HomeMy WebLinkAboutHOAG_ANNUAL_REVIEW*NEW FILE*
HOAG ANNUAL REVIEW
i
'
(� U
GUNTHER M. KILFOIL, A.I.A.
PROJECT MANAGER
FACILITIES DESIGN 8 CONSTRUCTION
DIRECT (714) 648.7741
FAX (714) 6467741
HOAG
MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
30INEWPORTBLVD. • BOX6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-6100
PHONE (714) 645.8600
Michael Cox
Architect
i
Architecture • Engineering • IntedOra • Planning
HMC
HMC GROUP
Corporate Office
3270 Inland
Empire Boulevard I
Ontario, CA 91764
(909) 989-9979
FAX (909) 483.1400
If
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH j
3300 Newport Boulevard - P.O. Box 1768 . " L
Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768 MAY 2 8 1992
4-�
GRANVIIi l"uuttyClerk
NOTICE OF DETERMINATIO-� �� Drpl.rry
To: Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk, County of Orange
EDPublic Services Division
P.O. Box 838
Santa Ana, CA 92702
From. City of Newport Beach
Planning Department
3300 Newport Boulevard - P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768
(Orange County)
Date received for filing at OPR:
Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the
Public Resources Code.
Name of Project: Hoag Hospital Master Plan, Ordinance No. 92-3, Ordinance No. 92-4
State Clearinghouse Number. Lead Agency Contact Person: Telephone No.:
89061429 Patricia Temple 714 / 644-3225
Project Location: 301 Newport Boulevard, 4000 West Coast Highway, Newport Beach, CA
Project Description: Adoption of a Development Agreement and Planned Community District
Regulations and Development Plan For Hoag Hospital
This is to advise that the City of Newport Beach has approved the above described project on 5-26-92
and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: (Dace)
1. The project ® will ❑ will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. ® An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
❑ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures ® were ❑ were not made a condition of the approval of the project.
4. A Statement of overriding Considerations 0 was ❑ was not adopted for this project.
5. Findings ® were ❑ were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
The final EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval is available for review at the Planning Depart-
ment of the City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92659-1768; 714/644-3225
May 28 1992
Job L. Douglas, AFC , Environmental Coordinator Date
Be
so
.{
May 28, 1992
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
County Clerk
Public Services Division
Environmental Coordinator
City of Newport Beach
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION FILING
Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Determination for filing as required by Public
Resources Code Section 21152. Compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21089(b)
and Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 is provided as follows:
[ ] Enclosed is a check in the amount of $875 ($850 as required for an EIR project +
$25 County Clerk filing fee).
[ ] Enclosed is a check in the amount of $1275 ($1250 as required for a Negative
Declaration project + $25 County Clerk filing fee).
[ ] Enclosed are two copies of a Certificate of Fee Exemption as provided by Fish and
Game Code Section 711.4 and CCR Title 14, Section 7535, and a check in the
amount of $25 (County Clerk filing fee).
(xj The approval associated with the enclosed NOD is one of a series of actions that are
jjj vvv part of the same project. The required DFG fee was paid at the time the Notice of
Determination was filed for the first such action on this project (see'attached
receipt). As provided by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(g), no additional DFG
fee is therefore required. Enclosed is the $25 County Clerk filing fee.
If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 644-3225.
F:\WPSI\PINNNINGVOHN-D\FORMS\NOD-CO V RMHM
1 4•
a 1• DEPARTMENT OFJJWD GAME
'. FEE CASH RECEIPT
0 8 v ;7
. ENVIRONME(LING
DFG 75a 5u (6-91)
Date:
5 / 19 / 92
Lead Agency. cityof Newport Beach
.
Document No.: 71392
F
• County/State Agency of ling: Oran e
d No.81
Var.No.1180
' Project Tale:
'
Phone Number:
Project Applicant Name:
• project Applicant Address:
Local Public Agency X❑
School District ❑
Other Special District ❑
Project Applicant (Check approprlafe box):
❑ Private Entity ❑
State Agency
' CHECK APPLICABLE FEES:
$M 00
$ 850.00
�) Environmental Impact Report
$1,250.00
$
O Negative Declaration
() Application Fee Water Diversion (State WalerResou Ces Control Board Only) W
$
() Projects Subject to Cerlifled Regulatory Programs
$25 00
$ 25.00
({) County Administrative Fee
( ) Project that is exempt from fees
875.00
•
TOTAL RECEIVED
$
•'••. ^';;;yi' -' •,jYsp,i'.,' : o- Signature and We of person taceMng payment:
•S •5%%v!b ••.v„ •._K%' n?f` WsTCOpvpROjECTAPNJCANT SECOND COf'Y•OFO/FAse
.... Yf'.,t :.. ...n:1:;: ..._ 1;i p::•j::: :�:::j:•i:::C::.•,.: �:': LlI:.:::{t. gi ti RE$$};Tt �TI
COPYAEAD AGENCY FOUM" COpypOUNiY/STALE AGEt= OF RUNU
-0
1
Authdrized to Pubf2sh Advertisements of a ding public notices by
i 'Decree of the Superior court of Orange Co"mia, NumberA•6214,
, September29; 1961; andA-24831 June 11, 1963
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange
I am a Citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am over
the age of eighteen years, and not a party to
or interested in the below entitled matter. I
am a principal clerk of the NEWPORT
BEACH —COSTA MESA PILOT, a
newspaper of general circulation, printed
and published in the City of Costa Mesa,
County of Orange, State of California, and
that attached Notice is a true and complete
copy as was printed and published on the
following dates:
November 9, 1991
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on November 9; ,199 1
at Costa M��alif rni
Signature
i
PU5 fC N0T10E'v J1The Cliy Fd-coourages me
bars o the eneral put
NOTICE OF to review ang comment
PUBLIC NEARING this documentation. Cop
Notice Is hereby given of the Environmental I
that the Planning Commis- pact Report and supportl
sion of the City of Newport documents are avoilal
Beach will hold a public for public review and
hearing on the appplication spectioh at the Plannl
of Hoag Memorial Hospltal Department, City of Nc
Presbyterian for Amend. port Beach, 3300 Nowp
ment No. 744 and Traffic Boulevard, Newport Bea,
Stutly No. 81 on property California, 92669.17
located at 301 Newport (714) 644.3225.
Boulevard and 4000 West Notice Is hereby furtf
Coast Highway. given that said public he
Request to establish Ing will be held on the 2'
Planned, Community Dis- day of November, 1991,
trict Regulations and adopt the hour of 7:30 p.m. In t
a Planned Community De- Council Chambers of t
velopment Plan for Hoag Newport Beach City H;
Hospital, The proposal 3300 Newport Bouleva
would establish regulations Newport Beach, Calitqrn
and development stand. at which time and pia
ards for the long term any and all persons Mt
build -out of acute and non. ested may appear and
acute health care facilities. heard thereon. If you ch
The proposal also Includes lenge this project In coy
an amendment to District- you may be limited to ra
Ing Maps No. 22'and 22•A Ing only those Issues y
so as to redistrlbt the has. r someone else raised
pitel-proppany from the A•P- the public hearing c
H and U(Unclasifldd) Dis• scribed In this notice or
tricts to the P•C (Planned written correspondence c
Community) Dls4ict; an livered to the City at,
amendment to Chapter pr{9r to, the public hearir
20.02 of the Newport For Information call (71
Beach Municipal Code so 644.3200.
as to amend the Height Norma Giovor, Socr
Limitation Zonys Map and tary, Planning Central
the legal description of the sion, City of Nowpe
261 35 Foot Height Limita• Bosch.
lion District to place the NOTE: The expepse
Lower Campus wholly
within the 32150 Foot this notice Is paid from
Height Limitation Districh filing lee collected from tl
and the approval of the applicant,
Traffic Study for Phase I of Published Newpo
the mastor plan program. Beach/Costa Mesa PII
NOTICE 19 HEREBY FUR-
THER GIVEN that an Envi• November 9, 1991.
noted above. It l:
I
present Intention of tt
to accept the
y ronmental Impact I
I And-agepprLinqclocur
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
June 28, 1999
Council Member Ridgeway requested that the General Services Department
and the SPON Tree Committee work together on the issue.
Mayor O'Neil stated that it has not been determined if the equipment is
faulty or if there was operator error.
Member Glover confirmed with City Attorney Burnham that no
n be taken by the City Council during Public Comments.
Iryne Bl ck, 1646 Irvine Avenue, stated that she spoke with an arborist in
Tennessee egarding the resistograph F-line machine. She said that he
indicated that he has had a lot of experience with resistographs giving false
readings. Shkadded that there are three types of resistographs and she'd
like the matter Ipoked into further.
Bob Caustin, 471 014 Newport Blvd, Defend the Bay, referred to the Water
Quality/Back Bay OArview at the earlier Study Session and complimented
staff for their very conojphensive review of the issues affecting the bay. He
thought that the level offunderstanding was commendable. Mr. Caustin
stated that Defend the Bakgs now prepared to ask the neighbors upstream
to do a better job of policing what enters the bay and share in the
responsibility.
Mary Porter, 700 Larkspur Aven-de,
trees removed in Corona del Mar. 91
her property and provide memorie
enhance her property. She stated tl
dead or dying. She stated that the
wildlife. She concluded by stating
removals.
stated that she is against having the
ie stated that three of the trees are on
3\�or her, have historical value and
iat`the trees do not look like they are
treesprovide shade and are used by
that Xv was not notified of the tree
Bettye Butterworth, 721 Jasmine Avenue, provided the City Council with
photos and a copy of her statement. She said that a ee on her property was
removed over a year ago and the removal caused d mage to her property,
which she was later reimbursed for. She stated that h r main complaint is
with the lack of notification that is given. She added t lat Patrick Bartolic
has also provided a statement and agrees with her that leNremoval of the
trees has a negative effect on the area. k
Kurt English, P. O. Box 2817, residing at Seashore & 39th, spokabout the
4th of July restriction problem. He stated that the barricades that hke placed
in the area make it difficult for the residents who want to leave the`area to
enjoy legal fireworks, because they have a problem trying to exit and turn
from their property. He requested that the City Council balance he
interests of property rights and civil order by instructing the Police to be
flexible as possible with the residents.
24. STATUS REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 4 (THE
IRVINE COMPANY, LIBRARY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT), NO. 6
(HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN), NO. 6 (THE
IRVINE COMPANY, CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT AND OPEN
`Elr�l�
Development
Agreements
No 4: C-2823-A
No 6: C-2912
Volume 52 - Page 565
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
June 28, 1999
SPACE AGREEMENT (CIOSA)), NO. 7 PACIFIC VIEW MEMORIAL
PARK), NO. 8 (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION), NO. 9 (FLETCHER JONES MOTOR CARS), NO. 10
(NEWPORT HARBOR LUTHERAN CHURCH), AND NO. it (THE
IRVINE COMPANY AND IRVINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY CONCERNING BONITA CANYON) — TO CONDUCT AN
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CURRENT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
TO REVIEW THE APPLICANTS' GOOD FAITH AND SUBSTANTIAL
COMPLIANCE WITH EACH AGREEMENT IN ADDITION TO THOSE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH.
Mayor O'Neil opened the public hearing.
Motion by Mayor O'Neil to continue the public hearing to a City Council
Study Session on Monday, July 12, 1999, at 4:00 p.m.
Without objection, the motion carried by acclamation.
TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE — PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
CHAPTER 15.40 OF THE NBMC, TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE,
O PROVIDE THAT CIRCULATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
R UIRED FOR A DEVELOPMENT ARE ROUGHLY
PRO ORTIONAL TO THAT PROJECT'S IMPACT, TO MODIFY THE
DEFI ION OF FEASIBLE IMPROVEMENT, TO ESTABLISH A
THRESHOLD FOR TRAFFIC IMPACTS THAT REQUIRE
CIRCULA IQN SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AND TO CHANGE THE
NUMBER OF'+ FFIRMATIVE VOTES NEEDED TO OVERRIDE THE
PROVISIONS Og THE ORDINANCE TO 5/7THS OF THE MEMBERS
ELIGIBLE TO VO (contd. from 6/14/99).
Mayor O'Neil stated tfi this item was reviewed at the previous City
Council meeting, that pub ' testimony was taken and that the Planning
Commission also reviewed it a several public hearings. Mayor O'Neil asked
that those in the audience that fished to comment on the item limit their
comments to information that. was not already a part of the public record.
City Attorney Burnham discussed the � angea that had taken place in the
document since the previous City Coun meeting. He stated that eight
changes were made to the draft Traffic Phas Ordinance (TPO). He began
by stating that language was added to the fin ' ge section.
Council Member Glover asked the City Manager abo t her request to have a
report prepared about how to put together a congestibla management plan.
City Manager Bludau did not recall the request, and ced that it was
not a part of the packet.
City Attorney/Burnham continued by stating that the language�ded to the
findings section should help the City defend the ordinance if it is cH enged.
He stated that a new section has also been added that deals with st ards
for approval that make it clear that improvements or contributions be ilk de
as a condition of the project. He stated that staff is also proposing to go b
to the 1% test for determining the significance of a project at any given
INDEX
No 6:
C-2920
No 7:
C-3058
No 8:
C-3059
No 9:
C-3067
No 10:
C-3152
No 11:
C-3174
(38)
Ord 99-17
Traffic Phasing
Ordinance
(26)
Volume 52 - Page 566
dEW p�Rr CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Hearing Date: June 28, 1999
O� 9 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Agenda Item No.:
y, PLANNING DEPARTMENT Staff Person: Eugenia Garcia
p�Top�.P 33 o NEWPORT BOULEVARD 644-3208
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92656 '
(94) 644-520 ; FAX (714) 644-5250
REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Status Report on Development Agreements Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,
and 11
PURPOSE: To conduct an annual review of current Development Agreements to review
the applicants' good faith and substantial compliance with each agreement in
addition to those terms and conditions required of the City of Newport
Beach.
REQUIRED
ACTION: Hold hearing; if desired, determine compliance, modify or terminate:
Development Agreement No. 4
The Irvine Company, Library Exchange Agreement
Development Agreement No. 5
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Development Agreement No. 6
The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement
and Open Space Agreement
Development Agreement No. 7
Pacific View Memorial Park
Development Agreement No. 8
Ford Motor Land Development Corporation
Development Agreement No. 9
Fletcher Jones Motor Cars
Development Agreement No.10
Newport Harbor Lutheran Church
ql Development Agreement No.11
The Irvine Company and Irvine Community Development Company
Concerning Bonita Canyon
Background
This report contains the annual performance review of development agreements approved by the
City of Newport Beach. Development Agreements 1, 2, and 3 are not included in this review for
the reasons described below.
Development Agreement No. 1 between the City of Newport Beach and Park Lido, Ltd. was
approved by the City Council (Ordinance No. 83-7) on January 24, 1983. This agreement required
that Park Lido, Ltd. advance 50% of the cost of the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection
of Hospital Road and Placentia Avenue in exchange for the approval of the development of a
65,269 square foot two-story medical office building located at 351 Hospital Road. The specific
project approved was never pursued and all approvals sunsetted after 24 months. Subsequently, a
second project was approved and constructed without a development agreement. The traffic signal
which was addressed in the original agreement has been installed.
Development Agreement No. 2 between the City of Newport Beach and the Irvine Company was
approved by the City Council on April 22, 1985. This agreement was to allow the construction of
888 residential dwelling units and 50,000 square feet of commercial development in the North Ford
Planned Community, and 295,000 square feet of office development in the Koll Center Newport
Planned Community. This project has been completed and the terms and conditions of
Development Agreement No. 2 have been satisfied.
Development Agreement No. 3 between the City of Newport Beach and the J. M. Peters Co. was
approved by the City Council (Ordinance No. 85-24) on September 23, 1985. This agreement
established specific development rights and related obligations pursuant to the annexation of the
Bayview site to the City of Newport Beach. This project has been completed and the terms and
conditions of Development Agreement No. 3 have been satisfied.
Discussion
The City of Newport Beach has entered into eight additional development agreements in
conjunction with the approval of several development projects within the City in order to achieve
maximum utilization of resources to the owners, while minimizing the economic cost to the public.
The development agreements represent certain assurances to the owners that they may proceed
with development of certain properties in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations,
and subject to conditions of approval. In approving these development agreements, the City
provided the opportunities for strengthening the public planning process, encouraging private
participation in comprehensive planning, and reducing the economic costs of development. The
approval process has provided the City with the opportunity to gain from the applicants certain
public benefit improvements such as streets, sewer facility improvements, public facilities, drinking
water, utility facilities and open space.
�d
Individual development agreements specify the duration of the agreement, the duration for the
completion of total build -out, circulation improvements, or dedication of open space. In some
cases, terms of the agreements span a 20-25 year time frame. The development agreements specify
permitted uses of the properties, density, intensity of use, maximum height and size of proposed
buildings and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, which may also
be included in the respective Planned Community Texts (PC's) for each development. The
development agreements, in some cases, provide that construction be commenced and completed
within a specified time period or accomplished in phases.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 15.45.070 of the Municipal Code, Article 2.5, Section
65865.1 of the California Government Code, and stated conditions of each development agreement,
the attached status reports have been prepared for each development agreement between the City
and the above stated applicants. The purpose of this review is to establish the status of each
development agreement and to assess compliance with the terms and conditions that have not been
accomplished since the last annual review. Those terms and conditions that were noted as
completed on the last annual review are not included in this report.
The Development Agreements included in this annual review and their dates of adoption are listed
below:
Development Applicant Date of Adoption
Agreement No.
4 The Irvine Company, Library Exchange 1/13/92, ORD 91-46
Revised 4/27/92
5 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 5/26/92, ORD 92-3
Amended 2114/94
6 The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and 9/14/92, ORD 92-35,
Open Space Agreement Amended 9111195,
ORD 95-42
7 Pacific View Memorial Park 7/10/959 ORD 95-26
8 Ford Motor Land Development Land Corporation 7/24/959 ORD 95-27
Amended 7/22/96
9 Fletcher Jones Motor Cars 9/11/959 ORD 95-43
10 Newport Harbor Lutheran Church 6/23/97; ORD 97-22
11 The Irvine Company and Irvine Community 11/10/97,ORD 97-77
Development Company Concerning Bonita Canyon
Conclusion
The decision before the City Council is whether to determine compliance with the terms of
Development Agreements 4,5,6,8,9,10, and 11, to modify any of the Agreements, or, if there is
not substantial compliance with the terms of an Agreement, to terminate the Development
Agreement. For Development Agreement No 7, direct staff to continue efforts to achieve
compliance with the terns of the Development Agreement:
I
Submitted by: Prepared by:
PATRICIA L. TEMPLE EUGENIA GARCIA
Planning Director Associate Planner
HOAG HOSPITAL
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT,NO.5
Project Status Report
Fourth Annual Review of the Development Agreement
by and between
The City of Newport Beach
and Hoag Memorial Hospital
I. Introduction
On May 11, 1992, the City of Newport Beach certified Final Environmental Impact
Report No. 142 for the Hoag Hospital Master Plan and adopted a Planned Community
Development Plan and District Regulations for Hoag Hospital.
On May 26, 1992, the City of Newport Beach approved Development Agreement No. 5
between the City and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian. It was recorded in the
Recorder's office in the County of Orange on August 4, 1993.
On February 14, 1994, the Development Agreement was amended by the City Council to
incorporate revisions requested by the staff of the California Coastal Commission and the
revised Development Agreement was recorded on March 23, 1994. The California
Coastal Commission approved the revised Development Agreement on April 14, 1994,
and amended the Coastal Development Permit on July 21, 1995.
H. Purpose
The purpose of Development Agreement No. 5 is to enable Hoag Hospital to develop the
hospital property consistent with a Master Plan and Planned Community Development
Plan and within the approvals set forth by the Coastal Development Permit issued by the
California Coastal Commission. The future development of the Hoag Hospital property
will allow the hospital to offer additional and needed services for the community by
responding to the ever -changing health and medical care technologies and delivery
systems. The Development Agreement spells out strict, binding limits on the amount and
height of permitted development and insures compliance with conditions related to
density, location, and, timing of construction to minimize, to the extent feasible, any
environmental impacts of the proposed expansion.
The Development Agreement includes requirements for dedication of property,
construction of public improvements and/or the installation of landscaping visible to the
public, which,fphen considered in conjunction with the public services provided by
Hoag, benefit the general public.
Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 15.45 of the Municipal Code and Section 5 of the
Development Agreement, Hoag Memorial Hospital or its successor(s) in interest is to
submit an annual report for review by the City Council demonstrating good faith
substantial compliance with the terms of the Agreement. .
Documentation submitted by Hoag Hospital substantiating good faith compliance with
the Development Agreement was submitted to the City on June 25, 1995, for the first
annual review and on May 8, 1996 (as amended on October 2, 1996, at the City's request)
for the second annual review. City staff subsequently requested that the reporting period
for the Development Agreement annual review be changed from April 15 ending date to a
July 1 ending date to correspond with City Council's review of all Development
Agreements with the City of Newport Beach. The attached project status report is for the
third annual review, July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997.
The third annual review was heard and approved at the City Council Meeting of January
26, 1998. This review was for the period of July 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997. At that
time, the City Council found Hoag Hospital and the City to be in full compliance with the
Development Agreement and Mitigation Measures.
This is the fourth annual review of Development Agreement No. 5 and is for the period of
January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998.
Hoag Hospital submitted a detailed status report which divides the annual review between
compliance with the requirements of the Development Agreement (public benefits,
exactions), and compliance with the requirements of the Mitigation Measures.
Since the original approval of the Development Agreement, the following table represents
the projects that have been implemented per the Agreement:
Cardiac Services Addition and
Completed during the 1995-1996 annual
Emergency Care Unit Parking Lot/Entry
review period
Reconfiguration (Upper Campus)
The Lower Campus Parking Lot — A 346-
Permits issued on Sept. 17, 1996 and
space ancillary parking lot
project completed June 11, 1997.
Flare Relocation/Scrubber Installation
Permits issued January 16, 1998 and
project
completed construction and relocation on
July 23, 1998.
Addition to the Central Plant and
Commenced construction on January 2,
emergency enerators
1998 and completed.
Tower Renovation Project
Plans approved by OSHPD, December,
1998
Support Seriftes Building and 368-space
Permits approved on April 16, 1998. And
Parking Structure
the project is currently under construction.
includes a review of the following:, Development Agreement
The annual review
Measures -
obligations and Environmental Document Mitigation Measures. per the
For this review period, the conditions and mitigation measures that are required
Development Agreement are listed below with an explanation as to how the requirements
were or are being met. All numbering is consistent with number sections of the
Development Agreement.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.S
3.2. Com trance wiu, •.• w•-- -
Miti ation Measure No. 42 ui s, s that they
This Mitigation Measure requires that City staff, on an ag Hospital,, requesting is, send
a letter
to each emergency vehicle company serving uest is in order to
turn off their sirens upon entering the hospital property. This req
idents. Hoag as provided the City
minimize the noise impacts to adjacent retiss and letters have been sent by staff
with a list of emergency vehicle companendix.
to the listed companies- See Table 2 in the App
8.2 Exactions: Hoag shall, as a condition to the right to develop, do the
following:
(a) Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate andGradethe Proposed Linear an
Consolidated View Park. Comp
(b) Public Improvement Funds ($2501000.00). Hoag spital is to pay
the amount to the City to fund the following improvements'.
(i) The construction of a sidewalk and
dtsinstallation de of landscaping
in the CalTrans right-of-way along was aid to
Boulevard southerly The improvements have been completed in
f I-lospital Road. This amount
the City io Hoag. construction.
conjunction with the Arches Interchange
(ii) and, if funds remain, theconstruction
Newport
e ocr oann d/ facilities rrperty. to
bring reclaimed water to West
d t pthe City by Hoag Hospital
This amount has been P eriod. The total amount of
during the second annual review
Ho g has been spent on the
money that was paid by
construction of sidewalks in conjunction with the Arches
e There will not be any remaining funds
td Interchange project. ect due to the costs of
available for a reclaimed water p roj
improvements associated with the Arches Interchange
construction.
(c) Study of possible future imp
in and around the easterly
end of Semeniuk Slough. Completed.
Notices and staff s report sent to:
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Attention: President
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Post Office Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884
Attention: Homer Bludau, City Manager
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Post Office Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884
Attention: Robert Burnham, City Attorney
City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Post Office Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884
#f
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
July 12, 1999
Mayor O'Neil concluded the conversation by stating that he is on the CVB
'Ng� as ex-officio, so more closely associated with the CVB than some of the
other-�ft44cil members. He stated that the enthusiasm from the group at
their recefiTkaunual dinner was marvelous, and that the participation and
membership is endous. He felt that the City Council appreciated the
work of the CVB anaRAL communication between the City and the CVB
should maybe be increase °' a suggested that representatives from the
CVB meet with the City Manag n to discuss the mission statement and
maybe increase some of the goals, a scussed earlier. Mayor O'Neil
thanked Ms. Williams for the presentation • wished Mr. McDaniel the
best of luck, and hoped that they received the revi6%xppsitively.
Council Member Noyes stated that he would like to see me of the
paperwork issues corrected, and that most of his comments were ed at
City staff.
3. STATUS REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS:
TO CONDUCT AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF CURRENT
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS TO REVIEW THE APPLICANTS'
GOOD FAITH AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH EACH
AGREEMENT IN ADDITION TO THOSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
REQUIRED OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH.
A) NO. 4 (THE IRVINE COMPANY, LIBRARY EXCHANGE
AGREEMENT);
B) NO. 5 (HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN);
C) NO. 6 (THE IRVINE COMPANY, CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT
AND OPEN SPACE AGREEMENT [CIOSA]);
D) NO. 7 PACIFIC VIEW MEMORIAL PARK);
E) NO. 8 (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION);
F) NO. 9 (FLETCHER JONES MOTOR CARS);
G) NO. 10 (NEWPORT HARBOR LUTHERAN CHURCH); AND
H) NO. 11 (THE IRVINE COMPANY AND IRVINE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CONCERNING BONITA CANYON).
City Manager Bludau stated that an annual review of all development
agreements is required by the City's Municipal Code.
Mayor O'Neil confirmed with Assistant City Manager Wood that compliance
with all terms and conditions of the development agreements has been met.
He added that the development agreements have different terms and
conditions, and he understands that staff has met with the parties involved.
Council Member Glover referred to the CIOSA Open Space Dedications chart
in the staff report for Development Agreement No. 6 and asked about the
dedication of ithe trail and bluff area on the Upper Castaways property.
Associate Planner Garcia responded that maintenance is taking place on the
upper bluff trail and that when it is completed, the site will be dedicated.
Council Member Glover confirmed with Associate Planner Garcia that
compliance meant that although there may be outstanding issues, that the
�"
Development
Agreements
No 4: C-2823-A
No 5: • C-2912
No 6: C-2920
No 7: C-3058
No 8: C-3059
No 9: C-3067
No 10: C-3152
No 11: C-3174
(38)
Volume 52 - Page 596
/
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
July 12, 1999
terms of the agreement are being met.
Council Member Glover stated that the plantings on the bluff side of th<
fence are not compliant with what the City required. She stated that plants
are being planted that are maybe pretty but are not appropriate to limit
erosion of the Cliff. She requested that the City talk with Taylor -Woodrow
Council Member Glover added that the fence that has been installed by
Taylor -Woodrow is made of cheap wood and should not be accepted by the
City. Also, the plants on the trail were removed and the residents have
planted new ones. Council Member Glover again wanted that issue looked
into.
Council Member Noyes commented about the topping of the trees on Lower
Castaways, and was curious who did it. No answer was received.
In reference to Development Agreement No. 9, City Manager Bludau stated
his disappointment that the repayments from Fletcher Jones had not been
received, and that staff is looking at ways to make sure development
agreements are agreed upon by all departments.
Mayor O'Neil suggested that Development Agreement Nos. 6 & 9 should be
continued for further review of the issues that have been raised.
Assistant City Manager Wood confirmed for Council Member Ridgeway that
the repayment owed by Fletcher Jones is for the improvement to Bayview
Way, and that the City did not send the invoice last year. She added that
she does not feel that Fletcher Jones has been out of compliance, but that the
City failed to make the billing.
Assistant City Manager Wood commented on the dedication of the trail on
the Upper Castaways property. She stated that the offer to dedicate was
made but that the City will -not accept the dedication until the property is in
the right condition for the City to accept it for long-term maintenance.
Associate Planner Garcia confirmed this and added that many of the
improvements are related to the finalizing of the tract map. She said that
the Public Works Department is aware of the issues.
Council Member Glover stated her concern that people think it is the City
that -has made, or approved, the changes to the site, which is not the case.
She said that she is receiving many complaints.
Carol Hoffman, The Irvine Company, confirmed that The Irvine Company
did make the offer of dedication for the Upper Castaways site, in compliance
with the development agreement. She stated that the acceptance has not
come as quickly as expected, but that the Public Works Department wants to
resolve all issues before accepting it.
Council Memdr Glover stated that Taylor -Woodrow must replace the fence.
