Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CORRESPONDENCE
i Nan A. RocowAx, Director Telephone 543.1550, ExT.-215 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Courthouse Annex SAN Luis ORISFo, CALIFORNIA - 93401 � August 27, 1975 i Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: We are embarking on a program for complete revision of our Zoning Ordinance. There are several fairly large unincorporated communities in our County, and we are compiling a series of reference ordinances from cities which might have similar land use situations or development problems. It would be extremely helpful if a copy of your current Zoning Ordinance could become a part of our library. We would also be interested in receiving copies of other policies or standards which relate to land development regulation. We will be glad to cover any costs involved. Thanks in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, NED A. ROGOWAY Planning Director LARRY J. RED Senior Planner co LJR:lm iL 0 5ve aQ ���• %ba a� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA . 926so City Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. (714) 673-2110 August 6, 1975 Mr. D. R. DeSimone 900 Aleppo Street Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Re: Proposed remodel of dwelling and construction of new garage - Plan Check No. 579-75 Dear Mr. DeSimone: This letter is written to you as a follow-up to our conversation of August 1, 1975 regarding your desire to connect the proposed garage to the existing dwelling. Having reviewed all of the sections of the Municipal Code pertaining to your problem, I have been able to convince Mr. Hogan that sufficient latitude exists within the Zoning Code to allow you to construct the breeze -way attachment without the need for a Modiffcation Permit from the City. If it is still your desire to construct the garage in this manner, all we require is two copies of the original plans which will be substituted for the plans currently on file. No additional plan check or plan check fees will be required. If you have any questions regarding this matter or if I can be of any further assistance, please let me know. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR BY C4MLJ 0saps D. Hewicker, stant Director - Planning JDH/sh cc: Dick Hogan Bob Fowler Lee Rodriquez Bill Laycock Carol Kruse M.. April 21. 1975 County of Orange Department of Real Property Services 400 Civic Center Drive Nest Santa Anas Calif, 92701 Re., GA 1121-62 Orange County Airport Dear Mr, Swindles Reference is made to your letter of March 31% 1975, pertaining to the lease of 1#145 sq, ft. of office space in the Air Cal fornia, corporate headquarters for the staff of the Airport land use Commission. The proposal has been reviewed by the Department of Community bevolopment and it has been determined that the lease of office space will be in conformance with the City`s General Plan and will not have any significant adverse effects on the environment. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT Of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. ROGAN, DIRECTOR u. Tl41ICUkal"0 taut Director » Planning ® =OUNTY OF © (0)�RANGE DEPARTMENT OF REAL PROPERTY SERVICES 400 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST SANTA ANAI CALIFORNIA 92701 TELEPHONE: 834-2550 AREA CODE 714 March 31, 1975 GA 1121-62 Orange County Airport Mr. Richard Hogan Director of Planning 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 STANLEY E. KRAUSE, SR/WA DIRECTOR GEORGE H. CORMACK, SRA, SR/WA MANAGEMENT DIVISION JOSEPH A. HENNESSEY,SR/WA ACQUISITION DIVISION JOHN R. SHADDY, SRAM SR/WA VALUATION DIVISION The County of Orange proposes to lease approximately 1145 square feet of office space in the Air California corporate headquarters at 3636 Birch Street, Newport Beach. The space will be used to provide an office for the staff of the Airport Land Use Commission. Please review the proposed lease of space and determine if it conforms with the City's General Plan. Also, please determine whether or not the proposed project will have any significant adverse effect on the environment. If you have any questions or desire additional information, please call me. Terry Swindle Property Manager TS/br D �J 1 � RQ�G of . 1 COUNTY OF ORANGE DEPARTMENT OF REAL PROPERTY SERVICES . Rzor RI -AN AIR 6,41-/1`0,eN/A OFF/CE BU/�C,D/it/la 3/o3G B/P411,57- Go/-ca/ PM //,?/-G ? DRAWN BV• .G�• APPROVED BY' JW j BATE �� / - %6 1 DRAWING NO PM /�.�/ o, �Jl, �= t THE CITY OF RENTON o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 yA AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235 - 2550 �ArFO SEPSE'o February 25, 1975 Director of Planning Municipal Building Newport Beach, Ca•lifornia•92660 Gentlemen: The Planning Department of the City of Renton is in the process of researching a new zoning ordinance. This Department would appreciate a copy of your cur- rent Zoning Ordinance and related materials which may be applicable in the control of development with -emphasis on the protection of the environment for the benefit of all the residents and the surrounding=communities. Of particular interest are criteria and means which may be useful in developing performance standards for new industries as opposed to listings of permitted and not - permitted industries. These standards would be addressed to pollution, noise, vibration and light. Innovative means and incentives for achieving aesthetic purposes would also be of interest. If there is a fee and the fee is less than $5.00, please send the ordinance with an invoice. Should the fee be more than $5.00 please notify this Department. Thank you for your assistance and please direct any questions to this Department. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director y v�vL MAR 3 19t5► Victor- R. Feltin� • • Zoning Specialist NWOROF T BEACH, VRF:ms CALIF. G1i Mayor MARILYN RYAN Mayor Pro Tempore KEN DYDA Councilmen GUNTHER W.BUERK FRANCIS D. RUTH ROBERT E. RYAN City Manager LEONARD G. WOOD Gry�Tadtcho Tdog qkkdeg January 30, 1975 A City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Gentlemen: The City of Rancho Palos Verdes will shortly be in the position of formulating its -zoning ordinance. To this end, it would be very helpful to us if we could obtain a copy of the zoning ordinance adopted by,your city. We are, therefore, requesting that a copy of your zon- ing ordinance be forwarded to our Environmental Services Department. If there is any charge for this document, please advise prior -to shipment. SinFerely, Sharon W. Hightower Director of'Planning R E C mt n YD C°m' ant Day DepU EE6 3 1915�" con °e`�cH / N p &UF. 1 31244 Palos Verdes Drive West • Rancho Palos Verdes, Ca. 90274 • (213) 377-0360 J MARINERS SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION WESTCLIFF AT DOVER • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92663 • (714) 642-4000 January 3, 1975 Ms. Shirley Harbeck Community Development Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Ms. Harbeck: Mariners Savings and Loan Association are lenders on both construction and permanent financing in your city and have financed several millions of dollars in residential, industrial and commercial buildings within your area. Due to rezoning in many areas we have found that in some in- stances our investments may be in jeopardy due to rezoning and master planning that is under consideration or has already been approved. We, as lenders, granted these loans in good faith, for long terms based on the existing zoning at the time. Because it is important that we be aware of any potential zoning changes that may affect our investments, we request that you place our company on the proper mailing list so that we will receive notices of any public hearings to be held. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, �Gor _ eorW. Maschmeyer Vice President > GWM/bh 001 ! YSYSt�+ HOME SAVINGS AND LOAN A8500ATION SANTA ANA OFFICE •1300 NORTH MAIN STREET, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 - AREA CODE 714 - 558-1212 December 30, 1974 y/ h' ,c \ JAN 0w 19/5_, /I7L� NEWFok O / 6e.',CN, CALL=, Department of Community Development City Hall 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Gentlemen: Could we get a copy of the ordinance which spells out, in the case of apartment buildings, when there is a fire or earthquake and some units are destroyed, what percentage can be re -built without getting a Conditional Use Permit to re -build property in a down -zoned area? In the course of our lending operations many times the property is older and in doom -zoned areas. There is an insurance available that will help us recapture some of our loss in down -zoned areas. To help us decide when to require this insurance we need to know your city's policy regarding re -building, say for example, 20 units where now only 15 units can be built and what percentage must be destroyed before the building would have to be re -built under the later doom -zoned density. Thank you for your assistance. 10 John Murrin Appraisal Department JM/km AMERICA'S LARGEST • MEMBER FEDERAL SAVINCS AND LOAN INSURANCE CORPORATION • FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK C> F G E PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 14, 1974 Zoning Section Newport Beach Planuigg Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92660 Gentlemen: TELEPHONES (714) 834.3733 P. O. BOX 4103 211 WEST SANTA ANA BLVD. 'SANTA ANA. CA 92701 We are in the process of revising the Orange County Zoning Code to assure its consistency with the General Plan as set forth in Government Code Section 65860 (A.B. 1301). We'd appreciate receiving a copy of your current zoning code. If there is a charge for the code, could you please let us know the price. Thank you for any assistance you can provide. ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT H. G. Osborne, Interim Director Mrs. Joan S. Golding Policy Analyst JSG:cjc �I 0 ��1 S RECEIVED Comn11n11Y pev DP1 ont 16197 Ap" Au G1TY of CH, /i P. O. BOX 909 (BOB) 982•4471 � 10 JOSEPH E. VALDES MAYOR SAM PICK MAYOR PRO TEN PHILIP M. BACA CITY MANAGER January 7, 1974 1 r�w�(7v 1 COUNCILMEN JOSEPH P ALLOCCA ,BOe Cez ROBERT L. BERARDINELLI EDWARD L. GONZALES I846 CLARENCE V. LITHGOW MT.7 LE E. LONGACRE LOUIS OUIB R. R. MONTANO . ROBERT M. STUART 87501 City Planning Director Newport Beach, California 92660 Dear Sir: The City of Santa Fe is considering the revision of its fees for subdivision and rezoning applications, and we are interested in comparing our fees with those charged by other communities approximating Santa Fe in population. We would greatly appreciate your sending us a schedule of your fees for such applications, if available. Sinc4FGleye l Paul Assistant City Planner PHG/eg rC�rH�tAP1 & 8HEITUIRD IUNry h ce �4tri/t+ ATTBRNt'Y% AT LAW Ip41N F Mt rl Mfe1} '+SIITt 1S : /ilpI'n1tY !>il Zrt Ll9l UI}Jn` ' : bl i nU.; itlf .: +^YNTF-ti ONIVC ,N7st"FOUT,B ACH, CALTFORNJA WW% November 4, 1914 Boar4 of Directors Oluffs Homeowners -Association 2414 Vista del Oro, Newport Beach, CA,', 92660 Gentleman; A„W! V-66 11A Tr LL, fa..wr OQ9-fill: -As'you are aware, Your tenant UstblUff Realty, Inc. has received a notice from the City of Newport Reach to the effect that their operation of a real estate sales office at,their present -location is not in line with the present Boning for that property. Bastbluff Realty do - sires to obtain a conditional use permit, allowable under the provisions of the zoning ordinances, which will enable them to conduct a real estate brokerage operation at their' present location: -14 connection therewith, they will need written authorisAtion 902: the filing of the application for a conditional use permit from you as the record owner of the property. Accordingly, we enclose a written authoriza- tion to be duly executeq'bpp your authorized agent on behalf of the homeowners Association. we iould appreciate it you would oause,#his document to be duly executed and forward it back to"'me as'soc4 as possible. Please contadt me if you have any questions or need any additional information. , . Scours Vory truly, ' n r / , JoRN it.. SH"Plan jpra�s t hs act Mr. James D. aewicker City of Newport Beach Mr. John $*Ilona u August 12, 1974 Mr. John M. Goodman Balboa Bay Club 1221 West Coast Highway Newport Beach. California' Dear Mr. Goodmaa: The enclosed check for $150.006 dated May 240 1974, in conj-unction with a use permit application for -additional Balboa Bay Club tennis courts, is being returned since required ,plot plans$ a property owners list and an appli- cation form have not been submitted to the Department of Community Development. It should be noted that the application fee for a use permit application has been increased to $200.00. If you desire further information* please feel free to contact me at any time after 1:00 P.M. Very trul'y yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN9 DIRECTOR By William K, LaYCOCK9 Senior Planner WRL/sh FITZGERALD, ABBOTT & BEARDSLEY 17313 To: Community Development Department 1330 BROADWAY, SUITE 4612 City df Newport Beach �AELEPH CALIF. -3300 �. p TELEPHONE: 451-3300 FROM:3300 Newport Blvd ilewpott Beach,California 4.8.74 RE: Gentlemen: Will you please send me a set of Modification Appliaation forms at your early convenience. Also,please send Zoning Compliance Report dpplication forms. I enclose a self addressed ;stamped envelope. Thank you Y 4ca ® Sta rzensky Southern Pacific Land Company 610 South Main Street • Los Angeles, California 90014 • (213) 624.6161 REAL ESTATE L. M. BROWN DISTRICT MANAGER. REAL ESTATE R.W.WOODROME ASSISTANT DISTRICT MANAGER. REAL ESTATE R. L. STACY ASSISTANT TO DISTRICT MANAGER. REAL ESTATE IN nnLr ILAASK nnfn To June 11, 1974 G-13578 General-Zoning-9 Newport Beach Planning Commission 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 Attn: Mr. John J. Jackowsky, Jr. Re: Future Planning, Zoning and Amendments to General Plan affecting property owned by Southern Pacific Company and subsidiaries. Gentlemen: This office is assigned the responsibility of management of Southern Pacific Company property within your jurisdiction. This includes any land owned by the following companies: Southern Pacific Company Southern Pacific Transportation Company Southern Pacific Land Company Southern Pacific Development Company Southern Pacific Industrial Development Company Monarch Land Company So that -we may be aware of any zone changes, future planning or amendments to General Plan affecting these lands, request that all notices pertaining thereto be directed as follows: Mr. L. M. Brown District Manager Southern Pacific Land Company 610 So. Main Street Los Angeles, California 90014 We would also be happy to answer inquiries you may have regarding such lands. Very truly yours, BE PAUL D. KIELY 2110 EAST KATELLA ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA June 12, 1974 City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Attention: Community Development Department Gentlemen: Please update your mailing list to reflect my change of address. FROM: 8702 Elmer Lane Garden Grove, Calif. 