Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3001 CLIFF DR
*NEW FILE* 3001 Cliff Dr t . i 1 i i SCALE 111 = 8 F IBu =J a I ., .. - REVISIONS � EY € i t } r Q u ' w t— co LJ 9 . i Zf- fn"" giI n �� O i Aip�rd p1ru� d►lyrnaf yrfd�. 50rifled. bra Watt Loh fw -reVkwq( fl/w1Is 4f Q Rqk • Il�z�b i DRAWN CHECKED DATE ��' 2 2,5"W SCALE JOB NO. SHEET / OF / SHEETS, i REVISIONS BY "S SCALE 1" = 8' �xiSTiv� I 7 98 $E7c� NA/L a 5 5o°/3,0Z" E CAI. FF DRIVE iy. 2/.29 20, �Q 5 - 0°/3 'OZ' 9/S9_ / 1pg3� fa C i / AIL- 2/.29 2' 5�T L•jT ?3 3 �aZti. fa. cNis t 93 0 -7I M to d- vi N d U W F- oW >- w � w d F zti d U 2 U d w CD N O (L } W W Z > _ cn Z w Q d 0 U U) fn I— o L0 0 — o J jr wz u.- O 3 O4-I,U. F-- Co w In O DRAWN CHECKED DATE 2' ZS-P5- SCALE, JOB NO. SHEET / OF SHEETS PRINTED ON 1000H-8 CLEARPRINT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3200 November 12, 1986 Peter Rodgers 758 W. Nineteenth Street Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Dear Mr. Rodgers: Based upon staff review, the City of Newport Beach Planning and Building Departments accept Robert J. Lung & Associates' topographic plan, dated December 9, 1980, as representing the original topography of 3001 Cliff Drive. In order for staff to further analyze the height of the proposed structure, please provide the following additional information: �1. Provide roof plan superimposed over original topographic plan (per Lung & Associates). Provide tabulated. list indicating: ridge height; maximum average height; and original grade for each roof plane. 2. P;ovide sufficient cross -sections to demonstrate that all roof lines shall conform. Show original grade (per Lung & Associates) on each section. 3. Submit complete elevations depicting the building height as measured from original grade. Any further revisions to originally approved plan shall require review and approval by the Planning and Building Departments. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director BY� Tra E. Williams Ass late Planner TEW:la 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach 1?6-n �A--vlr-K \ SCALE I'l = 8i 24 X 36 Pplii\1t'�'lN 1J IJV.`H CLl ARPRINT fC. i"iP ACE 13703 /� 1—V-�— 0 TO AP OF LOT 58, TRACT 444, NEWPORT BEA("H OWNER: JIM CLARKSON 4101 SEASHORE NEWPORT BEACH SEr DATE OF SURVEY NOV 1, 1983 SURVEYOR RON MIEDEMA L.S.4653 447 E. 17 TH. STREET COSTA MESA f I'. L1 T. CILI; r (_- DRIVE REVISIONS BY Date Scale Drawn Job Sheet / Of Sheets CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3200 November 12, 1986 ' Peter Rodgers 758 W. Nineteenth Street Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Dear Mr. Rodgers: Based upon staff review, the City of Newport Beach Planning and Building Departments accept Robert J. Lung & Associates' topographic plan, dated December 9, 1980, as representing the original topography of 3001 Cliff Drive. In order for staff to further analyze the height of the proposed structure, please provide the following additional information: 1. Provide roof plan superimposed over original topographic" plan (per Lung & Associates). Provide tabulated, list indicating: ridge height; maximum average height; and original grade for each roof plane. 2. Provide sufficient cross -sections to demonstrate that all roof lines shall conform. Show original grade (per Lung & Associates) on each section. 3. Submit complete elevations depicting the building height as measured from original grade. Any further revisions to originally approved plan shall require review and approval by the Planning and Building Departments. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director TV E. Williams Ass iate Planner TEW:la 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach RESIDENTIAL ZONING CORRECTIONS Telephone: (714) 644-3200 Plan Check No: /�G 9 7-- 2V6 By: Tracy Williams, Associate Planner By: Javier Garcia, Associate Planner Date: /2/2 61$61 Address: /VAS': 3,%'" Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot r�l_ Block ® Section Tract 99 4 Covenant required to combine lots or portions of lots. Please have owner's signature notarized on attached document and return to me. Lot Size d'd r 9?. 0Z f. Zone 4 Number of Units O.bB 1 ak Buildable Area �2 X SZ• OZ=� • WV 5, Maximum Structural Area (o f1 g % & (Area including exterior walls, stairway on one level and required parking). O,E x buildable area. Proposed Structural Area: p/Z x buildable area. Provide tissue overlay of calculations 'to verify provided square footage. Open Space Area 016- cu.ft. (Volume of space equal to buildable width times buildable height times 6). This area must be six feet in any direction (61x6'x6') and open on two sides or one side and above. Required Setbacks (Note: Architectual projections, i.e. bay windows or balconies not allowed in setbacks). Front J �t Rear Right Side f i Left Side 12 Height Limitation fSee /eAe 1-flreal �/ �Z- �lo• Loire,*41ay4 �/ VW how e7w 9AOVIVoy 5 / /11. ;;4 lOy�4G1' p/qh •LLirl�` df' G.yy-a zoo. Measured from natural grade -to average roof height. Dimension all elevations from natural grade to midpoint and maximum ridge of roof planes. P/a* s ts*L4*r O fell vid ho>` d/.ne ysi6h�<1 Show natural grade line shown on all elevations. Distance between buildings Maximum Coverage Number of Stories Parking (9' - 4" x 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, one space; 17' - 6" x 19' - 0" min, clear dimensions, two spaces). (Third required space may be 8' x 16'). Show clear interior dimensions of garage. 0r�1_ Fair Share Contribution 1-1/07o— c • i San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee Park Dedication Fee (OVER) 0 SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Modifications Committee. Indicate Modification Approval Number on plans. Planning Commission: Use Permit Variance Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Other - Public Works- Basement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut Subdivision Engineer iyLO3G /� v/i Fiil Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Development Permits: Approval in Concept -70 OOe /17 (Note: File 3 sets of plans: plot plan, floor plan, elevations). Coastal Development Permit No. Categorical Exclusion No. (Building permits may be issued 10 days following issuance of C.E.O.) Waiver/Exemption Miscellaneous 1. Floor plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. 2. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences to property line. Show second and/or third floor building footprint on plot plan. 3, Association Approval (Advisory) © 4. other - Aoee 'e to&fo OA e4 rr/s/I'r Ooviii"�tt� /i NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. A A I- i CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3200 November 12, 1986 • Peter Rodgers 758 W. Nineteenth street Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Dear Mr. Rodgers: Based upon staff review, the City of Newport Beach Planning and Building Departments accept Robert J. Lung & Associates` topographic plan, dated December 9, 1980, as representing the original topography of 3001 Cliff Drive. In order for staff to further analyze the height of the proposed structure, please provide the following additional information: 1. Provide roof plan superimposed over original topographic, ✓ plan (per Lung & Associates). Provide tabulated. list indicating: ridge height; maximum average height; and original grade for each roof plane. 2. Provide sufficient cross -sections to demonstrate that all ✓ roof lines shall conform. Show original grade (per Lung & Associates) on each section. 3.y/Submit complete elevations depicting the building height as measured from original grade. Any further revisions to originally approved plan shall require review and approval by the Planning and Building Departments. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director gyA/. 'r?� Tra E. Williams Ass iate Planner TEW:la 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach RESIDENTIAL ZONIN ., Telephone: (714) 644-3200 Pi-.i Check No: •-A4 //o y By: Tracy Williams, Associate Planner By: Javier Garcia, Associate Planner Date: /2/2 b o/& Address: .r,0;W1 -4'-d J]p/vim Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot S'of Block Section Tract 'Sr9 4 ak Covenant required to combine lots or portions of lots. Please have owner's signature notarized on attached document and return to me. Lot Size Sd Y 9? • 0 Z f Zone .e— / Number of Units Ohl" Buildable Area N $Z• 02=� 3�1-1/.i Maximum Structural Area 6 f*O % to (Area including exterior walls, stairway on one level and required parking). dX x buildable area. Proposed Structural Area: p/Z x buildable area. Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. Open Space Area 0-1�1- cu.ft. (Volume of space equal to buildable width times buildable height times 6). This area must be six feet in any direction (6'x6'x6') and open on two sides or one side and above. Required Setbacks (Note: Architectual projections, i.e. bay windows or balconies not allowed in setbacks). Rear $ i � See 4�/lo�es7' 5 s/d/es/ // /Z- 8�i• Right Side } i Left Side 12 Height Limitation Co7�OG/ / /AA GLirl�G` d/ �yy-3 god. Measured from natural grade -to average roof height. Dimension all elevations from natural grade to midpoint and maximum ridge of roof planes. P/oh t 41/s 1` dime st�6hP� Show natural grade line shown on all elevations. Distance between buildings Maximum Coverage Number of Stories Parking (9' - 4" x 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, one space; 17' - 6" x 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, two spaces). (Third required 'space may be B' x 16'). Show clear interior dimensions of garage. O.: Fair Share Contribution /707a- $an Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee Park Dedication (OSIER) SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Modifications Committee. Indicate Modification Approval Number on plans. Planning Commission: Use Permit . Variance Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Other - Public Works: Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut Subdivision Engineer Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Development Permits: Approval in Concept 71 d4G' (Note: File 3 sets of plans: plot plan, Coastal Development Permit No. Categorical Exclusion No. (Building permits may be issued 10 days Waiver/Exemption Miscellaneous floor plan, elevations). following issuance of C.E.O.) 1. Floor plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. 2. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences to property line. Show second and/or third floor building footprint on ,plot plan. 3. Association Approval (Advisory) © 4.. Other Rlwye GGJ11�raGA` Brr/or/.�d � ari"mr-�,/ /D Ar/'SGryy .AGGrar�,/� o✓rPO�//het NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. if you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. • Je I I N j i I a, 0 n SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES 25732 VIA DEL REY, 1r;AM SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA 92675 (714) 496-8504 SOIL ENGINEERING REPORT for a SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE to be located at 237 Santa Ana Avenue Newport Beach, California OWNER Jim Clarkson 4101 Seashore Newport'Beach, CA 92663 -ARCHITECT B.rion S. Jeannette & Associates, Inc. 470 Old Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA (714) 645-5854 REPORT DATE: June 7, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . 1.1 General . . . . . . . . . 1.2 Site Location and Description . . 1.3 Proposed Development . . . . . 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . . . . . 3.0 EXPLORATION . . . . . . . . . 4.0 TESTING . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS . . . . . . 5.1 General. . . . . . . . . 5.2 Fill . . . . . . . . . . 5.3 Topsoil . . . . . 5.4 Terrace Deposit 5.5 Groundwater . . . . . 6.0 DISCUSSION' . . . 7.0 RECOMMENDATTONS . . . . . . . . 7.1 General . . . . . . . . . 7.2 Existing Fill and Topsoil . . . 7.3 Compaction . . . . . . . . 7.4 Trench Backfill . . . . . . 7.5 Structure Footings . . . . . 7.6 Lateral Loads . . . . . . . 7.7 Prewetting of Slab Areas . . . . 7.8 Moisture Barrier . . . . . . i Page 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) 7.9 Concrete . . . . . . . 7.10 Retaining Walls . . . . 7.12 Construction Observation 8.0 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . Table No. 1 1 2 Figure No. 1 2 LIST OF TABLES M. 9 9 . . . . . . . 10 . 11 TERRACE DEPOSIT FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS - MEDIUM EXPANSION COMPACTED FILL FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS -MEDIUM EXPANSION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONCRETE IN CONTACT WITH SITE SOILS LIST OF FIGURES TEST HOLE LOCATION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION MAP SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG ii SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General This report presents the results of our soil engineering exploration for a single family residence to be located at 237 Santa Ana Avenue, Newport Beach, California. 1.2 Site Location and Description The site is located north of Pacific Coast Highway and east of Newport Boulevard•in the City of Newport Beach, California. The site is currently vacant. The lot is rectangular in shape, measuring approximately 50 feet along the sides parallel to Santa Ana Avenue, and 92 feet in the north- westerly direction. Figure 1, entitled "Test Hole Location and Proposed Construction Map," depicts the site configura- tion. The site is nearly level and is flanked by existing single family residences on both the northeast and south- west. 1.3 Proposed Development A two-story, single family residence of wood frame construc- tion is proposed. Minimal grading is anticipated for slab support and site drainage. The structure is to be supported on continuous footings extending into firm natural material. Slab support is to be derived from compacted fill material. This report is intended for construction similar to that described above. Changes should be reviewed for additional recommendaitons. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK The scope of our work included the following items: ° Excavation and visually logging of two hand dug test -holes; Review of available geologic publications and maps; SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES -2- ° Observation of existing surface topography and conditions; ' ° Laboratory testing of selected bulk samples; ' ° Evaluation of soil engineering conditions as affected by the proposed development; and ' ° Preparation of this report. 3.0 EXPLORATION Our field exploration was conducted on May 29, 1984. Two hand dug test holes were excavated to a maximum depth of 4 feet. Exploration was limited due to the semi -cemented, dense nature of the terrace materials encountered. A description of the soils encountered in the test holes ' is presented on the attached sheet entitled, "Log of Sub- surface Exploration." (Figure 2). The approximate location ' of the test holes is indicated on Figure 1. This map shows the property lines and the general outline of the development proposed for the site. This map is based on the "Site Plan" ' dated April 19, 1984, prepared by Brion S. Jeannette & Associates, Planners. Additional information to depict ' conditions at the site was added by the engineer in the field. The map should be considered approximate. ' ' 4.0 TESTING The hand dug test holes were examined and logged in the ' field. The attached logs tabulate •data based on visual inspection by the engineer. A bulk sample was obtained ' from the site for compaction, expansion and sulfate testing. These tests are described below. ■ SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES ' -3- tA compaction test was conducted on a sample of the topsoil ' encountered at the site. This test is performed in the laboratory in accordance with the (ASTM) Test Method D1557. The compaction test was made in a four -inch diameter mold ' having a 1/30 cubic foot volume, with 25 blows of 'a ten - pound hammer falling 18 inches on each of five layers for various moisture conditions. A new batch of soil was used for each moisture condition. The test determines the maxi- mum density and the optimum moisture required to achieve the maximum density. ' An expansion index test was conducted on a sample of the top, soil believed to be representative. The expansion test ' is an index test to classify the expansive characteristics of a soil. The test is conducted in accordance with the ' Uniform Building Code Standard No. 29-2. The test results indicate that the soil has an expansion index of 87. ' Based on this, the fill soil has a medium potential for expansion. A sample was obtained at. the site for sulfate content testing. The soluble sulfate content determination was ' conducted in conformance with the test method described as "California 417A". The test results indicate that the ' soil has a soluble sulfate content of .0118 percent. ' 5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 5.1 General ' The following soil descriptions, related information and the attached logs depict subsurface conditions only at ' the specific test hole locations indicated on the location map and on the particular date designated on the logs. Soil ' conditions occurring at other locations may differ from conditions occurring at the specified locations. 