Ms. Hoffman referred to the CIOSA Open Space Dedications chart in the
staff report, and stated that the Freeway Reservation parcel was included in
the park site that was acquired through Mello -Roos and the joint powers
INDEX
Volume 52 - Page 597
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
July 12, 1999
INDEX
authority. She stated that the site was purchased on March 18, 1999 and is
now owned by the City. She also stated that the deferred maintenance on
the Newport Village parcel has been completed.
Motion by Mayor O'Neil to determine compliance on all Development
Agreements, except for No. 6 - pending further review of the issues raised.
Without objection, the motion carried by acclamation.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - None.
ADJOURNMENT — 5:28 p.m.
The agenda for the Study Session was posted on July 7, 1999, at 2:40 p.m. on
the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of Newport Beach
Administration Building.
Recording Se r tary
--///'i, 1,/../•a !7//. /J�/•./�.)!��
City Clerk
Volume 52 - Page 598
��EwaOR� CITY �OF NEDORT BEACH
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
tJ s PLANNING DEPARTMENT
3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
(714) 644-3200; FAX (714) 644-3250
Hearing Date:
Agenda Item No.:
Staff Person:
REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
June 28, 1999
SS#3
Eugenia Garcia
644-3208
Supplemental Information
SUBJECT: Status Report on Development Agreements Nos. 4, 5. 6, 7, 8. 9.10,
and 11
PURPOSE: To conduct an annual review of current Development Agreements to review
the applicants' good faith and substantial compliance with each agreement in
addition to those terms and conditions required of the City of Newport
Beach.
REQUIRED
ACTION: Hold hearing; determine compliance, modify or terminate:
Development Agreements Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10 and 11.
This report contains supplemental information received by the City regarding the annual
performance review for compliance with the above referenced development agreements. The
following table is a summary of the compliance status for each development agreement.
Development Applicant
Agreement No.
4 The Irvine Company, Library Exchange
5 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
6 The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and
Open Space Agreement
7 Pacific View Memorial Park
8
9
10
11
Ford Motor Land Development Land Corporation
Fletcher Jones Motor Cars
w- ort Harbor Lutheran Church
Summary of
Compliance Status
In Compliance
In Compliance
In Compliance
In Compliance
In Compliance
In Compliance
In Compliance
The Irvine Company and Irvine Community In Compliance
Development Company Concerning Bonita Canyon
r]
RN
Development Agreement No.6
Staff has received additional information regarding the CIOSA Open Space Dedications and has
included the changes in bold on the attached chart, which replaces handwritten page #38 in the
report for June 28.
Development Agreement No. 7
As indicated in staff s previous report (handwritten page #65), Pacific View Memorial Park was
not in compliance with the landscaping requirement for Area 8 and the northeasterly boundary of
Building Site D. On June 28, staff met with the General Manager of Pacific View to address this
issue. New landscaping in these two areas has been installed recently, and upon
recommendations by staff, additional landscaping was to be installed to comply with the
requirements of the development agreement. On July 2, staff visited the site to review the
landscaping, and is now of the opinion that the two areas in question are in compliance with the
requirements of the Development Agreement.
Development Agreement No. 8
Since the initial reporting of compliance, staff has received concerns from a member of the
Eastbluff community that there is compliance issues with Section 5.5, Eastbluff Traffic
(handwritten page #72).
The Eastbluff community in the vicinity of the Ford property has had a historical concern
regarding the impact of through traffic on its streets. The EIR had concluded that the
development of the Ford property (Pacific Bay Tract) would not contribute sufficient through
traffic to constitute a significant impact on this existing problem. Further, Ford had no legal
obligation to correct the existing problems and the City had no authority independent of the
Development Agreement to impose a condition requiring Ford to correct the existing problem.
Pursuant to the Development Agreement, Ford was to contribute to the solution of the existing
traffic problem as follows:
a. The determination of a solution shall be dependent upon an agreement between the Eastbluff community
and the City.
b. If the "solution" costs $50,000 or less:
i. Ford will pay one -hundred percent of total cost of the capital improvements/traffic studies (as
opposed to long-term maintenance) of the solution as actually implemented; or
If the "solution" posts more than $50,000:
i. Ford will pay one-third of the total cost of the capital improvements/traffic studies as actually
implemented with a minimum payment of $50,000 and a maximum payment of $75,000.
C. Ford will not be required to make a deposit of funds until a "solution" actually is approved by the City for
implementation. Any funds actually deposited but not used to implement the solution shall be returned to
Ford.
Cv(
t agreed on a "solution" within one yearfron; the
d If the City and Date (7122196),tand the date for agreement has he Eastbluff community have onot been extended by Ford, this obligation shall terminate.
e
r
Pacific Bay Homes (Ford) has made payments to the City for traffic studies and improvements
and directly to the Eastbluff Community Association for studies related to the existing problems.
The community did not vote to gate the project. The date for agreement on a traffic solution has
been extended twice, upon Eastbluff s request the first time and by Pacific Bay Homes the
second time, and expired on December 31, 1997. Improvements to traffic ptnems at Jamboree
Road and Bison were implemented on a trial basis in January 1998, in order to reduce cut -
through traffic in this area. The City Council is scheduled to consider making these
improvements permanent at their meeting of July 26, 1999. Pacific Bay Homes has made an
additional commitment (see attached letter) to fund expenses to mitigate traffic in Eastbluff,
extended to December 31, 1999. Staff believes this commitment is an extra effort by Pacific Bay
Homes to contribute to the resolution of traffic problems in Eastbluff and is consistent with the
intent of the Development Agreement.
Develonment Agreement No. 9
Councilmember Adams requested that the review of this development agreement also include a
status report on lighting issues at the dealership. The mitigation measures and conditions of
approval related to lighting are attached, as is the action plan to reduce lighting that was
approved by the City Council in February 1998. After a 30-day review period to determine the
effectiveness of the lighting improvements, the City Council found the dealership in compliance
Cwith all lighting related mitigation measures and conditions of approval on April 13, 1998.
The Council also directed staff to budget for landscaping that would screen the lighting from the
view of nearby residents. That project was not completed in fiscal year 1998-99, and the Council
re -budgeted the project for 1999-2000. Fletcher Jones has agreed to match City funds on the
project, up to a maximum of $30,000, which brings the total project budget to $65,000.
Councilmember Adams and staff have been working with Fletcher Jones and the neighbors on a
planting plan that can be accepted by all parties, and believe we have achieved that. Staff is also
working with the California Department of Fish and Game and Coastal Commission on permit
approvals, and have learned of some biological issues with the landscaping plan, which will
require additional research and possible alternatives to the plan.
Item #3 on handwritten page #76 of the June 281h report refers to the funding of the Bayview
Drive extension and payments made to the City by Fletcher Jones Motorcars. Further research by
staff indicates that the actual costs of the construction of the street were approximately
$453,815.13. Fletcher Jones Motorcars made a contribution of $139,875.45 and an agreement
was made with the City to make five (5) annual payments for the remainder of the actual
construction costs. One payment of $62,787.97 was made on August 1, 1997, and staff cannot
verify further invoices. The remaining balance owed to the City is $251,151.71. Staff will send
an invoice for the 1998 and 1999 payments in August, 1999.
Conclusion
The decision before the City Council is
Development Agreements 4,5,6,7, 8,9,10,
terms of an Agreement, to terminate the
Agreements.
Submitted by:
SHARON Z. WOOD
whether to determine compliance with the terms of
and 11, if there is not substantial compliance with the
Development Agreement, or, to modify any of the
Prepared by:
EUGENIA GARCIA
City Manager Associate Planner
Attachments: CIOpen Space Dedications chart
Let from Pacific Bay Properties
Fletcher Jones Lights Action Plan
Excerpt from Planning Commission minutes dated August 24, 1995, for Fletcher Jones
e;
4.
(elole
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
January 26, 1998
opened the public hearing, and hearing no testimony,
26. STATUS REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS NOS. 4, 5, 6,
7, 8, 9, and 10. Conduct annual review of current Development Agreements
to review the applicants' good faith and substantial compliance with each
agreement in addition to those terms and conditions required of the City. .
Development Agreement No. 4 (C-2912)
The Irvine Company, Library Exchange Agreement
Development Agreement No. 5 (C-3068)
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian,
Development Agreement No. 6 (C-3059)
The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and Open Space
Agreement (CIOSA)
Development Agreement No. 7 (C-3065)
Pacific View Memorial Park
Development Agreement No. 8 (C-3152)
Ford Motor Land Development Corporation
Development Agreement No. 9 (C-2823A)
Fletcher Jones Motor Cars
Development Agreement No. 10 (C-2920)
Newport Harbor Lutheran Church
City Manager Murphy stated that each development agreement requires an
annual status report and review. He stated -that staff was available to
answer any questions about the information provided in the staff report.
Council Member Glover asked for a clarification regarding Development
Agreement #6, The Irvine Company Circulation Improvement and Open
Space Agreement. She noted that on Page 4 of the Project Status Report, it
states that the site on the southeast corner of San Miguel Road and Avocado
Avenue was redesignated as'multi-family residential according to General
Plan Amendment No. 97-3. She then noted that on Page 5 of the report, the
same site is listed as being open space. Assistant City Manager Wood said
that the amendment has only been initiated. Planning Director Temple
explained th�i the general plan was never actually amended to change the
underlying land use designation. She stated that the actual land use
designation, as mapped on the existing land use element, is administrative,
professional and financial commercial, however, through the development
agreement, The Irvine Company agreed to dedicate the site as open space.
Planning Director Temple said that if the multi -family residential project is
INDEX
Development
Agreements
C-2912
C-3058
C-3059
C-3065
C-3152
C-2823A
C-2920
(38/68)
Volume 51- Page 596
I/
e
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
January 26,1998
not approved, then staff would request a subsequent amendment to
designate the property as opera space in the general plan.
Council Member Debay inquired about Development Agreements #4, 6 and
9, and the fact that they appear to be incomplete. Assistant City Manager
Wood stated, that in the past, Development Agreement #5, Hoag Memorial
Hospital Presbyterian, has been the only applicant to provide a detailed
progress annual report. She stated, further, that staff has determined that
the other applicants have been in compliance with the substantive
requirements of the agreements.
Motion by Council Member Hedges to continue the item for one month, with
the exception of Development Agreement #5.
Mayor Edwards opened the public hearing.
Reverend Bill Mrlin-Hackett, Newport Harbor Lutheran Church, stated that
they submitted a report of compliance on their portion of the development
agreement (#10) and doesn't feel they should be continued. He feels that
they've complied. Council Member Debay clarified that the only
development agreements that she noticed were in non-compliance were
Development Agreements #4, 6 and 9.
Council Member O'Neil feels that if staff feels there is substantial
compliance, he doesn't feel that the development agreements need to come
back to the City Council this year, but that he'd like to see more
comprehensive compliance in the future. Council Member O'Neil stated that
he would not be supporting motion.
Don Stahlin, Pacific Bay Homes, understood that Development Agreement
#8, Ford Motor Land Development Corporation, was in full compliance. He
apologized for anything that is found to be substandard, but they would be
happy to bring their development agreement to full compliance.
Assistant City Manager Wood clarified that reports have been received from
Pacific View Memorial Park, Development Agreement #7, and Ford Motor
Land Development Corporation, Development Agreement #8. In regards to
Flacher Jones Motor Cars, Development Agreement #9, and Newport
Harbor Lutheran Church, Development Agreement #10, she stated that it is
the responsibility of the City to provide the information.
Carol Hoffman, The Irvine Company, understood from staff that all the
information needed for Development Agreements #4 and 6 had been
received. She stated that if additional information was needed, she would be
happy to provide it. They would like their information to be complete.
Hearing no§hrther testimony, Mayor Edwards closed the public hearing.
Amended Motion by Council Member Hedges to delete reference to
Development Agreements #5, 7, 8, 9 and 10; and request that Development
Agreements #4 and 6 be brought back to the City Council within 30 days.
INDEX
Volume 51 - Page 697
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
January 26, 1998
27.
The amended motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes Thomson, Debay, Hedges, Glover, Noyes,
Mayor Edwards
Noes: O'Neil
Abstain: None
Absent: None
WINDOWS ON THE BAY RESTAURANT (SCOTT SHUTTLEWORTH,
APPLICANT) FOR USE PERMIT NO. 3293 (AMENDED) ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2241 WEST COAST HIGHWAY - REQUEST
TO AMEND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF AN EXISTING FULL
SERVICE RESTAURANT TO CHANGE THE OPERATIONAL
CHARACTERISTICS (contd. from 11/24/97). -
Edwards asked for Council Member Glover to provide a brief update.
Counc\residents
ber Glover began by clarifying some of the background
informrovided in the staff report. At the City Council meeting of
Nove, 1997, the City Council directed Council Member Glover to
meet Crab Shack to resolve some of the issues associated with
that p, 'th Scott Shuttleworth, manager of Windows on the Bay,
and althe pellants, Mr. & Mrs. Weinberg. Council Member Glover
statede has 'nce met with each. Both the attorney for Joe's Crab
Shackr. Shuttl orth agreed to meet with Mr. & Mrs. Weinberg and
the otidents of o Isle. Mr. & Mrs. Weinberg declined the offer
throuspondence da d December 23, 1997.
Council Member Glover the referred to Mr. Shuttleworth's letter of
January 14, 1998. She noted t tin that letter, Mr. Shuttleworth makes
some concessions to the requests f the Planning Commission. Council
Member Glover stated that later she t with Mrs. Weinberg, Carolyn
Klein and Planning Director Temple. t that meeting, she understood the
complaints from the residents of Lido Islkeem to be directed at Joe's Crab
Shack, and not Windows on the Bay. CounV Member Glover feels that the
residents have concerns about Windows on t Bay because of the problems
associated with Joe's Crab Shack.
Council Member Glover also explained Windows on a Bay and how it sits
on the bay. She stated that the outside dining is actu on the parking lot
side of the building, enclosed with plexiglas. She sailat the bar is not
right out on the bay, but on an inset. Council Member Gl er reminded the
City Council that the decision made on the Windows on the y application
will set a precedence for other establishments on the bay.
Planning Director Temple explained the options available to a City
Council. She stated that if the decision of the Planning Commi 'on is
sustained, the original Exhibit A, dated October 23, 1997, we be
appropriate. A Revised Exhibit A was also provided in the staff report t t
incorporated the requests of Mr. Shuttleworth's letter of January 14, 199
INDEX
Windows on the Bay
Use Permit 3293
(88)
Volume 61-Page 598
•r t IrF aEWPpRT
V _
C�fIFOPP�P
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
,Zoo NEWPORT BOULEVARD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
(714) 644-3200; FAX (Tg) 644.3$0
Agenda Item No.:
Staff Person:
REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
26
Eugenia Garcia
644-3208
SUBJECT: Status Report on Development Agreements Nos. 4.5. 6.7. 8.9, and 10
PURPOSE: To conduct an annual review of current Development Agreements to review
the applicants' good faith and substantial compliance with each agreement
in addition to those terms and conditions required of the City of Newport
Beach.
REQUIRED
ACTION: Hold hearing; if desired, determine compliance, modify or terminate:
DevelopmentAgreement No. 4
The Irvine Company, Library Exchange Agreement
Development Agreement No. 5
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
DevelopmentAgreement No. 6
The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and Open Space
Agreement
Development Agreement No. 7
Pacific View Memorial Park
Development Agreement No. 8
Ford Motor Land Development Corporation
Development Agreement No. 9
Fletcher Jones Motor Cars
Development Agreement No.10
Newport Harbor Lutheran Church
Background 1`i
This report contains the annual performance review of development agreements approved by the
City of Newport Beach. Development Agreements 1, 2, and 3 are not included in this review for
the reasons described below.
Development Agreement No. 1 between the City of Newport Beach and Park Lido, Ltd. was
approved by the City Council (Ordinance No. 83-7) on January 24, 1983. This agreement required
that Park Lido, Ltd. advance 50% of the cost of the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection
of Hospital Road and Placentia Avenue in exchange for the approval of the development of a
65,269 square foot two-story medical office building located at 351 Hospital Road. The specific
project approved was never pursued and all approvals sunsetted after 24 months. Subsequently, a
second project was approved and constructed without a development agreement. The traffic signal
which was addressed in the original agreement has been installed.
Development Agreement No. 2 between the City of Newport Beach and the Irvine Company was
approved by the City Council on April 22, 1985. This agreement was to allow the construction of
888 residential dwelling units and 50,000 square feet of commercial development in the North Ford
Planned Community, and 296,000 square feet of office development in the Koll Center Newport
Planned Community. This project has been completed and the terms and conditions of
Development AgreementNo. 2 have been satisfied.
Development Agreement No. 3 between the City of Newport Beach and the J. M. Peters Co. was
approved by the City Council (Ordinance No. 85-24) on September 23, 1985. This agreement
established specific development rights and related obligations pursuant to the annexation of the
Bayview site to the City of Newport Beach. This project has been completed and the terms and
conditions of Development AgreementNo. 3 have been satisfied.
Discussion
The City of Newport Beach has entered into seven development agreements in conjunction with the
approval of several development projects within the City in order to achieve maximum utilization
of resources to the owners, while minimizing the economic cost to the public. The development
agreements represent certain assurances to the owners that they may proceed with development of
certain properties in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to
conditions of approval. In approving these development agreements, the City provided the
opportunities for strengthening the public planning process, encouraging private participation in
comprehensive planning, and reducing the economic costs of development. The approval process
has provided the City with the opportunity to gain from the applicants certain public benefit
improvements such as streets, sewer facility improvements, public facilities, drinking water, utility
facilities and open space.
Individual development agreements specify the duration of the agreement, the duration for the
completion of total build -out, circulation improvements, or dedication of open space. In some
cases, terms of the agreements span a 20-25 year time frame. The development agreements specify
permitted uses of the properties, density, intensity of use, maximum height and size of proposed
buildings and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, which may also
be included in the respective Planned Community Texts (PC's) for each development. The
development agreements, in some cases, provide that construction be commenced and completed
within a specified time period or accomplished in phases.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 15.45.070 of the Municipal Code, Article 2.5, Section
65865.1 of the California Government Code, and stated conditions of each development agreement,
2
the attached status reports have been prepared for each development agreement between the City
and the above stated applicants. The purpose of this review is to establish the status of each
development agreement and to assess compliance with the terms and conditions that have not been
accomplished since the last annual review. Those terms and conditions that were noted as
completed on the last annual review are not included in this report.
The Development Agreements included in this annual review and their dates of adoption are listed
below:
Develop.
Applicant
Date of Adoption
Agrmt. No.
4
The Irvine Company, Library Exchange
1/13/929 ORD 91-46
5
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
5/26/929 ORD 92-3
Amended 2/14/94
6
The Irvine Company, Circulation Improvement and
9/14/92, ORD 92-35,
Open Space Agreement
Amended 9/11/95,
ORD 95-42
7
Pacific View Memorial Park
7/10/95, ORD 95-26
8
Ford Motor Land DevelopmentLand Corporation
7/24/95, ORD 95-27
9
Fletcher Jones Motor Cars
9/11/95, ORD 95-43
10
Newport Harbor Lutheran Church
6/23/979 ORD 97-22
Conclusion
The decision before the City Council is
Development Agreements 4 though 10, to
substantial compliance with the terms
Agreement.
Submitted by:
SHARONZ. WOOD
Assistant City Manager
'e", �;'
f/
whether to determine compliance with the terms of
modify any of the Agreements, or, if there is not
of an Agreement, to terminate the Development
Prepared by:
EUGENIA GARCIA
Associate Planner
LIBRARY EXCHANGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, NO.4
Project Status Report
Review of the Development Agreement
by and between
The City of Newport Beach
and The Irvine Company
I. Introduction
On January 13, 1992, a Development Agreement between a City of Newport Beach and
The Irvine Company was approved by City Coungif Ordinance No. 91-46. The
Development Agreement and the approval of a se ' s of actions allowed the City to
exchange a two -acre library site in the Civic Plaza ea for a four -acre site in the Newport
Village area.
In order to facilitate development of the w Central Library in the Newport Village
Planned Community, on April 27, 199 ,the City Council amended the entitlements
approved as part of the original Libr xchange Agreement by transferring 30,000 sq.
ft. of allowable office development om Corporate Plaza West Planned Community to
Civic Plaza Planned Community. This transfer was necessary in order to maintain
consistency with the existing Lo Coastal Program Land Use Plan for Corporate Plaza
West. Due to conditions un ceptable to the City and The Irvine Company, Local
Coastal Program Amendme No. 24 and the Library Development Agreement were
withdrawn from Coastal C mmission consideration on April 9, 1992. As a result, the
City Council approved r isions to Development Agreement No. 4 and initiated Local
Coastal Program Ame ment No. 26, General Plan Amendment 755, and General Plan
Amendment No. 756. he changes also amended the Districting Maps so as to reclassify
the Corporate PI West Planned Community District to the "Open Space" and
"Unclassified" Di icts.
II. Purpose
The purpo a of Development Agreement No. 4 was to allow the City to exchange a two -
acre exis ng library site in the Civic Plaza Planned Community for a four -acre site owned
by Th rvine Company in the Newport Village Planned Community. The term of the
Deve pment Agreement is to continue until all permits required for the construction,
occ pancy, and operation of the project have been issued, not to exceed 20 years., The
a ption of Development Agreement No. 4 does not preclude the City of Newport Beach
m conducting future discretionary reviews in connection with the project, in
compliance with the plans, ordinances and policies in effect as of the effective date of the
agreement, nor does it prevent the City from imposing conditions or requirements to
1
HOAG HOSPITAL
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.5
Project Status Report
Annual Review of the Development Agreement
by and between
The City of Newport Beach
and Hoag Memorial Hospital
I. Introduction
On May 11, 1992, the City of Newport Beach certified Final Environmental Impact
Report No. 142 for the Hoag Hospital Master Plan and adopted a Planned Community
Development Plan and District Regulations for Hoag Hospital.
On May 26, 1992, the City of Newport Beach approved Development Agreement No. 5
between the City and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian. It was recorded in the
Recorder's office in the County of Orange on August 4, 1993.
On February 14, 1994, the Development Agreement was amended by the City Council to
incorporate revisions requested by the staff of the California Coastal -Commission and the
revised Development Agreement was recorded on March 23, 1994. The California
Coastal Commission approved the revised Development Agreement on April 14, 1994,
and amended the Coastal Development Permit on July 21, 1995.
H. Purpose
The purpose of Development Agreement No. 5 is to enable Hoag Hospital to develop the
hospital property consistent with a Master Plan and Planned Community Development
Plan and within the approvals set forth by the Coastal Development Permit issued by the
California Coastal Commission. The future development of the Hoag Hospital property
will allow the hospital to offer additional and needed services for the community by
responding to the ever changing health and medical care technologies and delivery
systems. The Development Agreement spells out strict, binding limits on the amount and
height of permitted development and insures compliance with conditions related to
density, location, and timing of construction to minimize, to the extent feasible, any
environmental impacts of the proposed expansion.
The Development Agreement includes requirements for dedication of property,
construction of public improvements and/or the installation of landscaping visible to the
public, which,fivhen considered in conjunction with the public services provided by
Hoag, benefit the general public.
Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 15.45 of the Municipal Code and Section 5 of the
Development Agreement, Hoag Memorial Hospital or its successor(s) in interest is to
1
I
submit an annual report for review by the City Council demonstrating good faith
substantial compliance with the terms of the Agreement.
Documentation submitted by Hoag Hospital substantiating good faith compliance with
the Development Agreement was submitted to the City on June 25, 1995, for the first
annual review and on May 8, 1996 (as amended on October 2, 1996, at the City's request)
for the second annual review. City staff subsequently requested that the reporting period
for the Development Agreement annual review be changed from April 15 ending date to a
July 1 ending date to correspond with City Council's review of all Development
Agreements with the City of Newport Beach. The attached project status report is for the
third annual review, July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997.
Hoag Hospital submitted a detailed status report which divides the annual review between
compliance with the requirements of the Development Agreement (public benefits,
exactions), and compliance with the requirements of the Mitigation Measures.
Since July, when the project status report was submitted by Hoag Hospital, the hospital
received a "Permit to Construct" the flare relocation/scrubber installation project from the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (on September 19, 1997). An amendment
to the Coastal Development Permit from the California Coastal Commission for the flare
relocation project was issued on October 27, 1997. The City Council approved the
design and relocation of the methane gas mitigation system on December 8, 1997. The
flare design plans are in final review with the City and building permits are pending.
The annual review includes a review of the following: Development Agreement
obligations and Environmental Document Mitigation Measures.
For this review period, the conditions and mitigation measures that are required per the
Development Agreement are listed below with an explanation as to how the requirements
were or are being met.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.5
3.2. Compliance with Master Plan Conditions/Mitigation Measures:
Mitigation Measure No. 42
This Mitigation Measure requires that City staff, on an annual basis, send a letter
to each emergency vehicle company serving Hoag Hospital, requesting that they
turn off their sirens upon entering the hospital property. This request is in order to
minimize the noise impacts to adjacent residents. Hoag has provided the City
with a IM of emergency vehicle companies, and letters have been sent by staff
to the listed companies. See Table 2 in the Appendix.
2
15
8.2 Exactions: Hoag shall, as a condition to the right to develop, do the
following:
(a) Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate and Grade the Proposed Linear and
Consolidated View Park. The Offer to Dedicate has been
recorded and the Dedication has been accepted by the City.
The two parks are part of the approved grading plan for the
lower campus parking lot which has been completed. The
linear park has been completed and the view park (Sunset
View Park) is in the process of completion.
(b) Public Improvement Funds ($250,000.00). Hoag Hospital is to pay
the amount to the City to fund the following improvements:
(i) The construction of a sidewalk and installation of landscaping
in the CalTrans right-of-way along the west side of Newport
Boulevard southerly of Hospital Road. This amount was paid to
the City by Hoag. New sidewalks are planned to be
constructed in conjunction with the Arches Interchange
construction.
(ii) and, if funds remain, the construction of facilities necessary to
bring reclaimed water to West Newport and/or the Property.
This amount has been paid to the City by Hoag Hospital
during the second annual review period. The total amount of
money that was paid by Hoag will be spent on the construction
of sidewalks in conjunction with the Arches Interchange
project. There will not be any remaining funds available for a
reclaimed water project due to the costs of improvements
associated with the Arches Interchange construction.
(c) Study of possible future improvement in and around the easterly
end of Semeniuk Slough. City staff and the P.B.&R.
Commission studied the use of this area and no improvements
were found to be feasible.
f/
3
Q
Notices and staff s report sent to:
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Attention: President
Tim Paone
Paone, Callahan, McHolm & Winton
19100 Von Karman, 8th Floor
P.O. Box 19613
Irvine, CA.92713-9613
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Post Office Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884
Attention: Kevin Murphy, City Manager
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Post Office Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884
Attention: Robert Burnham, City Attorney
City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Post Office Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92663-3884
I/
0
10
f .
Project Status Report
July 1, 1996 - July 1, 1997
Annual Review of Development Agreement
between the City ofNewpoit Beach
and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
I. Introduction
On August 4, 1993, the Development Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian was recorded. On February 14, 1994, the City
Council amended the Development Agreement to incorporate revisions requested by the
staff of the California Coastal Commission, and the revised Development Agreement was
subsequently recorded on March 23, 1994. On April 14, 1994, the California Coastal
Commission approved Hoag Hospital's Development Agreement with the City.
Section 5 of the Development Agreement requires an annual review to be conducted by
the City of the Hospital's good faith substantial compliance with the Development
Agreement. Based on the California Coastal Commission's approval of the Development
Agreement on April 14, 1994, the annual review period was, therefore, established as
April 15 of each year following the approval of the Development Agreement by the
California Coastal Commission.
Documentation from Hoag Hospital substantiating good faith compliance with the
Development Agreement was submitted to the City on June 25, 1995, for the first annual
review and on May 8, 1996 (as amended on October 2, 1996, at the City's request) for the
second annual review. City staff subsequently requested that the reporting period for the
Development Agreement annual review be changed from an April 15 ending date to a
July 1 ending date to correspond with City Council's review of all Development
Agreements within the City of Newport Beach. Therefore, this project status report, for
the third Development Agreement annual review, is for the year July 1, 1996 to July 1,
1997.
H. Summary of Previous Development Agreement Annual Reviews
The project status report for the first annual review documented Hoag Hospital's
compliance with the Development Agreement as related to three development projects
undertaken during that annual review period: the 5,990-square-foot Cardiac Services
Addition on the Upper Campus, the Emergency Care Unit Parking Lot/Entry
ReconfiguratioA/(also located on the Upper Campus), and the Flare Relocation/Scrubber
Installation project, located on the Lower Campus. The Cardiac Services Addition and
the Emergency Care Unit Parking Lot/Entry Reconfiguration were completed during the
1995-1996 annual review period. The plans for the Flare Relocation/Scrubber
Installation project, which were originally approved by the City on November 4, 1994,
1 "
11
Hoag Development Agreement
Third Annual Review
July 8, 1997
were not implemented, based on subsequent modifications to the project, which are
discussed further below.