92640 TO: 2110 East Katella Avenue P. O. Box 3490 Anaheim, California 92803 Ver my urs, Paul D. Kiely /dk l v T . August 200 1973, Mr. Keith F. Cordrey' 466 Prospect Street Newport Beach. California 92660 Dear Mr. Cordreys Reference is made to ybu,r-letter of July 30, 1973, and our recent telephone conve-rsation regarding the proposed radio tower at your residence in Newport Shorf;s. Your property currcntly is zoned R-1 and has a height limita- tion of twenty-four feet. This height may be dxceeded up to twenty-eight feet with a Use Permit and beyond twenty-eight feet with a Variance. ' It is my understanding tttat.you now propose to .use a tower, of tel'escop'i-ng tan foot sections and that this tower, if mounted on the ground, -would extend upward to approximately seventeen feet with,appendages. It is ivy opinion that yo long as the proposed tower and appendages do not exceed the twenty -four -foot height limit In the down position, that no permits will be required from this Dcpartment other than the normal building permits. If it is your desire to construct the proposed 'tower in such a manner that it would exceed the basic twenty-four foot height limit in o dawn ;position. thon either a Use Permit or a Variance from the requirement& of the Zoning Code will be repuireu. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, DEVELOPMENT R, V. HOGAN, Director By D. HEWICKER Assistant Director - Planning JDH/kk JI��II°JPffi IC��o Qppip�®]LB�D�ffi]Y .JjiciLte-b/ory July 309 197N, Mr, R. V. Hogan Director, Community Development City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Dear Mr. Hogan: I plan to establish an amateur radio station at my residence, 460 Prospect Street, Newport Beach, Newport Shores Tract. Ny residence is a one story home with a generally flat roof, eleven feet high above the ground slab, on a 35' x 800 lot size(approx) to a 201 paved alley; Powerlines run the length of the alley, about 400 high on the side opposite our property. I plan to install a steel tower, either on top of the flat roof at about the center of the house directly over a vertical bear- ing support, or on the ground level close to the alley as shown on the enclosed sketch. The height of the tower above ground to be 60-65 feet. The reason for this required height is two fold: (1) radio engineering requires that transmitting antennas be not less then 201 higher than the adjacent power lines to prevent substantial absorption of the radiated radio energy; (2) the proximity of the adjoining cliff and hill area of the Banning Oil Leqse with a elevated height of 40-60 feet acts as a shield against radiated radio waves in a northerly and easterly direction for major communication. The steel tower I have in mind is of the crank -up and crank - down type, guyed or fastened at the lower section with the upper part(cranked-up) free standing. The tower is composed of 201 sections, each of which telescopes into each other, During . operation of the station, primarily at night, the tower would be cranked-up':t When not in use, and definitely during Santana wind storms, the tower would be cranked -down to one 2Q' section with appendages extending upward to approximately 25-27' if tower is mounted on the ground or 36-381 if tower is erected on the roof. Any radio interference with TV or broadcast radio in the Newport Shores area would be corrected by me. This requirement is amply covered by POO Regulation 97.131 under which an amateur radio license is granted:, The height of the tower complies with FCC regulation 97.45 Request is made that I be given letter approval to erect this antenna. A reply at your convenience will be appreciated. 460 Prospect Street Newport Beach, Ca 92660 642-0417 1 enclosure 5FET ,8A41?, 3 e Fal 1;2 / v .'Zo i Ti® "Ttly� COUNTY OF INYO PLANNING COMMISSION COURTHOUSE INDEPENDENCE, CALIFORNIA Sept. 21, 1973 TO: County and City Planning Agencies FROM: Inyo County Planning Dept. Paul Giardina, Associate Planner Gentlemen: We are trying to build up a file of reference materials and samples from other counties. We would appreciate it if you would forward us a copy of your Zoning Ordinance, Thank you, Paul M. Giardina Associate Planner kls City Planning Dept, cei y3 U >_>Rn� yCCQ uO UM. Uo� O- M aU0 Z IL Newport Beach, Ca, 97U(o 11 - A August 141 1973 Mr. Paul Kica, Jr. 417 Last Chestnut Street - Apt. A Santa Ana, California 92701 Dear Mr. Mica: Reference is made to your,recent inquiry regarding the preparation of property owner lists. It is the -policy of this Department that this information shall be prepared and verified by a title company doing business in Orange County. Very truly. yours, DEPAR-kli7 lF COMIIVNITY4 UEVELOPMMT R. Y , •NOGA11' Director By,JAMES U. Assistant Div JDH/kk < � S ECRto � 9 RCo va�paP ant 417 J�Nl POofg73. SantaEast Anap Calif. 92701Apt A RT H7i 14 OAY: June 11.* 1973 Director Community Development City Hall.. Newport Beach) Calif. Dear Sir: As an employee of various Title Companies in Orange County I have had eleven (11) years experience in 100 feet and 300 feet variances as prescribed by the City of Newport Beach and other cities in Orange County. I desire to become self-employed by doing Variances as required by the people of the City of Newport Beach. A teleconversation with Mr. William BANDARIK indicated that verification at the conclusion of the list, as stipulated currently.. must be made by:a Title Company. As I must use the Orange County Tax Assessors indices and will indicate the same in my verification paragraph$ verifying that the information contained therein was obtained from the Tax Assessors indices$ it is fervently hoped that a waiver of the stipulation of only a Title Company be considered inasmuch as Title Companies use the same source of information as I do and will. I will specialize in one (1) day service which will be beneficial and especially soy if -and when Proposition Twenty (20) is realized. Sincerely yoursp PAUL MICA JR w� J �,. . 1a �amzeace �i. .-%lesEet el Camino —Real San Clellmde, Cali. 91671 a`� �� Mr. Bello Uva Willi am slurock Vpart6srs 1550 saysi-de artve' Corona del Mars, California 0625 Rett -Site''Noo' Is Lot 40'' Trtct 770 - Emkoy DeVelopmeni Dear Mr,. Zavac; Your letter 0f','ApHV1Oi 1-Mo addressed to Cal Stewart'-' and regarding the 14SOapO plan for Harry Hedly-'s restaurant* has been, 0referred -to this Up'artment for reply, Pursuant to your re4ue,stj1h41 Department of Community Development wil.1 process the plans•for the restaurant with,the understanding that the odcapatiCy. will not be permitted untiluCh time AS the PIA011 Or'tht'llind- scaping, have been apptovedlby the Directfor,of Park%# Beaches and'Rec'reatton and the landscaping has been Very truly yourso DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT R. V, HOSAN, Director By JAMES U Assistant 01re-etor CC PBAR Director, _ Building 'Division April 10, 1973 Mr. Cal Stewart Department of Parks, Beaches & Recreation City of Newport Beach 1714 W. Balboa Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Stewart: william blurock & partners architects planners Regarding Mr. Harry Healy's Restaurant (site No. 1, lot 4, Tr. 770 for Emkay Development Company Inc.), our landscape plan of the building has been delayed. We would appreciate it if you would allow us to proceed with the plan check with the Building Department subject to our submitting the landscape drawing to you before occupancy of the restaurant. Very truly yours, WILLIAM BLUROCK & PARTNERS Nello Zava NZ:gw Planning Commission Newport Beach, Calif. Dear Planning Commissioners: We are very much in favor ing a planned developement reason we wish to back the P. B, R.. plan.. M34 E« Balboa Blvd, Aprill. 25, 1973 if the commission develop - of our city.. For this Revised Edition of the Sincerely, 2&Z"" Mr. and Mrs. Daniell. Gilliland TAt%l' lam C �gEPpN, J. H. HUNTERgERV/�F� 314 The Grand Canal I Balboa Island, California 92662 M p - a APR +tM, j9.7 3 ,yQ :itLEa�C e4 �a%OD�i ( / 41/Gt7 G��iY/yy ea 1(7 &'Iij/1"44 ,4mz a4414L erp 0-1 � �lZI AZ� 1\ J. H. HUNTER 1 314 The Grand Canal Balboa Island, California 92662 November 15, 1972 Mr. William Boulton Bank of Am4rica- Corona del Mar, 'California, 92625 4, • Dear Sir: The following information is given in, response to your request regarding the property located at 2602 West.Oc n Front, Newport Beach, snd the bull -ding proposed for the s te— Gy the applicants, Gilbert W..Ferqu;on and Anita Ferguson,. The City of Newport Beach, on November 2, 1572, issued Build-ing Permit No. 8721 fo-r a single-family dweliing on this site. This structure is wa•t considered by this- department to have a significant impact on the environment inasmuch as: 1, The dwelling will .not create a•change in ,cha-racter, of its immediate surroundings by introducing a difference in use, 'density, population, size or config-uration. 2. There will not be s-ubstantial grading or excava- tion or alteration in topography, 30 There will be no'signiflciant effect on flora or fauna or possible destruction of histories areheal"ogical or paleontological sites, 4. There will not be a si'9Aific4nt effect on the ocean waters•or drainage systems going Into the o'4ean., S. There will not be a significant effect on sur- rounding uses by alteration of traffic patterns, demands on u-tility systems, the greation of unusual or prolonged noise levels, nor will there be significant interrupti-on of community views dr,creation of other serious detrimental effects. very truly yours, 1 , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT By JAREM. HEWIC ER,f t-Director �IOH/kk Asa Stan, :•. t • September 8, 1972 University Baptist Church 2252 S.E. Bristol Santa Ana, Ca. 92707 City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 gentlemen. This is to inform you that the Upper Bay Baptist Church changed its name to University Baptist Church. We received two copies of a Public Notice of Hearing. Would you please correct your mailing list by deleting Upper Bay Baptist Church. Thank you. Very truly yours, WJC : j s >/ RECEIVED Communit 1 DeveloPmen} Dept. SEP 2 219?2s�. NEWPOrRT gF CALIF,EACH, Pastor Willis J. Carrico 0 August 17, 1971 bill Banning, . Beeco Ltd. 505 30th Street' Newport Beach, Calif, Dear Bill. Enclosed are copies of our Planned Residential Development and Planned Community District ordinances. After re -reading these, I raalized I mislead you on the phone. The PRD can be applied to any residential district by use permit and does not involve a zone change. However, with, the split zone on your property* I still feel that we would have to go through some form of zone change. If you,have any questions concerning these, two ordinances, please feet free to call me. Very truly yours. William R. Foley, Assistant Plapner WRF/sm Encl, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA ma city Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. (714) +8A9WA" 640-2266 August 5, 1975 Mr. John Werlie, President Balboa Island Improvement Association P. 0. Box #64 Balboa Island, California Dear Mr. Werlie: Thank you for your letter of July 11, 1975.regarding the Association's concerns as to possible violations of the Building Code and variances from the regulations of the' R-1.5 District. As both Mr. Sinasek and I have indicated td you by phone, we will be happy to work with you and the Association in correcting any actual violations which are found to exist. We look forward to hearing from you and the committee which has been selected to identify specific problems in the near future. