HomeMy WebLinkAboutCARDIAC_SERVICE_ADDITIONi
ifl
i
i
i
*NEW FILE*
i
i
i
CARDIAC_SERVICE_ADDITION
Joseph L. Boyle
ENGINEERING
(714)957-8144
2098 South Grand Avenue • Suites A & B • Santa Ana, CA 92705
( IERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING CORRONS ,,,(
ephoneaf -14 ,. .. Plan Check No: // 3Q-/,y
By:Genie Garcia, Associate Planner
By:Marc Mverel, Assistant Planner
Date:
Districting Map No.
Corrections Required: T //-O
Legal Description: Lot Block Section Tract
ag
Resubdivision required t6 dom"b'ine lots or portions of lots when cons r t on orJ
alterations are in excess of $20,000.
By:Christv Teaaue, Associate Planner
By:
Land Use Element Page N
Address:40/ c-reeickth(eqkt
Covenant required. Please have owner's signature notarized on the attached
document and return to me.
Lot Size
Zone ��
Proposed Use 1Lf%14���
Required etbacks)
Front
Rear
Right Side
Left pide
FAR WO SHEET 4 .
Lot area (site area sq.ft.):
Base Development Allocation (BDA):
comm sq.ft.
[0.5 x site area sq.ft., unless otherwise specified in Land Use Element]
FAR permitted, without variance: (A) comm res pkq
Square footage permitted: comm res pkq sq.ft.
[(A) x site area sq.ft.]
Maximum FAR allowed with variance: (B) comm res pkq
Maximum square footage allowed:
[(B) x site area sq.ft.] j
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
(C) Base FAR use sq.ft.
comm reel sq.ft.
5;979 �S
aq.
Xa3a-e-Al
(D) Reduced FAR use sq.ft. sq.ft.
(E) Maximum FAR use sq.ft. sq.ft.
(F) TOTAL SQ.FT. [C+D+E] sq.ft.
PROPOSED PAR: [ F % site area sq.ft. ]
PROPOSED WEIGHTED DEVELOPMENT:
FAR Use Category
(G)
Weighting Factor Weighted Sq.Ft.
(H) ( G x H )
sq.ft. Base X 1.00 sq.ft.
sq.ft. Reduced X 1.67 sq.ft.
sq.ft. Maximum X 0.50 sq.ft.
TOTAL WEIGHTED SQ.FT.(May not exceed BDA)
Provide tissue overlay of calculations to verify provided square footage.
Required Parking 1/4.23p1.1 (/.PJo 5
Proposed parking (Indicate numbe
Total On -Site Parking
Standard Compact
�O 1 In -lieu Paring
1 t - Q4� 2. 6 / /f�OO
Dimension Wild' g height as measured f natural grade to average and maximum
roof height 44) ah0Vt m s.L . f ' j� /
19
of stalls provided)
EX/5774)6 / /9s
fd Cif/co
/, /(o
ill'Show natural g line on all elevations
40
Shgpr y1L rocaftop mach i al e2ui ant ;d d nsion from grade directlybelow.
Indicate location of trash contain ne£s a plan. /U he. sceteacic/
Number of stories
Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses.
Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in
relation to the property line.
Fair S are Contribution 1 ,rL : /.ii __' �. . a ;�- -�-.illl��i
r65479? 6-r7
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee
SPECIAL APPROVAL.REOUIRED THROUGH:
Please indicate any discretionary approval numbers on the plans and incorporate
the attached; excerpt of minutes and list of findings and
conditions into the blueline drawings
approval letter into the blueline drawings
Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No. on Bluelinss
Modification required for
Plannina Commission/Citv Council:
Use Permit: No.
Variance: No.
Resubdivision/Tract: No.
Site Plan Reviews No.
Amendment: No.
Other
Public Works:
Easement/Encroachment Permit
Subdivision Engineer
Traffic Engineer
Approval of Landscape Plans
Buildina Department:
Grading Engineer
Parks Department:
Approval of Landscape Plans
Coastal Development Permits:
Approval In Concept (AIC) No.
(Note: Pile 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and elevations)
Coastal Development Permit: No.
Effective Date:
No.
�y� Effective date: Elle
��� nit Z94t ati-41-*4<aial/edge '(74;4
Waiver/Exemption:
NOTE: It is the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and
obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you
have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-
3200.
FORNS\CONM-ZON.CO*
Rev. 1/93
To: Building Department /9
From: Planning Department
Re: Hold on Building Permit Final
Address 3o /
No Activity: e
In Plan Check:
Active Bldg Permit:
Public Works Notified:
!/9G W/�� Plan Checker Notified:
Plan Check No. T1.3,J6 7T
Planning Department Comments PRIOR TO RELEASE Of Building Permit Final:
[ ] Park Dedication Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
[ ] Fairshare Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
[ ] S.J.H.T.C. Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
[]
[ ] Parcel Map Recordation: Resubdivision No. Record date
[ ] Use Permit Conditions of Approval: Use Permit No.
Condition(s) No.
After recordation of the map a building permit change must be processed with
the Building and Planning Departments, PRIOR TO FINAL OF THE
BUILDING PERMIT, to change the description of the permit to reflect
condominium construction, the fee is nominal and payable at the time of the
change. Proof of payment of the above mentioned fees may be required at
that time if not collected at issuance of the original building or grading
permits.
[]
Coastal Commission Approval of Resubdivision Must Be Obtained.
Other:
2a /0, c37 n39 14
94//020
[ ] Other:
Units Demolished
jf, ' i date
Planning Department
Units Built
CC: v Code Enforcement
Plan Checker F:\WP50\JAY\MEM\BP-HOLD.MEM rev 4-5-90
•.MERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ZONING COR)JIONS �jfi, C�
Telephone: (714) 644-3200 Plan Check No: /S JJ /,
By:Genia Garcia, Associate Planner By:Christy Teague, Associate Planner
By:Marc Myers, Assistant Planner
Date: ol-- Address:
reo ain
Districting Map No. Land Use Element Page No.
Corrections Required:
Legal Description: Lot Block Section Tract
Resubdivision required to combine lots or portions of lots when construction or
alterations are in excess of $20,000.
Covenant required.
document and return to me.
Lot Size
Zone )('i
Proposed Use
Required Setbacks
Front
Rear
Right Side
Left Side
Please have owner's signature notarized on the attached
FAR WORKSHEET
Lot area (site area sq.ft.): sq.ft.
Base Development Allocation (BDA):
[0.5 x site area sq.ft., unless otherwise specified in Land Use Element]
FAR permitted, without variance: (A) Comm res pkq
Square footage permitted: Comm res pkq sq.ft.
[(A) x site area sq.ft.]
Maximum FAR allowed with variance: (B) comm res pka
comm sq.ft.
Maximum square footage allowed: Comm res sq.ft.
[(B) x site area sq.ft.]
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: �G
(16) ass FAR use sq. f l/ sq.ft.
(D) Reduced FAR use sq.ft. sq.ft.
(E) Maximum FAR use sq.ft. sq.ft.
(F) TOTAL SQ.FT. [C+D+E] sq.ft.
PROPOSED FAR: [ F % site area sq.ft. ]
PROPOSED WEIGHTED DEVELOPMENT:
FAR Use Category Weighting Factor Weighted Sq.Ft.
(G1 (H1 ( G x H )
sq.ft. Base X 1.00 sq.ft.
sq.ft. Reduced X 1.67 sq.ft.
sq.ft. Maximum X 0.50 - sq.ft.
TOTAL WEIGHTED SQ.FT.(May not exceed BOA)
Provide tissue Required Parking.//overlay
�oof�calculations to verify provided square footage;
,j���"""�r Gc f
�
Proposed parking (Indicate number of stalls` piovided)•
Total On -Site Parking
Standard Compact
In -lieu Parking
Dimension building heighh,t ag¢_a esu a from natural grade to average and maximum
roof height i, .40) /�%'O' jtt /J% 5.4,
/.., «
t
Show natural graoline on all elevations
Show all rooftop mechanical equipment and dimension from grade directly below.
Indicate location of trash containers on site plan.
Number of Stories
Floor Plan fully dimensioned showing all room uses.
Plot Plan fully dimensioned showing location of all buildings, fences, etc. in
relation to the property line. %�,
Fair Share Contribution /i c2 3 re,/%4/49
•
/(7v San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Fee
SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED THROUGH:
Please indicate any discretionary approval numbers on the plans and incorporate
the attached; excerpt of minutes and list of findings and
conditions into the blueline drawings
approval letter into the blueline drawings
Modifications Committee: Indicate Approval No. on Sluelines
Modification required for
Plannina commission/City Council:
Use Permit: No.
Variance: No.
Resubdivieion/Tract: No.
Site Plan Review: No.
Amendment: No.
other
public Works:
Easement/Encroachment Per
Subdivision Engineer
Traffic Engineer
Approval of Landscape Plans
9uildina Department:
Grading Engineer
parks Department:
Approval of Landscape Plane
Coastal Development Permits:
Approval In Concept (AIC) No.
(Notes File 3 sets of plans: site, floor, and elevations)
Coastal Development Permit: No.
Effective Date:
No.
Effective date:
ics)
Waiver/Exemption:
mcidilert
ste)
o
NOTE: 'ties the responsibility of the applicant to circulate their plans and
obtain the necessary approvals from the departments checked above. If you
have questions regarding your application, please contact me at (714) 644-
3200.
FORMS\COMM-ZON.COR
Rev. 1/93
i •
To: Building Department n442/<- ►r.t No Activity:
In Plan Check:
From: Planning Department Active Bldg Permit:
Public Works Notified:
Re: Hold on Building Permit Final Plan Checker Notified:
Address•3D,/ 7 4 e Plan Check No. //d f2
Planning Department Comments PRIOR TO RELEASE Of Building Permit Final:
[ ] Park Dedication Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
[ ] Fairshare Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
[ ] S.J.H.T.C. Fee in the Amount of $ is DUE.
[ ] Coastal Commission Approval of Resubdivision Must Be Obtained.
[ ] Parcel Map Recordation: Resubdivision No. Record date
[ ] Use Permit Conditions of Approval: Use Permit No.
Condition(s) No.
After recordation of the map a building permit change must be processed with
the Building and Planning Departmeiffs;, PRIOR TO FINAL ORTHE
BUILDING PERMIT, to change the description of the permit to reflect
condominium construction, the fee is nominal and payable at the time of the
change. Proof of payment of the above mentioned fees may be required at
that time if not collected at issuance of the original building or grading
permits.
[l
x
Other:
Other:
Units Demolished
BY.
P1. u u ng Department
//
CC: Code Enforcement
Plan Checker
Units Built
F:\WP50\JAY\MEM\BP-HOLD.MEM rev 4-5-90
2
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
MITIGATION MEASURES
May 1994
Applies Doesn't Apply
ysxrrnd
Applies Doesn't Apply
23 x
eed,74Sti:ihariuz-
24
o
. , 27
eptivait6
28
7
29;
30
31 x
ems' °it
•
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
MITIGATION MEASURES
May 1994
Applies Doesn't Apply
Applies Doesn't Apply
X
I
23/
ft-tti/.�
2 I X
�D��'"'"
24 X 0",
�
/oiu X 4cs ncr 2
X` � l
3214 �1� v.�.; efi
27
6 X
28 XX
7 X
X ?'Ad
8 X
30 X
t / �. j i
31 H , X
c % , ^7//7 . ,it
40rt.. ""_ X JF /`I is.'
I 32 X
11 X
33 X
X .de atA(.Ce)
34 X
X
,A
35
14
X
X OK.��tCW
15 X
Lek")
Lek") .tirt D'kj i ' �-�"" '
1'er6 A.A ? X
d �X r
17 ' r
a/201B lal: 4..<%!�, /4
18
t t(fri X
PI 1s i/'rr
�
x
X
4c>20
4
X
/
42 X
21 X
X en?) rea4CA4
22 X
Xa_ /1'P.f'.r
Cardiac Services Addition, continued
454')
46
47
48
A. plies Doesn't Apply Applies Doesn't Apply
17747)1.0 n-te-k-en
X
X
4w1 X
wzti
514 frGAcCee,
52 X
53 X
54 X
55 X
56 X
57� teCg X
58 X
59 X
60 X
61 X
62 X
63 X
64 X
65 X
66 X
67 �(7, X
68 X
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
89
901Jx X
91
92
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
�QQ
• •
Cardiac Services Addition, continued
Applies Doesn't AppI
Applies Doesn't Apply
46 X
70 X
47 X
71 X
48 X
72 X
'V-M1,�X, da 1
73 X
,50
J,X
74 /U
X
51 (,6Yrvinea, I X
75 X
52 X
76 X
53 X
77 X
54 X
78 X
55 X
79 X
56 X
80 X
�Q�2C)\
57 /o/.0X
81 X
58 X
82 X
59 X
r'
•
��
60 X
84
61 Xte
62
/h.Mi D-i. X
re�
63 X
87
64 X
880 x
65 i�✓ PX X
i1 X
66 X
fi),• ree X SD
68 X
es-, (
•
C• iac Services Addition, continued
Applies Doesn't ADPI
Applies Doesn't Appl
93
7 rij
117
X
94
jf7 4�
118
6
95
/7
119
x /J
X
96
A613
120
p�
97
, 013 eti
121
(quell."
X
98
/4( - '
122
X
99
70.7'11� A"�
123
X 2,,r/ ,444
100
X
j
101
X
102
iX n�
103
/
X
104
/
105
/n) V eleigA-
/X
107
00
108
X
109
p416 X
it
'4''' X
111
�/U /lU.�
112
XAAi ).
I
113
114
X
115
X
116
X
Cardiac Services Addition, continued
Applies Doesn't Apply
Applies Doesn't Apply
117 x
�
,,94/� tf1 re
118 X
Xi /
119
V X
X%s�J2Lre;�
131 X 7t (/
121 X
A{ X 'i r/
122 X
r x
1 X of70,4416
100 X
101 X
1 Irv. tX99
103 r X
X U N
/
X ®A)
X PJ�p,�.
71-06
il
108 X
109
/del "7 I'10d14
i 1 xfr
f x "
113 X
114 X
1
115 X
1
•
FAIR SHARE FEE MEMO
DATE: �'�9-7
TO: Rich Edmonston, Traffic Engineer
FROM: Genia Garcia, Associate Planner
Please provide a Fair Share Fee for �A-G ,/as//7-4L- -% i/1le,
eo/A
orieff ✓/L /Ire located at eUOOe�- fg/ ✓C/ /
r ` e
de/In PUS
A Traffic Study No. was approved on
Other approvals:--c-MYL!> (Se. ' % / r ���j, G7�
/Neu eM DFF-7ct e / as
. This project / is is not in plan check.
Other comments:(1�
G69ss �Q �� /6 5 9n
j�
og 9 9 Si/ LC
SENT BY:HMC GROUP
r
G
2- 4-94 ; 16:32 ; 3270 INLAND E� E-'7146443250 ;# 1
SONIMANKOMM
HMC
/�'�'"'� TRANSMITTAL/FAX COVER SHEET /O
TO • C._7C', -2.4; l !� ma,,, DATE • 405,00
0
Cr;� / ere" Pre JOB NO • /e0n3
�. / VIA : [ ] Mali
I] UPS
[ ] Other
�//// THE FOLLOWING : FOR YOUR :
RE :1 [ ] Originals [ ] Information
[ ] Specificatlons [ ] Action
[ ] Prints [ ] Use
t] Addendum [] Records
[ ] Other
ACTION REQUESTED
�,.�' [ ] Approval
[� FAX [ ] Review and Comment
Number of papas to follow
Time sent •
Phone number faxed to : C0a4/14e-
If you do not receive all the pages
please pall
(909) 989-9979 Ext, .222
COPES NUMBER DESCRIPTION
22ti71 e 4,a%n
RF�__d,aa,R,KS :'^
/� GL
SYSm B c a�/e?r,^
col File AO
By WAha C
HMC GROUP
Corporate Office: 3270 Inland Empire Boulevard, Ontario, CA 81784-4854 Tel 909/988-9979 Fax 909/483.1400
Architecture • En/Mooring • Interiors • Planning
hmc 101
r
SENT BY:HMC GROUP
pro
4-94 ; 16:32 ; 3270 INLAND EMPIRE-+7146443250
• ales LAACin Dot
•
r _ANNING Ocr„RTMENT
"TV OF NEWPORT BEACH
AM MAY h 1993 PM
71819110111112111213141516
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
:3Ui NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX Y • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658-8912 • PHONE (714) 645-8600
•
April 27, 1993
Ms. Pat Temple
Principal Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915
SUBJECT: CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
REFERENCE: REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURES
Dear Pat:
Thank you for meeting with us last week to discuss the applicability of the master plan
mitigation monitoring program to the proposed cardiac services addition (CSA). Based
on my notes, the following measures were discussed and will be required for the CSA:
• Mitigation Measure #38
• Mitigation Measure #45
• Mitigation Measure #105
• Mitigation Measure #120
• Mitigation Measure #123
Several mitigation measures were also discussed which were determined to be
inapplicable to the CSA, including:
• Mitigation Measure #30
• Mitigation Measure #31 (no additional requirements specific to the
CSA project. Pilot project required as part of this mitigation measure
is ongoing).
• Mitigation Measure #101
• Mitigation Measure #102
• Mitigation Measure #103
• Mitigation Measure #104
• Mitigation Measure #108
A NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACCREDITED DY THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS
J
•
Ms. Pat Temple
April 21, 1993
Page Two
The Planning Department also requested that external lighting, skylights, landscaping and
ADA requirements be addressed when the plans for the CSA are resubmitted for City
review as discussed in the meeting minutes.
We will be resubmitting plans on the CSA soon.
Sincerely,
ire'W Ftt-•--
Leif Thompson
Director of Major Projects
PM:LT:sas
cc: Janet Divan
Genia Garcia
Peter Foulke
Barry Klein
Peri Muretta
w� •ciEk r 1110
FINAL FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS
FOR USE' PERMIT NO. 1421 (AMENDED) "P"
AND
' TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 79
AS APPROVED BY CJTY COUNCIL
ON NOVEMBER 25, 1991
A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental document, making the
following findings and requiring the following mitigation measures:
Findings:
1. That based upon the information contained in the Initial Sti. ly, comments received,
and all related documents, there is no substantial evidence that the project, as
conditioned or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study,
could have a significant effect on the environment, therefore a Negative Declaration
has been prepared. The Negative Declaration adequately addresses the potential
environmental impacts of the project, and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA,
and is therefore approved. The Negative Declaration was considered prior to
approval of the project.
2. An Initial Study has been conducted, and considering the record as a whole there is
no evidence before this agency that the proposed project will have the potential for
an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends.
On the basis of the evidence in the record, this agency finds that the presumption of
adverse effect contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations (CCR) has been rebutted. Therefore, the proposed project qualifies for
a De Minimis Impact Fee Exemption pursuant to Section 753.5(c) of Title 14, CCR.
Mitigation Measures:
1. Prior to the completion of the final design phase, the project sponsor shall
demonstrate to the City of Newport Beach Building Department that all facilities will
be designed and constructed to the most recent seismic standards as specified by the
Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development.
2. The City of Newport Beach shall send a letter to each emergency vehicle company
that delivers patients to Hoag Hospital requesting that, upon entrance to either the
Upper or Lower Campus, emergency vehicles turn off their sirens to help minimize
noise impacts to adjacent residents. Hoag Hospital will provide the City with a list
of all emergency vehicle companies that deliver patients to Hoag Hospital.
3. Prior to issuance of any building permit (or commencement of construction if no City
building permit is required) the applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning
Department that the lighting system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in
such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare
to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a
1
licensed Electrical Engineer, with a letter from the engineer stating that, in his
opinion, this requirement has been met.
4. Roof top mechanical equipment screening shall not extend closer than 15 feet from
the west edge of the structure, and no closer than 10 feet from the edge of the
structure on any other side.
5. Noise from roof -top mechanical equipment shall not exceed 55 dBA at the property
line.
6. Hoag Hospital shall pay 75% of the cost of planting 30, 24 inch liens trees (or the
equivalent) in the berm between the service road and Villa Balboa southerly of the
tennis courts. Planting shall occur on Villa Balboa property.
7. Use of the heliport/helipad shall be limited to emergency medical purposes or the
transportation of critically ill patients in immediate need of medical care not
available at Hoag Hospital. Helicopters shall, to the extent feasible, arrive at, and
depart from, the helipad from the northeast to mitigate noise impacts on residential
units to the west and south.
B. Traffic Study No. 79: Approve the Traffic Study, making the findings listed below:
Findings:
1. " That an evaluation of the project related traffic has been coaucted by the City
Traffic Engineer which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the circulation
system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and
Council Policy S-1.
2. That the City Traffic Engineer indicates that the project -generated traffic will neither
cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major', 'primary -
modified', or 'primary' street.
C. Use Permit No. 1421 (Amended): Approve the Use Permit with the following
findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Element of the
General Plan and is compatible with surrounding uses.
2. That adequate parking will be provided to serve the expanded emergency care
facilities.
3. That the approval of this amendment to Use Permit No. 1421 will not, under the
circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare off persons residing and working in the neighborhood,
or be' detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or
to the general welfare of the City.
Conditions:
1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan,
floor plans and elevations.
2. That this Use Permit shall expir unless exercise( within 24 months from the date
of approval as specified in Sect )n 20.80.090A o the Newport Beach Municipal
Code.
