HomeMy WebLinkAboutBALBOA_PENINSULA_PLANNING_STUDY_APPENDIX_VOL_2111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
*NEW FILE*
BALBOA PENISULA PLANNIN
G_STU DY_APPEN DIX_VOL_2
PENINSULA
PLANNING
STUDY
APPENDIX
VOLUME 2 OF 2
URBAM
`DESIGN
-AS ItR pI f. NNING
, R 5 A N OI SIGN
Appendix Volume 2
CONTENTS
• District Workshop
Agendas and Minutes
• District Workshop
Exercise Sheets
I
u
I
1
1
I
D
L
1
I
1
PENINSULA
PLANNING
STUDY
DISTRICT
WORKSHOP
AGENDAS AND MINUTES
I
Balboa Peninsula Planning Workshop
Outline of Activities
Orientation Workshop
• May 15, 1996
Round One Workshops
• May 24, 1996
• May 22, 1996
• May 23, 1996
• May 21, 1996
Round Two Workshops
• June 14, 1996
• June 12, 1996
• June 11 & 18, 1996
• June 4, 1996
Round Three Workshops
• July 26, 1996
• July 24, 1996
• July 23, 1996
• July 30, 1996
Workshop Summary Meeting
• August 13, 1996
Lido/Civic Center
Cannery Village
McFadden Square
Central Balboa
Lido/Civic Center
Cannery Village
McFadden Square
Central Balboa
Lido/Civic Center
Cannery Village
McFadden Square
Central Balboa
II
l
1
I
II
II
11
11
I!
It
II
AGENDA
BALBOA PENINSULA PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
District Planning Workshop
Orientation
May 15, 1996
Newport Harbor Yacht Club
5:00 RECEPTION
5:30 WELCOME
• Introductions
• Background and Purpose of Study
• Composition of Project Team
District Representatives
- BPPAC Liaisons
-- Urban Design Camp
City Staff
• Intended Accomplishments
0
OVERVIEW OF THE BALBOA PENINSULA
• BPPAC Purposes
• Accomplishments to Date
• 15 Point Plan
ECT CONSULTANT PRESENTATION
• Company Background
• Formulation of Districts
• Project Format, Scope of Services and Timing
• Project End Product
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
7:15 ADJOURN
KEVIN MURPHY
City Manager
FRITZ DUDA
TIM COLLINS
Co -Chairs, BPPAC
JACK CAMP
Urban Design Camp
rrt
t
MASTER PLANNING
URBAN DESIGN
11 MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 14,1996
TO: Kevin Murphy, City Manager
City of Newport Beach
FROM: Jack Camp, President
Urban Design Camp
SUBJECT: Work Product No. 5
Balboa Peninsula Planning Study
Report Summarizing Four District Workshops
Orientation Meeting
May 15,1996.
The District Planning Workshops began with an orientation meeting on
Kevin Murphy, City Manager stated the City was making a commitment that this was
not going to be another planning study to be conducted and later shelved. The City
has expressed the need for change particularly economic change. He stated that the
desire is to find the ways for the Balboa Peninsula to improve and Newport Beach to
age gracefully.
Tim Collins, representing the Balboa Peninsula Planning Advisory Committee
is serving.
(B.P.P.A.C.) expressed the desire for economic development which resident
The B.P. P.A.C. developed a 15 Point Plan which was discussed and reviewed for
those in attendance. In addition the Linda S. Congleton economic analysis of the
for Central Balboa was reviewed.
retail patterns and expectations
Finally Jack Camp (Urban Design Camp) serving as a planning consultant outlined the
new planning study and explained the process by which the issues for each District
will be obtained and potential solutions formulated.
The meeting concluded with each District's representatives gathering to select a
District Coordinator and schedule meeting dates.
1 1401 QUAIL STREET, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TEL i714I 833-9193 FAX I71418333098
I
I
Mr. Kevin Murphy June 14, 1996
City of Newport Beach Page 2
Round One District Planning Workshops
All individual District meetings started with an orientation, by the consultant, to the
process and explanation of the forms to be filled out. Each of the sessions lasted
about 2-3 hours with the consultant available at the beginning to start exercise and
toward the end to address any questions. Many of the Districts conducted additional
first round meetings in order to be assured that all the issues were presented.
First round meetings were conducted as follows:
Central Balboa May 21, 1996
CanneryVillage May 22, 1996
McFadden Square May 23,1996
Lido Village May 24, 1996
Round Two District Planning Workshops
These individual District meetings reviewed summary sheets prepared by the
' consultant from the issues sheets completed by the District representatives. The issues
were further explained with additional concerns being addressed. The solutions
presented were also discussed as to priority and ability for implementation.
1
1
1
f-1
II
fI
I
I
II
A
II
LJ
I
I
II
I
I
Mr. Kevin Murphy
City of Newport Beach
Second round meetings were conducted as follows:
Central Balboa June 4, 1996
McFadden Square June 11, 1996 and June 18, 1996
Cannery Village June 12, 1996
Lido Village June 14, 1996
June 14, 1996
Page 3
The planning workshops have proven to be a very effective tool for the gathering of all
the various issues important to the Peninsula. The level of participation and
enthusiasm has remained high throughout the process. The individual districts are
working hard to achieve a group concensus on the various issues and the results to
date are very encouraging.
A meeting summary has been attached to this memo.
cc: Sharon Wood
John Douglas
kg%wpVda=VY uryl
1
MASTER PLANNING
URBAN DESIGN
June , 1996
PLANNING WORKSHOP
Meeting Agenda
I. Define meeting objectives
2. Review first phase District Planning Workshop issue identification
3. Work through each identified issue and potential new issues as a group using
the following process:
• Identify the issue
• Define the objective
• Brainstorm effects
• Determine change potential
• Create solutions/action plans
4. Explain next project phase - concept alternatives
S. Questions and answers
6. djournment
k6wp1camp1jlg:nd2
1401 GUAR STREET. SUITE 100 NEWPORr BEACH CA P?AAn Tn
I
I
'
t �
MASTER PLANNING
URBAN DESIGN
Lido Village/Civic Center District
Round Two Planning Workshop
June 14, 1996 (7:30 -10:30 a.m.)
Summary Report
Attendance: District Representatives - Todd Ridgeway (Coordinator), John Cotton, Bill
Dunlap, Tony Shaw, Clarence Turner
City Staff - Sharon Wood, John Douglas
rConsultant
- Jack Camp, Mike Adams (Urban Design Camp)
The meeting started with a review of the exercise and a more detailed explanation of the
process. The objective of the round two meeting was explained and a brief overview of the
issues were discussed.
In response to an expressed concern about potential funding for various project, the
consultant team prepared and presented an overview of possible funding sources for
consideration by the District and the City.
Issue Identification
The District completed 12 issues sheets. A summary sheet was prepared from the groups May
' 24,1996 meeting and distributed to each District representative.
The consultant further summarized the District issues into four major topics (land uses, access/
' circulation, parking, image/aesthetics).
The major topics were then presented by issue descriptions, objectives and potential solutions.
' The highlights for further refinement came from the District issues sheets. The issues sheets
have been attached to this report.
The exercise next challenged the group to review and discuss each issue and evaluate the
identified solutions. This resulted in a prioritization of potential solutions (high, medium or
low). The discussion then focused on the difficulty to implement the identified solutions
(easy, difficult or impossible).
The meeting concluded with a consensus of those participating that all the major issues and
concerns of their District and the Peninsula as whole had been adequately expressed. A
summary of the Districts issues, objectives and solutions is attached to this report.
1 1401 QUAIL STREET, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TEL (714) 833.9193 FAX (714) 033-3098
URBAN
nrcirm
t �
MASTER PLANNING
URBAN DESIGN
Cannery Village District
Round Two Planning Workshop
June 12,1996 (5:00 - 7:00 p.m.)
Summary Report
Attendance: District Representatives - Michael Porter (Coordinator), Cary DiSano, Jane
' Elliott, Russ Flueter, Steve Lewis, Buss Person
City Staff - Sharon Wood, John Douglas
Consultant - Jack Camp, Mike Adams (Urban Design Camp)
' The meeting started with a review of the exercise and a more detailed explanation of the
process. The objective of the round two meeting was explained and a brief overview of the
' issues were discussed.
In response to an expressed concern about potential funding for various projects, the
consultant team prepared and presented an overview of possible funding sources for
consideration by the District and the City.
Issue Identification
The District completed 11 issues sheets. A summary sheet was prepared from the groups May
22, 1996 meeting and distributed to each District representative.
The consultant further summarized the District issues into five major topics (land uses, access/
' circulation, parking, image/aesthetics and safety)
The major topics were then presented by issue descriptions, objectives and potential solutions.
' The highlights for further refinement came from the district issue sheets. The issue sheets have
been attached to this report.
The exercise next challenged the group to review and discuss each issue and evaluate the
identified solutions. This resulted in a prioritization of potential solutions (high, medium or
low). The discussion then focused on the difficulty to implement the identified solutions
(easy, difficult or impossible).
The meeting concluded with a consensus of those participating, that all the major issues and
concerns of their District and the Peninsula as a whole had been adequately expressed. A
summary of the District's issues, objectives and solutions are attached to this report.
1401 QUAIL STREET, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TEL (7141 833.91V3 FAX (714)833.3098
n
f �®
MASTER PLANNING
' U R 8 A N DESIGN
McFadden Square District
Round Two Planning Workshop
June 11,1996 (1:00 - 5:00 p.m.)
' Continued June 18, 1996 (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.)
Summary Report
Attendance: District Representatives - Marcia Dossey (Coordinator), Henry Johnson,
(6/11/96) Garold Adams (late)
'
City Staff - Sharon Wood, John Douglas
Consultant - Jack Camp, Mike Adams (Urban Design Camp)
Attendance: District Representatives - Marcia Dossey (Coordinator), Garold Adams,
(6/18/96) Rush Hill, Henry Johnson, George McGaffigan, Bob Rubian
City Staff - Sharon Wood, John Douglas
'
Consultant- Mike Adams (Urban Design Camp)
The meeting started with a review of the exercise and a more detailed explanation of the
process. The objective of the round two meeting was explained and a brief,overview of the
issues were discussed.
'
In response to an expressed concern -about potential funding for various projects, the
consultant team prepared and presented an overview of possible funding sources for
consideration by the District and the City.
Issue Identification
'
The district completed 32 issues sheets. A summary sheet was prepared from the groups
round one workshop, May 23,1996 and distributed to each District representative.
'
The consultant further summarized the district issues into five major topics (land uses, access/
circulation, parking, image/aesthetics and safety)
The major topics were then presented by issue descriptions, objectives and potential solutions.
The highlights for further refinement came from the District issue sheets. The issue sheets
t
have been attached to this report.
1 1401 QUAIL STREET, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TEL (714( 833-9193 FAX (714) 833.3098
'
t r
MASTER PLANNING
URBAN DESIGN
Central Balboa District
Round Two Planning Workshop
June 4,1996 (1:30 - 6:30 p.m.)
Summary Report
Attendance: District Representatives - Ron Baers (coordinator), Bob Black, Don Donaldson,
Bill Ficker, Ray Handy, Michael Kransley, Chan LeFebevre, Dan Thompson,
John Wortman
' City Staff - Sharon Wood, John Douglas
Consultant -jack Camp, Mike Adams (Urban Design Camp)
The meeting started with a review of the exercise and a more detailed explanation of the
process. The objective of the round two meeting was explained and a brief overview of the
issues were discussed.
' In response to an expressed concern about potential funding for various project, the
consultant team prepared and presented an overview of possible funding sources for
consideration by the District and the City.
Issue Identification
' The District completed 22 issues sheets. A summary sheet was prepared from the groups
round one workshop, May 21, 1996 meeting and distributed to each District representative.
The consultant further summarized the district issues into four major topics (land uses, access/
circulation, parking, image/aesthetics).
' The major topics were then presented by issue descriptions, objectives and potential solutions.
The highlights for further refinement came from the district issues sheets. The issues sheets
have been attached to this report.
Thd exercise next challenged the group to review and discuss each issue and evaluated the
identified solutions. This resulted in a prioritization of potential solutions (high, medium, or
' low). The discussion then focused on the difficulty to implement the identified soltuions
(easy, difficult or impossible).
' The meeting concluded with a consensus of those participating, that all the major issues and
concerns of their District and the Peninsula as whole had been adequately expressed. A
summary of the district's issues objectives and solutions is attached to this report.
1401 QUAIL STREET, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TEL (714) 833.9193 FAX (71 A) 833-3098
FUM
t '
MASTER PLANNING
URBAN RESIGN
Meeting Agenda
Planning Workshop No. 3
July 1996
1. Review summary reports from Planning Workshop No. 2.
2. Explain status of overall planning study and "Planning Concept Alternatives" report.
3. Review preliminary recommendations for the Balboa Peninsula.
4. Review and discuss specific recommendations for the District.
5. Explain next phase of the study.
6 Question and answers.
7. Adjourn to Peninsula Wide
@5:00 p.m. (Location to be
I
IAOT OUAII STREET. SUITI
F�
ma l:l1'JIm
MASTER PLANNING
U 88AN DESIGN
Lido Village/Civic Center District
Round Three Planning Workshop
'
July 26, 1996 (8:00 - 10:30 a.m.)
Meeting Memorandum
Attendance: District Representatives - John Cotton, Bill Dunlap, Jerry King, John Simple,
Clarence Turner
Yang
B.P.P.A.C. -Young
City Staff - Sharon Wood
Consultant - Jack Camp, Mike Adams (Urban Design Camp)
'
The meeting started with a review of comments generated from the District Round Two
Summary Report. Some changes were requested to the previous report. For example:
• Inclusion of a monorail or other type of transportation link to the rest of the community.
• Development of a shared parking program.
• Develop bike and pedestrian paths.
The District Representatives next reviewed the Peninsula and District Concept Plans. Concern
'
was expressed for the amount and location of new parking opportunities and impact to the
District residents on circulation ideas.
'
The consultants stated throughout the discussion that implementation of the suggested actions
could be accomplished in phases. The object of the recommended plan is to provide a
variety of solution, small steps, medium steps and grand plans.
Overall the plans were well received and many additional thoughts were added for inclusion
in the final recommendations including:
• The use of new entry nodes as an opportunity to tell the history of the Peninsula.
• Enhancement of the public area next to the Elk's Building.