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR B Ja es D. Hewicker, As istant Director - Planning JDH/sh cc: Jim Sinasek Bob Fowler BALBOA ROVEMENT ASS'N P. O. BOX # 6a BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 July 11, 1975 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 9266o Dear Sirs: The Balboa Island Improvement Association is receiving more and more complaints from residents in regard to violations of R-13Y building restrictions on Balboa Island. The Board of Directors of our Association made a motion that we write a letter to the Planning Commission to as- certain from you people why granting of variances that violate building restrictions are continued to be permitted. Personally, I cannot understand why anyone should have a public hearing if what they propose is in violation of R-1Y2. It seems to me this is a waste of time and money. Residents of Balboa Island also discover many flagrant violations of the building codes. To quote from a con- cerned resident, "The thing that makes me wonder is how come the inspector can't see what any casual stroller can see, and if he can see, as he is trained so to do, how come he permits it to go on?" tie also wonder!! The Balboa Island Improvement Association worked long and hard for R-1)4, and now that it is on the books, we and the residents of Balboa Island do not understand why it is not being enforced exactly as it should be. We respectfully would appreciate a statement from you people so we in turn can inform the residents of Balboa Island what action in this regard will be taken in the future. Since?Werlie, A John President R c.c. Mr. Henry Lacock JWW:chh ROUTE SLIP SS Date c o v •r 4J C W 4J c O ro E i c 3 w C7E C i Initials •r O E •> 0 7 4J N U Q C r•a NU C' N Q' r u- Director ssist.Dir.- Rannin st.D r.- Buildin v.P an Admin. Admin. Director's Secretary COMMENTS: From ROUTE SLIP Date c o v .J c ro c O (a Rt E c 3 a CJE c S- Initials ++ 4J O 4- r E 9 O 7 W r- U C N C.> (u C •r LL Director ssist.Dir.- Plannin ssist.Dir.- Buildin v.P1an Admin. Admin. Director's Secretary 1 � i From City Council Meeting Au ug st 11,_1975 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA 92m city Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. (714) *MWANN 640-2266 August 5, 1975 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 5 c 2 Mr. John Werlie, President Balboa Island Improvement Association P. 0. Box #64 Balboa Island, California Dear Mr. Werlie: Thank you for your letter of July 11, 1975 regarding the Association's concerns as to possible violations of the Building Code and variances from the regulations of the R-1.5 District. As both Mr. Sinasek and I have indicated td you by phone, we will be happy to work with you and the Association in correcting any, actual violations which are found to exist. We look forward to hearing from you and the committee which has been selected to identify specific problems in the near future. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR By 14W.46 0'4 rJa es D. Hewicker, 'A istant Director - Planning JOH/sh cc: Jim Sinasek Bob Fowler BALBOA ZOVEMENT ASS'N P. O. BOX #64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIPORNIA 92662 July 11, 1975 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Dear Sirs: The Balboa Island Improvement Association is receiving more and more complaints from residents in regard to violations of R-1)2 building restrictions on Balboa Island. The Board of Directors of our Association made a motion that we write a letter to the Planning Commission to as- certain from you people why granting of variances that violate building restrictions are continued to be permitted. Personally, I cannot understand why anyone should have a public hearing if what they propose is in violation of R-lyx. It seems to me this is a waste of time and money. Residents of Balboa Island also discover many flagrant violations of the building codes. To quote from a con- cerned resident, "The thing'that makes me wonder is how come the inspector can't see what any casual stroller can see, and if he can see, as he is trained so to do, how come he permits it to go on?" We also wonder!! The Balboa Island Improvement Association worked long and hard for R-11', and now that'it is on the books, we and the residents of Balboa Island do not understand why it is not being enforced exactly as it should be. We respectfully would appreciate a statement from you people so we in turn can inform the residents of Balboa Island what action in this regard will be taken in the future. Sincerel John W. erlie, President c.c. Mr. Henry Lacock JWW:chh r: 7 City Council Meeting Au ug st 11,_1975 CITY OF NEWPORT BEAC CALIFORNIA 9:fi0 city Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. (714) -6�10■ 640-2266 August 5, 1975 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 6 c 2 Mr. John Werlie, President Balboa Island Improvement Association P. 0. Box #64 Balboa Island, California Dear Mr. Werlie: Thank you for your letter of July 11, 1975 regarding the Association's concerns as to possible violations of the Building Code and variances from the regulations of the R-1.5 District. As both Mr. Sinasek and I have indicated td you by phone, we will be happy to work with you and the Association in correcting any,actual violations which are found to exist. We look forward to hearing from you and the committee which has been selected to identify specific problems in the near future. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR By Ja es D. Hewicker, As istant Director - Planning JDH/sh cc: Jim Sinasek Bob Fowler A µJ• BALBOA ISLAND��- IMPROVEMENT ASS'N P. O. 'BOX #64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 July 11, 1975 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Dear Sirs: The Balboa Island Improvement Association is receiving more and more complaints from residents in regard to violations of R-1y2 building restrictions on Balboa Island. The Board of Directors of our Association made a motion that we write a letter to the Planning Commission to as- certain from you people why granting of variances that violate building restrictions are continued to be permitted. Personally, I cannot understand why anyone should have a public hearing if what they propose is in violation of R-1Y2. It seems to me this is a waste of time and money. Residents of Balboa Island also discover many flagrant violations of the building codes. To quote from a con- cerned resident, "The thing that makes me wonder is how come the inspector can't see what any casual stroller can see, and if he can see, as he is trained so to do, how come he permits it to go on?" We also wonder:! The Balboa Island Improvement Association worked long and hard for R-1y2, and now that'it is on the books, we and the residents of Balboa Island do not understand why it is not being enforced exactly as it should be. We respectfully would appreciate a statement from you people so we in turn can inform the residents of Balboa Island what action in this regard will be taken in the future. Sincerel P~ �•� � John W. erlie, President c.c. Mr. Henry Lacock JWW:chh City Council Meeting Au ug st 11,_1975 August 5, 1975 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA nua city Hall 3300 Newport Mid. (714) **Mt"w 640-2266 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 5 c 2 Mr. John Werlie, President Balboa Island Improvement Association P. 0. Box #64 Balboa Island, California Dear Mr. Werlie: Thank you for your letter of July 11, 1975 regarding the Association's concerns as to possible violations of the Building Code and variances from the regulations of the R-1.5 District. As both Mr. Sinasek and I have indicated to you by phone, we will be happy to work with you and the Association in correcting any,actual violations which are found to exist. We look forward to hearing from you and the committee which has been selected to identify specific problems in the near future. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR By Ja es D. Hewicker, As istant Director JDH/sh cc: Jim Sinasek Bob Fowler BALBOA ZOVEMENT ASS'N P. O. BOX #64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 July 11, 1975 i. RgM_ _ L r Planning Commission City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 {{1 r•J\ Dear Sirs: The Balboa Island Improvement Association is receiving more and more complaints from residents in regard to violations of R-1)� building restrictions on Balboa Island. The Board of Directors of our Association made a motion that we write a letter to the Planning Commission to as- certain from you people why granting of variances that violate building restrictions are continued to be permitted. Personally, I cannot understand why anyone should have a public hearing if what they propose is in violation of R-1y2. It seems to me this is a waste of time and money. Residents of Balboa Island also discover many flagrant violations of the building codes. To quote from a con- cerned resident, "The thing that makes me wonder is how come the inspector can't see what any casual stroller can see, and if he can see, as he is trained so to do, how come he permits it to go on?" We also wonderli The Balboa Island Improvement Association worked long and hard for R-1}41 and now that'it is on the books, we and the residents of Balboa Island do not understand why it is not being enforced exactly as it should be. We respectfully would appreciate a statement from you people so we in turn can inform the residents of Balboa Island what action in this regard will be taken in the future. Sincerel John W. rlie, President c.c. Mr. Henry Lacock JWW:ebb City Council Meeting August 11, 1975 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA nuo City Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. (714) 4A04A20d 640-2266 August 5, 1975 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 5 c 2 Mr. John Werlie, President Balboa Island Improvement Association P. 0. Box #64 Balboa Island, California Dear Mr. Werlie: Thank you for your letter of July 11, 1935 regarding the Association's concerns as to possible violations of the Building Code and variances from the regulations of the R-1.5 District. As both Mr. Sinasek and I have indicated td you by phone, we will be happy to work with you and the Association in correcting any,actual violations which are found to exist. We look forward to hearing from you and the committee which has been selected to identify specific problems in the near future. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR By Lwa6 Q-AaoaI. Ja es D. Hewicker, As istant Director - Planning JDH/sh. cc: Jim Sinasek Bob Fowler BALBOA ISLAND`U% IMPROVEMENT ASS'N P. O. BOX #64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 July 11, 1975 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Dear Sirs: The Balboa Island Improvement Association is receiving more and more complaints from residents in regard to violations of R-1)� building restrictions on Balboa Island. The Board of Directors of our Association made a motion that we write a letter to the Planning Commission to as- certain from you people why granting of variances that violate building restrictions are continued to be permitted. Personally, I cannot understand why anyone should have a public hearing if what they propose is in violation of R-1'Yz. It seems to me this is a waste of time and money. Residents of Balboa Island also discover many flagrant violations of the building codes. To quote from a con- cerned resident, IIThe thing that makes me wonder is how come the inspector can't see what any casual stroller can see, and if he can see, as he is trained so to do, how come he permits it to go on?" We also wonder!! The Balboa Island Improvement Association worked long and hard for R-132, and now that it is on the books, we and the residents of Balboa Island do not understand why it is not being enforced exactly as it should be. We respectfully would appreciate a statement from you people so we in turn can inform the residents of Balboa Island what action in this regard will be taken in the future. Sincere r t John W. Werlie, President c.c. Mr. Henry Lacock JWW:chh A City Council Meeting Au ug st 11,_1975 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA nuo city Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. (714) 4MOm'X30a 640-2266 August 5, 1975 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 5 c 2 Mr. John Werlie, President Balboa Island Improvement Association P. 0. Box #64 Balboa Island, California Dear Mr. Werlie: Thank you for your letter of July 11, 1975 regarding the Association's concerns as to possible violations of the Building Code and variances from the regulations of the R-1.5 District. As both Mr. Sinasek and I have indicated td you by phone, we will be happy to work with you and the Association in correcting any actual violations which are found to exist. We look forward to hearing from you and the committee which has been selected to identify specific problems in the near future. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR Ja es D. Hewicker, As istant Director JDH/sh cc: Jim Sinasek Bob Fowler !' J BALBOA ISLANDNU**,-&7IMPROVEMENT ASS'N P. O. BOX #64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 July 11, 1975 !n L.