Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
7 CORPORATE PLZ
7 Corporate Piz WILU IFASM & SCHMI) O CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS August 20,1993 � L Diane Hussey McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc. 695 Town Center Drive, Suite 300 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Dear Diane: SUBJECT: CORPORATE PLAZA; OUR JOB NO.91247 In response to the letter you sent to me dated August 17, 1993, regarding the existing parking configuration, I am pleased to submit to you our parking summary tabulation. My comments reflect the results of our discussions regarding certain areas of question. If you have any further questions, please call me. zk(dc)Let Enclosure cc M. J. Poptanich, The Irvine Company Larry Williams, The Irvine Company Mike Marvell, The Irvine Company Jim Gillen, Williamson & Schmid Corporate Office • 15101 Red HIII Avenue • Tustin, California 926M • 7141259.79W • FAX 7141259.0210 Inland Empire Office • 1101 S. Milliken Avenue, Suite G • Ontario, California 91761 • 909/988.7880 • FAX 909/988.5299 San Diego County Office • 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 109 • Cadsbad, Califomia 92009 ' • 619/438-4332 Coachella Valley Office • 77.750 Springfield Lane, Suite A • Palm Desert, Califomia 92260 • 619/360.3744 • FAX 619/360.3745 C Corporate Plaza i S WIWASON & KHMID Our Job No. 91247 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AMC LAND SURVEYORS August 20,1993 Page 2 CORPORATE PLAZA PARKING SUMMARY STD COMPACT HCP kQT SPACES S SPACES TOTAL 1 190 0 5 195 2 137 6 3 146 3 144 5 6 155 4 108 0 0 108 5 121 (proposed) 3(proposed) 2(proposed) 126(proposed) 6 167 4 2 173 7 152 9 4 165 8 58 0 5 63 Bldg. 7 26 (proposed) 9 (proposed) 1(proposed) 36 (proposed) Total 1,100 38 28 1,167 Comments Lot 1 One standard stall with curb painted yellow, included in count above. Lot 2 Did not include area adjacent to trash enclosure. Lot 3 No comment. Lot 4 No comment. Lot 5 Construction of Building 7 (adjacent to Lot 5) is currently effecting Lot 5 parking. Parking numbers shown above are reflective of Building Department plan submittals per MV&P (architects). Lot 6 Does not include area adjacent to trash enclosure. Lot 7 Does not include non -striped area adjacent to trash enclosure. Bldg. 7 Proposed parking numbers as provided by MV&P. 0 August 17, 1993 Mr. John Suess Williamson & Schmid 15101 Red Hill Avenue n r Tustin, California 92680 Re: Corporate Plaza CsrlA7elarsnd. A.I.A. MV&P Job #92-180 Ernesto At. Vssquu. A.I.A. ArlhurC. Eckner. A.I.A. Dear John: sees Vasquez & Partners, Inc As Williamson & Schmid and MV&P have been simultaneously doing parking studies for Corporate Plaza at the request of different departments within the Irvine Company, I want to thank you for sharing your parking counts with us in an effort to produce a single parking survey that will benefit us all. I have reviewed your counts in comparison to those done by our office, and field checked any discrepancies between the two. The following is a -parking summary for Corporate Plaza as indicated on the accompanying site plan. Lot Williamson & Schmid MV&P Comments 1 194 195• Verified by MV&P 8/16/93. 2 146 145 Trash space not counted. 3 155 155 4 108 108 5 151 126 Building 7 - Under construction. Building Dept. submittals used to calculate parking. 6 173 172 Trash space not counted. 7 164 168 Verified by MV&P 8/16/93. 8 63 62 End of parking lot will only park 2 spaces. Building 7 Garage 0 36 Actual parking space count in subteranean garage. Total 1,154 1,167 Architecture & Planning 695 ic::: Ceate•Crre Seas 301, r�sta :asa CA d2626 FAX 7!41 _'-5 529- :.! 5» =- - Mr. John Suess Williamson & Schmid August 17, 1993 — page 2 In an effort to generate one set of parking counts that everyone can use and rely on, may I suggest the following: Reserve one (1) space immediately adjacent each trash enclosure for maneuvering area required to access trash bins. 2. Verify parking counts for Lot 1, and for Lot 7. (Equals 168 assuming two (2) cars can be parked between trash enclosure AMP space and 5 existing striped spaces.) 3. In lieu of using aerial, photographed prior to Building 7 construction, to count parking spaces in Lot 5 (Parcel B), use Building Department submittals to determine parking count once Building 7 is completed. These are the numbers the City will recognize. Pending verification of Item 2 above our totals for existing parking should equal approximately 1,167 spaces (see attached summary for breakdown). Your verification of these numbers this week would be appreciated to facilitate completion of our parking analysis. If I can be of further assistance, please give me a call. Sincerely, MCLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS, INC. Diane Hussey, AIA Associate DH/slm Copy: Larry Williams, Irvine Company Mike Marvell!, Irvine Company Jim Gillen, Williamson & Schmid r 0 0 PAAKIHG LOT SURVEY EGSTM ' Lot Identification Std. Spaces Comp. Spaces HCP Spaces Total 1 190 0 5 195 2 136 6 3 145 3 144 5 6 155 ■�/�Q )r/YcxP 4 108 0 0 108 5 121 3 2 126 6 166 4 2 172 7 155 9 4 168 g 57 0 5 62 BLDG 7 26 9 1 36 Total FxMng Total ex 1,103 36 28 1,167 CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT CENTER. ftMxyt �C4 TOTAL• 1516 SPACES PARKING PLAN ti LSA Associates, Inc. Principals Robb Balen Lyn Calerdme Les Card Jim Culver Robert Hnibes George Kurilko Carollvn Lobelf Bill Alayer Ray Me Beth Paden Rob Schonhoftz Malcobn J. Sproul Associates Connie Calica Gary Dow Kevin Encher Amy Flom Steve Granhofm Richard Grassetti RicbardHarlacher Roger Hams Art Homrigbausen Gina fi rick Larry Kennings Karen Kirtland Benson Lee Rob McCann Sabrina Nicholls Hamgene Perry Anthony Petros Dean Williams Jill Wihon LSA March 12, 1993 Ms. Gina Garcia Planning Department City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, CA 92659 Environmental Assessment Transportation Engineering Resource Management CommunityPlanning Environmental Restoration RECEIVLD By pLANNING DE12ARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MAR 15 1993 PM AtMglgl�kpllll>2111�13141516 S Subject: Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring for the 7 Corporate Plaza Project Dear Ms. Garcia; LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) was retained by Mr. Paolo Ghio of Sovereign Bancorp Ltd. to provide the paleontological monitoring for the 7 Corporate Plaza project. 1 attended the pre -grade meeting -and presented the safety and monitoring procedures that we would be employing while on site. Under my supervision, Mr. Brooks Smith, Ms. Andrea Charrbin and Ms. Enid Posner served as field monitors during the initial site grading. Paleontologic moni- toring was conducied bn a full-time basis while grading was being conducted in bedrock materials. The final day of grading was March 8, 1993. Grading on the site exposed primarily artificial fill with a modest amount of bedrock, The bedrock unit was Pleistocene terrace material deposited approximately 10,000 to 120,000 years before present. These sediments have proved to be abundantly fossiliferous both along the south Orange County coast and in the City of Newport Beach. A fossil vertebrate ,site containing the remains of a new species of fossil horse, the marine diving bird Chendytes, the land tortoise Geochelonia, Botta's pocket gopher Tomomys bottae and abundant invertebrates is located within a few hundred feet of the project. The sediments on the nearby fossil site are similar to those underlying the project site. The uppermost sediments were deposited by streams that once existed in the area. The underlying sediments were depos- ited by'a stream channel flowing across a marine terrace, much like an ava- lanche in a submarine canyon. The stream carried terrestrial fossil material from the land into the shallow sea where they were mixed with the remains of marine animals. 03/12/93(1:,.0PC301%M0N.LTR) One Park Plaai, Suite 500 Telepbone 714553-0666 Irvine, California 92714 Facsimile 714553-8076 0 LSA Associates, Inc. On the project site, terrace materials, consisting of brownish to reddish tan sands, silts and a minor amount of clay lying below the fill, were graded during this operation. The LSA monitors report that no paleontological resources were found during these grading operations on the project site. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 553-0666. Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Fran Govean Certified Paleontologist cc: Paolo Ghio 03/12/93 (1:,.OPC301%MONXTR) Principals Rob Balen Lyn Calerdine Les Card Jim Culver Robert Hmbes George Kurilko Cirollvn Lobell Bill Mayer Ray Moe Beth Radon Rob Scbonboltz 31alcolm J. Sproul Associates Comae Calica Gary Dora Kevni F,ncbcr Ainy Flom Stcrc Granbobn Richard Graeem Riebard F/arlacber Roger Harris ArtHomrigbausen GinaJonck Larry Kennings Kaicn,Kirtland Benson Lee Rob McCann Sabrina Nicholls Harrigene Perry Anthony Pctrm Dean Williams Jill lWhon RECEIVE r pLANNING DATIt11ENT ONTY OF NFWPORT REACH LSA March 5, 1993 Ms. Gina Garcia Planning Department City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, CA 92659 MAR 8 1993 AM 7181911001A411213141516 4 LSA Associates, Inc. Environmental Assessment Transportation Engineering Resource Management CommunityPlanning Environmental Restoration Subject: Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring for the 7 Corporate Plaza Project Dear Ms. Garcia: LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) was retained by Mr. Paolo Ghio of Sovereign Bancorp Ltd. to provide the archaeological monitoring for the 7 Corporate Plaza project. Under my supervision, Ms. Enid Posner served as field monitor during the initial site grading. The initial grading has been completed. Ms. Posner reports that no archaeo- logical resources were found during these grading operations. We anticipate that no additional archaeological monitoring will be necessary. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 553-0666. Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. tSK.tN/�000C��'L� . Beth Padon Certified Archaeologist cc: Paolo Ghio 03/04/93 (1:'+OPC301 •.ARCHMON.LL71) One Park Plaza, State 500 Telephone 714553.0666 Irvine, California 92714 Facsimile 714553.8076 • • LSA Associates, Inc. Principals Rob Balen Lyn Caleidine Les Card Jim Culver Robert Hnsbes George Ifurilko Camllyn Lobell Bill darer Ray Moe Beth Padon Rob Schonboltz ,valcobu J. Sproul Associates Connie Calica Gary Dote Kevin Fincber Amy Flom Stae Granbolm Richard Grasseut Richard Harlacber Roger Harris Art Hom gbausen Gina Jimck Larry Kennings Karen Kirtland Benson Lee Rob McCann Sabrina Nicholls Hamgene Peny Anthony Pettus Dean Williams Jill Wilson LSA January 26, 1993 Ms. Gina Garcia Planning Department City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, CA 92659 Environmental Assessment Transportation Engineering Resource Management CommumtyPlanning Environmental Restoration Subject: Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring for the 7 Corporate Plaza Project Dear Ms. Garcia: LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) has been retained by Mr. Paolo Ghio of Sovereign Bancorp Ltd. to provide the archaeological and paleontological monitoring for the 7 Corporate Plaza project. Beth Padon, an Orange County certified archaeologist, will serve as project archaeologist. Fran Govean, an Orange County certified paleontologist, will provide on -site paleontological monitor- ing as needed. Upon completion of grading operations, LSA will prepare a brief letter report that will fulfill the City of Newport Beach's requirements for archaeological and paleontological resources. A more lengthy report will be written if cultural or scientific resources are encountered. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 553-0666. Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Fran Govean Staff Paleontologist cc: Paolo Ghio One Park Plaza, Suite 500 Telepbone 714553-0666 Irvine, California 92714 Facsimile 714553-8076 January 27,1993 TO: RUSTY PRICE, BUILDING DEPT. FROM: GENIA GARCIA, PLANNING DEPT. RE: 7 CORPORATE PLAZA GRADING PERMIT Plancheck #2175-92 As of this date, the Sovereign Bankcorp, Inc., has completed arrangements with LSA for site monitoring (see attached letter). The Planning Dept. is satisfied with the agreement. The grading permit should continue in force. cc: Rick Higley 11 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659.1768 January 26, 1993 Mr. Ghio Paolo Sovereign Bancorp P. 0. Box 8049-301 Newport Beach, CA 92658 SUBJECT: 7 Corporate Plaza Dear Mr. Paolo: On January 25, 1993, the Building Department issued Grading Permit #G9100225 for work at 7 Corporate Plaza. Planning Department approval of the permit was contingent on your providing archaeological and paleontological monitoring during your excavation activities. The Planning Department has asked that this permit be suspended until satisfactory evidence is submitted to show that adequate arrangements for monitoring of the site have been made. They have received communications indicating LSA, the company you submitted as doing this work, has not agreed to provide this service. Therefore, based on Section 303(e) of permit G9200225 is suspended and no work can be satisfactorily resolved. the Uniform Administrative Code, your on the site may begin until this matter Please direct inquiries to Chief Building Inspector Rusty Price at (714) 644-3252 or Associate Planner Genia Garcia at (714) 644-3200. Very truly yours, BUILDING DEPARTMENT Raimar W. Schuller Director RWS:jf c: City Manager Planning Director City Attorney 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach 0 bc: Genia Garcia Rick Higley Rusty Price Don Hunsicker 0 To: Building Department From: Planning Department No Activity: In Plan Check: Active Bldg Permit: Public Works Notified: Re: Hold on Building Permit Final Plan Checker Notified: Address 7t4Plan Check No. Planning Department Comments PRIOR TO RELEASE Of Building Permit Final: Z�j v yvNs/cfce,' [ ] Park Dedication Fee in the Amount of is DUE. [ ] Fairshare Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE. [ ] S.J.H.T.C. Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE. [ ] Coastal Commission Approval of Resubdivision Must Be Obtained. [ ] Parcel Map Recordation: Resubdivision No. Record date [ ] Use Permit Conditions of Approval: Use Permit No. Condition(s) No. [ ] After recordation of the map a building permit change must be processed with the Building and Planning Departments; :PRIOR TO FINAL OF THE BUILDING PER MiT, to change the description of -the permit to reflect condominium construction, the fee is nominal and payable at the time of the change. Proof of payment of the above mentioned fees may be required at that time if not collected at issuance of the original building or grading permits. Units Demolished Units Built Rotting Department CC: _Code Enforcement _Plan Checker F:\WP50\JAY\MEM\BP-HOLD.MEM rev 4-5-90 To: Building Department No Activity: In Plan Check: L,=-' From: Planning Department Active Bldg Permit: Public Works Notified: Re: Hold on Building Permit Final Plan Checker Notified: Planning Department Comments PRIOR TO RELEASE Of Building Permit Final: [ ] Park Dedication Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE. [ J Fairshare Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE. [ ] S.J.H.T.C. Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE. [ ] Coastal Commission Approval of Resubdivision Must Be Obtained. [ ] Parcel Map Recordation: Resubdivision No. Record date [ ] Use Permit Conditions of Approval: Use Permit No. , Condition(s) No. [ ] After recordation of the map a building permit change must be processed with the Building and Planning Departmerifs; :PRIOR TO FINAL OF THE BUILDING PERMiT, to change the description of -the permit to reflect condominium construction, the fee is nominal and payable at the time of the change. Proof of payment of the above mentioned fees may be required at that time if not collected at issuance of the original building or grading permits. Other. (] Other: Units Demolished Units Built Ity: ate A �z I• ��•.rtinent CC: _Code Enforcement _Plan Checker F:\WP50\JAY\MEM\BP-HOLD.MEM rev 4-5-90 TAN 26 193 10:30AM LSA LSA LSA Associates, Inc. One Park Plaza, Suite 500 Irvine, California 92714 Telephone 714 553-0666 Facsimile 714 553-8076 P.1 FAX TPANSMWL J� FirmAate• /g o4 9� : ;�'v li�%l� �ar�+k� �l_?G—',.__.� Attention: f�, Qqr/p6j�cD _ Project Number, Fax Number: `%�'(a •- Project Name: From. - Sent by: Number of Pages (including this one):_ p At your request _� L7 For your approval D For your information ❑ Hard copy to follow t� For your review ❑Other .. Commentsez �� • haa� ,••_ %._-�a �6-'P�ss9n� r,T0TVrR TO: RUSTY PRICE, BUILDING DEPT. FROM: GENIA GARCIA, PLANNING DEPT. RE: GRADING PERMIT - PLAN CHECK #2175-92 ADDRESS: 7 CORPORATE PLAZA The grading permit for this project was issued on January 25, 1993 after supplying the Planning Department with a copy of letter from LSA, a firm employed by Sovereign Bankcorp, Inc. to provide the archeological and paleontological monitoring for the above referenced project. This is a requirement for development within the Corporate Plaza planned community. On Tuesday morning, January 26, 1993, Fran Govean of LSA called this office to inform us that they did not have a valid contract with Sovereign Bankcorp, Inc., and would not be providing monitoring service for this project. (See attached FAX). It is imperative that the Sovereign Bankcopr, Inc. stop grading activities immediately until a suitable arrangement can be made with LSA or any other firm they should want to contract for these services. 0 i JAN 25 '93 03t08PM LSA Principals Rob Balm Its Card Jim Culuar Cargo Kurith C,aroilyn Loball BUl Afayoe Ray Moe Rub Schonholtz Malcolm Sproul AJJoridrar Miebaal Cale Lyn Ccdcasarre Connie Odic's Clary Dow Kuvin lYncbor Stava Gmnholm Richard Crrawfa Rogct•llarris Art llomrighanam Robort HrubaJ Giwprich Bemon Lee RobMeCann Sabrina Nlcbolis BotlsRulon Harrigonr 11orry AntbonyPotros Arnyhudoll Doan Williams Jill Wilson January 25, 1993 Mr. Paolo Ohio Soverign Bancorp. Ltd. P. O. Box 8049-301 Newport Beach, CA 92658 P.1 ISA Associates. Inc. L'nvirmnncntrrl As>rs» nenr Ransportation Engmrrrirrg ResourcrAfanagrmcnt ComtnunityPlanning Envirvnmrnral Xc•srnration Post -it' brand fax transmittal memo 7M B of pages p 2 From ,raj f1� C� rC: CO. CO• Dept. PNOnak T©�` Fox # VAXN Subject:. Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring For The 7 Cor- porate Plaza Project Dear Mr. Crhlo: ISA Associates, Inc. (LSA) understands that your firm has contacted ISA re- garding the need for archaeologicai'and paleontological monitoring for the 7 Corporate Plaza project, in accordance with the City of Newport Beach's re- quirements, K 5 and K 6. This letter is to Inform you that our firm can pro- vide archaeological and paleontological monitoring at the site. Beth Padon, an Orange County certified archaedloglst, will serve as project archaeologist. Fran Crovean, an Orange County certified paleontologist, will provide on -site paleontological monitoring if needed. Upon completion of grading operations, ISA will prepare a brief letter report that will fulfill the City of Newport Beach's requirements for archaeological and paleontological resources, If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 553-0666. Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. 0 Beth Padon Staff Archaeologist Cultural Resource Division cc: Shawn Thompson 01t25M(H ,.BgrWff sGH10,LTR) • 0 101 I ftat c� �,. s e CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT CENTER GRADM, PUW { Newport Beach. C4 .,.. SOVEREIGN BANCORP, LTD. P.O. BOX 8049-301 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8049 (714)975-0910 December 18, 1992 Building Department CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768 RE: Grading Permit and Tentative Parcel Map #92-239 for: 7 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, CA Plan Check #2175-92, TO WHOM IT MAY'CONCERN: Sovereign Bancorp, Ltd. hereby'requestw that the City of'Newport Beach issue a Grading Permit prior to recordation of the lot consolidation currently in progress'. Sovereign Bancorp, Ltd. in turn relinquishes any rights or —demands on a foundation or building permit until this lot consolidation, Re -subdivision No. 989, is approved and recorded. Should you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (714) 975-0910. Sincerely, SOVERE.G BANCORP, LTD. Paolo Ghio Project Man r • PG/sc I t qL= J i I ( Imo' �iaB•" _ 11 _ I, . o (�/y b� 48 6� � �/6./) � l� - • '1d. LII I U yo- 8w / 2Q (i/s9z T.c ( peg °6Fj� _ o �.6r• i,a tis2e ,/ 8Z � �I01 k. _ 1 �I I� I'•I — trdee y) L l //7.00 52 `� h 11 IV - EO/SON � f S _ ,• I ?\ s�• c\�, - .. ' ' - . - �fG fc. BOX �J• EAST 169.53' e1 I°19oa) F�' _ aay� FL' - e-aQzE —_ .m Sop- v ((l°13 I p 5¢ O� L O30,00, —Ot(01016�9` " (ICo62 I rr i I i�a'°l �(]O� ,6 7�'' �� /3.ee)7- o II �� 56 1 yy� fI 0101 e30.00•, ss• (I0�'gp�� (0�08)F('°1q�)`•� ZI bi To .l (io6 A° �°1.Z O sr. Lr. sr.' Lr-JL\ 6oX I II II E ti �/ ri.2 �I 5T LT --- (fl - •�`,� ul AUTO TELLER- s�s) ° coo MY El °�' y2�� OO// �o (r°01 K� ---- 6 go) (Tob.g9) ro Sys (I I� 11�� F.�• �. c. 1 01' "pi7i9/N L PARKING SUMMARY 244. EAST 78.41 r 402.89 1 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 84„BAYS TOTAL ELIMINATED THROUGH MODIFICATION (26) BAYS TOTAL PROVIDED UNDER BUILDING = 40 BAYS .-TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 98 BAYS' Z��F ' P�E� a �j SOILS ENGINEER- G.A. NIC HOLES a ASSOC. 17241 MURPHEY AVE. IRVINE, CA 92714 (714) 250-9111 Telephone: (714) 644-3200 Check No: e;Wg By:Genia Garcia, Assistant_ Planner jJ By:MarC Mvera Assistant Pla ner � Date •a O dr-ess:• Districting Map No. �� Land Use Lot Block Section 'Tract 4Z4�5_ Corrections Required: Legal Description: By:Christy Teaoue Assistant Planner By: Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $20,000. Covenant required. Please have owner's signature notarized on the attached document andreturn to me. /S y y, n Lot Siz p/l/ V j(�L o� 0(�T Zone Y Proposed Use Recuired Setbacks Front o �hiocA�a Rear t3� 5��e�C Z� Right Side as 65 [//O% Left Side FAR WORKSHEET Lot area (site area sc.ft.): sq.ft. _?b &brAva \I M Base Development Allocation (BDA): Comm sq.ft. [0.5 x site area sq.ft., unless otherwise specified in Land *se /Element] c FAR permitted, without variance: (A) comet res vkc (��6J 7 �AO tSquare footage permitted: comet res vkc ■q.ft-/�%7' 1_S�F� [ (A) x site area sq.ft.] Maximum FAR allowed with variance: ( ) Comm res vkc. O( / It M ximum squarye footage allowed: comet res sq.ft. �teZ1tf� 1i iil / PROPOSE DEVELOPMENT: �y Q AJ (C) Base FAR use sq.ft. (D) Reduced FAR use sq.ft. �J�r//��oP-n �� (E) Maximum FAR use sq.ft. y, 7' ` G (F) TOTAL SQ.FT. [C+D+E] I PROPOSED PAR: PROPOSED WEIG$TED DEVELOPMENT: sq.ft. eq•{� [ F + site area sq. ] r� FAR Use Category Weighting Factor (G) (H) sq.ft. Base X 1.00 sq.ft. Reduced X 1.67 sq.ft. Maximum TOTAL WE TED SQ.FT.(May not exceed BDA) Provide tissue overlay of c.d Required Parking _ LA/% Proposed parki Total On c Standard In -lieu Dimension bui roof height . os Indicate n(?r e Parking _ Compact Ing -heiq7htlas rr ZVp1 6- X 0.50 9 nato� r of stalls Weighted Sq.Ft. ( G x H ) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. provided re footage. u ided) ✓T viz afar de o aver ge a d maximum, 0 show natural gA line on all elevations Show all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below. �S y_ Indicate location of trash containers on site plan. Number of stories Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, relation to the property line. Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Please indicate any discretionary approval numbers on the plans and incorporate the attached; excerpt of minutes and list of findings and conditiona into the blueline drawings approval letter into the blueline drawings Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No. on $luelines Modification required for Planning commission/City-Council: Use Permits No. _ Variance% No. _ Resubdivision/Tracti No. site Plan Review: No. Amendment: No. other Plane Plans ?V,P Approval In Concept (AIC) No. L-7 (Notes File 3 sets of plane: site, floor, and elevations) Coastal Development Permit: No. Effective Dates Waiver/Exemption: No. Effective date: dn d�co'Pin�G-.r / 7`„"_ GJ 1/G,/G.r/�/7 /�Q� � �� FJ E i/`�,LA.�t/J��,�{.S�c/J�a�/��t///��/r% �!/� //�j �///�,4NNIN� AA)b AhFCe,�TioAl .¢No �v Uc Gc10,2r�S, ,� GeTTe2 Gi/�l� ,���rlf�,� �%oN'1 /=1-,1_-,��'�f�se✓� ��s�P� A�cy�TeCr 7W,4T GLEt� pCG'O�J�//�(s' Ta f}i9A°�DI�ED OTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you have questions regarding your application, please contact xe at (714) 644- 3200: aj Q • 'f -O 'Y• - r . x . _ ��g.�._ .-.. - _-. _.. _�.-. t.. ! • _s r... .-. • w-. _vN"f-t+♦ ��• t.. .-..� .. .-a '{ ft.Y.ala. 4.NA - L� ° tixAN�nE7[ c• . . R r1• 4 •S � I Y-'- 4 ��� .. �..} � ♦ Y'` V t' � "� i-- ( _ ....-, ;�-.�-..-+ 1-...+..}f f it � .e _ - - 27-4 .-wn-...., -� � �-�--..�..� ....-. .� ....•.f+��.__ - µ.me - - +�1.•" �� r. S X} y . c . �!-:•t i•rh r t i tt ¢� f�-{fide" *r r � __', m. x f s •rtir.X...'..i��+ '�sY 3w' 8dsbanc-ie+;a=+r=,�mrk� •v>ma...a< — — -• - ws...;'i Y� .. - ' �# Y=-S * ` � "�'2. •-.-.'yam:-.�A,:,6iY2T. - - :tANDtZAPP� DAZE iY f A'fi".?iu WA=M VE 41 -� - - ,�, - _: a: .�,;*.r.:- _ �. - i �'{��.. �1..r...ram.....-•..•...-•...•.....-.:__ �` ....�.'-�,. ..__.._-.,___.-...-,_.._-., .. _- tl�A.- - - - --•-�_-•.-... -„ --- -'+; lam DAN'ttIAN ASS6^ATEC G G � • n 1 .I 3 Q 6 "s: � b . E F � -tY t�an�-t • . , O. 9• - a wa.. .vr.-. ,:.-77 SOVEREIGN BANCORP l C �M 1 8 ;IN x GARAGE PLAN ram, .nECM YW s�- M A Y G F E SOVEREIGN BANCORP C � � � � l� �(-•' -- --'_.�, B ; .,,=. - GARAGE t - ' • PLAN - - +-e=.. _ fi - - -- - ---- - - ..r� �+ f " .r w,arnb! "3 u�-.•icc'--� -,( amv�.' - _ - - _ • °fr` r �•C% as ,< ' ��aa - _. ___ �•-�—� - * - SCALE: VS"-T-O" - APR 011993 _ - #�,.'M!4.*'�'Y' Y-Stt:: .`.t:.k"Ay�'•. a[1� ':F � `w h�6! - '$.,� September 25, 1996 Mr. Jim Sinasek Code Enforcement Supervisor City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 Re: 7 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, CA Dear Mr. Sinasek: I am in receipt of your letter dated September 16 regarding above referenced matter. Let me first respond to your request, simply from a position of cooperation, and inform you that the major portion of the parking garage has now been cleaned up and freed of all non -vehicles and that we are further having approximately twelve executives of the company parking inside the building. Our intent is to fully clear the parking garage floor and make it available for parking. This action by us, however, should not be taken as an acquiescence to your demand that we are required to provide 36 spaces under the subject building. Quite to the contrary, the Irvine Company Purchase Agreement, and related recorded documents address this issue. Namely, that all parking for the subject site will be provided in common with the other Corporate Plaza buildings. 