1 SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES -4- Recent debris fill has been dumped in the central portion of the site. This fill consists of a sandy silt with tscattered bricks and concrete chunks. Offsite footing excavation along the northwestern property line has generated fill placed along this northwest property line. Beneath these fill soils, topsoil mantles the site to an explored depth of approximately 1} feet. Terrace de -posit underlies topsoil to an explored depth of 4 feet. ' 5.2 Fill Fill has been recently dumped on the site, and is in ' a loose condition. In its present condition, this material is unsuitable for foundation support. If requested, addi- tional, testing can be conducted to prepare recommendations for use of this soil as compacted fill. ' 5.3 Topsoil Topsoil was observed in both, of the hand dug test holes to a ' maximum depth of 1} feet This topsoil material consisted of a medium to dark brown, silty clay in a loose condition. Expansion cracks were noted within this material indicating ' a tendency for expansive potential.- In its present condi- tion, this material is not considered suitable for fill or ' foundation support. ' 5.4 Terrace Deposit Terrace deposit soil underlies the topsoil and was encoun- tered at a depth of 1 and 1i feet below existing ground surface in Test Holes 1 and 2 respectively. Natural terrace deposit soil is suitable for fill and foundation ' support. Y SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES ' -5- ' 5.5 Groundwater At the time of our exploration, no groundwater was ' encountered at the site. Seasonal rains and other factors may alter the subsurface water conditions. ' 6.0 DISCUSSION ' The recommendations in this report are based on random sampling as described in the previous paragraphs. Geologic ' conditions and soil deposits may vary in type, consistency and many other important properties between the test holes. ' Therefore, this report should be considered only prelimi- nary in nature; its purpose is to determine the general foundation system for the structure described in this Services to report. South Coast Geologic should continue be retained for the project in order that continued observa- tion of the subsurface conditions can be made and additional recommendations can be made for changes in design, if needed. This report is intended for design of this specific project. It is not intended to necessarily be adequate for a contrac- tor to provide a fixed price bid or for a client to expect that no changed conditions will exist. ' Not all portions of the site were accessible. The soil conditions where exploration could not be done are unknown. tFor the purposes of preliminary design, the soil conditions may be considered similar to those described in this report. ' Conditions should be re-evaluated by the soil engineer during site preparation for construction and grading. ' 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 7.1 General We recommend that completed plans and project specifications be submitted to us for review of the geotechnical aspects ' and additional recommendations. The site should be developed SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES 11 in accordance with the applicable portions of the recom- mendations contained in this report and the regulations of the governmental agencies. The engineer preparing the plans should include the applicable portions of the preceding documents on the plans. The contractor and others should not be required to refer to the report or building codes for dimensions, procedures or requirements. However, it is necessary to make the report available to the contractor for his evaluation of the subsurface.condi- tions. 7.2 Existing Fill and Topsoil Fill and topsoil at the site was observed to be in a loose condition and is not considered suitable for founda- tion support in its present condition. The loose fill soil should be removed from the site unless provisions to use this soil as compacted fill have been made. The top- soil should be removed from the building and driveway areas ( and 5 feet in all directions"beyond each). Removal should extend to such a depth that firm terrace deposit is exposed. The exposed surface should then be scarified to a depth of six inches, moisture conditioned as necessary and compacted. Once the exposed surface has been properly compacted, the topsoil may be replaced as compacted fill as described in section 7.3 "Compaction." 7.3 Compaction Structural fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent ' relative compaction as determined by ASTM Test Designation D1557. Fill material should be spread and compacted in Ili ' lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness. If construction proceeds during the wet winter months, time ' may be required to dry the on -site finer grained soils to be used as fill, since their moisture content will probably be appreciably above optimum. i1 SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES -7- 7.4 Trench Backfill Utility trenches should be placed outside of a 1:1 plane extending downward from the base of structural footings except where passing under the footing. The backfill in the trench should be compacted to reduce the potential for future'settlement. Utility trenches should be back - filled with fill placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness. If on -site soil is used, the material should be compacted to at least 90 percent rela- tive compaction by mechanical means only. Imported sand may also be used for backfilling trenches provided it is . compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. If imported sand is used, sufficient water should be added during the trench backfilling operation to prevent the soil from "bulking" during compaction. 7.5 Structure Footings We recommend that the structure be supported on conventional continuous footings extending either into firm compacted fill or terrace. Where compacted fill is elected for footing support, a minimum of 12 inches of compacted fill should be provided beneath the bottom of the footings. Continuous footings for a two-story structure should be founded at least 18 and 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade for interior and exterior footings, respectively. Where a single story is supported, the minimum footing depth for an interior footing may be reduced to 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade. Strip footings should be a minimum of 12 inches wide where a one-story structure is supported and 15 inches wide where a two-story structure is supported. Footings in compacted fill proportioned as recommended above may be designed for an allowable bearing capacity of 1000 psf. This value may be increased by 200 psf for each one (1) foot of SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES increased depth. Footings in terrace may be designed for an allowable foundation pressure of 1500 psf. This value may be increased by 300 psf for each additional one (1) foot of increased width or depth. Minimum recom- mended rei-nforcement for footings and slabs is presented on Table 1. South Coast Geologic Services should observe the footing excavations prior to placing forms and steel. 