• Eliminatioh of the left turn pocket from Newport Boulevard onto Via Lido.
'
Attached to this memorandum is the District Summary Report as amended.
1 1401 QUAIL STREET, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TEL 1714i 833-9193 FAX i714i 833.3098
I'
MASTER PLANNING
URBAN DESIGN
Cannery Village District
Round Three Planning Workshop
July 24, 1996 (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.)
Meeting Memorandum
'
Attendance: District Representatives - Michael Porter (Coordinator), John Barry, Gary
DiSano, Jane Elliott, Russ Flueter, Bill Hamilton
'
B.P.P.A.C. - Young Yang
' City Staff - Sharon Wood, John Douglas
Consultant - Jack Camp, Mike Adams (Urban Design Camp)
The meeting started with a review of comments generated from the District Round Two
Summary Report. Minor changes were suggested to the previous report.
The District representatives next reviewed the Peninsula and District Concept Plans. Concern
was expressed for the amount and location of new parking opportunities and impact to the
' District residents on circulation ideas.
The consultant stated throughout the discussion that implementation of the suggested actions
' could be accomplished in phases. The object of the recommended plan is to provide a
variety of solutions, small steps, mediums steps and grand plans including:
• The need to expand Villa Way to two-way traffic, even at the expense of sidewalks.
• The desire for a bayside boardwalk.
• Clustering parking opportunities.
Attached to this memorandum is the District Summary Report as amended.
1 1401 QUAIL STREET, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92660 TEL )71 A) 833 9193 FAX i71 A) 8333098
rrt
'
i r
MASTER PLANNING
URBAN DESIGN
McFadden Square District
Round Three Planning Workshop
July 23, 1996 (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.)
Meeting Memorandum
'
Attendance: District Representatives - Marcia Dossey (Coordinator), Henry Johnson,
George McGaffigan, Bob Rubian, Fran Ursini
B.P.P.A.C. - Rush Hill, Young Yang
' City Staff - Sharon Wood, John Douglas
Consultant - Jack Camp, Mike Adams (Urban Design Camp)
The meeting started with a review of comments generated from the District Round Two
Summary Report. Minor changes were suggested to the previous report.
The District representatives next reviewed the Peninsula and District Concept Plans. Concern
' was expressed for the amount and location of new parking opportunities and impact to the
District residents on circulation ideas.
The consultants stated throughout the discussion that implementation of the suggested actions
could be accomplished in phases. The object of the recommended plan is to provide a
variety of solutions, small steps, medium steps and grand plans.
Over all the plans were well received and many additional thoughts were added for inclusion
in the final recommendations including:
' • Providing new parking opportunities on both sides of the redesigned Newport Boulevard.
' • Exploring a new electric rail line between McFadden and Central Balboa.
Develop a transportation center which serves as a city hub for visitors.
Drop the idea of a sailing theme but develop unifying elements to distinguish Districts.
' • Reintroduce water taxi service.
Attached to -this is the District Summary Report as amended.
1 1401 QUAIL STREET, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TEL (714) 833.9193 FAX (714i 8333098
I
<R.IPIIM
'
MASTER PLANNING
URBAN DESIGN
Central Balboa District
Round Three Planning Workshop
July 30, 1996 (2:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.)
Meeting Memorandum
Attendance: District Representatives - Ron Baers (Coordinator), Bob Black, Don
Donaldson, Bill Ficker, Ray Handy, Michael Kransley, Chan LeFebevre, John
Wortman
B.P.P.A.C. - Tim Collins, Anne Gifford, Young Yang
Douglas
City Staff - Sharon Wood, John
Consultants - Jack Camp, Mike Adams (Urban Design Camp)
The meeting started with a review of comments generated from the District Round Two
'
Summary Report. A number of changes were suggested to the prioritization in the report of
certain issues. In addition, other items were added or amended.
'
A general concern was expressed that the Peninsula wide issues were too general and needed
to provide greater detail. Discussion of the following issues resulted in a change to a higher
priority:
• Redesign of the beach parking lot.
Development of a remote parking facility with shuttle.
'
• Development of wider sidewalks.
• Upgrading the Fun Zone.
Sign code violation enforcement.
'
• Development of new resident compatible retail.
Elimination of over head power lines.
' The District Representatives next reviewed the Peninsula and District Concept Plans. Concern
was expressed for the amount and location of new parking opportunities and impact to the
District residents on circulation ideas.
The consultarit stated throughout the discussion that implementation of the suggested actions
' could be accomplished in phases. The object of the recommended plan is to provide a
variety of solutions, small steps, medium steps, and grand plans.
H
fId01 QUAIL STREET, SUITE 100 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TEL i71 AI 833.9193 FAIT i71A1 833.3098
I
Overall the plans were well received and many additional thoughts were added for inclusion
in the final recommendations for example:
• The need for wide sidewalks, even at the expense of on street parking.
' Parkway landscaping or landscaping behind the property line.
• Landscaping between the curb and house important.
• Diagonal parking in front of residential property not a good idea.
• The Central Balboa residential area adjacent to the commercial core should have a special
treatment.
' Attached to this memorandum is the District Summary Report as amended.
' kg\wp\Mmplbppsl 1.do
d
I
7
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
BPPAC's DISTRICT MEETING
Tuesday - August 13, 1996
4:00 - 6:30 PM
AGENDA
I. Introduction - Fritz Duda, Chairman, BPPAC
II. Welcoming Remarks - Sharon Wood, Assistant City Manager
III. Overview of Project Study Process - Tim Collins, Co -Chairman, BPPAC
IV. Workshop Summaries and Recommendations - Jack Camp, U.D.C.
• Peninsula -wide Issues - Overview
• Lido Village/Civic Center
• Cannery Village
• McFadden Square
• Central Balboa
• Revisit Peninsula -wide Recommendations
V. Workshop Participant's Comments and Critiques
VI. Designation of Volunteers - Tim Collins, Co -Chairman, BPPAC
VII. Concluding Remarks - Sharon Wood, Assistant City Manager
BALBOA
PENINSULA
PLANNING
STUDY
DISTRICT
WORKSHOP
EXERCISE
SHEETS
I
t
J
J
I
I
I
r
I
r
I
I
I
1
F-29-1996 1:26AM FROM RIDGEWAY DEV CO 714 721 9008
I
BALBOA PENINSULA PLANNING STUDY
Newport Beach, California
DISTRICT PLANNING WORKSHOP
LIDO VILLAGEICIVIC CENTER
May 24, 1996
The Lido Village/Civic Center group met on May 24, 1996 at the Elks Club in Lido Village. Membors
present were Tony Shaw, Bill Dunlap, Clarence Turner, John Sipple, Don Dabney and Tod Ridgeway.
Members absent were Jerry King, Tim $trader and John Cotton.
' Maps were distributed that defined the study area as including Lido Marina Village(waterfront property),
Elks Club and adjacent public parking within Lido marina Village, Lido Village(Fritz Duda property), old
city hall and fire station, St. James Episcopal church, and Lido peninsula(John Curci property of
' approximately 15 acres),
The group attempted to define peninsula wide Issues and then district issues as follows:
Peninsula Issues: Possible Solutions: (meeting of 6-14)
Tragic and basic circulation.
' Limited pedestrian friendly areas.
Itinerant occupancy of com'l areas.
District Issues:
I
I
I
IJ
i
I
I
Create more efficient and greater parking
for Marina Village.
Block off Via Oporto to vehicles.
Need for hotel -Marina Village.
Signage for Lido and Lido Marina Village.
Create pedestrian ambiance in Lido Village
and Marina.
Need for more restaurants and theaters.
Shared parking for Lido Village, Marina
and Elks Club.
Bottleneck at Arches bridge.
Non integration of commercial areas.
Lido Island access,
Lido Peninsula.
Create high density residential and/or
hotel in Lido Village area.
Create joint parking for Lido Village and
Marina and SL lames Church,
City Hall -redesign and rebuild and/or
demolish and relocate.
Create new street scapes on Newport Blvd.
and entire district.
Itinerant occupancy of Lido Marina.
Antiquated infrastructure in Lido area.
Parking structure for all of Lido Village,
Lido Marina and City Hall.
Propose mono -rail from Mariners Mile
Propose using 32nd Street
Master'plan with Hotel, visitor marina and
high density residential.
Lido Village and Lido Marina•master
plan as entertainment center.
Add fiber optical system to underground
for computer & graphic users.
P. 1
� M No �. 00 M IM IM on I= . on. a r im no fm M tom an M
II
-
City of District_.A/7)a /,4
Newport peninsula IssueJAL
��7}S Number
Beach Issue Description:
W)W Al'�"7 A �ErJ lrosoz��E S��T/ov FvOe11,iAr.
l �� 7flr,;�sviG
S h' & tJr/GIP�
ter ss
Balboa aA)<
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strafe ies
Peninsula g Possible Solutions or Improvements
'tanning (--No
1
ifudy 7h'E .d��4. f/s�.%JS OTt%/�,��T�>.
"t
�1
MC1 PLANNING
ISAM O113161,
Negative Aspects (Doesn't w
needs improvement/change)
Conclusions:
Action Plan:
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Objectives/Strategies p„«:
or Improvements
(_ � � \ Illy IIIIIIIIIIII I� � � � ' I� � � lllllll� IIIIIII� I� Illllllllll,
i
1
City Of
District
Newport
Peninsula'issue
Beach
Issue Description:
Balboa
Peninsula -
Planning
Rudy
' .MAN
PLANNING
.MAN OES16N
Number
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives,/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
��S
J
t A-�o fSto
AJJC�, 04S UA-S-
Status
Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspecis (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
ObjectiveslStrategies
_e&_ J
F'�N`
'Possible Solutions or Improvements
t?
LoNt,wcn
P.,4pd
Conclusions:
Action Plan:
s
U
M no
No - aa MWINM on 11M M I M • OM no 4= 101 *w>r on "W-W
city of
Vewport
3each
;aiboa
'eninsula
'fanning
tudy
STEM ('LAMMING
SAN DESIGN
P
District ,Crso
Peninsula issue�p
Issue Description_
Number
,9va Fif.3� �T���G 5y5T�si'2 10 U.op� G--t20v�tJb UTI�>T/mod
Positive Aspects (Workswelf-can improve)
,44,m A�.#o7-6
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Conclusions:
Action
Status
vD)ecuves/-')trategies
/JrQGH/TbCT,j ��16.U6/,�Si
9'd�iL �Tr/Sir woPAD
Quo • Current Level of Activity
i
'ossible Solutions or Improvements
dpn�auy .fr=�k�
No Change
rosscoieSolutions or Improvements
4zzv�a� 49
,eX,-D VrIA17-1ES ,
Mon MM,M soon no MONINAM'"M
:i
City of
District ZIp0 L/LL FJ6 Lr
��C/Vw�Or�
Peninsula Issue s7/,v6,z/�,u�
OCC t+pANcy
O F C6mr7la57C/9G
/7rq4,9$ Number
Beach
—
Balboa
Peninsula
Planning
Study
4ASTLA PLANNING
1RRAN Rf SIGM
Issue Description: 7 ve $ HO/OS// E%F7/GGRS //J G100 GILL HGE /C+ .. �,/r,G 19ZW70 oR Awlefno
9'S• 77,�rS lzt5 oL75 /ty
GowtR Ro 6Pz G9L-utS� LtS SER Pv79G/ o S
� P � '� F 7e,s-raK7
19A10
ANO C9K 4'�tr yl riy�� Lt90
T a q prPa�sScp 9ReH % /97 /s %/�G- �y76 ti/J� 7a
L/DO SSLf7Y0. PLPRtsSED /S/�Y6HQ^/ryoops L&eRjS T� OL�dEsSe0 �R�95.
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
19-R eq OX F0K
%N/Y,9,"? -_ 907 /Y64-p s
J`!7
7��L< of v5E`2
.9rrt7/sTs Ta �a�e/�o,P/�
Xa
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change 6y
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
Objectives/Strategies 'Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change) -
57EypfCL�/jc
A4—tg rrroRe- PE•q-le- CIihVYGA Zo yr/Yd % O /}GGoc..
.4/7r1r5 A
s
FR1QvoLY. R4`S/D6/Y7lNG Asa //Y qe&¢
e0/ TR/!Le L .7"i/TiG---
v.97/i�Hs /�Gs7 vQ/liL—bcf7TloL1�s
o f REe/4ca7ro7j� ll SLR.
r7'o GD7 TffskG--•
�j yof,Ne4-6-
/F5 t5» 17 /5 /Yo7 /4
92 s •a ry
(Tipkc THE HRB/I FEEL uvED 7�Y.
Conclusions:
Action Plan: g7y,�7 �iI/r Z6LY/M� /9/Y/9�f�Si� To p6?�R/r./9�� zri/fb9 C6rrYGo
!/N J/fc-1zG/ DE rc/zr»/ryc �v/�lr7
//>` fF FtE 19
c^/7y coos e G//cam ro
/'- 6YP G1-1al4l<
0-r-7 To ,t'f ! !rf®
W r Iwo- M W* an W OM 0-0 -MI, I= im CM .i an go r��
City of District //ad /Lc ate
Newport Number
Number
BeachIssue Description:
Balboa
Peninsula
Planning
Study
'YASTER?IANNING
DSSAN DESIGN
(7
h%
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objective0trategies
Possible Solutibns•or mprovements
F-0Z-5 T/f6' t a - 60 7
5E 7 /7 iyE te,
/q
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
Objectives;0rategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change)
, /-?& TyE �e�yF s� s FoJt
/, T�i9�z Oar
3,.z 7 (s i/yE-�Fic/E�r�
�/�F.�_
3. 7 5 /yam/��,QE�
PREP 7, -4 P ��/r�.P/ac
• 13.e/,ys /�i� �0,3' e
/yyL/9
Giat�rf.f.j/G'o�YFERE>ytF-
C�
/ eR / F 7 /Gc/�O
G/5170/2> �gBvgEy
Conclusions:
-
lye6p 70 AC6�J
7Alqe"eg-17 f
(22-.el eLelp 2c7
e12
Action Plan: E
RG e571y — - 5' E 4i ��/l7 4l, e i�AG6 —
t@�
��E7C/IM//E/C- lciH/�7 4i� !•oUGp /I /�l/E,
.
( H
T'p4�y,-;
5
���it-vtfV/5 fi//cc: r" P—ncc.