During the second annual review period, the Lower Campus Parking. Lot project was
documented for compliance with the Development Agreement. A Coastal Development
Permit for the construction of the 351-space ancillary parking lofwas received on
October 11, 1995. On March 7, 1996, plans for the Lower Campus Parking Lot -were
submitted to the City. The implementation of the parking lot project is discussed under
the current year's project status report.
The Flare Relocation/Scrubber Installation project plans were revised during the second
annual review period, based on City plan check comments, and the City re -approved the
project on November 15, 1995. However, these plans were not implemented, as the City
and Hoag Hospital initiated legislation to fund the relocation of the flare and to install a
system that would -better meet the needs of the West Newport area by more efficiently
extracting methane gas. The legislation was subsequently withdrawn by the City because
the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) agreed to fund $750,000 for the
Flare Relocation/Scrubber Installation project.
This project status report includes a review of projects initiated or in process during the
third annual review period, July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997.
On September 17, 1996, the City issued permits for the construction of the Lower
Campus Parking Lot project. During the bulk of the third annual review period, the
Lower Campus Parking Lot was under construction. The project was completed and final
City approval was received on June 11, 1997.
On September 9, 1996, the City Council approved a Cooperative Agreement between the
City and Caltrans to formalize funding commitments and fund disbursement
procedures/requirements for the Flare Relocation/Scrubber Installation project. During
the third annual review period, the City and Hoag explored options for the relocation of
the flare and the installation of an upgraded system. On October 23, 1996, the South
Coast Air Quality Management District issued a Permit to Construct the project. Based
on additional revisions to the plans, to include additional monitoring and safety devices,
the plans were resubmitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District on June
17, 1997, for a new permit. At the end of the third annual review period, the plans were
under review Wthe South Coast Air Quality Management District.
Plans for the flare project were also submitted on June 20, 1997, to the California Coastal
Commission for a revision to the existing Coastal Development Permit which allowed
2
/a
Hoag Development Agreement
Third Annual Review
July 8, 1997
modifications to the existing flare system. At the end of the third annual review period,
the plans were under review by the California Coastal Commission.
The plans for the upgraded flare project were submitted to the City on June 10, 1997, and
are in the process of being reviewed by City staff. The mitigation measures related to the
original flare project were all completed and approved by City staff iri "1994. As part of
the upgraded flare project, the Planning Department reviewed all mitigation measures
completed for the originally -proposed project to determine which measures would be
required to be readdressed as part of the upgraded project. Based on that review, a
revised mitigation monitoring plan was prepared and submitted to the Planning
Department for the City's use in its review of the project plans.
Hoag Hospital also processed plans for an addition to its central plant to include
emergency generators. The Planning Department determined that a separate mitigation
monitoring plan would ndt be required for the generator project, due to the narrow scope
of the project. However, the Planning Department did identify several mitigation
measures that were required to be fulfilled. These mitigation measures were satisfied
during the third annual review period, and permits are expected to be issued for the
project within the next month.
IV. Mitigation Monitoring Prog aLm
As part of the approval of the Development Agreement by the City, and its subsequent
approval by the California Coastal Commission, the City was required to formally adopt
a mitigation monitoring plan. On June 13, 1994, the City adopted the Hoag Hospital
Master Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan. Section 5.4 of the Development Agreement
requires that the annual review include a detailed report of compliance with the
mitigation measures'identified in the mitigation monitoring plan. The mitigation annual
review is included as the Appendix to the project status report.
9(
3
13
APPENDIX
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
AND HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
�E
H
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Development Agreement Mitigation Annual Review
July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997
On May 11, 1992, the City of Newport Beach certified Final Environmental Impact
Report No. 142 for the Hoag Hospital Master Plan, and adopted a Planned Community
Development Plan and District Regulations for the implementation of the Master Plan.
At the same time, the City entered into a Development Agreement with Hoag Hospital.
The Development Agreement was subsequently amended to incorporate changes
requested by the California Coastal Commission in conjunction with its review of a mass
grading permit application by Hoag Hospital.
Section 5 of the Development Agreement requires that the City conduct an annual review
of- the Development Agreement in order to evaluate Hoag Hospital's good faith
substantial compliance with the Development Agreement. As part of that annual review,
a review of compliance with the mitigation monitoring plan (adopted by the City on June
13, 1994) for Hoag Hospital is also required. Specifically, Section 5.4 of the
Development Agreement states:
Mitigation Review: The annual review shall include a detailed report of
compliance with the various conditions and mitigation measures contained
within the mitigation monitoring plan. The report shall include an analysis
of the view impacts of buildings constructed in comparison to the
anticipated views as depicted in the EIR. For the five year monitoring
period imposed by the Department of Fish and Game Streambed
Alteration Agreement entered into between the Department of Fish and
Game and Hoag, the annual review shall also assess the success of any
off -site wetlands mitigation. Five years after the completion of the
Department of Fish and Game monitoring period, Hoag shall submit a
final report assessing the success of the off -site wetlands mitigation in its
annual review. If the survival and cover requirements set forth in the
Streambed Alteration Agreement have not been met, Hoag shall be
responsible for replacement planting to achieve these requirements. Hoag
shall be found in compliance with this Agreement unless the City Council
determines, based upon the evidence presented at the Annual Review, that
Hoag 4p not complied with all mitigation measures and conditions
including those imposed as a result of subsequent environmental analysis,
applicable to the grading of, or building on, the Property as of the date of
the Annual Review.
1
IS
Hoag Development Agreement
Mitigation Annual Review
July 8, 1997
This document is being submitted in compliance with the Development Agreement
requirement stated above for the year July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997.
H. Format/Contents of the Mitigation Annual Review
There are three categories of mitigation measures included in the adopted mitigation
monitoring program - measures that need to be complied with only once, measures that
relate to individual development projects undertaken by Hoag Hospital, and mitigation
measures which are required to be implemented on an ongoing basis and documented
annually. The "Hoag Hospital Development Agreement - Mitigation Annual Review"
(Table 1) summarizes, in matrix format, the applicability of all mitigation measures to
each of the three'categories of mitigation measures. During annual review periods when
mitigation monitoring plans completed for specific projects are being reviewed by the
City, the "project -specific mitigation measures" are further broken down to include these
individual projects.
Also, as stated above, Section 5.4 requires that for the "five year monitoring period
imposed by the Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement entered
into between the Department of Fish and Game and Hoag, the annual review shall also
assess the success of any off -site wetlands mitigation." The first year of the five year
monitoring period for the off -site wetlands occurred during the third annual review period
for the Development Agreement.
On January 22, 1997, the "First Annual Monitoring Report for 6.08-Acre Freshwater
Marsh Creation at the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve Pursuant to California
Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement Number 5-306-93 and
United States Army Corps of Engineers Authorization Number 93-00858-BH" was
submitted to the 'reviewing agencies. This report documented the mitigation
requirements, methodology for documenting compliance with the performance standards
for vegetative growth, results from the field measurements of plant growth, and ongoing
site maintenance.
The Department of Fish and Game and the United States Army Corps of Engineers
require that the annual report be submitted on January of each year subsequent to the
initiation of the mitigation project. Since the planting was not completed until May of
1996, the first annual report documents seven, rather than twelve, months of plant
growth. According to the First Annual Monitoring Report, the one-year success criteria
for percent vegetative cover is thirty percent. The field measurements undertaken as part
of the First Animal Monitoring Report found that while "...the project has not yet reached
its twelfth month, the transect data shows that the first -year 30-percent cover standard has
been satisfied: native plant species cover 30.77 percent of the non -open water portions of
the project site."
)(0
Hoag Development Agreement
Mitigation Annual Review
July 8, 1997
n
Project -specific mitigation measures relate to individual 'projects processed under the
Master Plan. These measures may be applicable to only one specific project, or they may
be applicable to more than one project. Two projects were in process during the third
annual review period: the generator project and the upgraded flare project.
The generator project, which included an addition to the Hoag central plant to contain
emergency generators, did not have a separate mitigation monitoring plan prepared, due
to its narrow scope, although the Planning Department did require that several of the
mitigation measures in the adopted mitigation monitoring plan be addressed. These
mitigation measures were completed during the third annual review period.
The upgraded flare project was under review by the City, the California Coastal
Commission and le South Coast Air Quality Management District during the third
annual review period. Table 1, "Hoag Hospital Development Agreement Mitigation
Annual Review" identifies the mitigation measures that are applicable to the upgraded
flare project. This list of applicable mitigation measures does not include all of those
contained in the original flare project, only those that were determined by the Planning
Department to require additional review as part of the upgraded flare project. City staff is
currently reviewing documentation prepared to comply with the mitigation measures as
part of its plan review process.
ffiff.rITITne
As part of the Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted for the Hoag Master Plan by the
City of Newport Beach on June 13, 1994, several mitigation measures were required to be
implemented on anon -going basis and to be monitored for compliance on an annual
basis. These mitigation measures and a summary of the compliance with these measures
is provided below:
* Mitigation Measure #11 requires routine vacuuming of parking lots/structures.
All parking lots/structures are cleaned/swept by Hoag Hospital on a weekly basis.
* Mitigation Measure #15 requires that master plan development comply with the
Hospital's Hazardous Material and Waste Management Program and its Infectious
Control Manual. No amendments were required of the above -referenced
documents and no new protocols were adopted in order to respond to concerns
related to hUardous materials, waste management and infectious control as a result
of projects processed during the third annual review period.
* Mitigation Measure #28 requires adherence to South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) regulations that pertain to trip reductions. On
3
0
Hoag Development Agreement
Mitigation Annual Review
July 8, 1997
January 15, 1997, Hoag Hospital submitted its Triennial Employee Commute
Reduction Program to SCAQMD. This document specifies Hoag's
policies/programs that are designed to reduce vehicle trips.
* Mitigation Measure #31 requires adherence to measures that were a part of
Hoag's pilot program to monitor and manage use of the Upper and'Lower Cainpus
service roads during non -working hours. Since 1991, Hoag has been implementing
measures to reduce usage of West Hoag Road during non -working hours. These
measures include signage controls, annual letters to vendors defining when West
Hoag Road can be used, and an annual note in the Hoag Times, the newsletter for
Hoag Hospital employees. These measures were again implemented for the third
Development Agreement annual review period.
In order to monitor traffic volumes on West Hoag Road, Hoag has been taking
periodic traffic counts: Updated traffic counts were last taken in June 1995. Prior
to the implementation of the pilot program, traffic volumes (taken from 9:00 p.m.
to 5:00 a.m.) ranged from 124-159.trips (over a three-day period). Since the
implementation of the pilot program in 1991, traffic volumes have dramatically
reduced, with 1995 counts averaging 21 trips per day over a three-day period.
Traffic volumes will be taken again by Hoag Hospital when its next building is
developed, to ensure that the pilot program remains effective as the Lower Campus
is developed.
* Mitigation Measure #35 requires that Hoag provide new employees information
on rideshare services and programs. It also requires that new employees be
included in updates to the trip reduction plan (the Triennial Employee Commute
Reduction Program) for the SCAQMD. Hoag continues to provide all new
employees rideshare service/program information, and new employees were
included in the January 15, 1997, update to the Hoag Hospital Triennial Employee
Commute Reduction Program.
* Mitigation Measure #42 requires that the City of Newport Beach send a letter to
each emergency vehicle company serving Hoag requesting that they turn off their
sirens upon entering Hospital property in order to minimize noise impacts to
adjacent residents. Hoag is required to provide the City with a list of all emergency
vehicle companies serving Hoag Hospital. Table 2, Emergency Units Responding
to Hoag Hospital, provides a current list of those companies.
* MitigatiA Measure #84 requires that Hoag continue compliance with its
Hazardous Material and Waste Management Program and its Infectious Control
Manual. As stated under Mitigation Measure #15, above, Hoag continues to
comply with the above -referenced documents, as well as continues to comply with
4
J�,
Hoag Development Agreement
Mitigation Annual Review
July 8, 1997
all new regulations that have been adopted' since the .Hoag Master Plan Final
Environmental Impact Report was certified.
* Mitigation Measure #117 requires that the usage of the Hospital's
heliport/helipad be limited to emergency medical purposes or the transportation of
critically ill patients in immediate need of medical care not available at Hoag.
Further, this mitigation measure requires that, to the extent feasible, helicopters
shall arrive at, and depart from, the helipad from the northeast, to mitigate noise
impacts on adjacent residences. Hoag continues to comply with Mitigation
Measure #117. `
* Mitigation Measure #119 requires that non -vehicular activities, such as the
operation of the trash compactor, which occur in the vicinity of West Hoag Road
shall be operated only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., daily. Hoag
continues to comply with Mitigation Measure #119.
•TO #I .n. ,� u .i u-,
Some of the mitigation measures required as part of the mitigation monitoring program
for the Hoag Hospital Master Plari are specialized studies or clearances from the City and
other governmental agencies that may or may not be related to a specific building or
building site. Although these mitigation measures are required to be satisfied only once
to fulfill the requirements of mitigation monitoring program, some of the one-time
measures may be required to be implemented as part of a specific project(s). Further, the
documentation prepared to fulfill these one-time mitigation measures may be amended
from time to time, as warranted by project site conditions or proposed development
projects.
The majority of these one-time compliance mitigation measures were completed during
the first and second annual review periods. During the third annual review period, no
additional one-time mitigation measures were completed. Table 1, "Hoag Hospital
Development Agreement Mitigation Annual Review", identifies the status of all one-time
compliance mitigation measures.
f6
5
)q
Table 1
HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
MITIGATION ANNUAL REVIEW
July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997
�• ru. ,r - .o. .r - .n. .r - -
. COMPLHrE
•
E• uumpiE
16 CONOLFFE
17 CONTLETE
id CUMFLhTE
' CONTLETE
1 COMPLISFE
23 COMPLETE
51
Table 1, Continued
HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
MITIGATION ANNUAL REVIEW
July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997
31 X
37 X
1 COMPLETE
43 X X
48 X X
49 X X
51 COMPLETE
53 COMPLETE X
55 X X
56 COMPLETE
57 X
Ns
61 X X
1?1
r
Table 1, Continued
HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
MITIGATION ANNUAL REVIEW
July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997
62 COMPLETE
90 COMPLETE
91
as
Table 1, Continued
HOAG HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
MITIGATION ANNUAL REVIEW
July 1, 1996 to July 1, 1997
101 x
107 X X
113 COMPLETE
115 COMPLETE
123 COMPLETE
a3
Table 2*
EMERGENCY UNITS RESPONDING TO HOAG HOSPITAL
Newport Beach Fire Department
NM-2
475 32nd Street
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Newport Beach Fire Department
NM-3
868 Santa Barbara Avenue
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Costa Mesa Fire Department
MM81
2803 Royal Palm
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Costa Mesa Fire Department
MM 83
1865 Park Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
Costa Mesa Fire Department
MM 85
Civic Center Station
2450 Vanguard Way
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Costa Mesa Fire Department
MM 82
800 Baker Street
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
July 1, 1997
Santa Ana Fire Department
SAM-4
1427 South Broadway
Santa Ana, CA 92707
Huntington Ambulance Service
P.O. Box 145
Sunset Beach, CA 90742
Med Trans Ambulance Company
2131 Placentia Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
Schaefer Ambulance Company
2215 South Bristol
Santa Ana, CA 92704
Doctor's Ambulance Company
23095 Terra Drive
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Medix Ambulance Company
310 West 18th Street
Tustin, CA 92680
Careline Ambulance Company
P.O. Box 70014
Anaheim, CA 92825
Mercy Air Ambulance
P.O. Box 2532
Fontana, CA 92334-2532
* The emergency units provided in Table 2 frequent Hoag Hospital on a regular basis..
Additional emergency service units also serve Hoag Hospital on a less frequent basis.
01
Table 2, Continued
EMERGENCY UNITS RESPONDING TO HOAG HOSPITAL
Costa Mesa Fire Department
MM 84
2300 Placentia
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Orange County Fire Department
ORCO 1-4
2 California
Irvine, CA 92715_
Laguna Beach Fire Department
LM-2
285 Agate Street
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
July 1, 1997
Search and Rescue (SAR)
MCAS
El Toro Air Force Base
Santa Ana, CA 92709-5020
Newport Beach Police Department
P.O. Box 7000
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Costa Mesa Police Department
99 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
* The emergency units provided in Table 2 frequent Hoag Hospital on a regular basis.
Additional emergency service units also serve Hoag Hospital on a less frequent basis.
CIOSA AGREEMENT
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.6
Project Status Report
Review of the Development Agreement
between the City of Newport Beach and
The Irvine Company Involving the Proposed Circulation
Improvement and Open Space Agreement
I. Introduction
On September 14, 19\twee,
City Council adopted Ordinance No. 92-35 adopting
Development Agreemethrough which the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine
Company entered intirculation Improvement and Open Space Agreement
(CIOSA), which involve parcels owned by The Irvine Company within the City
of Newport Beach. Ofve, nine are within the coastal zone boundary. The nine
parcels are known Diego Creek South, San Diego Creek North,
Jamboree/MacArthur, ta ays, Bay View Landing, Newporter North, Newport
Knoll, Newporter ResCo rate Plaza West. Seven of the nine parcels are
adjacent to Upper New.
The CIOSA was authorized pursuant to C
15.45 of the Newport Beach Municipal Cc
No. 93-0479122 of the Official Records of
:rnment Code Section 65867 and Chapter
The agreement was recorded as Document
t�ge County, California.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 86, a development agreement is not
valid for a development project located in an area r which a local coastal program is
required to be prepared and certified unless the Comm' Sion approves such development
agreement by formal commission action. Since the D elopment Agreement involves
nine sites in the coastal zone, the City of Newport Be h and The Irvine Company
submitted the development agreement to the California C stal Commission for their
approval.
The Coastal Commission identified a number of issue areas whXh needed resolution
prior to approval. In an attempt to resolve these issues, The Irvine 0qnpany prepared an
addendum to the CIOSA development agreement in order to clarify th uthorities of the
City and Coastal Commission and resolve the concerns of the Coastal CoNnission.
On May 24, 199�', the City Council adopted Ordinance 93-8 amending the D elopment
Agreement and on June 10, 1993, the California Coastal Commission gave final proval
to the Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement (CIOSA). The ag%ement
was then executed and recorded. In December of 1993, the City Councilfoed
hoc committee to develop an implementation strategy for CIOSA. As a rle
1
W-
City of Newport Beach
City Cpuncii Minutes
October 28, 1996
dining is allowed. She said she doesn't really like the outdoor dining at all
T1 T nk,of this particular building because it impacts the setback and it
would be�"i Lter.,,lf it could be on the roof. The motion carried by the
following roll calrvble:-,
Ayes: O'Neil, Edwards, Deb, , X,,glover, Watt, Mayor Hedges
Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
31. CITY DEVELOPMENT
STATUS REPORT.
City Manager Murphy explained that this is a status report on Development
Agreements 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, which the City has entered into with various
parties. He said the development agreements are with The Irvine Company,
Library Exchange Agreement; Hoag Memorial Hospital; The Irvine
Company, Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement; Pacific
View Memorial Park; Ford Motor Land Development, and Pletcher Jones
Motor Cars. He further explained that as a provision of each of the
agreements, the Council is required to conduct an annual review on the
status of the agreements and conduct a public hearing.
Mayor Hedges questioned how long the document has been available to the
public and staff responded that it was made available on Wednesday prior to
the Council meeting and the parties involved had it for over a month. He
requested that in succeeding years the document be available to the public
earlier so that they can testify, if they so desire, and also so everyone has
enough time to look through it.
Council Member Watt, referring to CIOSA, said it was her understanding
that the open space parcels were to be dedicated when the development
permits were issued for the major properties (Castaways, Newporter North,
and Bay View Landing) and asked if the dedications have occurred.
City Attorney Burnham said there were three thresholds for dedication: 1)
the issuance of the first building permit on Castaways or Newporter North;
2) the completion of the residential development; and 3) that all of the
parcels would be developed as entitled. He explained that the open space
dedication chart is Exhibit E to the CIOSA report and summarized that Bay
View Landing and Newport Knoll were to be dedicated upon the effective
date of the agreement; Upper Castaways and Newporter North, and
Freeway Reservation North were to be dedicated upon the issuance of the
first building permits; San Diego Creek South, San Diego Creek North
(which is no longer a candidate), and Jamboree/MacArthur were to be
offered for dedication upon the issuance of the last building permit for all
projects contained in the agreement, although the company could waive that
condition; and Newport Village was to be dedicated upon the issuance of the
first building permits for both Upper Castaways and Newporter North.
Motion by Council Member Watt to direct staff to bring back a specific status
report on November 12, 1996 on CIOSA to clarify the actual dedications.
Mayor Hedges opened the item up for public discussion.
In response to Mayor Pro Tom Debay, Mr. Murphy stated that if Prop 218
passes it will not chang%?ese agreements.
Motion by Council Member Edwards to receive and file the reports. It was
clarified by Mr. Burnham that the motion makes the determination of good
Volume 50 - Page 337
I0l Y
TIC/Library 04
C-2823 (a)
Hoag N5 C-2912
TIC/Open Space
N6 CIOSA C-2920
Pao View #7
C-3058
Ford Motor #8
C-3059
Fletcher Jones
89 - 3067
(38)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
October 28, 1996
faith and substantial compliance with each agreement by the other party,
except as to Development Agreement No. 6, which was continued until
November 12. The motion cnrried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: O'Neil, Edwards, Debay, Cox, Glover, Watt, Mayor Hedges
Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
Maxine Cohen, 118 33rd Street, distributed photos and a letter addressed to
the City Council dated October 27, 1996 requesting that consideration be
given to changing the parking on 33rd Street on the Balboa Peninsula in the
100 block between Balboa Boulevard and Seashore Drive, from the south to
the north side of the street. She reviewed the reasons for her request as
outlined in her letter. She further explained that her concerns had been
passed on to staff who indicated that a poll of residents on the street would
be ri+quired in order to get a consensus.
Mayor' edges requested that Ms. Cohen's letter be given to the City
Manager d that this issue be referred to the Traffic Affairs Committee for
review and nsideration.
Rose Porvin, 4 Slat Street, voiced concerns about the Connery Village area
in conjunction w the 47 be
license. that have been granted and the
resulting devaluati of her property.
Council Member Edwa ds asked Council Member Watt how much money
was raised on the Bay to each event. She indicated that she had not heard,
however Mr. Murphy indic ad that he thought it was less than last year due
to the smaller turn -out..
A member of the public (name
stand against the Mermaid estt
32. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
thanked the Council for taking a
VACANCIES:
Motion by Mnvor Hedges to appoint Seymou eek as the Marine Industry
representative and John Blom as the Corona akl Mar representative. The
motion carried by the following roll call vote.
Ayes: O'Neil, Edwards, Debay, Cox, Glover, \.�
ayor Hedges
Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
CURRENTBUSRVESS
33. UNSCHEDULED VACANCY ON THE CITY ARTS
Motion by Mayor Hedges to accept the resignation of Ken Marshall a cove
October 16, 1996; appoint Mayor Pro Tem. Debay and Council Mem ra
Edwards and O'Neil to the Ad -Hoc Appointments Committee; and direct a
City Clerk to post and publish a Special Vacancy Notice requesting tha
applications be submitted by 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 13, 1996,
and schedule the submission of the nominations to the Council on November
Volume 50 - Page 338
EDC (24)
Arts (24)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
December 2, 1996
TO: Kevin Murphy, City Manager
Patricia Temple, Planning Dept.
Genia Garcia, Planning Dept.
Dennis Danner, Administrative Services
FROM: Robert H. Burnham, City Attorney
RE: Hoag Development Agreement.
Estoppel Certificate
I have filled in and signed the Estoppel Zertificates requested by Hoag Hospital
relative to the pending bond issue. A copy of VEstoppel Certificate is attached for your
files.
3ERT H. BURNHAM
Attorney
RHB:cl
encl.
F:\cat\cris\memo\bob\hoagcert.doc
` l - R� >. �....., :.fi1
��ry' _ t•i,
i` 1..1 h� ...
In LL��~
i �ha�'A�rr.�.a�•'i ..i �'
` - ��y.
�n i. ix.wJr�'ni4(� iH.
�.:1 w�,���i4+a'. �i
'.�.'.y...�
�.� {l iTS"IMR' �}�.
1ESTOPPEL. CERTIFICAT9 .
Date Requested:
Date of Certificate:
On February 14, 1994, the City of Newport Beach approved the "Development Agreement
Between the City of Newport Beach and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian" (the
"Development Agreement').
This Estoppel Certificate certifies that, as of the "Date of Certificate" set forth above:
CHECK WHERE APPLICABLE
tIlL 1. The Development Agreement adopted February 14, 1994, and Hoag
Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Planned Community Development Criteria
and District Regulations adopted May 26, 1992 remain binding and
effective;
2. The Development Agreement adopted February 14, 1994 and Hoag
Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Planned Community Development Criteria
/ and District Regulations adopted May 26, 1992 have not been amended;
y 3. The Development Agreement adopted February 14, 1994 and Hoag
Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Planned Community Development Criteria
and District Regulations adopted May 26, 1992 have been amended in the
following respects:
d �
4. Neither Hoag nor any of its successors are in default under the
Development Agreement adopted February 14, 1994 or the Hoag
Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Planned Community Development Criteria
and District Regulations adopted May 26, 1992;
5. The following defaults exist under the Development Agreement adopted
February 14, 1994 and/or Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Planned
Community Development Criteria and District Regulations adopted May
26, 1992:
vuau45732 1 1081122936.0001 11/20/96
by.,;Mptransferee of mortg� -in
This Estoppel Ceftificate;9q: VC - . _1 _. P - - -, ' Z - - ,Ybe relied upon n mortgagee interest
the property, any entit y,.mWcIhk'a,Ioan,'ore*ndink crpdiVt6,,Ho#g -MemoriaI Hospital
Piesbyterl;m, or any attorney
ley , of ; Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
IVA
PUBL:45732-11081122936.0001 2 11/20/96
L-1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach will hold a public
hearing on the application of Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian for amendments to
Development Agreement No. 5, on property located at 301 Newport Boulevard and 4000
West Coast Highway.
Request to amend the provisions of Development Agreement No. 5 to incorporate changes
to the text of the agreement requested by the Coastal Commission staff. The changes will
clearly define role of the Coastal Commission in the review and approval of projects on the
Hoag Hospital lower campus, as well as incorporating into the Development Agreement a
number of already established conditions of approval and mitigation measures.
NOTICE I5 HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that all significant environmental concerns for
the proposed project have been addressed in a previously certified environmental
document, and that the City of Newport Beach intends to use said document for the above
noted project, and further that there are no additional reasonable alternative or mitigation
measures that should be considered in conjunction with said project. Copies of the
previously prepared environmental document are available for public review and
inspection at the Planning Department, City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard,
Newport Beach, California, 92659-1768 (714) 644-3225.
Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing will be held on the 13thh day of
D cem er, 1993, at the hour of 7.00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach
City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place
any and all persons interested may appear and be heard thereon. If you challenge this
project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the
City at, or prior to, the public hearing. For information call (714) 644-3225.
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach
fi a
Villa Balboa Community
Joyce Taylor President
c/o Villageway Mgmt. Co
P.O. Box 4708
Irvine, CA 92716
Seawind Community Assn.
Sandra Letto, President
c/o Progrsssional Mgmt.
P.O. Box 19530
Irvine, CA 92713
Towers Association
c/6 Dr. J. P. Smith
3121 West Coast Hwy
Newport Beach, CA
Assn. * Versailles Homeowners Assn. 0 West Newport Beach Assoc.
Marilyn Tabor, President Dave Bent, President
102 Scholz Plaza, Ph. 32 4904 Seashore Dr.
Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663
Seawind Newport Comm. Assn.
John Chiarenza, President
c/o Villageway Mgmt. Co.
P.O. Box 4708
Irvine, CA 92716
Lido Park Assn.
Leo Vortouni, President
#6C 4308 Patrice Road
92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663
Balboa Coves Community Assn
Barbara Garber, Presdient
25 Balboa Coves
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Newport Towers H.O. Assn.
Harry Cossman, President
c/o Villageway Mgmt. Co.
P.O. Box 4708
Irvine, CA 92716
Newport Crest Homeowners Assn
Tony Buttacavoli, Vice Pres.
c/o Villageway Mgmt. Co.
P.O. Box 4708
Irvine, CA 92716
Lido Sands Community Assn.
Hope Durio, President
P.O. Box 1373
Newport Beach, CA 92663
HOAG HOSPITAL
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.5
Project Status Report
Annual Review of the Development Agreement
by and between
The City of Newport Beach
and Hoag Memorial Hospital
I. Introduction
On May 11, 1992, the City of Newport Beach certified Final Environmental Impact
Report No. 142 for the Hoag Hospital Master Plan and adopted a Planned Community
Development Plan and District Regulations for Hoag Hospital.
On May 26, 1992, the City of Newport Beach approved Development Agreement No. 5
between the City and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian. It was recorded in the
Recorder's office in the County of Orange on August 4, 1993.
On February 14, 1994, the Development Agreement was amended by the City Council to
incorporate revisions requested by the staff of the California Coastal Commission. The
revised Development Agreement was recorded on March 23, 1994. The California
Coastal Commission approved the revised Development Agreement on April 14, 1994,
and amended the Coastal Development Permit on July 21, 1995.
