HomeMy WebLinkAboutCARDIAC_SERVICE_ADDITION111111111111111111111111111111111111111 lill III lill
Joseph L. Boyle (714)957-8144
2098 South Grand Avenue • Suites A & B • Santa Ana, CA 92705
J &RCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING COMAONS •t y
ephoneaf M Plan Check No:
By.Genia Garcia. Associate Planner
By:Marc Myers, Assistant Planner
Date• -e I Addre(
Districting Map No. Land Use Element Page
By:Christy Teague, Associate Planner
Corrections Required: //Z )
Legal Description: Lot T Block G Section Tract
Resubdivision required t/isiine lots or portions of lots when cone r t on or
alterations are in excess of $20,000.
Covenant required. Please have owner's signature notarized on the attached
document and return to me.
Lot Size
Zone r ( /
Proposed Use
Front -
Rear
Right S
i ARE'�
Left $ids � L11 (^
FAR WO SHEET
Lot area (site area sg. ft.) : G/L/G//!Jr/,q. ft. f�
Base Development Allocation (BDA): Comm sq.ft.
[0.5 x site area sq.ft., unless otherwise specified in Land Use Element]
FAR permitted, without variance: (A) Comm res vka
Square footage permitted: comm res nka sq.ft.
[(A) x site area sq.ft.]
Maximum FAR allowed with variance: (B) comm res vka
Maximum square footage allowed: Comm res sq.ft.
[(B) x site area sq.ft.] ,j
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(C) Base FAR use sq.ft.
(D) Reduced FAR use sq.ft.
(E) Maximum FAR use sq.ft.
(F) TOTAL SQ.FT. [C+D+Ej
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
PROPOSED FAR: [ F % site area sq.ft. ]
PROPOSED WEIGHTED DEVELOPMENT:
FAR Use Category Weighting Factor Weighted Sq.Ft.
(G) (H) ( G x H 1
ft. Base
sq.ft. Reduced
sq.ft. Maximum
TOTAL WEIGHTED SQ.FT.(May not exceed BDA)
Provide tissue overlay of
Required Parking
X 1.00 sq.ft.
X 1.67 sq.ft.
X 0.50 sq.ft.
ulationq�, to verify provided square foota
PAM
Proposed parking (Indicate numbee of stalls provided)
Total On -Site Parking / 1QS
Standard Compact EX/57//✓6�-' AJ CW14 p
1 In -lieu Paa,7
l�Y �4� 2 0 g i.. a'/f��'— �I
Dimension b it¢¢i/i� height as measured f�qm na_�a� grade to average and maximum
roof height /�{A /E ✓� /S? m . �f
Show natural gD line on all elevations
aEShgpr y1L rocaftop mach i al ec�uiffLLnn���nt ;d d nsion from grade directly/below.
indicate location of trash contain s�plan.
Number of stories
Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses.
Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in
relation to the property line.
e A
Fair
9
San Joaquin Hills Transportation
Fee
4
Please indicate any discretionary approval numbers on the plans and incorporate
the attached; excerpt of minutes and list of findings and
conditions into the blueline drawings
approval letter into the blueline drawings
Modifications Committees Indicate Approval No. on Bluelines
Modification required for
Planning Commission/City Councils
Use Permits No.
Variances No.
Resubdivision/Tracts No.
Site Plan Reviews No.
Amendments No.
Other _
Public Worket
Easement/Encroachment Permit
Subdivision Engineer t
Traffic Engineer s �f
Approval of Landscape Plana �y
Building Departments ` /V"Y
Grading Engineer ` �}
Parke Departments
Approval of Landscape Plane
Coastal Development Permits;
Approval in Concept (AIC) No.
(Notes File 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and elevations)
Coastal Development Permit: No.
Effective Dates
Waiver/Exemption: No.
17 4 Effective date:
i
NOTE, it is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and
obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above, if you
have questions regarding your application, please contact no at (714) 444-
3200.
FORNS\COMN-ZON.COR Rev. 1/93
4#
To: Building Department iC7 No Activity:
In Plan Check -
From: Planning Department Active Bldg Permit:
Public Works Notified:
Re: Hold on Building Permit Final Plan Checker Notified:
—
Address %CJ/V�j Plan Check No.
Planning Department Comments PRIOR TO RELEASE Of Building Permit Final:
Park Dedication Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
Fairshare Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
S.J.H.T.C. Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
Coastal Commission Approval of Resubdivision Must Be Obtained.
[ ] Parcel Map Recordation: Resubdivision No. Record date
[ ] Use Permit Conditions of Approval: Use Permit No.
Condition(s) No.
(] After recordation of the map a building permit change must be processed with
the Building and Planning Departments, PRIOR TO FINAL OF THE
BUILDING PERMIT, to change the description of the permit to reflect
condominium construction, the fee is nominal and payable at the time of the
change. Proof of payment of the above mentioned fees may be required at
that time if not collected at issuance of the original building or grading
permits.
�(f Other: �7
Other:_
Units Demolished
B/ date
Planning Department
CC:y Code Enforcement
_Plan Checker F:\WP50\JAY\MEM\BP-HOLD.MEM rev 4-5-90
Units Built
t_ i ..MERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING COB IONS GG Telephone: (7141 644-3200 Plan Check Nos p /d� , T
By:Genic Garcia, Associate Planner By:Christy Teaoue Associate Planner
By:Marc Myers, Assistant Planner By:
Date: V i25-' 5 Address: L214
Districting Map No. Land Use Element Page No.
Corrections Required:
Legal Description: Lot Block Section Tract
Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or
alterations are in excess of $20,000.
Covenant required. Please have owner's signature notarized on the attached
document and return to me.
Lot Size
Zone
Proposed Use • L� c
Required Setbacks
Frontj�2�G2
Rear
Right Side
Left Side
FAR WORKSHEET
Lot area (site area sg.ft.):
sq.ft.
Base Development Allocation (BDA): Comm sq.ft.
[0.5 x site area sq.ft., unless otherwise specified in Land Use Element]
FAR permitted, without variance: (A) Comm res
okc
Square footage permitted: Comm res nka
sq.ft.
[(A) x site area sq.ft.]
Maximum FAR allowed with variance: (B) Comm res
nka
Maximum square footage allowed: Comm res sq.ft.
[(B) x site area sq.ft.]
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: G
'
(C�) ase FAR use sq.f
sq.ft.
(D) Reduced FAR use sq.ft.
sq.ft.
(E) Maximum FAR use sq.ft.
sq.ft.
(F) TOTAL SQ.FT. [C+D+E]
sq.ft.
PROPOSED FAR: [ F site area
sq.ft. ]
PROPOSED WEIGHTED DEVELOPMENT:
FAR Use Category Weighting Factor Weighted Sq.Ft.
(G) (H) ! G
x H )
sq.ft. Base X 1.00
sq.ft.
sq.ft. Reduced X 1.67
sq.ft.
sq.ft. Maximum X 0.50
■q.ft.
TOTAL WEIGHTED SQ.FT.(May not exceed BDA)
Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify Provided square
footage.
&YZLz
f�
Required Parking.
Proposed parking (Indicate number of stalls p vided)•
Total On -Site Parking
Standard Compact
/ In -lieu Parking
�[Ci� Dimensionhheighh,t agg i aetural grade
to average and maximum
hbuilding
Show natural gralfline on all elevations
Show all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below.
Indicate location of trash containers on site plan.
Number of Stories
Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses.
Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in
�7 relation to the property line.
t Fair Share Contribution�2�re/1/%%/�/��
C7v San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee
Please indicate any discretionary approval numbers on the plans and incorporate
the attached] excerpt of minutes and list of findings and
conditions into the blueline drawings
approval letter into the blueline drawings
Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No. on Sluelines
Modification required for
Planninc Commission/City
Council:
Use Permit:
No.
Variance:
No.
Resubdivision/Tract:
No.
Site Plan Review:
No.
Amendment:
No.
other
Public Works! n�
/ Easement/Encroachment Per d,t
Subdivision Engineer
Traffic Engineer
Approval of Landscape Plans
Buildino Departments _
Grading Engineer
Parks Department:
Approval of Landscape Plans
Approval In Concept (AIC) No.
(Notes File 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and slevatic
Coastal Development Permits No.
Effective Date:
Waiver/Exemption: No.
Effective date
4
NOTE, It'is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and
obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you
have questions regarding your application, please contact as at (714) 644-
3200.
FORMS\COMM-20N.COR Rev. 1/93
i
To: Building Department -& Izz No Activity:
In Plan Check:
From: Planning Department Active Bldg Permit:
Public Works Notified:
Re: Hold on Building Permit Final Plan Checker Notified:
Address -so— _ z&w 6& Plan Check No.IV
�d
Planning Department Comments PRIOR TO RELEASE Of Building Permit Final:
[ ] Park Dedication Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
[ ] Fairshare Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
[ ] S.J.H.T.C. Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
[ ] Coastal Commission Approval of Resubdivision Must Be Obtained.
[ ] Parcel Map Recordation: Resubdivision No. Record date
[ ] Use Permit Conditions of Approval: Use Permit No.
Condition(s) No.
[ ] After recordation of the map a building permit change must be processed with
the Building and Planning Departmerifs,- PRIOR TO FINAL OF. THE
BUILDING PERMIT, to change the description of the permit to reflect
condominium construction, the fee is nominal and payable at the time of the
change. Proof of payment of the above mentioned fees may be required at
that time if not collected at issuance of the original building or grading
permits. Other: /a/ 4,&
Units Demolished Units Built
BY
Planning Department
CC: // Code Enforcement
_Plan Checker F:\WP50\JAY\MEM\BP-HOLD.MEM rev 4-5-90
is
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITIO�
MITIGATION MEASURES
May 1994
Doesn't Apply Applies Doesn't A
/6
x
I
l
I
• �i
a,
�I
�uiYl
_
i3
34
01
I35
�
1'N1�
�MAAr
J
we
a
45
46
47
J 48
49
C• iac Services Addition, cont•ed
m Doesn't Apply Appli
�p�,er.Q g 69
x 70
X 71
X 72
Ki
51
D �% �GlX
75
X
52
X
76
X
53
X
77
X
54
X
78
X
55
X
79
X
56
X
80
X
57
a (C9 X
81
X
58
X
82
X -
59
X
83 X,
60
X
84
X
62
63
64
Ll
4ZA ,�7
F
•
Cardiac Services Addition, continued
Applies Doesn't Apply Applies Doesn't Apply
5 X
69
X
46 X
70
X
47 X
71
X
48 X
72
X
� � �
73
X
J
50 X
74.16
X
51 X
75
X
52 X
76
X
53 X
77
X
54 X
78
X
55 X
79
X
56 X
80
X
57 0 X
81
X
58 X
82
X
59 X
X
60 X
84
X
61 X
L85
wA
62 wl X
X
63 X
87
X
64 X
F X
65 X
X
66 X
67
X
68 X
9 X
��r
m
O
C• iac Services Addition, continued
7
Applies Doesn't Apply
Applies Doesn't Apply
I
I
I
I
I
I
9
J
Cardiac Services Addition, continued
m
EM
'
9�
11v
118 x
X
119 X
x
1 x
x
"
121 x
X
��
122 x
9
x
1 x
100
X
101
X
ly0jj
X
103
X
X
x
X
x
108
x
109 A
x
1
x
/113
x
,
X
114
X
115
X
1
x
J
Im
0 6
FAIR SHARE FEE MEMO
DATE:
TO: Rich Edmonston, Traffic Engineer
FROM: Genia Garcia, Associate Planner
Please provide a Fair Share Fee for f9DA"- h/a5"olT14z� ''/UN-i-� ie 1 1,4-6--
✓/L' located at
Cam -,OPUS
A Traffic Study No.
Other approvals:
This project is _
Other comments:
was approved on
is not in plan check.
o i
'g � 9g, /�
SENT BY:HMC GROUP 4-94 ; 16:32 3270 INLAND E� E-+7146443250 :# 1
r --�
G
HMC
TRANSMITTAL/FAX COVER SHEET
[I"7 FAx
Number of pages to follow
Time sent!
Phone number faxed to
COPIES NUMBER NUMBER DESCRIPTION
1./
DATE.:
JOB NO,
VIA : [ ] Mall
[ ] UPS
[ ] Other
THE FALLOWING :
[ ] Originals
[ ] Specifications
[ ] Prints
C] Addendum
[ ] Other
FOR YOUR:
[ ] Information
[ ] Action
[ ] Use
[ ] Records
ACTION REQUESTED:
[ ] Approval
[ ] Review and Comment
If you do not receive all the pages
please call :
(909) 989-9979 Ext.
co : F(le -�60
BY: ! K/06E 601-
HMO GROUP
Corporate Offlae; 3270 Inland Empire Boulevard, Onterlo, CA 91784-4854 Tel 809/908-9979 Fax 000/483.1400
Archltaorrua • E0900 drp a kifedore • P/anndfp
hze 101
SENT BY:HMO GROUP 2- 4-94 16:32 3270
I
can
A� eye
DOZ
r _ANNIMG Oce„RTMENT
,-ry OF NFWPORT BEACH
AM MAY 11993 PM
7i80001ll11211120 4A6
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
.101 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX Y • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658-8912 • PHONE (714) 645-8600
April 27, 1993
Ms. Pat Temple
Principal Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915
SUBJECT: CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
REFERENCE: REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURES
Dear Pat:
Thank you for meeting with us last week to discuss the applicability of the master plan
mitigation monitoring program to the proposed cardiac services addition (CSA). Based
on my notes, the following measures were discussed and will be required for the CSA:
• Mitigation Measure #38
ii Mitigation Measure #45
• Mitigation Measure #105
• Mitigation Measure #120
• Mitigation Measure #123
Several mitigation measures were also discussed which were determined to be
inapplicable to the CSA, including:
• Mitigation Measure #30
• Mitigation Measure #31 (no additional requirements specific to the
CSA project. Pilot project required as part of this mitigation measure
is ongoing).
• Mitigation Measure #101
• Mitigation Measure #102
• Mitigation Measure #103
• Mitigation Measure #104
• Mitigation Measure #108
A NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACCREDITED BY THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS
J
Ms. Pat Temple
April 21, 1993
Page Two
The Planning Department also requested that external lighting, skylights, landscaping and
ADA requirements be addressed when the plans for the CSA are resubmitted for City
review as discussed in the meeting minutes.
We will be resubmitting plans on the CSA soon.
Sincerely,
/�1�e—wktl
Leif Thompson
Director of Major Projects
PM:LT:sas
cc: Janet Divan
Genia Garcia
Peter Foulke
Barry Klein
Peri Muretta
r ('
yx
FINAL FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS f
FOR USE'PERMIT NO. 1421 (AMENDED) "P"
AND
TRAFFIC STUDY NO.79
AS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL,
ON NOVEMBER 25, 1991
A. Enviromnental Document: Accept the environmental document, making the
following findings and requiring the following mitigation measures:
indin s:
1. That based upon the information contained in the Initial Sti iy, comments received,
and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project, as
conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study,
could have a significant effect on the environment, therefore a Negative Declaration
has been prepared. The Negative Declaration adequately addresses the potential
environmental impacts of the project, and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA,
and is therefore approved. The Negative Declaration was considered prior to
approval of the project.
2. An Initial Study has been conducted, and considering the record as a whole there is
no evidence before this agency that the proposed project -,,-rill have the potential for
an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the Habitat upon which wildlife .depends.
On the basis of the evidence in the record, this agency finds that the presumption of
adverse effect contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the California. Code of
Regulations (CCR) has been rebutted. Therefore, the proposed project qualifies for
a De Minimis Impact Fee Exemption pursuant to Section 753.5(c) of Title 14, CCR.
Mitgation Measures:
1. Prior to the completion of the final &sign phase, the project sponsor shall
demonstrate to the City of Newport Beach Building Department that all facilities will
be designed and constructed to the most recent seismic standards as specified by the
Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
2. The City of Newport Beach shall send a letter to each emergency vehicle company
that delivers patients to Hoag Hospital requesting that, upon entrance to either the
Upper or Lower Campus, emergency vehicles turn off their sirens to help minimize
noise impacts to adjacent residents. Hoag Hospital will provide the City with a list
of all emergency vehicle companies that deliver patients to Hoag Hospital.
3. Prior to issuance of any building permit (or commencement of construction if no City
building permit is required) the applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning
Department that the lighting system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in
such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare
to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a
•A 'a:may : „i
licensed Electrical Engineer, with a letter from the engineer stating that, in his
opinion, this requirement has been met.
4. Roof top mechanical equipment screening shall not extend closer than 15 feet from
the west edge of the structure, and no closer than 10 feet from the edge of the
structure on any other side.
5. Noise from roof -top mechanical equipment shall not exceed 55 dBA at the property
line.
6. Hoag Hospital shall pay 759o' of the cost of planting 30, 24 inch ficus trees (or the
equivalent) in the berm between the service road and Villa Balboa southerly of the
tennis courts. Planting shall occur on Villa Balboa property.
7. Use of the heliport/helipad shall be limited to emergency medical purposes or the
transportation of critically ill patients in immediate need of medical care not
available at Hoag Hospital. Helicopters shall, to the extent feasible, arrive at, and
depart from, the helipad from the northeast to mitigate noise impacts on residential
units to the west and south.
B. Traffic Study No. 79: Approve the Traffic Study, malting the findings listed below:
Findines•
1. � " That an evaluation of the project related traffic has been con ucted by the City
Traffic Engineer which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation
system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and
Council Policy S-1.
2. That the City Traffic Engineer indicates that the project -generated traffic will neither
cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major', 'primary -
modified', or 'primary' street. T
C. Use Permit No 1421 (Ame-n edl: Approve the Use Permit with the following
findings and subject to the following conditions:
ER& s:
i. That the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Element of the
General Plan and is compatible with surrounding uses.
2. That adequate parldng will be provided to serve the expanded emergency care
facilities.
3. That the approval of this amendment to Use Permit No. 1421 will not, under the
circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood,
or be' detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or
to the general welfare of the City.
Conditions:
1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan,
floor plans and elevations.
2. That this Use Permit shall expir unless exercises within 24 months from the date
of approval as specified in Sect )n 20.80.090A o the Newport Beach Municipal
Code.
E\wP51\PLANNING\CAROLYN\FF&C
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 2, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil 61!f-
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 3
Comments: A follow-up study prepared by GeoScience Analytical, Inc. regarding
methane gas at the Cardiac Services Addition site was inadvertently
submitted to you on July 8, 1994. That study was in draft form only.
Enclosed for your files is the final follow-up study (to the April
18,1994 study) dated July 25,1994, which contains modified
recommendations from the April 18, 1994 study.
The recommendations of the July 25, 1994 study will be implemented
in conjunction with site development.
GMK: bw
Enclosure
File: 1250.36-36.31-4MIT.MEAS.3
PHASE 2 HAZARDOUS GAS EVALUATION
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
Submitted to:
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Blvd.,
Newport Beach, CA
Prepared by:
Box Y
92658
GeoScience Analytical, Inc.