7.6 Lateral Loads Lateral loads will be resisted by a combination of resistance along the bottom of slabs and passive earth pressure against the sides of footings. For foundations in compacted fill this resistance may be determined by multiplying the contact area by a lateral sliding resistance of 130 psf. Resistance in terrace may be determined by multiplying the coefficient of friction of 0.25 by the structural dead load. Passive earth pressure is zero at the ground surface and may be assumed to increase with depth in compacted fill and terrace at the rate of 100 and 150 psf per foot of depth to a maxi- mum of 1500 and 2250 psf, in.fill and terrace material, respectively. 7.7 Prewettina of Slab Areas Laboratory test results indicate that the topsoil which currently mantles the site is moderately expansive. To help reduce the potential for soil expansion, slab areas should be thoroughly moistened prior to placing the moisture barrier discussed below. 7.8 Moisture Barrier Moisture barriers should be placed below concrete slabs in structure living areas. Barriers should overlay 4 inches of clean sand and should consist of a plastic film (6 mil polyvinyl chloride, minimum). The barrier should be SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES -9- tcovered with a minimum of one inch of clean sand. Sand overlying the barrier should be lightly moistened just ' prior to placing the concrete. The sand should provide a suitable working surface and aid in the cure of the ' concrete. All joints of the barrier should be sealed or overlapped at least 12 inches. Care should be taken not ' to damage the barrier during construction. ' 7.9 Concrete A soluble sulfate content determination was performed on a selected soil sample considered to represent surficial ' fill soils at the site to evaluate the potential for reaction with concrete. The concentration of soluble sulfate in the soil samples was determined to be 0.0118 percent. Concrete in contact with site soils may be pro- portioned using design designation "A" listed on Table 2. 7.10 Retaining Walls If requested, design wall pressure values will be provided. ' The following general recommendations are presented for your convenience. Wall'backfill should be drained. A continuous layer of gravel 12 inches in height should be placed against the back of walls. Weepholes should consist ' of unmortared joints in block walls or one inch diameter round holes in poured concrete walls. The openings should be at least 6 inches above finished grade to prevent sur- face water from flowing back into the holes. Where weep - holes will outlet over a slope face, provisions should be ' made to collect the water and conduct it via non erosive device to an approved location. ' Walls to remain dry may be drained by placing a perforated pipe, holes down, in the gravel and grading the pipe to ' drain to daylight. The pipe should be lower than the top of the floor slab. The back of the wall should be water- proofed. SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES -10- Wall backfill should be compacted to a density of at least 90 percent of maximum density. Where not protected by a superjacent structure, a paved drainage ditch should be placed at the top of walls to intercept runoff.and con- duct the water to aq approved location. 7.12 Construction Observation The recommendations provided in this report are based on preliminary design information for the proposed residence, field observations and interpretation of our laboratory test results. The subsurface conditions are based on two widely spaced test holes and should be checked in the field during construction. Significant differences between the assumed and actual subsurface conditions should be brought to the attention of this office. Unsuitable soil removals, surficial soil compaction, and placement of wall backfill or other compacted fill should be observed and tested by the soils engineer. ' -11- ' 8.0 CONCLUSIONS ' We conclude that the site will be suitable for the pro- posed const'ruction described in this report, providing the design and construction are properly executed. Our ' recommendations are based on site conditions during field exploration and experience with similar sites, and are in t accordance with the Uniform Building Code and generally accepted procedures of geotechnical engineering. SOUTH -COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES O pR4FESSlpN4 taC84 ��2 No: 36733 � ' G.�tiJj9l CIVIL �P Maire LaChapelle F0 CALlF4�'� R.C.E. #36733 Distribution: (4) Architect SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES TABLE 1 - TERRACE DEPOSIT FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS - MEDIUM EXPANSION Surficial Soil Expansion Index: 51-90, CONVENTIONAL SLAB ON GRADE Foundation - One and Two Story Structures Exterior Footing(4)- Minimum width = 12"(1-story), 15"(2-story) Minimum depth below lowest adjacent grade = 1811(1-story) 21 (2-story) Allowable footing pressure = 1500 psf(I) Lateral bearing pressure = 150 psf(2) Lateral sliding resistance (coefficient of friction)= 0.25 (3) Minimum reinforcement = Two number 4 bars, one near the top and one near the bottom. (1) Interior Footing - Minimum width - 12" Minimum depth below bottom of slab = 12" " Allowable footing pressure = 1500 psf(1) Minimum reinforcement = Two number 4 bars, one near the top and one near the bottom. Lateral bearing pressure = 150 psf(2) Lateral sliding resistance (coefficient of friction) = 0.25 (3) Floor Slabs - Living Areas Minimum thickness = Nominal 4", though not less than 3 5/8". Lateral sliding resistance (coefficient of friction) = 0.25 (3) Minimum reinforcement = 6" x 6" - 10 x 10 welded wire mesh. Moisture Barrier - Living Areas Four inches clean sand overlain by a plastic film, minimum 6 mil. polyvinyl chloride or equivalent, overlain by a minimum of 1" clean sand to provide a working surface and aid in concrete curing. Prewetting of Slab - Slab Areas Slab area should be thoroughly moistened immediately prior to placing moisture barrier. The allowable bearing value may be increased by 300 psf for each additional foot of width and/or depth to a maximum value of 4500 psf. The lateral bearing pressure may be increased by 150 psf for each additional foot of depth to a maximum value of 2250 psf. Coefficient to be multiplied by dead load. Includes interior piers and footings for raised floors: 237 Santa Ana Avenue Newport Beach, CA SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES TABLE 1 - COMPACTED FILL FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS - MEDIUM EXPANSION Surficial Soil Expansion Index: 51-90 CONVENTIONAL SLAB ON GRADE Foundation - One and Two Story Structures Exterior Footing(4)- Minimum width = 1211(1-story), 15"(2-story) Minimum depth below lowest adjacent grade = 2(1-story) 1"(2-story) Allowable footing pressure = 1000 psf(1) Lateral bearing pressure = 100 psf(2) Lateral sliding resistance = 130 (3) Minimum reinforcement = Two number 4 bars, one near the top and one near the bottom. Interior Footing - Minimum width - 12" Minimum depth below bottom of slab = 12" " Allowable footing pressure = 1000 psf(1) Minimum reinforcement = Two number 4 bars; one near the top and one near the bottom. Lateral bearing pressure = 100 psf(2) Lateral sliding resistance = 130 (3) Floor Slabs - Living Areas Minimum thickness = Nominal 4", though not less than 3 5/8". Lateral sliding resistance = 130 (3) Minimum reinforcement = 6" x 6" - 10 x 10 welded wire mesh. Moisture Barrier - Living Areas Four inches clean sand overlain by a plastic film, minimum 6 mil. polyvinyl chloride or equivalent, overlain by a minimum of 1" clean sand to provide a working surface and aid in concrete curing. Prewetting of Slab - Slab Areas Slab area should be thoroughly moistened immediately prior to placing moisture barrier. ' (1) The allowable bearing value may be increased by 200 psf for each additional foot of width and/or depth to a maximum value of 3000 psf. ' (2) The lateral bearing pressure may be increased by 100 psf for each additional foot of depth to a maximum value'of 1500 psf. (3) Resistance to be multiplied by surface area. ' (4) Includes interior piers and footings for raised floors. 