Il. Purpose
The purpose of Development Agreement No. 5 is to enable Hoag Hospital to develop the
hospital property consistent with a Master Plan and Planned Community Development
Plan and within the approvals set forth by the Coastal Development Permit issued by the
California Coastal Commission. The future development of the Hoag Hospital property
will allow the hospital to offer additional and needed services for the community by
responding to the ever changing health and medical care technologies and delivery
systems. The Development Agreement spells out strict, binding limits on the amount and
height of permitted development and insures compliance with conditions related to
density, location, and timing of construction to minimize, to the extent feasible, any
environmental impacts of the proposed expansion.
The Development Agreement includes requirements for dedication of property,
construction of �ublic improvements and/or the installation of landscaping visible to the
public, which, when considered in conjunction with the public services provided by
Hoag, benefit the general public.
8
s
Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 15.45 of the Municipal Code and Section 5 of the
Development Agreement, Hoag Memorial Hospital or its successor(s) in interest is to
submit an annual report for review by the City Council demonstrating good faith
substantial compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The attached project status
report is for the year April 15, 1995 to October 1, 1996.
The annual review includes a review of the following: Development Agreement
obligations and Environmental Document Mitigation Measures.
For this review period, the conditions and mitigation measures that are required per the
Development Agreement are listed below with an explanation as to how the requirements
were or are being met.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.5
3.2. Compliance with Master Plan Conditions/Mitigation Measures:
See attached table.
8. Public Benefits/Exactions:
8.2 Exactions: Hoag shall, as a condition to the right to develop, do the
following:
(a) Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate and Grade the Proposed Linear and
Consolidated View Park. The Offer to Dedicate has been made
and recorded. The two parks are part of the approved grading
plan for the lower campus parking lot, which is under
construction.
(b) Public Improvement Funds ($250,000.00). Hoag Hospital is to pay
the amount to the City to fund the following improvements:
(i) The construction of a sidewalk and installation of landscaping
in the CalTrans right-of-way along the west side of Newport
Boulevard southerly of Hospital Road., and, if funds remain,
(ii) The construction of facilities necessary to bring reclaimed
water to West Newport and/or the Property.
This amount has been paid to the City by Hoag Hospital
during the second annual review period. See attached
documentation
�(E) Study of possible future improvement in and around the easterly
end of Semeniuk Slough. City staff and the P.B.&R Commission
studied the use of this area and no improvements were found
to be feasible.
E
Mitigation Measure No.42
This measure requires that the City of Newport Beach send a letter to each emergency
vehicle company serving Hoag requesting that they turn off their sirens upon entering
hospital property in order to minimize the noise impacts to adjacent residents. Hoag has
provided the City with a list of emergency vehicle companies, and letters are being
sent by staff to the listed companies.
qd
10
/!GJC/Gk f re (r."' e6'I I'.
IketOV"e -cgcy've3 fib ee-ra
Prior to issuanc
submit, for the
landscaping plan
01P
e of the coastal development permit,
review and approval of the Executive
s for erosion control for each phase
siaj/9f
rV
Page _5 of _5
Application No. 5-93-253
the applicant shalt
Director, temporary
of grading.
' 12. Prior to issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall
(YS'N�4J submit, for the review and approval of the Executive Director, landscaping
plans which provide for the City of Newport Beach required setback area
adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway to be landscaped. The landscape plan shall
include vertical elements -which, at maturity, will soften and enhance the
facades of the future buildings to be constructed on the site. Drought
tolerant plant species shall be used to the extent feasible. The landscaping
shall be installed at the earliest possible time upon completion of grading
activity within the setback area.
13. Prior to issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall
submit, for the review and approval of the Executive Director, a construction
phasing and traffic control plan for each phase of the grading, approved by
the City traffic engineer. At a minimum the plan shall include limitations
on truck hauling traffic during summer weekends (from Memorial Day Weekend to
Labor Day Weekend).
b11
1743F
0 0 Exhibit C
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
PLANNED COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
AND
DISTRICT REGULATIONS
1991
Recommended for Approval
by the Planning Commission
February 20, 1992
Adopted by the City Council
City of Newport Beach
Ordinance No. 92-3
May 26, 1992
I1 1
landscaping and all other areas not devoted to building footprints or vehicular parking
and drive surfaces.
Mean_ Sea_Tevel: a reference or datum mark measuring land elevation using the
average level of the ocean between high and low tides.
Q=atient Uses: hospital patient services which do not require overnight stay.
Residential_ Care: medically -oriented residential units that do not require the acuity
level generally associated with inpatient services but require overnight stays.
Site Area for the purpose of determining development area
1. Gross - parcel area prior to dedications.
2. Net - parcel area after dedications.
Special_ Landscaped d Street: West Coast Highway is designated as a special landscaped
street, containing special landscape requirements.
Streets: reference to all streets or rights -of -way within this ordinance shall mean
dedicated vehicular rights -of -way.
May 26, IM 5
17
I
I
I
0
The setback on West Coast Highway easterly of the hospital entry signal
-� shall be 15 feet.
In addition, vertical articulation shall be required for buildings easterly of
the signal within 150 feet of the West Coast Highway frontage, as follows:
1st Floor: Up to 18 feet in height no additional articulation is required.
If the 1st floor exceeds 18 feet in height, it shall be subject to the
articulation requirements of the 2nd Floor.
2nd Floor (up to 3Z in height): A minimum of 20% of the building
frontage shall be articulated in such a manner as to result in an average
2nd floor setback of 20 feet.
3rd Floor and above: A minimum of 20% of the building frontage shall
be articulated in such a manner as to result in an average 3rd floor and
above setback of 25 feet.
The setback on West Coast Highway westerly of the hospital entry signal
shall be 45 feet.
In addition, vertical articulation shall be required for'buildings westerly of
the signal for buildings within 150 feet of the West Coast Highway
frontage, as follows:
1st Floor: Up to 18 feet in height no additional articulation is required.
If the 1st floor exceeds 18 feet in height, it shall be subject to the
articulation requirements of the 2nd Floor.
2nd Floor (up to 32' in height): A minimum of 20% of the building
frontage shall be articulated in such a manner as to result in an average
2nd floor setback of 55 feet.
3rd Floor and above: A minimum of 20% of the building frontage shall
be articulated in such a manner as to result in an average 3rd floor and
above setback of 65 feet.
In order to avoid any future structures in this area (within 150 feet of
West Coast Highway) from presenting an unacceptable linear mass, no
single structure shall be greater than 250 linear feet in width. Additional-
ly, 209o' of the linear frontage within 150 feet of West Coast Highway shall
be open and unoccupied by buildings.
MAY A im 16
'26
• . •
10% of the linear length of height zones A and B as viewed from the
existing bicycle/pedestrian trail, exclusive of that area adjacent to the
consolidated portion of the view park, shall be maintained as view
corridors between buildings.
These requirements may be altered for individual buildings, if requested
by the hospital, through the site plan review process defined in Section IX.
3. There will be no building setbacks along the boundary with CalTrans east
property at Superior Avenue and West Coast Highway.
4. A 20 foot setback from property line shall be provided along Newport
Boulevard from Hospital Road to a point 600 feet south; a 25 foot setback
from property line shall be provided along the remainder of Newport
Boulevard and along the Newport Boulevard/West Coast Highway
Interchange.
S. A ten (10) foot building setback from the property line shall be provided
along Hospital Road.
E. Liahtin
The lighting systems shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal
the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses.
The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed Electrical Engineer.
F. Roof Treatment
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project sponsor shall submit plans which
illustrate that major mechanical equipment will not be located on the roof of any
structure on the Lower Campus. Rather, such buildings will have clean rooftops. Minor
rooftop equipment necessary for operating purposes will comply with all building height
criteria, and shall be concealed and screened to blend into the building roof using
materials compatible with roofing materials.
G. 51gm
All signs shall be as specified under the Hoag Hospital Sign Program, Part VI.
H. Parkin
¢
All parking shall be as specified in Part VII, Hoag Hospital Parking Regulations.
r
0
VIII. HOAG HOSPITAL LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS
A. General
1. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans, prepared by a registered Architect
or under the direction of a Landscape Architect, shall be reviewed by the
Planning and Parks, Beaches and Recreation Departments and approved
by the Public Work Departments prior to issuance of a building permit
and installed prior to issuance of Certificate of Use and Occupancy. The
Landscape Plan may include a concept for the roofs and the parking
structures. Trees shall not be used, but a planter box or trellis system
shall be designed to provide visual relief of parking structures. All
landscaping shall conform to the building height limits established in this
text.
2. Parking lot trees shall be no less than fifteen (15) gallon size.
I Shrubs to be planted in containers shall not be less than one (1) gallon
size. Ground covers will be planted from (1) gallon containers or from
root cuttings.
4. Every effort should be made to avoid using plants with invasive and
shallow root systems.
5. Earth berms shall be rounded and natural in character, designed to
obscure automobiles and to add interest to the site. Wheel stops shall be
so placed that damage to trees, irrigation units and shrubs is avoided.
6. Trees in parking lots should be limited in variety. Selection should be
repeated to give continuity. Regular spacing is not required and irregular
groupings may add interest. Care should be exercised to allow plants to
grow and maintain their ultimate size without restriction.
7. Heavy emphasis shall be placed on the use of drought -resistant native and
naturalized vegetation and the use of an irrigation system designed to
avoid surface runoff and over -watering.
B. Maintenance
I. All planting areas are to be kept free of weeds and debris.
2. Lawn and ground covers are to be kept trimmed and/or mowed regularly.
IMAY 26, IM
. 24
36
3. All plantings are to be kept in a healthy and growing condition. Fertiliza-
tion, cultivation and tree pruning are to be carried out as part of regular
maintenance.
4. Irrigation systems are to be kept in working condition. Adjustment .Ind
cleaning of system should be part of regular maintenance.
5. Stakes, guys and ties on trees should be checked regularly for correct
function; ties to be adjusted to avoid creating abrasions or girdling to the
stems.
6. Damage to plantings created by vandalism, automobile or acts of nature
)
shall be corrected within thirty ( days.
C ,�pPriai Landscaoe treet
West Coast Highway is designated in the Hoag Hospital Planned Community as a special
landscaped street. A 15' building setback from right-of-way / property line is required
along West Coast Highway. only driveways, parking and signage are allowed in the
setback area. Parking areas shall be screened from view of West Coast Highway with
landscaped berms.
Landscaping along West Coast Highway shall consist of trees, ground cover and
shrubbery. All unpaved areas not utilized for parking or circulation shall be landscaped
in a similar manner. Tree size to be no less than twenty-four (24) inch box.
D. Villa Balboa Landscanen Zone
The area between the Villa Balboa/Hoag property line and the loading dock service
access road shall be landscaped except
t for landscapingydriveway,
vea, will bewalkway,
to r other ha buffer
elements in said area The pure
residential units from hospital activities.
E. j;'arline Areas I
A minimum of 5% of the surface parking areas shall be devoted to planting areas.
Planting areas around building shall not be included in parking area Planting of trees
essarily be in regular spacing. Alternative landscape
may be in groups and need not nec
perimeter parking area landscaping, est to and
programs may be developed, including
depressing of parking areas. Alternative landscape programs shall be subject to the
review of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department and the approval of the
Planning and Public Works Departments.
M+y A tugs 25
37�
• EXHIBIT C 0
HOAG HOSPITAL MASTER PLAN PROJECT
AMENDMENT NO.744
MITIGATION MEASURES
AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MITIGATION MEASURE SUMMARY
1. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall document to
the City of Newport Beach Building Department that grading and development of
the site shall be conducted in accordance with the City of Newport Beach Grading
Ordinance and with plans prepared by a registered civil engineer. These plans
shall incorporate the recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering
geologist, subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic
Investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as
Built" grading plans shall be furnished to the Building Department by the Project
Sponsor.
2. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall submit
documentation to the City of Newport Beach Building Department confirming that
all cut slopes shall be monitored for potential instabilities by the project
geotechnical engineer during all site grading and construction activities and
strictly monitor the slopes in accordance with the documentation.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall provide to
the City of Newport Beach a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation and
report of the site prepared by a registered grading engineer and/or engineering
geologist. This report shall also identify construction excavation techniques
which ensure no damage and minimize disturbance to adjacent residents. This
report shall determine if there are any faults on site which could render all or a
portion of the property unsafe for construction. All recommendations contained
in this investigation and report shall be incorporated into project construction
and design plans. This report shall be submitted to the City for review and
approval.
Prior to the completion of the final design phase, the Project Sponsor shall
demonstrate to the City of Newport Beach Building Department that all facilities
will be designed and constructed to the seismic standards applicable to hospital
related structures and as specified in the then current City adopted version of the
Uniform Building Code.
5. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits for each phase of
development, the Building Department shall ensure that geotechnicai
recommendations included in "Report of Geotechnical Evaluation for Preparation
of Master Plan and Environmental Impact Report, Hoag Memorial Hospital
Presbyterian Campus, 301 Newport Boulevard, Newport, California" as
prepared by LeRoy Crandall Associates, June, 1989, and in the report prepared'
pursuant to Mitigation Measure 3, are followed.
6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall conduct a
soil corrosivity evaluation. This evaluation shall be conducted by an expert in
the field of corrosivity. The site evaluation shall be designed to address soils to at
least the depth to which excavation is planned. At a minimum, at least one sample
from each soil type should be evaluated. Appropriate personnel protection shall
be worn by field personnel during the field evaluation. In the event soils are
found to be corrosive, the source and extent of the corrosive soils shall be
determined, and all buildings and infrastructure shall be designed to control the
potential impact of corrosive soils over time.
7. Based on the corrosion assessment and source determination, a soils and
construction material compatibility evaluation shall also be undertaken,
concluding with the appropriate mitigation measures and design criteria.
Corrosion resistant construction materials are commonly available and shall be
used where the evaluation/assessment concludes that corrosive soils conditions
could adversely impact normal construction materials or the materials used for
the mitigation of subsurface gas conditions. For example, there are many
elastomers and plastics, like PVC, which are resistant to corrosion by up to 70
percent sulfuric acid at 140 degrees Fahrenheit.
8. Should the soil be identified as hazardous due to the severeness of their
corrosivity (i.e., a pH less than 2.5), on -site remediation by neutralization
shall be undertaken prior to construction. Appropriate regulatory agency
approvals and permits shall also be obtained.
Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Project Sponsor shall ensure that a
construction erosion control plan is submitted to and approved by the City of
Newport Beach that is consistent with the City of Newport Beach Grading
Ordinance and includes procedures to minimize potential impacts of silt, debris,
dust and other water pollutants. These procedures may include:
• the replanting of exposed slopes within 30 days after grading or as
required by the City Engineer.
• the use of sandbags to slow the velocity of or divert stormflows.
• the limiting of grading to the non -rainy season.
The Project Sponsor shall strictly adhere to the approved construction erosion
control plan and compliance shall be monitored on an on -going basis by the
Newport Beach Building Department.
10. Prior to the issuance of grading permits the Project Sponsor shall submit a
landscape plan which includes a maintenance program to control the use of
fertilizers and pesticides, and an irrigation system designed to minimize surface
runoff and overwatering. This plan shall be reviewed by the Department of
Parks, Beaches and Recreation and approved by the City of Newport Beach
Planning Department. The Project Sponsor shall install landscaping in strict
compliance with the approved plan.
11. The Project Sponsor shall continue the current practice of routine vacuuming of
all existing parking lots and structures and shall also routinely vacuum all
future parking lots and structures at current frequencies. Upon implementation
of the County of Orange Storm Water'Master Plan, routine vacuuming shall be
done in accordance with the requirements specified in the plan.
12. Upon completion of final building construction plans, and prior to the issuance of
a grading permit for each phase of development, the Project Sponsor shall ensure
that site hydrological analyses are conducted to verify that existing drainage
facilities are adequate. The applicant shall submit a report to the City of Newport
Page 2
r
4) Information of transportation alternatives shall be provided to all
employees.
5) A rideshare vehicle loading area shall be designated in the parking area.
6) The design of all parking facilities shall incorporate provisions for access
and parking of vanpool vehicles.
or
ts located
7) arterials wherepublictransit exists or requireds shall be isfantic anticipated along
Bus stop exist within five
years.
The exact number of each of the above facilities within each phase of the Master
Plan shall be determined by the City during review of grading and bulidirig
permit applications for each phase. The types and numbers of facilities required
of each phase will reflect the content of the Ordinance at the time that a permit
application is deemed complete by the Planning Department.
39. If noise levels in on -site outdoor noise sensitive use areas exceed 65 CNEL, the
Project Sponsor shall develop measures that will attenuate the noise to
acceptable levels for proposed hospital facilities. Mitigation through the design
and construction of a noise barrier (wall, berm, or combination wall/berm) is
the most common way of alleviating traffic noise impacts.
40. Prior to occupancy of Master Plan facilities, interior noise levels shall be
monitored to ensure that on -site interior noise levels are below 45 CNEL. If
levels exceed 45 CNEL, mitigation such as window modifications shall be
Implemented to reduce noise to acceptable levels.
41. Prior to issuance of a grading and or building permit the Project Sponsor shall
demonstrate to the City that existing noise levels associated with the on -site
exhaust fan are mitigated to acceptable levels. Similarly, the Project Sponsor
shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Building Department that all noise
levels generated by new mechanical equipment associated with the Master Plan
are mitigated in accordance with applicable standards.
42. The City of Newport Beach shall send a letter to each emergency vehicle company
that delivers patients to Hoag Hospital requesting that, upon entrance to either
the Upper or Lower Campus, emergency vehicles turn off their sirens to help
minimize noise impacts to adjacent residents. Hoag Hospital will provide the City
with a list of all emergency vehicle companies that deliver patients to Hoag
Hospital.
43. Prior to issuance of grading and building permits, the Project Sponsor shall
ensure that a landscape and irrigation plan is prepared for each
building/improvement within the overall Master Plan. this plan shall be
prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate
and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule.
The plan shall be subject to review by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Department and approval by the Planning Department and Public Works
Department.
44. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Project Sponsor shall submit plans
to, and obtain the approval of plans from, the City Planning Department which
Page 8
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BLVD. - BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658-6100
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 17, 1994
To: Distribution
From: Leif Thompsonf7�
Vice President
Facilities Design & Construction
Reference: Hoag Project 1250.16 - Hoag Master Plan
Subject: Landscape Conditions to Fulfill Coastal Permit
Date: Thursday, May 26, 1994
Time: 2:00, p.m.
Place: City Hall, City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Attendees: Pete Foulke, Senior Vice President, Hoag Hospital
Genia Garcia, Associate Planner, City of Newport Beach
Steve Kellogg, Peridian
Peri Muretta, Consultant
Patricia Temple, Advanced Planning, City of Newport Beach
Leif Thompson, FD&C, Hoag Hospital
PF: bw
File: 1250.16-36.30-5/26 Agenda
IP,LANNwa At#, Ak; MENT
CITY OF 11� 1,YPORT BEACH
AM mgy f PM
U
11
11
II
U
II
II
II
II
47/�
GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES
Regulatory Services
CONCEPTUAL MITIGATION PLAN
FOR IMPACTS TO AREAS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF
THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT
MCI
THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 30233(a) OF THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT
AND
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 62 SECTION 1603 OF THE
CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME CODE
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN MASTER PLAN
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
April 23,1994
Prepared for:
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
301 Newport Boulevard, Box Y
Newport Beach, California 92658-8912
(714) 760-5908
Contact: Peter Foulke
Prepared by:
Glenn Lukas Associates
Contact: Greg Prettyman
23441 South Pointe Drive Suite 150 Laguna Hills, California 92653
Telephone: (714) 837-0404 Facsimile: (714) 837-5834
INTRODUCTION
This report describes the habitat restoration plan Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (Hoag
Hospital) proposes to implement within the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve as mitigation for
unavoidable impacts to habitat at their property in Newport Beach. This report is intended to
provide information sufficient for the following agency actions: 1) Authorization from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) for use of Nationwide Permit (NWP) 26 pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act; 2) Issuance of a Coastal Development Permit by the California Coastal Commission
pursuant to Section 30233(a) of the California Coastal Act; 3) Water Quality Certification by the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act;
and 4) Issuance of a Streambed Alteration Agreement by the California Department of Fish and
Game (CDFG) pursuant to Chapter 6, Section 1603 of the California Fish and Game Code, if
required
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Location
The project site is located in the southwest section of the City of Newport Beach, Orange County
(Exhibit 1). The Pacific Ocean is approximately one -quarter mile to the southwest, Upper Newport
Bay is approximately 2 miles to the east, and the mouth of the Santa Ana River is approximately 1-1/2
miles to the west (Exhibit 2). Hoag Hospital is roughly situated on the northwest corner of the
intersection of Pacific Coast Highway (Highway 1) and Newport Boulevard.
Hoag Hospital is composed of an Upper and Lower Campus (Exhibit 3). The Lower Campus is the
location of habitat which is subject to unavoidable impacts described in the Hoag Hospital Master
Plan. The Lower Campus is bounded by Pacific Coast Highway to the south, Superior Avenue to
the west, Newport Boulevard to the east, and residential development to the north.
Brief Sum arm of Overall Project
The project is a Master Plan Development program for Hoag Hospital. The Master Plan provides
the framework for future physical campus growth and/or change on a broad and conceptual scale.
Development of the Master Plan will occur over a period of approximately 20 years, and will be
regulated by a Planned Community Development Plan (PCDP) and District (City of Newport Beach)
Regulations. The Master Plan, PCDP and District Regulations will provide guidelines for
development, for expansion of medical programs and for services to the community. These actions
are designed to accomplish long-term objectives of facility growth while providing flexibility for
development as the demand for medical services and programs change.
According to the Master Plan Development program, build out of the Upper and Lower Campus
facilities will be implemented in phases. Anticipated development for Phase I includes construction
of: 140,000 square feet of outpatient service facilities; 115,000 square feet of inpatient service
facilities; 55,000 square feet of support service facilities; 30,000 square feet of administrative facilities
on the Lower Campus and a combination of outpatient and inpatient services totalling 140,000 square
feet for the Upper Campus. The Master Plan Development program for Phase lI and Phase III build
out of the Upper and Lower Campuses include approximately 450,000 square feet of residential care,
medical/support offices, inpatient and outpatient care facilities and sundry ancillary structures. New
Page 1
[1
square footage prescribed as a part of the Master Plan totals approximately 790,438 square feet for
both the Upper and Lower Campuses, bringing the Hospital Campus total to 1,343,238 square feet.
Project Impacts
The action requiring mitigation is the proposed filling of a 1.52-acre cattail marsh as part of
1 development of the Lower Campus. Within the approximate 20-acre Lower Campus is an existing
1.52-acre freshwater marsh. This marsh will be completely and permanently impacted by the
development of the Lower Campus as described in the Master Plan.
' Existing Conditions
This isolated 1.52-acre wetland is adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway and was formed following
excavation of the bluffs originally occupying the site (see Exhibit 2). Following analysis of aerial
photographs dated 1967 and 1977, LSA Associates' (LSA) biologists concluded that the wetland plant
communities that presently occur on the site have come into existence only within the past 25 years 1
' The excavated area currently receives seepage which issues from the lower cut slope and its foot, in
quantities sufficient to support wetland vegetation consisting primarily of cattails (7�pha domingensis)
and fleabane (Pluchea odorata). This isolated wetland is neither part of a natural drainage nor a
wildlife corridor, and receives a great deal of traffic -generated noise from the abutting Pacific Coast
' Highway. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle Newport, California (dated
1965 and photorevised in 1981) indicates no "blue -line" drainages or wetlands on the site.
t No Federally -listed threatened or endangered plants or animals occur on or in the wetland, the
adjacent vegetation or within the general vicinity of the site according to both the California Natural
Diversity Database and LSA biologists who performed on -site surveys for such species.
MITIGATION PLAN
Goals and Objectives
The goal of this mitigation plan is to compensate for impacts to the 1.52-acre cattail marsh on Hoag
' Hospital property through the restoration of 6.08 acres of freshwater marsh within the San Joaquin
Freshwater Marsh Reserve (Reserve)(Exhibit 4). The restored freshwater marsh at the Reserve is
intended to offer natural functions similar to that of local examples of established freshwater marsh.
' The proximity of the mitigation site to an existing natural habitat is expected to further enhance the
value of this mitigation project. To achieve the project goal it is the plan's objective to implement
programs for site grading and preparation, seeding and planting, exotic species control, water
' management, and biological monitoring.
Project Coordination and Development
The Reserve is owned and operated by the University of California Natural Reserve System
' (UCNRS). The UCNRS fully supports this mitigation project, and University staff has been
consulted regarding all aspects of project design. Furthermore, the University considers Hoag
Hospital's involvement to be a fortuitous source of funding for Reserve enhancement and also
' considers the University -Private Interest relationship to be a possible precedent setting endeavor; a
' 1LSA Associates, Inc. "Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 142 for Hoag Hospital Master
Plan, Volume I". Prepared for the City of Newport Beach, Planning Department. page 4-24.
' Page 2
II
relationship likely to be repeated as other private interests become needy of mitigation opportunities.
Letters from University staff expressing support for this project are included as Appendix A.
The conceptual mitigation plan is designed to conform to the guidelines of the "San Joaquin
Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan" (Enhancement Plan) of 1991 - a comprehensive plan for the
enhancement and future management of the San Joaquin Marsh? The Enhancement Plan
synthesizes extensive background information into a "Refined Enhancement Plan" which represents
the most feasible alternative for marsh enhancement in terms of existing conditions and available
water supply (Exhibit 5). The conceptual mitigation plan was developed using the Refined
Enhancement Plan as a model, and Enhancement Plan coauthor, Michael Josselyn of Wetland
Research Associates, Inc. was consulted to ensure mitigation plan compliance with the guidelines
described in the Enhancement Plan.
The proposed 6.08-acre mitigation site is higher in elevation than most areas in the marsh and,
consequently, was selected as the preferred mitigation site because it is considered least likely to
transform to wetland naturally. (Nearby, lower elevations support extensive stands of Schpus sp. and
Typha sp.). Review of aerial photographs dating back to 1928 clearly illustrate the changing uses of
the San Joaquin Marsh as it evolved from a natural system into a collection of seasonal ponds
managed by local duck hunting enthusiasts. Those past management practices together with the
construction of the San Diego Creek levee in 1968 have removed the entire San Joaquin Marsh from
the natural cycles of inundation and flushing that typically rejuvenate an adjacent marsh. The
mitigation design that follows proposes to reintroduce a managed version of these natural processes
into a portion of the marsh currently supporting only a scattering of wetland species that are
abundant in the wetter portions of the marsh.
The Refined Enhancement Plan proposes to convert all but four of the existing seasonal ponds west
of Campus Drive to freshwater marsh. The creation of this freshwater marsh will involve the
dredging of channels or sloughs to create additional open water habitat. The site that Hoag Hospital
is proposing to enhance is a 6.08-acre portion of the Reserve comprised of 4.92 acres of seasonal
pond and 1.16 acres of upland/levees (Exhibit 6).
Mitination Site Existing Conditions
The proposed 6.08-acre site has a flat bed with elevation ranging from 6.1 feet in its western end to
10.0 feet at its eastern end near San Diego Creek. This portion of the Reserve is generally higher
in elevation than those areas to the west, furthest from San Diego Creek. The soil mapped for this
site is Omni clay which is ideal for freshwater marsh habitat given its ability to perch surface water.
The higher elevation of the mitigation site as compared to nearby cattail -dominated sections of the
Reserve has evidently aided in the establishment of a small stand of tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis).
Tamarisk is a small, non-native tree that prefers alkaline soils, is salt -tolerant, depends on
groundwater for its water supply, and holds little habitat value for native animals. The western edge
of the site is supporting the densest stand of Tamarisk, and it is noted that dense stands of Tamarisk
2Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd., Wetland Research Associates, Inc. and Hyden Associates,
Inc. 1991. "San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan". Prepared for the City of Irvine, the
California State Coastal Conservancy, and the University of California Natural Reserve System. 92pp.
Page 3
1
will grow only where groundwater is between 1.5 and 6 in from the surface? Tamarisk's relationship
to groundwater suggests that available water in this site is typically too far from the surface to allow
establishment of a prevalence of native plant species typically found in coastal southern California
freshwater wetlands, and most particularly, within the wetlands of the Reserve (i.e., cattails [7)pha
sp.] and bulrush [Scirpus sp.]). This evidence supports the choice of this particular site within the
Reserve as unlikely to transform to a cattail marsh under natural conditions. The other vegetation
within the site includes mulefat (Baccharis salicifolia), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), one
large black willow (Salix gooddingit) and several black willow saplings. The slightly higher elevation
portion of the mitigation site is currently supporting artichoke thistle (Cynara cardunculus) and
scattered mulefat and saltbush (Atriplex canescens) (Exhibit 7).