A\VP51\PIANNING\CAROLYN\FF&C
• •
' HOAG MEMORIAL. HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 2, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil G3-
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 3
Comments: A follow-up study prepared by GeoScience Analytical, Inc. regarding
methane gas at the Cardiac Services Addition site was inadvertently
submitted to you on July 8, 1994. That study was in draft form only.
Enclosed for your files is the final follow-up study (to the April
18,1994 study) dated July 25,1994, which contains modified
recommendations from the April 18, 1994 study.
The recommendations of the July 25, 1994 study will be implemented
in conjunction with site development.
GMK: bw
Enclosure
File: 1250.36-36.31-4MIT.MEAS.3
•
.•
�
•
:
PHASE 2 HAZARDOUS GAS EVALUATION
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
Submitted to:
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Blvd., Box
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Prepared by:
GeoScience Analytical, Inc.
Jul 25 1994
i
•
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
(805) 526-6532
Y
-.
*
i
N
.......
•
pVIRONAze++M
0s.��
NO. 01680
EXP. JUNE 30, 1994
'+;;
• • •`;�,+�
GeoScience Analyal Inc.
'The Gas Busters" sue80
4454 INDUSTRIAL STREET SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063 (805) 526-6532 FAX 526-3570
25 July 1994
Mr. Leif Thompson
Vice President
Facilities Design and Construction
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100
RE: CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION:
METHANE GAS EVALUATION
Dear Mr. Thompson:
Subsequent to site grading on the above referenced project, we conducted a
Phase 2 Hazardous Gas Evaluation as a follow-up study to that previously submit-
ted report dated April 18, 1994 entitled "Hazardous Gas Evaluation Cardiac Ser-
vices Addition: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Huntington Beach, CA"
attached hereto as Appendix I.
Previously reported data identified methane concentrations as high as
41,431.0 ppm (v/v) at a depth of 4' below existing grade. Methane concentration
isopleths, depicted in Appendix I - Figure 2, attached, identified a soil gas anomaly
of unknown origin within the northwestern portion of the subject site. Based on
available data, methane remediation was recommended for incorporation into site
development.
Following site grading, an abandoned water pipe which contained a
hydrocarbon/water mixture of unknown origin was removed from the excavation
area and the underlying soil assessed for petroleum impacts. No soil
contamination was identified.
In order to assess the current hazardous surficial gas potential on the sub-
ject site, twelve (12) soil probes were advanced to a depth of 4' on the site following
completion of the grading operations. Soil gases were collected from these loca-
tions (FIG. 1) and subjected to laboratory analyses (TAB. 1).
Following grading operations, the site was void of methane and other low
Environmental Audits • Hazardous Gas Engineering • Litigation Consulting • Petroleum Geochemistry
molecular weight hydrocarbons significantly above background concentrations (5.0
ppm v/v). In the area located in the northwest corner of the site, however, methane
concentrations were slightly elevated above background concentrations reaching a
maximum concentration of 33.9 ppm (v/v) at a location 13' north and 37' west of the
northeast corner of the proposed Cardiac Services addition (FIG. 2). The anomaly
is similar to that previously identified (Appendix I: FIG. 2) prior to site excavation
except for the significant decrease in hydrocarbon concentration following excava-
tion which resulted in a 99.92% reduction in methane concentration.
Current hydrocarbon concentrations pose no negative impacts to health and
safety. Based on the reduction in methane concentrations following excavation, the
source of the methane is most likely residual methane produced through bacterial
decomposition of organic matter.
On account of the results reported herein, previous recommendations for
mitigation may be no longer be warranted. In order to provide monitoring of subsur-
face hydrocarbons within the existing plume area, the installation of two (2) perma-
nent soil gas monitoring wells is recommended. The wells should be installed
immediately north of the proposed structure and monitored quarterly thereafter for a
period of three (3) years. In the event methane concentrations do not increase
above 1,000.0 ppm (v/v), monitoring may occur semi-annually thereafter. Should
methane concentrations increase to 5,000 ppm (v/v), an electronic methane detec-
tion system should be installed within the proposed structure in accordance with de-
signs prepared by a qualified methane gas detection engineer. No subslab or other
mitigation measures are recommended for the subject site other than those identi-
fied herein.
We look forward to speaking further with you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely yours, Q
Fleet E. Rust, Ph.D.
President
cc: Peri Muretta
reHOAG1 OH.wsd
IMa,._, ..._.._ L_- t....s .tlMa • "0..10 6s.,.W .adore �►
.. Yawns
Existing Raised
Planter
Wooden Fence
LEGEND
0 Soil Probe
Proposed Building
® O
-n
5
C
m
11-20.0 ft-►I
GEOSCIENCE
ANALYTICAL,
INC.
4454 lndustrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
SHEET
TITLE:
PHASE 2 SOIL PROBE LOCATIONS
JOB
NO.
1575
DWN.
BY:
LJP
PROJECT: PROPOSED
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
CHKD
BY:
FER
DATE:
7/05/94
DWG.
NO:
1
reHOAG10.drw
•w•• __I Y.
•
Existing Raised
Planter
Wooden Fence
Proposed Building
30.0 ppm
15.0 ppm
10.0 ppm
m
Jzi
c
m
N
LEGEND
Q Soil Probe
If-20.0 ft—►I
GEOSCIENCE
ANALYTICAL,
INC.
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
SHEET nnE: METHANE CONCENTRATION ISOPLETHS
JOB
NO.
1575
DWN.
BY:
LJP
PROJECT: PROPOSED
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
CHKD
BY:
FER
DATE:
7/05/94
DWG.
NO:
2
reHOAG10A.drw
• TABLE 1
1
1
1
1
1
t
.1
C1-C7 HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL PROBE GAS
(PPM VN)
HYDRO-
CARBON
Soil Probe No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Methane
6.6
9.4
9.7
6.2
10.3
15.5
5.1
8.0
33.9
Ethane
0.3
1.0
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.5
Ethylene
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
Propane
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.2
<0.1
0.2
Propylene
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
Iso-butane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-butane
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.3
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
0.2
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
reHOAG22.wsd
• TABLE 1 (cont.)
•
f
-t
C1-C7 HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL PROBE GAS
(PPM VN)
HYDRO-
CARBON
Soil Probe No.
10
11
12
Methane
17.0
5.5
4.8
Ethane
0.2
0.3
0.1
Ethylene
0.1
0.1
<0.1
Propane
0.2
0.1
0.1
Propylene
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
'so -butane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-butane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
reHOAG22Awsd
• •
APPENDIX I
HAZARDOUS GAS EVALUATION
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
APRIL 18, 1994
HAZARDOUS.GAS EVALUATION
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
BY
GeoScience Analytical, Inc.
April 18, 1994
eisa
Fleet E. Rust, Ph.D
President
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
(805) 526-6532
GeoScience Analytical Inc.
'The Gas Busters" 4980
1
1
1
1
1
14 INDUSTRIAL STREET SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063 (805) 526-6532 FAX 526-3570
18 April 1994
Mr. Leif Thompson
Vice President
Facilities Design and Construction
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100
RE: CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION: METHANE GAS EVALUATION
Dear Mr. Thompson:
In order to assess the hazardous surficiai gas potential on the subject site,
nine (9) soil probes were advanced to a depth of 4' on the site. Soil gases were col-
lected from these locations (FIG. 1) and subjected to laboratory analyses. Based
on the results of these analyses, an additional eight (8) probes were advanced
within an area of concern and subsequently analyzed for C1-C7 hydrocarbons
(TAB. 1).
The majority of the site is void of methane or other low molecular weight hy-
drocarbons significantly above background concentrations (10.0 ppm v/v) to a
depth of 4' below existing grade. In one area located in the northwest comer of the
site, however, methane gas has been identified at concentrations as high as
41,431.0 ppm (v/v) or approximately 83% of the Lower Explosive Limit. The source
of the gas appears to be north of the buildable pad (FIG. 2) and does not pose a
significant hazard to site development provided that excavation is limited to 10'
along the northern boundary (see Figure 2).
Various options are available for mitigation of the gases present in the surfi-
cial soil at the northwest corner of the site. None of these options should pose a
significant impact on site development nor do they necessitate a major redesign of
the structure.
Our recommendations for mitigation are threefold:
• Further investigation should be undertaken in the direction of the
existing concrete patio to assess the source and extent of the
Environmental Audits • Hazardous Gas Engineering • Litigation Consulting • Petroleum Geochemistry
• •
t
1
J
1
1
.1
anomaly. The shallow investigation (soil probe phase) should
occur as early as possible with subsequent soil borings delayed
until after the demolition of the patio is completed.
• Building construction can continue unimpeded provided that a
methane detection system be incorporated into the first floor of the
structure. The system should be engineered to provide both venti-
lation and an evacuation warning in the event combustible gas
concentrations exceed predetermined interior concentrations of
15% and 25% LEL, respectively. Sensors should be installed at
ceiling elevation at eight (8) locations as set forth: electrical room,
photocopy room, corridor 116, cardiac service, corridor 107, office
103, office 104, coffee area.
• Site excavation should include site auditing by a qualified environ-
mental assessor capable of monitoring for methane and hydrogen
sulfide in accordance with the "Site Health & Safety Plan for the
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Master Plan" dated August
5, 1993.
Estimates of the costs associated with each of the mitigation measures iden-
tified herein are enclosed for your consideration. Design of the combustible gas de-
tection system can be completed in one (1) week with hardware available for
installation in six (6) weeks. No subslab or other mitigation measures are recom-
mended for the subject site.
We look forward to speaking further with you at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely yours,
Fleet E. Rust, Ph.D.
President
cc: Peri Muretta
reHOAG10D.wsd
L
t.., -n ...w.t
s W 1
Existing Raised
Planter
LEGEND
O Soil Probe
GEOSCIENCE
ANALYTICAL,
INC.
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
Proposed Building
SHEET
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SOIL PROBE LOCATIONS
PROPOSED
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
JOB
NO.
DWN.
BY:
CHKD
BY:
DATE:
DWG.
NO:
N--20.0 ft—►I
1575
LJP
FER
4/12/94
1
reHOAG10.drw
a.._... _ 1.
r h....4 ...el
... a ••
Existing Raised
Planter
j
A
Proposed Building
40,000ppm '
25,000ppm � - '
1,000ppm
100ppm •I
Recommended 10'
Limited Excavation
Boundary
1
•
1
•
1
•
1
•
1
•
$
•
1
•
1
•
$
•
1
•
1
•
U
C EE
N 8
W U
a
am
0
O W
m
0
c
JJ
m
14-20.0 ft—II1
GEOSCIENCE
ANALYTICAL,
INC.
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
SHEET METHANE CONCENTRATION ISOPLETHS
TITLE: (4FT DEPTH)
PROJECT:
PROPOSED
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
JOB
NO.
1575
DWN.
BY:
CHKD
BY:
LJP
FER
DATE:
4/12/94
DWG.
NO:
1
reHOAG10.drw
• TABLE 1
1
t
s
)
1
4
C1-C7 HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL PROBE GAS
(PPM VN)
HYDRO-
CARBON
Soil Probe No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Methane
2.4
4.1
7.5
90.1
81.9
12.9
1,492.0
8.5
9.7
Ethane
0.7
<0.1
0.5
0.1
8.4
2.4
10.5
0.4
1.3
Ethylene
<0.1
<0.1
0.5
<0.1
0.6
3.1
<0.1
0.5
1.8
Propane
0.6
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
2.5
1.0
2.7
0.2
0.6
Propylene
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
0.3
1.3
<0.1
0.2
0.8
Iso-butane
0.5
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.1
<0.1
1.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-butane
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.8.
0.2
1.9
<0.1
0.2
Cyclo-
pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-pentane
0.7
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.4
<0.1
1.5
<0.1
0.2
N-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
hexane
0.8
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
0.5
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-hexane
1.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.1
<0.1
1.4
<0.1
<0.1
N-hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
<0.1
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-heptane
0.4
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
<0.1
0.8
<0.1
<0.1.
N-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
reHOAG10B.wsd
• • TABLE 1 (cont.)
1
1
1
C1-C7 HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL PROBE GAS
(PPM VN)
HYDR0-
CARBON
Soil Probe No.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Methane
1,378.0
25,236.0
40.4
5.2
41,431.0
28,901.0
149.0
5.3
Ethane
0.2
0.8
<0.1
0.5
2.7
0.5
3.5
0.4
Ethylene
<0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
<0.1
<0.1
3.9
0.5
Propane
0.1
0.5
<0.1
0.1
3.1
0.3
1.5
0.1
Propylene
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.2
0.2
Iso-butane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.1
0.1
<0.1
N-butane
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
2.0
0.1
0.4
<0.1
Cyclo-
pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
Iso-pentane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-pentane
<0.1
0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.0
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Cyclo-
hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-hexane
<0.1
0.2
<0.1
<0.1
0.8
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-hexane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Iso-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
N-heptane
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1'
reHOAG10C.wsd
1
1
1
J
1
7
J
J
•
PHASE 2 HAZARDOUS GAS EVALUATION
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
•
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
BY
GeoScience Analytical, Inc.
July 6, 1994
&&wi C 064
Fleet E. Rust, Ph.D
President
CA REA NO. 01680
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
(805) 526-6532
•
•
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIA4
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. I
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 8, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil 6t -
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 3
RECEI:EETV `—'
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OE NEWPORT BEACH
JUL 11 1994 PM
71819110111112111213141516
A
! —
Comments: On May 11, 1994, we sent you a study conducted by GeoScience
Analytical, Inc. regarding methane gas at the Cardiac SerQibes Addition
site. That study identified methane gas on site, and ifecomrlehdbd;'t'
among other things, that further studies should be;conduct'id thricr1•
identify the source and extent of methane concentration. A I
Attached is a follow-up study completed by GeoScience Analytical, Inc.
last week. This study contains modified recommendations based"on the 'L
additional data gathered.
These recommendations will be implemented in conjunction with site
development. • •, slit
GMK: gl
Pile: 1250.36-74.50-3.MIT.MEAS.3
PHASE 2 HAZARDOUS GAS EVALUATION
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
BY
GeoSclence Analytical, Inc.
July 6, 1994
Fleet E. Rust, Ph.D
President
CA REA NO. 01680
4454 Industrial Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
(805) 526-6532
aeoScience AnaInc.
'the Gas buster? s•1980
4454 INDUSTRIAL STREET SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063 (805) 526-6532 FAX 528.3570
7 July 1994
Mr. Leif Thompson
Vice President
Facilities bepign.and Constr(ictlon
Hoag Memddal Hospital •Prettytelian
301 Newpof $lvd.
Newport Bl3aoh, CA 92050;6100
RE: CARDIAC SERVRE,S A►DOJTION:
.METHANE GAS'EVAL!!ATION
Dear Mr. Thompson:
i •
PhSubsequent to site•grading•on the above referenced OAS, we conducted a
ase 2 HatArdous Gas Evaluation as a follow-up study to that pravlousl ! submit-
ted report dated April 18,1994'eritltled'Hazardbus Gas Evaluation Cardiac Ser-
vid'es Addition: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbytedan'Huntltigtori Beach, GA'
attached hereto as Appendix 1.
Previously reported data Identified methane concentrations as high as
41,431.0 ppth (v/v) at a depth of 4' below existing grade. Methane concentration
Isopleths, depicted In Appendix I -:Figure 2, attached, Identified i'i 8011 gas anomply
of unknown &gin Within'the'•riorthwestem portion of.the subject 9iS. Based on
available data, methane remedlatlon Was recommended forfndorporatloh Into site
development.
Following Ste grading, an abandoned water pipe which cbrttained a
hydrocarbon/water mixture of -unknown origin was removed front the excaVation
area and the.undertying soli assessed tor petroleum impacts: NO soil
contamination.was Identlfled.(private ogmmunlcation) although. additional pipe was
left In place tinder the existing concrete slab located Immediately::north of the sUb-
Ject excavation area.
In order WI assessthe. current hazardous surflclal gas potential an the sub-
ject site, twelve (12) soli Probe were advanced to a depth of 4'On the site•following
completion of She grading.opsfatlons. 'Soil gases were collecte.'d:from these loca-
tions (FIG.1)•and subJeoted to laboratory analyses (TAB. 1).
Environmental Audits N Hazardous Gas Engineering • Litigation Consulting • Petroleum Geochemistry
'
Following grading operations, the site was void of methane and other IoW
molecular weight hydrocarbons significantly above background concentrations (5.0
ppm v/v). Iri•ths area located•In the northwest comer of the site, however, methane
concentrations were slightly elevated above background concentrations reaching a
maximum concentration of 33.9 ppm (v/v) at a location 13' north •arid 37' West of the
northeast corner of the proposed Cardiac Services addition (FIG. 2). 7he'anomaly
is similar to that•previousfy identified (Appendix I: FIG. 2) prior tip' site excavation
except for the significant decrease In hydrocarbon conCentratign, following excava-
tion which r(sulted In a 99.92% reduction in methane concentration.
Curreht hydrocarbon concentrations pose no' negativiimpacts to health and
safety. • Based oh•the reduction in Methane concentrations f0110*1iig excavation, the
source of thp Methane Is.mdst tlkely'reSlduai methane producedthrough bacterial
decomposIdbr of organic•matter, probably associated, in part, with the water pipe
recently excavated.
On account of the results reported herein, previous recodimendatlpns for
mitigation may be no fongerbe warranted. Since future anticipated eitcavatfon will
include additional removal of the waterpipe underlying the existiryp concrete patio
located Imrri9Qia`tely north of.the subject site, additional potential sources of
petroleum'bV$roducts within' surfictai soils will be removed.' In order IC provide
monitoring df:subsurface #tydrooarbons within the existing piurris,erea; the; installa-
tion of two.(2) permanent s'oll gas monitoring wells is recommended. Thewells
should be Intt*Ued Immediately north of the proposed structure'erid monitored quar-
terly thereafter for a period of three .(3) years. In the event niethghe concentrations
do not increase above 1,000,0 ppm (v/v), monitoring may ocoursemi-annually
thereafter. Should methane .obncentrations Increase to 5,000 ppm (v/v), an elec-
tronic methane detection system should be installed within the proposod structure
in accordance with designs prapared by a qualified methane•gas detection•engl-
neer. No subblab or other m)tigatibn measures are recommended for the subject
site other than.those identified herein.
We look forward to speaking further with you at yourearllest convenience.
cc: Perl Muretta
Sincerely yours,
Fleet E. Rust, Ph.D. •
President
• r.NVAGIOR nd
. • -
Proposed Buitding
Existing Raised
Planter
4-20_0 ft-pf
GEOSCIENCE
ANALYTICAL,
INC.
44s Iodated Chet
Simi Vthay, CA 93051
JCS
• PHASE 2 SittitintattiodAtkitiS 'met
LIP
PROPOSED
CARDIAC SERVICES ADD1T(ON
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTEFtIAN
011W
BY.:
FER-.
DATE
7/05(94
1
natOAGlOsIvi..
lJ
Proposed Building
Existing Raised
Planter
Probe
tt—►{
•
0
co
m
w
.GEOSCIENCE
A1#ALY ICAE, . .
n�.
44541ndmtiel Street
Simi Vela, CA 93063
alga
n"hiMETtfANECONCENTRAT1ONISOPLETHS 'vet
ut
1575
PflO'EC`: ° PROPOSED:
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
ChIPCD
FETI
DATE
7/05/94
2 •
isnAGtMri v
•
TABLE 1
C1107 HYDROCARBONS IN $OIL PROBE GAS
HYDRO-
CARBON
Soli Probe No.
• :••711
°•
' •
' 2
3 ;..;
,
• 4
5
: 6 .
•
78
9
Methane
. ,'; 6.6
9.4•
• •9.t.
: 6.2
10.3•
15.6
. $.1
. 19.0
..33.9
Ethane
,,., :0:3
1.0
: 13.5•:
1.5
•0,6'
: 0.6.
.; 0,5..
0.2
• 0.6
Ethylene
., :•0.3.
0.3
•., 0.5'
0.2'
0,6
• 0.3:
•0.2
0.2.
0.3
Propane
0.1 •
0.3
0.3•
' 0.6
0.3
0.2
::0.2
'
4.1
0.2
Propylene
•; 0.1
<0.1
: <0,i,
•<0.1
•. 0.1
<0.1
•'4.1
:
<b.1
0.2
Iso•butane
s0,1
<0.1
kO:i'
' 0.4
0.1
. <0.1
'4.1
.
<0.1
' <0.1
N-butane
•'r r0.1
0:1
• ' <0.t
. •0.5
0.3
'• <0.1
0:1
<6.1
• <0.i
Cyclo-
pentane
•t, 0.1
••.
<0.1
•
:<0;1:
'
' <0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
. <0..1
<0.1
tso-pentane
• <0.1
<0.1
.<0.1;
• 0.6
9.2,
0.2;
<0,1
<0.1'
'•<0.1
N-pentane
v't+0:1
<0.1
• '•<0.j
° ' 0.2
<Q;1
<0.1:
• •<0.1
;
<0.1
<0.1
Cycles
hexane
c<0.1
<0.1
. ' <0.1I
• <0.1
•
<0.1
<0.1
,
.41,1
,
<0.1
..<0.1
Iso-hexene
;i<0.1
<0.1
, 0:1.l
• :<0.1
<0.1
<0.1::
4.1
:
<,1
<0.1
N-hexane
• 4.0;1
<0.1
:<0:1'
••. ;<0.1
<0.1 •
• .<0.1..
<9:1
.+N
<0.1•
•' <0.1
tso-heptane
;*0.1
<0.1'
:<0.1••
• `<0.1
<0.1
' <0.7;
<0.1
,
<0.1.