7 Corporate Plaza • Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 644-OLEN • Fax (714) 719-7200 J Our construction of the garage was for our personal use and contrary to your position that "this building would not have been approved for construction by the Planning Department if parking spaces were not going to be provided ... " If your position was to prevail then we were sold land by the Irvine Company which could not have been developed. Simply put, there was never any intent in the C.C. & R.'s or recorded plat maps to have any parking under the subject building by either the Planning Department of Newport Beach or the Irvine Company. This was a voluntary decision and not one which in any way intended to increase the parking pool available spaces for Corporate Plaza. If the Irvine Company would like to have our parking spaces counted as part of the parking pool, so that they can then increase their density of office space in Corporate Plaza on other available vacant parcels, then we would be happy to comply if the Irvine Company wishes to pay us for the expense of constructing the parking garage. It can't be both ways, namely selling us land which was to be parked in common and then once we have built a very expensive parking garage for personal reasons suggest that these spaces become part of the Corporate Plaza pool, without paying us for them. Setting the legal issues aside, however, I suggest to you that this is escalating "a mole hill into a mountain." We don't have a parking problem in Corporate Plaza and there are more than sufficient spaces in the immediate area. If our neighbors would like to free up the spaces in the immediate area between the three buildings in this pod of Corporate Plaza, they simply need to ask their employees to park in the parking lot across the street adjacent to 23 Corporate Plaza. The problem that is causing a congestion in the immediate parking lot is the substantial traffic and parking by Bank customers and ATM users. The parking requirements in this immediate pod of parking never contemplated that there would be the massive use of the ATM machines and that the banking industry as a whole would move to this medium of banking. This medium of banking is simply an expansion of the transactions which would have normally been transacted inside the building (for which space area parking was calculated) to outside areas for which no parking was contemplated or provided for. This is further complicated by the unused ATM machine building which belonged to Great Western. This ATM building uses an area which previously provided 8+ spaces. Additionally the trash enclosure for the three buildings was previously not on this parking lot, and is eliminating 3 - 4 spaces. In summary, I would suggest that you take into account these issues. I would also urge you to look at the recorded documents, C.C. & R.'s and Approved Site Plans for the subject area of Corporate Plaza, some of which are enclosed, in determining whether we have a requirement to provide parking under the building. I have noticed that the Irvine Company, in a recent Site Plan, show the 36 spaces under our building as part of the count for the Corporate Plaza parking pool. Although that may suit their purpose for density calculations, it is tantamount to taking of our property without compensation, which we would certainly rigorously oppose. Sincerely, Igor MxOlenicoff IMO:ct cc: City Manager Assistant City Manager, Planning & Building City Attorney CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ? P.O. BOX 1765. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-&915 September 16, 1996 Igor M. Olenicoff, President % Olen Management Corp. 7 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, Ca. 92770 SUBJECT: Parking Requirement 7 Corporate Plaza (A. P. 442-271-29) Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Olenicoff: Thank you for your letter of August 30, 1996. Pursuant to our letter dated August 21, 1996, we would again like to remind you that your building would not have been approved for construction by the Planning Department if parking spaces were not going to be provided since the approved spaces were part of the parking pool requirement for Corporate Plaza. We are sure you are aware, your building was approved and built with a 21,000 square foot garage. This garage Has approved with the provision that at least 36 parking spaces would be provided along with appropriate stripping. The City can certainly understand the concerns you expressed during our phone conversation on August 30, 1996 regarding permitting the public the use of your parking garage. Therefore, since the plaza is underparked in the first place and because your 35 to 55 employees create such a demand on the pool parking areas adjacent to your building the City feels that at least your employees shop:!d be required to u:i:ize the Parking located be-::'.: the area in which choose to work, this would at least free -up the Pool puking spaces nlin your building and 1%'P to reduce the demand by the public utilizing the businesses in the area The City appreciates your cooperation and understanding in this matter. Would you please advise the undersigned as to the date by w hicb you will accomplish our request. If you have any questions about this matter, you may contact me directly at (714) 644-3215 between 7:30 to 8:00 A.M. and 330 to 4:00 P.M. or by writing to the above address. 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach Septemher 16, 19% r Page 2 Very truly yours, BUILDING DEPARTMENT Raimar W. Schuller, Director go Supen•isor JSjf c: C' y Manager ssistant City Manager, Planning and Building City Attorney Irvine Company P. 0. Box 6370 Newport Beach, Ca. 92658-6370 August 30, 1996 Mr. Jim Sinasek Code Enforcement SuperLisor City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 Re: Parking Requirement 7 Corporate Plaza (A.P. No. 442-271-29) Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Sinasek: SEP - 3 1996 CITY OF NEWPORT dtAum CALIFORNIA This letter is to confirm that we have telephonically, this morning, discussed the above referenced matter. I did not want to have your letter go unanswered. Thank you for your assistance in getting this matter resolved. Sincerely, I� IMO:ct 7 Corporate Plaza • Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 644-OLEN • Fax (714) 719-7200 °X CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH T a~� August 21, 1996 Igor M. Olenicoff, President % Olen Management Corp. 7 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, Ca. 92770 SUBJECT: Parking Requirement 7 Corporate Plaza (A. P. No. 442-271-29) Newport Beach California Dear Mr. Olenicofi: This office has been informed that the required parking for your subject property is no longer accessible or available to your employees or to the general public should they choose to park a vehicle within your building. The City believes that this lack of access and availability is a violation of Section 20.33.05513 of the Newport Beach )Municipal Code and, as such, your property is not in compliance with the original approvals relative to the overall pool parking requirement for your property and Corporate Plaza. When your property was developed, the approval for this project was predicated on your providing thirty six (36) parking spaces with appropriate striping within your building. These spaces are to be available to your employees and the general public. The garage area is not to be for your exclusive use for the storage of boats, boat trailers, furniture, or for the placement of amusement devices such as ping pong tables, unless the minimum amount of parking has been first provided. The sliding garage gate/door which allows or prohibits access to this parking area has been installed in such a manner that it provides an actual as well as a psychological deterrent to the public for the parking of vehicles within your building. Therefore. %%iihln fifteen (15) da%s from the d--- :e ; f *his let::[. you are to: Provide access during business hour (8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.) to the parking area under your building by continually leaving the sliding gate/door in an open position; or, • Provide a legible sign on the gate/door that indicates the availability of public parking with a card type access system for your employees and the general public; 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach August 21, 1996 Page 2 Provide striped automobile parking spaces for no less than thirty six (36) spaces as per the approved plans for the construction of the building; Remove all fi_—niture, boats, trailers, ping pong tables, and any other items which preclude access to a minimum of the required thirty six (36) parking spaces; and, Contact the undersigned on or before September 6, 1996 to arrange for an appointment for the inspection of your required parking area. We can assure you we appreciate your anticipated efforts in helping to resolve this issue as timely and as amicably as possih'e. On the other hand, we should inform you, if you choose to ignore our request this matter %NU be referred to the office of the City Attorney for appropriate action. If you have any questions about this matter, you may contact me directly at (714) 644-3215 between 7:00 to 8:00 A.M.. and 3:30 to 4:00 P.M. or by writing to the above address. Very truly yours, BUILDING DEPARTMENT Raimar W. Schuller, Director La Jim Sjasek, Codforcement Supervisor JS:jf c: i e Company P. . Box 6370 Newport Beach. Ca. 9^_658-6. 70 Patty Temple, Pla_-ming Director Newport Beach 5 corporate Plaza Newport Beach. CA 92M August 12, 1996 Jim Sinafek Code Enforcement City of Newport Beach PO Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Dear Jim, I would appreciate if you would investigate a significant parking problem that has been created by Olin Property Management, 6/7 Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, CA 92660. It is my understanding that the company was required to build underground parking for its employees as a requirement for its building permit. The owner of the property now uses the underground parking for his personal boat and vehicle storage, but requires bis employees to park in the common parking lot used by the occupants of the other buildings. I receive numerous parking complaints from individuals unable to find a parking space. Please look into this matter and do what you need to do to have Olin move its employees into the spaces that were required when the building permit was approved. I may be reached at 721-8437. Thanks your help. Sincerely, Bhp ernhardt Vice President and Manager BUILDING DEPARTMENT AUG 141996 CITY OF Wt:k-VPGF 1 btt%UH CALIFORNIA Printed on Recycled Paper October 4, 1993 TO: John Douglas, Principal Planner FROM: Genia Garcia, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Corporate Plaza Entitlement After a lengthy and detailed study conducted by myself and Diane Hussey of McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc., of the Corporate Plaza Planned Community, I have outlined the square footage for each building. The use of tissue overlays of the original plans used in the issuance of building permits for each building was the basis upon which we determined the square footage. The attached chart represents gross square footage for entitlement purposes, gross square footage for parking, and net square footage for parking. cc: Pat Temple, Advance Planning Manager Senior Planners Bill Laycock, Current Planning Manager Janet Divan, Traffic Engineering Division CORPORATE PLAZA ENTITLEMENT -PARKING AND ANALYSIS Existing N.B. N.B. N.B N.B Development Bldg. Gross Pkg. Pkg. Permits Entitle. Gross Net 1 Corporate Plaza 16,000 17,671 17,499 16,503 2 Corporate Plaza 24,246 21,323 21,026 19,592 3 Corporate Plaza 20,886 20,392 20,300 18,934 4 Corporate Plaza 21,630 22,007 22,072 20,682 5 Corporate Plaza 10,154 10,390 10,032 9,847 7 Corporate Plaza 21,000 23,627 23,379 22,592 12 Corporate Plaza 15,747 16,441 16,107 15,254 13 Corporate Plaza 17,574 15,755 15,141 14,456 14 Corporate Plaza 24,040 26,954 26,704 25,348 15 Corporate Plaza 15,500 16,143 15,755 15,049 16 Corporate Plaza 13,610 13,271 13,218 11,995 17 Corporate Plaza 23,350 22,976 22,617 21,447 18 Corporate Plaza 16,000 18,231 17,929 16,790 19 Corporate Plaza 17,580 16,378 15,895 15,698 20 Corporate Plaza 8,200 8,168 7,755 7,630 23 Corporate Plaza 82,619 82,746 82,130 80,046 Total 348,136 352,473 347,559 331,863 September 14, 1993 Required Parking - Gross 1,390 - Net 1,190 Existing Parking 1,160 = (30) spaces Total Proposed Additional Spaces 349 = 1,509 Total October 4, 1993 TO: John Douglas, Principal Planner FROM: Genia Garcia, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Corporate Plaza Entitlement After a lengthy and detailed study conducted by myself and Diane Hussey of McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc., of the Corporate Plaza Planned Community, I have outlined the square footage for each building. The use of tissue overlays of the original plans used in the issuance of building permits for each building was the basis upon which we determined the square footage. The attached chart represents gross square footage for entitlement purposes, gross square footage for parking, and net square footage for parldng. cc: Pat Temple, Advance Planning Manager Senior Planners Bill Laycock, Current Planning Manager Janet Divan, Traffic Engineering Division i CORPORATE PLAZA ENTITLEMENT -PARKING AND ANALYSIS Existing N.B. N.B. N.B N.B Development Bldg. Gross Pkg. Pkg. Permits Entitle. Gross Net 1 Corporate Plaza 16,000 17,671 17,499 16,503 2 Corporate Plaza 24,246 21,323 21,026 19,592 3 Corporate Plaza 20,886 20,392 20,300 18,934 4 Corporate Plaza. 21,630 22,007 22,072 20,682 5 Corporate Plaza 10,154 10,390 10,032 9,847 7 Corporate Plaza 21,000 23,627 23,379 22,592 12 Corporate Plaza 15,747 16,441 16,107 15,254 13 Corporate Plaza 17,574 15,755 15,141 14,456 14 Corporate Plaza 24,040 26,954 26,704 25,348 15 Corporate Plaza 15,500 16,143 15,755 15,049 16 Corporate Plaza 13,610 13,271 13,218 11,995 17 Corporate Plaza 23,350 22,976 22,617 21,447 18 Corporate Plaza 16,000 18,231 17,929 16,790 19 Corporate Plaza 17,580 16,378 15,895 15,698 20 Corporate Plaza 8,200 8,168 7,755 7,630 23 Corporate Plaza 82,619 82,746 82,130 80,046 Total 348,136 352,473 347,559 331,863 September 14, 1993 Required Parking - Gross 1,390 - Net 1,190 Existing Parking 1,160 = (30) spaces Total Proposed Additional Spaces 349 = 1,509 Total OLMN April 8, 1999 City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92660 Re: Zoning Compliance Letter Gentlemen: RECEIVED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEkA/PnRT BEACH AM APR L 61999 PM 71819110111112111213141316 Olen Commercial Realty Corp., is in the process of refinancing three of their properties located in the City of Newport Beach. The Lender, GE Capital Corporation, has asked that we provide them with an updated Zoning Compliance Letter. Attached is the proposed format for the Compliance Letter that GE is asking td be used. Following is the information relevant to the subject property: 1. 3366 Via Lido (Olen Lido Plaza) APN 423-123-10 and APN 047-031-20 2. 7 Corporate Plaza APN 442-271-29 3. 2 Corporate Plaza APN 442-271-02 Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should there be a cost for the issuance of these Letters, please advise and a check will be issued forthwith. Sincerely, OLEN COMMERCIAL REALTY CORP. Christine Trill Administrative Assistant 7 Corporate Plaza • Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 644-OLEN • Fax (949) 719-7200 [GECC TEMPLATE: CMBS LARGE LOAN PROGRAM - MULTIPLE PROPERTIES] FORM OF ZONING LETTER (LETTERHEAD OF MUNICIPALITY) General Electric Capital Corporation Re: [insert name and address of property and describe project amenities specifically] (the "Project") Ladies and Gentlemen: In response to your request concerning the Project's compliance with applicable codes, regulations and ordinances, please be advised as follows: (i) the [here insert applicable governmental authority] is responsible for (a) enforcement of building codes, zoning ordinances and similar codes or ordinances related to commercial development in [here insert applicable city, county, or municipality] and (b) responsible for the issuance of certificates of occupancy in [here insert applicable city, county, or municipality]; (ii) certificates of occupancy have been issued and are in effect for the Project and we are not aware of any circumstances which would render the certificates of occupancy invalid or cause them to be revoked. A copy of such certificates of occupancy for the Project are attached hereto; (iii) the Project is zoned under the laws or ordinances of [here insert applicable governmental authority], which zoning is proper for the [here insert brief description of Project] and related amenities comprising the Project, and accordingly the Project is a conforming use; and (iv) as a condition of the issuance of the certificates of occupancy in [here insert applicable city, county, or municipality] (the "Authority") a [retail] [hotel] [apartment] [office] project must comply with all applicable codes and ordinances including, but not limited to, building and occupancy codes, any regulations pertaining to an entry sign board, fire department codes and regulations, applicable zoning and use laws, landscaping and parking requirements, obtaining appropriate curb cut permits and provisions for applicable sanitary sewer, water, storm drainage and other utilities. The issuance of the certificates of occupancy for the Project is evidence that the conditions set forth have been satisfied at the Project. [Note; If the issuance of a certificate of occupancy does not necessarily indicate compliance with all these requirements, substitute the following: The Project currently complies with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to zoning, land use, parking, and is in compliance with applicable building and fire codes.] (v) a current search of the Authority's applicable records indicates that there are no pending violations of any applicable laws, codes, rules, regulations or ordinances described in paragraph (iv) above and there are no pending rezoning applications, hearings, cases, appeals or proceedings which could affect the zoning classification of the Project. Sincerely, (Title) COM. <CIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING CORRECT ,'s ' Plan Check No:,fr"'�Z /',• U idica'te n� r of stalls provided). — Parking _ Compact9--=� 4 —, A-, 1W as Telephones (714) 644-3200 By:Genia Garcia Assistant Planner �7 / a By:Marc Myers Assistant Planner /: Date: � ZI �Addddress Districting Map No. Land Use E Byschristy Teague, Assistant Planner Corrections Required: tie Legal Description: Lot Block _ Section Tract -�_/G,S Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or alterations are in excess of $20,000. covenant required. Please have owner's signature notarized oon�Gthe attached document and return to me. Lot Siz Zone e42r,4 iwlefti �__� Required Setbacks Front g//6,, / ,.'�Q�C�/�6 Rear �V �'` 2PSIrzf � Right side dS /0'f Left Side PAR WORKSHEET Lot area (site area sg.ft.): sq.ft. 30 Aa a Base Development Allocation (BDA): Comm sq.ft. [0.5 x site area sq.ft., unless otherwise specified in Land Us/e EEleemme�nt]] C FAR permitted, without variance: (A) Comm res cka Square footage permitted: corm res vkg sq.ft-/��7' �Sf�GL [ (A) x site area sq.ft.] 0, /. r/ Maximum FAR allowed with variance: (B) Comm res Pkg_ �( M�xim//um square( footage allowed: comm res sq.ft. �n tesq / d ft. if Ajel/aZ� /Of RJS7 /1/iaw( �,s PROPOSE° DEVELOPMENT: (C) Base FAR use sq.ft. sq.ft. ri (D) Reduced FAR use sq. ft. sq. ft. (E) Maximum FAR use sq.ft. sq.ft. CYJOjO- / C U/ (F) TOTAL SQ.FT. [C+D+E] sq.ft. _, /1 �. PROPOSED FAR: [ F + site area sq.ft. J PROPOSED WEIGHTED DEVELOPMENT: FAR Use Category Weighting Factor (G) (H) sq.ft. Base X 1.00 sq.ft. Reduced X 1.67 sq.ft. Maximum X 0.50 Weighted Sq.Ft. 3'% ( G x H ) �/ TOTAL WE TED SQ.FT.(May not exceed BDA) Provide tissue overlay offcalculations to verify provided Required Parking,Qj� Proposed parki Total On Standard In -lieu Dimension bu roof height �A� sq.ft. sq.ft. I sq.ft. C footage. C/e40,1 /i16,• PCi BUT 75�7VIV + � Show natural grace line on all elevations _ Show all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below. Indicate location of trash containers on site plan. Number of Stories Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses. Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in relation to the property line. �r _ . w , t'n i� . I�.�f ��nn i• is ��`s `.� Fair Share :Sian Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee Please indicate any discretionaryexcerpt approval r v l nutberses aon the plans of and incogaorand the attached] - conditions into the-bluelins drawings approval letter into the blueline drawings Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No. on Bluslines Modification required for Mannino Commie o u c 1s Use Permit: No. Variance: No. Resubdivision/Tract: No. Site Plan Reviews No. Amendment: No. other ermit Plane Plans Approval In Concept (AJ,u) no• (Note: File 3 sets of plans: ■its, floor, and elevations) Coastal Development Permit: gNo. Effective Date: Waiver/Exemptions No. dates o /�7i©i(1 /hIL4r/s m� i l� ,(�a5 ca/viN� r GAA/n/in/� !T-n BG �EY/GtJF� .By ,� G�TTr?2 Cry/LG Sd/�/u �n ,e004A1W1-0n/ ,4Avo Pv u� u�oer�s. !- #q A-41n seo 0(10sC'APe, T AWEO IMF, b F��� Gq.)O �� %��'S ��""" ��STi9LL,�/7 �C.C-4�✓%/NAG' ,L,1c,�rnNi✓ NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. if you have questions regarding your a)Iplication,please/.contact as aty(714) 644- 3200. / f. - /. -_il a IAid/1A f7///H�L�/t�J GI/yY� CORPORATEPLAZA 1. November 21, 1974. Amendment No. 434 to establish the Planned Community Development Plan and Development Standards for the Corporate Plaza Planned Community. Resubdivision No. 465 to create twenty-one numbered parcels for commercial development and one lettered parcel for a common parking lot. Approved March 24, 1975. 2. Land Use Agreement for Corporate Plaza, recorded on May 2, 1977. 3. Resubdivision No. 880 to create six numbered parcels and one for off-street parking. Lots 6-11, 19, 20, and a portion of Parcel B. September 12, 1988. 4. March 8, 1990. Lot Line Adjustment No. 90-02 between 7 and 8 Corporate Plaza. 5. January 13, 1992. Amendment No. 728. Corporate Plaza Planned Community District Regulations. 6. November 19, 1992. Resubdivision No. 989. Sovereign Bancorp LTD, applicant. 7. January 22, 1993. 7 Corporate Plaza began Plan Check No. 2434-92 and Grading Plan Check No. 2175-92. This is the zoning Plan Check correction sheet. Attached is a copy of the plans for the garage under the building that show the "rolling gate". Bill Laycock and Jim Hewicker felt that allowing the development of 7 Corporate Plaza may result in a defect of parking, but that it would be made up with future development. At this point, it was not known whether or not there was a deficit. 8. February 24, 1993. As a result of G. Garcia's request for an updated parking count, the Irvine Company retained McLarand Vasquez & Partners to do a Corporate Plaza Parking and Entitlement Analysis. This did not include any entitlement for 7 Corporate Plaza. 9. February, 1993. G. Garcia researched all the building permits for Corporate Plaza and found a discrepancy in square footage numbers between what the building permits disclosed and what the consultant presented. 10. April 19, 1993. Diane Hussey, the Consultant submits net square footage calculations. It was determined after looking at the plans for a couple of the buildings, that there was not a way to determine if the building permits reflected gross or net square footages, or even what the definition of those were when the buildings were constructed in the 1970's. The submittal from the consultant included the proposed development entitlement of CP 7. As a result of the discrepancies, it was agreed upon by the Irvine Company, (Larry Williams) to have a thorough investigation of existing square footages in Corporate Plaza. The study included reprinting the microfilmed plans that were on file with the City of Newport Beach, for each existing building in CP. The consultant did a tissue overlay (tissue laid over the plans to calculate gross and net square footages) and returned each plan to G. Garcia for her review. She spent approximately 8 hours on each building (8 times 16 buildings =128 hours approximately) and this work was spread over approximately 6 months. The study included square footages for 7 CP and the related parking that it was to provide. Due to a redesign of the common parking lot in front of CP 7 to accommodate the new building (noted on Plan Check Correction Sheet), there was a net loss of 7 parking spaces. The Irvine Company felt that these spaces could be made up with the addition of the 36 spaces under 7 CP. 11. May 11, 1993. Consultant submits more calculation for Planner to review. This includes the development of 7 CP. 12. July 29, 1993. Mike Marvelli, Irvine Company, faxed G. Garcia results of parking study on hand. 13. August 20, 1993. Another Consulting firm, Williamson and Schmid, were conducting parking analysis of Corporate Plaza simultaneously for the Irvine Company. That information was sent to the City to review. Again, 7 CP was included in both consultants parking counts. 14. September 14, 1993. Consultant from MVP sent correspondence confirming square footages for CP 7. 15. October 4, 1993. Final results of square footages for the buildings in Corporate Plaza. The consultant and G. Garcia agree on totals after complete review of consultants work. 16. October 7, 1993. G. Garcia asks Code Enforcement, Jim Sinasek, to count three lots that had not been previously field counted. (Note: G. Garcia field counted all but three lots). Based on this information, it was determined that with the addition of the 36 spaces under the building at 7 Corporate Plaza, the entire Planned Community development was deficient by 30 spaces. 17. August 12, 1996. Letter of complaint from Joe Bernhardt, Vice President and Manager of the Wells Fargo Bank that shares the common parking area. August 21, 1996. Code Enforcement send letter to Igor M. Olenicoff, owner of the building at 7 Corporate Plaza. z August 30, 1996. Letter received from Igor Olenicoff, acknowledging phone conversation that date. September 16, 1996. Letter to Mr. Olenicoff from Code Enforcement. September 25, 1996. Letter in response to Code Enforcement from Mr. Olenicoff. 4 CORPORATE PLAZA NOMORT CENTER 'MnvfOwl Ar4 SETBACKS SITE i I :i •.i oRAcE No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ESTABLISHING A PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS,FOR THE CORPORATE PLAZA PLANNED COMMUNITY IN NEWPORT CENTER The City Council Of the City of Newport Beach DOES ORDAIN as follows: SECTION 1. The following described real property located in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California, to wit: That portion of Block 93, Irvine's Subdivision in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as per map filed in Book 1, page 88, Miscellaneous Record Maps, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Westerly terminus of that certain course in the Southerly right of way line of "Proposed Civic Center Drive" shown as "N. 77. 00' 33" E. 3:961" on a map filed in Book 27, page 17, Parcel Maps, records of said County; thence along said right of way line the foliowing described course: North 77. 00' 33" East 3.96 feet; Easterly 314.13 feet along a 461.50 foot radius curve that is concave Southerly through an angle of 39" 00' 00"; South 63" 59' 27" East 310.06 feet; Easterly 220.95 feet along a 538.50 foot radius curve that is concave Northerly through an angle of 230 30' 33"; South 870 30' 00" East 383.69 feet; Easterly 221.50 feet along a 461.50 foot radius curve that is concave Southerly through -an angle of 270 30' 00"; South 600 00' 00" East 48.92 feet; Southerly 39.27 feet along a 25.00 foot radius curve that is concave Westerly through an angle of 900 00' 00"; thence South 300 00' 00" West 926.50 feet to the beginning of a curve that is concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 1,945.50 feet; thence Southwesterly 357.97 feet along said curve through an angle of 10. 32' 33"; thence South 40. 32' 33" West 425.00 feet to the beginning of curve that is concave Northerly and having a radius of 35.00 feet and whose Westerly terminus is tangent to the Northeasterly right of way line of East Coast Highway as shown on a map of Tract No. 6015 filed in Book 239, pages 28 through 41, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said County; thence Southwesterly 54.98 feet along said curve through an angle of 900 00' 00" to said right of way line; thence North 49. 27' 27" West 573.13 feet along said line to an angle point in the boundary of the land described in a deed recorded in Book 8362, page 186, Official Records of said County; thence North 430 44' 49" West 301.50 feet along said boundary to an angle point therein; thence North 490 27' 27" West 85.89'feet along said boundary to the beginning of a curve therein concave Easterly and having a radius of 100.00 feet; thence Northerly 157.08 feet along said curve and boundary and the boundary of said Tract No. 6015 through an angle of 900 00, 00"; thence along the boundary of said Tract the following described courses: North 40. 32' 37" East '109.71 feet; Northerly 808.20 feet along a 865.00 foot radius curve that is concave Westerly through an angle of 53" 32' 00"; North 12. 59' 27" West 151.86 feet to -1- �� a,,,i< ,.I. �,'usl';cL•' 4: �'�:;{�i the beginning of curve °'concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 25.00 feetF thence Northeasterly 39.27 feet along said curve through an angle of 90. 