The levees which surround most of the proposed mitigation site are approximately 2 feet higher than
the lowest elevations and are dominated by artichoke thistle and poison -hemlock. Arroyo and black
willows (Salix lasiolepis and gooddingii) are found nearby lining the opposite side of the levee to the
immediate west. The levees surrounding this and the other seasonal ponds within the Reserve
effectively isolate the ponds from surface flows. However, the seasonal ponds do become inundated
occasionally, either from direct precipitation or when seasonally elevated groundwater levels are
sufficient to surpass the bottom elevations of the ponds.
General Design Considerations
The proposed 6.08-acre marsh enhancement will be a portion of the larger freshwater marsh planned
for the southern end of the Reserve. The mitigation design roughly incorporates the Enhancement
Plan's ratio of 40% open water to 60% emergent marsh and utilizes existing levees to define the
limits of the mitigation site. These levees will be removed later when resources become available for
further expansion of the freshwater marsh. The ultimate removal or breaching of these levees will
not impair the function of this mitigation site since future marsh enhancements will be designed with
consideration of previous marsh enhancement efforts.
Project Management
The University will reserve the right to assume management of the project installation, maintenance,
and monitoring. In addition to faculty and staff who are qualified to carry out such functions, the
University may also utilize qualified students interested in taking on many of the tasks necessary to
maintain and monitor the mitigation site. The Marsh Steward (manager of the Reserve appointed
by the University) will be responsible for organizing maintenance crews and monitoring visits, as well
as for the general supervision of the site. Designated representatives of Hoag Hospital will be
available to assume any of the roles described above that the University is unable or unwilling to fill.
The monitoring data collected will be transferred to Hoag Hospital, or its designated representative,
who will organize the data into the annual reports required by the Corps, CDFG, and the Coastal
Commission (see "Monitoring", page 8).
3Kerpez, Theodore A. and Norman S. Smith. 1987. "Saltcedar Control for Wildlife Habitat
Improvement in the Southwestern United States". U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource
Publication #169. 16 pp.
Page 4
1
II
II
Fundine
Hoag Hospital will bear the cost of grading, site preparation, planting, installing water lines, and any
other costs associated with project start-up. Following completion of the installation, any expenses
necessary for site reconstruction, replanting or other effort to aid in project success will be
coordinated with and will be the financial responsibility of Hoag Hospital. These costs are not
included in the endowment fund described later under "Habitat Maintenance Program".
Implementation Plan
Site Preparation and Grading: Before grading begins, eradication of the tamarisk must be
accomplished through complete removal of all existing root crowns. Chemical herbicides will not be
required since roots or pieces of roots of tamarisk do not sprout or develop into new plants; however,
severed stems and shoots do readily root in moist soil so much care will be necessary in the removal
of all parts of the plant from the Reserve. Tamarisk seed readily germinates on saturated soils and
can remain viable for several weeks following separation from the parent plant; however, the
seedlings grow slowly and are unable to survive submergence for more than several weeks. For this
reason, the proposed flooding of the mitigation site is expected to deter further tamarisk
establishment. Future invasion of tamarisk by seed is not expected to be a major management
challenge since no other tamarisk infestations (sources of seed) are currently found within the
Reserve.
The most important feature of the enhancement plan will be the grading of the site to create the
open water portion. (See conceptual grading and planting plan, Exhibit 8) This excavation will be
made to a depth of 4-5 feet below the normal waterline for the marsh during the spring months
This depth will ensure that cattails do not colonize the areas of the site intended to be permanent
open water. The surface elevation of the other portions of the mitigation site will be lowered one
to three feet, depending on their existing elevations.
Planting Plan: Existing Typha-Scirpus marsh within the Reserve provides the basic model for the
planting design within the mitigation site (Exhibit 8). While it is expected that the desired species
will naturally colonize the site, some seeding and transplanting of rhizomes will be done to encourage
desired species ratios, accelerate the establishment process, and deter the establishment of weed
species. Due to the invasive nature of the common cattail (Typha latifolia) and the greater habitat
value of the Scirpus species found at the Reserve, the initial planting of emergent vegetation will
include primarily Scirpus species while the cattails will be allowed to self establish. Past experience
at the Reserve has suggested that once a stand of Scirpus has become established it is fairly resistant
to competition by cattails, and the cattails typically establish themselves quite readily without human
intervention, given the correct water regime. Consequently, while the ultimate ratio of Scirpus to
cattails within the mitigation site cannot be known, efforts will be made to maximize the percentage
of Scirpus present, thereby increasing the habitat value of the site.
The common cattail and California tule (Scirpus califomicus), both of which will grow in standing
water 1 to 3.5 feet deep, will be the dominant species within most of the site. Olney's bulrush
(Scirpus americanus) and alkali bulrush (S. robustus) will be planted in the higher elevations of the
site, primarily around the perimeter and near the single arroyo willow found near the center of the
site. Black and arroyo willows and mulefat will be planted along the perimeter levee to stabilize the
4The excavated material will be transported to an appropriate upland location.
Page 5
II
I
banks and to supply additional habitat. Mulefat planting along the perimeter will provide at least 1:1
compensation for mulefat lost during grading.
All plant material used within the mitigation site is to be collected from within the Reserve.
Rootstock from Scirpus and cattails, cuttings from willows and mulefat, and seeds from those species
' and more are all available and easily collectable from within the Reserve. Furthermore, limiting the
use of plant material to that collected within the Reserve ensures both the genetic integrity of
vegetation found within the Reserve and also protects against the introduction of any harmful insect
' or pathogen into the Reserve that could be carried on imported container stock or seeds.
Water Managements: The water management program described in the Enhancement Plan offers
a flexible approach to selecting and distributing water to any area within the Reserve. Water will be
delivered to the mitigation site via a surface pipe system capable of delivering well water, reclaimed
water, or shallow dewatering effluent. The highest quality water available will be used to fill the pond
within the mitigation site since this area is likely to concentrate salts due to loss of water by
' evaporation. The highest quality water available will typically be deep well water; however, if used
occasionally, water from other sources may suffice. A deep well with pump is currently in operation
and is available to deliver water to the mitigation site. Hoag Hospital will finance the acquisition of
' piping to deliver water from the pump to the mitigation site.
Flushing may be necessary to leach high salt concentrations similar to those seen in the north central
part of the Reserve. Flushing may take place as often as every 6-10 years, at the discretion of the
Marsh Steward. Acquisition of a portable pump will be financed by Hoag Hospital to allow draining
of the mitigation site. The portable pump would also have utility for other areas within the Reserve
' which require draining. The maintenance of the pump would be covered by funds drawn from the
endowment provided by Hoag Hospital.
' Eventually, with further implementation of the Enhancement Plan, the open water portion of the
mitigation site will be connected to open water on both the western and eastern edges to allow
circulating water to pass through from higher elevation sections of the marsh toward the central drain
t (see Exhibit 5). However, the proposed mitigation plan does not require that adjacent portions of
the Reserve be enhanced for the mitigation to succeed.
' Schedule: Project implementation would take place in the late summer or early fall when water levels
are at their lowest in the Reserve. Low water elevations are necessary to allow access for heavy
equipment operators. Seeding and planting activities will occur between late October and early May
to coincide with the rainy season. Drought conditions may allow planting to occur later in the spring
' if adequate quantities of water are supplied to the site.
' Habitat Maintenance Program
Fundine: Maintenance and general management activities necessary for the upkeep of the mitigation
site and project monitoring will be funded in perpetuity through an endowment, or other similar
' 5 The water management program described here is presented in greater detail in pages 69-72 of
the Enhancement Plan, and is included here as Appendix B.
' Page 6
I11
I
arrangement, provided by Hoag Hospital. Preliminary estimates of the annual per acre operating
costs at the Reserve are as follows6:
' Administrative, Maintenance and
General Costs $500.00/acre/year
' Water acquisition and distribution $500.00/acre/year
' Total $1,000/acre/year
This figure translates to an estimated operating cost of approximately $4,560 per year for the
proposed mitigation site. Included within the projected budget are activities such as mosquito control,
periodic flushing of the permanent pond, water pumping expenses, weed control, equipment
' depreciation and maintenance, labor, site monitoring and other routine activities. Costs associated
with project start-up, demolition, grading, planting, and monitoring are not included within the annual
operating budget and will be borne solely by Hoag Hospital. Costs associated with remediation,
replanting or any effort necessary to meet the performance standards established by the resource
1 agencies will be covered by Hoag Hospital. Any amount of the annual operating funds not required
for the activities described above will not be returned to Hoag Hospital, but rather, will remain with
the University for discretionary use.
' Maintenance: The purpose of this program is to ensure the success of the mitigation planting.
' Maintenance will occur over a three year period beginning at the end of project implementation.
The following tasks must be performed during the maintenance period:
' • Contractor Education: The contractor must schedule a meeting with the Marsh Steward previous
to the start of the maintenance period in order clearly identify proper maintenance procedures. If
' the University chooses to provide its own source of maintenance workers (i.e., students working with
faculty or staff), a private maintenance contractor may not be required.
' • Irrigation: An adequate water level must be maintained at least during the late winter through
early summer to suppress the growth of cattails in the deeper portions of the open water area. The
Marsh Steward will be responsible for scheduling water distribution to the site.
' • Weeding: Weeds species are not expected to be a problem within the mitigation site; however, the
likelihood of weed infestation around the perimeter of the site within the willow and mulefat
plantings is high. Weeds from this area should be cleared from the mitigation area on a weekly basis
1 during the first six months following installation and at a lesser rate thereafter as determined by the
extent of the weed problem. Herbicides should be used only when mechanical (hand tools) methods
prove inadequate. If herbicides are judged to be necessary then they should be used in accordance
' with the manufacturers directions and the Marsh Steward should develop an application program
which does not harm the desired native plant species.
' 6Bretz, Bill, Reserve Steward. 1993. Personal Communication, February 24, 1993.
' Page 7
• Plant Replacement: Any reseeding necessary to improve sparsely covered areas will be conducted
following the same procedures described above. The Marsh Steward must be consulted to determine
the proper seeding rates, site preparation and timing.
• Pruning and Staking: Pruning and staking of trees and shrubs is not necessary. Dead wood should
remain where it has fallen, it plays an important role in habitat creation and in soil formation.
• Pest Control: Plants should be monitored for herbivory and diseases. Biological control of insect
pests is preferred and badly damaged plants should be removed to prevent spread of the problem.
This program is intended to provide continued oversight of the mitigation site after installation is
completed. This oversight will accomplish two objectives: 1) provides source of feedback for
maintenance crew; and 2) provides information used to evaluate project progress, and adjust project
performance standards. This information will be relayed to CDFG , the Corps and the Coastal
Commission annually, as described below.
The performance standards detailed below are based on examination of emergent marsh elsewhere
within the Reserve. The five-year goal is 80% vegetative coverage with native emergent species
within the non -open water area of the mitigation site. A successful project is one that is composed
of at least the same percentage of Scirpus species as other marsh found within the Reserve and is
relatively free of non-native weed species.
Surveys of wildlife use of the mitigation site will also be included in the monitoring program; however,
no performance standard will be established for wildlife use and this portion of the monitoring will
not be used to evaluate project success by the resource agencies. The faunal data gathered will
nevertheless be included in the annual monitoring reports submitted to the permitting agencies.
Hoag Hospital will provide funding for field data collection and the writing of annual monitoring
reports required by the permitting agencies. Monitoring may extend for a period of time deemed
necessary by the permitting resource agencies (Corps and Coastal Commission) and following agency
notification of project completion the monitoring funding will be terminated.
Monitoring will be supervised by the Marsh Steward or a qualified biologist or horticulturalist with
experience in native habitat restoration. This role may be filled by University faculty or staff.
Monitoring for this mitigation plan will occur in the following manner:
Recording of the initial planting effort: Careful records will be made of the species, quantities, and
locations of all vegetation, as well as methods used. Any significant problems encountered, such as
site conditions unsuitable for planting, will be recorded. A photographic record of the site will be
kept from the time of the initial planting, through the end of the monitoring program.
After initial, planting, the area will be checked monthly by the project monitor for the first 12 months
and quarterly thereafter. During these monthly and quarterly checks, any unsuccessful plantings shall
Page 8
I
be replaced as needed to bring the mitigation area into overall compliance with the minimum success
standards. Records will be kept of mortality and other problems, such as insect damage.
Other potential site problems, such as weed infestation and soil loss, should also be identified by the
project monitor. Remedial measures addressing these problems will be designed by the project
monitor, submitted to the University and Hoag Hospital, and implemented by the maintenance crew.
Any remedial measures undertaken should be reported to CDFG, the Corps and Coastal Commission
(Permitting Agencies) and referenced later in the required annual reports.
First -year Monitoring
Success Standard: 30-percent coverage of non -open water area by target plantings.
One year after planting, a report, including all data and photographs taken during the preceding 12
months, will be submitted to the Permitting Agencies. The report will map the vegetation by type
and will recommend steps to ensure that 50-percent coverage by target plant species will be achieved
within the mitigation area by the end of the following year.
Second -year Monitoring
Success Standard: 50-percent coverage of non -open water area by target plantings
Two years after planting, a second, similar report will be submitted to the Permitting Agencies. This
second report will list steps required to ensure that approximately 70-percent coverage will be
achieved in the mitigation area by the end of the third year.
Third -year Monitoring
Success Standard: 70-percent coverage of non -open water area by target plantings
Three years after planting, a third annual report will be submitted to the Permitting Agencies. This
report will list steps required to ensure that approximately 80-percent coverage will be achieved in
the mitigation area by the end of the fourth year.
Fourth -year Monitoring
Success Standard: 80-percent coverage of non -open water area by target plantings
Four years after planting, a fourth annual report will be submitted to the Permitting Agencies. This
report will list steps required to ensure that approximately 80-percent coverage will be achieved in
the mitigation area by the end of the fifth year.
Fifth -year Monitoring
Success Standard: 80-percent coverage of non -open water area by target plantings
Five years after planting, a fifth annual report will be submitted to the Permitting Agencies. This
document will report either the satisfaction of the performance standards or will list steps required
Page 9
1
' to ensure that 80-percent coverage will be achieved in the mitigation area by the end of the sixth
year. The permittee recognizes that failure of any portion of the mitigation plan (relative to percent
' cover by the desired species) may result in the requirement to replace that portion of failed
mitigation.
' At any time prior to the end of the fifth year of monitoring, if the goals and success standards of the
fifth year are deemed satisfied by the Permitting Agencies, then the permittee will be released from
responsibility for further maintenance and monitoring of the mitigation area. At the conclusion of
' project monitoring the final report will include data and photographs as in the first four reports and
will also include an overall evaluation of the success of the mitigation project.
S:0011-1G.MIT
1
1
1
1
1
Page 10
1
I'll.. _,l,'ili,! '1„!1!i,
';' '.1111” I
11-,!,.- `i,l
'I tl l r
-
r
'!,! _i;iI'
,
„dl!Ilg;fl'__„1!+,111:8'!_
_ n
„rr
'''�
•,
,.
r ,_. r lidr
!
ii''i
r ,
III',
l
lll!I!Iil!iri,
!i� i '
III ii
i!1 ri!
„illy,, IIII!1!i
II!41f: �! i I�III
'!i .ul!,.1, li 1,
! II1
!ISW ; II
,'fl!!I!1;
!i ril
1�:7
- 1' 19'y, 11'•'
�n','
iii �'
lio. "!!!!r
' _I'r'r _�,I!i
I,
Sari
-11'nrrr,!y!P;
Bekiuith Tino
Co:';L!,.lIv ; ,r;
„ "„y
'i'.n
..'!�;'i'y
i'iIll;!1 ijlll I!!I' :
10!Il ijili!I,Ii! ;IIII!�,';I'dill;il4fpl,11;!;
li l!l 11 i'lil„y!,n'P':
'•Ilif,'II,!''! d,•,';r.,, i!;ILtl,ln;,r:.i
rir!I,tn„ 11,11
l !!i;
4r;
'ui "q dllpil!i'd"
'•!•,
!I!"1!�5!!;'d '�Akl;hl,,ri,
,,Iil,,'1�
;i ,
+,n,p,, _
,Ilie,r,l!i'_
- rxrr'
-
:4 I,'
l"
'L;'i
•_
,ril.
pip IiII dI!!!i ilI!I';�' iIl!II j�l 5,,, 5111!II!41!I
ilP
:r•rujr!, {,, ,
1:,1!iiPi; '
•!,„
- i' .,
, ! lip'',!
'' '; `
„ ,
'':. ';�"'_
,•'i:'i,.
_ .i.::
it
,IIII llil i!�IIIIII!III!Ili r "!i'!fl'
'',I
'!! ili' `I lr, I,i
''a'!!,
90
,:I!
I,, I,In;•' I,,d''
r'i+
, :I'i ' I.
I.
n'lil!i, !I d L, , P4r;l I
,i�P
.
,rl 1,
,I:IG'tPr
Riverside.;
Co.':;, ... . It
;!
91
r
55
Orange
County
!!
; , •
! '
'IN!dllljljil�' I!II;;,.
';;!„' 'jlri!ii;I•;;,.i!!iii;li';!!,�.'i•!;vi!!tr:...;,!,;�nd
22
Is
Ckyeland
55
\
National
rl,i,
,,,".,
_
_
39
1
Forest
til(F� nG{�t
73
s r !LOCATION
yr; `♦♦
If ; ; r {'14r'rA nk V ��ll,'jy,, 4d 1�11 ♦ !r it
r
,.ti�n,4 ''�fr�._,+: .,''C: �"�.'_ �'r ri�fl -_ r!.{. �;c,`__ ♦ j1:!r ,,;r
��\i''''�'� 'I,�F7!�'�i�'1 !!�"M,, ,� Il'`uil ,rt}\�'t\Vlit',15(i:Ii{Ir l ♦♦
'ligji 1r; „
r {t.:ii �� G;fi, t ',�;,-,��,,f nar_�'�r, 3�,r�'-ft ��`=4i;TM II�G--" •,l u! !r:..': `:5
;•,alp, i "if{frY `n � 4,, !:,,tyl, elf--rr;� ''� !;7r�t`!;'rlr'(,' r, rlr;i ip "a,t,'p S ,a,h
dill' 'ii;'•:'i'
ry'I!nti 74
�'!It;� At
;41"i',ti+,u'r,;i,l,!J){i!V��ntc 1tt'�-TC"•L�'�' Fx=.r.,r 4„! '�3—i,.d,S_F�r h'wc, �
I!t'L=;111!:!`I,li6111i"',1�;1�r
tt�\ 11r'2c�r;"rdld�l�\p Ipr2;'1: 1!h;;Alnildi!\!,il\ �r rr,'r�i9r;� �,�{i�tv 'w��r ryg�j
'tl,C:ihr 'n(t�� ��t f' �• 'I�',I.
-,4'P\;?,y; '.y,;, v!'4•j';,,,1 "ilm!!!1�'la�,. �.1;'11 1 c' i�.�{1 !k, I',d
" ";•4i' „>;': r, ,. ,.NM, ,,r„} r_�J 'HIUIi ;' 11'iF31T,P1?:fi 4r11 fro
;:
Idj�4�'\`' ,;?`.,St",!4Lx'"-z,.�;"yS;A, •; I.y, (il;i Ir 1 „ 4y1 d „+1f difr_ „-'f� , j?I!", :,. r„ I'I!I. I„ i
'„�;]',�i`fii.,ca'r,;?•lLy`,L_ - , .•'S•_ .,_�:11\!!'; _�;N!�Na�+r��i;,,�,1��frx�4' �r� ,�'�x�' _ � '
ri�.,,'r. _ 60.
i,•in„ ,,id�h rll;in r. v�-iiNM1rr:u,.(1, ,ri
1'L!p,i;�';:,Ii>,!iIF'e,1,;�,,1P,ti�c=;a,71i!.1 `c yP,r\rlf'li,,;'� ,,M,'�;�i '� '4r}�1't`-t:: ii,{St'~' ,F`H`"'' San ,
'� Ui1^ !° ��u " Ir ' h {{� `I y { {',='r�,i; {,-;r',,1 t1f u rz ' ' 11�1i, j 1 r DreVO. CO: .
;,',i{.:Nr1�'"uid'';:''%'.r'1!,I!I;1�i r, aary8altlill!yltlhlnrt:!!(a!!..i'{�rlr;-1!�"!id•tfl'i_.t. NI!Ih!L ^,lu!IiIL,'li', ,I•,In',•I lo•I,II„ .iy
:tf•t;{iq;;i��„'�';i'41}ljiy'
!'!'4't�"•'t`��;!i'"!!','r!\u�.,'
SAN JOAQUIN MARSH MITIGATION PLAN
Regional Location Map - Hoag Hospital
', ' , iili!P
i'i n
�
iii'I!•,
Not to scale L-XnlbiT 1
North
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Ili m m m m
m
11
Boundaries of 20.4-acre
Hoag Hospital Expansion Site,
Including 1.52-acre Wetland
r
'!��. - Vie► �-:''ri..
1\
EJOAQUINMARSH MITIGATION PLAN
cation Map - Hoag Hospital
GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES
Exhibit 2
4L
'1
LEGEND
N
Su
Adapted from LSA Associates, Inc., Hoaa Hospital Master Plan DEIR, October, 1994.
SAN JOAQUIN MARSH MITIGATION PLAN i
Hoag Hospital Master Plan
(Upper and Lower Campus Development Areas)
GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES
Exhibit 3
COASTALZONE
.,. BOUNDARY
Carlson
��. C, y Y- :r„- rl•� 5 P`-1-:i, ..--.: i •' ;:.•. - -s: r .;r;1::.. • .: .. , . - �' -- aa� ; t
.-,lF ' N.....r :`� , a f y E`.i.-.. �'v, --• _ ... ..�.•~Y'tl'9:_• y
VZ
NRS - 1 - TIC
'`'•d�,(`�� '(j �" scs_� � ry � FYI•.. ,' R' _ —_-_ :.�ti" -. \
. ,�'+`."xe• vim. _ .\�. 1 , - '`� ��q 'it _ "�• `- ---f :- - -
f : a ii I l . ,( ��(y, aLY '----••z�•. ' - -` •' : t`_ 1.
'r%�.� � NRS . `.'��?.�- r - _ - _^t: M, �'-�_-• _ - r-�-n-•`, _ �
TIC � . ,p : },» . tiy. '-+'.°•J' 62-:`�",�� - =I '� . _iar�
ram. '\�%` op c ... :; •� .: F' n r.4:;�i'•; _�-r.:.
\ -7 i iTIC Thn e Irvine Ranch Water Distid •...•'+
_PROPOSED.. .-''�' ~ - - �- ,,.-�'rr-'=.>•. ���_ ,1- : � •�•
M111GATION SITE-
;�• "•� .,, dam---�-�t---"�J'.._�,���... _
a� SAM � — -^ f v, yam_ --` .'�. � 'r.e^-.. •io- Ha
E
m
U
NRS - Natural Reserve System (University of California)
TIC - Irvine Company NOT TO SCALE
Note: All land north of Campus Drive is Irvine Company, except for IRW D rnm"�. & a,.rJ. a ua
property. c x . Hv&�V Ownership of the San Joaquin Marsh
SAN JOAQUIN MARSH MITIGATION PLAN
Reserve Ownership and Location of Mitigation Site
(Adapted from "San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan", 4991)
GLENN LLIKOS ASSOCIATES
EXHIBIT 4
PhIllp &AA..k. .u& Wetlands Research C. Gary Hyden
Associates, Inc.
EGEND
'supply&SCha,ge pMft
8"audd
i NOT TO SCALE
I
I
North
Cf) LO
w
f— 1=
Q m
U X
O w
U)
cn
cn
0
J
z
w
J
Z
01
a
01
g
d
II
a
Z
m
O
m
�
U
C
II
'n
V
w
5�
L
Gy
G
=
cm
3
/C/)
N
f m
c
L
c ii
� C
Z
r
V0
C6
c-5
as
p
Q
O
C
wo
Z
m�
ca
6
Cn
Q
_;
`
r
r
.®�® A
OFF
Photo 1 - View of mitigation site showing foreground of artichoke
thistle, mustard, poison hemlock, and mulefat.
Photo 2
Black Willow
NI Poison Hemlock
Artichoke Thistle -
A
View of mitigation site showing vegetated levees
\
"iarrw�y;;
a
Z
g
a
Z
O
Q
O
fm
I /17/// 9
z.
-MITIGATION BOUNDARY
TYPHA-SCIRPUS MARSH
�7
I \
f
,
ACREAGES - TYPHA-SCIRPUS MARSH - 4.40 ACRES \
OPEN WATER - 1.68 ACRES
+ TOTAL - 6.08 ACRES
V
3
>w
FUTURE
TO AD,
.e
a �
A
FUTURE CONNECTION
TO ADJACENT MARSH
c'
f 1, � I•
,
1
e — 6 WATER SOURCE -
■�mm 1 A IRRIGATION PIPE
FEET
0 80 160
a
rL
g
a a
Z °-
0 D
c
3
a
= a
Q
UI
Z U
Q
O o
Z a)
Q �
c/) 2
North
lilalrla•EY • 11A\'19 • Dl\9NE ' LOS A17CF1R1 • IUVCRSIUY. iAN 111EG0 •CAN iY1ANCi5C0 MANTA OA110.111A • YANI'A CII17L
SAN IOAQUIN FRM IWATRR MARSH RESERVE IRVINL, C'AUFORNIA 92717
11UHN9 PINON Rlr„:E EIDSDI(l RL$L•RVR
DEWARTME•N•1' OF DCOLOGY AND ,
CVOI.LMONARY MUM
Sf;HnUL OF DIOLOCICAL SCIENCIS
20 April 1993
Dr. Deborah L. Elliot -risk, Director
UniverSity of California Natural Reserve System
300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612-3,960
Ril: Iioag Iospital Mitigation Project
Dear 17ehby:
Several months ago I-Ioag Hospital contacted the Officer of Natural Reserves
(required we 11
ttfortfutureact
uhoss spittpldeve opment)sslbilitY of aongaaportionctofnthe UCNation RSIISan
Marsh Reserve. Since then Tim Bradley, Peter Bowler and
Joaquin Freshwater
myself have been involved in discussion and refinement of tills mitigalioli
government representatives
(USFW5rom ICDFG, CoastaltaCommissiol and its n, ArtiylsC� psoof
Engineers, City of Irvine), and our own consultant oil Marsil enhancement
planning, Dr. Mike Josslyn of Wetlands Research Institute,
last week Peter and I met with the representatives from Iioag IlosPlial, Mike
Dirand
Pla niniing at UCIchard to review thelpro posed Hoag H Spitalctor of 5miligadon 1plan.I��lusl
Prior to that meeting I was able to talk briefly with Sat Tamarlbuehi of The Irvine
H
Company about the oag I-Iospital plan, and he indicated lilai as he understood
it, there did not seem to be any conflict or problem from TIC's,perspective. The
result of that meeting was Qte attached conceptual plan, which Tim, Peler and I
think should he Supported by the University,
We think that there are several good reasons that the UCNRS should supPort
and encourage ap )roval of this project by the California Department of Fish and
Game, the Coastal Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S.
Artily Corps of Engineers:
--the proposed site In the Reserve has been severely altered from Its original
wetland condition, and has become a rather upland -type of habitat; the
Iioag project would restore this site to Its former permanently
flooded wet
land condition,
--the Iioag project is designed to Implement a portion of the overall Marsh
I
enhancement plan prepared by Phillip Williams & Associates, Ltd., and
tnticnctiithe
ill hr
encybut canfuon ndependentlym the time when TIC carries
out the other parts of the overall plan,
--thus project would function as a pilot project that would assist In practical
reMement of the larger Marsh Enhancement Plan before its full implemen-
tation U TIC:,
--this project will provide great opportunities for teaching and research in
the areas of restoration and conservation biology, by University involve-
ment in the detailed planning stages, during the construction and planting
stages, and throughout the followup monitoring,
--the Hoag project would Include the necessary endowment to assure the
long term operation and management of the site as designed; tlus would
establish a valuable precedent for UCNRS involvement In other future
mitigation projects, fundralsing efforts, and University budget planning.
Although we are comfortable with the details of the physical design of this
mitigation plan, we would welcome any comments or stiggesllons from
Systemwide. In particular, perhaps you could review the proposed level of
funding with Liza Riddle anct Jeff Kennedy. Our concept has bee" that 1'10ag
would provide an endowment that woulcl yield the necessary Interest to provide
the estimated $1,000 per acre per year in perpetuity.
In summary, the Hoag Hospital conceptual mitigation plan has the fall
support of us here at UCI, and we are recommending that the UCNRS provide its
support from the Systemwide and/or DNAR level to assist I-loag In obtaining
the necessary government approvals. if you have any questions, please call
either Tim, Peter, or myself.
Altachtnenl
rc: Liza Riddle, UCNRS
Jeff Kennedy, UCNRS
Sincerely yours,
l�yours,
`ii
Willili am L. Bretz, Reserve Manager
UC Natural Reserve System
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE
SANTA IIAItRA1tA . SANIA L'IU 1'!.