�A•"upr JUL r Planning Commission City of Newport Beach �N3- 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 ✓\ Dear Sirs: The Balboa Island Improvement Association is receiving more and more complaints from residents in regard to violations of R-1)� building restrictions on Balboa Island. The Board of Directors of our Association made a motion that we write a letter to the Planning Commission to as- certain from you people why granting of variances that violate building restrictions are continued to be permitted. Personally, I cannot understand why anyone should have a public hearing if what they propose is in violation of R-1y2. It seems to me this is a waste of time and money. Residents of Balboa Island also discover many flagrant violations of the building codes. To quote from a con- cerned resident, "The thing that makes me wonder is how come the inspector can't see what any casual stroller can see, and if he can see, as he is trained so to do, how come he permits it to go on?" We also wonder!! The Balboa Island Improvement Association worked long and hard for R-1'12, and now that 'it is on the books, we and the residents of Balboa Island do not understand why it is not being enforced exactly as it should be. We respectfully would appreciate a statement from you people so we in turn can inform the residents of Balboa Island what action in this regard will be taken in the future. Sincerel John W. erlie, President D.C. Mr. Henry Lacock JWW:chh 0 City Council Meeting Au u2 st 11,_1975 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA nuo city Hall $300 Newport Blvd. (714)*NNX NN 640-2266 August 5, 1975 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 5 c 2 Mr. John Werlie, President Balboa Island Improvement Association P. 0. Box #64 Balboa Island, California Dear Mr. Werlie: Thank you for your letter of July 11, 1975 regarding the Association's concerns as to possible violations of the Building Code and variances from the regulations of the R-1.5 District. As both Mr. Sinasek and I have indicated td you by phone, we will be happy to work with you and the Association in correcting any,actual violations which are found to exist. We look forward to hearing has been selected to identi future. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEV R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR By Q- Japes D. Hewicker, Assistant Director - P1 JDH/sh cc: Jim Sinasek Bob Fowler I; BALBOA ISLAND`U C IMPROVEMENT ASS'N P. O. BOX .#64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 July 112 1975 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Dear Sirs: The Balboa Island Improvement Association is receiving more and more complaints from residents in regard to violations of R-lyz building restrictions on Balboa Island. The Board of Directors of our Association made a motion that we write a letter to the Planning Commission to as- certain from you people why granting of variances that violate building restrictions are continued to be permitted. Personally, I cannot understand why anyone should have a public hearing if what they propose is in violation of R-lyz. It seems to me this is a waste of time and money. Residents of Balboa Island also discover many flagrant violations of the building codes. To quote from a con- cerned resident, "The thing that makes me wonder is how come the inspector can't see what any casual stroller can see, and if he can see, as he is trained so to do, how come he permits it to go on?" We also wonder!1 The Balboa Island Improvement Association worked long and hard for R-lyz, and now that it is on the books, we and the residents of Balboa Island do not understand why it is not being enforced exactly as it should be. We respectfully would appreciate a statement from you people so we in turn can inform the residents of Balboa Island what action in this regard will be taken in the future. Sincerel John W. rlie, President c.c. Mr. Henry Lacock JWW:chh City Council Meeting August 11, 1975 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA August 5, 1975 Mr. John Werlie, President Balboa Island Improvement Association P. 0. Box #64 Balboa Island, California Dear Mr. Werlie: nuo City Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. (714) :670xX30ft 640-2266 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 5 c 2 Thank you for your letter of July 11, 1975 regarding the Association's concerns as to possible violations of the Building Code and variances from the regulations of the R-1.5 District. As both Mr. Sinasek and I have indicated td you by phone, we will be happy to work with you and the Association in correcting any actual violations which are found to exist. We look forward to hearing from you and the committee which has been selected to identify specific problems in the near future. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR B �.- y on gina� Ja es D. Hewicker, As istant Director - Planning copy JDH/sh cc: Jim Sinasek Bob Fowler BALBOA ISLAN IMPROVEMENT ASS'N P. O. BOX #64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 July 11, 1975 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Dear Sirs: 5X" RF / n �4/Yrryupl]pY ant JUL 15���sm The Balboa Island Improvement Association is receiving more and more complaints from residents in regard to violations of R-11� building restrictions on Balboa Island. The Board of Directors of our Association made a motion that we write a letter to the Planning Commission to as- certain from you people why granting of variances that violate building restrictions are continued to be permitted. Personally, I cannot understand why anyone should have a public hearing if what they propose is in violation of R-1)ho It seems to me this is a waste of time and money. Residents of Balboa Island also discover many flagrant violations of the building codes. To quote from a con- cerned resident, "The thing that makes me wonder is how come the inspector can't see what any casual stroller can see, and if he can see, as he is trained so to do, how come he permits it to go on?" We also wonder!! The Balboa Island Improvement Association worked long and hard for R-1'/2, and now that it is on the books, we and the residents of Balboa Island do not understand why it is not being enforced exactly as it should be. We respectfully would appreciate a statement from you people so we in turn can inform the residents of Balboa Island what action in this regard will be taken in the future. Sincerel ��- John W. e,lie, President c.c. Mr. Henry Lacock JWW:chh BALBOA ISLAND,.-. IMPROVEMENT ASS'N P. O. BOX #64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 planning Commission City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beacho Calif. 92660 � _ �. , �,l �- ���.� ICI, r �( l tOVEMENT ASS'N P. O. BOX #64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 July 11, 1975 G>, RonT`f'O Planning.Commission1tgG"? �J1s City of Newport Beach,T 3300 Newport Blvd.r Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Dear Sirs: The Balboa Island Improvement Association is receiving more and more complaints from residents in regard to violations of R-1Y2 building restrictions on Balboa Island. The Board of Directors of our Association made a motion that we write a letter to the Planning Commission to as- certain from you people why granting of variances that violate building restrictions are continued to be permitted. Personally, I cannot understand why anyone should have a public hearing if what they propose is in violation of R-1'h. It seems to me this is a waste of time and money. Residents of Balboa Island also discover many flagrant violations of the building codes. To quote from a con- cerned resident, "The thing that makes me wonder is how come the inspector can't see what any casual stroller can see, and if he can see, as he is trained so to do, how come he permits it to go on?" We also wonder:! The Balboa Island Improvement Association worked long and hard for R-1'J2, and now that it is on the books, we and the residents of Balboa Island do not understand why it is not being enforced exactly as it should be. We respectfully would appreciate a statement from you people so we in turn can inform the residents of Balboa Island what action in this regard will be taken in the future. Sincerel John W. -/erlie, President c.c. Mr. Henry Lacock City Council Meeting August 11, 1975 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA rtuo city Hall 3300 Newport Blvd (714) =GVM" 640-2266 August 5, 1975 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 5 c 2 Mr. John Werlie, President Balboa Island Improvement Association P. 0. Box #64 Balboa Island, California Dear Mr. Werlie: Thank you for your letter of July 11, 1975 regarding the Association's concerns as to possible violations of the Building Code and variances from the regulations of the R-1.5 District. As both Mr. Sinasek and I have indicated td you by phone, we will be happy to work with you and the Association in correcting any,actual violations which are found to exist. We look forward to hearing from you and the committee which has been selected to identify specific problems in the near future. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR Ja es D. Hewicker, As istant Director - Planning JDH/sh cc: Jim Sinasek Bob Fowler f r'y BALBOA tOVEMENT ASS'N P. O. BOX #64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 July 11, 1975 Planning Commission City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Dear Sirs: The Balboa Island Improvement Association is receiving more and more complaints from residents in regard to violations of R-1Y2 building restrictions on Balboa Island. The Board of Directors of our Association made a motion that we write a letter to the Planning Commission to as- certain from you people why granting of variances that violate building restrictions are continued to be permitted. Personally, I cannot understand why anyone should have a public hearing if what they propose is in violation of R-lYz. It seems to me this is a waste of time and money. Residents of Balboa Island also discover many flagrant violations of the building codes. To quote from a con- cerned resident, "The thing that makes me wonder is how come the inspector can't see what any casual stroller can see, and if he can see, as he is trained so to do, how come he permits it to go on?" We also wonder:! The Balboa Island Improvement Association worked long and hard for R-1YB, and now that it is on the books, we and the residents of Balboa Island do not understand why it is not being enforced exactly as it should be. We respectfully would appreciate a statement from you people so we in turn can inform the residents of Balboa Island what action in this regard will be taken in the future. Sincerel' 9y• Job. W. erlie, President c.c. Mr. Henry Lacock JWW:chh COUNCILMEN � m A� 0 SG9P N� �.q �y ZZ m11ma 0 ROLL CALL a T e a 2 a m CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH July 28, 1975 MINUTES INDEX Copy of a letter to the Planning Commission from Ba oa slam-tiaprove"ment Asso at'3.on regarding violations of the R-1.5 building restrictions on Balboa Is an . Copy of a letter from the Bridge Action Team to the Board of Supervisors asking for the Board's endorse- ment of the campaign for prompt replacement of the Pacific Coast Highway Upper Bay Bridge in Newport Beach. Copy of a letter to the Mayor from the Corona del Ma Chamber of Commerce expressing their support fo:P01t, Bridge Action Team 176 and enclosing a resoluti adopted by the Chamber which requests the City request immediate action of the State in acco ance with recommendations of the Bay Action Team 76. A letter from Lisa Tiffany Marr protest g any future expansion of the airport. Letters to the Mayor from Dr. John/T. Chiu and Clinton Rygel, and a letter to Council from Mr. and Mrs. E. Thomas protesting the l.drfting of the night curfew at Orange County Airpo t. A resolution of the Irvin Ranch Water District approving proposed memb ship of additional entities in Newport -Irvine Was -Management Agency, including the City of Newport each. A letter from Ne ort Police Employee's Association expressing the disappointment with the salary- fringe benef negotiation process. (A report from the City Ma ager with survey data was presented.) I Copy of letter to Supervisor Ralph Clark regarding nudit . Le ter from the City of Seal Beach giving the re- ganization of its Council. Memorandum from the Intergovernmental Coordinating Council Legislative Liaison Advisory Committee listing resolutions received since June 30, 1975. Notice of hearing before the Public Utilities Com- mission on the applications of Orange Coast Sight - Seeing Company, Town Tour (Funbus) Co., Inc. and The Gray Line Tours to extend their operations under their Certificates of Convenience and Necessity. Interim Opinion on the applications of Pacific Telephone and Telegraph before the Public Utilities Commission for a rate increase. Agenda of the Board of Supervisors meetings held July 15, 16, 22 and 23, 1975. Volume 29 - Page 165 January 2.2, 1976 w s Frecia C. Ransom _ Charles Dunn Company 4000 Westerly place • Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Dear M,a,.Ransom.: '^. In response to your -tatter of January 19* 1976, please be Advised that the subject property is a portion of a +•`•, site designated on the Planned Cgmmunity Development Plan for Koil Center Newport as Retail and Service No. 1. .Restaurants are a permitted uses within this area. '. 's`_ I enjoyed meeting with you and Mr. Akullian on Tuesday, January.20., 1976., If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. Very truly yours,' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V.HOUN, 'DIRECTOR By Assistant Director — Planning JDH/sh' SALES • LEASES . MANAGEMENT , FINANCING • APPRAISALS CHARLES DUNN COMPANY* REALTORS 4000 WESTERLY PLACE . NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 • (714) 833-8800 January 19, 1976 Ms. Carol Kruse City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92663 Dear Ms. Kruse: Mr. Harry Akullian intends to purchase approximately 40,000 square feet of land in the City of Newport Beach for the purpose of establishing a restaurant. For the time being, it is only necessary that we receive formal approval from.the City for the use. The property is Assessor's Parcel #445-121-04, and is the south 1/2 of Lot 9 which begins 120' from the corner of Campus and Von Karman (See attached exhibit). Please advise if you need additional data and thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, CHARLES DUNN COMPANY Frecia C. Ransom FCR:sh Enclosure s CD IS oFCF/� N c 'J. ewZ- , of CAC/FetACH lO %ram P SN AC ASSESSOR'S MAP NOTE•ASSESSO0.'S ELOCKB. BOOK445PAGE II MARCH 1967 PARCEL NUMBERS AIARCH 1974-75 COUNTY Of ORANGE CDTR. NO. 6551 ALAI 243-36,371ACY. SHOWN IN CIRCLES ; /.;W a:.