Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORD PC- PACIFIC BAYAERONUTRONIC FORD/BELCOURT General Plan land Use Designation Single Family Detaches WE Single Family Attached BEOpen Space AVENUE AOTES I 1. ELEVATION T1PES ON TURNBERRY DRNE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS. 2r THIS EXHIBIT REFLECTS REVISED LOT NUMBERS RESULTANT FROM PROPOSED AMENDED TRACT MAPS NUMBERS 153M k 15389. u If 4 8 4 JJ "'f 71A' fi J0 9 ( l0 A09 TA 639 I 14 !b Le7 18 20 72 H 10 220RR IM 21 20.3 a0 x 24eft '05 28 ¢ 90 26 %% ?.� C f 08 23 B ' 07 3ER 08 24 -'a 4 35 u 04 2b LEGEND a tpRw Q CNN0. (PRGWCT P) ROGN ® STONIB(PROEUCT 3) [�SUWERHOUSE (NIODUCT 4)^:^!� O MvDENCE (moucT 5) Pon: HEIGHTS (pwmT 6) 0 NEC. AREA PASEO A COUIIQH NO SIOPES W EAT NUUMM PER Po01 TRACT UIPS 4W BUUNG TYPE Ammo BY. GATE AMMD MD BY. DATE APpRM P. DATE ONE FORD ROAD NEWPORT BEACH, CA pacif' ay HOMES 1 �'2Ti 0 C'^ d c ]QtEI Ill 'sm 221 17,0! JM 21 2 2A9 3M 20 n 2A 10 4m 3w 10 C m 17 A 2c iNt18 Z BN 7i p aw 12 Il l0 W 4 a � 'D A Rr� Y4 A6ri ' MARCH 12, 1990 ADAMS • STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. I5 tOgepM ]]c]0M, W.. G 92W Pk 11i 7443fi Fa: 7149ae-0251 I I ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP OF COMPANIES 4401 ATLANTIC AVENUE SUITE 200 LONG BEACH, CA 90807 30 January 1998 ESC198-ADM/CNB-01 City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA. 92658-8915 Attention: Ms. Genia Garcia Associate Planner PHONE: 562.984-2079 FAx: 562-988.0129 SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) Dear Ms. Garcia: In accordance with your request, this letter has been prepared to provide you with an update of the status of the environmental aspects of the project associated with the redesignation and redevelopment of the former Ford Aeromttronic/Loral property (Site) from use as an industrial to a residential site. BACKGROUND As you are aware, the Site was historically used for aerospace and defense -related activities that included the use of a variety of hazardous substances. The use of these chemicals resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the Site. Ford Motor Land Corporation (FMLC) retained an environmental consulting firm, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. (now Arcadis Geraghty & Miller [G&M]) to investigate the extent of the soil and groundwater contamination, conduct health risk assessments to evaluate whether such contamination posed public health issues, and develop and implement a soil and groundwater remediation plan. These activities have been conducted under the authority and requirements of state and local environmental regulatory agencies, primarily the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). The City of Newport Beach retained Environmental Services Consortium, Inc. (ESCI - formerly Environmental Management Services [EMS]) to act as a monitor for the project on behalf of the City. As the City monitor, ESCI initially reviewed the research related to Site usage and the resulting identification of "Areas of Potential Environmental Concern" (APECs) and the associated soil and groundwater investigation activities that had been conducted by G&M, participated in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, and attended meetings with the involved regulatory agencies and with Ford, G&M and the City of Newport Beach. ESCI also reviewed and evaluated all associated project reports and agency communication, and provided recommendations on behalf of the City, where appropriate. This included the technical evaluation of the health risk assessments (HRAs) prepared by G&M for the Bayridge and Belcourt areas, current residential areas that had formerly been part of the Site, and the post-remediation HRAs prepared for the main or northern area, and the ATC or southern area of the Site. In addition, ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities that were performed as part of the pre -demolition phase of the project. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS Demolition and Constritetion-related Activities As you are aware, facility decommissioning activities, including pre -demolition building decontamination of regulated materials, have been completed. This activity comprised the removal of building components that constituted hazardous waste, or that were environmentally regulated in some manner, and the decontamination of building surfaces. This activity was conducted in accordance with procedures specified in a Project Demolition Manual submitted to the Cityby FMLC and reviewed by ESCI, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 1-7,10,17,18, and 23. ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities, and co -signed the Pre -Demolition Building Certifications issued for each of the buildings at the Site. Those aspects of the above -referenced mitigation measures that apply to construction in general at the project Site are continuing to be implemented. Soil and Groundwater Rentediation Activities Soil remediation activities at the Site were conducted under the oversight of the RWQCB and OCHCA, and in accordance with health -based cleanup levels (HBCLs) (levels evaluated to be protective of human health) that were developed by Ford and G&M, reviewed by ESCI on behalf of the City of Newport Beach, and approved by the OCHCA. Mitigation Measures 9,10,17,19,21,22 and 23 were implemented during soil remediation activities for soil that had been identified as contaminated prior to the demolition and grading, and also for any additional contaminated soil identified during demolition and/or grading. Based on documentation reviewed and meetings attended by ESCI, soil remediation has been completed to the satisfaction of the RWQCB and the OCHCA. Onsite groundwater remediation was conducted during 1995 and 1996 under the authority of the RWQCB in accordance with a Groundwater Remedial Action Plan (RAP) approved by the RWQCB, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 8,11,20,21,22, and 23. The RAP addresses groundwater impacts in the main area or the northern portion of the Site, and in the southern area of the Site, formerly known as the "ATC" area. ESCY&ADMIMB-01 2 FSC! UPDATE 198 - CNN Groundwater remediation activities were completed in 1996. In a letter dated 4 November 1996 the RWQCB approved the closure of the groundwater remediation system, which has subsequently been dismantled and removed from the Site. Ongoing monitoring of the groundwater is currently being required by the RWQCB. Post -development groundwater remediation at the Site has not been required by the RWQCB. Offsite groundwater contamination found to be present to the north of the Site is being addressed as a separate issue by FMLC and the RWQCB, and is not expected to result in the placement of any equipment onsite. Health -Risk Assessments Human health risk assessments for the Belcourt and Bayridge areas were prepared by G&M, evaluated by ESCI, and reissued by G&M on behalf of FMLC. Soil and groundwater contamination in these areas were found to pose no risk to human health. The risk assessment reports were submitted to the OCHCA, who concurred with the conclusions of these studies. Site -specific data collected during the soil and groundwater remediation were used by G&M to prepare post-temediation/pre-developmenrt health risk assessments for the northern and southern areas of the Site, as required by Mitigation Measure 21. These assessments concluded no risk to human health was present in the areas studied at the Site. The health risk assessments were independently evaluated by OCHCA and ESCI, who concurred with the conclusion of these studies. Should you have further questions regarding the status of this project or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours truly, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. i Lyn ethrington, REA, M Principal Environmental Scientist cc: File John Douglas, Principal Planter, City of Newport Beach Eric Pearson, P.E., Environmental Control Manager, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Thomas E. Culek, Environmental Control Engineer, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Gary Boettcher, Project Manager, Arcadis Geraghty & Miller ESC198-AAWCN"I ESCI UPDATE 198 - CNB a riN AVENUE [2q j2aRI2C 1181- ONE FORD ROAD NEWPORT BEACH, CA pa j tay HOMES • as ou 57 x 1A DRNE S8 69 60 61 e38R 2CR 70 1 ' _ sPgNl 63.c sBR 69 713A G, 12A 48 3C iB 4AR CR SH �J- 420 0 Cad 2DR 1E 4DR 18C (� 52 5 g e 7 /aR2BR oL y, 86 2B 72 IJ 1 D 11 12 13 x iec 4ER la' 4 44 Safi 65 16R0ti I731c 14 1$ IS 17c 1 2Eq, N •34 3 RJ4R 48R 1Cq Bg Cmo 7430R O 3ER 9 ° F JUPITER DRIVE 8 I9 20 1"* 37 8 1a 4c 2A a g - g 21 4AR 04142 43 scR1op r 751aR 3 7 8 5 88 87 g o 22 � A 17 o DER a 1C 4A LDNG EWY'OR1VE 18R 15 76 x A 3BC 10 46CR W ' 30 ?BCR JER 85 ' 84 23 3332323C292B 2q ?BR4Aas0`g2 2� 7726 38CR ID 4BC 2E ? 4BCR *� ?BCR 63 0 2CR 1CRJAR 2 2 25 24 23 �00.151g B 1 ti 9 4 E B9 OR * 2DR 82 °��2 2516 Oti 1 2 3 4R 5 1A ?C JB iC 4A ,��1�� OLD COURSE DRIVE ! �,� i� 3� 61 �� 2620R Eocew000 DRIVE ti` 'L 03A 1 2 3 4 $ , 4' E, 5 3 241 ~ ti �A y14 TRACT E 4BCR iBC 4DR 3BC 2BC 6 C \ 7► 60\ pp 27 40 15390 9 tER 7 \ '�� n 4CR iRR 36R /C 4BR, • 46nq 18 86 i k 30R 5 47 JC RON 4 1A 5 3BCR 4DR JBCR P 2A 59 28 xR 3a ?B 4 28CR 3BC I 8 H c u 36 2c °483BR 2A 9 A 8 $2 1B 15 14 13 12R ?� J£q 40 301 58 29 4B 34 5 38 3 3 39 491cR 4c 63 w ' ! 7 so 0l0 REE ~ 1 j ! p 2BCR 9 SAWGRA5S DRIVE B 502BR 3A $2 , 13 iBR xR $ B -- °Rll'E _„1 CLENEAGLES DRIVE (, 30 tER D 2c 81 xR3AR F 17 16 19 20 2j 16 4C 57 33 31 30 29 51 sAR 98 2A 3B 2CRi Y ' 5210 38 80 9 iD ?g 3w zD 18 2DR ?E JBCR 640R 3BC 37 53 31 3DR 14 1 15 17 16 52 yp 1B 2C to 1 53 2A 5448 16R78 I G BIG HORN B 2 4�R 1D 38CR 48C ,353BCR vi 2C 0 18cR 38 a- 3ER 56 32 zCR �' zB 7 28� Y 55 3A 4AR , 23- 22 19 5 24 23 22 3416c 4ER 39 0 51 46 20 65, w ,b 1��1-•- `� mil. ale 156 4c 3AR 76 30R /M, 3SiR - HONoRs OR1VE 39 0 Z01"E epY 19 1 57 IA 4BR75 ?B x A sBCR ,1pq 40 50 3tYt JCR 54 a 20 58 cR74 24� 10 3 .y0 29 30 31 37 D TRACT °; 34 30 21 x 26R 3a q,� ,�1A g0 1 27 zacR 1ER 30R A� 4BC 41 49 4c G 35 3BR 2R 2A OYSTER BAY DRIVE 25 �Q TRACT 30 C.I. 20 42 5.38 48R `S C 15390 38CR 1 (48 2AR 38 zA 1C 691AR 4A 73 tie rl' 0 �`. t0R 19 60 se 72' 25 Eae 33 g2 hq, 51 50 zER 43 37 10 1 A x 2CR 71 ' F o " '5 ` 2C 0 28Cg3 49 47 sDR 38 BR ,� 0. 1ER 3E 5 4C rat 64 BB iAa i Rt 70 36 No 47 E a 54 48 447 46 4 44 F 4 1ER 482 55 C coLowAL DRNE 45 48R 47 AR 3ER 52 ,R44 VPgC3 49 58 57 56 59 60 1�1 4BCR 44 za 1 43 40 2ER 30R TICK Qa .1R �P� 2CR42 50 36c aecR d� R 4 43 tB 1AR 38 le 2C 16 TRACT 41 4o 41 51 47 a15387 422C o 40 39 25 �. F OLD CO DRl 18R 4 F 3E RSE DRIVE 2 43 44 48 46 ' 40 3 • 38 1 26 2 xw 2A tE 2C 1B 24 1 2cR 39 4B 37 $ ?AR 23 2 is R 2R Z \ 1BR 3 50 38 22 1,,• �27 4A 3 TAR 3 36 28 'Z 30 2CR 21 14 `tJ' A 1 20 x B LEGEND 35 34 ' 33 32 31 TAR 19 G 5 18 Q BALBOA (PRODUCT 1) 48R 2 4AR ��h�0 96 16 8 2C Q CARMEL (PRODUCT 2) C 2BR 7 y Q tcR 17 STDNYBROOK (PRODUCT 3) 16 2 8 1 Q SUMMERHOUSE (PRODUCT 4) to :15 9 1 Q PROVIDENCE (PRODUCT 5) 13 12 11 �0 x Q PACIFIC HEIGHTS (PRODUCT 6) JB yA 48 Q REC. AREA, PASEO d COMMON AREA SLOPES .0- B 4BUILDING TYP60 LOT NUMBERS 8R PER FINAL TRACT MAPS - of A FORD ROAD 220' 110' 0' 220' 440' ��' I JULY 11, 1997 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1'=220' ADAMS STREETER CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. 15 Corporate Pork. Irvine, CA 92606 Ph: 714 474-2330 Fax: 714 474-0251 email: A IASIOmnetcom.com �p,WPORJ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Meeting Date: June 20, 1996 PLANNING/BUILDING DEPARTMENT Agenda Item No.: 8 350o NEWPORT BOULEVARD Staff Person: Patricia L. Temple NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92656 (714) 644-3200 4,row' (714) 644-3200; FAX (714) 644'3$o Council Review: automatic j REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PROJECT: Pacific Bay Homes 2300 Jamboree Road PURPOSE OF APPLICATION: Amendments to Development Agreement No. 8 and the Aeronutronic Ford Planned Community to revise and refine the definitions and development standards for planning area 4 (Ford Land Development). The changes will reduce the permitted number of dwellings units from 500 to 450 and provide development standards for a detached single-family development. SUGGESTED ACTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ZONE: OWNER: Hold public hearing. If desired, adopt Resolutions No. approvalof: and recommending I • First Amendment to DevelopmentAgreementNo.8 • AmendmentNo.848 Parcel 4 as shown in Book 140, Pages 1 through 6 inclusive of Parcel Maps, records of Orange County, California. PC (Aeronutronic Ford Planned Community) Same as applicant Points and Authorities • Environmental Compliance (CalifomiaEnvironmentalQuality Act) All significant environmental concerns for the proposed project have been addressed in a previously certified Environmental Impact Report (SCH #94011022), and the City of Newport Beach intends to use that report for the project under consideration, and there are no additional reasonable alternative or mitigation measures that should be considered in conjunction with said project. Copies of the previously prepared EIR are available for public review and inspection at the Planning Department, City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92663. VICINITY MAP FIRST AMENDMENT to DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT No. 8= AMENDMENT No. 848 1 SubiectProperty and SurroundineLandUses The subject property is the former site of the Ford Aeronutronic and Loral Aerospace research and development facilities, which have now been demolished. To the north are the residential communities of Bayridge and Belcourt. To the west is Jamboree Road, with the community of Eastbluff beyond. To the south is the Belcourt Hill development, Ford Road and the community of Big Canyon. To the east is the Belcourt development. FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.8 AMENDMENT NO. 848 June 20, 1996 Page 2 • Conformance with the General Plan and Zoning District The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the site for Single Family Attached and Detached Residential development, with an allocation of 500 dwelling units. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The proposal includes amendments to the Planned Community District Regulations and Development Plan. • The procedures to amend a Development Agreement are contained in Section 15.45.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Section 20.51.045 of the Code contains the procedures to amend a Planned Community DevelopmentPlan. ANALYSIS Subsequent to the approval of the General Plan Amendment, Planned Community (PC) Amendment, Tentative Tract Map and Development Agreement for the Ford/Loral site, Ford Motor Land Development identified the builder/developer for the project. Pacific Bay Homes (formerly JM Development) immediately commenced discussions with City staff on changes to the original project approval. While generally in keeping with the concept of the original development, the new plan of all detached, single family dwellings necessitates changes to the Development Agreement and PC Text. It is important to note that these changes address the definitions and development standards contained in the Planned Community Development Plan under which the project is to be developed. The change of land use category to residential and the Environmental Impact Report certification and mitigation program are not under consideration as part of this action, other than the determination as to whether the changes to the zoning document would require changes to the mitigation program previously established. First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 8 Minor changes to the development agreement adopted as part of the original approval are necessary to incorporate language recognizing the proposed changes to the Planned Community Development Plan. No changes to the substance of the agreement are proposed. The changes also recognize that Ford Motor Land has accomplished some of the requirements of the original Development Agreement. Those accomplishments are the Belcourt Terrace Landscape Screen Agreement and the participation in the Affordable Housing Task Team, which has been meeting over the last several months, and is in the process of issuing a Request for Proposals for the project. The Office of the City Attorney considers the proposed amendments to the development agreement to be minor and technical in nature, and has no objections to the proposed changes. FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.8 AMENDMENTNO.848 June 20, 1996 Page 3 AmendmentNo. 848 for the Aeronutronic Ford Planned Community The proposed amendments to the Planned Community District Regulations and Development Plan, while comprehensive in scope, do not substantially alter the intent of the original set of regulations. The changes are needed to accommodate the revised development plan. The important changes to the development are the realignment of the internal loop road resulting in an expansion of the land area within the "circle," and revisions to development standards to accommodate the new development concept of 100% single family dwellings. Pacific Bay Homes will be submitting a revised Tentative Tract Map reflecting these changes in the near future. The changes to the development plan fall into two categories, formatting changes and changes affecting the development standards. The changes are itemized on the chart attached to this report (Attachment 1) titled SUMMARY OF KEYPROPOSED CHANGES TO AERONUTRONICFORD PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS. This chart is indexed to the redline/ strikeout text attached to this report (Attachment 2). Generally, the key changes to the text are as follows: • Format changes to incorporate all the definitions and development standards for the project area into a single section. • Addition of definitions needed as a result of the specific residential product types envisioned by the new plan. These include alley loaded development. • Clarification of the definitions of Cluster Unit Development and Conventional Subdivision on a Planned Community Concept. This is needed because both staff and the developer had difficulty interpretingthe original definitions. • Changes to the Statistical Analysis, including reducing the permitted number of dwelling units from 500 to 450. • Changes to the specific development standards, including: • Alteration to the uses permitted in the areas adjacent to Belcourt residences, implementing the agreements regarding lot size and configuration. • Changes to setback requirements to provide for greater architectural variation. • Simplifying the text for ease of use. • Establishment of administrative procedures for modifications to the development standards. The procedures proposed reflect approval processes contained in the zoning code. • Clarification of the circumstances when Site Plan Review is required. FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 8 AMENDMENT NO.848 June 20, 1996 Page 4 • Provisions for the establishment of limited food and beverage service in a community. recreation facility serving residents and guests only, subject to the securing of a Use Permit. This is requested because the current development plan envisions a large community facility which could accommodate social functions. Staff has worked closely with the applicant in revising the development standards. Staff has no objections to the proposed changes, as they are needed to accommodated the revised development plan of 100% single family dwellings, and will be more understandable and easier to interpret as the development moves forward. Conclusion and Specific Findings Chapter 15.45 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code allows for the amendment of a development agreement upon mutual consent of the parties to the agreement. The Office of the City Attorney and the Planning Department have reviewed the proposed changes to the agreement proposed by the applicant, and have no objections to the changes. No specific findings are set forth in the Municipal Code for the amendment of Planned Community District Regulations and Development Plans. It is the opinion of staff that the proposed P-C Text Amendments are consistent with the General Plan, and reinforce the concept of the original approval. Staff has also reviewed the previous certified Environmental Impact Report and is of the opinion that the changes to the development plan are adequately addressed by that document, and that no new impacts not previously identified will result from the changes and no new mitigation measure are required. Should the Planning Commission desire to approve the project, draft resolutions recommending approval of the project to the City Council are attached. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PatriciaL. Temple Director Attachments: 1. Summary of Key Proposed Changes to the Aeronutronic Ford Planned Community District Regulations 2. Redline/strikeoutPlannedCommunity Text 3. Revised Development AgreementNo.8 4. Letter from the Office of the City Attorney regarding amendment development agreement 5. Draft Resolution regarding the first amendmentto DevelopmentAgreementNo. 8 6. Draft Resolution regarding AmendmentNo. 848 FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 8 AMENDMENT NO.848 June 20, 1996 Page 5 SUMMARY OF KEY PROPOSED CHANGES TO ;t AERONUTRONIC FORD PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS [NOTE: THIS SUMMARY ADDRESSES ONLY KEY CHANGES. PLEASE SEE REDLINE FOR ALL SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES.} Page References are to the Draft with the Footer Reading "053196-1553IF31331-002/44925.27." SUBJECT REFERENCE SUMMARY OF CHANGE FORMATTING' CHANGES Introduction Page 1 Change: The Introduction has been updated to reflect the current status of the property, provide additional procedural background, and clarify the purpose of the PC Text. Reason: The Introduction had not previously been updated to reflect actual site conditions and the revised uses for the property. General Background Pages 3-4 Change: Clarifies that Planning Area 4 is now designated for residential and ancillary purposes only. Sections II and III Reason: Prior text indicated that expansion of R&D uses was still a permitted use. Development Page 5 Change. References approval of DA. Indicates that terms of DA prevail. Agreement Section III Reason: The existence of a DA and its relationship to the PC Text should be made known to a reader of the PC Text. Definitions Pages 6 & 17 Change: The definitions for the previously developed planning areas remain in Section IV. Definitions for Sections IV and IX Planning Area 4 are contained entirely in Section IX. Reason: The definitions for Planning Area 4 have been updated and clarified. It would not be appropriate, however, to change the definitions with respect to previously built out portions of the PC. Therefore, those definitions remain unchanged, but new definitions needed to govern Planning Area 4 are contained within Section IX. Additionally, by placing all information related to Planning Area 4 in a single section, the document becomes more "user friendly" for the public, City staff, and Ford. 053196-1559 / M1331-002 / 48176.6 1 r SUBJECT REFERENCE SUMMARY OF CHANGE Standards for Pages 17-27 Change: The development standards for all of Planning Area 4 are contained within a single section (Section Planning Area 4 Section IX IX). Reason: Previously, development standards for Planning Area 4 were set out in two separate sections. With only a few notable exceptions, the standards were identical for all subareas. This sometimes made it difficult to figure out where the standards were not identical. By placing all Subareas in the same section, distinctions in development standards between Subareas become readily apparent because they are seen "side -by -side." For example, under "Development Standards" (Page 19, Section D) it is now easier to see the "Minimum Lot Size" distinctions between the Subareas. STANDARDS Definitions Access Drive Page 17 Change: Definitions for "Access Drive," "Primary Access Drive," and "Rear Access Drive" have been added. IX, A, 1 Reason: Product types anticipated utilize, in some cases, drives and alleyways for access to residential lots. Cluster Unit Page 17 Change. This definition has been modified to clarify its meaning. Development DC, A, 2 Reason: As revised, it clarifies that in a Cluster Unit Development, individual lots have less square footage than the required minimum, but the total number of units for the Planning Area remains within the allowable With the change to the definition of Conventional Subdivision on a Planned Community Concept, this range. clarifies the distinction between the two categories. Conventional Page 17 Change: The components of a Planned Community Concept are clarified. Subdivision on a IX, A, 3 Reason: The prior definition was confusing and unclear. This clarifies that a PC consists of some lots which Planned Community are smaller than the minimum, but with an average lot size which meets the minimum. Again, the clarification Concept helps to distinguish the PC from a cluster. Statistical Analysis Lot Size Page 18 Change: A definition for "Lot Size" is added. To accommodate the Rear Access Drive product, this lot to the centerline of the Access Drive, IX, A, 5 definition establishes that, for calculation purposes, the extends including where the Access Drive is held in common ownership for maintenance and liability reasons. Reason: Although there was previous reference to minimum lot sizes, "lot size" was not defined. Due to the product types under consideration for this site, clarification of "lot size" is needed. ...J 053196-1559 / F31331-002 / 48176.6 2 SUBJECT REFERENCE SUMMARY OF CHANGE Maximum Gross Page 18 Change: A "maximum," rather than a precise and inflexible number of acres, has been identified for each Acres IX, A, 6 Subarea. Reason: Until maps are finalized, the acres included within each Subarea are not precisely known. To retain some flexibility, a maximum number of acres for each Subarea has been identified. Obviously, the total cannot exceed 100.5 acres which is the actual site acreage. Net Acres Page 18 Change: These categories have been deleted. Buildable Acres IX, B Reason: In the existing PC Text, precise statistics are provided which would require a PC Text amendment if Site Coverage any future map or other approvals do not precisely comply with those statistics. These figures will become known as development proceeds, particularly after tentative map approval. Statistical Analysis Page 19 Change: The Statistical Analysis for Planning Area 4 has been moved to Section IX. Statistics are provided IX, B only for proposed categories. Reason for Change: Previously, the Statistical Analysis for the entire Planned Community, including both Ford's Planning Area 4 and the existing built out areas such as Belcourt, was contained at the front of the PC Text. The statistics for built out areas appear to reflect actual - as opposed to entitled - statistics. Those statistics are not relevant to this Project and have been deleted from the format. Additionally, by placing all information related to Planning Area 4 in a single section, the document becomes more "user friendly" for the public, City staff, and Ford. Maximum DU Page 19 Change: The maximum number of dwelling units for the project has been reduced to 450. IX, B Reason: The product types now under consideration allow for a reduction in the ultimate number of homes to be built on the site. Rather than maintain the prior maximum, the potential number of units has been reduced to emphasize that the proposed PC Text amendments are designed to reduce potential density and enhance compatibility with existing neighborhoods. Specific Development Standards Uses Permitted Page 19-20 Change: Conventional Subdivisions on a Planned Community Concept are no longer allowed in Subarea D. Subject to Site Plan IX, C, 6c Reason: This reflects a reaffirmation of the commitment to enhance the compatibility of Subarea D with Review: PC Concept adjoining Belcourt residents. 0 053196-1559 / F31331-002 / 48175.6 3 r REFERENCE SUMMARY OF CHANGE SUBJECT Minimum Lot Size Page 20 Change: Clarifies that minimum lot sizes do not directly apply to Clusters and PCS. IX, D, 1 Reason: Previously, the application of the rules to Clusters and PCS was unclear. This change brings the text into compliance with the intent of the standards, as well as general practice regarding the application of minimum lot sizes to Clusters and PCS. Subarea 4D Page 20 Change: Clusters and PCS are not permitted under any circumstances in Subarea 4D. IX, D, lc Reason: Again, this reflects commitments made to Belcourt residents. Side Yard Setbacks Pages 21 Change: Greater variation provided for width and calculation of side yard setbacks. IX, D, 4b Reason: Allows for greater creativity and flexibility in Clusters and Access Drive products. Recognizes potential for detached and/or rear access garages. Garage Setbacks 2 Pa:D, Change: Provides standards for garages accessed by a Rear Access Drive at the rear of the lot. Requires, in IX,4f all cases, a 26-foot setback between garages on opposite sides of a Rear Access Drive. Reason: Standards were required to address detached garage and/or rear access situations. Easements Page 22 Change: Allows Site Plan Review for design techniques which preserve setbacks between structures, but which IX, D, 4 (following might use easements or other legal mechanisms to maximize use of individual lots. 4h) Reason: Allows developer to propose reciprocal or alternating easements, among other potential mechanisms, which would retain the required side yard setback, but allow for expansion of useable side yard areas. Calculation of Page 22 Change: Calculation method changed and provisions inserted to address Access Drive intersections. Fence, Hedge, and Wall Height IX, D, 5 Reason: Extends restriction to Access Drive intersections. Simplifies calculations by deleting reference to right-of-way lines. Trellis Height Page 23 Change: Allows trellises to be ten feet high, rather than eight. IX, D, 6 Reason: Eight feet is too restrictive. The revised standard allows for eight feet of head room under the trellis. Private Street Pages 23 Change: Addresses all private street standards in a single section. Provides specific standards for Access Standards IX, D, 7 Drives. Allows for landscape pockets for parking turnouts. Reason: Simplifies text. Provides needed standards for Access Drives. Allows for more street landscaping in 75-by-80 foot product. 053196-1559 / F31331-001 / 48176.6 4 SUBJECT REFERENCE SUMMARY OF CHANGE Process for Project Page 27 Change: Specifies which development standard modifications require PC Text amendments, subdivision map Modifications IX, F, G, H amendments, and standard City modification process approval. Reason: These provisions supplement the discussion of the Site Plan Review process by clarifying the approval process for various development standard modifications. Maximum Site Area Page 25 Change: Clarifies existing content. Indicates that temporary structures, patio covers, and similar ancillary Coverage IX, D, 10 structures, as well as trellises, are not included in the site coverage calculation. Reason: Makes the section consistent with new definitions, such as Lot Size. Site Plan Review: Page 25-27 Change: Clarifies circumstances under which Site Plan Review is required. When Required IX, E Reason: Site Plan Review should be limited to those "special circumstances" involving creative planning techniques which are specifically authorized by the PC Text, such as Clusters and PCS. Community Service Page 28 Change: Subject to a use permit, allows food, beverage, and valet services for residents and guests only. Facilities X, A, 3 Reason: Provides a convenience amenity for residents and their guests. Community Page 28 Change: Clarifies specific "ancillary" uses, specifying clubhouses, including kitchens, and meeting rooms. Recreational Facilities: Ancillary X, A, 2 Reason: This allows for normal types of community recreational facilities. Uses Community Page 28 Change: The height limit of community recreational facilities is raised to 37 feet. Recreational Facilities: Building X, B, 1 Reason: This corresponds with the maximum building height for residential structures. Height Community Page 28 Change: One parking space is required for every 200 square feet of a clubhouse or meeting room facility. Recreational Facilities: Parking X, B, 3 Reason: This supplements the clarification of ancillary uses and assures that adequate parking will be available for community meetings and activities. Signs Page 29 Change. Specific sign locations are established. XI, B, 1 & 2 Reason: Addresses the issue now. �� 053196-1559 / ZU1331-002 / 48176.6 AERONUTRONIC FORD PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS Adopted September 9, 1979 Ordinance No. 1807 Amendment No. 542; Amended March 9, 1981 Resolution No. 9986 Amendment No. 559; Amended October 13, 1981 Resolution No. 11064 Amendment No. 564; Amended September 28, 1983 Resolution No. 1104 'Amendment No. 591; Amended July 10, 1995 Resolution No. 95-89 Amendment No. 800 053196.15531 F3I331-002 r 44925.27 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SECTION I - STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 3 SECTION II - GENERAL 44 SECTION III - GENERAL NOTES § 4 SECTION IV - DEFINITIONS -71 SECTION V - ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL/AREAS 1, 6,7 87. Sub -Section A Uses Permitted 8.1 Sub -Section B Uses DevelopmeaW Development Standards 97 SECTION VI - ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL/AREA 8 44 Sub -Section A Uses Permitted 44'10 4410 Sub -Section B Uses Permitted Subject To A Use Permit 44 Id Sub -Section C Development Standards SECTION VII - DETACHED RESIDENTIAL/AREA 2 4-4 i3 44 IS Sub -Section A Uses Permitted 4.413 Sub -Section B Development Standards SECTION VIII - CUSTOM LOT, RESIDENTIAL/AREA 5 • -715 Sub -Section A Uses Permitted ��'� 4-7 1$ Sub -Section B Development Standards SECTION IX - ATTACHED/DETACHED RESIDENTIAL/AREA —4A-20 ngW NT#AL p ANI�'IIZ0 AREA:4 :11. ...... ,..Sub-Secllan A.i3efitxitiorls. � �� Su Secdan B Statistical Analysis 19. Sub -Section C Uses kermitted' 11 Sub -Section D Development Standards 20 Sub-Secdoit E Site Plan Review ,m.. 25 5Iv ITt +t X = C fJAiltvltil IT R CREATIi)I�AI4 VACILITiES 8 Sub -Section A Uses Permitted she nt n,...:ew !n 053196-15531 F31331-002 / 44925.27 •f C (�TTllT.7 !�llA AT AT TT.TiT > D (�DL' n T'Tr11.T n T C G ITIES 34, 9,43 Reefien n r rses Peffnitted -3429 Sub -Section B Development Standards SECTION XI Xi - SIGNS/RESIDENTIAL AREAS 1,2,4,5,6,7,8 Sub -Section A Permanent Signs M 3629 Sub -Section B Temporary Signs•< 053196.1553 / P31331-002 144925.27 k� INTRODUCTION The Aeronutronic Ford (Planned Community) District for the City of Newport Beach is in conformance with the Newport Beach General Plan. The purpose of t13is ihese Planned Community (PC) District .:Rd da66hi is to grevide fef est iGsli the zoning classification and development e€ staridariis for the subject property develep neat standards set fe -hen— the"-" zegulaiioii �l-pieta rover rejitlaii`o"r contained iri'flie'�;iy''5 geiieial zoning ardiziarice: Whom . ho�veverx tine provisions These regulations are silent w3flarespect to"a-particular development of the general =niug" ordinance shall ,coniroi. Tisese'I2egutativtis tv�ek-6i gmaily ad"opted rin,$epteuii3er'9,' I979,1iy Oidinance"NQ` 18ii}i: Since then, the Regulations Piave been amended several times to reflect changing development. -concepts and; ultimately, a major change in permitted use, L`.. On July 10, 1995, the Reguiat oric research and develop.ons ,%we amended to elimhWe the hist t `l ' ..i ' e ment fj kThat" ht_ m_ - hpmtted e eeiO Planning Area. 4 {consisting cif Subareas 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, and 4EY of the site to 'residential and awIllaty uses. The amendment dated 1996, rcRecis-Rmther reftuements 16 the residential -concept for Platuwsg Area 4. Nothiii ; contained in thisLatestaruendracatshould be construed to alter the provisions of these Regstia6ons with respect to any Plannh ig Area other #Bash Platu*g Area 4:... _,...... .. w . 