III:IIKSI.RY . DAVIS . IRVINI! . LOS ANCRLES •RIVERSIDE • SAN DISCO • SAN FRANCISCO
i L t
a ee
DIWARiVENT OF CCOLOGY AND
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
April 20, 1993
Dr. Deborah L. Elliot -Fisk
Director, Natural Reserve System
University of California
Office of the President
300 Lakeside Dr., 61h Floor
Oakland, California 94612-3560
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92717
FAX (714) 725-2181
RE: Tile Hoag Hospital Mitigation Project in Ilse San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve
Dear Deborah:
I wanted to provide you with my review comments of ilia Hoag Hospital miligal(on
project In the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve. Bill Brelz and I have met with
Hoag representatives as well as various agencies about the issue, and it clearly is a
proposal that has great morn. Linda Dawes (USFWS) was particularly enthusiastic as It
will provide some added habitat for the Pacific Pond Turtle population.
The proposed mitigation site is a former wetland area, as indicated by old aerial
photographs showing emergent welland vegetation, which was blanketed in many feet of
sediment during the days of the old dam across San Diego Creek. Since that lime it has
been one of the higher areas of the basin and is essentially upland In character. The silo
though there are a few isolated welland Indicator
Is dominated by upland weedy species,
laxa present. The proposal follows the Enhancement Plan, however, It Iles outside Ilse
any. I can see
Plan
be timplemented bwil oult mine itigationpprojects such as otheway
one proposed partof of
dby
Hoag, and It is my opinion that it is an exciting opportunity to restore welland function
In a part of fife system otherwise predominantly upland.
Hoag has also indicated support of any research efforts we might want to
impinewement, and mit gation site easrItjIncreases in welland elements.
it also can beect provides a chance to examine fe avnaa way of nd tpredictiuse ng
flow other components of the Enhancement Plan will serve to benefit wildlife.
In summary, this is a good, project which we should fully support. Without [his
project I can see no way that wetland conditlons can be restored to tins area of Ilse Marsh
which Is outside TIC's mitigative responsibilities.
Please don't hesitate In contacting me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Peter A. Bowler, Pli.D.
�I
APPENDIX B
Excerpted from:
Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd., Wetland Research Associates, Inc.
and Hyden Associates, Inc. 1991. "San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement
Plan". Prepared for the City of Irvine, the California State Coastal
Conservancy, and the University of California Natural Reserve System. Pages 69-72.
',i
' 6.5 WATER MANAGEMENT
' 6.5.1 Selection of Water Sources
The primary hydrologic objective of the project is to provide adequate quantities of
' water to support the habitat distribution summarized in Section 6.2. Adequate drainage
must be incorporated into the design to prevent the long-term increase of salinity or the
accumulation of urban pollutants. There will be a balance between the quality of the water
source and the amount of water that can be used in any particular area of the marsh.
The project is designed to be as flexible as possible, and water can be transferred
through the marsh as required. The best -quality water will be used in the permanent ponds
and riparian areas, since these areas are more susceptible to the buildup of contaminants.
For example, if a permanent pond is filled predominantly by dewatering well water, the
salinities will concentrate over time due to the loss of water by evaporation. If this process
continues for several years, the salinity levels may become detrimental to the natural
resources in the pond. The preferred sources of water for each type of habitat are shown
in Table 6.1.
A water budget for the elements of the restoration plan was calculated for elements
of the restoration plan in San Joaquin Marsh, in order to predict the annual availability of
water to marsh vegetation and to provide an estimate of the need for water from alternative
sources. The water budget is an accounting of -input, output, and changes in storage of water
in the San Joaquin Marsh system, and was calculated for one water year (October through
September). Potential water input to the marsh includes precipitation (Ip), runoff from
upstream areas (Ir), shallow groundwater from IRWD wells (Is), and deep groundwater from
one existing and one future well (Id). Output from the system includes evapotranspiration
(Et) and overland drainage from the restoration elements (D). Seepage losses were assumed
to be negligible in this first approximation, and were not considered. Toups (1973)
estimated that seepage losses may amount to 5 ac-ft per year for the University sector of the
marsh. Monthly precipitation, runoff, and evaporation values used in the water budget are
reported in Table 6.2.
The water budget was calculated for restoration elements including: permanent ponds
(4 areas), seasonal ponds (7 areas), marsh (3 areas), pickleweed (1 area), riparian (4 areas),
grassland (3 areas), and the existing mitigation area (1 area). The location of the areas are
illustrated on Figure 6.1. The areas of each element are listed in Table 6.3. Restored
elements account for approximately 410 acres out of the total marsh area of 515 acres.
6.5.2 Assumptions Used in the Water Budget
Specific criteria for the permanent ponds require a design depth of 5.0 ft., and an
initial depth of 4.0 ft. was assumed at the beginning of the water year. Criteria for the
Seasonal Pond require a design depth of 3.0 ft., while an initial depth of 0.0 s assumed
-4t.
o:
at the beginning of the water year. Initial conditions in other restoration elements were also
assumed to be dry at the beginning of the water year.
Assumptions relating to potential water sources (input) and output to the restoration
elements include the following:
1. input to the permanent ponds includes precipitation and runoff, while output
includes evapotranspiration. Deep groundwater may be added to maintain
design volume;
2. Input to seasonal ponds includes precipitation, while output includes
evapotranspiration and drainage. Shallow groundwater may be added to
maintain design volume;
3. Input to pickleweed areas includes precipitation, while output includes
evapotranspiration. Shallow groundwater may be added to maintain design
volume;
4. Input to riparian areas includes precipitation, while output includes
evapotranspiration. Deep groundwater could be added for irrigation;
5. Input to the grassland areas includes precipitation, while output includes
evapotranspiration; and
6. Input to the existing mitigation area includes precipitation, while output
includes evapotranspiration. Assumed rates for evapotranspiration,
groundwater percolation losses, and pipe leakage losses should be verified by
field observation.
6.5.3 Annual Water Requirements
Results of the water budget calculations (Appendix E) indicate the volume of water
needed on a monthly and annual basis to maintain the restoration design. Volumes reported
here are dependent on the assumptions made of initial depth in the restoration elements,
and will vary from year to year depending on climatic conditions.
The water budget calculation suggests that approximately 256 acre-feet/year of de6p
groundwater would be needed to maintain the design volume In the Permanent Ponds.
Approximately 189 acre-feet/year of shallow groundwater would be needed to maintain the
design volume of the Seasonal Ponds. Approximately 78 acre-feet/year of deep groundwater
would be needed for irrigation of riparian areas after the initial planting stage. It is assumed
that the variety of grass in the Grassland is drought -resistant and will not need irrigation.
Approximately 8 acre-feet/year of shallow groundwater would be needed to maintain a
constant water level in the Pickleweed area.
70
II
1
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
iI
6.5.4 Availabflityof Deep and Shallow Groundwater
Availability of deep and shallow groundwater sources was evaluated to determine if
available water is sufficient to maintain the design volumes of the restoration elements. The
existing University of California deep groundwater well supplies 300-400 gpm. This yield
corresponds to 475 acre-feet/year to 634 acre-feet/year. Another deep groundwater well
planned for the San Joaquin Marsh will provide approximately 600 gpm, or 1,040 acre-
feet/year (Tettemer, pers. comm., 1991).
For permanent ponds and riparian areas, there would be enough water to maintain
the design volume on an annual basis using the existing UC well. However, storage would
be required prior to initial filling of the ponds after construction unless water is available
from the second deep groundwater well.
Shallow groundwater is available from IRWD wells adjacent to the San Joaquin
Marsh. Approximately 108 acre/feet are available annually, at a constant rate of 9 acre-
feet/month. This amount of water would be sufficient during most of the year; however,
there would be insufficient water for initial filling to the design volume in the seasonal ponds
and the pickleweed area during the month following construction.
6.5.5 Operation of the Marsh
The project site has been divided into a series of discrete modules. Each module can
be filled or irrigated from either deep groundwater, dewatering well water, urban runoff, or
tertiary treated effluent. Riparian areas will drain by percolation or by direct runoff into the
central drainage channel. Seasonal and permanent ponds have control structures at the
outlet into the central drainage channel. The inflow and outlet points to these ponds are
located on opposite sides of the pond to enhance flushing of the entire pond in the event
of a buildup of contaminants. The inflow and outflow locations for each pond are detailed
in Figure 6.1.
Distribution of Water in the Marsh
The water distribution within the marsh is shown in Figure 6.1. The pipe distribution
system can convey deep well water, reclaimed water, or shallow dewatering well water to any
of the outlets shown. Stormwater runoff flows down to the retention pond, which regulates
the rate of flow through the treatment ponds (Section 6.3.3). The stormwater runoff can be
passed down the central drain to the permanent ponds or into San Diego Creek.
Water can be discharged from the central drain into San Diego Creek through the
culvert in the south end of the marsh. The bed elevation of San Diego Creek varies
depending on the volume of sediment deposited since the previous channel dredging.
71
I-
iI
Typical variations are from ft. to ft. NGVD. Gravity drainage will occur only
during low water surface elevations in San Diego Creek and very high pond elevations in the
study area. The central drain or permanent ponds can only be drained by pumps. TIC has
proposed a trailer -mounted pump that can be driven to the outlet during periods of flushing
and stored undercover during winter months. The capacity of the pump is recommended
to be cis, which would drain the largest permanent pond in days or the seasonal
ponds in _, days. This potential rate is satisfactory, since a rapid lowering of the water
surface elevation could cause seepage failure of the banks of the central drain or permanent
ponds. It is probably unnecessary to drain the permanent ponds completely on a regular
basis. If salinity becomes a problem in a permanent pond, the salinity levels can be reduced
by approximately 50% if half of the water is drained and refilled with high -quality deep well
water.
A rotation for flushing will be developed whereby water quality testing will determine
the quantity of water to be replaced in permanent pond 1. In subsequent years, permanent
ponds 2, 3, and 4 will be flushed. In intervening years, soil testing taken as part of the
monitoring program may require leaching of some of the riparian areas, as evidenced by the
existing high salinity levels in the north central part of the project site.
Assuming flushing would not be undertaken in dry years, the permanent ponds can
b acted to be flushed every 6-10 years if the Marsh Manager determines it to be
e exp
necessary.
Seasonal ponds would be drained every year and the water passed through the central
drain and into San Diego Creek. Seasonal ponds Sl-S4 can be filled independently but are
interconnected, and all drain through S4. Seasonal ponds S5-S7 can be filled and drained
separately. Appendix E shows that riparian areas would drain by percolation to the shallow
groundwater or as runoff into the central drain. Adequate drainage and irrigation during
it planting program should be provided to prevent ponding of water for long periods.
6.6 PUBLIC ACCESS FACTORS
6.6.1 Desiett Concept
The preservation and enhancement of the San Joaquin Marsh is a necessity for marry
obvious ecological, cultural, and aesthetic reasons. Developing an access and recreation
element of the enhancement plan that turns the potential for marsh degradation into an
advantage for preservation is an essential component of a successful plan.
The recreation design for this project is built around the concept that education is
one of the best tools for controlling the impact of human access and recreation on a
sensitive site such as the San Joaquin Marsh. Once people understand the importance and
fragility of the marsh, most will use the access properly and will also take an active role in
preventing others from misusing the facilities.
72
TABLE G.1:
PRIORITIES FOR SELECTING WATER SOURCES
Water Sour:ce.
Tertiary
IIabltnl Direct Pre-
Deep Well
•Dewatering
Urban
Trcuen
cipitation
Water
'Well Water
Runoff
Efllcnt
Permanent Pond 1
3
D
2
4
Seasonal Ponds 1
4
2
_
3
Riparian 1
E
E
Grassland 1
E
E
Pickleweed 1
"
Cost of Water 0
$40 +
Pumping"
0
?
/Ac-Ft.
Pumping
Costs
Cost
First of water; remaining water requirement
to be madk
up from other sources
1. source
2. Second choice of water source
3. Third choice of water source
4. Fourth choice of water source
D. Water source in drought conditions only
E, Water source to be used in establishing enhancement Brous
When available, Dewatering Well Water will come at no c05C ru tuu vu.wu,.J ------
(Table 6.1 has been adopted from the "San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Habitat Enhancement Plan",
1991 to reflect this clrnnge)
TABLE 6.2:
MONTHLY PRE,E,CIPITA I SAOA
RUNOFF
AND N MARSH
VALUES
IN THE
Month (Et)
October
November
Precipitation (Ip)
(Acre -Feet)
6
11
Runoff (Ir)
(Acre -Feet)
0
0
Evapotranspiration
(Acre -Feet)
37
37
December
24
10
27
January
28
13
26
February
28
12
42
March
23
10
40
April
11
0
65
M
May
4
0
72
June
1
0
93
July
0
0
57
43
August
0
0
September
0
0
55
Yearly Total
136
45
594
1
I,
TABLE 6.3:
' AREAS OF ELEMENTS OF THE RESTORATION PLAN
Restoration Element
Area (Acres)
Permanent Ponds
Pi
37
P2
22
P3
49
P4
32
Seasonal Ponds
S1
3.5
S2
3.5
S3
3.5
S4
1.1
S5
12.0
S6
12.0
S7
12.0
Marsh
M1
59.0
M2
53.0
M3
33.0
Pickleweed
8.9
Riparian
RI
6.9
R2
38.0
R3
0.4
R4
42.0
Grassland
GI
10.0
G2
33.0
G3
2.5
Existing MItigation Area
16.7
Semi -Permanent Stream Habitat
10.0
TOTAL (Acres):
491
" Y QF NFIMP0RT CiF,+,;
AM d E C 141993 PM
71819110Al2i1AMA6
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX Y • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658-8912 • PHONE (714) 645-8600
December 13, 1993
Ms. Patti Temple
Planning Department
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915
Dear Patti:
Based on the delay in receiving Coastal Commission legal counsel
comments on the hospital's requested clarifications on the
Development Agreement amendments, the hospital has no objections to
continuing this item to the next City Council meeting.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Stephens
President
14DS: sas
A NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACCREDITED BY THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS
1 ►
0
FRIENDS OF CAT -TAIL COVE
2221 East 16th Street
Newport Beach, CA 92663
(714) 548-6326
_ Map 8, 1992
.- yy_, y • .M'0f
Mayor Phil Sansone and
City Council Members
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach CA 92663
Dear Mayor Sansone and City Council Members:
PLANNING DEPARTMEM
flTY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MAY 8 1992
AM PM
71819110111112111213141516
A
Re: Possible Conditions for Inclusion
in the Hoag Hospital Master Plan
Development Agreement
We offer our suggestions regarding the Hoag Hospital
wetlands we know as Cat -Tail Cove, on the Lower Campus:
1. Project shall be designed so that Lower Campus Phase I
buildings would be sited in Zones C, D, E, F, and G only. Any
wetlands removed in this phase should be mitigated onsite in
Zones A and B at a 1:1 ratio.
2. Any coastal sage scrub removed during Phase I shall be
replaced on the bluff in Zones A and B, consistent with efforts
to protect potential habitat for the gnatcatcher.
3. Initial mass grading shall avoid impacting the wetlands by
means of protective fencing. Any fill in the wetlands shall be
prevented during that mass grading.
4. Total wetlands on the Lower Campus is 2.59 acres. Offsite
replacement shall be at a minimum of 1:5 x 2.59 = 3.90 acres,
unless otherwise permitted by the resource agencies.
5. Retention of the wetlands at the western end of the Lower
campus shall be considered by Council as an earthquake mitigation
measure, since test borings by M. E. Wright show probable
location of the fault at 30 feet below the surface at this site.
See Appendix I, Volume III, DEIR, Crandall boring 95, p. 8, of
Merrill Wright report.
6. Mitigation sites should also be evaluated, including the
CalTrans West site, as a possible mitigation for the wetlands.
7. Prior to removal of the wetlands at the Hoag Lower Campus,
existing fauna -- including all amphibians and fish as well as
animals such as rabbits, squirrels, mice, opossums, and raccoons
-- shall be removed to the new wetlands site pending approval of
the resource agencies. Such removal shall be accomplished either
a
May S, 1992
Mayor Sansone and City Council
FCTC Suggestions Re: HHMPDA on
Members
Wetlands, p. 2
before or after normal reproductive cycles in which young are
born and reared in nests, for example, in Fall.
S. If possible, portions of wetlands -- including vegetation --
should be removed to the new wetlands site prior to grading in
order that the creatures have appropriate cover and forage areas.
9. The Development Agreement should be limited to completion of
the first phase of eight years, and all wetlands mitigation
should be in place and functioning during Phase I.
10. We agree with the Homeowners of Villa Balboa letter (to
Mayor Sansone dated April 22, 1992, signed by Bill Jennings)
regarding their Item Ho. 7:
'Incorporate into landscape architectural plan for the
Lower Campus the retention of 1.52 acres of
consolidated sensitive wetlands community at the
western end of the Lower Campus, including restoration
of the coastal bluff above the consolidated wetland.'
We agree with all other comments of the Homeowners of Villa
Balboa letter of April 22, 1992.
Very truly yours,
lz 4G �' J
Jan D. Vandersloot, M.D.
for the Friends of
and Jo An a D. Burns
Cat -Tail Cove
t
E
I
qHOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX 6100 • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658.6100 • PHONE (714) 645-8600
HOAG MASTER PLAN
March 24, 1994
I. Project Status
A Cardiac Services Addition
B. Mass Grading Plan
1. Redefinition of mass grading project <
2. Establishment of grade
C. Outpatient Services Building
II. Mitigation Monitoring Program Procedures
A Submittal of information on specific projects �O
B. Submittal of information for one-time studies '
C. Review/comment/revision process once information is submitted
D. Form and content of itorinib _ ' �-
1 . Project specific (notebooks)
2. Annual (letter)
y III. South Coast Air Quality Management District
C` A Strategy to address mitigation measur V
B. Meeting setup
File:1250.16 tivh��OM�/ �Il
A NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACCREDITED BY THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS
HOAG MASTER PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
MITIGATION MEASURES
RELATED TO SCAQMD
36. Prior to issuance of grading and building permits for each phase of development,
the Project Sponsor shall provide evidence for verification by the Planning
Department that the necessary permits have been obtained from the SCAQMD for
regulated commercial equipment incorporated within each hase. An air quality
analysis shall be conducted prior to each phase of developmen for the proposed
mechanical equipment contained within that phase that Identifies additional
criteria pollutant emissions generated by the mechanical equipment to be
Installed in that phase. If the new emissions, when added to existing project
emissions could result in impacts not previously considered or significantly
change the land use impact, appropriate CEQA documentation shall be prepared
prior to issuance of any permits for that phase of development. Each subsequent
air quality analysis shall be reviewed and approved by the SCAQMD.
64. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the Project Sponsor shall
evaluate all existing vent systems located on the lower campus and submit this
data to the City Building and Fire Departments, the State Department of
Conservation, Division of Oil and Gas, and the Southern California Air Quality
Management District for comment. Additionally, any proposed' new passive vents
shall be evaluated by these agencies prior to the issuance of grading or building
permits. If the vents are emitting detectable levels of hydrogen sulfide and/or
toxins, the emitted gases must be treated prior to discharge in a manner
acceptable to these agencies.
65. if required by the Southern California Air Quality Air Management District, an((l tf
1
Vg is ersion model shall be required in order to predict the cumulative effects
of the emissions. Compliance with any additional requirements of the AQMD shall be verified through a compliance review by the distric wit written verification �° Q
received by the Newpo each BWildinCDepartment. �= q I���O Am't4
-Qn�
77. 7As required by the Distri ,the"Pr ect Sponsor shall develop a sampling and
analysis protocol for District approval to evaluate the impact the existing and
post -scrubber emissions will have on the ambient air quality and on possible
receptor populations. The required evaluation shall include analysis for criteria
and toxic pollutants, and an evaluation of the potential risks associated with the
emission of these pollutants (Rule 1401). Included in the plans for the design o �n o
the scrubber system should be a make-up gas source. �K �u
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
MITIGATION MEASURES RELATED TO SCAQMD
PAGE
The Project Sponsor shall submit plans to the City of Newport Beach Building
Department that demonstrate that the flare operation will be shut down within
four vears of Au ust, 1992. The project sponsor must prepare and obtain
approval from the AQMD to implement a sampling and analysis protocol for
evaluation of the existing emissions from the flare after scrubbing (Mitigation
Measures 75 & 76), and the effect of flare shutdown on ambient air quality. The
,methane gas source should be used, if engineering design allows, as a
supplemental source of fuel for the Hospital'sboilerrS,., If the gas is not usable,
the flare shall be relocated. ��`-Px-
Prior to installation
protocol for a study
The Project Spons,
prior to initiating tt
of the scrubber system, the Project Sponsor shall develop a
to evaluate the integrity of the control equipment and piping.
)r must obtain agreement from the District on the protocol
e study.
File: 1250.16.74.50 FIN.EIR.MIT.MEAS
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301
NEWPORT BLVD. • BOX Y • NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658.8912
MEMORANDUM
Date:
August 5, 1992
To:
Patricia Temple
Advanced Planning Manager
City of Newport Beach
Advanced Planning Department
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-8915
-
From:
F. W. Evins
Vice President
Con/struction
Facilities Design &
Subject:
Hoag Hospital Master Plan
Regarding:
Mitigation Measures Monitoring Summary Table
Comments:
Pursuant to my letter to you dated April 29, 1992 (attached), regarding the
compilation of a Mitigation Monitoring Summary Plan, please receive the
attached draft document dated August 5, 1992.
Because of the comprehensive, complex, and cumbersome nature of the 123
mitigation measures, I have attempted to streamline this document by
abbreviating and condensing the approval and monitoring/conformance
checkpoints.
Please review this initial draft document and get back to me with your comments.
Contact me at 760-5908 if you have any questions.
FWE: bw
c: Pete Foulke
Attachment: Hoag letter dated April 29, 1992
Mitigation Summary Table
File: 16-33.30-Mit.Table
,,
)
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
301 NEWPORT BOULEVARD • BOX Y • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658.8912 • PHONE (714) 645-8600
April 29, 1992
Patricia Temple
Principal Planner
City of Newport Beach
Advanced Planning Department
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-8915
Subject: Master Plan Mitigation Measures
Dear Patricia:
As you know, mitigation monitoring for the Hoag Master Plan EIR is required pursuant to AB
3180. The majority of the mitigation measures are presently in a format that will assure their
implementation, as required, and monitoring, if needed. The conditions of approval for the
Master Plan and the Development Agreement, however, are not currently written in a similar
format.
As we have discussed, due to the complexity of the project, it is imperative that Hoag and the
City have a clear interpretation of all conditions of approval and mitigation measures for the
Master Plan. Therefore, we would suggest that once the project has been acted upon by the City
Council, we jointly prepare a manual of parts that identifies the following for each condition of
approval and mitigation measure:
The point in the development process by which a condition of approval or mitigation
measure is to be accomplished. This milestone should be directly tied to a City
discretionary action, e.g., building permit, grading permit, etc., or to a routine
inspection process that occurs during grading and/or construction.
The City department(s) who are responsible for verifying that the mitigation
measure or condition of approval has, in fact, been accomplished.
A concrete product which is to act as the standard by which to determine whether or
not a mitigation measure or condition of approval has been fulfilled, e.g., a report,
letter, permit from another agency, etc.
A NON-PROFIT COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACCREDITED BY THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS
Letter to Ms. Temple Master Plan Conditions Monitoring Page 2
Because the conditions of approval, as they are currently worded, have been recommended by
the Planning Commission for adoption by the City Council, it is my preference that this
conditions compliance/ mitigation monitoring manual be prepared after a decision has been
made on the Hoag Master Plan by the City Council, and that this manual be received by the
Planning Commission for their input on the format and content of the manual.
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Sincere
W. Evins, III, AIA
Vice President
FWE:bw
c: Pete Foulke
Per! Muretta
File: 16-33.00-MP Cond./Mit. Monitor.
Y-tsT .ttTu Pc�T- +-cFt�-,i.ic�+tsa�Y 4cl%T zo ITT
Ag2 7 vim.-' t"T Ic.�s
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN
8/05/92 PRELIMINARY DRAFT
MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING SUMMARY TABLE
Mitigation
scriptian
cationp
Threshold/
ApprovalP
Verification
Measure #
Consultant
�
UpperCam us
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
GSA—c.eK-Dire S.sR_vrc.AT .�prj'io...i
1.
City Grading Standards
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
• Building
Bldo.
2. FL
Cut Sloe Monitoring
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
3 1L
Safe Grading/Faults
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
4.
Seismic Building Standards UBC
Architecture
UC/LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept.
5. µ
LRC Geo Report 6/89
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Architect
Building
14
Soil Corrosivity Tests
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
7. ty
Soils Corrosivity
Geo/Soils
LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept
Construction Compatibility
Architect
8. 9
Corrosivity
Geo/Soils
LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept
Neutralization
9. 'r
Silt, Dust, Runoff
Civil Engineer
LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept
Landscape
10 11
—
Landscape Plan
Landscape
Grading
PBR/
Architect
Planning
11. !J
Routine Vacuuming
N/A
OC Water MP
County
Plannin
12. �,J
Hydrologic Analysis
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading/
Building
Bldg. Dept
Civil Enqineerl
I Buildinq
VVQCB
13.
Groundwater Analysis
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading/
Building
Bldg. Dept
De4atering and Subdrains
Civil Engineer
Building
14. u
Dewatering Permits and
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading/
=013
WC1CB
Discharge Permits
Civil Engineer
Building
NPDES
Bld . Dept.
15.
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management
FD&C
LC/UC
N/A
N/A
N/A
Infection Control
Engineering
16.
Wetlands Agencies Review Requirements
Wetland
LC
Wetland
AOCE
City
Biologist
Big Canyon
Mitigation
CD;
coo
Permits
F&G
F&W
City
17. N
Wetlands Mitigation Plan Agencies Jurisdiction
Wetland
LC
Wetland
ACE
City
Biologists
Big Canyon
Mitigation
F&G
CCC
Permits
F&W
CD✓
city
18.
Final Wetland Mitigation Plan
Wetland
LC
Grading/WL
ACCE
City
Biologists
Big Canyon
Mitigation
Ox
07C
Permits
F&G
0
F&W
V
rij
r0 - I)
Location
Threshold/ Approval/
Verification
Mitigation
Description
Hoag
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit Monitor Dept.
Form
Measure #
Lower Campus
Schedule
t g, Wetland Mitigation Plan Provisions/Monitoring
Wetland
Big Canyon
Grading/WL
Mitigation
PCCE
C7C
City
Cm
Biologist
Permits
11
F&G
F&W
20. j Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Requirements Grading,
Wetland
Big Canyon
Wetland
Mitigation
POD
O
O7C
City
Plant Lists, Monitoring Programs
Biologist
Permit
City
F&G
F&W
*.
2� �.( Archeologist Monitoring of Mass Grading
Architect
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
9•
x`
22.) i J Paleontologist Monitoring of Mass Grading
Paleontologist.
Architect
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Paleontolo ist
a
23. iy Fes AIoo VillaBalboaCommon Property Line
N/A
11;
N/A
City
En ineenn
Bldg. Dept.
c..,.�
24. -( MP Project Approvals & Documents
Y'
Varies
UC/LC
Grading
Permit
Varies
Ongoing
MP/PC Text/EIR/Gradin Permits/Buildin Permits
To Be
UC/CC
End of
City Planning/
City
25. W Phase I - Subsequent Studies _
Determined
Phase I
Traffic Dept.
Planning &
TPO Volume Analysis Phases I &III
Traffic
6. Prior to Phase I Traffic - Trip Generation - Not to
To Be
UC/LC
Prior to
Phase I/
City Planning/
Traffic
City
c�ytp` Exceed 1338 PM Peak Hour
r
Determined
Grading
27. t.1 After Phase I Trip Generation for Phases II & III
To Be
UC/LC
Grading
Phase II
City Traffic
lPlanninq Dept.
City
Determined
28. Future AOMD Regulations
Varies
UC/LC
Ongoing
Pam
Pam
Cit
29. City Transportation Demand Management Ordinance
To Be
LC
Ongoing
City/County
City/
Count
O.C. Con estion Mana ement
Determined
P14
UC/LC
On i
Cit Traffic
OCTD/Cit
30.1 Pubic Transit Bus Sto s
I Westside RoadwayTraffic Control -Pilot Pro ram
Traffic
LC
Gradin
Plannin
Plannin
a91 <_
Traffic Generated Parking Rates Subsequent to Phase
I Traffic
UC/LC
se I
Traffic
Completionha
Traffio
33. N Roadways Circulation
Civil Engineer
UCILC
Grading
Public Works/
Traffic
34. ments
LHos
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Traffic
En ineer
City Traffic
En ineer35.
tiaAvenue
ERideshareffripReduction
Traffic
Transportation
N/A
N/A
Transportation
Transport.,
sz
Coordinator
Coordinator
Coordina{or
-fwi
Page 2 1
Hoag
Location
Threshold/
Approval/
Venfication
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
1 Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
11 I Schedule
36z f ` {+t
Regulated air missions equipment Permits through
gyp
Mach. Engin.
Architect
UC/LC
Grading/
Building
Planning
% DMID
_
3�3
Energy efficient lighting incorporated into design
Elec. Engineer
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Building
PTraEn
38. 7
Ordinance #91-16-5% Carpool Parking
Planning
UC/LC
Grading/
BuildingTraffic
Planning
En
39. }
Bike Lockers, Rideshare Information YCt4C15d, .