� �,�.,.:,•.: a ;, .,a.,,,:,; 02 �$r 03... 04 r — avrvE Y N 0 CA LOTIf"t M4. TRACT O : lu; ' „•la ' 3O $ 41 ; Lof It i Lot I TRACT I -, R xr • Loan n �•. ; z./eSAa F N .i791J : ^ v ra: V /RNNE r, x. Ie - l9 i Q ..ww• ,.. r Lorur corm 123 /R V/NE, PAR s r Q ,f OI • q O M LoE- r O C761 AC `( /soAc 7 121 Lorr x aL r1B O2 �• waK BLK. 50 . Ib/IrAC. .. t If�U O m l eJ00' • Yp Yr re,9ACL4 n: e. ` w�• �,� su,a , e h a AI/w' rU N' -.' j. pA Y STREET Y 1 O • B1RCll Y LOTS / / . • ' , S ,,: 1oI is LIIIIIIIIIIE 13 , •' 125 I 1 . LOT J 13 ' CO rrrn AC. t 1 PARO( 166l AR � • �J :•. • NO 7953 , u it/6) q� J NOTE•il55ESSORS BLOCK 0 ASSESSORS MAP O i:!�(`•, Q"+,�..`F�, PARCEL NUMBERS OOOK495 PAGE 12 MARCH I973 IRVINE SUB. • • ALAI. 1•88 • • "'• . SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE MNKH 1974-7.1 TRACT N0. 7953 M.M 310-7TUlliNC. •� , PARCEL AIAP P,AI. 60-17 PARCEL MAP PAL 61-1 9 oE�E�VE� S S c4 pewloP � psPt• �Ej► — 6 3 iSY of - - -- -P f March 9, 1976 ° .."p '+ r. Robert Rooney Chairman California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission South Coast Regional Commission b� 666 E. Ocean Boulev ard, Suite 3107 P. 0. Box 1450 4s/ Long Beach, California, 90801 ro Genxlemen: I wish to protest the types of applications the Coastal'Commission feels called upon to include in your agenda. Even with the use of the it calendar" policy, I cannot believe the citizens who voted for the Coastal Commission (and I was one of them) ever considered that you would devote time and moneyjinakinq decisions in -highly developed residential areas within incorporated cities. The enclosed NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING is an example. What the Coastal Commission is doing holding a hearing on such a routine matter I cannot imagine. A house on our street burned (3 months or more ago) and there it sits, a hazardous structure to the neighborhood. It should have been and would have been demolished long ago, but instead the homeowner had to go through this nonsense with your agency. I protest heartily, as I do to your hearings on any remodels in an area like Balboa Island. This residential area has its own unique charm, and in fact that uniqueness (including parking on the street) is the reason people buy here. We don't want Balboa Island to look or feel like Lido Island. We think Newport Beach is quite capable of reflecting our needs and a good examole'is t he pressure brought to bear by the Balboa Island Improvement Assn. in changing the zoning concerning duplexes on the Island. Your requirement for three parking spaces on a 30 foot lot is ridiculous, given the nature of the area you are working with. If I have a chance to vote again on the Coastal Commission, this time I would vote NO, despite some of the worthwhile things the reality accomplished. Like most beaucratic agencies, y ignore of-good.common sense. • Sin Xer G Mrs. Dick Soth• 118 Turquoise Newport Beach, Cal 92662 CC: GOK+ernor Tey!ry Brown k,Acity of Newport Beach Mr. Melvi Lane State Commiasion� S.F. , _- �i/ / � \ // / / � �i / // /i/� / �, / / '� '� ,.�-V-, --- � ��. Xcwport Brest HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION 9 Kielce Court, Newport Beach, California 92660 June 28, 1976 Honorable Newport Beach City Council 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Gentlemen: At the last West Newport Improvement Association's annual meeting, Mayor Rogers stated the City Council was taking steps to improve the unsightly appearance of the R.V. lot located on Pacific Coast Highway. The Newport Crest Homeowners Association would like to know the time schedule and manner in which the screening and landscaping is to be accomplished. Very truly yours, Thomas A. King President TAK/lml cc: Councilman Donald McInnis Richard V. Hogan - Community Development Dept. i R Co s v' ent DB�uD Pu J0� Of %XXXV 640-2181 &7une 30,, 1976 mr. Mike Drom City of Carmel-by-tho-Sea F.O. Lox 5372 Carmel,-by.the -Soa, CA 93921 Dear tSr. Brolm. Your Icttcr of ,Tune 31 1' 76 re,,ardiny ue,E. of city streatN for Charter/tour Lu2as has be .n referrad to this office. The quesLiono YOU Avkc'd Can Le simply anovered by :'ayince, ar, of tl4i.. date, r;e have not c.apgrir-tx�:d ar,y proL1eU.e. 'u} cliertcr/tou.r sr-rvice$3. e ars bast :ornt- rroLlez:� w til local cehool districts durin;t tL+e "Vliool dear that arrive at our ')cachas and marl- Ltte;cs in red curb a.rpas. Mil-.1, of the,ne problems have teen re;aolved by phone cal1s to the School District. ve do not antiaigate ary p.ableltir, an tlee, near futar::, Lut woulu LC interet ts:d 3n the type Of progran, Ln lcmentea and any probloms that Tati Sht occur.. write or call nn at (714) 640-2181 if you nave any questions or need additional information. .�VerIJ truly Cyouro, cam- m Bill L . Darnall REc��vp Traffic Engineer CC: aaM09 #TewiO}Cer �t e� DLD:bca 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BE.A.CH. CALIFORNIA 9266o City Halt 3300 Newport Blvd. (714)673 2110 June 28, 1976 City of Carmel -by -the -Sea P. 0. Box 5372 Carmel -by -the -Sea, Calif. 93921 Attention: Mike Brown Dear Mr. Brown: Your letter of June 8, 1976, regarding use of city streets by charter/tour buses has been referred to the City Traffic Engineer for reply. You "should be hearing from him shortly. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR By J mes D. He icker, As istant Director - Planning JDH/sh cc: Traffic Engineer carmcG�( �fFie��ea Cal COUM (Man. June 8, 1976 �:;' � J�N � Sir/Madame, c�yoi eo This letter is forwarded to share with you a problem whi City of Carmel is confronted with and to learn if your community is rr= finding similar problems. Carmel, as you may know, draws numerous tourists during the summer months. During the past few years, Carmel has found itself confronted with a facet of tourist traffic which is becoming unbearable for many of our residents - namely, Charter/Tourist buses (Charter - Party Carriers). With this problem in mind; I have been trying to find a solution which draws the greatest satisfaction for all parties concerned. I am proposing to our city council that we restrict Charter/Tour- buses to certain streets and establish special parking zones strictly for Charter/Tour buses. This letter is forwarded to learn: 1. Has your community found free use of all city streets by Charter/Tour buses (Charter - Party Carriers) a problem? 2. have you taken steps to alleviate the problem? 3. Do you know of a community which has a problem similar to Carmels? 4, Is your community interested in working with Carmel to find a solution which can be shared? Thank you for your time and attention. , I look forward to hearing from you. V'I p.d. doac ,5.3i�. ca��neG�h1�f,.1.�»•�,ea, ca[�oi� a3�lxt �eCe�h�l� �z�►��ygo �� �/-� ,fie ns� � P�`i�°� % � � ui4 cC lit C/G'��� C D/z��'GC�� � � ' �Li t � � Jy-��e—sea--�� d �/"o� e DATE ' 6, TO: ❑ COUNCIL ❑ MANAGER ❑ ADMIN. ASST. ❑ ATTORNEY ❑ CITY CLERK K,COMM. DEV. ❑ DATA PROC. ❑ FINANCE ❑ FIRE ❑ GEN. SERVICES ❑ LIBRARY ❑ MARINE ❑ PARKS & REC. ❑ PERSONNEL ❑ POLICE ❑ PUBLtWgWRKS FOR: ❑ ACTION & DISE 6ITIO N�KcF�Pc� ❑ FILE Qo �F, ❑ INFORMATION'. NEB cP ❑ REVIEW & COM NT ❑ RETURN REMARKS: �...... USPO @ au4117s �.13 .�.n.�t , ra�Err CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BLVD. NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 Attention: Mr Robert L Wynn, City Manager CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIMRNIA xxxxxx 640-2181 August 16, 1976 Mr. Melvin J. Hoeffliger , . Professional investors 13913 Struikman Road ,_j• Cerritos, CA 90701 •, 9_ ''... Dear Mr. Uoeffliger. Mr, Devlin has referred your latter to me :foi reply. Tn your letter, you requisted'information telatile to the use of the five-foot gear yard setback. adJacent to the alleys in the 400 blA>& of. Heliotrope,_ Goldenrod, and Fernloaf Avenues. section 20.16.025 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code requires .¢ that in residential districts having alleys to the rear of lots or building sites, attached or detached garages, fences, screen plantings or•othee'r obstructions must set back five(5) feet from the rear property ?" lines when the alley is 15 feet or less in width: #• The term "obstructions" would apply to parking and or, r storage as questioned in your letter. The intent is to keep the entire setback clear for maneuvering in ;'. and out of garages, as well as,maintaining through ` access in the alley, Should you have further questions about zoning regu- lations, please call the Community Development Depart- ment at 640-2139, very truly yours, M RECEI Hill E. Darnell do3u1,iani Traffic Engi.near n 01 AUG, 61976a_,� y.p , cc: James Howicker (Comm. Dev. Dept.) CITY OF Joe Devlin BEDabcd oa7`/'7 a� V 1H 13 0 a B ... cstaEe �ui%%ti a trl o�eaC G�sEate Gi�`arsoye��utE TELEPHONE (213) 926•4A07 1 3 9 1 9 STRUIKMAN ROAD • C E R R I T O S, CALIF. 9 0 7 O, 1' MELVIN J. HOEFFLIGER SALLY A. GIPPLE August 11, 1976 Mr. Jerry Devlin Public Works Administration City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Reference: 400 Block on 'Heliotrope, Goldenrod and Fernleaf, Corona del Mar Dear Mr. Devlin: There appears to be an alleyway of 14 feet with. a- rear. yard setback of 5 feet on each side of the alley which totals 24 feet. I am questioning whether the 5-foot rear yard setback can be used for parking and/or storage, or must it be kept clear for the turning radius for garage entry. I will appreciate any information you may be.able,to give. '' P,ECEI�9RK� 4��11'C 19751k AUC��3 CITY OF �NENIFCALIBEACN, ',1 January 4, 1977 Orange County Chapter Building Industry Association of California, I-nc. 17291 Irvine Bouleva-rd Suite 264 Tustin, California 92680 Gentlemen: In reply to your memorandum of December 23, 1976, request- ing P1-annfng Commission a-gendas, we wish to advise that it will be necessary for you to supply us with stamped, self-addressed enve lopes for this purpos-e. 'A regular , letter -sized envelope-(4;4 X 9k) is sufficie►tt-in size. Your supply of envelopes should be forwarded to Shirley Harbeck community Development ueparwmenz Bity of Newport Beach 3300 3360 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, Calif. 92663 Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR - By James D.lidwicker, Assistant Direcb6r - Planning JDH/sh S ORANGE COU6of'P'Y CHAPTER BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 172911rvin&Blvd., Suits 254'rust In. Cellfarnin 92600 9714) 832 — 3404 December,23, 1976 MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk FROM: Orange County Chapter of BIA RE: CityvCouncil and Planning Commission agendas We would ,like =to be dded to your mailing list for City Council and Plannin ommassion-agen_as3. Orange County Chapter Building Industry Association of Calif. 17291 Irvine Boulevard Suite 254 Tustin, California 92680 If self-addressed envelopes are required, please advise. i RECEIVED Co nlmonity Deveiopinent Dept. �� DEC 21719760- • CITY of / NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. , 0 Affill.ud with the A .... 1.dnn of Hemp Bundnrx -- ------------------------- --- -- ---- ----- -- - 44 - Chris Johnson 1964 Port Dunleigh ' - -- -- - -- - - - - --- - --�— Newport Beach, CA 92660 - - - -- ----_— _---------- --- -_-:�-,'mil in. - O Gce u�O2Qti' '�01 N BALBOA ISLE P. O. BOX #64 BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662 TELEPHONE (714) 675-1773 ASS'N September 27, 1976 Community Development Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Re: Springston Residence Dear Sir: On September 14, 1976, Mr. & Mrs. Springston appeared at our board meeting with their plans for 116 Coral. The board unanimously approved of the plans and would like to ublically thank the Springstons for staying within the R zoning. Sinperely, Frank Fulton, President Balboa Island Improvement Association 4 RECE(V Do nimu,(,D volepmen SEP 3 01916>A• COYCW 1 r - The Sporting House October 4, 1976 3931 MacArthur Boulevard Suite 106 Newport Beach California 92660 714 752-0565 Mr. J. Hewicker City of Newport Beach Department of Community Development 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92663 Dear Mr. Hewicker: Racquetball Fitness Club Vollevball Jogging Track Olympic Pool While our athletic club is progressing well, we want to make the club the finest possible and an asset to our community. As you know, this type of club is relatively new. Even with all the pre -planning by our staff and consultants, some deficiencies have been pointed out by our new members. The major requests have been for a swimming pool, running track and a food service facility. We have developed schemes for a swimming pool and running track. When we reviewed the schemes it became evident that we needed to create a different environment from these areas in order to produce a truly relaxing transformation from the work atmosphere. We have accomplished this transformation by using many large trees to screen the area from adjoining areas and streets. The plans are in process using suggestions that you forwarded. We hope to have the drawings completed in the near future for your review. The need for food service has been expressed by many members, and after much study, we agree that this is a necessary addition to our club. For members who workout at 6 A.M., there is little time left to drive to another location for breakfast before going to their place of business. The same inconvenience is created during the lunch period from 11 A.M. to 2 P.M. for members who workout and have lunch. After talking to members, we have also come to the conclusion that evening meals are desirable for families and young adults attending the club at that time. The club would then truly be an all-around meeting place for those who are concerned about their health and physical fitness and wish to spend their free hours in a wholesome atmosphere. jy o�cett qN, 9eoef`n�nit� / 0� j ear ef,t �C 1916 Newpt" ' R o� Ir. SgCH : ` The Sporting House 3931 MacArthur Boulevard Suite 106 Newport Beach California 92660 714 752.0565 Mr. J. Hewicker City of Newport Beach Page 2 Racquetball Fitness Club Volleyball Jogging Track Olympic Pool The existing lounge area, comprising of 1,000 square feet, could serve for both lounge and food service. If this additional service is accepted by your department and our plans proceed, we will operate within the following parameters: 1. No alcoholic beverages will be sold. 2. No live entertainment will be provided. 