorded in Book 3, Pages 41 and 42 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange
County, California.
Except that portion thereof described as follows:
Beginning at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 34; thence Northwesterly along
the Northeasterly line of said Lot 34, to the beginning of a curve concave to the
Southeast and having a radius of 40.0 feet, as described in deed conveying certain
property to the City of Newport Beach for street purposes, recorded in Deed Book
684, Page 180 of Deeds, records of said Orange County; thence Southwesterly
around said curve to its point of tangency in a line which is 30.0 feet
Southeasterly of and parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Block A-36;
thence Southwesterly along said parallel line to a point which is 4.65 feet
Northeasterly of the Southwesterly line of said Lot 32: thence Northeasterly around
a curve tangent to last mentioned parallel line, concave to the Southeast and
having a radius of 67.5 feet, a distance of 78.62 feet; thence Southeasterly on a
line tangent to last mentioned curve to its intersection with the Southeasterly line
of said Lot 34; thence Northeasterly along said Southeasterly line a distance of
2.07 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, as granted to City of Newport
Beach, a municipal corporation of the Sixth Class in deed recorded February 18,
1952 in Book 2288, Page 456 of Official records.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
OLD WORLD CRAFTSMAN INC.
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
OLD WORLD CRAFTSMAN INC.
14914 VIA LA SENDA
DEL MAR, CA 92014
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE)
WAIVER OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE PUBLIC FOR FUTURE LIABILITY OR DAMAGE
RESULTING FROM PERMISSION TO BUILD
This Waiver of Claims against the public for future liability or damage resulting from
permission to build is entered into on the _day of , 1994, by Old World Craftsman
Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "OWC") for the benefit of the City of Newport Beach, California
(hereinafter referred to as "NB") as a condition of Resubdivision No. 932.
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, OWC is the owner of that real property described on Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated by this reference; and
B. WHEREAS, NB is the municipality of location of that real property described on Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference; and
C. WHEREAS, OWC and NB have processed and approved Resubdivision No. 932,
containing Condition #9.
IT IS THEREFORE AGREED:
1. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. OWC, per Condition #9 of Resubdivision No. 932, waives all
claims against the public for future liability or damage resulting from permission to build.
2. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event either party hereto shall commence legal proceedings
against the other to enforce the terms hereof, or to declare rights hereunder, as the result of
a breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, the prevailing party in any such
proceeding shall be entitled to recover from the losing party its costs of suit, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, as may be fixed by the court.
3. GOVERNING LAW. This agreement has been entered into and executed in the State
of California and shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of said State.
4. NOTICES. Any notice or other coohunications required or permitted hereunder shall
be in writing and shall be deemed to, have been given by placing in the United States mail',
registered or certified, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or personally delivered,
addressed as follows:
NB:
City of Newport
P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach,
Beach
Ca 92658-8915
OWC:
Old World Craftsman Inc.
14914 Via La Senda
Del Mar, CA 92014
Each of the foregoing shall be entitled to specify a different address by giving notice of the
aforesaid to the other.
5. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, negotiations and discussions, whether oral or
written, of the parties in connection the subject matter hereof, except as specifically set forth
herein. No supplements or modifications or waivers or terminations of this Agreement shall
be binding unless executed in writing by the parties to be bound thereby. No waiver of any
provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other
provision herein (whether or not similar), nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver
unless otherwise expressly provided.
6. INTERPRETATION. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each has been
given the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel, and/or has
the requisite experience and sophistication to understand, interpret, and agree to the particular
language of the provisions hereof.
7. AUTHORITY. The undersigned individuals an/or entities executing this Agreement on
behalf of their respective parties represent and warrant that said individuals are authorized to
enter into this Agreement on behalf of such parties, the appropriate corporate or other
resolutions have been passed and obtained, and that this Agreement shall be binding on same.
8. EXHIBITS. The documents referred to hereinabove and Exhibits attached hereto are
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.
9. EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS. Each party agrees to execute and deliver such other
documents and instruments and to take such further actions as may be reasonably necessary
to fully carry out the intent and purposes of this Agreement.
10. HEADINGS. The headings contained in this Agreement have been inserted for
convenience only and in no way define or limit the scope or interpretation of this Agreement.
11. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit or the heirs, legatees, estate, executors, legal representatives, successors and assigns
of the parties hereto.
12. EXECUTION. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be
entered into as of the date first written above.
OWC: NB:
Old World Craftsman Inc. City of Newport Beach
BY: BY:
Kim Campbell
ITS: President ITS:
2
EXHIBIT A
The land referred to is situated in the State of California, County of Orange, and is
described as follows:
Lots Thirty, thirty-two, and Thirty-four in Block A-36 of "Corona Del Mar", in the
City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a Map
recorded in Book 3, Pages 41 and 42 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange
County, California.
Except that portion thereof described as follows:
Beginning at the most Easterly corner'of said Lot 34; thence Northwesterly along
the Northeasterly line of said Lot 34, to the beginning of a curve concave to the
Southeast and having a radius of 40.0 feet, as described in deed conveying certain
property to the City of Newport Beach for street purposes, recorded in Deed Book
684, Page 180 of Deeds, records of said Orange County; thence Southwesterly
around said curve to its point of tangency in a line which is 30.0 feet
Southeasterly of and parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Block A-36;
thence Southwesterly along said parallel line to a point which is 4.65 feet
Northeasterly of the Southwesterly line of said Lot 32: thence Northeasterly around
a curve tangent to last mentioned parallel line, concave to the Southeast and
having a radius of 67.5 feet, a distance of 78.62 feet; thence Southeasterly on a
line tangent to last mentioned curve to its intersection with the Southeasterly line
of said Lot 34; thence Northeasterly along said Southeasterly line a distance of
2.07 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, as granted to City of Newport
Beach, a municipal corporation of the Sixth Class in deed recorded February 18,
1952 in Book 2288, Page 456 of Official records.
COMMISSIONERS
"Ix
q
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
July 19, 1990
M1*UZES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
construction storage or delivery of materials shall e stored'
within the Ocean Boulevard or Corona del Mar Beach
access ramp rights -of -way. Prior to issuance of any grading
permits, a parking plan for workers must be submitted and
approved by the Public Works Department.
8. That arrangements be made with the Public Works
Department to guarantee satisfactory completion of the
public water and sewer services serving the subject project,
including pavement repair prior to the issuance of any
grading or building permits.
9. That permitted development shall be designed to minimize
the alteration of natural land forms along bluffs. It is also
�1
required that the applicant shall sign a waiver of all claims
against the public for future liability or damage resulting
from permission to build. All required waiver documents
shall be recorded with the County of Orange Recorder's
Office.
10. That a geologic report that will determine areas of potential
instability or hazard along with a map indicating such
information must be submitted to the City Grading
Engineer.
11. That a park dedication fee for one dwelling unit shall be
paid in accordance with Chapter 19.50 of the Municipal
Code.
12. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission
approval of this application prior to the recordation of the
parcel map.
13. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been
recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an
extension is granted by the Planning Commission:
4 • t
-18-
/GI
COMMISSIONERS
Now \
4 July 19,1990
MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL, CALL.
INDEX
residential units, as are a majority of the other lots along
Breakers Drive.
7. That the granting of the requested exception will not be
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
properties in the vicinity, inasmuch as the proposed average
width of 46.35 t feet for Parcel 2 is greater than the average
width of the existing Lot 1 which is only 41.41+t feet.
comm.
L That a parcel map be recorded prior to occupancy, and that
the Parcel Map be prepared using the State Plane
Coordinate System as a basis of bearing.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
3. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water
and sewer lateral connection to the public water and
service
sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department.
4. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to
issuance of any building permits.
5. That a minimum 18 foot clear width driveway be provided
with a reciprocal easement dedicated for ingress and egress,
and that a minimum of 24 feet be provided for backing from
garages. The design shall be approved by the Public Works
Department prior to the issuance of building permits.
6. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and
circulation systems shall be subject to further
pedestrian
review by the City Traffic Engineer.
7. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and
by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by
proper use of traffic control equipment and flagman.
Traffic control and transportation of equipment and
materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and
local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed
and approved by the Public Works Department. 14o
M17_
I
COMMISSI6NERS
A so.o
July 19, 1990
ATtiS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
4. That the establishment of the SPR overlay zone on Parce
1 is appropriate due to the location of the subject property,
the difficult access to the site, its steep topography, and the
potential obstruction of public views from the beach access
ramp.
5. That the requested amendment will not adversely impact
upon the surrounding parcels and that the granting of said
amendment will not be detrimental or injurious to persons,
property, and improvements in the neighborhood or general
welfare of the City.
6. The project will not have a significant environmental impact.
B. Resubdivision No. 932
Findings
1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision.
2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 ,of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the. City,
all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning
Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision.
3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from
a planning standpoint.
4. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section
66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
5. That there are unusual circumstances associated with the
subject property which justify the granting of an exception
to the average lot width requirement inasmuch as the
existing irregular shape of the Breakers Drive parcel makes
it difficult to develop an efficient.and workable site plan.
6. That the exception to the Subdivision Code is necessary in
order to allow for the redevelopment of Parcel 2 with two
-16-
6
ENS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
e pub c e ng was opene in connection with this item, an
Mr. Robert Bucci, applicant, appeared before We Planning
Commission wherein he concurred with the findings and conditions
in Exhibit W.