>� ri W aw 804M mew M* � twl • (w moEn '" IN= so loa loa
M
City of
Newport
Beach
Balboa
Peninsula
Planning
I Study
District L/aa L/L/oc/- /Cr/6/c CC-(/T6/2
District Nsae,jej, oaar!! vG R •�
'< <PgR umber
Issue Description: /,yaK& lsaE- , llr,c s S veY y� ql���L�
043�tK7to&5 v, 7Wa- 1729� jC/HG !ty ��<(- 9RcAs e,,,r;,V"s T
TC'HAHT S//RNo oc l tcGR'S /"5 i7�FJ !/X TNIr /�R6Fj o f' THE cll�.G E
e C/YT-/!, 7-NC �Av/«Oy SHo /ys FLCc•LP .7 9GG TH4 GHti
Cl 7y /<//7Cc �'yS !� PRo�Ga,rn O�RlN6riXL- tueT,K 9/YU THc Rcd<HAS 9 P,Po�ccm ay S4Y0/a�S
OoR(,S'6 rNc- 5rimmc-2 �+1y0 �',�1a f'j`�"�rc z'elrTlp/��. ,r,'Hs �!p/1cB��
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectivecstrategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
O/PPcAa+ry7 pemrsHO /76TAlooS l..T/YC/zallse ao,y> a.se A9p TA/3 O P
,�Cff. CIzY CNu tcp- ANo /Los! 5
/rY %�4C rIV5ZR u47 Pfg1,Wol6 , GM06,_ rs'G-s v 5 r/i s r�.a�.9.
f{E'L�5', C� •.Z N>7/J4 Thary o PW4. L<9U/.j{,.
//5� oP 2-PrPO�(Oa lAav<4- pTRKiNC: To -?eyo PRoi» r9aa/7 70 /!/rnrcr/TG lT7GTE/25 / o/c CvEl3 MG/3G!/lL ris o- m5. C. s /Z n 7 A7E Us cR7 - NC-'aY �K/�K(NG GOT
S %"o eYe L� 5�.rs�Gcrc- �ie�/R, 3, cR�szs Rec/PiQoaK- P.vKkielG
3e 6"sC c/Ecrrc-ss /s �� �.-/7jF'pGcO c- !rG'R�lrsylfTS./e o
r c ,yE P/� P.oFri�c/G /3 T as
!' � zZNNAees, G�l!'�Ol7 c-/ICrAL� crzy i GYaR ccY.
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Ivegauve Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
>�Sii71i I. COry'7Ih'Voof /JNS7LC obt/i
t � (I4Rr�?/iLO P�K/YC,Y G,
2• �p �F PAKN!<YS Dc-7c/ZS
MASTER PLANNING
UIIIAN DESIGN Po TE°YJ/AL GLg 7Ol77E/ts
3, c /3& n77 lys a'eAze ,a CAB FL,
�r /.. /%i5� Pi6pa/ClcyG ��U-a15 UZ6R
r�R /rerOG-y
7'`c ClZf lf�G.� Go zo c,yye�.
3, I3�ra/s B�c1G ZQs,6- coal7m t7pc'!s�
rosstt)fe solutions or Improvements
(?UrLp !¢ eY&-C/ >W,97-
/3 0o.74c 4,94cp .grXp gezLPIA
alr7
Qj/GL c/¢ESTe
7WY 6, A2024-1-1,
• e. rrloRK j�G'E zrSc6(1_
Condusions: c/ic.ry/9L/9jc/ir/3Ls,•^ P�rtrrr/yG rs a Kt
/Yo /Y /(ESlUtrgT //,•L p6 LG-c % >r1YSe'?6e9/'a?V7 'OM !%'057, /e- 1Vo7 /I;-LL
JZC-frn,cy /�GlirLj9/8Gc , PaR S!. �GUS' LERsi ffCCQSS /%' Pi6R6Cakr �5 k�
/JFS/R6U � ^Rtc7 S P R�OcLcze�on Gij�-7 AGt#c� �ra'!�7 ///lop�c�r �o/Y6 TC
E•23 P"Se�s s %f/6f {� �G arc else-s
�RopcCrN5/ ,noway tr7C Cam-- G� Wr7lY /a"W 70 K�SeGvr 151v�a/
I
so on'' do 004M WhIMMMI, r A M MOON =14 1MIMM OWNS
Balboa
Peninsula
Planning
Study
URBAM
DEOI
M-U, ftli
IAST(S PLANNING
IASAM RTf IGN
City of District z-z . r-
� :1, ,
Newport Peninsula issue ,z1 PC-i7 �PI�TI Number
Beach Issue Description:
T� '�x�.,i-u�ss ��i .�: ,$.o42Q.d �Uc�cv��•:- �E�- X�i<�:`�:� _ �'Et�si6,u.�d-a�Wd
1, 4%(7-51G
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Fnieieds
Aspects (Doesn't work -well - Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
provement/change)
Conclusions:
Action Plan:
1
js
City of District
Newport District Issue_
Beach Issue Description:
Balboa
Peninsula
Planning
Study
INASTEi 1EAMMIMS
U..AX DEEICN
Ut
s4ft&--
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) ObjectiveOtrategies
Cr ei�, utt(m�,
Status Quo • Current level
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change) Pa--\
�MZ3 lot
do SFti4.`6s
Conclusions:
Action
Number
ISSIble Solutions or Improvements
e
• No Change
Solutions or Improvements
i
District
City of
Newport . Peninsula Issue i _,� _ �'tvtC Number
Beach
Issue Description:
Balboa
Peninsula
Planning
Study
' MASTER PUNNING
N .ADADESIGN
O/J -S
AAA
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
-wQ CA W4S
Rewtou� o0.t s�
Status Quo . Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Qb -to
Objectives6trategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
�,, J'A NA'' P�L / .
4KQ/
IWAO&UL Opp p S+UU
/is of S —
Conclusions:
Action Plan:
r. r■r Well SOME r i si . r . w 10 tr .r so +s men on
ii hr
City of District • A'iZ>10
Newport Peninsula issue_c�4 j��{T� ,��c�
Number
Beach Issue Descriptioq:
+--""(
Balboa z� is A V"ZD T; D
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
Peninsula
Planning
study
llt
1
t /
AS1fS ILANMtaG
ROAN Df61LM
Status Quo • current Level of Activity . No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work well - • ' Objedives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change)
�i ,26:5 ({"Uoe.J
f 5 A?O v5— aXC&*X PD2
Conclusions:
Action
s)
%2S
9
r >, 4 r a* fln r ar io• r • an 1♦r 10110 r r m it wm �.
I -
City of DistrictL z)z)n ul z-Z-.dcO
Newport peninsula Issue , T xz_.
' Number
Beach Issue Description:
��po� t>— �31v� �, t/ ���... o�� ,C,d,va �.a�� �.e C�'.���e v-�2 •�G �.s�l'�rna�k�.r�
Balboa Positive As eds
p Works well -can improve) Objeaives/Strategies
Peninsula -ZZ5;vc.)v-,Roj-
Planning
Study
'IASIIA IIANNINC
PLAN D[SICN
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
or Improvements
Negative Aspects (Doesn'twork-well- 70bjectiv�e�t-rateg7jes
needs improvement/change) Possible Solutions or Improvements
u
Conclusions:
Action Plan: ;.
1
M s M011 M M >! 100 M. M.100 Us "MIr IM IM owes M
:ity of District
Jewport Peninsula Issue
;eachIssue Description:
alboa
eninsula
fanning
tudy
TER PLANNING
IAN DESIGN
�o Li�l�- CLur( .E,&
Number
ge
Positive Aspects (Works �well-can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
/1,105 -
u. C�t,S UlQs
Status
Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needsrovement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
1, ,fc,s t Tzs NHS
CoN ulNcu
l�J P
Conclusions:
Action Plan:
I
11
I
I
I
I
1
r
I
1
1
I
1
11
I
I
1
I
1
I
ity of District c�N NgYgg
ewport Peninsula Issue iPfCA-r-tW
Number_
each Issue Description: },D_ gNE�st1t�— �,^
Itboa .
minsula
inning
My
I I
N PLANNING
N 0ESICN
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well - Objectives/Strategies needs improvement/change) S e Possiblolutions or Improvements
l�3
'NS UAc-a t_ocs * ope,16*-tt.tl G� up -Vcf$ M a1JT Uw.At,
hn('ap6S CQ ti-ITtSV,5fP9 AVo,dVYLt;Mptil a
OP -rvty &CA12v6 . tn4AVWffNE- TIfs pgcR�%V,v
Conclusions I I ;
Action Plan: I
ity of District C2A,Aj 11►gq
ewport Peninsula Issue -I �_ IUrz/94
each
Ilboa
Ininsula
inning
idy
A PLANNING
N DESIGN
Number
Issue Description: I A4i70 UpL tto 0MLM -RY(L-Ims�
lt7M, Awes: -CF:I
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo . Current Level of Activity
No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)I�
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
TVAA?JGl g IEVtQ6T?(,5 �ItZCtX.A-?�ax1
TRZ
E•STU�
kGciS
Conclusions:
Action Plan:
S
City of District CA21=1 UI! f
Newport I District Issue g_ A)50 Number_
Beach
Issue Description: IS T 'i5JSo.
3alboa
'eninsula
'tanning
;tudy
Llt
B
t In
fLANNING
URBAN RESIGN
OP
Cl y of District G,A� V6L.LAr G
Newport ; District issue T9.A64Zj_j]T
3each I Ism � escription:"j- 41, .-} R�Y,(,t1p1N(� 2r�iT S i�ppt ETG. lU STiz6�i5
�s a� ujr-- , ,o� � 74-VtuE
'alboa
'eninsula
fanning
Ludy
'ASTER rtANNING
HSAN DESIGN
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
I )OtJC—
Negative Aspects (Doesn't w
needs improvement/change)
}Jwe&plboD �tL1t�r
Action
Number i.
or
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
�7V -MV S71G{ BSI ♦aiL{ CP-eaza "t'Ii1-e p1 (3511 umt3
�'�6 i ottJ s p.pp10
titter tK&sEd Rat.
PPMo1PW{Ar� LO�ATtoN-%
NUJ FOOAAG TRAM Glowj
1
.yyr,
Y
_ity Of
District ... f"J2E Lli1 v IUIQ(�E
geWport ,
District IssueTQM VJ
Number.
'each
:alboa
eninsula
tanning
to dy
ASTER PLANNING
flBAM DEIGN
Issue Description: (JP(pj2gp� "�
�(�, fYvt�C9B �� T�flN6 TMRGI';Y>��'
SVOIJ )Cs�,x -FAW
CWN" vet ,8
Positive Aspects (works well -can improve)' Objectives/Strategies
P 1 g ies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Th"& cure. VICUJ 2s
W/ CA4Ji 59M V tl.l
lmmvh5o (xt KSa 5-VOIJ5
A400 I" PAigs cps.) lk�
GooILOtN1rT(�i ADJ6RtS6 '>M
CCz--"fNATIM a0- C.t&VTiN6
t54L57rlhl(0 ULl l..A&e� tl�l(Z
fsEIUERdc�
Ppc
f�L(NK ati(pu. SfiOQs 0
u1�(��01lt�ePt
W t� RMS i VO IT 3t t 1 �F' ;lUi;S$ bP- MUU UA6B
ST dR- PR-a'sPhwi VL- t
L-Vr-JT To L.IOtr /Z)e-
GD Iaig AU F'WAA--B .506N
00WV PP6.hV6 L.,164TfNG
WOR"1L 1Mt2$
w1�ORI�TIQtt)
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No Change • 9)UCoo(ZIKr1g IAnvac,40A6
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
Objectives/Strategies
AV IPP(VU&L, LOTS
Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change)����
oljVt,A 1J)PNw+ OP powx,
�F�iNm� R�t3u�5�N�to6
S(bpS t6. Ap RwtN6�Aiknt�
to cAtJ e:�,,
Conclusions: St6NMg
Action Plan:
City of District GNP NEW, UILA_Alrng
Newport I District Issue bLIGlo 6 Number_ 1
3each
>alboa
'eninsula
'fanning
fudy
1ASTER fEANNING
IA/AN DESIGN
Issue Description: 'T�l)FbtZct>7ytE�"r �
�tsTtlJ(a R•i�t�.p-f'Eo711'j
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Ei6oE7�PrI6 lhs;fittrlLt'
�AAtATr/rtfJ #ll(,
4on outi AAO�-UVIT
Point xs(22
sit tCF_C*VWVJ
UtwA&a
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity
No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
K)O-T Guar UtSfiDM-Utq
A
IUD ,i;
py Aug
Conclusions: u6eD (-M wo(Lg- U�S�iLuty
Action Plan:
:�I
City of
Newport I
Beach
3alboa
'eninsula
'fanning
►tuay
MASTER MANNING
URBAN RESIGN
District ii%dJN4� . osuLhg2
District Issue [;UN!.1L k)(It5Mqcr,
Issue Description: VMJDAWSM VF4kWTIC J
-n t0u kc3 71tP Ult.jprr'Q
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
lsb u e
.