,<0.1
N-heptane
; Q.1
<04_;•;:<Q.,14.,; 0.1•
<0.1'
... <0.1•
_ 4.1
•:•
<9,1
<0.1
•
• MHDA022.wrd
TABLE 1 (cont.)
C1C7 HYDROCARBONS iNSSOIL PROBE GAS
• •
HY iiio• `•
0At'iSN ;:
.
Boll Probe No.
10
'
11
12 •
within).•
••
•'17.0
•5:6.
4.8
Epr• e ';'
• 0.2
0,3
0.1:
Et(lylene..
0.1
0.1;
<0.1:
Propane: -
. o.S
• 0.1,
0.1.
: Pnipytena.
••Isatitiiane•-•
• <0.1.
<0.1
<0.1:
• ..<0.1
<0.1';
<0.1;
N•tiiilane:;;.
ti.
'c0.1
'<0.1
<0,1'
• biota ,':
pint aria
• <0.1
<0.1
<0.1
110.4' t •
••s0.1
'<0.1-
c0.1
N•pAtlianf`i;
<0.1
50'.i•
,
<0,1
cydo• :
•taSne . •
:coil
•
<0.1
4.1
1804 i (04?,,
<0.1
5Q.1 •
•
<0,1:
N-Beene,;
.<0.1
<0.1
.'
<0,11
Ieo•tiaptane:
<0.1
<0.1
<01
N-hapteki
;50.1
kc0,1
<0.1
r..tip GflAwsd
•
•
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
TRANSMITTAL
Date: June 16, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil 6 14—
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 38
PLANNINGEIVED DEPBY
ARTNVENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 20 031
AM
18191101I11121112131415i 6
4
Comments: Mitigation Measure No. 38 requires a number of site development requirements to
be included in building plans in compliance with Ordinance No. 91-16.
Additionally, Mitigation Measure No. 38 requires that "information on
transportation alternatives shall be provided to all new employees."
Enclosed is a page from the employee handbook that is provided to all new employees
at orientation. One section of this handbook discusses the Hoag Rideshare Program.
Also enclosed are samples of "Hoag Times," the newsletter provided to all Hoag
employees. This newsletter periodically includes segments regarding
transportation alternatives.
GMK: gl
Attachments: Page from employee handbook and samples of Hoag Times
c Janet Divan
File: 1250.36.36.31-1.MIT.#38
HOAG HOSPITAL
Charting
Your Course
Employee Handbook
Hoag Memorial Ilos[)ilal Presbyterian •
NEWPORT BEACH • CA
Fire, Disaster and Evacuation Plan
The hospital has developed a Fire, Disaster and Evacuation Plan
outlining procedures to be followed in the event of a fire or other
disaster in the facility and to handle casualties in time of local or
regional disaster.
Each department and nursing station is provided with a Fire,
Disaster and Evacuation manual which contains instructions for each
area and its employees.
Employees are expected to familiarize themselves with these
procedures and be prepared for any emergency.
Dress and Grooming Standards
The professional atmosphere at Hoag Hospital is maintained, in
part, by the image that employees present to patients and visitors.
Hospital policy requires that employees use good judgment in apparel
and appearance.
The following is a brief overview of the hospital policy on dress
and grooming standards. Employees are requested to ask their respec-
tive department heads for specific dress standards for their depart-
ments.
All employees are required to wear clean and neatly pressed
designated department uniforms or appropriate street attire. Denim
pants and/or T-shirts are not permitted unless authorized by the Vice
President of Human Resources. Non -canvas shoes are recommended.
Fragrances, jewelry and other adomments that would interfere with
work performance or create a safety hazard are prohibited. Name
badges are to be wom at all times.
Employees inappropriately dressed will be sent home and directed
to retum to work properly attired. The employee will not be compen-
sated for this time away from work. Also, scrub attire is not designed
for use outside patient care areas and is not a substitute for personal
attire, nor is it to be wom or carried off the premises without the
Department Head's approval.
Hoag Rideshare Program.
Employees who carpool, ride the bus, bike or walk to work, are
eligible to enroll in Hoag's Rideshare Program. Participants in the
program are eligible to receive a variety of incentives.
For more information on Hoag's Rideshare Program, contact the
Transportation Coordinator in the Recruitment Office at extension
5863.
Parking
Hoag Hospital provides adequate free parking for employees in the
five -story parking structure at the south end of the hospital. Employ-
ees working the first, second and 12-hour shifts, whether full time, •
part time, on -call, etc., who arrive at work prior to 11:00 a.m., are
required to park on the first, second and third (bottom three) levels of
the parking structure.
The fourth level is reserved for second- and third -shift employees
coming on duty after 11:00 a.m. Employees who are enrolled in
Hoag's Rideshare Program may also park on the fourth level, if they
display a Hoag Rideshare hang tag on the car's rear view mirror.
Employees who fail to follow the parking guidelines and park in
unauthorized areas will be cited by Security. Also, all employees are
expected to display the hospital -issued parking identification sticker
on the left rear bumper, or the front windshield driver's side.
Resignation
Employees who resign from Hoag Hospital are expected to present
a written letter of resignation to their supervisor and give an advance
notice of at least two weeks. Exempt employees are asked to give at
least four weeks notice.
If an employee resigns with proper notice, he/she can come
to the Human Resources Department with the completed check -off list
between 3 and 5 p.m. on the last day of work and receive a final
check.
19
20
r
HOAG-
-May 13,1993
Skin Safe gets you
set for summer_
What do Carlos Brantley, veni- Skin cancerwill strike more than
Hoag Sheltered - puncture, Pat Smith, medical - 600A00people inthe United States `
records, and Bruce Nyrop, engineer- , ;this yearalone, and California has -
Savings plan expands ing, have In common? They don't one of the highest tales of skin -
To provide more flexibility in _ drive a car to work. Pat walks, Bruce cancer incidence..But you can take-
- selecting and changing your - , - bikes and Carlos rides the bus. . .steps to reduce your chance of "
current and -past contributions to _ If biking, walking or riding the bus -disease.
Hoag Sheltered Savings, a third ,isn't,practical for you, how about ` Call 7-CANCER to registerfor a -
- h I id -ffh{I dT
fund, gtotai equity fund, Is being s ar ng a r e w • a r en
added; Carpoolers get a'special hang tag ,
Beginning June 30, participants _ entitling them to preferred parking -0,
may change the Investment on the fourth floor of the parking
percentage of current and past structure. _
You'll be doing your part to
free -head to-tce skin
-�cancer screening on
� .May 22 from 9 a.m. to
12 p.m. - . -
at Hoag Health •
• Center -Irvine.
of twice
contributions each quarter instead help clean up the air and re ' Reservations are
of twice ayea -
r' duce traffic congestion. And, If you required.Youfileven receive a bag
Cgr7.8 percent.
t. Youund is rideshare more than 60 percent of of sldn-protection items you can put
paying 7,8 percent. You can invest the month, you will receive a $10 to use -right awayl (If you.can't make
In the fixed fund In 25 percent meal ticket when you-redeemyour _this screening, another Is planned for
increments up to 100 percent of rideshare claim form at the recruit- July31 at the Hodg Cancer Center.) _
your contributions. Changes can ment office on the last two days of•
be made In June, and will become the month. EXpiOre a new career
effective July 1.
rideshare program -also win prizes in a Focus on hlealfh Care Careers is
meetings to learn more about monthly drawing. Prizes Include: oil
g a new educational program •
changes, car washes, movie•passes,
these changes as well as an Hoag wear, meal tickets and S25 designed to provide information on__
update on other options. - the many career optionsavailable
- Fdshion Island gift certificates. _ • . at Hoag _
Wednesday,May 26 - _ 5 For more information on Hoag's c This-month=sfocus is on; :•-
. _ 9:30 a.m., conference center 2._ ; Rideshare program, call P_am•Bolen in medical -transcription.. ; ;
1 rn., corifereride center 2 hurnan
resources atext. 6990.
_3ten•byth'e cafete-
3:30 p.m.;conference center 2 We're expecting..' ria from 11 a;m,to 1=
Thursday June 3 - -
II
News and information for Hoag Hospital employees
Work-out. on the -
way to work
Mark your calendar and plan Active members of Hoag's on your lunch- break -
to attend one of the following -
p.m. on Tuesday,- , - - Lir -
7:30am.-conferencecenterl f Hoag-LDR expands` May_19.You'u {
, 3:30 �.r�5p.conference center 2 - - = Hogg Childbirth Center grill unveil -have an opportu '=
- Friday, June 4 -,_three new LDR suites-to`the public at -nilyto talkwith . _ • .
' 9-a.m:, conference center-1. _ran open house on Sund•ay, May 23. medical -Tian- - - - >-
9 a.m., conference center 1- -' -- Thesethree suites-bring'Hoag's LDR . 'scribers about - _Jr-
12 p.m.', -cancer center_'' - — ;� capacity to -twelve -and -make it , their career field,
auditorium /' _•_ 7possible for more&than 4•
'500 babies, - see,atianscrib• ;
- _ - r, - - -A-,each yearto make thei?premiet at -,. , ing machine, —. -
-'Contact the employee benefits ,,Hoag.: ,,: - t` _ '' - • • Iisten•to.dicta lon5 _'r
office at-ext. 5883 if youhave any ,1-.:‘,---- vytitithe LDR-addition and the - - and read - - i e-
questions. - Y - - i • expansion of the speclal care nurseryfranscribed medical •
_r_`-, and pediatrics-area,Hoagdeadsfhs --reports; All visitors to
- - i e: wpy In" offering comprehensive also
' .. - Gseryices•to Orange,Couhty.'.'' ` _ [enter a drawing for a -
- . door prte. • , •
-„ . - - �' 1t ' t - 1
'H OAG
thing fob code page, so use it
onry In urgent sltuations, If you
Itavelany questions, contact
Marty Fenton, supervisor of com-
munications, at'ext, 2005. , -
-Welcome to Hoag
Join us in welcoming:Vivian
Mitchell to her position in nursing
News and information for Hoag Hospital employees
r•
August.19,1993
_Hoag first in O.C. to offer innovative heart surgery
�- ' -Hoag Hospital's cardiology department made news on July 22 by
successfully completing -the first Flex-Stenthi-procedure In Orange County.
The procedure is safer than more conventional options, is relatively inex= _
pensive, expands surgical options, and has been called "a near=atternd-
STAT paging line opens - live to emergency coronary bypass surgery." Dr-: Subbarao Mylavarapu
was assisted in the hour-long operation by Dr. Steven Schiff and Joanne
The communications depart- Colley, CVr, Judith Reiner, CVr, and LB -Connelly, RN.
ment has instituted a SLAT physl- i . The Flex-StentT^r is a tiny stainless steel coil which Is guided to thepoint
clan paging line, ext. 1231. The in a coronary vessel In danger of collapse. The sfent expands to support
number Is to be used any time a -- the vessel wall when a standard coronary angioplasty balloon is inflated
doctor must be paged Immedi- inside it The body soon coats the "steel with tissue and the vessel is strength- -
ately. ibis SEAT line Is the nearest • 'eried, - - '
Four Hoag Hedrt Institute physicians are specially trained to use the
new procedure. Steve Moreau, vice president of operations, states thdt
"Hoag Heart Institute Is excited to be offering this new technology to
. Orange,County residents so soon after it became available." Congratula-
tions to the cardiology team on a Job well done- - ' l . � -
Childcare center parents can earn`rideshare_credits
The South Coast Air Quality Management District recently amended a
federal regulation regarding-ridesharing with children. Effective September
•
•
education. fie new program ' " 1, Hoag employees who drive their children today care centers, -
manager comes to Hoag from - babys'riters or schools within one mile of the hospital are eligible to partici-
Mercy Healthcare Bakersfield and -
brings with her 17 years of hospital
education experience_VWian •
earned her Master's degree In
_ health care -administration at Cal -
" State university Bakersfield, Good
'luck Inyournew Job, Vivian, we
hope you will enjoy Hoag -as much -
'as we do. -- - f
.New hospital mailing-;
address : _
G
CARPER
'pate in our rideshare.program. To qualify,
Uyou must drive With your child aminimum
of three -times a week (two times If you_
O worka 12-hour--. -
Complete a rideshare claim form '
' monthly and redeem it -for a meal ticket at,.
the recruitment office on the last two
1 ' .working days of the month form 9-fo -
D a:m. You'll then be elIglblerto win great
- prizes in our monthly rideshare drawing-
For more Information, contact Pam
.<' Bolen at ext. 6990. , ' _Z
• Due to a change in post office _ 7 - • - r — - •
-
regulatibns,,tfie.hospital has been
given-8 new post office box
number. The old -address will be-
- honored by the post office until
July of next year, but It is a good .-
Idea to_get used to using the new ,
one as soon as possible. Ourynew
address Is; •
Hoag Memorial Hospital
Presbyterlan ,
'301 Newport Blvd
' P.O. Box6100
_ Newport -Beach, CA 92658-6100
•
June rideshare winners J_ -
r -' Leslie Aimone, EdmondtAtexander, Norma Anderson, Elaine ' '
= - Bataz, Elena Bazaurl: Michael Beltran, Linda Beutel. Ramona , : /- '
Billing, Uhda'Bobendetti,.Kristin Brady, Joyce Brown; Virginia ' -,
Burns, William Cadletnr, Lourdes Castellon, Karen Chapman;
- Colleen Cline, Joanne Colley, Crystal Craig, Rosalle De Santis,•.;'
Susan Doucot, Essle Fales:Matthew-Franks, Ruben Gonzalez,
Robert Hart, Debra Haynes,Dennis Henderson, Concha
i Hernandez, John Huebler, Lisa Kemmett; Matt Kosman, Darla
`Laird, Marc,Locke, Richard Lynch, Beafriz Martinez, Ula-Mendez,. j
Janice Miller, Martha Ortega, Patricia Parker, Mike Reiner,'^ r-.-/ -,
Ramiro Robledo, Karen Schiller; Joan Sinkinson, Mary Skinner`r=� _ -`
. Natalie Stepelevltch, Maria iirado, Medina liro, Usa Townsend, Mark
Welker, Richard Wilson, James Wrather, Mary Ellen Zimmerman -
r
‘H.6AG.
Food and nutrition services, as
well as the medical,.nursing and-
Share Our Selves (S.OS,), a -tom hospital staff at Hoag should be
Join the fun today at Jolunteer organizatioh.serving the ` _ proud! Fred Martin, "On the Coast"
needy,.issponsoring an`"Adopta - columnist for the DatlyPilot;spent-
holiday party! - f Family for Christmas -program. This • Thankssgivfng at Hoag Hospital and
Holiday festivffies•wifl be In full - is a great Idea for a department shared his positive experiences.--
swing in the Hoag cafeteria from 1 project. There ore several options" with readers in his Saturday, -
10 a.m. today through 2 a,rri.
from which you can choose that November 27 column entitled
- Friday, December la You'll enjoy - , :will lietp needy fdmiliesrinformation "Thanksgiving at Hoag best -kept :
a delicious holiday menu pre- sheets are a4ailabie inhuman- secretin town." Mr. Martin was .
pared by --our own food and - resources. Please consider this visiting -his wife who was at Hoag -,
nutrltlon servces s itaff. Lots of fun Program as you prepare for the , for surgery. It's nice to know that
events are piahned—there's- holidays. Far more information, call - according to -this visitor."Hoag •
Kristin Baker at ext: 5862.
something for e4eryoner photos - seems to do_everything right."
- with Santa, Ron Cray's Famous -
Kielbasa, Christmas Carolers,'
Radiology Band, Marlabhls; Hoag
Hospital Choir and a Michael . _ -
Bolton sound -alike! Door prize . -
• drawings and much more will ,
happen throughout the day. See
you there! " - - •
-Christmas Boat <
-Parade„Sets sailioon 7yfott may already bey
Getth'e Riolidayspirit; Begin- - a winner!" .
nIng Friday; December17", the "- ASorry tti s isn't Ed McMahon's
85th•annual Newport Harbor
- Christmas shopping -
fun and easy at Hoag
• - `fired of fighting the crowds of
shopping malls?,Need to pick up a
last-minute giff7; Stop byte Gift
- `Box.andcheckout•theirwide --
selection of Iaite oliday-ms. Christ-
mas Candlesr tree ornaments,
dards_stUffed bears, figurines,
lingerie: and holiday baby clothes are some of the items available. -
Gift Box -hours are'Mondaythrough
Friday, l0-a.rn.;to 8 Om and '
Christmas B'oaf Parade takes • publisher's cleannghoUse give .� weekends T1.30 a.rn, to 3p.m. The
pi"ace nightlythrough,Thursday,• , .away, but it's-aimostds good: If ' Gift Box is operated bythe Auxill
;December 23. The parade starts You rideshare; you.may qualify for , . -. lary and proceeds benefitthe_' -
eech.night at 6.30 p.m: arid runs a we In Hoag Hospital's n'deshare .hospital."'-, , ; - „-'.
appronlmately ivio and one-half-, - ; recognition contest. Prizes will be; - - Hoag Wear - _ "-
hours, ' ' - ; 4- - _ -'- awarded in -January for : - "` sweatshirts -arid other -
' • To vfewthe parade from -
. Earliest enrollment date in assofted items make
- -'the fdeshare program -.-great Christmas gifts,
-grandstand,seating, yakcan y _ ti
• -,make reservations -by calling the • s, - ;; ,Most cmuisttent,partic!pa- - tool See Ede - v , ,
,,, Asnerican Legion Hall crt-673-5070r-, - ''•; - tiooJn rideshare program rd'` 'Jordan on,Ma�-
Tlckets are 35. You can also view ; ;_ter .,•.�eThalongest,commuteTor:-- - ,days, Wednesdays ;1.
the paradefrom waterfront " ,� 1 ' j bicycle riders;,walker's', bus'. orThursdays be—
restaurants.or harbor cruises. For ' - .- : - riders and carpoolers iween 8.a:m.-and-; :.
more informatlonrcolitactthe ✓ Most carpoolers iri yefilcle _ 'noon'Heroffige isan• --
Newport Harbor Chamber of-,-` — - the Grace Hoag -
Commerce at 729-4400:� ; ; - .' To be eligible for recognition , Conference csnter Or,
and.prizes in-an`y of these catego-.
r . . . s - ` r - ries, cdlrPam Bolerrot.ext, 6990 byi , more information,
PL
r.
December 9,1993'
-
-
News and information for Hoag Hospital employees
Adopt a family for . - Kudos to Hoag'sstaff
Christmas .. '
L = December--
• call her at ext. 5838 fd
• •
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 16, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768 '
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil G )c-
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures No. 95
Comments Mitigation Measure No. 95 states:
"Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Sponsor shall
demonstrate to the City Fire Department that all existing and new
access roads surrounding the project site shall be designated as fire
lanes, and no parking shall be permitted unless the access way meets
minimum width requirements of the Public Works and Fire
Departments. Parallel parking on one side may be permitted if the
road is a minimum 32 feet in width."
The existing west service road, from Hospital Road to the Hospital's
parking structure is currently painted red on curbs on both sides of
the street. Subsequent to completion of the Cardiac Services Addition,
this roadway will continue to serve as a fire lane and parking
restrictions will also be continued.
GMK: gl
File: 1250.36-36.31.1.MIT.#95
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 16, 1994
To: Genic Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil GIA-
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 3
Comments The report prepared by GeoScience Analytical, Inc., dated April 18,
1994, entitled "Hazardous Gas Evaluation: Cardiac Services Addition,"
recommends the following mitigation measure:
Site excavation should include site auditing by a qualified
environmental assessor capable of monitoring for methane and
hydrogen sulfide in accordance with the "Site Health and Safety
Plan for the Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Master
Plan" dated August 5, 1993.
The safety officer will be Pete Philpott (Inspector for the Office of
State Health Planning and Development) who will work in conjunction
with Karen Chapman (Hoag's Safety Officer) and the Facilities Design
and Construction division of Hoag Hospital.
GMK: gl
File: 1250.36-36.31-2.MIT.MEA5.3
• •
HOAG MEMOR/AL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 16, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Ki!foil, AIA G-
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 102
COMMENTS: Mitigation Measure No. 102 requires that:
"The Project Sponsor shall ensure that al! haul routes for import
or export materials shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer
and procedures shall conform with Chapter 15 of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code. Such routes shall be included in the above
construction traffic plan."
No import/export materials will be transported on public streets
as part of the development of the Cardiac Services Addition. Any
requirements for import/export will be addressed internal to the
hospital property on the lower campus. Therefore, a haul route
plan is not required.
GMK: g l
c: Janet Divan
File: 1260.36.3 6.3.1. M IT. M EAS.# 102
i
4. HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN _ _' _
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 21, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil 6 V—
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 91
91
RECEIVED BV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
AM PM
2 211991 PM
7181911011102111213141516
4
Comments: Mitigation Measure No. 91 states:
"Prior to issuance of grading permits, emergency fire access to the
site shall be approved by the City Public Works and Fire
Departments."
Enclosed is a graphic depicting emergency fire access routes to/from
the Cardiac Services Addition. For approximately three weeks,
commencing on June 20, 1994 and ending on July 11, 1994, a
segment of the west service road will be closed.
A meeting was held with Hoag, its general contractor, and Steve
Bunting, of the City Fire Department, on June 7, 1994 to discuss fire
services issues related to the Cardiac Services Addition, including
emergency fire access.