053196.1553 I F31331-002144925.27 f SECTION I - STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR PLAINKNG AYEAS 1, 2, V G, 7> & -'. Note: 'The',5tatisticat AriaTysis for plaru2ing �Ireu 4 and its Subareas ts:set forth:tri Sectio�z 17� Gross PM Buildable Maximum Type Area Acres Net Acres Acres DU Planning 1 18.6 16.2 12.3 50 Areas 2 18.6 17.5 12.7 54 5 33.0 26.0 17.3 48 6 15.1 14.4 10.4 54 7 17 16.0 11.6 56 8 12 11.5 8.5 168 Subtotal 114.3 101.6 72.8 430 PERCENTAGE OF SITE COVERAGE Planning Area 1, Z, S, 6, 7 8 Building Footprint 14.6% 28.0% Parking Areas 21.7% 5.00 0 Landscape and Pedestrian 63.7% 27.0% Circulation 31.5% Streets g g% Perimeter Open Space 053196.15531 F31331-002144925.27 2 SECTION II - GENERAL Location The Aeronutronic Ford Planned Community encompasses 215.2 gross acres in the City of Newport Beach. The community is bounded by Bison -Avenue on the north, MacArthur Boulevard on the east, Ford Road on the south, and Jamboree Road on the west. Existing Zoning The existing zoning is designated PC (Planned Community). The development standards set forth herein will provide for the development of the subject property. Land Uses The Aeronutronic Ford Planned Community is priM6usly was designated for residential development and for the expansion of Research and Development uses of the existing Ford Aerospace and Communication Corporation, As a result of i ie most recent.Iini rtents to these iFegulatlotts Planued'00" 2i ntty naw provndes entirely for residential and ana , ary uses; Public Recreation The City of Newport Beach Park Standards will be met by in -lieu fees. Private Recreation Four (4) private recreational areas totaling 1.2 acres will be located within the residentid-areas Platun"M`Z Azeas 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Facilities included in these private recreational areas will include a mn3imtun of four (4) swimming pools, four (4) jacuzzis and associated recreational buildings. Private recreational facilities, open and/or structured, within the development boundaries shall be maintained and operated by the Community Associations. in -are .allowed in ,4dditiez tl ohe br'more additional private recreation areas tney-be-pex3' »" _.,. 15iaCkttiiag Area 4... ... ..m , ., w, . 053196.1553 / F31331-002 / 44925.27 r SECTION III - GENERAL NOTES Water Service Water service to the Planned Community District will be provided by the City of Newport Beach. 2. Sewage Disposal Sewage disposal service facilities to the Planned Community will be provided by the City of Newport Beach, Orange County Sanitation District No. 5, or Irvine Ranch Water District, as per agreement (May 14, 1980). Flood Protection Development of the subject property will be undertaken in accordance with the flood protection policies and requirements of the City of Newport Beach. 4. Grading Grading and erosion control shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the City of Newport Beach Grading Ordinance and shall be subject to permits issued by the Building and Planning Departments, 5. Zoning Ordinance Compliance Except as otherwise stated in h' Planned ' M� =—tom ; lau of a DeveloprrlezitAgreetilent,%rPIa>:uung Area4, the requirements of the Newport Beach Zoning Ordinance shallapply. 6. Building Code Compliance The contents of this text notwithstanding, all construction within the Planned Community boundaries shall comply with all provisions of the Uniform Building Code and the various mechanical codes related thereto. 7. Parking Lot Lighting All new parking lot lighting shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director. 05319661553 / F31331.002 / 4492527 4 111 8. Archaeological/PaleontologicalResources Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the site shall be examined to determine the existence and extent of archeological and paleontological resources in accordance with adopted policies of the City of Newport Beach. 9. Public Health and Safety Requirements (Planning Area 41 The Ford Motor Land Services Corporation or its successor shall comply with all requirements and mitigation measures related to public health and safety as described in Final EIR No. 153 for Planning Area 4. provisions of that Development Agreement shall .deterniine'the Piduiances, XMOIIqOns, policies,AndoffialocatliiwsappficzWdto,thedevelopffieht'&fP]=mng'Area'.'4. wbemthert. is an inconsistency between the terms of (1=6 Rei"Pps�,# -the,peeveIopmcnt the terms of the Development Agreement shall •prevail 05319&1553 / F31331-W2 /44925.27 .s SECTION IV - DEFINITIONS The following definitions shall apply to the development of aU Planning Are s•exc4tPlarirungArea 4 of the Aeronutronic Ford Planned Community. Definitions for Planning Area 4 are contattted 14 Section ]3� 1. Gross Acreage shall mean the entire site area within the project boundary plus the centerline of the perimeter streets excluding MacArthur Boulevard, in which case the boundary' line extends to the existing right of way line which is the Newport Beach City boundary. This acreage is the area within the boundaries of the Tentative Subdivision Map. 2. Parcel Map Net Area shall mean the entire area Within the project boundary excluding previously dedicated perimeter streets. 3. Buildable Acreage shall mean the entire site area Niithin the project boundary excluding streets, park dedication, areas with existing natural slopes greater than 2:1. and natural flood plains. 4. Cluster Unit Development shall mean a combination or arrangement of attached or detached dwellings and their accessory structures on contiguous or related building sites where the yards and open spaces are combined into more desirable arrangements or open spaces and where the individual sites may have less than the required average for the district but the density of the overall development meets the required standard. 5. Conventional Subdivision on a Planned Community Concept shall mean a conventional subdivision of detached dwellings and their accessory structures on indivi&- l lots where the lot size may be less than the required average for the district but where the density for the entire subdivision meets the required standards and %;bere open space areas are provided for the enhancement and utilization of the overall development 053196-1553 / F31331-002 144925.27 0 q SECTION V - ATTACHED RESIDENTIALdAREA 19 65 7 These areas are intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. A. Uses Pemutted 1. Cluster unit developments, as defined in Section IV, Definitions. 2. Single family dwellings attached or detached. 3. Conventional subdivisions on a Planned Community Concept, as defined in Section IV, Definitions. 4. Custom Lots. 5. Condominium/fownhomes. 6. Temporary model complex and appurtenant uses. 7. Community Recreational facilities. 8. Signs (as provided in Section XI of this Planned Community Text). 9. Security Gates and/or Guard Houses. B. Develooment Standards 1. Maximum Height Limits a. All buildings shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of 37 feet or an average height of 32 feet. b. Chimneys and vents shall be permitted as set forth in section 20.02.060 of the Municipal Code. 2. Setbacks from Public Streets A minimum setback of 15 feet shall apply to all structures other than garages adjacent to public streets; except that balconies and patios may encroach six (6) feet into the required setback. Architectural features such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and Aingwalls may extend two and one-half (2%2) feet into the required setback from a public street. Setbacks shall be measured from the ultimate right-of-way line. 053196.15531 F31331.002 / 44925.27 7 0 Setbacks from Other Property Lines and Structures a, A minimum front yard setback of five (5) feet shall be required. This setback shall be measured from the back of curb or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewakL b. All main residential structures shall be a minimum of eight feet apart. This shall be measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. C. Detached garages shall be separated from train residential structures a minimum of eight (8) feet. This also shall be measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. d. Two car garages with direct access shall be setback from five (5) to seven (7) feet average or a minimum average of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that the sidewalk shall be permitted with roll -up or other type garage doors approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Additional garage spaces need not meet the above criteria 4. Fences Hedges and Walls Fences shall be limited to a maximum of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six (6) feet. Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right- of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolonged. 5. Trellis Open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to within three (3) feet of the side or rear property lines. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eight (8) feet. Trellis areas shall not be considered in calculating lot area coverage; however, trellis areas shall not exceed 25 percent of the remaining open space of a developed lot. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area. 053196.1553 / F31331.002144925.27 8 �, r 6. Architectural Features Architectural features, such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wing walls may extend two and one-half (2'/2) feet into any front, side or rear yard setback 7. Parking A minimum of 3.0 parking spaces per unit shall be required. One of the required spaces may be permitted on the driveway of the residence, providing that said driveway has a minimum depth of twenty (20) feet or eighteen (18) feet with roll -up or other type garage doors approved by the City Traffic Engineer, measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. In addition to driveway parking spaces, a minimum of 0.5 guest parking spaces may be provided on -street or in the bays, and their location shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and the City Traffic Engineer. 8. Maximum Site Area Coverage The maximum site coverage permitted shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area For purposes of this Planned Community, site coverage shall include all areas under foot but shall not include trellis areas. 05319rr1553 / F3133I-W2 / 44925.27 f SECTION VI - ATTACHED RESIDENTIAIJAREA 8 These areas are intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. A. 1.31 C. Uses Permitted 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Cluster unit developments, as defined in Section IV, Single family dwellings attached or detached. Conventional subdivisions on a Planned Community IV, Definitions. Custom Lots. Definitions. Concept, as defined in Section Temporary model complex and appurtenant uses. Community Recreational facilities. Signs (as provided in Section XI of this Planned Community Text). Security Gates and/or Guard Houses. Uses Permitted Subject To A Use Permit 1. Condominium and townhome dwellings. Development Standards 1. Maximum Height Limits a. All buildings shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of 37 feet or an average height of 32 feet b. Chimneys and vents shall be permitted as set forth in section 20.02.060 of the Municipal Code. 2. Setbacks from Public Streets A minimum setback of 15 feet shall apply to all structures other than garages adjacent to public streets; except that balconies and patios may encroach six (6) feet into the required setback. Architectural features such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and A ingwa.Us may extend two and one-half (2'/2) feet into the required setback from a public street. Setbacks shall be measured from the ultimate right -of -«ay line. 3. Setbacks from Other Property Lines and Structures a. A minimum first story front yard setback of five (5) feet shall be required. This setback shall be measured from the back of curb or in the event that 053196.1553 / F31331-002 / 44925.27 10 �� sidewalks are constructed. from back of sidewalk. The second story front may be constructed adjacent to the back of curb or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, adjacent to back of sidewalk. b. All main residential structures shall be a minimum of eight(8) feet.apart. This shall be measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. C. Detached garages shall be separated from main residential structures a minimum of eight (8) feet This also shall be measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. d. Two car garages with direct access shall be setback from five (5) to seven (7) feet average or a minimum average of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that the sidewalk shallbe permitted with roll -up or other type garage doors approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Additional garage spaces need not meet the above criteria. 4. Fences Hedges and Walls Fences shall be limited to a maximum of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six (6) feet Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right- of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolonged. 5. Trellis Open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to within three (3) feet of the side or rear property lines. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eight (8) feet. Trellis areas shall not be considered in calculating lot area coverage; however, trellis areas shall not exceed 25 percent of the remaining open space of a developed lot. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area. 053196.1553 1 F31331-002 144925.27 11 6. Architectural Features Architectural features, such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wing walls may extend two and one-half (2%2) feet into any front, side or rear yard setback. 7. Parking A minimum of 2.0 parking spaces per unit shall be required Guest parking shall be cluster with a minimum of two spaces per cluster. 8. Maximum Site Area Coverage The maximum site coverage permitted shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. For purposes of this Planned Community, site coverage shall include all areas under foot but shall not include trellis areas. 9. Affordable Housing The developer will provide 25 per cent of all units above 38 as moderate priced for sale units as defined by the City's Housing Element. All in -lieu park fees, traffic improvement fees and noise wall fees for the affordable units and the previously approved 38 units will be waived. 053196-1553 / F31331-002 / 44925.27 12 SECTION VII - DETACHED RESIDENTIAIJAREA 2 This area is intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. A. Uses Permitted 1. Single family dwellings. 2. Conventional subdivisions on a Planned Community, as defined in Section IV, Definitions. 3. Custom Lots. 4. Community recreational facilities. 5. Security gates and/or guard houses. 6. Temporary model complex and appurtenant uses. B. Development Standards Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot sizepermitted shall be 6,000 sq.ft. 2. Maximum Building Height. All buildings in Areas 2 & 8 shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of 37 feet or an average height of 32 feet. 3. Setbacks The following setbacks shall apply to all structures excluding garden walls or fences. a. Front Yard A minimum setback of five (5) feet for the garage and a minimum of ten (10) feet for the dwelling unit shall be maintained. This shall be measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. b. Side Yard Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of five (5) feet. The Planning Director may approve a zero side yard concept provided that a total of ten (10) feet be provided on the opposite side yard. A zero side yard concept will not b` allowed under a custom lot program. C. Rear Yard A minimum of ten (10) feet shall be maintained for the rear yards. d. Setbacks - Garages Two car garages with direct access shall be setback from five (5) to sera (7) feet average or a minimum average of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed from back of sidewalk. A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks 053196.15531 F31331.002144925.27 13 are constructed, from back of sidewalk shall be permitted with roll -up or other type garage doors approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Additional garage spaces need not meet the above criteria. A minimum of five (5) feet for side -on garages shall be maintained. 4. Fences Hedges and Walls Fences shall be limited to a maximum of eight (8) feet. except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six (6) feet. Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right-of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolonged. 5. Trellis Open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to within three (3) feet of the side or rear property lines. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eight (8) feet. Trellis areas shall not be considered in calculating lot area coverage; however, trellis areas shall not exceed 25 percent of the remaining open space of a developed lot. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area. 6. Parking Parking for residential uses shall be in the form of not less than three (3) parking spaces per dwelling unit. 7. Maximum Site Area Coverage The maximum site area coverage for any residential lot shall be 60 percent of such lot. 8. Architectural Features Architectural features, such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wing walls may extend two and one half (2'/2) feet into any front, side or rear yard setback. 053196.1553 / F31331402 / 44925.27 14 SECTION VIII - CUSTOM LOT RESIDEN-17L4IJAREA 5 This area is intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. A. Uses Permitted 1. Single Family Dwellings. 2. Conventional subdivisions on a Planned Community, as defined in Section N, Definitions. 3. Custom Lot. , 4. Community recreational facilities. 5. Temporary model complex and appurtenant uses.. 6. Tennis Courts. B. Development Standards i. Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size permitted shall be 9,000 sq.ft. 2. Maximum Building Height. All buildings in Areas 5 & 8 shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of 37 feet or an average height of 32 feet 3. Setbacks The following setbacks shall apply to all structures excluding garden walls or fences. a.' Front Yard A minimum setback of twenty (20) feet for the dwelling unit shall be maintained. This shall be measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. b. Side Yard Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of five (5) feet C. Rear Yard A mnumum of ten (10) feet shall be maintained for the rear yards. d. Setbacks - Garages Two car garages with direct access shall be setback from five (5) to seven (7) feet average or a minimum average of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed from back of sidewalk. A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk shall be permitted with roll -up or other type garage doors approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Additional garage spaces need not meet the above criteria. A minimum of five (5) feet for side -on garages shall be maintained. 05319& 1553 / F31331-002 144925.27 15 CIA, 4. Fences Hedges and Walls Fences, with the exception of tennis courts, shall be limited to a maximum of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six (6) feet NNrmg walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right-of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolonged. 5. Trellis Open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to within three (3) feet of the side or rear property lines. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eight (8) feet Trellis areas shall not be considered in calcu&ing lot area coverage; however, trellis areas shall not exceed 25 percent of the remaining open space of a developed lot. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area 6. Parking Parking for residential uses shall be in the form of not less than three (3) parking spaces per dwelling unit. 7. Maximum Site Area Coverage The maximum site area coverage for any residential lot shall be 60 percent of such lot. 8. Architectural Features Architectural features, such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wing walls may extend two and one half (2'/-.) feet into any front, side or rear yard setback. 9. Tennis Courts Tennis courts are allowed and may be within 3' of the rear and side property lines. The courts are permitted fencing up to 12' in height. The courts lighting shall use 27' max height, square tubular and painted posts with 1000 watts metal halide lights in a flat pan fixture. All tennis court lighting shall be designed in such a way as to prevent light from shining directly on the adjacent residential properties and to insure that the lighting does not adversely affect night vehicular traaffic.along MacArthur Boulevard. All tennis court lighting shall be subject to a use permit. 053196.1553 / F31331-002 / 44925.27 16 SECTION IX - ATTACKED t DETACMD`RESIDENMAL P WING' AM 4 A, " DF iIQITLOIVS ihe'foIIowms defm3hons avnly `to Plann2na Area 4 ...... ..." .1 • •".""`Access• Drive'�`"x"efers "tti" e�"iliive;"'inotttdiiig " those owite�" �iidlox itiainCai3ieiS 'by u ,coFnmucriti`' assod" Which provides front, side, of rear access to one or more residential lots. An Access Drive is not'a Private Street as diet teem is used withift these )tteguiations p veways as a tesidentEaf Icit are not Access Drives. �;'=tPri»icuy ACaess Drive" refers is an Access :bilvewucti is designer as t&e "princi means of ace to a rOdetuiai lei Diive which 'v (R access to"a residential A'`°Rear Access 17stve .refers to an.Aocess_ • PTo :., w lot from the rear of the lot. etnem .. . 2: "Cliiste'r Unit Devefa"pmenf' iefefs" to a &ffibiiiattan or arran 't of attacheii of detached 4vTQi n'gs and their accessory structures on, cantiguotis or related bg4ing sites �rhere ., M, w M. ,., ww..w w"w . ..... . the .open speeds arid' private yards :v�7tiiiii a Planturig Area •oritl,area are M , combined into more desirable mmgements, greenbelts, or open spaces and ' iddhidnal residdntidl lots hire less square footage than the r0ir6d r'am1inunt:lof w... size for the Planning . Area or Subarea, :but- the number of residential traits permitted within the Planning Area: or Subarea does'not exceed the maxim* immber of, Won for that Planning Area a?r Subarea as. sbown in. thz latistical 3.. "•"Corxveii€ioria'[ StrT�iiivisitaxn onapl'arinecl"CoiniriimiEyCoieepl""i'e.#er"s to aeoizven�otial ... subdivision of detached dwel ' and their accessory structures on individual lots where: tl,. i J �= ' wtlie'ioti'slze ofsome iixlrvidcial'r='r entsal lots may be Less their the regchred m"minimum for the Planning, Ards. or Subarea,_ :but the average .lot size for all; residential lots within the P,,L mung, A or Subarea equals, .or exceeds ih recnredm3nunuin lot size did € �. .. w. .w w,..,w.w • opem_spacc areas are provt for the enhancement or nhitzat3on a> fire o dvne] tnent:.M."..ww,.,_o ,w... fi., ." .., ......,w...„..,..,.......,"„ , .,,,,.. , 4;" ""Flag S:o� bziireway""xe£eis"fa anwArcess tki$e �tfucf%••altliAu�i"having:the'appeacariee add fundtio3i of an extended driveway; is used to provide access to two" or —more residential emits irom a 11xivafe Street- ar Access Drive „m 053196-15531 F31331-00214192527 17 30 5. . "l of Size". iefers to the total square footage of a residential lot. The boundaries , • ttt detennine the lot site of a residential lot shall. be those set faith, on the subdivision snap: no, square footage.of a residential lot shall bg.deemed'to.include those abutting areas extending to the center line of adjoining Access DrN es, — , where the Access DrWo is shown as 2 separate Iot under common ownershil3: 6, `fi)a imiuu rCiss Acres" refaito the mammum number:of gross acres �ioh mad included .within any planning Subarea, as shows► is the Statistical Analysis for Piann#n 7. A"` 'iivat$'$treef'' refers •to auy .street wiEitio 'laniung Area 4 which is owtteii acid maintained by the Community Association. While a Rear Access Dmre may be owned and' maintained by the Coritmunity� tl,asoaiatiari„a Rear. Access Dxive is not. a °�lxtxuate w Street" for purposes of these Regulations; 8. °Setback" iefers.6 the nunimum distance btveen a structure on a lot and'ihe'closer.uf (i) the property line, 'Qi) the -back of an 4a=, t. sidewalk, and jilt) •the back of ad adjacent Cuih VJitere the DereiopmerA $tandwds contained'ia Secti'Qn D belbw specify a different stpdatd fot the measurement of a: „setback," the standard set forth„ p Section D shall control,11 053196.1553 / F3133 W2 / 4492$.27 18 13, siki§t,61 AIil^iiifii Plifi 'Area"4 NfR316la Gross M azimnm ' . .... DU....... . 4A 40 1.f40 4D .24 IIJ 4iK.."'22 140 acres're 'fijcjed in-.tfijscolwnn,repr&sentsbhe maximum ihai can below W6 wT thin Svbqroa,bvundarles are intended tp,bpjUxi6le within, the Maximm scr0'790& iiienti red_ Note: The for allocationof-roddential units between the.Subarex and to ref adjustments vfSuhama boundaries on subdivision pVtrecorda as developmentPrOgms= Vx Waxilm= DU'# Cd=,n refiertg a maximum number of 450 residenW units for Reshkndal Area 4, ewn'though the sum of the "M=imvn D W'for he Inavidta Subarez js much greater than 450. ?WlsalkW;JorjlodbJI4 in assigning units 3withttt the Subareas while maintaining ark overall on the lafS -number . allowed 3within 4rea 053196-1553 F31331-002 144925.27 19 C. Uses Perriiiffed Planiiin Aiea 4 is intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. 1. Single-family detached subdivisions, subject to• approval of a Parking Plan (see Section E9) � Jp) and Landscaping Plan, if required (see'Section Elm CD). 2. Custom lot sales and custom homes. 3. Temporary model complexes and appurtenant uses. 4. Signs (as provided in Section XI of this Planned Community Text). 5. Tennis courts, subject to the provisions of Section -IX.G.10. MOAT; S. Coinmvuity recreational facilities; subject fo:thpmvisi4ns of Section X: 7. Uses Permitted Subject to Site Plan Review (see gee-D4 Section Bl' "', "'iri;Stitiarea 4A only, single family attached subdivisions. b: In Subarea 4A,'Clnsfer Iiiit i�eCzl'oj3meuts: C. Id Stitiai�as 4A, 4B; 4C Ea �" ConVentiO&l:. Siitidi'siiF&s on a Planned CommtU* Concept, . a fi A d. Entry guard houses and gates. D. Development Standards Minimum Lot Size Ofher'•ti%asi for Cif "Unzt �P7 velopwents of C`bnvei�ioiial: Subdi�isiozis oii"a �'liuin� Commimitj' Concept.�where periniited subject to kite plan ieviS%), the nunimuuF lot sizes shah C_ V •SAb` i 4A:f The mininumilet-sizeMea shany e. 3,000 square feet. b. ".""-Siabareas;�3B, ��;arid"4E•�,fla� sgtfaze£eet:,"� C. "Su�amn"4D: d;006 square fee% Cluster, Emit i?eY�Iapmer�ts and ConYemiorrai " Subdivilwas on a i'lanned Com twl cCaneept :WT, not ;tie•pexuikxa w Sjibarea 4D 053196.1553 / F31331-002 144925.27 .?3 2. Maximum Height Limits a. All buildings in Subareas 4A, 4B, 4D, and 4E shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of 37 feet, with an average itoof�height not to exceed 32 feet. b. All buildings in area 4C shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of twenty-eight (28) feet, with the average height not to exceed twenty-seven (27) feet. C. Chimneys and vents shall be permitted as set forth in the Municipal Code. 3. Setbacks from Public Streets (i.e., Jamboree Road and Ford Road) _•/ A minimum setback�of fifteen (15) feet shall apply to all structures other than garages adjacent to public streelxcept that balconies and patios may encroach six (6) feet in the required setback. t Architectural features such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wingwalls may extend two and one-half (2'/2) feet into the required setback from a public street. Setbacks shall be measured from the ultimate right-of-way line. 4. Setbacks from Other Property Lines and Structures iccept as ose �statii's'sTaeii taugiZ tbe'�it''s Modcatsori prae setbsr from oihei pmperty lines and structures shah be „M ' Fromtyazd: in Subarea 4A, a muumum front Yazd setback of five (5) feet shall �:...:......� required... ........"..... ""-...... sklewalks�. a fr haeIE of side* � 1n1. •Subareas 4B2 4C;'4D; and 4E, imi front d setback v tf a(%O) feet sliaii berec�uued for tlio'tria u, a.utsnini Y elwelling'{excltr i tg attached or detachod ara b. Side vard. Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of five (5) feet,-101 ,• 11 plan n The location off"A. feria i'shPd s'zioi rele"vane 'to"4iie „cati;ilatiort of yar setback. goitk Properties may be "the.suhjeet of easements z{$icii a11Rv t fences take paced Oman adjoitintg property Provided that all dweiiing units bane the minimum five"( boat setbaekfz�tn,�ire pxapetty ittte.,.:.„„...:... Side y$xd'setiiagks fot attaetied'gazages iacatetl entireiY yr dirt tie ;front iif:ci£a lot shall bea minimum o€five {Sj feet.! 053196-1553 / F31331.002 / 44925.27 21 Side yaid seflia* for garages located *iuiamniiy;in the"rear.half of a lbt sl&be a Minimum of three (3) feet for the lust floor ofthe structure and five (5) feet for the second floor. Where garages are located in the Iear•of a- lot in order to access a Rmr Access DrNe,.no side yatci setback shall .be ieequlred l�etwe 8ar?ges azi adjoi3ritag %ts< C. Rear yard. `tomfe preperty linesre " eate a minimum ten (10) foot rear yard Tl 1 ' a bal a - than 1 8" beye ..«.,7...ray setback shall be requaed a- ., .a , 'e 3 �c t"tal lot"uiV M7I1x`�ear,", ,.,.,... _- up foi a re"siden adlo3ns angsr resiclerifial Doti' A iniiiiutimi titter (3) foot rear yard setbaelcshail bequireti. fnr;a siltgie staiy stiucture ort a residential tat svhose,iear adjgitts a 1Zcar Access: Drive 1 or a two story stntctt3ce on.a residential'iot tivitbse seal Adjoins a hear Arcess.l7xlve> The average selbacic (inciudiiag g lower=level gal age vlich complies Yuittt aPh 4€below s*ha11 be no Less tkiffi foir feet Poi lots aocessed-by a Rear Access Drive, R Vpid si:tYr�ck rshaii be measured from (1) the tlow line of.a roiled.eurb or (ii? the back of a standard curb, as applicable. . " .... " "e'setbacks shall'be deli' by V& lilts access ea by a, ear Access l7nve, gaxag Patagr.# 4f (°Garages") I3eluw. d. Structural separation. Foc'detach&d units, all main residential structures shall be a minimum of six (6) feet apart measured from face of finished v.-all to face of finished wall. e. Detached garage separation. Detached garages shall be separated from main residential structures a minimum of six (6) feet measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. Garages. Garages shall be set back from three (3) to seven (7) feet, or a minimum of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk shall be permitted with roll -up or other garage door types approved by the City Traffic Engineer. ., a es%� •set: back u for lilts accessed y Rear Accs T)tnvc, gtuage mininturir o£three (3) feet from (iytthe •flow lute of a roiled curb�or (R) the back of a standard etrih, ae applicable. lu .all oases, however, garages located od gppgsnte side's of a Ream Access Drive shall be set back from each ctl3er, a �``�° � i33inimum of t?xenty-si2r (26j feetf� """..,",x,,..mx. -. K 053196.1553 / F31331.002 / 41925.27 22 Side -entry garages shall maintain a minimum front setback of five (5) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. g. Architectural features. Architectural features such as, but not limited to, cornices, eaves, and wingwalls may extend two and one-half (N) feet into any front, side or rear yard setback, provided that such architectural features shall not project any closer than two (2) feet from any property line. h Fireplaces and chimneys. Placement of fireplaces and chimneys shall comply With the requirements of the Zoning Code. hilteCity'sstat�ilaxtiIvfWication process," setiiacksmay.6eiedut tirtezJfacatec Mmgaestaccommodate dsgthe betwen adjpliwn of pi ivate spat III ttt creating tmdesirable speiiai relationships between o djciining properEies €. 5. Fences Hedges and Walls Fences shall be limited to a maximum height of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six 6) feet. Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At sireeE-t0.street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in hei t _ ifit is Wa e an e feet beiin-a i �l t, 6�b of each of,,;,,the intersecting S r = kul a c HumunF, �e jx- cenop ajr)� lirt�""jited tirty`(3U) feet distant from the intersection of the Ott of-,vay intersecting lines. • Ai street.to-tlecess inteisectioiiis, nosuoEt alipurtei'teiice sbail exceed tv�a (2j feet: in iteigltt ttteastued iron curb height within the triangle bounded by the face of curb Imes and a eonriecting:iin� drawn between points twenty (20) feet distant from.the: intersection oftherolongedwface Of curb lines. 6. Trellises open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to Within three (3) feet of the side or rear property line. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eighf-(83 feed feet: 053196-1553 / F31331-0024 44925.27 23 Private Street. Rear Access Drive and Flag Lot Driveway Standards 1'iivate $tzs Anil Access Dri4es within residential development shall be a minimum of sty-Si7C" f* feet in width with parking allowed on borh 'Bdesy ene amide: b,: l uty;twaA(3 }'feeiin�tzdth.Mtfi' one.siiie;.i6d c. Twenty eight s 28) feel in.width tirzth parkuig on neither: stdet x .... . T•iventy siis {2�, feet for• Pmnary A*Drivel serving no more than 16 dwelling units. b. The nirAmum v4dth may be a. d to 29 feet c r eeeess dF eS . .......... " 20 feel for Piimary •Access Drives,µincluding"ia.Ltit"Dmevi¢ys; e. iwentg 2..�x." et... ...x♦♦.rive .. x..... serving no more than► 4 dwelling units. •at, may b Feduced . is ceet taeeess ,.i dweging upit- f. Sixteen l6jx feet foi-Pd—n=y, Accessllrives, including l of i5iive�vays> x.♦ Seming no more: than 2.dwelling units: d: Primary Access Drives of 20 or 16 feet as provided for -the above shall be increased to a minimum width of 26 feet if serving a common parking area. e Tbo"iviiltli of parking ttimoutsiatl:Tie itidtuie3 4vithui the :caicutatiozi of piivii; sizeet widths....ui less otlierwise'defined in tltis text, private streets shall be designed in compliancewith the private street standards of the City of Newport Beach Rear Access Drives shallbe a rum2miim of=ti��erity A�20};feet inNvtZdth; 053196.1553 / F31331-002 / 44925.27 24 8. Site Distance Requirements Residential development shall be designed to provide adequate sight distance (25 MPI), at the intersection of all private streets and &ivies Piiman"Atxess drives, and along curves unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 9. Parking Plan Each tentative subdivision map that would create legal building sites shall be accompanied by a parking plan demonstrating compliance with the following standards: a. Single -Family Detached Parking Requirements A minimum of two (2) garage parking spaces shall be provided per ifetae iiiveilitig unit. In addition, guest parking shall be provided within the development at a minimum rate of two (2) spaces per unit Guest parking may be provided on street, in parking bays, or on d evay agrens iiiitewal (minimum 20 feet in depth) or 1;8 feet where mil up garage "doors are provido in a manner acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. A maximum of one of the guest spaces may be provided on the driveway. A reduction in the guest parking requirement may be considered subject to approval of a finding by the Planning Commission that the reduced parking ratio will not cause an adverse impact on the community. b. Condominiums and Townhomes Dwelling Attached d-W—RIirig units less than or equal to 1500 square feet shall provide a miruimim f 29parking spaces per unit, including one covered space. In addition, guest parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.5 space per unit. Guest parking may be provided on street in parking bays, or on -driveway-agrses dr►veways (minimum 20 feet in depth or 18 feet where roll up garage doors are provided), in a manner acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. A maximum of fifty percent (50%) of the guest spaces may be provided on driveways. Dwelling Attached dvvellitig units greater than 1500 square feet shall provide a minimum of 2 covered spaces per unit In addition, guest parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of one (1) space per unit Guest parking may be provided on street, in parking bays, or on dtivewar'-epFeAs driveways (minimum 20 feet in depth or 18 feet where roll up garage doors are provided), in a manner acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. A maximum of fifty percent (50vo) of the guest spaces may be provided on driveways. 