Noise Levels 65 CNEL at On -Site Outdoor Hospital
Coordinator
Mach. Eng.
UC/LC
N/A
.
N/A
Areas
Architect
Traffic En in.
40. YInterior
Noise Levels, 45 CNEL Below
Architect
UC/LC
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mech. Engin.
Ti.
Existing Exhaust Fan - New building are mitigated re:
Architect/
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning
noise levels.
Acoustical
Building
Mach. Eng.
4'2�-'
City to send letter to emergency vehicle company to
Paramedic
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
f 43
cut off sirens.
Landscape and irrigation plans to be developed for
Coordinator
Landscape
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning/
Building
each building/project by licensed landscape architect.
Architect
Building
PBR/
Dept.
Public Works
•�
44. j
Lighting and window systems for wastsida of UCper
Architect
Building
Building
Building
Campus to minimize light spillage
Elec. Engin.
45. J
Mechanical and trash screen from public view
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Planning/
Planning/
Buildin
Building
`46TJ
No major mechanical equipment on LC rooftops -
ct
LC
Building '
Planning/
Planning/
Conceal and screen
.
BuildingBuilding
'7
Linear Park - Dedicate grade and improve.
g.
LC
Building/
Planning
Building
f�:1
�r
pe
Grading
PBR, PW
PBR
ct
Building
48. r(
EIR Conformance - View impacts verified for each
ker
LC
Building
Planning
Planning
49. Af
L C building
Hazardous materials/waste management
ng.
F(Hosp.)
LC
N/A
N/AInfactious-wastState
oA
encies
50.
Reabandonment of oil wells
LC
Building
Building/D.O.G
Building/
D.O.G.
51. �
Collection of gas samples at Newport Beach
LC
GradingSoil
gas sampling and monitoring program
LC
Grading
Building
Building'
Mitigation
I
Measure #
rDescriF
L
53. ,
Site safety plan
C�
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Building
54. �/
Gas collection wells drilled
Cos
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Building
55.
Monitoring system
C�
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Building
.+V
Study of other hazardous constituents
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Buildin
Buildin
V. 0I_
V
Study of wells and flare
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Buildin
5'8.64
N
Scrubbers stem
Scrubber
LC
Grading
Building 1
59. N
Evaluation of flare system
Scrubber
LC
Grading
Buildin
Building
60.!')C /V
Relight system in flare
Scrubber
LC
Gradin
Buildin
61. ,V
Gas monitor
Scrubber
LC
Gradinq
Buildin
62.
Stormwater pollution prevention plan
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Building
Engineering
RWQCB
163. .` A/
Soils samples for BTEX
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Buildin
_
64.
Evaluate existing vent systems
G�i
LC
Grading
Building
Fire
D.O.G.
AMU
65.
Air dispersion model
Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Building
Building
Planning
AQW
'Al
Gas monitoringequipment
Remediation
LC
Buildin
Buildin
Trench and monitor inferred fault
Geo/
Soils/
Ges
LC
Grading
Building
Structures designed for gas seepage protection
Geotechnical
En ineer
Building
Building
Building
F9.A,
Plans sharin as test burins for buildin s
Ces
LC
Gradin
Buildin
Passive gas collection systems
Geotech/
Architect
LC
Building
Grading
En ineer
Plans sharing sealing from gas mitigation
Geotech/
Architect
LC
Building
Grading
En ineer
Plans sharing Gas gas sensors
Engineer
LC
Building
Building
Fire
73.
Plans for as accumulation in stora a areas
Mech. En .
LC
Buildin
Buildin
✓OW
Page 4 1^
Hoag
Location
Threshold/
PP A roval/
Var liaation
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule -
74. ,�/
Utilize explosimeter
Mech. Eng.
LC
During
Construction
Fire
75.�n/
Monitoring during flare removal
Ga;
LC
During
Construction
Building
7' �6. �;L ,i/
Scrubber system to remove H2S
Remediation
LC
Grading
ng
planning
POW
�7
Sampling and analysis protocol
Remediation
Geo/Soils
LC
Prior to
Scrubber
Building
Planning
Installation
AOMD
78! N
Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber
equipment
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Scrubber
Installation
Building
Planning
AQMD
79.
Sampling and analysis protocol
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Scrubber
Building
Planning
Installation
I PCM
80. /k/
Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber
equipment
rRemediation
LC
Prior to
Scrubber
Installation
Building
Planning
X)X
SY. %
Study to evaluate control equipment
LC
Prior to
Scrubber
Building
Planning
Installation
AOMD
82. t
District Rules #402 Public Nuisance
403 Fu itive Dust
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building
Building
83.Uf V
Hazardous Materials/
Waste Management Infection Waste
(Hasp.) Engin.
LC/UC
Building
I
Fire Preven.
CCHO%
Verify Plans
84., ,c/
Hazardous Materials/
Waste Management Infection Waste
(Hasp.) Eng.
LC/UC
Building
Fire Prevent.
Verify Plans
85.i, ,t/
Waste Management/Storage Hazardous Materials for
(Hasp.)
LC/UC
Ongoing
Fire Prevent.
Verify Plans
Expanded Facilities
OO CA
a6*w ;�/
7
�6 l
Air Toxic Rules--1401, 1403, 1405, 1415 AQMD
are being carried out.
(Hasp.)
UC/LC
Ongoing
Planning
A MD
Hoag Letter
to Planning
Director
87. Al
Paved roadways done early in project - Phase I mass
grading and paving
Civil Engineer
IL
Phase I
Building
Hoag letter
to Planning
Director
88. (Y
Energy Efficient Building Systems
Architect/
Engineers
UC/LC
Ongoing
Building
Building
Plans
89. Ile
Employment of methods/materials where feasible to
(Hasp.)
LC
Ongoing
minimize VOC emissions
iG,Lc,:-Y DD1 r1-Di✓
Page 5
Fbag
Location
Threshold)
A royal/
PP
Verification
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
c�
g0.,.r �
Overhead power lines at Critical Care/Surgery
Architect
LC
CCSAConst
Public Works
CCSAPIans
Addition
Elec. Engin.
Edison
91.
Emergency fire access
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Fire Dept.
Phase I
Public Works
Civil Plans
92.
Water saving devices and fixtures
Mach.
UC/LC
Building
Building Dept.
Bldg. Plans
Engineer
93.
Water and sewer facilities
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works
Phase I
j
Master Plan - Verity adequacy of existigA facilities
Building
Civil Plans
94. .f
Fire sUCpression/sprinkler systems for all buildings
Mech.
UC/LC
Building
Fire Dept.
Building
En ineer
Plans
95.
Access Roads - Existing and new to become fire lanes
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Building
Fire Dept.
Phase 1
Civil Plans
96.
Thermal Integrity - New buildings' time clocks,
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building Dept.
Architect.
-
sensors & construction measures
Mech. En in.
Plans
97.
Window glazing, insulation & efficient ventilation in
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building
Architect.
new buildin
Mech. En in.
Bld . Plans
.
98. Y
Energy efficient building appliances
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building
Architect.
Plans
Water heaters, furnaces & boilers
Mech. En in.
Bldg.
99.
`C
Solar Designs and solar heating
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building
Architect.
Mech. En in.
Bldg. Plans
).00.-)
Soils disposal into environmentally cleared landfill
Geo/Soils
UC/LC
Grading
Building
Grading
Civil
Phase I
101 � �!
Construction traffic phasing
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
Grading
1
En ineer
Doc./Permit
102. q
Haul routes for export material
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
Grading
Chapter 15 NBM Code
Doc./Permit
103.7 r
Public traffic dis 9tion
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
Grading
Doc./Permit
104.
Truck trip limits - 16 per hour from June 1 to
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading/
Public Works
Grading
Sept. 1
I
I Buildin
Doc./Permit
105.
Trucks will utilize covers to minimize material loss
Contractor
UC/LC
I
Grading/
Public Works
Grading
in transit.
Buildin
Doc./Permit
106. Y
Grading will be done in according with Grading
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works
Grading
Ordinance re: dust, erosion, noise.
Contractor
Doc./Permit
107.
Grading to comply with AQMD Rules and Regulations
Civil Engin.
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works
Grading
Contractor
Doc./Permit
108. ,
Construction crew trip reduction plan for
Architect
UC/LC
Grading/
Traffic
Contractor
Contractors. Identify plan measures.
Contractor
Building
Engineer
Verification
,Qy1--/1g
Civil En in.
=rs
h -
lbag
Location
Threshold/
Approval/
Verification
Mitigation
Mitigation
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Measure #
a
Lower Campus
Schedule
109. AV
Stationary emissions factors for equipment used
Architect
UC/LC
Grading
Planning Dept.
Contractor
during construction utilizing SCAQMD Handbook
Contractor
Plans/
Contract
t4 u f
110.
Low sulfur fuels to & verified for use in stationary
Architect
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning Dept.
Contractor
Plans/
equipment
Contractor
Building
Contract
111.
Mufflers will be maintained on all engines and kept in
Architect
UC/LC
Ongoing
Planning Dept.
Contractor
Verification
_
112._
ro er tune
Construction Activities - Hours of oiler on as
Contractor
Architect
`contractor
VC(LC
JJ/�=� r+A
Ongoing
Building Dept.
Contractor
defined b NB Munici al Code ��
113.
$250,000 for streetfront improvements on Newport
(Hosp.)
UC/LC
OCC
Approval
Planning
City Receipt
Dev. Agree.
Blvd. or reclaimed water facilities
1 14.
E.R. Addition - Rooftop screening of mechanical
Architect
UC/LC
ER.
Building Dept.
Architect
equipment
Construction
Verification
115.
E.R. Addition - Mechanical equipment not to exceed 55
Architect
UC/LC
ER.
Building Dept.
Architect
dBA at property line
Construction
Mech. Eng.
Verification
i
Hoag to pay 75% of 24 ficus trees along property line
(Hoag)
11;
Completed
Planning
Hoag
with Villa Balboa
Completed
17. 4/.
Heliport Use - Limited to emergency medical care
(Hoag)
LID
Ongoing
Planning
Hoag Policy
118. Al
Hoag - Letter from City to OSHPD stating project
(Hoag)
UC/LC
Building
Planning
City Letter
conformance
P e rm it
of
Verification
119. �/
Loading Dock Services - non -vehicular activities -
(Hoag)
U0,
Ongoing
Planning
Hoag Policy
trash compactor 7 a.m. to 7 .m.
�.
( 120. }'
Acoustical/visual screen at Loading Dock -
Architect
LC
CCS1
Planning
CCSADesign
CCSA acoustical study requirements
Landscape
Permit/CCC
Architect
121. 7
CO Hotspot'Rnalysis - Each individual Phase I, ll, III
Gas
UC/LC
Grading
Planning
Gasftag
0
.DVIVIO ✓
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPt t AL PRESBYTERIAN
8/05/92 PRELIMINARY DRAFT
MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING SUMMARY TABLE
Mitigation
11045scription
HDag
Threshold/
Approval/
Verific ation
Measure #
Consultant
U erCam usI
PPacaam
Permit
I I Monitor Dept.
Farm
Lower Cam usI
Schedule
1.
City Grading Standards
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Gradino
Buildinq
Bldg. Dept.
2.
Cut Sloe Monitoring
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
3.
Safe Grading/Faults
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
4.
Seismic Building Standards UBC
Architecture
UC/LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept.
5.
LRC Goo Report 6/89
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Architect
Building
6.
Soil Corrosivity Tests
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
7.
Soils Corrosivity
Geo/Soils
LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Construction Compatibility
Architect
8.
Corrosivity
Geo/Soils
LC
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Neutralization
9.
Silt, Dust, Runoff
Civil Engineer
LC
BuildingBldg.
Dept.
Landscape
10.
Landscape Plan
Landscape
Grading
NBd
Architect
11.
Routine Vacuumin
N/A
CC Water MPPlannin12.
Hydrologic Analysis
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading/Bldg.
Dept.
Civil Engineer
Buildinq
VnOB
13.
Groundwater Analysis
Geo/Soils
LC
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Dewaterin and Subdrains
Civil Engineer
14.
Dewatering Permits and
Geo/Soils
LC
W OB
WOM
Dischar a Permits
Civil En ineer
VGrading/
NPDES
Bld . De t.
15.
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management
FD&C
LC/UC
N/A
N/A
Infection Control
En ineerin16.
Wetlands Agencies Review Requirements
Wetland
LC
POLE
City
Biologist
Big Canyon
CD;
OTC
Permits
F&G
F&W
City
17.
Wetlands Mitigation Plan Agencies Jurisdiction
Wetland
LC
Wetland
POLE
City
Biologists
Big Canyon
Mitigation
F&G
ax
Permits
F&W
CCC
City
18.
Final Wetland Mitigation Plan
Wetland
LC
Grading/WL
ACCE
Cfty
Biologists
Big Canyon
Mitigation
Cm
GM
Permits
F&W
=
Mitigation
Description
Fbag
Threshold/
ApprovalP
Verification
Measure #
Consultant
pPocatio P
U erCam us
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
19.
Wetland Mitigation Plan Provisions/Monitoring
Wetland
Big Canyon
Grading/WL
ADCE
City
Biologist
Mitigation
COC
07C
Permits
F&G
F&W
20.
Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Requirements Grading,
Weiland
Big Canyon
Wetland
POCE
Ox
Plant Lists, Monitoring Programs
Biologist
Mitigation
COG
City
Permit
City
F&G
F&W
21.
Archeologist Monitoring of Mass Grading
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
22.
Paleontologist Monitoring of Mass Grading
ffPaleontologist
LC
Grading
Building .
Bldg. Dept.
23.
Fence Along Villa Balboa Common Property Line
LC
N/A
City
Bldg. Dept.
En ineerin
24.
MP Project Approvals & Documents
UC/LC
Grading
Varies '
Ongoing
MP/PC Text/EIR/Gradin Permits/Buildinq Permits
_
Permit
25.
Phase I - Subsequent Studies
To Be
UC/CC
End of
City Planning/
City
TPO Volume Analysis Phases 11 & III
Determined
Phase I
Traffic Dept.
Planning &
Traffic
26.
Prior to Phase I Traffic - Trip Generation - Not to
To Be
UC/LC
Prior to
City Planning/
City
Exceed 1338 PM Peak Hour
Determined
Phase I/
Traffic
Grading
27.
After Phase I Trip Generation for Phases If & III
To Be
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
City
Determined
Phase II
Planning Dept.
28.
Future AQMD Regulations
Varies
UC/LC
Ongoing
AQMD
AOfvD
City
29.
City Transportation Demand Management Ordinance
To Be
lD
Ongoing
City/County
City/
O.C. Congestion Management
Determined
Count
30.
Public Transit Bus Stops
N4
UC/LC
Ongoing
City Traffic
OCTD/Cif
31.
Westside RoadwaV Traffic Control - Pilot Program
Traffic
LC
Grading
Planning
Planning
32.
Traffic Generated Parking Rates Subsequent to Phase I
Traffic
UC/LC
Phase I
Planning
Traffic
Completion
Traffic
33.
Internal Roadways Circulation
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works/
Traffic
34.
Intersection Improvements
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Traffic
City Traffic
Hos italRoad/Placentia Avenue
Traffic
Engineer
Engineer
35.
Employee Rideshare/rrip Reduction
Transportation
N/A
N/A
I
Transportation
Transport.
AQMD Reg.XV
Coordinator
Coordinator
Coordinator
Page 2 /1
Hoag
Location
Threshold/
Approval/
Verification
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
36.
Regulated air emissions equipment permits through
Mach. Engin.
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning
ACAU
Architect
Building
AOfuD
AQW
37.
Energy efficient lighting incorporated into design
Elec. Engineer
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning
Building
38. 1
Ordinance #91-16-5% Carpool Parking
Planning
UC/LC
Grading/
Building
Planning
Traffic Eng.
Planning
Traffic Eng.
Bike Lockers Rideshare Information
Coordinator
N/A
N/A
39.
Noise Levels 65 CNEL at On -She Outdoor Hospital
Mach. Eng.
UC/LC
N/A
Areas
Architect
Traffic Engin.
40.
Interior Noise Levels, 45 CNEL Below
Architect
UC/LC.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mach. Engin.
41.
Existing Exhaust Fan - New building are mitigated re:
Architect/
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning
noise levels.
Acoustical
Building
Mech. En .
42.
City to send letter to emergency vehicle company to
Paramedic
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
cut off sirens.
Coordinator
43.
Landscape and irrigation plans to be developed for
Landscape
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning/
Building
each building/project by licensed landscape architect.
Architect
Building
PBR/
Dept.
Public Works
44.
Lighting and window systems for west side of UCper
Architect
LC
Building
Building
Building
Campus to minimize tight spillage
Elec. Engin.
45.
Mechanical and trash screen from public view
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Planning/
Planning/
Buildinq
Buildin
46.
No major mechanical equipment on LC rooftops -
Architect
LC
Building
Planning/
Planning/
Conceal and screen
Mech. En .
BuildingBuildin
47.
Linear Park - Dedicate grade and improve.
Civil Eng.
LC
Building/
Planning
Building
Landscape
Grading
PBR, PW
PBR
Architect
Building
48.
EIR Conformance - View impacts verified for each
Model Maker
LC
Building
Planning
Planning
L C buildin
49.
Hazardous materials/waste management
{Hosp.) Eng.
LC
N/A
N/A
State
Infectious Waste
Aclencles
So.
Reabandonment of oil wells
Gas
LC
Building
Building/D.O.G
Building/
D.O.G.
51.
Collection of gas samples at Newport Beach
Crs
LC
Grading
Building
Building .
Townhomes
52.
JSoil gas sampling and monitoring program
CEs
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Page 3 /��
9
Location
Threshold/
Approval/
Verification
Mitigation
Measure *
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
53.
Site safety plan
Cgs
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Building
54.
Gas collection wells drilled
Gas
to
Grading
Building
Building
Building
55.
Monitoring system
ces
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Building
56.
Stud of other hazardous constituents
Geo/Soils
LC
Gradin
Buildin
Building
57.
Study of wells and flare
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
58.
Scrubbers stem
Scrubber
LC
Grading
Building
59.
Evaluation of flare system
Scrubber
LC
Grading
Building
Building
60.
Relight system in flare
Scrubber
LC
—Grading
Building
61.
Gas monitor
Scrubber
LC
Gradina
I Buildin
62.
Stormwater pollution prevention plan
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Engineering
Building
RWOC.B
63.
Soils samples for BTEX
Geo/Soils
LC
Gradin
Building
64.
Evaluate existing vent systems
Gs
LC
Grading
Building
Fire
D.O.G
AQ D
65.
Air dispersion model
Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Building
Building
Planning
AQ D
66.
Gas monitoring equipment
LC
BuildingBuilding
67.
Trench and monitor inferred fault
LC
Grading
Building
68.
Structures designed for gas seepage protection
Peh
Building
Building
Building
69.
Plans sharin as test borin s for buildin s
LC
Gradin
Buildin
70.
Passive gas collection systems
LC
Building
Grading
Architect
Engineer
71.
Plans sharing sealing from gas mitigation
Geolech/
LC
Building
Grading
Architect
Engineer
72.
Plans sharing Gas gas sensors
eer
E:En
LC
Building
Building
Fire
73.
Plans for as accumulation in siora a areas
Me .
LC
Buildin
Buildin
UO
r1
HM."
Location
Threshold/
Approval/
Verification
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
74.
Utilize explosimeter
Mach. Eng.
LC
During
Fire
Construction
75.
Monitoring during flare removal
Gas
LC
During
Building
Construction
76.
Scrubber system to remove 1-12S
Remediation
IA
Grading
Building
Planning
PCMJ
77.
Sampling and analysis protocol
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
Geo/Soils
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
PCND
78.
Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
equipment
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
BIND
79.
Sampling and analysis protocol
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
AOMD
80.
Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
equipment
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
PCND
81.
Study to evaluate control equipment
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
PCMD
82.
District Rules #402 Public Nuisance
Civil EngineerI
Building
Building
Building
403 Fugitive Dust
Architect
83.
Hazardous Materials/
(Hosp.) Engin.Building
Fire Preven.
Verify Plans
Waste Management Infection Waste
COCA
84.
Hazardous Materials/
(Hosp.) Eng.Building
Fire Prevent.
Verify Plans
Waste Management Infection Waste
00'CA
8s.
Waste ManagementlStorage Hazardous Materials for
(Hosp.)Ongoing
Fire Prevent.
Verify Plans
Expanded Facilities
CG-iA
86.
Air Toxic Rules--1401, 1403, 1405, 1415 AOMD
(Hosp.)Ongoing
Planning
Hoag Letter
are being carried out.
POND
to Planning
Director
87.
Paved roadways done early in project - Phase I mass
Civil EngineerPhase
I
Building
Hoag letter
grading and paving
to Planning
Director
88.
Energy Efficient Building Systems
Architect/
Ongoing
Building
Building
En ineers
Plans
89.
Employment of methods/materials where feasible to
(Hosp.)Ongoing
minimize VOC emissions
rage n
hbag
Location
Location
Threshold/
Approval/
VeL-71
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
0
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
0
Lower Campus
Schedule
90.
Overhead power lines at Critical Care/Surgery
Architect
LC
CCSAConst.
Public Works
CCSA Plans
Addition
Elea. Engin.
Edison
91.
Emergency fire access
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Fire Dept.
Phase I
Public Works
Civil Plans
92.
Water saving devices and fixtures
Mech.
UC/LC
Building
Building Dept.
Bldg. Plans
Engineer
93.
Water and sewer facilities
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works
Phase I
Master Plan - Verify adequacy of existing facilities
I
Building
Civil Plans
94.
Fire sUCpression/sprinkler systems for all buildings
Mach.
UC/LC
Building
Fire Dept.
Building
En ineer
Plans
95. i
Access Roads - Existing and new to become fire lanes
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Building
Fire Dept.
Phase I
Civil Plans
96.
Thermal Integrity - New buildings' time clocks,
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building Dept.
Architect.
sensors & construction measures
Mach. En in.
Plans
97.
Window glazing, insulation & efficient ventilation in
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building
Architect.
new buildingMach.
En in.
Bldg. Plans
98.
Energy efficient building appliances
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building
Architect.
Water heaters, furnaces & boilers
Mach. Engin.
Bld . Plans
99.
Solar Designs and solar heating
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building
Architect.
Mech. Engin.
Bldg. Plans
100.
Soils disposal into environmentally cleared landfill
Geo/Soils
UC/LC
Grading
Building
Grading
Civil
Phase I
101.
Construction traffic phasing
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
Grading
Engineer
Doc./Permit
102.
Haul routes for export material
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
Grading
Chapter 15 NBM Code
Doc./Permit
103.
Public traffic disrUCtion
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
Grading
Doc./Permit
104.
Truck trip limits - 16 per hour from June 1 to
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading/
Public Works
Grading
Sept. 1
Building
Doc./Permit
105.
Trucks will utilize covers to minimize material loss
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading/
Public Works
Grading
in transit.
Building
Doc./Permit
106.
Grading will be done in according with Grading
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works
Grading
Ordinance re: dust, erosion, noise.
Contractor
Doc./Permit
107.
Grading to comply with AQMD Rules and Regulations
Civil Engin.
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works
Grading
Contractor
Doc./Permit
108.
Construction crew trip reduction plan for
Architect
UC/LC
Grading/
Traffic
Contractor
Contractors. Identify plan measures.
Contractor
Building
Engineer
Verification
Civil Engin.
Page 6 ��
Mitigation Descr
• Measure p
r
109.
Stationary emissions factors for equipment used
during construction utilizing SCAQMD Handbook
Architect
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading
Planning Dept.
Contractor
Plans/
Contract
110.
Low sulfur fuels to be verified for use in stationary
equipment
Architect
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading/
Building
Planning Dept.
Contractor
Plans/
Contract
111.
Mufflers will be maintained on all engines and kept in
proper tune
Architect
Contractor
UC/LC
Ongoing
Planning Dept.
Contractor
Verification
112.
Construction Activities - Hours of operation as
defined b NB Municipal Code
Architect
Contractor
UC/LC
Ongoing
Building Dept.
Contractor
113.
$250,000 for streethont improvements on Newport
Blvd. or reclaimed water facilities
(Hosp.)
UC/LC
Ox
A roval
Planning
City Receipt
Dev. Agree.
114.
E.R. Addition - Rooftop screening of mechanical
equipment
Architect
UC/LC
ER.
Construction
Building Dept.
Architect
Verification
115.
E.R. Addition - Mechanical equipment not to exceed 55
dBA at property line
Architect
UC/LC
E.R.
Construction
Building Dept.
Architect
Mech. Eng.
Verification
116.
Hoag to pay 75% of 24 ficus trees along property line
With Villa Balboa
(Hoag)
LC
Completed
Planning
I
Hoag
I Completed
117.
Heliport Use - Limited to emergency medical care
(Hoag)
LC
Ongoing
Planning
Hoag Policy
118.
Hoag - Letter from City to OSHPD stating project
conformance
(Hoag)
UC/LC
Building
Permit
Planning
City Letter
of
Verification
119.
Loading Dock Services - non -vehicular activities -
trash compactor 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
(Hoag)
LC
Ongoing
Planning
Hoag Policy
120.
Acousticallvisual screen at Loading Dock -
CCSA acoustical study requirements
Architect
Landscape
Architect
U3
OISA
Permit/CCC
Planning
CCSA Design
121.
CO Holspot Analysis - Each individual Phase I, 11, 111
CEs
UC/LC
Grading
Planning
Gas/I-bag
ro"; Page i"1
C
F = � fir• P- f [Atddtkf& D-�P
&r- G,eADI N'G
HOAGMEMORIAL HOSPrrALPRESBYTERIAN -a = VLF^
8105192 PRELIMINARY DRAFT TW _ Qvb l r a Work
MITIGATION MEASURES MONMORING SUMMARYTABLE
FI Miti ation
D�scri lion
P
fixes
Location
Threshold/ Approval/
Verification
Measure #
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Cam us
Schedule
i
City Grading Standards
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Buildino
Bldg. Dept.
2 1Cut
Sloe Monitoring
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bld . De I.
\
Safe Grading/Faults
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bld . De t. -
Seismic Building Standards UBC
Architecture
UC/LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept.
5.
LRC Goo Report 6/89
Geo/Soils
IJO
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Architect
Buildin
-Dept.
Soil Corrosivity Tests
Geo/Soils
LC
Gradln_q
Building
Bid .
Soils Corrosivity
Goo/Soils
LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept.
V
Construction Compatibility
Architect
8
Corrosivity
Geo/Soils
LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept. t
'
Neutralization
9.
Silt, Dust, Runoff
Civil Engineer
LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Landscape
10j
Landscape Plan
Landscape
Grading
PBR/
Architect
Planning
1j.I; '
Routine Vacuuming
NIA
OCWater MP
GountvPlannin
"
Hydrologic Analysis 94rp5torl
Sr a- ior7 Covrftl
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading/
Building
Bldg. Dept,
t
neer
Buildin
VVOC8
Groundwater Analysis
ils
LC
Grading/
Building
Bldg. Dept.
[
Dewaterin and Subdrains
neer
Building
14.
Dewatering Permits and
ils
LO
Grading/
WOOB
WOCB
Dischar a Permits
Engineer
BuildingNPDES
Bldg. Dept.
15. /y
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management
pnn
LC/UC
N/A
N/A
N/A
f L
Infection Control
rin .16.
Wetlands Agencies Review Requirements
d
LC
Wetland
FOCE
City
ist
Big Canyon
Mitigation
GJG
COG
Permits
F&G
F&W
Cit
17.
Wetlands Mitigation Plan Agencies Jurisdiction
Wetland
LC
Wetland
AOCE
City
Biologists
Big Canyon
Mitigation
F&G
O00
Permits
F&W
OJC
City
18.
Final Wetland Mitigation Plan
Wetland
LC
Grading/WL
FOCE
City
Biologists
Big Canyon
Mitigation
OJG
CUG
Permits
F&G
0
F&W
W
III
0"%
O
f
Mitigation
Description
Hoag
Location
Threshold!
Approval/
Verification
Measure rY
Consultant
9
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
19.
Wetland Mitigation Plan Provisions/Monitoring
Wetland
Big Canyon
Grading/WL
POCE
City
Biologist
Mitigation
COC
cm
Permits
F&G
F&W
2
Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Requirements Grading,
Wetland
Big Canyon
Wetland
POCE
CJC
Plant Lists, Monitoring Programs
Biologist
Mitigation
CM
City
Permit
City
F&G
F&W
Archeologist Monitoring of Mass Grading
Architect
LC
Grading
Building
Paleontologist
'
Paleontologist Monitoring of Mass Grading
Architect
LC
Grading
Building
RM
Paleontolo ist
23. �(
Fence Along Villa Balboa Common Property Line
N/A
LC
N/A
City
t
En ineerin
24 i
MP Project Approvals & Documents
Varies
UC/LC
Grading
Varies
MP/PC Text/EIR/Gradin Permits/Building Permits
Permit
f'
Phase I - Subsequent Studies
To Be
UCICC
End of
City Planning/
City
i'
TPO Volume Analysis Phases II & III
Determined
Phase I
Traffic Dept.