GMK: gl
Enclosure: Graphic
File: A250.36-36.31-1.MIT.#91
•
SCALE:1'7.100'
n
Gtefel For-
*Thi RM. WE 5
00
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSP. PRESBYTERIAN
UPPER CAMPUS
MAY 24, 1994 HI7-100-03
•
#- 9 3
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 21, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O.Box 1768
Newport Beach,California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA G K
Project Managert
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 93
COMMENTS: Mitigation Measure No. 93 states:
"Prior to issuance of grading permits, a master plan of water and
sewer facilities shall be prepared for the site. The Project
Sponsor shall verify the adequacy of existing water and sewer
facilities and construct any modifications or facilities necessitated
by the proposed project development"
Enclosed is a letter from the engineer for the Cardiac Services
Addition stating that existing water and sewer facilities are
adequate to serve the project.
GMK: gl
Enclosure: Letter
File: 1250.36-36.31-M I T.M EASM 93
ENGINEERING
June 16, 1994
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard - Box 6100
Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100
Attention: Gunther Kilfoil
Project Manager
Cardiac Services Addition
Hoag Hospital Master Plan
Mitigation Measure 93
In response to Mitigation Measure 93, this is to confirm the
proposed Cardiac Services Addition is serviced by an existing
24 inch diameter water transmission main (public) and an existing
12 inch diameter sewer main (public) as construct-ed per improvement
plans approved by the City of Newport Beach, and that they are
adequately sized to serve the proposed building.
lV'"li'L
Joseph L. Boyle
RCE 44497
JLB:ib
H17-100-10
2098 South Grand Avenue • Suites A & B • Santa Ana, California 92705 • (714) 957-8144 • Fax (714) 957-8499
. •
0 4;FQ ii N
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
TRANSMITTAL
Date: June 21, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA Gi `L'
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures No. 12 and 13
COMMENTS: Mitigation Measures No. 12 and 13 require completion of a
hydrological analysis for the Cardiac Services Addition. Copies of
this hydrological analysis were forwarded to the Public Works
Department on June 14, 1994. A copy is enclosed for your
review.
GMK: g l
Enclosure: Hydrological Analysis
File: 1250.36-36.31-M IT.M EAS.# 12-13
• •
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 21, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 39
COMMENTS: Based on the acoustical analysis prepared by Colia Acoustical
Consultants, window glazing was recommended for the Cardiac
Services Addition. The enclosed letter specifies the
recommendations by the acoustical consultant.
GMK: g l
Enclosure: Letter
File: 1250.36-3 6.3-1. M I T. M EAS. #39
iRECPTVED
JUN 2, 0 1994
FACILITIES DESIGN
;$j CONSTRUCTION
June 15, 1994
•
HMC
Mr. Gunther Kilfoil, AIA
Project Manager
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Facilities Design and Construction
301 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Regarding: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Cardiac Services Addition
HMC #1029033
Subject: Hoag Project #1250.36
City of Newport Beach Plan Review #430-94
Mitigation Measure #39
Dear Gunther:
•
File 125 0 • 3 • "j � .5 p
We have reviewed the acoustical analysis prepared by Colia Acoustical Consultants for
the proposed Cardiac Services Addition. In accordance with the recommended glazing
requirements, we have specified 'A" glass in all windows on all elevations of the new
building. Mechanical ventilation and inoperable windows will be installed, since the
acoustical calculations require that windows remain closed.
We expect that these measures will attenuate exterior noise to acceptable interior
levels. If you need additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
HMC GROUP
Architecture Division
Michael K. Cox
Architect
MKC:mr
cc: File -AG
HMC GROUP
Corporate Offices 3270 Inland Empire Boulevard, Ontario, California 91764-4854 909 989-9979 Fax 909 483-1400
Architecture • Eng,neenng • Interiors • Planning LGKIL2 MK0-1
•
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 3, 1994
To: City of Newport Beach Planning Department
3300 Newport Boulevard
P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1760
Attention: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA 6K-- Phone 714-646-8901
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project # 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures 104, 105, 106, 107, 110, 111, and 112
Comments: The above mitigation measures are required to be contained in the
Contractor/Subcontractor Supplemental General Conditions in accordance with
the mitigation monitoring program for the Cardiac Services Addition.
Enclosed is a portion of the Hospital's agreement with the Contractor requiring
adherence to the above mitigation measures.
GMK: gl
c: Janet Divan
File: 1250.36-74.50-GARCIA/NB MEMO
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
AM
SUN 6 1991
718191101111121112131415 6
4
/6'4,c, (0)7
Oil I10 2-
r •
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
Standard Form of Agreement Between
Owner and Contractor
where the basis of payment is the
COST OF THE WORK PLUS A FEE
With or without a Guaranteed Maximum Pace
1993 EDITION
THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH
AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION
Use only with the 1993 "ECU" Edition of FD 201, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction.
AGREEMENT made as of the Twentieth day of April in the year of Nineteen Hundred and Ninety -Four
BETWEEN the Owner: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard, Box 6100
Newport Beach, California 92658-8912
and the Contractor:
The Project:
The Architect:
Pozzo Construction Company
2894 Rowena Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90039
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Cardiac Services Addition (1250.36)
301 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92658-8912
David A. Boyle Engineering
2098 South Grand Avenue, Suite A
Santa Ana, CA 92705
The Owner and the Contractor agree as set forth below.
OWNER
INITIALS
CONTRACTOR
DOCUMENT FD 112 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL • STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR
(REV. 1/6/93)
INIfALS
• 1993 EDITION • JANUARY 1993. 301 Newport Blvd. • Box 6100 • Newport Beach, California 92658-8912 • 1
• •
ARTICLE 17
ENUMERATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
The Contract Documents, which constitute the entire agreement between the Owner and the Contractor, except
for Modifications Issued after execution of this Agreement, are enumerated as follows:
AGREEMFNTS AND CONDITIONS TO THE CONTRACT
This Agreement - The 1993 Edition of FD 112, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and
Contractor. (Rev. 01/06/93)
General Conditions - The 1993 Edition of FD 201, General Conditions of the Contract for
Construction. (Rev. 01/06/93)
Exhibit A - Supplemental General Conditions
OBFn g F of VALUFS
Exhibit Al - Schedule of Values
Exhibit A2 - Construction Overhead and Reimbursable Expenses
DRAWINGS
Exhibit B - Drawing Index
PROJFCT MANUAI
Exhibit C - Project Manual Index (None)
ADDENDA
Exhibit D - Addenda (None)
SPECIFIC FXCLUSIONS AND CI ARIFICATION TO BID PROPOSAI
Exhibit E - Specific Exclusions and Clarification
SI IPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS
Exhibit F - Asbestos Abatement Agreement
Exhibit G - Interim Life Safety
Exhibit H - Life Safety Evaluation Form
Exhibit I - Daily Inspection Form
OWNER CONTRACTOR
INITIALS INITIALS
DOCUMENT FD 112 HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL • STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR
(REV. 1/6/93) • 1993 EDITION • JANUARY 1993• 301 Newport Blvd. • Box 6100 • Newport Beath, California 92656.6912 • 23
r •
EXHIBIT E
SPECIFIC EXCLUSIONS AND CLARIFICATION
1. Due to the close proximity of construction to many sensitive areas in the hospital much care must
be taken by the contractor to minimize noise, pollution or other disturbances. Some disturbances
may require the contractor to reschedule the required work. If the contractor is asked to stop work
due to these disturbances no additional compensation in either monetary or time delay shall be
accepted by the owner.
2. There will be weekly meetings for this project. The contractor will be required to attend all
meetings.
3. All communications, questions and clarifications are to be submitted in writing to the architect and
copied to the owner.
4. In Article 2 of the General Contract the term Architect shall mean David A. Boyle Engineering.
5. Contract amount Includes hard and soft -demolition of existing photocopy room and preparation of
subgrade.
6. Testing, permits and inspection is by Owner.
7. General Contractor payment and performance bond is excluded.
8. Methane Gas has been identified in the soil at the Northwest corner of the proposed building.
9. Shoring and lagging to be excluded.
10. Work to be performed during normal working hours.
11. All concrete demolition to be non -pneumatic within 50 feet of any building.
12. Removal of known existing utilities within excavated area is included as an allowance.
13. De -watering is excluded.
14. Replacement of existing paving, curbs, gutters and landscaping is excluded.
15. The attached Mitigation Measures required by the city of Newport Beach are clarifications to the
Contract. The Contractor is required to follow Mitigation Measures 104,105,106,107,110,111
and 112.
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 104
Timing For Completion: Ongoing During Site Preparation and Construction
Text of Mitigation Measure: The Project Sponsor shall ensure that construction activities
requiring more than 16 truck (i.e., multiple axle vehicle) trips per hour, such as excavation
and concrete pours, shall be limited between June 1 and September 1 to avoid traffic
conflicts with beach and tourist traffic. At all other times, such activities shall be limited to
25 truck (i.e., multiple axle vehicle) trips per hour unless otherwise approved by the City
traffic engineer. Haul operations will be monitored by the Public Works Department and
additional restrictions may be applied if traffic congestion problems arise.
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on:
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature:
)
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 105
Timing For Completion: Ongoing During Site Preparation and Construction
Text of Mitigation Measure: The Project Sponsor shall ensure that all trucks used for
hauling material shall be covered to minimize material loss during transit.
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on:
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature:
I
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 106
Timing For Completion: Prior to the Issuance of Each Grading Permit
Text of Mitigation Measure: Project sponsor shall ensure that all proiect related grading
shall be performed in accordance with the City of Newport Beach Grading Ordinance which
contains procedures and requirements relative to dust control, erosion and siltation control,
noise, and other grading related activities.
Standard For Compliance: Shown on approved grading plans: documented in contractor/
subcontractor supplemental general conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on:
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature:
0
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 107
Timing For Completion: Prior to the Issuance of Each Grading Permit
Text of Mitigation Measure: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project sponsor shall
demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 which will require watering during the
morning and evening prior to or after earth moving operations. To further reduce dust
generation, grading should not occur when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour (MPH),
and soil binders on SCAQMD approved chemical stabilizers should be spread on
construction sites or unpaved areas. Additional measures to control fugitive dust include
street sweeping of roads used by construction vehicles, reduction of speeds on all unpaved
roads to 15 miles per hours, suspension of operations during first and second stage smog
alerts, and wheel washing before construction vehicles leave the site.
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on:
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature:
• •
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 110
Timing For Completion: Prior to the Issuance of Each Grading and Building Permit
Text of Mitigation Measure: The project sponsor shall ensure that low emission mobile and
stationary equipment is utilized during construction, and low sulfur fuel is utilized in
stationary equipment, when available. Evidence of this fact shall be provided to the City of
Newport Beach prior to issuance of any grading or building permit.
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on:
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature:
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 111
Timing For Completion: Ongoing During Site Preparation and Construction
Text of Mitigation Measure: The project sponsor shall ensure that all internal combustion
engines associated with construction activities shall be fitted with properly maintained
mufflers and kept in proper tune.
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on:
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature:
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING
Project: Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure: 112
Timing For Completion: Ongoing During Site Preparation and Construction
Text of Mitigation Measure: The project sponsor shall ensure that construction activities are
conducted in accordance with Newport Beach Municipal Code, which limits the hours of
construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 8:00 a.m. to
6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No person shall, while engaged in construction, remodeling. digging,
grading, demolition, painting, plastering or any other related building activity. operate any
tool, equipment or machine in a manner that produces loud noise that disturbs, or could
disturb, a persons of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity. on any Sunday
or any holiday.
Standard For Compliance: Documented in contractor/subcontractor supplemental general
conditions.
Compliance:
Hoag Hospital City of Newport Beach
Submitted on: Approved on:
Submitted by: Approved by:
Signature: Signature:
• •
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 1, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA 614,
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 31
COMMENTS: Mitigation Measure No. 31 states:
"Prior to issuance of a grading permit for any of the proposed
Master Plan facilities, the Project Sponsor shall implement a
pilot program approved by the City Traffic Engineer that monitors
and manages usage of the Upper and Lower Campus service roads
during non -working hours. Such controls may include requesting
that the majority of vendors deliver products (other than
emergency products) during working hours (Le., 7:00 a.m. to
8:00 p.m.), signage to restrict use of the road by hospital
employees, physicians, patients and visitors during non -working
hours, and other methods by which to restrict use. The hospital
shall also request that vendors not deliver (i.e., scheduled and
routine deliveries) on the weekends.
This restriction specifically applies to scheduled and routine
deliveries. The results of this program shall be submitted to the
City for review prior to issuance of the grading permit. If the
results indicate that such controls do not significantly impact the
operations of the hospital, and provided that requests for specified
vendor delivery times is consistent with future Air Quality
Management Plan procedures, the City may require that the
program be implemented as hospital policy. If operation impacts
are significant, other mitigation measures would be investigated at
that time to reduce service road impacts to the adjacent residential
units."
In a letter sent to Janet Divan on April 12, 1993, from F. W.
Evins, traffic count information from the westside roadway was
provided (see attached). These traffic counts were taken for the
Memo to Genia Garcia
City of Newport Beach
• •
Mitigation Measure #31 Page 2
years 1990, 1991 and 1992. Additional traffic data was collected
in 1993. Below is a table identifying traffic counts for 1993 and
the previous years. As shown in the following table, traffic
volumes on the westside roadway continued to decrease,
demonstrating the effectiveness of our pilot program.
WESTSIDE ROADWAY - OFF HOUR (9 P.M. - 5 A.M.)
TRAFFIC REDUCTION SUMMARY
1993 1992 1991 1990
June 23-25 Dec. 14-16 Dec. 9-11 Dec. 10-12
Day 1 20 28 35 159
Day2 35 45 36 158
Day 3 13 la 41 124
68 112 120 441
GMK: bw
File: 1250.36-36.3-M IT. M EAS.#31
SENT BY:Xerox Tolecopier 7020 ;'4J-T41'10:17AM ; LICENSE DIVIS 4 :# 2
i ... n
HOAG MEMOR/AL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
• 301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX Y • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92e58.8912 • PHONE (714) 845.8800
April 12, 1993
City of Newport Beach
Traffic Department
City Hall
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1788
Newport Beach, California 92658-8915
Attention: Janet Divan
Associate Civil Engineer
Reference: Cardiac Services Addition (1250-38)
Subject: Response to City Mitigation Measure Traffic Questions
Dear Ms. Divan:
Pursuant to your previous request for information regarding mitigation questions, Hoag
Hospital's responses are listed below. 1 have arranged them In a question and answer format and
referenced the mitigation number, Hospital responses are In bold type for your convenience. As
we had previously surmised, the bulk of the mitigation measures adopted In conjunction with
our Master Plan approval are associated with Lower Campus development or a major Upper
Campus project.
MEASURE NO,
30. CI Bus turnouts -any identified yet? When would these be constructed?
A. Bus Turnouts - May or may not be required; however, given
the scope and scale of the Cardiac Services Addition (CSA),
they would appear to be unnecessary at thls time. Final
determination will be made by the City Traffic Department.
31. Q What monitoring Is being done? May require count data to verify results.
Also need a copy of the letter to vendors about delivery restrictions, and a
plan that shown all closures, signs, and hours• of restrictions for
deliveries and Hoag staff.
A. An annual monitoring program has been Implemented on the
westside roadway to verify the reduction of off hour traffic.
The traffic Counts were performed by Newport Traffic
Studies and are as follows:
SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 5.1-94,;10;10AM I LICENSE DIVIS�y
;# 3
April 12. 1993 Mitigation Measures Page 2
A. WESTSIDE ROADWAY • OFF HOUR (9 P.M. • e A.M.)
TRAFFIC REDUCTION SUMMARY
1992 1991 1090
Dec. 14-16 Dec. 9.11 Doc. 10.12
Day 1 28 36 159
Day 2 46 36 158
Day3 U II 124
112 120 441
In order to reduce the "off hour" traffic along the woataide
roadway, Hoag has Implemented the following plan since
November 1091:
1. Erect barricades during off hours 8 p.m. to 6 a.m.
2. Installation of slgnage.
3. Semiannual issuance of notices to vendors/employees. ",;I' 5tf ";
4. Conduct annual traffic counts.
38. C1 TDM Ordinance - Need a summary of the existing items listed. Also,
additional facilities may be required each time new construction will
handle 100 or more employees.
A. The CSA is not a major component or phase of the Master
Plan; however, In an effort to meet the Intent of this
mitigation measure, Hoag will provide the following:
1. A carpool parking space will be provided and designated.
2. As previously agreed, this project does not require
bicycle lookers to bo Installed.
3. A minimum of one shower and two lockers will be provided
In the building addition.
4. Information regarding transportation alternatives shall
be ptovlded to all employees.
6. A rldesharo vehicle loading area may not be warranted by
the implementation of this project.
6. Hoag does not provide venom' services.
101. Q Discuss with Mr. Evans about processing the larger projects. We need to
review all traffic control plans for construction projects.
A. The relatively small scale nature of the CSA project does not
warrant the Implementation of an external construction
phasing and traffic control plan. Such a plan will be
developed with future major phases as was intended with the
development of the Master Plan.
•
102. Q Obtain haul route permits from Traffic Engineering for trucks on city
streets (for every project requiring large trucks).
A. This mitigation measure will be mot by requiring the
Contractor Involved with the specific project to obtain the
necessary permits. (See attached summary sheet.)
SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 1-04410:18AM ; LICENSE DIVIS 4
April 12, 1993 Mitigation Measures
Page 2
103. 0 Submit a copy of letter re: construction delays for our review.
A. The intent of this mitigation measure Is related to public
roadways. There will be no Interruption of traffic departing
our campus onto public roadways. An Internal plan will be
developed for our staging and implementing purposes. The
contract will provide to City as required,
104. Q This mainly applies to all projects.
A. The scope and scale of this project will not begin to approach
the "16 truck trips per hour" threshold; therefore, this
measure does not apply.
10e. Q This applies to all projects.
A. Hoag Hospital will comply with this measure.
108. Q We will be reviewing trip reduction plans for construction crews for all
larger types•of projects involving several crews.
•
A. The CSA project` does not require compliance to this
mitigation measure duo to the scope and scale of the CSA
project.
120. Q We need to review the location of all screening materials for sight
distance compliance.
A. The CSA project will incorporate appropriate landscape
screening to meet the intent of this mitigation measure.
I hope that thls response answers your questions. 1 look forward to meeting with you 0n
Tuesday, April 13, 1993. In the Interim, please call me at 780-5908 If I can answer any
questions.
Sincerely
�
F. Evins, III, AIA
Vice President
Facilities Design and Construction
c: Pete Foulke, Senior Vice President
Leif Thompson, Director of Major Protects
Barry A. Klein, AIA
Peri Muretta
Patricia Temple
FWE:bw
File: 38-33.00-Mitigation Measures
;# 4
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 11, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil C�l�
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Subject: Cardiac Services Addition
Comments: Mitigation Measure No. 36 states:
"Prior to issuance of grading and building permits for each phase of
development, the Project Sponsor shall provide evidence for
verification by the Planning Department that the necessary permits
have been obtained from the SCAQMD for regulated commercial
equipment incorporated within each phase. An air quality analysis
shall be conducted prior to each phase of development for the proposed
mechanical equipment contained within that phase that identifies
additional criteria pollutant emissions generated by the mechanical
equipment to be installed in that phase. If the new emissions, when
added to existing project emissions could result in impacts not
previously considered or significantly change the land use impact,
appropriate CEQA documentation shall be prepared prior to issuance
of any permits for that phase of development. Each subsequent air
quality analysis shall be reviewed and approved by the SCAQMD."
There will not be any regulated commercial equipment contained
within the Cardiac Services Addition which will require a permit
from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Therefore, no
air quality analysis, as specified in the above mitigation measure, is
required.
GK: bw
File: 1250.36.36.31-M IT. MEAS.#36
•
•
Reference:
Subject:
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date:
May 19, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA GG-
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Mitigation Measure No. 44
COMMENTS:
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MAY 2 3199,1
7t819f1Ufllf12t112t314t5 6
GMK:
Mitigation Measure Nos, 44 states:
"Prior to issuance of a building permit the Project Sponsor shall
submit plans to, and obtain the approval of plans from, the City
Planning Department which detail the lighting system for all
buildings and window systems for building on the western side of
the Upper Campus. The systems shall be designed and maintained
in such a manner as to conceal light sources and to minimize light
spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall
be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer, with a
letter from the engineer stating that, in his or her opinion, this
requirement has been met."
The building plans were submitted to the City on March 17, 1994.
These plans include a lighting system designed by Dale Karjala and
Associates, Inc., Electrical Engineers, which, among other things,
address the above mitigation measure.
Attached is a letter from the electrical engineer in compliance.
with Mitigation Measure No. 44.
bw
Enc. Letter to Hoag Hospital from Dale Karjala and Associates, Inc. dated
5/1 8/9 4
File: 1250.36-74.50-MIT. MEAS.#44
1.1250.34 .': .'.
bale Karjala and Associates, Inc.
Electrical Engineers .
MAY'.1:91994.. -•_ ; ,:. .. <. . .•
- &CONSTRUCTItON
: HOAG MEMORIAL IiOSPIfAL••PRESBYfERIAN
Newport' Beach;: CA' 92663'.
Attn:' :;Gu▪ 'rither ,kilfoil!,AIA
.M.,
▪ - Projectanager
Facilities Design and.ConstrUction
PROJECTi; HOAG CARDIAC'SERVICES ADDITION
SUBJECT: :MITIGATION. MEASURE #44
:May 18;11994.
'In • my opinion; .the` plans meet this requirement.'; That -is, the lighting .