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or
needs improvement/change)
� �`
tUWI1JlYTf3 TIM J-10t56
Improvements
(b:44;' AW(ai%Um
5 1A P, U1 of t c¢S
,eNo TIME Uvt5re�c8
VOIL IJ65 t QPOQEkiIF� h1r8
1 PAPAWCr 'W 614110 b
t)IaNOA'Ur,60
9(�D i'UMPI iN �t,1.6yj
• ' POUG* TT{$ PAF,>
Conclusions: Vezcr_,�lam of tuuo zs
Action Plan:
i i i� i ! ! ! ! r• , i ! ! ! t• ! i ! ! i
i
1
w
"Ity of
District Glc1.,. t7�.�(�lG( L,II.I A&+s,
Newport i
District Issuer GLPD)LA•T(a]
Number
;each
Issue Description: IWACs5 LSN T 44WMAfAO
n-s PEs Ir Co6w rye
i
alboa
Positive
Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
'eninsula
& 1'FItJD"
�' TttEfbi•law T&"T-7FF6
TIB ruW/p4k1E¢MSIN6 I Iffpz6
'fanning
" r ousE;`frytrrPcc�
VIwRC96 is '' fKe P--es7
»• " IN IJMOUJrr"'
ptkzmc"MA S*NS 01i TI,'e
Ludy
Status
Quo • Current Level of Activity
No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
E
needs improvernent/change)
GLEA7 $rpv%Tvrl2f IDIb
04v-rlewW1 Lfi-�'A•W6p'rls+p6
� �PI
■�1�11�1
W� ep lF� WiL{J(oDIIi�Zt6ni
L-or-A-T jOiV 5Ta6r:i 01M W&%/Sw- to
WC11111
v wNa.r:> vai wwl Tb
(54U65
MASTER PLANNING
UAGAN DESIGN
�� N^�ES SS jGIJQQ,ry TIIV {!yealaxIS
LzGrnly, MD 7yW-rR A.A)JLe DU
�' O(7T5�-E(t'TS dF 77d'l; VIr,L,QloF
u%LI ai .'i AteL(7PPai%ilo(o f-WA. 3i
oft N
Conclusions: Nth a4N ov(;,pJ (Lqq �IRCIJGI(CrdfJ (I?�U
Action Plan:
E
i M .iI = i i i i m i i i
City of District
Newport t District Issitel'kk(,Oro Number
Beach
3alboa
'eninsula
'fanning
study
IMASTER MANNING
URBAN DESIGN
dAVM__f ?AVAtJ.6 tt l/)T M91*,4106 IN T& Ult i
PAtictW6 CtZO" oy—
l.}ou)Ww-t VVD",. trav- e.Pd" alarm t* to Sf T ",F
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies
pPPVW Titts( WG ma t cd
vfaYL 0z Duglwro fGt� t Fb Hco�Ga
WAOIWOY
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
jik'AifMt� t,
A PRaP o 10 �5'oma Rg�
fib • UN -tor' -k 2uM
Tm�h� �TRO e-wua-
90n T 0-W TftfZ—(a[5 10
azhi". xr?Pe;mMdt) oF-
WPaA/— I',oyX.4106
U'ttLIZAgLzYJ d�- UrJ0G_UT1G(1M
Pi1106 ucf(
Conclusions: F;� i &046tN6
t?N t o V6 -T&7LM PR9-t: ,U taasMCTc d s
Action
Solutions or Improvements
Possible Solutions or Improvements
OW09~ AtILV�'t�
MEtex% PbTfW4 law3 t vent,'.
u e OwPA t'Axt�tF� G
S1ai7 D'tsa ftSV5; to VuBuC� L.e'rs
I
�ity of District \ lU V a
4ewport: District Issue t)SE Number
T—
'each
alboa
eninsula
tanning
Ludy
1 P
,ASTER PLANNING
AGAR DESIGN
Issue Description: pit-yT)pN(�I�I,�IM�)N,A-(i, JUN� t7sIOI2HD t„csNO uaeS
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
cAm-5t PFZST 5T000s, { "qurs SmPz_5
PAG4c.ITp•TI3 TyG tNc4z4s5 tru
P=5T 57UDI o! 6'asL�Iuse.. S`cupto5
,tImo seuc," vi3u ,
'rF)'b5i. S
G6umfro W IM ftTML1 S4C uLmA1S
MW50 US*
aCn.t11BPjpl erl%�"iCK-1 j
Loor— A.-r ?MW A 8AUPGPOST oiet)
*MW*t.cose- f-T T'DNN76 4 n1vocea
155u6S 15�p-wltirED W6
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change)
n oaG Ar-TIUG fbuGIN6
por) l R-TV-pL
jw-5.1 tuic-A -TcL(JgS
xsp~ oo No-r ,au.ow A -AM MOPS
)ZSUIMU
06V- &X:
IN THU Cora br.
�- ulu-aae.
rtEBP MAY_JLb: F61iMl_ PNO MOIA
d
( UIG W ZoNIN� [ b�iL
,xMBI�SIIRUIC$ 4
yLD%7ST�R�V �1�yIC�A�I
STO^ G EFy)pwav/
Conclusions:
Action Plan:
i
1
�ity of District GdklAlt�1 t)ILL.(5
4ewport' District Issue Number__
;each
alboa
eninsula
lanning
:udy
1 �
1STEN PtANNING
1BAN DESIGN
Issue Description: �ptt.l5 � SYt4t�
F2pv�t TUG �}� �,
Positive ,Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
ttft P- -LJUE c,AW q &�
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity
No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
FAR s IM T6} P*Nt
WOMOM S MtGL
0 �&t1/K(i PIPblilUrr ja
$/Yt£u� 'iU.OUbFi —1FI'E 5(3uER3
URcuc6T6 �fYGl RNINa Wt}T
Conclusions:
Action Plan:
I
I
r
L
MCFADDEN
' SQUARE
1
I
Ll
1
1
L7
r
Mom i= M i= i= ,M, m= i m m m i m
ty of District
E!wport 1�
!ach
_,dumber / )
(!
_ - •.r � Tacvu —
Issue D
escription: ,
I
Positive Aspects- /(Works �well-can improve) , Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
,�����G9 �`ZJ i�Y�" i�j i%�s��nt. f���/ • ��/�G.rr�iy � Cd3�cs�, c�-�7�0 °�n.c/CF 2cc�
(/ " i
�QGc`-/r tdcC�Lo
/ Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well - Objectives/Strategies 'Possible Solutions or Improvements
eeds improvement/change) c`d
Cld
fjL of e y� CuE� %7 A� P4c, ZGce �G�
�yL lG �ca` �d'l0i �� ✓/�oS, ,P/iG�ill.Qnte�v �ti--
Co sions:
Action Plan:
�� f
�� f
so M IM i M M M M= .!. = M M M M M M= M
District/):.', !�x
Number / Cz
Issue Description:
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
,Possible Solutions or Improvements
7CLL.C'%j�c„ij�,[.�-GCri'�
//Wets/ �
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement t/ge)
Objectives/Strategies //
n ' ^t �� � ���
'Possible Solutions or Improvements
']���� 0� �
77
(
DIC
Ply AR "M
Conclusions: - �j A
�'-`�u/
/
Action Plan:
mom M i M M M M M ,lM. M M M M M M M I• M
ity of District.`- 46,C-66"-.. „�..
Issue
ewport1
each
Issue Description:
dboa
min$ula
anning
udy
JOB
I nI PLANNING
AN DESIGN
Number / l 3
(�
fC.11C E.K�f�-� C • � CC1G'� J�
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
_7,11 `Zve ./_e
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvemeks
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needsimprovement/change)
Objecttiv�ess/�Sttrraategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
/%�2 CL
Oc��lCl�o^✓DIGS
r-v�fv
Conclusion /
U
Action Plan:
�
1 ��� L>�2 «��c� c✓ c
�� -
ry
�
Ry of District
i
lewpor _A41� Issue
each
Issue Description:
alboa
eninsula
fanning
tudy
EEt
1
NIM
t on
PLANNING
BAN DESIGN
Number /(J)
��%�/�',�
LEA°�o7�v'!
�C��LGP lLE
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
/71
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change 4
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needsimprovement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
(�
N/ttbf
Conclusion4��,,_,����°Gjj/� �dC�Gy�Gt%ceayGy�'t,.SlB7csl.��i�7�i%—�dlZ- G'fIZG�[.`k��'
�(/�
Action Plan:
I
axl
! ! ! ! ! ,! i Iwo" ` ! !
V of District :ice
'IWPOYt !?'AdIssue
ach
Number
Issue Description:
✓f,LE�f/%76� cam`✓c O.�'ld'�7
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
zP.l
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
wNe: U�
Objectives/Strategies
� ` c
Possible Solutions or Improvements
&Yet&
Conclusi ns: &
Action Plan:,4R,.,,1_dh1 "�/ / S�fim ZJ �,�
��J'd�/ila-;,� �
-y/�
l(w,
W1
I
o(/b., 'V L [ma c ✓ 6 &�J-/�� &V)r1ZeJ
M M1111M*a MR I" M 'M� i M ON M" o r 1W M
of District ✓ /
'Wpor �/ � Issue
eachIssue Description:
dboa
minsula
inning
udy
t '
'ER PLANNING
AN DESIGN
LJNumber z (
��//�p
Positive Aspects (Workks�� yell -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies yam_
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
'Possible Solutions or Improvements
Conclusions:
Action Plan: /
5
c Pik r�117 ,�ri' /� zm � (Z/7��
M M 11�11 WR 11M ON . ME Ir WE � low we III= *0 M
ty of
'wport
each
lboa
ninsula
inning
My
"t
ON
EN MANNING
1N DESIGN
District -'i<'G�GCl�7L0 td-er _ ,
!ssuet��`��//��/i2� G Number
Issue Description:
c
Positive AAspects (Works well -can improve)
G�2�'20
�j
Objectives/Strategies
�%%?4Lt✓/%�G�L�C/i�2E�2�d��
Possible Solutions or Improvements
e�jdYe�%�7�°.Fi'
�; �irf- 4�G�
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change _ lL) &4AA
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/cLIQ�ax�,�1/, gZce�w
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
V
v
@GUa6m&J�
5� ri1
Conclusions: tl
Action Plan:
1" MI omen
ity of District
eWP01 t �'d Issue(; 7bMU, 2;,✓�ll/6;
each
Issue Description:
dboa
minsula
anning
udy
Est
E
ME
HE
IEN MANNING
AN DESIGN
Number 3
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
-Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements \
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)u
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
//,,
�,
Conclusions: ^/
/tea 96 �( Qi1 l �ZIc J� 7� 41CJ QCT3 �.
Action Plan:
ity of
ewpo
each
Issue
Issue Description:
Positive Aspects (Works well -can im rove)
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
N.
I
e
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No
MO .�iiii®R
Number
Possible Solutions or Improvement
Possible Solutions or Improvements
District
District issue'
Number_ v�
Issue Description:
itiv(Works well -prove)
Objectives/StrategiesGtdhs Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements ,
^
00 j
Conclusions:
q
�
Action Plan:
I
i
1W no IM on 40 am M110M •40 - fMM go` No an111110 an on A
ty of District 0i Q
Uport District Issue •C-15DA41�a�
ach
[boa
iinsula
.nning
Idy
IEA PLANNING n`\
AN OESIG Nt",t'
Number
Issue Description:.
P�ositiiv/e, /Aspects (Works well-ca i prove)
Objecttiivess//Sitraate'gies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
O
Status Quo Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well
needs improvement/change)
Vy>
-
O i to
p�,t nk r�
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Conclusions:
) n
`on
Action Plan:
—�4
A61&
I
1001 so so on10* on so in am •40 . 16M so (Ain go soIN* am ON as
of District// `'(
District Iss
�wport ue L�
!ach Issue Dqscription:
Llboa
-ninsula
inning
My
ffPP,
.
Uns
10,111
STELA PLANNING
SAN DESIGN
0
Number
' ,, ,.
-7
M
i 1/J1
MOMMM2,/ /
Positive Aspects orks well-canlimprove)
1 i
ObjeeNes/Strategies
-
Possible Solutions or Improvements
775
Status • . Current Level of Activity No / /
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
0—blectives/Strategies /&�(� &dtW
1 Possible Solutions or Improvements
� W01
ActionON
Plan:1
v U v
IMMIM44"! on Room 60""On"i
I "of
District
vport Distri
ch
)oa
insula
Ining
ly
IBME
HE
MR
PLANNING
DESIGN
A Issue Number ( f l
Issue Description:
C/�,, A&v �"y mf dGd&av qZ L(
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Strategie{��` Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needsniimpproovvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
Conclusions:
( -
-w
Action Plan:
1101 MO an am 06` on an M •*Ml- in100*U so ON"I ON on MF
ty, of District
!wport Distri
ach
lboa
ninsula
Inning
idy
LEt
,ME
RM
TER PLANNING
iAN DESIGN
l 4 J
ct Issue, i Number-6
Issue Description:
PPosiiptive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
pfp-
LSZ-- a-
j9j� I Status Quo Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
5
Possible Solutions or Improvements
r
Conclusions:-
F`� �%G/w�uo� riscJc��r�,c9�/
Action Plan 7s�
`i`DZ�re,pir�
01111"""" M MOMIN0 4M." Boom M" r M
t,� of District
:wport Distr„
Each
lboa
ninsula
inning
My
EE1
IMM
t '
STEP PLANNING
GAIS DESIGN
Number
Issue Description:
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possibl Sol tions or Improvements
Status Quo Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)Q,i
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements _
`
Conclusion;. a�D11�1�0�
Action Plan: ari_ c�yy�����
%�vL
I
IMs IMM OM M won so in r .ir - 6000its so logoINNI is we
of
District
wport District Issue
ich
boa
iinsuta
nning
dy
I
MM'
t
EN PIRNNING
♦N DESIGN
Number
Issue Description:.
G��L 90�
Positive Aspects (Works well-pcan
� improve)
Objectives/Strategies -
Possible Solutions or Improvements (�
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs iGen;(chan e�G�>
Objectives/Strategies
/ ��
Possible Soludo�ns�ojr Improvements
G� ��� ✓
Conclusions: //,�
�,i(. ,C� J 1 ,
Action Plan,,&
I
Ms so M im soon M M I .IM, 10 goes r s 20+` rs M
fy of District
�wport District lssue//%�4��GcCr�c�``
eachIssueDescription:
lboa
ninsula[
inning
,dy
"t
t '
:TEN PLANNING
]AN DESIGN
u
Number
— 0
�
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
cY//�G ��
Objectives/Strategies
G i�
Possible Solutions or Improvements
x;;WAWV1_
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
change)
Objectives/Strategies
C n 'y� 0�
Possible Solutions or I provelnent/cr
` �%
Conclusions�Q,�
Action PI�
J%
n
(MEN M r so ON IMa ma-1111• M =II I" loan M onm ew
Number
Issue Description:
Positive Aspects (Works well -can i prove)
Z���lIG�`�1> 1'�15��
Objectives/Strategies /
� ��d!/�c,�.�/l�/,�, J
Possible Solutions or Improvements
�-�^/�L�• (Q�7�', '�`'�
'
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improv ent/,chan e)���
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Conclusions:
Action Plan: �• �'' eA _ /, ����� G�no�4�
G�yz•�""_ _
I
>r is on 00 so` so 00010111• r waills 41104101011 am(in as
ity of Distric
ewport Dist"
?ach
-unoa
!ninsula
anning
udy
l�
RM
STEM FUNNING
BAN DESIGN
C Number 6
Issue Descn xion:
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
l '
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needsim rove enVchang )
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Conclusions:
Action P n:
L -
as me M M as ON no M no IM ' M ON M ism M = (IM M
y of District �r
wport District Issue ' ,C�•�• J-
tchIssue Den:
boa
Iinsula
rining
dy
';i
ME
on
8 MANNING
N DESIGN
Number
/
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strate ies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs i e)
Objectives/Strategieess��,y
��� � b".-_ .