00' 00" to the point of beginning, which is zoned P-C, is hereby amended to establish a Planned Community Development Plan and Development Standards known as the Corporate Plaza Planned Community in Newport Center. SECTION 2. Copies of said Development Plan and Develop- ment Standards are on file in the Office of the City Clerk for the City of Newport Beach and are made a part hereof by this reference. SECTION 3. The Community Development Director of the city of Newport Beach is hereby instructed and.directed to show said amendment on said property and P-C District, as described herein - above; and, as said P-C District shall have been -so amended, the same shall be in full force and effect and be a part of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be published once,in the official newspaper of the City, and the same shall be effective thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. ` ' This ordinance was introduced at'a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach held on the 13th day of slanuary , 1975, and was adopted on the 24th day of March , 1975, by'the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEN: McInnis,rOstal, BarrettKuehn Rogers Ryckoff, Store NOES, COUNCILMENs Nme ABSENT COUNCILMEN: None CERTIFIED AS TIM OT^'N-d At" ATTEST : CCRTIFICD AS TO F•l':P:.: '.': ' DATE MAR 2 6 1975 V C �ICLIerk' ttn% of ' CITY O, N. w .z ', E. Landscaping Detailed landscaping• and irrigation plans, prepared'by a landscaping architect, licensed landscaping contrac- tor or architect shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuing of Building Permits and installed prior to issue of Certificate of Use and Occupancy. All landscaping referred to in this section shall be maintained in a neat and orderly fashion. 1. Front Yard Setback Area a. General Statement Landscaping in these areas shall consist of an effective combination of street trees, trees, ground cover and shrubbery. -39- b. Special Landscaped Street The entire area between the curb and the building setback line shall be landscaped, except for any driveway in said area. C. Other Streets The entire area between the curb and a point ten (10) feet in back of the front property line shall be landscaped except for any driveway in said area. 2. Side Yard and Rear Yard a. General Statement All unpaved areas not utilized for parking and storage, shall be landscaped utilizing ground cover and/or'shrub and tree materials. b. Undeveloped Areas Undeveloped areas proposed for future expan- sion shall be maintained in a weed free condition, but need not be landscaped. C. Screening Areas used for parking shall be screened from view or have the view interrupted by land- scaping and/or fencing from access streets, freeways, and adjacent properties. Plant materials used for screening purposes shall consist of lineal or grouped masses of shrubs and/or trees. d. Boundary Areas Boundary landscaping is required on all interior property lines. Said areas shall be placed along the entire length of these property lines or be of sufficient length to accommodate the number of required trees. Trees, equal in number to one (1) tree per twenty-five (25) lineal feet of each property line, shall be planted in the above defined areas in addition to required ground cover and shrub material. -40- e. All landscaped areas shall be separated from adjacent vehicular areas by a wall or curb, at least six (.6) inches.' higher. that • the adjacent vehicular area. 3. Parking Areas Trees, equal in number to one (1) per each five (5) parking stalls shall be provided in the parking area. F. Loading Areas 1. Street side loading on other than special land- scaped streets, shall be allowed providing the loading dock is set back a minimum of seventy (70) feet from the street right-of-way line, or one hundred ten (110) feet from the street center line, whichever is greater. Said loading area must be screened from view from adjacent streets. G. Storage Areas 1. All outdoor storage shall be visually screened from access streets, freeways and adjacent pro- perty. Said screening shall form a complete opaque screen up to a point eight (8) feet in vertical height but need not be opaque above that point. 2. Outdoor storage shall be meant to include all company owned and operated motor vehicles, with the exception of passenger vehicles. 3. No storage shall be permitted between a frontage street and the building line. H. Refuse Collection Areas 1. All outdoor refuse collection areas shall be visually screened from access streets, freeways and adjacent property. Said screening shall form a complete opaque screen. -41- 2. No refuse collection area shall be permitted between a frontage street and the building line. I. Telephone and Electrical Service All "on -site" electrical lines (excluding lines in excess of 12KV) and telephone lines shall be placed underground. Transformer or terminal equipment shall be visually screened from view from streets and adja- cent properties. J. Pedestrian Access It is required of all developments in the commercial areas to submit a plan of pedestrian access to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of building permits. Said plans will detail consideration for pedestrian access to the subject property and to adjacent properties, and shall be binding on subsequent development of the property. The plan shall show all interior walkways and all walkways in the public right-of-way, if subh walkways are proposed or neces- sary. -42- FOOTNOTES (1) Planned Cbmmunity Text Amendment No. I,' dated December '13, 1971, incorporating a revised land use plan. (2) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 2, dated June 12, 1972, incor- porating the following changes: a. Relocation of Fire Station site. b. Limitation of tourist information, travel agencies and ticket reservations within Retail Commercial sites. C. Addition of specific restaurant density within Retail Commercial sites. (3) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 3, dated October 24, 1972, permitting Auto Centers as an additional use within Industrial Site 2B. (4) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 4, dated January 8, 1973, incor- porating the following changes: a. Provision for a Mechanical Car Wash within Service Station Site No. 1. b. Eliminate provision for a Fire Station within Industrial Site 3A. (5) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 5, dated July 23, 1973, incor- porating the following changes: a. Rearrangement of Office Site 3 and Restaurant Site 2 and reappor- tionment of land allotted to each. b. Reduce allowable building area in Office Sites 1 and 2 and increase allowable building area in Office Site 3A. C. Increase allowable building height in Office Site 3A to 8 stories. (6) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 6, dated June 10, 1974, estab- lishing parking requirements for Hotels and Motels based on'a demon- strated formula. (7) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 7, dated September 8, 1975, revising off-street parking requirements for restaurants to conform with existing City Standards. (8) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 8, dated February 9, 1976, permitting General Commercial uses on Auto Center Site la and 2b. -43- FOOTNOTES (Cont.) (9) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 9, 'dated 'April 11, 1977, incor- porating the following changes: a. Expand the permitted uses for General Commercial. b. Re -designate General Commercial Site 1-A and 2-B to General Commercial, Sites 1, 2 and 3. C. Expand General Commercial Site 3 to include one half of Indus- trial Site IA. d. Convert Industrial Site 2A to General Commercial Site 4. e. Restrict the allowable building area and the permitted uses for General Commercial Sites 1, 2, 3 and 4. (10) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 10, dated May 23, 1977, incor- porating the following change: a. Delete the provision added by Resolution No. 8261 adopted by the City Council on June 10, 1974 from Section III, D, 6. (11) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 11, dated April 10, 1978, incor- porating the following change: a. Establish guidelines for an exception to the minimum site area. (12) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 12, dated July 11, 1978, incor- porating the following change: a. Revised the allowable building height for Parcel No. 1 of Resubdivision No. 585. (13) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 13, dated November 27, 1978, incorporating the following change: a. Requirement that a Phasing Plan be approved by the Planning Commission for seventy (70) percent of the undeveloped allowable building area existing as of October 1, 1978. (14) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 14, dated June 11, 1979, incor- porating the following changes: a. Reduce the allowable building area of Industrial Site 3A. b. Reduce the allowable building area of Commercial/Professional and Business Office Site 1 and 2. -44- FOOTNOTES (Cont.) (15) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 15, dated March 23, 1981, incorporating the following changes: a. Specification of a maximum building height of seven (7) stories on Parcel No. 2 of Resubdivision No. 585. (16) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 16, dated March 8, 1984 incorporating the following change: a. Increase of 16,154 square feet of office space in Professio- nal and Business Offices Site 5. (17) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 17, dated April 23, 1984, incorporating the following change: a. Increase of 1,091 square feet of office space in Professio- nal and Business Offices Sites 1 and 2. (18) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 18, dated June 25, 1984, incorporating the following changes: a. Establish a specific limit on hotel rooms in Hotel Sites lA and 1B. (19) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 19, dated July 23, 1984, incorporating the following changes: a. Transfer of 4,130 .square feet of allowable building area from General Commercial Site 4 to Professional and Business Offices Site 5. (20) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 20, dated January 12, 1987, incorporating the following changes: a. Add Professional and Business Offices Site 8, with 54,000 square feet allowed. b. Delete Restaurant Site 2A, with 8,400 square feet deleted. (21) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 21, dated March 9, 1987, incorporating the following change: a. Increase allowed development in Professional and Business Offices Site 5 to 241,570 square feet; allow additional support retail uses up to 294,600 square feet total; add support commercial as permitted land use. (21) -45- FOOTNOTES (Cont.) (22) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 22, dated February 4, 1988, incorporating the following change: a. Allow structures located within a portion of Industrial Site 3A to be constructed in excess of the 35 foot height limit up to a maximum of 50 feet, subject to the approval of a use permit. (23) Planned Community Text Amendment No. 23, dated July 6, 1989 incorporating the following change: a. Allow restaurant uses on General Commercial Site 1, subject to the approval of a use permit in each case. -45A- , C,01%M 3ISSIONERS . NVINWmod �ff,�� k9.p\ CITY OF NEWFOR jB.EACH MINUTES j November 19, 1992 OLL CALL r' INDEX 140 of the Municipal Code unless it is determined by the City ineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impracti 6. That this resubdivision sh ire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning ssion. Resubdivision No. 989 Public Hearin Item No.2 Request to resubdivide two existing parcels into a single parcel of land for office development, on property located in the Corporate Resub 989 Plaza Planned Community. approved LOCATION: Parcel 6 of Parcel Map 93/4546 (Resubdivision No. 465), and Parcel 2 of Lot Line Adjustment 90-2 located at 7 Corporate Plaza, on the northwesterly side of Avocado Avenue, between East Coast Highway and Farallon Drive, in the Corporate Plaza Planned Community. ZONE: P-C APPLICANT: Sovereign Bancorp LTD., Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant Western Pacific Engineering, Inc., Costa Mesa fENGINEER: i The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Paul Ghio appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant. He concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. -5- CONlNIISSIONERS • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES November 19, 1992 .OLL CALL INDEX Motion was made and voted on to approve Resubdivision No. 989 ,lotion U1 Ayes subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". MOTION CARRIED. FINDINGS: 1. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans, the Corporate Plaza Planned Community District and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 5. That the reciprocal easements for ingress, egress and parking for the mutual benefit of the subject property and adjoining properties is necessary for adequate ingress, egress and parking by employees and patrons to the subject property. CONDITIONS: 1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to issuance of Building Permits unless otherwise approved by the Public Works and Planning Departments. The parcel map shall be prepared on the California coordinate system (NAD83) and that prior to recordation of the parcel map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital -graphic file of said map in a -6- C01MjJuS10NSRs : • \m4gqpippol CITY OF NEWPOIZT BEACH MINUTES 1VUVCHILMI 17, 177� INDEX ALL CALL manner described in Section 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the , Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. 2. That prior to recordation of the parcel map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Section s 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set On Each Lot Corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. 3. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 4. That each building be served with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 5. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 6. That the intersection of the private streets and drives be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty- four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non -critical locations, subject to approval of the City Traffic Engineer. That sight distance shall be provided at all streets and driveway intersections per City Std. 110-L. -7- , conMUSS101`TERS • . CITY OE NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES November 19, 1992 201,1, CALL INDEX 7. That reciprocal easements for ingress, egress and parking f be dedicated as required. Easements for public emergency I and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes on I all private streets be dedicated to the City. That all ! easements be shown on the parcel maps. I 8. That all vehicular access rights to Avocado Avenue be i released and relinquished to the City of Newport Beach. 9. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department. The storm drain system shall be designed to handle a 25 j year storm frequency with no buildings flooded during a 100 year storm frequency. A master plan of water, sewer i and storm drain facilities shall be prepared for the on -site improvements prior to recording of the parcel map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, i water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. i 10. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 11. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. There shall be no construction storage or delivery of materials within the Avocado Avenue right- of-way. 12. That asphalt or concrete access roads shall be provided to all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junction structures locations, with width to be approved by the Public Works Department. -8- CgrqMESSIONERS • • � e� Fed de CITY OF NEWPORT BEACI3 ,n InAn MINUTES rvovemoer LY, 177G ALL CALL INDEX 13. That any Edison transformer serving the site be located outside the sight distance planes as described in City Standard 110-L 14. That a non-standard improvement agreement be provided for any private streets having textured paving over utility easements. 15, That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. s s x R subdivision No. 990 (Public Hearin Item No.3 Reques to resubdivide four existing lots into a single parcel of land for c mercial use, on property located in the 'Retail and Service Co ercial" area of the Cannery Village/McFadden Resub 990 Approved Square Specific Ian. LOCATION: is 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 277, Section A, Ne ort Beach, located at 2615 Newport Boule rd, on the commercial island bounde by Newport Boulevard (northboun 28th Street, Newport Boulevard (so bound), and 29th Street, in the Cannery 'lage/McFadden Square Specific Plan. ZONE: SP-6 APPLICANT: Thomas R. Lewis, Orange OWNER: Same as applicant ENGINEER: Philip W. Taggart, Irvine -9- SCALE 1'aioo* AREA 1.172 ACRES i PARCEL ALL OF TPM 92-239 IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. MESTERN PACIFIC ENGIAEMING O.G.Q. HoP"Nlz_. Gon1"r' y.f?5IVv•!o2 o.f l l.v. mot 2• b1�PF�� GAP IN VlEt.x. w/ tvNU� M�l� arltr�f N.21" c:!:oqv. 131 Ir - co, 0(( II15. 1-oj2 tAe✓!c:;P Or C>E p.FMNC-j2 1. PAUL A. PEREA G OCTOBER 1992 L.S. 6199 Ca • 2750 00^ , �.• 1 L� 'r : I22.35' A • 27.30' 00• , P• y00' T 1. • 2oA.90' T • 12.2,b8' �/ .o . �. \ PD. hTO. GIT`C L)F NZf '- MON (2"f*Alf-0a..'C.Or IN 1 fVNC,H HA^K ONL Y 1 t't-s,r�• 1-P2/45-4co. 9N. fro' n4S t;,ep,P,iNGS SHOWN Ht✓puFonl AIiE PW.SrD ON THE \ Ari1hY�t)STWE�>J O.CiAv.HOa"�IZOhITAt.�CONTRoi, O SOON G.P.S. No. 4rap2't`1 Ar4o STATION G-,.Rdro. No. 4,294 BEING N. G • C21 ' to.. E . FEf.N ?)er ,pc, ON T-"-II...B IN - n4elr orvlc&r of T{{g �O \ C7?-�G1E ocjoor� P-ATUM STATEMENT' = \ SHOWN ARE P Q ON T}{Etc,sJ-AmoP\N,tASTT�7tZ\ P►AIJ<✓ C.G0?'lpjNA'r'E Ehl6-MM,ZON6 V 1� 19b3 IV,A.D. (1'N10 OG2. GP6 AR1tX�Tr'iENT� DRIVE 5jp. Grj`( oP N.=7. MON .5h GAp IN `1J L.tr 5NGH M&�y) 70-W.., lob.42' i IO• W., 10V-4V j Q 03q) E3z�� tc to NOTES INorCpc Mom FOONC> WEu. t-U)t4UMEN't" Ah No ISIC> tNDtGA'lw-v- FOL'>r47 P6 NOTr-r-> . IM71cAl1E�� e[- I" (.P.TAGclEc> t_S.CGI•let- l7 INDIC�A.T>%h cva-v t iiAn Ar4o -1 PE(i Gl (t( or NBWIvP)-r 1%P-ASH 4qp. I(1-L"'rAC:.1C ep 144P. D INDICAit-h t►,EC.oFLa C;p.TA. VMV&% t.OT Utt-tt� AV-1V`�Tt-AV N NO. 1�lbL,l�A `jo-o2 PEG.JuNE7.1990Ac:p iWA- NO. `io-�. 190d.P1. cnT eOF Rem. MoN• (2•$p.�GX� C, .F IN vjeA.wWt A N�NGIi tMs�+V, ot4L-Y) No ry p AGGLP ttW A5 tt-+'T oP S: oKy vellva .I. A.,o AP,� or 49.G�'i�Ar�tUCo CAp. rDN 01 Qyot�NC7AP'�� � Vi�'11V tT`( 1-�a.t�' FC AST 4- EMM o°, \ PARCEL 1 Yri OAST .10 M.B.�3ja! 'beE "T 1 Ftb Nicy. H GIIVA Y N E l.- t T • bO lb' I', R• ZOGn'l T•bO�tb'J� z Z N��L ®li y, WC4% tz. Got-47- G1Rh, hp. ci2'i4. A-0. NAU- A7H wGPA%JttiT- 2l(a7blo0.2b4 (0000COU4g.-544 MEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, 'ATE OF CAL.IFORNIA 7IYEMING OCTOBER 1992 EREA L.S. 6199 t� (Q • 27 30' oo" , � • SCaD - ! L • 2sol.1v , T = 122.�F7' Q•2.7.50'CIO" , r••1500' T l- 2"M15' T * 2 // � �o `o0,tl. . DRIVE (N-l.0•00100"W i IOb•4?- W. Ste. Gt T`( OF N.v MON - '2" ' �hC. tN `wl u/ O"-Y) '� pG Pri.v./gs -44.. STD. GITI :2F N.v. moN • (2"�,� CAme tN VVtF� � t-1 HA fVNG^K C)NL Y ) M pt,I*V• ,P2/45-4co. DN. 1.0 r7 0 . h (V 1 co -o a� �a� �� t 1. • 2'l.Il' , T • i2.•�b' �o . q-ob'n n•�y�.2ti'� p n_A�� l_•2•i.µ'. T•12.6b' Z.1. gto't5' it / N.QO'32'23'E, sD.l.3` N. 40' 32' �•� 1� yooe q�y� hEE y*4es'j- 2 FOP}. t�p.5Ki OF p*-�N61e-pf p� MTV NIt4 ��UMErtT NOTE oaP W • V�7eu- wi 'SIE:R7Pr-:, exG. �p AuM. tllf!V�\ -4to-'t2N. to, 0 N O SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS SCALE 10=30' AREA 1. V2 ACRES i PARCEL ALL OF TPM 92-239 PARCEL MAP. 92-239 IN THE CITY OF STA TAPORT . OF CALAIFORN CK COUNTY OF ORANGE, NESTEW PACIFIC ENG.TWERING PAUL A . " PEREA wuNfl K� •—����i711 $g! ro. �.ar T •� �6.. ,0� ail Gi.So•s}2.'S0"E. 0.21' lht Mori �1z i`I•b.1.rl.,/s+. °lo-OZ, R AO- 5rnf1'147 O.P-,. OCTOBER 1992 L.S. 6199 ENTRY DRIVE m. &O-co' lo"W. 222.oO' C .c,o• oo' oo $i N.2R• � c( tr.�•c�•c�.` . (oaoo n Ri 1.30.2b` T=30•`^' t-- 90.2b' T-'S0.51' I .07 �Q�q�•3b.p„ 1,�.� 276 20 g.55.24.51.6 pnp.{el r TY or t1,.e, M• W- lC4�h�C.al P'IPs'K Orr-Y� ., 9 t r ^c z)ar tF o Pez) 4r, W. Aux.ao AvF,. AMC> • (� m� onWE� �n�v J1L� C SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS SCALEi'a100' PARCEL -MAP 92- 239 It AREA 1.172 ACRES i PARCEL IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, ALL OF TPM 92-239 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Qfi.2. NoP.IZ. GaNT r� �• CITY of N.�. 2• bp�Pf�o GP,P IN WEu. W/ FUNGI l M�FiK ONI s( N. 21-to�v.13� MESTERN PACIFIC ENGIWERING PAUL A. PEREA OCTOBER 1992 L.S. 6199 INP t G_am_ CA • 21' 30 00" , T" • `'cao , L � 2�.90' T • 122Ti5' �/ � �� ,�, vo . o_'oe PO. 51v. GtTC �2F N.v. t- CN. is.. VF'A� CAP IN W VONC,H HA^K ONLY) CE Ft-1&7. '11�,/4S4co. DN. 1.0' zi6 ay DRIVE Aesu4. of . r It Planning Commission Meeting November 19.,1992 Agenda Item No. 2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department Request to resubdivide two existing parcels into a single parcel of land for office development, on property located in the Corporate Plaza Planned Community. LOCATION: Parcel 6 of Parcel Map 93/4546 (Resubdivision No. 465) and Parcel 2 of Lot Line Adjustment No. 90-2, located at 7 Corporate Plaza, on the northwesterly side of Avocado Avenue, between East Coast Highway and Farallon Drive, in the Corporate Plaza Planned Community. ZONE: P-C APPLICANT: Sovereign Bancorp LTD., Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant ENGINEER: Western Pacific Engineering, Inc., Costa Mesa Application This application involves a request to resubdivide two existing parcels into a single parcel of land for office development, on property located in the Corporate Plaza Planned Community. Resubdivision procedures are set forth in Section 19.12.040 of the Municipal Code. Environmental Significance This project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions). TO: Planning Commission - 2. Conformance with the General Plan The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the site for "Administrative, Professional and Financial Commercial" uses. The proposed resubdivision is consistent with the existing commercial development permitted on the site. The total amount of development allocated to the Corporate Plaza Planned Community District is 432,320 sq.ft. of floor area. The remaining development available is 103,550 sq.ft.. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan provisions. 13a At its meeting of March 6, 1990 the Modifications Committee approved Lot Line Adjustment No. 90-2, a request to permit the adjustment of a lot line of two parcels in the Corporate Plaza Planned Community District. This parcel makes up a portion of the subject property which is the subject of this resubdivision application. At its meeting of November 21,1991, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Amendment No. 728, 'a request to amend the Corporate Plaza Planned Community Development Plan so as to permit 85,000 sq. ft. of additional office development transferred from the Newport Village Planned Community. The proposal also included a request to amend the Planned Community sign provisions so as to be consistent with the proposed sign provisions of the Corporate Plaza West Planned Community. At its meeting of January 13,1992. the City Council adopted Resolution No. 92-4 approving Planning Commission Amendment No. 728, amending the Corporate Plaza Planned Community Development Plan so as to permit 85,000 sq.ft. of additional office development transferred from the Newport Village Planned Community, for atootal of 432,320 sq.ft. permitted. The approval also amended the Planned Communitysign provisions so as to be consistent with the proposed sign provisions of the Corporate Plaza West Planned Community. Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is currently vacant. To the north is a parking lot with office buildings beyond; to the east, across Avocado Avenue, is the future site of the City Library; to the south, is a parking lot and bank building; and to the west is an existing office building and related parking area. n I i The proposed parcel will be comprised of Parcel No. 6 of Parcel Map 93/4546 (Resubdivision No. 465) and Parcel 2 of Lot Line, Adjustment No. 90-2 and will contain 51,042 sq.ft. of land area. The Municipal Code provides that where a building is proposed to cross a property line, the parcels must be resubdivided into a single building site. S_necific Findin¢s Section 19.12.020 (D) of the Municipal Code provides that in order to approve a resubdivision, the Planning Commission shall determine that it is satisfied with the plan of subdivision, that the map is in conformity with the requirements of Title 19, all ordinances of the City and all applicable general and specific plans. Should the Planning Commission wish to approve this application, the findings and conditions of approval set forth in the attached Exhibit "A" are suggested. In accordance with Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act, a legislative body of a city or county shall deny approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, if it makes any of the following findings: (a) That the proposed mAp is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is not physically suitable for the density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. It is staffs opinion that none of the above findings may reasonably be made in this case, and therefore no exhibit for denial has been provided. PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By_ a" Javier S. Gard Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map Tentative Parcel Map TO: Planning Commission - 4. EXHIBIT"A" FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR RESUBDIVISION NO.989 ENDINGS: 1. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans, the Corporate Plaza Planned Community District and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 3. That the proposed resubdivisiori presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 5. That the reciprocal easements for ingress, egress and parking for the mutual benefit of the subject property and adjoining properties is necessary for adequate ingress, egress and parking by employees and patrons to the subject property. CONDITIONS: 1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to issuance of Building Permits unless otherwise approved by the Public Works and Planning Departments. The parcel map shall be prepared on the California coordinate system (NAD83) and that prior to recordation of the parcel map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital -graphic file of said map in a manner described in Section 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. 2. That prior to recordation of the parcel map, the surveyor/engineer preparing the map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Section s 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set Qn Each Lot Corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construction project. 3. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. TO: Planning Commission - 5. 4. That each building be served with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 5. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 6. That the intersection of the private streets and drives be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. The.sigbt distance requirement may be modified at non -critical locations, subject to approval of the City Traffic Engineer. That sight distance shall be provided at all streets and driveway intersections per City Std. 110-L. 7. That reciprocal easements for ingress, egress and parking be dedicated as required. Easements for public emergency and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes on all private streets be dedicated to the City. That all easements be shown on the parcel maps. 8. That all vehicular access rights to Avocado Avenue be released and relinquished to the City of Newport Beach. 9. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department. The storm drain system shall be designed to handle a 25 year storm frequency with no buildings flooded during a 100 year storm frequency. A master plan of water, sewer and storm drain facilities shall be prepared for the on -site improvements prior to recording 'of the parcel map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the developer. 10. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 11. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. There shall be no construction storage or delivery of materials within the Avocado Avenue right-of-way. 12. That asphalt or concrete access roads shall be provided to all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junction structures locations, with width to be approved by the Public Works Department. 13. That any Edison transformer serving the site be located outside the sight distance planes as described in City Standard 110-L. TO: Planning Commission - 6. 