• -system is designed in a nianner'to conceal light' sources and, minimize -
-light;spillage and glare to the adjacent residences.,,. : • t
•
•
'Dale C. Karj
3185-0 Airway Avenue . Costa Mesa, CA- 92626-4601 ■. (714) 751-185'1 .-FAX (714) 751-421e
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 18, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O.Box 1768
Newport Beach,California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil, AIA 6IC
Project Managert
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 110
#7/3
Srge
COMMENTS: Mitigation Measure No. 110 states:
"The project sponsor shall ensure that low emission mobile and
stationary equipment is utilized during construction, and low
sulfur fuel is utilized in stationary equipment, when available.
Evidence of this fact shall be provided to the City of Newport Beach
prior to issuance of any grading or building permit."
Hoag Hospital will adhere to this mitigation measure and will
provide documentation to contractors for the Cardiac Services
Addition specifying that they adhere to the above mitigation
measure.
GMK: bw
File: 1250.36-36.3-MIT.M EAS.#110
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 11, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures No. 86
Comments: Enclosed are copies of the permits that Hoag'obtains on an annual basis
from the South Coast Air Quality Management District in compliance
with the SCAQMD Air Toxic rules, and as required by the following
mitigation measure:
"The Project Sponsor shall provide evidence to the Planning Director
that measures to ensure implementation and continued compliance
with all applicable SCAQMD Air Toxic Rules, specifically Rules 1401,
1403, 1405 and 1415, are being carried out."
GK: bw
File: 1250.36-36.31-MIT.#86
SOUTIIAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIST
21865 East Copley Drive, Dlamond Bar, CA 91765
PERMIT TO OPERATE p0y'
Permit No.
D70919
A/N 274019
' This initialperinittnustbe renewed' ANNiJAI:LYuutess the e4ulpmentis moved; or changes ownership.
•,-4tthcbillingfor annua1renewel fee (Rule 3011) isnot iedeived by the expiration date, contact the District.
Legal Owner
or Operator. HOAG MEM HOSP PRESBYTERIAN
ATTN: NELSON SMITH
301 NEWPORT BLVD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-4120
ID 011245
Equipment Location: 301 NEWPORT BLVD, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-4120
Equipment Desceiption:
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM CONSISTING OF:
1. CATALYTIC OXIDIZER (ETO ABATOR), DONALDSON, MODEL 50 SCFM, WITH A 5.8 KW
ELECTRIC HEATER, A 6.0 HP BLOWER AND AN ENCLOSED CATALYST BED, 2'-3" W x 3'' " L x 2'-
2" H.
2. EXHAUST' SYSTEM WITH AN AIR BLOWER, VENTING TWO ETHYLENE OXIDE
STERILIZER/AERATOR SYSTEMS.
Conditions
1. OPERATION OF THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DATA
AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION UNDER WHICH THIS PERMIT IS
ISSUED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BELOW.
2. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD OPERATING
CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. .
3. THE TEMPERATURE OF THE EXHAUST FROM THIS CATALYST BED SHALL BE MAINTAINED
BETWEEN BETWEEN 280 DEGREES F AND 550 DEGREES F AS INDICATED BY A PROPER
TEMPERATURE GAUGE AND/OR RECORDER.
4. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LEAK CHECKED AND SOURCE TESTED PER DISTRICT RULE
1405.
•
5. RECORDS SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE CONDITIONS.
THE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT FOR AT LEAST TWO YEARS AND MADE AVAILABLE TO
DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON REQUEST.
ORIGINAL
SO,OAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIS•T
21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PERMIT TO OPERATE
CONTINUATION• OF'PERMIT TO OPERATE
Permit No.
D70919
A/N 274019
NOTICE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206, THIS PERMIT TO OPERATE OR COPY SHALL BE POSTED ON OR
WITHIN 8 METERS OF THE EQUIPMENT.
THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE EMISSION OF AIR CONTAMINANTS IN EXCESS OF THOSE
ALLOWED BY DIVISION 26 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR
THE RULES OF THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE
CONSIDERED AS PERMISSION TO VIOLATE EXISTING LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS OR
STATUTES OF OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. .
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ptcuu: oh gaiety
By Dorris M. Bailey/ac
3/10/1993
ORIGINAL
SOUlOAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIS•T
21 5 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PERMIT TO OPERATE
Permit No.
D70918
A/N 274018
This mitial permit must bo•Xenewed ANNUALLY »mess the 'equipineut'is moved, Or changes ownership.
_ If the'billi4g for annual renewal fee '(Rule 301.f)•is notreceived by the expiration date, contact the District.
Leila Owner
or Operator:
HOAG MEM HOSP PRESBYTERIAN
ATTN: NELSON SMITH
301 NEWPORT BLVD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-4120
ID 011245
Equipment Location: 301 NEWPORT BLVD, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-4120
Equipment Description:
ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILIZATION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF:
1. ETHYLENE OXIDE (ETO) STERILIZER, 3M, MODEL 5XL, WITH A 2.2 KW ELECTRIC HEATER,1'-
5" W x 2'-8" L x 1'-3" H (INTERNAL DIMENSIONS).
•
2. AERATOR, 3M, MODEL XL, WITH A 2.0 KW ELECTRIC HEATER, AND A 0.3-HP EXHAUST
BLOWER, V-6" W x 3'-0" L x 1'-4" H (INTERNAL DIMENSIONS).
Conditions:
1. OPERATION OF THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DATA
AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION UNDER WHICH THIS PERMIT IS
ISSUED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BELOW.
2. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD OPERATING
CONDITION AT ALL TIMES.
3. THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF STERILIZING GAS (100% ETHYLENE OXIDE) USED IN THIS
EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.66 POUNDS IN ANY ONE DAY OR 15 POUNDS IN ANY
CALENDAR MONTH.
4. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE OPERATED UNLESS THE STERILIZER IS VENTED ONLY TO
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT WHICH IS IN FULL USE AND HAS BEEN ISSUED A
VALID PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT OR OPERATE BY THE DISTRICT.
5. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LEAK CHECKED AND SOURCE TESTED PER DISTRICT RULE
1405.
• ORIGINAL
SOUT•OAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIST•T
21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PERMIT TO OPERATE
, CONTTNUATlON' QF-PERMIT TO OP,I:rRATE
Permit No.
D70918
A/N 274018
6. RECORDS SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE CONDITIONS.
THE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO YEARS AND BE MADE AVAILABLE
TO DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON REQUEST.
NOTICE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206, THIS PERMIT TO OPERATE OR COPY SHALL BE POSTED ON OR
WITHIN 8 METERS OF THE EQUIPMENT.
THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE EMISSION OF AIR CONTAMINANTS IN EXCESS OF THOSE
ALLOWED BY DIVISION 26 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR
THE RULES OF THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE
CONSIDERED AS PERMISSION TO VIOLATE EXISTING LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS OR
STATUTES OF OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
By Dorris M. Bailey/ac
3/10/1993
ORIGINAL
SOUTHOAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIST
21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PERMIT TO OPERATE
Permit No.
D70917
A/N 274017
Par 1
This halal permit must:be renewed ANNUALLY unlessa;=ggitipnlent is moved;. or changes ownership.
_if the baling forannual'renewal fee (Rule 301.01s•not tcceived'by.the expiration -date, contact the District.
Legal Owner
or Operator: HOAG MEM HOSP PRESBYTERIAN
ATTN: NELSON SMITH
301 NEWPORT BLVD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-4120
ID 011245
Equipment Location: 301 NEWPORT BLVD, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-4120
t
I
Equipment Ucscriptlon:
ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILIZATION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF:
1. ETHYLENE OXIDE (ETO) STERILIZER, 3M, MODEL SXL, WITH A 2.2 KW ELECTRIC HEATER, 1'-
5" W x 2'-S" L x 1'-3" H (INTERNAL DIMENSIONS).
2. AERATOR, 3M, MODEL XL, WITH A 2.0 KW ELECTRIC HEATER, AND A 0.3-HP EXHAUST
BLOWER,1'-6" W x 3'-0" L x 1'-4"• H (INTERNAL DIMENSIONS).
Conditions:
1. OPERATION OF THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DATA
AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION UNDER WHICH THIS PERMIT IS
ISSUED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BELOW.
2. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD OPERATING
CONDITION AT ALL TIMES.
3. THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF STERILIZING GAS (100% ETHYLENE OXIDE) USED IN THIS
EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.66 POUNDS IN ANY ONE DAY OR 15 POUNDS IN ANY
CALENDAR MONTH. •
4. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE OPERATED UNLESS THE STERILIZER IS VENTED ONLY TO
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT WHICH IS IN FULL USE AND HAS BEEN ISSUED A
VALID PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT OR OPERATE BY THE DISTRICT.
5. THIS EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LEAK CHECKED AND SOURCE TESTED PER DISTRICT RULE
1405.
ORIGINAL
SOU•OAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIS•T
21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765
PERMITTO OPERATE
CONTINUATIONOF PERMIT TO.OPERATE
Permit No.
D70917
A/N 274017
•
6. RECORDS SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE CONDITIONS.
THE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO YEARS AND BE MADE AVAILABLE
TO DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON REQUEST.
NOTICE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206, THIS PERMIT TO OPERATE OR COPY SHALL BE POSTED ON OR
WITHIN 8 METERS OF THE EQUIPMENT.
r
THIS PERMIT" DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE EMISSION OF AIR CONTAMINANTS IN EXCESS OF THOSE
ALLOWED BY DIVISION 26 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR
THE RULES OF THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE
CONSIDERED AS PERMISSION TO VIOLATE EXISTING LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS OR
STATUTES OF OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
By Dorris M. Bailey/ac
3/10/1993
ORIGINAL
le: N o/
STATE OF CAUFORNIA
PETE WILSON, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
C. DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
- OCCUPATIONAL CARCINOGEN CONTROL UNIT
455 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE, ROOM 5227
SAN-f11ANCISCO, CA 94102
02-04-93 .
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
.301 NEWPORT BLVD
NEWPORT BEACH , CA 92663
Dear Employer
Your company/business has been
,registry with the Occupational
REGISTRY NUMBER 4213
' ADDRESS REPLY TO:
P.O. BOX 420603
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
(415) 703-3631
included in the Report of Use
Carcinogen Control Unit under:
EFFECTIVE DATE 04-11-85
94142
Under Title 8, California Code of Regulations, sections listed
below, you reported you used, or you have "affected employees" with
whom there is substantial probability they will be exposed as a
result of the use or presence of carcinogen(s) in the workplace
which are checked as follows:
5208
X Asbestos
5209
5210
2-acetylaminoflorene
4-aminodiphenyl
Benzidine (and its salts)
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
(and its salts)
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
alpha-Naphthylamine
beta-Naphthylamine
4-Nitrobiphenyl
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
beta-Propiolactone
bis-Chloromethyl ether
Methyl chloromethyl ether
Ethyleneimine
Vinyl Chloride
5211
5212
5213
5214
5215
5217
X
5218
5219
5220
X
Coke Oven Emissions
1,2-Dibromo-3-
chloropropane (DBCP)
Acrylonitrile
Inorganic Arsenic
4,4'-Methylenebis (2-
chloroaniline) MBOCA
Formaldehyde
Benzene
Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)
Ethylene Oxide (Et0)
This Report of Use or any change of the information shall be
reported in writing within 15 (10 for EDB) calendar days to:
Chief, Division of Occupational Safety & Health, 455 Golden Gate
Avenue, Rm 5224, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102, or P.O. Box
420603, San Francisco, CA 94142.
Cal/OSHA 184
June 1992
• •
FOR YOUR OFFICE -TO FILL OUT
_r THE FOLLOWING IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF OUR REPORT OF USE:
fr/NO CHANGE IN REPORT INFORMATION
NO LONGER A USER OF CARCINOGENS; DELETE FROM REGISTRY
CHANGE THE REPORT OF USE INFORMATION AS FOLLOWS: (A change
constitutes ANY change; address, phone number, contact person
business name, number of affected employees, addition or deletion
of listed and regulated carcinogens, locations, or any other
change.
Include name and address of union and name of representative, if
applicable. Use an additional sheet, if necessary.
If you need to add carcinogens to your existing report, please
include the following:
Carcinogen(s):
Date:
Location in plant
Temporary job site (Y/N)
Number of affected employees:
2 0 CI 4N) S<<{:fS
SIGNATURE (Sign & prdnt please) •
fca q Y -C �-1i�r� a 1 f-%f [) .( ReSh � :(am--
COMPANY NAME (If name change, wr to old & new name
r
Wiz) I k)e.W1Y14 tt) (4 t0)/N , c1 q L ( 3
ADDRESS, STREET, (Number of P.O. B CITY, ZIP
(91y)`7(00—acv(• Date ' tb�-(/}
3
Phone No.
-2-
•
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 11, 1994
To: Genie Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures No. 90
ZWit -47
Comments Mitigation Measure No. 90 states:
"In conjunction with the Critical Care Surgery Addition, the Project
Sponsor will place the overhead power lines located west of the Upper
Campus underground if feasible."
The Critical Care Surgery Addition (see enclosed graphic), which was
proposed to contain 59,947 square feet and cantilever from its third
floor, down to the first floor, with the third floor being only 37 feet
from the common property line with the Villa Balboa/Versailles
Condominiums, is no longer being proposed. In its place, the one-
story, 5,990-square-foot Cardiac Services Addition is now being
proposed. The Cardiac Services Building is not proposed to extend
further than existing projections from the second floor of the hospital
(approximately 47 feet from the common property line).
Since this mitigation measure is related to the Critical Care Surgery
Addition, it is our opinion that it is not relevant to the much smaller.
Cardiac Services Addition. However, we have discussed this matter
with Southern California Edison and received from them a "ball park"
estimate for undergrounding the overhead power lines (attached).
The cost estimate is too high to be considered feasible, especially in
relation to the much smaller Cardiac Services Addition that is now
being proposed.
GK: bw
Enclosure: Graphic
SCE Letter dated 5/4/94
File: 1250.36-36.31-MIT.#90
1
•
05/04/94 13:32 e714 89,188
ORANGE COAST DIS •?Join
LEi F
astoe
Southern California Edison Company
• 7339 BOLSA AVENUE
WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 02693-5294
May 4, 1994
Gunther Kilfoil, AIA
Project Manager
Facilities Design and Construction
Hoag Memorial Hospital
301 Newport Blvd., Box 6100
Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100
Subject: Undergrounding of Facilities on
West Side of Facility
Dear Gunther:
The ball park estimate to place the subject facilities underground would be $100,000 to
$110,000. This cost estimate would be for labor, materials, structures and the 34% rTCC
tax.
All of the facilities would be underground except a pad mounted capacitor bank. We
would need easements to cover the new facilities.
Should you have any questions, please call me at 895-0246.
Sincerely,
Chris Cartwright
Customer Service Planner
CC:cg
Service Driveway
Open Court ---,
at Thtd Floor Whdows
Support /Walting
kwffi
Floor
/
ourth F
CCU
Third Floor
Mechanics
Second Fkor.
Surpsry/ Cardiac
Ohhp I Msethp Rooms
Surgery
Ground Floor
Service Floor
Basement
Proposed, Exhthp to
Building Section
uver-e s arovQo FM
4���
4:- ----2. - ›il>.,_,. '9 1$491trit.
r „,,,, - ,/z -,lei l i1
if-4 ���"d 'wl1"n 7'
r ,,IftL
•
n
t'
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 11, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil G(C
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Constructio
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measures No. 26
)
Comments: Mitigation Measure No. 26 states:
"Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase 1 of the project, the
Project Sponsor shall conduct a project trip generated study which
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. This
study shall determine if the traffic to be generated by existing plus
Phase I development will not exceed 1,338 PM peak hour traffic
trips. In the event the Traffic Engineer determines that existing plus
Phase I development will generate more than 1,338 PM peak hour
trips, the project shall be reduced in size or the mix of land uses will
be altered to reduce the PM peak hour trips to at or below 1,338."
Seven hundred eighty-four (784) PM Peak Hour Trips were existing
at the time the EIR for the Hoag Master Plan was prepared, leaving
554 trips per Phase I (784 + 554 = 1,338).
The Cardiac Services Addition contains 5,990 square feet.
Approximately 60 patients, 15 support staff/personnel and 3
physicians will utilize the facility on a daily basis. None of these
patients, support staff/personnel or physicians that will utilize the
Cardiac Services Addition represent "new" trips. They are being
relocated from other existing facilities on campus. Existing hospital
functions will utilize the space being vacated by the existing Cardiac
Services area, and no new trips will be generated.
i • •
Memo to Genia Garcia
Mitigation Measure No. 26 Page 2
Therefore, for the PM Peak Hour, the Cardiac Services Addition
represents none of the additional allowable 554 trips to reach the
threshold for Phase I.
GK: bw
File: 1250.36-36.31-MIT.#26
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 11, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil GK
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36 v`„..
Cardiac Services Addition'
Subject: Mitigation Measures No. 83, 84, 85
Comments: Attached are letters from Hoag Hospital regarding Hoag's Hazardous
Materials and Waste Management Plan and Hoag's Infection Control
Manual. As stated in these two letters, no additional facilities will be
required to address the Cardiac Services Addition.
GK: bw
File: 1250.36-36.31-MIT.#83-85
•
•
•
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
RECEIVED
Intrahospital Memorandum
TO: Leif Thompson,
Vice President Facilities & Design
r•/
FROM: Didier Nafus,
Director Envi onmental Services
JUN 2 419 3
W��CILITIES DESIGN
DA ONGPIWVION
SUBJECT: Waste Generation of Cardiac Services Building Addition
Per your request of May 28, 1993 concerning the impact to our
current waste handling procedures with the addition of the Cardiac
Services Building, I am writing this memo as follow-up.
The addition of 5,000 square feet to our existing facility will
have little or no impact on the waste handling system. We have the
capacity to continue recycling white and colored paper, sterilize
medical waste, bale corrugated containers and landfill remainder.
Sharps disposal will continue to be handled by an approved licensed
contractor.
I trust this will answer any questions you have with regards to
waste handling needs.
DN:db
•
RECEIVED
MAR 14 1994
FACILITIES DESIGN
& CONSTRUCTION
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBY T ERIAN
301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX Y • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658-8912 • PHONE (714) 645-8600
March 11, 1994
Gunther Kilfoil, AIA
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Dear Gunther,
In response to mitigation measure 84, all projects must comply with the
policies and protocol established for the hospital in the Infection Control
manual. Infection Control reviews and monitors all construction for
adherence to infection control measures. Non-compliance would be
addressed by the Chairperson of the Infection Control Committee and its
members and administration appropriately notified.
In response to mitigation measure 85, no additional infectious material will
be generated to require additional storage areas. Additional storage areas
will be added as necessary, and all areas will be closely monitored by
Infection Control. To assure all measures are being taken to decrease dust
and other air contaminants to hospital patients and personnel, Infection
Control will monitor the areas closely.
Please call me if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
Rosalie DeSantis, MS, RN, CIC
Nurse Epidemiologist
RD/Ifw
A NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACCREDITED SY THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 11, 1994
To: Genia Garcia
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-1768
From: Gunther Kilfoil GK
Project Manager
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project No. 1250.36
Cardiac Services Addition
Subject: Mitigation Measure No. 39
Comments: Enclosed is an acoustical analysis as required by Mitigation Measure
No. 39 which requires:
"If noise levels in onsite outdoor noise sensitive use areas exceed 65
CNEL, the Project Sponsor shall develop measures that will attenuate
the noise to acceptable levels for proposed hospital facilities.
Mitigation through the design and construction of a noise barrier
(wall, berm, or combination wail/berm) is the most common way of
alleviating traffic noise impacts."
As stated in the report, "Because the projected and measured noise
levels at the outdoor patio area do not exceed 65 CNEL, acoustical
shielding will not be required" (p.3).
GK: bw •
File: 1250.36-36.31-MIT.MEAS.#39
• •
April 28, 1994
RECEIVED
APR 29 1994
{ .tS DESIGN
wtJSTRUCTICMJ
COLIA ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANTS
2610 Avon Street, Suite B
Newport Beach, CA 92663
(714) 631-7315
FAX (714) 631-3824
ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDl'1'1ON
IN NEWPORT BEACH
Prepared For:
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 Newport Boulevard
P.O. Box 6100
Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100
Prepared By:
CHARD
Acoustical Consultant
MEMBER INCE
R4-032
Institute of Noise Control Engineering • Acoustical Society of America
ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
INTRODUCTION
At the request of Gunther Kilfoil, Colia Acoustical Consultants have
prepared an acoustical analysis of the Cardiac Services addition as a part
of Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian in Newport Beach. The proposed
project is located on the north side of Pacific ('pact Highway between
Newport Boulevard and Superior. The principal source of noise to the
project area will come from future vehicular traffic on Pacific Chqqt
Highway.
The noise criteria of the City of Newport Beach for current and projected
conditions state that the noise intrusion to interior habitable spar
from exterior sources should not exceed 45 decibels (dB) Community Noise
Equivalent Level (CNEL) when the proposed project is within a CNEL contour
of 60 dB or greater. Exterior habitable areas are to be in a noise
environment no higher than 65 CNEL. In addition, the noise from the
loading dock and condenser are to be less than 55 dBA Leq at the west
property line.
The purpose of this report is to determine the exterior noise environment,
design noise control measures to reduce the projected noise impacts, and
present other mitigation measures, where necessary, to reduce other noise
impacts to acceptable levels.