237 Santa Ana Avenue ' Newport Beach, CA SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES TABLE 2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONCRETE IN CONTACT WITH SITE SOILS* Design Designation Soluble Sulfates In Soil % 'Cement Ty e Maximum Water/Cement Ratio Minimum Cement Content-Lbs./Cu.Yd A 0-0.02 (Negligible . . . . .Sulfate . . . . Reaction) B 0.02-0.10 I or II 0.55 470 C 0.10-0.20 II 0.50 560 D 0.20-1.50 II 0.45 660 D 0.20-1.50 V 0.50 560 E Over 1.50 V 0.45 660 * Cement Industry Technical Committee of California "Recommended Practice to Minimize Attack on Concrete by Sulfate in Soils and Water" SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES i1 TEST HOLE NO.��`, 2 PAGE -Lot I SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG EXPLORATION DATE MAy Z9 Iti$y LOGGED BY �L JOB SITE LOCATION 23'7 SANTA ANA AVENUE, NF:WPo¢T QCgGII, Ua, EQUIPMENT USED 14CANZ OUG GROUNDWATER NpnIE w W 0 O = i DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL r � 6 'W G TEST HOLE NO. I. TOP.SOIL,.16ANDy, SILTY C6Ay, fal1C atioim, Loose TomQO ER, Fx Gt, pay a;% ie02Ac.Gr Ofl'0S IT, S AN t S t LT 2 ;;,a, .«;� �/ ajRA � I,.15 't0 A S tCTY .jAtJa w, rlh :.:`;; g ',:?a;i:," DtDT\A, Llyh? 't111N, f'nEplwm DCNSE TO AL'NSE W,>'It DC PT It, Su4ATLY TEST' HOLE NO;. 2 oFSO,L, ,5A,wzyzivry C�Ay, A -a- 0W.✓A, Z"a TU,I`+EASTIFF, Fx,!r!,^uw�, 64) Z I.-gRaA4W PCP031T, SA)D L-14.Afr 1340W.J To "/V, 004tr, 3 r�; �?.>- .S1.tyl�kly CtMfNTBD, M.OLy'1- MGM a SOUTH COAST GEOLOGIC SERVICES I i 4k i CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 (714) 644-3257 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MINUTES OF BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS REHABILITATION COMMISSION MEETING December 3, 1986 A. Meeting was called to order at 4: 02 p.m. at the Newport Beach Council Chambers by Chairman Brion Jeannette. B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Roll Call - Board Members Present: H.E. Riley Brion Jeannette Ray Cranston Board Members Absent: T. Duncan Stewart C. A. Higbie P. Larry Root City Staff Present: Raimar W. Schuller, Building Director Carol Korade, Asst. City Attorney Dee Mallicoot, Paralegal Don Hunsicker, Building Inspector Tracy Williams, Assoc. Planner Julia Klein„ Building Dept. Secretary Public Present: Ross Boydell, Architect Peter S. Rodgers, Owner Jim Clarkson, Neighbor D. Minutes of the Rehabilitation Commission Minutes of October 22, 1986 were unanimously approved (Motion by Mr. Riley; second by Mr. Cranston). E. Resignation of Board Member: Mr. Schuller read to the Board a letter of resignation from Mr. Briggs. The Chairman accepted the resignation with regret stating that Mr. Briggs had served the City for almost 25 years and his experience will be missed. 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach ' 0 0 F. Public Hearing 1. Staff Report Mr. Schuller gave the staff report stating that this is a continuation of the October 22, 1986 hearing to give the owner time to establish original grade for 3001 Cliff Drive. The Building Director acknowledged that grade has been established and the redesigned residence sub- stantially conforms with Newport Beach height regula- tion and recommended that after hearing public input, the Commission consider either declaring 3001 Cliff Drive a public nuisance or establishing a definite time schedule to complete the residence and furnish monthly progress reports to the Director. 2. Public Testimony Mr. Rodgers stated that the plans on the structure have been redesigned to comply with height requirements of Newport Beach. He requested a time period of 60 days to complete foundation work and felt that City Staff's suggestion to complete the project within one year was fair and adequate. Chairman Jeannette asked Staff the status of the revised plans. Associate Planner Tracy Williams stated that she had reviewed the preliminary plans and a very superfi- cial look indicates that they substantially conform to the height limit with the exception of a third floor stairway access. Architect Ross Boydell stated that the plans should be ready for formal plan check submission on December 21, 1986 and ready for permit issuance by January 15, 1987. Ms. Williams distributed a letter dated November 12, 1986 in which she had requested that the Planning Department be provided with additional elevations to show design change as well as additional reference points on the roof plan to clearly indentify grade. Chairman Jeannette advised the owner to submit the plans as soon as possible in order to permit City Staff adequate review time. The Chairman also expressed his concern about the stability of the upper sections of the structure. The owner should either remove the upper portion of the structure or shore it properly to minimize the hazard and reduce owner's and City liability. Mr. Rodgers or the Structural Engineer must accept full responsibility and legal liability for the existing structure. -2- Y Mr. Rodgers stated that he fully accepts all liability on his structure while under construction. Shoring work will begin as soon as possible. Mr. Rodgers has until December 13, 7986 (10 days) to meet with Build- ing Inspector Don Hunsicker to establish proper shoring. The Commission agreed with Staff recommendation that underground and shoring work could commence right away, but that any further work be done only after proper permits are obtained. Mr. Schuller assured the Commission that the Building Department will check the plans as soon as possible in the interest of public safety. Mr. Clarkson, a neighbor, addressed the Commission and stated that he was concerned with the quality of existing framing lumber on the site and what preventative meas- ures can be taken to insure continued progress. The Commission answered Mr. Clarkson by stating that the engineer of record would review the existing struc- ture and submit a certification letter before any new lumber is added to the building. Building Inspector Don Hunsicker, Architect Ross Boydell and the Structural Engineer will meet on the jobsite and walk through the job. The Engineer will then submit a letter to Mr. Schuller certifying that the structure they will be work- ing from is structurally sound and stable. This letter shall be submitted with final stamped plans. After consulting with the Assistant City Attorney Carol Korade, the Commission set the following dates for hear- ing continuance: March 15, 1987 August 15, 1987 February 15, 1988 These hearings will be held only if construction is not progressing per schedule. City Staff is allowed the dis- cretion to notice any additional hearings if the schedule is not being adhered to. -3- r The Commission, Staff and Owner then agreed upon the following deadlines: 1. Revised monthly status/progress reports will be due on the 15th of each month to Building Director Ray Schuller. 2. By December 22, 7986, final plans will be submitted to the City along with the certification letter from the engineer. 3. By January 15, 1987, permits will be issued. 4. .By February 15, 1987, foundation will be approved, pending extensions. 5. By July 15, 1967, framing will be completed pending suitable construction weather. 6. By January 15, 1988, the entire project will be com- pleted. G. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:48 p.m. -4- 4 W CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3200 November 12, 1986 Peter Rodgers 758 W. Nineteenth Street Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Dear Mr. Rodgers: Based upon staff review, the City of Newport Beach Planning and Building Departments accept Robert J. Lung & Associates' topographic plan, dated December 9, 1980, as representing the original topography of 3001 Cliff Drive. In order for staff to further analyze the height of the proposed structure, please provide the following additional information: 1. Provide roof plan superimposed over original topographic plan (per Lung & Associates). Provide tabulated, list indicating: ridge height; maximum average height; and original grade for each roof plane. 2. Provide sufficient cross -sections to demonstrate that all roof lines shall conform. Show original grade (per Lung & Associates) on each section. 3. Submit complete elevations depicting the building height as measured from original grade. Any further revisions to originally approved plan shall require review and approval by the Planning and Building Departments. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By Tra E. Williams Ass date Planner TEW:la 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT . November 7, 1986 MEMO TO FILE SUBJECT: 3001 Cliff Drive, Newport Beach, CA The following is a update of status of the above mentioned property. On Monday, November 10, 1986, Rick Higley, Grading Engineer, will be reviewing the photogrammetic grading plans as submitted by Robert J. Lung & Associates for the subject property. I have contacted Peter Rodgers' office to request a meeting for Thursday, November 13, 1986 to discuss establishment of grade. Should any additional questions arise, please inform Mr.. Rodgers that he may contact Jay Garcia in my absence. TRACY WffffAMS Associ to Planner TEW:la (714) 631-2345 October 28, 1986 Tracy Williams City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California 92663 Re: 3001 Cliff Drive Newport Beach, Ca Dear Tracy, I per conve —1986., I woul om /Ulek qurve f A n .+eJ VrPa M r 758 W on Thursday, October 23, to clarify our time limit tablish natural grade on �at 3001 Cs3a ff" ciriv�. (714) 631-2004 5. , (714) 631-2345 9"UwAt S Tracy Williams City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California 92663 Re: 3001 Cliff Drive Newport Beach, Calif Dear Tracy, t 1 I am so �\ appoint Roa Bo -P- ,� ✓� }nou 1 and ed �jV h�C.-YT,y�s 9 SS X Vie^ ?jr_ I mys,el < -this pr-toje}(`c Sigyn�oe eyjp PSR%d'f RECEIVE" N S NOV 71986 CITY r NEWPOT CALIF - le t you were unable to keep our Monday, November 3, 1986. ad worked the weekend, as cl scussed,`siid' px"e'pa ed a op�lans th'=mow�ZaPq�te ,t o �n!'t�be"e tri :din m' fed' tlx��a t he ;a; sdn�=-Ti Stan! ch$ck r `r ' eF4iesnsu'P?yR ,s1-jfTito dC�hil�e to.Fex'pe ]tee :.,. sr//neon a` osibl;e.. +'tL��%�'�� 6t,.,...�.:d_bt i0►{Y,� per Yrr`".ar �",�e�,. 758 W. NINETEENTH ST. • COSTA MESA, CA 92627 • ST. LIC. NO. 337169 L CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 November 5, 1986 Mrs. Rosemary Rodgers 3001 Cliff Drive Newport Beach, Co. Dear Mrs. Rodgers: Attached is a copy of the Minutes of the Building Board of Appeals and the Rehabilitation Commission Meeting of October 22, 1986. These minutes and my letter should clear up any confusion you may have regarding what needs to be done by December 3, 1986. Robert J. Young told me today that he can prepare a topographic plan that will establish the 1980 grade to an approximate 6" accuracy and complete this within ten (70) calendar days after the contract is entered into between you and his firm. Your Architect, Ross Boy - dell, could then determine if the currently framed structure at 3001 Cliff Drive conforms to Newport Beach height requirements. This method is acceptable to the City of Newport Beach. Final determina- tion of building height is subject to Planning Department review and approval. The Commission continued the hearing until December 3, 1986 and fully expects that grade will be established, that your Architect will have determined if the building can be built as framed or needs to be demolished, and that you supply a construction time schedule which gives deadlines for Building Department acceptance of the foundation, the framing and final approval of the entire project. Should you fail to comply with the Commission's request we will re- commend that 3001 Cliff Drive be declared a substandard building and abated per Section 15.28.010 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. / RECEIVED Planning Department Nov 61986 CITY OF d�NEWPORT BEACH \ CALIF. C 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach 0 Mrs. Rosemary Rodgers Page Two Should you still be unclear about the Commission's intent or have additional concerns, you may contact me at the above address or by calling 644-3282. Very truly yours, BUILDING DEPARTMENT Aai�mar:T Schuller Director cc: Rehabilitation Commission Ross Boydell, Architect Jim Hewicker, Planning Director Asst. City Attorney ik CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 November 5, 7986 Mrs. Rosemary Rodgers 3001 Cliff Drive Newport Beach, Co. Dear Mrs. Rodgers: Attached ys a copy of the Minutes of the Building Board of Appeals and the Rehabilitation Commission Meeting of October 22, 1986. These minutes and my letter should clear up any confusion you may have regarding what needs to be done by December 3, 1986. Robert J. Young told me today that he can prepare a topographic plan that will establish the 7980 grade to an approximate 611 accuracy and complete this within ten (10) calendar days after the contract is entered into between you and his firm. Your Architect, Ross Boy - dell, could then determine if the currently framed structure at 3001 Cliff Drive conforms to Newport Beach height requirements. This method is acceptable to the City of Newport Beach. Final determina- tion of building height is subject to Planning Department review and approval. The Commission continued the hearing until December 3, 1966 and fully expects that grade will be established, that your Architect will have determined if the building can be built as framed or needs to be demolished, and that you supply a construction time schedule which gives deadlines for Building Department acceptance of the foundation, the framing and final approval of the entire project. Should you fail to comply with the Commission's request we will re- commend that 3001 Cliff Drive be declared a substandard building and abated per Section 15.28.010 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach « . V Mrs. Rosemary Rodgers Page Two Should you still be unclear about the Commission's intent or have additional concerns, you may contact me at the above address or by calling 644-3282. Very truly yours, BUILDING DEPARTMENT Raimar W. Schuller Director cc: ik Rehabilitation Commission Ross Boydell, Architect Jim Hewicker, Planning Director Asst. City A*t^�^A ti RE NTIAL ZU, .. yUXIOxs • Plan CheoR No,* Pe 16g7-•-84 By: Tracy Williams, Associate Planner Telephone: (714) 644-32p9 Date: AUh. 04 1 I41h& Address: 300 r CL 1 tl+ PP11 V Y. Corrections Required: SPp4 051 1106 G,91W CT AO" ) 7 5AZ14f I PU. Legal Description: Lot 5G Block Section Tract-1-1-1 Covenant required to combine lots or portions of lots. Please have owner's signature notarized on attached document and return to me. Lot Size SO X �I Z •(72 Zone —I Number of Units i;AZ.,1¢YLX- Buildable Area Maximum Structural Area (Area including exterior walls, stairway on one level and required parking). x buildable area. Proposed Structural Area: x buildable area. Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage. • Open Space Area cu.ft. (Volume of space equal to buildable width times buildable height times 6). This area must be six feet,in any direction (6!x6'x6') and open on two sides or one side and above. Required Setbacks (Note: Architectual projections, i.e. bay windows or balconies not allowed in setbacks). Front 5 Rear 5 GONS T R UG'f 10N O N- s rY E. ok 9 Right Side LJ a)W,4U- N07E MOD. mN cpLA4vd Left Side (� S� SOIL ENOli F L2 -TO V C'� I ' 7 WTI f FILL ON 'S;'T IF,, 106 Height Limitation RA,7A tlr r-VIb7(" 4AA©F , IWIC. NVq� E!`FEL 7 VVCOLL NE , Measured from natural grade to average roofof height. Dimension all elevations from natural grade to midpoint and maximum ridge of roof planes. WOVIVC POOP PLAN OVEIZLAYY ON A 7OP0 IqA P OP- L 07 - a 9u8M17TEP 6L[Y- eNGo(JS l '-rEN"T. 12 V/O r pL AW, Show natural grade line shown on all elevations. 3 pQOVIVE COPY or Lr4AL SURVE-y 4 fFCTIONS (4.Wr v) Distance between buildings N7 k'Aa JzEvrsE PLAM• Maximum Coverage S SOW Ton OF-WrtP69. RA rL r N 61 (JA, Pr(PNhi•Ipdcs . Number of Stories Parking (9' - 4" x 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, one space; 17' - 6" x 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, two spaces). (Third required space may be S' x 16'). Show clear interior dimensions of garage. OTC Fair Share Contribution NON F San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee Park Dedication Fee NON E NONE (OVER) i • SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH: Modifications Committee. Indicate Modification Approval Number on plans. Planning Commission: Use Permit Variance Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Other - Public Works: Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut Subdivision Engineer NO M E Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans k E%vw t ry & b. Coastal Development Permits: ok, Apprcvval in Concept YOW.. R E 0 u 1 PEP . (Note: File 3 sets of plans: plot plan, floor plan, elevations). Coastal Development Permit No. Categorical Exclusion No. (Building permits may be issued 10 days following issuance of C.E,O Waiver/Exemption , Miscellaneous 1. Floor plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. 2. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences to property line. Show second and/or third floor building footprint on plot plan. PROMDE IzW DLGk PL AN 3. Association Approval (Advisory) 4. Other NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200. r CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 (714) 644-3257 BUILDING DEPARTMENT MINUTES OF BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS REHABILITATION COMMISSION MEETING October 22, 7986 A. Meeting was called to order at 4: 10 p.m. at the Newport Beach Council Chambers by Acting Chairman, Brion Jeannette. B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Roll Call - Board Members Present Board Members Absent: City Staff Present: S.E. Briggs H. E. Riley Ray Cranston Brian Jeannette P. Larry Root T. Duncan Stewart, Chairman C. A. Higbie Raimar Schuller, Building Director Carol Korade, Asst. City Attorney Dee Mallicoat, Paralegal Don Hunsicker, Building Inspector Tracy Williams, Assoc. Planner Julia Klein, Building Dept. Secretary Public Present: James Davidson, Peter Rodgers' Attorney Ross Boydell, Architect Peter S. Rodgers, Owner Rosemary Rodgers, Owner D. Minutes of the Building Board of Appeals Meeting of May 27, 1981 were unanimously approved (Motion by Mr. Briggs; second by Mr. Cranston). E. Mr. Schuller explained to the Board their additional duties as Re- habilitation Commission and the fact that this Commission is limited to five ,voting members. F. Election of a Chairman: Due to Mr. Stewart's ill health, Mr. Briggs moved to elect Brian Jeannette as Chairman. This was seconded by Mr. Riley and unanimously approved. 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach • G. Election of a Vice Chairman: Based on Mr. Root's willingness to serve, Mr. Briggs moved to elect Mr. Root as Vice Chairman. Mr. Cranston seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved. H. Public Hearing 1. Staff Report Mr. Schuller explained the slow construction progress on the property. He submitted to the Commission photographs taken of the property on October 22, 1986 by Don Hunsicker, Build- ing inspector. Mr. Schuller stated that there is no permit on the project at present and recommended the Rehabilitation Com- mission declare 3001 Cliff Drive a public nuisance by Resolu- tion and order the owner to abate the same within 15 days after the premises is posted by demolishing and removing said structure from the property. 2. Public Testimony Mr. Davidson stated that he was representing Mr. Rodgers and testified to has character. Mr. Rodgers relayed his back- ground and involvement in the project. He stated that in the process of resolving everything, he encountered difficulty with requirements by Tracy Williams of the Planning Depart- ment to establish natural grade. Mr. Rodgers showed the Rehabilitation Commission the original approved plans. Mr. Schuller stated that these plans had been deviated from during construction and that a new set is now ready to be issued. Chairman Jeannette offered suggestions on how to establish natural grade. Associate Planner, Tracy Williams, stated that the natural grade on the original plans was incorrect. Planning Depart- ment had asked applicant on August 4, 1986 to show natural grade on plans. This was never done. Mr. Rodgers then submitted three letters to Staff and the Commission, as follows: a. Letter dated October 16, 1986 from AAKO Engineering Con- sultants stating it is impossible for them to verify the natural ground elevation prior to rough grading. b. Letter dated October 21, 1986 from Alpine Consultants suggesting, use of topo maps to generate contours for the subject site. c. Letter dated October 22, 1986 from Robert J. Lung & Associates stating that aerial photographs may be helpful in determining natural grade. Discussion continued on the natural grade problem. Mr. Briggs asked what the City wants Mr. Rodgers to do. Mr. Schuller stated that the owner, Mr. Rodgers is directed under Section 3 of the proposed Resolution to obtain a building permit within 15 days after the property is posted by the City and he shall proceed with construction with due diligence in accordance with the following schedule: 1. Obtain foundation approval within 30 days, 2. Complete framing within 6 months, and 3. Complete entire project within one year. Upon the Chairman's inquiry, Mr. Rodgers stated that he could agree with the proposed schedule, but would need more time to establish grade and complete foundation work. Commissioner Briggs concurred that 15 days is too short. Tracy Williams stated that on October 23, 1986, she would let the Planning Director determine how to proceed to establish grade. Mr. Rodgers showed pictures of the former house before it was demo- lished to address the grade issue. It was moved upon and the Commission requested that on or before November 5, 1986, City Staff inform Mr. Rodgers how td establish natural grade and Mr. Rodgers in turn will establish a reasonable time schedule to proceed with the project by November 5, 1986. Carol Korade advised that the Commission keep the hearing in per- spective by finding that a substandard building •exists and that this constitutes a public• nuisance. She suggested that the Commission set a firm deadline and force the owner to adhere to it. The Commission continued the hearing until December 3, 7986, and ordered the owner to establish grade and determine if the building had to be demolished or if it could be corrected as presently framed by December 3, 1986. The Commission also ordered the owner to fur- nish a schedule and a time sequence for completion of and a comple- tion date for the project by December 3, 7986. Mr. Briggs moved that the Rehabilitation Commission reconverse this hearing on December 3, 1986. Mr. Cranston seconded and the motion passed unanimously. I. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6: 10 p.m. TECHNICAL • AAKOCONSULTANTS. INC. 2483 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE. / FULLERTON, CA 92631-5304 / (714) 773-1232 Toll Free: (800) 422-4117 4697-C4-A6 October 16, 1986 Peter Rodgers 758 West 19th Street Costa Mesa, California 92627 References: 1) Aako..., Inc."Preliminary Soils Engineering Investigation for the Proposed Two Story Residence, 3001 Cliff Drive, Newport Beach, Orange County, California 2) Aako..., Inc. "Rough Grading Report for the Proposed 2-Story Residence, Job # 4697-C1-85, dated June 1985. 3) Aako..., Inc. "Grading Compaction Report for the Backfill of the Drain Pipe Trench, Job # 4697-C2-85, dated June 1985. 4) Aako..., Inc. "Grading Compaction Report for Backfill of the Utility Trenches, Job # 4697-C3-85, dated June 1985. Dear Mr. Rodgers: Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed our reports and other available data pertaining to your -site on 3001 Cliff Drive, Newport Beach. Since we have no legal documentation noting natural grade elevations, it is impossible for us to verify the natural ground elevation prior to rough grading. This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, AAKO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. jb No. 24711 I HNICAL AAKOENGINEERING NGINE RING CONSULTANTS. INC 0 0 Alpine Consultants, Inc. 3303 Harbor Blvd "0-1" P.O. Box 1994. Coate Mesa, California 92626-0994 October 21, 1986 Tracy Williams CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Blvd. P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA Tole: [714) 540-1195 SUBJECT: CLIFF DRIVE & SANTA ANA AVE. NATURAL GROUND PETER S. RODGERS PROPERTY Dear Tracy Williams: As per our telephone conversation,I have found what may be available to use for generating contours for the subject site. Robert Lung and Associates flew the area in 1970 for the County of Orange with photography that can be used to develop topography, although none had been compiled to date. By using known County benchmarks and elevations that have been established on the curb and centerlines of the surrounding roads it appears that two foot