053196.1553 / F31331.002/ 44925.27 25 C. Parking Space Placement and Dimensions The Subject"tathe pronsions. of a DevelopmentAgreement for Planning Area4; t}ie size, a placement of all parking spaces and areas shall be as specified by the residential parking standards contained in the Newport Beach Municipal Code, Standard Plans 805-L-A and 805-L-B, and Council Policy L-2 unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 10. Maximum Site Area Coverage The building �� - '' "„ ' bWldh- footprints or residences p gaia� s sliali no# eovecmore than sixty percent (60%) of the f Planned _ �*ea`iiieladed'^wt iii the `7.,a£ ize:�'"'"i7c purpose$.Of�tlese Reguiatigm; Inus areas, tEt?IpE1fdi structures,Yifl^coVees, c4Yera patios, and Similar ancilTaFy stnretures shall not be considered -"~ , "' ' in the'ealcuiaiion ofsite sled coverage. 11. Tennis Courts Tennis courts are allowed and may be within three feet (3') of the rear and side property lines. The courts are permitted fencing up to 12' in height. The courts' lighting shall use 27' max height, square tubular and painted posts with 1,000 watt metal halide lights in a flat pan fixture. All tennis court lighting shall be designed in such a way as to prevent light from shining directly on the adjacent residential properties and to insure that the lighting does not adversely affect night vehicular traffic along Jamboree Road or Ford Road. All tennis court lighting shall be subject to a use permit. 12. Landscaping Plan Each tentative subdivision map that would create legal building sites and which contains a common area abutting an existing residential development outside Planning Area 4 shall be accompanied by a landscaping plan for that common area, drawn to scale, showing the locations of existing trees proposed to be removed and proposed to be retained', and indicating the amount, type, and location of landscaped areas, planting beds and plant materials with adequate provisions for irrigation . The plan shall be designed so as to create a suitable buffer between the existing residential area and the new development. ....Site :Phn Itev?et Sitz'Platz Rekievay'iie req�uireit"only for a iaudoviner piopnsai vriilcli ctinslsts of iir iiieiues n Cpnzz�uioti{st Subdivisiatt +nn. a 1'iaiuteci �otnmattzty C,oucept �r .w . a modification ofspecifie development staucfa?ds contained:"lnmmSections D4, D 22 aa3 DTZ of these regniations. ..... _....,, A ..... 053196.1553I F31331-002144925.27 26 The purpose of this section is to establish a Site Plan Review procedure to ensure that the project conforms to the objectives of the General Plan as well as the requirements and development scanBards contained in these Plaaned Genununity ni..tiet Regu a eBs Regwatitaxis. "'ihe Site 1?t iteview iiia.,uke•intu consiiieia�ion ati provisions of:atiy Develvpnaert ptgceemerrt for 1?laxtctxng Axed 4 „ 2. Findings The Site Plan Review procedures contained in this section are intended to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the community according to the Site Plan Review Findings set forth in the Zoning Code. 3. Application When required, Site Plan Review approval shall be obtained prior to or concurrent with the approval of any tentative subdivision map that would create legal residential building sites, or prior to issuance of a building permit for non-residential structures (e.g., recreation facilities and entry guard gates). 4. Plans and Diagrams to be Submitted The following plans and diagrams shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval: Plot plan. A plot plan, drawn to scale, showing the arrangement of buildings, driveways, pedestrian ways, off-street parking, landscaped areas, signs, fences and sidewalks. The plot plan shall show the location of entrances and exits, and the direction of traffic flow into and out of off-street parking areas, the location of each parking space, and areas for turning and maneuvering vehicles. The ,plot plan shall indicate how {rti* uI#P ies and drainage are to be provided. r o• eus b. Landscape plan. A landscape plan, drawn to scale, showing the locations of existing trees proposed to be removed and proposed to be retained; and indicating the amount, type, and location of landscaped areas, planting beds and plant materials with adequate provisions for irrigation. C. Grading plan A grading plan to ensure development properly related to the site and to surrounding properties and structures. 0531951553 / F31331.002 / 44925.27 27 'L� C d. Exterior lighting. Scale drawings of exterior lighting showing size, location, materials, intensity and relationship to adjacent streets and properties. e. Parking plan. A parking plan demonstrating compliance with the requirements contained in Section Q9 U10 above. f. Noise attenuation. For subdivisions abutting Jamboree Road or Ford Road evidence demonstrating compliance with applicable noise attenuation requirements. g. Any other plans, diagrams, drawings or additional information determined by the Planning Director to be necessary to adequately consider the proposed development and to determine compliance with applicable policies and standards. Application Fees The applicant shall pay a fee as fhe s}andard,C* y"iaa bite l'lari'tGej rV feeiestablished by Resolution of the City Council with each application for Site Plan Review. 6. Notice and Hearing Procedures. Procedures regarding public hearing notification and Planning Commission and City Council actions shall be as provided for Site Plan Review in the Zoning Code. I Y4...I'il"icatioai'rocess A i ic�3i�'zca0i of sp ctfic"t eveiapiizexit sf aids (auied zip: Secuot 7 w D�}t S, anct 5 may be obW,,vd throw the gty's, standard Mddi[ cation pzncess G.. Svbdivisiori.l}tap I'r'4icess opment's A 3ztodificarion of'specifie develiatidariis'cont' ini ifl Sectfibns-Dl and'157 may W. obtained through Mize cWs standard subdivision map aWW-W daces pursuant to tlae Catifimrtua Subdisas orb Iviap'A.ct and applicable pity ordutanees N M M.. PC':C° Ariieurlmeii A'ritndilacation :af sp�'t� d"e�relopt standards rontamedin ;;ectitiris obtained only tt>Fouo. an amendment to these Plannea Community KAs �T: 053196.1553 / F31331-002144925.27 28 L1 SECTION X - COIVIIVIUNN Y RECREATIONAL FA A. Uses Permitted 1. 'rivate 1 PlaYg !?ads, recxeanon areas, roman lac. nties; or open green leas, related iacllitiesa �: ' � :��cesso'r"y'bui2du�"s; �stractiir"e�"an�'ia§es rela#ed.ami'irieidentai"to tip nnses Wluding ciul&uws (including kitclxeos); meetinglooms, .... courts; su ppois and 3: SulnJectto ause :permit; reside _#O, sts=onty.#ood, ?nzverape; and ra)ef services B. Development Standards Building Height The maximum building height shall be V-ei-&F( 'v� > tii{Fseven (3.7j feet as defined r.. by the Zoning Code. Towers or architectural features greater than W e ='-T'- `� &Wsp-Y� {371 feet but not exceeding sixty (60) feet in height may be permitted subject to approval of a Use Permit. 2. Building Setbacks Fifteen (15) feet minimum from any residential property line and ten (10) feet minimum from any street measured from back of curb, or from back of sidewalk where sidewalks are provided. ...................... l7iie parking spacc'sfiall be provided .for every 200 _c�;,rare %et of a strucinre dear as a clubhouse err meet ing room; ,On street parki?>se adja—� to the facilities may be used to ineet this requirement 053196.1353 / F31331.002 144925.27 29 �`D' SECTION3a r• er1vc/n emAREAS 15 29 45 55 65 75 8 A. Permanent Signs 1. Miscellaneous Directionat(Infe:mational Sims DirectionaUinformational Signs, such as but not limited to "right turn only", "exit", "entrance", "tennis courts", etc, shall be permitted. Said signs shall be kept to a minimum and shall be designed as a coordinated part of the overall project. Each sign shall not exceed ten (10) squ=e feet of sign area. 2. Primary Identification Signs One double-faced sign or two single -faced signs at the main entrances to each residential area shall be permitted. Said sign shall not exceed a height of four (4) feet above the grade or surface to which attached, nor shall said sign exceed an area of thirty-five (35) square feet per face. Said sip may be internally or externally lighted. The information listed on the sign shall be lirLed to: a. Village name b. Project name C. Facilities identification B. Temporary Siena (Prior to and during construction) 1. Future Facility Sims A sign which informs the viewer, through graphic symbol and verbal reinforcements, of the type of facility planned fc.- the site. f�-,�ppexd�-A} Far Plann�g`�tes.4, a iriiriiinuuz of ii�u dou�o-faeeilfatnze• facitii3? signs, wt l die atSnwed One. ay fare Jarnbozee .[toad nad Otte MV face Fold itoact 2. Merchandising Sims A sign which informs the vie-•er, through graphic symbol and verbal reinforcement, of the facility name, opening dar= type of occupancy, owner -developer, and phone number for sales information. . .. CM. I.. w wwwn. ...b+ .... rr mow..+ , rvv , yx..r.w.. ••w r.w fy M' Fo=-Plariniiig.Arra �1;`a mr�mum of t�vo doable -faced` mercllandistug allowed. One may .face Jamboree 96ad and one may face Ford StaadM ee pendi A� 0531961553 / F31331-002 / 44925.27 30 Recording Requested By and When Recorded Return to: City Clerk City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92660 050"&1001 1 F31331-M 115T14.21 FIRST AMENDED DEVELOPINIENT AGREENIENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH WE PACIFIC BAY HOMES Original Agreement Approved July 24, 1995 Ordinance No. 95-27 Amendment Approved . 1996 Ordinance No. 96 = Submitted By: Paone Callahan McHohn & Winton 19100 Von Karman Avenue 8th Floor P.O. Box 19613 Irvine, CA 92713-9613 Lt FIRST AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (the Agreement) is entered into between the City of Newport Beach (the "City"), and Pacific Bay Homes, a California corporation and a subsidiary of the Ford Motor Company. RECITAIS. This Agreement relates to the following: 1.1 Original Agreement. On July 10, 1995, the City Council of the City approved the "Development Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and Ford Motor Land Development Corporation" (the "Original Agreement"). The Original Agreement was recorded in the official records of the County of Orange on September 26, 1995. 1.2 Ownership Status. At the time of the Original Agreement, Ford Motor Land Development Corporation: ("Ford Land") held an equitable interest in the property which is described in Exhibit A (the "Property"). Ford Land is a subsidiary of Foal Motor Company. In April 1996, The JM Development Company ("JM"), also a subsidiary of Ford, acquired fee title to the Property. Since the acquisition, JM has changed its name to Pacific Bay Homes. Pacific Bay Homes shall be referred to within this Agreement as "Foal." 1.3 Planning Status. The City Council conducted public hearings on these matters and the Original Agreement and certified the EIR on July 10, 1995. The General Plan Amendment (see Section 2.22 below), the Original PC Text Amendments (see Section 2.29 below), the Tentative Map (see Section 2.34 below), and the Original Agreement were approved on July 10. 1995. Since the approval of the Original Agreement, site planning has continued for the Property. As a result of that planning, Ford has proposed certain changes to the Planned Community District Regulations (the "PC Text ") which also will result in changes to the Tentative Map. In addition to the stated purposes of the Original Agreement, this Agreement intends to make those modifications to the Original Agreement which will allow the development of the Property (the "Project') to proceed consistent with approved modifications to the PC Text and the Tentative Map. 1.4 General Findings. By approving this Agreement, the City Council finds that the modifications to the PC Text and this Agreement, when implemented through subsequent entitlement procedures, such as the subdivision mapping process, are consistent with the intent of the City Council in approving the Original Agreement. 1.5 CEQA Compliance. On July 10, 1995, the City Council certified Environmental Impact Report No. 153 for the Project (the "EIR"). Before approving this Agreement, an 050996-10011 F31331.OM / 15774.21 Addendum to the EIR was prepared and presented to the City Council and was approved by the City Council on 1996. The Addendum establishes that neither PC Text modifications nor changes to the Original Agreement will cause any significant environmental impacts not previously considered and will not require any new mitigation measures. The proposed modifications represent minor technical changes to the Project. 1.6 Effect of Original Agreement. This Agreement is intended to modify the Original Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement which modify the Original Agreement are the only provisions intended to be modified. The use of a single document called an "amended agreement, " rather than the use of a list of modifications or amendments to be used in comparison to the Original Agreement, is intended to simplify future reference to this Agreement. Vie Effective Date of this Agreement remains the original Effective Date of the Original Agreement, August 23, 1995. The Approval Date remains July 10, 1995. 1.7 Effective Date of Modifications. The provisions of this Agreement which represent actual changes from the Original Agreement shall become effective on the effective date of the ordinance approving this Agreement. 1.8 Purpose of Agreement. This Agreement restates the intent of the Original Agreement as follows. a. Provide for the orderly transition of the land use on a property commonly known as the "Loral Site" from commercial/industrial uses to less intense residential uses. b. - Establish the parameters of building height, density, location, and timing to minimize, to the extent reasonably feasible, any significant adverse impacts of Ford's proposed residential development on the environment. C. Provide the City with greater certainty that the project will be implemented as presently planned so that the City will receive the substantial economic benefits projected by the project's fiscal impact study. d. Provide public benefits to the City in excess of normal mitigation requirements in the form of (1) substantial financial assistance from Ford in resolving a long-standing, traffic circulation issue in the Eastbluff community, (2) financing by Ford of extraordinary environmental monitoring of site remediation. and (3) the provision of assurances by Ford with respect to the funding and/or provision of affordable housing units within the City. 1.9 Authorization. This Agreement is authorized by, and is consistent with, the provisions of 65864 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California, and Chapter 15.45 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 050996.10011 F31331.002 / 15774.21 IA6 1.10 Interest of Ford. Ford is the legal owner of approximately 98.1 acres of real property located in the City and more particularly described in Exhibit "A" (the "Property"). 1.11 Development of the Property. Subject to those conditions and mitigation measures identified in Environmental Impact Report No. 153 for Ford Land Newport (the "EIR") which were imposed by the City Council as conditions to approval of all or part of the Development Plan, this Agreement authorizes development on the Property consistent with the Development Plan. 1.12 Condition of Site. At the time of the Original Agreement, the Property was occupied by buildings constructed over the last thirty years to house research, design, and industrial types of uses. Since the Approval Date and as part of the Development Plan, Ford has demolished the existing structures. Additionally, prior activities on the site have resulted in soil and groundwater contamination. Efforts to remediate these conditions, which would have been made by Ford with or without this Agreement, have moved substantially and positively forward since the Approval Date. 1.13 Project Benefits. While the landowner has the right to continue the presently permitted uses on the Property, existing circumstances present the City with the opportunity to establish, with the landowner's cooperation, new economically and environmentally viable uses on the Property. The proposed project presents a relatively unique opportunity to reduce the intensity of land uses occurring on the site. The EIR has demonstrated that the conversion of the existing research and development uses on the Property to residential uses will provide substantial benefits to the community through the improvement of environmental conditions related to traffic, air pollution. the potential for groundwater pollution, the consumption of non-renewable energy resources, and noise. Additionally, a review of the fiscal impacts of the proposed project indicates that the City will derive increased revenues from property and sales tax as a result of the proposed project. 1.14 Planning Commission/City Council Hearings• This Agreement. The Planning Commission, 'after giving appropriate notice, held public hearings to consider this Agreement and the newly proposed PC Text amendments (see Section 2.29 below) on 1996. The City Council conducted public hearings on the proposed PC Text amendments and this Agreement on 1996. 1.15 Consistency. Like the Original Agreement, this Agreement is consistent with the various elements of the Newport Beach General Plan, the Development Plan, and other applicable ordinances, plans, and policies of the City. Also like the Original Agreement, this Agreement is also consistent with the purpose and intent of state and local laws authorizing development agreements in that it represents Ford's commitment to comprehensive planning, provides certainty in the approval of subsequent projects subject to compliance with conditions, reduces the economic costs of development by providing assurance to Ford that it may proceed with projects in accordance with existing regulations, and provides assurance 050"&10011 F31331.OM 115774.21 3 PM to adjoining property owners that limits on the height of structures and amount of development as specified in the Development Plan. 1.16 Police Power. As it did with the Original Agreement, the City Council has determined that this Agreement is in the best interests of the health, safety and general welfare of the City, its residents and the public, was entered into pursuant to, and represents a valid exercise of, the City's police power, and has been approved in accordance with the provisions of state and local law that establish procedures for the approval of development agreements. 1.17 City Ordinance. On July 10, 1995, the City Council approved the Original Agreement and conducted the first reading of Ordinance No. 95-27 approving and, authorizing the City to enter into the Original Agreement. On July 24, 1995, the City Council completed adoption of the Adopting Ordinance. The Adopting Ordinance became effective on August 23, 1995. On 1996, the City Council approved this Agreement and conducted the first reading of Ordinance No. 96-_ approving and authorizing the City to enter into this Agreement. On . 1996, the City Council completed adoption of this ordinance. DEFINITIONS. 2.1 The "Adopting Ordinance" refers to City Ordinance No. 95-27 adopted by the City Council on July 24, 1995, authorizing the City to enter into this Agreement. 2.2 "Agreement" refers to this "First Amended Development Agreement Between the City of Newport Beach and Pacific Bay Homes." The Agreement is also identified by the City as the City's Development Agreement No. 8. 2.3 "Annual Review" refers to the review of Ford's good faith compliance with this Agreement as set forth in Section 6. ' 2.4 The "Approval Date" means July 10, 1995, the date on which the City Council voted to approve the Original Agreement and the prior Development Plan. 2.5 All forms of use of the verb "assign" and the nouns "assignment" and "assignee" shall include all contexts of hypothecations. sales, conveyances, transfers, leases, and assignments. 2.6 "CEOA" and the "CEOA Guidelines" refers to the California Environmental Quality Act and the CEQA Guideline promulgated by the Secretary of Resources of the State of California. 2.7 "City" refers to the City of Newport Beach, California. 05099&10011 F31331-0021 15774.21 2.8 "Council" refers to the City Council of the City. 2.9 "Cure Period" refers to the period of time during which a Default may be cured pursuant to Section 9. 2.10 ,A "day„ or "days" refers to a calendar day, unless expressly stated to be a business day. 2.11 A "Default" refers to any material default, breach, or violation of the provisions of this Agreement. A "City Default" refers to a Default by the City, while a "Ford Default" refers to a default by Ford. 2.12 "Development Permit" means building permits, grading permits and otherpermits authorizing construction activity. 2.13 The "Development Plan" refers to (i) the General Plan (see Section 2.24), (ii) the PC Text (see Section 2.29), and (iii) the Tentative Map (see Section 2.33 below). 2.14 The "Effective Date" refers to the effective date of the Adopting Ordinance and is the effective date of this Agreement. The Effective Date is August 23, 1995. 2.15 The "EIR" refers to Environmental Impact Report No. 153 of the City of Newport Beach. 2.16 An "Estoppel Certificate" refers to the document certifying the •status of this Agreement required by Section 6.6 in the form of Exhibit "D". 2.17 An "Exhibit" refers to an exhibit to this Agreement. All Exhibits are incorporated as a substantive part of this Agreement. The Exhibits to this Agreement are: Exhibit A: Legal Description of the Property Exhibit B: Map of the Property Exhibit C: List of Project Conditions Exhibit D: Estoppel Certificate 2.18 "Existing General Reeulations" means those General Regulations approved by the City on or before the Approval Date (irrespective of their effective date) and not rescinded or superseded by City action taken on or before the Approval Date. 2.19 Financing District. "Financing District" for purposes of this Agreement means any assessment district, special district, community facilities district, maintenance district, or other similar district, legal entity, or mechanism formed pursuant to the provisions of legislation in effect at the time the Financing District is formed. The purpose of a Financing District is to finance the cost of public improvements, facilities, maintenance, or services. 050996-1001 1 F313314M 115774.21 5 u Examples include districts formed under the Municipal Improvement Acts of 1911 and 1913 and the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982. 2.20 "Ford" refers to Pacific Bay Homes, a subsidiary of Ford Motor Company. 2.21 "Future General Regulations" means those General Regulations (see Section 2.23 below) adopted by the City after the Approval Date. 2.22 The "General Plan Amendment" means GPA-93-2(A) amending the general plan of the City as approved by the City Council on July 10, 1995. 2.23 "General Regulations" means those ordinances, rules, regulations, policies, and guidelines of the City, which are generally applicable to the use of land and/or construction within the City and include, the Fair Share Traffic Contribution Fee Ordinance, Uniform Building Codes and water and sewer connection and fee ordinances. 2.24 "General Plan" refers to the City's General Plan in effect on the Approval Date, plus all amendments to the General Plan adopted by the City on or before the Approval Date as part of the Development Plan. "General Plan" also shall include any general plan amendments affecting the Property or the Project which are adopted by the City and consented to, in writing, by Ford. 2.25 "Includes" and all contexts and forms of the words "includes" and "including" shall be interpreted to also state "but not limited to." 2.26 "Mortgagee" refers to the holder of a beneficial interest under any mortgage, deed of trust, sale -leaseback agreement, or other transaction under which all or a portion of the Property, including those portions acquired by assignees, is used as security (a "Mortgage") or the owner of any interest in all or any portion of the Property under a Mortgage, including those portions acquired by assignees. 2.27 "Notice" refers to any written notice or demand between the Parties required or permitted by this Agreement. 2.28 The "Original Agreement" refers to the Development Agreement for the Project which was approved on July 10, 1995, and recorded on September 26, 1995. This Agreement modifies the Original Agreement. 2.29 The "Ori¢dnal PC Text Amendment" refers only to the "Aeronutronic Fond Planned Community District Regulation" as amended by the City Council on July 10, 1995. 2.30 The "Parties" refers to the City and Ford and a "Party„ shall refer to either of the Parties. 050996.1001 1 F31331-M 115774.21 2.31 The "PC Text" refers to the "Aeronutronic Ford Planned Community District Regulation" as amended by the City Council on July 10, 1995, with the approval of Amendment No. 800, and all subsequent modifications of the PC Text which are approved by the City Council and Ford. 2.32 "Plannine Commission" refers to the Planning Commission of the City. 2.33 The "Project" refers to the proposed development of the Property pursuant to the Development Plan and this Agreement. 2.34 The "Property" refers to the real property described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B." 2.35 The "Tentative Mao" refers to the tentative tract map for Tract No. 14925 approved by the City Council on July 10, 1995, and any subdivision map approved by the City Council after the Approval Date which substantially conforms with the PC Text at the time of the map's approval. If a subsequent subdivision map (or maps) replaces or supersedes TTM No. 14925, the new map(s) shall be considered the Tentative Map which is included within the Development Plan. 3. CONDITIONS TO DEVELOPMENT. 3.1 Introduction. The provisions of this Section express the intent of the Parties regarding the extent to which this Agreement vests Ford's right to proceed with the development described in the Development Plan. Ford acknowledges that its right to proceed with development described in the Development Plan is subject to numerous conditions including the following: (a) The specific limitations and restrictions contained in the Development Plan; (b) Conditions and mitigation measures imposed by the City Council to mitigate significant effects identified in the Mz, (c) Conditions imposed by the City as a result of subsequent or supplement environmental analysis pursuant to provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines; (d) Compliance with the terms and conditions specified in this Agreement; and (e) Compliance with the Existing General Regulations. 3.2 Compliance with Development Plan Conditions/MitigationMeasures. Ford acknowledges that City Council approval of the Development Plan and this Agreement was subject to compliance with numerous conditions and mitigation measures designed to minimize or 050996.10011 F31331-0021 15774.21 7 eliminate the significant adverse effects of the Project and insure the health, safety, and welfare of nearby residents as well as residents of the proposed project. Pursuant to CEQA, many of these conditions and mitigation measures impose specific development standards and requirements to be implemented in conjunction with further study and analysis of site or subsurface conditions before certain specified development activity. In certain instances, these mitigation measures may exceed those which might otherwise be appropriate under "nexus" and "rough proportionality" tests. By entering into this Agreement, Ford agrees to be bound by and waives any protest any such project conditions. The conditions and mitigation measures adopted by the City Council are set forth in Exhibit C. 3.3 Compliance with General Regulations. Ford is required to comply with the Existing General Regulations. As to those Existing General Regulations which require the payment of fees, costs, and expenses, for a development application, the applicable fee, cost, or expense shall be that in effect on the date such an application is determined by the City to be complete. Ford shall also comply with any Future General Regulation that does not impair or affect its ability to develop the Property in accordance with the Development Plan. Ford shall also comply with all provisions of the Uniform Building Code, whether adopted before or after the Approval Date, which are in effect at the time applications for specific development permits are submitted. 3.4 Water Capital Improvement Charges. Section 14.33.040 of the City's Municipal Code provides for the payment of a "water capital improvement charge" for lands designated pursuant to Section 14.33.030 of the Municipal Code. Section 14.33.040 of the Municipal Code relates only to system facilities that will be needed to serve an "undeveloped area." Because the Project consists of replacement of an existing use on a previously developed site which can be adequately served from existing City water facilities, Ford shall not be required to pay water capital improvement fees to the City. 3.5 Public Health and Safety/Uniform Codes. This Agreement shall not prevent the City from either (i) adopting Future General Regulations (including uniform codes which are based on recommendations of a multi -state professional organization and become applicable throughout City, such as, but not limited to, the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Electrical Code, Uniform Mechanical Code or Uniform Fire Code) or (ii) imposing conditions inconsistent with the Development Plan on future discretionary approvals, where such actions directly result from findings by the City that those actions are necessary to avoid consequences which are injurious or detrimental to the public health and safety. This reservation of authority is subject to the following: a. City shall neither (i) refuse to issue or approve any application or permit nor (ii) apply to the Project or the Property any conditions or Future General Regulations if such action would prevent, preclude, delay, alter, or in any way affect (in a manner not satisfactory to Owner) the implementation of all or any portion of the Development 050996.10011 F31331-M1 16714.21 M Plan until the City Council makes a finding that such action is the only reasonably necessary means to correct or avoid such injurious or detrimental condition. b. Any such action taken pursuant to this Section shall apply only to the extent and for the duration necessary to correct or avoid such injurious or detrimental condition. 3.6 Environmental Remediation. Certain portion(s) of the Property will require environmental remediation before occupancy. Subject to all other provisions of this Agreement, occupancy permits shall be issued by the City for those portions of the Property if Ford has complied with Mitigation Measures 4, 5, and 6 set forth in Section 3.10 (Public Health and Safety) of the EIR. 4. BENEFITS TO FORD. 4.1 Right to Develop. During the term of this Agreement and subject to the provisions of Sections 3 and 5, Ford shall have a vested right to develop and receive occupancy permits for construction on the Property to the full extent permitted by the Development Plan, including grading of the site as contemplated by the elevations shown on the Tentative Map, subject to: (a) compliance with CEQA, (b) the terms and conditions of this Agreement, (c) the City's grading ordinance in effect on the Approval Date, and (d) compliance with conditions imposed on any subdivision map submitted by Ford subsequent to the Effective Date, provided that the City may only impose subdivision map conditions which are (i) necessary to mitigate any significant adverse impact not identified in the EIR, (ii) necessary to ensure compliance with the subdivision design and improvement standards of the City in effect on the Approval Date, or (iii) necessary to make the findings required by the Subdivision Map Act. Subject to the provisions of this subsection and Sections 3 and 5, City shall only take action which complies with and is consistent with the Development Plan and this Agreement .unless Ford otherwise consents in writing. City shall not impose any condition or requirement (whether in the form of a fee, tax, requirement for dedication or reservation of land, or any other type of exaction) on the Project, except as expressly permitted by this Agreement or required (as opposed to permitted) by state or federal law. 4.2 Conflictinz Measures. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, no initiative measure, moratorium, referendum (except as provided in Government Code Section 65857.5), ordinance, statute or other provision of law which in any way limits or restricts development of the Property to the full extent permitted by the Development Plan and this Agreement (including density, intensity, timing, phasing, and sequencing) shall be applied to the Property during the term of this Agreement. 4.3 Reservations or Dedications of Land. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, no dedications or reservations of the Property shall be required of Ford in conjunctioa with the application or issuance of any permit authorizing development, construction, use, or operation of the Property. 050996-1001 1 F31331-M 115V4.21 9 4.4 TCA Credit. As a result of the reduction in traffic impacts generated by converting the Project site to less intense uses than presently exist, the Transportation Corridor Agencies (the "TCA") have acknowledged a credit to Ford in the amount of $3,436,966 in relation to the construction of the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor. This credit shall be applied toward any Project fees otherwise payable to the City, the Transportation Corridor Agencies, or any other agency in connection with the construction of the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor or any other transportation corridor for which fees are imposed upon development. If (i) this credit is larger than the Project*s corridor fee obligation and (ii) Ford and the TCA enter into an agreement to allow Ford to sell or transfer any credits in excess of the Projects fee obligation, then the City shall not object to the sale or transfer of the credits on the terms set forth in that Ford/TCA agreement. 