�1s4�lG'C E. RUg)
July 25, 1994��.�E
NO. 01680
EXP. JUNE 30, 1994 /*
4454 Industrial Street_
Simi Valley, CA 93063
(805) 526-6532
GeoScience Anal4cal Inc. The Gas Busters" s*80
4454 INDUSTRIAL STREET SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063 (805) 526.6532 FAX 526-3570
25 July 1994
Mr. Leif Thompson
Vice President
Facilities Design and Construction
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100
RE: CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION:
METHANE GAS EVALUATION
Dear Mr. Thompson:
Subsequent to site grading on the above referenced project, we conducted a
Phase 2 Hazardous Gas Evaluation as a follow-up study to that previously submit-
ted report dated April 18, 1994 entitled "Hazardous Gas Evaluation Cardiac Ser-
vices Addition: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Huntington Beach, CA"
attached hereto as Appendix I.
Previously reported data identified methane concentrations as high as
41,431.0 ppm (v/v) at a depth of 4' below existing grade. Methane concentration
isopleths, depicted in Appendix I - Figure 2, attached, identified a soil gas anomaly
of unknown origin within the northwestern portion of the subject site. Based on
available data, methane remediation was recommended for incorporation into site
development.
Following site grading, an abandoned water pipe which contained a
hydrocarbon/water mixture of unknown origin was removed from the excavation
area and the underlying soil assessed for petroleum impacts. No soil
contamination was identified.
In order to assess the current hazardous surficial gas potential on the sub-
ject site, twelve (12) soil probes were advanced to a depth of 4' on the site following
completion of the grading operations. Soil gases were collected from these loca-
tions (FIG. 1) and subjected to laboratory analyses (TAB. 1).
Following grading operations, the site was void of methane and other low
Environmental Audits • Hazardous Gas Engineering 9 Litigation Consulting • Petroleum Geochemistry
molecular weight hydrocarbons significantly above background concentrations (5.0
ppm v/v). In the area located in the northwest corner of the site, however, methane
concentrations were slightly elevated above background concentrations reaching a
maximum concentration of 33.9 ppm (v/v) at a location 13' north and 37' west of the
northeast corner of the proposed Cardiac Services addition (FIG. 2). The anomaly
Is similar to that previously identified (Appendix I: FIG. 2) prior to site excavation
except for the significant decrease in hydrocarbon concentration following excava-
tion which resulted in a 99.92% reduction in methane concentration.
Current hydrocarbon concentrations pose no negative impacts to health and
safety. Based on the reduction in methane concentrations following excavation, the
source of the methane is most likely residual methane produced through bacterial
decomposition of organic matter.
On account of the results reported herein, previous recommendations for
mitigation may be no longer be warranted. In order to provide monitoring of subsur-
face hydrocarbons within the existing plume area, the installation of two (2) perma-
nent soil gas monitoring wells is recommended. The wells should be installed
immediately north of the proposed structure and monitored quarterly thereafter for a
period of three (3) years. In the event methane concentrations do not increase
above 1,000.0 ppm (v/v), monitoring may occur semi-annually thereafter. Should
methane concentrations increase to 5,000 ppm (v/v), an electronic methane detec-
tion system should be installed within the proposed structure in accordance with de-
signs prepared by a qualified methane gas detection engineer. No subslab or other
mitigation measures are recommended for the subject site other than those identi-
fied herein.
We look forward to speaking further with you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely yours,
- n /I
cc: Per! Mu
.�,._, ..._.._ i._.,.,, b...s .tlMa • •.... 6s.,.W ....� �►
i*40A,
Existing Raised
Planter
C
VJ
LEGEND
O Soil Probe
Proposed Buildinq
SHEET
GEOSCIENCE TITLE: PHASE 2 SOIL PROBE LOCATIONS
ANALYTICAL, PROJECT: PROPOSED
INC. 44541ndustrial Street CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
Simi Valley, CA 93DG3 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
.c a
CHKD
BY:
DATE:
DWG.
NO:
F4-20.0 rt—►I
1575
Lip
FER
7/05/94
1
• .... r_
. � .�r •wy
M.+.11
Y. �� �a..wpY WO
Existing Raised a)
Planter
'a
c
CD
0
0
0
1
LEGEND
O Soil Probe
GEOSCIENCE
ANALYTICAL,
INC.
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93M
Proposed Building
30.0 ppm
15.0 ppm
:.: 10.0 ppm
so
0
x�11 n
If-20.0 ft--►I
SHEET METHANE CONCENTRATION ISOPLETHS
TITLE:
10� a -
DW rl.
BY:
Lip
PaolEcr: PROPOSED
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
CHKD
BY:
FER
DATE:
7/05/94
wG.
o11
9
reHOAG10A.drw
TABLE 1
Cl-C7 HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL PROBE GAS
(PPM VN)
Soil Probe No.
HYDRO-
CARBON
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Methane
6.6
9.4
9.7
6.2
10.3
15.5
5.1
8.0
33.9
Ethane
0.3
1.0
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.5
Ethylene
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
Propane
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.2
<0.1
0.2
Propylene
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
Iso-butane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-butane
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.3
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
0.2
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
]so -hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
reHOAG22.wsd
TABLE 1 (cont.) 0
Cl-C7 HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL PROBE GAS
(PPM VN)
HYDRO-
CARBON
Soil Probe No.
10
11
12
Methane
17.0
5.5
4.8
Ethane
0.2
0.3
0.1
Ethylene
0.1
0.1
<0.1
Propane
0.2
0.1
j 0.1
Propylene
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-butane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-butane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
]so -hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-heptane 1
<0.1 I
<0.1 I
<0.1
reHOAG22Awsd
APPENDIX I
HAZARDOUS GAS EVALUATION
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
APRIL 18, 1994
r
HAZARDOUS'GAS EVALUATION
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
01
GeoScience Analytical, Inc.
April 18, 1994
� 0L,
Fleet E. Rust, Ph.D
President
)SI VIRONe7eyT�
* NO. 01680
EXP. JUNE 30./19/ r�
4454 Industrial Street c of ca
Simi Valley, CA 93063
(805) 526-6532
GeoScience Analy&al Inc. "MeGm Busters" si0980
14 INDUSTRIAL STREET SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063 (805) 526-6532 FAX 526-3570
18 April 1994
Mr. Leif Thompson
Vice President
Facilities Design and Construction
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100
RE: CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION: METHANE GAS EVALUATION
Dear Mr. Thompson:
In order to assess the hazardous surficiai gas potential on the subject site,
nine (9) soil probes were advanced to a depth of 4' on the site. Soil gases were col-
lected from these locations (FIG. 1) and subjected to laboratory analyses. Based
a on the results of these analyses, an additional eight (8) probes were advanced
within an area of concern and subsequently analyzed for C1-C7 hydrocarbons
(TAB. 1).
The majority of the site is void of methane or other low molecular weight hy-
drocarbons significantly above background concentrations (10.0 ppm v/v) to a
depth of 4' below existing grade. in one area located in the northwest comer of the
site, however, methane gas has been identified at concentrations as high as
41,431.0 ppm (v/v) or approximately 83% of the Lower Explosive Limit. The source
of the gas appears to be north of the buildable pad (FIG. 2) and does not pose a
significant hazard to site development provided that excavation is limited to 10'
along the northern boundary (see Figure 2).
Various options are available for mitigation of the gases present in the surfi-
cial soil at the northwest corner of the site. None of these options should pose a
significant impact on site development nor do they necessitate a major redesign of
the structure.
Our recommendations for mitigation are threefold:
• Further investigation should be undertaken in the direction of the
existing concrete patio to assess the source and extent of the
Environmental Audits • Hazardous Gas Engineering • Litigation Consulting 9 Petroleum Geochemistry
•
E
anomaly. The shallow investigation (soil probe phase) should
occur as early as possible with subsequent soil borings delayed
until after the demolition of the patio is completed.
• Building construction can continue unimpeded provided that a
methane detection system be incorporated into the first floor of the
structure. The system should be engineered to provide both venti-
lation and an evacuation warning in the event combustible gas
concentrations exceed predetermined interior concentrations of
15% and 25% LEL, respectively. Sensors should be installed at
ceiling elevation at eight (8) locations as set forth: electrical room,
photocopy room, corridor 116, cardiac service, corridor 107, office
103, office 104, coffee area.
• Site excavation should include site auditing by a qualified environ-
mental assessor capable of monitoring for methane and hydrogen
sulfide in accordance with the "Site Health & Safety Plan for the
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Master Plan" dated August
5, 1993.
Estimates of the costs associated with each of the mitigation measures iden-
tified herein are enclosed for your consideration. Design of the combustible gas de-
tection system can be completed in one (1) week with hardware available for
installation in six (6) weeks. No subslab or other mitigation measures are recom-
mended for the subject site.
We look forward to speaking further with you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely yours,
Fleet E. Rust, Ph.D.
President
cc: Peri Muretta
reHOAGIOD.wsd
liew,
s W 1
Existing Raised
Planter
LEGEND
O Soil Probe
GEOSCIENCE
ANALYTICAL,
INC.
4464 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
Proposed Building
r i/ . ky k [u] A is /, lit 9 ) Z
TITLE SOIL PROBE LOCATIONS DWN.
BY:
PROJECT: FH-PROPOSED BY KD
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION DATE:
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN DWG.
NO:
I4--20.0 rt--►I
1575
UP
FER
4/12/94
reHOAG10.drw
S
L _ ... ..�..I ., �.... ..._+
Existing Raised
Planter
40,000ppm
25,000ppm
1,000ppm
100ppm
GEOSCIENCE
ANALYTICAL,
INC.
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
Proposed Building
Recommended 10'
Limited Excavation
Boundary
N m
m
a_
0
Dw
I�4-20.0 ft—►I
SHEET METHANE CONCENTRATION ISOPLETHS
TITLE: (4Ff DEPTH)
"o
1575
BY "'
Lip
PROJECT: PROPOSED
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
Y:
BY.
FER
DATE
4/12/94
DWG.
NO:
1
TABLE 1 01
I
I�
Cl-C7 HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL PROBE GAS
(PPM VN)
HYDRO-
CARBON
Soil Probe No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Methane
2.4
4.1
7.5
90.1
81.9
12.9
1,492.0
8.5
9.7
Ethane
0.7
<0.1
0.5
0.1
8.4
2.4
10.5
0.4
1.3
Ethylene
;0.1
<0.1
0.5
<0.1
0.6
3.1
<0.1
0.5
1.8
Propane
0.6
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
2.5
1.0
2.7
0.2
0.6
Propylene
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
0.3
1.3
<0.1
0.2
0.8
Iso-butane
0.5
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.1
<0.1
1.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-butane
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.8.
0.2
1.9
<0.1
0.2
Cyclo-
pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-pentane
0.7
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.4
<0.1
1.5
<0.1
0.2
N-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
hexane
0.8
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
0.5
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-hexane
1.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.1
<0.1
1.4
<0.1
<0.1
N-hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0A
<0.1
0.3
<0.1
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-heptane
0.4
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
<0.1
0.8
<0.1
<0.1.
N-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1 I
<0.1
<0.1
10 TABLE 1 (cont.)
Cl-C7 HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL PROBE GAS
(PPM VN)
Soil Probe No.
HYDRO-
CARBON
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Methane
1,378.0
25,236.0
40.4
5.2
41,431.0
28,901.0
149.0
5.3
Ethane
0.2
0.8
<0.1
0.5
2.7
0.5
3.5
0.4
Ethylene
<0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
<0.1
<0.1
3.9
0.5
Propane
0.1
0.5
<0.1
0.1
3.1
0.3
1.5
0.1
Propylene
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.2
0.2
Iso-butane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.1
0.1
<0.1
PHASE 2 HAZARDOUS GAS EVALUATION
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
GeoScience Analytical, Inc.
July 6, 1994
cezd C 0a4
Fleet E. Rust, Ph.D
President
CA REA NO.01680
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
(805) 526-6532
V N
!.V
* NO. 01680
EXP. JUNE 30, 7991,
CAL
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAII
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. I,
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 8, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of'Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil (sr --
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 3
RECEI CL7'B7 `-"
PLANKING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NFWPORT BEACH
JUL I 1 1994 I'm
7e8�91101llI�t11213i41516
Comments: On May 11, 1994, we sent you a study conducted by GeoScience! w
Analytical, Inc. regarding methane gas at the Cardiac SerVibes Addition
site. That study identified methane gas on site, and''f`ecomrfibadbd;,'t'
among other things, that further studies should be, -conducted F06 1•
identify the source and extent of methane concentration.
Attached is a follow-up study completed by GeoScience Analytical, Inc.
last week. This study contains modified recommendations based"on the '
additional data gathered.
These recommendations will be implemented in conjunction with site
development. V. ' ,, SM.
GMK: gl
Pile: 12 S0.36-74. S0-3.10ITAEAS.3
PHASE 2 HAZARDOUS GAS EVALUATION
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
m
GeoSclence Analytical, Inc.
July 6, 1994
Fleet E. Rust, Ph.D
President
CA REA NO. 01680
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
(805) 526-6532
eoSclence Anal)Wcal Inc. 7hoGlabustats" #98n
4464 INDUSTRIAL STREET SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063 (806) 526-6532 FAX 626.3570
7 July 1994
Mr. Leif Thompson
Vice Prealdtlnt
Facilities bepton.and constrgoon
Hoag Memdi1411 Hospital -Prettyt0an
301 NewpodVivd,
Newport I!f toh, CA 92959-i'6100
RE:, CARDIAC SERVIC98 A►DOITION:
.MET ;IANE CIAO-g0AWA*toN'
Dear Mr. Thorttpson:
PhSubsequent to site'grt oing',on the above referenced proj'®ot, we cohduoted a
ase 2 HarArdous Gas t:vsluatliin as a follow-up study to 4hat;prevlousl� submit-
ted report dated April 18,1994'eritltied'Hazardbus Gas Evaluatiob Cardiac $er-
vic'es Addition: Hoag Memorlal Hospital Presbytedan'Huntirigtori Beach, GA'
attached hereto as Appendix 1.
Prevlpusiy reported data Identified methane concentratlons as high as
41,431.0 ppr'n (vtv) at a depth of 4' below existing grade. Methghd cohcertlratlon
isopieths, deploted In Appshi * I -:Figure 2, attached, IdentifieQ i'i doll as anomaly
of unknown origin within'the4lonhwestem portion of.the subledt ilibi. t3asid on
available data, methane remedlation was recommended for'inootporallori Into site
development.
Following site grading, an abandoned water pipe which contained a
hydrocarbontwator mixture pf-unknown origin was removed frdni the OxcaVatlon
area and the.underlying soil Assessed for petroleum Impacts: 'No soil
contaminatlon,.was Idondlled.(pdvate ogmmunioatiori) although, 4001tiohai Ripe was
left In place tinder the existing concrete slab located lmmedirlltely.'north of the sub-
ject excavatlgn area.
In order tb assess,the. current hazardous surflolal gas potential an the sub-
ject site, two (12) soil probes were advanced to a depth of•'4' On the site following
completion of the grading.opWations. 'Soil gases were collected1rom these loca-
tions (FIG.1)•and subjetited to laboratory analyses (TAB.1).
EWronmental Audits 0 Hazardous aas Engineering 0 Litigation Consulting w Petroleum Geochemistry
Following grading operations, the site was Vold of methane and other low
molecular wolght hydrocarbons significantly above background concentrations (5.0
ppm v/v). In -the area located -In the northwest comer of the site, however, -methane
concentrations were slightly elevated above background concentrations reaching a
maximum concentration of 33.9 ppm (v/V) at a location 13' north'ar d 37' West of the
northeast corner of the proposed Cardiac Services addition (FIG. 2). Thonomaiy
Is similar to that -previously l6rit1fled (Appendix I: FIG. 2) ptior to, site oxcsvatlon
except for the significant decrease In hydrocarbon ooncentratlon following excava-
tion which rdsuited In a 99.dho reduction in methane concentration.
Curreht hydrocarbon concentrations pose no' negativelmpacts to health and
safety.' Baso on -the reduction in methane concentrations folld.Ming excavation, the
source of thp Methane Is.md$t llkely'ro§ldual methane producedthrough bacterial
decomposidM of organic -matter, probabl associated, in p9O, kh the water pipe
recently excavated.
on account of the results reported herein, previous reconimendatlpns for
mitigation miry be no fonger6a wahanted. Since future antiolpated e9cavatlon will
include add►fJdnal removal of the water -pipe underlying the 9> 10ting concrdte patio
located ImnmQiately north afAhe subject site, additional potend3l souroes of
petroleum'by+-products within, fhe surflolai soils will be removed.' j6 prder to provide
monitoring of:subsurfaoe hydrocarbons within the existing piurrfl;!'erea; thd; installa-
tion of two.0 permanerit soil gas monitoring wells is recommended. fihew' tills
should be ln'O Ilod Immedlafe)y north of the proposed structttre'erid monitored quar-
terly thereafter for a period of three t3) years. In the event MathiKa egncentradons
do not increase above 1,000.0 ppm (v/v), monitoring may ocourseml-annually
thereafter. Should methane ooncen'trdtions Increase to 5,000 ppm (v/y), an elec-
tronic methane detection system should be installed within the proposod structure
in accordance with designs pii pared by a qualified methane-g'aa detection: engl-
neer. No subblab or other m)tigation measures are recommended for the subject
site other than.those Identifled herein.
We Io9k forward to speaking further with you at your4oarliest convehlenoe.
Sincerely yours,
Pleat E. Rust, Ph,D.
President
cc: Pori Muretta
rn140AQ1(A1,md
A
Egsting Raised
Planter 12
IV.
C9
cs
AMLYWAL,
INC.
4454 kKkmM SkW
smvssw.CA 53067
recr PROPOSED
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIALHOSMALPRESBYflUnM
igi�577.
LLJPP.
CHM
M, FSR- -
DATe 7/0% "094
owa 1 H-*
Mm
E)dsting Raised
Planter
V
/�mayy -
Soil, Probe'
tt—►{
- .METHANE•CONCEiT7TRAUN ISOPLI=
CE05Cr'E WP
Ii:Yr AE, • ter:: PROPWKY MR
4454 SkW
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION DATE 7A)5f9d.
Sint vaft CA 93M 140AG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PREsByTERIAN M6 2
TABLE 1
Soll Probe No.
HYDRO•
CARBON
2
3 ;;
4
5
6
'7
8
9
Methane
;,';8.6
9A'
9.
:62
10,5•
16,6
S.0
33:8
.$.1
Ethane
.:; :0.3
1.0
' : ' OA
: 1.6
•0,6
0A
C;S..
0.2
, 0.6
Ethylene
..0.3
0.3
•.: 0. '
02
0,6
0.$'
0.2
0.2
0.3
Propane
0.1
0.3
0,�
0.6
0.0
0.$
.:0.