3. This facility will be for members only, as it is with the rest of the club. 4. Parking will be provided for the dining areas as per city requirements: one space for each 40 square feet. The food service activity would not be a primary function because the area (approximately 2% of the total facility) would also be used as a waiting lounge. .Many corporate offices and industrial firms have dining facilities for the use of their employees as a convenience. We hope to enjoy this same benefit for our members. We recognize that the operation of the food service facility cannot be a financial gain by itself, but that its operation shall lend to the harmonious operation of the total club. I would greatly appreciate your comments regarding this activity and how it would be viewed by your department. As previously mentioned, we want to make this club a credit to our community in becoming a wholesome center for our young people, and a outstanding physical fitness facility for all. Sincerely„ J ck aiman i CENTRAL NEWPORT BEACH Community Association P.O., BOX 772 BALBOA, CALIFORNIA 92661 MARCH 2 1 $ ig?7 MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH NEWPORT BEACH9 CALIFORNIA DEAR COMMISSIONERS9 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CENTRAL NEWPORT BEACH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION WARMLY ENDORSE THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAND ON THE It-5 DOWN20NING IN OLD NEWPORT. WE WOULD LIKE A CLARIFICATION OF WHAT PROPERTIES ARE SPECIFICALLY INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL. OUR POLICY STATEMENT STAND IS UNILATERALLY OPPOSED TO ANY VARIANCE REQUESTS FOR MODIFICATIONS WHICHt IN EFFEOT9 SERVE TO INCREASE DENSITY OR TO OAUSE MORE TRAFFIC OOMPLICATIONS DUE TO DECREASED PARKING REQUIREMENTS* CCI MAYOR COUNOIL MEMBERS VVEEj,R,YY TRULY YOURS$ BOBS OVELL PRESIDENT CU E / ,.Y �00TM��ti� t PQ� or 004 000 Po >DP/e— S.S. �/ZI /7� ....»...., 640.22b6 October 18, 1976 Mrs. Janet A. Purcell 210 Poinsettia Avenue Corona del Mar, Calif. 92626 C111-i Dear Mrs. Purcell: Your letter'of Octobe-r 11, 1976, has been referred to me for reply. - Section 20.10.030 of the Municipal Code provides that a detached accessory building: shall not be located within five (S) feet of any alley or within five (S) feet of :}. the side line -of ,any alley. I am enclosing a copy of Section 20.10.030 for your information and review. Also enclosed is a copy of Section 20.11.030 which would s permit an -open parking space in the alley side yard but no structural encroachments. If I can be of any further assistance in this matter, please let me know* Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR By , ames . Hew cker, Assistant Director•- Punning JDH/sh cc: Director community Development City Attorney Bob Fowler 7� o (i-7C 1i f cC- i 0 OYQ-t -V-1 i i ? r q' 6 �G tc_� �.., ...�-�°►,��' ,�,��'`� �° �i6-� ,r��.c.��-asp g,ECEIVED �[{ 0�� 1 g1916 cmCOF CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALITORNIA 92660 city Hall 3300 Newport 131ri1. (714))67"UD 640-2130 September 29, 1976 Mrs. Janet A. Purcell 210 Poinsettia Avenue Corona del Mar, Ca. 92625 RE: 210 Poinsettia Avenue Dear Mrs. Purcell: I appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and review first hand the structures located at 210 Poinsettia. The department has had the opportunity to evaluate the information gathered at this meeting as well as review the plans which were submitted. It is unfortunate that work proceeded•on your project prior to the obtaining -of a building permit or approvals for the work. It appears that a number of problems have been created by this action. As you know, your property is zoned R-1. The setback requirements are 20 ft. from Poinsettia, 5 ft. from the alley on the right side, 5 feet from the alley on the rear, and 4 feet from the property line on the left side. Our calculations reveal that your existing dwelling plus the detached structure contain approximately 2,000 sq. ft. This requires that you provide a minimum of two legal parking spaces (9 ft. by 20 ft.1 One of these spaces must be covered. The other space may be an open space which would be permitted to extend into one sideyard setback. More details of these requirements may be obtained from Mr. Hetivicker of our Planning Division. The plans which were submitted for plan check are not adequate to provide the necessary information to allow the department to perform -a thorough plan check or issue a permit. I am attaching a sheet indicating the department's minimum standards for preparation of plans. If you are not experienced in preparing plans it may be that you will have to obtain help from a profes- sional. Our review of the present plans along with the inspection conducted at the site has revealed some deficiencies which should be,pointed out at this time. If you intend to proceed with your plans of converting your existing garage to habitable area and constructing new parking areas as outlined above, the following corrections must be made: ' Mrs. Janet A. Purcell RE: 210 Poinsettia Avenue Page 2 1. Remove the garage door and frame in a wall with 2x4 studs at 16" o.c. This new wall must have a foundation 15" wide and 18" into natural.grade. A curb should be installed in order that all wood is a minimum of 6 inches above grade (foundation may be existing -,it can be exposed for the inspector's verifi- cation). 2.- Fully dimension all new doors and windows and show header sizes. 3. Provide a minimum 3 sq. ft. window in the bathroom or provide an exhaust fan ducted to the outside. 4. Provide a minimum of 40 sq. ft. in window area in the converted garage space. One-half of this must be openable. 5. Glass doors adjacent to the proposed carport must be sealed shut. 6. Provide new electrical outlets along all walls. Maximum distance between outlets must not exceed 12 feet. 7. Provide a heating unit capable of maintaining 70 degrees at 3 feet above the floor of, all habitable rooms. 8. Specify interior finishes of wall in the converted garage area. 9. Remove fences or other structures from the five foot rear alley setback area.(all new construction must observe the required setbacks). 10. Show the exact square footage of each building on the plans. 11. It will be necessary to pay the plan check fee prior to any additional review of plans. Due to the fact that the proposed carport projects almost two feet into a required sideyard, the department has made no effort to evaluate this structure as proposed. When adequate plans are prepared, additional corrections may become evident. I am sure that you are presently aware that construction without a permit is a violation of the Newport Beach Municipal ordinance with possible penalties of $500 or six months imprisonment, or both. Since work was continued on this job after "Stop Work" notices were placed, the City has prepared and it' rdady to -file a'criminal:,roisdemeanbr charge at'this'•time: t Mrs. Janet A. Purcell Page 3 RE: 210 Poinsettia Avenue We are very anxious to work this problem out as rapidly as possible. The department is continuing to receive complaints from the neighboring area. It would be to everyone's mutual benefit to achieve a satisfactory conclusion as early as possible. We thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. If you have further questions, please contact either myself or Jim Hewicker. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT t. BOB /rOWLER Assistant Director -Building BF:rw Enc 3 xc: Director -Community Development Assistant Director -Planning Plan Check Engineer-Harbeck Chief Inspector City Attorney 41-a& Y_-tl� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA 91600 city Hall 330DNewport Blyd. (714) 673 2110 .June 22, 1977 Mr. Gordon W. Baldwin Williamson and Schmid 17782 Sky Park Boulevard Irvine, California 92714 Dear Mr. Baldwin: Pursuant to your request of June 20, 1977, please be advised that the parcel to which you refer at the end of Mariners Drive is currently zoned Unclassified. Adjoining residential development in the Westcliff area was reclassified to the R-1-B District at the time the subdivision was processed through the City. Prior to any development on the property, it will be necessary to reclassify the property and process a parcel map. We would suggest the R-1-B District classification which would be compatible with the zoning on the adjoining property. If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR By Ja es D. Hewicker, Ass'stant Director - Planning JDH/sh cc: Mr. Ed Coutchie, TIC Mr. Chick Willette, TIC A June 20, Mr. James D. Hewicker City of Newport Beach Community Development Section 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Dear Mr. Hewicker: SUBJECT: MARINER'S DRIVE, NEWPORT BEACH; OUR JOB NO. 77183. While researching a site for our client, The Irvine Company, I received conflicting information of existing zoning on a parcel of land located at the northerly terminus of Mariner's Drive. I would appreciate your checking this site and fur- nishing me with a letter verifying its present zoning. Enclosed is a copy of our tentative parcel map of this site and a copy of Compiled Assessor's Maps of the area. Thank you. Sincerely, Gordon W. Baldwin zf Enclosures cc: Mr. Ed Coutchie, TIC Mr. Chick Willette, TIC 17782 SKY PARK BOULEVARD IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714 • (714) 549.2222 I ACT O •• r To O Pu a � ri q J �3nrao 4. •s hfAR/NE•RS f�•u. �.^y 4 st l I ' \J 0 q [.r� 49 73.JS N. .ti`. 7J.S7 °1 0 o is 0 k © 6 3 46 R• It 6 0+° `I� F4 .4 :. 17 •� i. 71.et�al o �� ;e e, • IO ba tf � n o�' 41 •� .O �j °° OAf Agl ea • I I �4 r40 dNs 4! " ^ .t'J• r e.. ra... ° Y T H� , 12 palY� t°' °i t ".y a � a <e.•v e. 62� 2 i °. e . a.' > .ei w I•y ^ p YAK ' .p "-p lvi . G) 6 6 O e>.st l2 42Z4 174 se. �. rc.fd Li.O 1 1 M 10 1I i. lid ss OuA 1�? R S tJ•Je �� 9 - B A `� O • 3Y9 • p7D 1f Y%A}' �/` �I ly,�, e• 6 � 0041A� jp0 ��' 78 �0 �w' ,• 1yti 7R. 14. 4224 Ad M. 157-l7U 14 1Nn . NOT£ •ASSESSOR'S BIOCX 13 . PARCEL NUMD£RS SNOWN 14 CIRC[F9 O fop 4y CA .{SSESSOR'S MAP 100X 117 PAGF 66 tONNlY O� 6AANCf, Tow /V T•4 T/ V 49 SHEET 1 OFSHEET SCALE: ," -40- PAR EL MAP /N Tx1s C/TY OF Nvl ro ►T /ge-4cw, O.P.4we rbuNTY, C'4L /FO.PNL4 `SE/NG 4 /oORT/ON OF LOT /58, Acac l 551, /,P/ mes Sv$ D/V/S/ON ,4S S,4OWN ON TAex MAP f/LED /N .60fA' /, P,/GE BB Of /LJ/SCELL.4NEOUS AECO?,O N%4P9, /IEco,POs O.c ORANGE Cav"Y, C.4L/FaRN/4 04,VCAI 1977 67ER4L.0 F OL 04AI4 uaG , L. S. 324ro W&L/4MSON a semmo, C/✓/L ENG/NEEQS /v f i O. B QC/lE5 61?055 O (o t4C?E5 MET Poe4fRo,reo /N TaE OFF/CE OF., NIU MA-160N SCNM//>, CIAZ ENG/.f/EE,PS /77e4? Sky Pork fjau/evq�d 11WI?e , Ca/ fo1-ni a 917/4 Xt P?EP4 Pe 0 07 741,E PEaz1Err OF •' Tf/E //I1I/N£ CO,L/,04NY 550 Ne&lonrf Cenfer /Jriue, NetuPorf 6&ael5, Ca/ifoinio 9,?&&0 (7/Q% &e4 - 30// 0 77- /B3 r BROADMOOR HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION P. O. Box 503 • Corona del Mar, California 92625 October 10,1977 Mr. Joseph T. Devlin Director of Public works City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd Newport Beach, CA. 92660 Dear Mr. Devlin: The Broadmoor Hills Community Association represents fifty one homes which are located on the Ocean side of San Joaquin Hills Road between Crown Drive and San Miguel Rd. Our association is nine years old and has participated in the planning and sensible development of our area. This has served to maintain our city as an outstanding place to live. The purpose of this letter is to inform you of our continuing interest in the sensible development of the area around us and our desire to be notified in advance of and to participate in all planning meetings which could impact our community. The major items of interest to us include but are not limited to: -Any changes to the present San Miguel Drive. -Extensions of San Joaquin Hills Road and increases in its traffic. -Any development of the R-1 zoned land adjacent to Rogers Nursery. -Any new construction of the Corona del Mar Freeway. -All other traffic pattern or developmental changes in our area. In order to work with the city on a constructive basis during the current planning cycle, we have appointed the following persons as our official Community Affairs Representatives and have empowered them to act on our behalf at all city planning meetings: -Dr. Robert Rosenberg.............Community Affairs R pr tative 2507 Salt Air Circle 644-2422 Corona del Mar, CA. 92625 `� RECEIVER �, -Mrs. Mary LouP'urnas ............. Alternate _ PUBLIG WORKS 2501 Blue water Drive 644-6789 OCT 13 1977„~- } Corona Del Mar, CA. 92625 CITY OF ?