4.5 Fair Share Ordinance. As a result of the reduction in traffic impacts generated by the Project and the traffic improvements included within the Project, no fees shall be payable for the Project under the City's "Fair Share" Traffic Ordinance, 4.6 Sewer Connection. The City shall provide sewer service to the Project through a connection to existing City sewer lines serving the adjacent Belcourt communities and the existing Loral site. City shall provide sewer facilities only to the boundaries of the Project and Ford shall pay any sewer connection or sewer service fees required by the Existing General Regulations. 4.7 Storm Drains. The City shall provide drainage capacity to the Project by allowing connection to existing City storm drains. 4.8 Park Fees. The Project shall comply with all City park requirements through the payment of park fees in the amount of $6,897.37 per residential unit. Ford shall advance Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) in park fees to the City within sixty days after the Effective Date. The fees paid in advance shall be credited toward and satisfy park fees for the first seventy-three residential building permits issued for the Project. Thereafter, Ford shall pay $6897.37 per residential unit until all park fees required by this Agreement have been paid. These payments shall satisfy the City's Park Dedication Ordinance. No dedications or reservations of land except as expressly identified in the Development Plan shall be required of the Project. 4.9 Time for Construction and Completion of Project. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement and the Development Plan, Ford shall have the right to decide the timing, phasing, and sequencing of construction on the Property and shall be entitled to apply for, and receive timely approval of permits or approvals, at any time. 4.10 Extension of Tentative Mao. To the extent permitted by law, the City shall extend through the term of this Agreement (pursuant to Government Code Section 66452.6) the Tentative 050996.10011 F313314Q0:1 15774.21 10 All r A Map (see Section 2.33 above) and all tentative subdivision maps applied for by Ford approved by the City in the future. 4.11 Phased Final Maas. As many as forty phased final maps may be filed for each tentative tract map approved for the Project. 4.12 Development Standards. Because this Development Plan has been prepared to meet the unique design parameters of this Project, the City Council has determined that rigid consistency with the City's development standards for other areas of the City is neither necessary nor appropriate. Therefore, as to this Project. the provisions of the Development Plan and this Agreement .shall prevail over any conflicting provision of any other City ordinance or resolution. 4.13 Fees. Taxes. and Assessments. The City shall not impose any additional fee, tax, or assessment on all or any portion of the Project or the Property, whether as a condition to a Future General Regulation or otherwise, except such fees, taxes, and assessments as are described in or required by this Agreement. Ford shall be responsible only for those fees, taxes, and assessments which presently are applicable to the Property under the General Regulations in effect on the Approval Date. Except as set forth in Section 4.8 above, the rates of such fees, taxes, and assessments shall be the rates in existence at the time said fees, taxes, and assessments are normally required to be paid to the City. 5. PUBLIC BENEFITS. 5.1 Reduced Impacts. This Agreement confers •a substantial public benefit by converting an existing commercial/industrial use to a less intense residential use. The E1R for the Project has established specific improvement in environmental conditions related to reduced potential for impacts arising from traffic, air pollution, the consumption of non-renewable energy resources, the potential for groundwater pollution, and noise. 5.2 Fiscal Benefits. The project's Fiscal Impact Report projects that, at maximum Project buildout, the City will receive net recurring revenues of approximately $571,700 per year in constant 1995 dollars. The recurring surplus is based on projected annual Project revenues of $963,600 and projected annual costs of $391,000. 5.3 Affordable Housing. The City's Housing Element presently sets forth goals and strategies for providing housing units for very low, low, and moderate income housing ("Affordable Units"). The Housing Element requires residential developers to provide affordable units, either on -site or off -site, with the number of units contingent upon numerous factors including the presence or absence of development incentives, the extent of any financial contribution to the development by public entities, and the overall feasibility of providing affordable housing given the unique characteristics of the project. The Housing Element specifically 050996-1001 / F31331.002 / IM4.21 I1 !S":�; encourages the use of development agreement and expedited permitting to encourage the construction and occupancy of affordable housing projects. The City and Ford agree that this development presents a unique opportunity, possibly in combination with a Development Agreement between the City and one or more other developers, to construct affordable housing on vacant sites within the City using a unique public/private planning and financing process outlined in this Section: a. Affordable Housing Percentage. The Housing Element requires projects such as this to provide, to the extent feasible, units affordable to moderate income families and individuals equal in number to between 15 % and 25 % of the market rates units produced by the project. These units are to be provided for a minimum of twenty years. The City and Ford agree that the cost and delay attendant to environmental remediation of the Property, Ford's agreement to advance park fees, and the other public benefits provided by Ford under this Agreement make infeasible the production of affordable housing in excess of 15 °% of the total number of residential units constructed pursuant to the Development Plan. b. Task Team Participation / In Lieu Fees. The Original Agreement contained a requirement for Ford to satisfy its affordable housing requirements by participating in a "Task Team" to be established by resolution of the City Council to identify, evaluate, and implement one or more affordable housing projects to implement Ford's affordable housing obligations under this Section. Since the Approval Date, Ford has actively participated in the Task Team, which is implementing its original goals as set forth in the Original Agreement. The requirement contained in the Original Agreement remains in place and reads as follows. "b. Task Team Participation / In Lieu Fees. Ford shall satisfy its affordable housing requirements by participating in a "Task Team" to be established by resolution of the City Council to identify, evaluate, and implement one or more affordable housing projects to implement Ford 's affordable housing obligations under this Section. The Task Team shall consist, at a minimum, of a member of the City Council, a representative of Ford , and members of the City staff. The City Council also may appoint to the Task Team representatives of other property owners, builders, or persons experienced in the development of affordable housing. Ford shall make available to the Task Team its. experience and expertise in land development upon reasonable request by the Task Team. 05099&1001 1 F31331-M 115774.21 The Task Team shall submit to the City Council a statement of goals and priorities within ninety days after the later of (i) the Effective Date or (n) the appointment of the Task Team by the City Council. The Task Team shall have a single term of two years, unless extended by mutual agreement of the City and Ford. The Task Team shall report to the City Council no less than 12 once every ninety days after submittal of its statement of goals and priorities. The goal of the Task Team shall be to submit to the City Council, within two years after the Effective Date, a report identifying one or more affordable housing projects to be funded in whole or in part by Ford. If a project is identified and implemented, Ford shall contribute $2,500,000 (less $5,000 for each of the 500 units allowed by the Development Plan which Ford agrees, in writing, not to build) toward the implementation of that project. Subject to Ford's ongoing participation in Task Team implementation efforts, payment of this sum will satisfy Ford's affordable housing obligations. "c. Qption If No Task Team Project. If either (i) the City Council does not require Ford to fmancially contribute to implementation of a Task Team project as described in Subparagraph b above or (il) the Task Team does not recommend implementation of an affordable housing project to satisfy Ford's affordable housing requirement, then Ford shall have the option, within sixty days after the term of the Task Team expires, to satisfy that requirement by notifying the City that it will either: i. construct or rehabilitate offsite residential units within the City and make those units affordable to moderate income families or individuals for 20 years or more from the date of occupancy; or ii. pay an affordable housing in lieu fee of $5,500 for each residential building permit issued within the Project: or iii. construct fewer than the number of affordable units required under Subsection c(i) above and pay an affordable housing in lieu fee equal to: • $5,500 for every residential building permit issued for the Project minus • $36,000 multiplied by the number of affordable units constructed and/or refurbished by Ford. Under this option, Ford's affordable housing in lieu fee shall not be less than twenty percent of its total financial commitment." 5.4 Environmental Monitorine. Due to existing soil and groundwater contamination on the Project site, before residential occupancy can occur on the site, Ford is required by law, as 050996.10011 F31331-OM 115774.21 13 well as by the City's conditions and mitigation measures for the Project, to obtain approvals from other public agencies, such as the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Orange County Health Care Agency ("County Health'). By this Agreement, Ford also will pay for the cost of an environmental monitor to be retained by the City to review all Ford submittals to those agencies. Ford shall provide the monitor with copies of all submittals concurrently with their delivery to those agencies. Additionally, if requested by the monitor, Ford shall provide to the City the underlying data which supports Ford's request to County Health for a Health Risk Assessment of the Project site. The City may have either the monitor or another consultant review and independently verify the accuracy and validity of the Health Risk Assessment and analysis and conclusions and correspond, if needed, to County Health before its final action. The monitor shall not perform any independent collection of data. The monitor performing this function may be the same or may be different than the monitor performing the general overview described in the first paragraph above. In performing either function, the monitor may report his or her findings to the City Council and the City Council, in turn, may take any action it deems appropriate which is not inconsistent with this Agreement. Ile selection of the monitor and the data consultant and their scope of work shall be subject to the mutual approval of the City and Ford. Any inconsistency between this provision and any mitigation measure for the Project shall be resolved in favor of the mitigation measure. 5.5 Eastbluff Traffic. The Eastbluff community in the vicinity of the Project site has had a historical concern regarding the impact of through traffic on its streets. The EIR has concluded that the Project will not contribute sufficient through traffic to constitute a significant impact on this existing problem. Further, Ford has no legal obligation to correct the existing problem and the City has no authority independent of this Agreement to impose a condition requiring Ford to correct the existing problem. Pursuant to this Agreement, however, Ford shall contribute to the solution to the existing traffic problem as follows: a. The determination of a solution shall be dependent upon an agreement between the Eastbluff community and the City. b. If the "solution" costs $50,000 or less: i. Ford will pay one -hundred percent of the total cost of the capital improvements/traffic studies (as opposed to long-term maintenance) of the solution as actually implemented: or If the "solution" costs more than 550.000: 050996-1001 1 F31391-0021 15774.21 14 i. Ford will pay one-third of the total cost of the capital improvements/traffic studies as actually implemented, with a minimum payment of $50,000 and a maximum payment of $75,000. C. Ford will not be required to make a deposit of funds until a "solution" actually is approved by the City for implementation. Any funds actually deposited but not used to implement the solution shall be returned to Ford. d. If the City and the Eastbluff community have not agreed on a "solution" within one year from the Effective Date and the date for agreement has not been extended by Ford, this obligation shall terminate. e. If a lawsuit is brought by any person or entity challenging any of the Ford approvals on the basis of the Eastbiuff traffic conditions and that lawsuit is not terminated within thirty days after service, the provision requiring Ford's contribution to the traffic solution will terminate. 5.6 Dlainaee. Concerns have been expressed in the public process regarding the impacts of the Project's drainage on nearby residential communities. The E R has established that the Project will not have any significant drainage impacts on any other residential communities. Nonetheless, pursuant to this Agreement Ford will take the following actions: a. Upon formation of the Master Community Association, the conditions, covenants, and restrictions will provide that: All structures shall have gutters and downspouts; ii. The Master Association shall routinely maintain the onsite storm drain system to facilitate proper operation of the system; and iii. The submittal of landscape plans for each individual lot shall provide that water from downspouts will be transported to the street through an appropriate collection system. b. The Project site will be graded so that surface drainage will flow to the streets where it will be collected and channeled into a closed storm drain system. 5.7 Belcourt Terrace Landscape Screen. This Agreement as originally recorded on September 26,1995, contained a Section 5.7 which imposed certain obligations upon Ford with respect to the establishment of a landscape screen along the boundary of the Property and the Belcourt Terrace project adjacent to the Hillsdale Drive boundary wall. Since the recording of the Agreement, that condition has been satisfied by the signing of a Landscape Screening 050996-1001 1 F31331-002 / 15774.21 15 Agreement between Ford and the Belcourt Terrace Homeowners Association (the "Association ") " ANNUAL REVIEW. 6.1 City and Ford Responsibilities. At least every twelve (12) months during the Term, the City shall review Ford's good faith substantial compliance with this Agreement (the "Annual Review"). After the Annual Review, the City's finding of good faith compliance by Ford shall be conclusive for the purposes of future Annual Reviews or legal action between the Parties. Either Party may address any requirements of the Agreement during the Annual Review. However, fifteen (15) days' written Notice of any requirement to be addressed shall be made by the requesting Part)-. If, at the time of the review, an issue not previously identified in writing is required to be addressed, the review shall be continued for no more than sixty days at the request of either Party to afford sufficient time for analysis and preparation of a response. 6.2 Opportunity to be Heard. Ford shall be permitted an opportunity to be heard orally and in writing at any noticed public hearing or meeting related to the Annual Review. 6.3 Information to be Provided to Ford. The City shall mail to Ford a copy of the staff report and related exhibits concerning Agreement performance a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the Annual Review. 6.4 Mitigation MonitorinE. The Annual Review shall include an analysis of compliance with the various conditions and mitigation measures contained within the mitigation monitoring plan. Ford shall be found in compliance with this Agreement unless the City Council determines, based upon the evidence presented at the Annual Review, that Ford has not complied with one or more mitigation measures or conditions including those imposed as a result of subsequent environmental analysis. applicable to the grading of, and building on, the Property as of the date of the Annual Re�:-.w. 6.5 Review Letter. a. After Finding of Compliance. If Ford is found to be in compliance with the Agreement after the Annual Review, the City shall issue, within ten (10) days of Ford's written request. a letter to Ford stating that the Agreement remains in effect and Ford is not in Default. b. After Cure of Default. If Ford is found to be in Default under this Agreement at the Annual Review, but subs-equently cures that default in the manner provided by this Agreement, the City shall issue, within ten (10) days of Ford's written request, a letter to Ford stating that the Agreement remains in effect and Ford is not in Default. 05099&10011 F31331,W2115774.21 16 6.6 Estoppel Certificate. Either Party may at any time deliver written Notice to the other Party requesting an estoppel certificate (the "Estoppel Certificate") stating: (a) The Agreement is in full force and effect and is a binding obligation of the Parties. (b) The Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally or in writing or, if so amended, identifying the amendments. (c) To the best of the signing Party's knowledge, no Default in the performance of the requesting Party's obligations under the Agreement exists or, if a Default does exist, the nature and amount of any Default. A Party receiving a request for an Estoppel Certificate shall provide a signed certificate to the requesting Party within thirty (30) days after receipt of the request. The Planning Director may sign Estoppel Certificates on behalf of the City. An Estoppel Certificate may be relied on by assignees and Mortgagees. The Estoppel Certificate shall be substantially in the same form as Exhibit "D." 6.7 Failure to Conduct Annual Review. The City's failure to conduct an Annual Review shall not constitute or be asserted by the City as Ford's Default. 7, GENERAL PROVISIONS. 7.1 Effective Date. This Agreement and the obligations of the Parties shall be effective as of the Effective Date. However, this Agreement shall bind the Parties as of the Approval Date, subject only to the Adopting Ordinance becoming effective pursuant to California law. 7.2 Term of A_--;eement. The tetra of this Agreement (the "Term") shall begin on the Effective Date and continue for twenty-five (25) years unless otherwise terminated or modified pursuant to this Agreement. 7.3 Assignment. Ford has the absolute right to assign (see Section 2.5) its rights and/or delegate its obligations under this Agreement as part of an assignment of all or a portion of the Property. Any assignment shall be subject to the provisions of this Agreement. As long as Ford owns any part of the Property, Ford may assign the benefits of this Agreement without delegating the obligations for the portion of the Property assigned. If that occurs, however, the benefits assigned shall remain subject to the performance by Ford of the corresponding obligations. Where an assignment includes the delegation of the corresponding obligations, those obligations become solely the obligations of the assignee. If an assignee is in Default, then as to Ford or any assignees not in Default, the Default shall not constitute their Default, give 05099&1001 1 P31331-0021 15774.21 17 I .x b1 grounds for termination of their rights under this Agreement or be a basis for an enforcement action against them. Under no circumstances, shall Ford be relieved of its obligations under Sections 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, and 5.6. 7.4 Amendment of Agreement. (a) Subject to the provisions of Subsection (b), this Agreement may be amended from time to time by the mutual consent of the Parties, or their successors in interest, but only in the manner provided by the Government Code and this Agreement. After any amendment, the term "Agreement" shall refer to the amended Agreement. (b) The City Council shall not approve, and Ford shall not request, any amendment to the provisions of the Development Plan or this Agreement that would increase the maximum permitted gross floor area or the maximum permitted building height above that established as of the Effective Date of this Agreement. This Subsection shall prevail over any conflicting ordinance, resolution. policy or plan adopted by the City Council. 7.5 Enforcement. This Agreement is enforceable by each of the Parties and their respective successors and assigns. . 7.6 Termination. This Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further effect upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) Expiration of the twenty-five (25) year term; (b) Completion of the Project in accordance with the Development Plan and the City's issuance of all occupancy permits necessary to fully implement the Project, the acceptance of all dedications required by this Agreement, and the satisfaction by Ford of its obligations under Sections 5.3, 5.4. 5.5, and 5.6 above. (c) Entry, after all appeals have been exhausted, of a final judgment or issuance of a final order directing the City to set aside, withdraw, or abrogate the City's approval of this Agreement or any material part of the Project; or. (d) The effective date of a Party's election to terminate the Agreement as provided in Section 9.3 of this Agreement. 050996.1001 I F313314M 115774,21 18 , 8.CONFLICTS OF LAW. 8.1 Conflict with State and Federal Laws and Regulations. Where state or federal laws or regulations prevent compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement, those provisions shall be modified, through revision or suspension, to the extent necessary to comply with such state or federal laws or regulations "and the modified Agreement shall remain in effect, subject to the following: (a) the City shall not request modification of this Agreement pursuant to this provision unless and until the City Council makes a fording that such modification is required (as opposed to permitted) by state and federal laws or regulations; (b) the modifications must be limited to those required(as opposed to permitted) by the state or federal laws; (c) the modified Agreement must be consistent with the state or federal laws or regulations required modification or suspension; (d) the intended material benefits of this Agreement must still be received by each of the Parties after modification; (e) neither the modification nor any applicable local, state, or federal laws or regulations, may render the modified Agreement impractical to enforce; and (f) Ford consents in writing to the modification. Ford shall have the right to seek judicial review of any proposed modification to ensure compliance with this Section. 9. DEFAULT REMEDIES AND TEKNM ATION. 9.1 General Provisions. In the event of a Default (see Section 2.11), the Party alleging a Default shall give the other Party a written Notice of Default. The Notice of Default shall specify the nature of the alleged Default, and a reasonable manner and sufficient period of time (not less than thirty (30) days) in which the Default must be cured (the "Cure Period"). During the Cure Period, the Party charged shall not be considered in Default for the purposes of termination of the Agreement or institution of legal proceedings. If the alleged Default is cured within the Cure Period, then a Default shall be deemed not to exist. 9.2 Option to Institute Legal Proceedings or to Terminate. If an alleged Default is not cured within the Cure Period, the noticing Party must give the defaulting Party a Notice of intent to terminate the Agreement if that Party intends to terminate the Agreement. Within thirty 050996.1001/ F31331-OMI 15V4.21 19 (Z (30) days after giving of the Notice, the City Council shall hold a public hearing in the manner set forth in Government Code Sections 65865,65867, and 65868, as amended, to consider and review the matter. This hearing shall utilize the procedures outlined for the Annual Review in Section 6 above. 9.3 Notice of Termination. After the City Council hearing described in Section 9.2, the Party alleging the Default, at its option, may give written Notice of termination of the Agreement to the other Party and the Agreement shall be terminated immediately upon giving the Notice. A termination shall be valid only if good cause exists and clear and convincing evidence was presented to the City Council to establish the continued existence of a Default after the Cure Period. The findings of the City Council as to the existence of a Default shall have no weight in any legal proceeding brought to determine the existence of a Default. The validity of any termination may be challenged pursuant to Section 11.17, in which case the court shall render an independent judgment as to the existence of a Default and good cause for termination. Termination may result only from a material Default of a material provision of this Agreement. 9.4 Waiver. Failure or delay in giving Notice of Default shall not waive a Party's right to give future Notice of the same or any other Default. 9.5 Default by Ford. Subject to and after termination of this Agreement in compliance with Sections 9.1 through 9.3, if Ford Defaults, the City shall have no obligation to perform any of City's obligations under this Agreement (as opposed to the City's obligations under the Development Plan and the General Regulations), unless otherwise ordered by a court of law. The City's election not to perform as permitted by this provision shall not constitute a Default. 9.6 Default by the City. Subject to and after termination of this Agreement in compliance with Sections 9.1 through 9.3, if the City Defaults, Ford shall have no obligation to perform any of Ford's obligations under this Agreement, unless otherwise ordered by a court of law. Ford's election not to perform as permitted by this provision shall not constitute a Default. 9.7 Specific Performance. The Parties agree that the loss by either of them of their respective rights under this Agreement may not be compensable through monetary damages. Therefore, the remedy for a Default for each Party shall be limited to specific performance and/or injunctive relief. This provision applies only to actions related to the Parties' performance under this Agreement and does not limit the remedies of either Party under any other provision of law. 050"6.1001 / F31331-M 115774.21 20 I ": 10. ENCUMBRANCES AND RELEASES ON PROPERTY. 10.1 Discretion to Encumber. Ford may encumber all or any portion of the Property in any manner. The City acknowledges that lenders providing financing may require technical modifications to the Agreement which do not materially alter the intent of the Parties. The City agrees to meet, upon request, with Ford and/or lenders to negotiate in good faith any lender request for modification. The City agrees to not withhold unreasonably its consent to such modification, provided the proposed modification does not materially alter the terms and provisions of this Agreement, the obligations imposed upon either Party, or the benefits received by either Party. 10.2 Entitlement to Written Notice of Default. Any Mortgagee and its successors and assigns, upon written request to the City, shall be entitled to receive from the City written Notice of any Ford Default at the same time Ford is provided with Notice pursuant to Section 6.1. 11. 'MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 11.1 Notices. All Notices (see Section 2.27) shall be written and delivered by personal delivery (including Federal Express and other commercial express delivery senices providing acknowledgments or receipt), registered, certified, or express mail. or telegram to the addresses set forth below. Receipt shall be deemed complete as follows: (a) For personal delivery, upon actual receipt; (b) For registered, certified, or express mail, upon the delivery date or attempted delivery date as shown on the return receipt; and Notices shall be addressed as follows: To the City: City Clerk City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92660 Attention: City Attorney Attention: Planning Director To Ford : Pacific Bay Homes Attn: Karin T. Krogius 18400 Von Karman, Suite 900 Irvine, California 92715 r�x,;::ir��i�s>i•::�sa�n 21 � pl With a copy to: Tim Paone Paone, Callahan. McHolm & Winton 19100 Von Karman, 8th Floor P.O. Box 19613 Irvine, CA 92713-9613 The addresses to which Notices shall be sent may be changed by giving Notice of a new address. 11.2 Enforced Delay: Extension of Time of Performance. Neither Party shall be deemed to be in Default where delays or non-performance are due to war. insurrection, strikes, walkouts, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, oil spills, casualties, acts of nature, unavailability of materials, governmental restrictions imposed or mandl ed by governmental entities, suspension of rights in accordance with the existence of unfereseen circumstances, litigation, or similar bases for excused performance. An extension of time for performance shall be deemed granted for the period of the delay, or longer as m _y be mutually agreed upon. 11.3 Severability. If any material part of the Agreement is found by a court to be invalid, void, or illegal, the Parties shall modify the Agreement to implement the original intent of the Parties. These steps may include the waiver by either of the Parties of their right under the unenforceable provision. If, however, the Agreement ob-ectively cannot be modified to implement the original intent of the Patties and the Pam substantially benefi ted by the material provision does not waive its rights under the unenforceable provision, the entire Agreement shall become void. For purposes of this Section, and without excluding the possible materiality of other provisions of this Agreement. a1 provisions of Section 4 and 5 are deemed "material." 11.4 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire =derstanding and Agreement of the Parties regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement supersedes all negotiations and previous agreements between the Parties regarding that subject matter. 11.5 Waivers. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement ,rust be in writing and signed by the Party making the waiver. 11.6 Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals set forth in Section 1 are part of this Agreement. 11.7 Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealine. Neither Party shall do anything which shall have, the effect of harming or injuring the right of the other Pam- to receive the benefits of this Agreement. 050996-1001I F31331.OM 115774.21 22 (o6 11.8 Covenant of Cooperation. The City shall help Ford obtain any permits from either the City or other public agencies which may be required for development of the Project or as a result of any modifications, suspensions, or alternate courses of action allowed by this Agreement. Ford may challenge any such ordinance. measure, moratorium, or other limitation in a court of law if it becomes necessary to protect the development rights vested in the Property pursuant to this Agreement. 11.9 Further Actions and Instruments. Upon the request of either Party, the other Party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the terms of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 11.10 Successors and Assigns. Subject to Se: ion 7.3 above, the burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of the Agreement inure to, all successors -in -interest and assigns of the Parties. 11.11 Construction of Agreement. All language in all parts of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole and given its fair meaning. The captions of the paragraphs and subparagraphs are for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of construction. 'This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. This Agreement is not intended to impermissibly contract away the legislative and governmental functions of the City, and in particular. the City's police powers or to surrender or abrogate the City's governmental powers over the Property. 11.12 Authority to Execute. The person exer.:ting this Agreement on behalf of Ford warrants and represents that he/she has the authori:-�• to do so and the authority to bind Ford to the performance of Ford's obligations under this Agreement. 11.13 Consent. Any consent required by the Parties in carrying out the terms of this Agreement shall not unreasonably be withheld. 11.14 Effect on Title. This Agreement shall not continue as an encumbrance against any portion of the Property as to which this Agreement has terminated. 11.15 Recording. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Agreement to be executed by the City and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County no later than ten (10) days after the Effective Date. The recordation of this Agreement is deemed a ministerial act and the failure of the City to record the Agreement as required by this Section and Government Code Section 65868.5 does not make the Agreement void or ineffective. 11.16 Institution of Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies. either Party may institute legal action to cure, correct, or remedy any Default, to enforce any provision of this 050996-1001 1 F31331.OM 1 15774.21 Agreement, to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation of this Agreement, to recover ` damages for any Default, or to obtain any remedies consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. Legal actions shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California. or in the Federal District Court in the Central District of California. 11.17 Attorneys' Pees. In any arbitration, quasi-judicial, administrative, or judicial proceeding between the Parties initiated with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs, expenses, and disbursements in connection with such action. 11.18 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no third party beneficiaries to this Agreement or to any provision of this Agreement, including the public benefit provisions of Section 5. Date: , 1996 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH By; Mayor Date: , 1996 PACIFIC BAY HOLIES By: 03099640011 F31331-002115774.21 24 A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 (714) 644-3131 June 11, 1996 Cathy Young Paone, Callahan, McHolm & Winton 19100 Von Karman Avenue 8th Floor P.O. Box 19613 Irvine, CA 92713-9613 Re: Latest Draft of Pacific Bay Homes (Ford) Development Agreement Dear Cathy: I have no problem with the proposed modifications to the Pacific Bays Homes Development Agreement. RB:wb - CC: Sharon Wood Patti Temple wb\young.1tr Very truly yours, l: p Robert H. Burnham City Attorney 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach r RESOLUTION NO._ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTNO.8 WHEREAS, the State Legislature and the City Council have determined that the lack of certainty in the approval of developmemprojects can resultin a wasted resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development to the consumer, and discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public; and WHEREAS, the assurance that an applicant may proceed with a project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in compreltensiveplanning, and reduce the economic costs of development; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65864 et seq. authorizes cities to enter into development agreements with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of the property; and WHEREAS, Chapter 15.45 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides requirements and procedures for the amendment of development agreements; and WHEREAS, the First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 8 has been prepated in complianco with $into law and the Newport Beach Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, in compliance with state law and city ordinance, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission to consider the First Amendment to Development AgreementNo. 8; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission rinds that the Amendment is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelincspromulgated thereunder; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that said Amendment is in conformance with the Newport Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, the adoption of the Development Agreement Amendment will not preclude the City from conducting future discretionary reviews in connection with the project, nor r ° +4 10 H would it prevent the City from imposing conditions or requirements to mitigate significant impacts identified in such reviews provided that the measures do not render the project infeasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby recommends City Council approval of the First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 8. ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 1965, by the following vote, to wit: NOES ABSENT BY TOD W. RIDGEWAY CHAIRMAN BY MICHAEL C. KRANZLEY SECRETARY Attachment: Exhibit1: First Amendment to Development Agreement No. 8 PLT...C:\NISOrFICE1WINWORD{PQRCS•DA8 DOC RESOLUTION NO. — A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE AERONUTRONIC FORD PLANNED COMMUNITY (PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENTNO.848) WHEREAS, as part of the development and implemontationoflhe Newport Beach General Plan the Land Use Element has been prepared; and WHEREAS, the Newport Beach Municipal Code provides specific procedures for the implementation of Planned Community zoning ror properties within the City of Newport Beach; and WHEREAS, the proposed Planned Community District Regulations are consistent v� ith the Newport Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report has been previously certified for the project consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) mid the State CEQA Guidelines, and the information contained therein is considered adequate for die proposed amendments to this Planned CommunityText. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach does hereby recommend to the City Council an amendment to the Aeronutronic Ford Planned Community District Regulations and Development Plan as attached hereon as Exhibit 1. ADOPTEDthis 20th dayof June ,1962,bythe following vote, towit: 11"f x �11:l' lip BY Tod W. Ridgeway, CHAIRMAN BY Michael C. Kranzley, SECRETARY Attachment: Exhibit 1 PLT ..C;\11SOrricc%6wINR ORMI'MAIDAS48RUS DOC A ABSENT '13 1* ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP OF COMPANIES 4401 ATLANTIC AVENUE SUITE 200 LONG BEACH, CA 90807 30 January 1998 ESC198-ADM/CNB-01 City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA. 92658-8915 Attention: Ms. Genia Garcia Associate Planner PHONE: 562-984-2079 FAx: 562-988-0129 SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) Dear Ms. Garcia: In accordance with your request, this letter has been prepared to provide you with an update of the status of the environmental aspects of the project associated with the redesignation and redevelopment of the former Ford Aeronutronic/Loral property (Site) from use as an industrial to a residential site. BACKGROUND As you are aware, the Site was historically used for aerospace and defense -related activities that included the use of a variety of hazardous substances. The use of these chemicals resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the Site. Ford Motor Land Corporation (FMLC) retained an environmental consulting firm, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. (now Arcadis Geraghty & Miller [G&M]) to investigate the extent of the soil and groundwater contamination, conduct health, risk assessments to evaluate whether such contamination posed public health issues, and develop and implement a soil and groundwater remediation plan. These activities have been conducted under the authority and requirements of state and local environmental regulatory agencies, primarily the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). The City of Newport Beach retainedEnvironmental Services Consortium, Inc. (ESCI - formerly Environmental Management Services [EMS]) to act as a monitor for the project on behalf of the City. As the City monitor, ESCI initially reviewed the research related to Site usage and the resulting identification of "Areas of Potential Environmental Concern" (APECs) and the associated soil and V A groundwater investigation activities that had been conducted by G&M, participated in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, and attended meetings with the involved regulatory agencies and with Ford, G&M and the City of Newport Beach. ESCI also reviewed and evaluated all associated project reports and agency communication, and provided recommendations on behalf of the City, where appropriate. This included the technical evaluation of the health risk assessments(HRAs) prepared by G&M for the Bayridge and Belcourt areas, current residential areas that had formerly been part of the Site, and the post-remediation HRAs prepared for the main or northern area, and the ATC or southern area ofthe Site. In addition, ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities that were performed as part of the pre -demolition phase of the project. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS Demolition and Construction -related Activities As you are aware, facility decommissioning activities, including pre -demolition building decontamination of regulated materials, have been completed. This activity comprised the removal of building components that constituted hazardous Waste, or that Were environmentally regulated in some manner, and the decontamination of building surfaces. This activity was conducted in accordance with procedures specified in a Project Demolition Manual submitted to the City by FMLC and reviewed by ESCI, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 1-7010,17,18, and 23. ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities, and co -signed the Pre -Demolition Building Certifications issued for each of the buildings at the Site. Those aspects of the above -referenced mitigation measures that apply to construction in general at the project Site are continuing to be implemented. Soil and Groundwater Renrediatian Activities Soil remediation activities at the Site were conducted under the oversight of the RWQCB and OCHCA, and in accordance with health -based cleanup levels (HBCLs) (levels evaluated to be protective of human health) that were developed by Ford and G&M, reviewed by ESCI on behalf of the City of Newport Beach, and approved by the OCHCA. Mitigation Measures 9,10,17,19,21,22 and 23 were implemented during soil remediation activities for soil that had been identified as contaminated prior to the demolition and grading, and also for any additional contaminated soil identified during demolition and/or grading. Based on documentation reviewed and meetings attended by ESCI, soil remediation has been completed to the satisfaction of the RWQCB and the OCHCA. Onsite groundwater remediation was conducted during 1995 and 1996 under the authority of the RWQCB in accordance with a Groundwater Remedial Action Plan (RAP) approved by the RWQCB, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 8,11,20,21,22, and 23. The RAP addresses groundwater impacts in the main area or the northern portion of the Site, and in the southern area of the Site, formerly known as the "ATC" area. ESCIP&ADWN"I 2 ESCI UPDATE 108 - CNN Groundwater remediation activities were completed in 1996. In a letter dated 4 November 1996 the RWQCB approved the closure of the groundwater remediation system, which has subsequently been dismantled and removed from the Site. Ongoing monitoring of the groundwater is currently being required by the RWQCB. Post -development groundwater remediation at the Site has not been required by the RWQCB. Offshe groundwater contamination found to be present to the north of the Site is being addressed as a separate issue by FMLC and the RWQCB; and is not expected to result in the placement of any equipment onsite. Health -Risk Assessmeizts Human health risk assessments for the Belcourt and Bayridge areas were prepared by G&M, evaluated by ESCI, and reissued by G&M on behalf of FMLC. Soil and groundwater contamination in these areas were found to pose no risk to human health. The risk assessment reports were submitted to the OCHCA, who concurred with the conclusions of these studies. Site -specific data collected during the soil and groundwater remediation were used by G&M to prepare post-remediation/pre-development health risk assessments for the northern and southern areas of the Site, as required by Mitigation Measure 21. These assessments concluded no risk to human health was present in the areas studied at the Site. The health risk assessments were independently evaluated by OCHCA and ESCI, who concurred with the conclusion of these studies. Should you have further questions regarding the status of this project or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours truly, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. i Lyn ethrington, REA, M Principal Environmental Scientist cc: File John Douglas, Principal Planner, City of Newport Beach Eric Pearson, P.E., Environmental Control Manager, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Thomas E. Culek, Environmental Control Engineer, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Gary Boettcher, Project Manager, Arcadis Geraghty & Miller ,ESC19&ADM/CN8-01 ESCI UPDATE '98 - CNB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP OF COMPANIES 4401 ATLANTIC AVENUE SUITE 200 LONG BEACH, CA 90807 30 January 1998 ESC198-ADM/CNB-01 City of Newport Beach P.O.'Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA. 92658-8915 Attention: Ms. Genia Garcia Associate Planner PHONE: 562-984-2079 FAX: 562-988-0129 SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) Dear Ms. Garcia: In accordance with your request, this letter has been prepared to provide you with an update of the status of the environmental aspects of the project associated with the redesignation and redevelopment of the former Ford Aeronutronic/Loral property (Site) from use as an industrial to a residential site. BACKGROUND As you are aware, the Site was historically used for aerospace and defense -related activities that included the use of a variety of hazardous substances. The use of these chemicals resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the Site. Ford Motor Land Corporation (FMLC) retained an environmental consulting firm, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. (now Arcadis Geraghty & Miller [G&M]) to investigate the extent of the soil and groundwater contamination, conduct health risk assessments to evaluate whether such contamination posed public health issues, and develop and implement a soil and groundwater remediation plan. These activities have been conducted under the authority and requirements of state and local environmental regulatory agencies, primarily the Santa Ana 'Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). The City of Newport Beach retained Environmental Services Consortium, Inc. (ESCI - formerly Environmental Management Services [EMS]) to act as a monitor for the project on behalf of the City. As the City monitor, ESCI initially reviewed the research related to Site usage and the resulting identification of "Areas of Potential Environmental Concern" (APECs) and the associated soil and yi 7 groundwater investigation activities that had been conducted by G&M, participated in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, and attended meetings with the involved regulatory agencies and with Ford, G&M and the City of Newport Beach. ESCI also reviewed and evaluated all associated project reports and agency communication, and provided recommendations on behalf of the City, where appropriate. This included the technical evaluation of the health risk assessments(HRAs) prepared by G&M for the Bayridge and Belcourt areas, current residential areas that had formerly been part of the Site, and the post-remediation HRAs prepared for the main or northern area, and the ATC or southern area of the Site. In addition, ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities that were performed as part of the pre -demolition phase of the project. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS Demolition and Cotistrrtctiotarelated Activities As you are aware, facility decommission ing activities, including pre -demolition building decontamination of regulated materials, have been completed. This activity comprised the removal of building components that constituted hazardous waste, or that were environmentally regulated in some manner, and the decontamination of building surfaces. This activity was conducted in accordance with procedures specified in a Project Demolition Manual submitted to the City by FMLC and reviewed by ESCI, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 1-7,10,17,18, and 23. ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities, and co -signed the Pre -Demolition Building Certifications issued for each of the buildings at the Site. Those aspects of the above -referenced mitigation measures that apply to construction in general at the project Site are continuing to be implemented. Soil and Groundwater Rentediadon Activities Soil remediation activities at the Site were conducted under the oversight of the RWQCB and OCHCA, and in accordance with health -based cleanup levels (HBCLs) (levels evaluated to be protective of human health) that were developed by Ford and G&M, reviewed by ESCI on behalf of the City of Newport Beach, and approved by the OCHCA. Mitigation Measures 9,10,17,19,21,22 and 23 were implemented during soil remediation activities for soil that had been identified as contaminated prior to the demolition and grading, and also for any additional contaminated soil identified during demolition and/or grading. Based on documentation reviewed and meetings attended by ESCI, soil remediation has been completed to the satisfaction of the RWQCB and the OCHCA. Onsite groundwater remediation was conducted during 1995 and 1996 under the authority of the RWQCB in accordance with a Groundwater Remedial Action Plan (RAP) approved by the RWQCB, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 8,11,20,21,22, and 23. The RAP addresses groundwater impacts in the main area or the northern portion of the Site, and in the southern area of the Site, formerly known as the "ATC" area. ESC198-ADM/iCNB-01 2 VW1 UPDATE'98 - CN6 Groundwater remediation activities were completed in 1996. In a letter dated 4 November 1996 the RWQCB approved the closure of the groundwater remediation system, which has subsequently been dismantled and removed from the Site. Ongoing monitoring of the groundwater is currently being required by the RWQCB. Post -development groundwater remediation at the Site has not been required by the RWQCB. Offsite groundwater contamination found to be present to the north of die Site is being addressed as a separate issue by FMLC and the RWQCB, and is not expected to result in the placement of any equipment onsite. Health -Risk Assessments Human health risk assessments for the Belcourt and Bayridge areas were prepared by G&M, evaluated by ESCI, and reissued by G&M on behalf of FMLC. Soil and groundwater contamination in these areas were found to pose no risk to human health. The risk assessment reports were submitted to the OCHCA, who concurred with the conclusions of these studies. Site -specific data collected during the soil and groundwater remediation were used by G&M to prepare post-remediation/pre-development health risk assessments for the northern and southern areas of the Site, as required by Mitigation Measure 21. These assessments concluded no risk to human health was present in the areas studied at the Site. The health risk assessments were independently evaluated by OCHCA and ESCI, who concurred with the conclusion of these studies. Should you have further questions regarding the status of this project or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours truly, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. e4— .thrirLyn gton, REA, Principal Environmental Scientist cc: File John Douglas, Principal Planner, City of Newport Beach Eric Pearson, P.E., Environmental Control Manager, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Thomas E. Culek, Environmental Control Engineer, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Gary Boettcher, Project Manager, Arcadis Geraghty & Miller ESC19&ADH/CNB-01 ESCI UPDATE 198 - CNB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP OF COMPANIES 4401 ATLANTIC AVENUE SurrE 200 LONG BEACH, CA 90807 30 January 1998 ESC198-ADM/CNB-01 City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA. 92658-8915 Attention: Ms. Genia Garcia Associate Planner PHONE: 562-984-2079 FAX: 562-988-0129 SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) Dear Ms. Garcia: In accordance with your request, this letter has been prepared to provide you with an update of the status of the environmental aspects of the project associated with the redesignation and redevelopment of the former Ford Aeronutronic/Loral property (Site) from use as an industrial to a residential site. BACKGROUND As you are aware, the Site was historically used for aerospace and defense -related activities that included the use of a variety of hazardous substances. The use of these chemicals resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the Site. Ford Motor Land Corporation (FMLC) retained an environmental consulting firm, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. (now Arcadis Geraghty & Miller [G&M]) to investigate the extent of the soil and groundwater contamination, conduct health risk assessments to evaluate whether such contamination posed public health issues, and develop and implement a soil and groundwater remediation plan. These activities have been conducted under the authority and requirements of state and local environmental regulatory agencies, primarily the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). The City of Newport Beach retained Environmental Services Consortium, Inc. (ESCI - formerly Environmental Management Services [EMS]) to act as a monitor for the project on behalf of the City. As the City monitor, ESCI initially reviewed the research related to Site usage and the resulting identification of "Areas of Potential Environmental Concern" (APECs) and' the associated soil and groundwater investigation activities that had been conducted by G&M, participated in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, and attended meetings with the involved regulatory agencies and with Ford, G&M and the City of Newport Beach. ESCI also reviewed and evaluated all associated project reports and agency communication, and provided recommendations on behalf of the City, where appropriate. This included the technical evaluation of the health risk assessments (HRAs) prepared by G&M for the Bayridge and Belcourt areas, current residential areas that had formerly been part of tite Site, and the post-remediation HRAs prepared for the main or northern area, and the ATC or southern area of the Site. In addition, ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities that were performed as part of the pre -demolition phase of the project. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS Demolition and Construction -related Activities As you are aware, facility decommissioning activities, including pre -demolition building decontamination of regulated materials, have been completed. This activity comprised tile removal of building components that constituted hazardous waste, or that were environmentally regulated in some manner, and the decontamination of building surfaces. This activity was conducted in accordance with procedures specified in a Project Demolition Manual submitted to the City by FMLC and reviewed by ESCI, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 1-7,10,17,18, and 23. ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities, and co -signed the Pre -Demolition Building Certifications issued for each of the buildings at the Site. Those aspects of the above -referenced mitigation measures that apply to construction in general at the project Site are continuing to be implemented. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Activities Soil remediation activities at the Site were conducted under the oversight of the RWQCB and OCHCA, and in accordance with health -based cleanup levels (HBCLs) (levels evaluated to be protective of human health) that were developed by Ford and G&M, reviewed by ESCI on behalf of the City of Newport Beach, and approved by the OCHCA. Mitigation Measures 9,10,17,19,21,22 and 23 were implemented during soil remediation activities for soil that had been identified as contaminated prior to the demolition and grading, and also for any additional contaminated soil identified during demolition and/or grading. Based on documentation reviewed and meetings attended by ESCI, soil remediation has been completed to the satisfaction of the RWQCB and the OCHCA. Onsite groundwater remediation was conducted during 1995 and 1996 under the authority of the RWQCB in accordance with a Groundwater Remedial Action Plan (RAP) approved by the RWQCB, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 8,11,20,21,22, and 23. The RAP addresses groundwater impacts in the main area or the northern portion of the Site, and in the southern area of the Site, formerly known as the "ATC" area. 6SCl9d-ADM/CNA-01 2 &CI UPDATE' id - CNX ./P Groundwater remediation activities were completed in 1996. In a letter dated 4 November 1996 the RWQCB approved the closure of the groundwater remediation system, which has subsequently been dismantled and removed from the Site. Ongoing monitoring of the groundwater is currently being required by the RWQCB. Post -development groundwater remediation at the Site has not been required by the RWQCB. Offsite groundwater contamination found to be present to the north of the Site is being addressed as a separate issue by FMLC and the RWQCB, and is not expected to result in the placement of any equipment onsite. Heal!& Risk Assessments Human health risk assessments for the Belcourt and Bayridge areas were prepared by G&M, evaluated by ESCI, and reissued by G&M on behalf'of FMLC. Soil and groundwater contamination in these areas were found to pose no risk to human health. The risk assessment reports were submitted to the OCHCA, who concurred with the conclusions of these studies. Site -specific data collected during the soil and groundwater remediation were used by G&M to prepare post-remediation/pre-development health risk assessments for the northern and southern areas of the Site, as required by Mitigation Measure 21. These assessments concluded no risk to human health was present in the areas studied at the Site. The health risk assessments were independently evaluated by OCHCA and ESCI, who concurred with the conclusion of these studies. Should you have further questions regarding the status of this project or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours truly, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. i Lyn ethrington, REA, 16MM Principal Environmental Scientist cc: File John Douglas, Principal Planner, City of Newport Beach Eric Pearson, P.E., Environmental Control Manager, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Thomas E. Culek, Environmental Control Engineer, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Gary Boettcher, Project Manager, Arcadis Geraghty & Miller ESC198-ADM/CNB-01 3 ESCI UPDATE '98 - CNB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP OF COMPANIES 4401 ATLANTIC AVENUE SUITE 200 LONG BEACH, CA 90807 30 January 1998 ESCI98-ADM/CNB-01 City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA. 92658-8915 Attention: Ms. Genia Garcia Associate Planner PHONE: 562-984-2079 FAx: 562-988-0129 SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) Dear Ms. Garcia: In accordance with your request, this letter has been prepared to provide you with an update of the status of the environmental aspects of the project associated with the redesignation and redevelopment of the former Ford Aeronutronic/Loral property (Site) from use as an industrial to a residential site. BACKGROUND As you are aware, the Site was historically used for aerospace and defense -related activities that included the use of a variety of hazardous substances. The use of these chemicals resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the Site. Ford Motor Land Corporation (FMLC) retained an environmental consulting firm, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. (now Arcadis Geraghty & Miller [G&M]) to investigate the extent of the soil and groundwater contamination, conduct health risk assessments to evaluate whether such contamination,posed public health issues, and develop and implement a soil and groundwater remediation plan. These activities have been conducted under the authority and requirements of state and local environmental regulatory agencies, primarily the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). The City of Newport Beach retained Environmental Services Consortium, Inc. (ESCI - formerly Environmental Management Services (EMS]) to act as a monitor for the project on behalf of the City. As the City monitor, F,SCI initially reviewed the research related to Site usage and the resulting identification of "Areas of Potential Environmental Concern" (APECs) and the associated soil and x groundwater investigation activities that had been conducted by G&M, participated in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, and attended meetings with the involved regulatory agencies and with Ford, G&M and the City of Newport Beach. ESCI also reviewed and evaluated all associated project reports and agency communication, and provided recommendations on behalf of the City, where appropriate. This included the technical evaluation of the health risk assessments(HRAs) prepared by G&M for the Bayridge and Belcourt areas, current residential areas that had formerly been part of the Site, and the post-remediation HRAs prepared for the main or northern area, and the ATC or southern area of the Site. In addition, ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities that were performed as part of the pre -demolition phase of the project. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS Demolition and Construction -related Activities As you are aware, facility decommissioning activities, including pre -demolition building decontamination of regulated materials, have been completed. This activity comprised the removal of building components that constituted hazardous waste, or that were environmentally regulated in some manner, and the decontamination of building surfaces. This activity was conducted in accordance with procedures specified in a Project Demolition Manual submitted to the City by FMLC and reviewed by ESCI, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 1-7,10,17,18, and 23. ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities, and co -signed the Pre -Demolition Building Certifications issued for each of the buildings at the Site. Those aspects of the above -referenced mitigation measures that apply to construction in general at the project Site are continuing to be implemented. Soil and Groundwater Rentediation Activities Soil remediation activities at the Site were conducted under the oversight of the RWQCB and OCHCA, and in accordance with health -based cleanup levels (HBCLs) (levels evaluated to be protective of human health) that were developed by Ford and G&M, reviewed by ESCI on behalf of the City of Newport Beach, and approved by the OCHCA. Mitigation Measures 9,10,17,19,21,22 and 23 were implemented during soil remediation activities for soil that had been identified as contaminated prior to the demolition and grading, and also for any additional contaminated soil identified during demolition and/or grading. Based on documentation reviewed and meetings attended by ESCI, soil remediation has been completed to the satisfaction of the RWQCB and the OCHCA. Onsite groundwater remediation was conducted during 1995 and 1996 under the authority of the RWQCB in accordance with a Groundwater Remedial Action Plan (RAP) approved by the RWQCB, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 8,11,20,21,22, and 23. The RAP addresses groundwater impacts in the main area or the northern portion of the Site, and in the southern area of the Site, formerly known as the "ATC" area. ESC198-ADMICNB-01 2 ESCI UPDATB'!l - CNB U Groundwater remediation activities were completed in 1996. In a letter dated 4 November 1996 the RWQCB approved the closure of the groundwater remediation system, which has subsequently been dismantled and removed from the Site. Ongoing monitoring of the groundwater is currently being required by the RWQCB. Post -development groundwater remediation at the Site has not been required by the RWQCB. Offsite groundwater contamination found to be present to the north of the Site is being addressed as a separate issue by FMLC and the RWQCB, and is not expected to result in the placement of any equipment onsite. Health -Risk Assessments Human health risk assessments for the Belcourt and Bayridge areas were prepared by G&M, evaluated by ESCI, and reissued by G&M on behalf of FMLC. Soil and groundwater contamination in these areas were found to pose no risk to human health. The risk assessment reports were submitted to the OCHCA, who concurred with the conclusions of these studies. Site -specific data collected during the soil and groundwater remediation were used by G&M to prepare post-remediation/pre-development health -risk assessments for the northern and southern areas of the Site, as required by Mitigation Measure 21. These assessments concluded no risk to human health was present in the areas studied at the Site. The health risk assessments were independently evaluated by OCHCA and ESCI, who concurred with the conclusion of these studies. Should you have further questions regarding the status of this project or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours truly, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. Lyn ethrington, REA, M Principal Environmental Scientist cc: File John Douglas, Principal Planner, City of Newport Beach Eric Pearson, P.E., Environmental Control Manager, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Thomas E. Culek, Environmental Control Engineer, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Gary Boettcher, Project Manager, Arcadis Geraghty & Miller ESC198-ADMWCNB-01 3 FSCI UPDATE 199 - CNB a i If rfAcr ssfto 1 r +:Ism I NEMPORT BEACH, CA pdClF ay HOM[S sic Or `47� 1� �o tt ► 1a a—�� a °*� ff tf /f '� Is 81 r u t ff • t '� Z• t allf X At X f so ft f• t y • ff z•, M AI Ef 1p fl f w ,,►nJs- f A t fl ff w�lp / b X �P\� w r IS 6 frt LEGEND �+ " p to s XOASW srf'X teDrCo" st sf sf M (6 Kt(M vw WIS s Y 17 .N FtDw nn m • w NEIIPORT BEAM, CA pacif' ay HOMFS w p NEWPORT BEACH, CA pdsc1f ay HOMIS I C 10 b �= ii no It Ii N Ii N 7 i+ U 7 RR t + x e7 1 i• r d „t ei \/ A • it y } V` V, t'� M 4Y LEGEND p row Kassr.0 sr#o Kao*m N w wnw is Ko rsa W wi .r ma un t i RTyti It p N xa i asv�ers o+w t 67 wale i[x a6t ,afe i1• tee 1•I0 wt, sail we 11 i Ii• T C • It N io 3 ,x 17 37% I7 p r 31 {I 41 p < Ii p W ,+c1 40 N t TRACT 41� s7e1 m a t w NEWP0RT BEACH, CA pacif' ay HOMES s A N N N t tt t6 / � O ■ t i k >< 37 >• 134 t6 It, �• R tl y r N 33 .s " W,36 62R sa N 1 u, w6/ No w66 �w/0 66 t, 064 Nw D +e u 404 ' c RI 11 NY >•w y� N 37 w tt tw 61 46 N /6,p + r 6v litw +w N w TRAQ It 016N1 m H aM LEGEND 16 Ds (—nIolsMWs�411'i+?KN[AN6 11 !t tt tt S1 M =,s n. ,.^ wn wf s w v r ,00 w m At t A 1' lAl,*ll l\,V NEWPORT BEACH, CA paciE' ay Homis E: 60 N> 1 r � O M ra AK4 .{J°• �.1 Ata 60 13« °° �t fo tlw �rrisi�41 {t{ J �° 4,,0 �0 iti ► °`° °fit aet 41 t M is 'lr !t / 40 1 `u Z• 1 AR M r x 1101 1r d s It x „37 it i tt(Jt \/ Of . tl y wi tois C f r t� of M 7M,P 17 f frl LEGEND 1b fx fro¢ aoAs+W- Sr" Korca+as �o M t01 "JKAS MI mK WAI MOS ■ !K. 1A q, 4aGpti mf f ,o+Rw� m M x m (111 Is J NEWPORT BEACH, CA c pa - ay HOMES as 5428 5 58 57 gg b9 gp 81 3ex 2cR 7D . DRIVE '• srANISN 03 Ac Sea 89 713A 1 , L ,B 3C I—B I1µq CR @lam 42eP L^ 18 cm 7DR 1E Ipt 2gC 1BC /ER $251 0149I40 7182g 44 '"a� 005 �ea0 73+c U 10 li 32 13 14 15 18 17 �8R 7Ex J�9 IBR 3A44B,p ICR eg 2A Cm 743BR O SFA 9 F JUPRER DRNE 18 20 �¢ 34 837 8 8 041 42 43 TAR n 75+� ygglg 7 8 5 88 87 g E o 21 22 loNO BAY D A lea 17 79 x Sec ID /BCR 30 2e�` gb 21ER ' R1rE A w •kx 84 c 33 32 3B3 282 2 ?a 23 24 23A22 ,.f � 77 2e 31 R 2 ,ec 2E ? IBCR •9'x � ,� 2BCR 2�83 H 24 � Te 21 12 3 4 5 3 7 8 9 1p ti�ry��� 1;3 B OLD COURSE ORrvE 7t �� �lQp� D'9B 51 � 282pi EDOENOOo ORIVE E �, 1 I♦1BC ,Op JBC qBC IER C IE 80 27 IA 45 3 24140 ' ICR IBR R ICR ,BR 492at 1B BB /R17�DNk 4 a 5 IA O 3BCR 40R 28CR 3BC 9 38CR g }� 7A 69 H 26 SC0. 1/ 2s Ica 3e zc 4CR 8,AR zl gg ' f,� f °o oq, .A g7 52 18 15 14 13 2 ABC .TER /e 29 /B 34 ? 38 3 gM gg 49 eR Ic g3 w 4 , 7 { tD B OAK TREED 10 2 8 B 30 7EA g 0 -,9 RNE CIENFACLES DRIVE p SpBWCRf55 ORNE $O2BR SA g2 � ig !gq =gyp.. pXq A 513+R x 81 xR F 17 18 19 20 21 63 t8^ ID 57 33 31 30 29 0 52Te Ss 80 20 2DR +� IBC xE a 391DR y�37 31 3DR 32 u JB 2cR tB 2e Sul 3CR le 53 2A IAR 79 322cR b 18 14 1 .17 . 52 2c 3E11 58 tBCR 38 g y,x' IB 1C 1A o 54 /B 2BR78 . C BIG HORN NE B 18 2BCa /BCa 1D 3BU IBC 363ecR 3 0 2e o9 28 Y 55 x IAx77 23 2P 19 28 25 24 23 22 341� ,LR 39 `T bl /e 2D 56 V 33 IA 24 2.J26 DaNC 581C 1w 78 JDR lAq 26 ,2x ]DSR A HON°0.'` ' ORNE 3 SDR 40 60 SLR xa 54 i 34 C B' 1571A ,eR7$ 2¢ 31 3D Tua �E 19 eR yfi 0 29 30 31 02 D TRACT 0 212� 2eR 58 yB tcR74 7,0 � 30 31 2� 2AL 2e01 'Eft 3DR A'F IBc 41 49 Ic G 3640R 2 OYSTER SAY DRIVE eR Ica � 25k4 Nib,E 2� C 75390 SBCR T � 2n 42 ¢g 2w 5�8 38 ?A c 591Ax /A 13 tie 2 °+ ° .E 51 Tae 43 37 .n, 18 10 A 80 Sa 72 28NUHDEI`. 0� iC 9 2 02 50 492Ea tBc 0.7 3DR 38 tBa 15 83 2a+71 F g. E �3 Ad+ SE M gCa14 382R IBR 84 70 00 s SI54 Seca ABC0. +48 45 44 qg TLR k +e Bc qg 47 F �e 13 yp-.�• 00 ,+b h 47 462BR 55 C COLONUd. DRNE q5 /8A qup D H,y4cf 49AR SsA gg 67 58 59 ,�1 48CR 44 2A 1 } 0 P Ji 43 a 7D AB %9 /BCp 2FR 0 '"0OR sac STICK ° 3 � B 7� � � 69 431BR A 3g !B tB TRACT ti°0 y,�°1 I ql 40 41 51 47015387 422C `� 0 {°PAR 392 40 25 ¢ F — OLD COURSE DRryE 41 E 48 44 45 46 40 28 2 I� acR aA if 2c le 24 1 �• 39 Ia 37 2AR 23 2 as WE to � 27� 3 Se a 3B 22 3 1AR 38 'h,\� 28 29 30 2cR 21 � 4 'f1' A ' H 'L'- IAR 2D 2 3C B 35 ° 31 FAR G 518 34 33 32 WIT 19 ,BR 2 AMI 28 3-58 ?G 7� C xe 16 TcR 17 8 ISR LEGEND IA 15 93C r--j LOTS REOUESTING SEBACK u0D nCARONS 14 13 12 11 10 DO LOT NUMBERS PFR FINAL TRACT MAPS 1 38 2A ICII SA /BR BUILDING TYPE -- • ... I 79ey e<O' i �Iltls xB 24 vi J NEWPORT BEACH, CA pacif' ay HOMES vE-1-1' (1061$g/80 6A I&W 2CR 70 ' =- sPAwsH 03 Lo 3Ba 89 713A 515 1948 71AR �4cR �o O'i10x, IN 00 7228 LI 10 31 12 13 �D tBc rEa 3Bc rgcR 8 44 a 05 Aea Oh � 73tc 14 15 18 17 1 acR ,� SIR rBR 7CR ooM C'" 743BR 0 3ER 9 ° F JUPRER DRNE 5 19 20 s� 3837 8 A 04142 A3 gtM m 751AR 3BgtB 7 8 5 �" 08 87' B E o 21 22 LONC gAY'DR A 10a �B17 78k 10 /BCR 3p 7BCR B$ 23 NE � A J1R 84 323B3c2g2g aA JB agR 4M A22 Nc, 77 aB 3�g Ip 48C xE rgcg +� a�g 83 °H 27IR 2 2 25 24 23 0 �y ti0 1 2 3 4 E 89 j R ao sDR 82 °� 25 tB ICR 1tR /5R 39 to ,g',ylNl 8 8 '._.. 