<b.1
0.2
Propylene
0,1
<0.1
<O,a•
•4.1
•.0.1
<0.1
•'40.1
<b.1
0.2
Iso•butane
:; 0,1
<0.1
�c0:1'
0.4
0.1
<0.1
<O.1
<0.1
'4.1
Nfiutane
rr0.1
0:1
,'<0.1`
0.6
0.3
' <0.1
A0:1
<Q.1
<O.i
Cyclo-
<0.1
<0:7:
' <0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.9
; . <Q.1
<0.1
pentane
[so -pentane
<0.1
4.1
.<O.i•.
• 0.6
0.2
01
ell
4.1
'•<O.1
N-pentane
N-4.1
<0.1
' '•<0.1'
° ' . 0.2
<Q;1
<0.1
4.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo•
<0.1
. <0.1'`
' <0.1
<0.1
<0.1
•eA',1
<0.1
<0.1
hexane
Iso-hexane
;i 0.1
<0.1
, 0:1.
' <0.1
4.1
<0.14
• <O.1
41
<0.1
Whexane
*,,4;1
4.1
<O.1„
'• ;<O.1
<6.1
•<0.9•
ci3:1
<0.1•
4.1
Iso•heptane
; 0.1
r0.1'
:<0:1
`<0.1
<0.1
<0.1 •
4:1
4.1
4.1
N-heptane
:cQ,1
<0,1•
;<Q.l
,.0.1
<0.1
<0.1
�0:1
. . t"AOYQ.wod
TABLE 1 (oont)
CAAION
Boll Probe No.
10
11
12
17.0
-5.:s
4.4
0.2
OA
0A.:
EtQylens•:'
0.1
0.1.
4.1.
Piop.*.nsl'
0.2
. 01
0.1
0.1
Liwono.
4.1,
<00
<CrA
....ko.i
-Oto.t:
<oA
N-6*no:,!
'<O.i
'<O,l
<0,1.
cy.clo.
4.1
C0.1
'C0.1'
<0.1
<O.t
<001
cy - 610-
Uxone
4.1
<0.1
<O.i*
1".OW,41
<0.1
..<0.1.
4.1
<0.1.
.<O.l
<01
<0.1
-.50.1
ko'l
<0,1
� irti ' • •
A
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
TRANSMITTAL
Date: June 16, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil IL —
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 38
RECEWCO By
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
7
18ADID1121112131415p6
4
Comments: Mitigation Measure No. 38 requires a number of site development requirements to
be included in building plans in compliance with Ordinance No. 91-16.
Additionally, Mitigation Measure No. 38 requires that "information on
transportation alternatives shall be provided to all new employees."
Enclosed Is a page from the employee handbook that is provided to all new employees
at orientation. One section of this handbook discusses the Hoag Rideshare Program.
Also enclosed are samples of "Hoag Times," the newsletter provided to all Hoag
employees. This newsletter periodically includes segments regarding
transportation alternatives.
GMK: gl
Attachments: Page from employee handbook and samples of Hoag Times
c Janet Divan
File: 1250.36.36.31-1.MIT.#38
HOAG HOSPITAL
NEWPORT BEACH • CA
If
Charting
Your Course
Employee Handbook
lloakt: Memorial 11ospilal Yresbpleriau
Fire, Disaster and Evacuation Plan
The hospital has developed a Fire, Disaster and Evacuation Plan
outlining procedures to be followed in the event of a fire or other
disaster in the facility and to handle casualties in time of local or
regional disaster.
Each department and nursing station is provided with a Fire,
Disaster and Evacuation manual which contains instructions for each
area and its employees.
Employees are expected to familiarize themselves with these
procedures and be prepared for any emergency.
Dress and Grooming Standards
The professional atmosphere at Hoag Hospital is maintained, in
part, by the image that employees present to patients and visitors.
Hospital policy requires that employees use good judgment in apparel
and appearance.
The following is a brief overview of the hospital policy on dress
and grooming standards. Employees are requested to ask their respec-
tive department heads for specific dress standards for their depart-
ments.
All employees are required to wear clean and neatly pressed
designated department uniforms or appropriate street attire. Denim
pants and/or T-shirts are not permitted unless authorized by the Vice
President of Human Resources. Non -canvas shoes are recommended.
Fragrances, jewelry and other adornments that would interfere with
work performance or create a safety hazard are prohibited. Name
badges are to be wom at all times.
Employees inappropriately dressed will be sent home and directed
to return to work properly attired. The employee will not be compen-
sated for this time away from work. Also, scrub attire is not designed
for use outside patient care areas and is not a substitute for personal
attire, nor is it to be wom or carried off the premises without the
Department Head's approval.
Employees who carpool, ride the bus, bike or walk to work, are
eligible to enroll in Hoag's Rideshare Program. Participants in the
program are eligible to receive a variety of incentives.
For more information on Hoag's Rideshare Program, contact the
Transportation Coordinator in the Recruitment Office at extension
5863.
!4
Hoag Hospital provides adequate free parking for employees in the
five -story parking structure at the south end of the hospital. Employ-
ees working the first, second and 12-hour shifts, whether full time, •
part time, on -call, etc., who arrive at work prior to 11:00 a.m., are
required to park on the first, second and third (bottom three) levels of
the parking structure.
The fourth level is reserved for second- and third -shift employees
coming on duty after 11:00 a.m. Employees who are enrolled in
Hoag's Rideshare Program may also park on the fourth level, if they
display a Hoag Rideshare hang tag on the car's rear view mirror.
Employees who fail to follow the parking guidelines and park in
unauthorized areas will be cited by Security. Also, all employees are
expected to display the hospital -issued parking identification sticker
on the left rear bumper, or the front windshield driver's side.
Resignation
Employees who resign from Hoag Hospital are expected to present
a written letter of resignation to their supervisor and give an advance
notice of at least two weeks. Exempt employees are asked to give at
least four weeks notice.
If an employee resigns with proper notice, he/she can come
to the Human Resources Department with the completed check -off list
between 3 and 5 p.m. on the last day of work and receive a final
check.
20
-
Ar,
.May 13,1993
for Hoag Hospital employees
News and
information
Workout. onthe - MJ -'Skin Safe gets you
'
way to work
-.
set for summer
l -
What do Carlos Brantley, vent-
Skin cancerwill strike more than
`
Hoag Sheltered
puncture, Pat smith, medical
600,000 people In the United States
_
records, and Bruce Nyrop, engineer- ,
this yearalone, bnd Cafrfornia has.
Savings plan expands
ing, have in common? They don't
,
one of the highest "rates of skin -
To provide more flexibility in
pr
drive a carto work. Pat walks, Bruce -
bikes and Carlos rides the bus.
cancer incidence..But you can take
steps to reduce your chance of " •_ "
selecting
current and and changing your contributions to
If biking, walking or riding the bus
for you, how about
-disease. _
Call 7-CANCER to register -for a -
Hoag Sheltered Savings, a third
,isn't,practical
-sharing•a ride \Wh'a {rien6T
�� /, free.head to -toe skin -
fund, a,total equity fund, is being
-
Carpoolers get a'special hang tag
i , cancer screening on
addBginning June 30, participants
_ entitling them to preferred parking��
20me—
.Mdy22from9a.m.to
12
-percentage
may change the Investment
on the fourth floor of the parking
structure.
p•m,
Hoag Health
of current and past
_at
You'll be doing your• part to
Center- Irvine.
contributions each quarter instead
of twice a year. •-
help clean up the air and re- _
Reservations are
Currently, the fixed -fund is
duce traffic congestion. And, If you
requVed.You'II even receive a bag' . -
paying 7,8 percent. You can invest
rideshare more than 60 percent of
the month, you will receive a $ 10
of skin -protection items you can put
to use -right awayl (If you -can't make
In the fixed fund in 25 percent
meal ticket when you.redeemyour
this screening, another Is planned for
increments up to 100 percent of
your contributions. Changes can
rideshare claim form at the recruti-
July31 at the Hodg Cancer Center.)
be made in June, and will become
ment office on the last two days of
Explore a new career
effective July
Mark
the month.
Active membersofHoog's
-
on' our lunch -break -+
our
your calendar and plan
to attend one of the following
rideshare program -also win prizes in a
6 s
` Focus on Heaffh Care Careers is
meetings to learn more about
monthly drawing. Prizes Include: oil
changes, car washes, movie•passes,
a new educational program
-
these changes as well as an
Hoag wear, meal tickets and $25
designed to provide information on
update
update an other options.
—
Fat Island gift certificates. h
the many career options available
Wednesday, May 26 - _
--ion -
-; For more information on Hoag's
at Hoag _
C Thlsmonth=sfocus is on-' -
_ 9:30 a,m., conference center 2-_
; Rideshore program, call P_dm•Bolen in
mediccUranscripflon.. ;
.12p n_ conference center 2
human resources at-ext. 6990. �.
"' '_
_St6p•bytF cafete
3:30 p.m., conference center 2
We're expecting...
dafrom 11 a:m,to 1-
-
Thursday, June 3 . . -
J 7:30am.;I
f Hoag--LDR expands. "_ -_
p.m. 6n Tuesday,
May_18.You'u
conference. center
13:30 p. 5� conference center 2
.: Hoag Childbirth Center Grill unveil
have an opportu-
Friday;June 4
three new LDR sulte's-t64he public at
-nilyto tolkwith
9-a.m:, conference center-1-
an open house on Sunday, May 23.
medical tfan- . >-
9 a.m., conference -center 1- ,
- These'three suites-bring'Hoag's LDR .
•scribers about
12 p.m.', -cancer center-, _
auditorium=-
;� yapacity to -twelve and make ff =
bies
ypossibleformorelthan4;500ba
their career field;
see,atranscrib- fi�, r:°'
-
t:
• , �•'�. -
/yr
'Contacttheemployeebenefits
,,Hoag.: �: - =
listen,fo.dictation
office at-ext. 5883 if yoxrhave any
_. v VVIth-the LDR.oddition and the
and read
questions. " Y ".
_
i' expansion of the special care nursery
franscr bed medical '
,and pediatrics area, Hoagdeads fhe—reports,Ali visitorsto
r way in offering comprehensive familyr-the
display may also.
Gseryices•f,, Orange,County.'. _
renter a drawing for a -
door e. i
H OAG
}
STAT paging line opens .
The communications depart-
ment has instituted a STAT physt-
clan paging line, ext, 1231. The
number Is to be used any time a
doctor must be paged immedi-
ately. This SEAT line is the nearest
thing to a code page, so use It
only in urgent situations. If you
have, any questions, contact
Marty Fenton, supervisor of com-
municatioru, at'ext, M.
-Welcome to Hoag
Join us in welcoming:Vivian
Mitchell to her position in nursing
education. The new program '
manager comes to Hoag from ,
Mercy Healthcare Bakersfield and
brings with her 17 years of hospital
education experience. WlarL.
earned her Master's degree In'
_ health care'adminisfrd ion at Cal
State University Bakersfield, Good
'luck in your new Job, Vivian, we
r hope you will enjoy Hoag as much
as we do. - -F
New hospital mailing:
address ' _.
Due to a change in post office _
regulations, tfie.hospital has been '
given a new post office box
number. The old --address will be- _
'honored by the post office until,
July of next year, but if is a good ..
Idea to -get used to using the new ,-
one as soon as possible.-Ourynew
address ir, • — „
Hoag Memorial "Hospital
Presbyterlan ,
-3ot Newportavd.
P.O. Box61Lt7
_ Newport -Beach, CA 92658-6 100
r•
August.19,1993
_Hoag first in O.C. to offer innovative heart surgery
Hoag Hospital's cardlology department made news on July 22 by
successfully completing -the first Flex-StentTM.procedure in Orange County.
The procedure is safer than more conventional options, is relatively ine(-
_
pensive, expands surgical options, and has been called "a near-alternd-
tive to emergency coronary bypass surgery," Dr Subbarao Mylavarapu
was assisted in the hour-long operation by Dr. Steven Schiff and Joanne
Colley, CVr, Judith Reiner, CVr, and Lis -Connelly, RN. '
The Flex-StentTM is a tiny stainless steel colt which is guided to thepoint
in a coronary vessel in danger of collapse. The sfent expands to support
the vessel wall when a standard coronary angioplasty balloon isdnflated
inside ff. The body soon coats the steel with tissue and the vessel is strength- -
'eried, - . ' - -
Four Hoag Hedrt Institute physicians are specidlly trained to use the
new procedure. Steve Moreau, vice president of operations, states thdt
"Hoag Heart Institute Is excited to be offering this new technology to
Orange,County residents so soon after it became available." Congratula-
"tions to the cardiology team on a Job well done,- - l
-Childcare center parents can earn`rideshare_credits
The South Coast Air Quality Management District recently amended a
federal regulation regarding-ridesharing with children. Effective September
1, Hoag employees who drive their children td day care centers, , -
babys'riters or schools within one mile of the hospltal are eligible to partici-
�-,pate in our rideshore.progrom. To qualify, -
you must drive with your child a•minimum
r ° 0 of three -times a week (two times If you-
0 worka 12-hour shift). -
' Complete a rideshare claim form '
' monthly and redeem it -for a meal ticket at,.
e the recruitment office on the last two
I ' .working days of the month form 9"fo -
1-1 a:m. You'll then be eliglblefto win great
Lprizes in our monthly rideshare drawing. ,
For more Information, contact Pam
- - Bolen at exf. 6996 -
.,June rideshare winners
Leslie Aimone, EdmongAtexander, Norma Anderson, Elaine
r Bataz, Elena Bazaurl: Michael Beltran, Linda Beutel, Ramona '
Bllling, Linda'Bobendetli,•Kdstln Brady, Joyce Brown; Vlrgink3
Burns, Willlam Cadieux, Lourdes Castellon, Karen Chapman;
Colleen Cline, Joanne Colley, Crystal Craig, Rosalie De Santis ',_:
Susan Doudot, Essle FalesMotthew.Frdnks, Ruben Gonzalez,
Robert Hart, Debra Hayn6s, Dennis Henderson; Concha
Hemandez,John Huebler, Lisa Kemmett; Matt Kosman, Darla
`laird, Marc. Locke, Richard Lynch, Beatriz Martinez, L11a-Mendez,. I
Janke Miller, Martha Ortega, PaMda Parker, Mike Reiner,'
Ramiro Robledb, Karen Schiller, Joan Slnkinson, Mary Skinnerir� _ •`
Natalie Stepelevltch, Moda iirado; Medlm 11ro, Lisa Townsend, Mark
Welker, Richard Wilson, James Wrather, Mary Ellen Zimmerman
'HOAG.
December 9,1993' _
News and information for Hoag--Hospital-employees
Adopt a family, for
Kudos to-Hoag's'staff
Christmas ` Food and nutrfflon services, as
well as the medical,.nursing and"
Share Our Selves (S.O,S, 1, a -' � hospital staff of Hoag should be -
Join the fun today at volunteer organizatioh.servingthe ` _ proudi Fred Martin,"OntheCoasf
needy„is sponsoring aOAdopt a - columnist for the Dolly Pilot spent
holiday party! - -- f Family for Christmastprogram. fits Thcinkssglving at Hoag Hospital and
Holiday festivffies will be in full a great Idea for a department shared his poslNve experiences_ --
swing in the Hoag cafeteria from 1 project. There are several options" with readers in his Saturday,
10 a.m. today through 2 a,rri.
from which you can choose that November 27 column entitled
Friday, December;10. You'll enjoy - , =will tietp needy fdmiliesrinformation "Thanks at Hoag best -kept
a delicious holiday menu pre- ( sheets are available in human- secretin town." Mr. Martin was
pared by --our own food and " resources, Please consider this visff!nd his wife who was at Hoag
nutrition services staff. Lots of fun Program as you prepare for the for surgery. It's nice to know that
events are planned -there's' holidays. For more !nformatlon, call - according to this visffor."Hoag
Kristin Baker at ext: 5862. - seems to do -everything right."
something for everyone:, photos -
-w'ffh Santa, Ron Crays Famous:-
Klelbasa,Christmas carolers, -- • o O Christmas shopping - _
Radiology Band, Morlachis; Hoag ° ' o
Hospital Choir and a Michael . _ L fun and easy at Hoag
Bolton sound alike! Door prize - `fired of fighting the crowds at
drawings and much more will shopping malls? -Need to pick up a
happen throughout the day. See - - last-minute 610,Stop by the Gift-
youtherel 2+v ° '-:-Bcx.andcheckout•theirwide '"
selection of holiday -items. Christ-
-Christmas Boat _ ;t '; - _ mas candiesaree ornaments
a - " cards_stuffed bears, figurines,
-Parade,•sets sail -soon- , You -may already be -•V-lingerie; and holiday baby clothes
Get.thhe �olldayspiriti Begin a winnerl are some of the items available,
ning Friday; Decemberl T, the or. tti s isn't Ed McMahon's ' _ Gift 56x hours are'Monday.through
85th•annual Newport Harbor S ry- Friday, l0•a.m.'to 8 p`.m. and '
Chrlstmas B'oaf Parade takes Pubi'�sher's clearinghouse give .4 -weekends T1.30 a.m. to 3p:m. lhe'
prace nlghtlythrough,Thursday, r .away, but it's-afmostds good: If ' Gift Box is operated bythe Auxil.
;December 23, The parade stads You rideshare; you.may cluallgfor , .. fary and proceeds benefifthe- '
each.night at 6.30 P.K. and runs a prize in Ore hospital.—,
ioag Hospffal's n'desh
appto-drhdtefy two and one half-, recognffion contest. Prizes will be; = Hoag Wear
hours.' = r awarded !n-January for: _ sweatshirts and other. _ s
To viewthe parade from -
- Earliest enrollment date in assorted Items make
the rideshare program great Christmas gifts,
'-grandstand•seating, yoyican y _ ti
,make reservations -by calling'fhe• ; -Most consis'tent,partic!po- - tool See Edye"
,4 ASnerican Legion Hall at-673.5070 ,-, - tiogin-rideshaie program �d'- 'Jordan oriMo�-
Tfckets are S5. You can -also view ;_ter ,ae.longest,commute"for,-. ,days, Wednesdays .�, n
the paradetrom waterfront 1 ' j bicycle riders;,ydalker's, bus orfiursdays be,
restaurants.or harbor cruises. For - rld' and carpoolers - iween 8. Vrn. and.;
more information,colitact the ✓ . , Most cdrpoolers in yefiicle _ noon Heroffice is=1n
Newport Harbor Chamber of-,-` - - the Grace Hoag ,
Commerce at 729-440b: ; ; { .' To be eligible for recognition'
3 - conference cater or,
L and -prizes !n-an`y of these catego-. = , call her at ext. 5838 fd
ll
r L ! ries, cdlrPam Bolerrot.ext. 6990 bye more information. ;
-'. - December 23.=
_ _
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. - BOX 6100 - NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 16, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil G ��-
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures No. 95
Comments Mitigation Measure No. 95 states:
"Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Sponsor shall
demonstrate to the City Fire Department that all existing and new
access roads surrounding the project site shall be designated as fire
lanes, and no parking shall be permitted unless the access way meets
minimum width requirements of the Public Works and Fire
Departments. Parallel parking on one side may be permitted if the
road is a minimum 32 feet in width."