Mr. Bob Koop appeared before the Planning Commission in
support of the proposed project.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Don
Webb, City Engineer, stated that the Corona del Mar beach access
street is a prolongation of Iris Avenue. He further stated that the
street address of the proposed development will be considered on
Breakers Drive.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Amendment No. 713
All Ayes
and Resubdivision No. 932 subject to the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A". MOTION CARRIED.
A. Amendment No 713
Findings:
1. That it has been determined that the requested Amendment
No. 713 is appropriate and that both the existing and
proposed land uses are consistent with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan and the Local Coastal
Program, Land Use Plan, and is compatible with
surrounding land uses.
2. That the requested zoning amendment is logical, and
necessary for the purpose of adjusting the Zoning District
boundary so as to be consistent with the new parcel
configuration proposed by the applicant.
3. That the establishment of a 10 foot front yard setback along
both the Iris Avenue and Ocean Boulevard frontages of
Parcel 1 will provide a more consistent and uniform street
side setback for the subject property in relation to other
properties along Ocean Boulevard.
-15-
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
OLD WORLD CRAFTSMAN INC.
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
OLD WORLD CRAFTSMAN INC.
14914 VIA LA SENDA
DEL MAR, CA 92014
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE)
WAIVER OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE PUBLIC FOR FUTURE LIABILITY OR DAMAGE
RESULTING FROM PERMISSION TO BUILD
This Waiver of Claims against the public for future liability or damage resulting from
permission to build is entered into on the —day of , 1994, by Old World Craftsman
Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "OWC") for the benefit of the City of Newport Beach, California
(hereinafter referred to as "NB") as a condition of Resubdivision No. 932.
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, OWC is the owner of that real property described on Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated by this reference; and
B. WHEREAS, NB is the municipality of location of that real property described on Exhibit
"A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference; and
C. WHEREAS, OWC and NB have processed and approved Resubdivision No. 932,
containing Condition #9.
IT IS THEREFORE AGREED:
1. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. OWC, per Condition #9 of Resubdivision No. 932, waives all
claims against the public for future liability or damage resulting from permission to build.
2. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In the event either party hereto shall commence legal proceedings
against the other to enforce the terms hereof, or to declare rights hereunder, as the result of
a breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, the prevailing party in any such
proceeding shall be entitled to recover from the losing party its costs of suit, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, as may be fixed by the court.
3. GOVERNING LAW. This agreement has been entered into and executed in the State
of California and shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of said State.
4. NOTICES. Any notice or other coin hunications required or permitted hereunder shall
be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given by placing in the United States mail,
registered or certified, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or personally delivered,
addressed as follows:
NB: OWC:
City of Newport Beach Old World Craftsman Inc.
P.O. Box 1768 14914 Via La Senda
Newport Beach, Ca 92658-8915 Del Mar, CA 92014
Each of the foregoing shall be entitled to specify a different address by giving notice of the
aforesaid to the other.
5. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, negotiations and discussions, whether oral or
written, of the parties in connection the subject matter hereof, except as specifically set forth
herein. No supplements or modifications or waivers or terminations of this Agreement shall
be binding unless executed in writing by the parties to be bound thereby. No waiver of any
provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other
provision herein (whether or not similar), nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver
unless otherwise expressly provided.
6. INTERPRETATION. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each has been
given the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel, and/or has
the requisite experience and sophistication to understand, interpret, and agree to the particular
language of the provisions hereof.
7. AUTHORITY. The undersigned individuals an/or entities executing this Agreement on
behalf of their respective parties represent and warrant that said individuals are authorized to
enter into this Agreement on behalf of such parties, the appropriate corporate or other
resolutions have been passed and obtained, and that this Agreement shall be binding on same.
8. EXHIBITS. The documents referred to hereinabove and Exhibits attached hereto are
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.
9. EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS. Each party agrees to execute and deliver such other
documents and instruments and to take such further actions as may be reasonably necessary
to fully carry out the intent and purposes of this Agreement.
10. HEADINGS. The headings contained in this Agreement have been inserted for
convenience only and in no way define or limit the scope or interpretation of this Agreement.
11. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit or the heirs, legatees, estate, executors, legal representatives, successors and assigns
of the parties hereto.
12. EXECUTION. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be
entered into as of the date first written above.
OWC: NB:
Old World Craftsman Inc. City of Newport Beach
L�
Kim Campbell
ITS: President
5Z
ITS:
2
EXHIBIT A
The land referred to is situated in the State of California, County of Orange, and is
described as follows:
Lots Thirty, thirty-two, and Thirty-four in Block A-36 of "Corona Del Mar", in the
City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a Map
recorded in Book 3, Pages 41 and 42 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange
County, California.
Except that portion thereof described as follows:
Beginning at the most Easterly corner of said Lot 34; thence Northwesterly along
the Northeasterly line of said Lot 34, to the beginning of a curve concave to the
Southeast and having a radius of 40.0 feet, as described in deed conveying certain
property to the City of Newport Beach for street purposes, recorded in Deed Book
684, Page 180 of Deeds, records of said Orange County; thence Southwesterly
around said curve to its point of tangency in a line which is 30.0 feet
Southeasterly of and parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Block A-36;
thence Southwesterly along said parallel line to a point which is 4.65 feet
Northeasterly of the Southwesterly line of said Lot 32: thence Northeasterly around
a curve tangent to last mentioned parallel line, concave to the Southeast and
having a radius of 67.5 feet, a distance of 78.62 feet; thence Southeasterly on a
line tangent to last mentioned curve to its intersection with the Southeasterly line
of said Lot 34; thence Northeasterly along said Southeasterly line a distance of
2.07 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, as granted to City of Newport
Beach, a municipal corporation of the Sixth Class in deed recorded February 18,
1952 in Book 2288, Page 456 of Official records.
COMMISSIONERS
•0400"%W4101A\`
July 19, 1990
MINUTES
N CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
INDEX
ROLL CALL
The public hearing was opened to connection withthis item, an
Mr. Robert Bucci, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission wherein he concurred with the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A".
Mr. Bob Koop appeared before the Planning Commission in
support of the proposed project.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Don
beach
Webb, City Engineer, stated that the Corona del Mar access
the
street is a prolongation of Iris Avenue. He further stated that
street address of the proposed development will be considered on
Breakers Drive.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Amendment No. 713
All Ayes
and Resubdivision No. 932 subject to the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A". MOTION CARRIED.
A Amendment No. 713
Findings:
1. That it has been determined that the requested Amendment
No. 713 is appropriate and that both the existing and
proposed land uses are consistent with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan and the Local Coastal
Program, Land Use Plan, and is compatible with
surrounding land uses.
2. That the requested zoning amendment is logical, and
necessary for the purpose of adjusting the Zoning District
boundary so as to be consistent with the new parcel
configuration proposed by the applicant.
3. That the establishment of a 10 foot front yard setback along
both the Iris Avenue and Ocean Boulevard frontages of
Parcel 1 will provide a more consistent and uniform street
side setback for the subject property in relation to other
properties along Ocean Boulevard.
-15-
r
COMMISSIONERS
'° sg o
ohs �� ���
�,'t. N
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
July 19,1990
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
4. That the establishment of the SPR overlay zone on Parcel
1 is appropriate due to the location of the subject property,
the difficult access to the site, its steep topography, and the
potential obstruction of public views from the beach access
ramp.
5. That the requested amendment will not adversely impact
upon the surrounding parcels and that the granting of said
amendment will not be detrimental or injurious to persons,
property, and improvements in the neighborhood or general
welfare of the City.
6. The project will not have a significant environmental impact.
B. Resubdivision No. 932
Findings:
1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision.
2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City,
all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning
Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision.
3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from
a planning standpoint.
4. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section
66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
5. That there are unusual circumstances associated with the
subject property which justify the granting of an exception
to the average lot width requirement inasmuch as the
existing irregular shape of the Breakers Drive parcel makes
it difficult to develop an efficient and workable site plan.
6. That the exception to the Subdivision Code is necessary in
order to allow for the redevelopment of Parcel 2 with two
-16-
y
COMMISSIONERS
.e s o
s�� �N �
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
July 19, 1990
MINUTES
ROIL CALL
J
I
I
IINDEX
construction storage or delivery of materials s a11 be store
"
within the Ocean Boulevard or Corona del Mar Beach
access ramp rights -of -way. Prior to issuance of any grading
permits, a parking plan for workers must be submitted and
approved by the Public Works Department.
8. That arrangements be made with the Public Works
Department to guarantee satisfactory completion of the
public water and sewer services serving the subject project,
including pavement repair prior to the issuance of any
grading or building permits.
9. That permitted development shall be designed to minimize
the alteration of natural land forms along bluffs. It is also
required that the applicant shall sign a waiver of all claims
against the public for future liability or damage resulting
from permission to build. All required waiver documents
shall be recorded with the County of Orange Recorder's
Office.
10. That a geologic report that will determine areas of potential
instability or hazard along with a map indicating such
information must be submitted to the City Grading
Engineer,
11. That a park dedication fee for one dwelling unit shall be
paid in accordance with Chapter 19.50 of the Municipal
Code.
12. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission
approval of this application prior to the recordation of the
parcel map.
13. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been
recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an
extension is granted by the Planning Commission.