ANALYSIS
Exterior Noise Environment -Current
The current noise impact to the project site was determined by on -site
noise measurements. The current noise measurements were made at the
project site on April 7, 1994. The measurement microphone of the sound
level meter was positioned at two locations on the project site (see
Figure 2). Measurements were made at microphone heights of 5 feet above
existing grade to represent first story levels near the site. The
measurement microphone of a Bruel and Kjaer 2230 Precision Integrating
Sound Level Meter (SIM) was located at the approximate westmost project
line (Site 1) closest to Pacific Coast Highway (PCB), where the highest
noise impacts are expected. Site 2 was at the patio area.
The SLM can provide continuous Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) measurements
which are read directly from the display on the meter. At the end of each
measurement period an Leq was taken from the SLM for the representative
sample period. Table 1, on the next page, shows the results of the
measurements: time of day, measured Leq and calculated current CNELs.
• •
R4-032
April 28, 1994
Using the recorded Leg values and typical hourly traffic distribution
information, further Leg values were calculated for each'hour of the day,
were nighttimeweighted
hours� (0�PM to 7 toeve the current 10 for evening hours (7 PM to 10 PM) and CNEL values Shown
in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Measurement Results, April 7, 1994
Site Measurement Measured Calculated Microphone
- Hour Leq, dB(A) CNEL, dB Height, Ft.
1 3:30 PM 56.4
2 3:45. PM 54.7
58.3 5
56.6 5
The calculation methodologies for the CNEL determinations are shown in
Tables 2 and 3.
Future: The County of Orange EMA Advanced Planning was consulted to
determine the future traffic volumes for Pacific Coast Highway UCH). The
Average dail Traffic (ADT) for build -out conditions was determined to be
58,000.
To determine the future traffic impacts across the project site the FNMA
Noise Prediction Model (iA RD-77-108) was used with the build -out ADP of
58,000. The road and model parameters used in the calculations were taken
from roadway data and on -site observations. Soft site conditions were used
in the analysis. The results of the FHWA projects are shown in Table 4.
The projected CNEL is 54.7 dB at the closest building line to POI and 54.2
dB at the patio area.
The FHWA noise model calculates projected noise impacts in terms of
Equivalent Sound Level (Leg) and Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNES,)
using standard roadway day -night traffic percentage breakdown. Other
roadway and model parameters used in the calculations are shown in Table 4
for future conditions.
The projected noise levels to the new building line and patio area are
summarized in Table 5. These values will be used to determine the
mitigation measures for the project.
R4-032
April 28, 1994
MITIGATION MEASURES
Exterior Noise Control
Because the projected and measured noise levels at the outdoor patio area
do NOT exceed 65 CNEL, acoustical shielding will NOT be required
Exterior -lb -Interior Noise Control
The analysis perfof!ai in this study indicates the noise reduction
provided by each exterior wall component in each proposed habitable area.
The A weighted sound transmission loss associated with the building
construction components which were used in the calculation of the
composite building shell noise attenuation is as follows.
Exterior Wall
Sliding Glass Door
Entry Door
1/4 inch g1a.Ga
Windows:
-3/16" glass
-Double Strength G1ass(DSB)
-Single Strength Glaaca(SSB)
43.0 dBA
26.8 dBA
26 dBA
27 dBA
25
23
22
dBA
dBA
dBA
Generalized Glazing Requirements
The floor plans and new building footprints were analyzed to potential
exterior -to -interior noise intrusion. The Transmission loss values are
calculated in Table 6. The composite wall analysis is shown in Table 7.
The exterior -to -interior calculations are shown in Table 8. The glazing
recommendations based on the results of Table 8 are designed to meet the
state and city interior noise criteria of 45 CNEL. These recommendations
are shown below. The exterior noise impacts used in the analysis are taken
from Table 5.
Glazing Requirements
1. 1/4 inch glass
neater
-All windows on
or Sound Transmission Class (STC) rated windows 25
all elevations of new cardiac servirps }viilding.
Interior noise levels are calculated to be less than 45 CNEL with doors
and windows closed, thus mechanical ventilation must be provided.
-3-
• •
R4-032
April 28, 1994
NOISE GENERATED FROM PROJECT
Condenser Unit
The A -weighted sound level from the condenser unit at 3 feet is 84.2 dBA.
The nearest property line to the west is 122 feet. At that distance the
noise level drops to 52 dBA based on the following equation.
Noise level = 20 log 3/122 = 84.2 = 52 dBA
This equation is based on a point source and a noise drop-off rate of 6 dB
per doubling of distance. This value is less than the 55 dB standard of
the city, and thus conforms.
Loading dock
The analysis of the loading dock noise is based on the construction
activity noise model. No exact data was available so it was assumed there
would be trucks with trailers and medium (2 ton) trucks. During the site
visit no heavy trucks with trailer were observed. In a ten hour day it was
assumed 1 heavy truck every 5 hours. in addition it was assumed one medium
truck every hour on average. The noise model indicates the average noise
level (Leq) is calculated by summing the daily nce, peak use and noise of
truck. The noise level is 82 for heavy trucks at 50 feet and 80 dB for
medium trucks. The daily uGe is the percentage of the day the trucks
operate and the peak use is the time the maximum horsepower is engaged
while at the site.
Leq = 10 log (daily use) + 10 log (peak nsn) + Level
For heavy trucks the values are:
Leq = 10 log (0.05) + 10 log (0.2) + 82 = 62 dBA.
Where 0.05 is 1 in 10 hours and 0.2 is maximum HP 20 % of time at site
For medium trucks the values are:
Leq = 10 log (0.166) + 10 leg (0.2) + 80 = 65.2 dBA
Where 0.166 is 10 minutes in every hour and 0.2 is 20 % maximum HP
The sum of the values 62 and 65.2 2 is 66.9 dBA at 50 feet. The nearest
condos are 200 west of the loading dock. At that distance the noise drops
off to 54.8 dBA whic is less than the 55 standard of the city by the
following equation.
Leq = 20 log (50/200) + 66.9 = 54.8 dBA
-4-
• •
R4-032
April 28, 1994
Conclusion
Following implementation of the recommendations contained herein, it can
be expected that the intrusive interior noise criteria of the city of
Newport Beath will be met.
-5-
• •
TABLE 2
A -Weighted Leq Noise Level Data Collected During A Representative
Sample Period On April 7, 1994, Together With Calculated Hourly
Leq Values And Resulting CNEL Value.
Site 1
One Hour Hourly Leq Hourly Leq Adjusted
Period Data, (dBA) Weighting Hourly Leq
Factor
0700 57.6 0.0 57.6
0800 55.7 0.0 55.7
0900 54.7 0.0 54.7
1000 54.6 ' 0.0 54.6
1100 54.8 0.0 54.8
1200 54.9 0.0 54.9
1300 55.0 0.0 55.0
1400 55.2 0.0 55.2
1500 56.4 MEAS 0.0 56.4
1600 57.9 0.0 57.9
1700 57.6 0.0 57.6
1800 55.9 0.0 55.9
1900 54.5 5.0 59.5
2000 53.4 5.0 58.4
2100 52.7 5.0 57.7
2200 51.7 10.0 61.7
2300 51.1 10.0 61.1
0000 49.5 10.0 59.5
0100 47.1 10.0 57.1
0200 45.9 10.0 55.9
0300 44.1 10.0 54.1
0400 45.1 10.0 55.1
0500 48.9 10.0 58.9
0600 55.3 10.0 65.3
10 Log
( Sum Antilog of Adjusted Hourly Leq Values)
24
58.3 CNEL
TABLE 3
A -Weighted Leq Noise Level Data Collected During A Representative
Sample Period On April 7, 1994, Together With Calculated Hourly
Leq Values And Resulting CNEL Value.
Site 2
One Hour Hourly Leq Hourly Leq Adjusted
Period Data, (dBA) Weighting Hourly Leq
Factor
0700 55.9 0.0 55.9
0800 54.0 0.0 54.0
0900 53.0 0.0 53.0
1 000 52.9 0.0 52.9
1100 53.1 0.0 53.1
1200 53.2 0.0 53.2
1300 53.3 0.0 53.3
1400 53.5 0.0 53.5
1500 54.7 MEAS 0.0 54.7
1600 56.2 0.0 56.2
1700 55.9 0.0 55.9
1800 54.2 0.0 54.2
1900 52.8 5.0 57.8
2000 51.7 5.0 56.7
2100 51.0 5.0 56.0
2200 50.0 10.0 60.0
2300 49.4 10.0 59.4
0000 47.8 10.0 57.8
0100 45.4 10.0 55.4
0200 44.2 10.0 54.2
0300 42.4 10.0 52.4
0400 43.4 10.0 53.4
0500 47.2 10.0 57.2
0600 53.6 10.0 63.6
10 Log
( Sum Antilog of Adjusted Hourly Leq Values)
24
= 56.6 CNEL
TABLE 4
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
FHW (RD-77-108)
Client: Hoag Hospital
Project: Cardiac Center
Date:
4-27-94
ROADWAY:
ADT:
AUTOS:
MEDIUM TRUCKS:
HEAVY TRUCKS:
TRAVEL SPEED:
ACTIVE HALF WIDTH:
DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE:
SINGLE LANE EQUIVALENT:
ANGLE OF VIEW:
ROAD GRADE
HARD/SOFT:
Pacific Coast Highway
Future
58000
97.42 %
1.84 %
0.74 %
50 MPH
46.0 FEET
1400.0 FEET
1399.2 FEET
180.0 DEGREES
0.0%
0.5
PROJECTED
NOISE IMPACT:
CNEL A:
CNEL MT:
CNEL HT:
CNEL CONTOURS
Projected
CNEL, dB
75
70
65
60
57
55
54.7 dB CNEL
53.1 dB
46.5 dB
46.9 dB
Distance
To SLE, ft.
62.5
134.6
290.1
624.9
990.5
1346.4
TABLE 5
Future Noise Impacts to Project Areas
AREA Distance to Future
Centerline, ft. CNEL
Cardiac
1400 54.7
patio 1520 54.2
• •
TABLE 6
GLAZING TRANSMISSION LOSS CALCULATION
Frequency: 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1000 Hz 2000 Hz 4000 Hz
Relative Traffic
Noise Spectra: 65.5 69 74 79 78.5 72.5
SUM
65.5 69 74 79 78.5 72.5 83.1
SSB Glass TL: -14 -17 -19 -24 -25 -25
West. Elect. Labs
STL Test # 77-114 51.5 52 55 55 53.5 47.5 60.8
22.3 = TL
65.5 69 74 79 78.5 72.5 83.1
DSB Glass TL: -19 -18 -21 -24 -25 -26
West. Elect. Labs
STL Test # 382-76 46.5 51 53 55 53.5 46.5 59.8
23.3 = TL
65.5 69 74 79 78.5 72.5 83.1
3/16" Glass TL: -19 -19 -23 -27 -26 -28
West. Elect. Labs
STL Test # 77-120 46.5 50 51 52 52.5 44.5 58
25.1 =TL
65.5 69 74 79 78.5 72.5 83.1
3/16" SI. GI. Dr.: -25 -25 -26 -29 -26 -26
NBS Test #W-16-72 - - -
40.5 44 48 50 52.5 46.5 56.3
26.9 = TL
65.5 69 74 79 78.5 72.5 83.1
Solid Core Door: -21 -27 -30 -26 -25 -29
NBS TEST #W-90-71
Exterior Wall:
NBS TEST #W-50-71
44.5 42 44 53 53.5 43.5 57.1
26 = TL
65.5 69 74 79 78.5 72.5 83.1
-30 -37 -47 -51.5 -55 -60
35.5 32 27 27.5 23.5 12.5 38.1
45 = TL
• •
TABLE 7
COMPOSITE WALL ANALYSIS
Building:
ROOM/ COMPONET COMPONET COMPONET —i Si/S _i*Si/S COMPOSITE
AREA, Sq.FT. TL, dB TL, dB
West Wall 577 43 0.00005 0.8014 0.00004 33.6
1/4" gl. 143 27 0.001995 0.1986 0.000396
1 0 0
1 0 0
South Wall 536 43 0.00005 0.8158 0.000041 33.9
1/4" gi. 121 27 0.001995 0.1842 0.000367
1 0 0
1 0 0
North Wall 460 43 0.00005 0.7002 0.000035 30.7
1/4" gl. 77 27 0.001995 0.1172 0.000234
doors 120 25 0.003162 0.1826 0.000578
• •
Area
TABLE 8
Calculation of Exterior -To -Interior Noise Intrusion
Exterior Glazing Atten Design INTERIOR
CND,, dB Type dBA Factor CNEL
West 58.3 1/4" 33.6 +6 30.7
South 58.3 1/4" 33.9 +6 30.4
North 58.3 1/4" 30.7 +6 33.6
•
"MI
1
y SMIT al,
CM I
pk
i
■
r'm
,
C �
ri
BAY
4�
R1 d
7
..,_ ss
❑
3
ST
cr,
AL;;;......e,
i:
it"
1 5
,z,. .1
TYA-4
'��"i
al. mai
i
tom/ .,(�a
N.Z.14-476;
�..;.:ATF�1�5"G
Tr .MIylreMINI
�7wae
M1111
�:
n
r�
err
'' l�7'
N
rr��
•EFEl��AI�1`'��'-3.
MO
sRE
,
��•
Ell
Low'
I PCQAIIlt DR
r ,
I /
1 W t Ri ' '�...
. Y..:..,•�
a+� 1. ^
•
PIO
WiE SI
r'f•.IRMti�
'aq'�w�E,:�y(�1try�if{,1 '
R`�
�S$
'
_
Y
33 Yt
{ -
��
Pi
1'tCI:�.
0:EmarsT fa T'
t ,
I .ti
r i
�
r• •'.. A A
- o
(•. ..
q
3 SURF
bZ BEACH
Y,�.
N".•ii
IEItlMPoI iT
A y5
)*S'
-„ r :v o
.o
y� R�
-
g
g
'ors
it ssl3�is
19TH
5T
7
■
uti�aI u��rb� g..
- _ - '-7 }}}'''���
■F .W.PfNI <
a
111 W
r
a R
ST
•
.R!MR!w._...1.9 .�'f
a
RE�S�t���
N
I AV _ _
' I
/ 1� j
wn
Sii�
IRt i
�
CEXEER ST,
'
/
r
y7
r
3
j�1�•
W
..e 4,
', 3I•�
(
�jl 'il��
Llius
RI ,
Z $IT
�1
DR
u.
d A:. �%
E
9� v
_
,Rn,
As
RUIIMA
pton
sr
t'�
e
a .7
1 _.
t �8
y�
%tns
ssmm.rAr
,
utl j1
yyy .jj�
`W'`I CR e•IId�
mowI
; 1
�%
�E•2 \ BOir
MY1I41O tlt ,
CI
Cit
W
5.
i
Oft ...
_MA
idW
413:ll'. -_
RA gra
_ all:
,EIMI.
5T
lmtt I +
••r
_ .. ` V
RIV
1
,_
r -1
44,
4
I
au
9
iT
,RJ+$
,--`
al ''
S4IZ!
1cit-
�,` ` AIM Cr
�1'
AST AM,
441
.
,vyti .
5>
Vial, •
•'iVC:n
'G TiJ $1',4
f 27
�;i1 A�
EXIST. SUILWHG LINE
6 '\ TYP.
n
i >
n -I
va m 0
ITT
^n PION:N.
ACCESSIBLE
EA.bPIO PIbBON
FNOIECI IN PLACL
r._
FIGURE 2: Site Measurement lA ations
T_
N
m
m
io
o
m r
r r
0
to m
u r
IMNCc* iC
WALKWAY
•
JHJKHJH
ELEC RICAL 1
F ...0 jl
°*1 0 LEXIST. LOADING DOC
'I
0
••EXIST. R4* U$P $.NWE
ei.ir".i)P ', ` n
• RECEIVED
HOAG MEM"6PRIA29HOSPITAL
INTRAHMITALMEMGRANDUM
& CONSTRUCTION
TO:
FROM: Luke Keeley, Manager Of Plant Operations
DATE: August 26, 1993
SUBJECT: Relocation of Surgery Exhaust Fan #,8' -! 1
•
File 125 •
Leif Thompson, V.P., Facilities, Design & Construction
t /
I was given a drawing (see attached), by Tsuchiyama & Kaino from Dubby Evins. He
requested that I have a contractor perform the work as detailed on the drawings. K & S
Air Conditioning performed the work which was completed on approximately
October 1, 1991. I was told that this would reduce the noise level of the fan exhaust to
an acceptable level.
v-egi'' MD
(/GA--
•
err
as-
10_22-91 07:04 PM FROM I'A. GAINES
•
E'U2: U
2
r-
exisr CONC.
Ec dTPHEN7
t 1S &X • MOZ„,
RM11-ES -SH
R-0078 C47,7)
..fry/ r %2 "q3 e'
Cl .. .
t G
d • I r - , • 1 0
•
Y i ♦ .,
,., ,fl .• 'p . e• , . u
a
44f
_HEAVY _S4N_Q81.45T
/*RIC3A.T0"'LACING
• 5LEVAT/ON . . 2IC1...s %41CQHC.
¢w /940 ly/4 -.. ."0. P,
HCH,_ 4.414 a
CNMCMD BY /T" !• u aHN
M!Cf /, eau/?....I EL0C,47/.�N
HOAG MEMcRI.aL ]SUCH/ 7:AMA4 ka1.10
�r-=n TAYLdR & GAINES NasSPITAL cOH$LILTINe _
IIIIIirs•t
tQUtsT TOR APPRO IATION
R
nX1 o�
OATR DSIARTMRNT MANINO IT
tla3/7/ ,ENG/Nf8R'/ XS/744
SELECTION FORM ATTACHED:
2 YES ❑ NO
O►
❑RE►LACED
SOLD
DESCRIPTION OP REDDEST:
OF FUNDS (RFA• (CAPITAL EQUIPMEN1
ORIARYMCNT NVMSCR
1�V70
IMPS ATTACHED:
ES ❑ NO
IN ❑ ADDITION ❑ DI ONLY ❑ TRANSIER ONLY
gelocrnr Sax6£xy cet-� S>CH/fcn-7 Ff,J c + gAwl,JA
/ SLCH/rani t,C$.wa. - /
•
2NJD 8ID • 2.c "cotes Ahem CONO,foM,Ait. '�7, 9n.co
NAME, AND PHONE NUM•ER OF VENDOR:
at ours?
164
PURCHASE ORDER
AHD
�/Galvt
tfS 7/f- 6, 3 o-
A//c. CoAlDthaaiCW 2S3o Vi/t MAr'r�ENs .�/V�I//a"i.M <'A 92106
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/CONDITIONS AGREED UPON WITH VENDOR:•
i
tVEDoic '71 /*4 F,le MML'x/, ll AS To ,4'/Na fi z€f . lletrO . ,3
jcac'pwe tu,TN+ /'aucj`i Deer Oj'G./ !./inc.< CAN acc fa.
Ritzier /NcLvod.3 f',ceMso,l, L.��x. cs>j4Iri1
SNDINEERINO S ANP RECOMMENDATIONS.
f'aue. * AYper.E1 vies (/. P. Fi+c;�/r;FJ Dcn;&0 AND CoNJr,cuc^ieos) Aid c
Sou 4+.0 cea c S - rtistr i, i7Lv o Co ur, D di,. i t frSec; ' �"o /faten; t
ESTIMATED COST:
MATERIAL B
LABOR
SALES TAX
FREIGHT
TOTAL $ J/ y�j�
DP 0.101
)PI�S/V• OP MINA AMINO L• GATE.
AOMIN
DATE
ENNATVRE
❑ BUDGETED ITEM - BUDGET YEAR
"ION BUDGETED ITEM URGENTLY NEEDED
uE BUDGETED
uP
OTHER
PEE ERRLARAY.•M 1
SOURCE OF ►LINOS (A•MIRI wE usc ARLO
❑ RESTRICTED FUNDS
❑ BOARD DESIGNATED
❑ OPERATING
ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL: °ATE:
S DATE:
2493 (EMI)
FUNDS OSLIGATEo1
X
ON..I DA
1
1 • •
Tsuchiyama & Kaino
Consulting Mechanical Engineers
Principals
Victor M. Tsuchiyama, P.E.
Kenneth K. Kaino, P.E.
July 2, 1991
Mr. F.W. Evins, Vice President
Facilities Design & Construction
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 Newport Boulevard
Box Y
Newport Beach, California.92658-8912
Subject: Exhaust Fan (EF-8) Noise @ West End of Hospital
Dear Dubbie:
Senior Associate
Thomas S. Kaya
Associates
Stanley S. Sato
Cindi L. Noll
Keith Matoi
Larry Sun, P.E.
Pursuant to your call Friday, we reviewed the material we had
previously gathered and revisited the fan room to view the
subject exhaust fan. We also have reviewed our recommendations
with Mestre Greve Associates. We predict that a 20% reduction of
the noise recorded outside the fan room can be easily achieved.
Our recommendation is to relocate the fan back (to the east)
approximately 5-6 ft. The fan discharge is now fairly close to
the concrete block wall (approx. 4 ft.) and we are experiencing
high localized velocities across the concrete block openings. The
average velocity across the entire face (about 7 ft. high by 5
ft. wide) is about 800 feet per minute (fpm). With the fan as
close to the block wall as it is, we predict that the localized
velocities may run as high as 2,000 fpm. By moving the fan and
transition back, we accomplish two objectives: 1) we can allow
the air to slow down to the lower average velocity, which reduces
the noise generated by the high velocity through the concrete
block openings and 2) we provide additional acoustically lined
duct length to attenuate the low frequency fan noise or create
space for the installation of a sound trap later, in the event
that just the duct length itself does not provide the proper
attenuation.