14. That a non-standard improvement agreement be provided for any private streets having textured paving over utility easements. 15. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. I. VICINITY MAP ♦ /0.l0 � I Y • ! Jt Y, � ,. 1 H,y,!/EG �' Riv R . Cy . ' � , n �uRr>•• Dn ,py� f ! , C-C ! • vI1M r i OR/YE ! /•1_,�!s1� N' N IM p�2 » Y 5 9:� �,.OQ•'; � H'4=/ ,s min }r• o� !! * y* N !/ i� 0.5 11[[/N ^ us wt111 tN[ XI NX. P-C EAST COAST R-3-B PC R.g p A DISTRICTING —MAP —CITY—OF-NEWPOKT- OLAcn-%iAL.I ry Y^N.1 nl 1[nMSN NI M'RNI NNR, toll RnNIN NN[I nl raves": TK M. M N[nwY [wr[.NM Yn [IN MXIMXt fN f\ Nff NH1MN MLfN MINulY 1[NM Mlt 1-N.M Yllf•fT AMNl11RNO WlM NIM NNII RMIN• [urN fuR RNnI�- Yit N•It�N MM I MNNII ,G[N.IYp[M�[t4IM ww • wn tN u Y .� y.. vLrn[Y.n.• uw[Wlwi'[.0 Wtf[fN.l• N\NMNN114W InMt RIl YfX MVIN NI t Iww hf . y�.�• wY� •ww +wM I IY Ry1 YIY Yl1 N RN YR N '111tYt'MRrLNM [��RY t�♦11NN �Ry�f,, In. YN fCXM 1f t•{• rN`� f[R11~RY1 iww 1/ • 1 NRKIIfN[hF� R/[M�NW�NW�IMNfff( II.lNNW1iNltl R[YIRfIN M YWNf 1-N- N►IIM w NXMNy y•eWM4ty !� YRf�IIMNlIfW1W sWILIR pN I (MR.� HR RIRti MNN. N[ NI.NR YA W W1 XM�y N Ml;yiMNiuIidN I NNI\NI IOvll Yj .1: T I.t RESUBDIVISION NO. 989 March 22, 1993 r CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. 16 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: RESUBDIVISION NO. 989 LOCATION: Parcsion No. 465)e16 of and Parcel e2 ofpLot /Line 6Adjustmei nt90-2 located at 7 Corporate Plaza, on the northwesterly side of Avocado Avenue,tbetween East Coast Highway and Farallon Drive, in the Corporate Plaza Planned Community. DEVELOPER: Sovereign Bancorp LTD., Newport Beach RECOMMENDATION: Accept the offer to release and relinquish all access rights to Avocado Avenue to the City of Newport Beach. DISCUSSION: On November 19, 1992 the Planning commission conditionally approved Resubdivision No. 989. The conditions of approval included the condition requiring the owner to release and relinquish all access rights to Avocado Avenue. A parcel map has been prepared and a copy is attached for reference. It is desired to accomplish the required release and relinquishment of access rights on the map in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. It is recommended that appropriate action be taken to accept the release and relinquishment of access rights to Avocado Avenue as offered. The corresponding certificates on the parcel map can then be signed and the parcel map filed for record. Benjamin B. Nolan Public Works Director DH:so N BEET 2 OF 3 SHLETS 'SCALE PARCEL MAP 92-239 1•-100• AREA ACRES 1 PARCELCEL IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. COUNTY OF ORANGE. ALL OF TPM 92-239 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. RESTERN PACIFIC ENGINEERING OCTO©E•R 1992 PAUL A. PEREA L.S. 6199 �>•xrx•m w•ax• 4r x'fITDTv122 K'� Wf 00 Ap C/:wti PD9C lwi QNh 1 v-rvNCT"'�`+twnka+`Y) T'R• 4T or Np MON r _ 12•pd!•h Gd'WM�Et�W \ �-N•+G1 HX.K 01.1VY7 Ri. \ PH ti 'Ih/•ILi •4Li C1. ;f V o� bAhly OP 6EF.T">INUS • � , TwC cer N TJ i..^A: _ •�CPL ^. �I•x: b>'a=n �. TE `\. \ GC>I��..YvI CE�M'P1N +"L•�i NLP 2LSaT•a•...�h•t+•G{. JiT.Cry GPh• vC• i2; : YG 4-.a'C*1 :. n:+ tN Y6T4 tE.N! � N G•^I C C fCP Pt:: P•:Yr .^. -_C I'•T V G�'••:X L•F TnE CRwNr.t' C0.1VT: w+•-T••+EYGP •^7 DATUM STATEMENT: 4^OP [YNA^.L'.� : OYV AqG ?'•+gyp L1a T•IE GA4r_'YwN1ASTaTC� PWNC :•�-'K".•,TC 5.4 ;LM 2:T•L. ': \ v�C�r NP p (1TM1q >1., CY•'a,• ^A:a,. e.. g:. V/L tti V •.^`, VL4-C:i .^TMCP WIiE w: :l•^•, •'L• _r 4.. iP!t [tf S. •.'. t` YLl •tLY' :aAOJIJO NoTES! E• ✓L •«: Can-:. mot• _LE. .'...- ¢l:^,Cy" •..L I p! .. P2 rL A�.e • a ..y M/!• NC• ••(.'•'\}•i^^.:f•Or. .at. tr•TeC• Ay1N1 cp eM.Kv DhI,K L IN1J � OI• ' a•K• e,v.�L•eww H.P. `EASr tti w�*ev •. • - g V. wp2 'a;J PARCEL 1 Pdt G Op;GS.!ij QGLL��. C)2 CDASr HIGyhAY w ICD 42 Joe 42' , n,•'we w,t= •.rox; . i • m •: oGH PC CL T 'ae. 4nq W 4214 F2, CgaG NAIL f N W PA,•MT PNEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS PARCEL MAP 92-239 RREA 1.172 ACRES 1 PARCEL IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. COUNTY OF ORANGE. a al Na ALL OF 7PN 92-239 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DATE OF SURVEY 10/8/92 BLOCK 5250 BEING A CONSOLIDATION OF PARCEL B. AS SHOWN ON A MODULE 75 MAP FILED IN BOOK 93. PAGES A5 AND 46 OF PARCEL MAPS, Raa IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER AND PARCEL 2 AS tiw rt!1 SHOWN ON EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO THAT CERTAIN LOT LINE IRfTRAOt! ADJUSTMENT NO. 90-OZ RECORDED JUNE 7. 1990 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 90-303998 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALL OF m lax ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. 1JK a. aaaaa Tam lRmoa NESTERN PACIFIC ENGINEERING OCTOSETL 1992 PAUL A. PEREA L.S. 6199 IT OWNFASHIPCERTIFICAT! W., pK rMuOTnei. kk5dpnb kr4ul--4AN iar4 k6e W awd MSJ. WJ.bNycauRK bAK M.l+�rb. W munWb arnlrp•r.Io.R rYk k.lkUrkw bilr Er. We b.M aWr W W,4kb Ac Ckl a W-Fd Arad an wkk kaar NSW b Arorai. Ara �b/`my`1d/p�jl�umR W.. a kwo Camm� :1.Y.. W.LW4 fla•otA Ci i• YIGE FN`AIOErtT�D�GTfhr YIrA3 TTrE6toCNT STATE OF CAUFORNIA ) )r COUNTY OFA-2(-) 0. ku kfae we Puna.% IKnarl l.Hr•• lur.brt la dbwsJ. adrWAiul n.balrkke p..rs rbN rmM rt W.nTd b Jr r.ka kw.raJ W alwmkJtd r aK k.l V•7 uawd drmc k UKK n.k.aa olrcka, arl Ant M kd VEraar a ak knverr JK .rq.I.r kAJfd.kKf Ile P.+R•" rVA oa.W ak L.Ylboei. W. rF ALyJ RS.ur. (� MF 0^a�A.I pYr��aa c. ru17IaNK Ia W fa rJ Yr s r (JAC.n•y.c C.-Y. �� t /� r.� Mltwrulu.eW+a�l+L SIGNATURE OMISSIONS hnuuR b YK pruiww d.aus 6MJ6 U) O) IAI a UK Sa.kri3s Mnp Aa, AK kJM�nT aOumN, kw 6m usrW: TIC Car.l aOanp, kkia duawrr.a nk.i k!•Ki 6965, p1. 721 ddTKW .aaJ, h V•AEMK.rr M. TOt. NAtcM' ' tkr.w t. l•n Aark,RAllo bNM16SRF�TN�IYIbPN ITS• d� ul taaJ...lAID CFliF1E1Jr Yk In)a Cn ,.►AJn a aR.Knu.slal•µ.W W) mkR—dwr Inm N.. 92-0653 0 d df uI ms .9 oCt+aCM rMsfh1 W,-z6l Eq,u NJo UT"TY Nhrobelo- IMPROVEMENT CERTIFICATE NrvurbUK 1. bks.dl 664113 ft S"1116r MV An. At k4k" Imlrme.Ks, ne.gwJ: Gwualar dayNJl a m�ael..cm, ark b.R I.MK wlJiu..rkA saJ.i. .W l•'K14r Rn[la, kalAw. tURPOSESTATEMENT Tk pyvr dbk•" p k 0 a.bin, two ryaN isV e., prtd. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT W k kW vx I fkb W"y W w WWI rlp� IW2. 1k bl r.r Y NI . bi ow. W Ikr A./ riK CIY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT ThU.np m.fa.0 Mp AO W lod wkrAra D.IsI YY Y/d Ham. M CRY PAara a Tk Oy d w.I.KI kad R.C.l.! Ml NSUaro afiv COUNTY SURVEYOR S STATI:MkNT Tb*.a.A.r, rJ ft s,J5 Nm . a UK S".vs MV M W Ir mud raR rwkvall-x Dna Uk ald It_� kin r Cu y Sr..lu. CRY CLFAK3 CERTIFICATE STAUWCAUFORNIA ) Y COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 1 bd7 MrufT Or" Rap rb Van Wk, g,. 0n OK CM Cw JdA. CRF .(N.ry.nku6U.aplraKdot *-a k1d r.IwaJJd.MuaJaay Yld d IuWw JRr.k.W r.b. Ntk. b A. ,,.a W arced. MY•.`• sp• W cap A. � d.rbr 6MM��U1 (A dke�3dJnNTi.k�i. Mp M.�n� Dra l\K 4ld .H_ M Cy [maN..f•n ksn fNi..l COUNTY TRFASUREA.TAX CMAICTOR'S CERTIFICATE STATEOFCAUFONNIA ) M CWHTYOFOMNGE ) I kady a.Ufl tr. raartkMb dadlu.VgaWSUA. CawT�n l��urkwl 2sdTwedMlJ.artrtMl ryl aua r a1KcW .rcmrr, aJk.Nd r race D.nJur bd n� Tnr.W k.b CurlTmrra•TU Ca11af.I Dqul TU Ca -t 3 ' 3 SHEETS PARCEL MAP 92-239 E 1'•30 1.172 ACRES IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE. ACEL STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Of TPM 92-239 NESTERN PACIFIC ENGINEERING OCT09ER 1992 PAUL A. PEREA L.S. 6199 5 L € 1 i t ENTRY DRIVE41 $O aS 1 DC'GV'w 222 ob') '• ryMC CIT`/q•ND.FpN seAnGleb N WLC'•b•W 222 oe IN�.o' — �T�M' • ..�) L1'VA'h elP Nv�i.t.� PCU.*• NT1.+ �'— � �riryi �Kr`cc•• � `• rIp( M•IC+-I n^•nP•T>+•Y) •8i •g R n •PCP AGGEPIFC Mom'' n. Lei ((N4C•CC'CE•'W, IW OO')) P.• n NT AIP:ADGA�E.MW B8 .._ Nw•x•ic•w Iron• _ ��JG; "�S,'j'M;.�.�a"''.ebN�1�° TDLLT T• g5f'L Lb'N.D�a p ppyL'>O'E 021'w LCU OP 1' 1 P TA�1C G� LH AW+a 1'CR N n LLA 'f0.OL �ueo L -1 ��•� I(L•>DLO hT 'P 11 JJ (Ip.•.wnW i,.>l il'e grl , Rr� 1 :T7 �Lf jwf Y.� .Lpb 4s0! 2Y .N L�yj p 1• I P INKiFrI p•hi•iC •A n•N' •Ljo 02, W�'�OY11b0r A•hL•ro h= A'I.• yl•WIX' T.>!M rvjL✓TwaL.EC`Lb4.M Lh M/•h N2M.A� •W �C+J11b C(� 1C'-C2 1 'v PARCEL i �•p , �'�' \Y Y>Yp x�i i �• 9 ' q ss-r 2 fD f &A� OF bEai••INre�i• VA," 3�Ti MENT AND Mon "LENT NCT�S uh � � I V n.T•rn hL'. n•hl2'• 0'�j'I ,A, (s .ran r•a hTa•a�` C . Q ' P I• - I I .yl .I .I p •i'b i+TY OP N nDIVN, ' 'Pt-' P A..LFPLFO wh P1L �l1 DEFINITIONS: Required Parking: For Standard Office use the required parking is based on net floor area. For Medical use the required parking Is based on gross floor area, 1 space per 250 square feet. Based on City of Newport Beach Zoning Code Ch. 20.30.35C, "Pool Parking is applied to Corporate Plaza. PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR OFFICE BUILDINGS BASED ON SIZE OF PARKING POOL The parking requirement for office buildings, as specified in Section 20.30.035 (B.) (2), may be modified in accordance with the following schedule: 1. For the first 125,000 sq. ft., parking shall be provided at one space per 250 square feet of net floor area. 2. For the next 300,000 sq. ft., parking shall be provided at one space per 300 square feet of net floor area. 3. Any additional floor area, parking shall be provided at one space per 350 square feet of net floor area. For pools based on more than 425,000 square feet of net floor area, the Planning Commission may modify the parking formula by Use Permit, based on a demonstrated formula. (ord. 1663 § 1, 1976; Ord. 1404 § 4, September 20, 1971), MV&PExisting Parking: Existing parking is based on a field survey conducted by MV&P. This total reserves one space adjacent to each trash enclosure to allow access to trash bins, and is not counted as a parking space. Existing vacant land to be developed as a designated parking areas. Proposed parking Is an estimated count for designated parking areas. Actual parking layout studies will determine maximum parking counts in areas noted. (Refer to attached preliminary designated parking lot layouts prepared by Mctarand, Vasquez & Partners,lnc..) NET Floor Area: (Parking) Per Chapter 20.87.184 Newport Municipal Code. "Net Floor Area" is the area included within the surrounding wails of a building, exclusive of vent shafts, elevator shafts, stairways, exterior corridors or balconies, rooms containing only mechanical and electrical equipment used for service of the building, utility shafts and parking. (Ord. 1404:2,1971). GROSS Floor Area: (Parking) Per Chapter 20.87.190 Newport Beach Municipal Code. "Gross Floor Area" is the area included within the surrounding exterior walls of the building or portion thereof, exclusive of vent shafts and courts. The floor area of a building, or portion thereof, not provided with surrounding exterior walls shall be the usable area under the horizontal projection of the roof or floor above. (Ord. 1404: 1, 1971) GROSS Floor Area: (Entitlement) Per Chapter 20.07.030 Newport Beach Municipal Code. For the purposes of this chapter, gross floor area shall be defined as the area of a building or portion thereof including the surrounding exterior walls, except that outdoor dining areas utilized in conjunction with a restaurant shall also be Included. Any finished portion of a building which measures more than 4 feet from finished floor to ceiling and is accessible shall be Included in calculations of gross floor area. Areas utilized for stair wells and elevator shafts shall be counted towards gross floor area on only first level. s , 0 PR / 0 3 E06 (ii�io) ' F /0 O� job j/s t• .>> V .a _ c�Pl�lob00%5��1 ��3 O •% :gym - � s F. / INSTAL L N/GH' AM//- /N L/NE W1r11 AIR -6Aa OVIN FAD/N BACK/NG 9b 11vT0 BASEMENT " _ - pURiNd GUNSTf�U> OES&,r1 % Br9S/N. "' 1'DATA.BLE f'UiY1P . - � �•, '.. � . -/'SEE PLAN FOR t " 11 p�S/L T/NG BA. t S//OIYN ON ;S:yE�f ALL-H.gNO�IAP RE°QU/RL h!.9NG LANO/N.6S TO f� OF TfRAVE_L CON:STRUiCT'ION:. NOTES. OPNSTALL CATCH"BASIN.;--'-- O,.SQ. 531. ;M?N• , TRAFFIC RAfiED: ' 2O . INSTAI L •' G" ,DI}1: "'IN 'W/DOME ' 'GRATE NTOS 60 OR 55�21141- UT-A.+TPE� NCH: 4Q. 5' 2I13.s: vSTAbL 1 " .iJIA. >7 X#' EIF , SCii+' �10. P. v.C. 7 RF`iif9E EkTIh.S�iIiif3"_ &:GUTE REMOVI E.XIST.INGr,_X.4..,:k'l1tiF3 T �. IDiSTALir'CATgH F#$ :r.V. ¢! �'4.• �N. 1*41J. NUS 1,2.2.. C?i,.'EQl7ti': 10 COptSTRttCR THTTL- I B S 'PErj?ist NEWPORT.BEACH'.-CI i' SPD� 3E�4-' 11 CONSTRUCT" 6"E//RB PEfT•ciTY OF NEYYPORT BEAl1H CrTY STO %ac /2 //vSTALL .7RAFF/C FfATEO. Ti4E/VCf/ 04A/N PEF! DETA/L,: Tf1/S Sf/E. j //vSTALL DUAL 'SUMP' PUMP PEF? OET/T/L (SPECS.) SHEET e /¢ FsE4IOYE EX/ST OESILT BAS/N- 6oiYNEC7- TO EX15T. STORM DRA//V E / FN Y a„1 N EAST C. 169.53' 81 - 9� 6. �� 9•. 'yam /o 0 yY',e 6` o �, ,- I 4 Ba - PUMP OislJ/ G/NE %f/6f/ .` -£ � ;! fib. • IIO. - --A(- r oP a� a. yy�TD Igo. 3 --� -- i • TEMP. OAS/LT/rf/6 ./ Fs.io . y -• .i B/1SlN F/CTEfI/rY6 �SFEOET.9/L- ywr 69Z c„c 3a 162� _ 4 � 6 k - i ' W �R, � n, -: 4 5 i r-• y: .8 ti FG Y �, ' / off/ �' '•r'' 'i . '.2/ _ y` /�q (I/3 S� � •I -•/ sue, :. ':,'. -•' ., �30 5• �lcoA 3 . r 1 I Tc;• ' , �9-N / ti / irh //3640 5 /�I� O lii2/ :it saz•�• .1 .ilZ /• � / 'I Ova! / s� Ai �,o a INSTAL L Nl6H PO//YT L/NE WIT IN H 41R GAP � c E sroA (/a .�3)F/• 9b , /NTO BASEMENT N` -- • ' lei= ' - .: . @•;` �- "'P�i :.S•t'ifi-'-•S :Ex':t,'',_' - `L"t fF d:. `..c • - - -.. •' - S NY AALL /3A/ U p AU G �W -S B '''`'•"`,;;':`'. <i'�LG''PL4NTEf3 WALL SIJBORA/N. S7 •� :.r "` • ��! • : % " � , , VYATERPAODF/N6 PER AR.G'H/TFi `^�' •. - z pUR/N6 L?9NSTRUCT/ONE 6A/i�96E `OE OES/LT//VG -A4-1C' 1! LV/L'L BE PORTABLE PUMP 7O EX/ST%NG j SEE PLAN fOiT E.Y .o DES/t T/NG BAFIIV F/LTEft/N6 /Y!L S110WIV VAO'l SHEET. ,2. " ALL HH/t/p/CAP fi�A/l'1PS ?' EXT R�QU/RF 110A A/L%iUI S. A 7 LANO/NGS 7"O HAKE iL1/N OF 7 TRAVEL CONST-R'"JIO.N ..NOT_ES, •' -" ;' ' ', -. _ , - + ' APPROVAE.OF THE 1 INSTALL CATCH -BASIN/.. 10.0'S4- I+N..MT_N. TRAFFIC RATED:'-•" AUTRORIZATIONTO !, TENT WITH, THE OR (i" DIA. YARD. DR-ATN_ W'/. DOME :GRATE y NOS BO OH EQ�� BEACH. THIS APPRC '.. P ANS ANU POL CH - -' REQUIRE ANY PER& O - Ij•T.STAL-L DEGK .DRAIN_r. ,_?,`:;.� - RENTAUTHORIZED - TION, If NECESSARI OF THE CITY OF NET 4�jSTA;t.T, 4" DIA,, lljZA%IA; •PIP1 , `.34U. PV, C. APPLICANT'SACKNO /� T y ;DA:`fsitANPE, 'iA'CH. S'vli . "PMC DEPARTMENT" PUBLIC WORKS `J O i �- PI?USett12" ;TvSTAiL ..:_ TRAFFIC FIRE GRADING' �•-� ('T i ELL,�kS19 T,+KISTINKQ +i,�UI2F� &: G`YrT`I,'Ei•.- � ... `•.PUNNING d� REMO%JB EXISTL2IG A,.C.. PAVEIVNT .. _•. ,-."' y,-.,._• -. _ ^`Bx:-' INSTALL CATCH BAEKT;iD `Q• I21. SKIN. NDS _'..' BFF�CH_"Cl/P� STiJ. 3£�TI= 10 CONSTRUCF" THRW C9Rb# - F4 V'Lr PEA. NEWPORT "" 0,6 1 G/TY OF NEYYPORT DEfIIH C/TY STD : B2-L �rYP� . 0 CONSTRUCT 6 CURB INITY MAP N. T. S, 0 II -b� OJT _ k 7 o m s 60 Fs �00 yc T. c, TOP OF' CURB 1 TOP OF 8ERM GARAGE FLOOR F.[.'' FLOW LINE INVERT , "EXIST, ELEV. / PROP. ELEV. T.G. TOP OF GRATE P!4 PLANTER AREA EXIST. WALL • 'PROP GARDEN WALL PROP. RETAINING WALI • DOWN SPOUT STREET �.6 s FG� Y:sysfi •MOt'EO.'.i "N77104',iY9, /09.30T•c. /p93S oB.d` 7 I, II x /Of.60 09. l L dl L�oB c' ; I �I � QT. G T _i 8 ttr--- ;B // II II. 2 //�• ��r_ t. 11. • E-AST� 17.08 s FTN. FTN. u33 f.6• ' I FTN. , C imr.w olo F � IIII b' 93 10/04 10200 ^p 4947eb1 MCUHIewNU VASQUEZ '— 01 i i DATE: AV, I 1p FAX NO.: cen eAeurbnd. A.1A' FROM•'+%!'�ll� core eM.9Ad.';; A.1.A. AHbur 0. ackn�r. A.LA. NUMBER OF( SHEETS TO F W: PROJECT: �����• �G�pt,� , COMMENTS;: !,19p�rcl • r ram/ IF YOU D,b �OY At CEIVE THE NUMBER OF CALL THE S NDER AT (714) 549.2207• MV&P FAX h.UMBER IS (714) 549.5297. Archltectur & plaint 695 Town Ce fey Drive .3 in3W coma Mesa. C 926,26 PAX. 714 !49 Ci 97 714 CAO OOA7 '93 IUi04 IU:U1 M, 4947nei M61HKAMP UHsQUEZ 02 CORPORA4"E :� d P]G�CINC; SDIGIlG4(F(Y- Vasquez & October 1, 1,993 i / anIncls,, hL',, ! , EXISTING E OPMENT ErAlsement Parking Pei IM Offlo �U00 Paling Ul-r lUt USE Cross Gross*** 4 •" Balm Floor/vee Floor Mae Fla Area "dad RP u atl` •Aa 1 Corpamtb Dove 17,671 17,490 8,503 2 Capo'Olb Pla Dnva 21,323 21,026 0,092 3 Corporat$ Pia Orlve 20,302 20,300 0,034 4 Caparal4 PI Diva 22,007 22,072 ,002 5 Co'paa16 PI Olive 10,38p 101032 9,847 r Corporate Pla Drive 23,627 23,379 2,582 t2 t' rmarat0 Pia Drive 16,441 18,107 5,'464 13 Corporalo Via Drive 15,756 115,141 4,455 14 Capbra PIC Drive 20,054 26,704 513W 15 Corporal PI Drive 16,143 15,755 6,049 16 Corporal PI Drive 13,971 13,218 1,995 CarlMdarana. A. LA, 17 Corpora PIC Drive 22,076 22,617 1,447 rrnaareM, vaaqua<, A.I.A. 19 Corporat9 PI Odv9 18,231 17,929 0,790 ANAYI Q E•Nnr.A.I.A. 19 Onrpomt4 PI Drive 10,370 15,005 5,Ma ' 20 Corporate Pla Orlvo 8,188 7,766 7,630 23 roroorald Pia Drive 82,749 82,33a 110.046 5 - I UI AL EXISTING r:LOPMENT $52,473 $47,659 331,803 11160 Y,100 Ii 130) �J'J PROPOSED DgVELOPMENT Ersltlament Parking P ng � Office Use Parking STIW�QPFjICE05E..rr Grose Grose" Na*** Parlrl P SrrpWs Floo-Area FloorAroa FI Nea dad Required* alit e caporstsi PIC Drive 25.000 24,650 3,418 ia. rl+b 78 (19) 9 Cvporatg pla Drive 14,500 14,297 3,502 So I 45 13 11 Corporate Pia Drive 20,000 10,720 18,734 as ' 62 38 22 Corporate Pta Drive 20,347 90.062 19,059 44 i 04 70 _. 90 LJEI- AL _ 1_-_- PROPOSF.O OPMENT 79.047 78.729 71,793 So 249 100 TqT& DPA OMENT C01fiPONA t: AZA 432,320 420,208 401,666 1,500 i,430 i 70 • EXISTING OEVt-OPMENT 352,473 347.559 33 .863 I 1,160 Mm (3D) PROPOSED DE�r[LOPMINT Eml9ement Parking Park Madlp 1 Use PerMrg MLUILiN- LA1 E LISE•• #- GroBs Grose" Nat •` Parking Park rip Surplus FILx Area Floor Area Floa Area Provided Room& 10saclo 8 Corporate Pie} UI'IVB 25,000 24,650 ,418 9ft1,�`6 1 0o (40) B Ca'poat9;Pla d'Iva 14,500 14,207 1 ,582 50 ! $7 1 11 Corporate;Pla Drive 20,000 10,790 1 ,734 96 . 221forporata�Pl Dim 20,347 20,062 1 ,059 44 i eo 64 ao ' -T T • PROPOSCO; DE OPMENT 79.047 711l 74,793 J49 1% :315 34 TOTAL D d MF.NT i ,,, 1 432,320 426.286 40 ,658 1,609 11,505 4 Parking 14 bas�d on 1t250 sf: 1st 125,000 sf •" As umptlon: Based on tissue ov x1my results, Nat Floor Area (Pao( Parkingtjormula) 1/300 sf; 125,000-425,000 $t lfd508hova•425,OpO8f P of Ir1g Gross egtp(a apprdsim tery 98.6% ntmementora�s. Pe RingNot equal!appmxlmet y96% " Medical Parkin Is basad an Of ing Gross, Parking ()rosspFloor Area; 1,850 sf, toml Madlcal sf "*•` Suggostsd M*)lmum Sr Architecture Nanning ' 69b lawn GC,det il,BU ..100 Mesa. CA')?rvo W,114 549. 5291 ; 114, 64 f), ,', ( , n '93 10/04 1N:01 M p 4947Ne1 MCt AP' ••,E2 03 P7 KRA LAZA INGT.DT L"vh4`—' October 1, 1093 EXISTING PARtCING Lot IdbnT Illcailon 1 2 3 4 6' p 7 B &MPr�/h /-1 BUILDING 7* TOTAL rXlSTINQi qrf MCLuu,d. A.f.A. flnsno AN. w040e.. A.I A. PROPOSED a lN0 Arlk((: a Eeknar, A.LA. Max, Lot h—a8, Si Lotldentlflcatlpn ' A — B C, D U —' TOTAL PROPOSEb TOTAL EXISTXNCJ & PROPOSED PROPOSED PW#KING Max, Late — $5, sf Lot ldsntlflcatl0n _ 8 C D E TOTAL PROP=O TOTAL EXISTINGI& PROPOSED q vas" az & PCirl�7Ll lnc, 134 6 3 143 143 5 $ 18 4 .OK - 106 116 3 2 123 111 1- 165 163 4 a 2 4 171 too 69 0 6 63 1,1115 27 and8rd Spat Compact Sl2eCe9 44 0 55 0 56 0 93 p — 06 0 334 0 1,439 27 blandard Compact Spaces Spa 44 as 53 0 45 0 93 0 66 0 821 0 1,428 27 4ucu — w,wu 6I Latldentlllceedn Standard Compact S1eCe5 Sn2C83 B C 55 0 D 20 0 E 93 0 Be 0 TOTAI• PROPOSED 290 0 TOTAL ExisTING �PROPOSED 1,403 27 NOTE: AN parking lot couMO do not Include TWO spaces Immediately adlecent taoh or tponings, to reaarveidedtcatsd eooass space to and from fresh enclosures. A Due to the cutent ¢p�oarnrklsrltn�uatlon fi Duliding7 and re —striping at Loth, Building Deper17 and 4rnentbccuments on ounts peatthe time Of this sed On OLrrant enaIV816� Beach Modlllpatbr those documents are currently being Mello and will change the parting space when constuctlon Is finalized, Architecture & 6W,'fowl) Confer Gordn Mast, CA Je i IAX;714.114D 6207 714 6.19. PP0/ 16 (S4e 48 1,500 :e 2044 i T al 45 a s6 1s 338 1,408 313 1,473 J '93 10/04 10:02 B 4947861 N • Carl MCtlrand. A,LA. Cmarrn M. yasquor, A.I.A. Anlrur C. Cck,W. A.U, COR. P(1FN"f'E IiLATA Ootober1,iM j Bulk Vasquez &1 Pirlr iers, Inc. ' GROSS FLOOR Il1fW& orp �qn Vlsol �raoff nciutll�nu the surrouond area ex�rellarbBwad sf, axceptgnt o mof o x ullOngnreas Wined In conlu on with a restaurant shag also be Included. Any finished ptxtl¢n d e bulldlnp which mamma more than 4 feetfmm Mlsh�d floor to celllnq m and Is aesslble shall be Included In caloUlatlons of gross ficorarea. Areas "IbOd for stWwalls and elevator shafts shall be oou Md loxerds oms ffotrarea t%'71t the firstImtal, PAWING Ro FLOOH REA Dafinitlons NUWPM a g a Cheptar 20,e7 FLOOR AREA, G�6'S. Gross Floor aa' I the eroa Inclucbdwllhln the sunounoing ®decor walls exclusive of vent a fte and colrts. The float area of a building, or portion awroUnding 6twlgqrr walls shall be the Usable area under the horizontal pre (Ord, 1404/1, 1MR) IAZ'rNO N@T Fl)OOf) ARFA wpm o ng a DerinlUons Cheptw 20,e7 FLOOR AREA, NET. 'Nat Floor Ares• Is a area ahciuded within Ore surounding wells of a elevator shafts, amgways, ex[erlrraorridors or balmnles, rooms inns elecrk *l equlpmerrr us6d for sorvIrs of the building, Utility shafts and Wilding or portion thereat, I hot proNded with of the roof or floor above. j NOTE: EMorlor roofed Atrium areas open on 2 cr Mora sides, and exterior roofed balm 108 or walkways open on one side 1qq 1hs sky, shag not be Included In Entitlement GrOBS, Parking e, ar Peddng NetSq. gootage oalculations, <" s er�a.l �i se- Use RLrv- ifJ G Net Floor Atae: I sf: 125,Oup—Zi,Cdp 6f (P001ParkkVFrtmulal e1:9VOr425,0005F For pools bused p�n more ttran 425,000sq, ft, of net floor area, the may mOd'fy the ptxicing frrmula by Use PerMl; based on a demur (Crch 1 eaa M . t 76; CFd.14o4 / 4, Sepmmbar 20,1971). Perking •'° Assumption: Sased on Ussue overlay results, PWkIrU Cross eg6e16 approximately 90.8% of Entitlement Cross, Psrking Not equals approxgriutely 95a6 of Parking Gross.; Architeoturc,% 69.13 Ibwii CnniClr SuIIr d0U (:usld MUUU, CA Oe I AX. 714 b4f). 5pS)I /14. 549. PP07 Principals Rob Balen Lew Calenlune Les Card Jim Culver Robert Hnrbes George Krrrilko Carollyn Lobell Bill Alayer Ray Aloe Beth Padon Rob Scbonholtz Malcolm]. Sproul Associates Conine Grlica Gan, Dow Krvnr tirrcber Amp Flour Steve Granhohn Richard Grassetti Richard Harlacber Rnger Hams Art Hornnghausen Gina Jurxk Larry Kennings Karen Kirtland Benson Lee Rob AkCann Sabrina Nicholls Hamgene Perry Anthony Petros Dean Williams Jill Wilson LSA Associates, Inc Environmental Assessment Transportation Engineer ing LSA Resource Management Community Planing Environmental Rwtnanon RECEIVE C 8Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT c+Ty OF NEWPORT BEACH March 12,1993 MAR 1 , 1993. PM AM '23456 71819t10tllt12t1t t 1 i t Ms. Gina Garda Planning Department City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, CA 92659 Subject: Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring for the 7 Corporate Plaza Project Dear Ms. Garcia: LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) was retained by Mr. Paolo Ghio of Sovereign Bancorp Ltd. to provide the paleontological monitoring for the 7 Corporate Plaza project. I attended the pre -grade meeting and presented the safety and monitoring procedures that we would be employing while on site. Under my supervision, Mr. Brooks Smith, Ms. Andrea Charroin and Ms. Enid Posner served as,field monitors during the initial site grading. Paleontologic moni- toring was conducted on a full-time basis while grading was being conducted in bedrock materials. The final day of grading was March 8, 1993. Grading on the site exposed primarily artificial fill with a modest amount of bedrock. The bedrock unit was Pleistocene terrace material deposited approximately 10,000 to 120,000 years before present. These sediments have proved to be abundantly fossiliferous both along the south Orange County coast and in the City of Newport Beach. A fossil vertebrate site containing the remains of a new species of fossil horse, the marine diving bird Cbendytes, the land tortoise Geocbelonia, Botta's pocket gopher Tomomys bottae and abundant invertebrates is, located within a few hundred feet of the project. The sediments on the nearby fossil site are similar to those underlying the project site. The uppermost sediments were deposited by streams that once existed in the area. The underlying sediments were depos- ited by'a stream channel flowing across a marine terrace, much like an ava- lanche in a submarine canyon. The stream carried terrestrial fossil material from the land into the shallow sea where they were mixed with the remains of marine animals. 03/12/93(1:' •OPC301'"•MON.LTR) One Park Plaza, Suite 500 Telephone 714 553"0666 Irvine, California 92714 Pacstnrile 714353"8076 M project site, terrace materials, consisting of brownish to reddish tan r On the p ) were graded sands, silts and a minor amount of clay lying below the fill, during this operation. The LSA monitors oepranothisaon°he project site. resources were found during these grading Pe If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 553-o666. Sincerely, LSAASSOCIATES, INC. 4 Fran Govean Cerriaed paleontologist cc: Paolo Ghio 03/12/93(1:10PC301'.M0N XTR) 2 October 4,1993 TO: John Douglas, Principal Planner FROM: Genia Garcia, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Corporate Plaza Entitlement After a lengthy and detailed study conducted by myself and Diane Hussey of McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc., of the Corporate Plaza Planned Community, I have outlined the square footage for each building. The use of tissue overlays of the original plans used in the issuance of building permits for each building was the basis upon which we determined the square footage. The attached chart represents gross square footage for entitlement purposes, gross square footage for parldng, and net square footage for parking. cc: Pat Temple, Advance Planning Manager Senior Planners Bill Laycock, Current Planning Manager Janet Divan, Traffic Engineering Division w vOl° Existing Development 1 Corporate Plaza 2 Corporate Plaza 3 Corporate Plaza 4 Corporate Plaza 5 Corporate Plaza 7 Corporate Plaza 12 Corporate Plaza 13 Corporate Plaza 14 Corporate Plaza. 15 Corporate Plaza 16 Corporate Plaza 17 Corporate Plaza 18 Corporate Plaza 19 Corporate Plaza 20 Corporate Plaza 23 Corporate Plaza CORPORATE PLAZA ENTTTLEMENT-PARKING AND ANALYSIS N.B. N.B. N.B Bldg. Gross Pkg. Permits Entitle. Gross 16,000 17,671 17,499 24,246 21,323 21,026 20,886 20,392 20,300 21,630 22,007 22,072 10,154 10,390 10,032 21,000 23,627 23,379 15,747 16,441 16,107 17,574 15,755 15,141 24,040 26,954 26,704 15,500 16,143 15,755 13,610 13,271 13,218 23,350 22,976 22,617 16,000 18,231 17,929 17,580 16,378 15,895 8,200 8,168 7,755 82,619 82,746 82,130 Total 348,136 352,473 347,559 September 14, 1993 Required Parking - Gross 1,390 - Net 1,190 Existing Parking 1,160 = (30) spaces Total Proposed Additional Spaces-AA'M,e TU7G9,C 2?ew[ )Oe,('7 ' 349 = 1,509 Total N.B Pkg. Net 16,503 19,592 18,934 20,682 9,847 22,592 15,254 14,456 25,348 15,049 11,995 21,447 16,790 15,698 7,630 80,046 M,863 779 N v d o VICINITY MAP u qCT 16 192 13:46 M IAN ASSOC.-,--' E 163 I I I , I i Iml I Imal DIRE H October 4, 1993 TO: John Douglas, Principal Planner FROM: Genia Garcia, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Corporate Plaza Entitlement After a lengthy and detailed study conducted by myself and Diane Hussey of McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc., of the Corporate Plaza Planned Community, I have outlined the square footage for each building. The use of tissue overlays of the original plans used in the issuance of building permits for each building was the basis upon which we determined the square footage. The attached chart represents gross square footage for entitlement purposes, gross square footage for parking, and net square footage for parldng. cc: Pat Temple, Advance Planning Manager Senior Planners Bill Laycock, Current Planning Manager Janet Divan, Traffic Engineering Division A CORPORATE PLAZA ENTITLEMENT -PARKING AND ANALYSIS Existing N.B. N.B. N.B Development Bldg. Gross Pkg. Permits Entitle. Gross 1 Corporate Plaza. 