The existing west service road, from Hospital Road to the Hospital's
parking structure is currently painted red on curbs on both sides of
the street. Subsequent to completion of the Cardiac Services Addition,
this roadway will continue to serve as a fire lane and parking
restrictions will also be continued.
GMK: gl
File: 1250.36-36.31.1.MIT.#95
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 16, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil GV--
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 3
Comments The report prepared by GeoScience Analytical, Inc., dated April 18,
1994, entitled "Hazardous Gas Evaluation: Cardiac Services Addition,"
recommends the following mitigation measure:
Site excavation should include site auditing by a qualified
environmental assessor capable of monitoring for methane and
hydrogen sulfide in accordance with the "Site Health and Safety
Plan for the Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Master
Plan" dated August 5, 1993.
The safety officer will be Pete Philpott (Inspector for the Office of
State Health Planning and Development) who will work in conjunction
with Karen Chapman (Hoag's Safety Officer) and the Facilities Design
and Construction division of Hoag Hospital.
GMK: gl
File: 1250.36-36.31-2.MIT.MEA5.3
•
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 16, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kiifoil, AIA G�
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 12,50.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 102
COMMENTS: Mitigation Measure No. 102 requires that:
"The Project Sponsor shall ensure that all haul routes for import
or export materials shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer
and procedures shall conform with Chapter 15 of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code. Such routes shall be included in the above
construction traffic plan."
No importlexport materials will be transported on public streets
as part of the development of the Cardiac Services Addition. Any
requirements for import/export will be addressed internal to the
hospital property on the lower campus. Therefore, a haul route
plan is not required.
GMK: g I
c: Janet Divan
He: 1260.36.36.3.1.M IT.MEAS1102
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN _ _
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 21, 1994
Ta Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil 6 �—
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 91
Comments: Mitigation Measure No. 91 states:
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEWI
AM " J PM
718, 9110111112111213141516
A
"Prior to issuance of grading permits, emergency fire access to the
site shall be approved by the City Public Works and Fire
Departments."
Enclosed is a graphic depicting emergency fire access routes to/from
the Cardiac Services Addition. For approximately three weeks,
commencing on June 20, 1994 and ending on July 11, 1994, a
segment of the west service road will be closed.
A meeting was held with Hoag, its general contractor, and Steve
Bunting, of the City Fire Department, on June 7, 1994 to discuss fire
services issues related to the Cardiac Services Addition, including
emergency fire access.
GMK: gl
Enclosure: Graphic
File: A250.36-36.31-1.MIT.#91
HOSPITAL
�7 0
SCALE -IN- 00,
M:
J
=� u
E
PARKING
STRUCTURE
I
�1,r1
Q I
3
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSP. PRESBYTERIAN
UPPER CAMPUS
MAY 24, 1994 H17-100-03
a • • �..J 'le
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 21, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O.Box 1768
Newport Beach,California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA G K
Project Managert
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 93
COMMENTS: Mitigation Measure No. 93 states:
"Prior to issuance of grading permits, a master plan of water and
sewer facilities shall be prepared for the site. The Project
Sponsor shall verify the adequacy of existing water and sewer
facilities and construct any modifications or facilities necessitated
by the proposed project development."
Enclosed is a letter from the engineer for the Cardiac Services
Addition stating that existing water and sewer facilities are
adequate to serve the project.
GMK: gl
Enclosure: Letter
R IO: 1250.36-3 6.31-M I T. M E AS.# 93
DAVID A
O -�G
ENGIN ERING
June 16, 1994
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard - Box 6100
Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100
Attention: Gunther Kilfoil
Project Manager
Cardiac Services Addition
Hoag Hospital Master Plan
Mitigation Measure 93
In response to Mitigation Measure 9
proposed Cardiac Services Addition i
24 inch diameter water transmission ma
12 inch diameter sewer main (public) as
plans approved by the City of Newport
adequately sized to serve the proposed
L
Jo eph L. Boyle
RCE 44497
JLB:ib
H17-100-10
3, this is to confirm the
s serviced by an existing
in (public) and an existing
constructed per improvement
Beach, and that they are
building.
2098 South Grand Avenue • Suites A & B - Santa Ana, California 92705 • (714) 957-8144 • Fax (714) 957-8499
0 0
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
TRANSMITTAL
Date: June 21, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA Gi `L'
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures No. 12 and 13
COMMENTS: Mitigation Measures No. 12 and 13 require completion of a
hydrological analysis for the Cardiac Services Addition. Copies of
this hydrological analysis were forwarded to the Public Works
Department on June 14, 1994. A copy is enclosed for your
review.
GMK: g I
Enclosure: Hydrological Analysis
File: 1250.36-36.31-M IT.M EAS.# 12-13
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 21, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 39
COMMENTS: Based on the acoustical analysis prepared by Colia Acoustical
Consultants, window glazing was recommended for the Cardiac
Services Addition. The enclosed letter specifies the
recommendations by the acoustical consultant.
GMK: g I
Enclosure: Letter
File: 1250.36-36.3-t NITNEAS.839
• File 125 t7 • 3 "j L1 p
HMC
FACILITIES OESIGN
tCONSTRUCTION
June 15, 1994
Mr. Gunther Kilfoil, AIA
Project Manager
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Facilities Design and Construction
301 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Regarding: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Cardiac Services Addition
HMC #1029033
Subject: Hoag Project #1250.36
City of Newport Beach Plan Review #430-94
Mitigation Measure #39
Dear Gunther:
We have reviewed the acoustical analysis prepared by Colia Acoustical Consultants for
the proposed Cardiac Services Addition. In accordance with the recommended glazing
requirements, we have specified 1/4" glass in all windows on all elevations of the new
building. Mechanical ventilation and inoperable windows will be installed, since the
acoustical calculations require that windows remain closed.
We expect that these measures will attenuate exterior noise to acceptable interior
levels. If you need additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
HMC GROUP
AN;4
sion
Michael K. Cox
Architect
MKC:mr
cc: File -AG
HMC GROUP
Corporate Offices 3276 Inland Empire Boulevard, Ontario, California 91764.4854 909 989.9979 Fax 909 483-1400
Architecture • Engineering • Interiors • Planning LGKIL2 MKG1
N
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 3, 1994
To: City of Newport Beach Planning Department
3300 Newport Boulevard
P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1760
Attention: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA 616-
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Phone 714-646-8901
Reference: Hoag Project # 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures 104, 105, 106, 107, 110, 111, and 112
Comments: The above mitigation measures are required to be contained in the
Contractor/Subcontractor Supplemental General Conditions in accordance with
the mitigation monitoring program for the Cardiac Services Addition.
Enclosed is a portion of the Hospital's agreement with the Contractor requiring
adherence to the above mitigation measures.
GMK: gl
c: Janet Divan
File: 1250.36-74.50-GARCIA/NB MEMO
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
AM
JUN 6 1991
718191101111121112A415 6
i
6`1:5- ��^7
Oil
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
Standard Form of Agreement Between
Owner and Contractor
where the basis of payment is the
COST OF THE WORK PLUS A FEE
W1th or without a Guaranteed Maximum Pace
1993 EDITION
THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH
AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED W17H RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION
Use only with the 1993 ECU" Edition of ID 201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction.
AGREEMENT made as of the Twentieth day of April in the year of Nineteen Hundred and Ninety -Four
BETWEEN the Owner: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard, Box 6100
Newport Beach, California 92658-8912
and the Contractor: Pozzo Construction Company
2894 Rowena Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90039
The Project: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Cardiac Services Addition (1250.36)
301 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92658-8912
The Architect: David A. Boyle Engineering
2098 South Grand Avenue, Suite A
Santa Ana, CA 92705
The Owner and the Contractor agree as set forth below.
DOCUMENT FD 112 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL • STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR
(REV. 116/93) • 1993 EDITION • JANUARY 1993• 301 Newport Blwt. • Box 6100 • Newport Beach, Califomia 9265"912 1
LJ
0
ARTICLE 17
ENUMERATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
The Contract Documents, which constitute the entire agreement between the Owner and the Contractor, except
for Modifications Issued after execution of this Agreement, are enumerated as follows:
This Agreement - The 1993 Edition of FD 112, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and
Contractor. (Rev. 01/06/93)
General Conditions - The 1993 Edition of FD 201, General Conditions of the Contract for
Construction. (Rev. 01/06/93)
Exhibit A - Supplemental General Conditions
Exhibit Al - Schedule of Values
Exhibit A2 - Construction Overhead and Reimbursable Expenses
Exhibit B - Drawing Index
Exhibit C - Project Manual Index (None)
Exhibit D - Addenda (None)
Exhibit E - Specific Exclusions and Clarification
Exhibit F - Asbestos Abatement Agreement
Exhibit G - Interim Life Safety
Exhibit H - Life Safety Evaluation Form
Exhibit I - Daily Inspection Form
DOCUMENT FD 112 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL • STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR
(REV. 1/6193) • 1993 EDITION • JANUARY 1993• 301 Newport Blvd. • Box 6100 • Newport Beach, Califomla 9265"912 • 23
r
EXHIBIT E
SPECIFIC EXCLUSIONS AND CLARIFICATION
1. Due to the close proximity of construction to many sensitive areas in the hospital much care must
be taken by the contractor to minimize noise, pollution or other disturbances. Some disturbances
may require the contractor to reschedule the required work. If the contractor is asked to stop work
due to these disturbances no additional compensation in either monetary or time delay shall be
accepted by the owner.
2. There will be weekly meetings for this project. The contractor will be required to attend all
meetings.
3. All communications, questions and clarifications are to be submitted in writing to the architect and
copied to the owner.
4. In Article 2 of the General Contract the term Architect shall mean David A. Boyle Engineering.
5. Contract amount Includes hard and soft -demolition of existing photocopy room and preparation of
subgrade.
6. Testing, permits and inspection is by Owner.
7. General Contractor payment and performance bond is excluded.
8. Methane Gas has been identified in the soil at the Northwest corner of the proposed building.
9. Shoring and lagging to be excluded.
10. Work to be performed during normal working hours.
11. All concrete demolition to be non -pneumatic within 50 feet of any building.
12. Removal of known existing utilities within excavated area is included as an allowance.
13. De -watering is excluded.
14. Replacement of existing paving, curbs, gutters and landscaping is excluded.
15. The attached Mitigation Measures required by the city of Newport Beach are clarifications to the
Contract. The Contractor is required to follow Mitigation Measures 104,105,106,107,110,111
and 112.
r 0
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 104
Timing For Completion: Ongoing During Site Preparation and Construction
Text of Mitigation Measure: The Project Sponsor shall ensure that construction activities
requiring more than 16 truck (i.e., multiple axle vehicle) trips per hour, such as excavation
and concretel2ours shall be limited between June 1 and September 1 to avoid traffic
conflicts with beach and tourist traffic. At all other times,
imes such activities shall be limited to
25 truck (i.e., multiple axle vehicle) trips per hour unless otherwise approved by the City
traffic engineer. Haul operations will be monitored by the Public Works Department and
additional restrictions maye applied if traffic congestion problems arise.
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on:
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature:
0
C
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 105
Timing For Completion: Ongoing During Site Preparation and Construction
Text of Mitigation Measure: The Project Sponsor shall ensure that all trucks used for
hauling material shall be covered to minimize material loss during transit.
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital
City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on:
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature: _
0
0
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 106
Timing For Completion: Prior to the Issuance of Each Grading Permit
Text of Mitigation Measure: Project sponsor shall ensure that all project related grading
shall be performed in accordance with the City of Newport Beach Grading Ordinance which
contains procedures and requirements relative to dust control, erosion and siltation control,
noise and other grading related activities
Standard For Compliance: Shown on approved grading clans- documented in contractor/
subcontractor supplemental general conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital
City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on,
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature: _
0
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 107
Timing For Completion: Prior to the Issuance of Each Grading Permit
Text of Mitigation Measure: Prior to issuance of gradingpermits the project sponsor shall
demonstrate compliance with SCAOMD Rule 403 which will require watering during the
and soil binders on SCAQMD approved chemical stabilizers should be spread on
construction sites or unpaved areas Additional measures to control fugitive dust include
alerts and wheel washing before construction vehicles leave the site.
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital
Submitted on:
Submitted by:
Signature: _
City of Newport Beach
Approved on:
Approved by:
Signature: _
0 •
C
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 110
Timing For Completion: Prior to the Issuance of Each Grading and Building Permit
Text of Mitigation Measure: The project sponsor shall ensure that low emission mobile and
stational equipment is utilized during construction and low sulfur fuel is utilized in
stationary equipment when available Evidence of this fact shall be provided to the City of
Newport Beach12rior to issuance of any grading or building permit.
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental eg neral
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital City of Newport Beach
Submitted on
Submitted by:
Signature: _
Approved on:
Approved by:
Signature: _
0
•
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: Ill
Timing For Completion: Ongoing During Site Preparation and Construction
Text of Mitigation Measure:
mufflers and kept in proper tune
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital
Submitted on:
Submitted by:
Signature: _
City of Newport Beach
Approved on:
Approved by:
Signature: _
0
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 112
Timing For Completion: Ongoing During Site Preparation and Construction
Text of Mitigation Measure:
oranyholiday
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on:
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature: _
i
9
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 1, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kiifoil, AIA 6{<
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 31
COMMENTS: Mitigation Measure No. 31 states:
"Prior to issuance of a grading permit for any of the proposed
Master Plan facilities, the Project Sponsor shall implement a
pilot program approved by the City Traffic Engineer that monitors
and manages usage of the Upper and Lower Campus service roads
during non -working hours. Such controls may include requesting
that the majority of vendors deliver products (other than
emergency products) during working hours (i.e., 7.00 a.m. to
8:00 p.m.), signage to restrict use of the road by hospital
employees, physicians, patients and visitors during non -working
hours, and other methods by which to restrict use. The hospital
shall also request that vendors not deliver (i.e., scheduled and
routine deliveries) on the weekends.
This restriction specifically applies to scheduled and routine
deliveries. The results of this program shall be submitted to the
City for review prior to issuance of the grading permit. If the
results indicate that such controls do not significantly impact the
operations of the hospital, and provided that requests for specified
vendor delivery times is consistent with future Air Quality
Management Plan procedures, the City may require that the
program be implemented as hospital policy. If operation impacts
are significant, other mitigation measures would be investigated at
that time to reduce service road impacts to the adjacent residential
units. "
In a letter sent to Janet Divan on April 12, 1993, from F. W.
Evins, traffic count information from the westside roadway was
provided (see attached). These traffic counts were taken for the
0
Memo to Genia Garcia
City of Newport Beach
0
Mitigation Measure #31
Page 2
years 1990, 1991 and 1992. Additional traffic data was collected
in 1993. Below is a table identifying traffic counts for 1993 and
the previous years. As shown in the following table, traffic
volumes on the westside roadway continued to decrease,
demonstrating the effectiveness of our pilot program.
WESTSIDE ROADWAY - OFF HOUR (9 P.M. - 5 A.M.)
TRAFFIC REDUCTION SUMMARY
1993
1992
1991
1990
June 23-25
Dec. 14-16
Dec. 9-11
Dec. 10-12
Day 1
20
28
35
159
Day
35
45
36
158
Day 3
1 3
a-9
49
124
68
112
120
441
GMK: bw
File: 1250.36-36.3-M IT. M EAS.#31
SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 t'-9"4';'10:17AM t LICENSE DIVISW
t# 2
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX Y # NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658.8912 • PHONE (714) 645.8600
April 12, 1993
City of Newport Beach
Traffic Department
City Hall
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1766
Newport Beach, California 92658-8015
Attention: Janet Divan
Associate Civil Engineer
Reference: Cardiac Services Addition (1250-38)
Subject: Response to City Mitigation Measure Traffic Questions
Dear Me. Divan:
Pursuant to your previous request for information regarding mitigation questlons, Hoag
Hospital's responses are listed below. i have arranged them in a question and answer format and
referenced the mitigation number, Hospital responses are In bold type for your convenience. As
we had previously surmised, the bulk of the mitigation measures adopted In conjunction with
our Master Plan approval are associated with Lower Campus development or a major Upper
Campus project.
20. Q Bus turnouts -any identified yet? When would these be constructed?
A. Bus Turnouts - May or may not be required; however, given
the scope and scale of the Cardiac Services Addition (CSA),
they would appear to be unnecessary at this time. Final
determination will be made by the City Traffic Department.
31. Q What monitoring Is being done? May require count data to verify results.
Also need a copy of the letter to vendors about delivery restrictions, and a
plan that shown all closures, signs, and hours• Of restrictions for
deliveries and Hoag staff.
A. An annual monitoring program has been Implemented an the
westside roadway to verify the reduction of off hour traffic.
The traffic counts were performed by Newport Traffic
Studies and are as follows:
SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; �1-94,;10;10AM ; LICENSE DIVIS�-� ;# a
April 12. 1993 Mitigation Moacuron Page
A. WESTSIDE
ROADWAY • OFF
HOUR (9 P.M. • 0 A.M.)
TRAFFIC REDUCTION SUMMARY
1992
1991
logo
Dec. 14.16
Dec. 9.11
Dec. 10.12
Day 1
28
36
ISO
Day 2
46
36
1S6
Day 3
12
LA
lu
112
120
441
In ardor to reduce the "off hour" traffic along the wastside
roadway, Hoag be* Implemented the following plan since
November 1991:
1 . Erect barricades during off hours 8 p.m. to 6 a.m.
2. Installation of Blanco*.
3. Semiannual Issuance of notices to vendors/employees.
4. Conduct annual traffic counts.
36. a TOM Ordinance - Need a summary of the existing items listed. Also,
additional facilities may be required each time new construction will
handle 100 or more employees.
A. The CSA is not a major component or phase of the Master
Plan; however, In an effort to most the Intent of this
mitigation measure, Hoag will provide the following:
1 . A carpool parking space will be provided and designated.
2. As previously agreed, this project does not require
bicycle lookers to be Installed.
3. A minimum of one shower and two lockers will be provided
In the building addition.
4. Information regarding transportation alternatives shalt
be provided to all employees.
S. A rldesharo vehicle loading area may not be warranted by
the implementation of this project.
6. Hoag does not provide vanpooi services.
101. Q Discuss with Mr. Evins about processing the larger projects. We need to
review all traffic control plans for construction projects.
A. The rofatively small scat* nature of the CSA project does not
warrant the Implementation of an external construction
phasing and traffic control plan. Such a plan will be
developed with future major phases as was Intended with the
development of the Master Plan.
102. Q Obtain haul route permits from Traffic Engineering for trucks on city
streets (for every project requiring large trucks).
A. This mitigation measure will be met by requiring the
Contractor Involved with the specific project to obtain the
necessary permits. (Sao attached summary sheet.)
SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ;1-54-;10:18AM ; LICENSE DIVI8,64
April i2, 1093 Mitigation Measures Page
103, a Submit a copy of letter re: construction delays for our review.
A. The intent of this mitigation measure Is related to public
roadways. There will be no Interruption of traffic departing
our campus onto public roadways. An Internal plan will be
developed for our staging and Implementing purposes. The
contract will provide to City as required.