-18-
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
All St J 1`J9J
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Resubdivision No. 932 (Discussion)
Item No.
Request to permit the extension of a previously approved
R932
resubdivision that permitted the resubdivision of three Iris Avenue
lots into a single parcel of land for single family residential
Approved
development and to adjust the common interior property line
between the proposed Iris Avenue parcel and a Breakers Drive
lot. The approval also included an exception to the Subdivision
Code so as to allow the creation of a parcel which is less than 50
feet wide.
LOCATION: Lots 30, 32 and 34, Block A-36, Corona del
Mar, located at 126-130 Iris Avenue; and Lot
1, Tract No. 1026 located at 3016 Breakers
Drive, on the southeasterly corner of Iris
Avenue and Ocean Boulevard and on the
northerly side of Breakers Drive, easterly of
Iris Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONES: R-1 and R-2
APPLICANT: Kim Campbell, Corona del Mar
OWNER: Old World Craftsman Inc., Corona del Mar
ENGINEER: Paul Como, Newport Beach
Mr. Kim Campbell, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission. In response to a question posed by Mr. Campbell,
Chairman Merrill explained that the recommendation is to extend
the approval of Resubdivision No. 932, to August 27, 1995, as
stated in Condition No. 1, Exhibit "A'.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Resubdivision No. 932,
Ayes
*
*
*
*
*
subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". MOTION
Absent
*
CARRIED.
-2-
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
�y�o�.tt P'io 'Qos o
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Au st S 1993
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Finding:
1. That the circumstances under which the original application
for Resubdivision No. 932 was approved have not changed
and that the granting of a two year extension is appropriate
so as to allow the applicant additional time to record the
required parcel map.
Conditions:
1. That in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.16.010
of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the original
approval of Resubdivision No. 932 is extended two years to
the date of August 27, 1995.
2. That all conditions of approval of Resubdivision No. 932,
as approved by the City Council on August 27, 1990, shall
be fulfilled.
Use Permit No. 3040 Amended (Public Hearing)
Item No.
Reques o amend a previously approved use permit which
UP3040A
permitted t stablishment of a take-out Haagen-Dazs ice cream
shop with incide 1 seating on property located in the Mariner's
Approved
Mile Specific Plan . The previous approval also included the
waiver of a portion of the uired off-street parking spaces. The
proposed amendment involves equest to change the operational
characteristics of the restaurant as to allow the facility to
operate as a full service restaurant inc in table service and on -
sale beer and wine. The proposal also inclu s a request to waive
a portion of the required off-street parking spa
LOCATION: A portion of Lot A, Tract No. 919,` ted at
2400 West Coast Highway, on the nort
side of West Coast Highway, easterly o
Tustin Avenue, in Mariner's Mile.
-3-
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
9pO�lmm
� O�O
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Je temper L3 im
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Site Plan Review No. 65 (Public Hearing)
Item No.
Request to permit the construction of a single family dwelling on
SPR 65
property located in the R-1 SPR District.
Approved
LOCATION: Portions of Lots 30, 32 and 34, Block A-36,
Corona del Mar and a portion of Lot 1,
Tract No. 1026 on property located at 3014
Breakers Drive, on the southeasterly comer
of Iris Avenue (unimproved) and Ocean
Boulevard, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: R-1
APPLICANT: Kim Campbell, Corona del Mar
OWNER: Same as applicant
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Kim Campbell, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission. In response to a question posed by Chairman
Merrill, he concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit
"A", with the exception of Condition No. 3 stating ..that the
proposed on -site block wall adjacent to the Beach Access Road have
a maximum height of 42 inches on the access road' side.... He
requested that the condition be modified to permit a maximum
height of five feet to provide mitigation of noise between the
beach access road and the residents, and it would also provide a
physical safety barrier to protect the rear yard. Don Webb, City
Engineer, stated that 42 inches was required inasmuch as it is the
height of a wall that is required for the safety of a pedestrian and
it would also provide a view over the wall to the ocean for the
pedestrian walking on the sidewalk. Discussion followed regarding
the feasibility of allowing a five foot high wall but to require the
upper 18 inches of said wall to be of open construction.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
-15-
C,OMAUSSIONERS
ploop �cl�ro%�t�O�dfps
���0��� P09 OO
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
be tember L3 1993
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Site Plan Review No.
Ayes
*
*
*
*
*
65, subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", and to
Absent
*
modify Condition No. 3, so as to allow the construction of a 5 foot
high wall with the upper 18 inches to be of open construction
subject to the approval of the Public Works Department.
MOTION CARRIED.
SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 65:
Findings:
1. That development of the subject property in the SPR
Overlay District will not preclude implementation of
specific General Plan objectives and policies.
2. That the value of property is protected by preventing
development characterized by inadequate and poorly
planned landscaping, excessive building bulk, inappropriate
placement of structures and failure to preserve where
feasible natural landscape features, open spaces, and the
like, resulting in the impairment of the benefits of
occupancy and use of existing properties in such area.
3. That benefits derived from expenditures of public funds for
improvement, acquisition and beautification* of streets,
parks, and other public facilities are maximized by the
exercise of reasonable controls over the layout and site
location characteristics of the proposed residential
development.
4. That unique site characteristics are protected in order to
ensure that the community may benefit from the natural
terrain, harbor and ocean, to preserve and stabilize the
natural terrain, and to protect the environmental resources
of the City.
-16-
4
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
ado° '1Z� Gt cfn�O O�
o
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Se tember 23 1993
ROLL CALL
INDEX
5. That the proposed development fully conforms to the
established development standards for the R-1 SPR
District.
6. That the development -is compatible with the character of
the neighborhood and will contribute to the orderly and
harmonious development of surrounding properties and the
City.
7. That the development has been designed to maximize
protection of public views from Ocean Boulevard.
8. That there are no archeological or historical resources on -
site.
9. That there are no environmentally sensitive areas on -site.
10. The property does not contain any areas of unique geologic
hazards.
11. That the proposed project will meet City noise standards
for residential development.
12. The site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas and
pedestrian and vehicular access are functional in that the
project has been designed so as to limit vehicular access to
the site from Breakers Drive.
13. The development is consistent with surrounding land uses
and with the goals and policies of the General Plan and
Local Coastal Program.
14. Mechanical equipment and trash areas will be concealed
from view.
15. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
-17-
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Se tember 23 1993
ROLL CALL
INDEX
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development.
16. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 20.01.070 of the Municipal Code.
17. The approval of the proposed project will not, under the
circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of
persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in
the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
Conditions:
1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial
compliance with the approved site plan, conceptual grading
plan, floor plans, elevations and sections, except as noted
below.
2. That arrangements be made with the Public Works
Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion
of the public improvements, if it is desired to record a
parcel map or obtain a building permit prior to completion
of the public improvements.
3. That the public right-of-way area between the property line
and the Beach Access Road be graded level with the
existing sidewalk with a minimum two (2) foot bench
provided behind the Beach Access Road right-of-way; that
the proposed on -site block wall adjacent to the Beach
Access Road shall be limited to a height of five feet (the
upper 18 inches to be of open construction) on the access
road side with a low landscape buffer between the A.C.
sidewalk and the wall as approved by the Public Works
Department; and that a concrete curb be constructed along
the southerly side of the parcel to confine the landscape
planting adjacent to the Beach Access Road. All work shall
-18-
,COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
September 23 1993
ROLL CALL
INDEX
be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the
Public Works Department.
4. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded
to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section
19.24.140 of the Municipal Code.
That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be
screened from public streets and adjoining properties.
6. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission
approval of this application prior to the issuance of building
permits.
7. That all conditions of approval of Resubdivision No. 932
shall be fulfilled.
3. That this Site Plan Review shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in
Section 20.01.070 K of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
General Plan Amendment No. 3-2 D Public Hearin
Item No.7
Request amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan so
is to allow additional 3,805 square feet of development on
GPA 93-21)
( R1336)
roperty locate in Block 600 of Newport Center; and the
cceptance of an en ' nmental document.
Ts87
UP3509
NITIATED BY: The GY f Newport Beach
Approved
AND
B. Traffic Study No. 87 Public Hearin
Request to approve a traffic study so as to allow the nversion of
pproximately 14,445 square feet of existing general o ' e space
-19-
Conditions of Approval
3014 Breakers Drive
Site Plan Review #65
Resubdivision #932
SITE PLAN REVIEW #65
Condition Department
1. Substantial Conformance Planning
2. Public Improvements Public Works
-- 3. Beach Access Road Imps. Public Works
9,W4. Underground Utilities Building
0,14,C Mechanical/Trash Screen Planning
Pehdiky'4�6. Coastal Commission Appr. Planning
W7. Cond. of Appr. Resub 932 Planning
&8. 24 Month Expiration
RESUBDIVISION #932
f,Wndition Department
r
-1. Parcel Map Recordation Public Works
-2. Improvements Constructed Public Works
-3. Indiv Water/Sewer Public Works
-4. County Sanitation Fees Building
-5. 18' Min. Driveway Width/ Public Works
Access Easement
-6. Onsite Parking,Circulation Traffic
•-7. Traffic Control Public Works
_8. Completion of Water/Sewer
9. Minimization of Alts. of
S�I' RAG Natural Land Forms/Waiver
b2i of Future Public Liability
0. Geologic Report
9041. Park Dedication Fee Pd.
ye,.Aml 12. Coastal Commission Appr.