16,000 17,671 17,499 2 Corporate Plaza 24,246 21,323 21,026 3 Corporate Plaza 20,886 20,392 20,300 4 Corporate Plaza 21,630 22,007 22,072 5 Corporate Plaza 10,154 10,390 10,032 7 Corporate Plaza 21,000 23,627 23,379 12 Corporate Plaza 15,747 16,441 16,107 13 Corporate Plaza 17,574 15,755 15,141 14 Corporate Plaza 24,040 26,954 26,704 15 Corporate Plaza 15,500 16,143 15,755 16 Corporate Plaza 13,610 13,271 13,218 17 Corporate Plaza 23,350 22,976 22,617 18 Corporate Plaza 16,000 18,231 17,929 19 Corporate Plaza 17,580 16,378 15,895 20 Corporate Plaza 8,200 8,168 7,755 23 Corporate Plaza 82,619 82,746 82,130 Total 348,136 352,473 347,559 September 14, 1993 Required Parking - Gross 1,390 - Net 1,190 Existing Parking 1,160 = (30) spaces Total Proposed Additional Spaces 349 = L509 Total N.B Pkg. Net 16,503 19,592 18,934 20,682 9,847 22,592 15,254 14,456 25,348 15,049 11,995 21,447 16,790 15,698 7,630 80,046 331,863 Cj,WcLamad Ad A Ernnsla M Vasquez. A I A Arinar C Ecknar, A.I.A September 14, 1993 Mr. Larry Williams The Irvine Company 550 Newport Center Drive, 7th Floor Newport Beach, California 92660 Re: Corporate Plaza MV&P Job# 92-180 Dear Larry: now- McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc. Pursuant to our previous conversation regarding the Sovereign Bank Building, Corporate Plaza 7, Gina Garcia, of the City of Newport Beach, and I have finalized our square footage calculations. Using a tissue overlay process on construction documents provided to us by Sovereign Bank, we have calculated the following: First level: 20,621 Square Feet Garage level: 3,006 Square Feet Total Gross Entitlement: 23,627 Square Feet Building Permit: 21,000 Square Feet Building 21,000 Square Feet Garage Parking and vehicle circulation areas are not included when calculating Gross Entitlement. However, the City does include any usable building areas within the garage such as lobbies, electrical/mechanical, telephone rooms, storage rooms, stairs, and walls surrounding those areas. Sovereign Bank has incorporated such areas in their garage totaling approximately 3,006 square feet. This will account for the increase in Gross Entitlement for Corporate Plaza 7 and the decrease in available Gross Entitlement for the entire Corporate Plaza Development. Should you have any further questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, McLARAND, Diane Hussey, AIA Associate DH/slm & PARTNERS, INC. Copy: Gina Garcia, City of Newport Beach Planninq Department ____ Architecture & Planning TR E E T \a ��' �� 2°\a5 „ _ _ s°° oo C' E-AST \\ T --9 � --= -/•��G b �1' •G w p TG• / b. b.y QE �y1• .�, \ L Z-J_ c y---= -'� /0%Bo fv✓. \\ �' ��1 F� 0 �, 3 F 3)fo' YF3AfN/yv----------- - ----____-- a / f7 7"ABE,RE= N FTiY. ,r/ //6,75' ,� --- „ _ .Jlb-¢o///c T -� ( ZO) I'EO._A/PE r°' y t .. •sG. 3o(//6• . N TD -2f.6. FTiV" b/�: .64fy., • . , .: I� .r._. - b 41' 0 pkl' `t'\ p13 �.F.l-'�,• /s �> Z/,�P'� �•:\ - (J_ r:3nv✓ %s \l r/i o 3 0 b 1 F 9 o ( - //6s s6J\IO- I6��. �\ csBo l�i-S, 1�6• \�dL16gG 7}` /1. - - ---------------- -- - - >•_ IV' U Ui• II -v v. - Vd'- 3 /. v• //6- /N✓ � �P � G I (rr . as n� ` � 3' G Ei 0 yoFy 'o oT �(I q 11�r/Fatr•. iro. 8.8o5/ F5 yf �.(,.•' I "u1',' `./.0 ¢z�6F'.>o ' � G. II • • ; .:... 1 ! 0�6 A 0 IOU'o 08o -15, 0 /N✓ OIL+' /lf6. tzN! �6- "s/i6so k 1 2 1`_ , � ' s :• /o y � Oq I ,8 • � ,1l/ v /¢;y � a t G' j 6. ,� �2. / .a L4 / ' ' ' 7 /aB-6oF-S. I QQy 1 '�. ��''- /I p5 �'�.ao/v'' R�C•5 (II s. �q 0 9<< �5 �o �/6,/� 1�)'� I'II ✓O/N EX/ST, 2 I - WALL SUBORA/N ----- _ �9 —1� of - u'L•. L-_ -�—I((. � 08? 8F III II(IIlII y 2 !!083' !N✓✓ o 10 ",¢,,3o .. b(.I rI •�y,4 zq-i2 -,-'I /-16.avaI (Tj'Y�G'Pv ) e 81 q. � F ooFld APpPlPE't eTLTI/ v AP PEN - '� �. losJ' e•i��a � I, /n/o6sv-51 rs0 . o r.G.zzr. oq 3 fG0 //6•sr. - _ / t/ I� II' Z /��"� 7 089� f �' .• ,� ' :•t6p F r s.e° wAe�� � FF. = .//7.00 N N � //sue ' s � � � `� / `'), . , / / / /O Tr � � /0 (I r•/M.' GL �_` � /oc/o � � 9< i � � -J � 'b' / �, /06• i 90�1 G•4... , _ )r� �oTB.c.6oeEOo/xStON. IWNFZC .¢.— N✓- - - ek' - /6-.2-/ I ¢' 4 / O 9, 0 REEAST /O / sue• _ . r' c� . . . ri6q� / :O T.W. I c 8¢yL'iOB./o gb)FQ .. "I BL•. : //c.s --- ?v si Q.�'7EfAfl QES/L3 _QA O :rou. Q qT JF�. (I 7 (10 /oB. 9z �. F 2 it h ms,/Y /,/LTE �6vZ.s�o b °`rSR. �EvErAi�ss/t s s' do F II II Zo >L: �t1, / {Oq�06 !l6•S ji627G. /as-/c - - -- -- ---= /s �9 '11 ,i� l � /NY. K'AGL �/ i6 C%6 %y` //R6. ltp //. II' 8 q/rasg �6• II 1 p 101,' 0161' FTs�. ; (I 10:e7o d 1-yr„Ra ALL BULO/NG WALL 5e 10TC" 6Z CONNETO GARAGE/ yy // / p7.6� . _ :�'�.-: •-'• ' ,:.g3•, T as -•?' /06.50 ...k,�< _ .iyv /, �o �1) •{ I ao'C,y F1iG' ..: . lII (ti0"F.6.1<F9:23�<9<� 'M6/N,ly B•I i0�� F0�(�,-:? xrVOi/:-'l/�.�33�Y�, .' . _ /a�2g°�r'fN.� y',` -�:. •••.-i' - /'�9`a �tt64� , �-�s�•''.'y�'o. � . � _ ALTW f56CONiYEC1' TO PLANT Iob gp16 ° c�oolFIp 0 9z)/os (6 (too, ,./e/ r0Igo .S �. • / j '`� _Y -'I // - 7fu °,y��,�i � ' •f. G - 6 y I f.Nl• 2 us . G. I G. � /� �. 36 / 6 � liiz/2 II AUTO TELLER ) I G • y (101'� ZA�I t F O 'T 6o I 7 : Gj j� j IIF. 11 l01$ 3p F (1o�N \ II �_ 0 / j6 0 T /NY• • �'� �r • ' 2. ' G //3 �u T� 000'1/� 9 / / i•� f 2 //G 00 _ \` lirz./> (1 /3 �'. 5 //c /'oo r ��ti,/' Na✓z) D� q"�� ��.. I`"?�` o I pUMPO/Sd/aiP6E Ig) obi �. - ��Y B Ij L/NE,, PT 'G6: ii6 ((01,/� % - / 's b� / S. o /NV, mrao I.,, '� H.4NQ/CAP 1111/L1r /.7 AT 8.33 0 c o 6'� o s ' IQ6' //o j ALC LANO/iU65A/1EAT CONSTRUCTION j� . .NO1 /06 00) `L- rVC Q I / S 9�f L- (O6.3q� i5 (�' - r�o9 �' O� I INSTALL CATCH 'BASIN, : '100 ,SQ. IN oI 32� l '�6E I ' F$• �C. la. 4 s e , " oS--:INSTALL 6 DIA. YARD. DRAIN W/DO IV 244.00 IYSfALL DECK.DRAIN_ 8.41 7 EAST—402.89_hl a (I 0 q1) f 6 h j ��. / Z 4 �STA:LL 4 DI'A, TJI2AZN 'PIPE, SCI q 1 M h / D b� 6/ ` 1 GL OA9/NOOT[EJ / 106' ' l Iw.� INS'L':�.8,'3,:i�.'`..I& S) :' RA1N� ' IPE s+":�J F' z ��� �`°A.e?_,N„ E, pl I� TES �OF �,.' S. ��� � • , .;� ,.... .. ::..: << ' . 11" "INSTAL DIA. D bE PIS , SC t✓8 ` 1/' / ��o R ?it; /L k �yisTlhf; .a uitt3 § M0TTn: x p />Q hkMO,t iYISTING. i+.C..- PAVEMENT ro,�a riro.cs) �o of / /N57ALL H/GH PO/NT B• ' 6- '/0 Sac?9 99 INSTALIr CATCH *B! AkN` 19,0:SQ. IF _576wl1'I 10 CGNSTR QT-'THRL;E PER Ni S,rRzfc - 6 cal,5w PEfT C/rY OF ' .9SEtYJE'rVT // CON — - _ _ _ Y a- a. iE ::.-- _s�� - ti•rtti �Y a SECTION IV. BUSINESS, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMERCIAL A. Intent The intent of this district is to permit the location of a combination of business and professional office uses, and light general commercial activities engaged in the sale of products to the general public. The following shall be permitted: 1. Retail sales and service of a convenience nature. 2. Administrative and professional offices (excluding medical offices). 3. Restaurants, including outdoor, drive-in or take-out restaurants, shall be subject to the securing of a use permit in each case. Facilities other than indoor dining establishments or those that qualify as outdoor, drive-imor take- out establishments shall be subject to the City of Newport Beach regulations covering drive-in and outdoor establishments. 4. Institutional, financial and governmental facilities. 5. Civic, cultural, commercial recreational and recreational facilities. 6. Parking lots, structures and facilities. 7. Drive -up teller units, subject to the review of the on -site parking and circulation plan by the City Traffic Engineer and approved by the Director of Planning. C. Building Location All buildings shall be located in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. D. Building Height All buildings and appurtenant structures shall be limited to a maximum height of thirty-two (32) feet, with the exception of Building "22" which shall be permitted up to the limit established by the sight plane and the extension of the sight plane northerly to Farallon Drive and southerly to Pacific Coast Highway. 1Q E. Parkin Adequate off-street parking shall be provided to accommodate all parking needs for the site. The intent is to eliminate the need for any on -street parking. Required off-street parking shall be provided on the site of the use served, or on a common parking area in accordance with the off-street parking requirements of City of Newport Beach Planning and Zoning Ordinance. F. Landscaping Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans, prepared by a licensed landscape architect, licensed landscaping contractor, or architect shall be reviewed by the Director of Parks, Beaches and Recreation. In no case shall any landscaping penetrate the sight plane ordinance established by the sight plane for Harbor View Hills. All landscaping referred to in this section shall be maintained in a neat and orderly fashion. 1. Screening Areas used for parking shall be screened from view or have the view interrupted by landscaping, and/or fencing from access streets, and adjacent properties. Plant materials used for screening purposes shall consist of lineal or grouped masses of shrubs and/or trees. 2. Landscaping -Vehicle Separation All landscaped areas shall be separated from adjacent vehicular areas by a wall or curb, at least six (6) inches higher than the adjacent vehicular area. 3. Parking Areas Trees, equal in number to one (1) per each five (5) parking stalls shall be provided in the parking area. G. Loading Areas 1. Street side loading shall be allowed providing the loading dock is screened from view from adjacent streets. -10- H. Storage Areas 1. All outdoor storage shall be visually screened from access streets, and adjacent property. Said screening shall form a complete opaque screen. 2. No storage shall be permitted between a frontage street and the building line. I. Refuse Collection Areas 1. All outdoor refuse collection areas shall be visually screened from access streets, and adjacent property. Said screening shall form a complete opaque screen. 2. No refuse collection area shall be permitted between a frontage street and the building line. Telephone and Electrical Service All "on site" electrical line (excluding transmission lines) and telephone lines shall be placed underground. Transformer or terminal equipment shall be visually screened from view from streets and adjacent properties. K 5iM 1. Building Address Sign Building address numerals shall be a maximum of two (2) feet in height and shall be consistent with the building identification signing. Building address number shall face the street (and/or pedestrian walkways in the case of necessity), and be located on the building so that they are visible from adjacent frontage roads and designated parking areas. 2. Project/Building Identification Sign Project and/or building identification signs are permitted at major entry access drives from adjacent frontage streets, provided that they comply with the City of Newport Beach site distance requirement 110-L. The identification signage is permitted in the form of a free-standing (single or double faced) monument sign. The sign copy shall be restricted to the project or building name and street address. Individual letter heights shall not exceed eighteen (18) inches. -11- 3. Tenant Identification Signs Tenant identification signs are permitted and are divided into two (2) categories: Primary Tenant Secondary Tenant Tenant identification signs are to be wall -mounted graphics, consisting of individually fabricated letters. Box or "can' signs are not permitted. The maximum number of primary tenant signs permitted on any one building elevation is two (2). Each secondary tenant shall be limited to one (1) identification sign. The maximum letter height of a primary tenant sign shall not exceed twenty- four (24) inches. The maximum letter height of a secondary tenant sign shall not exceed sixteen (16) inches. ' Sign copy shall be restricted to identification of the person, firm, company or corporation operating the use conducted on the site. 4. General Sign Standards a. Signs (to include all those visible from the exterior of any building) may be lighted but no sign or any other contrivance shall be devised or constructed so as to rotate, gyrate, blink or move in any animated fashion. 5. Temporary Signs The following guidelines are intended to produce a consistent sign design for temporary signs within Newport Center. All temporary signs require the approvals of the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company. Temporary signs are to identify the future site, project or facility under development on individual project sites. Information on this sign is limited to: For Sale, For Lease, Future Home of, Building/Project Name, etc. Type or Name of Development Type and Area of Space Available Major Tenant or Developer -12- Financial Institution General Contractor Architect Leasing'Agent Occupancy Date Phone Number Irvine Company or Irvine Company Project Name and Logo Location: One temporary sign is permitted on site for each frontage street. These signs may be single or double-faced and parallel or perpendicular to the roadway. Design: All temporary signs are to be built in substantial conformance to The Irvine Company corporate design standards, as shown on the following page. Longevity: Signs can exist from the time of lease or sale of the parcel until construction and/or leasing of the facility is complete. r AL -5- SECTION II. GENERAL NOTES 1. Grading outside an area submitted under the Planned Development Ordinance but within the Planned Community area will be permitted upon securing of a grading permit. 2. Water within the Planned Community area will be furnished by the City of Newport Beach. 3. Sewage disposal facilities within the Planned Community will be provided by Orange County Sanitation District No. 5. 4. The subject property is within the City of Newport Beach. The Developer will provide the necessary flood protection facilities under the jurisdiction of the City of Newport Beach. 5. Erosion control provisions shall be carried out on all areas of the Planned Community in a manner meeting the approval of the Director of Planning. 6. Except as otherwise stated in this Ordinance, the requirements of the Newport Beach Zoning Code shall apply. The contents of this supplemental text notwithstanding, no construction shall be proposed within the boundaries of this Planned Community District except that which shall comply with all provisions of Newport Beach's Uniform Building Code and the various mechanical codes related thereto. 7. Parking lot lighting shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Planning. Parking lot lighting shall be designed in a manner so as to minimize impacts on adjacent residential areas. 8. All mechanical appurtenances on building roof tops and utility vaults shall be screened from street level view in a manner meeting the approval of the Director of Planning. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the site shall be examined to determine the existence and extent of archaeological and paleontological resources in accordance with adopted City polices. 10. Any future signal light on East Pacific Coast Highway at the private street intersection will be the responsibility of The Irvine Company. 11. The on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems shall be reviewed and approved by the Traffic Engineer. .'GM 12. The intersections at private streets and drives shall be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 30 miles per hour. Slopes landscape, walls and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non -critical locations, subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer. 13. Prior to occupancy of any structures, easements for public emergency and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes should be dedicated to the City over all private streets. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the master plans of water, sewer and storm drain facilities shall be reviewed and updated to current standards and any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the review shall be the responsibility of the developer unless otherwise provided for through an agreement with the property owner. The review of the storm drain master plan will require the submittal of hydrology and hydraulic studies to the Public Works Department for review and approval. The hydrology study shall include both on -site and off -site drainage to determine the measures necessary to protect the subject development from flooding during a 100 year storm frequency. The developer may be required to install retention basins upstream from the proposed development or enlarge the existing downstream storm drain system to satisfy the requirement. 15. The northerly entrance/exit on Avocado Avenue shall be designed for a right turn in and out, ONLY. The design shall provide for an island that restricts left turns. This requirement may be waived if the driveway lines up with the access to the parcel easterly of Avocado Avenue and the City incurs no additional costs to relocate their proposed access to the library site. i CORPORATE PLAZA P.C.# DATE SO.FT.(GROSS) n% #1 �768-77 8/24/77 i6,000 /�615 /5i99p 2 :�'123-77 5/26/78 24 �246)2l4462 m7".._. 767-78 9/15/78 20,886 '301-78 6/3/78 21,630 2ouvn/y2; -396-78 6/27/78 91974 f396-78 180 ' `1384-80 9/8/80 15,747 ld,b3?� Iry i4J 1 �\ 6I � /894-78 11/2/78 7.7,57 1`•�=--�a tG e GrJ'c'r, Na'�31-78 10/13/78 24,,040 ! U �47-78 9/5/78 151,600 �� - < <• t; 586-78 9/15/78 13,610 114 7 53-77 9/2/77 23,350 1573-77 5/25/78 16-,000 9• ! 't ' , --j 137-78 8/28/78 17,580 i51 hot ✓ Q/J 680-78 10/.13/78 8,260 N �i rya 23 ,,565-90 6/19/90 82,019 r 8`J�4jZ. ryJi, lv1f,r f oUS -rj i a- gJ61- _ mil-• � (91- ax I2 2rA P(c,'r t'Ioo 5,7 qu-= I1 - ,• •, ll%'�t,,c� fir? ,:.yam' Cf- 1 /li•.. /!,d''(h��% l"fj.`�'.f, r-F� /7�!4 _ ;' f5':C.0 i•_. - 04iq,D 101 AV54 QOjUU� 1"E u 461.0 JVj<iri 11 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PU a0x 176Y NPWPOaT hEACH,CA 91G59•il(�1 (§) PLANNING DEPARTMENT- (714) 644.32M siaren 9. 1990 Application: la>r Unc Adjustincnt No. 90.2 Applicant: Irvine Company Addrem of Property luvolvcd: 7 and H Corporate Plaza Isgal Description: Parcels No. Is, 7 and g, Parcel Map 93.46 Modification Requested- Request to permit the adjustment of lot lines between three p,rrcci% in the Corporate Plata Planned Community. Ilse Modifications Committee on MBLS)L6• Q, approved the application subject to the fo:losing conditions: 1. Permanent lot stakes and tags shall be installed at all new lot cl,rncrs by a licensed %urveyor or civil engineer prior to recordation of the lot line adptstmcnt unless otherwise provided by the Public Works Department. Installation of and lift stakes and tags shall require a Record of Survey pursuant to Sectioa 8762 of the I:md Surveyor's Act. Prior to recordation of line lot line adjustmr,u grant deeds indicating the changes in tildes of ownership shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review. 2. Upon approval of the lot line adjustment, and completion of the dot line staking, the lot line adjustment shall be submitted to the Public Works currently with tale County Recorder 3. ot line and County Assessor's ustment and Offices ant deeds shalt be filed co 'f be Modifications Committee determined in this case that the proposal would not be detrimental to persons. property or improvements in the neighborhood and that the ❑ odification as approved would be consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, and made the following findings: 1. The project suc rdcscribcd in the proposal consists of legal building siter4 2. The land taken from one parcel will be added to an adjacent parcel and -no additional parcels will result from the lot line adjustment. 3. The project complies with the requirements of lire California Environmental Quality Act. 4. Tosal is he propconsistent with the General Plan. 5.'[i c lot line adjustment, in and of iself, will not result in the need for additional improvements and/or facilities. G. That the City would permit the construction of a commercial building on Parcels No. 7 and g whether or not this Lot i.ine Adjustment were approved. NOT[:: This approval shall extend for a period of 24 months from the end of the appeal period, and cannot he extended. 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach " AECOPLINC REQUESTER BXf � - ® p q ' AND NAIL TOf .. 44- PUBLIC NORXS DEPARTMENT Newport beach. Lot Line Adjostnent No, CITY OT NEWPORT BEE? 3300 Newport Honlevard . P. 0. Boa 1768 +` "dwport Beach, CA 92656-0913 Attni subdivision section a Phone (714) 720-J200 Applicant_ Irvine Company b�reet rl#.s^ Address of Property Involved None]assignedpurposs of Applieatios:(deeeribsfullyTo accomodatements on �rrhaast�Parcel 2; to accommodate proposed building on Parcel 3. yironsf' (714)'' 720-3200'[q, `A"ra'Y'+.:v, n • :.,. A ONNWe AIZIDAVI? 1 } hereby certify that !),S asf/we an the record ovner(n of aent4trcels proposed Of for adjustment by this' apPlicatlOn, A2) S/fr�':Mvn lcnrnf2edge.ot and eonsaappli the filing true this application, ]) tha5lnformatioa aubwltted ln'eonneetion with thin application, Is true end correct, and 4) f/we consents to the rec. these doeufxiat ordation ofa., ..; . re (a) of owner(sf of Parcel 2 Signature(s). of owner(s1 of Parpl r Signature (a),aL owner (a) of Parcel 3 a Signature(m) of, owner (s); of Parcel-4= k,.f. 1=ta These Signatures}vuat be notar Ited; and the appropriate certificate of acknovladgme:,t attached by:a Notary Public. Do wn` oNpLELICA TS APPTION SEIAN THIS cLINB Public Works Approval Y 'Date Received g r {TAT[OF CAUIORNN NIY Or 4 a,�3a.e 9' f94� aNav fne.%+P�a�a.ryvweaM.�afa _._._------ x :ry . ..h�Ot a�Ww� �p�11�: •b..v, �� cpenpuaJk,W..nbaM t>Na'+neb M an eu Mul of xfa• eS r8Y41. MAL----------^ s httairadd,nc.7 b0efM Mr�'/Q+.t.a��,��wPaW+}aP � fti fi `\.Y L'.tl:'�f7_t t � eam.dl, KN elthlnkwl,umMl and KfNo+Mee. t �`�.., n.,=%� tK\,:NLU. C'hrt iN '�y;y CR\�'4Y C]UIRY' f I,ehMffMr uatvNe W Mme. }- f � y z W Cenxnfne„ d&n o.ca*n+ 17, law Y17TNta{I,r fMrA anadafltl uM i,aa,..a,.n..l r.ranp„Hwa.....i {4'4ISry � � ✓Nh :-=rl"'."',. d �>;tiu S7Nt MahloRkgi rwluW wM .... .., ..-. tr.. '�,y .'fA.A5,�F�i rT T,LN'.r✓�L$Y`�o+ ` Lip 0 -119 V QUALITY ORIGINAL (S) '92 04i19 16:35 S 4947861 MCLARAND VASQUE2 02 r r *l YCa(I Ca11Ah.L.u.nd, A.LA• Fmetlo M. W -qune, A.I.A. Atlhur C. icknll. A. LA. a W- rvnn 10 rr.nc.A PARKING ANALYSIS August 26.1992 Revised February 17,1993 Roviaed April 1911993 A. Eilsting Development ,Description 1 2 3 4 5 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 23 7 Total Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plana Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Not Floor Area 1;990 20,379 • l%842 " 49,260 9,551 14,990 14,990 2--3,605.4 14,535 11,893 21,600 15,R32 15,090 +. 8,000 81,442 20,171 327,230 Required Parking 64.0 81.5 79.4 77.0 38.2 60.0 60.0 94.7 $2.2 39.6 72.0 52.8 50.3 26.7 269.1 57.6 1,174 McL.alana Vasquez & t'�rtn�ay, Iris: Archi19c1Mr9 & Planning 694 lawn Cunlur DIM, 411M.100 Cu;,lu Musa, CA 9.9(w(1 1 AA• 714. 64D. VW Existing Parking 1,157 Parking Surplus (Deficit) (17) '92 04/19 16135 Corpol�'ate Plaza Parking Analysis . April )'9, IM. -- Pago 2 standard Office 81 9 1I/V& ' Total C. 8 9 11 I 22 Total Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive EXISTING & SED Net Required Floor Area Parking 17,627 50.4 18,050 $1.6 14,250 40J 28,500 81.4 78t427 224 405,657 1,398 tovolopmont (Medical orris Use) ;ed on Gross Floor Area $ 4947861 MCLARR14D URSOLIF7 Proposed Parking Parking Surplus (Deficit) a 0 0 0 345 121 1,502 104 In Gross Required Proposed Parking Floor Area Parking Parking Surplus (Deficit) Plaza Drive 18,555 53.0 0 Plaza Drive 19,000 54.3 0 Plant Drive 15,000 42.9 0 Plaza Drive 30.000 85.7 0 EXISTING do '92 04/19 16:36 2 4947861 MCLFRA 04 Corp or tc Plaza Parking Analysis April l 1 1993 Pugr 3 C. Pakkine Lot Analvsk Total Si Total pi TOTAL PROPO TOTAL Lot Number a 3 4 5 6 7 8 BLDG 9 U1 Number A 8 C b C p8 (DERCIT) Sid. spaces 136 .144 108 121 166 05 57 Z5 1102 44 55 56 89 86 320 1432 Comp, Spaces 5 0 3 4 9 0 0 27 CompI. 8PHes 0 6 0 0 n 0 27 HCP Spaces 5 3 6 0 2 2 4 HCP Spam S 1 28 0 3 3 5 4 15 43 Total 195 145 is$ 108 126 172 Iro •1 62 26 1157 44 58 59 94 90 345 1502 1398 104 t , '92 04/19 16:36 corporate Plaza Parking Analysis April 1 , J993 i- Page 4 y z 3 n 4 �l 5 1 7 Ir 14 IS 16 17. \'J 18 \\��19 23 Total $ 4947861 MCLRRnND UASaUE2 05 Description Original Design Building Actual Net P. C. Permit Guidelines Permit. Plan F1oorArea. Number Date Gross ' Gross Gross Floor Area Floor Area Floor Area Plaza Drive 16,000 16,000 16,815 � 15,990 70-77 8/24/77 Plaza Drive 24,000 24,246 21,452 20,379 1123-77 5/26r18 s Phut Drive 20,000 20,886 20,886 - 19,842 767-78 9115178 : Plaza Drive 20,000 21,630 20,000 19,260 301-78 6/03/78 : Plaza Drive 10,000 10,154 10,054 9,551 396-78 6/27//S Plaza Drive 30,000 - 20,864 V 20,171 - Plaza Drivc 15,000 15,747 ,4 14,990 384-80 9/Q$M Plaza Driva 130 37,574 16 6371 14 990 Plaza Drive 25,000 24,040 24,910: 23,6fi5 331-78 10/13j78 Plaza Drive 15,000 15,500 15,300 14,535 447-78 9/05/78 Plaza Drive 10,000 13,610 140143 11,893 586-78 9/15178 Plaza Drive •22,000 23,350 22,737 21,000, '653,77• • 9ro2/77 Playa Drive 16,000 16,000 17,102 15,832 1573-77 50/78 Plaza Drive 16,0DO 17,580 15,884 151090 437-7$ OIN(78 Plaza Drive 8,000 8,200 a,254 8,0W 680-78 10113/78 playa Drive 5000 82,619 82,619 v 81,449 5W-yq 0112M 340,000 321,1_�4` 343,070 327,230 C.wiption 01`19111al Design Proposed Actual Proposed Guidelines 9uildlug Phil Not Gross Gross Gross Floor Area Floor Area Floor Area Floor Area 8 Cc porato Plaza Drive 16,000 18,555 17,627 9 (b porate Playa Drive 16,000 19,000 18,050 10 Cc porate Playa Drive 15,000 0 0 11 Co porate Plaza Drive 10;000 15,000 14,250 22 Co porate Plan Drive S3,t1D0 30,000 28,500 Total Pr posed 110,000 82,555 0 73,427 TOTAL EXISTING & 450,01X1 409,691 343,070 405,657 M '92 04/ a 4947861 MCLRRAND VRSQUEZ J-1 Corp rate Plaza Parking Analysis AprilI1%1993r—PagaS . Requ red Parking: Based on City of Newport Dwh Zoning Code Ch. 20 °.0.35 C, Pool pirking formula, one parking space for each 25o square feet of 118t 1)0 r AW Is.raqui'ed for the -first. 125,000 sq, ft. of office development. One pirking space for each 300 square feet of net floor area is required for thc next 125001 to 300,000 square feet of office development. For lh remaining development, the rcquiremems are one parking space for MP each 3 io square feet of net floor area. For M 1 ti1CNl use the required parking is based on gross floor area, EA151111 6 Parking: BxisOn parking Is based on a field survey conducted by MV&P. This total reserve; one space adjacent to each trash enclosure to allow access to trash bins, a d is not counted as a parking space. Proposed parkin!~; Exislln ,V9eant land to be developed as designated liarkin6 area§, No-p-0 gotl parking 1s an cstLnatcd count for designated parking areas, Actual tir%inglayout statues will determine ma)dinum parking counts in areas noted. (Refer attached preliminary designated parking fot layouts prepared by Molarad, Vasquez& Partners, Ina dated April 19,1993, Ncl I'll or Area: pet' Chapter 187.194 (Newport Beach Municpal Code. NA6 SilM represent Actual plan Net Ploor Area unless otherwise noted by a ` which indicates that Net Floor Area is based 95% of Actual Plan Gross Floor Area due to tack of recorded documentation of Aclu !I Plan Net Floor Area, Gross eor Area; Per Cha ter 20.87.190 Newport Beach Municpal Code. Origins DOSIgn Guidelines Gross I'IOpr Arlo; Design ulddincs, (,corporate plaza, Newport Center, prepared for the Irvine Company by LE .4 .AGES & Associates Building! Permit Gross Floor Area: As recor*d by the City of Newport Beach. Actual P an Grow Floor Arop; Based on f8VI6w Of microfilm copies of actual plan documents on file at the City of Newport Beach, Actual P an Not Floor Area: 1lased on eviewof microfilm copies of actual plan documents on file at the City Of Newport Beach, 93 t DATE: TO: ■�� MI l�tP FAX Nt CmAklAmd.kI.A. FROM: IrrtuNM. Vttgwt. A.I.A. AAAUM E04110. A.LA, NUMBI PROJE IF YOU DO NOT REC IVE THE I NUMBER OF CALL THE SENDER A (714) 549-2207. I MV&P PAX NUMBER I (714) 5#9-5297, j VASQUEZ =I' INDICATED (ABOVE, PLEASE A chitectureAPlanning 69 5 Town Ceniei Drive 5w 300 Cost i Mosa. CA 92M) fAX 14, 549. 5297 714 5 9 201 01 '93 02/24 11:38 a 4947861 MCLARAND URSQUE2 02 CORP4ATE PLAZA PAPKiR G ANALYSIS 4ugust 26,1992 12evIsetl February 17' 1993 MPA. Existing Developmentl Cad Mda,and, A.LA. Description Cross l q> utral r/Aalfn M. VASIVI" A to ,�' FI, a*** Parkin$"• AMU? C. fth,m,. A.LA. Q' 1 Corporate Plaza Drive 1 17,403 2 Corporate Plaza Drive i 24,U6 3 Corporate Plaza Drive I 20,W6 4 Corporate Plaza Drive 21,630 5 Corporate Plana Drive I 10,154 12 Corporate Plaza Drive ' 15,500 13 Corporate Plaza Drive 13.610 14 Corporate Plaza Drive 1 23,350 15 Corporate Plaza Drive 1 15,747 16 Corporate Plaza Drive ; 16,286 17 Corporate Plaza Drive , 24,040 18 Corporate Plaza Drive 17,514 19 Corporate Plaza Drive 17,%0 20 Corporate Plaza Drive ; 8,265 23 Corporate Plaza Drive 82 559 Total Existing 328,770 t r� i yr i M rand! Vas e7 t:X f r F�stJng Pamg, 96.9 83.5 86.5 40.6 IrS,�4� 62,0 54.4 77.8 1s, --'-7 52.5 i1: , •. I 54.3 58.4 I $8,6 iy�vC 27.6 S2,wry 275.2 11178 1179 /y I 0 1,157 Parking Surplus (Deficit) (21) 92 04r19 16:34 B 4947861 NCLRRAND VASQUEZ 01 � w ir�squez & Partners, Inc DATE: TO:�. MWP FAX:No.: .: 7 al.FlknA.I.A. FROM:FROM:71 — / &MIC M, vakquv" A.I.A, AffttMwFa kokna , A,LA. NUMBER OF SHEETS TO FOLLOW: PFtOdECT:��,•t,,rs�•'i��weJ,, IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE THE NUMBER OF SHEETS INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE CALL THE SENDER AT (714) $49.2207. MV&P FAX NUMBER IS (714) 549-5297. Architecture A Plennlhg 695 Town Cen1Ar Dnve Slate 300 Cush Mesa. CA 9206 FAX. 714 549 5297 714. 