104. Q This mainly applies to all projects.
A. The scope and scale of this project will not begin to approach
the "16 truck trips per hour" threshold; therefore, this
measure does not apply.
toe. Q This applies to all projects.
A. Hoag Hospital will comply with this measure.
108. Q We will be reviewing trip reduction plans for construction crews for all
larger types -of projects Involving several crews.
A. The CSA project` does not require compliance to this
mitigation measure duo to the scope and scale of the CSA
project.
120. Q We need to review the location of all screening materials for sight
distance compliance.
A. The CSA project will incorporate appropriate landscape
scroening to most the intent of this mitigation measure.
I hope that this response answers your questions. I look forward to meeting with you On
Tuesday, April 13, 1993. In the Interim, please call me at 780-5908 If I can answer any
questions.
rel
SinoeF.
III, AIA
Vice President
Facilities Design and Construction
c: Pete Foulke, Senior Vice President
Leif Thompson, Director of Major Projects
Barry A. Klein, AIA
Pori Muretta
Patricia Temple
FWE:bw
File: 38-33.00-Mitigation Measures
;# 4
a 0
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 11, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil C�l�
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Subject: Cardiac Services Addition
Comments: Mitigation Measure No. 36 states:
"Prior to issuance of grading and building permits for each phase of
development, the Project Sponsor shall provide evidence for
verification by the Planning Department that the necessary permits
have been obtained from the SCAQMD for regulated commercial
equipment incorporated within each phase. An air quality analysis
shall be conducted prior to each phase of development for the proposed
mechanical equipment contained within that phase that identifies
additional criteria pollutant emissions generated by the mechanical
equipment to be Installed in that phase. If the new emissions, when
added to existing project emissions could result in Impacts not
previously considered or significantly change the land use impact,
appropriate CEQA documentation shall be prepared prior to issuance
of any permits for that phase of development. Each subsequent air
quality analysis shall be reviewed and approved by the SCAQMD."
There will not be any regulated commercial equipment contained
within the Cardiac Services Addition which will require a permit
from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Therefore, no
air quality analysis, as specified in the above mitigation measure, is
required.
GK: bw
File: 1250.36.36.31-M IT. MEAS.#36
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 19, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach '
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA GG—
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 44
COMMENTS: Mitigation Measure Nos, 44 states:
"Prior to issuance of a building permit the Project Sponsor shall
submit plans to, and obtain the approval of plans from, the City
Planning Department which detail the lighting system for all
buildings and window systems for building on the western side of
the Upper Campus. The systems shall be designed and maintained
RECEIVED BY in such a manner as to conceal light sources and to minimize light
PLANNING DEPARTMENT spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer, with a
letter from the engineer stating that, in his or her opinion, this
MAY 2 3 i99,4 requirement has been met."
�18�9f1Ufllf1211t2tgi4tS g The building plans were submitted to the City on March 17, 1994.
These plans include a lighting system designed by Dale Karjala and
! Associates, Inc., Electrical Engineers, which, among other things,
address the above mitigation measure.
Attached is a letter from the electrical engineer in compliance.
with Mitigation Measure No. 44.
GMK: bw
Enc. Letter to Hoag Hospital from Dale Karjala and Associates, Inc. dated
5/18/94
File: 1250.36-74.50-MIT. MEAS.#44
1 :25 AZ
D6le Karjala and M§ odiates, Inc.
Electrical Engineers
NAt
FAuiLITIES DESt:iiV 'May 18, 1994.-.,
&CONSTRUCTION
HOAG MEMORIAL. HOSPITAL'•PRESBYT_ERIAN
301 ;Newport Bivd:,; Box Y •.
-:,.,.Newport 92663': f �V -
Attn:' :Gufither iCiifoilV'AIA Lc
- Project,Manager . '`:,` , ;; =`
FaciliiW3 Design and -Construction "
..PROJECT*; '
ADDITIONSUBJECT:
=CES
#44
'in • ;my opinion; .the` plans meet this requirement.'; That -is, the lighting .
' system is designed in mannerio donceal lighf sources and, minimize
-'a
light spillage and glare to the adjacent residences., ,.
IT
bale C. Karja
` 3185-C Airway Avenue . Costa Mesa, CA 92626-4601' ■. (714) 751-1861 . FAX (714) 751-4216
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 18, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O.Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA (:-� �L
Project Managert
Facilities Design & Construction f
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 110 _
COMMENTS:
GMK:
File:
Mitigation Measure No. 110 states:
"The project sponsor shall ensure that low emission mobile and
stationary equipment Is utilized during construction, and low
sulfur fuel is utilized in stationary equipment, when available.
Evidence of this fact shall be provided to the City of Newport Beach
prior to issuance of any grading or building permit."
Hoag Hospital will adhere to this mitigation measure and will
provide documentation to contractors for the Cardiac Services
Addition specifying that they adhere to the above mitigation
measure.
MIT
1250.36-36.3-M IT. M EAS. #110
//J
0
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 - NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 11, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner /
City of Newport Beach f�
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil
Project Manager
Facilities Design &Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures No. 86
Comments: Enclosed are copies of the permits that Hoag'obtains on an annual basis
from the South Coast Air Quality Management District in compliance
with the SCAQMD Air Toxic rules, and as required by the following
mitigation measure:
"The Project Sponsor shall provide evidence to the Planning Director
that measures to ensure implementation and continued compliance
with all applicable SCAQMD Air Toxic Rules, specifically Rules 1401,
1403, 1405 and 1415, are being carried out."
W. bw
File: 1250.36-36.31-MIT.#86
SOUT AST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIST Pemdt No.
F 21865 East Copley Drive, Dlamond Bar, CA 91765 W0919
• A/N 274019
PERMIT TO OPERATE
This initial permit trust lie ienewed'ANNUAI LYuutess the egriipmeriCis moved; or changes ownership. '
w1f WvbiiQ for anmuatrenewai fee (RuI6 MIJ) is'not received by the expiration dafb, contact the District.
Leal Owaer
or Operator.
Equipment Location:
r
Equipment Desceiptlon:
ID 011M
HOAG MEM HOSP PRESBYTERIAN
ATTN. NELSON SMITH
301 NEWPORT BLVD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-41M
301 NEWPORT BLVD, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-4120
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM CONSISTING OF:
1. CATALYTIC OXIDIZER (ETO ABATOR), DONALDSON, MODEL 50 SCFM, WITH.A 5.8 KW
ELECTRIC HEATER, A 6.0 HP BLOWER AND AN ENCLOSED CATALYST BED, T-3" W x 3' " L x 2'-
2" H'
2. EXHAUST SYSTEM WITH AN AIR BLOWER, VENTING TWO ETHYLENE OXIDE
' STERI=R/AERATOR SYSTEMS.
ComdiHous:
1. OPERATION OF THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DATA
AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION UNDER WHICH THIS PERMIT IS
ISSUED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BELOW.
2. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND KEPT -IN GOOD OPERATING
CONDITION AT ALL TIMES.
3. THE TEMPERATURE OF THE EXHAUST FROM THIS CATALYST BED SHALL BE MAINTAINED
BETWEEN BETWEEN 280 DEGREES F AND 550 DEGREES F AS INDICATED BY A PROPER
TEMPERATURE GAUGE AND/OR RECORDER.
4. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LEAK CHECKED AND SOURCE TESTED PER DISTRICT RULE
1405.
5. RECORDS SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE CONDM
THE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT FOR AT LEAST TWO YEARS AND MADE AVAILABLE TO
DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON REQUEST.
l '
ORIGINAL
SOUebOAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIRT Bumit No.
21866 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 D70919
A/N 274019
PERMIT TO OPERATE
CONTINUATION•OF PERMIT TO OPERATE
NOTICE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206, THIS PERMIT TO OPERATE OR COPY SHALL BE POSTED ON OR
WITHIN 8 METERS OF THE EQUIPMENT.
THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE EMISSION OF AIR CONTAMINANTS INEXCESS OF THOSE
ALLOWED BY DMSION 26 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR
THE RULES OF THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE
CONSIDERED AS PERMISSION TO VIOLATE EXISTING LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS OR
STATUTES OF OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.
EXECUTIVE OF�F(I16
11E;R/
By Dorris M. Bailey/ac
3/10/1993
ORIGINAL
SOU OAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISOT Permit No.
21 5 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 W0918
- A/N 274018
PERMIT TO OPERATE 14881
This mitia7permit mustbo Renewed ANNUALLY unless the equipmeut^is•moved, or changes ownership.
s If the billing for annuakrenewal fee'(Rule 301f)•is noGrecbived by the expiration date, contact the District.
140 Owner
or Operator:
Equipment Imcatton:
Equipment Description:
ID 011245
HOAG MEM HOSP PRESBYTERIAN
ATTN. NELSON SMITH
301 NEWPORT BLVD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-41M
301 NEWPORT BLVD, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-4120
ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILMATION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF:
L ETHYLENE OXIDE (ETO) STERILIZER, 3M, MODEL 5XL, WITH A 2.2 KW ELECTRIC HEATER, 1'-
5"W x Z-8" L x 1'-3" H (INTERNAL DIMENSIONS).
2. AERATOR, 3M, MODEL XL,- WITH A 2.0 KW ELECTRIC HEATER, AND A 0.3-HP EXHAUST
BLOWER, 1'-6" W x Y-0" L x 1'-4" H (INTERNAL DIMENSIONS).
Conditions:
1. OPERATION OF THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DATA
AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION UNDER WHICH THIS PERMIT IS
ISSUED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BELOW.
2 THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD OPERATING
CONDITION AT ALL TIMES.
3. THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF STERILIZING GAS (100% ETHYLENE OXIDE) USED IN THIS
EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.66 POUNDS IN ANY ONE DAY OR 15 POUNDS IN ANY
CALENDAR MONTH.
4. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE OPERATED UNLESS THE STERILIZER IS VENTED ONLY TO
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT WHICH IS IN FULL USE AND HAS BEEN ISSUED A
VALID PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT OR OPERATE BY THE DISTRICT.
S. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LEAK CHECKED AND SOURCE TESTED PER DISTRICT RULE
1405.
ORIGINAL
SOUTP OAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTIPT Permit No.
21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 D70918
PERMIT TO OPERATE A/N 274018
CONTINLiAPlON'OF-PERMIT TO OPERATE
6. RECORDS SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE CONDITIONS.
THE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO YEARS AND BE MADE AVAILABLE
TO DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON REQUEST.
NOTICE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206, THIS PERMIT TO OPERATE OR COPY SHALL BE POSTED ON OR
WITHIN 8 METERS OF THE EQUIPMENT.
THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE EMISSION OF AIR CONTAMINANTS IN EXCESS OF THOSE
ALLOWED BY DIVISION 26 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR
THE RULES OF THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE
CONSIDERED AS PERMISSION TO VIOLATE EXISTING LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS OR
STATUTES OF OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
By Dorris M. Bailey/ac
3/10/1993
ORIGINAL
SOUTHOAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIST* Permit No.
21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 W0917
- A/N 274017
PERMIT TO OPERATE
'!'his initial permit mustbe renowed ANNUALLY unles #c=ygiypment is mov4',or-changes dwnership.
f the billing fdrannual'renewal fee -,(.Rule 301.0'16•not tcceivedliy.the expiration -date, contact the District.
Legal Owner
or Operator:
Equipment Location:
t
Equipment Description:
ID 011245
HOAG MEM HOSP PRESBYTERIAN
ATTN. NELSON SMITH
301 NEWPORT BLVD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-4120
301 NEWPORT BLVD, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-41M
ETHYLENE OXIDE STER 17 TION SYSTEM CONSISTING OR
L ETHYLENE OXIDE (ETO) STERILIZER, 3M, MODEL 5X1.WITH A 2.2 KW ELECTRIC HEATER, 1'-
5"W x Z-S" L x 1'-3" H (INTERNAL DIMENSIONS).
2. AERATOR, 3M, MODEL XL, WITH A 2,0 KW ELECTRIC HEATER, AND A 03-HP EXHAUST
BLOWER,1'-6" W x 3'-0" L x 1'-4"• H (INTERNAL DIMENSIONS).
Conditional
1. OPERATION OF THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DATA
AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION UNDER WHICH THIS PERMIT IS
ISSUED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BELOW.
2. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD OPERATING
CONDITION AT ALL TIMES.
3. THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF STERILIZING GAS (100% ETHYLENE OXIDE) USED IN THIS
EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.66 POUNDS IN ANY ONE DAY OR 15 POUNDS IN ANY
CALENDAR MONTH.
4. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE OPERATED UNLESS THE STERILIZER IS VENTED ONLY TO
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT WHICH IS IN FULL USE AND HAS BEEN ISSUED A
VALID PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT OR OPERATE BY THE DISTRICT.
5. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LEAK CHECKED AND SOURCE TESTED PER DISTRICT RULE
1405.
ORIGINAL
SOU140AST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIRT Permit No.
21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 D70917
PER W TO OPERATE 1!-P I 017
'CONTINUATION OF PERMIT TO.OPERATE
6. RECORDS SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE CONDITIONS.
THE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO YEARS AND BE MADE AVAILABLE
TO DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON REQUEST.
NOTICE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206, THIS PERMIT TO OPERATE OR COPY SHALL BE POSTED ON OR
WITHIN 8 METERS OF THE EQUIPMENT.
r
THIS PERMITbOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE EMISSION OF AIR CONTAMINANTS IN EXCESS OF THOSE
ALLOWED BY DIVISION 26 OF THIS HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR
THE RULES OF THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE
CONSIDERED AS PERMISSION TO VIOLATE EXISTING LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS OR
STATUTES OF OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
By Dorris M. Bailey/ac
3/10/1993
i
ORIGINAL
&I NO /
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON, Govemm
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ; j• ^ `Y.
. DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH �o
OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGEN CONTROL UNIT .ay
455 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE, ROOM 5227
SAN-fKANCISCO, CA 94102 ADDRESS REPLY TO:
02-04-93 P.O. BOX 420603
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94142
(415) 703-3631
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
.301 NEWPORT BLVD
NEWPORT BEACH , CA 92663
Dear Employer
Your company/business has been included in the Report of Use
,registry with the occupational Carcinogen Control Unit under:
REGISTRY NUMBER 4213 EFFECTIVE DATE 04-11-85
Under Title 8, California Code of Regulations, sections listed
below, you reported you used, or you have Ilaffected employees" with
whom there is substantial probability they will be exposed as a
result of the use or presence of carcinogen(s) in the workplace
which are checked as follows:
5208
X Asbestos
5209
2-acetylaminoflorene
_ 4-aminodiphenyl
Benzidine (and its salts)
3,31-Dichlorobenzidine
(and its salts)
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
—_ alpha-Naphthylamine
_ beta-Naphthylamine
_ 4-Nitrobiphenyl
_ N-Nitrosodimethylamine
_ beta-Propiolactone
bis-Chloromethyl ether
_ Methyl chloromethyl ether
Ethyleneimine
5210
_ Vinyl Chloride
5211
Coke Oven Emissions
5212
_ 1,2-Dibromo-3-
chloropropane (DBCP)
5213
Acrylonitrile
5214
Inorganic Arsenic
5215 -
_ 4,41-Methylenebis (2-
chloroaniline) MBOCA
5217
X Formaldehyde
5218
Benzene
5219
Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)
5220
X_ Ethylene oxide (Et0)
This Report of Use or any change of the information shall be
reported in writing within 15 (10 for EDB) calendar days to:
Chief, Division of Occupational Safety & Health, 455 Golden Gate
Avenue, Rm 5224, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102, or P.O. Box
420603, San Francisco, CA 94142.
Cal/OSHA 184
June 1992
0
FOR YOUR OFFICE -TO FILL OUT
_r THE FOLLOWING IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF OUR REPORT OF USE:
(X NO CHANGE IN REPORT INFORMATION
NO LONGER A USER OF CARCINOGENS; DELETE FROM REGISTRY
CHANGE THE REPORT OF USE INFORMATION AS FOLLOWS: (A change
constitutes ANY change; address, phone number, contact person
business name, number of affected employees, addition or deletion
of listed and regulated carcinogens, locations, or any other
change.
Include name and address of union and name of representative, if
applicable. Use an additional sheet, if necessary.
r '
If you need to add carcinogens to your existing report, please
include the following:
Carcinogen(s):
Date:
Location in plant
Temporary job site (Y/N)
Number,,of affected employees:
print please)
nnm= rhann= Writ= nlrl
Phone No. Date D-0-
-2-
r] L
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date:
May 11, 1994
Ta
Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach---
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From:
Gunther Kilfoil
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference:
Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject:
Mitigation Measures No. 90
Comments
Mitigation Measure No. 90 states:
"in conjunction with the Critical Care Surgery Addition, the Project
Sponsor will place the overhead power lines located west of the Upper
Campus underground if feasible."
The Critical Care Surgery Addition (see enclosed graphic), which was
proposed to contain 59,947 square feet and cantilever from its third
floor, down to the first floor, with the third floor being only 37 feet
from the common property line with the Villa Balboa/Versailles
Condominiums, is no longer being proposed. In its place, the one-
story, 5,990-square-foot Cardiac Services Addition is now being
proposed. The Cardiac Services Building is not proposed to extend
further than existing projections from the second floor of the hospital
(approximately 47 feet from the common property line).
Since this mitigation measure is related to the Critical Care Surgery
Addition, it is our opinion that it is not relevant to the much smaller
Cardiac Services Addition. However, we have discussed this matter
with Southern California Edison and received from them a "ball park"
estimate for undergrounding the overhead power lines (attached).
The cost estimate is too high to be considered feasible, especially in
relation to the much smaller Cardiac Services Addition that is now
being proposed.
GK:
bw
Enclosure:
Graphic
SCE Letter dated 5/4/94
File:
1250.36-36.31-MIT.#90
05/04/94
13:32 '5714 896188 ORANGE COAST DIS • Q 001
LEt F
Southern California Edison Company
• 7333 BOL9A AVENUE
WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683.5294
May 4, 1994
Gunther Kilfoil, AIA
Project Manager
Facilities Design and Construction
Hoag Memorial Hospital
301 Newport Blvd., Box 6100
Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100
Subject: Undergrounding of Facilities on
West Side of Facility
Dear Gunther:
The ball park estimate to place the subject facilities underground would be $100,000 to
$110,000. This cost estimate would be for labor, materials, structures and the 34% TTCC
tax.
All of the facilities would be underground except a pad mounted capacitor bank. We
would need easements to cover the new facilities.
Should you have any questions, please call me at 895-0246.
Sincerely,
Chris Cartwright
Customer Service Planner
CC:cg
91xth Fbo
. -
Open Court 6Fby
Na
-
at Third Floor Windows
.rfh
rTo
Critical Cue gods
CCU
v�
hirduFba
Support /Walling
echadcs
ec
Surgery/ Cardiac
-
S4zWry
Ground
Service Driveway -.
OhN I Meelhp Rooms
Service
F
loo
I.<.
"
Basement
Proposed,
ExYthp
z..