2010 Main Street • Suite 450 • Irvine • California 92714 • (714) 756-0565 • FAX: (714) 756-0927
las •
Tsuchiyama & Kaino
Consulting Mechanical Engineers
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
July 2, 1991
Page 2
If you have any questions or if additional information is
required, please call.
Sincerely,
TSUCHIYAMA & KAINO
Kenneth K. Kaino, P.E.
Principal
ds
cc: Mr. Neal Rinella, Taylor & Associates
Mr. Vincent Mestre and Mr. William Bloomer, Mestre Greve
Associates
Tsuchiyama & Kaino
• •
tz50-1(s
Tsurt44A
ektiao eccis P
Consulting Mechanical Engineers
Principals
Victor M. Tsuchiyama, P.E.
Kenneth K. Kaino, P.E.
July 18, 1991
RECEIVED
JUL 22 1991
Mr. Vincent Mestre
MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES
280 Newport Center Drive, Suite 230
Newport Beach, California 92660
Subject: Exhaust Fan (EF-8) Noise @ West Side of Hospital
Adjacent to Villa Balboa Condominiums
Dear Vincent:
Senior Associate .
Thomas S. Kayo
Associates
Stanley 5. Salo
Cindi L. Noll
Keith Matoi
Larry Sun, P.E.
We have reviewed the material we had previously gathered with the
help of your office and revisited the Second Floor Fan Room to
view the subject exhaust fan. We estimate that a 7 to 8 dB
minimum reduction (in terms of L50) of the noise recorded outside
the fan room (at Site A at the west property line) can be easily
achieved. This would reduce the noise to within stipulated
levels.
If you have any questions or if additional information is
required, please call.
Sincerely,
TSUCUIYAMA & KAINO
Kenneth K.
Principal
ds
Kaino, P.E.
cc: Ms. Pat Temple, Planning Department, City of Newport Beach
Ms. Amy Flom, LSA
Mr. F.W. Evins, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Mr. Neal Rinella, Taylor & Associates
Mr. William Bloomer, Mestre Greve Associates
2010 Main Street • Suite 450 • Irvine • California 92714 • (714) 756-0565 • FAX: (714) 756-0927
• •
)
1.
ALAW/CRANDALL, INC.
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REPORT OF CONSULTATION REGARDING
FOUNDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA
FOR
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
(092072.AB)
DECEMBER 16, 1991'
LAW/CRANDALL,C.
ENGINEERING ANO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
December 22, 1992
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard
Box Y
Newport Beach, California 92658-8912
Attention: Mr. F. W. Evins
Gentlemen:
Drilled Pile Capacities
Proposed Cardiac Services Addition
301 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California
(092072.AB)
It has come to our attention that the drilled pile capacities plate was missing from our
report of consultation regarding foundation design, dated December 16, 1992, for the
subject project. Drilled pile capacity plates are enclosed; please make the necessary plate
insertion.
We are sorry for this error and for the resulting inconvenience. Please call us if you
require additional information.
Sincerely,
LAW/ Al L INC.
Shahen Askari
Principal Engineer
Branch Manager
0C19/PS/mw
Attachments (1)
(2 copies submitted)
cc: (1) Taylor & Gaines
Attn: Mr. Saurin Chakrabarti
(3) Barry Klein Architects
Attn: Mr. Barry Klein
200 CITADEL DRIVE • LOS ANGELES, CA 90040
(213) 889-5300 • FAX (213) 721-6700
ONE OF DIE LAW COMPANIES
U
0-
) 0
N
0
w
0
n
0
N
cn
O
PENETRATION BELOW PILE CAP in Feet
0
10
20
30
40
50
DOWNWARD PILE CAPACITY in Kips
150
200
250
Recommended
(Due to depth
Pile Penetration
of existing fill)
Minimum
Pile diameter
in Inches
ac
Inn
1•
0
NOTES:
25 50
UPWARD PILE CAPACITY in Kips
(1) The indicated values refer to the total of dead plus live loads; a one-third increase may
be used when considering wind or seismic loads.
(2) Piles in groups should be spaced a minimum of 2-1/2 diameters on centers, and should
be drilled and filled altemately with the concrete permitted to set at least 8 hours before
drilling an adjacent hole.
The indicated values are based on the strength of the soils; the actual pile capacities
may be limited to lesser values by the strength of the piles.
(3)
DRILLED PILE CAPACITIES
5
LAW/CRANDALL, INC.•
PLATE 2
•
•
)
December 16, 1992
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard
Box Y
Newport Beach, California 92658-8912
Attention: Mr. F. W. Evins
(092072.AB)
Gentlemen:
We are pleased to submit our "Report of Consultation Regarding Foundation Design,
Proposed Cardiac Services Addition, 301 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California,
for Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian."
The scope of the consultation was planned in collaboration with Mr. Hodge C. Gaines of
Taylor & Gaines, Structural Engineers. We were advised of the structural features of the
addition by Taylor & Gaines, and the results of our consultation and preliminary
foundation recommendations were discussed with them.
The results of our prior investigation at the site and recommendations for design of
foundations, grading, and for floor slab support are presented in the report.
It has been a pleasure to be of professional service to you on this project. Please call if
you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance.
Respectfully submitted,
LAW/CRANDALL, INC.
Paul R. Schade
Project Engineer
0C18/PS/mw
(2 copies submitted)
cc: (1) Taylor & Gaines
Attn: Mr. Hodge G. Gaines
(3) Barry Klein Architects
Attn: Mr. Barry Klein
_—a-C
Shahen Askari
Principal Engineer
Branch Manager
•
•
REPORT OF CONSULTATION REGARDING
FOUNDATION DESIGN •
CARDIAC SERVICES ADDITION
301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
FOR
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
O92072.AB
Page 1
SCOPE
This report presents the results of our geotechnical consultation performed for the
proposed Cardiac Services Addition. The locations of the proposed addition and our
prior nearby exploration borings are shown on Plate 1, Plot Plan.
This investigation was authorized to review the field and laboratory data obtained in our
prior nearby investigations, and to provide recommendations for foundation design and
floor slab support for the proposed addition. More specifically, the scope of the
investigation included the following objectives:
• To evaluate the subsurface conditions, including the soil and ground
water conditions within the area of proposed construction.
• To recommend appropriate foundation systems along with the
necessary design parameters.
• To provide recommendations concerning construction procedures and
quality control measures relating to earthwork.
• To provide recommendations for floor slab support.
The assessment of general site environmental conditions or the presence of pollutants in
the soil and ground water at the site was beyond the scope of this investigation.
Our recommendations are based on the results of our prior field explorations and
laboratory tests and appropriate engineering analyses. The results of the field
explorations and laboratory tests are presented in the attached Appendix.
Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill
ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants
}
O92072.AB
•
Page 2
practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made
as to the professional advice included in this report. This report has been prepared for
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and their design consultants to be used solely in
the design of the proposed development. The report has not been prepared for use by
other parties, and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or
other uses.
PRIOR STUDIES
We have performed several investigations for nearby projects, within the hospital complex.
We have been able to use the results of those prior investigations in this study. The logs
of nearby prior borings are presented in the Appendix. The pertinent prior investigations
are as follows:
• Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed South Tower Addition, for Hoag
Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (AE-84159).
• Foundation Investigation, Proposed Nursing Wing and Power Plant,
for Hoag Memorial Hospital (A-69080).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Cardiac Services Addition will be located on the west side of the existing
hospital building. The addition will be one story in height and will be of light frame
construction. The maximum column loads are estimated to be about 40 kips. The floor
of the addition will match the lower floor elevation of the adjacent existing hospital; some
✓compacted fill will be required to achieve the desired floor elevation. We understand the
foundations of the adjacent hospital may be about 10 to 12 feet below grade.
i
O92072.AB
•
•
Page 3
EXPLORATIONS AND TESTS
FIELD INVESTIGATION
The soil conditions beneath the site were explored during our previous investigations by
drilling four borings. The locations of the prior borings are shown on Plate 1, Plot Plan.
Details of the explorations and logs of the prior borings are presented in the Appendix.
LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory tests were performed during our previous investigations on selected samples
obtained from the borings to aid in the classification of the soils and to determine their
engineering properties. The following tests were performed: moisture content and dry
density determinations, direct shear, consolidation, and compaction. Details of the
laboratory testing program and test results are presented in the Appendix.
SOIL CONDITIONS
Fill soils, 2 to 11 feet in thickness, were encountered in the borings. The fill consists of
moderately firm silty sand, clay and silt, and contains only slight debris. Deeper and/or
poorer quality fill could occur between borings.
The natural soils consist primarily of medium dense to dense sand and silty sand and
medium stiff silt and clay.
Ground water seepage was encountered at depths of 27 to 32 feet below ground surface.
Ground water levels were measured at 34 to 491/2 feet below ground surface.
O92072.AB
•
•
Page 4
RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Feasible Foundation Types
Shallow and deep foundation systems have been considered for support of the proposed
addition. The fill soils are not considered suitable for support of the proposed addition
because of settlement considerations: If the existing fill soils are excavated and properly
recompacted, the addition could be supported on spread footings in the compacted fill.
Alternatively, the addition could be supported on drilled cast -in -place concrete piling
extending through the fill and into the natural soils.
Recommendations for grading and support of floor slabs are presented in following
sections of the report.
Spread Footings
Bearing Value
Spread footings for the addition supported in the undisturbed natural soils or properly
compacted fill, compacted to at least 90%, and extending at leastv2 feet below the
adjacent grade or floor level may be designed to impose a net dead plus live load pressure
/ of 2,500 pounds per square foot.
Footings for minor structures (retaining walls less than about 5 feet in height, etc.)
established in the undisturbed natural soils or properly compacted fill may be designed to
impose a net dead plus live load pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot at a depth of
11/2 feet below the adjacent grade.
A one-third increase in the bearing values may be used for wind or seismic loads. The
recommended bearing values are net values. The weight of concrete in spread footings
O92072.AB
• Page 5
may be taken as 50 pounds per cubic foot and the weight of soil backfill neglected when
determining the downward loads.
While the actual bearing value of any required fill will depend on the material used and
the compaction methods employed, the quoted bearing values will be applicable if accept-
able soils are used and are compacted as recommended. The bearing value of the fill
should be confirmed during the grading.
Settlement
The settlement of the proposed addition, supported on spread footings in the manner
recommended will be about 1/2-inch.
Lateral Loads
Lateral loads may be resisted by soil friction and by the passive resistance of the soils. A
coefficient of friction of 0.4 may be used between footings or the floor slabs and the
supporting soils. The passive resistance of the natural soils or properly compacted fill
against footings may be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a fluid with a
density of 250 pounds per cubic foot. A one-third increase in the passive value may be
used for wind or seismic loads. The frictional resistance and the passive resistance of the
soils may be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance.
Footing Observation
To verify the presence of satisfactory soils at design elevations, all footing excavations
should be observed by personnel of our firm. Footing excavations deeper than 5 feet
should be sloped back at 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) or shored.
Inspection of footing excavations may also be required by the appropriate reviewing
governmental agencies. The contractor should be familiar with the inspection require-
ments of the reviewing agencies.
O92072.AB
Page 6
All applicable requirements, including OSHA requirements, should be met.
Backfill and Drainage
All required footing backfill and utility trench backfill within the building areas should be
mechanically compacted; flooding should not be permitted. Measures should be takento
prevent ponding of water adjacent to the proposed structures. The exterior grades should
be sloped to drain away from the structure to minimize ponding of water adjacent to the
foundations. Proper grade and drainage devices should be provided to direct water away
from the building areas.
Drilled Piling
Drilled Pile Capacities
The downward and upward capacities of 18-, 24-, and 30-inch-diameter piles are presented
on Plate 2, Drilled Pile Capacities. Dead plus live Load capacities are shown; a one-third
increase may be used when considering wind or seismic Loads. The capacities are based
on penetration into undisturbed natural soils. Longer piles will be required if the fill
thickness is found to be greater than 11 feet during installation. The capacities are based
on the strength of the soils; the compressive and tensile strength of the pile section itself
should be checked to verify the structural capacity of the piles.
Piles in groups should be spaced at least 2' diameters on centers. If the piles are so
spaced, no reduction in the downward capacities of the piles need be considered due to
group action.
Settlement
The settlement of the proposed structure, supported on drilled piling in the manner
recommended, will be about 1/4-inch.
O92072.AB
Page 7
Lateral Loads
Lateral loads may be resisted by the piles, by soil friction on the floor slab, and by the
passive resistance of the soils. The soils adjacent to a 18-inch-diameter pile, at least 20
feet long, can resist horizontal loads imposed at the top of the pile up to 9,000 pounds.
The lateral resistance of other sizes of piles may be assumed to be proportional to the
diameter.
In calculating the maximum bending moment in a pile, the lateral load imposed at the top
of the pile may be multiplied by a moment arm of 5 feet. For design, it may be assumed
that the maximum bending moment will occur near the top of the pile and that the
moment will decrease to zero at a depth of 20 feet below the pile cap. The lateral
capacity and reduction in the bending moment are based in part on the assumption that
any required backfill adjacent to the pile caps and grade beams will be properly
compacted.
A coefficient of friction of 0.4 may be used between the floor slab and the supporting
soils. The passive resistance of the natural soils or properly compacted fill soils against
pile caps and grade beams may be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a
fluid with a density of 250 pounds per cubic foot. A one-third increase in the quoted
passive value may be used when considering wind or seismic loads.
The resistance of the piles, the passive resistance of the soils against pile caps and grade
beams, and the frictional resistance between the floor slab and the supporting soils may
be combined without reduction in determining the total lateral resistance. If the actual
lateral loads on the structure can be resisted by the piles or by the passive resistance, or
by a combination of these elements, it is our opinion that foundation tie -beams between
piles will not be necessary unless there are other reasons for including them.
O92072.AB
• Page 8
Installation
All drilled pile excavations should be observed by personnel of our firm. Longer piles will
be required if the fill thickness is found to be greater than 11 feet during installation.
Our prior exploration borings were drilled to depthsof up to 50 feet with 18-inch-
diameter bucket -type drilling equipment. Heavy caving and sloughing of the auger boring
walls occurred during drilling in one boring below a depth of 32 feet from the ground
surface. Precautions should be taken during the installation of the piles to reduce caving
and raveling. Among other precautions, the drilling speed should be reduced as necessary
to minimize vibration and sloughing of the sand deposits.
Piles located 5 diameters on center or closer should be drilled and filled alternately, with
the concrete permitted to set at least eight hours before drilling an adjacent hole. Pile
excavations should be filled with concrete as soon after drilling and inspection as possible;
the holes should not be left open overnight. The concrete should be placed with special
equipment so that the concrete is not allowed to fall freely more than 5 feet and to
prevent concrete from striking the walls of the excavations.
GRADING
General
After clearing the site, the existing fill soils within the proposed building area should be
excavated. If the building is to be supported on piling extending into the natural soils and
the slab is to be structurally supported, the existing fill may be left in place. If the slab
is to be supported on grade and some potential for future settlement of the floor slab is
acceptable, at least the upper two feet of fill below the existing grade could be excavated,
but not less than 3 feet below the final grade. The exterior grades should be sloped to
drain away from the structure to minimize ponding of water adjacent to the foundations.
O92072.AB • • Page 9
Compaction
After excavating as recommended, the exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of
6 inches and rolled with heavy compaction equipment. The upper 6 inches of exposed
soils should be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density obtainable by the
ASTM Designation D1557-78 method of compaction. All required fill should be placed
in loose lifts not more than 8 inches in thickness and compacted to at least 90%. It is
recommended that the moisture content of the sands and silts at the at the time of
compaction vary no more than 2% below of 2% above optimum moisture content. The
moisture content of the clay soils should be brought to about 4% over optimum moisture
content.
Material for Fill
The on -site soils, less any debris or organic matter within existing fill, may be used in
compacted fills. Clay soils should not be used within 1• foot of the subgrade beneath
concrete slabs on grade.
Field Observation
The reworking of the upper soils and the compaction of all required fill should be
observed and tested by a representative of our firm. This representative should have at
least the following duties:
• Observe the clearing and grubbing operations to assure that all
unsuitable materials have been properly removed.
• Observe the exposed subgrade in areas to receive fill and in areas
where excavation has resulted in the desired finished subgrade,
observe proof -rolling, and delineate areas requiring overexcavation.
• Perform visual observation to evaluate the suitability of on -site and
import soils for fill placement; collect and submit soil samples for
required or recommended laboratory testing where necessary.
O92072.AB
Page 10
}
• Perform field density and compaction testing to determine the
percentage of compaction achieved during fill placement.
• Observe and probe foundation bearing materials to confirm that
suitable bearing materials are present at the design grades.
• Observe the installation of drilled piles.
The governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the project should be notified prior
to commencement of grading so that the necessary grading permits may be obtained and
arrangements may be made for the required inspection(s).
FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT
If the existing fill soils are excavated and properly recompacted, the floor slab and
adjacent walks and slabs may be supported on grade. If the fill is left in place and the
addition is supported on piling, we recommend that the slabs be structurally supported.
However, if the fill thickness is too great making the reworking of it uneconomical, and
if some risk of settlement is acceptable, the upper soils may be excavated to a depth of
at least 2 feet below the existing grade but not less than 3 feet below the final grade. If
only the upper fill soils are excavated, there is a potential for up to 2 inches of additional
settlement due to consolidation of the underlying left in place fill soils. i3
Construction activities and exposure to the environment can cause deterioration of
prepared subgrades. Therefore, we recommend that our field representative observe the
condition of the final subgrade soils immediately prior to slab on grade construction and,
if necessary, perform further field density and moisture content tests to determine the
suitability of the final prepared subgrade.
(r
ca1.—
1- O92072.AB • •
Page 11
Where a floor slab covering that would be critically affected by moisture, such as vinyl,
is to be used, we suggest that the floor slab be supported on a 4-inch-thick layer of gravel
or on an impermeable membrane as a capillary break. A suggested gradation for the
gravel layer would be as follows:
Sieve Size Percent Passing
3/4" 90 - 100
No. 4 0 - 10
No. 100 0 - 3
If the membrane is used, a low -slump concrete should be used to minimize possible
curling of the slabs. The concrete slabs should be allowed to cure properly before placing
vinyl or other moisture -sensitive floor covering.
O92072.AB
Page 12
BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations provided in this report are based on our understanding of the
described project information and on our interpretation of the data collected during the
subsurface exploration. We have made our recommendations based on experience with
similar subsurface conditions under similar loading conditions. The recommendations
apply to the specific project discussed in this report; therefore, any change in building
Loads, building location, or site grades should be provided to us so we may review our
conclusions and recommendations and make any necessary modifications.
The recommendations provided in this report are also based on the assumption that the
necessary geotechnical observations and testing during construction will be performed by
representatives of our firm. The field observation services are considered a continuation
of the geotechnical investigation and essential to verify that the actual soil conditions are
as anticipated. This also provides for the procedure whereby the client can be advised of
unanticipated or changed conditions that would require modifications of our original
recommendations. In addition, the presence of our representative at the site provides the
client with an independent professional opinion regarding the geotechnically related
construction procedures. If another firm is retained for the geotechnical observation
services, our professional responsibility and liability would be impaired.
-oOo-
J
13Q
Q 24
Q 10
214)
le Ex ISr. BLOC.
Q 9
0 14 Q 12
EXISTING
HOSPITAL
A4_FOR BOR. EL EV S.
FFE OF EXIST. HOSPITAL
EL •65.O
Q 20
•
19
PROPOSED CARDIAC
SERVICES ADDITION
•
•
REFERENCE:
PLAN (UNDATED) BY
BOBROW / THOMA S ASSOCIATES.
KEY:
3 • PREVIOUS
INVESTIGATION (AE-84159)
9O PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION (A-71235)
i 3 Q PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION (A-69080) LL BORING LOCATION
BORING NUMBER
t55) ELEVATION OF SURFACE OF FIRM SOILS
PLOT PLAN
SCALE I" = 1001
PLATE I
•
•
O
x
0
UI
0
2
O
w
O
(V
0
N
5
O
CO
O
(3)
PENETRATION BELOW PILE CAP in Feet
0
10
20
30
40
50
DOWNWARD PILE CAPACITY in Kips
100
150
200
250
Recommended
(Due to depth
Pile Penetra
of existing fill)
ion
Minimum
diameter
in Inches
Pile
25 50
UPWARD PILE CAPACITY in Kips
NOTES:
(1) The indicated values refer to the total of dead plus live loads• a one-third increase may
be used when considering wind or seismic loads.
(2) Piles in groups should be spaced a minimum of 2-1/2 diameters on centers, and should
be drilled and filled alternately with the concrete permitted to set at least 8 hours before
drilling an adjacent hole.
The indicated values are based on the strength of the soils; the actual pile capacities
may be limited to lesser values by the strength of the piles.
DRILLED PILE CAPACITIES
LAW/CRANDALL, INC.#;
PLATE 2
O92072.AB Page A-1
APPENDIX
EXPLORATIONS
The soil conditions beneath the site were explored during two previous investigations by
drilling four borings at the locations shown on Plate 1. The borings were drilled to depths
of 45 to 51 feet below the existing grade using 18-inch-diameter bucket -type drilling
equipment. Caving of the boring walls did occur during the drilling of one boring with the
bucket auger but casing or drilling mud was not used to extend the bucket borings to the
depths drilled.
The soils encountered were logged by our field technician, and undisturbed and loose
samples were obtained for laboratory inspection and testing. The logs of the previous
borings are presented on Plates A-1.1 through A-1.4; the depths at which undisturbed
samples were obtained are indicated to the left of the boring logs. The energy required to
drive the sampler 12 inches is indicated on the logs. The soils are classified in accordance
with the Unified Soil Classification System described on Plate A-2.