549 2207 92 04,19 16:35 . r $ 4947861 MCLARAND VASQUE2 02 Call MCL.r.nd, A.I.A. Frnulo M. thaqum, A.I.A. Arthur a Ackner. A.I.A CORPORATE PLAZA PARKING ANALYSIS August 26,1992 Revised February 17,1993 Revised April 1911993 A. 134isting Development ,bescription 1 2 3 4 5 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 23 7 Total Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Playa Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive P1am Drtvc Plaza Drive Not Floor Area 15r990 20,379 " 19,842 " 19,260 9,551 " 14,990 14,990 23,605 14,535 + 11,893 21,600 15,832 15,090 t 8,000 81,44Z 20,171 327,230 Ttcgulred Parking 64.0 81,5 79.4 77.0 38.2 60.0 60.0 94.7 $2.2 39.6 72,0 $2.8 50.3 26.7 263.1 57.6 1,174 Vasquez & 1pr`]rble15, /1I(:. Architecture & Planning 09C, lum (;crltut Unvu ;;udr.:300 Cudo Mass, (,A 9,M;4; l AK•'114. b40. 5?9/ / 14, b49.. '*01 Existing Parking 1,157 Parking Surplus (Deficit) (17) '92 04i19 16:35 Corpo ate Plaza Parking Analysis . April 9,19Z -- Pago 2 I w 2 4947861 MCLAR914D UR50UF7 03 Description Net Required Proposed Parking j Floor Area Parking Parking Surplus (Deficit) 8 Corporate Plaza Drive 17.627 50.4 0 9 4 bfporate Plaza Drive 18,050 5116 0 11 Corporate Plaza Drive 14,250 40.7 0 i� in p 22 Corporate ��(� Plaza Drive 28,%0 81.4 0 Total proposed 78,427 224 345 121 TOT''''''°0°°°°}}}}}}��1���'''''' EXISTING & PROJOSED 405.657 1,398 1,502 104 C. Proposed Development Medical Office Use) PII rkingbased on Gross Floor Area Aascription Gross Required Proposed Parking Ii Moor Area Parking Parking Surplus (Deficit) 8 orporato Plaza Drive 18,555 53.0 0 9 t"puralo Plaza Drive 19,000 54.3 0 ] l orporate Pura Drive 15,000 42.9 0 22 Plaza Drive 30,000 85.7 0 Total (orporate proposed 82,555 236 345 109 TOT L EXISTING t� PROJOSL+U 409,785 11410 11502 9Z '92 04/19 16:36 Corpor tc Plaza Parking Analysis April 1 1993 Page 3 Total E: Lot Number a 3 4 5 6 7 8 BLDG Ut Number A 8 C 1- Total pr4ased TOTAL MISTING Bc PROPO ED TOTAL REQUIRED SUMPS (DEFICIT) S 4947861 MCLRRRND URSQUE2 Sid. Comp, MCP Spaces Spaces Spaces 1�6 6 3 .144 5 6 108 0 0 121 3 2 166 4 2 155 9 4 57 0 5 � 0 i 1102 27 28 Std. .. Camp: -HCP Spaces Spaces Spaces 44 0 0 55 6 3 56 0 3 89 0 5 86 n 4 330 0 is 1432 27 43 Total M 145 155 108 126 172 U:1i 62 y 1157 Total 44 58 59 94 VA, 345 1502 1398 104 1 $ 4947861 MCLRRRND UASQUE2 e5 '92 04/19 16!36 Corporate Plaza Parking Analysis April 1 ,1993 i- Page 4 �y Description AM/) 1 RfjlOfale Plam DrNe 2wrate plaza Drivtl 3 4 5 7 1z i� 14 15 16 17, 18 19 II Total 8 9 10 11 0 Total TOTAL Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drlvc� Plaza Drive Plan Driva Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Plaza Drive Playa Drive Original Design Building Actual Guidelines rermit, ..Plan . Gross , Gross Gross Floor Aro% ` Floor Area Floor Area r, 6,000 Kim 16,815 j1ll-JP24,000 24,446 21,452 10,000 30,ODO 15,000 13,000 25,000 15,000 10,000 20,886 21,630 10,154 15,747 17,574 24,040 15,500 13,610 23,950 16,Ot70 17,580 9,200 82,619 20,886 20,000 10,054 20,864 15,413 16,637 24,910 15,300 14,143 22,737 17,102 15,884 t3,4K4 8z,619 340,000 327,136 343,070 Net P. C. Permit F1oorArea, Number Date 15,990 20,379 19,842 19,260 9,551 20,171 14,990 14,990 23,665 14,535 11,893 21,600 15,832 151090 S,im 81140 327,230 )lion 0691ual De.¢ign Proposed Actual Proposed Guidelines Building Plan Not Gross Gross Gross Floor Area Floor Area, Floor Area Floor Area Plaza Drive 16,000 18,555 17,627 Plaza Drive % 16,000 19,000 18,050 P1ara Dre�e (/ 15,f100 0 0 Plaza Drive J 10,000 150000 14,250 P1a�v drive 53,O110 30,000 28,500 110,000 82,556 0 79,427 PING & 1450,000 409,691 343,070 405,657 768-77 1123-77 767-78 301-78 396-78 384-80 $94-7& 331-78 447-78 586-78 '653-7.7 1573-77 437-7$ 680-78 8fl7. 5/26/78 9115178 003/78 6)27/78 9108180 11A12178 10/13/78 9/05/78 9/15178 9/02177 50fla MOB 10/13/78 '92 04/19 16137 2 4947861 MCLRRRND URSQUE2 06 Corp We Plaza Parking Analysis Apri119,1993 — Page 5 s _ Requ red Parking: Based on City of Newport Beach Zoning Code Ch. 20 30.35 C, P001 pIrking formula, one parking space for each 250 square feet of n8t r Area IS. Mquired for tlie•first• 125,000 sq, ft. of office development. One p rking space for each 300 square feet of net floor area is required for th next 125MI to•300,000's` uarc feet of office development. Hoc [lt remaining deveiephredt, lie requirements are one parking space for � cash 3 0 square foci of net floor area. pbr Midloal U38 the required parking is based on gross floor area, $469 & Parking; Exislln parking is based on a field survey conducted by MV&P. This total reserve one space adjacent to each trash enclosure to allow access to trash bins, a d is not counted as a parking space. parking; Exislin ,V110ant land to be developed as designated parkin6 areas, &r os J"purking 14 an estuuatcd count for designated parking areas. A01181 /Irking layout studies will determine tnaXiinum parking counts in areas noted. (Refer 0 attached preliminary designated parking lot layouts prepared by Mclan raid, Vasquez & Partners, Ina dated April 19,1993, Not Pic or Area: Pef Cha lt8r 187.184 Newport Beach Municpal code. Nombe ,;!town r@present Actual plan Net Floor Area unless otherwise noted by a • which indicates that Net Flo r Area is based 95% of Actual Plan Gross Floor Area due to lack of recorded documentation of Actua, Plan Not Floor Area. Gross oor Area: Per Cha ter 20.87.190 Newport $each Muniepal Code. Origins Resign Guidelines Gross F109f Ar08i Degign uI'd41inv., &rporatc plaza, Newport Center, prepared for the Irvine Company by LEFT .,AGES & Associate., Building! Permit Gross Floor Area; As recorc cd by the City of Newport Beach. Actual P Ign Gross Floor Aroa; RAW on eView of microfilm copies of actual plan documents on file at the City of Newport Beach, Actual P an Net Floor Area: Based on eviewof microfilm copies of actual plan documents on file at the City of Newport Beach. '93 03/10 12:56 S' 4947861 MCLRRRND URSQUEZ 01 aJi i r va uez Part eu, lna i FAX Tfl NSM)TTAL QQV6R,8HEET DATE: �'�d'�: RELLftl)8r � PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: � '�44 NTV OF NEINPORT BEACH AMP FAKNO.: � r� MAR 10 1993 a,.uo4.w,A,l FROM: T/� s�g11U111�121 PM Am bnpb M. ii/QYAq A.I.A. 141516 NUMBER OF SHEETSIO FOLLOW: 4 PROJECT: COMMENTS: mac.• � � f�'�j -�.�`� low - IF YOU DO NOT R IVE THE NUMBER OF SHEETS INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE CALL THE SENDER AT, (714) 549.2207. MV&f FAX NUMBER I� (714) 549.529-1. Arbh1 taature A Planning 695 Town Censer Drive Suite 300 Costa Mesa. C.A 92626 NIX. 114 549 5297 714 549. 2207 '93 03/10 12:57 S 4947961 MCLnRRND URSQUEZ 05 Corp rate, Plaza Parking Analysis Fcbr ary 17, 1991 --. Page, 4 D. roa Anal is Fxist ng: Description Actual Original Design Area Sq. Ft. Ouidelines Surplus (Over -built) 1 :orporate Plaza Drive, 17,403 16,ODO (1,403) 2 WP 3 .orporate Plaza Drive orporatc Plaza Drive 24,246 24,000 (246) 20,8% 200D0 (886) 4 orporatc Plart Drive. 21,630 20,000 (11630) 5 rporalc Plaza Drive 10,154 10,w (1S4) 12 !'orpurato Plaza Drive 15,500 15,000 (500) 13 orporaic Plaza Drive 13,610 13,000 (610) 14 .orporal: Plant Drive 23XO 25,000 1650 15 orporate Plaza Drivo 15,747 15,000 (747) 16 orporate Plaza Drive 16,266 10,p00 (6�M) 17 )rporate Plaza Drive 24,040 22,000 (2jW) 18 Corporate Plaza Drive 17,514 16,0DO (1,514) 19 Corporate Plaza Drive 17,%0 16,000 (1,580) 20 Corporate Plaza Drive 81265 8000 (M) 23 CorporatO Plaza Drive 82,559 80,000 (2,559) Total xisting 328,770- 310,000 (18,770) Praviol sly Approved: ! Description Approved Origtn#1 Design Area Sq. Pt. Ouldelines Surplus (Over-built) $ Corporate Plaza Drive, 18,555 16,000 (2,555) Total I 7xisting & 347,325 326,000 (21,325) Approred Propo ed Description Proposed Original Design Area Sq. Ft. Guidelines surplus (Over -built) 7 C,rporate Plaza Drive . 20,250 30,g00 9,750 4 C rporate Plaza Drive 19,000 16,11Ut1 (3,000) 10 C rporate Plaza Drive 0 15.000 15,(W 11 C rporate Plaza Drive 15,0DO 10,0DO (5,000) 22 C rporate Plaza Drive 30,000 53,000 23,ODO Total Proposod 84,250' 124,000 39,750 TOTAII DEVELOPMCNT 431,575 450,000 .18,425 102,705, Ili 44 0 0 44 55 0 '3 58 16 0 3 59 tog 0 5 113 96 0 4 90 (26) ° 0 (26) 25 0 1 26 348 0 16 364 1451 193 03/10 12:57 Corp rate Plaza Parking Analysis Fe»r ary 17, 1993 -- Page 3 C. arking Lot Analysis _ L'lriat(ag: II Lot Std. Numhor. Spaces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total I xisting i Propo ed• Lot Number. S 4947061 MCLRRRND VASQUE2 04 ar .Comp. HCP Total Spaces Spaces 190 0 5 195 V6 6 3 145 144 5 6 155 108 0 0 108 147 3 2 152 166 4 .2 172 155 9 4 168 57 0 5 62 1103 27 27 1157 Stri. Comp. HCP Total Spaces Spaces Spam A i g I C I D I E 5 BLDG 7 Total 1 roposed TOT EXISTING & P110P SFO TOTA�REQUIRED I SURP+US (DEFICIT) /ass egod a 40 27 43 1521 M 1521 0 '93 03i10 121S7 Corp ratc Plaza Parking Analysis Pc*ary 17,2993 Page 2 $ 49470E1 MCLRRRND URSQUEZ 03 i B. — fnposed Development i Descriptlpn Cross 5q.PY...v+ 7 Corporate Plaza Drava 8 rporatc Plaza Drive 9 .orporate Plam Drivo Ampp 11 rporatc Plaza Drivo 22 rporatc Plan Drivo Toiali propoacd TOT 1 8XISTING & PRO OSFD i Revired • Proposed Parking Parking* 20,250 67.5 26 18,555 61.9 0 19,000 63.3 0 15,(100 50.0 0 30,0()0 100D 0 102,805 431,575 \ , 343 364 Parking Surplus (Deficit) 21 1,521 1,521 0 �7 f"� 1 r✓ ._ I 193 03/10 12:56 S 4947861 MCLRRRNO VASOU92 W 02 _ -- l/a quez & CORP6RATL'+ NLAZA PARKING ANALYSIS August 26,1992 Revised February 17,1993 1IIMC)l! A. E7�isting Development en,I MAI ma:d. ALA. �cscrlption Gross RequirW Eidsting Parking Fq,Ytlu M. V.A99Uk,,A LA i **** A,II„„C.rcknc,,A.I.A. Sq.Ft. Parking** Parking*** Surplus 1 orporate Plaza Drive. 17,403 69.6 (Deficit) 2 orporate Plaza Drive 24,246 96.9 3 r7horporate Plaza Drive • 20,886 83.5 4 Corporate Plaza Drive . 21,630 86.5 U 5 nrporatc Plaza Drive, 10,154 40.6 lye Q 12 Corporate Plaza Drive 15,500 `62.0 13 orporate Plaza Drive 13,610 54.4 \\n ' 14 Corporate Plaza Drive 23,350 77.8 V / 15 Corporate Plaza Drive 15,747 52.5 16 Corporate Plaza Drive 16,286 54.3 17 Corporate Plaza Drive 24,040 80.1 18 Corporate Plaza Drive 17,514 58.4 ` 19 Corporate Pla7a Drive 17,580 58.6 i� 20 Corporate Plaza Drive 8,265 27.6 23 Cprporate Plaza Drive 82,559 275.2 Total ivting $28,770 1178 1157 7,,( 21) 54 �� C2 bI,G 0 rivo iytr�' 131 b� Architecture & Planning �... t.: Y.nl ,4)I!6•I. • JAI :Ii'!7. 11 '92 05/11 17=25 'd 4947861 MCLPRRND UASQUEZ 0f M Vasquez & Partners, Inc DATE: /-ANNING (jr 41 (�/ TO:/ TY OF NFWpORT FACN MV&P FAx No.: 1py .. AN MAY 1 )1993 a.1Mol.r,.n0.A.I.A. FROM' I 718,9110111112j11213 4i5 6 I.M. M. Vuquwr. A.I.A. C. Anhu, tckns . A.6A. NUMBER OF SHEETS TO FOLLOW: PROJECT: COMMENTS:': IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE THE NUMBER OF SHEETS INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE CALL THE SENDER AT (714) 549-2207. MV&P FAX NUMBER IS (714) 549.6297, Arahitooture & Planning 095 Town Center Own site 300 Costa +Nara. CA 92626 rAX, 71a. 5a9. 5297 71,1 5s9 2207 07/29/93 16:39 V714 720 9453 THE IRVINE CO. 0 002/002 THE IRVINE COMPANY 23 CORPORATE PU►ZA PARKING REQUIREMENTS Manner's Parool Number. 42-274-20 Zoning: Planned Community Development Space Deficiency per McClarand: 36 Space Deficiency per WHOmmaon & Schmid: 39 arkln tBoforo'•23cCOY :�Pluaa:�», ,;a :�:' !r�•.u: •tatkiti rR'e • 2S0;ILot�2?i?!l�tiPyCgim";?>j ':':l:r° 1215,000 300 WltilF6>fo'Cpvniy":. T$pie4(1v.0vt%-30u'af•Pfj4A4A1AliafAi<Ito rµ;.„;;x^ 106,362 3S5 '.Cotnl'CY;PTaCTI'culCiry�{eGlar�fa(1`` °°" ` 231,362 &55 Pot>xl;Spine;L`auuts:rA;?:.",-••r. �'=.:�.""_;•.:;,:LL:,a„ 987 o.: Y iA � o-x?�r•; �Siiti'Sie.% D'eGaten �•s 132 :laatkin :ASter.231Cor :Pltlzii'. x«<R`; :;k'•,;Ni?AA,:tr = Pbrkin .Rb . Y..',.t., 1. �:,.,•is.o:..,>•.f>„�.n"•::.,.a;<.; �...... ...... w ep�cC'Co%eveYji¢3',;ifiiF,N'F,(ti:.ap�ta:�>.;t<<(�"M1 125,000 Soo 1�pado'forovary300tf1pf, i?A'tharga[tcr, �7 :'.' 1651558 619 fgtA1CP.NoCHloottArci;(Ma„Ciar„qn )r, ;•;;R 310.558 1,119 T.rEAI'tSlinco doput• _I 157 •Sur Parkin After-,rScvhrei fiBank Cu'rxCddQ;32c ;; .;;a•'NRA ::,` n. �arlriB'Rii"?•i. %r.>.y.. :i,ppcc'fq[;ei%yry';7,,`�,11ydF:atkf�iA.;u�Co:s':i;;• ;�t.:;Y 125.000 500 :ti'Ammo,rc aQvary Ff gkz FA kbCTeA'LkGY'"-«!3kr 207,950 693 .P.a Fi}ks1CPTTck`.k7ARiwA,fda:(McGar'anit�„� °`�%R 332,959 i,i93 an °• 5ii'r"' luau uSaraao (a) Current Total Net Floor Amu: 332,959 sf (b) Total NFA prior to 23 Corp. Plaza Construction: 231,362sf (a) NFA ror 23 CP: 79,196 of (d) Total NFA after 23 CP Construction: 310,558 sr (e) NFA for Sovereign Hank: 22,401 sf (1) Total Parking Count prior to 23 CP: 987 (2) Total Parking added simultuneoua to 23 CP Construction;170 lit 4 (108 spaces Added), Lot 8 (62 spaoea added) (3) Total Parldoa Count: 1,157 October 4, 1993 TO: John Douglas, Principal Planner FROM: Genia Garcia, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Corporate Plaza Entitlement After a lengthy and detailed study conducted by myself and Diane Hussey of McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc., of the Corporate Plaza Planned Community, I have outlined the square footage for each building. The use of tissue overlays of the original plans used in the issuance of building permits for each building was the basis upon which we determined the square footage. The attached chart represents gross square footage for entitlement purposes, gross square footage for parking, and net square footage for parking. cc: Pat Temple, Advance Planning Manager Senior Planners Bill Laycock, Current Planning Manager Janet Divan, Traffic Engineering Division Existing Development 1 Corporate Plaza 2 Corporate Plaza 3 Corporate Plaza 4 Corporate Plaza 5 Corporate Plaza 7 Corporate Plaza 12 Corporate Plaza 13 Corporate Plaza 14 Corporate Plaza 15 Corporate Plaza. 16 Corporate Plaza 17 Corporate Plaza 18 Corporate Plaza 19 Corporate Plaza 20 Corporate Plaza 23 Corporate Plaza Total September 14, 1993 Required Parking - Gross 1,390 - Net 1,190 Existing Parking 1,160 = (30) spaces Total Proposed Additioi 349 = 1,509 Total • • CORPORATE PLAZA ENTITLEMENT -PARKING AND ANALYSIS N.B. N.B. N.B N.B Bldg. Gross Pkg. Pkg. Permits Entitle. Gross Net 16,000 17,671 17,499 16,503 24,246 21,323 21,026 19,592 20,886 20,392 20,300 18,934 21,630 22,007 22,072 20,682 10,154 10,390 10,032 9,847 21,000 23,627 23,379 22,592 15,747 16,441 16,107 15,254 17,574 15,755 15,141 14,456 24,040 26,954 26,704 25,348 15,500 16,143 15,755 15,049 13,610 13,271 13,218 11,995 23,350 22,976 22,617 21,447 16,000 18,231 17,929 16,790 17,580 16,378 15,895 15,698 8,200 8,168 7,755 7,630 47 rio Q) 7n,< Q1 Ilan Qn nnr CITY OF NE"ORT.BEACH NINSES COWCIL V"BERS ljwu AR co9Nc1L Nz=psa Present Ix Ix IN, IN IN IN I: N c uem N All Ay as Hagen x All Ayes L. ROLL CALL- S. Reading of 1(imutes of Meeting of December 9, 1991, And Ad oourned Hearings of .7annan 6And 7, 99 ea approved as written, and ordered filed. C. resolutions lis wa ions under comaideratlom sos waivod, and City Clerk was directed to read by titles only- D. HEARINGS: 1. Mayor Sansone opened the public hearing regarding: A. General Plan Amendment No. 91-1fC3 A request to amend the Land Usa Element of the General Plan so as to increase the allowable development on the new library site for the Newport Village Planned Community from 50,000 sq. £t. to 65,000 sq. ft.; and' the acceptance of Environmental Impact Rapbrt No. 149; AND B. Tacal C stal Pr =" Amendment No, Z4 A request to amend the LocaPlan 91, as to Program en 30,000 square feet of allowable office development from the NewpozV Village Planned Community to the Corporatt,9,PTa't'a—Wasc—Plenn Co unity: AND Planet in sa on andment No. 7 A A request y c e Irvine Company to amend the Corporate Plaza Planned community Development Plan so As to permit $5,000 sq. ft. of additional office development transferred from the Newport Village Planned Community, The proposal Also includes a nest to amend the Planned Community sign provisions so as to be consistent with the proposed sign provisions of the Corporate Plaza West Planned Community; AND D. Newport Beach and The Irvine Company to amend the Civic Plaza Planned Community Development Plan so as to add 57,150 sq. ft. of additional office development, 35,000 sq. ft. of which would be transferred from the Navport Villagge Planned Community and 22,150 sq. ft. of which is new development entitlement, and to delete 14,000 aG ft. of library antitlement, which would be transferred to the Nlvvpport Village Planned Community. 1Ta proposal Volume 46 - Page 3 t 4 I CPA 91-1(C), (65/94) , t t 3 1.CP Pr.,14, I i.9 , CWICCIL MVERS 19 CITY OF NWORT BEACIO MIWTES 1992 also includes: a request to amend Mner Lat Lng Planned Community sign atendarda; and a change to require the approval of a use permit for restaurants rather than a site plan review; AND E. Proposed OSDIHAMCE 140. 91-47. being. COUNCILITY OF ORDINANCE THE COF THE CI F NEVPORT BEACH ADOPTING FLOM cowANITY DISTRICT RyGMATIONS AHD DEVEIAFKEN'I PIAN FOR CORPORATE PIAZd VEST AND AMENDING PORTIONS OP DISTRICTING NAP NO. 48 SO AS TO RECLASSIFY SAID PROPERTI FROM THE DNGLASSIFmD (D) AND OPEN SPACE (O-S) DISTRICTS TO TEX PLAHItID CONHONITI (P-C) DISTRICT (PLANNING comaSSION AMEH)=T NO. 730). A request by The Irvine Company to amend A portion of Districting Hap No. 4a so as to reclassify property known as Corpotate P lase Vast Planned Community, lotac ones the northwesterly Coast Newport nitr Driv* Highway, and in Nssort Center; AND F. P1am+inR CoagSFi(mn �ndacnt No: Company to amend the Newport Village Planned .^.ommunity Development Plan so as to: rpAnd boundarythe Community so fPlanned as to hetinclude the land bounded by Avocado Avenue, San Miguel Drive, MacArthur Boulevard and San Joaquin Hills Road; revise the land use plan so as to identify five statistical development areas which are distributed between two land use dealggl1nations of Governmental/ delete Instutional the anmuand ltipnle pacfamily residential and retail designations; add davalopment standards for the davelopmant of a 65,000.square-foot library, d a 100,000-square-foot museum, 4•acre public park; and the addition of a General Motes Section; AEiD Voluae 46 - Para 4 Ord 91-47 Corp P1zA West JPCA 746 ai ME 4 y"♦yr, ?TF) CITY OF NMORT BEACH- p MIWTES :Ctf+CIL f£t1Hfh5 t IS' 'r Jaauary 13, 1992 IN17=X I i 1 1 1 1 I C. Proposed ORDINANCE NO. 91-46, being, AN ODNCILIH ORDINANCE THE THE YCIOF NEVPORT BEACH APPROV !4 DEVEWM2(T ACBEffiNT' 110. PO 88XHT-- HE CITY GHEENEN'I DETV£EN THE CITY OY HEStPOHT BP \CH ATD) 11H: AND N, Tr ffi tedy N So. 72 A request by T:o Irvine Compto approve a Traffic Study so as to demonstrate compliance of the proposed entitlements for Civic Plaza, Corporate Plaza, and Corporate Plaza Vest with the Traffic asinx Ordinance; Ord 91-46 Dev Agm Library Exchng TTfc S-dy 72 I, x ubdivis ion No. 971 A request Rasub 97l by The Irvine Company to ..subdivide an existing parcel of land into three parcels; one parcel for A museum, one parcel for a library, and one parcel for open space on property located in the Y-C District' Property 0 Avocado located at SOO.120 Avenue, comprising the entire southeaatorly aid. of Avocado Avenue between San Nigual Drive and East Coast Highway, in Newport Cancer. Report from the Planning Dapartment. The ove pplicatioManager +n SA •through outlined the hand tithe recommended action. H. stated that all of the Ssana have berlehppheowed exception Council in concept, of the Development Agreement. Tom Redvitz, representing The Irvine Ir Company and vine Pacific, addressed the Council and stated he was excited over the project, and available for questions. Hearing nothers bearing was to .ess the closed. the Council, public h Motioneto ytheP ade Approve the lann ect asrecommndedbing Commission and: ;.us 9:-{ 1, Adopt Resolutionapproving, 92ani ac ccpting. PP eat ling PSsual EZR No. 149; and a, )take c iFin contained Statement il0 of Findings and Facts (Exhibit A of eha Resolution): and am volaoe 46 - Page 5 ,' _'r4. ' ..:,, j� CITY OF NSWPORT BEAC* MIMES CaXIL K2SERS January 13, 1992 b, Find that the facts sot forth in the Statement of overriding Considerations (Exhibit 8 of the Resolution) are true and are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including Final EIR 149; and C. Find that although the Final EIR identifies certain unavoidable significant environmental e ffsets that will result if the project is approved, the mitigation measures identified shall be incorporated into the p r oja et, and all significant environmental effects that can feasibly be mitlgatad or avoided have been eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level, and that the remaining unavoidable ble significant effects, balanced against the facts set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considera- tions, are acceptable; and d. Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program contained in Exhibit C of the Resolution. 2. Adopt Resolution No, 92-2, approving Central Plan Amendment No. 91-1(C). 3. Adopt Resolution No. 92-3, ,..ernvtne Local Coastal Program 4. Adopt Resolution No. 92-4, approving Plarmimg Coemiasiom Amendment No, 728 to the Corporate Plaza Planned CCVK mi 5. Adopt Resolution No. 92.5, approving Planning Coamitisaion Amendment No. 729 to the Civic Plaza Planned Community. 6. Adopt Ordinance No. 91-47. approving Planting Commission Amendment No. 730 for the Corporate Plaza Vest Planned Cossun Uy. 7. Adopt gesolution No. 92-6, Approving Plamning Commission Aa..decor No. 746 to the Newport village Planed Community- S. Adopt Ordinance No.91-46, approving Developaout Agreement No. 4. volume 46 - Page 6 Res 9:-2 Rcs�42--7 Res 9— 2-+ •b Res 92-5 x Ord 91-47 Rc; 92-6 Ord 91-46 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH* MINJTES CWNCil WMBi% January 11, 1992 9, Sustain the action of the Planning Commi a a ion in approving Rosubdivision No. 977 and Traffic Sturdy No. 72. Mayor Sansone opened the public hearing regarding Proposed ORDINANCR No' 91-49, being. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEVPORT nhcli A14:ND) C TITLE 20 OF TUE NEVPOR1 rrvat. CODE SO AS TC AS, BUT NOT 'keCIGARETTES, S, CANDY, (NE8 AND SAUCE OF POOR. IN i Y1TH THE OPERATION OF T--RyQ➢TREXTM FOR ON -SITE PAN=" SPACES FOR AUTOMOBILE ICH DO NOT DAVE VICE ERVICE BATS OBUTNS �DO INCLUDE THE' OF CONVE(MCE ITEMS: TDE AD 17ION OF COVERED MECHARICAI. CAR VAS 7r.,FACT� AS REEQVIBEMIIL� Y TO ACT TS: 1'RO B REST ROOMS AHICLL ARE AVA114LZ TO THE GENERA:. PUBLIC FOB VV efftOLL➢DIIL SERVICE FTATIOt :�I AND TUX BEQOTo BE FOR C8 SIGNS IR BE IN FUEL AN VI'ID, is NOT EXCEED THE M IlILLM PRICE SICH BBQU SLT YORTU IN THE BUSINESS Y80YESSIONS CODE OF T![8 STATE O C6ISPOitNTA (PIIJLNING COMlfISSION MFJ:1' NO. 7I8). Report from the Pis ing Department. Discussion ensued, vh *in it vat noted that the California S to Business and Professions Code provi as that cities and counties may not ado t an ordinance Or resolution after Js us 1, 988 which prohibits the concur ant retailing of motor vehicle fuel and set and vine for off - sale consumption in sorting districts where the Bonin ordinance allows motor fuel and off-sa a beer and vine to be retailed on toper to sites. Inasmuch as the city's existing Automobile SSrwite Station 0 inanee, which prohibits the retail Bala of any product unrelated to A service tatlon operation (other than those sold in dispensers), was adopted prior to January 1, 1988. the City can 1e lly prohibit the concurrent sale of m for vehicle fuel and the sale of off-s lc beer and vine. However, if the Ci Y permits the sale of ',that types retail convenience items, it is the City\ Attorney s opinion that the City could not prohibit the sale of beer and vine. A majority of the Planning Commisslonars were of the opinion that the sale of beer and vine•for off -sale consumption was not compatible with automobile servlee stations in the City, and to the theeof an convenience items { parmitted itemssold in dispensers) vet deleted from the proposed amendment. Volume 46 - Page 7 ^d 91-49 ruing/ :A 138 )+) M •^,r:n*7:•ma`;9NS,Fn:•Yt�'i,+'e,`\}��i'ii4'li'�.'?t."„'il•;;`n'i. g/�,,:,,J{,'�7'�i;'%�'v; �`IM`��,il,r., :l<,i?!;CAi'':+/• ® City Council :cting._,L'UAturv.-1-.. Agenda Item No. D - L---- CI'1X OF NIiWPORT BEACH TO: City Council DRUM: Planning Department SUBJI;CI: of PIMI NO 'as toe(luesttto 11 c allowable.Land Use development ontthctnlc li lrarylshe for tilt' Newport Village Planned Community from 50,000 sq. ft. to 65,000 sy ft,; and the acceptance of Environmental Impact Report No. )'{9 AND ft tnonl Co7;!Lali's�i1'»�J� n,� licyucst to amend the Local Coastal Program land Use Plan so as on Office t transfer of allowab Newport Vi�ge PlannedtCommnitylcto�le Corporate Plaaa\Vast planned Community. AND C unity Rcy"cst to :Intend the Co or',ry_0 Pln ')Itof addined u Mallnffice Development Plan so as to petile nmt planned development trans'f"°dsulf 11 o includes cal)rcyu stort llto�antent, the Community. •Ihc I { > • • . 0.1cst I'lanned pplanned ropoyedChign 11prov'N'On\Ilofvltil0l Corporate s SO Is to 1illaza Slslcm wU,l the (:ommlulity. AND Rcquc•;,t dl :uncnd the Civic Plaza flannel Cunu"untty Development Nall Au at, w add 57,150 sy. ft. Of additional office dcvclopmrnt.35,000 .,y, ft, of wh)eh would Ile transferred fro") the Ncwpnrt VPlagc flannel (•outf,f %v and 2^.,IS05q. (t. of which is new levelolnnent entitic)nert• T•� gmr'.+,n rim l, „ C"M IK6M y".,.* rrltdDA"'..""✓`'riN.\ W-• ue:.._t� 1Lrt, ! ril�``� ,�,� ki 4,!1r, y(J,4 y'Li `•y Y u+, (` t i }PVI'`1il�ii�{`t4hw'+�atw�lllk{`rtf "i`Itu 1,I 0 Ir AI IY,1 � Y YI^ I' C 4�, {i,,y �.� ;(•1�1 4i!,{�, t1 ''�"7( r r� f Intl l� � 'r r'�F' �{.�� {1 I r , s'4 ut I { �vi�l r,{ ,+ ;i`� itrfl 1 ii ,r , i �• 'It tn�4 �" ` �V'yt,�,U,,ryu,�`� .5 '�r.�. i � ;4h . .lM. �af';rt;'S'1F _lf:�.riP�ll'•Mt r"Nr4 1;�i51�> 1rrtY { �t 1 ,� •,�,t'lylivy' q h Y, •nV .. yr rr •t•.,TO: Coc, 'oCouncil • 2. I+,• { j.,.•'?!�� and to delete 1,1,00f1 sq, ft, of library entitlement, which would Planned Community. The proposal transferred to dtc Newport Village also includes: a request to amend the existing Planned Community sir.:: ""f:,7'• standards; and a change to require the approval of a use permit for •• ''� •; °�" , restaurants rather than a site plan review. flk �A; AND l%lYI lie._L).01S.OSiLILCIt�L..a+ .%s�� n t IIt{� j Request to amend a portion of Districting Map No. SIR so ns u, and Oren S , ace O S) reclassify property from the Unclassified (U) , 1 fDistricts to the Planned Community (P-C)Distr c�, and adopt I'lamtcd Community District Regulationsand Development I lao on prrpeny known as Corporate Plaza West. AND •',!Y;�s,,+:*' Request to amend the Newport Village Planned Commmnirp the boundary of the Planned Development Plan 50 as to: expand include the land bounded by Avocado Avcmtc. Community so as to San Miguel Drive, MacArthur 13oulcvard and San Jonquin I fills Road; development revise the land use plan so as to identify Gve statistical areas which are distributed between two Ixnd use designations e delete th0 nndtipl `•" " 5' Govcmmental/Institutional and Open Space, rind retail designations; add development st:uvJ:ud. rr, q•"�, •r;,,i'•4; ''y kt family residential and for the development Of a 65,000-squnrc•foot library, a 100,000•square- the addition of a General "`'";IttF} tout museum, and a •1•acre public park; and Notes Section. ilr """'?14t, it, , AND AT F;Mt•I v Ir m n 1' r r n 1 ''-fi•;�It;i; �,�i Request to approve Development Agreement No. J fur the I,ilrz I'ixchmnge Agreement between'11rc Irvine Cump:uty mui (he (:ire :•' `rl ar'+1'•, Newport Beach. 2,Vnl, AND r+'c ;,.•t;ru, . I).._I'lp Ty_� lrtLly i�P,�ii :.,,.',��• 'gl�.rrt;("y� Request lu approve aTraffic Shiny so as to dcnuururat0 c❑nyrlianr, r '' •J,I;S'R•�+,t'' of t60 pngrn.cd cntid0nrcn(s for Civic i'l:mt, Corporate I`L•tza, :un. ('mporale 11:11.:1 \Vest with tile 'I'rdfic I hasinl; Ordin:uu•c. ••„l. •;>; is l�" ,�± I ' ,•i,� �'y1i �0i7�t :t •. 't"qt, t ° ,t t ir;;t !,�}�`, ,'1��'t. ';°4L�'y!i;+�tivV.,'tV�t„vr��1 �i:1sv�•�•(i�tQ��' tjir 9' tµ�ti�"c1i�')rY�'Y''fi�'1,�Jt'i' !� ,n"r 4`j,c 1.K;,}I �•�ti„ �+4tt r•J 1� i ,V b •`'`�d'Ir F. . .. '.,�1 ;•',F'¢�' ',.r;��+ll^I':�\, 'n"t.'