13. 3 Year Expiration
Public Works
Planning
City Attorney
Grading Engr.
Planning
Planning
Action
Plan Review
Plan Review/
Guarantee Bond
Plan Review
Encroachment Permit
Plan Review
Plan Review
Letter of Intent
AIC Appr. Receipt
Plan-Rev-lew- Lgf?,yr
No Action
Action
Plan Review
Plan Review
Plan Review
Permit Issuance
Plan Review/
Easemt. Dedication
Plan Review
Traffic Control Plan
Parking Plan
Plan Review/Bond
Require Waiver
Approve Waiver
Review Report
Collect Fee
AIC Appr. Receipt
No Action
-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Gowinor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION` Page 1 of
SOUTH COAST AREA g
245 W. BROADWAY, STE. 380 Date:4-7-94
P.O. BOX 1450 Permit No. -
lONO BEACH, CA 90802.4416
(310) 590.5071
On March 17. 1994 , the California Coastal Commission granted to
this permit subject to the attached Standard and Special conditions,
development consisting of:
Resubdivision of three lots into one and a lot line adjustment; demolition of a
portion of an existing duplex (single garage stall and second level bedroom); and
construction of a 4038 square foot, 24 foot high at maximum point, four level
single family residence with an attached two car garage. Also proposed is 1040
cubic yards of grading.
more specifically described in the application file in the Commission offices,
The development is within the coastal zone in
3014 and 3016 Breakers_ Orty
Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commission by
PETER DOUGLAS
Executive Director
County at
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide
by all terms and conditions thereof.
The undersigned permittee acknowledges that Government Code Section 818.4 which
states in pertinent part, that: "A public entity is not liable for injury caused
by the issuance. . . of any permit. . applies to the issuance of this permit.
IMPORTANT: THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNLESS AND UNTIL A COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH
THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION OFFICE. 14 Cal.
Admin. Code Section 13158(a),
Dat *SigureJof aeittee
A6: 4/88
- If
Page 2— of 2�
Permit No. 5-93-381
STANDARD CONDITIONS:
1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgement. The permit is not valid and
development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the
permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and
acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office.
2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two
years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application.
Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a
reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be
made prior to the expiration date.
3. C.Qmpliance. All development must occur in strict compliance with the
proposal as set forth in the application for permit, subject to any special
conditions set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be
reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval.
4. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition
will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission.
5. Insoections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and
the project during its development, subject to 24-hour advance notice.
6. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided
assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and
conditions of the permit.
7. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be
perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to
bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms
and conditions.
V42 101WRIM
1, Geologic Recommendations
All recommendations contained in the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
prepared by Geofirm, dated October 8, 1993 regarding the proposed development
shall be incorporated into the final design and construction plans. Prior to
issuance of the coastal development permit the applicant shall submit, for the
review and approval of the Executive Director, foundation and drainage plans for
the project signed by the geologic consultant incorporating the recommendation
made in the referenced report.
The final plans approved by the consultant shall be in substantial conformance
with the plans approved by the Commission relative to construction, grading and
drainage. Any substantial changes which may be required by the consultant shall
require an amendment or a new coastal development permit.
1621F
MV/im
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY _ PETE WILSON, Oo"mor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST AREA Page I of ;
245 W, BROADWAY, STE. 380 Date:4-7-94
P.O: BOX 1450 Permit No.
LONG BEACH, CA 90802.4416
(310) 590.5071
.LIOJAUANUAIII
On Marsh 17. 1994 , the California Coastal Commission granted to
this permit subject to the attached Standard and Special conditions,
development consisting of:
r
Resubdivision of three lots into one and a lot line adjustment; demolition of a
portion of an existing duplex (single garage stall and second level bedroom); and
construction of a 4038 square foot, 24 foot high at maximum point, four level
single family residence with an attached two car garage. Also proposed is 1040
cubic yards of grading.
more specifically described in the application file in the Commission offices.
The development is within the coastal zone in
Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commission by
PETER DOUGLAS
Executive Director
County at
The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide
by all terms and conditions thereof.
The undersigned permittee acknowledges that Government Code Section 818.4 which
states in pertinent part, that: "A public entity is not liable for injury caused
by the issuance. . . of any permit. . ." applies to the issuance of this permit.
IMPORTANT: THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNLESS AND UNTIL A COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH
THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION OFFICE. 14 Cat.
Admin. Code Section 13158(a).
A6: 4/88
KMA r.1U __mmu■ggg,III
Page 2 _ — of 2—
Permit No. „ „5-9,3-381
STANDARD CONDITIONS:
1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgm n . The permit is not valid and
development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the
permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and
acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office.
2, Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two
years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application.
Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a
reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be
made prior to the expiration date.
3. S�olllliance.. All development must occur in strict compliance with the
proposal as set forth in the application for permit, subject to any special
conditions set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be
reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval.
4. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition
will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission.
5, Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and
the project during its development, subject to 24-hour advance notice.
6. Assianment, The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided
assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and
conditions of the permit.
7. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be
perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to
bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms
and conditions.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
1, Geologic Recommendations
All recommendations contained in the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
prepared by Geofirm, dated October 8, 1993 regarding the proposed development
shall be incorporated into the final design and construction plans. Prior to
issuance of the coastal development permit the applicant shall submit, for the
review and approval of the Executive Director, foundation and drainage plans for
the project signed by the geologic consultant incorporating the recommendation
made in the referenced report.
The final plans approved by the consultant shall be in substantial conformance
with the plans approved by the Commission relative to construction, grading and
drainage. Any substantial changes which may be required by the consultant shall
require an amendment or a new coastal development permit.
1621F
MV/lm
OLD WORLD CRAFTSMAN, INC.
14914 VIA LA SENDA - DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA - 92014
(619) 259-2012
April 28, 1994
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92658
RE: SPR 65, Resubdivision No. 932
Dear City of Newport Beach:
Old World Craftsman Inc. is the owner of the property at 3014 Breakers Drive, Corona Del
Mar, CA.
We intend to comply with all conditions of approval of Site Plan Review NO. 65 and
Resubdivision No 932.
OP'n/ , �PI/
PresidentKi
..
OLD WORLD CRAFTSMAN, INC.
14914 VIA LA SENDA - DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA - 92014
(619) 259-2012
April 28, 1994
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92658
RE: SPR 65, Resubdivision No. 932
Dear City of Newport Beach:
Old World Craftsman Inc. is the owner of the property at 3014 Breakers Drive, Corona Del
Mar, CA.
We intend to comply with all conditions of approval of Site Plan Review NO. 65 and
Resubdivision No 932.
Sincerely,
Ki Campbell
President
Planning Commission Meeting September 23, 1993
Agenda Item No. 6
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Site Plan Review No. 65 (Public Hearin
Request to permit the construction of a single family dwelling on
property located in the R-1 SPR District.
LOCATION: Portions of Lots 30, 32 and 34, Block A-36, Corona del Mar and a
portion of Lot 1, Tract No. 1026 at 3014 Breakers Drive, on the
southeasterly corner of Iris Avenue (unimproved) and Ocean
Boulevard, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: R-1 SPR
APPLICANT: Kim Campbell, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
Application
This application involves a request to permit the construction of a single family dwelling on
property located in the R-1 SPR District. In accordance with Section 20.01.070 of the
Municipal Code, any property within the "Site Plan Review" (SPR) overlay district is
required to obtain the approval of a Site Plan Review by the Planning Commission for any
proposed development so as to insure that the project conforms with the objectives of the
General Plan. Site Plan Review procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.01 of the Municipal
Code.
Environmental Significance
This project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is categorically exempt
from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 3 (New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures).
Conformance with the General Plan and
Local Coastal Program, Land Use Plan
The Land Use Element of the General Plan and the Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan
designate the site for "Single Family Detached" uses. The subject project is a permitted use
within this designation. In accordance with the provisions of the California Coastal Act, the
subject application also requires the approval of the Coastal Commission.
bi ct PropeeM and Surrounding Land es
The subject property is an irregular shaped parcel of land which fronts on Iris Avenue (i.e.
the beach access road) and Breakers Drive. As indicated previously, the site was originally
comprised of three lots which fronted on Iris Avenue and which now have been joined with
a portion of an adjoining lot, so as to provide vehicular access to Breakers Drive. The
subject property is currently vacant and maintains a slope area which occupies approximately
74% of the site and ranges in slope between 54% (1.1.85) and 68% (1:1.46). To the
northeast, across Ocean Boulevard, are single family dwellings; to the southeast is a duplex;
to the southwest, is the parking lot for the Corona del Mar State Beach; and to the
northwest, across Iris Avenue, is a single family dwelling.
Backaround
At its meeting of July 19,1990, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
the approval of the following applications in conjunction with the subject property and a
portion of an adjoining lot:
1.
Request to amend a portion of Districting Map No.18 so as to reclassify one portion
of the subject property from the R-1 District to the R-2 District, another portion
from the R 2 District to the R-1 SPR District and another portion from the R-1
District to the R-1 SPR District. The proposal also included a request to establish
a 10 foot front yard setback on the Districting Map for that portion of the subject
property adjacent to Iris Avenue and Ocean Boulevard. It is noted that the
establishment of the SPR overlay zone on the undeveloped property adjacent to Iris
Avenue and Ocean Boulevard (i.e. the subject property) was due to the unusual
topography and difficult access of the property.