LABORATORY TESTS
The field moisture content and dry density of the soils encountered were determined by
performing tests on the undisturbed samples. The results of the tests are shown to the left
of the boring logs.
Direct shear tests were performed on selected undisturbed natural samples from our two
previous investigations to determine the strength of the soils. The tests were performed
at field and increased moisture contents and at various surcharge pressures. The yield -point
values determined from the direct shear tests are presented on Plate A-3.1 and A-3.2,
Direct Shear Test Data.
O92072.AB Page A-2
Confined consolidation tests were performed on four undisturbed samples to determine the
compressibility of the soils. Water was added to one undisturbed sample during the test.
The results of the tests are presented on Plates A-4.1 through A-4.3, Consolidation Test
Data.
-oOo-
1
0
S
v
ge
a
h
•IS
e:
0
DATE 6 / 8 / 8 4
12
0
N
E
b.
-
N
W
wE_
az
oa
zy
az
z0
0;
cai 0
O J
K
0 W
Z =
0
mQ
0
W N
U 0
w-
N 0
wz
zo
Fw
as
r¢
ZJ
o m
co y
H
w
U 3
cr
to Z
w N
N
H
W -
0
0
w
J Q
U
W O
2
1- ?
C• y A.
�� J�,�� Q, !` : �Q-�: „, DATE DRILLED:
4.. �1.• 4, A. •atO o 4, 0 EQUIPMENT USED:
\ �v
4Y a '1/4yo 4.e) 41»:? cf-' yQs� ELEVATION 63.7*
BORING I
June 4, 1984
18"-Diameter Bucket
(PRIOR JOB AE-84159)
60
55 -
50
45 -
40 -
10
15
20
25
8.5
129
lilt
9.8
11.0
122
117
1
,
SM FILL - SILTY SAND, SANDY SILT and SILTY U
CL CLAY - mottled brown
SM FILL - SILTY SAND - fine, brown
Grey and brown
13.3 117
73.6 101
4.6
100
CL SANDY CLAY - light brown -
2.5
100
10
(iii
i i`t
CL SILTY CLAY - light brown
SP
Thin layers of Sand, light brown and light
grey
SAND - fine, light brown
Thin layers of Sandy Silt
CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PLATE)
*See Plate 1 for location and elevation of
bench mark.
LOG OF BORING
LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
ge
I
3
MS
DATE 6/ 8/84
.JOB AE- 8 4 1 59
N
E
oW
wf
az
oa
z
z
z o
O p
U O
0
J
w o
zx
Ft
O
m G
W N
z
w0
a. —
Inc
w z
x VO
F- w
J o
O CO
y N
PI W
N m
NO
off
w
c
z z
OQ
V cr
Luc
cc
N z
N
N 1-
li -
O
8W
J Q
W O
xz
1-_
0
z
1 A. A.
44.4
��,11y4, i y�1
e �* 4 �y O ° 41 a
4., 4? ` ;ter
O o •: . w a
tiv e y a�'`\o - 4.0 pQ-`.-
O
35 -
30
25 -
20 -
15 1
10
30
35
45
50
55
20.2
101
8
32.3
87
BORING 1 (CONTINUED)
DATE DRILLED: June 4, 1984
EQUIPMENT USED: 18"-Diameter Bucket
.,l
}IL
.Thin layer of Clay
SANDY SILT - light grey
,/j CLSILTY CLAY (POSSIBLE WEATHERED SHALE) - grey
Light greyish -brown
48.9
72
72.1
56
/ Gypsum fragments
71.1
5
•
•
•
•
•
.•
66
SHALE - massive, dark grey to black
NOTE: Slight water seepage encountered.at a depth
of 27'. Water level measured at 49'-f' 10
minutes after completion of drilling. No
caving.
LOG OF BORING
LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
•
•
;e
a
3
4S
DATE 6/ 8/84
J08AE- 8 41 59
1-
O •
N
wf
az
oa
z
az
zo
or
U
- tr
z S
cc O
m
m�.
U
wz
UO
wF
a_
(n m
w2
VO
▪ U
ZJZ j
m
7
N N
w
b
Q W
zQ
wz
cz
ww
xw
za
w
OM
=w
enm
z0
F-
o
ow
zz
0
U a
d:
111'
(.3
7o
N 2
N
7
N
O.
W 8
OO <
Q
0
4.7
60
55
50
45
40
ya.
J'# 4, !1 y�
'2 4 `y c O �o
h� �Oe Q?`mac"
DATE DRILLED:
EQUIPMENT USED:
ELEVATION 62.6
��/
SM
,1p U•
CL
SM
-
%Ik11
15.4
110
1
r {F
- 5
111E
{/ %
li
17.4'102
1
rEII
;II
//,
:IW4
<
10
17.8
111
3
i
/
(
CL
tt
sM
/ '
CL
- 15
26.9
96
2
11,
28.1
94
5
/
20
-7.9
93
3
TZ
SP
.,c
156
89
11
I
.:-
BORING 2
June 4, 1984
18"-Diameter Bucket
(PRIOR JOB AE-84159)
SILTY SAND - fine, brown
FILL - CLAY and SILTY SAND - fine, mottled
brown
Lenses of Sandy Silt
Some concrete chunks
SANDY CLAY - light brown .
SILTY SAND - fine, light brown
SILTY CLAY (POSSIBLE WEATHERED SHALE) -
light brown and light grey
Some cementations
SAND (POSSIBLE WEAKLY CEMENTED SANDSTONE) -
fine, light brown
(CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PLATE)
LOG OF BORING
LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
0
x
x
U
Lk
a
a
m
O
p
N
E
0
LL
o
wf
Fit
az
oa
z N
Q z
zO
O F..
0 0
OJ
K
mw
Z
E25
cop_‹
U
LLZ
U O
wF
tan
W z
Q
z j
O m
0 N
a
aw
0w
z
CC wW
xw
zW
oCC
xW
N m
z
O t-
r 0
ow
zz
oz
U �
W K
Q
LL
co-
o
fn z
m N
LL-
O .
0
O Q
U
0
• z
w
0
O
Z
..
JQ % Q 0 0
4i 4rCO
44/4i
h
_'-`/
35-
18 0
86
6
1
30
30
r 35
25-
20.1
106
10
j
40
20-
22 1
101
10•
�I
45
15-
CA
ytL-
:•4
t.
• pi•
• '
40.1
1
oso
BORING 2 (CONTINUED)
DATE DRILLED: June 4, 1984
EQUIPMENT USED: 18"—Diameter Bucket
NOTE:
Some gravel
Some medium Sand
(BORING TERMINATED DUE TO HEAVY CAVING,
SLOUGHING, AND LACI: OF PROGRESS)
Water seepage encountered at a depth of
32'. Water level measured at 34' 20
minutes after completion of drilling.
Heavy caving and sloughing below 32'.
LOG OF BORING
LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
Of Arr A _, Vh
•
11.61
h
i
h
w
I -
a
0
0
0
C
m•
0
60 -
55 -
50 -
45 -
40 -
35
30
25
5
10
15
20
I 25
20 -
1/41') BORING 3
+ �tZ, �� 4, 9stc, �, DATE DRILLED : April 28, 1969
4, `y_•C�a6Q�,�c°*�Q‘' EQUIPMENT USED: 18"-Diameter Bucket
O a .k y ?
,`,, O� `ten 5
8.5
113
16.4
8.5
6.7
4.5
113
113
101
109
se -
(PRIOR JOB A-69080)
ELEVATION 62.0
iC FILL - CLAYEY SAND and SILTY CLAY MIXTURE -.
brown
•
:
P
CL
30.7
30.0
91
94
7.8
88
q4
30 17.6
35
40
4.2
101
111
i
4
iSP
•
19.5
106
•
+AL
SAND - fine, some Clay, brown
Coarse, few gravel
SILTY CLAY - mottled grey and brown
NOTE: Water encountered at a depth of 39'; water .
level at a depth of 40' 15 minutes aftter com-
pletion of drilling. No caving.
SAND - fine, light grey
Cemented layer
Layer of SILTY SAND
Few °ravel
Layer of SILTY SAND
Clayey, mottled dary grey and brown
SANDY SILT - mottled grey and brown
45
38.1
83
11
'__EROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
PI ATF A-1 Q
•
r•
0
S
V
•nu
c-
ui
d
H
w
<
c
O
JOB 4690$O
•
•
BORING 5-
DATE DRILLED : May 2, 1969
EQUIPMENT USED: 18"-Diameter Bucket
(PRIOR JOB A-69080)
-
-
60
55
50-
45
40-
35-
30
25-•
20-
8.3
9.8
105
105
104
100
r
•M
L
FILL - SAND and CLAYEY SILTMIXJURE -
brown .
%/'�
0•
vd
CLAYEY SAND - fine, rootlets, brown
SAND - fine, some Clay, light brown
SILTY CLAY - jointed, mottled grey and brown
0
4.7
3.3
N.
1
29.3
29.7
95
94
/
r
L
NOTE: Water encountered at a depth of 36'; water
level at a depth of 38' 15 minutes after com-
pletion of drilling. No caving.
2I
•
SILTY SAN D - fine, light grey
Brownish -grey
Layer of CLAYEY SAND
SANDY SILT - some mica, brownish -grey
CLAYEY SAND - fine, few gravel, brownish -grey
SAND - fine, few gravel, some Clay, mottled brown
and grey
SILTY CLAY - jointed, grey
LOG OF BORING
1CDC'i.,:rnnr..nni, n•,r' Ar:. n
5.0
93
•
I
24.7,
95
L
30
,
3
14.3
117
•t
45
42.3
78
/ L
A1
Di n rr A.1 A
MAJOR DIVISIONS
GROUP
SYMBOLS
TYPICAL NAMES
GRAVELS
50%
CLEAN
GRAVELS
(little or no lines)
bw0
�O ,a 44
GW
Well graded gravels, gravel -surd mixtures,
little or no fines.
.C-.•
\ elt'
: i
GP
Poorly graded gravels or grovel -sand mixtures,
Wile or no fines.
COARSE
GRAINED
(hare Mon of
coarse fraction is
LARGER than the
No.4 sieve size)
, GRAVELS
WITH FINES
of (Appreciable amt.
of fines)
C
GM
Silly gravels, gravel -sand -silt mixtures.
i+
GC
Clayey gravels, rovel-sand
Y g -day mixtures.
SOILS
(More Than 50 of ?.
materiol is LARGER
than No.200 sieve
size)
SANDS
CLEAN SANDS
(Little or no Imes)
}
-
SW
Well graded sands, gravelly sands, Mlle cc
no f ines.
-
SP
Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little
or no fines.
(Marc than 50% of
coarse fraction 15
SMALLER than the
No.4 sieve size/
SANDS
WITH FINES
(Appreciable amt.
of fines)
SM
'
Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures.
SC
Clayey sands, sand -cloy mixtures.
FINE
GRAINED
SILTS AND CLAYS
(Liquid limit LESS lhan 50)
ML
Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour,
silty or clayey fine sands or clayey silts
wllh slight plosticdy.
CL
Inorgonic cloys of low fo medium plasticity,
gravelly cloys, sandy clays, silty clays, lean
clays.
OL
Organic sills and organic silty clays of low
plasticity .
N'
SOILS
(More than 50% of
material is SMALLER
than No.200 sieve
size)
SILTS AND CLAYS
NmU GREATER than 50)
MH
Inorganic micaceous or dasil .
tine Bondyy or or Silly Solis, elastraic silts.
v
CH
Inorganic days o/ high plaslici+y, lot cloys.
i(Liquid
OH
Organic clays of medium to high dasticily,
organic sibs.
!
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
PI
Peat and other highly organic sods.
..J<
BOUNDARY CLASSIFICATIONS: Soils possessing chore ler,st cs of two groups are des,gnaled by
combinations of group symbols.
PA RTICLE
SIZE
LIMITS
SILT
OR
CLAY
SAND
GRAVEL
1
COBBLESI
1
BOULDERS
r,wc
wcmu.
COARSE
(INC co49SE
N0.200 N0.e0 NO10 N0.4 '4.r. 3.,.
U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE
12m
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Reference :
The Unified Sod Clussificalion System, Corps of
Engineers, U.S. Army Technical Memorandum No.3-357.
Vol, 1, March, 1953. (Revised April, 1960)
LAW/CRANDALL, fNC. Pam•
PLATE A-2
C
0
S
U
w
0
m
0
O
0
11000
0- 2000
-o
c
0
c
— 3000
w
CC
to
w
CC 4000
w
c9
Q
U 5000
CC
0
co
6000
SHEAR STRENGTH in Pounds per Square Foot
1000 2000 3000 •4000 5000
6000
y/�20 /1/6•
\r:2
ia/E•
•2./2
•
• 2a/5 /S/4
3e9 Q
•
BORING NUMBER
SAMPLE DEPTH
&
(FT.)
/c-zo doii
•3v,2 •22/2
/o/4
•
•
030 9
VALUES
IN ANALYSES
USED
KEY:
• Tests at field moisture content
o Tests at increased moisture content
DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA
(PRIOR JOB AE-84159)
LEROY CRANDALL & ASSOCIATES
PLATE :A-3.1
•
tl
•
O
lL
d 1000
Cr
2000
ID
D
c
0
O
11
c_
3000
(i.1
CC
3
(n
(n
tt1
d 4000
w
0
Q
U 500J
CC
3
6000
SHEAR STRENGTH in Pounds per Square Foot
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 60C9
\
_ \'eie•
le7't 14.e
.9Ee\ �p9e9
me e/
•ses
•
PROPOSED NURSING WING
1
I
1
9� \< •B@//
'/\,/f0�
•
1 \ •
I 7CPi
BORING NJVBER 8
.rSAMPLE ;DEPTH (FT.)
larads
t
•(
\
G.a 2.
•
•
-« ey \
j
I
i
'e, 20
I
• 6a 27 I
I
+f
•
S@3D
:o o
Gde6
1 i
\4ea7
• \
l iG 0 Z: I
•
I
I
j
VALUES USED
N ANALYSES
i i
it
0a" \• i
_
I
i 1
\
•
7.?: 7 i :.cam :.p
I
j
KEY .
• Tests co field moisture content
o Tests ca increased moisture content
DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA
(PRIOR JOB A-69080)
LEROY CRANDLLL fl AS5OCi.,TE3
PLATE A-3.2
SIONIIIMISSISMINIONS
z
z
0
cc
0
0
DATE 6 / 1 8 / 84
JOB AE-8 4159
FORM 116
0
0.01
0
z
0.02
cc
w
0
0)
w
= 0.03
U
z
CONSOLIDATION
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
LOAD .IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT
20 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7
•
_
��
(POSSIBLE
I
Boring 1
SILTY
WEATHERED
I
at 35'
CLAY
SHALE)
�•
Boring
(POSSIBLE
.2 at
SILTY CLAY
WEATHERED
15'
SHALE)
•
41,,..
\
\
-WIIIIIIIIII.
k\
\ L
•
NOTE: Samples tested at field moisture content.
CONSOLIDATION TEST DMA
(PRIOR JOB AE-64159)
LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES
PLATE A-4:1 "
•
Y
0
U
nu
W
0
tti
ui
1-
a
0
0
Z
INCHES PER
Z
CONSOLIDATION
0.4
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT
0.6 0.8 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
6.0 8.0 10.0
20.0
30.0
•
I
�
\
•
I
Boring
SILTY
I
3
CLAY
1
at
I
15'
I
:
i
•
`
I
I 1
I
Tom_•
1
i
i
i
i
Boring
I
I
4 at
SAND
2J1•
T`
•
1
i
1
i
I
I
I 1
I I
1 .
I I
1
i
!
I
i 1
i I
I
1
NOTE: Samples tested at field moisture content.
CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA
(PRIOR JOB A-69080)
LEROY CRANDALL & ASSOCIATES
__ A-a9
r
0
x
0•
0
a
0
z
z
INCHES PER
CONSOLIDATION
LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 80 10.0
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
20.0
�•
I
1
I
I
j
I
Boring
SILTY
I
5
SAND
I
at 4'
I
.
1
'
I \ •
�
I \
I'
.
.
i
I
I
\•
' \
I
I
I
I
i
'
I
1
• I
. Th-...� I
I
1 I
:
i
\
i
f
I ' :I
' I
1
i t :,
i\•
I
1
t
1
1 I • 1
i I
I
, i • ;
' Boring 6 at 30' -/
• SANDY SILT
1
i • :
I
I
I
j
i
i
.
I I '.
i I
1 i I
i
j 1
1
I
I
NOTE: Wcter added to sample from :.oring 5 after consolidation
under a load of 3.6 kips per square foot. The other
sample tested at field moisture content.
CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA
(PRIOR JOB A-69080)
LEROY CRANDALL & ASSOCIATES
0i ATc A-4.3'
N
0
N \
p) \ \ICI
O
O �\
m
N
O
O
m
W
O IV
O
O
m
W
0
MAP
m
W
A
O
O
:1--\\\\
....„
Th, ,_
I78,61\\
1
yoq \\\ /
TOPOGRAPHIC
/ ..\
\ �.
/
N 13,000/
vvv
v RD
�\
\ \\\ • \\
x
�-n
\\\\\
i9.3//
1;
lea
�\
\\
qq --..\
I
ASPH.
A
x
hO
\
x
/
75.3
, !
x
___
'
\\\ \
x
;
x
I
��
�i
- v
I,
„�
to
82.4
I p D
0
- \
\
11
r
\
J'
•
/�'`
FAN
i
i81.4
\\\ \\\�
x
I
alli
I_I�
P
vv
x75.0
ASH.ISIBLE
v<\\
hi
O N C
N12 800
C
�\ �
x78.4 wq<�\� \\
\
�� \
ASPH \�\\�\
FOUN9''
���.
I I�
J
7C.4
1117
I
75.4
ASPH. �
79.8
ii�
3
1
i
78.2
:5.0
//44v„
77,5
X
\
1
1 IS
4.
• 77.1
x
77.5
S
�I x99
\\\
i
di-
\
74.7
1�.
----------
17Z5
x
� i
71.1
ill,
61.6
7Z4
x
NOT
VISIBLE
x
x
x
_
,
-7
1.6
v
j75
�1
CONC
1
x"
x
WALL
76.3
/
/
CO NC
I:9�
/
/
r
1111,
I I
��
I I
1
___
i
`
1
-
ti
f
I
I
76,5
��
-X
N12 600 1.
i
J
F--�
�111r1♦1MI
I
--
ASPH
76.1
x lib
rapid,
x78.4
r--
-1 r
L
Jr
61.3
='
MOP
AL1
x
HOAG
77.2x
x76.1
X
HOSPITAL1PRESBtTE"uI4
VILLA
BALB•A
1i
II
62.8
7
1'
591
J
PROPERTY
PROPERTY
_
II
7bi
WALL
S
x77.0
CB x76.4
n
-
RECORD
OF
SURVEY
15/
3
TRACT
N°
8336
5x
M.
M.
439
/8-12
FPO
60.9
75.7
x
N 12,400
76.2
x
78.4 x
78. 2IL
x
UNx76.5
I
\
70 �i
FH
�
76.4
/ /
59.8
__
F
5 9.9
L -
C0NC �- -
X5.4
(: • •::•. ' = -=
L
••.• �=3
I
74.5
Li
-_ -
'59. 9
-
.'
_
S
/59.2
•.......
•.„„,„„,
•
:.:.:.:.:.:•
:,:,:,:,:,:,
N12,200...........
---T
at961r
4.1
7.0
117
xl
:••
\
•
•
-
•
7
M H S 1
•
x710
63.8
ASPH x72.6
,>p
x74.8
x535:.5 :;+,:,;�-
,�x
�
so
Jf S
EV
L
.J
50:7�
/542x
sail
��� 11.4
5o'II�
LEGEND
1.11*
�1
•
N 12
I �/����I
��._.._�f`i�
e DENOTES AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES AND
,000
_,�i'
��v
PUBLIC UTILITIES GRANTED TO HOAG MEMORIAL���
38,8
/
�
HOSPITAL AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 3 OF A GRANT
��
x
�
��:�
DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 8. 1946 IN BOOK 1398.
PAGE OFFICIAL sp ��
N
44 2
x /
20 OF RECORDS.
DENOTES A RESERVATION FOR ROAD PURPOSES AND 1
dre
1�
PUBLIC UTILITIES AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 OF milt'�
A GRANTOTAL7
FEBRUARYD8. 1946OIN MEMORIAL
1398. PAGE 2000FDED ��
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
DENOTES AN EASEMENT FOR EMERGENCY AND PUBLIC
401 01
401 801
lillf
111111
SECURITY INGRESS AND PURPOSES GRANTED
_EGRESS
10
/
AS
1
/
40
,
TO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DESCRIBED IN
A GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED JUNE 2. 1978. IN
BOOK 12701. PAGE 104 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
Il
3:.4
'•:::::.::.,
DENOTES AREA CLAIMED TO BE SUBJECT TO
PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT.
SCALE IN FEET
45.3x
'*
1
DATE OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY: D'ECEMBER 10, 1985
`ltoben'BeiIL,'William `Fi"ost associates
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS& SURVEYORS
P.O. BOX 19739. 14725 ALTON PARKWAY, I RVINE,CALIFORN IA 92718
(714) 472-3505
MARCH 17, 1988
J.N. 24712
av .01
�c,rE
DEC 2 31992
!' n.»»' !'g' .r.<s'F73- fisa..y.K...u-i _ 3`^ lig=14 —