Building Section
_
e e 6 xl el ttn
Ue•.f-? �ovQo
w
z
9 1�5
a
� pi l
rjET,- - ,
iw-m
x w-w
e
,_ -gig._ �r _ _ •.
n
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 11, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil G(_
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Constructio
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures No. 26
Comments:
Mitigation Measure No. 26 states:
"Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase 1 of the project, the
Project Sponsor shall conduct a project trip generated study which
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. This
study shall determine if the traffic to be generated by existing plus
Phase I development will not exceed 1,338 PM peak hour traffic
trips. In the event the Traffic Engineer determines that existing plus
Phase I development will generate more than 1,338 PM peak hour
trips, the project shall be reduced in size or the mix of land uses will
be altered to reduce the PM peak hour trips to at or below 1,338."
Seven hundred eighty-four (784) PM Peak Hour Trips were existing
at the time the EIR for the Hoag Master Plan was prepared, leaving
554 trips per Phase 1 (784 + 554 = 1,338).
The Cardiac Services Addition contains 5,990 square feet.
Approximately 60 patients, 15 support staff/personnel and 3
physicians will utilize the facility on a daily basis. None of these
patients, support staff/personnel or physicians that will utilize the
Cardiac Services Addition represent "new" trips. They are being
relocated from other existing facilities on campus. Existing hospital
functions will utilize the space being vacated by the existing Cardiac
Services area, and no new trips will be generated.
i
0
Memo to Genia Garcia Mitigation Measure No. 26 Page 2
Therefore, for the PM Peak Hour, the Cardiac Services Addition
represents none of the additional allowable 554 trips to reach the
threshold for Phase I.
W. bw
File: 1250.36-36.31-A
V
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date:
May 11, 1994
To:
Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From:
Gunther Kilfoil �K
_
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference:
Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Subject:
Cardiac Services Addition '
Mitigation Measures No. 83, 84, 85i
i
Comments: Attached are letters from Hoag Hospital regarding Hoag's Hazardous
Materials and Waste Management Plan and Hoag's Infection Control
Manual. As stated in these two letters, no additional facilities will be
required to address the Cardiac Services Addition.
GK: bw
File: 1250.36-36.31-MIT. #83-85
•
0
7
e125Q•7L�'--
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
Intrahospital Memorandum RE En D
JUN 21,1S93
. CILITIES DESIGN
TO: Leif Thompson, DA �tONGYWM
Vice President Facilities & Design
FROM: Didier Nafus,
Director Envi onmental Services
SUBJECT: Waste Generation of Cardiac Services Building Addition
Per your request of May 28, 1993 concerning the impact to our
current waste handling procedures with the addition of the Cardiac
Services Building, I am writing this memo as follow-up.
The addition of 5,000 square feet to our existing facility will
have little or no impact on the waste handling system. We have the
capacity to continue recycling white and colored paper, sterilize
medical waste, bale corrugated containers and landfill remainder.
Sharps disposal will continue to be handled by an approved licensed
contractor.
I trust this will answer any questions you have with regards to
waste handling needs.
DN:db
t . File125�•='v3`}•S`r'
MAR 14 1994
FACILITIES DESIGN
& CONSTRUCTION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBY T ERIAN
301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX Y - NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658-8912 • PHONE (714) 645-8600
March 11, 1994
Gunther Kilfoll, AIA
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Dear Gunther,
In response to mitigation measure 84, all projects must comply with the
policies and protocol established for the hospital in the Infection Control
manual. Infection Control reviews and monitors all construction for
adherence to infection control measures. Non-compliance would be
addressed by the Chairperson of the Infection Control Committee and its
members and administration appropriately notified.
In response to mitigation measure 85, no additional infectious material will
be generated to require additional storage areas. Additional storage areas
will be added as necessary, and all areas will be closely monitored by
Infection Control. To assure all measures are being taken to decrease dust
and other air contaminants to hospital patients and personnel, Infection
Control will monitor the areas closely.
Please call me if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
Rosalie DeSantis, MS, RN, CIC
Nurse Epidemiologist
RD/Ifw
A NONPROFIT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACCREDITED By THE -JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 11, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil GK
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 39
Comments: Enclosed is an acoustical analysis as required by Mitigation Measure
No. 39 which requires:
"If noise levels in onsite outdoor noise sensitive use areas exceed 65
CNEL, the Project Sponsor shall develop measures that will attenuate
the noise to acceptable levels for proposed hospital facilities.
Mitigation through the design and construction of a noise barrier
(wall, berm, or combination wail/berm) is the most common way of
alleviating traffic noise impacts."
As stated in the report, 'Because the projected and measured noise
levels at the outdoor patio area do not exceed 65 CNEL, acoustical
shielding will not be required' (p.3).
W. bw
File: 1250.36-36.31-MIT.MEAS.#39
u
1
COLIA ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANTS
2610 Avon Street, Sufte B
Newport Beach, CA 92663
(714) 631-7315
FAX (714) 631-3824
April 28, 1994
.ECEED
ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE
APR 2 9 1994 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTE
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
{ ..c.5 DESIGN IN NEWPORT BEACH
&, wtJSTRUCTION
Prepared For:
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTER
301 Newport Boulevard
P.O. Box 6100
Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100
Prepared By:
a42 (�
CHARD
Acoustical Consultant
MEMBER INCE
R4-032
Institute of Nolse Control Engineering • Acoustical Society of America
ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTEE
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
At the request of Gunther Kilfoil, Colia Acoustical Consultants have
prepared an acoustical analysis of the Cardiac Services addition as a part
of Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach. The proposed
project is located on the north side of Pacific Coast Highway between
Newport Boulevard and Superior. The principal source of noise to the
project area will come from future vehicular traffic on Pacific Coast
Highway.
The noise criteria of the City of Newport Beach for current and projected
conditions state that the noise intrusion to interior habitable spaces
from exterior sources should not exceed 45 decibels (dB) Community Noise
Equivalent Level (CNEL) when the proposed project is within a CNEL contour
of 60 dB or greater. Exterior habitable areas are to be in a noise
environment no higher than 65 CNEL. In addition, the noise from the
loading dock and condenser are to be less than 55 dBA Leg at the west
property line.
The purpose of this report is to determine the exterior noise environment,
design noise control measures to reduce the ,projected noise impacts, and
present other mitigation measures, where necessary, to reduce other noise
impacts to acceptable levels.
ANALYSIS
Exterior Noise Environment -Current
The current noise impact to the project site was determined by on -site
noise measurements. The current noise measurements were made at the
project site on April 7, 1994. The measurement microphone of the sound
level meter was positioned at two locations on the project site (see
Figure 2). Measurements were made at microphone heights of 5 feet above
existing grade to represent first story levels near the site. The
measurement microphone of a Bruel and Kjaer 2230 Precision Integrating
Sound Level Meter (SIM) was located at the approximate westmost project
line (Site 1) closest to Pacific Coast Highway (PCS), where the highest
noise impacts are expected. Site 2 was at the patio area.
The SIM can provide continuous Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) measurements
which are read directly from the display on the meter. At the end of each
measurement period an Leg was taken from the SIM for the representative
sample period. Table 1, on the next page, shows the results of the
measurements: time of day, measured Leq and calculated current CNELs.
E
R4-032
April 28, 1994
Using the recorded Leq values and typical hourly traffic distribution
information, further Leq values were calculated for each 'hour of the day,
were 0 dB for tbs
nighttii �hours ted �(0 PM to 7 t eve the current 5 dB for evening hours (7 PM to 10 PM) and l CNELvalues shown
in Table 1.
Measurement Results, April 7, 1994
site Measurement Measured Calculated Hicrcpbcne
Hogs ieq, dB(A) CNM, dB Height, Ft.
1 3:30 PM 56.4 58.3 5
2 3:45-PM 54.7 56.6 5
The calculation methodologies for the CNEL determinations are shown in
Tables 2 and 3.
Future: The County of Grange EMA Advanced Planning was consulted to
determine the future traffic volumes for Pacific Coast Hi Pai TYIe
To determine the future traffic impacts across the project site the EHM
Noise Prediction Model (iM RD-77-108) was used with the build -out ADP of
58,000. The road and model parameters used in the calculations were taken
fran roadway data and on -site observations. Soft site conditions were used
in the analysis. The results of the Fina projects are shown in Table 4.
The projected CNEL is 54.7 dB at the closest building line to PCH and 54.2
dB at the patio area.
The FHa noise model calculates projected noise impacts in terms of
B;L valent Sound Level (Leq) and CaiYm uty Noise Dquivalent Level (CNEr,)
using standard roadway day -night traffic percentage breakdown. Other
roadway and model parameters used in the calculations are shown in Table 4
for future conditions.
The projected noise levels to the new building line and patio area are
Summarized in Table 5. These values will be used to determine the
mitigation measures for the project.
goj),
-2-
R4-032
April 28, 1994
10MVICe"WORSO•
Exterior Noise Control
Because the projected and measured noise levels at the
do NOT exceed 65 M L, acoustical shielding will _NOT _be :
Exterior -To -Interior Noise Control
The analysis performed in this study indicates the noise reduction
provided by each exterior wall component in each proposed habitable area.
The A weighted sound transmission loss associated with the building
construction components which were used in the calculation of the
composite building shell noise attenuation is as follows.
Exterior Wall
Sliding Glass Door
Entry Door
1/4 inch glass
Windows:
-3/16" glass 25
-Double Strength Glass(DSB) 23
-Single Strength Glass(SSB) 22
Generalized Glazing Requirements
The floor plans and new building footprints were analyzed to potential
exterior -to -interior noise intrusion. The Transmission loss values are
calculated in Table 6. The composite wall analysis is shown in Table 7.
The exterior -to -interior calculations are shown in Table 8. The glazing
recommendations based on the results of Table 8 are designed to meet the
state and city interior noise criteria of 45 CNEL. These recommendations
are shown below. The exterior noise impacts used in the analysis are taken
from Table 5.
Glazing Requirements
1. 1/4 inch glass or Sound Transmission Class ( SIP)_ rated windaas 25
or gr!�ater
All windows on all elevations of new cardiac services bull _ding.
Interior noise levels are calculated to be less than 45 CNEL with doors
and windows closed, thus mechanical ventilation must be provided.
-3-
0 0
R4-032
April 28, 1994
Condenser Unit
The A -weighted sound level from the condenser unit at 3 feet is 84.2 dBA.
The nearest property line to the west is 122 feet. At that distance the
noise level drops to 52 dBA based on the following equation.
Noise level = 20 log 3/122 = 84.2 = 52 dBA
This equation is based on a point source and a noise drep-off rate of 6 dB
per doubling of distance. This value is less than the 55 dB standard of
the city, and thus conforms.
The analysis of the loading dock noise is based on the construction
activity noise model. No exact data was available so it was assumed there
would be trucks with trailers and medium (2 ton) trucks. During the site
visit no heavy trucks with trailer were observed. In a ten hour day it was
assumed 1 heavy truck every 5 hours. In addition it was assumed one medium
truck every hour on average. The noise model indicates the average noise
level (Leq) is calculated by summing the daily use, peak use and noise of
truck. The noise level is 82 for heavy trucks at 50 feet and 80 dB for
medium trucks. The daily use is the percentage of the day the trucks
operate and the peak use is the time the maximum horsepower is engaged
while at the site.
Leq = 10 log (daily use) + 10 log (peak use) + Level
For heavy trucks the values are:
Leq = 10 log (0.05) + 10 log (0.2) + 82 = 62 dBA.
Where 0.05 is 1 in 10 hours and 0.2 is maximum HP 20 % of time at site
For medium trucks the values are:
Leq = 10 log (0.166) + 10 Log (0.2) + 80 = 65.2 dBA
Where 0.166 is 10 minutes in every hour and 0.2 is 20 % maximum HP
The sum of the values 62 and 65.2 2 is 66.9 dBA at 50 feet. The nearest
condos are 200 west of the loading dock. At that distance the noise drops
off to 54.8 dBA whic is less than the 55 standard of the city by the
following equation.
Leq = 20 log (50/200) + 66.9 = 54.8 dBA
-4-
• 0
R4-032
April 28, 1994
conclusion
Following implementation of the recmm endations contained herein, it can
be expected that the intrusive interior noise criteria of the city of
Newport Beach will be met.
-5-
0
TABLE 2
A -Weighted Leq Noise Level Data Collected During A Representative
Sample Period On April 7, 1994, Together With Calculated Hourly
Leq Values And Resulting CNEL Value.
Site 1
One Hour Hourly Leq
Period Data, (dBA)
Hourly Leq
Weighting
Factor
Adjusted
Hourly Leq
0700
57.6
0.0
57.6
0800
55.7
0.0
55.7
0900
54.7
0.0
54.7
1000
54.6
0.0
54.6
1100
54.8
0.0
54.8
1200
54.9
0.0
54.9
1300
55.0
0.0
55.0
1400
55.2
0.0
55.2
1500
56.4 MEAS
0.0
56.4
1600
57.9
0.0
57.9
1700
57.6
0.0
57.6
1800
55.9
0.0
55.9
1900
54.5
5.0
59.5
2000
53.4
5.0
58.4
2100
52.7
5.0
57.7
2200
51.7
10.0
61.7
2300
51.1
10.0
61.1
0000
49.5
10.0
59.5
0100
47.1
10.0
57.1
0200
46.9
10.0
55.9
0300
44.1
10.0
54.1
0400
45.1
10.0
55.1
0500
48.9
10.0
58.9
0600
55.3
10.0
65.3
10 Log
( Sum Antilog of Adjusted Hourly Leq Values)
24
58.3 CNEL
TABLE 3
A -Weighted Leq Noise Level Data Collected During A Representative
Sample Period On April 7, 1994, Together With Calculated Hourly
Leq Values And Resulting CNEL Value.
Site 2
One Hour Hourly Leq
Period Data, (dBA)
Hourly Leq
Weighting
Factor
Adjusted
Hourly Leq
0700
55.9
0.0
55.9
0800
54.0
0.0
54.0
0900
53.0
0.0
53.0
1 000
52.9
0.0
52.9
1100
53.1
0.0
53.1
1200
53.2
0.0
53.2
1300
53.3
0.0
53.3
1400
53.5
0.0
53.5
1500
54.7 MEAS
0.0
54.7
1600
56.2
0.0
56.2
1700
55.9
0.0
55.9
1800
54.2
0.0
54.2
1900
52.8
5.0
57.8
2000
51.7
5.0
56.7
2100
51.0
5.0
56.0
2200
50.0
10.0
60.0
2300
49.4
10.0
59.4
0000
47.8
10.0
57.8
0100
45.4
10.0
55.4
0200
44.2
10.0
54.2
0300
42.4
10.0
52.4
0400
43.4
10.0
53.4
0500
47.2
10.0
57.2
0600
53.6
10.0
63.6
10 Log
( Sum Antilog of Adjusted Hourly Leq Values)
24
= 56.6 CNEL
0
TABLE 4
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
FHW (RD-77-108)
Client: Hoag Hospital Date:
Project: Cardiac Center 4-27-94
ROADWAY:
ADT:
AUTOS:
MEDIUM TRUCKS:
HEAVY TRUCKS:
TRAVEL SPEED:
ACTIVE HALF WIDTH:
DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE:
SINGLE LANE EQUIVALENT:
ANGLE OF VIEW:
ROAD GRADE
HARDISOFT:
Pacific Coast Highway
Future
58000
97.42 %
1.84 %
0.74 %
50 MPH
46.0 FEET
1400.0 FEET
1399.2 FEET
180.0 DEGREES
0.0 %
0.5
PROJECTED
NOISE IMPACT: 54.7 dB CNEL
CNEL A:
53.1 dB
CNEL MT:
46.5 d6
CNEL HT:
46.9 dB
CNELCONTOURS
Projected Distance
CNEL, dB To SLE, ft.
75
62.5
70
134.6
65
290.1
60
624.9
57
990.5
55
1346.4
Future Noise Impacts to Project Areas
AREA Distance to Future
Centerline, ft. CNEL
cardiac 1400 54.7
patio 1520 54.2
0
TABLE 6
GLAZING TRANSMISSION LOSS CALCULATION
Frequency: 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1000 Hz 2000 Hz 4000 Hz
Relative Traffic
Noise Spectra: 65.5 69 74 79 78.5 72.5
SSB Glass TL:
West. Elect. Labs
STL Test # 77-114
DSB Glass TL:
West. Elect. Labs
STL Test # 382-76
3/16" Glass TL:
West. Elect. Labs
STL Test # 77-120
65.5
69
74
-14
-17
-19
51.5 _
52
55
65.5 69 74
-19 -18 -21
46.5 51 53
SUM
79
78.5
72.5
83.1
-24
-25
-25
55
M53.5
47.5
60.8
22.3 = TL
79
78.5
72.5
83.1
-24
-25
-26
55
53.5
46.5
59.8
23.3 = TL
78.5 72.5 83.1
-26 -28
52.5 44.5 58
25.1 = TL
65.5 69 74 79 78.5 72.5 83.1
3/16" SI. GI. Dr.: -25 -25 -26 -29 -26 -26
NBS Test #W-16-72 ------ ----- ------ --------------------
40.5 44 48 50 52.5 46.5 56.3
Solid Core Door:
NBS TEST #W-90-71
65.5
69
74
79
-19
-19
-23
-27
------
46.5
------
50
51
52
65.5
69
-21
-27
44.5
42
74
79
-30
-26
44
53
65.5 69 74 79
Exterior Wall: -30 -37 -47 -51.5
NBS TEST #W-50-71 ------ ------ ------------
35.5 32 27 27.5
26.9 = TL
78.5
72.5
83.1
-25
-29
53.5
43.5
57.1
26 = TL
78.5
72.5
83.1
-55
-60
23.5
12.5
38.1
45 = TL
0
TABLE 7
COMPOSITE WALL ANALYSIS
Building:
ROOM/
COMPONET
COMPONET
COMPONET
—i
Si/S
—i*Si/S
COMPOSITE
AREA, Sq.FT.
TL, dB
TL, dB
West
Wall
577
43
0.00005
0.8014
0.00004
33.6
1/4" gl.
143
27
0.001995
0.1986
0.000396
1
0
0
1
0
0
South
Wall
536
43
0.00005
0.8158
0.000041
33.9
1/4" gi.
121
27
0.001995
0.1842
0.000367
1
0
0
1
0
0
North
Wall
460
43
0.00005
0.7002
0.000035
30.7
1/4" gl.
77
27
0.001995
0.1172
0.000234
doors
120
25
0.003162
0.1826
0.000578
0
TABLE 8
Calculation of Exteroior-To-interior Noise Intrusion
Area Exterior
Glazing
Atten
Design
IRITRIOR
CNEL, dB
Type
dBA
Factor
CNEL,
West 58.3
1/4"
33.6
+6
30.7
South 58.3
1/4"
33.9
+6
30.4
North 58.3
1/4"
30.7
+6
33.6
0
mary
n
ig\L
1^
Iy�r%r��J��
I�".CYl
'.♦
FIGURE 1: Site Location Map
o
EXIST. BUILDING LINE •
JHJKHJH
i >
A p
m
H
m
K3 II au
l'CESSIULC - I
---------- •-___I_
CoNcol iC
WA,KWIAY
FIGURE 2: Site YRas 7T2A mt IA03t1Ons
r
z
m
i
ZEXIST.LOADING
O
� •� \'•�EXIB
�I
• HOAG MEaYR&L9HOSPITAL�'Ie�25_•____.