Request to resubdivide three Iris Avenue lots into a single parcel of land for single
family residential development and to adjust the common interior property line
between the Iris Avenue parcel and a Breakers Drive lot. Said proposal also
included an exception to the Subdivision Code so as to allow the Breakers Drive
parcel to be less than 50 feet wide.
The action of the Planning Commission was taken with the findings and subject to the
conditions of approval set forth in the attached excerpt of the Planning Commission minutes
dated July 19, 1990.
At its meeting of August 27, 1990, the City Council approved the above applications with
the findings and conditions of approval recommended by the Planning Commission and
Planning Commission - 3.
adopted Ordinance No. 90-35 which applied to the rezoning of the subject property. An
excerpt of the City Council minutes dated August 27, 1990 is attached for the Planning
Commission's information.
At its meeting of May 9, 1991, the Planning Commission approved this same project in
conjunction with its consideration of Site Plan Review No. 63. The action of the Planning
Commission was taken with the findings and subject to the conditions of approval set forth
in the attached excerpt of the Planning Commission Minutes dated May 9, 1993. In
accordance with Section 20.01.070 K, any Site Plan Review granted in accordance with the
provisions of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code shall expire within 24 months
from the effective date of approval. Inasmuch as the previous owner of the property did not
exercise the previous approval within 24 months, Site Plan Review No. 63 expired on May
30, 1993.
Unlike the approval of site plan review applications, the Subdivision Code includes
procedures for the extension of previously approved subdivision maps or tentative parcel
maps. As a result, the applicant requested and the Planning Commission granted, at its
meeting of August 5, 1993, a two year extension of Resubdivision No. 932. An excerpt of
the Planning Commission minutes dated August 5, 1993 regarding this matter is attached
for Commission review.
Analysis
In accordance with the current zoning of the subject property (R-1-SPR), the applicant is
requesting the approval of a new Site Plan Review for the previously approved single family
residential development. The subject project is the same as previously approved and will
be built on four levels and will contain 4 bedrooms, 4 1/2 bathrooms, a dining room/library,
a living room/dining room, a kitchen and an exercise room. The following outline sets forth
the major characteristics of the subject project:
Land Area: 6,971± sq.ft.
Buildable Area: 5,190± sq.ft.
Permitted Gross Structural Area: (1.5 x
Buildable Area) 7,785± sq.ft.
Proposed Gross Structural Area: (includes
parking. 5,462± sq.ft.l
Proposed Floor Area Ratio: 1.05 x Buildable
Area
'Inasmuch as the building exceeds 5,000 sq.ft. in area, the Uniform Building Code
requires that automatic sprinklers be provided in the structure.
MI @un .rI
Building Setbacks:
Front: (Iris Ave. & Ocean Blvd.)
Rear: (Southeasterly property line)
Side: (Southwesterly property line)
Off -Street Parking:
Open Space:
Permitted Building Height:
Proposed Building Height:
110 fr d Varies be�10 ft, - 6 in.
and 14t ft.
10 ft. Varies between 10 ft. and
44 ft.
4 ft. Varies between 5 ft. and
29t ft, on ground floor
2 spaces 2 garage spaces
8,928t cu.ft. In excess of 26,628t cu.ft.
24 ft, average roof height;
29 ft. maximum ridge
height; and not to exceed
top of curb height on Ocean
Boulevard
24 ft. average height; 26t
ft. maximum height of
highest portion of building;
and 5 ft: 6 in. below top of
curb on Ocean Blvd.
Required Standards for Site Plan Review
The review of site plans have specific standards of review as established in Section 20.01.070
of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Each standard is listed below, with a brief
discussion of the project as it relates to each.
1. Sites subject to Site .Plan Review under the provisions of Section 20.01.070 of the
Municipal Code shall be graded and developed with due regard for the aesthetic qualities
of the natural terrain, harbor, and landscape, giving special consideration to waterfront
resources and unique landforns such as coastal bluffs or other sloped areas, trees and
shrubs shall not be indiscriminately destroyed: The slope area on the subject property
is part of the coastal bluff system; however, the existing slope on the property is an
alteration of the original natural land form which occurred as a result of the
construction of the beach access road which boarders the site to the north. The
General flan and Local Coastal Program include the following regulations which
apply to new construction and are for the purpose of preserving coastal bluff systems:
'The following regulations apply to all building sites on existing subdivided
lots, and residential subdivisions containing less than four lots:
TO: Planning Commission - 5.
1) Grading. Permitted development shall be designed to minimize the
alteration of natural landforms along bluffs and cliffs. In areas of
geologic hazard, the City shall not issue a building or grading permit
until the applicant has signed a waiver of all claim against the public
for future liability or damage resulting from permission to build. All
such waivers shall be recorded with the County Recorder's Office.
2) Geologic Report. To promote public safety, a geologic study shall be
performed for each site to determine areas of potential hazard or
instability. The bluff areas of potential hazard or instability shall be
indicated on maps as a part of any development plan.
As indicated in the attached plans (Sheets 8 and 9), the largest cut on the property
will occur on the lower portion of the site so as to create a flat building pad with
elevations of 14.5 and 15.0. Said cut will have a vertical dimension of approximately
15t feet at the highest point. It is staffs opinion that the proposed grading on the
site has been designed so as to mimm9ze the alteration of the natural land forms and
provides for a structure that fully conforms to the 24/28 Foot Height Limitation
District. The requirement for the preparation of a geologic report has been required
in conjunction with the previously approved Resubdivision No. 932.
2. Development shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood and
surrounding sites and shall not be detrimental to the orderly and harmonious
development of the surroundings and of the City: The proposed development is in
keeping with the existing development along the bluff side of Ocean Boulevard.
3. Development shall be sited and designed to maximize protection of public views, with
special consideration given to views from public parks and from roadways designated as
Scenic Highways and Scenic Drives in the Recreation and Open Space Element of the
General Plan: There are significant public views available from the upper portion
of Ocean Boulevard which looks over the subject property. The proposed
development will not obstruct these view opportunities inasmuch as the highest
portion of the structure is 5 feet 6 inches below the top of curb on Ocean Boulevard.
There are no significant views from that portion of the beach access road which is
adjacent to the subject property due to an existing oleander hedge that is
approximately 6 feet to 8 feet high measured from the adjacent walkway. Based on
this information, it is staffs opinion that the proposed project has been sited so as
to protect existing views from public parks and roadways and scenic drives.
4. Environmentally sensitive areas shall be preserved and protected. No structures or
landfonn alteration shall be permitted in environmentally sensitive areas unless specific
mitigation measures are adopted which will reduce adverse impacts to an acceptable
level or the Planning Commission or City Counci4 on review or appear, finds that the
benefits outweigh the adverse impacts: The site does not contain any environmentally
sensitive areas.
11 1' 11111 /1
5. No structures shall be permitted in areas of potential geologic hazard unless specific
mitigation measures are adopted which will reduce adverse impacts to an acceptable
level or the Planning Commission or City Council; on review or appeal, fords that the
benefits outweigh the adverse impacts: The site is not located in an area of particular
geologic hazard, other than the seismic hazards common to the Southern California
area.
6. Residential development shall be permitted in areas subject to noise levels greater than
65 CNEL only where specific mitigation measures will reduce noise levels in exterior
areas to less than 65 CNEL and reduce noise levels in the interior of residences to 45
CNEL or less: The subject property is not located within an area subject to noise
levels in excess of 65 CNEL.
7. Site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas, pedestrian and vehicular access ways,
and other site features shall give proper consideration to functional aspects of site
development, Because of the narrowness and steepness of the beach access drive,
the applicant has designed the project so as to provide vehicular access to the site
from Breakers Drive. Such a design is the only acceptable means of access to the
site and has been strongly recommended by the Public Works Department and the
Planning Department. Such a design has necessitated the establishment of shared
access easement with the adjoining property which is in the same ownership as the
subject property and will be redeveloped at a future date.
8. Development shall be consistent with specific General Plan and applicable Specific Area
Plan policies and objectives, and shall not preclude the implementation of those policies
and objectives: As discussed in the General Plan Compliance section, the proposed
project is consistent with the General Plan and the Local Coastal Program.
9. Development shall be physically compatible with the development site, taking into
consideration site characteristics including, but not limited to, slopes, submerged areas,
and sensitive resources: As indicated previously, a large portion of the site is in slope;
however, the development is in keeping with the other existing development on the
bluff side of Ocean Boulevard. It is also noted that the project has been designed
with four different levels so as to conform with the 24 foot height envelope.
10. When feasible, electrical and similar mechanical equipment and trash and storage areas
shall be concealed. Conditions of approval have been imposed on the project which
will mandate the screening of electrical and mechanical equipment, and conceal trash
enclosures.
11. Archaeological and historical resources shall be protected to the extent feasible: 'There
are no archeological or historical resources on -site.
12. Commercial development shall not have significant adverse effects on residences in an
abutting residential district: The proposed project does not include any commercial
development.
TO: Planning Commission - 7.