Planning &
Traffic
2
Prior to Phase I Traffic - Trip Generation , Not to
To Be
UC/LC
Prior to
City Planning/
City
Exceed 1338 PM Peak Hour
Determined
Phase 1/
Traffic
Grading
27.
After Phase I Trip Generation for Phases II & III
To Be
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
City
Determined
Phase II
Plannino Dept.
28
r
Future AQMD Regulations
Varies
UC/LC
Ongoing
PCuD
POND
City
29
City Transportation Demand Management Ordinance
To Be
U0
Ongoing
City/County
City/
O.C. Con estion Management
Determined
County
3ff.
Public Transit Bus Stops
N4
UC/LC
Onqoinq
I City Traffic
OCTD/City
31.
Westside RoadwayTraffic Control - Pilot Program
Traffic
to
Gradin
Plannin
Planning
32.
Traffic Generated Parking Rates Subsequent to Phase I
Traffic
UC/LC
Phase
Planning
Traffic
Completion
Traffic
33.
Internal Roadways Circulation
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works/
Traff is
34.
Intersection Improvements
Civil Engineer
UCA-0
Grading
Traffic
City Traffic
r '
Hospital Road/Placentia Avenue
Traffic
En sneer
En sneer
35.
Employee Rideshare/rrip Reduction
Transportation
N/A
N/A
I
Transportation
I
Transpo
AQMDReg. XV
Coordinator
Coordinator
Coordina
1
I
15 P
T
T'
I�
2
a:: rl
Mitigation
Description
Hoag
Location
Threshold)
Approval/
Verification
Measure #
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
11
Lower Campus
Schedule
11
3
Regulated air emissions equipment permits through
Mach. Engin.
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning
D
Architect
Building
AOMD
PQ D
37.
Energy efficient lighting incorporated into design
Elea. Engineer
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning E
Buildin
3
Ordinance #91-16-5% Carpool Parking
Planning
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning
Bike Lockers Rideshare Information
Coordinator
Buildin
Traffic Eng.
Traffic En .
39.
Noise Levels 65 CNEL at On -She Outdoor Hospital
Mach. Eng.
UC/LC
N/A
N/A
N/A
/
Y
Areas ,- r'"
%
Architect
Traffic En in.
40 /
Interior Noise Levels, 45 CNEL Below
Architect
UC/LC
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mach. Engin.
41
Existing Exhaust Fan - New building are mitigated re;
Architect/
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning
°
i
noise levels.
Acoustical
Building
Mach. Eng.
42 •
City to send letter to emergency vehicle company to
Paramedic
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
cut- off sirens.
Coordinator
431.
Landscape and irrigation plans to be developed for
Landscape
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning/
Building
each building/project by licensed landscape architect.
Architect
Building
PBR/
Dept.
Public Works
44
Lighting and window systems for west side of UCper
Architect
LID,
Building
Building
Building
r '
Campus to minimize light spillage
Elea Engin.
d5. /
Mechanical and trash screen from public view
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Planning/
Planning/
Building
Buildin
46. 1
No major mechanical equipment on LC rooftops -
Architect
LC
Building
Planning/ '
Planning/
Conceal and screen
Mach. Ena.
Buildin
Building
47,-7
Linear Park - Dedicate grade and improve.
Civil Eng.
LC
Building/
Planning '
Building
r
Landscape
Grading
PBR, PW
PBR
/"
Architect
Buildin
48.
EIR Conformance - View impacts verified for each
Model Maker
LC
Building
Planning
Planning
L C building
49.
Hazardous materials/waste management
(Hosp.) Eng.
LC
N/A
State
Infectious Waste
Agencies
50.
Reabandonment of oil wells
Gas
I.0
Building/D.O.G
Building/
D.O.GCollection
of gas samples at Newport Beach
Gas
LC
rN/A
Building
Building
Townhomes
Soil gas sampling and monitoring program
C
LC
Building
Buildifg,
I
E
Mitigation
Description
I -bag
Location
Threshold/
Approval/
Verification
Measure #
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
53.
Site safety plan
Cs
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Building
54.
Gas collection wells drilled
C•cs
LC
Grading
Building
Building
f
Building
55.
Monitoring system
Gas
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Building
5;5,
Study of other hazardous constituents
Geo/Soils
LC
Gradin
Building
Building
570
Stud of wells and flare
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Buildin
W
Scrubbers stem
Scrubber
LC
Grading
Buildin
59.
Evaluation of flare system
Scrubber
LC
Grading
Building
Building
60.
Relight system In flare
Scrubber
LC
Gradin
Building
61.
Gas monitor
Scrubber
LC
Gradin
Buildin
62
Stor water pollution prevention plan
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Engineering
, �_ .__%
BuildingRWW8
63.
Soils
sam les for BTEX
Geo/Soils
LC
GradingBuilding
64.
Evaluate existing vent systems
Gas
LC
Grading
Building
Fire
D.O.G.
65.
Air dispersion model
Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Building
Building
Planning
AOMD
66.
Gas monitoringequipment
Remediation
LC
Building
Buildin
67.
Trench and monitor Inferred fault
Geo/
LC
Grading
Building
Soils/
Gas
68.
Structures designed for gas seepage protection
Geotechnical
Building
Building
Engineer
69.
Plans sharingas test borings for buildings
C�
LC
Buildin
70.
Passive gas collection systems
Geotech/
LC
Grading
Architect
En ineer
71.
Plans sharing sealing from gas mitigation
Geotech/
LC
LBuilding
Grading
Architect
En ineer
72.
Plans sharing Gas gas sensors
Engineer
LC
Building
Fire
73.
Plans for as accumulation in storage areas
Mech. En .
LC
Buildin
1,
C
1 ME
Mitigation
Description
t-bag
Location
Threshold)
Approval/
Verification
Measure #
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
11
74.
Utilize explosimeter
Mach. Eng.
LC
During
Fire
Construction
75.
Monitoring during flare removal
Gas
LC
During
Building
Construction
76.
Sc ubber system to remove HpS ••—� any � e
13Y
Remediation
LC
Grading
Building
r�Nt t say? PAXI 1493
Planning
AOMD
77. ' /
Sampling and analysis protocol
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
Geo/Soils
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
ACMD
78.
Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber
Remediation
ID
Prior to
Building
equipment
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
ACMD
79.
Sampling and analysis protocol
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
• Scrubber
Planning
Installation
AOMD
80.
Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
equipment
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
AQMD
81.
Study to evaluate control equipment
Remediation
I-C
Prior to
Building
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
AOMD
82.
District Rules #402 Public Nuisance
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Building
Building
Building
403 Fu itive Dust
Architect
8 Jj
Hazardous Materials/
(Hosp.) Engin.
LC/UC
Building
Fire Preven.
Verify Plans
/
Waste Management Infection Waste
OCKA
84. ^
Hazardous Materials/
(Hosp.) Eng.
LC/UC
Building
Fire Prevent.
Verify Plans
Waste Management Infection Waste
OVA
85: Y I
Waste ManagemenUStorage Hazardous Materials for
(Hosp.)
LC/UC
Ongoing
Fire Prevent.
Verify Plans
Expanded Facilities
OOKA'
Air Toxic Rules--1401, 1403, 1405, 1415 AOMD
(Hosp.)
UC/LC
Ongoing
Planning
Hoag Letter
are being carried out.
PC=
to Planning
Director
87.
Paved roadways done early In project - Phase I mass
Civil Engineer
LC
Phase[
Building
Hoag letter
1
grading and paving
to Planning
r
Director
8.
Energy Efficient Building Systems
Architect/
UC/LC
Ongoing
Building
Building<1
Engineers
Plans
Employment of methods/materials where feasible to
(Hosp.)
LC
Ongoing
/
minimize VOC emissions
�p
F
F9
N*
h
' Page 5
r-M-i7tf-Ig`atf-lon-j
Description
Location
Threshold/
Approval/
Verification
Measure #
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
90
Overhead power lines at Critical Care/Surgery
Architect
LID
CCSAConst
Public Works
CCSA Plans i
Addition
Else. Engin.
Edison
9
Emergency fire access
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Fire Dept.
Phase 1
Public Works
Civil Plans '
9?J
Water saving devices and fixtures
Mach.
UC/LC
Building
Building Dept.
Bldg. Plans
Engineer
9 `I
Water and sewer facilities
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works
Phase I
N
Master Plan - Verify adequacy of existing facilities
I
I
Buildinq I
Civil Plans
941
Fire sUCpression/sprinkler systems for all buildings
Mech.
UC/LC
Building
Fire Dept.
Building
!
Engineer
Plans
95
Access Roads - Existing and new to become fire lanes
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Building
Fire Dept.
Phase I
'
Civil Plans
96. '
Thermal Integrity - New buildings' time clocks,
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building Dept.
Architect.
sensors & construction measures
Mach. Engin.
Plans
9
Window glazing, insulation & efficient ventilation In
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building
Architect.
new buildina
Mach. En in.
Bld . Plans
9
Energy efficient building appliances
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building
Architect.
Water heaters furnaces & boilers
Mach. En in.
Bldg. Plans
90h
Solar Designs and solar heating
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Building
Architect.
Mach. Engin.
Bldg. Plans
100.
Soils disposal into environmentally cleared landfill
Geo/Soils
UC/LC
Grading
Building
Grading
Civil
Phase I
101.
Construction traffic phasing
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
Grading
En ineer
Doc./Permit
102
Haul routes for export material
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
Grading
Cha ter 15 NBM Code
Doc./Permit
103.
Public traffic disrUCtlon
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading
City Traffic
Grading
Doc./Permit
104.
Truck trip limits - 16 per hour from June 1 to
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading/
Public Works
Grading .
sent. 1
BuildingDoc./Permit
105.
Trucks will utilize covers to minimize material loss
Contractor
UC/LC
Grading/
Public Works
Grading
in transit.
Buildin
Doc./Permit
106
Grading will be done in according with Grading
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works
Grading
Ordinance re: dust erosion noise.
Contractor
Doc./Permit
107.
Grading to comply with AQMD Rules and Regulations
Civil Engin.
UC/LC
Grading
Public Works
Grading
Contractor
Doc./Permit
108.
Construction crew trip reduction plan for
Architect
UC/LC
Grading/
Traffic
Contractor
Contractors. Identify plan measures.
Contractor
Building
Engineer
Verification
jI
I Civil Engin.
Mitigation
Description
Hoag
Threshold/
Anitor
Verification
Measure #
Consultant
aLocation
U rCam us
Upper Campus
Permit
Dept.
Monitor De t.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
109.
Stationary emissions factors for equipment used
Architect
UC/LC
Grading
Planning Dept.
Contractor
during construction utilizing SCAQMD Handbook
Contractor
Plans/
Contract
110.
Low sulfur fuels to be verified for use in stationary
Architect
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning Dept.
Contractor
equipment
Contractor
Building
Plans/
Contract
111
Mufflers will be maintained on all engines and kept in
Architect
UC/LC
Ongoing
Planning Dept.
Contractor
proper tune
Contractor
Verification
11 I
Construction Activities - Hours of operation as
Architect
UC/LC
Ongoing
Building Dept.
Contractor
defined by NB Municipal Code
Contractor
$250,000 for streetfront improvements on Newport
(Hosp.)
UC/LC
CCC
Planning
City Receipt
d
Blvd. or reclaimed water facilities
Approval
Dev. Agree.
E.R. Addition - Rooftop screening of mechanical
Architect
UC/LC
ER.
Building Dept.
Architect
m
equipment
Construction
Verification
E.R. Addition - Mechanical equipment not to exceed 55
Architect
UC/LC
ER.
Building Dept.
Architect
rl�
dBA at property line
Construction
Mach. Eng.
Verification
Hoag to pay 75% of 24 ficus trees along property line
(Hoag)
LC
Completed
Planning
Hoag
with Villa Balboa
Com leted
Heliport Use - Limited to emergency medical care
(Hoag)
LC
Ongoing
Planning
Hoag Policy
1118—
Hoag - Letter from City to OSHPD stating project
(Hoag)
UC/LC
Building
Planning
City Letter
``S
conformance
Permit
of
;11f
Verification
119.
'Loading Dock Services - non -vehicular activities -
(Hoag)
to
Ongoing
Planning
Hoag Policy
1�
i _
trash compactor 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
120. -%�
Acoustical/visual screen at Loading Dock -
Architect
LC
CCS4
Planning
COSA Design
�•"
COSA acoustical study requirements
Landscape
Permit/CCC
Architect
121.
CO Hotspot Analysis - Each individual Phase I, II, III
Cos
UC/LC
Grading
Planning
Gas/Hoag
r S
5Gr [c
S � �
G, }�
F
it /A N N f NCr LA--1 r
�= G,CAF-)I aCG
HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN BL �y
8/05/92 PRELIMINARY DRAFT �1= - b( L,
MITIGATION MEASURES MONITORING SUMMARYTA13LE T
Hx9
Location
vThreshold/
Approval/
Verification
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept.
Form
11
Lower Cam us
Schedule
1lC .. / ;-)
1)
CityGradingStandards
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
GracingBuilding
Bldg. Dept.
2.
Cut Sloe MonitoringGeo/Soils
LC
GradingBuildin
Bldg. Dept.
3J
Safe Grading/Faults
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Buildin
Bldg. Dept. -
4.1
Seismic BuildingStandards UBC
Architecture
UC/LC
Buildin
Building
Bldg. Dept.
S.l
LRC Goo Report 6/89
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
_
I.
Architect
Buildin
B. y
Soil Corrosivit Tests t' .
Geo/Soils
LC
Gradin
Buildin
Bldg. Dept.
7.,
;Soils Corrosivity
Geo/Soils
LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Construction Compatibility _
Architect
Geo/Soils
LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept.
8.
. Corrosivity //
L
t
s.'
Neutralization (.1'
Silt, Dust, Runoff
Civil Engineer
LC
Building
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Landscape
_
,10. f
Landscape Plan
Landscape
Grading
PBR/
't
Architect
Planning
11
Routine Vacuuming
N/A
OC Water MP
Coun
Planning
.
t 12V
Hydrologic Analysis l vpsto� Sk�! cC-hon Co
Goo/Soils
LC
Grading/
Building
Bldg. Dept,
y
1,
Civil Engineer
BuildingWCCB
113
Groundwater Analysis
Geo/Soils
LC
Grading/
Building
Bldg. Dept.
r i
Dewaterin and Subdrains
Civil Engineer
Building
14.
- atering Permits and
/
Geo/Soils
Civil Engineer
LC
Grading/
BuildingNPDES
WCOB
Woo
Bldg. Dept.
15.
Discharge Permits _
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management /
FD&C
LC/UC
N/A
N/A
N/A
Infection Control /��-%
Engineering
16.
Wetlands AgenciesRequirement 6T, 2
Wetland
La
Wetland
P
City
7lv
Biologist
Big Canyon
Mitigation
Permits
M
Ox
FRG
O7C
F&W
/
Cit
17.
Wetlandfi Mitigation Plan Agencies Jurisdiction
Wetland
LC
Wetland
ACCE
City
Biologists
Big Canyon
Mitigation
F&G
Cx
i h
Permits
F&W
Ox
Cit
18.
Final Wetland Mitigation Plan
Wetland
LC
Grading/WL
PCCE
City
Biologists
Big Canyon
Mitigation
Ooo
OTC
Permits
F W
u
Hoag
Location
Threshold/
Approval/ Venfication
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept. Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
19.
Wetland Mitigation Plan Provisions/Monitoring
Wetland
Big Canyon
Grading/WL
PaE
City
CD;
Biologist
Mitigation
000
/
Permits
F8,G
r"
F&W
20.
Final Wetland Mitigation Plan Requirements Grading,
Wetland
Big Canyon
Wetland
POCE
OM
CM
City
Plant Lists, Monitoring Programs
Biologist
Mitigation
Permit
City
F&G
F&W
21.
Archeologist Monitoring of Mass Grading L fb8
Architect
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Paleontologist
I
22.
Paleontologist Monitoring of Mass Grading
I.LJ/
Architect
LC
Grading
Building
Bldg. Dept.
Paleontolo ist
23.
Fence Along Villa Balboa Common Property Line
N/A
LJ3
N/A
City
Bldg. Dept.
/
En ineerin
(
MP Project Approvals & Documents
Varies
UC/LC
Grading
Varies
Ongoing
MP/PC Text/_IR/Gradin Permits/BuildingPermits
Permit
25.
Phase 1- Subsequent Studies
To Be
UC/CC
End of
City Planning/
City
TPO Volume Analysis Phases II & III
Determined
Phase I
Traffic Dept.
Planning &
.
Traffic
26.
Prior to Phase I Traffic - Trip Generation - Not to
To Be
UC/LC
to
City Planning/
City
-
Exceed 1338 PM Peak Hour f b'
Determined
I/
Traffic
v
27.
After Phase I Trip Generation for Phases II & 1117
To Be
UC/LC
g
City Traffic
City
a (_ .'
Determined
II
Plannin Dept.
28. _�c
Future AQMD Regulations
Varies
UC/LC
ng
PCyvD
AQMD
City
`2� "
City Transportation Demand Management Ordinance
To Be
LC
ng
gad
City/County
City/
Count
O.C. Congestion Management / _(1
Determined
30,
Public Transit Bus Stops L /`
N4
UC/LC
Ongoing
Cit Traffic
OCTD/Ci ty
31. l{
Westside RoadwayTraffic Control - Pilot Program
Traffic
LC
Grading
PlanningPlannin
32.
Traffic Generated Parking Rates Subsequent to Phase I
Traffic
UC/LC
I
Planning
Traffic
tion
Traffic
33.
Internal Roadways Circulation
/ `✓
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
ng
Public Works/
Traffic
/
34.
Intersection Improvements
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Traffic
City Traffic
Hospital Road/Placentia Avenue
Traffic
Engineer
En ineer
35.�} %
Employee Rideshare/Trip Reduction
ITransportation
N/A
N/A
Transportation
Coordinator
Transpo
Coordinadk
i 8
AQMD Req. XV
I Coordinator
i
Haag
Location
Threshold/
A proval/
P
Verification
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
Upper CampusI
Permit
I Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
b
Rated air emissions equipment permits through
Mach. Engin.
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning
Architect
Building
AMD
AOtvD
37)
Energy efficient lighting incorporated into design
Elec. Engineer
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning E
Buildin
a+=:•
38.,E 1
Ordinance #91-16-50/6 Carpool Parking
Planning
UC/LC
Grading/
Buildin
Planning
Traffic En
Planning
Traffic En .
y z
39.�G
Bike Lockers Rideshare Information
Noise Levels 65 CNEL at On -Site Outdoor Hospital
Coordinator
Mech. Eng.
UC/LC
N/A
N/A
N/A
`/
Areas
Architect
Traffic En in.
40�
Interior Noise Levels, 45 CNEL Below
Architect
UC/LC
N/A
N/A
N/A
4�I
Existing Exhaust Fan - New building are mitigated re:
Mech. En in.
Architect/
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning
Planning
noise levels.
Acoustical
Building
Mech. Eng.
-.Y
City to send letter to emergency vehicle company to
Paramedic
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
'
43;
out off sirens.
Landscape and irrigation plans to be developed for
Coordinator
Landscape
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning/
Building
-
each building/project by licensed landscape architect.
Architect
Building
PBR/
Dept.
Public Works
f 44. -
Lighting and window systems for west side of UCper
Architect
LID
Building
Building
Building
tl
Campus to minimize light spillage
Elec. Engin.
(4�51
Mechanical and trash screen from public view
Architect
UC/LC
Building
Planning/
Building
Planning/
Building
46.
No major mechanical equipment op LC rooftops -
#.r
Architect
LC
Building
Planning/ `
Buildin
nning/
ildin
Conceal and screen /
Linear Park - Dedicate grade and improve.
Mach. En .
Civil Eng.Building/
Planning 'ildingLandscape
Grading
PBR, PWPBRArchitect
BuildinEIR
Conformance -View impacts verified�r/eaach
Model Maker
LC
Building
Planning
anning
AQY
L C building
Hazardous materials/waste management
(Hosp.) Eng.
LC
N/A
N/A
State
Aciencies
O�,�
Infectious Waste
Reabandonment of oil wells
Gm
LC
Building
Building/D.O.G
Building/
D.O.G.
Collection of gas samples at Newport Beach
Ge;
LC
Grading
BuildingTownhomesSoil
gas sampling and monitoring program
C�
LC
Grading
Building
Buildlug
I 19
3T P
a
IUS�c��
r�
1111 011,
Hoag
Location
Threshold/ A roval/ Verification
PP
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit Monitor Dept. Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
53.
Site safety plan
Ca.
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Building
54.
Gas collection wells drilled
Gas
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Building
55.
Monitoring system
Gas
LC
Grading
Building
Building
Building
56.
Study of other hazardous constituents_
Geo/Soils
1
Grading
Building
Building
Stud
/Soils
LC
Building
Scrubbers stem. tl t -% 2.', . I
Scrubber
LC
Grading
Building
59.
Evaluation of flare systefb
Scrubber
lC
Building
Building
60.
Relight system In flare
Scrubber
IC
Grading
Building
61.
Gas monitor
Scrubber
LC
Grading
RBulldinq
Building
Storrnwater pollution prevention plan
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Engineering
Soils sam les for BTEX ) ". ;" _' -_
Geo/Soils
LC
Buildin64.
Evaluate existing vent systems
Gas
LC
Building
Fire
D.O.Cx
AOMD
65.
Air dispersion model
Engineer
UC/LC
Grading
Building
il
Building
Planning
fUM
Gas monitoringequipment
Remediation
LC
BuildingBuilding
Trench and monitor inferred fault
Geo/
LC
Grading
Building
Soils/
Ges
F70.
Structures designed for gas seepage protection
Geotechnical
Building
Building
Building
En ineer
Plans sharin as test borin s for buildin s
Gas
LC
Gradin
BuildinPassive
gas collection systems
Geotech/
LC
Building
Grading
Architect
Engineer
71.
Plans sharing sealing from gas mitigation
Geotech/
LC
Building
Grading
Architect
Engineer
72.
Plans sharing Gas gas sensors
Engineer
LC
Building
Building
Fire
73.
1 Plans for gas accumulation in storage areas
Mech. En .
LC
Building
Buildin
EUM
Location
Threshold/ A roval/
PP
iT
Verification
Mitigation
Measure #
Description
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit Monitor Dept.
Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
74.
Utilize explosimeter
Mach. Eng.
LC
During
Fire
Construction
75.
Monitoring during flare removal
Ces
LC
During
Building
Construction
76. j
, Scr(ubber s stem to remove H2S —an5 -6-� a
Remediation
LC-
Grading
Building
Planning
a 9L 1 1-by M� IR43/
�(' �
AOMD
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
77.
Sampling and analysis protocol
Geo/Soils
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
X) D
78.
Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
equipment
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
ACMD
79.
Sampling and analysis protocol
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
ACMD
80.
Calibration and maintenance plan for scrubber
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Building
equipment
Scrubber
Planning
Installation
AMU
81.
Study to evaluate control equipment
Remediation
LC
Prior to
Scrubber
Building
Planning
Installation
AOMD
82.
District Rules #402 Public Nuisance
Civil Engineer
UC/LC
Building
Building
Building
`.,
�83-b
403 Fugitive Dust
Hazardous Materials/
Architect
(Hosp.) Engin.
LC/UC
Building
Fire Preven.
OQ-CA
Verify Plans
• fi:; r��
84. 1
Waste Management Infection Waste
Hazardous Materials/
(Hosp.) Eng.
LC/UC
Building
Fire Prevent.
Verify Plans
,, j
- Waste Management Infection Waste
OO-C!t
85.
Waste Management/Storage Hazardous Materials for
(Hosp.)
LC/UC
Ongoing
Fire Prevent.
Verify Plans
_ . v
86.
Expanded Facilities
Air Toxic Rules--1401, 1403, 1405, 1415 AQMD
(Hosp.)
UC/LC
Ongoing
COCA
Planning
Hoag Letter
are being carried out.
I I
PINED
to Planning
Director
87. 1'
Paved roadways done early In project - Phase I mass
Civil Engineer
LC
Phase I
Building
Hoag letter
grading and paving t
1
1
to Planning
11
IL�
Director
( 8&:
Energy Efficient Building Systems
Architect/
UC/LC
Ongoing
Building
Building
�89.
Employment of methods/materials�tyherelfeasible to
En ineers
(Hosp.)
LC
Ongoing
Plans
minimize VOC emissions _ I II
IF
7SY
r
15
F
I
Mitigation Description I
Overhead power lines at Critical Care/Surgery
gJ
Addition
91
Emergency fire access
C
92fi
Water saving devices and fixtures
93.)
Water and sewer facilities
C
��.
Master Plan - Verityadequacy of existingfacilities
94. }`
Fire sUCpression/sprinkler systems for all buildings
95.)
�.
Access Roads - Existing and new to become fire lanes
C
96.
Thermal Integrity - New buildings' time clocks,
sensors & construction measures
Window glazing, Insulation &efficient ventilation In
.97.j
new bulidin
98/j
Energy efficient building appliances
Water heaters furnaces & boilers
99
Solar Designs and solar heating
100.
, Soils disposal into environmentally cleared
101.
Construction traffic phasing
f1024
Haul routes for export material
._IJ V
Chapter 15 NBM Code
103. j
Public traffic disrUCtion
101'
k
Truck trip limits - 16 per hour from June 1 to
Sept. 1
105. %,
Trucks will utilize covers to minimize material loss
In transit.
106>
Grading will be done in according with Grading
Ordinance re: dust erosion noise.
C1 07;j
Grading to comply with AOMD Rules and Regulations
To8.
Construction crew trip reduction plan for
Contractors. Identify plan measures.
5
�_ +► % �
a7
Mitigation
Description
Hoag
Location
Threshold/
Approval/ Verification
Measure #
Consultant
Upper Campus
Permit
Monitor Dept. Form
Lower Campus
Schedule
109.
Stationary emissions factors for equipment used
Architect
UC/LC
Grading
Planning Dept.
Contractor
`
during construction utilizing SCAQMD Handbook
Contractor
Plans/ I
Contract
1 10.
Low sulfur fuels to be verified for use in stationary
Architect
UC/LC
Grading/
Planning Dept.
Contractor
equipment
Contractor
Building
Plans/
r--�,
Contract
11 1.
Mufflers will be maintained on all engines and kept in
Architect
UC/LC
Ongoing
Planning Dept.
Contractor
>'
proper tune
Contractor
Verification
�12;,
Construction Activities - Hours of operation as
Architect
UC/LC
Ongoing
Building Dept.
Contractor
r""-
i0
defined b NB Municipal Code
Contractor
113.
$250,000 for streetfront improvements on Newport
(Hosp.)
UC/LC
coo
Planning
City Receipt
Z
r Blvd. or reclaimed water facilities
Approval
Dev. A ree.
1 14. -�`
E.R. Addition - Rooftop screening of mechanical
Architect
UC/LC
ER.
Building Dept.
Architect
Gequipment
Construction
Verification
1 15.
ER. Addition - Mechanical equipment not to exceed 55
Architect
UC/LC
ER.
Building Dept.
Architect
dBA at property line
Construction
Mach. Eng.
/
Verification
116.
: Hoag to pay 75% of 24 ficus trees along property line
(Hoag)
LC
Completed
Planning
Hoag
fi
>ri
with Villa Balboa
Completed
117.k
Heliport Use - Limited to emergency medical care
(Hoag)
U3
Ongoing
Planning
Hoag Policy
118.
Hoag - Letter from City to OSHPD stating project
(Hoag)
UC/LC
Building
Planning
City Letter
/
conformance
Permit
of
Verification
119.
' Coading Dock Services - non -vehicular activities -
(Hoag)
LC
Ongoing
Planning
Hoag Policy
- e ,'
trash compactor 7 a.m. to 7 .m.
120 1 "
AcousticaVvisual_scree0.at Loading Dock -
Architect
UC
COS4
Planning
CCSADesgn
CCSA acoustical study requirements
Landscape
Permit/CCC
Architect
121.
CO Hotspot Analysis - Each individual Phase I, ll, III
Gas
UC/LC
Grading
Planning
Gasftag
`A
rIna Ior'C
rJ
gscre-e( ce. -s
IC Page 7
&, o
m I I
i
i
_- --
5
Au
omMIR
r
I jiit/ . / %Iv , i.
s ,
/i
C/ �r
-- - -
el �.
---------------- - --
PHASE VI
Approx. 16 monlhs conslruclion
.I
PHASE IN
Approx. 16 monlhs PHASE IV conslruclion
{
Approx. 16 monlhs consimm;... I
PHASE V
Approx, 16 monlhs ��,,..,..._..
110A(; Aig010k1A1. IIOSPITAL Pft ESItYT�N1AN
1.0 w1rr1I CA6IPUS AIASSINC S7•u0v
13
PHASE 11
Approx. 16 monlhs conslruclion
1.. PHASE
jrm Approx. 16 monlhs consruclion
POTENTIAL PROJECT PHASING