Possible Solutions or Improvements
�� ���•1�55y5�
gm�p�r�o�v�e�ment/chan
��,,ph���ytu�/
Conclusions: //y_ zl
Action Plan:
�h
M r M r so ON no 40 no .+ I= 1=1 as gr an ilk an 11M W
ity of District " C
ewport peninsula Issue
each (11
Issue Description:
Uboa
2ninsula
anning
udy
'I[A IIAMNIN6
AM DESIGN
Number
_,z
20
?&u_ U
Positive Aspects (Works we(l-can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs imp{ovement/c�hange)�
� •
Objectives/Strategies
y�dl ,��_ ry�
Possible Solutions or Improvements
��j ,ij�p� cusp �-�-�C-
Conclusions:
Action Plan: !� LL rr
` -`Lt b
r
ZJ
i
V
I fir of District
ewport Peninsula Issue�Ny
each
Issue Description:
dboa
!riin
sula
anning
udy
T
LLt
RM
EM tLANMING
-\M 0E316M
Number
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change ,
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
A4r`�
e �, v
ca
�` "
Conclust
Action Plan:
.,
ME
0
M M M r M Itn m M I" AN. M mlm i M s M r in
ty O f District
�wport Peninsula Issue
ach Issue Description:
lboa
ninsula
Inning
Idy
'd fEANNING
Y DESIGN
Number _
Wx
Mid.
1 Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
,,,h
/
StatusQuo * Current Level of Activity No Chan&o'
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well _—Obje—aives/Strategie-s—
n6eds improvement/change)
'Possible Solutions or Improvements
/I
/
/
/I�'
. -s /
_ 1�
Action Plan: Yj ag
Z
1
I
M M M M Mon i M M AM- M M! i M i M M M
'of District
i
Peninsula Issue �� � - A
ewport
eachIssue Description:
alboa
eninsula
lanning
:udy
"t
t
IEEN PLANNING
IAN DESIGN
Number /
Positive Aspects orks well can improve)
V 00-9p 13�LQ.4/i ' ().f. L�JZ2�
Objectives/Strategies
U � 4 D U � Qu�e
Possibl Solutions or Improvements
ze
����
ram.
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)•
Objectives/Strategies
'Possible Solutions or Improvements
�lLVGe c2¢
„
G�e
,/l�l
ConclusonsQ/:
Action Plan:���
J
IN
M M M M M M i
M i .i . l♦ M! i M M M
M
ity of
'ewport
each
alboa
-aninsula
fanning
:udy
I�t
1
IRM
ME
Ii EN PLANNING
PAN DESIGN
District � �A�
Peninsula I
Number
Issue Description:
o� k
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No
,p�;Ole Solutions or Improvements
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well - Objectives/Strategies 'Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change) /l, _
r
ity of
ewport
each
i1boa
minsula
anning
udy
I"t
MMM
TER MANNING
IAN DESIGN
District
ue
M
Number _
Issue Description:
YID"& �p � 4� [ O LC
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
lei
Possible Solutions or Improvements
\DJ��6%
v�
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needsimprot/change)�
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
U W
aA" zcne
/
Conclusions:
V-Z
Action Plan: � ,J 0
I
:ity of District
Peninsula issue•''
lewport
each
Issue Description:
alboa
eninsula
fanning
Eudy
'$TEN PLANNING
IIAN DESIGN
�-
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)�
Objectives/Strategies
Po�sibnle__Solutions or Improvements
1
L e
Conclusions: t(/J Gr1 oc�
Action Plan:
ra
i i i i i i i i� .i • i i i i i i i i >•
Ity of
lewport
each
alboa
-oIninsula
tanning
-udy
("t
1
ma
t '
TER PLANNING
AN DESIGN
District J 2
Peninsula Issue
Number__
Issue Description:
Positive Aspects(Works I -can improve) Objectives/Strategies, Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
1 //
Action Plan:
a �f723-eoCeua Q�e� �e�Jr.O.e.�
rossime Solutions or Improvements
-/9 Caw�Zra¢vls� o
i
I
ity of
ewport
each
Aboa
:ninsula
anning
udy
RBAN
ESIG�I_
TEN PLANNING
-AN DESIGN
M = ! M =
District
Peninsula Issue
Issue Description:
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Conclusions:
Action Plan:
M M M M M M M MEW .i, M
:ity of
lewport
each
alboa
eninsula
tanning
Ludy
FT
I�
3t FA M
IAN DESIGN
District
Peninsula Issue��
Iss/ciy, Despti n:
QQ p
fin/ �/�/ / yr� eo � ,J U - �i
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
n ds i prove�m�ent/c an �/� ,�
Objectives/Strategies
( me�tB� n noaz
Possible Solutions or Improvements
�
( lYV
57ez-17
Conclusions: 0/QLZ� i(J 4 Lliurs� , l%ww�ifl2 ��/r>ffL
��.
Anion Plan:
Gf�t.�e�I l�UG ✓lu l3� �'`
m
! M i= M M i M .i. i M! M M M M i M
:ity of District
lewport peninsula Issue
eachIssue Description:
alboa
eninsula
lanning
.udy
iEA PLANNING
1AN DESIGN
Number
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
NIZ
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needsvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
Vd
Cot I—nclusions: sionse f� �p Lk %%% �%iQQ Gr G� / C�[/.� ch, A% 06� 4u-
Action Plan: -
M M i
„ty of
�>t
4ewport
each
'alboa
'eninsula
'tanning
turfy
'MEA PLANNING
IIIAM DESIGN
District /
Peninsula Issue
Issue Description: „i2iZ�i,���'��/IJ � •� l �/ ��-�-�-�—�-�
Positive Aspects (Wo s well-canove)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improve�
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
TY`5
Possible Solutions or Improvements
49�
Conclusions:,,.,,
I/'
Action Plan:
I
t
[1
1
'1
1
i
1
1
1
[1
i
d
II
i i i,. i i i i i� ,i • i i i i i i i i i
i . of
District cezmt, RALeOA
'Wport peninsula Issue AM- ' it)AAIP_'VLA Number
!ach
,lboa
,ninsula
inning
idy
Irt
r
MR
l r
rN ttANNINO
1N OrrION
Issue Description- F.,(U.p.R�lsnl ;1 5v✓hq,,��J,.r('Jnl ornyt�",,yu 0�1iJChAvG�i Ny�r/i
S+wQyl 61fpi%t�.,tits
NKl.ld Cn�ir., (��l tFu+i�rur (n cm�c+S•
`l.iJ
�%ItlnT p•IlI, Ism Pntn,•f;
/
Usc
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
COIXr;57I0A) HAS/MfNUeP FWX1AI6 o0j 0 7D
sYN.UMTS4 clr(HAM
AecEfr A LEVEL, of GoA.1GMom
IkFFI,Vt LPAY AP F•.A P.I.
MAIArmw cvlm T<(OFFD-MD ytanvrA/L'lU
ZALFAA WIPL LAIMI-AW
MA S5 AUD MEDIAN
tI d&IMA)G ADEOUATt
S RIG POW PD.UE @ SWaL 15 6a*-CARR'i0
UJATERWAY5-MY
we my
wAr�t rAx)'s
Status Quo : Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change)
xse RAAlp& H✓ ,( TMmr- COmwA Dn�
TPAFRc Ar Tar OF FAI;UtA.
11 rhr;s',r6.+;X0 (INV yrt, -fM i - �(Pt
RAL.@L, DMiNA Le•J7'tuA PME M.
VRCLVR 5I4NA6E T6VA1g5 66T Lo5r
coN6L TICA) IM SVMIA'A MrfiV5
MAIM -TRIP TO CGkMAL VALF04 tiFiKA/!r
A(;RAMS OFTRANAT- FUA)I BtEgRIC CW5
BkrXE CDME PMAI PEMMARA EMPFK
LINKS Mom DFF-srrc wKPI(;
ISO V °TURNS OU ML .BLVD • loccint71IDJr• To
MS1DL7_"
IM%NVE IUM •AWvP - WP :,YI.:,TFM:
G40KA7_7AM5 9NALW4 PEAK PAS.
LVDP SYS'TI-til M-,-MAP/NPOUND
Conclusions: 1.6,10 40 NK)UCl AvO S U,UA6t GCNSIOm m U TU(WS W/41NA70 /N OFF- 50"
ArJ1) MYE5 AT AU. T/Ate5 SIMG CAMUM N
IS 14117114AL.,
Action Plan:
-MAUCUj-
mop M .m M = ,= . M -= M M M
City of District C c tur.- rJ l• I :,
Newport: District Issue (Nr, a-;z
Beach
i
Balboa
Peninsula
Planning
Study
MASTER PJANNIN0
URBAN DESIGN
Number
Issue Description:
�Altt
'i>a.n n-I:a� Illo..n.cl Caw Vcm>)t ,..... ...;- S/Ir. {i,. ,.. ,_...... .......•.�
'1 r .$
�1rj Tr,�,-,. .,`rl,r'-.)•.,.)Ir .. .. ,. a. t:. IJr.�. C. a..),..: r,•L, ,, .-rr,�
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
SPr.�i•/'. tat$ \ .IJi (-1/•1... 1>
p
1 )• 11 •
.•v, .�.+J� L+>.. ,c nr U..,.r...,, r3.>,>
1'11 r.. •+q„n, C'pa n_,1-�
n:• ,2nr•o/
I „•YL:• riFn. ). �T. .1 ). .. r.. ,-. ilr.:Jt
`\
Ir6'[, %-N,V, •,. n�.l)
�1 . .r?r,\ VIOI••\ I, .:.aw „nq. 1.
Ilnq,rr,A• L i-.� n i>
M
`3
rnaD.N.l L P..'>,an l,p t� n.eMU
Status Quo Current Level of Activity No'Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs an eim rovement/ch)
P g
rnn.. c_ g n , Ln,.•.,n3Lc
P,.T,;1 ,d: %]0.n, or Tr
�..; nn, rro0;
C W,=N r,.,1 ul
�_ �G:nn)an rn .Iln.,
r p. ..s.., O)I c•.J )n
/s-, n�� r.-,� 1.?. uit,�a_
;: nr.c n,n1,
��..rtL >„",.;,.:_,.. din_„ r,"I, rr .�
t:.r•r L•+Ji,l ,...N r.•� s"t•)„>I:r, J.,,.-:,.,
., t 3n >/
t• (: EL[n� ,
C�,sa Y l �,._ .. "i , dan, .a .
J
i. 'fir n� r.. ;•.,>.+, r.,
�EUY�t •l•.
\1 p2n.vp OJI L
t'VT )t, �Jl:i /%'1
INiI YJ,n yiY ✓Y .J
Conclusions: .�� .. n I n•..•,.
�.
Ii•�1. 1+ r. �? ••.., 71„'i{„� L•.
1�„. hr•,✓c, ,s. I.,,.n:. n NL /„IY. I.JL
�
IJ! „•. EH rl•,.1l�r r, .(f.l' %Dv
LY.Isr �1
Jq.\, IMh,J jTi
..nJ
C .a n. ...... ... �... � ,.. •. .. .,. ) Sr.. et . pa.\ ,. o: r.Tr:ri n•.
4i•MIl
L \'d 1'. Plc.
Action Plan: �2'.. r_- S}Iig "�IYo:.:-
- ,. ..- tw• ... ...• Sr. ..:,- f 9 / \ •
S
nT -rbq
oT irc. 'I EN•
L
7VWFF,4. —o LGv U„...].moo •>.>
C„.l.r,.e..; \,NA+..
,
'�p,Llt,r.` .•-aCH Sn�T�t
a
" 1 -• �L.n-
C->oge.r.nT•n.-! \.- !r\. PLc �aronT r-.,o
Il rv,y �nn.
y of
wport
tch
boa
linsula
nning
dy
i
1
I
DIStdct CF1_ NL. $ALwA '
District Issue CIRCUt IWAI Number 2-
Issue Description: CIRWLA'UOA) RDUTGS -TD c6A)MAL SWCA P35VAIATIDUS (WF MI rMY FriCICA16l Laird �vmmAawsur) ARE umtw ARID DIRSCTFoNAL
Mx r HELP. FTAK *up' tuN665nO)J "TRAMS A£:IDEMTS AUD VISITORS ALIKE
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
GRID RAN FRLVIDz Grob wir- pz44EWCI IK
MAIN CORRIPOR(S"A SWo) I5 WIDE E1=6'1 TJ
AWW ALTVWAnye5 To 6E 6xADRM
VVORK WITH (7QID U.FMD_,TILVLU5AUD VEHICLES
ACCEPT LIMITS OF 5T&£r Sji, GgPAGTY AOD 5Er
REALKTIL 4DAL5 ON TRAFMc VOLUME TD EE
ACCOMMODATED AUD mouNI. OF ZoNGESTIDN
LOOK Mr, OFF-FKAMPSULA %U-MO )S _M 1P 01C
MAMMEMV)jT
WX HOLIS77C AR:ROACH 7D CIRCULATION-'LMN AT
Aj FVG_S AS WAY TD FRYMOM µW-YEHICUTAr
ro55101e Joluaons or
MEND GRID )AM fECA
FLAA) -
i51K HRS W/ AU PARYJUrT
tixji P,F- PvANSITACCE551 OFF•SIT6 fARKWCT
A0001-woDA% Mc TAUATj BIKEA5IVVA=A5 A5
Alai D21ORIT(
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
C44-MAToN 51 GNA66 AND RDUF65 "TO FsxRYA
FARICIN6 WTSI i'aks Ate un10.EaR
NOCLMTORN AR6oND W YILLA66
MAK HOUR UP6E5TIOM FRo5TRATE5 RESIDENFS
WK OF SYAkH/bAIIZZ •twnc; sicjvALS,
Objectives/Strategies
TL(HLP0wMTIOU FIA"ISIUM6B RAM
FT/"WC SMAIM TO RESIDPrr5 ACCESS CAlSFD BY
V161TDILS
MSIble Solutions or Improvements
?4WA omMroF CITI( 'ro SYAXskOMlzs SIGUALS(EI
MgINI )YA5R1A17W1 PAV4,
5f'ALWC AS FAQ14U4ZONEwHetEMOSTVISMZ
IPAMC. IS FONAkl�0 TD S1,V8 W.