Conclusions and Specific Findings
Section 20.01.070(F) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code sets forth the standards by
which the Commission is to evaluate Site Plan Reviews. Should the Planning Commission
wish to approve the subject project, the findings and conditions of approval set forth in the
attached Exhibit "A" are suggested. Inasmuch as the project is in full conformance with the
provisions of the General Plan, the Local Coastal Program and the R-1 District, staff has
not included an exhibit for denial. However, the possibility remains that information may
be provided at the public hearing which may provide adequate basis for denial of the project
should the Planning Commission wish to take such an action.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director
&O&a
W. iam Ward
Senior Planner
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Excerpt of the Planning Commission Minutes dated July 19, 1990
Excerpt of the City Council Minutes dated August 27, 1990
Excerpt of the Planning Commission Minutes dated May 9, 1993
Excerpt of the Planning Commission Minutes dated August 5, 1993
Site Plan, Conceptual Grading Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations,
and Sections
Bn.Uw\uP�sexcs
• ill 1 ' 1 11 MMMIMM
EXHIBrr "A"
FINDING AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
SrM PLAN REVIEW NO, 65
1. That development of the subject property in the SPR Overlay District will not
preclude implementation of specific General Plan objectives and policies.
2. That the value of property is protected by preventing development characterized by
inadequate and poorly planned landscaping, excessive building bulk, inappropriate
placement of structures and failure to preserve where feasible natural landscape
features, open spaces, and the like, resulting in the impairment of the benefits of
occupancy and use of existing properties in such area.
3. That benefits derived from expenditures of public funds for improvement, acquisition
and beautification of streets, parks, and other public facilities are maximized by the
exercise of reasonable controls over the layout and site location characteristics of the
proposed residential development.
4. That unique site characteristics are protected in order to ensure that the community
may benefit from the natural terrain, harbor and ocean, to preserve and stabilize the
natural terrain, and to protect the environmental resources of the City.
S. That the proposed development fully conforms to the established development
standards for the R-1 SPR District.
6. That the development is compatible with the character of the neighborhood and will
contribute to the orderly and harmonious development of surrounding properties and
the City.
7. That the development has been designed to maximize protection of public views from
Ocean Boulevard.
8. That there are no archeological or historical resources on -site.
9. That there are no environmentally sensitive areas on -site.
10. The property does not contain any areas of unique geologic hazards.
11. That the proposed project will meet City noise standards for residential development.
Winning Commission - 9.
12. The site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas and pedestrian and vehicular
access are functional in that the project has been designed so as to limit vehicular
access to the site from Breakers Drive.
13. The development is consistent with surrounding land uses and with the goals and
policies of the General Plan and Local Coastal Program.
14. Mechanical equipment and trash areas will be concealed from view.
15. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements
acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the
proposed development.
16. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.01.070 of
the Municipal Code.
17. The approval of the proposed project will not, under the circumstances of this case,
be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of
persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to
property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
Conditions:
1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial compliance with the approved
site plan, conceptual grading plan, floor plans, elevations and sections, except as
noted below.
2. That arrangements be made with the Public Works Department in order to
guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to
record a parcel map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public
improvements.
3. That the public right-of-way area between the property line and the Beach Access
Road be graded level with the existing sidewalk with a minimum two (2) foot bench
provided behind the Beach Access Road right-of-way; that the proposed on -site block
wall adjacent to the Beach Access Road have a maximum height of 42 inches on the
access road side with a low landscape buffer between the A.C. sidewalk and the wall
as approved by the Public Works Department; and that a concrete curb be
constructed along the southerly side of the parcel to confine the landscape planting
adjacent to the Beach Access Road. All work shall be completed under an
encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department.
4. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate
pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code.
Mon :i, i 871, 01
5. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from public streets
and adjoining properties.
6. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission approval of this application prior
to the issuance of building permits.
7. That all conditions of approval of Resubdivision No. 432 shall be fulfilled.
8. That this Site flan Review shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the
date of approval as specified in Section 20.01.070 K of the Newport Beach Municipal
Code.
0
0
k'
I•
OF FEET
}GO — 1?0
VVV41T%-r ►gyp
SEE MAP. NO. />
DISTRICTING
WPORT BEACH -
AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY RE5DEMIAL C—F
DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL C'Z
. MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL M-1
COMBINING DISTRICTS
MAP
ALIFORN
MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL
LIGHT COMMERCIAL
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
MANUFACTURING
UNCLASSIFIED
sEE MAP NO. /9
Sire i��t�w rlm m5
ORD NO. 4AS
DEC. K. low
COMMISSIONERS
S
MINUTES,
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
_L CALL tNOEX
n was made and voted o�nt nue esu version o.YJO
1ng-eommission=Aing. MOTION
ition
to the August � ,
.1 Ayes
CAR
t • 4
A Amendment No J (Public Hearine� Item No.5
Request to amend a portion of Districting Map No. 18 so as to A713
reclassify one portion of the subject property from the R-1 District
to the R-2 District, another portion from the R-2 District to the R932
R-1 SPR District and another portion from the R-1 District to the
R-1 SPR District. The proposal also includes a request to establish Approved
a 10 foot front yard setback on the Districting Map for that portion
of the subject property adjacent to Iris Avenue and Ocean
Boulevard.
AND
B Re�ubdivieion No 932 (Public Hearine�
Request to resubdivide three Iris Avenue lots into a single parcel
of land for single family residential development and to adjust the
common interior property line between the proposed Iris Avenue
parcel and a Breakers Drive lot. The proposal also includes an
exception to the Subdivision Code so as to allow the creation of a
parcel which is less than 50 feet wide.
LOCATION: Lots 30, 32 and 34, Block A-36, Corona del
Mar, located at 126-130 Iris Avenue; and Lot
1, Tract No. 1026 located at 3016 Breakers
Drive, on the southeasterly corner of Iris
Avenue and Ocean Boulevard and on the
northerly side of Breakers Drive, easterly of
Iris Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONES: A-1 and R-2
APPLICANT: Robert Bucci, Newport Beach
OWNERS: John Harris, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Robert Bucci Associates, Newport Beach
-14-
COMMISSIONERS
' MINUTES
:OLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Me public hearing was openeu m cViuJVVL1V.. I-- ""-
qr. Robert Bucci, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission wherein he concurred with the findings and conditions
In Exhibit "A'.
Mr. Bob Koop appeared before the Planning Commission in
support of the proposed project.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Don
Webb, City Engineer, stated that the Corona del Mar beach access
street is a prolongation of Iris Avenue. He further stated that the
street address of the proposed development will be considered on
Breakers Drive.
Motion was made and voted on to approve Amendment No. 713
and Resubdivision No. 932 subject to the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A". MOTION CARRIED.
A. Amendment No. 713
Findin s:
1, That it has been determined that the requested Amendment
No. 713 is appropriate and that both the existing and
proposed land uses are consistent with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan and the Local Coastal
Program, Land Use Plan, and is compatible with
surrounding land uses.
2. That the requested zoning amendment is logical, and
necessary for the purpose of adjusting the Zoning District
boundary so as to be consistent with the new parcel
configuration proposed by the applicant.
3. That the establishment of a 10 foot front yard setback along
both the Iris Avenue and Ocean Boulevard frontages of
Parcel 1 will provide a more consistent and uniform street
side setback for the subject property in relation to other
properties along Ocean Boulevard.
-15-
INDEX
13
COMMISSIONERS
cm0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
July 17, 177V
MINUTES
_L CALL
INOEX
4. That the establishment of the SPR overlay zone on Parcel
1 is appropriatedue to the location of the subject property,
the difficult access to the site, its steep topography, and the
potential obstruction of public views from the beach access
ramp.
5. That the requested amendment will not adversely impact
upon the surrounding parcels and that the granting of said
amendment will not be detrimental or injurious to persons,
property, and improvements in the neighborhood or general
welfare of the City.
6. The project will not have a significant environmental impact.
D Re�ubdivision No. 932
Findinps:
1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision.
2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City,
all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning
Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision.
3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from
a planning standpoint.
4. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section
66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
5. That there are unusual circumstances associated with the
subject property which justify the granting of an exception
to the average lot width requirement inasmuch as the
existing irregular shape of the Breakers Drive parcel makes
it difficult to develop an efficient and workable site plan.
6. That the exception to the Subdivision Code is necessary in
order to allow for the redevelopment of Parcel 2 with two
.16-
CbMMISSIONERS July 19, 1990MINUTES
c^ G q q
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
tOLL CALL
INDEX
residential units, as are a majority of the other lots along
Breakers Drive.
7. That the granting of the requested exception will not be
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
properties in the vicinity, inasmuch as the proposed average
width of 46.35± feet for Parcel 2 is greater than the average
width of the existing Lot 1 which is only 41.41± feet.
Conditions:
1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to occupancy, and that
the Parcel Map be prepared using the State Plane
Coordinate System as a basis of bearing.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
3. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water
and sewer lateral connection to the public water and
service
sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department.
4. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to
issuance of any building permits.
5. That a minimum 18 foot clear width driveway be provided
with a reciprocal easement dedicated for ingress and egress,
and that a minimum of 24 feet be provided for backing from
garages. The design shall be approved by the Public Works
Department prior to the issuance of building permits.
6. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and
pedestrian circulation systems shall be subject to further
review by the City Traffic Engineer.
7. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and
by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by
proper use of traffic control equipment and flagman.