INTRAHQ4L3 fALSMEM iANDUM
& ,CONSTRUCTION
TO: Leif Thompson, V.P., Facilities, Design & Construction
FROM: Luke Keeley, Manager Of Plant Operations
DATE: August 26, 1993
SUBJECT: Relocation of Surgery Exhaust Fan
I was given a drawing (see attached), by Tsuchiyama & Kaino from Dubby Evins. He
requested that I have a contractor perform the work as detailed on the drawings. K & S
Air Conditioning performed the work which was completed on approximately
October 1, 1991. 1 was told that this would reduce the noise level of the fan exhaust to
an acceptable level.
,K 3 -2? 7
10-22-91 07:04 PM FROM I'A&,, GAINES . E'U2'U2
&./5T,' CGJC,
MAD
o_.-....1.*LAM
EgdrP�ENT
a
4 Co ct
J9AL75
TI.SREx' M04,
Rmu-C-0 -sH
R-o0 5 (¢ 7C7,)
v2 n¢ ExP.
4YS4v-(,54N-Q/ -A*T
FR/CC;R .7C�1;,4CING
CN.ORID .Y /T" !L. ON(IT N0.
Ho,4G MEMDRlal. 75UCy/ y�MA+� ka�7
TAYLOR & GAINES H(:)%SPITAL CaMSLIMM:7
Z.
I
rstgUtST -FOR APPROMPIATION OF FUNDS (RF (CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
p AT[ D[►ARTY[NT MANINO R [[T OI.ARTY[NT NVMR[R
.� E EEd'�Mfi of�.r�rro;w � 4' 70 1 C n
IL
NO
- nap LJ[OLO LJ TRAO[ IN LJ AOOITION UOISPOtAL ONLY ❑T IA au`�An
O R[OY[[T (� (�
AELo"Iw .,S'uK6£xy
0
..... ..AR•. ANp "ON[ NUMO[R or V[NOOR:
XAS A/K :2$3o 1//A. MArrYuS AC4 92JOG
tat [CIAL IM tTRY CTIOMt/C OMDITI....... O UPON IT V[N OR Y
tV``4Do0' T �,CEFi!/f /VIAMJK. AS?b �/N/.+rrz[� .Sf�/7pew� %/Me
VA00A , O .Sc0dLA0L& uol
pcof /PCivoEA f',cE»slon ,41*64 . cs>�rsl�
gEd2uE.f7E' Ay
p(/ P
Fi+c;rrr;Fs
�cSlfrA) fiN�
CaNl'lKuc^ieoJ %o �c�C
soc,u.0 ze- [S
Twyw,.r�iTs�
o G'oul o
tivA'J /VEec;
�'a /fati�T�+G
MATERIAL, S
LABOR
SALES TA%
FREIGHT
TOTAL $ J" yajoc
❑ BUDGETED ITEM - BUDGET YEAR
9ONB�OGE.�DITEMURGENTLY NEEDED
RI
Erva ,.[[ [RRILAR•T.•N AtTACNR\I
:9 O"UNO{ IRRYIRIITRAYIYI .04 0R..1
❑ RESTRICTED FUNDS
❑ BOARD DESIGNATED
❑ OPERATING
OAT[: AOYININTRATIV[ AI/ROYAL: OAT[:
nwi
•
Tsuchiyama & Kaino
Consulting Mechanical Engineers
Principals
Senior Associate
Victor M. Tsuchiyama, P.E.
Thomas S. Kaya
Kenneth K. Kaino, P.E.
Associates
July 2 , 1991
Stanley S. Sato
Cindi L. Noll
Keith Matoi
Larry Sun, P.E.
Mr. F.W. Evins, Vice President
Facilities Design & Construction
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 Newport Boulevard
Box Y
Newport Beach, California.92658-8912
Subject: Exhaust Fan (EF-8) Noise @ West End of Hospital
Dear Dubbie:
Pursuant to your call Friday, we reviewed the material we had
previously gathered and revisited the fan room to view the
subject exhaust fan. We also have reviewed our recommendations
with Mestre Greve Associates. We predict that a 20% reduction of
the noise recorded outside the fan room can be easily achieved.
Our recommendation is to relocate the fan back (to the east)
approximately 5-6 ft. The fan discharge is now fairly close to
the concrete block wall (approx. 4 ft.) and we are experiencing
high localized velocities across the concrete block openings. The
average velocity across the entire face (about 7 ft. high by 5
ft. wide) is about 800 feet per minute (fpm). With the fan as
close to the block wall as it is, we predict that the localized
velocities may run as high as 2,000 fpm. By moving the fan and
transition back, we accomplish two objectives: 1) we can allow
the air to slow down to the lower average velocity, which reduces
the noise generated by the high velocity through the concrete
block openings and 2) we provide additional acoustically lined
duct length to attenuate the low frequency fan noise or create
space for the installation of a sound trap later, in the event
that just the duct length itself does not provide the proper
attenuation.
2010 Main Street • Suite 450 • Irvine • California 92714 • (714) 756-0565 • FAX: (714) 756-0927
� y
Tsuchiyama & Kamo • •
Consulting Mechanical Engineers
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
July 2, 1991
Page 2
If you have any questions or if additional information is
required, please call.
Sincerely,
TSUCHIYAMA & KAINO
Kenneth K. Kaino, P.E.
. 1500r044A
Tsuchiyama & Kaino
Consulting Mechanical Engineers
Principals Senior Associate .
Victor M. Tsuchiyama, P.E. tt--r� Thomas S. Kaya
Kenneth K. Kamo, P.E. I?E C E I It F U
Associates
July 18, 1991 J U L 2 2 1991 Stanley S. Salo
Cindi L. Noll
Keith Matoi
Larry Sun, P.E.
Mr. Vincent Mestre
MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES
280 Newport Center Drive, Suite 230
Newport Beach, California 92660
Subject: Exhaust Fan (EF-8) Noise @ West Side of Hospital
Adjacent to Villa Balboa Condominiums
Dear Vincent:
We have reviewed the material we had previously gathered with the
help of your office and revisited the Second Floor Fan Room to
view the subject exhaust fan. We estimate that a 7 to 8 dB
minimum reduction (in terms of L50) of the noise recorded outside
the fan room (at Site A at the west property line) can be easily
achieved. This would reduce the noise to within stipulated
levels.
If you have any questions or if additional information is
required, please call.
Sincerely,
TSUC IYAMA & KAINO L//���/
A t'T /�'.
Kenneth K. Kaino, P.E.
Principal
ds
cc: Ms. Pat Temple, Planning Department, City of Newport Beach
Ms. Amy Flom, LSA
Mr. F.W. Evins, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Mr. Neal Rinella, Taylor & Associates
Mr. William Bloomer, Mestre Greve Associates
2010 Main Street - Suite 450 - Irvine - California 92714 - (714) 756-0565 - FAX: (714) 756-0927
LAW/CRAND,ALL, INC.
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REPORT OF CONSULTATION REGARDING
FOUNDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA
FOR
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
(092072.AB)
DECEMBER 16, 1991'
I�
�cLAW/CRANDALL, *C.
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
December 22, 1992
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard
Box Y
Newport Beach, California 92658-8912
Attention: Mr. F. W. Evins
Gentlemen:
Drilled Pile Capacities
Proposed Cardiac Services Addition
301 Newport Boulevard
Ne�ort Beach California Beach California
�na•/I
}U'1 04
s11
(092072.AB)
It has come to our attention that the drilled pile capacities plate was missing from our
report of consultation regarding foundation design, dated December 16, 1992, for the
subject project. Drilled pile capacity plates are enclosed; please make the necessary plate
insertion.
We are sorry for this error and for the resulting inconvenience. Please call us if you
require additional information.
Sincerely,
LAW/ INC.
Shahen Askari
Principal Engineer
Branch Manager
OC19/PS/mw
Attachments (1)
(2 copies submitted)
cc: (1) Taylor & Gaines
Attn: Mr. Saurin Chakrabarti
(3) Barry Klein Architects
Attn: Mr. Barry Klein
200 CITADEL DRIVE • LOS ANGELES, CA 90040
(213)889.5300 • FAX(213) 721-6700
f
ONE OF INENWCOMPANIES
EMI
l�J
I
I
December 16, 1992
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard
Box Y 092072.AB)
Newport Beach, California 92658-8912
Attention: Mr. F. W. Evins
Gentlemen:
We are pleased to submit our 'Report of Consultation Regarding Foundation Design,
Proposed Cardiac Services Addition, 301 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California,
for Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian."
The scope of the consultation was planned in collaboration with Mr. Hodge C. Gaines of
Taylor & Gaines, Structural Engineers. We were advised of the structural features of the
addition by Taylor & Gaines, and the results of our consultation and preliminary
foundation recommendations were discussed with them.
The results of our prior investigation at the site and recommendations for design of
foundations, grading, and for floor slab support are presented in the report.
It has been a pleasure to be of professional service to you on this project. Please call if
you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance.
Respectfully submitted,
LAW/CRANDALL, INC.
It �,�� Q�t iY ASS! F9
IV CID No. 101
9�
Paul R. Schade x Shahen Askari
a- W Exp. 12.31-93 n
No. 49679 rn tie
Project Engineer d Exp. 9 30.96 Principal Engineer
41_ Branch Manager
OC18/PS/mw
(2 copies submitted)
cc: (1) Taylor & Gaines
Attn: Mr. Hodge G. Gaines
(3) Barry Klein Architects
Attn: Mr. Barry Klein
REPORT OF CONSULTATION REGARDING
FOUNDATION DESIGN
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
FOR
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
092072.AB 0
Page 1
1
SCOPE
This report presents the results of our geotechnical consultation performed for the
proposed Cardiac Services Addition. The locations of the proposed addition and our
prior nearby exploration borings are shown on Plate 1, Plot Plan.
This investigation was authorized to review the field and laboratory data obtained in our
prior nearby investigations, and to provide recommendations for foundation design and
floor slab support for the proposed addition. More specifically, the scope of the
investigation included the following objectives:
• To evaluate the subsurface conditions, including the soil and ground
water conditions within the area of proposed construction.
• To recommend appropriate foundation systems along with the
necessary design parameters.
• To provide recommendations concerning construction procedures and
quality control measures relating to earthwork.
• To provide recommendations for floor slab support.
The assessment of general site environmental conditions or the presence of pollutants in
the soil and ground water at the site was beyond the scope of this investigation.
Our recommendations
are based
on the results of our
prior field explorations
and
laboratory tests and
appropriate
engineering analyses.
The results of the
field
explorations and laboratory tests are presented in the attached Appendix.
Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill
ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants
O92072.AB •
0 Page 2
practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made
as to the professional advice included in this report. This report has been prepared for
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and their design consultants to be used solely in
the design of the proposed development. The report has not been prepared for use by
other parties, and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or
other uses.
PRIORIES
We have performed several investigations for nearby projects, within the hospital complex.
We have been able to use the results of those prior investigations in this study. The logs
of nearby prior borings are presented in the Appendix. The pertinent prior investigations
are as follows:
• GeotechnicalInvestigation'
Proposed South Tower Addition, for Hoag
Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (AE-84159).
• Foundation Investigation, Proposed Nursing Wing and Power Plant,
for Hoag Memorial Hospital (A-69080).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Cardiac Services Addition will be located on the west side of the existing
hospital building. The addition will be one story in height and will be of light frame
rd
construction. The maximum column loads are estimated to be about 40 kips. The floor
of the addition will match the lower floor elevation of the adjacent existing hospital; some
✓compacted fill will be required to achieve the desired floor elevation. We understand the
foundations of the adjacent hospital may be about 10 to 12 feet below grade.
O92072.AB • , Page 3
EXPLORATIONS AND TESTS
FIELD INVESTIGATION
The soil conditions beneath the site were explored during our previous investigations by
drilling four borings. The locations of the prior borings are shown on Plate 1, Plot Plan.
Details of the explorations and logs of the prior borings are presented in the Appendix.
LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory tests were performed during our previous investigations on selected samples
obtained from the borings to aid in the classification of the soils and to determine their
engineering properties. The following tests were performed: moisture content and dry
density determinations, direct shear, consolidation, and compaction. Details of the
laboratory testing program and test results are presented in the Appendix.
SOIL CONDITIONS
Fill soils, 2 to 11 feet in thickness, were encountered in the borings. The fill consists of
moderately firm silty sand, clay and silt, and contains only slight debris. Deeper and/or
poorer quality fill could occur between borings.
The natural soils consist primarily of medium dense to dense sand and silty sand and
medium stiff silt and clay.
Ground water seepage was encountered at depths of 27 to 32 feet below ground surface.
Ground water levels were measured at 34 to 49'/2 feet below ground surface.
O92072.AB •
• Page 4
RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Feasible Foundation Types
Shallow and deep foundation systems have been considered for support of the proposed
addition. The fill soils are not considered suitable for support of the proposed addition
because of settlement considerations: If the existing fill soils are excavated and properly
recompacted, the addition could be supported on spread footings in the compacted fill.
Alternatively, the addition could be supported on drilled cast -in -place concrete piling
extending through the fill and into the natural soils.
Recommendations for grading and support of floor slabs are presented in following
sections of the report.
Spread Footings
Bearing Value
Spread footings for -the addition supported in the undisturbed natural soils or properly
compacted fill, compacted to at least 90%, and extending at leastl,2 feet below the
adjacent grade or floor level may be designed to impose a net dead plus live load pressure
t/ of 2,500 pounds per square foot.
Footings for minor structures (retaining walls less than about 5 feet in height, etc.)
established in the undisturbed natural soils or properly compacted fill may be designed to
impose a net dead plus live load pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot at a depth of
11/2 feet below the adjacent grade.
A one-third increase in the bearing values may be used for wind or seismic loads. The
recommended bearing values are net values. The weight of concrete in spread footings
O92072.AB • . Page 5
may be taken as 50 pounds per cubic foot and the weight of soil backfill neglected when
determining the downward loads.
While the actual bearing value of any required fill will depend on the material used and
the compaction methods employed, the quoted bearing values will be applicable if accept-
able soils are used and are compacted as recommended. The bearing value of the fill
should be confirmed during the grading.
Settlement
The settlement of the proposed addition, supported on spread footings in the manner
recommended will be about '/2-inch.
Lateral Loads
Lateral loads may be resisted by soil friction and by the passive resistance of the soils. A
coefficient of friction of 0.4 may be used between footings or the floor slabs and the
supporting soils. The passive resistance of the natural soils or properly compacted fill
against footings may be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a fluid with a
density of 250 pounds per cubic foot. A one-third increase in the passive value may be
used for wind or seismic loads. The frictional resistance and the passive resistance of the
soils may be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance.
Footing Observation
To verify the presence of satisfactory soils at design elevations, all footing excavations
should be observed by personnel of our firm. Footing excavations deeper than 5 feet
should be sloped back at 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) or shored.
Inspection of footing excavations may also be required by the appropriate reviewing
governmental agencies. The contractor should be familiar with the inspection require-
ments of the reviewing agencies.
O92072.AB 0
Page 6
All applicable requirements, including OSHA requirements, should be met.
Backfill and Drainage
All required footing backfill and utility trench backfill within the building areas should be
mechanically compacted; flooding should not be permitted. Measures should be taken to
prevent ponding of water adjacent to the proposed structures. The exterior grades should
be sloped to drain away from the structure to minimize• ponding of water adjacent to the
foundations. Proper grade and drainage devices should be provided to direct water away
from the building areas.
Drilled Piline
Drilled Pile Capacities
The downward and upward capacities of 18-, 24-, and 30-inch-diameter piles are presented
on Plate 2, Drilled Pile Capacities. Dead plus live load capacities are shown; a one-third
increase may be used when considering wind or seismic loads. The capacities are based
on penetration into undisturbed natural soils. Longer piles will be required if the fill
thickness is found to be greater than 11 feet during installation. The capacities are based
on the strength of the soils; the compressive and tensile strength of the pile section itself
should be checked to verify the structural capacity of the piles.
Piles in groups should be spaced at least 2%2 diameters on centers. If the piles are so
spaced, no reduction in the downward capacities of the piles need be considered due to
group action.
Settlement
The settlement of the proposed structure, supported on drilled piling in the manner
recommended, will be about '/4-inch.
O92072.AB 0 • Page 7
E
Lateral Loads
Lateral loads may be resisted by the piles, by soil friction on the floor slab, and by the
passive resistance of the soils. The soils adjacent to a 18-inch-diameter pile, at least 20
feet long, can resist horizontal loads imposed at the top of the pile up to 9,000 pounds.
The lateral resistance of other sizes of piles may be assumed to be proportional to the
diameter.
In calculating the maximum bending moment in a pile, the lateral load imposed at the top
of the pile may be multiplied by a' moment arm of 5 feet. For design, it may be assumed
that the maximum bending moment will occur near the top of the pile and that the
moment will decrease to zero at a depth of 20 feet below the pile cap. The lateral
capacity and reduction in the bending moment are based in part on the assumption that
any required backfill adjacent to the pile caps and grade beams will be properly
compacted.
} A coefficient of friction of 0.4 may be used between the floor slab and the supporting
soils. The passive resistance of the natural soils or properly compacted fill soils against
pile caps and grade beams may be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a
fluid with a density of 250 pounds per cubic foot. A one-third increase in the quoted
passive value may be used when considering wind or seismic loads.
The resistance of the piles, the passive resistance of the soils against pile caps and grade
beams, and the frictional resistance between the floor slab and the supporting soils may
be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance. If the actual
lateral loads on the structure can be resisted by the piles or by the passive resistance, or
by a combination of these elements, it is our opinion that foundation tie -beams between
piles will not be necessary unless there are other reasons for including them.
O92072.AB
• Page 8
Installation
All drilled pile excavations should be observed by personnel of our firm. Longer piles will
be required if the fill thickness is found to be greater than 11 feet during installation.
Our prior exploration borings were drilled to depths. of up to 50 feet with 18-inch-
diameter bucket -type drilling equipment. Heavy caving and sloughing of the auger boring
walls occurred during drilling in one boring below a depth of 32 feet from the ground
surface. Precautions should be taken during the installation of the piles to reduce caving
and raveling. Among other precautions, the drilling speed should be reduced as necessary
to minimize vibration and sloughing of the sand deposits.
Piles located 5 diameters on center or closer should be drilled and filled alternately, with
the concrete permitted to set at least eight hours before drilling an adjacent hole. Pile
excavations should be filled with concrete as soon after drilling and inspection as possible;
1 the holes should not be left open overnight. The concrete should be placed with special
equipment so that the concrete is not allowed to fall freely more than 5 feet and to
prevent concrete from striking the walls of the excavations.