\ IIEV&ORT BEACH. -Mr. Philip L. Arst...............Association Pre &entCAIFA]ternate 1 2601 Lighthouse Lane Corona del Isar, CA. 92625 64o-1242 (Bus. 213-679-4511) Please place us on your mailing list(send mail directly to Dr. Rosenberg's address) and insure that we are notified of all public meetings which will discussthe above listed areas of interest to our community. We would like to also obtain copies of all traffic and land usuage studies of our area so that we may contribute to the planned growth of our city. ilip L. Arst President Broadmoor Hills Community Assn : ;� � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH t u at November 7, 1977 Dan Olmstead Bayshore/Olmstead Development 1601 Dove, Suite 138 Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Re: MacArthur Centre Dear Mr. Olmstead: Per our conversation on November 4, 1977, I am forwarding to you the environmental documentation requested by your Lender. The properties in question (4041 MacArthur, 1300 Dove, and 1200 Dove) were zoned P-C in 1970 as part of the Newport Place Planned Community Plan and Text. No environmental documentation was required at that time because the California Environmental Quality Act was not applicable to private projects. Since your project is in conformance with the zoning and all that is required at this point is the issuance of building permits, no further environmental documentation is required. The issuance of building permits is considered to be a ministerial, or administrative, action and is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Attached is a Notice of Exemption documenting this determination, which has also been forwarded to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors for filing. If either you or your Lender have any further questions, feel free to call. Sincerely, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR By Beverly/f�ood, Environmental Coordinator BW/sh Encl. City Hall to 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California 92663 CONTINUATION sheer AP-BWDiX E FOR FIMIG ADA1IPl1."•711-ATIVw R;GIMATo(0)1)S WIT:: ME SECRUARY OF STAIM (Puisuce to rovernmanf Cade Svdfon 11300.1) • . November 4, 1977 Notice of Exeraption. T0: Q Scc.ret=y for Resources FRO t: Community Development 1416 Ninth Street, Room 3.311 Dept., City of SU.cra onto, ,California 95314 Newport Beach. ' 3300 Newport Blvd. 57 CbXu%.A Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Newport Beach,Calif. 'Coluity of ' .Orange 92663 P. 0. Box' 687 Santa Ana, Calif. 92702 Project -Title MacArthur Centre Project Location - Specific 4041.MacArthur, Blvd., 1300 Dove Street, 1200 Dove Street Project Location - City Project Location•- County Newport Beach Orange Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project Construction of office (administrative and financial) space in accordance with the adopted.Planned Community Plan and Text. -Tame of Public Agency Approving Project • Newport Beach 5are of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project Bayshore/Olmstead Development Exempt Status: kunecx vne-i x Minirterial (Sec- 15073) _beclared Llaergency (Sec. 15071 (a) ) Emergency Project (See. 15071 (b) and (c) ) +Categorical Exemption- State type and section number: Reasons why project is exempt: Th.e only requirement is the issuance of building permits. Contact Person Area Code Telephone 1!bctension R. V. Hogan, Director,Comm.Dev.Dept. 714 640-2137 If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption•finding. .2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project, Yes x No` Tor everly D. Woo CITY OF, NEWPORT BEACH November 30, 1977 Mr. William Krommenhoek Krommenhoek & Associates 1515 Morena Boulevard San Diego, Calif. 92110 Re: Proposed San Diego Federal Savings and Loan Building - Corporate Plaza Dear Mr. Krommenhoek: I am in receipt of your letter of November 2, 1977, and the defini- tions of the terms "story" and "mezzanine" as excerpted from the 1976 U.B.C. A review of the definitions provided to me would clearly indicate that the Uniform Building Code would permit a one story building with a , mezzanine on the site. However, conformance with the Uniform Building Code constitutes only a portion of the required plan check process. The remaining plan check process requires conformances with the City's Zoning Ordinance and the Planned Community Development Standards for Corporate Plaza. I have already indicated to you that neither the Zoning Ordinance nor the Planned Community Development Standards make any provision for a mezzanine. Therefore, the alternatives available to you would be to redesign the building to fit,the one story config- uration permitted under the Planned Community Zoning or amend the. Planned Community Plan for Corporate Plaza to permit a building with one story and mezzanine or a two story building in this location. If you do not concur with either of these suggesti-ons, you do have the right to appeal decisions based upon the interpretation of the zoning ordinance to the Planning Commission. Said appeal can be made in the form of a,letter addressed to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission meets on the 1st and 3rd Thursdays of each month. If I can be of further assistance, I may be contacted at 640-2266. Very truly yours, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR By Ja es D. Hewicker, ss'stant Director - Planning JDH/sh City Hall • 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California 92663 ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK &ASSOCIATES 1515 MORENA BOULEVARD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110 TELEPHONE (714) 276-7710 WILLIAM C. KROMMENHOEK AIA JOHN M. McKEOWN JR. AIA 2 NOVEMBER 1977 WAYNE E. DAVIS AIA JAMES D. HEWICKER ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, PLANNING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT., CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 SUBJECT: SAN DIEGO FEDERAL SAVINGS E LOAN IRVINE CORPORATE PLAZA DEAR MR. HEWICKER: THANK YOU FOR SENDING ME THE COPY OF PAGE 179 AND THE DEFINITION OF A " STORY" PER YOUR ZONING ORDINANCES. I WISH TO NOW ASK YOUR REVIEW OF THE ENCLOSED SECTIONS OF THE 1976 U.B.C. WHICH DEFINES A " STORY" ALMOST EXACTLY AS PER YOUR ZONING ORDINANCE YET ALSO DEFINES A MEZZANINE AS CONSTITUTING A STORY ONLY WHEN IT EXCEEDS 33-1/3% OF THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA. POSSIBLY THIS FURTHER DEFINITION OF MEZZANINE SPACE ESCAPED YOUR NOTICE AND THEREFORE I AM HEREBY ASKING YOUR RECONSIDERATION OF THE RULING THAT ANY MEZZANINE WILL BE CLASSED AS A " STORY" . WE ARE ONLY ASKING THAT YOU USE THE 1976 U.B.C. DEFINITION ENCLOSED. VERY TRULY WILLIAM-NC. KROMMENHOEK WCK/M CC: MARC SANDSTROM W/ENCL. PAUL THAKUR to BOB FOWLER " NOLER of RECEIVED `(( Community �( Develop,nent Dapt. NOV 4 1977► CITY OF N. CALIF EACH, JEAN R. BENNECHE, AIA LEWIS P. HOLSTON, AIA JOHN E. LAWLESS, AIA KENNETH C. WELCH, AIA Page 179 DEFINITIONS Chapter 20.87 20.87.285 STORY. The term "story" shall mean that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the upper surface of the floor next above, except that the topmost story shall be that portion of a building includ- ed between the upper surface of the topmost floor and the ceiling or roof above. If the finished floor level directly above a basement, cellar or unused underfloor space is more than 6 feet above grade as defined'herein for more than 50 percent of the total perimeter or is more than 12 feet above grade as defined herein at any point, such basement, cellar or unused underfloor space shall be considered as a story. (Ord. 1481 § 1,1972: Ord. 1173 § 1, 1966: Ord. 1115, 1965: 1949 Code § 9107.341). 20.87.290 STREET. The term "street" shall mean a public or private thoroughfare which affords principal means of -access to abutting property, including avenue, place, way, drive, lane, boulevard, highway, road, and any other thorough- fare except an alle as defined herein. (Ord. 635, 1950: 1949 Code § 9107.35�. 20.87.300 STREET LINE. The term "street line" shall mean the boundary line between a street and property. (Ord. 635, 1950: 1949 Code § 9107.36). 20.87.310 STRUCTURE. The term "structure" shall mean anything constructed or erected, the use of which required location on the ground or attachment to something having location on the ground. (1949 Code § 9107.37 added by Ord. 635; December 12, 1950). 20.87.320 STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS, The term "structural alterations" shall mean any change in the supporting members of a building, such as bearing walls, columns, beams or girders. (1949 Code § 9107.38 added by Ord. 635; December 12, 1950). 20.87.330 TRAILER COURT. The term "trailer court" shall mean land or premises used or intended to be used, let or rented for occupancy by or of trailers or movable dwellings, rooms or sleeping quarters'of any kind. (1949 Code § 9107.39 added by Ord. 635; December 12, 1950). 20.87.340 USE. The term "use" shall mean the purpose for which land or premises of a building thereon is designed, arranged, or intended or for which it is or may be occupied or maintained. (1949 Code § 9107.40 added by Ord. 635; December 12,.1950). 408413 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE guest for sleeping purposes. Every 100 square feet of superficial floor area in a dormitory shall be considered to be a guest room. H Sec. 409. HABITABLE SPACE (ROOM) is space in a structure for liv- ing, sleeping, eating or cooking. Bathrooms, toilet compartments, closets, halls, storage, or utility space, and similar areas are not considered habitable space. HEIGHT OF BUILDING is the vertical distance above "Grade" as defined herein to the highest point of the coping of a flat roof or to the deck line of a mansard roof or to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. The measurement may be taken from the highest adjoining sidewalk or ground surface within a 5-foot horizontal distance of the exterior wall of the building, when such sidewalk or ground surface is not more than 10 feet above grade. The height of a stepped or terraced building is the maximum height of any segment of the building. HELIPORT. A heliport is an area of land or water or a structural sur- face which is used, or intended for use, for the landing and takeoff of helicopters, and any appurtenant areas which are used, or intended for use, for heliport buildings and other heliport facilities. HF.LISTOP. A helistop is the same as a heliport, except that no refuel- ing, maintenance, repairs or storage of helicopters is permitted. HORIZONTAL EXIT. See Section 3301 (c). HOTEL is any building containing six or more guest rooms intended or designed to be used, or which are used, rented or hired out to be occupied, or which are occupied for sleeping purposes by guests. Sec. 410. No definitions. J Sec. 411. No definitions. K Sec. 412. No definitions. Sec. 413. LINTEL is a structural member placed over an opening or a recess in a wall and supporting construction above. LISTED AND LISTING are terms referring to equipment which is shown in a list published by an approved testing agency, qualified and equipped for experimental testing, and maintaining an adequate periodic inspection of current productions and whose listing states that the equip- ment complies with nationally recognized safety standards. LOADS. See Chapter 23. LODGING HOUSE is any building or portion thereof, containing not more than five guest rooms which are used by not more than five guests 42 1976 EDITION 413-416 where rent is paid in money, goods, labor or otherwise. A lodging house shall comply with all the requirements of this Code for dwellings. M Sec. 414. MARQUEE is a permanent roofed structure attached to and supported by the building and projecting over public property. Marquees are regulated in Chapter 45. MASONRY is that form of construction composed of stone, brick, con- crete, gypsum, hollow clay tile, concrete block or tile, or other similar building units or materials or combination of these materials laid up unit by unit and set in mortar. MASONRY, SOLID, is masonry of solid units built without hollow spaces. CODE is the Uniform MEZZANINE or MEZZANINE FLOOR is an intermediate floor placed in any story or room. When the total area of any such "Mezzanine Floor" exceeds 33'h percent of the total floor area in that room, it shall be considered as constituting an additional "Story." The clear height above or below a "Mezzanine Floor" construction shall be not less than 7_t=e- MOTEL shall mean i N . Sec. 415. NONCOMBUSTIBLE as applied to building construction material means a material which, in the form in which it is used, is either one of the following: 1. Material of which no part will ignite and burn when subjected to fire. Any material conforming to U.B.C. Standard No. 4-1 shall be considered noncombustible within the meaning of this Section. 