contours cgn be established for the lot•with the approximate error of one foot (plus or minus). Prior to initiation of this type of topo generation,•Mr. Rodgers would like to varify that this type of information would satisfy the City of Newport Beach. Please do give me a call if you have any questions. Yours truly, ALPINE,CONSULTANTS, INC. LJC/ds L ry Christensen President � A 1 QuOuliv so UH10 [5 Q00013004Q10 INCORPORATED AERIAL MAPPING, PHOTOGRAPHY & ENGINEERING REPRODUCTION October 22, 1986 City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Beach Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92660 Attention: Tracy Williams Dear Tracy, I offer the following information in regard to the Peter Rogers Parcel on Cliff Drive. Robert J. Lung & Associates has black & white vertical aerial photography taken in June 1970 with the Wild RC-8 distortion free mapping camera. This photography was taken with 60% forward overlap giving us the photogrammetric capability of plotting information stereoscopically. If adequate City bench marks can be identified to establish an accurate level solution in our Kern DSR-11 analytical stereoplotter, then photogrammetic work is possible. Spot elevations accurate to within 1.25 feet could be dropped to establish the ground level and shape as existing at that time. This is a routine type operation whose accuracies vary primarily with the height of the airplane and would be similar to the mapping we have accomplished for the City along the Coast Highway. RJL/mt Please feel free to call should you have any further questions. Yours very truly, Roberti Lung President ^ 21332 WALNUT AVENUE, SUITE E TUSTIN CALIFORNIA 926BO (7141 832-2077 GET ECHNICAL AAKDENGINEERING CONSULTANTS. INC. 2483 E. ORANGETHORPE AVE. / FULLERTON, CA 92631-5304 / (714) 773-1232 Toll Free: (800) 422-4117 4697-C4-A6 October 16, 1986 Peter Rodgers 758 West 19th Street Costa Mesa, California 92627 References: 1) Aako..., Inc."Preliminary Soils Engineering Investigation for the Proposed Two Story Residence, 3001 Cliff Drive, Newport Beach, Orange County, California 2) Aako..., Inc. "Rough Grading Report for the Proposed 2-Story Residence, Job # 4697-C1-85, dated June 1985. 3) Aako..., Inc. "Grading Compaction Report for the Backfill of the Drain Pipe Trench, Job # 4697-C2-85, dated June 1985. 4) Aako..., Inc. Grading Compaction Report for Backfill of the Utility Trenches, Job # 4697-C3-85, dated June 1985. Dear Mr. Rodgers: Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed our reports and other available data pertaining to your site on 3001 Cliff Drive, Newport Beach. Since we have no legal documentation noting natural grade elevations, it is impossible for us to verify the natural ground elevation prior to rough grading. This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, AAKO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. HNICAL AAKOENGINE RING CCOONSSU TANTS.INC r QOOa04 so; MOO 0 gaaoaoaQaa INCORPORATED AERIAL MAPPING, PHOTOGRAPHY& ENGINEERING REPRODUCTION October 22, 1986 City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Beach Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92660 Attention: Tracy Williams Dear Tracy, I offer the following information in regard to the Peter Rogers Parcel on Cliff Drive. Robert J. Lung & Associates has black & white vertical aerial photography taken in June 1970 with the Wild RC-8 distortion free mapping camera. This photography was taken with 60% forward overlap giving us the photogrammetric capability of plotting information stereoscopically. If adequate City bench marks can be identified to establish an accurate level solution in our Kern DSR-11 analytical stereoplotter, then photogrammetic work is possible. Spot elevations accurate to within 1.25 feet could be dropped to establish the ground level and shape as existing at that time. This is a routine type operation whose accuracies vary primarily with the height of the airplane and would be similar to the mapping we have accomplished for the City along the Coast Highway. RJL/mt Please feel free to call should you have any further questions. Yours very truly, Robert . Lung President / 2632 WALNUT AVENUE, SUITE E. TUSTIN. CALIFORNIA 92680 (714) 822-2077 Alpine Consultants, Inc. 3303 Harbor Blvd "0-1" Tale: (714) 540-1 195 P.O. Box 1994, Coate Mesa, California 92629-0994 October 21, 1986 Tracy Williams CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Blvd. P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA SUBJECT: CLIFF DRIVE & SANTA ANA AVE, NATURAL GROUND PETER S. RODGERS PROPERTY Dear Tracy Williams: As per our telephone conversation,i have found what may be available to use for generating contours for the subject site. Robert Lung and Associates flew the area in 1970 for the County of Orange with photography that can be used to develop topography, although none had been compiled to date. By using known County benchmarks and elevations that have been established on the curb and centerlines of the surrounding roads it appears that two foot contours can be established for the lot with the approximate error of one foot (plus or minus). Prior to initiation of this type of topo generation, Mr. Rodgers would like to varify that this type of information would satisfy the City of Newport Beach. Please do give me a call if you have any questions. Yours truly, ALPINE CONSULTANTS, INC. LJC/ds L ry Christensen President POOR QUALITY ORIGINAL (S) �—� RS0Qon&VW4 � �NTIAL :.C'D?::iG CQ.'+KFCT_IO:SS Plan Check No: 7 ,. I By: Tracy Williams, Associate Planner Telephone: (714) 644-3200 Date: ���4i. fi4 i (lt.(� Address: - -or i GL I tf P.-!'/ r. Corrections Required: Legal Description: Lot 5c7 Block Section Tract '7114 Covenant required to combine lots or portions of lots. Please have owner's signature notarized on attached document and return to me. Lot Size Ff) r.' �7. •(.' Zone 3�'C—I :?umber of Units Buildable Area '±aximum Structural Aria (Prea including e=,::tr•rior :;all„ a din;ay on one level and required parking) x buildable arc Proposed-tructural Area: x buildable are,,. :'rovide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided sivire footage. ?pen Space Area cu.ft. (Volume of space equal to buildable width times buildable height times 6). This area most be six feet in anv direction (6'x6'x6') and open on two sides or one side and above. Required Setbacks (Note: Architectual projections, i.e. bay windows or balconies not allowed in setbacks). 1-1� Front_ r� e Rear ' i Right Side Left Side :��:IAIL':i:1't: :.i''t:. •r :r Height Limitation measured from natural grade to average roof height. Dimension all elevations from natural grade to midpoint and maximum ridge of roof planes. t'::•Y? f. !•:j ly. / f1 r•. - !Show natural grade line shown on all elevations. Distance 'between buildings Ma:[imum Coverag?__ ':umber. of Stories Parking (9' - 4" x 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, one space; 17' - 6" x 19' - 0" min. clear dimensions, two spaces). (Third required space may be &' x 16'). Show clear interior dimensions of garage. C Fair Share Contribution OP N E San Joacuin '.;ills Transoortation Corridor Fee Park Dedication Fee Urly b WAIE e'P CIAL APPROVAL REQU* THROUGH! Modifications Committee. Indicate Modification Approval Number on plans. Planning Commission: Use Permit Variance Resubdivision - Tract Site Plan Review Other - Public Works: Easement/Encroachment Permit Curb Cut Subdivision Engineer p/ONF (ZnQL41FZL- lh. Traffic Engineer Approval of Landscape Plans Building Department: Grading Engineer Parks Department: Approval of Landscape Plans Coastal Development Permits: t =: Approval in Concept !"flit (.' i' (9 N ! f'rp . (Note: Pile 3 sets of plans: plot plan, floor plan, elevations). Coastal Development Permit No. Categorical Exclusion No. (Building permits may be issued 10 days following issuance of C.F..O.) Waiver/Exemption Miscellaneous 1. Floor plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. 2. ?lot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences to property line. Show second and/or third floor building footprint on plot plan. P.:. 3. Association Approval (Advisory) 4. Other NOT4: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions reg.:rding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-3200.