Tg.'( "AA:D WW AROOMD FU YILIA6e
MMU NOU-YEH IGULA AWE55
6PA7C VA" FFDM YIIIAIE-DETMEDWFAG
E LIGHTS W/ DW/JD SYS.
CEMiPAL- rAL2rA 15 A SMALL. ACEA Co17M LOTS of A7TRAc110A)C, RR Yl;rtriR.(fwD rvRTn1AWi'Rt;l[EArTS>, IT WILL iSE CoA16EsTEv WNNr� F�EAK NOVAS, 'WepEkF6)HyW4CE CDA!GESTIC`N ANO FAMP1 /XN-t•;HICULA/� ACC655
CDOAD%NA_
Action Plan: FARkIUG^ S16MA6E WO r
I I GRcUtAT10A1 k.9N� 70 R,E CsTRD1UAlp AS PAfki((,E OF IN%'oYF,c1EM7S,
M
y of
wport
ich
5oa
insula
Ining
.ly
r� r r �r Ir ■r ■r rl �r • � -r
District r:( "f. ' i f•' f
No
District Issue ( 2&iCa Number 3
an *A w
Issue Description: lAf7 u1r, i-- A 11111n•.itip VIr,: r, f)••gr)tl!: nn'• a,
r<! •-I ".t.• f 4'i• ! %•l:r': •n 1:,!• Sf3�r.Fr r.11.•a Pr.. / Y 1 11'Y;Iwitr PIP, rr(oll Or I/r1+11', II•I(q I/l{, I'I I" '"' I$ fr:/q •r.%'{ Y/A'II InI r - ryJ• Ri IX'Ei llOr :J(A IS
7OALYX-j FARrip Uu05 o t /d1.1t6 f11 ..I.U. LA."•• )/(, ///,,):4(pt/y' (%Jti/�r;i 4 F RKID6Frj5, VISIT)R5/ 6usu,sss5, EMRoY[E,) E'jL,
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
)M Ity: F<F1'p),j %I :n')/ r -W) Et. f pen'LY i/qfo.+L FVW ? P 6WI 7b ErrC0JMU- PnCaM P4MI+r p
I; uA-n IYIr' lawns M ) 1bU11.4.6 PECK LQICH tut"
HYJ,f.:liJ t 1nA I.)I':'I(/)tY / r
5ET'F.Yr.t:M o&)ErrIVES fit P&I/MIXH r(•F"IN(I PryllDC riLD FWM& Iro Mr-:tA'a/11omisg-nME5
TC rFwIC=) FOR W11O) AI)F wockE Pr-H rA1,n1.f6q for AS g:Mvls w-r U/ TpAM sca tiC6
,004D DE"A MMM(i STAUM/15
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
rEACH Lar AA, imkricl&uri onfr, CVMe(f:�I/.IC
Accr=SL, 15 uI,1(Pmm-.TACLC(wIVJ ?)
It:'IIIIA•flr7/):� IAr:•1 rt(,.1;)rn^•r•a ;:•,1/ f.)l+',
Par KIM, ALL0tA7InI)1PRICUX, 11(fr ;nrf•;rrn!-, SHryfy).;
Conclusions: Fxs)u 1nv.I. %RwI--s /•n1,io )
IMPPTED Fr VISIr.)r• PN)0116
PEMO.&A rnv, rADCU;J OX )t!)Uf]DIA At 91 CO)VAL
IMIMAE IW-1r_. 'a:{C Q fSM.•I:,rll rn)y:•.-nra'1rTD
VILLA ,E.1 A))D IW4Ur S CAPACIT,'
FXPAIX) )P)k Uv, VIA
1UPIA( )f'/•FIi1r,J )/- .I1 .lilfi7l t•F•'/M
ILEMOIC f7/1'u>;1 51r 5,
U•/:P
Possible Solutions or Improvements
5uP.WY PAP4mc, Lor USpt�-pxY1NATDn1)7/ML-JIM.
HA MIC;•5
FltA.l(? I r/r,' VAR IOUs TIME :(.N)5."
I? awf/rrSY 11G) ItWrmtjrrOA)ITiI (Ili)V, tP. CxrePlFt"Wiff.W
rynp17Y,
AYuli, I. Imrli/• I1:,-RV%I WAJkl
I}Am :'I _: rrail ftnI)fi SrrEi-DVAIAWAK
PPDVIOS IWAI Nn PAFrII-,j
fMwi); fMx)Ar,Fyf/T RrN
PL-,IDU1T 84.4Dr, .•r••I-rpe
NCED OC,.I gW15 DATA OP OUSTW4 PnFKo)4 USE) PGU5TIC M6695 W.) AUW1IT))Xj V115 :r/).'r5 R£ay/F,�r VAI(T rAKittI)y OPPOA) ,^D.¢ RESnIiy/ r;c, 0rOLC 57P
"fi) P3.r1ErIT RESII{uri)V)SI'rdfS,I :!lIC:.:e';I ETL. PwllDe VIIADV�C 13AArRK,
PFnVIDL SPRIAL 7o1), [-of. IkiN7 rATPOHg
Action Plan: fJt'Egy!,c Stlnp-FMF�.ljII4�q).y, NAAvaRs rr �A) _ ELE(TU)r; IALLUDE eTF-SIM REeMpLe5 Prtiowt VAPIDIr, MMF yoNt; vrogzmet 11T•
ALu)('AT-9 CAPITg1. IMF/WLmWr MIMy _ D REDO OFA04 LOT* ) ) ) I
PU^,INE-SiES� TI))(a NOT RELA7rzipp IN%!My t:UILANCc CO1A09tNCt: OF lACk1UC,'jD N151NEy`$ES
BY GLDSER (tl:IA710NSHIP-ADJACENT.
No w
Jw)
yof District _cENrA,,,L NtpzA
xport District Issue MI) US\; Number
tch
)oa
insula
fining
fy
M)
Iffm
illl R
i eIANNIN0
1 0MON
Issue Description: Vl:ovl3tij �,�,,,, ,}e
� I �. cello
Positive Aspects (Works !we'll -can improve)
f6Jgies
4J411)N 9h�rLJOy �� to+A
I
Objectives/Strate
Possible Solutions or Improvements
AtyAV4 buck
I i92 Sl, ��+a�^fca Ihi jtfy
/ma%i4 uww OkAa94
1i �l,Uri j (ti ; jr,�
�j btu
o%w ih+� �eY u�Yp+l twbY�y »' Nu/oilify
�u� d°n'e"�
uColtu� �cc
{���h1an+mn`itMat}-Gto m.
"
Upd A RU4frWVJ dip'fiu �o 4o
5 attic — �nJiJ p s��tsN
Status
Quo • Current Level of Activity
No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs im����p"rovement/chan e) 1
(iMnd/ JJq,4 c�.dvv::GnyK1�tnttc�du-fM[ I5 (nwSt.p
Objectives/Strategies
Pq$gible oft1Lions or improvements
7i9h7A)cnl�Ga en/J%r A%ata..
J,M(dLI w.
Fa,XWO //Gtt.�.t 4,1G , vnn rV,v)Nv� Y
O)•w„Vte �1-
U44 fit%%" Q{Snatti
lc� 11 0%_Pam . /•rzP
II�"" II
Atw
sfiut.�(a��t�
waI, OCA6Lv� wh.p perry n' /
Mxo (tns dG+JraP-��
yn1U) FiIN'
IRa1 p�1�M G�hc�.tt.N r.��•-t{ Wk),A
/,
rn�>,L.L WtJ,, wrbP
CV e r. rAtMp, Pi3W.
WZURSIOM A N—ITOLlZ FRIYMMAmS
MULATF
)aj%
Conclusions 'r- ) t
•TD"d A)�+^I.f� Gr»vry�KCl n..�, i�I+•%n�jnt^�'I vr%', B,.,C'/ _ f��tl'•�. (.fi),.'Fj•'Ir, 6%'i
Action Plan: Oed(,cz �tta, t.tcv� �j7 e
06
so IM
ity of
ewport
!ach
ilboa .
minsula
anning
udy
� [A IUNN�N6
ISM 0[S��N
go no M »l1�
District 0EN7/uZ- 141—d-54
Peninsula Issue f1114A e161Y4NlOF .49tiA q.r e
M r W M W rs M
Number-4
Issue Description: ,pjr77�'/er- H.sr ,CXtjErr ('DAly,E,CG/9[. Lw.da 'L/J>5 - /leJi4.FAJT�i4L Fi
/u! DFnJT fEf[I/AJG CaM Fi'/cNT- /W-r LOli
h t el'/fL - visiTd2 r42di,Uc i DdAIIVIE ZZ/.t`G IS To d�I°rFiJ (1,�Nr ula�v (; ✓ dd
vNs 7*6 � To B,9 Sutr,FsrFRL — /}Icy IA�II� dosr.vuo kl=.cT,Q/a7'id.E �dlrllfl6,�EG/�G-,crr�t/.f l/QUP S�I�PFa
Oft��D2 ,C,E-Q.f!/, ^ M4[�IF /+bN G27�i�DIZH/.f�L L[SE — O,IF�f 4APs el,,,, ru,rl IMSNY'O FILLY
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
1)'9;- JPF-6lrie Ac4A) 6,4Ve Peat 11P0,0 57711=dGT,y(r - E�aJ[P�E
Ft�xeaury ro ffvEde�oP /SuSMJAs A!)d T fJ` arr�aer/vt/6Zfrn C�nVA6 ,&f fYp/�v�M�sf/TJ
z)Pf_4�ST,Z/AI✓ d,41P.au'reTiv,O DF 1yB/�li'U.fL/Y�U/S/Td2 D/L AM
p.E,0ES`l,�/.O.V��iTdR�'f///l/�
FNeDu2ACGr zjxtc r-x4r, 4,4r;r/,. TD
S
ST. 13 cr{lvNrFt6� Ato*/E J?MAKIn/izEAdRE1S/L/ff DF/j�R}i OdFRA717Z (JIS,TaR CP�tJpcLS
FR0n1r InrNlroU,s'r/Ei✓7- H-ls T/1T.fa F0 ,E41,Gs1-ICfc ,iES/OF.Id719L-�LFlk7JY�
�/1PrIAFN7S rF�EM /LFS/GA/!rA TO Q4/ta ,n) I VIG /IiGFNT!/�S fDC AdG And AURLvR. A&4'!S A0 1EOLCT.tI�,
DkIVJ,06' 41x7:2,V6,FS A&L zt&A/L,,tts�O_f 9eG,EP r At 114fet.Ir7-toc,".t (CMWAM txst
H ASC,FGSMF %" AlS77 1 ,!' _ IsIm21N�31��—C4rl5lt 7n! u/4r2 ,LOLL OF S,VON-TAzR ,PE7
Stz�Ea rMpkor�,nE Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change 1+ a DF !✓A/�etrte�r
7j9it'SIT-,C4e1jjTiFi(jDdy (lvrtt
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
A/d AR MP 7,F0r4'1U L 71AF 1,G FN/ AW4
tk_1V r7UL 4fr _,'eV 72MMC aF li!>Slt%s1
dI w?ar Is, i4aae oAb /NF�fEGr!!/E
>] LANAI) jS ('AAI'T frreter Qy,�o,ry
7"FIV4AIr4-4EX07- 7v NrtJ ,6T.1AF4&&' U
Action
['oilrouQ.t/,E//ZEOEfI,EGdP /1LIGylT�
_ac RI�CG/Nam cvn+�rcv2c/L
/7EFirt1E ,PFS/g6Nr SEstU/,�6 TiEAH.N!✓
TJ�r ,oeF Mira /.rJG -,2L-'c2ui7T/!d'IJ?
tAJ�s F1Y1V c;cj r . axw,U,0 To
E Fa2rx-rlc. /ukFaf�'S
/ /CeY. d,d FcM IL AAQJ CP/Cc'i c�G
xAUf1,l7- 1,Q0.0aek-Z 161177[1&' 66(511ers
Possible Solutions or Improvements
�FFiu/6 XASe),11. 64IJA Z(,fF ,,,de
/41Z
o Fv`U<w��HJTiL L�BFnxlGll�tk/W7-1
T,Y4/-d-.�",c PEr/o61c1Td gpzi ,h7,2
SF7_74,c eJ g T. rV,--_ d et,!srs ,a-
�OFsrinll/-ivAJ OuAL1)-v ft lAa2rL -CIZE
>rv/t�r PFo�dE�vPA��as .d�i�Jcy 11ae frS
AWT E V5E rmmjr5/ZONW4 Q° SA160RTRgor$� OF
f
1
I -
I •
City of District en rr ,r
Newport District Issue y�N;, �) . E_ Number
3each
Issue Description:
Balboa
'eninsula
'tanning
Ludy
t
AASTEII rLANNING
IAIIAN DESIGN
t_n,,•,>-. r,.,,.,.,,. ..
.1�•....._,...._
.:� „.>.•..�.-1. .,,r...,.1
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
•.:.1. 1a,..� r,.,_ ,. .,.>, •
_ ,:, � .� r'.I Ir... �,..,..
4. ,v.u. ,I,._c •.r,•,.—• _.•.>_-�,..���„ Y,
,,.I,:-
.,
•,,,,...
...,, ,.r,r.,r,+
c,.,
L Ian.) ,,,r.> . ♦ ...; ) Y
�,. ... . 1. -... ... I.. .. ., ,,.. ..
Status
Quo Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/change)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
`.,�IUFiI)L \; MIOIV t.gr,nu .,.
. I. ,.t i\S i... j.....(..,
-` +l I ,\Ir.
�•n
,L'I.a T)]. M..J J41 UN.>C_ JT,l 1i C)t Y•i/H/Hlf
,L. ,'n• i1�'.
„ Sa.... , ,. ` Aal.... ;,
N: ..,
�. •.. .. , :. r•.-•r •. r.,
0,
t•nld,rC. I. �Jti• Drc i, .n,, F,r ,. :.,.•,..P..;
�. ,
r ,,,,.,- A•: <�nr IV,1„�
il'rl, An.-.':�,. IaO. •.• •„ ID.I,.r Ir1,. ],na
1
'
>„ •.{r I, .• n..,
Ill o`•„ Y,4i 11i+atUW�
Conclusions:
Ni
nc„rr..
Action Plan: _ _
'7� ✓, St.