GRADING
General
After clearing the site, the existing fill soils within the proposed building area should be
excavated. If the building is to be supported on piling extending into the natural soils and
the slab is to be structurally supported, the existing fill may be left in place. If the slab
is to be supported on grade and some potential for future settlement of the floor slab is
acceptable, at least the upper two feet of fill below the existing grade could be excavated,
but not less than 3 feet below the final grade. The exterior grades should be sloped to
drain away from the structure to minimize ponding of water adjacent to the foundations.
O92072.AB •
• Page 9
Compaction
After excavating as recommended, the exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of
6 inches and rolled with heavy compaction equipment. The upper 6 inches of exposed
soils should be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density obtainable by the
ASTM Designation D1557-78 method of compaction. All required fill should be placed
in loose lifts not more than 8 inches in thickness and compacted to at least 90%. It is
recommended that the moisture content of the sands and silts at the at the time of
compaction vary no more than 2% below of 2% above optimum moisture content. The
moisture content of the clay soils should be brought to about 4% over optimum moisture
content.
Material for Fill
The on -site soils, less any debris or organic matter within existing fill, may be used in
compacted fills. Clay soils should not be used within 1• foot of the subgrade beneath
concrete slabs on grade.
Field Observation
The reworking of the upper soils and the compaction of all required fill should be
observed and tested by a representative of our firm. This representative should .have at
least the following duties:
• Observe the clearing and grubbing operations to assure that all
unsuitable materials have been properly removed.
• Observe the exposed subgrade in areas to receive fill and in areas
where excavation has resulted in the desired finished subgrade,
observe proof -rolling, and delineate areas requiring overexcavation.
• Perform visual observation to evaluate the suitability of on -site and
import soils for fill placement; collect and submit soil samples for
required or recommended laboratory testing where necessary.
O92072.AB •
• Page 10
Perform field density and compaction testing to determine the
percentage of compaction achieved during fill placement.
• Observe and probe foundation bearing materials to confirm that
suitable bearing materials are present at the design grades.
• Observe the installation of drilled piles.
The governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the project should be notified prior
to commencement of grading so that the necessary grading permits may be obtained and
arrangements may be made for the required inspection(s).
FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT
If the existing fill soils are excavated and properly recompacted, the floor slab and
adjacent walks and slabs may be supported on grade. If the fill is left in place and the
addition is supported on piling, we recommend that the slabs be structurally supported.
However, if the fill thickness is too great making the reworking of it uneconomical, and
if some risk of settlement is acceptable, the upper soils may be excavated to a depth of
at least 2 feet below the existing grade but not less than 3 feet below the final grade. If
only the upper fill soils are excavated, there is a potential for up to 2 inches of additional
r
settlement due to consolidation of the underlying left in place fill soils. �3 ��� /✓
Construction activities and exposure to the environment can cause deterioration of
prepared subgrades. Therefore, we recommend that our field representative observe the
condition of the final subgrade soils immediately prior to slab on grade construction and,
if necessary, perform further field density and moisture content tests to determine the
suitability of the final prepared subgrade.
O92072.As • •
Page 11
Where a floor slab covering that would be critically affected by moisture, such as vinyl,
is to be used, we suggest that the floor slab be supported on a 4-inch-thick layer of gravel
or on an impermeable membrane as a capillary break. A suggested gradation for the
gravel layer would be as follows:
Sieve Size
Percent Passing
3/4"
90 - 100
No. 4
0 - 10
No. 100
0-3
If the membrane is used, a low -slump concrete should be used to minimize possible
curling of the slabs. The concrete slabs should be allowed to cure properly before placing
vinyl or other moisture -sensitive floor covering.
C0YI _11-
• Page 12
BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations provided in this report are based on our understanding of the
described project information and on our interpretation of the data collected during the
subsurface exploration. We have made our recommendations based on experience with
similar subsurface conditions under similar loading conditions. The recommendations
apply to the specific project discussed in this report; therefore, any change in building
loads, building location, or site grades should be provided to us so we may review our
conclusions and recommendations and make any necessary modifications.
The recommendations provided in this report are also based on the assumption that the
necessary geotechnical observations and testing during construction will be performed by
representatives of our firm. The field observation services are considered a continuation
of the geotechnical investigation and essential to verify that the actual soil conditions are
as anticipated. This also provides for the procedure whereby the client can be advised of
unanticipated or changed conditions that would require modifications of our original
recommendations. In addition, the presence of our representative at the site provides the
client with an independent professional opinion regarding the geotechnically related
construction procedures. If another firm is retained for the geotechnical observation
services, our professional responsibility and liability would be impaired.
.1.
J
I :.
s"
W
O
W
F
Q
t-
m
O
\
DOWNWARD PILE CAPACITY in Kips
0 so 100 150 200 250
0
y
d
d
LL
c
10
a
Minimum
Recommended
Pile Penetration
1
O92072.AB
APPENDIX
EXPLORATIONS
Page A-1
The soil conditions beneath the site were explored during two previous investigations by
drilling four borings at the locations shown on Plate 1. The borings were drilled to depths
of 45 to 51 feet below the existing grade using 18-inch-diameter bucket -type drilling
equipment. Caving of the boring walls did occur during the drilling of one boring with the
bucket auger but casing or drilling mud was not used to extend the bucket borings to the
depths drilled.
The soils encountered were logged by our field technician, and undisturbed and loose
samples were obtained for laboratory inspection and testing. The logs of the previous
borings are presented on Plates A-1.1 through A-1.4; the depths at which undisturbed
samples were obtained are indicated to the left of the boring logs. The energy required to
drive the sampler 12 inches is indicated on the logs. The soils are classified in accordance
with the Unified Soil Classification System described on Plate A-2.
LABORATORY TESTS
The field moisture content and dry density of the soils encountered were determined by
performing tests on the undisturbed samples. The results of the tests are shown to the left
of the boring logs.
Direct shear tests were performed on selected undisturbed natural samples from our two
previous investigations to determine the strength of the soils. The tests were performed
at field and increased moisture contents and at various surcharge pressures. The yield -point
values determined from the direct shear tests are presented on Plate A-3.1 and A-3.2,
Direct Shear Test Data.
O92072.AB
Page A-2
Confined consolidation tests were performed on four undisturbed samples to determine the
compressibility of the soils. Water was added to one undisturbed sample during the test.
The results of the tests are presented on Plates A-4.1 through A-4.3, Consolidation Test
Data.
•1.
w
a
�w
wE_
~ 60
az
oa
Zy
aZ
z0
op
0 55
0
c� w
Z=
ct5
0
mQ
v
W z 50
U O
wp
Q. f0
wz
=o
Fw
as
r W 45
ZJ M
O m
0 y
W
J b
a
aW
a�
zP 40
w~
WW
z
W W
=W
cr
za
0w
o(r
_W
Nm
z o
Z�
0
Iw
O
Z
tz
\
y \ .l.le 41
8.5
129
3
1
5
9.8
122
1
11.0
117
1
10
13.3
117
3
7
15
4.6
100
5
20
2.5,
100
10
;:•
BORING I
V�
DATE DRILLED: June 4, 1984
EQUIPMENT USED: 18"-Diameter Bucket
ELEVATION 63.7* (PRIOR JOB AE-84159)
SUM FILL - SILTY SAND, SANDY SILT and SILTY
MCLAY - mottled brown
FILL - SILTY SAND - fine, brown
Grey and brown
SANDY CLAY - light brown
SILTY CLAY - light brown
Thin layers of Sand, light -brown and light
grey
SAND - fine, light brown
111311 Thin layers of Sandy Silt
I�25
(CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PLATE)
*See Plate 1 for location and elevation of
bench mark.
LOG OF BORING
LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
W
a
mW
wf
a z 35
ma
Z y
QZ
l ZO
oP
a8
o 30
J
O 0 w
Y Z=
U EE
m G
U
ge "z 25
a Wo
3 NCL
w
F O
VMS a v
J? 20
i om
1
Wcn
w
Jb
a
° w
m a,
Z t= 15
OF
v Irw
w
Co xw
co Zw
oa:
tD N W 10
m
W N
O
O O F-
t- O
O W
Z Z
O<
_ wQ
v Li
Co Cr
W N Z
Q m y
m—
O F•
O
0
�w
J Q
U
w O
SZ
.� W
N 0
Z
E
o`
30
2.3
87
6
35
8.9
72
2
40
2.1
56
4
45
1.1
55
4
50
�2.1
66
8
55
BORING 1 (CONTINUED)
DATE DRILLED: .Tune 4, 1984
EQUIPMENT USED: 18"-Diameter Bucket
.Thin layer of Clay
SANDY SILT - light grey
CL[ SILTY CLAY (POSSIBLE WEATHERED SHALE) - grey
Light greyish -brown
Gypsum fragments
SHALE - massive, dark grey to black
NOTE: Slight water seepage encountered. at a depth
of 27'. Water level measured at 4931' 10
minutes after completion of drilling. No
caving.
LOG OF BORING
LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
11 "S
fW-
oWw
wf
Fp
QZ
oa
z N
Q z
ZO
Of
ta; o
0
CD w
zx
¢�
0
mQ
U
LL z
Z
W
tan O
W z
f' O
F twj
QQI
LL
J M
'6m
N N
W
Jb
a
aW
r
WZ
M
WW
xw
zW
oM
zW
N m
0 O
O r'
h a
ow
z
oz
U �
W K
U Q
N Z
m 0
D -
tn
F
LL -
O
O
O Q
U
W
z.0
Pz
W
8
z
z
Of v _
35
30
30
1
35
I
j
25
I
120.1
1106
10
l
40
I
i
I
i
20
I
45 •
22
101
10
1 1
15
cn
0
M
o;.
BORING 2
SATE DRILLED: June 4, 1984
IIPMENT USED: 18"—Diameter Bucket
Some gravel
Some medium Sand
(CONTINUED)
(BORING TERMINATED DUE TO HEAVY CAVING,
SLOUGHING, AND LACI: OF PROGRESS)
NOTE: Water seepage encountered at a depth of
321. Water level measured at 34' 20
minutes after completion of drilling.
Heavy caving and sloughing below 32'.
LOG OF BORING
LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
01 ATl A _1 Vh
\ A BORING 3
4 9��t�, � DATE DRILLED : April 28, 1969
JP�`O Q�Z oyCJa�O�?c°�Q�' EQUIPMENT USED: 18 "-Diameter Bucket
(PRIOR JOB A-69080)
�i ELEVATION 62.0
` C FILL -CLAYEY SAND and SILTY CLAY MIXTURE -
60 ' L brown
8.5 113
5
16.4 113
55 .: p SAND -fine, some Clay, brown
8.5 113
1
6.7 101
50 Coarse, few gravel =
4.5 109 ~�`
L SILTY CLAY - mottled grey and brown
15 NOTE: Water encountered at a depth of 39'; water
30.7 91 level at a depth of 40' 15 minutes after com-
45 pletion of drilling. No caving.
40
35
30
25
PA
30.01 94
P
SAND - fine, light grey
7.8
88
Cemented layer
17.6
101
Layer of SILTY SAND
4.2
111
Few aravel
Layer of SILTY SAND
19.5
106
Clayey, mottled dary grey and brown
1 ar L SANDY SILT - mottled grey and brown
38.1 83
'__EROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
PI ATF A-1 0
BORING 5--
DATE DRILLED :May 2, 1969
EQUIPMENT USED:18"-Diameter Bucket
(PRIOR JOB A-69080)
C1 CVATI/1A1
M
FILL -SILTY SAND and CLAYEY SILTMIXiURE -
L
brown .
8.3
105
CLAYEY SAND - Fine, rootlets, brown
60
9.8
105
4.7
104
11
3P
SAND - fine, some Clay, light brown
55
I 3.3
100
1
SILTY CLAY - jointed, mottled grey and brown
CL
29.3I
95
NOTE: Water encountered at a depth of 36'; water
50
level at a depth of 38' 15 minutes after com-
1 29.7
94
pletion of drilling. No caving.
45
SILTY SAN D - fine, light grey
M
2'
i
40
2 5.0
93
Brownish -grey
i
Layer of CLAYEY SAND
35
I
L
SANDY SILT - some mica, brownish -grey
3 24.7!
95
30 -
CLAYEY SAND - fine, few gravel, brownish -grey
C
7
3
77
SAND - fine, few gravel, some Clay, mottled brown
i
G
and grey
25
-
14.3
117
SILTY CLAY - jointed, grey
L
20
LOG OF BORING
45L42.3
a.. •..••v. v�••"•�. V•1lV •"••.� •'1JJV VIMILJ
Di ft t- A-1 A
C
1
�h
5
W
H
Q
0
SHEAR STRENGTH in Pounds per Square Foot
^• 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
0`
O
O
lL
d 10
v
7
Cr
C• 2000—
C
7
O
d
3000
C_
W
w
a 4000
W
0
Q
U 5 -.0•.?
KEY.
6000
• Tests of geld moisture cament
o Tests c: Increased moisture content
DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA
(PRIOR JOB A-69080)
I EROY CRAN'JALL a ASS.00I:.TE:.
U)
I
�
`'eie I
PROPOSED NURSING EYING
/ate 2/
•
CQ�• /OOSI •
6@ 20
�GT� I�.e •9�s
I
I
.9Ee •p 9�9
�
I I
9� •B@��
I
\
30R;;•JG �JV3cR•
B
.�SH1AP:.E :I�PTrI
(r -( 1
PLATE A-3.2
0.01
2
U
Z
0.02
Cr
w
a
M
w
= 0.03
U
Z
r.
Z 0.04
O
F—
a
0
J
O
to
Z 0.05
O
U
0.06
0.07
LOAD .IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 20 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 &0
Boring 1 at 35'
SILTY CLAY
(POSSIBLE WEATHERED SHALE)
Borir_g .2 at 15'
SILTY CT,AY
(POSSIBLE WEATHERED SHALE)
NOTE: Samples tested at field moisture content.
CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA
(PRIOR JOB AE-84159)
LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
PLATE A-411 "
LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT
0
Y
2
U
nu
w
0
�•S
t�
I
6
:t
I•
0.01
z
U
z 0.02
U
w
0.03
z
z
0 0.04
t-
a
0
J
O
z 0.05
O
U
0.06
0.0%
LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT
0.6 0.8 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 20.0 30.0
I!
I
Boring
5 at 4'
•
II
SILTY
SAND
I ! I
I
j
I
IL
I \
I
I
I
I
�� I l t
'
i �
`�
I
I
I
I•
I
I
i
X1, I ;
Boring C• at 30'
I
! I SANDY SILT
NOTE: 'Wcter added to sample from :.oring 5 after consolidation
under a load of 3.6 kips per square foot. The other
sample tested at field moisture content.
CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA
(PRIOR JOB A-69080)
LEROY CRANDALL 8 ASSOCIATES
a. nTc A-4. 7
c.
' 1 . �4 G]egg1
r Ito t i 1` N
'� mar. ,"i. . ,
a1.
- ,, - x - �• e'.tir.' yt:
�'
l 1" i , _ f
,r ��, _
lit I�'.�� , �l a a. *.. .. _ s, .Ji.. .ail - K
w5 - - { t Q. `p .,
it 1
$ - -Tr b .i �yrofK
- .. - - ., . _ Y -
�11
Y - 3„% y, -, - „e- -',b ..-a �.1 t l i q -� -n��
t
r
r S q 'h •= _ - _ _ _L. _
I. .,,
_ _ , . _ C
-t "'- t- - Y..1rt`,t .�
-' - - .-, r
s.'V,, _° . - _ d1 4t - _ - .� de,e
r4/ S✓ _ .. . K _ 5.
NT
.y, a.r - 3 .. < 'F - - -m'.
l' PR iI
��
..ltt� -1. rd„_ ,, $x 7k - 'S at - - t t _
.s, _ l - a° - - -i F� _ 1
�S S . ,'.t .'' It { - i-
.. - -* .g, k i.", ,#.. A
`''- f Y 'r` ti n i" .. 4.,n.,, `-. 5 - - M1 LJ f - S'ti i-
.-.
�_ .w Y w v - ,-iC e>
t' - ;x '.Y - h _ - - - _ Y -f _ „�- r`
,v. -.r - i' I - i x e �Ss
d3r I C x' !� i s, ,•;7
,' "
S Cn 1
_ = _ 4 - - 4 a . '(ilr:
- .}' x R.
s _ 'r,- - _ r -„
` cS
m ,,''-
m
:.>, "
y-. ,w
x
r'
Ri "m
,., t - .- . - �i. _
t i �' 'S r a. - ,a. x,'- t - 'y "ve'Se:
:S
{ In t, .t -s
! _ i , 'h _ -
j - -
.
_ #, - _ _ Y, -
c}
th t
A Y r
Y
s'
-'. ..1st a'
- - _ ., - ti
1'; r-. - -' - yy j({
k.",
J_ "
: §i ,
,"'.
-r . �. y t s ;H : . , . :
- .4 1/ _ p 1
Ai
- - .. - - s - x I,,y.
W' "c' - _ 3 k
G- 1
. r
I
.�.' ! .- ... : - - - - L
'i - - '� .-tr { Y _-
4c ,.:-, a ., -y ,� z
j
_ - 4 �2 t C
n
`ai_ - -i:E.
h
A
k• q ;
1 *. k l#wf ,f _ _ < i 4 , - - h 3 _ _ a {..r 12.E '��'�
.ti
,..
3
-
.: -
1" ii
t�
s - " i u ti' ..
w ,
.n - . -
if, ] Y _ _ 1 _ - 1 _ 3
_! F._ _ ..% I—" - - -k 3. Vie_
!.
} r - - ,.,x,:
a. �- . . - I; f ,? - 1, r.
_ )TSM. T1r.
env - -
r:
y
lA
_ - _ ,, - 1 2i: 3 ,7, _
X
�,
rn _ _ - - _ ..,
ll>
f
,. 1 .a, .I, .,'.,� T,+.vtiv. f - i, x .r+'
M + C
" o
,_::
��
�. .te - ` t . -
_ Y a 'r , . - / n �48i� _ gc. V' Y
_ �1. 1.a .Lt R _
'y.:.k F - _ _ _ -V riV i-.:
S F _ .,. I'�
.: _
'r 1_ -,i,
_ e - - , 4 . - - >z
-1i `:�i
'I. 'e, -r- - -- :.'"s s l,' - "'s 's:r .r,
;td-` f4r - - - i :. -r..
�,
- £,. , i i -, + i _
_ %.14 - t es a _ - - -r, f,
-xe - L y _ _ - - t
-+:. - T ..a .J - - -M �.
,. a.. '1., 'c. � - - - .r :3,' �.��. - .: -r * qT
r..
- _ >`$ - _ o
- i .� �' _ ON iF - ai-
v11-1
il
try _ _ F" e e , .- 'z.. : t ,>.Y - -r,
- 4 ) - - t Y
a .c f,%
f ,' q IA :• _ .�
i JY: _ �` _ - 9:_
r ..� _ .r
. N _ fe'
1{ i Y� a
.. _c .a _ Ft� -
t
L� _ � 'Aq_