�)•�;'{'s���l,'y1.,tt. "t'i,i�f�,}'i,'t �'�t "5� i '1 ^`,`t�, llb�t ,,i ii vSti'�"h4{�, P`i ii�,t}y���f1i�„1����,•t� T0: Ci#Council - 3. AND 1_!i�ltdi'i'io_,_ n No 973 Re uest to resubdivide an existing parcel of land into duce parcels: one parcel for a museum, one I parcel Cora library and one parcel for open space on property located in the P-C District, 1)ILkWi! Q.tI library exchange Agreement, Which ae1'ofSCitcold Council.ment the if approved h PII )roved by y prcv ou5Yapproved }SlE:t Acti011 if desired, approve the project as recOmmcndod by 'Ile I101d ring; close hearing; he:+ r Planning Commission and: Final MR No. I':'• 1, Adopt Resolution 1.40._, accepting, approving, and certifying ;.. and hn,it in the Stalcmcnt of Findings *.Ind Facts rx a, �\tnkc the findings contained Resolution); and •• .x A of the sidera lis b, Find that the facts set forth in ll`cSWe ands supported byof overriding tsubstarnial (Exhlbit 11 of the Resolution) , are including Final EIR 149; and evldCllce In tIle record, •, '} I:iltd that although the Final EIR idend — certain unavoidable signific:ult is apprOVCCI, the nil L'Ijaneli c, CIIVIfnI1(Ilelllal eEfCClS that WIII result IE lI1C prefCCl incorporated Into the prolecl, and all slg!11fi1'a111 IIW:LSIII C`S IlICI1lIfIC(I Shall be CffCCLS III; it can feasibly be mitignied or avoided have heell •i ell Vlrnllml'n61I to anacceptable balanced against thI and e facts hat tset forth itile , CIIIIIII1:gCll Ur6redU {, nt when Il WIVUldable Signifltant CffCClS, Statement of Overriding Consideratiol15, are aCCCplable; and Monitoring:utd 12cperting Program contained in t ,I Adopt the Mitigation of Ile Resolution. ,. '4 Adopt Itcsohuuln No.,_..r., approving General I'I:ut Amcndmcm No. cll•1(C). oving la)cal (:o:lual I'lol;r;un Amcndlnam No. .'. I. •\dopt Re,oluunn No.,.......:Ipin 1 ! Amendtncllt No. 728 al the Corpor:ue 5 �R', Adnpl Itc.l lotion Nu.._ _._, •+pplovinJ- ,I,• I'I:uund r'unummity N1 ,., ;4 TO: Clly"Council - 4. 0 S. Aoopt Resolution No._,aPProvin Amendment No. 729 to the Civic Plaza PIw:n' .: 6 C'ut111uunity. 'uS 6, Adopl Ordinance Nn._, approving Amendment No. 730 for the Cotporatc Fla .r .t West Planned Community. t 4 7. Adopt Resolution No._, approving Amendment No. 746 to the Newport Vdlarr Phumed Community. e Adapt Ordinance No..___r approving Development Agrce:mcnt No. 4. 0, Smutiu the action of the Planning Commission in approving Resubdivision No. M and Traffic Study No. 72. ItJiGj_C>:Mttncl At its meeting of November 21, 1991, the Planning Commission voted unanimously u, recommend City Council approval of the series of nctions listed above, which are neccs?r, Ininnplenlent the Library Exchange Agreement. An excerpt of the Planning Coi'll"N..l•n minutes along with copies of the staff reports are attached for the Council's review. December 9, 1991 the City Council introduced the ordinances for Items C and C7.:rr', scheduled a puhlic hearing for January 13, 1992 to consider these items along with the ot'1• requested actions. Respectfully submitted, PL\NNINC DVAR'1'MIiN'r JAIbIPS D. llh:\VICKER, Director By:,i Jr hn 11. Douglas 1ICf �. I'tncipal Planner ,V ctuhntcnr,: I. 191ccrpl of Plannifig, Cnmmission Mimics of November 21, 1991 1'I:uminl; Cunlutission Staff licporl of November 21. 1!1!>1 1 I'I:uming Cbmnlission Staff Report Addentlunn of November 21. 1991 4, t'nuuuculti and Respuusos for Final GIR No. 1,19 Iltafl Rcanlulion Na.,, certifying Find L'•111 No. 1,19 Fxhtbu A: Statement of Findings and Facts P.xhihit 15: Slateutcnt nl Ovcrriding Considerations I Mahn C: Miul;.mon Mourtonnl; :uul Reporting 1'roguun �tiC r'��, 'N• if,�, +�4��i ��t�� �`+,7�",ttltl +y +`I� �,.. 1 r+t"Wi 1 l�rt+ 1�SiIGRt'! 1 h �1, ' r i ;�1�, 11�1V1t ', tdiltj°1 dr')vl`w54�r1� JJ1'tlje+}p1h �1y1`� ti �t�r f.��+yr V +! f'�:�• 1 +4, +1+5C 1 � !� () 1�. + 4t' vi � �� ;! \ '�h!��,�jl{���+{ty,; t ha str`�4�; l�'�1,��� i i• f JpCouncil - S. TO: h, Draft Resolution No._ approving General Plan Amendment 91-1(C) Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 24 7, R. Draft Rcsolution No.— Draft Resolution No.__ approving approving Amendment No. 728 for Corporate Plaza PC 9. Draft Ordination No.— approving No. 730 for Corporate Plaza \Vest 10, ._ Draft Ordinance No.__ approving app (; 11. PC Draft Resolution No— approving Amendment No. 746 for Newport Village PC 12. Draft Ordinance No._ approving Development Agreement No. 4 Attached Separately: 13. 14. Draft 81R No. 149 Rcsubdivision No. 973 r.�_umtwcr ccurn.anc tu�r.t� :.<INI 0 CO M?A IS S ION ERS s\: -N v t\ ROLL CALL ©J Attachrnn• November 21. 1991 Id l 1.1 t'' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH _ tcqucst to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan so e, to incrmLsc the allowable development on the new library site or the Newport Village. Planned Community from 5 0M sq. ft- to 55,(NNI sq. ft.; approval of a Development Agreement: and the acceptance of an environmental document. INITIATED 13l : 111c City of Newport Beach AND licqucat to anlcnd the Local Coastal program Land lJsc Plan smto as pment tileransfer Newportl Village Planned Comm unity 10 the Corjxx) square feet orallowble office rpor lc 1'Ia1r1 West Planned Community. INITIATED BY: "I'hc City of Newport Beach AND Request to amend the Corporate Plaza Planned Community Development Plun Simi to permit 85,(N)1) -Sq. ft. of additional office development transferred from the Newport Village Planned (•onunumity, 'I'll,: proposal also includes it request to :umcnd the 1'I:uulcd Co nunu oily sign provisions so its u1 he consistent with the proposed sign provisions of the Corporate Plaza \Vest Plnnnal LOCATION: Corporate Plaza Planned (:onununuy bounded by Farallon Drive, Avocado Avenue. 1, 1%t Cn:151 hlighway and Newport Center Drive, loca(ed southerly of I'mIlion Island, in ,Newport Center. IZUNI:. I'•t• •17- Awl V a t,i l� �' i' 4(1�5)il tii ... .{...a L tyi!`'q a4\1 }ifr..rl�rt �'< •r !' i, r � i 1�15A s 11�plrii tlr �1 ti'v it �} �µ al ) Ii 'f�'t�eS ri 1' 4 } 'j Fk'S't 141 ,1 ik 571 ry�'s 4 t Iljt�i,' bi.�i 'Y act}tn�l ),ail Y41N���i la�i ��� }ti d 9 1 ���1�FFF'Fkkkv�3g � y u., ' r • COMMISSIONERS ROIL CALL j 0 0 0 drlovember 21, 1991 M1tl1j' . 3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH_ APPLICANT: 'ne Irvine Company, Newport (leach OWNER: Same as applicant AND Request' to,' amend ilia, Civic Plaza Planned Community . Development Plan so as to add 57,150 sq, It. of additional'officc 9cvclopmcnt, 35,000 sq. ft. of which would be transferred Gom dtc Vcwport Village Planned Community and 22,150 sq. it. of which is acw development entitlement, and to delete 14,M0 sq. ft. of library ,miticmcnt, which would be transferred to ilia Newport Village Planned Community. The proposal also includes. a request to amend the existing Planned Community sign standards; a change to require the approval of n use permit for restaurants rather than a site plan review; and a change to require the Modifications Committee's review of the number and design or compact parting spaces, rather than the Planning Commission. I.00A,nC)N: Civic Plaza Planned Community generally bounded by San Joaquin Ilills Road, Santa Cruz Drive, San Clemente Drive and Snnm Barbara Drive, located northerly of Fashion Island, in Newport Center. ZONE: P•C APPLICANTS: 91te City of Newport Beach :utd the Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant AND st In csrublish Planned Community District Rc4111a1iuns and it Planned Community Development Pl:ut for ilia Corporrme I a COMMISSIONERS November 21, 1991 NEWPORT BEACH CITY OF ROLL CALL Plaza West Planned Community. The proposal includes 145,0W Sq. ft. of development. 30,(X)) sq. ft. of which is transferred from the Newport Village Planned Community and 115,000 sq. ft. which is currently entitled in the General Plan. LOCATION: Corporate Plaza West Planned'Communilq, located at the northwesterly corner of Newport, Center Drive and Gast Coast ' I•Iighway, in Newport Center. 7_ON17: • I P-(J APPLICANT: Tlic Irvine Company, Newport Beach • OWNGR; Snme as applicant i AND P Antcndrn ' his), far !Pr hlic 1•Ic•trines Request 10 amend the Newport Village Planned Community to: expand the boundary of the Planned Development Plan so as Community so as to include the land hounded by Avocado Avenue, I San, Miguel Drive, MacArthur Boulevard and San Joaquin Ilills ns to identify five sutlislical t Road; revise the land use plan sn ire distributed hetween two hual use i development areas which designations of Governmental/institutional and Open Sp;rcc, and delete the multiple family residential and recoil designntions; add ft development standards for the development Of a o5,(W sq. library, a I(X).00) sq' ft*museum, and a 4 acre public part:: and du - addition of a General Notes Section. LOCATION: Newport Village Planned Cununu:ur. ' hounded by San lligucl Drive, blocArihm Boulevard, bast Coast I lighwav and Avuc;ul Avenue, located southeostcrly of Corporate Plaza, in Newport Center. ZONE: 11-C i r � lli tt''- r . • I thlhjf ,i4��i?Vd�1tl�l' COMMISSIONERS n ROLL CALL "iP,c r t November 21, Mall CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport f3c2ch OWNER: Same as applicant AND I Request, to approve a 'Traffic Study so as to demonstrate compliance ofthe proposed entitlements for Civic Plaza, Corpnratr ! Plara,.,and Corporate Plaza West with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. LOCATION: Civic Plaza, Corporate Plaza, and Corporate Plaza West Planned Communities. ! ZONE: P'C APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNGit: Same as applicant AND I I, Itcstl)Z(Ijvision No 97J (Pu tli I.1 ':vltlSi i Request to resubdivide an existing parcel or land into three parcels: one parcel for a museum, One parcel for a library and one parcel for office development on property located in the 11•C District. LOCATION: A portion of !dock 93, lrviucy Subdivision, located at A00 • 1200 Avocado Avenue, comprising the entire southeasterly side o! Avocado Aventle between San Miguel Drive and Gast Const hlighway, in Newport Caner ZONE: P•C APPLICANT: "Ilse Irvine Contp:my, 14cwpnrt Rcach •20- COMMISSIONERS CALL 0 CITY OF NEW J1F-iMIZ,4�� iiN\tiuiri '1 1 • ��pp r^+ QNovcmbcr 21, 1901 fr i; 1 •�fl R-r r� BEACH OWNER: Same as applicant James I,Icwicker, planning Dirrel0i, atmcd that the foregoing actionswnuld implement the Library fixch:mgc Ag� ci�ent between the City of Newport Beach and'T11e Irvine Com ut r Ile Waled that the addendum to the staff re(r%ft•t is in response to concern¢ posed by Harbor View I•lills residents. Don Webb, City L^nginecr, explained that the addendum joltWhr of modified conditions to Resubdivislon No. 973, recommended that Condaccess tn Panel No tion No. 16 be c 2acdeleted oss Parctlil Nor grading required to provide 1 shall be r+r the, expense of rite owner of Parcel No- 1 inasmuch a< it was addressed in another agreement. In response it) a question posed'by Commissioner Debay reFfdinr compact parking spaces, Mr. \Vehb replied that universal parking spaces arc being utilized. Commissioner Pomeroy addressed Amendment No. 740 (Newport Village), indicating that buildh+ls heights would be Iimited to the extension of the sight plane cslablisbcd for COrpoilue Plaza 11C, or 45 feet whichever is less' `Ilic public hearing was opened in connection with Ibis item, :In(' Mr. Tom Redwitz appeared before the pl: aning Conurtiasinn nn behalf o(The Irvine Company, and he concnn•ed with the Gndinrp and conditions in Exhibit W. I. Redwilr, addressed the need and desire for anew library, :ua1 rho cooperation liar exists hciaeen the City and The Irvine Company to sec that l+e City'% goad is 11 to construct a new library. Mrs. Deborah Allen, 1021 White S:rils \Vav, appcarctl hch,re �'r• planning Commission on behalf of the Ilarbur \+ine Ildi Community Association, and she srued that all of l+o %svici.mmi previous,concerns have heed a:d0ressed I+• staff. '(here being no others desiring to rIPpe:lr and be heard, the puhin• u,,trine was closed at this lime. r- , '•' COMMISSIONERS ./A45 •A�'S 1 �� RML CALL _ Motion Ayes Absent , o tAIIJI; 7ES �nvcmbcr 21, 1901 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Motion was made and voted on to approve General Man Amendment No. 91•I(C), Development Agreement No. 4. and the teceptance of an environmental document, (Resolution No, 1272): c.. t •27; weal Coastal Program Amendment No. 24, (Resolution No. 1273): , 127a Amendment No. 728, (Resolution No. 1274); Amendment No. 721). ;Resolution No,'1275); Amendment No. 730, (Resolution Nn. 1276); Amendment No. 746, (Resolution No. 1277); Traffic Scaly No. 72, and Resubdivislon No. 973, subject to the findings auvl conditions .in Exhibit "A", as amended, including deletion of Condition No. 16, Resubdivision Nti'. 973. MOTION CARRIED. A. LN�IRnNi."FNTAL DOS(1M_•>-T!T L•iniliiu:' . nat the Planning Commission has reviewed Draft L••IR No. 149 and finds that it has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the state CEQA Guidelines. and the City's environmental review procedures, .Ni1Sll'illLttll.i'1SSIS1ltSS: , Traffic and Circulation I. All project proponents shall participate in the Newport Center Transportation Ntanaigcmau Association. 2, Prior to occupancy of any permitted structure, a site specific Transportation Management System 0IMS) component sh;t11' be prepared by project proponents and approved by the City Public Works and t'lannin,; I Departments. Air Qu lil" ' 3, Parking arras ahnll he paved early dar.ae cunslnlcliun activities. Appropriate CrI;mrutuun j phasing shall be determined in conjunction with the Public Works Department prior In issuance ui .22- yk;(gnPfTrS(jm\" `k�Tii�tli.Ss. COMMISSIONERS ROLL CALL a 0 G11G,rFMf17�L.d{r ;\.l' ..w-r34i{riw 4. ISiNUI CITY OF NEW PORT EACH grading permits. 4.. Major grnding shall occur when soil moisurle is hirF+• • Appropriate conditions shall be determined by II' Public Works'„ Department'prior to issuance "f grading permits, 5. Secure bicycle facili«cs'shall be incotporated ,nro projects. Compliance shall be determined 1•y Ir' planning and Building Departments prior m iwun• of building permits. (. The proposed projects shall comply wnh appropriate emission control measures a' n•gmt-' the AQMD. 7. The project stroll comply with all 'Fide 1.1 vu• ., efficiency requirements. R. The office component or the proposed project .hall participate in existing ridesharing programs in the Newport Center area, and comply with At)7dl Regulation XV requirements if office sire exc•ecd. certain empinycc thresholds. 9. Grading of projects shall be phased to one Site n1 :t time, where feasible, to limit the area dismrb-f simultaneously. 10. To the extent feasible, projects shnuld cml,: ., csutblishment or:dternatfve work sehcdulr" :o •<•,' peak hour travel. Noise IL Prior to issuance of ntv budding p:•nn;l.. acoustical study shall he prepared Nlwd on J1 TI, I' pall, property, roadway grades, buildup; and orientation to assure that noisy imp,n•:. �b\ ��,� exceed 50 CNEI. for interior areas of rats' COMMISSIONERS ROLL CALL, j f a r ,,1 4h••;ti1t ;tS?I 1vk5 < it 1 riT r•t FSVVVVVV CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH- "1 library buildings, and 55 CKlil- in• .. retail/commcrcinl establishutcnts. Water Resources 12. Any on-sitc.systems or cmensiun of culveim for contributory drainage from areas outside the fluid, proposed developments shall tic considered a localized condition, These culverts shall be %ludied during the project design phase and any rerpun,l Improvements shall be installed in conformance 11, local ordinances and accepted engineering practice• ' 13. All existing and proposed dcsihing basins Inc,ucd • within Newport Center or serving projeels Incni-I within Newport Center shall be maintained by thr project proponent, until such time as an appr.,,,nale — agency accepts maintenance responsibility. • 14. ''it • I, oJil The project) proponent shall comply will' all requirements of the Regional Water 0ualily r:onlnd Board. Cultural Resources,' I.S. prior to 'isstltince of grading pernll;? for ally construction on the. Ncwpult Village site, :In archaeological and palcoutulogicl records search shall be conducted by a qualified archaeO!nl;tst la determine whether proposed activities would encroach upon or otherwise adversely impact I',r. previously recorded Locus % or Il of (A-(')rl In; 16. If it is determined that proposed activilic, affect CA-Ora-167, die following specific promo:", shall be implemented: .24- + ( , 1'i:it„r�r4i,'Si' � 11 i 1 � ryj�flr'[� 1", jl(: �i "i:\t•., i ` :,1�:';y\ S COMMISSIONERS November.'.I. „ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH _ ROLL CALL — -- - — V SA•f1r,1:147J�1155.L� �; .a• x q,. a. A survey of the site :vca shall coke start during which time surface materials shall b+• flagged In order to identify the horizontal �,y•`5l • surface boundaries of the locus. ,ti ,d".,• b. 'Following identification of the surface evicts of any cultural resources, e 5 squarr nu•' i J'f grid system $hall be Inid out that r.nc"1111M.,`,' t„ h. all flagged material. .�., a Using the grid system, all fing>;cd m:,+m, is v+'�,• shall he systematically collected d, After collection of surface materials. I"" t., three units measuring I square ntctcr `.halt 1•• h placed within Ilia grid sysWnL to pro, idc +I limits of ilia vertical disk rihu l inn of :I-' cul(ural material as well as idenufyin. It, suhmurfacc integrity. r' C. Following completion of ilia subsw facc onus. 'r •, a series of hand -dug portholes shall be plac-d in the site to further define i(s sub"irlarr t. s horizontal distribution. 2 f. All material recovered from surface collcrul`^ and subsurface units shall be anah•-+•,! . catalogued. g. If sufficient Shellfish remain% are we" .: . fro m(lie subsurface. :III east Iwo aIII r••n, he suhntittcd for CII dalin_r,. h. 'Ilia results of the test prol.-nnl, inrludw-, methodology, analysis of recovered m:u,•,,:d and recnnunentlalinns, if necessary. for furh+ r work shall be documented in a report •25• �A �r '4"`af\'t'S �;, 4Rp a \ 't ! "7F'ih�y"7r'}ylt;;!,.`: +1 . F�N;_,., .,`!\,fi•`�(;',rii�'`5•yf:! ,.•{�, j',:i�h,'.t !�' Sl... ,. ' ?'q�k'.",;ti,}'r�,>k, I COMMISSIONERS r•n�t11 i overnber 21, 1991 CITY OF NEWPORT. BEACH i, All of the above work shall be undertaken h' I an archacologist on the Or nge County I!+l 'I of Certified Archaeological Consuhants. _C'A•Orn•1 +7 • ncus B t a, t3ccause of the suspected disturbed No= of Locus B an approved archaeologist shall be Present during the initial grading phase at ltc location previously identified M that of lox❑s 13• If a significant, subsurface deposit is uncovered during the grading ilia project proponent shall he prepared to have the material evaluated and if need he permit Ow introduction of a limited lem-leve, investigation. Acsthelics 17. Detailed visual analysis shall be conducted at the time of use permit or site plan review for all uses In assure that no significant adverse visual impocls will occur. Compliance shall be determined by the City of Newport Beach Planning DePariment. Ig, Barth hernia anti graded slopes shall be cnuluurcd and blodscaped to the approval of the Planning, and Building Departments, 19. No exterior signs shall he Perntiltcd ,shove tilt- ow of ilia sccand story. 2(), Signage and exterior lighting shall be approved the Planning and Public Works Deparlmcm\. 21. No dluminaled signs shall he roof-moumed. 22, All ruoGmnwuctl mcch;mical aluipmcnt ~hail h, screened by architectural femures and shall cnuh+rc, to established height limits in specific a mm .26- a + dft Novcmhcr 1.1, 1991 MIIILI � t,1tr,USSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT' BEACH in 23. halllheorienteinated d toward lmncArsigns hhur Boulevard. Police 24. 97he project proponent shall work in conjunction with the City of Newport !leach police Department to ensure that crime prevention features are included in ' huilding design and construction. Sewer/Wastewater ject 25, Prior to pn>honems shall demonstrate tourince of any bthc rBuilding, land public Works Departments that adequate scwerage capacity is available to acrvc the project. 13. �MrNT rll•M Adopt Resolution No. 1272, recommending City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 91.1(C). IC. J?j v_Cl OPMFNT AS:13TN1FNT Nn. a .l:jiLglllGs+ I, That the Development Agreement is in complinnec 1 Willi California Government Code Section (15SM et seq. ant] Newport Beach Municipal code Chapter ; iS.a5. 'i'h:u edoplua urlhe Development Agreement would i not preclude the City from conducting I'uuuc lliserctlonary reviews in connection With tile pn+µ•e" ant. wouid it prevent the City from iogln.irn' 1 conditions or rcquirerllcros to mitigate .il;ni(ic;un li Impacts identified in such reviews provided ihnt the meamres do not render the project infeasible. .27. G I COMMISSIONERS nvcmlcr3; "" , CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH _. R C>I_L CALL _--- �9.�-ti11ill5. ' I. Once every 12 months from the date of execution the I3evelopmcni Agreement, the project prnpouer• or his successor in interest shall prepare and tobm" for review by the City Council a r•pnr dcmonstruting compliance will' the terms of Agreement, its required by Section 15.45.070 nl d- Newport Bench Municipal Code. t„ D. LQCALS_o&UA1.�PIIS2vtZ�tr,`.7 Adopt 1esolution No. 127.3, recommending City Ow, approval of IA)cnl Consul program Amendment No . aff Adopt Resolution No. 1274, recon,n,ending City approval of Amendment No. 728. [r. pM1ih'12N11:N.Ti9.:ZZ2". • Adopt Resolution No. 1275, recommending CITY l.ollm:l approv; i of Amendment No. 720. G. AULNpUEN_7' Nn 730 Adopt Resolution No. 1276, reconune III ing City Corr,• approval or Amendment No. 730. Adopt Resolution i4o. 1277, recnmume nd int; f•it% 1 •^I approval of Amendment No. 746. �8• • va ,CIE b r {a ,{j�,t1t 'M 4��i ,�tlr ds'"�L".i{�ht�t,�2�,�,�,4'�,t�re����yyylj 4 , te:`Irt' ,�{ llgi'^i, toy+iS'{{�f��t 4'1. Til, 7�1 :tt r3�t }vr�:11,1(,�Y'11, �r� N7;`I�, �����l;t�ij• ��( {� ���� Y��� �{�ii �Ik�A7 �tl �uiV li�j��:A '�at��r 1C'Y(41i�Yxi,4H •{r}�11�{I�r4�I I r OMMISSIONERS a 11PNovcmhcr 21, 1991 a 1. ALL i i 'CITY OF NEW_PORT 1. that it Traffic Study has been prcparcd whic!' 11 analyzes the impact of the proposed project on dv morning and afternoon peak hour traffic .1110 circulation system in accordance with,Chapte• 1540 of the Newport Reach Municipal Code and c.it.• Council Policy S-I. 2. That the traffic study indicates that [lie pntjcU, with the mitigation provided by the comiructinn or 1 Newport Coast Drive, will neither cause nor mn4r worse an unsatisfactory level or service on ally maim, primary -modified, or primary street. S.o_asJitiutls: I. All project proponents shall parlicipmc in Ill" Newport Ccntcr Transportation NIrmagenn•w Association. 2. Prior to occupancy or any permitted stricture, :t MW specific Transportation Management Sysicm (THIS) component shall be prepared by project propouau'. and approved by the City Public Works and PL'uulinl• Departments. J. 1? G,`iSlLl21 V ' Q IN L t»1 .01i.i1b, rn I. 1'hat the design of the subdivision wdl 11.1t amllic, with any casements acquired by the public at lnrr•' For access through or use of proper:v •kithin 0 proposed subdivision. .29. '11tai a parcel map I,e recorded prior to i+wanes of Building Permits unless otherwise approved It" dtc Politic Works and Planning Departments '111:11 the Parcel Mail be prepared so tlmt the Bcaring; retatc to the State Plarle Coordinate Systco,. Monu,nenlS (one inch iron pipe will, tag) lnocd by �n l»aslLl raLGflrn�t unless otherwise al Iv the Subdivision Engineer' iNlnmmnem+ lhnll he protected in place if installed prior to auupcomt of construction project. I'llat all l Ordinance and the politic cWorkscted as rcd by Dcparuncnt That it standard subdivision agreement and accompanying, surely be provided in order In guarantee satisfactory completion to the Public Improvements if it is desired to obtain a g1111 ihlc permit prior 10 cotnplction of the improvelliel ts. That the on•sile parking, vehictdar circulation and pcdolrian circulation sySlcnzs he subiccl It, funh�•r revic,v by tile, Traffic Iingineca That the inlemectio❑ of Avocado Avelluc and 1114' privmc drives be designed to provide Yight for speed of 45 miles per hour. Slupc•�, i:uul.uq,�•. walls :md ollter obstruction shall he cumidc: cd in the sight ditiloncc requirements. Inndsc:tpinp'Aldiit shy sight line shall not cseced twcutyInu, n,cheIn height. The sigh) distance requitement may he ,•,r•I�SIO(((NERS r• 4� OF MirVYPOF:T BEAC''I CITY 2• That public iniprovemenls may be requir:•d of r. developer per Section 19.08.020 of 'tic >luniriPal Codc and Section 66415 of 1110 Subdivision \lap Act. (:gindililm; 2. 4. 5• �niY;Si a P.. r '„� }`A^i'•Y l�k�l���'�4, "'t, 15 r�V'{',j.��I �, ;S. (!AISSIONF.RS CITY OF NEWPORT �3P.ACH Y modified at noncritical locml':m., v1h1; ; ; :n: of thc'I'raffic Engineer. I 6. �Illat all clscirlelll for ingf Gs 1111(l eCfCK la• I'Im u(rl: i across parcel No. i for the benefit of 7. That coscmcnts Ile provided for all Ituhlic miiiuc. I crossing the subject project will' the mhll casements to be nppruvcd by the Puhlic \i'mt:' ! Department. R. 'iluit all•wcather surface roads xh:dl he rnr iIl'•d 1" , all public utilities, vaults, manhnlc'..:Ind Inrl',ns, � structure locations, with wi(Itll luld d""11 "1 '• approved by the public Works Depal IIiIC III. 9. 11un all vchicular aeeess rights a, MneArOmi Boulevard. San Miguel and Iiat1 Cn:ly ILphn ny '" released and relinquished to the ('ir: ni Reach. 'luau ail vehicular octets rn'hlt to PIWO."In Avenue be relinquished except :11 app:i'•"'' driveways, a Alex Illmm or five lnc:111nIP. .P• approved by die public works Deparlinvill. I 10, lllat street, drainage and Illllity IRIt)f(tyt'I Itf slit ln• ' shown of standard improvement plant prelmr-ed by :1 licentcd civil engineer. I 11, '(hat a hydrology and hydratilic study he prep^"I'll I phut .ct•I ;long with a master of ty:uer, ": ❑d i drain facilities for the on -site impnrvl.mrn;, pl"': •,1 recording (if the parcel Ill:lh Ail\' IIV„h7•I JIII}'9 •• e icleosllllls to the 0INling morm dolor. sale- .I'n 1 %ewer systems Sllowll to be retloilell "v Quill be the re.sponSibllity of the deyt•Inp¢r of :.I• L parcel. 12. a. That righl•or•way lie dedlt'nictl m Ill(: i for street BIId hlt!Ilw:ly plum• ....... ,.la^" I' , ! I MacArthur Iloulmird fumot's- lost a •JI- •,,.t,{r��till{ttti{r�:'y'clliy[i}lf{¢({'(!N�2;7��{K�;�'lyyir/��(jri�4llJ�(i}"�jy1%4�'"t(r+ �1��1'�'i:1' i;l{74'i1nf::GfCGTllhl%dtl]w�ihlN\S�OL�;4N.t11AlYr��tl�!1 ' twiER3 \\ CITY OF NEWPORT B3 arterial highway Ihal !••.' acconlrnodatc chnnvc•,:,. dedication shall he Works Deparuncnl mr,' Circulation lilcnunt• J}, That right-of-way be cledic:ucd turnout along the Bast Coast I tiv' the location, width and length to ; Public Works,Dcpartmem. 14. 'I'hntCounty SanitmionDi%oi%:'•• isswlnce.. of any building permir. 15. Disruption caused by eumtnn 1,^ roadways and by movement of sball he minimized by proper ,:- equipment and flagmen. 'it transportation of equipment :W` conducted in accordance gut. requirements. 'there shall he nn ,, or dclibcry of materials within Il (Bast Coast I lighwa-v and within the San Miguel righr-ol no Storage of materials within t! right-of-way. 10, Deleted. 17. 'I'llal any Bdison transform,.,, detector checks Sen•ilR! Ill" •.n• the sight disuutce ploncs a. Standard I I0-L. IS. That a 20 fool wide rclucnl.d,l.. eamnlent be dedicated ncros• accv.Ss if :1 pedestrian/hic:cb• 1, ;terns+ \IacArthur Boulevar'! X Crown Drive. 'Ihe cneul:•m • hndl Parcel 2 and Avnt;uln •s•.••' .32. Ni 1•} i tar n hi, �mta+ce wuh oVed by trc piu,r •art, ulu�n� � 'I .:•n; 'I !,.ill ,,,• �n•4t-nit•:... ,nlcvdn 4l „r •r; +heii he dq Avemtc November 21. •1991 • • I,SI`• r�. NEWPORT BEACH m 4 ••mx•nt ut he determined when MacArthur t .•Jc�ard is widened. If the bridge is not ,.I.,oucted with the \IZICArIitttf Boulevard widening than the ensemcnt will be relinquished. :t'.;,._2:tS.f.Cc»)si�xssLCtrslis<J14uriuil • ' I .�blr.h Planned Community District regulations and •,•d t:nnununity Development plat for Castaways n • occeptance of an environmental document. AND 89 L�tautit)irsl�ulltcAtvstvncl e uaffic study so ns to permi tc construction •� uu,a with support parking :ill( keesaory facilities •farina I'larmcl C'nnunur • Y. Atli) u ylr_L•I+JN LUU VSU-11 QLL.� W01.1F1w m ma• pj/fa/•I/of land for marina (ievalopmenl in '4.i�+,t.'�.�+I;Inncd Community. , A pt\h of I of I.'rract run, I)25, Incatcd al 101) Doverq)rive, on the northcasterly corner ,it Unver Dlvc and \Vest Cunt Highway on the fasum•nyv jx\ I rerty. �� 1 \ I'hr Ininr Cumpauy. Ncwp"rt Beach ,;,one ;Is applicant r a e N � I October 4, 1993 TO: John Douglas, Principal Planner FROM: Genia Garcia, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Corporate Plaza Entitlement After a lengthy and detailed study conducted by myself and Diane Hussey of McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc., of the Corporate Plaza Planned Community, I have outlined the square footage for each building. The use of tissue overlays of the original plans used in the issuance of building permits for each building was the basis upon which we determined the square footage. The attached chart represents gross square footage for entitlement purposes, gross square footage for parking, and net square footage for parking. cc: Pat Temple, Advance Planning Manager Senior Planners Bill Laycock, Current Planning Manager Janet Divan, Traffic Engineering Division A CORPORATE PLAZA ENTITLEMENT -PARKING AND ANALYSIS Existing Development 1 Corporate Plaza 2 Corporate Plaza 3 Corporate Plaza 4 Corporate Plaza 5 Corporate Plaza 7 Corporate Plaza 12 Corporate Plaza. 