Win.. cyLE;�,;r Jnw4
Ind ,. r..t_I;,
T..v
�.,. ,..
Ic
mom *W S swim rl imlips on • M ■i M M&NU r M tM M
.y' of District. CA AnrA_l_I:.9 L11M
wport District Issue IMAGt _ Number 5
ich
Issue Description: W�WT_ 13 .fi+EM6 pF AR.EA
boa
iinsula
nning
dy
GLLAVUAIESS SECUPJ7`'?VIS 1-0IMA6E
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
-1FWPr
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
SW'34 PA06 MA cF 15MCA-1,09 RR UP-SrALE AIIX
ftMA" Apo HISTORY OF SALCoA
-
NEW Tp U5E IT AS REzvycA�
RND KW, et•77FRr ROALnY sTuze5,/MrANe Mix
FMIM COMMVViete?a UTUrL7:N MF7a�Ni5 �cU,A OFF;
DEVELOP NI57ORY SNOWCA%
CATY picks UP TM5M
MERMNAKIV 1AO(AP4 )tiff ID 13POAKA3 Aflt4L
CREATE A DRAW -M C-ET Reft+/iTY15nW_s
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change)
CttMUAJESS IN MUT of SILP65
KK FACADEs ,t w woRK
PRUMM u'/Mact+ TS A,UP C(TY oN aEAU)G
EA. W_rn rDOES THEIR 4%
fVU'=-- MSEMCE LAKMAV4 ATNIGIfr-yoW.X, S10TE-
20AAMZ5 ATµ16 / 44MP.,WEr6
MCfW PoUCE RZESE/.1A-WCC1AU:r ATNI(,f{T
riHAsdF -ja (p 7u zasvf)
AMAIINVALK 15 MkleY iv_,"
955DLVC VIA OIZCULA17M AF0 PA?k1N4
r `mr-Es, M fku -ry CAFroFF'rsymsut,4,
Conclusions: /S0Lv4,j(, ACR• tq ltRG 15 VEr1 UIPLE,
FAMILY REcAuAvoN ) MJ nACE'M 6E
Action Plan:
,
WrK.oF FW, TMFK OM LE. i3ALMA BLVD.
Tbo MANr *CAVSS�\
.irr.•r, ,. ..., I... .
WNltALI V% a 1 Ti -J VJt -Ivw-i IVNIrW/IYC>
FUICw- f2p cTO?- VISITI%1AAP I MA
SKI•.\[ • � •\
City of
Newport
Beach
3alboa
'eninsula
'lanning
to dy
AASTEN FUNNING
MAN DESIGN
M W go fm 111111111a 4=• M M* M 11111111116 M M M Ma M
i
District (' ♦ , i (, •,
1
1
1
1
{
District Issue 1 a, laf. ; Number
Iss-uTe Description:
ht �uf `J. n.. �r t, •la\, i CO, ..� l �> •:,rl+\x2 Tim..l Ki ncq�
14
,.•vut o+ IFA —' NP.4r S1t, r
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or improvements
.,_ TAM:. 1�
nl'c�.;, ,,_,R rpf r a 1'nu� � 7n1/r
r x1. 1\ 1'11n ...t.„,\, (, 1 • •I l l�r l..� \` 1\j 1' r.I1a
1 4'.. ... n I r r.•1 Il,lal...1 nr..
IJjrin 1 Y, E Q\.a �i,n IJi..•.J'f nfx tTn.\„n rli
Status Quo Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well - Objectives/Strategies
needs improvement/change) Possible Solutions or Improvements
L �7rw7E LEic
L1G?ni 4 '7rin.-, �� �nILKI
No PO 09. (,;N \ / Slr nT l�r h1>V SAirYf
f`- ,� '.ir..r � l Lhr d..n, Irllrz v. •-. 71.+x Svr. rfa
Una. , .\. u. •) C Iri : r'. rl . .�+ . =onclusions:
(,a a• Ian••:: THt.. 'd:•. • fncu•I ;m r i a�
h Sar ., rfu, v,e\r-v 1r nCin
Action Plan: t
1� ;. 7 j \ r� 11. IMc-,: a•.ral>,. i w .r .. _
r1,w4V;-i 4,y ta^ :r x.r I •pnni .. I' l-Ji.inP•. ut
` c.,...r_ ��• c_v, 1 { 1JEc:, �t �1 �Uon, 13
I
ty of District LI=MRAL C41VOA
wport District Issue ItAPLFMEAJpFn0A) Number (6
ach
lboa
ninsula
Inning
Idy
t �
iN PLANNINII
AN Of ZION
Issue Description: 15 FuuDiACt Pr-06fiAAl -
0114T AOC)L ISuwpoMIGS
1DOJ- GOOD IDEAS _M IMVLUMEIVT
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
SET MOR471SS
6Ej _MIkV?5 Pone
)TOLD 07%r 4CCCV1,TA8W
WILD A CvW_G i VISION TffAT- WILL t'A ky
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well - Objectives/Strategies
needs i ment/change)
Possible Solutions or Improvements
I.gCK OF FUNDSBONDS �1ND {j /(c>rXlLRCE 9
c4MMIT MONCY 4 pa-sW-c65
15THME Li:AbEASrRJP A1-017y TV 4e-T ?
15 THERE tk-AMsnlP PROM OfWMVS/MGxotgrr,5 C9MISINA7TON OF MUe-A'IVA7E FUAIDIN(r
REMgSIO/MVJT- pl-A
TO ACT ?
rRO"TY COMER A1.15
A.=lMC,ur pls7Mlcr 5uffWrrDpy r_4e04—THEN
LCP.Z`{ 70 CITY FDA MATCHW4
Conclusions: MW -to U,1)S,Dr7t lvNDW(,, xY/ArcS
WIZZY 17;9 RLITICAL SUP/igr rK wg1AL pAiLpq fA,ppvVCML;Jr FRV6PAM.
Action Plan: G,0 AFMk
mom 1= i(M M UMM OM• M Mli ` r m I• m Is w
b
City of District rr_tfIFAL RALI'uA
Newport District Issue Number
BeachIssue Description:A..,:rI;l(LI/r
Balboa
Peninsula
'tanning
itudy
URBAN
DESIGN
MA f TEA FIANNINO
OD/AN DE 310H
,•r./,'f.l•- :TnIaT`-Iall:,.,,irvrt_' :. I`Iv:�; r' ruD:'?FI/'l1 ERI�FtIC/,KGI
•'",'r/1E'
t/It1Ai{ LACK GTPE[T7ACC: DR OTHCR A^r A/t: TO eH'PLTCR
IFa111PAT SNgD(:RD YRD/� EAAYANUN
0, O
1)
cmR1AA.)D S/iADE rtNC-57NAN5) LACK 5Ta6tT FURNINRE
F'DTm-M SEZ5 OF VIUAEE) AND LACK STREE-r vILWE uGH7) �7•
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
p
�DAPPWALI. /1/In I'Lt51, y✓A'r•P;-CIFAU OP IMAGE ON
Rtnu/� ` DFTD F,,y ' r+r�fP'rllr n;rr -11.1 ''I ••r�:r (1jV11;'111iI04ZMLl1T
I• IN11C!; IMII'rN+/nI /Il•"• f1'l/i/'/t✓1.
"`EMWxADERcNre4LDD4 AtW eA(-0UTM
MAIA) Sr• 7REE5
51rnA)4-DIN/NCT1 RrMPVE ODsrACLES ID r.V= 0%
ACtrss TD NATER p¢F,trr AT•PAVIU.jON,
SIR"YLllki UNEp IO+iN CUIU)L(KI FrCAnTlES -CglF _5
INTEREST MR FMCSTRIgNSI VILLA6E
61VCS SCALE
TO STREE75
AMIIrrAIN BVIU)/NC, Mss AYOID
r }iDi.E$ IAl FABRIC
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well - Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change)
FE•LX1[ta1Cr A9�SS�H7r psTRIC1
I. A ALLEYS 6.f ) j�IV•I) WASHIUGICN,hWIN) COMPPEHSNnYE sT&'ETSY FLAN �`IM/)yVE/AEA'r'IFO6RAM
wlCEASIVSWALIS), Vr `+IREt?•f>�ES>>EWgINATE
WIRL:S
SIVEOVEWtAD
ART,DoPAA
:PJ
wIRUK,
'TOWN LAFk5 MEAT L)C4Mh)6-LCoNs CLcrED [O/1PAEHEA>;N6 s'iREGf-f)Vk,lY,kI;WAY L4HDU() To
I-ACK BFGATEWAYS
AUIYMAITiwiKs1a& UP FYRhf
E NCs TD YIU C6 CiLl'AM SW)`r OF sAFf wnwTH.rRlelmu, E ,
Conclusions:
INMLL aF+MTNe q AFSTHEKL14RAf)tR sTiz m Ancy_
WKIA) AND IMRCMFNF SV'L.CI SrArE fNPPR(Lrry_) r
COMF^RTAeIG 5 n. h.R E. eALL(X+RwL) E. l'A'fl E1a6 V/!•ltF.'I pact wA:Hlr](a7Li)
PLFA,AAn' ICr W/•lXy Lx )
cA aTE Dlsrl E 6 `. r._
fgAIN P•'NrDw.tLFC 'J}IAr V7i't IiipYIDE �FE)
U) F-- GATEWAY; Will I,E
1 I
7HE VIItA=F. M1D R"E: ' rip"d' trjNi):� 11D/+`• r e
� �Fl:tt PA, k117G TO VIUA4_ DI: �T'IPATMN.
Action Plan: PREPARE it516N/CON51RIKn0N RAUS FAR COMMOuISIVE STREEFwX 1AIfnVE1FM (PO"
PEFINC PHASIA)4 PF06RAM1/MPLE/4EN1A710.0 PRIORITIES
r6FINE WND(AI6 PR06P4M
DF M-sm
SIDEWAU
DE
% WAW.
PAI*IN4
r M
,ty of
ewport
teach
ilboa
Aninsula
anning
udy
r tw
a
District _r•l.l pf/'- I:f•' 1.
t
IWI M M
rr► r r r r. ,i■�
!r
Peninsula Issue- _-NPE.'/•f_= 7
Number _
Issue Description: flAi-rgrt P•LVD IS T116 OMC( RkT9 TWT- FTrAFf! .: r.^
Ar(r,. 7D IoHII)Z 11MMATTW5, ITS V15VAt- A-rV`FAAIGG
15 DN 551 0JTTA M 7HI5 /M1DRyl� 6, PoR iWD r'�Dj� CMG 11 f�K j}IE fT41jUSUlA. 1T lAq 5 UMDSrAPItKt j FELLsiRWfJ SG4L6
AD RESIDFj,rjAL M j AKluksS TRourA6ES GEUFRAt4y LA[K FW r
AMCTS tFrjnpr FU)1,U5D1A. A DPZ4jzY sPZMI. pt1VE T YARD
wn.rAPw[,�roAKIST EAtF MIXE-WAtl. 71S"GA)T,
Positive As ects p (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
7z/,?U FLOWS 'D. k. va' •1 TllFbuf 1 AU:s IANhSly SRES - VIA Oro 64s sTAtt �c�n�Y 94
PEN-�GLLCL �` /JEU) RC: WV RAL EWUU)(r /rAyE _ CUX=MEDJ/M CAghf '[ML CW fMR q4 L
�f+(O'JFKf OMI',ID/•fAlllt::'1) PBF4TF•n1 MOUF%f'CC/6E�F,,rS%;I1L�tli[.`�6f�/rufls/RFYa.AT�
BkM�IA
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work ---well-
needs improvement/change) U*' u�rp
CIFMFRMEDIM) P4P.KUX, wtjr4-,r TRAFM I$
1 /) trr, 7DO H4FIZMf-tfnUT( or-rr11.Ttr)w, 1
(7/tP.0,DWA) mr,Ftr v.rb rjrwXrtaj)
UGLY FF/+r),^ pq, V/All!. 1
-Arl:0I- to/+fi::rn'yr,j 7Ar-)/,=_
4rA1.6 of Mrf;T TDo WIDE.Movi ,w cute
PrI!-.IC,AI PObtEMrD
MATE A MMYF) ASMIncatA.1 RrAsgej
IAM6 MR T14F CORRIDOR
Possible Solutions or Improvements
MIMIMArE pi[OM�)1nsL7 fAl''f)','/NEjU/e1ftR
I)WI 1AL F/• l-11 Y,j ;n Itr (/.f, pl't '1-*U7r
siorv/ALKS, ro.Yl:TCrrr '."rCCrr FEr.ri
TAE•�R� AM) '11 SWiI� ^),rnu< A GF/rID WAY WIIItA EhllWrr TIIC /fMFn:.Y, TIC F'd tlet�
2•YJlV7Y A/W "', o.;,t:. IA.4 111r, l,�Nta v/'I K:A3Lb $1ViY/JI✓!; STFLrT iTrf: rip. SIV{c,
—PAkKA 1br n� )'1' •:� Tp1' io F-C 1-•r IAKOFMPA r: A 61'Ifr'n.E '1?1;Flti JIT}Ic u f , r : r r
r :. r[ t r „ ,I� T't �1 r>rFi iVLJ. t't.I })� ST �lftD arvV', 1MMVr.D. 0I7•:7r
Action Plan: P� MASTPrt P.W AItD 1M Ej4CUTa7TO,o PROGRAM
FREPAPC FVA)DIA)(j frj,GPAM
s ON
7vrrlu
+. .■■ ram,. �
1
DISIfICt LEA7TRA/ �LnDA
District Issue j4M6ErtFArr Number 8
Issue Description: Al �SfS 1 PAID re U'YT970L ) IMCLUDIAMCI INSUMAICC 1"
COME i tAA TH15 eoSr: 1 M 4NCLA M' Cnr/s 'P.35/�. • M44 L»m'r tjAvc pa.# TD
T1E� T oMo110"y—E1,151A '—Am' 5W-01 F2- W MMS94WL MGM=
NEED to C4NWAKC PFott74 0WA•F:2S/M6gZNT5 TO PAY K2 AKCA1T SeAYI(,1:5,
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies
8)D '
Negative Aspects (Doesn't w
needs improvement/change)
6Mw"I'uts POI )NVOLVED
51D CotlttgMouS pIFFICj)LT
Conclusions:
Action Plan:
WF tcNWA Z FMM 'ta-)e W A.MtWR1A7E 4
I`bR Pko►kTt HICIMT. awns
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity • No
HAVE A STAKE IN vILtA66
i
Possible Solutions or Improvements
HIRE 0_MWAI IIWM60;C'� 5
1" LD 961ATTONS F-� C17Y Ms�tlAuT5
11VIW 4iIT/J5 7w N ME�StIAAR 5 Ar�A
(2.ELICsruTS i
5PEVAL &VWJrS 600RUArAVA i
TO:uN DIWcMPY--MAILER
Jbr/.rj'rC1A!!f�-77N(q iNL Ft:NWSU44
Possible Solutions or Improvements
rMIDtk WD(,M 6ASED1 µ7r fENA/-r1—&4sW
RR BID.
ono a1T OT'( Rxtclg�
M dWM M r M M M 401011•M Mill r it M r �.