2. Material having a structural base of noncombustible material as S defined in Item No. 1 above, with a surfacing material not over % inch thick which has a flame -spread rating of 50 or less. "Noncombustible" does not apply to surface finish materials. Material i required to be noncombustible for reduced clearances to flues, heating ap- pliances, or other sources of high temperature shall refer to material con- forming to Item No. 1. No material shall be classed as noncombustible which is subject to increase in combustibility or flame -spread rating ' beyond the limits herein established, through the effects of age, moisture or other atmospheric condition. Flame -spread rating as used herein refers to rating obtained according j to tests conducted as specified in U.B.C. Standard No.42-1. O 1 Sec. 416. OCCUPANCY is the purpose for which a building, or part 4 thereof, is used or intended to be used. 1 OCCUPANT LOAD. See Section3301 (c). 43 416-420 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE ORIEL WINDOW is a window which projects from the main line of an enclosing wall of a building and is carried on brackets or corbels. OWNER is any person, agent, firm, or corporation having a legal or equitable interest in the property. Sec. 417. PANIC HARDWARE. See Section 3301(c). PERMIT is an official document or certificate issued by the Building Official authorizing performance of a specified activity. PERSON is a natural person, his heirs, executors, administrators, or assigns, and also includes a firm, partnership, or corporation, its or their successors or assigns, or the agent of any of the aforesaid. PLATFORM, ENCLOSED, is a partially enclosed portion of an assembly room the ceiling of which is not more than 5 feet above the pro- scenium opening and which is designed or used for the presentation of plays, demonstrations, or other entertainment wherein scenery, drops, decorations, or other effects may be installed or used. PUBLIC WAY. See Section 3301 (c). 0 Sec. 418. No definitions. R Sec. 419. REPAIR is the reconstruction or renewal of any part of an existing building for the purpose of its maintenance. Sec. 420. SHAFT is a vertical opening through a building'for elevators, dumbwaiters, mechanical equipment, or similar purposes. SHALL, as used in this Code, is mandatory. SMOKE DETECTOR is an approved detector which senses visible or invisible particles of combustion. The detector shall bear a label or other identification issued by an approved testing agency having a service for in- spection of materials and workmanship at the factory during fabrication and assembly. STAGE is a partially enclosed portion of an assembly building which is designed or used for the presentation of plays, demonstrations, or other entertainment wherein scenery, drops, or other effects may be installed or used, and where the distance between the top of the proscenium opening and the ceiling above the stage is more than 5 feet. STORY is that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the upper surface of the floor next above, except that the topmost story shall be that portion of a building included between the up- per surface of the topmost floor and the ceiling or roof above. If the finished floor level directly above a basement, cellar or unused under -floor space is more than 6 feet above grade as defined herein for more than 50 44 1976 EDITION 420.424 i percent of the total perimeter or is more than 12 feet above grade as defin- • t ed herein at any point, such basement, cellar or unused under -floor space shall be considered as a story. --SVR�C,l IS ally LIMIUUr tc space not less than 16 eet in width which has been dedicated or deeded to the public for public use. STRUCTURE is that which is built or constructed, an edifice or ., building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or com- posed of parts joined together in some definite manner. ^ j T t Sec. 421. No definitions. 5 Sec. 422. U.B.C. STANDARDS is the Uniform Building Code Stan- dards, 1976 Edition. (See Chapter 60.) V Sec. 423. VALUE or VALUATION of a building shall be the estimated cost to replace the building in kind, based on current replacement costs, as determined in Section 303 (a). VENEER. See Section 3002. VENTILATING CEILING is a suspended ceiling containing many small apertures through which air, at low pressure, is forced downward from an overhead plenum dimensioned by the concealed space between suspended ceiling and the floor or roof above. W Sec. 424. WALLS shall be defined as follows: - t Bearing Wall is any wall meeting either of the following classifications: 1. Any metal or wood stud wall which supports more than 100 pounds per lineal foot of superimposed load. 2. Any masonry or concrete wall which supports more than 200 ' pounds per lineal foot superimposed load, or any such wall sup- t= _ porting its own weight for more than one story. i Exterior Wall is any wall or element of a wall or any member or group of members, which defines the exterior boundaries or courts of a building and which has a slope of 60` or greater with the horizontal plane. Faced Wall is a wall in which the masonry facing and backing are so = bonded as to exert a common action under load. Nonbearing Wall is a wall which supports no load other than its own weight. Parapet Wall is that part of any wall entirely above the roof line. ,. Retaining Wall is a wall designed to resist the lateral displacement of soil or other materials. e t WATER HEATER is an appliance designed primarily to supply hot : 45' C Westside Commercial Management Company March 2, 1978 City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Attention: Gentlemen: City Clerk RECEIVED ` s Community Development Dept. b MARG 1978! CITY of \ r NEWPCRT CAALIF.�CH, .� Please be advised that Lido Village has been purchased by Lido Marina Village, a partnership. All right, title and interest held by Donald M. Koll and/ or Lido Village in that certain off -site Parking Agree- ment dated November 24, 1975 has been assigned -to Lido Marina Village. Any notices are to be delivered to: Lido Marina Village 2222 Corinth Avenue Los Angeles, California 90064 Thank you. Sincerely, Steven E. Fortner Senior Vice President and General Manager =jn the Office of 1� Y City Clerk TODAY IS AIL Date : 3 _(o— 7 8 COPIES SEII11O: ® Mayor 14 AfanaDer LL v ' fM Attorney SEF : jr MAR E6 1978 9 0 P lY Di+ector 17, 'OF CorDcv Director ", O::,o t� � w - Corncilmen �•• �1 1 nyt l.� 2222 Corinth Avenue • Los Angeles, Califomia 90064 • (213) 478-1021 Mrs. Jean watt 4 Harbor Island Newport Beach, CA 92660 January 23, 1978 Newport Beach City 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA Council 92663 Mayor Dostal and Members of the Council, Since September, 1977, we (L.N.A.F. members in particular) haver watched the General Plan review with interest; found the reports extremely valuable; evaluated the ,Planning Commission's suggestions of lower densities to be used as a test in the compu- ter model; and guessed at the outcome of all of this in relation to your request that densities be lowered and phasing be implemen- ted to bring the land use into conformance with the circulation, In addition, we have: developed a specific idea of what we believe should be our goals in regard to phasing of development; agreed on what would seem to be an appropriate maximum density goal where some growth must take place despite circulation defi- oiencies; and are in the process of finalizing a traffic phasing ordinance to be used as an initiative in order to be sure that as many of these goals as possible can be reached. I have discussed this ordinance with Mr. Darnell, Mr. O'Neil, and Mr. Hogan as well as independent traffic engineers and lawyers - so that all ques- tions could be addressed by our group.. We are making as many changes as we can to simplify the implementation but still main- tain the basic intent of the ordinance. Now you know where we are - this is what we think: 1. The best way to answer the problem is for a cooperative ef- fort-io—be made on all sides - with all the knowl-CAge that we have recently gained - but with a firm committment by the City to assure that the necessary time will be taken to reach a real solution.. 2. The only way to assure us that t1ais would be so is to enact an "urgency ordinance" or moratorium - and to do so prior to the February General Plan hearings. Without that assurance, we will feel that any implied phasing or density changes are virtually meaningless. 3. An ordinance by initiative is not the best way to answer the problem but, if it is the only way to insure a tangible, real solution, then it is what we feel we must do. Sincerely, Jean watt COY OF NEWPORT BCOCH COUNCIL MEMBERS \Ai 0 �y y9 yF` A s� September 26, 1983 ctni i S' MINUTES INDEX pprove the preliminary Engineering Upper Bay (Upper Newport Bay Bike Trail BikA/Egstrn ibility Study); Trail irect staff to apply for Orange ty Transportation Commission SB 821 s; irect staff to begin negotiations \PUBLIC ecessary right-of-way and right - entry; and irect staff to pursue a cooperative ect with the County of Orange to and construct the project. TS: None. F. CONSENT CALE AR: Motion x The following actio s were taken as indicated, All Ayes except for those ite s removed: 1. ORDINANCES FOR IN RODUCTION - Pass to second reading on October 11, 1983: (a) Removed fro the Consent Calendar. 2. RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTI,N: (a) Resolution No. 83- declaring the City Vacation/ of Newport Beach's tention to vacate Pblc Utl the public utility ea ement within Reims Esm/Reims Ln Lane - Tract No. 8336; adopting a map (90) showing the area to be vacated; and setting a public hearin on October 24, 1983 (Dwg. R/W 5472-L). (Report from Public Works) 3. CONTRACTS/AGREEMENTS: (a) Consent of the City of Newpor Beach to Marinapark Sale of Mobilehome and Trailer Park Spl17-A Space - Contract No. 1784 (Newp rt C-1784 Marinapark Space No. 7-A). (Repo t from (38) Assistant City Attorney) 4. COMMUNICATIONS - For referral as indicat \d• (a) To Planning Department/Planning \ U/P 3058 Commission for inclusion in the recor, (88) letters from Richard Nichols, and Corona del Mar Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors regarding Use Permit No. 3058. (b) To staff for response, letter from General Sery William E. Wilkinson regarding cleanup (44) of bayfront in the downtown Balboa area. (c) To Planning Department for inclusion in Plang Dpt/ the records, letter from Cara Hoepne_r Dance Cnctn regarding the Dance Connection, a (68) business leasing space : the Coppertree Bus1ne-eas—Par . - -- Volume 37 - Page 297 *Y OF NEWPORT B&CH 10, COUNCIL MEMBERS �O�?,9G� ��y�� ani i rAi i �'A \tpSeptember 26, 1983 MINUTES iT79W-1 has been budgeted for the project. Upper Bay Additional funds may be available for the Bike/Egstrn County of Orange and the Orange County Trail ransportation Commission (Regional SB 821 F nds). The Regional SB 821 Funds are only el gible for the bike and pedestrian portions of the project. Funds for the equestrian por ion of the project ($61,500) will be requ red from the County and the City. Pam D via, representing the California State Parks oundation, addressed the Council and stated hat they have given a commitment to fnd the 10-mile Irvine Coast the C14 t\As Trail, wonnects Upper Newport Bay with Crystal ark. Ms. S. Dn, resident of Santa Ana Heights presenting 'the Back Bay Communitciation, addressed the Council in suppothe proposal. She stated that they are g forward to a permanent trail with multipurp se uses. Hearing no othe wishing to address the Council, the pub c hearing was closed. Motion x Motion was made to All Ayes (a) Accept, ap grove and certify the Final EIR as indicated in Attachment A; (b) Make the fin\ ngs contained in the Statement of Fact (Attachment A, Exhibit 1) with reVect to significant impacts identified n the Final EIR; (c) Find that the fa is set forth in the Statement of Overridi g Considerations (Attachment A, Exhibit 2) are true and are supported by subsC tial evidence in the record, including t o Final EIR; (d) With respect to the p oject, find that although the Final E identified certain unavoidable signif cant environmental effects that ill result if the project is approved, hose mitigation measures identifi in the Certified Final EIR shall be incorporated into the proposed project, and all significant environment\gated, effects that can feasibly be mi or avoided have been eliminatedreduced to an acceptable level, that the remaining unavoidable signint effects, when balanced against eacts set forth in said Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attaehmen A, Exhibit 2), giving greater weight to he unavoidable environmental effects, arl acceptable; Volume 37 - Page 296 CITY OF I 14EW�MT 136H CAM CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P. 0, Box 1935 Newport Beach, CA 92663 To whom it may concern: COVIN � r�ia W0 - fi Cara Hoepner 3631 Seaview Avenue Corona del Mar, CK 92625 I am writing in regards to DANCE CONNECTION, a business establishment that has leased space in the new COPPBRTRBE BUSINESS PARR in the city of Newport Beach, I realize that DANCE CONNECTION deals in artistic education and retail, and • that the building is not liscensed or zoned to meet such requirements. I am also aware of the difficulties ,that could be caused in the future if the city were to bend its laws to nermit the opening of such an organization in that particular snace. However, I strongly feel that Newnort Beach would benefit from the cultural enrichment this establishment has to offer. 1, other students of the school, and its fine staff would appreciate and be grateful for your consideration. cth • .Sincerely, Cara lioepner, Dancer Date I,'/ MES SENT TO: yor 4 CancifMen anager ❑ Attorney I ❑ Bldg. Dir. ' ❑ GenSery Dir. ❑ R Dir,. R?Ianning Dir. ❑ Polite Chief [tY9'!'her 't