13 Corporate Plaza 14 Corporate Plaza 15 Corporate Plaza 16 Corporate Plaza 17 Corporate Plaza 18 Corporate Plaza 19 Corporate Plaza 20 Corporate Plaza 23 Corporate Plaza. Total September 14, 1993 Required Parking - Gross 1,390 - Net 1,190 Existing Parking 1,160 = (30) spaces Total Proposed Additional Spaces 349 = 1,509 Total N.B. N.B. N.B N.B Bldg. Gross Pkg. Pkg. Permits Entitle. Gross Net 16,000 17,671 17,499 16,503 24,246 21,323 21,026 19,592 20,886 20,392 20,300 18,934 21,630 22,007 22,072 20,682 10,154 10,390 10,032 9,847 21,000 23,627 23,379 22,592 15,747 16,441 16,107 15,254 17,574 15,755 15,141 14,456 24,040 26,954 26,704 25,348 15,500 16,143 15,755 15,049 13,610 13,271 13,218 11,995 23,350 22,976 22,617 21,447 16,000 18,231 17,929 16,790 17,580 16,378 15,895 15,698 8,200 8,168 7,755 7,630 82,619 82,746 82,130 80,046 348,136 352,473 347,559 331,863 + o -i o, ... !, . 1 'I 0101..41 ` f ;VO �v� CORPORATE PLAZA Parking Summary October 28, 1993 LOT TOTAL 1 194 2 143 3 ° 154 4 108 5 (Proposed) 123 6 171 7 166 8 63 Bldg. 7 (Proposed) R Total 1160 Note - Does not include 2 spaces adjacent to trash enclosures. Construction of Building 7 (adjacent to Lot 5) is currently affecting Lot 5 parking. Parking numbers shown above are reflective of Building Department plans for Building 7 and prior to restriping of Lot 5. Genia Garcia Associate Planner I/ CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT CENTER rk»Pat Soma%CA TOTAL: 1516 SPACES PARKING PLAN �•wcrirl IUSI!N- 714 549 7375 ti 2 0 W WILLIAIvtSON & SCHMID CONALILTING CIVIL eNOINEaaa AND LAND aUa V eVoae r CORPORATE PLAZA PARKING SUMMARY Revised September 2,1993 STD COMPACT HCP LOT 52&= $2AA=SPA TOTAL 1 190 b 2 3 137 144 6 5 3 6 1j55' 17 1 4 108 0 0 Jos � J 5 121(proposed) 3 (proposed) 2 (proposed) &(proposed) 6 167 4 2% 7 152 9 4 165, 8 58 0 5 /6 Bldg. 7 26 (proposed) 9 (proposed) 1(proposed) 3 (proposed)A Total 11103 36 28 1 7 / 1 (0 0Lt- Lot 1 One standard stall with curb painted yellow, included In count above Lot 2 Did not include area adjacent to trash enclosure. 4j�� 11v Lot 3 No comment. �• Lot 4 No comment. t? Lot 5 Construction of Building 7 (adjacent to Lot 5) is currently effecting Lot 5 parking. Parking numbers shown above are reflective of Building Department plan submittals per MV&P (architects). Lot 6 Does not include area adjacent to trash enclosure. Lot 7 Does not include non -striped area adjacent to trash enclosure. Bldg, 7 Proposed parking numbers as provided by MV&P. sk(dOL*t '�_J . ? / ,�2'>l 7 Corporate Office 10101 Red Hill Ave, • ]Latin, California 92680 • 7141959.7900 FAX 714/269.0210 Inland Empire Office • `—'— P 1101 S. Milliken Ave., Suite G • Oratorio, California 01761 • 7141888.7880 FAX 714/088.520 San Diego County Office • 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 109 • Carlsbad, California 02009 • 019/438.4332 Coachella Valley Office • 77.622 Country Club Dr. Suite P • Palm Deser., CNlilornla FPONn 4 040.:an '92 05/11 17:2'6 a 4947861 MCLRRRMD VASQUEZ 04 Corporate Plam Parking Analysis May 11,199.1 -- Page 3 B. Parking Lot Analysis EAsting: Lot Std. Number Spaces 1 190 2 136 3 144 MV&p 4 108 5 121 6 166 7 155 8 57 DLDG7 25 Total Eidsting 1102 Proposed Comp. HCP 'Total Spaces Spaces 0 5 105 6 3 145 5 6 155 0 0 108 3 2 126 4 2 172 9 4 168 0 5 62 0 1 26 27 28 1157 1,01. Std. Comp. IMP Total Number Spaces Spaces Spaces A 44 0 0 44 B 55 0 3 58 C 56 0 3 59 D 93 0 5 98 E 86 0 4 90 Total proposed 334 0 15 349 TOTAL EXIS77NG & PROPOSED 1436 27 43 1506 '92 05/11 17:25 'S 4947861 NCLARAND VASQUE2 03 Corporate Plaza Parking Analysis May 11, 1993 — — Page 2 A. Parking Analyais Cont. Proposed Development (Standard Office Use) Description MV&P 8 Corporate Plaza Drive 9 Corporate Plaza Drive 22 Corporate Plaza Drive 9 Remaining Entitlement Total proposed TOTAL EXISTING & PROPOSI?I) ACWRI Actual Plan Plan Gross Net Required Floor Area Floor Area Parking 18,555 17,627 " 50.4 20,000 181050 " 51.6 44,000 28,500 ° 81A 4,074 *• 3,870 11.1 86,629 68,048 194 432.320 395,278 1,368 Proposed Development (Medical Office Use) Parking based on Gross Floor Area Description Actual Plan Gross Floor Area 8 Corporate Plnza Drive 18,555 9 Corporate Plaza Drive 20,000 22 Corporate Plaza Drive 44,000 '1Remaining Entitlement 4,074•• Total proposed 86,629 TOTAL, EXISTING &. PROPOSED 413,859 Required Parking 53.0 57,1 125.7 11.6 FM' 1,421 Proposed Parking 0 0 0 0 349 11506 Parking Surplus (Deficit) 155 139 Proposed Parking Parking Surplus (Deficit) 0 0 D 0 349 101 1,506 85 " Net Floor Area is based on 95% of Actual Plan Gross Floor Area due to lack of recorded information at the City of Newport Beach Planning Department. ** Floor Area difference between Building Permit Gross 1-1oor Area and Actual Plan Gross Floor Area, The City of Newport Beach has agreed to use the Actual Plan Gross Floor Area for Entitlement purposes. 92 05/11 17:25 M 4947861 MCLARAND VASQUEZ 02 MCLatrand, Vasquez & PofIr)C.)I Inc. CORPORATE PLAZA PARKING AND LN77TLEMENT ANALYSIS May 11,1993 AMP A. Parking Analysis CAI MOLAw.d, AA A. trnnf0 M, VAequcr, a f A Arlhur C. teknnc A.I A. Fxiating Development Description Actual Actual Required Odstiug Plan Plan Parking Parking Gross Net Floor Area Floor Area 1 Corporate Plaza Drive 16,815 15,990 64.0 2 Corporate Plaza Drive 21,4,52 20,379 * 81.5 3 Corporate Plaza Drive 20,886 19,842 " 79.4 4 Corporate Plaza Drive 21,610 19,260 77,0 5 Corporate Plaza Drive 10,054 9,551 * 38.2 12 Corporate Plaza Drive 16,413 14,990 60.0 13 Corporate Pla7a Drive 16,637 14,990 60.0 14 Corporate Plaza Drive 24.910 23,665 * 94.7 15 Corporate Plaza Drive 15,300 14,515 * 52.2 16 Corporate Plaza Drive, 14,143 11,893 39.6 17 Corporate Plaza Drive 22,737 21,600 * 72.0 18 Corporate Plaza Drive 17,102 15,832 52,8 19 Corporate Plaza Drive 15,884 15,090 * 50.3 20 Corporate Plaza Drive 8,245 8,000 26.7 23 Corporate PInm Drive 82,619 81,442 268.1 7 Corporate Plaza Drive 20,864 20,171 57.6 Total lizialing 345,691 327,230 1,174 1,157 Parking Surplus (Deficit) Net Floor Area is based on 95% of Actual Plan Gross Floor Area due to lack of recorded information at the, City of Newport Beach Planning Department. Architecture & Planning f95 lawn Ccrnar Auve 5utlu ; i00 Cu::fd Mrsd (A $06.98, MX 714 540 )297 /M. 549, 2201 (17) CORPORATE PLAZA 1. November 21, 1974. Amendment No. 434 to establish the Planned Community Development Plan and Development Standards for the Corporate Plaza Planned Community. Resubdivision No. 465 to create twenty-one numbered parcels for commercial development and one lettered parcel for a common parking lot. Approved March 24, 1975. 2. Land Use Agreement for Corporate Plaza, recorded on May 2, 1977. 3. Resubdivision No. 880 to create six numbered parcels and one for off-street parking. Lots 6-11, 19, 20, and a portion of Parcel B. September 12, 1988. 4. March 8, 1990. Lot Line Adjustment No. 90-02 between 7 and 8 Corporate Plaza. 5. January 13, 1992. Amendment No. 728. Corporate Plaza Planned Community District Regulations. 6. November 19, 1992. Resubdivision No. 989. Sovereign Bancorp LTD, applicant. 7. January 22, 1993. 7 Corporate Plaza began Plan Check No. 2434-92 and'Grading Plan Check No. 2175-92. This is the zoning Plan Check correction sheet. Attached is a copy of the plans for the garage under the building that show the "rolling gate". Bill Laycock and Jim Hewicker felt that allowing the development of 7 Corporate Plaza may result in a defect of parking, but that it would be made up with future development. At this point, it was not known whether or not there was a deficit. 8. February 24, 1993. As a result of G. Garcia's request for an updated parking count, the Irvine Company retained McLarand Vasquez & Partners to do a Corporate Plaza Parking and Entitlement Analysis. This did not include any entitlement for 7 Corporate Plaza. 9. February, 1993. G. Garcia researched ail the building permits for Corporate Plaza and found a discrepancy in square footage numbers between what the building permits disclosed and what the consultant presented. 10. April 19, 1993. Diane Hussey, the Consultant submits net square footage calculations. It was determined after looking at the plans for a couple of the buildings, that there was not a way to determine if the building permits reflected gross or net square footages, or even what the definition of those were when the buildings were constructed in the 1970's. The submittal from the consultant included the proposed development entitlement of CP 7. As a result of the m discrepancies, it was agreed upon by the Irvine Company, (Larry Williams) to have a thorough investigation of existing square footages in Corporate Plaza. The study included reprinting the microfilmed plans that were on file with the City of Newport Beach, for each existing building in CP. The consultant did a tissue overlay (tissue laid over the plans to calculate gross and net square footages) and returned each plan to G. Garcia for her review. She spent approximately 8 hours on each building (8 times 16 buildings =128 hours approximately) and this work was spread over approximately 6 months. The study included square footages for 7 CP and the related parking that it was to provide. Due to a redesign of the common parking lot in front of CP 7 to accommodate the new building (noted on Plan Check Correction Sheet), there was a net loss of 7 parking spaces. The Irvine Company felt that these spaces could be made up with the addition of the 36 spaces under 7 CP. 11. May 11, 1993. Consultant submits more calculation for Planner to review. This includes the development of 7 CP. 12. July 29, 1993. Mike Marvelli, Irvine Company, faxed G. Garcia results of parking study on hand. 13. August 20, 1993. Another Consulting firm, Williamson and Schmid, were conducting parking analysis of Corporate Plaza simultaneously for the Irvine Company. That information was sent to the City to review. Again, 7 CP was included in both consultants parking counts. 14. September 14, 1993. Consultant from MVP sent correspondence confirming square footages for CP 7. 15. October 4, 1993. Final results of square footages for the buildings in Corporate Plaza. The consultant and G. Garcia agree on totals after complete review of consultants work. 16. October 7, 1993. G. Garcia asks Code Enforcement, Jim Sinasek, to count three lots that had not been previously field counted. (Note: G. Garcia field counted all but three lots). Based on this information, it was determined that with the addition of the 36 spaces under the building at 7 Corporate Plaza, the entire Planned Community development was deficient by 30 spaces. 17. August 12, 1996. Letter of complaint from Joe Bernhardt, Vice President and Manager of the Wells Fargo Bank that shares the common parking area. August 21, 1996. Code Enforcement send letter to Igor M. Olenicoff, owner of the building at 7 Corporate Plaza. 2 August 30, 1996. Letter received from Igor Olenicoff, acknowledging phone conversation that date. September 16, 1996. Letter to Mr. Olenicoff from Code Enforcement. September 25, 1996. Letter in response to Code Enforcement from Mr. Olenicoff. .. i1, J September 25, 1996 Mr. Jim Sinasek Code Enforcement Supervisor City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 Re: 7 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, CA Dear Mr. Sinasek: I am in receipt of your letter dated September 16 regarding the above referenced matter. Let me first respond to your request, simply from a position of cooperation, and inform you that the major portion of the parking garage has now been cleaned up and freed of all non -vehicles and that we are further having approximately twelve executives of the company parking inside the building. Our intent is to fully clear the parking garage floor and make it available for parking. This action by us, however, should not be taken as an acquiescence to your demand that we are required to provide 36 spaces under the subject building. Quite to the contrary, the Irvine Company Purchase Agreement, and related recorded documents address this issue. Namely, that all parking for the subject site will be provided in common with the other Corporate Plaza buildings. 7 Corporate Plaza • Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 644-OLEN • Fax (714) 719-7200 Our construction of the garage was for our personal use and contrary to your position that "this building would not have been approved for construction by the Planning Department if parking spaces were not going to be provided ... " If your position was to prevail then we were sold land by the Irvine Company which could not have been developed. Simply put, there was never any intent in the C.C. & R.'s or recorded plat maps to have any parking under the subject building by either the Planning Department of Newport Beach or the Irvine Company. This was a voluntary decision and not one which in any way intended to increase the parking pool available spaces for Corporate Plaza. If the Irvine Company would like to have our parking spaces counted as part of the parking pool, so that they can then increase their density of office space in Corporate Plaza on other available vacant parcels, then we would be happy to comply if the Irvine Company wishes to pay us for the expense of constructing the parking garage. It can't be both ways, namely selling us land which was to be parked in common and then once we have built a very expensive parking garage for personal reasons suggest that these spaces become part of the Corporate Plaza pool, without paying us for them. Setting the legal issues aside, however, I suggest to you that this is escalating "a mole hill into a mountain." We don't have a parking problem in Corporate Plaza and there are more than sufficient spaces in the immediate area. If our neighbors would like to free up the spaces in the immediate area between the three buildings in this pod of Corporate Plaza, they simply need to ask their employees to park in the parking lot across the street adjacent to 23 Corporate Plaza. The problem that is causing a congestion in the immediate parking lot is the substantial traffic and parking by Bank customers and ATM users. The parking requirements in this immediate pod of parking never contemplated that there would be the massive use of the ATM machines and that the banking industry as a whole would move to this medium of banking. This medium of banking is simply an expansion of the transactions which would have normally been transacted inside the building (for which space area parking was calculated) to outside areas for which no parking was contemplated or provided for. This is further complicated by the unused ATM machine building which belonged to Great Western. This ATM building uses an area which previously provided 8+ spaces. Additionally the trash enclosure for the three buildings was previously not on this parking lot, and is eliminating 3 - 4 spaces. In summary, I would suggest that you take into account these issues. I would also urge you to look at the recorded documents, C.C. & R.'s and Approved Site Plans for the subject area of Corporate Plaza, some of which are enclosed, in determining whether we have a requirement to provide parking under the building. I have noticed that the Irvine Company, in a recent Site Plan, show the 36 spaces under our building as part of the count for the Corporate Plaza parking pool. Although that may suit their purpose for density calculations, it is tantamount to taking of our property without compensation, which we would certainly rigorously oppose. Sincerely, "\ i Igor Mx Olenicoff IMO:ct cc: City Manager Assistant City Manager, Planning & Building City Attorney CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 176.4. NEWPORT BEACH. CA 9265S.6915 September 16, 1996 Igor M. Olenicoff, President % Olen Management Corp. 7 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, Ca. 92770 SUBJECT: Parking Requirement 7 Corporate Plaza (A. P. 442-271-29) Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Olenicoff: Thank you for your letter of August 30, 1996. Pursuant to our letter dated August 21, 1996, we would again like to remind you that your building would not have been approved for construction by the Planning Department if parking spaces were not going to be provided since the approved spaces were part of the parking pool requirement for Corporate Plaza. We are sure you are aware, your building was approved and built with a 21,000 square foot garage. This garage was approved with the provision that at least 36 parking spaces would be provided along with appropriate stripping. The City can certainly understand the concerns you expressed during our phone conversation on August 30, 1996 regarding permitting the public the use of your parking garage. Therefore, since the plaza is underparked in the first place and because your 35 to 55 employees create such a demand on the pool parking areas adjacent to your building the City feels that at least your cn,ploNce: s1,o ld be required to t::i:ite the parkin_ .:r: located b:-::'.: the area in which choose to %N ork. fhis would at least tree -up the pool parking :paces near your building_ and it.:p to reduce the demand by the public utilizing the businesses in the area The City appreciates your cooperation and understanding in this matter. Would you please advise the undersigned as to the date by which you will accomplish our request. If you have any questions about this matter, you may contact me directly at (714) 644-3215 between 7:30 to 8:00 A.M. and 3:30 to 4:00 P.M. or by writing to the above address. 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach . I September 16. 1996 Page 2 Very truly yours, BUILDING DEPARTMENT Raimar W. Schuller, Director By: 140*2 2 /J JimOinasek, Codie Efiforcement Supen•isor JS jf c: C' y Manager ssistant City Manager, Planning and Building City Attorney Irvine Company P. 0. Box 6370 Newport Beach, Ca. 92658-6370 August 30, 1996 Mr. Jim Sinasek Code Enforcement Supervisor City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 Re: Parking Requirement 7 Corporate Plaza (A.P. No. 442-271-29) Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Sinasek: SEP - 3 1996 CITY OF NEWPORT btHun CALIFORNIA This letter is to confirm that we have telephonically, this morning, discussed the above referenced matter. I did not want to have your letter go unanswered. Thank you for your assistance in getting this matter resolved. Sir Ig( IMO:ct 7 Corporate Plaza • Newport Beach, CA 92660 (7141 644-OLEN • Fax (714) 719-7200 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH August 21,1996 Igor M. Olenicoff, President % Olen Management Corp. 7 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, Ca. 92770 SUBJECT: Parking Requirement 7 Corporate Plaza (A. P. No. 442-271-29) Newport Beach California Dear Mr. Olenicoff: This office has been informed that the required parking for your subject property is no longer accessible or available to your employees or to the general public should they choose to park a vehicle within your building. The City believes that this lack of access and availability is a violation of Section 20.33.055B of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and. as such, your property is not in compliance with the original approvals relative to the overall pool parking requirement for your property and Corporate Plaza. When your property was developed, the approval for this project was predicated on your providing thirty six (36) parking spaces with appropriate striping within your building. These spaces are to be available to your employees and the general public. The garage area is not to be for your exclusive use for the storage of boats, boat trailers, furniture, or for the placement of amusement devices such as ping pong tables, unless the minimum amount of parking has been first provided. The sliding garage gate/door which allows or prohibits access to this parking area has been installed in such a manner that it provides an actual as well as a psychological deterrent to the public for the parking of vehicles within your building. There ore, %Nithin fifteen (15) days ram the ds:e if :iris le::er. you are to: Provide access during business hours (8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.) to the parking area under your building by continually leaving the sliding gate/door in an open position; or, • Provide a legible sign on the gate/door that indicates the availability of public parking with a card type access system for your employees and the general public; 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach R August 21,1996 Page 2 Provide striped automobile parking spaces for no less than thirty six (36) spaces as per the approved plans for the construction of the building; Remove all fi_miture, boats, trailers, ping pong tables, and any other items which preclude access to a minimum of the required thirty six (36) parking spaces; and, Contact the tmdersigned on or before September 6, 1996 to arrange for an appointment for the inspection of your required parking area We can assure you we appreciate your anticipated efforts in helping to resolve this issue as timely and as amicably as possih'e. On the other hand, we should inform you, if you choose to ignore our request this matter w4:1 be referred to the office of the City Attorney for appropriate action. If you have any questions about this matter, you may contact me directly at (714) 644-3215 between 7:00 to 8:00 A.`:. and 3:30 to 4:00 P.M. or by writing to the above address. Very truly yours, BUILDING DEPARTMENT Raimar W. Schuller, Director By: Jim S' k, Coe forcentent Supervisor JS.jf c: t e Company P. . Box 6370 Newport Beach. Cs. 92658-6370 Patty Temple, Pla_-ming Director ,; AZA ANILOMM Newport Beach 5 Corporate Plaza Newport Beach. CA 92660 August 12, 1996 Jim Sinafek Code Enforcement City of Newport Beach PO Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Dear Jim, I would appreciate if you would investigate a significant parking problem that has been created by Olin Property Management, 6/7 Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, CA 92660. It is my understanding that the company was required to build underground parking for its employees as a requirement for its building permit. The owner of the property now uses the underground parking for his personal boat and vehicle storage, but requires his employees to park in the common parking lot used by the occupants of the other buildings. I receive numerous parking complaints from individuals unable to find a parking space. Please look into this matter and do what you need to do to have Olin move its employees into the spaces that were required when the building permit was approved. I may be reached at 721-8437. Thanks your help. Sincerely, Bernhazdt Vice President and Manager BUILDING DEPARTMENT AUG 141996 CITY OF IitAUH CALIFORNIA Pnntod on Recycled Paper r McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc August 17, 1993 Mr. John Suess Williamson & Schmid 15101 Red Hill Avenue A� ro n ,r,YC�lh Tustin, California 92680 Re: Corporate Plaza CadNclannd,A.LA. MV&P Job #92-180i EMMA YA,qu,z. A.LA. MhurQ Eckno. A.LA. Dear John: As Williamson & Schmid and MV&P have been simultaneously doing parking studies for Corporate Plaza at the request of different departments within the Irvine Company, I want to thank you for sharing your parking counts with us in an effort to produce a single parking survey that will benefit us all. I have reviewed your counts in comparison to those done by our office, and field checked any discrepancies between the two. The following is a parking summary for Corporate Plaza as indicated on the accompanying site plan. Lot Williamson & Schmid MV&P Comments 1 194 1�5 Verified by MV&P 8/16/93. 2 146 145 Trash space not counted. 3 155 155 4 108 108 5 151 126 Building 7 - Under construction. Building Dept. submittals used to calculate parking. 6 173 172 Trash space not counted. 7 164 168 Verified by MV&P 8/16/93. 8 63 62 End of parking lot will only park 2 spaces. Building 7 Garage 0 36 Actual parking space count in subteranean garage. Total 1,154 1,167 Architecture & Planning 695 ic:: ^ Ce�re• Dme Suite 3CC Costa %,;asa CA z 2626 F4X. Ira =. 9 5297 Y( Mr. John Suess Williamson & Schmid August 17, 1993 — page 2 In an effort to generate one set of parking counts that everyone can use and rely on, may I suggest the following: 1. Reserve one (1) space immediately adjacent each trash enclosure for maneuvering area required to access trash bins. 2. Verify parking counts for Lot 1, and for Lot 7. (Equals 168 ��1N I� assuming two (2) cars can be parked between trash enclosure IVlvcxl— space and 5 existing striped spaces.) 3. In lieu of using aerial, photographed prior to Building 7 construction, to count parking spaces In Lot 5 (Parcel B), use Building Depfartment submittals to determine parking,count once Building 7 is completed. These are the numbers the City will recognize. Pending verification of Item 2 above our totals for existing parking should equal approximately 1,167 spaces (see attached summary for breakdown). Your verification of these numbers this week would be appreciated to facilitate completion of our parking analysis. If I can be of further assistance, please give me a call. Sincerely, McLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS, INC. Diane Hussey, AIA Associate DH/slm Copy: Larry Williams, Irvine Company Mike Marvelli, Irvine Company Jim Gillen, Williamson & Schmid J Lot Identification Std. Spaoes Comp. Spaoes HCP Spaces Total 1 190 0 5 195 2 136 6 3 145 3 144 5 6 155 4 108 0 0 108 5 121 3 2 126 6 1661 4 2 172 7 155 9 4 168 8 57 0 5 62 BLDG 7 26 9 1 36 Total Existing 1,103 36 28 1,167 PROPOSED Lot Identification - A 44 0 0 44 B 55 0 3 58 C 56 0 3 59 O 93 0 5 98 E 86 0 4 90 Total proposed: 334 0 15 349 Total exisfirg & proposed: 1,437 36 43 1.516 J N O) i L-120 I i CORPORATE PLAZA NEWPORT CENTER Mmpar aeeM rA u OeXOP, 9 C Mill ;0 , " °Q,�M.Y. S TOTAL: 1516 SPACES PARKING PLAN a WILLIAMSON & SCHMID CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS August 20, 1993 4 -, Diane Hussey't McLarand, Vasquez & Partners, Inc. 695 Town Center Drive, Suite 300 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Dear Diane: SUBJECT: CORPORATE P�AZA; OUR JOB NO.91247 In response to the letter you sent to me dated August 17, 1993, regarding the existing parking configuration, I am pleased to submit to you our parking summary tabulation. My comments reflect the results of our discussions regarding certain areas of question. If you have any further questions, please call me. scccda- S es f ce zk(dc)Let Enclosure cc M. J. Poptanich, The Irvine Company Larry Williams, The Irvine Company Mike Marvell, The Irvine Company Jim Gillen, Williamson & Schmid Corporate Office • 15101 Red Hill Avenue • Taatin, Califomia 92680 • 714/259.79W • FAX 714/259-0210 Inland Empire Office • 1101 S. Milliken Avenue, Suite G • Ontario, Califomia 91761 • 9OM88.7880 • FAX 909/988.5299 San Diego County Otrice • 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 109 • Cadsbad, Califomia 92009 • 619/438.4332 Coachella Valley Office • 77-750 Springfield Lane, Sulle A • Palm Desert, Califomia 92260 • 619/360-3744 • FAX 619/360.3745 Corporate Plaza Our Job No. 91247 August 20,1993 Page 2 OSWIWAMSON & SCHMID CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS CORPORATE PLAZA PARKING SUMMARY 4 STD COMPACT HCP LQT SPACES SPACES SPACES TOTAL 1 190 1 0 5 195 2 137 6 3 146 3 144 5 6 155 4 108 0 0 108 5 121(proposed) 3(proposed) 2(proposed) 126(proposed) 6 167 4 2 173 7 152 9 4 165 8 58 0 5 63 Bldg. 7 26 (proposed) 9 (proposed) 1(proposed) 36 (proposed) Total ----- 1,100 --- 38 --- 28 ----- 1,167 Comments Lot 1 One standard stall with curb painted yellow, included in count above. Lot 2 Did not include area adjacent to trash enclosure. Lot 3 No comment. Lot 4 No comment. Lot 5 Construction of Building 7 (adjacent to Lot 5) is currently effecting Lot 5 parking. Parking numbers shown above are reflective of Building Department plan submittals per MV&P (architects). Lot 6 Does not include area adjacent to trash enclosure. Lot 7 Does not include non -striped area adjacent to trash enclosure. Bldg. 7 Proposed parking numbers as provided by MV&P.