1
.ri
Ly of District LEYTM(— SAI,PtA
mport District IssueA'�FS PFVCS Number
ach
Issue Description:
(boa
iinsula
nning
dy
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
CHAA16G oN MAIN ST.
CPCAT5 QUALITY IMA(,E OVCFgiL itR f>AIINSu4q
bfW-0r
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity
No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
Objectives/Strategies
Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change)
OVptNpAD WIRfi51RtE51COY WIRESI sgwcr tpop,-
FW1vsvtA-wlrE 6ffbp,1-
WIDT1f OF SIDEMALKS
I.Ackor comJ� viit CHA)ZACT69,-IN PzsJXk7k%
W1W w/ r.ONSISTFW PAp WAY
URW� �SIG1J
sOM6 QtAAmSTi`)'IT WON'T' t3E cm-W
AND LOMMEFC L
C{V AuN
AND
CN1LWPA
5fA6
PARNG'� NFR GoRNErtS 4 DRIVEYAYS
G,tlizs ON-�, �— PARk1A.ICj
cID9
ntiT cwRE AMcG
IXK OF CMAD.oN SIMS AAID AYMIA45
C�+iEWA fs 7O VILLAGE
Conclusions: slAtg-A16KTAWWrAND 00 S:METti/tib to sT/lp- U4LU 901-Umn
Action Plan:
,
r� r•'. ;• r r r +� r r- r r +� s r r (r� � r
1 .x
5
•ty Of Districtl,4
ecF�T/J4 RPge zgSA
'Wport District Issue �CfST�LETI . Number
Aaeh Issue Description:
Od62H6A•G Lfil2ES/p049-Y GuySf Sr�/yd/cG ,D2c/�S,
Positive Aspects (Works welt -can improve) Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
/V/6AJ E-- /U A A11
Status Quo Current Level of Activity . No Change -
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well - Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvem nts
needs improvement/change) 2Gs/y/mt/e, 4/-Z- .0Ozreve,44 sp � 0 AS d� r;rtZA7'
j ISV4LG y / ea#-4P5 ,t./AIDS 4Nq Ass6c/47-6d
7# a Mo 57- ,U FZ2I •T1!/G--
e'LOMGA/fi L�r'u'rs Pgss ads¢
'Mb uSL'S .4,vA PO4e
IIfCYk15, ¢tIO'LILLtrt/ 4 �/J
Conclusions: 7,t�/�-Sslor�to �!d 9 /J/Ga /z/pp?/7`Y.4N0 S3Jc Ld r 4
G�Nccu2ayp
,4S A /R6.tJ/�JSu[� �cJ/Dcf P4,4 , /r 44,4e rid Ct/on/jF,g A.t/D/! a' :4
S'cJr�ho2rL�a l.�%1eoPL�3 VleC,d T.�s9To,Ae-crA,,, S 4C 400/�r14
G .Q
Action Plan: T M cJs7' r/9 /G � A P� 06 -,4C 4/E %�eS/Tldt/ uS7 As'Tc% 5/
A44s d04) .Gz-YG=Y /SAJ/qJG ErC I�tiO/�IIQU�LS �cl �(l6/41�402;%0� CAt)
f*�t RurCil-y /►rvs7- T-.ap.a��rsc�iu�
.Iboa
ninsuia
inning
idy
t;t
� t
It:IlAMM111
IAOtale:
I
M MGM i! M i M a-M M IMI r M M i� M
ty ,of District CAS
,Whoft District Issue, L%z�ryr_-r/cs Gt� Number q16
iption:
•
L�/OT.E/ bfi S/�EWAG/LS ENO ASSoGIbTE,I) %�C:4NT/,t/l�/�421C/�tJ� £zT�,
A/J1S Coeel&l1 4771&2/,¢6
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) Objectives/Strategies ' Possible Solutions or Improvements
t=- VeA) n142i2oW WaL./zS • LGgt/v qs /s qvT 11N/t=o2iii P"ff).93/ .
hl/7-// 4 Z117,0&etux •S'L 4 /Y7W,/f;?/7/Lor/2 �Ac//it/G �T�G4�11�`/N�
ANd �Mc- /44n)TiNG 21-I) Coo2/.tl?/-�, . P r✓N,6 !a71,V 6
C4N ;9,e 4xw-,a7-
,
Status Quo Current Level of Activity . No Change
Negative Aspects' (Doesn't work -well - Objectives/Strategies / Possible Solutions -or Improvements
needs improvement/change) In pV Gr 6 u12 B //I/A/? "7 p vyt c vrLg /N/4) 2
oLlJ/�L�_,rJa
c.4rzS % cz-o.<e %a D6tT2//f .ca 0/J A'I /Rl /r1l U n! %2lF e f,
ANe fkvras 6¢ //A/ZPS, OArM&7-&/29b P442ZWC. /,u
PAg&-T/G!1 G 4/269 �Al /! I3L►ID G6N7'¢2 br` l3 aGg�.e .�LUp
Conclusions: /Ac
Action Plan j*,, r
�/tJ0 fZ c�car-s�i��UA P2Gc/�G /sY,///IOv��v1GrN•TS
a 41o,C4 a.j Cullrraa/ orz� U,UT/c 2�So t Uce .
ach
Issue Descr
[boa
An
sula
inning
Idy
M
r.�
r
OM
,nr
[A RAMMIM�
sit■
ach
Issue Descr
[boa
An
sula
inning
Idy
M
r.�
r
OM
,nr
[A RAMMIM�
sit■
,
of District Lis-)Tpg-��
%Wport District Issue, 0#124141 7—,�V,-- 7-,yUp= � Number L
achIssue ggscription:
Iboa
ninsula
Inning
►dy
t l
't� Il11MMINt
AN .OI IIIM
7-92Z 0)= o7 o V-/ 7-/ r y /s i� ck/4,k::�
/rl1 IZC�S/OG'iJ7/4G �Gon�.r-i�2t/4L
.
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve)
LLIL•/ /4ar7 �O he- ga t?A
Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
ImAaova
C�x�aM/�tG�S^ f3e�W Gor�Y}�g
134 /N
r A6.US' 471"r je-'Xf)K91.-4 s
A)PW A id 20,Y1ooc�Gt�D D� �7oop �o�UT/o,iJS.
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
I ,•
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvemeniJdtange)
Objectives/Strategiet Possible Solutions or Improvements
-W&0 /v%tJe7 VOL VAJTa6oPZ
An•cu t re�rS,D�s/tgN6,¢s/
.4124U IT,FtrS
�004 �140D,zS ,9tG 6C)
A-'UA Nor CmST Inorzeg )2r,V/e°r•J ALG / 4'44A.0
GOLo2S CTC r4No
lLCfCoyuii18N0 �rl%D.G'�OIH,tIc
Conclusions:
Action Plan: p/ZCXli6G%S
%O/dCz 7,l�t %O Ge.L+�t+v.IJ/Ty iQ1:'S?0/47'14641s
Aa GliJGova,�CSa,�¢1"rE2'GotJST�jC�^/n1J�06S�'�� Q/j9GTTf�
G
�V / 7TT&Gi .VCT-104) 0dl !G$V/ll�k) n1 UST FV6c FsO�/^'.
r
I
I
ity of
ewport
each
alboa
aninsula
anning
udy
fU fUFMIM�
♦F enuF
District /far a04
Peninsula lssue __ A e _,C C& 7-/ c .0 Number q D
Issue Description:
A4 Q/G/AJG Too �J oa2 C62AJ6:2s AI N4 02r E/C=W4ys
2 . P.1 alA hs .
Positive Aspects (Works well -can improve) I Objectives/StrategiesI Possible Solutions or Improvements
i
Status Quo . Current Level of Activity No Change
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well - Objectives/Strategies Possible Solutions or Improvements
needs improvement/change) �, �� �,��.P CAtz r 9 4 e/G PAr� LU2�s �L�d
'GAris- SQc�GCz� /N 4.ccesX,4,vo T
,4.v.D 6- vv/J Q v�2z.�h Drzrdcs ciQcc�L,o 7-io.v pe.ar,S ! o ,�.t�-.,, Ca¢•Jc�2
,¢���ylv C2pSs W 4L.fit a,lG�sT
L/�/4i/Ro2�'Q �'ootcs 1�! ►/G G(J dYS,
2.g cac-� 01_0_Pav1, <,
N of District _�is t/ 7n,.2G geg:r
'1
,Wporf District Issue-. / �ctg Number9r
ach risue Description: C002
.9S WC[l_ A.O .21V47/D,V D1-
041, �G 14,VIAI, S1U��oGr.D,
TSf62 A TT�n1 Tid.{i ��rTC�2S L./LAG 1dLfJ.v�/rJ�S 6"TC
boa
iinsula
nning .
dy
Positive Aspects (works well -can
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity . No Change
or Improvements
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well - Objectives,/Strategies Possible Solutions or Im ovemenu
needs improvement/change) p�
VOL U- )7 )Z izC7. i//(YK/
Conclusions:
Action Plan: AS/� Gig r y %a 41717a /A) i4el9
4/JI/ Cz mmlr7so 74e7/o4) v,U )Z�Fvizw Mjjxrpj�::pAg,7- •. ,
ty of District cFAfl G SAM
'Wport District Issue,Mc ,ate t Mush `IFNr,
�ach
[boa
Ansula
nning
dy
[N FtANNING
-.N 91214"
Number Cr
District
Peninsula Issue
Issue Description: Y�r��U/�r��S
Positive Aspects (Works well -can irriprpve)
NA c t�2 ��p7�J<y. s S
tavlaosH�l sa�.�vtiTis�Gx
A.Py Moo1LlMfLY6t%" ,.ev t3SC'
i57L /¢iyt ca v ceW K�
10
Number .V ]pm��J�Sm�
Objectives/Strategies wuNrr e s T.,t+ Possible Soluti nsoor� e�
S
I ST /sr yrywl?
71ct91.r�e,csg� ievJ1'aN5 Zrsstitn is
O' tYs9he/M iT wo., rd PyC �tY 1'ro,
�3 r�x+a-Y %s-iuY�w�d -� LSsrS of, LteE PAAJ-iN✓ Jasr/G
BFF7V I�'or 27sa*'/oot4i Tm REvi s wou/d )'�8 A r3a Ps+Aio-
�h�-,L��icav AuiGTT.�c.e�Y�trE E+vac,ti�. /srss � ev�2Q'zema
.open/G-e. Me. e-- 7NE Iftw Jzeer
r4r7-yRMrt 4a� c,b, >o�. QI-T5EAc-aAPuvT&ay.�..yS &A
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work -well -
needs improvement/cha
USW Pr5
nT iThE &f4ngC SST stir
R fW7'oN lNC CO19S71
c..Eyr ems ,:- a., Hi vxscAfovcy f ocic
xi ee srrse�7cor�Qes7. Urevlci'
'Ire9urs c,Ty.f�n�v�NS- �v- SLii�
Va�assy�a fr+c-1-o2, . V!(�/TINrY4Gh7
4,�Ty a tv> D,ST�YbE
Action
Objectives/Strategies j�,je,E ¢o
4W.S IhFieE wcss, .av as.Su, s,t�E
:•F4S caNcc/� /�. E NCw C�du'g7:
I u I swcrLC.tcyF�t
'THe'e�a.at.t, cr,tl�l-w+aT�yLw,aYg
tow „ul-.coHw� ,�tovc yritzY c3
rosstoie botutions or Improvements
<'am9 SpyiNFD^S� XC-
ACLsyrc��y�.s� 4�.K intTa
tr,Cvt. rr tl?,�,c,� i a-..• N�X, e
C1lYCBL.Fr g,e.��.3, . < nce rt,�tC tt-Q
i 2cf.&vc.
bt
. -SA
c.9AJV5
szew.g-
s
--�ity of
4ewport
each
alboa
°aninsula
'anning
udy
'1's11�11'lt�
MA rtANNINO
.AN D[tIDN
M M i M M. == M M== i i-
District c..gfir,�a� qt .x,w
District
Issue Description:
Positive Aspects (Works well -can im rove)
w5C[- PraTCr7-C�•Nnrtse�
sc+rex H+Az��.71�7�l;
f�s>•rbgsL �S U�. �/
ALL, ►'heslLr�IrfS k}re' wCLL
KsPr.
Negative Aspects (Doesn't work-wel► -
needs improvement/change)
8iv� ctfg.vis-�.
.S.Errcx e.m.-c ,
�-tcLvcx•YTaiu k /�rfcy@Q-
Conclusions:
.br,.
Number
uP 6r.odC r�ny meex�✓� . Possible Solutions or Improvements
1ao.a7+s, se r.a� .Ur.•E PSrnpt /N,�/nrt-e` v '
��F•fSrc-p. R� r-+srrcc2s
So.+.6 I�r�6 .juw� GNC�3o+cy/trosT �s o/'CAnn
T/yes-TE`Xi RE S.st� or P1-o✓iv� S/E'�o rca c��p 3��i/�,
PSo�t �' xu��,Jrp p'Y �• �v+w� cc9r ST+iTi
• Ptovr vE �K/� STewa9t'
Ay7.sh tg Lu4T�kt SsipN'Lf/r
Status Quo • Current Level of Activity No Change
/V,1r Hfu Gla.-Cq.aJ'7i�C-
�.Y�rroK.
n,
v�Iule botutions or Improvements
Pr Z5VidE' Q 7CrVLG6 9"LA-
4r A Cl.wA7,6-.
»erMA-- 'Z~r)-m.ee, o� 7--* $k
'rj U4.A� -,'l7 is
E3sr G*,V5 .0;7- PVbr.G S%
NEEA .4aarT.o�,�,L
r�ic/G .Jy�s.
I