Traffic control and transportation of equipment and
shall be conducted in accordance with state and
materials
local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed
and approved by the Public Works Department. No
'
-17-
COMMISSIONERS
s d
.Ppf �N .4
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
July 17, 1.17V
MINUTES
tOLL CALL,
INDEX
construction storage or delivery of mater a shall store
within the Ocean Boulevard or Corona del Mar Beach
access ramp rights -of -way. Prior to issuance of any grading
permits, a parking plan for workers must be submitted and
approved by the Public Works Department.
8. That arrangements be made with the Public Works
Department to guarantee satisfactory completion of the
public water and sewer services serving the subject project,
including pavement repair prior to the issuance of any
grading or building permits.
9. That permitted development shall be designed to minimize
the alteration of natural land forms along bluffs. It is also
required that the applicant shall sign a waiver of all claims
against the public for future liability or damage resulting
from permission to build. All required waiver documents
shall be recorded with the County of Orange Recorder's
Office.
10. That a geologic report that will determine areas of potential
instability or hazard along with a map indicating such
information must be submitted to the City Grading
Engineer.
11. That a park dedication fee for one dwelling unit shall be
paid in accordance with Chapter 19.50 of the Municipal
Code,
12. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission
approval of this application prior to the recordation of the
parcel map.
13. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been
recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an
extension Is granted by the Planning Commission.
I t,
-� .ITY OF NEWP-ORT LEACH
CIL MEMBERS
wn 1 r (`d G�y��� N y9A�G�\
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
PLACE: Council Chambers
TIMEs 7100 P.X.
DATES August 27, 1990
MINUTES
INDEX
yor Plummer presented a Proclamation to Harry
Hu no, Executive Director for the MEHPORT
CENTER SHION ISLAND WORLD SUMMIT FOR CHILDREN
CANOLELIO VIGILS - SEPTE"ER 23, 1990.
Present
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
A. ROLL CALL. r
Motion
All Ayes
x
B. Reeding of Minutes Meeting of August 13,
1.990, was waived, app ved as written, and
ordered filed.
Motion
x
C. Reading im full of all ordi ces and
All Ayes
resolutions under consideration was ved,
and City Clerk was directed to xea
titles only.
D. HEARINGS:
1. Mayor Plummer opened the public hearing
regarding:
Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 90-35, being,
Ord 90-35
Zoning
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
(94)
THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING A
PORTION OF DISTRICTING MAP NO. 18 $O
AS TO RECLASSIFY ONE PORTION OF THE
PROPERTY FROM TEE R-1 DISTRICT TO THE
R-2 DISTRICT, ANOTHER PORTION FROM
THE R-2 DISTRICT TO THE R-1 SPR
DISTRICT AND ANOTHER PORTION FLOW THE
R-1 DISTRICT TO THE R-1 SPR DISTRICT
AND ANOTHER PORTION FROM THE R-1
DISTRICT TO THE R-1 SPR DISTRICT.
THE PROPOSAL ALSO INCLUDES A REQUEST
TO ESTABLISH A 10 FOOT FRONT YARD
SETBACK ON THE DISTRICTINO MAP FOR
THAT PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
ADJACENT TO IRIS AVENUE AND OCEAN
BOULEVARD. LOTS 30, 32, AND 34,
BLOCK A-36, LOCATED AT 126-130 IRIS
AVENUE; AND LOT 1, TRACT NO. 1026
LOCATED AT 3016 BREAKERS DRIVE, ON
THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF IRIS
AVENUE AND OCEAN BOULEVARD, AND ON
THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF BREAKERS DRIVE,
EASTERLY OF IRIS AVENUE, IN CORONA
DEL HAR u,T MTNO rOMMreamv
PCA 713
AMENDMENT NO. 7131;
AND
RESUEDIVISION NO. 932 - A request of
Resub 932
ROBERT BOCCI to xeaubdivide three
Iris Avenue lots into a single family
residential development and to adjust
the common interior property line
between the proposed Iris Avenue
parcel and a Breakers Drive lot. The
Volume 44 - Page 281
J
.A1 T Vr NtWt'VKI b"ALM
" �UNCIL MEMBERS � MINUTES
�'V V
ROLL CALL August 27, lfso INDEX
proposal also include# an exception
Zoning
to the subdivision code so as to
allow the creation of a parcel which
Is led* than $0 feet wide.
Report from the Planning Department.
She City Manager summarised the subject
proposal as followsm
•
"In order to facilitate the future
construction of a single family
dwelling an the Iris Avenue parcel,
the Applicant is proposing to
consolidate the three existing lots
fronting on Iris Avenue into a single
building rite (Parcel 1). Inasmuch
as the vehicular access to Parcel 1
would be extremely dlfficult from the
Corona del Mar buck access ramp on
the northeasterly side of the site,
the applicant is proposing to
establish a vehicular access easement
over the second property which he
owns, on Brukera Drive (Parcel. 2).
said access easement would be over
portion/ Of both parcels and would
norvo the prnMat,d ninght family
dwolllWJ it, PdLCul I end lbw teal
unit on Parcel 2. It Lx the opinLon
of the Public works bepartment and
the Planning bepArtmant that ouch an
alternative for vehicular access to
Parcel 1 is the boat of all possible
alternatives. It should also be
noted that such an alternative will
also provide controlled access to
Parcel It inasmuch as the access will
be behind the existing security gate
at the entrance to Breakers Drive.
-Said access easement will be
established in conjunction with a new
two unit residential development to
be located on parcel 2. in order to
facilitate the development of parcel
2, along with the establishment of
the proposed access easement the
applicant IN also proposing to adjust
the interior common property line
between the two parcels so At to
provide it more uniform width for
Parcel 2 and a more uniform depth for
Patcol 1. In order to accomplish the
proposed lot consolidation and
boundary line adjustment, the
applicant ie requesting approval of
a parcel map. An proposed by said
parcel map, Parcel 1 will Contain
Volume as - Page 212
/f
MI
61971 square feet and Parcel 2 will
Zoning
contain 5,715 square feet. It is
also noted that the applicant is
requesting an exception to the
Subdivision Code, inasmuch as the
average lot width of the proposed
Parcel 2 will be lose than 50 feet
(46.35+ fact)."
Robert Sunni, Engineer representing the
owner of the subject property, addressed
the council in support of the request,
otating that they will be utilizing a
rather "unusual" different type of parcel,
and it is their intention to provide a
quality project. He also answered
questions posed by Mayor Pro Tem Sansone
regarding the access road to Breakers
Drive.
Hearing no others wishing to address the
council, the public hearing wan closed.
tion
x
Motion was made to adopt ordinance No. 90-
35, amending Districting Map No. 18, and
1 Ayes
approve Resubdivision No. 932, subject to
the findings and conditions an recommandeQ
by the Planning Commission. ,
2. Mayor Plummer opened the public hearing and
Mod No.
City Council review of an appeal by VILLIAM
3718/Lange
N. LANDS, from the action taken by the
Appeal
1•Inunluy vnimd eel w, •• do lV Iv. 1.•
lot
t•141
auutaln Lhe approval MODIFICATION NO.
3718, on property located at 15 Rocky Point
Road, at the northerly terminus of Rocky
Point Road in Spyglass Hill, a request by
Mr. and Mrs. Vijay Boni to permit the
retention of a portion of a single family
dwelling currently under construction to
encroach 1 foot 1 inch into the required 10
foot rear yard setback. The total length
of the encroachment in 7 feet, and occurs
at both the first and second floors.
Report from the Planning Department.
Appeal application of William W. Lange with
letters of support to oppose the subject
edification from Ken Strottman, Robert R.
erduvast, and J. A. U11All.
The L ly Mnllager uuLllued Lhv aLatt aepurL
as fol we:
"The object property is currently
being d eloped with a single family
dwelling. To the north is a single
IF dwel ng (i.e. the residence
of the appe ant); to the east,
across Rocky Po t Road, is a single
Volume 66 - Page 283
COMMISSIONERS
May 9, 1991MINUTES
f N CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
INDEX
ROLL CALL
"
ZONE: C-1
' TCANT: MajId Dezand, Newport Beach
OWNER; a plicant
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to continue ' ' Review No.
All Ayes
62 and Use Permit No. 3415 to the May 23, 199
Commission meeting. MOTION CARRIED.
sss
$ite Plan Review No 63 (Public Hearing)
Item No.4
Request to permit the construction of a single family dwelling on
SPR No.63
property located in the R-1 SPR District.
Approved
LOCATION: Portions of Lots 30, 32 and 34, Block A-36,
Corona del Mar, and a portion of Lot 1, Tract
No. 1026 located at 3014 Breakers Drive, on
the southeasterly corner of Iris Avenue
(unimproved) and Ocean Boulevard, in
Corona del Mar.
ZONE: R-1 SPR
APPLICANT: Robert Bucci, Newport Beach
OWNER: John Harris, Newport Beach
Addressing comments from Chairman Debay, Planning Director
Hewicker advised the Commission that correspondence from
neighboring residents of the subject property had been received
after the distribution of the staff reports and had been distributed
to the Commission in a separate handout. Concerns expressed in
the letters included those regarding possible drainage and runoff
problems due to the proposed construction on the site. Mr.
Hewicker explained that prior to the time building permits are
issued for the project, the City's Grading Engineer will require
-8-
COMMISSIONERS
May 9, 1991
MINUTES
f CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
INDEX
ROLL CALL
„
complete grading plans of the site which will include provisions
designed to protect the existing site and adjoining properties from
water runoff.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item and
Mr. Robert Bucci, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission and expressed his concurrence with the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A."
Mr. John Coons, 207 Iris Avenue, addressed the Planning
Commission. In replying to Mr. Coon's expressed concern that his
view might be obstructed by the construction of the proposed
structure, Chairman Debay stated that the Commission has no
authority to deny a project in order to protect a private view.
Director Hewicker explained previous land use requests regarding
the site which had received Commission approval and which
included the subdivision of three lots into a single parcel to allow
for a single building site. He said that due to the key location of
the site in relation to the beach access road and the sensitivity of
protecting public view opportunities from Ocean Boulevard, the
development on the parcel was conditioned with the requirement
of a Site Plan Review.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Referring to one of the findings in Exhibit "A," Commissioner
Merrill inquired as to how staff determined that public views would
not be obstructed. During the ensuing discussion, Current Planning
Manager Laycock referred to the displayed grading plan and said
that by interpolating the existing grading measurements with those
proposed, it was determined that the highest portion of the
structure would be 5 1/2 feet below the top of curb on Ocean
Boulevard.
At the request of Chairman Debay, the public hearing was
reopened and Mr. Bucci reappeared before the Commission and
added that by utilizing City map data, elevations had been
established for the project and for sites along Ocean Boulevard.
Using these elevation figures as a basis, actual physical
measurements were taken between the site elevations to arrive at
the 5 1/2 feet below the curb along Ocean Boulevard.
-9-
�!
COMMISSIONERS
9i 10k\
oi
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
May 9, 1991MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INbEX
Commissioner Pomeroy commented that the word "maximize"
should be deleted from the verbiage of the finding.
Mr. John Veenstra, next door neighbor, appeared before the
Planning Commission and stated that access to the subject project
was being taken from a portion of his adjacent property. Mr.
Veenstra further commented that oceanward from the subject
property was 200 yards to 300 yards of parking lot.
Referring to one of the letters mentioned above which expressed
concerns of the Breakers Drive Association, Mr. Bucei stated that
consideration would be given, during project construction, to
alleviate the stated concerns.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed again at this time.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Site Plan Review No.
l Ayes
63 subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A." MOTION
CARRIED.
Findings;
1. That development of the subject property in the SPR
Overlay District will not preclude implementation of specific
General Plan objectives and policies.
2. That the value of property is protected by preventing
development characterized by inadequate and poorly
planned landscaping, excessive building bulk, inappropriate
placement of structures and failure to preserve where
feasible natural landscape features, open spaces, and the
like, resulting in the impairment of the benefits of
occupancy and use of existing properties in such area.
3. That benefits derived from expenditures of public funds for
improvement, acquisition and beautification of streets,
parks, and other public facilities are maximized by the
exercise of reasonable controls over the layout and site
location characteristics of the proposed residential
development.
COMMISSIONERS
o`�'� �o� N1\4
May 9, 1991
MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
INDEX
—
ROLL CALL
4. That unique site characteristics are protected in order to
ensure that the community may benefit from the natural
terrain, harbor and ocean, to preserve and stabilize the
natural terrain, and to protect the environmental resources
of the City.
5. That the proposed development fully conforms to the
established development standards for the R-1 SPR District.
6. That the development is compatible with the character of
the neighborhood and will contribute to the orderly and
harmonious development of surrounding properties and the
City.
7. That the development has been designed to maximize
protection of public views from Ocean Boulevard.
8. That there are no archeological or historical resources on -
site.
9. That there are no environmentally sensitive areas on -site.
10. The property does not contain any areas of unique geologic
hazards.
11. That the proposed project will meet City noise standards for
residential development.
12. The site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas and
pedestrian and vehicular access are functional in that the
project has been designed so as to limit vehicular access to
the site from Breakers Drive.
13. The development is consistent with surrounding land uses
and with the goals and policies of the General Plan and
Local Coastal Program.
14. Mechanical equipment and trash areas will be concealed
from view.
-11-
�3
COMMISSIONERS
.o
to O, d
'��� AN e4
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
May 9, 1991
MINUTES
ROIL CALL
INDEX
15. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development,
16. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 20.01.070 of the Municipal Code.
17. The approval of the proposed project will not, under the
circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of
persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in
the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
Conditions,
1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial
compliance with the approved site plan, conceptual grading
plan, floor plans, elevations and sections, except as noted
below.
2. That arrangements be made with the Public Works
Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of
the public improvements, if it is desired to record a parcel
map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the
public improvements,
3. That the public right-of-way area between the property line
and the Beach Access Road be graded level with the
existing sidewalk with a minimum two (2) foot bench
provided behind the Beach Access Road right-of-way; that
the proposed on -site block wall adjacent to the Beach
Access Road have a maximum height of 42 inches on the
access road side with a low landscape buffer between the
A.C. sidewalk and the wall as approved by the Public Works
Department; and that a concrete curb be constructed along
the southerly side of the parcel to confine the landscape
planting adjacent to the Beach Access Road, All work shall
be completed under an encroachment permit issued by the
Public Works Department.
-12-
xH
COMMISSIONERS
May 9, 1991
MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
4. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to
the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section
19.24.140 of the Municipal Code.
5. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be
screened from public streets and adjoining properties.
6. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission
approval of this application prior to the issuance of building
permits.
7. That this Site Plan Review shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in
Section 20.01.070 K of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
Use Permit No 1711 (Amended)(Public Hearin e)
Item No.5
Request to amend a previously approved use permit which
UP1711A
permitted the expansion of an existing restaurant now known as the
Approved
Warehouse Restaurant. The proposed amendment involves a
request to change the operational characteristics of the restaurant
so as to permit dancing and live entertainment on the second floor
between the hours of 10:30 p.m. and 1:30 a.m. nightly.
L ON: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 63-11 (Resubdivision
No. 447) located at 3450 Via Oporto, on the
northeasterly side of Via Oporto, easterly of
Central Avenue, in Lido Marina Village.
ZONE: - -H
APPLICANT: Warehous Restaurant, Newport Beach
OWNER: June Johnson, Ne ort Beach
The public hearing was opened in connection 'th this item and
Mr. Lee Riley appeared before the Planning Co ' ion on behalf
of the property owner. Mr. Riley explained th because,
historically, dancing had been an on -going activity at the s even
before the time of the present ownership, it had been assumed t
-13-
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
tiI
I
I
I
IAU
st J 19Y3
kom4caL
INDEX
Resubdivision No. 932 (Discussion)
Item No-1
Request to permit the extension of a previously approved
R932
resubdivision that permitted the resubdivision of three his Avenue
lots into a single parcel of land for single family residential
Approved
development and to adjust the common interior property line
between the proposed Iris Avenue parcel and a Breakers Drive
lot. The approval also included an exception to the Subdivision
Code so as to allow the creation of a parcel which is less than 50
feet wide.
LOCATION: Lots 30, 32 and 34, Block A-36, Corona del
Mar, located at 126.130 Iris Avenue; and Lot
1, Tract No. 1026 located at 3016 Breakers
Drive, on the southeasterly corner of Iris
Avenue and Ocean Boulevard and on the
northerly side of Breakers Drive, easterly of
Iris Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONES: R-1 and R-2
APPLICANT: Kim Campbell, Corona del Mar
OWNER: Old World Craftsman Inc., Corona del Mar
ENGINEER: Paul Como, Newport Beach
Mr. Kim Campbell, applicant, appeared before the Planning
`
Commission. In response to a question posed by Mr. Campbell,
Chairman Merrill explained that the recommendation is to extend
the approval of Resubdivision No. 932, to August 27, 1995, as
stated in Condition No. 1, Exhibit "A".
Motion
Motion was made and voted on to approve Resubdivision No. 932,
Ayes
*
*
*
*
*
*
subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". MOTION
Absent
*
CARRIED.
-2-
,z �
CoWn ISSIONERS
MINUTES
dIL��S
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
AMMUSL D. 1993
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Finding:
1. That the circumstances under which the original application
for Resubdivision No. 932 was approved have not changed
and that the granting of a two year extension is appropriate
so as to allow the applicant additional time to record the
required parcel map.
Conditions:
1. That in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.16.010
of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the original
approval of Resubdivision No. 932 is extended two years to
the date of August 27, 1995.
2. That all conditions of approval of Resubdivision No. 932,
as approved by the City Council on August 27, 1990, shall
be fulfilled.
z x s
e Permit No. 3040 Amended Public Hearin
No.:
Reque to amend a previously approved use permit 'ch
40Apermitted
r:LU�P3
a establishment of a take-out Haagen-Dais i creamshop
with inc' ental seating on property located in t Mariner's
oved
Mile Specific PI Area. The previous approval o included the
waiver of a portion the required off street -king spaces. The
proposed amendment olves a request to ange the operational
'
characteristics of the res urant so to allow the facility to
operate as a full service resta nt . cluding table service and on -
sale beer and wine. The propos so includes a request to waive
a portion of the required of treet p ing spaces.
LOCATION: ortion of Lot A, Trac o. 919, located at
400 West Coast Highway, the northerly
side of West Coast Highway, easterly of
Tustin Avenue, in Mariner's Mile.
-3-