0 yl '4 x 2 3 4 8 7 8 9 10 ti ol0 couRSE ORrvE ? 5 N 3 � }/Qp i786 �81 28xa+ 00 lD8 W2414, E ••�,1+ -1 �� JDS BRA O 1BCR IBC 6027 4A /9� 48ap1 IB BB /q kR 5 O xA 59 2B ka 473gq 3C 65 °'aY/p - 4 B to 52 JBCR rDR 28CR 38C I 8 P H 40 to 3B xc 4BrAR a+ 84 0 , 2 'f °p og4FA 38 15 14 13 12 71 4p },ate" 58 29 48 103 3 39 '491CR 4C 83 W r �a 7 sc OAK TREE I p aSCR 8 _ ' '9 B ORNE _�•• GLENEAGLES DRNE AAss DRrvE 50xBR aA 82 19 ga -3pa., 8yw - _ C 301ER 513Aa x 01 3 3cR F 17 18 19 20 21 A ._. �•• 31 30 29 tec ABc xE 31�g 30 3BC 37 531BY 4c 57 31 kR TA >B xCR 5218 JB 80 o t0 18 yR TD . t9 20R 53 xA IAR 79 1 C HORry 10 17 18 48ca +D 3Brn +sc 35JecR W 52 2c 3ER 58 32 acR xc u o 544e 2BR78 G H aecR IBCR 38 3v I IB 27 28 x 55 J" 4AR77 23 22 19 28 25 24 23 22 341gc 4Ea 39 `� 51 48 x5 55 `4J 33u �20 pRNE � 58 4C 31R 78 ' JDR 14p •. 3011 3DSR A HONOaS ORrvE 33 p � e° 57 a 4BR75 24 29 0R 40 50 3Ea xa 54 �x'3 34, LE 212019 5B 3B ICR74 IBv �0 �p 31 27 2s xecR IER we 3d +Bc 41 H 49 4c 7fiACT0�36 2 k OYSTER BAY ORNE 253Vt 0 TRACT C:! aD 42 5d9B 4�t R •• •- +B C 15390 3BCR 38 LG 591IR u73 e9 2� DRN 1 48 zvt aA 51 tort LI 10 80 3B 72 20 NDEae%492ER IBC 43 30R 371ea 15 / A 81 xcR 71y, 2C .TF E aBcr53 3E 47 38 t14 30xcR tBa 70 3e ,dA h9 tec54 48 447 t40 A5 44 F 48 AER +c a 13 8x tB 0� eh Ao 4810- 55 C CO ON DRIVE 45 48R 44 0 - I t 3Ea 58 59 80 81 02 �i °Or 6y P 1 3ut 43 °fo 49 AD 57 50 xER 3Da tec 4xR 44 aA ,00 �OsncK o�`Na•� 2 vTR• 3� aqx ZIA 42 � 50 3Bc 4BCR 43 ISR .9 8TRACT >4M1eg M1 009 141 40 41 517e 47 15387 42 �y x O / 7C 1�AR 39 40 25 •�.. COURSE pg .�•/ 41 3E IBe {4 48 •44 45 48 F 39 40 IB 24 3 38 28 x aA tE ac 1 ace 40 37 xAR 23 2 38 x K xR 38z \ \7lBR 3 29 4A 38 22 3 IAR E 3 Zc^\ A • L28 30 2cR 21 1- 4 A 35 t ut 20 G B ° 31FAR19 6 to 34 43R a3 342w �4py`0 2 10 8 xc C, 2BR16 IOR17 2 7B IBR LEGEND IA 15 9 x = LOTS REOUESTING SETBACK MODIFICATIONS 14 13 12 11 to 50 LOT NUMBERS PER FINAL TRACT MAPS 3A 38 xA ILR 4BR BUILDING TYPE B FORD ROAD °ory eeEY �i� l 16 2A 2B 24 J NEWPORT BEACH, CA pacif' ay HOMES 58L57EF L58gg�80 IA 36R 2CR 70 . 0 1 SPANISN 83 AC JBR 69 u• 71 J 1p�1 2D9 IE /pq ,, - t8 48 � 19 SR ACA �°� 541.4, M 53 � 7229 U 18 11 12 13 JD 1BC /ER JBC /QCp 2 ' 44 56 A>sR 07 m 731C ° 14 15 IB 17 18 1 f IBR I 08MC^ 74,E 0 3ER 9 F JUPRER DRIVE 9 28 /ft` 37 CA �'k IA AC N' z 21 4AR -e 8 04142 43 A QAOA IPR 75+� secAg 3x iD 22 48CR JER LONC BAY pRR,� 'J0.1 �, 1817 78 k 77 2B A G JD 28CR 3ER / 85 84 23 2AR 3 2g Ie JB 28,q AIR 22 2 4. 2 2 2 23 24 23 .�• ,e Atib Z6 0 B 1 2 3 4 E 88 OR D �� 2ue 82 2518 ¢R $ 9 2C 3B IC 4A ,�Mti�, OlD COURSE DRNE 1 is ,Aq;, `BBB 83 �f 282� OD DRIVE 7 8 9 10 3�>> ,� y5a 7RACt +BCR tBc IDR Jec 8 C r IE 80 °P 27 b8 15390 92AC TER 7 �°'� � 3cR 62 IG I&2 ?CR le 88 igD/v 4 R IA JBCR IDR 28CR 3BC i 38cR 8 a@¢ 2A 59 H 28 38 2c 48µp 84 0 42 f{ooq'il'A g72c •10 15 14 13 12R j� JER /D 'ia�" ,R 58 29 AS 139 B '491CR AD 63 ,?D ,KO 9 B OAX TREE 0@Nf 1p �,�•9 CIENEACLES OflIVE C 30 +ER 7RrvE 5028R 3A 82 $ 13 '� =JCR.. 83AR .. F lg 19 20 D 29 51w1 x 81 ,u+ 17 1 53+a Ac 67 B 2CR g 5218 3B 88 0 1D 1B yR YD 2DR +� ABC 7E 3pCR 38/� JBC 37 c 31 ,DR 53 2A TAR 79 14 I5 18 :�'? ` 18 / Jt 18CR 38 52 2C xR 58 32 2CR C 1A ° 5448 2DR78 C BIC HORN IVE B 2BCR 4BCR 10 SBCR 6Y,' 3BCR n o L7 28 x 55 3A ArR77 23 2E 19 28 25 24 23 22 341ec IER 39 5 51 4B 1D 55 33 u oNE 58 Ac aw 78 J?R ue ?t 2Jp JasA �A HONoas oRIyE 33 i 67 IA 48R75 24 3 , JDR 40 8 50 JEA xR 54 34 2019 583R IcR74 IW `A`'0 q0 31 27 20 29R tEa JDR 3�' IBC 41 7RACY x 28R .. 2 n00 Ac 20C 49 Ac OYSTER BAY DRIVE 7RA(:f JD G 3548R w 591a 4� 73 25 2� uR 0 15390 3eCR IDR i 2D 42 148 2AR 5 8 38 2A 1 ♦S 80 3a 72 20 NOEaO` " 93 32 A�y`L 50 492D+ iBC 43 mR 3718R A tw`� 9 2c .dA 28C�3 47 38 ABCR 82 2cR 71 F 3 E ACR 3E 2CA 189 70 �o x 44 3eCA + 6 4g IER Ac 47 k82� 1�555 0 Its 4cal.o8� DRrvE F q6 ABa ° SY'y 06 6 `P 4 44 D yMec 9 JW -80 81 82 P 3AR F Ap 8 57 58 59 3oA IBC 4BDR 44 ZA rF°sn KoRcR•A g l� 2ce 2° 50 Jec 4BG+ 2EA 43.-- 0 AR 38 Is 1 41 40 41 5118 47 59BTRACT / 42�0 '�V'AARR 392 40 25 ti,- F OLD Co..-,[ pql�_.._-.� 41 IBR 42 43 44 45 48 -� VE F 40 38 26 2 /aY. JCR 2A IE 20 +B 24 S 2CR 39 46 2AR 23 2 38 SUEK TR 37 z IB,q J \8 JB 22 36 °9 �27 2e 30 u xR 21 4 IAA `a." A Ti •L.. 28 r AR zg = x e 35 34 0 31 TAR xR 19 G 5 is 43R Y 34AR A.Q➢y0 28 18 81c C, 28R 6 ICR 17 a 78 ISR LEGEND ,A 15 9 3c = LOTS REOUESTING SETBACK MODIFICATIONS -11 10 14 13 12 q0 60 LOT NUMBERS PFR FItUL TRACT NAPS \JB 7A 1CR y' 4EIR BUILDING TYPE n 44ry , J NEWPORT BEACH, CA pacif' C ay HOMES 13&q 2CR 70 le 03 A0 yea 09 71 sA q0a 'A p� 1 2q1 IE AM 3D Be1 13 {ER �� 0g S.aA 00ry c U 10 it ]2 13 14 IS 18 Sx {ece 2Ea 1Ba ° 60 v C o 743BR 0 SD 9 F UUPRER DRNE 9 2 21 4AR 3 g7AR 751AR 78CRg 7 6 5 88 87 g E o 22 4A 10 73 i9a>c 17 ti > 10 7B x A JBC tO 43CR c p SD 2ECR ,R OS 04 3ER 23 772 SBCR ID {Bc 2E {BCR {� 23ca SeR 63 ° H 24 Ae �h ti6 1 2 3 4 E 89 2D 2Da to "i 25 } 1 „ OLD COURSE ORNE ,? ��282DR N � � `cgs 3 2` 1 23 �'4p 4 8 i7�h C CBI {A 60 27 M11' TRACT {BCR 18C 141 305 15390 4DR SBC 6 Y 1E % IER ?U,'�r 9aBC 7 xR 5 59 SCR 2BCR JDC IECR AIB ?�� u H B w AROHy.O 4 to g52 39CR {OR 2 D A? fODDq A 67 16 15 14 13 12 1� SER l saP 3DR 58 29 AB 2c .70 ��0 kR B B OAK p�R 8 TREE O/7Nf �0 ••�•- CLENEA— DRIVE G 30 IER 19 s3CR 3WAMR g 17 10 IB :ZD 1DR 18 7BC 19 {BC 20 7F 2; A �.• 3OCR ail. 3�37 5318 4D 57 31 3DR 14 31R I fi I6 17 • I8 t3 35 1 38 {BD SBDR c 62 2C 3ER 66 V 32 2CR G RIO NOR, IVE B -2ABCR 10 SBCR 29 22 19 20 25 24 23 22 341RC {ER CR 39 � 51 43 aD 55 Ro ,� 33 1A SOR ,M, 21 '�2D SOSR . NONORS DRNf 3 0 23 x A aeeR SDa 40 24B 26 '!93 9 27 20 29 30 31 3'� IIR ARF +Bc 41 B 50 Sea xR 54 34 30 TRACT' Ai Yl`� 3, w "c 2BCR SDa 25 49 AC G 35{BR 5 8 TRACT � 20 42 � Aye 090 75390 secR � 482AR 3821 26 HoeaOr '33 A6 1pR� 32 y2 51 fiU 492ER IBc 43 A7 SOR 37tDv F 2c .d` E 2�3 3E 38 90 x 54 SBCR 4Dca 148 A5 AA 47 AB 1ER Ac .oQ• M3 47 2Ew 1V. 40 �w 48 55 0 cot.DND3. DRrvE F 45 A&l 56 59 80 81 B2 c 49� SIR f �21D 57 2D 58 tec 45CR ABCR 2ER 44 u 32• A7� 2CR , 30C 9 � T 50 ?� 4318, 3g Z1 t IRA 40 18 41 6118 o RAC! / 42x qq 75387 Ay, 40 F OLD 413E 39 25 CDuasE DR•1`.-".� rvf IDq 49 {� 43 44 45 _. 46 Is 24 F 40 39 3 26 2 + u IE 2c {e 37 2AR 23 2 2C X K 2a a 27 aR 3 a 33 22 21 jjE L28 30M xR 4 H ,AR 20 35 0 31 TAR G 513 34 33 32 �p(, 3CR 19 OR 2 AIR �eAy,52 28 16 61C G, 2BR16 ICR 17 2 78 BR LEGEND A 15 s B x = LOTS REQUESTING SETBACK MODIFICATIONS 34 131 2 11 ,18 60 LOT NUMBERS PER FINAL TRACT MAPS \33 2A 1CR SA 4BR BUILDING TYPE °on J virvii NEWPORT BEACH, CA paclt ay HOMES �t 642ga 2A 60 � 7226 1 �"a� p� UU 2D,P IE 4DR 10 31 12 p8C 13 JD IBc 4ER 2ER 05x tgR 6h 73 tt 14 15 38 17 Sg J� 19 66M Co 7AS00. 0 SFR 9 ° F JUPRER 20 21¢ ORryE 43 tAP vi 751AR J 3 7 8 5 �' 88 87 g E o 22 '• y. ICR 10 55 53 2A IAR 79 JeR ie YC lA Q 54 48 BR78 2B 26 55 JA AAR77 24f'�2 RNe 1 584C ,wt 78 P1LE e"Y 67 IA 40R75 SU i F636 ICR74 2126 PBR 23 x JBRR ICR OYSTER BAY DRIVE 1C RA..e .\73 Rp 6 Al RT 8 18 ,y3e2 1 41 40 4] 511E 47 5 RA38 / 422C 39 40 41 25 �•. .. ._ OLD COURSE DRIVE SE IBit 48 — 44 45 4_ . F 40 S 36 24 2 48R � JCR IA IE 2c 6 IB 24 I2CR 39 4B 37 Z � 23 2 JB \7 x -- 2R IBR J \B JB 22 3 MR 36, 28 29 30 M xR 21 �.' J H.. •� g 4 Jc AR 20 35 ° 31 IAR G 61B 34 xR' 19 33 32 4BR 2 "A �QAy,°2 2B 16 m 6 2C 0, 2aR 1 z 7 JA IB to 7 81BR _LEGEND ,A 16 9 " C� LOTS flEOUo 11 �ESTING SETBACK MODIFICATIONS 14 13 12 0 60 LOT NUMBERS PFR FINAL TRACT MAPS ` Je 24 ICU y' 4BR BUILDING TYPE \ u 76 x 3 A ID 48CR ff JER m JD zBCR JER 86 64 23 y2 7728 JBCR ID 46c 2E 4 ;NCR JER 21R 63 ° H 24 c�'i ,e �y 16 1 2 3 B _. 4 E 89 2D 90 >1 2DR 3C 82 2518 2DR OLD COURSE DRIVE �$ 14P °'ge 81 !s` 26 yry `L s 1 2 3 4 6 A G 4Nt 4A 80 gp27 ti 1RA0 +BCP I�` 4qt JBc zec tmg IE k xR 5 9 lacy 8 �ROHy.0p 4 6 1A 52 JBCR 4DR 26CH JBC IBCR ID u,'�r ���' 2A 59 11 28 xR q2 fI�DRry£ 72G 36 IS 14 13 12 11 JO? 3a'" 5B 29 46 AK TREE .7D 'EO 9 B O.. 2BCR 9 ORryE 10 •,�•• GLENEAGLES DRIVE G 30 IEA i3ARF zE0 JaR A 5318^ 4c 67 31 JOR 1D 28 J/R , 38 3Bp37 4Bq o 14 I6 Sg ,1?' 10 36 18 4q^ JBCR IBM 38 62 2C SER 58 32 2CR G BIC HORN IVE B pBCR 4BCR 1D SOCR 23 22 19 20 25 24 23 22 34IBC 4ER39 z 51 40 20 55 S ¢ � 33 IA 30P • IAq 21 .,2G". SpBR 20 JC HONORS OR/yE 33 A JBCR JD.R 40 ' O S0 JER xR 54 u 34 30 31 32 25 30 31 2� 2\c z9S IER JDR .S 4Bc 41 I) 7RACF 0' w 4g 4c G 3546R 4,a 25 1�1 oR G 15390 JBCR 2D 42 5�8 48 tut 38 2A 26 aD�aela 33 ton 92 y2 51 50 492ER IBC 43 47 JpR 371BR F• lb 2C YtlA 2K%3 38 3000. {BFR tER { 5 b4 54 47 46 4 4g 1ER 4C jp4D , 482BRtAR t 55 G 46 COLONIAL DUNE F 45 4BR 44 58 59 +01 49 67 56 ,�1 4BCR 24/D '' 2D 330 {BCR 2ER 44 2A d DS 50 431BR A 44/ ,i 2B M !j Vhl L NEWPORT BEACH, CA pa cif ay HOMES i�58L57L58 `"�80 gj 3Bp zCR 70 . • i 1 "�••-SPM'ISN @ 6`S'c JBR O9 71 � J �3 ,� L° 2DR IE 1 x 1848 71B y 44 ��, gg5� t886h �7228 73 tc lJ 10 11 12 j3 14 15 18 3� 1� 7fR `O p 'ci' ytq 4BR 7CR g6 M Cm 74 O 3EN 9 ° F JUPRER ORNE 8 19 2 °3837 2A1C to 4C M ' 8 E 21 8 0 04142 A`3 tPR � 751Nt 3BCR 7 8 5 � �8 87 g o 22 3UI ACR LONG &r DRtrE A '� 1617 78 x A 3BC tD +BCR HY' JB m zecR Jac)?Jac)?85 94 23 2C 21R 3 3 2gZ � 3e 2B,q 4N7 A2 Z 2 Lc, 77 2B 3BCR 7B 4� 2E � IBCR � 2�B 83 ° H 24 2 2 25 24 23 .e �Ty 15 1 2 3 4 E 88 � aB mR 82 � 2578 3 4 6R9 7 g u urytiry� 3 DRIVE?�117p `rBe81�s 28za+ EW000 DRIVE E 9 10 ,13•�ti 0 1 2 3 4 5 `P,D 80 27 4A ti �� 305 TRACT +BER tx 4DR 3BD 2BC 6 C �},ht, IE � t 2414� •• •- ,6 1539D 9 IER 7 rT � ICR IBR 4@2CR IB B@ Iq JDR 5 O JBCR 8 .33� 2A 59' H 28 JCR 0 4 JBC,R 40R u 38 x 461AR zn Bg I2O000R A 6 A 5214R JEe 4D sue' JDR 58 29 43 3 3 39 $ 50 BR 9 7 sD $ OAK TREE p/ENf 1 10 20CR 9 CIENEACLES ORNE i5 DRNE 5O2BR 3A 62 = 13 .: rBp ;-JDR•- By,R .._ G 30 tER l 30 29 513AR 2c 61 [s[�� xR F 17 t BC DC EO 321 A 3 ._• 37 ' 53 tBy �c 57 31 xR A >B $R 5278 3B BO 5 1D 18 yR •� I9 2DR @�� JBC = 53 2A IAR 7t 14 18 -1? 5 IT BIG H 16 18 1D JBCR IBC 353BCR 62 2C JER 68 32 2CR j 2C lA � 54 48 BR78 G ORN NE $ 2BCR 40DR a ,0 27 2O x 55 JA 4AR77 23 2P 19 26 25 24 23 22 3416 IER 39 51 49 zD 56 33 IA ORNE � 58 4c 3w78 JOR ' IA4 2B �x JDSR A HONOR$ ORNE 33 C N 57 IA 4BR75 2q 34 8 2 JBOR 3DR 40 50 JER xR 54 Wx`i 34 x L120 s 58SB icR_74 I� 25 1�0 3t 2q 20 z�R IfR 3aR 3�' 4BC 41 0 49 4c T� Cn35 2A x OYSTER RAY DRNE 25JAR e� � C TRACT 3D CT 2D 42 48 zAR 5�@ 38 zA4eR c 581M 4A73 10 ry a ° Ac gi IoR 10 p 60 x N '2 9 88n1eI2ScaR� 70 a�N36to `�b5 4x7 - 2�ztec642 5) 4BC0R 44409C72RERt4ER8 UD4q0R JqE 4 F 4476x12RR 384c 37 2 362717 5 B2 3 7BR DRNE 45 4Re I- nP=O .g 66 0P 1} 4 49.h��cFa 49 p 6 67 58 fiJo0R 8� {BCR 44 2A p rc^O pc2 t11` 3� 2fR 20 JBC 4BCR STICK° A , 9 3g 1e ws 60 tB TRACT 41 / 43 tRa do g 'l ti6' ,5n21 7 40 41 51 47 015387 42x 2 25 �.. F at0 CO SE s _•'__-�'-./ 41 3' .. ..� _-- E DRIVE F 4D JE IBR 4g 43 44 46 48 -_ s 38 rgp JCR aA E zc to 24 1 aCR 39 4B -, 28 2 37 aAR 23 2 JB x E 2R z 271sk 3 to 3B 22 3 TAR ��1A]E 3 . 38 127 H` 28 29 90 a 2cR 21 4 'i�'' A 35 ° 31 IAR Im 20 G 6 B $ 34 xR 18 BR 23 0 •��Gj°Y0 28 19 0 8 2C C 2816 ICR 37 8ISR LEGEND IA 15 9 f� LOTS REOUESTINC SETBACK MODIFICATIONS 14 '13 12 11 1� x 60 LOT NUMBERS PER FINAL TRACT MAPS 33 2A ICR 3" 48R BUILDING TYPE o nnN yin J NEWPORT BEACH, CA pacif cbay HOMES ORNE—� .lU' 0!159/e0 BI BJBR 2CR 70 3 1 �' SPANISN 03'0 3BR 09 71 JA f °S 1A 4B JC 1B 1AR 7 Bi A1� 9 1B 2DR fE 4DR 2BC tBG AER I 2FR � 52 61 848 CR IM ta4CR o 0 � 215 c�S 72 �% 10 11 12 13 � JBC 4Bta '� 8 3 44 a� 55 ton OK � 73tc O 14 IS IB iq 8 I 0 �� �' 4BR BR yy 4BR g5M (."^ 74JB0. 3ER 9 ° F JUPRER DRRrE 9 2 34353837 tcR u x u 4C M z 8 •• E 21 4AR .8 9 D4142 A3 AtF tpR n 751AR 3ggl 7 8 5 �' 88 87 g o 22 JER LONG A , JBC to +ecR to a &rDRIVE � , 1817 78x A � JD 2eta,ER 486 gq 23 � A 93 32 3B3c2g I9 JB 7BR 4M x' try ry �, 77 2B JecR to nee zE �Bta 7BCR 2 2 2 25 24 23 2 .e �15 ti0 B I 2 3 4 E 89 >� 0 2DR 82 'cl 25 to ICfl 3 4 JB U 7C 39 IC �.�i9ti OLD COURSE DRIVE I �Z /qp 38 x 81 �f 26-- 12 5 g7891A M1ry 3 a� � 9 4an m EOOEWOOD DRIVE 0 >> 2 1 2 3 4 5 C it 80 0 27 4A 45 4 3 24140 E .• tt• TRACT 48CR IBC 4DR Sec 928C 8 tE a 1 3oA 15390 1ER 7 3�� 2i^ 4ta IBR ICR 4&R 492CR Is OB �q k xR 5 Jeca 8 a�R� 2A 59 A 28 xR oq 4 � 3BGq +OR 2Bta SBC IBCR sD ,t TB 4C IA 3B 2C 484Aq u 8q � f? �ooR�p g�A 62 38 IS 14 ]3 12 ��' ,� -'�'^ 3DR 58 29 4e 34 ?303 3 39 49 CR 4c 63 N A 7l 1 2c B ONE TREE DR 10 2BCR 9 CLENEAGLES DRIVE SAD ORASS DRIVE B 50zBR 3A 82 0 "9, _ .-�• G 301Ea gq B 33 31 30 29 513w 2C 81 9 ix3R �xa.. 3eR g 19 ABC 2E0 ,sue A 38 87 5318 Ac 57 31 wR 32 5218 Je BD o tD 2e yR io ; 2DR 4oR Jeco xR to y 53 u tan 79 g to Je 2 O G HORN 18 17 18 4BCR to 3BCR 4eC 36,ecR tBCR 38 52 2c JER 58 g 32 2CH 1B 2O u � 54 A8 zBR78 G IVE B 2ecR 2a 28 553A 4aR77 23 22 2 19 28 25 24 23 22 34t� 4[tt39 51 4B 2D 55 33 u 24 25' 20 27 56 4C 14978 30R 2Aq 1 �.'i.0 ]OSR HONORS ORryE 0 339 •�•• Y DRIVE 7B x A mR JOfl 40 30 JER 3CR 54 i 34 C 0K 57 a +ert75 24 ,� JO TuanE2120 79R 583fl Ica74 tme gfi qo 3 �.. 20 29 30 31 92 B YRACT 20 � 30 1 27 AE 2BCR TER 3DR .� 4ec 41 49 tc G 354eR 23 22 2A x R BAY ORN25 0 TRACT x 3 O15FEE CT 2D 42 3 3 3BR teat � tb,L 2 N C 15390 38CR 1 48 TAR 53 021 tC 69 tAR u73 'toy Pota ,E 2 51 5U 43 37 x 18 ♦0 A 80 x x 72 2lH�NOE: 9a ,,3C. 3� 2ecI�3 0.9zw tee 47 JOR tea 15 81 zCR 71 F y, E � SC 38 �oR AT 4 3B2 ua tea 35 x 54 4eca tO+ 4 44 8 tEn w 2c 1 84 to 2ua � 70 to tA0 47 tBc 40 47 48 p NE g 4 e 13 Je R 00 fah 482ta 55 C co oNW 45 4BR ga12 oP .P 00 0? 44 B 64r� 49 3En 58 59 80 81 62 1 S} 6 xR cJ• 57 58 tee +eca 44 u RtA, 0 `O 6 pth• �• 7i ,tey 3`al 2C4R3 0 7D 4D SBC 4BCR 2O2 44243 I8R Rr 3g 18 /// ,IOO� ti. U"2 t 41 40 41 bltfl 47 G15 87 -22c 2 _ 41 39 40 25ta •• F OLD COURSE DRIVE F,.v 4O 3E 8 43 44 45 48 3 44q IB 24 39 38 28 2 ,ta u IE 2c +e 2AR 23 1 T5 2 3B x 2R 37 Ieq , Ao Je 22 38,• 27 1I28 20 30 3 TAR 3 TI •L•. •� tAa 20 0 4 x 35 0 31 IAR 19 G 51B 34 33 32 P�a xR 8 2c 4BR 2 4M r,gry 28 18 m C 2BR 7 16 ua17 2 8tBR LEGEND IA 15 93C = LOTS REQUESTING SETBACK MODIFICATIONS 14 13 12 11 1•L0 60 LOT NUMBERS PER FINAL TRACT MAYS 30 2A ICR 3A ABR BUILDING TYPE a 141 n7N PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3200 MODIFICATIONPERMIT January 15,1998 Pacific Bay Homes 4041 MacArthur Blvd., #500 Newport Beach, CA 92660 ApplicationNo: ModificationPermitNo.4625 Applicant: Pacific Bay Homes Address of Property Involved: 8 Thunderbird Drive Legal Description: L , ractNo.15390 To Pacific Bay Homes: ModificationRequested: A Modification of the Zoning Ordi ce to permit a new garage in conjunction with a new single family residence�o be set bac eet, from the front property line where the Code requires garages be et back fro feet to 7 feet from property line, or 18 feet with a roll -up garage door or 20 feet with a standard gaoWdoor The Modifications Committee on, November 12, 1997, voted 3 ayes to approve the application subject to the following condition: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, and elevations, except as noted in the following condition. 2. That parking of vehicles over public right-of-way in front of the garage shall be prohibited. The Modifications Committee determined in this case that the proposal would not be detrimental to persons, property or improvements in the neighborhood and that the modification as approved would be consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, and made the following findings: 1. That the proposed encroachments are a logical use of the property that would be precluded by strict application of the zoning requirements for this District because: � �1 1-0 A Modification of the Zoning Ordinance to permit a new garagk conjunction with a new single family residence to be setback 10 feet,-9-inclT's where the Code requires garages be set back from 3 feet to 7 feet from property line, or 18 feet with a roll -up garage door or 20 feet with a standard garage door..Also requested is a 2 foot, 9 inch encroachment into the required 10 feet front yard setback with portions of the second floor of the new dwelling. ( LI J NEWPORT BEACH, CA palgl ay HOMES 7G.., IIL 1 n 52 515 t948 Rua ea+cR �a 6410x M 00 7228 LI OR 11 12 13 x ,ec +ER 7Bc +�R 7 6 544 a 05 �gn 0'1 `� 73tc 14 IS 18 17 8 12ER ''a +BR BP , C'" JDR O JU, 9 F JUPITER 1 8 2D �Q• � 37 t ER 0 74 DRNE 34 8 B 04142 A i nca 38at8 7 8 5 88 87 6 E o 21 22a 3� LONG &1' A �0R 617 390 10 +BCR ff rc - DRIVE ~ ti 1 78 x A W JD 2BCR 3ER 85 g4 23 0 93 32 3 3 2132 E ZR 83 24 23 .S �6 77 2e JBCR 2 +BC 2E ? +BCR �� 2BDp 2�63 ' 11 c} 242AR 3 4 E 88 70 D 82 '0ti 25 ,B ICR ICR 3tR+BR J I ��g�l. � OLD COURSE DRIVE 71 �� A9P i7Bx 81 �e^ 28z� EDCEW000 DRIVE E 9 10 R ��'� ti • ?I N �N15 ; RA 0 +BDR tBC +DR JBC 2BC ,ER C R ,�}�•�P tE 80 � 27 u +cR iB,R 41 40 45 9B 2IC4 + � 47 2(R t R 88 ARp k' 4 5 1A � JBCR +DR 2BCIt 3BC 9 7BCR 2A 59 H 26 xR 31 1B +C fA JB 2C. '481AR 84 12 f°pO°R.yF.A 87 52 18 15 14 13 2 j&' AD oar JBR 58 29 4B 34 5983 3 39 491CR +C 83 w 4 .?3• f 2O g OAK TREE D 10 2BCR9 - . SAWGRASS DRIVE H 5028R 3A 82 13 -• IRR� 9, 3 RNE �•• CLFNFAGLES DRIVE G 30 1FF 0 51JAR 2c 81 +c 57 33 32 - tx +Bc 2E 36Cq S 3q 31 JDR 31 30 29 3 y, SB 2CR ' S27B JB 80 0 1D 1B yR •2D_; tB 10R g+� Jec o xR tB 53 2A to 79 6 18 iS 14 1 1 622c xR 58 IB tD JecR +�, 3638cetBCR38 g 322cR 1B 2C 1A � 54 AB 2BR73 G BIC HORN IVE H I28 20 x 55x 4AR77 23 2E 8 19 28 25 24 23 22 34tx +ER 99 `� 5] +a 2D 55 33 to L4 25'20 27 3DR W, 2s 2 I JDSR /• NONORS DRIVE .J,-yDaNE � 58+c 3ut78 AR RO i A 33 C eP't 57 a +aR75 - JBCR 3pR 40 50 JFR xR 54 '� 3430 �utOLf 26 19 583g tcR74 24SR Yh6 '�° 3t 30 27 26 29 , 31 32 H 49 +c TRACT 23 g2 21 x 2BR .. 2 yg. AE 2BC0. JDR ��' +BC 41 G 35+eR JBR 1CR OYSTER BAY DRNE 253w 2e,1 2a C 135038 90 3BCR 2D 42 i48 2AR 382A c 59,Aa +A73 1e Z t D .r 51 10R 43 37 15 2c Sg �e A 80 >a 72 28puN�E�03k 20 3�• 1 y2 50 492Di tBc • 47 JDR tton81 2ut71 .FD3 98 4 E JE M J6 q 382 ,BR 70 �0 x 54 JBCR +BCR 1ER g5 4q q6 IER +c 2ca1 2CR ``� 47 tec 40 47 48 F �0 13 83B to aF. �' 0`3 'ay A0 482� 55 C COLON— ORNE 45 4SR xR�2 c'P .& 00 0 `P?�R 44 H hM�c •�,49AR JER 58 58 59 00 a loc BBCR 44 2A �, S6 oor�OSncR u� P 3 2 �,S• 3 � � 2cR3 42 oF• g0 +D JBc7 +BCR 20t Jua O h ` 8g IR Jos tB TRACT 43 teR ,y,3g1 t 41 40 41 51 47 0 15387 42x 40 F 41 �1AR 39 25 -�.. OLD couR SE OR '1 JE NIR 42 43 44 45 48 F 40 3 38 +� 3CR 2A IE 2C to 24 12CR- 39 +B 97 t 2AR-23 2 38 3E K 2R fo� 27 BR 3 E0 38 22 3 tAR 36 9�; 27 28 29 30 +A 2CR 21 9 4 A J .L.. •�' o x H 35 ° 31 UR ,� 20G 5 tB 34 33 32 xR 39 '& +BR 2 AIR �Qyy,D2 2e 18 m 8 2c C 2DR 7 y 18 tcR 17 B g iBR LEGEND to 16 9 x Q LOTS REQUESTING SE16ACK MODIFICATIONS 14 13 12 11 10 60 LOT NUMBERS PER FINAL TRACT MAPS JB 7A 1CR y' +BR BUILDING TYPE H FORD ROAD -_-�--tea I•' 'Al i 2A 28 M J NEWPORT BEACH, CA pajq ay HOMES 55L51571b8'291to 11A30q acR 1 SPANISN 8"� AC e 3C IB 1Aq 1� 2CR 7E {DR i15 48 Rua {CR c 04 ar 00 7228 10 I1 12 13 JD tec RER JBC 4BCR 8 44 05 1eR Oh z 73 tc 14 18 18 19 19 2ER R 3{A{BR 0811` C 74xR O SFa 9 ° F JUPITER OR. 19 20 38371Ea�,18 04142 A tAR 751AR a�a8 8 6 88 87 8 E ° 21 22 LON JER BAY DRIVE A ti A, 1517 78 x A JBC t0 /BCR 3D 2BC,p 3ER 85 B4 23 3B9 28 to z.le 2 {AR x 22 2 4, 77 2B JBCR ID R � 22 2524232 .g8 B 1 2 3 4 E 89 yER;B 2DR 82y 251e 3 ¢R $ 7C 3B 1C AA .{dry%�1 OLD COURSE DRIVE 0 l �.2 ,AqP °'ggB1J, 282BR DEvrooD pR 7 8 9 !0 l�titi 2 1 2 3 4 5 �� D. NI,27 TRACT {BCR teC +oR Jec 2x 8 C •} ,� tE 80 $ 3 241402 �,�, 5S 15390 9 tER 7 Q` R !O4 {BR 4B2CR la BB /q0 4 R JBCR ?@� 2A 59 H 2B xR 4738 3C8 My 1A 52 JBCR {DR 2BCR SBC t 8 u JB x 48µR u 84 o fg , °pooq A 0 d8. 15 14 13 2 sec Ao }^ 3aR 58 29 {B 9 3 39 491cR +c g3 • w '� aj' 7 2D B - OAK TREE DR 11 IQ 20CR 9 — - 55 ORNE H $O2Ba }{ 82 13 - IBPg -jCR.. By4 19 20 NE A -- GLENEAGLES DRIVE G 30 1ER 613+R 2c 81 JCR F 17 19 21 �•' 631a {G 57 S 30 29 0 80 �37 31 ypR u JB 2cR � 52tB Je� 14 15 � .17 tQ 2oa tx +ac 2E 3aCR 38{oR 0 53 2A IAR 79 16 ' 18 36 t 38 g 62 2C JER 58 32 2w IB 2C 1A 54 Ae 2BR78 G BIC HORN NE H 2BCR {BGP` 10 38Ca !BC JtM,R BCR 27 28 x 6$ y, {AR77 23 22 2 19 28 25 24 23 22 3418C IER 3g 5! AB aD 55 33 to 2 ERNE 58 ¢ JAR 78 JDP !µ 79 230' 3DSR •A HONORS ORNE33 ca R^'t 57 a {eR75 2q 3R 29 30 INK 3DR 40 50 3ER 3V D 64 �x'7 34 30 2120 z 587R tcA774 I�+ -0 3p 21 27 20 xecR !Ea 3DR 3& {ec 41 49 {c 7RAC1•GU36{eR y' OYSTER BAY DRNE 259 TRACT JD CT Sd38 +c 59 tAR a 79 a `2� a v N C 15390 51 1 m 43 37 48 2Aa 38 21 tdt �1 10 p 80 Je 72 20�JHOc,?a�� "33r 3 2 y2 $0 492ER tec q7 JDa 38 tea 81 zca71 F 0 p E3 {� JE 4 38z�a� tea 70 3Ao 54 JeCR{eca 148 45 44 481ER w 3 47 F L g� Ie &,, 09 1 p0 4Z 402BR 1BC 56 G 4B OOLONIAL DRNE q5 4BR 44 D hM, 1AR JCR 80 81 02 >> 6y P 1 ? 3A4 43 4oFo 49 {0 8 57 50 6 JDR tec {eca 44 2A �i E, 2D {eCR , .� 0 sncK °�`e5•� 3 2 �� 3g 74p 2CR '2� 50 Jx 431aR tiet ,1 d 't t 41 3g 40 41 51tB 47� TRACT8422C ��' 2 '"`• 41 .RY'6 ,AgA 39 40 25 �• F .. .�. OLD COURSE DRY 3E JAR 42 43 44 45 48 _ - F 40 3 38 26 2 10 JCR 2A IE 2c IB 24 12Ca• 39 40 37 2vt 23 2 JB JE E 2R !Ba 3 10 38 22 E 3 30 1 �28 29 30 `A 2cR 21 i 4 3C A H 35 ° 31 JAR IAR 20 G 61B 34 33 32 3CR 19 {BR 2 MR Vi�y�a 2B 10 8 xc C, zeR a TIN 18 ta+17 0 B ISR LEGEND IA 15 9 LOTS REQUESTING SETBACK MODIFICATIONS 14 19 12 11 1) 60 LOT NUMBERS PER FINAL TRACT MAPS 3A {BR BUILOMG TYPE u 7nN el Lot No. 71 1 4 9 11 13 17 20 23 30 33 36 39 43 47 9 13 One Ford Road Building Setback Modification Requests May 20, 1997 Tract Garage Buildine Appurtenance 15332 X X 15389 X 15390 X X 15390 X 15390 X X 15390 X X 15390 X 15390 X 15390 X 15390 X Lot No. Tract 71 15332 94 15389 1 4 9 11 13 17 20 23 30 33 36 39 43 47 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 One Ford Road Building Setback Modification Requests May 20,1997 Garage X X X X 9 15391 X 13 15391 X Building Appurtenance X R. X P m X One Ford Road ' Building Setback Modification Requests May 20, 1997 Lot No. Tract 71 15332 94 15389 1 15390 4 15390 9 15390 11 15390 13 15390 17 15390 20 15390 23 15390 30 15390 33 15390 36 15390 39 15390 43 15390 47 15390 9 15391 13 15391 Garage X X X X Building Aurourtenance X v X X X X X VA NEWPORT BEACH, CA pa ay HomE5 X L 31 TMU 153M 02 F 10 /23 34 tM E W if 10 tl 3 Jegg ze: 4Sx B+ rt x M 37Y F 2T 3 M / Ja.�3r, I20 20 Ja JI W 134 JS J2 0� LEGEND Q ton BLmw . WC -Syr w BB lBl 1.W0(R Ro (K 10.C1 WPS �M mv4 WE a PUBLIC NOTICE Modification No. 4625 Notice is hereby given thatPacifiic Bay Homes (Marc Lamkin, contact), property owner, has requested a Modification of the Zoning Ordinance to permita new garage in conjunction with a new single family residence to be set back 9 feet, 5 inches from the front property line where the Code requires garages be set back from 3 feet to 7 feet from property line, or 18 feet with a roll -up garage door or 20 feet with a standard garage door. The request for the modification is due to the garage being located on a curved section of the streeton property located in thePC District Property located at: 8 Thunderbird Drive A public hearing will be held by the Modifications Committee a13:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 12, 1997, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard. All interested persons will be heard and all correspondence read at that time. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City, at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information contact the Newport Beach Planning Department, Current Plans and Projects Division, (714) 644-3200. NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. PUBLIC NOTICE Modification No. 4651 Notice is hereby given that Pacific Bay Homes, property owner, has requested a Modification of the Zoning Ordinanceto permit a new garage to be set back 9 feet 6 inches from the front property line where the Code requires garages be set back from 3 feet to 7 feet from property line, or 18 feet with a roll -up garage door or 20 feet with a standard garage door, in conjunction with construction of a new single family dwelling,on property located in thePC District Property located at: 8 Thunderbird Drive A. public hearing will be held by the Modifications Committee a13:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 27, 1998, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard. All interested persons will be heard and all correspondence read at that time. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City, at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information contact the Newport Beach Planning Department, Current Plans and Projects Division, (714) 644-3200. NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. PUBLIC NOTICE Modification No. 4624 Notice is hereby given thatPacific Bay Homes (Marc Lamkin, contact), property owner, has requested a Modification of the Zoning Ordinance to permita new garage in conjunction with a new single family residence to be setback 9 feet, 5 inches from the front property line where the Code requires garages be set back from 3 feet to 7 feet from property line, or 18 feet with a roll -up garage door or 20 feet with a standard garage door. The request for the modification is due to the garage being located on a curved section of the streeton property located in thePC District. Property located at: 9 Sawgrass Drive A public hearing will be held by the Modifications Committee 0:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 129 1997, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard. All interested persons will be heard and all correspondence read at that time. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City, at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information contact the Newport Beach Planning Department, Current Plans and Projects Division, (714) 644-3200. NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. AERONUTRONIC FORD/BELCOURT PLANNED COMMUNITY Planning Department Advance Division 5-30- 1995 PUBLIC NOTICE Modification No. 4657 Notice is hereby given that Pacific Bay Homes, property owner, has requested a Modification of the Zoning Ordinance to permit to permit the construction of a wall that to exceed the permitted 8 foot height limit by 1 foot 6 inches for an overall height of 9 feet 8 inches. The wall is located on the property line between two properties that have a change in grade elevations, on property located in the PC District, Property located at: 1 Vintage Drive A public hearing will be held by the Modifications Committee at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 10, 1998, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard. All interested persons will be heard and all correspondence read at that time. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City, at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information contact the Newport Beach Planning Department, Current Plans and Projects Division, (714) 644-3200. NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. PUBLIC NOTICE Modification No. 4650 Notice is hereby given that Pacific Bay Homes, property owner, has requested a Modification of the Zoning Ordinance to permit a new garage to be set back 9 feet 3 inches from the front property line where the Code requires garages be set back from 3 feet to 7 feet from property line, or 18 feet with a roll -up garage door or 20 feet with a standard garage door, in conjunction with construction of a new single family dwelling,on property located in thePC District Property located at: 3 Thunderbird Drive A public hearing will be held by the Modifications Committee a13:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 27, 1998, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard. All interested' persons will be heard and all correspondence read at that time. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City, at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information contact the Newport Beach Planning Department, Current Plans and Projects Division, (714) 644-3200. NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUMS INC. PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP OF COMPANIES 4401 ATLANTIC AVENUE SUITE 200 LONG BEACH, CA 90807 30 January 1998 ESCI98-ADM/CNB-01 City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA. 92658-8915 PHONE: 562-984-2079 FAX: 562-98MI29 Attention: Ms. Genia Garcia Associate Planner SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) Dear Ms. Garcia: In accordance with your request, this letter has been prepared to provide you with an update of the status of the environmental aspects of the project associated with the redesignation and redevelopment of the former Ford Aeronutronic/Loral property (Site) from use as an industrial to'a residential site. BACKGROUND As you are aware, the Site was historically used for aerospace and defense -related activities that included the use of a variety of hazardous substances. The use of these chemicals resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the Site. Ford Motor Land Corporation (FMLC) retained an environmental consulting firm, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. (now Arcadis Geraghty & Miller [G&M]) to investigate the extent of the soil and groundwater contamination, conduct health risk assessments to evaluate whether such contamination posed public health issues, and develop and implement a soil and groundwater remediation plan. These activities have been conducted under the authority and requirements of state and local environmental regulatory agencies, primarily the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). The City of Newport Beach retained Environmental Services Consortium, Inc. (ESCI - formerly Environmental Management Services [EMS]) to act as a monitor for the project on behalf of the City. As the City monitor, ESCI initially reviewed the research related to Site usage and the resulting identification of "Areas of Potential Environmental Concern" (APECs) and the associated soil and a groundwater investigation activities that had been conducted by G&M, participated in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, and attended meetings with the involved regulatory agencies and with Ford, G&M and the City of Newport Beach. ESCI also reviewed and evaluated all associated project reports and agency communication, and provided recommendations on behalf of the City, where appropriate. This included the technical evaluation of the health risk assessments(HRAs) prepared by G&M for the Bayridge and Belcourt areas, current residential areas that had formerly been part of the Site, mid the post-remediation I -IRAs prepared for the main or northern area, and the ATC or southern area of the Site. In addition, ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities that were performed as part of the pre -demolition phase of the project. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS Demolition and Coitstrtiction-related Activities As you are aware, facility decommissioning activities, including pre -demolition building decontamination of regulated materials, have been completed. This activity comprised the removal of building components that constituted hazardous waste, or that were environmentally regulated in some manner, and the decontamination of building surfaces. This activity was conducted in accordance with procedures specified in a Project Demolition Manual submitted to the City by FMLC and reviewed by ESCI, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 1-7,10,17,18, and 23. ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities, and co -signed the Pre -Demolition Building Certifications issued for each of the buildings at the Site. Those aspects of the above -referenced mitigation measures that apply to construction in general at the project Site are continuing to be implemented. Soil and Groundwater Rentediation Actipities Soil remediation activities at tite Site were conducted under the oversight of the RWQCB and OCHCA, and in accordance with health -based cleanup levels (HBCLs) (levels evaluated to be protective of human health) that were developed by Ford and G&M, reviewed by ESCI on behalf of the City of Newport Beach, and approved by the OCHCA. Mitigation Measures 9,1Om17,19,21,22 and 23 were implemented during soil remediation activities for soil that had been identified as contaminated prior to the demolition and grading, and also for any additional contaminated soil idcutifled during demolition and/or grading. Based on documentation reviewed and meetings attended by ESCI, soil remediation has been completed to the satisfaction of the RWQCB and the OCHCA. Onsite groundwater remediation was conducted during 1995 and 1996 under the authority of the RWQCB in accordance with a Groundwater Remedial Action Plan (RAP) approved by the RWQCB, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 8,11,20,21,22, and 23. The RAP addresses groundwater impacts in the main area or the northern portion of the Site, and in the southern area of the Site, formerly known as the "ATC" area. ESC198-ADM/CNB-01 2 ESCI UPDATE '98 - CNB Groundwater remediation activities were completed in 1996. In a letter dated 4 November 1996 the RWQCB approved the closure of the groundwater remediation system, which has subsequently been dismantled and removed from the Site. Ongoing monitoring of the groundwater is currently being required by the RWQCB. Post -development groundwater remediation at the Site has not been required by the RWQCB. Offsite groundwater contamination found to be present to the north of the Site is being addressed as a separate issue by FMLC and the RWQCB, and is not expected to result in the placement of any equipment onsite. Health -Risk Assessments Human health risk assessments for the Belcourt and Bayridge areas were prepared by G&M, evaluated by ESCI, and reissued by G&M on behalf of FMLC. Soil and groundwater contamination in these areas were found to pose no risk to human health. The risk assessment reports were submitted to the OCHCA, who concurred with the conclusions of these studies. Site -specific data collected during the soil and groundwater remediation were used by G&M to prepare post-remediation/pre-development health risk assessmentsfor the northern and southern areas of the Site, as required by Mitigation Measure 21. These assessments concluded no risk to human health was present in the areas studied at the Site. The health risk assessments were independently evaluated by OCHCA and ESCI, who concurred with the conclusion of these studies. Should you have further questions regarding the status of this project or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours truly, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. i Lyn ethrington, REA, Principal Environmental Scientist cc: File John Douglas, Principal Planer, City of Newport Beach Eric Pearson, P.E., Environmental Control Manager, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Thomas E. Culek, Environmental Control Engineer, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Gary Boettcher, Project Manager, Areadis Geraghty & Miller ESC198ADIWCNB-01 ESCI UPDATE '98 - CNB PUBLIC NOTICE Modification No. 4626 Notice is hereby given thatPacific Bay Homes (Marc Lamkin, contact), property owner, has requested a Modification of the Zoning Ordinance to permita new garage in conjunction with a new single family residence to be setback 10 feet, 9 inches where the Code requires garages be set back from 3 feet to 7 feet from property line, or 18 feet with a roll -up garage door or 20 feet with a standard garage door. Also requested is a 2 foot, 9 inch encroachment into the required 10 feet front yard setback with portions of the second floor of the new dwelling. The request for the modification is due to the garage being located on a curved section of the streetgn property located in thePC District. Property located at: 6 Bighorn Drive A public hearing will be held by the Modifications Committee a13:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 12, 1997, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard. All interested persons will be heard and all correspondence read at that time. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City, at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further information contact the Newport Beach Planning Department, Current Plans and Projects Division, (714) 644-3200. NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. One Ford Road Building Setback Modification Requests May 20, 1997 Lot No. Tract Garage Building Appurtenance R15332 X E 15390Ci X X 4 E� 15390 3 De- X 9 �16 15390 ,C d2 X X 11 qE 15390 X X 13 - 15390 d4?, X 17 15390 X 20� 15390 X 23 15390 3 �� X 30 15390 29 X X 33 15390 X 36 15390 3 X X 39 15390 a X X r- 43 r. 15390 �r X X 47 15390 ?C X X m 13 15391 / /fK, X 15391 o X 05j I ccV I-&4k 1 I t 2-1 I r r• i , , - - - ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15387 Lots 1 - 45 CEL(tiAT� T S SVeq Le LOT ADDRESS I CHANGE E 2 Southern Hills Guard House #1 1 2 Turnberry Drive 2 4 Turnberry Drive 3 6 Turnberry Drive 4 8 Turnberry Drive DriveTurnbeny Drive Turnberry Drive Turnberry.Drive UTumberry Tumberry Drive Tumberry Drive Turnberry Drive Tumberry Drive 13 21 Turnberry Drive TY 14 19 Turnberry Drive Y 15 17 Turnberry Drive Y 16 15 Tumberry Drive Y 17 11 Turnberry Drive Y 18 9 Tumberry Drive Y 19 7 Tumbery Drive Y 20 5 Turnberry Drive Y 21 3 Turnberry Drive Y 22 1 Turnberry Drive Y 23 2 Troon Drive Y 24 4 Troon Drive Y 25 10 Troon Drive Y 26 18 Troon Drive Y 27 20 Troon Drive Y 28 22 Troon Drive Y 29 24 Troon Drive Y 30 23 Troon Drive Y 31 21 Troon Drive Y 19 Troon Drive Y 15 Troon Drive Y 11 11 Troon Drive Y M36 9 Troon Drive Y 7 Troon Drive Y 5 Troon Drive Y 3 Troon Drive Y 39 1 Troon Drive Y 40 111 Old Course Drive Y 41 115 Old Course Drive Y 42 117 Old Course Drive Y 43 119 Old Course Drive Y 44 121 Old Course Drive Y Mapinfo.xls 1/9/98 1:08 PM ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15387 Lots 1 - 45 LOT ADDRESS I I ICHANGEI 45 5 1 Old Course Drive Pool Rec. Area #1 I Y A total of 2 lots were deleted from this tract. Mapinfo.xis 1/9/98 1:08 PM ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15388 Lots 1 - 77 LOTMADDRESSS CHANGE A 'Club Drive Guard House #2 1 rse Drive2 rse Drive3 urse Drive4 urse Drive5 Hills Drive 6 19 Jupiter Hills Drive 7 21 Jupiter Hills Drive 8 23 Jupiter Hills Drive 9 25 Jupiter Hills Drive 10 24 Jupiter will. Drive 11 22 Jupiter Hills Drive 12 20 Jupiter Hills Drive 13 18 Jupller Hills Drive 14 16 Jupiter Hills Drive 15 14 Jupiter Will. Drive 16 12 Jupiter Hills Mn". 17 10 It pifer Hills Drive 18 8 Jupiter Hills Drive 19 6 Jupiter Hills Dive 20 4 Jupiter Hills Drive 21 2 Jupiter Will. Drive 22 34 Gleneagles Drive 23 32 Gleneagles Drive 24 30 Gleneagles Drive 25 28 Gleneagles Drive 26 26 Gleneagles Drive 27 24 Gleneagles Dnve 28 22 Gleneagles Drive 29 20 Gleneagles Drive 30 18 Gleneagles Drive 31 16 Gleneagles Drive 32 14 Gleneagles Drive 33 12 Gleneagles Drive 34 10 Gleneagles Drive 35 8 Gleneagles Drive 36 6 Gleneagles Drive 37 4 Gleneagles Drive 38 2 Gleneagles Drive 39 2 OId Course Drive 40 4 Old Course Drive 41 6 Old Course Drive 42 8 Old Course Drive 43 10 Old Course Drive 44 12 Old Course Drive 45 14 Old Course Drive 46 16 Old Course Drive 47 18 Old Course Drive 48 20 Old Course Drive 49 22 Old Course Drive 50 24 Old Course Drive 51 26 Old Course Drive 52 28 Old Course Drive Mapinfo.xls 119198 1:07 PM ONE FORD ROAD -TRACT 15388 Lots 1 - 77 LOT ADDRESS CHANGE 53 30 Old Course Drive 54 9 Gleneagles Drive 55 11 Gleneagles Drive 55 15 Gleneagles Drive 57 17 Gleneagles Drve 58 19 Gleneagles Drive 59 21 Gleneagles Drive 60 23 Gleneagles Drive 61 25 Gleneagles Drive 62 27 Gleneagles Drive 63 29 Gleneagles Drive 64 3 Jupiter Hi k Mive 65 5 Jupiter Hdls Drive 66 9 Jupiter Hills Drive 67 11 Jupiter Hills Drive 68 15 Jupiter Hills Drive 69 48 Old Course Drive 70 46 Old Course Drive 71 44 Old Course Drive 72 42 Old Course Drive . 73 40 Old Course Drive 74 38 Old Course Drive 75 36 Old Course Drive 76 34 Old Course Drive 77 32 1 Old Course Drive Mapinfo.xls 119198 1:07 PM •Ir • ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15389 Lots 1 - 59 LOT ADDRESS CHANGE 1 53 Old Course Drive Y 2 51 Old Course Drive Y 3 49 Old Course Drive Y 4 47 Old Course Drive Y 5 45 Old Course Drive Y 6 39 Old Course Drive Y 7 35 Old Course Drive Y 8 31 Old Course Drive Y 9 2 Oak Tree Drive Y 10 4 Oak Tree Drive Y 11 6 Oak Tree Drive Y 12 8 Oak Tree Drive Y 13 10 Oak Tree Drive Y 14 12 Oak Tree Drive 15 11 Oak Tree Drive Y 16 9 Oak Tree Drive Y 17 7 Oak Tree Drive Y 18 5 Oak Tree Drive Y 19 3 Oak Tree Drive Y 20 12 Honors Drive Y 21 14 Honors Drive Y 22 16 Honors Drive Y 23 20 Honors Drive Y 24 21 Honors Drive Y 25 19 Honors Drive Y 26 17 Honors Drive Y 27 15 Honors Drive Y 28 11 Honors Drive Y 29 9 Honors Drive Y 30 7 Honors Drive Y 31 5 Honors Drive Y 32 3 Honors Drive Y • 33 1 Honors Drive Y 34 29 Old Course Drive Y 35 27 Old Course Drive Y 36 25 Old Course Drive Y 37 23 Old Course Drive Y 38 21 Old Course Drive Y 39 19 Old Course Drive Y 40 17 Old Course Drive Y 41 2 Colonial Drive Y 42 4 Colonial Drive Y 43 6 Colonial Drive Y 44 8 Colonial Drive Y 45 10 Colonial Drive Y 1/9/98 1:10 PM Mapinfo.xls ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15389 Lots 1. - 59 LOT ADDRESS ICHANGE1 46 20 Colonial Drive Y 47 22 Colonial Drive Y 48 24 Colonial Drive Y 49 23 Colonial Drive Y 50 21 Colonial Drive Y 51 19 Colonial Drive Y 52 17 Colonial Drive Y 53 15 Colonial Drive Y 54 11 Colonial Drive Y 55 9 Colonial Drive Y 56 7 Colonial Drive Y 57 5 Colonial Drive Y 58 3 Colonial Drive Y 59 1 Colonial Drive Y A total of 3 lots were deleted 'from this tract. Mapinfo.xls 1/9/98 1:10 PM ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15390 Lots 1 - 52 LOT ADDRESS CHANGE 1 68 Old Course Drive 2 64 Old Course Drive 3 60 Old Course Drive 4 2 Ironwood Drive 5 4 Ironwood Drive 6 6 Ironwood Drive 7 8 Ironwood Drive 8 9 Ironwood Drive 9 7 Ironwood Drive 10 5 Ironwood Drive 11 3 Ironwood Drive 12 1 Ironwood Drive 13 80 Old Course Drive 14 84 Old Course Drive 15 2 Big Horn Drive 16 4 Big Horn Drive 17 6 Big Horn Onve 18 8 Big Horn Drive 19 9 Big Hom Drive 20 7 Big Horn Drive 21 5 Big Horn Drive 22 3 Big Ham Drive M fa- 23 90 Old Course Drive I 24 94 Old Course Drive 25 96 Old Course Drive 26 98 Old Course Drive 27 2 Thunderbird Drive 28 4 Thunder Bird Drive 29 6 Thunder Bird Drive 30 8 Thunder Bird Drive 31 10 Thunder Bird Drive 32 9 Thunder Bird Drive 33 7 Thunder Bird Drive 34 5 Thunder Bird Drive 35 3 Thunder Bird Drive 36 1 Thunder Bird Drive 37 106 Old Course Drive 38 108 Old Course Drive 39 110 Old Course Drive 40 112 Old Course Drive 41 1 Vintage Drive 42 3 Vintage Drive 43 5 Vintage Drive 44 7 Vintage Drive 45 9 Vintage Drive 46 11 Vintage Drive 47 10 Vintage Drive 48 a Vintage Drive 49 6 Vintage Drive 50 4 Vintage Drive 51 2 Vintage Drive 52 1 49 Old Course Drive Rec. Area #2 1/9198 1:11 PM Mapinfo.xls .X4 ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15391 Lots 1 - 84 LOT ADDRESS CHANGE 1 1 Crooked Stick Drive 2 3 Crooked Stick Drive 3 5 Crooked Stick Drive 4 7 Crooked Stick Drive 5 9 Crooked Stick Drive 6 11 Crooked Stick Drive 7 15 Crooked Stick Drive 8 17 Crooked Stick Drive 9 19 Crooked Stick Drive 10 21 Crooked Stick Drive 11 23 Crooked Stick Drive 12 25 Crooked Stick Drive 13 27 Crooked Stick Drive 14 29 Crooked Stick Drive 15 31 Crooked Stick Drive 16 33 Crooked Stick Drive 17 3 Turtle Bay Drive Y 18 5 Turtle Bay Drive Y 19 7 Turtle Bay Drive Y 20 9 Turtle Bay Drive Y 21 11 Turtle Bay Drive Y 22 10 Turtle Bay Drive Y 23 8 Turtle Bay Drive Y 24 6 Turtle Bay Drive Y 25 4 Turtle Bay Drive Y 26 2 Turtle Bay Drive Y 27 3 Sawgrass Drive Y 28 5 Sawgrass Drive Y 29 30 7 9 Sawgrass Drive Sawgrass Drive Y Y �4b2 31 11 Sawgrass Drive Y 32 12 Sawgrass Drive Y 33 10 Sawgrass Drive Y 34 8 Sawgrass Drive Y 35 6 Sawgrass Drive Y 36 4 iSawgrass Drive Y 37 2 Sawgrass Drive Y 11 38 11 Edgewood Drive Y 39 15 Edgewood Drive Y 40 17 Edgewood Drive Y 41 19 Edgewood Drive Y 42 21 Edgewood Drive Y 43 23 Edgewood Drive Y 44 72 1 Crooked Stick Drive '4 it- Y 45 1 70 lCrooked Stick Drive R7L Y I(• lA 1 46 1 68 lCrooked Stick Drive /M I Y 22'i [ • I L 58 Mapinfo.xls 119198 1:08 PM ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15391 Lots 1 - 84 LOT ADDRESS CHANGE 1 DOh-e- 47 66 Crooked Stick Drive 1.G 2 Y y2• l / /�' 3' 48 49 64 62 Crooked Stick Drive Crooked Stick Drive z 6R 'SAILY Y 50 60 CrookedStick Drive 6 Y 2�"`(� f•l�i 51 58 Crooked Stick Drive n0 Y "' ✓r 52 56 Crooked Stick Drive 1 46 Y l /•iY 53 54 54 52 Crooked Stick Drive Crooked Stick Drive 3R- l—' Y Y Z' v 2.13- ! 6- Y, J It • fY 55 50 Crooked Stick Drive I A- Y zv 5 & 1' ! 4 •S$. 56 48 Crooked Stick Drive 3.6 Y �r �� 57 46 Crooked Stick Drive Y 58 44 Crooked Stick Drive Y 59 42 Crooked Stick Drive Y 60 40 1 Crooked Stick Drive Y 61 38 Crooked Stick Drive Y 62 36 Crooked Stick Drive Y 63 8 Crooked Stick Drive Y 64 6 Crooked Stick Drive Y 65 4 Crooked Stick Drive Y 66 2 Crooked Stick Drive Y 67 105 Old Course Drive Y 68 103 Old Course Drive Y 69 101 Old Course Drive Y 70 99 Old Course Drive Y 71 97 Old Course Drive Y 72 95 Old Course Drive /� Y 2a 5 �iY: 73 93 Old Course Drive r? r� Y 74 91 Old Course Drive /L Y 75 89 Old Course Drive /fi'YL Y 76 87 Old Course Drive 26►Z Y 77 85 Old Course Drive oyzl Y " 78 83 Old Course Drive 3 Y 79 81 OId Course Drive Lri Y ti k 80 81 82 79 77 75 Old Course Drive Old Course Drive Old Course Drive ` Y Y¢'jr Y r t n t 83 73 Old Course Drive 3 Y 'L* `l� 1 • f¢.y� 84 71 Old Course Drive 113 Y A total of 2 lots were deleted from this tract. Mapinfo.xls 1/9/98 1:08 PM ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15332 Lots 1 - 77 LOT ADDRESS ICHANGEI 1 20 jEdgewood Drive 2 18 Edgewood Drive 3 16 Edgewood Drive 4 14 Edgewood Drive 5 12 Edgewood Drive 6 10 Edgewood Drive 7 8 Edgewood Drive 8 6 Edgewood Drive 9 4 Edgewood Drive 10 2 Edgewood Drive 11 69 Old Course Drive 12 67 Old Course Drive 13 65 Old Course Drive 14 63 Old Course Drive 15 61 Old -Course Drive 16 59 Old Course Drive 17 3 Long Bay Drive 18 5 Long Bay Drive 19 7 Long Bay Drive 20 9 Long Bay Drive 21 11 Long Bay Drive 22 15 Long Bay Drive 23 17 Long Bay Drive 24 19 Long Bay Drive 25 21 Long Bay Drive 26 23 Long Bay Drive 27 25 Long Bay Drive 28 27 Long Bay Drive 29 29 Long Bay Drive 30 31 Long Bay Drive 31 33 Long Bay Drive 32 35 Long Bay Drive 33 37 Long Bay Drive 34 36 Long Bay Drive 35 34 Long Bay Drive 36 32 Long Bay Drive 37 30 Long Bay Drive 38 28 Long Bay Drive 39 26 Long Bay Drive 40 24 Long Bay Drive 41 22 Long Bay Drive 42 20 Long Bay Drive 43 18 Long Bay Drive Mapinfo.xls ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 16332 Lots 1 - 77 LOT ADDRESS ICHANOEI 44 9 Spanish Bay -Drive 45 11 Spanish Bay Drive 46 15 Spanish Bay Drive 47 17 Spanish Bay Drive 48 19 Spanish Bay Drive 49 21 Spanish Bay Drive 50 23 Spanish Bay Drive 51 25 Spanish Bay Drive 52 27 1Spanish Bay Drive 53 28 Spanish Bay Drive 54 26 Spanish Bay Drive 55 24 Spanish Bay Drive 56 22 Spanish Bay Drive 57 20 Spanish Bay Drive 58 18 Spanish Bay new 59 16 Spanish Bay Drive 60 14 Spanish Bay Drive 61 12 Spanish Bay Drive 62 10 Spanish Bay Drive 63 8 Spanish Bay Drive 64 6 Spanish Bay Drive 65 4 Spanish Bay Drive 66 1 2 Spanish Bay Drive 67 1 9 ISingletree Drive 68 11 Singletree Drive 69 15 Singletree Drive 70 17 Singletree Drive 71 14 Singletree Drive 72 12 Singletree Drive 73 10 Singletree Drive 74 8 Singletree Drive 75 6 Singletree Drive 76 4 Singletree Drive 77 2 Singletree Drive Mapinfo.xis 1/9/98 1:12 PM BISON AVENUE ONE FORD ROAD NEWPORT BEACH, CA tjr:pt l 30 x to 3A tc@ se rz 53 64 b5 56 57 58 59 80 61 3BR 2CR 70 z 1 DRIVE 8,2 .,gyp •♦ coi . , g , ♦ �� 3FMIISN g3 `C JV"g9 N 71 W. Y I �'IfL%,.}%. ,. a{111uy'�'„^'� >lG i.'.w ` �o • 44 � tettg `� 73 _�,i�y~,liir.' ,��.,w; Q1g Cm 74xR O 'f > ` JUPRER a� HILLS 4BRiCR' -" )s� 0 0 r3 •:, , 37 8 9 �411.42-: 3` .. � 75tAR '~" �, • ,� n ��f � 'i!��';'.t Rn'e E' ,.,�Ij.. 22 b ir; - LOq� �1 y 'O) �� � 7V x W .. u: )Y. !` )•�. �. t. 7�.• E^J. _ 23 A o awl J2 3 4G ae "�2 77 za ._ • T2 = 83 11 24 25 24 .e .ti5 ti E$;y qx 62 �i 25 ..,,E • 3 4 g.7 g.'9. j0` .,r;. �y� - �3 B OLD COURSE DRNE - '',.,C ii,.; x' ":4/3i61 �c�i^J, 26 OGtl40pD DRryE `Y,Y'1 �' "� ,. ." ���'; :'a X ��.. "k. ;•i, . +' !, >) ., •4A . 7RAG7' ,i� 3` 38 ti� 3DS :15390•. .. ; `�-=•;t�v'-+ '.�p.. ,1, . .�`�, s-r". tE �, t '44 TB ' 30R 5 ., # <r �•y ft " , < :3' 'r : y� 59 0 4BR x,R B¢ �RpN 4 to � ., '-r =, • � ,,r ; a `>"��'„ • '�G�; . H 28 44 3CrQ3: 8' S2'!'�; oR A� •�yy,: $% 471at 4C 2 w 14 II 7 2G OAK B -a) I� TREE ni j"i - 81 9 B DRNE -w r% "" GLENEAGLES DRNE SAwcRAss GRNE 482eR 3A_80. 0 13 G 30 toz D 493AR '2l),79� " xR F k �fi � A .uY;•... 31 29 28 27 0 9 1' r , yam, .. G 53. tB 4c 57 31 3D 2D '. . � uai�tS a. �c L'�'imY' i t�' 'i�f �'dµti r K 38 2A xR x 50-ta .� 78 0 1D 2B yR to r : r- ; i R: •:: jj, ), , o " '51 aA tAR 77" 14 2C 3A 2B ,$2 4or 2BRry6, G BIG HORN D NE D 2e tB 28 Y 75 23 19 .:28` ,; (, o- 25 22 ,2 ., :�, _�. �i`7C�`' W i " $14B iD 55 ,, 33 IA • _ Y,.a 22 23 24 $ :54 4C 301; 2BR ttip I 20 305R FIONORS DRNE :; Q ,Y'ri .,,' p - U oaNE � 34 C t3"1 55 to 4att73 , 24 $: u. • w 3D �p 18 17 3g 'iaR7i2, teR 5 ; T• Y i... , ' r N ' D 56 19 IAR 2 �0p r . '~ iCR OYSTER BAY DRNE 25 q,5 7RAC3 5038 �e.1 C `.1'539p �: • . 48 2AR ' 38 yt 57 tAR 4971- .0 �+ OR ..s^;, ,_ `''`, • spy,: ' n'` 2C 14 5 58 3g 13 A iP10 4+R : �0�oN3� 3x 37IBR 9f 238512 1 Ili "'88' 9B 4c. � g2` te: 3c A:g 47 �• r"'V ' °. s'._ ..,, F �1`5!1 �5?'a 48 : ' �) C COLONIAL DRIVE 45 4eR l •tom °�'cb �',� � �a� 44 hMgc 49 �'�' 1i �; �: < > WJ: JAR Fd "''3•WY•:�: 3.5 44 2A 43 0 2D � ,�,' �., : r >s 'i'i:. k - ,I �:,': oRrh' �. STICK �t4t' 3�9p 30S 50 .r. r.43 1BR 9 1@ � yi01 39 40 511e 45 53e 42 2C I , 38 4'1 g A 2R 37 4 23 { F OLD COURSE DR F 40 3E 38 ;,::...r:::k2,t;43'; IX, x 22 1IOR 39`.. 40 3ER 24 2 eTCR::' 9.1 _' > 1 4 Z 25 2 4 iR 10 21 2 lAR K E 0 3CR s' „.a ;q ry 34 'P 27 28 xR 20 �' s�..�:�; x 2 28•; A H 3CR 19 4 x 'B w 0 29 tR LEGEND 33 32 31 30 � 3CR 18 G BALBOA (PRODUCT 1) JB 4 3ER �h�0 28 17 5 x CARMEL (PRODUCT 2) C, iCR 18 g STONYBROOK (PRODUCT 3) a,: 71BR L� SUMMERHOUSE (PRODUCT 4) 3A 14 r8 PROVIDENCE (PRODUCT 5) ^ 13 12 11 10 PACIFIC HEIGHTS (PRODUCT 6) 3w © REC. AREA, PASEO h COMMON AREA SLOPES B 50 LOT NUMBERS PER FINAL TRACT MAPS 4BR BUILDING TYPE FORD ROAD 220' 1 t0' 0' 220' 440' DECEMBER 2, 1997 ADAMS • STREETER GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=220' _ '� CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. NOTE: ELEVATION TYPES ON TURNBERRY DRIVE SUBJECT TO 15 Corporate Park, Irvine, CA 92606 Ph: 714 474-2330 Fax: 714 474-0251 CHANGE DUE TO BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS. email ASIASI®ix nelcom.com L I ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP OF COMPANIES 4401 ATLANTIC AVENUE SUITE 200 LONG BEACH, CA 90807 30 January 1998 ESCI98-ADM/CNB-01 City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA. 92658-8915 Attention: Ms. Genic Garcia Associate Planner PHONE: 562-984-2079 FAx: 562-988-0129 SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) Dear Ms. Garcia: In accordance with your request, this letter has been prepared to provide you with an update of the status of the environmental aspects of the project associated with the redesignation and redevelopment of the former Ford Aeronutronic/Loral property (Site) from use as an industrial to a residential site. BACKGROUND As you are aware, the Site was historically used for aerospace and defense -related activities that included the use of a variety of hazardous substances. The use of these chemicals resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the Site. Ford Motor Land Corporation (FMLC) retained an environmental consulting firm, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. (now Arcadis Geraghty & Miller [G&M]) to investigate the extent of the soil and groundwater contamination, conduct health risk assessments to evaluate whether such contamination posed public health issues, and develop and implement a soil and groundwater remediation plan. These activities have been conducted under the authority and requirements of state and local environmental regulatory agencies, primarily the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). The City of Newport Beach retained Environmental Services Consortium, Inc. (ESCI - formerly Environmental Management Services [EMS]) to act as a monitor for the project on behalf of the City. As the City monitor, ESCI initially reviewed the research related to Site usage and the resulting identification of "Areas of Potential Environmental Concern" (APECs) and the associated soil and groundwater investigation activities that had been conducted by G&M, participated in dle preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, and attended meetings with the involved regulatory agencies and with Ford, G&M and the City of Newport Beach. ESCI also reviewed and evaluated all associated,project reports and agency communication, and provided recommendations on behalf of the City, where appropriate. This included the technical evaluation of the health risk assessments (HRAs) prepared by G&M for the Bayridge and Belcourt areas, current residential areas that had formerly been part of the Site, and the post-remediation HRAs prepared for the main or northern area, and the ATC or southern area of the Site. In addition, ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities that were performed as part of the pre -demolition phase of the project. CURRENT PROJE, CT STATUS Detaolidon and Constrttction-related Activities As you are aware, facility decommissioning activities, includingpre-demolition building decontamination of regulated materials, have been completed. This activity comprised the removal of building components that constituted hazardous waste, or that were environmentally regulated in some manner, and the decontamination of building surfaces. This activity was conducted in accordance with procedures specified in a Project Demolition Manual submitted to the City byFMLC and reviewed by ESCI, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 1-7,10,17,18, and 23. ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities, and co -signed the Pre -Demolition Building Certifications issued for each of the buildings at the Site. Those aspects of the above -referenced mitigation measures that apply to construction in general at the project Site are continuing to be implemented. Soil and CrottiWwater Retttedialiott Activities Soil remediation activities at the Site were conducted under the oversight of the RWQCB and OCHCA, and in accordance with health -based cleanup levels (HBCLs) (levels evaluated to be protective of human health) that were developed by Ford and G&M, reviewed by ESCI on behalf of the City of Newport Beach, and approved by the OCHCA. Mitigation Measures 9,10,17,19,2t,22 and 23 were implemented during soil remediation activities for soil that bid been identified as contaminated prior to the demolition and grading, and also for any additional contaminated soil identified during demolition and/or grading. Based on documentation reviewed and meetings attended by ESCI, soil remediation has been completed to the satisfaction of the RWQCB and the OCHCA. Onsite groundwater remediation was conducted during 1995 and 1996 under the authority of the RWQCB in accordance with a Groundwater Remedial Action Plan (RAP) approved by the RWQCB, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 8,11,20,21,22, and 23. The RAP addresses groundwater impacts in the main area or the northern portion of the Site, and in the southern area of the Site, formerly known as the "ATC" area. E8CI99­ADWCNB-01 2 ESCI UPDATE'99 - CNB Groundwater remediation activities were completed in 1996. In a letter dated 4 November 1996 the RWQCB approved the closure of the groundwater remediation system, which has subsequently been dismantled and removed from the Site. Ongoing monitoring of the groundwater is currently being required by the RWQCB. Post -development groundwater remediation at the Site has not been required by the RWQCB. Offsite groundwater contamination found to be present to the north of the Site is being addressed as a separate issue by FMLC and the RWQCB, and is not expected to result in the placement of any equipment onsite. Health -Risk AssessmeWs Human health risk assessments for the Belcourt and Bayridge areas were prepared by G&M, evaluated by ESCI, and reissued by G&M on behalf of FMLC. Soil and groundwater contamination in these areas were found to pose no risk to human health. The risk assessment reports were submitted to the OCHCA, who concurred with the conclusions of•these studies. Site -specific data collected during the soil and groundwater remediation were used by G&M to prepare post-remediation/pre-development health risk assessments for the northern and southern areas of the Site, as required by Mitigation Measure 21. These assessments concluded no risk to human health was present in the areas studied at the Site. The health risk assessments were independently evaluated by OCHCA and ESCI, who concurred with the conclusion of these studies. Should you have further questions regarding the status of this project or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours truly, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. emLyn ethrington, REA, Principal Environmental Scientist cc: File John Douglas, Principal Planner, City of Newport Beach Eric Pearson, P.E., Environmental Control Manager, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Thomas E. Culek, Environmental Control Engineer, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Gary Boettcher, Project Manager, Arcadis Geraghty & Miller ESC198-ADWCNR-01 3 ESCI UPDATE 198 - CNB 15387 A ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15387 Lots 1 - 46 LOT ADDRESS E 2 Southern Hills DR. Guard House #1 1 2 Turnberry Drive 2 4 Tumberry Drive 3 6 Turnberry Drive 4 8 Turnberry Drive ' 5 10 Turnberry Drive 6 12 Tumberry Drive 7 14 Turnberry Drive 8 16 Tumberry Drive 9 18 Turnberry Drive 10 20 Turnberry Drive 11 22 Tumberry Drive 12 24 Turnberry Drive 13 26 Turnberry Drive 14 23 Turnberry Drive 15 21 Turnberry Drive 16 19 Tumberry Drive 17 17 Turnberry Drive 18 15 Tumberry Drive 19 11 Turnberry Drive 20 9 Turnberry Drive 21 7 Turnberry Drive 22 5 Turnberry Drive 23 3 1 Tumberry Drive 24 1 Turnberry Drive 25 2 Troon Drive 26 4 Troon Drive 27 10 Troon Drive 28 18 Troon Drive 29 20 Troon Drive 30 22 Troon Drive 31 24 Troon Drive 32 23 Troon Drive 33 21 Troon Drive 34 19 Troon Drive 35 15 Troon Drive 36 11 Troon Drive 37 9 Troon Drive .. 38=.:. -.-7- -. r .-.Troon-Drive-: .. 39 5 Troon Drive 40 3 Troon Drive 41 1 Troon Drive 42 111 Old Course DrNe Page 1 15387 A ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15387 Lots 1 - 46 LOT ADDRESS 43 115 Drive 44 117 TOldourse ourse Drive45 119 ourse-Drive 46 121 Old Course Drive 47 5 Old Course Drive Pool Rec. Area #1 0 Page 2 15388 A E FORD ROAD -TRACT 15388 Lots 1 - 77 LOT ADDRESS A 1 Country Club Drive Guard House #2 1 56 Old Course Drive 2 54 Old Course Drive 3 52 Old Course Drive 4 50 Old Course Drive 5 17 Jupiter Hills Drive 6 19 Jupiter Hills Drive 7 21 Jupiter Hills Drive 8 23 Jupiter Hills Drive 9 25 Jupiter Hills Drive 10 24 Jupiter Hills Drive 11 22 Jupiter Hills Drive 12 20 Jupiter Hills Drive 13 -18 Jupiter Hills Drive 14 16 Jupiter Hills Drive 15 14 Jupiter Hills Drive 16 12 Jupiter Hills Drive 17 10 Jupiter HillgzDrive 18 8 Jupiter Hills Drive 19 6 Jupiter Hills Drive 20 4 Jupiter Hills Drive 21 2 Jupiter Hills Drive 22 34 Gleneagles Drive 23 32 Gleneagles Drive 24 30 Gleneagles Drive 25 28 Gleneagles Drive 26 26 Gleneagles Drive 27 24 Gleneagles • Drive 28 22 Gleneagles Drive 29 20 Gleneagles Drive 30 18 Gleneagles Drive 31 16 Gleneagles Drive 32 14 Gleneagles Drive 33 12 Gleneagles Drive 34 10 Gleneagles Drive 35 8 Gleneagles Drive 36 6 Gleneagles Drive 37 4 Gleneagles Drive --'38'- = 2-- 3 2 Old Course Drive 40 4 Old Course Drive 41 6 Old Course Drive 42 8 Old Course Drive m 15388 A ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15388 Lots 1 - 77 J LOT ADDRESS 43 10 Old Course Drive 44 12 Old Course Drive 45 14 Old Course Drive 46 16 Old Course Drive 47• 18 Old Course Drive 48 20 Old Course Drive 22 Old Course Drive ,49 50 24 Old Course Drive 51 26 Old Course Drive 52 28 Old Course Drive 53 30 Old Course Drive 54 9 Gleneagles Drive 55 11 Gleneagles Drive 56 15 Gleneagles Drive 57 17 Gleneagles Drive 58 19 Gleneagles Drive 59 21 Gleneagles Drive 60 23 Gleneagles Drive 61 25 Gleneagles Drive 62 27 Gleneagles Drive 63 29 Gleneagles Drive 64 3 Jupiter Hills Drive 65 5 Jupiter Hills Drive 66 9 Jupiter Hills r :e 67 11 Jupiter Hills Driv 68 15 Jupiter Hills Drive 69 48 Old Course Drive 70 46 Old Course Drive 71 44 Old Course Drive 72 42 Old Course Drive 73 40 Old Course Drive 74 38 Old Course Drive 75 36 Old Course Drive 76 34 Old Course Drive 77 32 Old Course Drive page 2 15389 A ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15389 Lots 1 - 62 LOT ADDRESS 1 55 Old Course Drive 2 53 Old Course Drive 3 51 Old Course Drive 4 49 Old Course Drive 5 47 Old Course Drive 6 45 Old Course Drive 7 39 Old Course Drive 8 35 Old Course Drive 9 31 Old Course Drive 10 2 Oak Tree Drive 11 4 Oak Tree Drive 12 6 Oak Tree Drive 13 8 Oak Tree Drive 14 10 Oak Tree Drive 15 12 Oak Tree Drive 16 14 Oak Tree Drive 17 11 Oak Tree Drive 18 9 Oak Tree Drive 19 • 7 Oak Tree Drive 5 Oak Tree Drive 3 Oak Tree Drive 12 Honors Drive $20 14 Honors Drive 16 Honors Drive 18 Honors Drive 20 Honors Drive 27 21 Honors Drive 28 19 Honors Drive 29 17 Honors Drive 30 15 Honors Drive 31 11 Honors Drive 32 9 Honors Drive 33 7 Honors Drive 34 5 Honors Drive 35 3 Honors Drive 36 1 Honors Drive 37 29 Old Course Drive 38 27 Old Course Drive 39 25 Old Course Drive '40 m _ '--23"— OId Course=Dn3e 41 21 Id Course Drive 42 19 Old Course Drive 43 17 Old Course Drive 44 2 Colonial Drive - Page 1 15389 A ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15389 Lots 1 - 62 LOT ADDRESS 45 4 Colonial-Qdve 46 6 Colonial Drive 47 8 Colonial Drive 48 10 Colonial Drive 49 20 Colonial Drive 50 22 Colonial Drive 51 24 Colonial.Drive 52 23 Colonial Drive, 53 21 Colonial Drive 54 19 Colonial Drive 65 17 Colonial Drive 56 15 Colonial Drive 57 11 Colonial Drive 58 9 Colonial Drive 59 7 Colonial Drive 60 5 Colonial Drive 61 3 Colonial'Drive 62 1 Colonial,Drive 15390 A ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15390 Lots 1 - 51 Lot ADDRESS 1 68 Old Course Drive 2 64 Old Course Drive 3 60 Old Course Drive 4 2 Ironwood Drive 5 4 Ironwood Drive 6 6 Ironwood Drive 7 8 Ironwood Drive 8 9" Ironwood Drive 9 7 Ironwood Drive 10 5 Ironwood Drive 11 3 Ironwood Drive 12 1 Ironwood Drive 13 80 Old Course Drive 14 84 Old Course Drive 15 2 Big Horn Drive 16 4 Big Horn Drive 1 17 6 Big Horn Drive I 18 8 Big Horn Drive 19 9 Big Horp Drive 20 7 Big Horn Drive 21 5 Big Horn Drive 22 3 Big Horn Drive 23 90 Old Course Dive M Wo/ 24 94 Oid Course Drive 25 96 Old Course Drive 26 98 Old Course Drive 27 2 Thunder Bird Drive 28 4 Thunder Bird Drive 29 6 Thunder Bird Drive 1 r✓ 30 8 Thunder Bird Drive 1fV0 6 31 10 Thunder Bird Drive 32 9 Thunder Bird Drive 33 7 Thunder Bird Drive & 09 34 5 Thunder Bird Drive 35 3 Thunder Bird Drive 36 1 Thunder Bird Drive M 37 106 Old Course Drive 38 108 Old Course Drive 39 110 Old Course Drive 40"- 112 • Old Course Drive 41 1 Vintage Drive 42 3 Vintage Drive 43 5 Vintage Drive 44 7 Vintage Drive Page 1 15390 A ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15390 Lots 1 - 51 Lot ADDRESS 45 9 Vintage Drive 46 11 Vintage Drive 47 10 Vintage Drive 48 S Vintage Drive 49 6 Vintage Drive 50 4 Vintage Drive 51 2 Vintage Drive 52 49 Old Course Drive Rec. Area #2• i Page' 2 15391 A ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15391 Lots 1 - 86 Lot ADDRESS 1 1 Crooked Stick Drive 2 3 Crooked Stick Drive 3 5 Crooked Stick Drive 4 7 Crooked Stick Drive 5 9 Crooked Stick Drive 6 11 Crooked Stick Drive 7 15 Crooked Stick Drive 8 17 Crooked Stick Drive 9 19 Crooked Stick Drive 10 21 Crooked Stick Drive 11 23 Crooked Stick Drive 12 25 Crooked Stick Drive 13 27 Crooked Stick Drive 14 29 Crooked Stick Drive 15 31 Crooked Stick Drive 16 33 Crooked Stick Drive 17 35 Crooked Stick Drive 18 37 Crooked Stick Drive 19 3 Turtle Bay Drive 20 5 Turtle Bay Drive 21 7 Turtle Bay Drive 22 9 Turtle Bay Drive 23 11 Turtle Bay Drive 24 10 Turtle Bay'Drive 25 8 Turtle Bay Drive 26 6 Turtle Bay Drive 27 4 Turtle Bay Drive 28 2 Turtle Bay Drive 29 3 Sawgrass Drive 30 5 Sawgrass Drive j 31 7 Sawgrass Drive 32 9 Sawgrass Drive 33 11 Sawgrass Drive 34 12 Sawgrass Drive 35 10 Sawgrass Drive 36 8 Sawgrass Drive 37 6 Sawgrass Drive 38 4 Sawgrass Drive 39 40 2 11 Sawgrass Drive Edgewood Drive'- 41 15 Edgewood Drive 42 17 Edgewood Drive 43 19 Edgewood Drive Page 1 15391 A ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15391 Lots 1 - 86 Lot ADDRESS 44 21 Edgewood Drive 45 23 Edgewood Drive 46 72 Crooked Stick Drive 47 70 Crooked Stick Drive 48 68 Crooked Stick Drive 49 66 Crooked Stick Drive 50 64 Crooked Stick Drive 51 62 Crooked Stick Drive 52 60 Crooked Stick Drive 53 58 Crooked Stick Drive 54 56 Crooked Stick Drive 55 54 Crooked Stick Drive 56 52 Crooked Stick Drive 57 50 Crooked Stick Drive 58 48 Crooked Stick Drive 59 46 Crooked Stick Drive 60 44 Crooked Stick Drive 61 42 Crooked Stick Drive 62 40 Crooked Stick Drive 63 38 Crooked Stick Drive 64 36 Crooked Stick Drive 65 8 Crooked Stick Drive 66 6 Crooked Stick Drive 67 4 Crooked Stick Drive 68 2 Crooked Stick Drive 69 105 Old Course.Ddve 70 103 Old Course Drive 71 101 Old Course Drive 72 99 101d Course Drive 73 97 ION Course Drive i 74 95 Old Course Drive 75 93 Old Course Drive 76 91 Old Course Drive 77 89 Old Course Drive 78 87 Old Course Drive 79 85 Old Course Drive 80 83 Old Course Drive 81 81 Old Course Drive 82 79 Old Course Drive -' 83 77` Old Course Drive' - '' 84 75 Old Course Drive 85 73 Old Course Drive 86 71 Old Course Drive Page 2 15332 A .ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15332 Lots 1 - 77 Lot ADDRESS 1 20 Edgewood Drive 2 18 Edgewood Drive 3 16 Edgewood Drive 4 14 Edgewood Drive 5 12 Edgewood Drive 6 10 Edgewood Drive 7 8 Edgewood Drive 8 6 Edgewood Drive 9 4 Edgewood Drive 10 2 Edgewood Drive 11 69 Old Course Drive 12 67 Old Course Drive 13 65 Old Course Drive 14 63 Old Course Drive 15 61 Old Course Drive 16 59 Old Course Drive 17 3 Long Bay Drive 18 5 Long Bay Drive 19 7 Long Bay Drive 20 9 Long Bay Drive 21 11 Long Bay Drive 22 15 Long Bay Drive 23 17 Long Bay Drive 24 19 Long Bay Drive 25 21 Long Bay Drive 26 23 Long Bay Drive 27 25 Long Bay Drive 28 27 Long Bay Drive 29 29 Long Bay Drive 30 31 Long Bay Drive 31 33 Long Bay Drive 32 35 Long Bay Drive 33 37 Long Bay Drive 34 36 Long Bay Drive 35 34 Long Bay Drive 36 32 Long Bay Drive _ 37 30 Long Bay Drive 38 28 Long Bay Drive 39 26 Long Bay Drive -40 ' 24 "' ` Long Bay Drive ' 41 22 Long Bay Drive 42 20 Long Bay Drive 43 18 Long Bay Drive Page 1 15332 A ONE FORD ROAD - TRACT 15332 ., Lots 1 - 77 Lot ADDRESS 44E Spanish Bay Drive 45Spanish Bay Drive 46Spanish Bay Drive 47Spanish Bay Drive 48Spanish Bay Drive 49Spanish Bay Drive 50 Spanish Bay Drive 51 25 Spanish Bay Drive 52 27 Spanish Bay Drive 53 28 Spanish Bay Drive 54 26 Spanish Bay Drive 55 24 Spanish Bay Drive 56 22 Spanish Bay Drive 57 20 Spanish Bay Drive 58 18 ISpanish Bay Drive 59 16 Spanish Bay Drive 60 14 1 Spanish Bay Drive 61 12 ISpanish Bay Drive 62 10 Spanish Bay Drive 63 8 Spanish Bay Drive 64 6 Spanish Bay Drive 65 4 Spanish Bay Drive 66 2 Spanish Bay Drive 67 9 Singletree Drive 68 11 Singletree Drive 69 15 Singletree Drive 70 17 Singletree Drive 71 14 Singletree Drive 72 12 Singletree Drive 73 10 Singletree Drive 74 8 Singletree Drive 75 6 Singletree Drive 76 4 Singletree Drive 77 2 Singletree Drive SECTION X - DETACHED RESIDENTIAL/AREAS 4B, 4C, 4D, & 4E This area is intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. A. Uses Permitted 1. Single-family detached subdivisions, subject to approval of a Parking Plan (see Section C.9) and a Landscaping Plan, if required (see Section C.12). 2. Custom lot sales and custom homes. 3. Temporary model complexes and appurtenant uses. 4. Signs (as provided in Section XI of this Planned Community Text). 5. Tennis courts, subject to the provisions of Section IX.C.10. B. Uses Permitted Subject to Site Plan Review (see Sec. D) 1. Conventional subdivisions on a Planned Community Concept, as defined in Section IV. 2. Entry guard houses and gates. 3. Community recreational facilities. C. Development. Standards 1. Minimum Lot Size The minimum lot size permitted shall be 6,000 square feet. 2. Maximum Building Height a. All buildings in areas 4B, 4D, & 4E shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of thirty-seven (37) feet, with the average height not to exceed thirty-two (32) feet. b. All buildings in area 4C shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of twenty-eight (28) feet, with the average height not to exceed twenty- seven (27) feet. C. Chimneys and vents shall be permitted as set forth in the Municipal Code. 27 SECTION IX - ATTACHED/DETACHED RESIDENTIAL/AREAS 4A These areas are intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. A. Uses Permitted 1. Single-family detached subdivisions, subject to approval of a Parking Plan (see Section C.9) and Landscaping Plan, if required (see Section C.12). 2. Custom lot sales and custom homes. 3. Temporary model complexes and appurtenant uses. 4. Signs (as provided in Section XI of this Planned Community Text). 5. Tennis courts, subject to the provisions of Section IX.C.10. B. Uses Permitted Subject to Site Plan Review (see Sec Dl 1. Single-family attached subdivisions. 2. Cluster unit developments, as defined in Section IV. 3. Conventional subdivisions on a Planned Community Concept, as defined in Section IV. 4. Entry guard houses and gates. 5. Community recreational facilities. C. Develooment Standards 1. Minimum Lot Size The minimum lot size permitted shall be 3,000 square feet. 2. Maximum Height Limits a. All buildings shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of 37 feet, with an average height not to exceed 32 feet. b. Chimneys and vents shall be permitted as set forth in the Municipal Code. 20 I Fireplaces and chimney. Placement of fireplaces and chimneys shall comply with the requirements of the Zoning Code. Fences shall be limited to a maximum height of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six 6) feet. Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right-of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolonged. 6. Trellises Open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to within three (3) feet of the side or rear property line. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eight (8) feet. Trellis areas shall not be considered in calculating lot area coverage; however, trellis areas shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the remaining open space of a developed lot. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area. 7. Private Street Standards Private streets within residential development shall be a minimum of thirty- two (32) feet in width with parking allowed on one side. Through the Site Plan Review process, the following modifications to this standard may be approved: a. The minimum width may be reduced to 26 feet for access drives serving no more than 16 dwelling units. b. The minimum width may be reduced to 20 feet for access drives serving no more than 4 dwelling units. C. The minimum width may be reduced to 16 feet for access drives serving a single dwelling unit. 22 d. Drives of 20 or 16 feet as provided for the above shall be increased to a minimum width of 26 feet if serving a common parking area. e. Unless otherwise defined in this text, private streets shall be designed in compliance with the private street standards of the City of Newport Beach. Residential development shall be designed to provide adequate sight distance (25 MPH), at the intersection of all private streets and drives, and along curves unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 9. Parking_Plan Each tentative subdivision map that would create legal building sites shall be accompanied by a parldng plan demonstrating compliance with the following standards: a. Single -Family Detached Parking Requirements A minimum of two (2) garage parking spaces shall be provided per unit. In addition, guest parking shall be provided within the development at a minimum rate of two (2) spaces per unit. Guest parking may be provided on street, in parking bays, or on driveway aprons (minimum 20 feet in depth), in a manner acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. A maximum of one of the guest spaces may be provided on the driveway. A reduction in the guest parking requirement may be considered subject to approval of a finding by the Planning Commission that the reduced parking ratio will not cause an adverse impact on the community. b. Condominiums and Townhomes Dwelling units less than or equal to 1500 square feet shall provide a minimum of 2 parldng spaces per un% including one covered space. In addition, guest parldng shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.5 space per unit. Guest parldng may be provided on street, in parking bays, or on driveway aprons (minimum 20 feet in depth or 18 feet where roll up garage doors are provided), in a manner acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. A maximum of fifty percent (50%) of the guest spaces may be provided on driveways. 23 Dwelling units greater than 1500 square feet shall provide a minimum of 2 covered spaces per unit. In addition, guest parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of one (1) space per unit. Guest parking may be provided on street, in parking bays, or on driveway aprons (minimum 20 feet in depth or 18 feet where roll up garage doors are provided), in a manner acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. A maximum of fifty percent (50%) of the guest spaces may be provided on driveways. C. Parking Space Placement and Dimensions The size and placement of all parking spaces and areas shall be as specified by the residential parking standards contained in the Newport Beach Municipal Code, Standard Plans 805-L•A and 805-L-B, and Council Policy L-2 unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer. The maximum site area building coverage shall be sixty percent (60%) of the net site area. For purposes of this Planned Community, trellis areas shall not be considered structural coverage subject to the requirements of Section C.6, above. 11. Tennis Courts Tennis courts are allowed and may be within three feet (Y) of the rear and side property lines. The courts are permitted fencing up to 12' in height. The courts' lighting shall use 27' max height, square tubular and painted posts with 1,000 watt metal halide lights in a fiat pan fixture. All tennis court lighting shall be designed in such a way as to prevent light from shining directly on the adjacent residential properties and to insure that the lighting does not adversely affect night vehicular traffic along Jamboree Road or Ford Road. All tennis court lighting shall be subject to a use permit. 12. Landscaping Plan Each tentative subdivision map that would create legal building sites and which contains a common area abutting an existing residential development outside Planning Area 4 shall be accompanied by a landscaping plan for that common area, drawn to scale, showing the locations of existing trees proposed to be removed and proposed to be retained; and indicating the amount, type, and location of landscaped areas, planting beds and plant materials with adequate provisions for irrigation. The plan shall be designed so as to create O-V a suitable buffer between the existing residential area and the new development. D. Site Plan Review ME11� 6 • - The purpose of this section is to establish a Site Plan Review procedure to ensure that the project conforms to the objectives of the General Plan as well as the requirements and development standards contained in these Planned Community District Regulations. 2. Findings The Site Plan Review procedures contained in this section are intended to promote the health, safety and general welfare, of the community according to the Site Plan Review Findings set forth in the Zoning Code. 3. Application When required, Site Plan Review approval shall be obtained prior to or concurrent with the approval of any tentative subdivision map that would create legal residential building sites, or prior to issuance of a building permit for non-residential structures (e.g., recreation facilities and entry guard gates). The following plans and diagrams shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval: (a) Plot plan. A plot plan, drawn to scale, showing the arrangement of buildings, driveways, pedestrian ways, off-street parking, landscaped areas, signs, fences and sidewalks. The plot plan shall show the location of entrances and exits, and the direction of traffic flow into and out of off-street parking areas, the location of each parking space, and areas for turning and maneuvering vehicles. The plot plan shall indicate how utility and drainage are to be provided. For custom lot sales programs, the plans shall either provide for sufficient guest parking to accommodate units without driveway parking or else establish requirements in a form acceptable to the Planning Director that driveway guest parking shall be provided 25 .. ..0 �t.. .. - • ,. . . , •.,. A minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet shall apply to all structures other than garages adjacent to public streets; except that balconies and patios may encroach six (6) feet in the required setback. Architectural features such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wingwalls may extend two and one-half (2 1/2) feet into the required setback from a public street. Setbacks shall be measured from the ultimate right-of-way line. a. Front yard. A minimum front yard setback of five (5) feet shall be required. This setback shall be measured from the back of curb or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. b. i r . Side yard setback shall be a minimum of five (5) feet, or as otherwise established through Site Plan Review approval. C. r r . Where property lines are created a minimum of ten (10) feet rear yard setback shall be required. Decks and balconies greater than 18" above grade may extend into the rear yard setback up to 3 feet. d. Structural separation, All main residential structures shall be a minimum of six (6) feet apart measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. e. Detached garagesgparation. Detached garages shall be separated from main residential structures a minimum of six (6) feet measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. f. Garages. Garages shall be set back from three (3) to seven (7) feet, or a minimum of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk shall be permitted with roll -up or other garage door types approved by the City Traffic Engineer. g. Architectural features. Architectural features such as, but not limited to, cornices, eaves, and wingwalls may extend two and one-half (21/2) feet into any front, side or rear yard setback, provided that such architectural features shall not project any closer than two (2) feet from any property line. 21 SECTION IV - DEFINITIONS The following definitions shall apply to the development of Aeronutronic Ford Planned Community. 1. Gross Acreage shall mean the entire site area within the project boundary plus the centerline of the perimeter streets excluding MacArthur Boulevard, in which case the boundary line extends to the existing right of way line which is the Newport Beach City boundary. This acreage is the area within the boundaries of the Tentative Subdivision Map. 2. Parcel Map Net Area shall mean the entire area within the project boundary excluding previously dedicated perimeter streets. 3. Buildable Acreage shall mean the entire site area within the project boundary excluding streets, park dedication, areas -with existing natural slopes greater than 2:1, and natural flood plains. 4. Cluster Unit Development shall mean a combination or arrangement of attached or detached dwellings and their accessory structures on contiguous or related building sites where the yards and open spaces are combined into more desirable arrangements or open spaces and where the individual sites may have less than the required average for the district but the density of the overall development meets the required standard. 5. Conventional Subdivision on, a Planned Community Concept shall mean a conventional subdivision of detached dwellings and their accessory structures on individual lots where the lot size may be less than the required average for the district but where the density for the entire subdivision meets the required standards and where open space areas are provided for the enhancement and utilization of the overall development. SECTION V - ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL/AREA 1, 6,7 These areas are intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. 1. Cluster unit developments, as defined in Section IV, Definitions. 2. Single family dwellings attached or detached. 3. Conventional subdivisions on a Planned Community Concept, as defined in Section IV, Definitions. 4. Custom Lots. 5. Condominium/Townhomes. 6. Temporary model complex and appurtenant uses. 7. Community Recreational facilities. 8. Signs (as provided in Section M of this Planned Community Text). 9. Security Gates and/or Guard Houses. 1. Maximum Height Limits a. All buildings shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of 37 feet or an average height of 32 feet. / - b. Chimneys and vents shall be permitted as set forth in section 20.02.060 of the Municipal Code. 2. Setbacks from Public Streets A minimum setback of 15 feet shall apply to all structures other than garages adjacent to public streets; except that balconies and patios may encroach six (6) feet into the required setback Architectural features such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wingwalls may extend two and one-half (2 1/2) feet into the required setback from a public street. Setbacks shall be measured from the ultimate right-of-way line. 3. Setbacks from Other Properly Lines and Structures a. A minimum front yard setback of five (5) feet shall be required. This setback shall be measured from the back of curb or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. 91 b. All main residential structures shall be a minimum of eight feet apart. This shall be measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. c. Detached garages shall be separated from main residential structures a minimum of eight (8) feet. This also shall be measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. d. Two car garages with direct access shall be setback from five (5) to seven (7) feet average or a minimum average of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that the sidewalk shall be permitted with roll -up or other type garage doors approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Additional garage spaces need not meet the above criteria. 4. Fences Hedges and Walls Fences shall be limited to a maximum of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six (6) feet. Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right-of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolonged. 5. Trellis Open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to within three (3) feet of the side or rear property lines. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eight (8) feet. Trellis areas shall not be considered in calculating lot area coverage; however, trellis areas shall not exceed 25 percent of the remaining open space of a developed lot. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area. 0 MIAMMM-1740 a WMIMM Architectural features, walls may extend two yard setback. 7. Parking such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wing and one-half (2 1/2) feet into any front, side or rear A minimum of 3.0 parking spaces per unit shall be required. One of the required spaces may be permitted on the driveway of the residence, providing that said driveway has a minimum depth of twenty (20) feet or eighteen (18) feet with roll -up or other type garage doors approved by the City Traffic Engineer, measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. In addition to driveway parking spaces, a minimum of OS guest parking spaces may be provided on -street or in the bays, and their location shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and the City Traffic Engineer. 8. Maximum Site Area Coverage The maximum site coverage permitted shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. For purposes of this Planned Community, site coverage shall include all areas under foot but shall not include trellis areas. 10 SECTION VI - ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL/AREA 8 These areas are intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. A. Uses Permitted 1. Cluster unit developments, as defined in Section TV, Definitions. 2. Single family dwellings attached or detached. 3. Conventional subdivisions on a Planned Community Concept, as defined in Section IV, Definitions. 4. Custom Lots. 5. Temporary model complex and appurtenant uses. 6. Community Recreational facilities. 7. Signs (as provided in Section XI of this Planned Community Text). 8. Security Gates and/or Guard Houses. 1. Condominium and townhome dwellings. C. Development Standards t 1. Maximum Height Limits a. All buildings shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of 37 feet or an average height of 32 feet. b. Chimneys and vents shall be permitted as set forth in section 20.02.060 of the Municipal Code. 2. Setbacks from Public Streets A minimum setback of 15 feet shall apply to all structures other than garages adjacent to public streets; except that balconies and patios may encroach six (6) feet into the required setback. Architectural features such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wingwalls may extend two and one-half (2 1/2) feet into the required setback from a public street. Setbacks shall be measured from the ultimate right-of-way line. 11 a. A minimum first story front yard setback of five (5) feet shall be required. This setback shall be measured from the back of curb or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. The second story front may be constructed adjacent to the back of curb or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, adjacent to back of sidewalk. b. All main residential structures shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet apart. This shall be measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. C. Detached garages shall be separated from main residential structures a minimum of eight (8) feet. This also shall be measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. d. Two car garages with direct access shall be setback from five (5) to seven (7) feet average or a minimum average of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that the sidewalk shall be permitted with roll -up or other type garage doors approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Additional garage spaces need not meet the above criteria. 4. Fences. Hedges and Walls Fences shall be limited to a maximum of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six (6) feet. Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right-of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolonged. 5. Trellis Open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to within three (3) feet of the side or rear property lines. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eight (8) feet. 12 6. 7. 91 4. Trellis areas shall not be considered in calculating lot area coverage; however, trellis areas shall not exceed 25 percent of the remaining open space of a developed lot. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area. Architectural Features Architectural features, such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wing walls may extend two and one-half (2 1/2) feet into any front, side or rear yard setback. rkin A minimum of 2.0 parking spaces per unit shall be required. Guest parking shall be cluster with a minimum of two spaces per cluster. Maximum Site Area Coverage The maximum site coverage permitted shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. For purposes of this Planned Community, site coverage shall include all areas under foot but shall not include trellis areas. The developer will provide 25 per cent of all units above 38 as moderate priced for sale units as defined by the City's Housing Element. All in -lieu park fees, traffic improvement fees and noise wall fees for the affordable units and the previously approved 38 units will be waived. SECTION VII - DETACHED RESIDENTIAL/AREA 2 This area is intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. A. Uses Permitted 1. Single family dwellings. 2. Conventional subdivisions on a Planned Community, as defined in Section IV, Definitions. 3. Custom Lots. 4. Community recreational facilities. 5. Security gates and/or guard houses. 6. Temporary model complex and appurtenant uses. B. Development Standards 1. Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size permitted shall be 6,000 sq.ft. 2. Maximum Building Height. All buildings in Areas 2 & 8 shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of 37 feet or an average height of 32 feet. 3. Setbacks The following setbacks shall apply to all structures excluding garden walls or fences. a. Front Yard A minimum setback of five (5) feet for the garage and a minimum of ten (10) feet for the dwelling unit shall be maintained. This shall be measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. b. Side Yard Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of five (5) feet. The Planning Director may approve a zero side yard concept provided that a total of ten (10) feet be provided on the opposite side yard. A zero side yard concept will not be allowed under a custom lot program. C. Rear Yard A minimum of ten (10) feet shall be maintained for the rear yards. d. Setbacks - Garages Two car garages with direct access shall be setback from five (5) to seven (7) feet average or a minimum average of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed from back of sidewalk. A minimum of eighteen (18) feet 14 measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk shall be permitted with roll -up or other type garage doors approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Additional garage spaces need not meet the above criteria. A minimum of five (5) feet for side -on garages shall be maintained 4. Fences Hedges and Walls Fences shall be limited to a maximum of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six (6) feet. Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right-of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolonged. 5. Tr Ili open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to within three (3) feet of the side or rear property lines. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eight (8) feet. Trellis areas shall not be considered in calculating lot area coverage; however, trellis areas shall not exceed 25 percent of the remaining open space of a developed lot. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area. 6. Parkin Parking for residential uses shall be in the form of not less than three (3) parking spaces per dwelling unit. 7. Maximum Site Area Covera¢e The maximum site area coverage for any residential lot shall be 60 percent of such lot. 15 Architectural features. such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wing SECTION VIII - CUSTOM LOT RESIDENTIAL/AREA 5 This area is intended to provide residential housing and related community facilities. A. Uses Permitted 1. Single Family Dwellings. 2. Conventional subdivisions on a Planned Community, as defined in Section IV, Definitions. 3. Custom Lot. 4. Community recreational facilities. 5. Temporary model complex and appurtenant uses. 6. Tennis Courts. B. Development Standards 1. Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size permitted shall be 9,000 sq.ft. 2. Maximum Building Height. All buildings in Areas 5 & 8 shall not exceed a maximum ridge height of 37 feet or an average height of 32 feet. 3. Setbacks The following setbacks shall apply to all structures excluding garden walls or fences. a. Front Yard A minimum setback of twenty (20) feet for the dwelling unit shall be maintained. This shall be measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. b. Side Yard Side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of five (5) feet. C. Rear Yard A minimum of ten (10) feet shall be maintained for the rear yards. d. Setbacks - Garages Two car garages with direct access shall be setback from five (5) to seven (7) feet average or a minimum average of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed from back of sidewalk. A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk shall be permitted with roll -up or other type garage doors approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Additional garage spaces need not meet the above criteria. A minimum of five (5) feet for side -on garages shall be maintained. 17 4. Fences. Hedges and Walls Fences, with the exception of tennis courts, shall be limited to a maximum of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six (6) feet. Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right- of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolonged. 5. Trellis Open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to within three (3) feet of the side or rear property lines. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eight (8) feet. Trellis areas shall not be considered in calculating lot area coverage; however, trellis areas shall not exceed 25 percent of the remaining open space of a developed lot. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area. 6. Parldn Parking for residential uses shall be in the form of not less than three (3) parking spaces per dwelling unit. 7. Maximum Site Area Coverage The maximum site area coverage for any residential lot shall be 60 percent of such lot. 8. Architectural Features Architectural features, such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wing walls may extend two and one half (2 1/2) feet into any front, side or rear yard setback. m 9. Tennis Courts Tennis courts are allowed and may be within 3' of the rear and side property lines. The courts are permitted fencing up to 12' in height. The courts lighting shall use 27 max height, square tubular and painted posts with 1000 watts metal halide lights in a flat pan fixture. All tennis court lighting shall be designed in such a way as to prevent light from shining directly on the adjacent residential properties and to insure that the lighting does not adversely affect night vehicular traffic along MacArthur Boulevard. All tennis court lighting shall be subject to a use permit. 19 (b) Landscape plan. A landscape plan, drawn to scale, showing the locations of existing trees proposed to be removed and proposed to be retained; and indicating the amount, type, and location of landscaped areas, planting beds and plant materials with adequate provisions for irrigation. (c) Grading plan. A grading plan to ensure development properly related to the site and to surrounding properties and structures. (d) Exterior lighting. Scale drawings of exterior lighting showing size, location, materials, intensity and relationship to adjacent streets and properties. (e) Parking plan. A parking plan demonstrating compliance with the requirements contained in Section C.9, above. (f) Noise attenuation. For subdivisions abutting Jamboree Road or Ford Road evidence demonstrating compliance with applicable noise attenuation requirements. (g) Any other plans, diagrams, drawings or additional information determined by the Planning Director to be necessary to adequately consider the proposed development and to determine compliance with applicable policies and standards. 5. Application Fees The applicant shall pay a fee as established by Resolution of the City Council with each application for Site Plan Review. 6. Notice and Hearing Procedures. Procedures regarding public hearing notification and Planning Commission and City Council actions shall be as provided for Site Plan Review in the Zoning Code. RM A minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet shall apply to all structures other than garages adjacent to public streets; except that balconies and patios may encroach six (6) feet in the required setback. Architectural features such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wingwalls may extend two and one-half (2 1/2) feet into the required setback -from a public street. Setbacks shall be measured from the ultimate right-of-way line. 4. Setbacks from Other Proper Lines and Structures a. Front r . A minimum front yard setback of ten (10) feet shall be required for the main dwelling (excluding attached or detached garages). This setback shall be measured from the back of curb or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk b, Side yard. Side yard setback shall be a minimum of five (5) feet, or as otherwise established through Site Plan Review approval. C. Rear yard. A minimum of ten (10) feet rear yard setback shall be required. Decks and balconies greater than 18" above grade may extend into the rear yard setback up to 3 feet. d. Structural separation. All main residential structures shall be a minimum of six (6) feet apart measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. e. Detached garage separation Detached garages shall be separated from main residential structures a minimum of six (6) feet measured from face of finished wall to face of finished wall. f. Garages. Garages shall be set back from three (3) to seven (7) feet, or a minimum of twenty (20) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk shall be permitted with roll -up or other garage door types approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Side -entry garages shall maintain a minimum front setback of five (5) feet measured from back of curb, or in the event that sidewalks are constructed, from back of sidewalk. g. Architectural features. Architectural features such as, but not limited to, cornices, eaves, and wingwalls may extend two and one-half (21/2) feet into any front, side or rear yard setback, provided that such architectural features shall not project any closer than two (2) feet from any propertyline. h. Fireplaces and chimneys. Placement of fireplaces and chimneys shall comply with the requirements of the Zoning Code. 5. Fences. Hedges and Walls Fences shall be limited to a maximum height of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to six (6) feet. Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right-of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the right-of-way lines prolonged. 6. Trellises Open trellis and beam construction shall be permitted to attach the garage to the dwelling structure and may also extend from the dwelling to within three (3) feet of the side or rear property line. In side yards, the maximum height shall be eight (8) feet. Trellis areas shall not be considered in calculating lot area coverage; however, trellis areas shall not exceed twenty-five percent (259o') of the remaining open space of a developed lot. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area. M.. To Private streets within residential development shall be a minimum of thirty- two (32) feet in width with parking allowed on one side. Through the Site 29 Plan Review process, the following modifications to this standard may be approved: a. The minimum width may be reduced to 26 feet for access drives serving no more than 16 dwelling units. b. The minimum width may be reduced to 20 feet for access drives serving no more than 4 dwelling units. C. The minimum width may be reduced to 16 feet for access drives serving a single dwelling unit. d. Drives of 20 or 16 feet as provided for the above shall be increased to a minimum width of 26 feet if serving a common parking area e. Unless otherwise defined in this text, private streets shall be designed in compliance with the private street standards of the City of Newport Beach. 8. Site Distance Requirements Residential development shall be designed to provide adequate sight distance (25 MPH), at the intersection of all private streets and drives, and along curves unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 9. Parking Plan Each tentative subdivision map that would create legal building sites shall be accompanied by a parking plan demonstrating compliance with the following standards: a Single -Family Detached Parking Requirements A minimum of two (2) garage parking spaces shall be provided per unit. In addition, guest parking shall be provided within the development at a minimum rate of two (2) spaces per unit. Guest parking may be provided on street, in parking bays, or on driveway aprons (minimum 20 feet in depth), in a manner acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. A maximum of one of the guest spaces may be provided on the driveway. b. Parking Space Placement and Dimensions 30 The size and placement of all parking spaces and areas shall be as specified by the residential parking standards contained in the Newport Beach Municipal Code, Standard Plans 805-1. A and 805-L-B, and Council Policy L-2 unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 10. Maximum Site Area Coverage The maximum site area building coverage shall be sixty percent (60%) of the net site area. For purposes of this Planned Community, trellis areas shall not be considered structural coverage subject to the requirements of Section C.6, above. 11. Tennis Courts Tennis courts are allowed and may be within three feet (3) of the rear and side property lines. The courts are permitted fencing up to 12' in height. The courts' lighting shall use 27' max beight, square tubular and painted posts with 1,000 watt metal halide lights in a flat pan fixture. All tennis court lighting shall be designed in such a way as to prevent light from shining directly on the adjacent residential properties and to insure that the lighting does not adversely affect night vehicular traffic along Jamboree Road or Ford Road. All tennis court lighting shall be subject to a use permit. 12. Landscaping Plan Each tentative subdivision map that would create legal building sites and which contains a common area abutting an existing residential development outside Planning Area 4 shall be accompanied by a landscaping plan for that common area, drawn to scale, showing the locations of existing trees proposed to be removed and proposed to be retained; and indicating the amount, type, and location of landscaped areas, planting beds and plant materials with adequate provisions for irrigation . The plan shall be designed so as to create a suitable buffer between the existing residential area and the new development. D. Site Plan Review 1. Purpose The purpose of this section is to establish a Site Plan Review procedure to ensure that the project conforms to the objectives of the General Plan as well as the requirements and development standards contained in.these Planned Community District Regulations. 31 2. 3. 9 Fin in The Site Plan Review procedures contained in this section are intended to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the community according to the Site Plan Review Findings set forth in the Zoning Code. Application When required, Site Plan Review approval shall be obtained prior to or concurrent with the approval of any tentative subdivision map that would create legal residential building sites, or prior to issuance of a building permit for non-residential structures (e.g., recreation facilities and entry guard gates). Plans and Diagrams to be Submitted The following plans and diagrams shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval: (a) Plot plan. A plot plan, drawn to scale, showing the arrangement of buildings, driveways, pedestrian ways, off-street parking, landscaped areas, signs, fences and sidewalks. The plot plan shall show the location of entrances and exits, and the direction of traffic flow into and out of off-street parking areas, the location of each parking space, and areas for turning and maneuvering vehicles. The plot plan shall indicate bow utility and drainage are to be provided. For custom lot sales programs, the plans shall either provide for sufficient guest parking to accommodate units without driveway parking or else establish requirements in a form acceptable to the Planning Director that driveway guest parking shall be provided. (b) Landscape plan A landscape plan, drawn to scale, showing the locations of existing trees proposed to be removed and proposed to be retained; and indicating the amount, type, and location of landscaped areas, planting beds and plant materials with adequate provisions for irrigation. (c) Gradingpian. A grading plan to ensure development properly related to the site and to surrounding properties and structures. (d) Exterior lighting. Scale drawings of exterior lighting showing size, location, materials, intensity and relationship to adjacent streets and properties. 32 (e) Parking_plan. A parking plan demonstrating compliance with the requirements contained in Section C.9, above. (f) Noise attenuation. For subdivisions abutting Jamboree Road or Ford Road evidence demonstrating compliance with applicable noise attenuation requirements. (g) Any other plans, diagrams, drawings or additional information determined by the Planning Director to be necessary to adequately consider the proposed development and to determine compliance with applicable policies and standards. 5. Application Fees The applicant shall pay a fee as established by Resolution of the City Council with each application for Site Plan Review. 6. Notice and Hearing Procedures. Procedures regarding public hearing notification and Planning Commission and City Council actions shall be as provided for Site Plan Review in the Zoning Code. 33 41 SECTION XI - COMMUNITY RECREATIONAL FACILITIES A. Uses Permitted 1. Private parks, playgrounds, recreation or open green areas, and related facilities. 2. Accessory buildings, structures and uses related and incidental to the uses permitted, including tennis courts, swimming pools, and spas. B. Development Standards 1. Building Heieht The maximum building height shall be twenty-eight (28) feet as defined by the Zoning Code. Towers or architectural features greater than twenty-eight (28) feet but not exceeding sixty (60) feet in height may be permitted subject to approval of a Use Permit. 2. Building Setbacks Fifteen (15) feet minimum from any residential property line and ten (10) feet minimum from any street measured from back of curb, or from back of sidewalk where sidewalks are provided. 34 BISON AVENUE C Q O OC W W cc O m 1 — — 53 54 O O 2-2A 2-38R 2-2C O 57 O ' 2-18 2-3A 2—ICA I _ i 1 52 O 49 I I 1-2A 1 48 1-50 7-18 48 3C 1-4AR 1 Jz7 Sze I 1 O J24 I O 310 I 311 J12 31J 1 I J4 35 I I I 1-48R 1-28R 36 0 3B 1 1-3AR 1-48R —IC I � 1 I W _ IY � �• 1 _ II 1-1C 32 31 30 1-4A 1-3B —2C 29 — 1 2y1 1 4C 2 1 0 ' o zat289 o 1 1 2 [ _ t-2C 3 C 1 O 5 _yam 1_48R 6 t-JB i' STREET _ 'M' STREET LEGEND BUILDINGS WITH SETBACK ISSUES 5o LOT NUMBERS PER TRACT MAP ioo LOT NUMBERS PER TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 70 34e ' 2-ire � =v 787 87REET 1 Z yA \ 2—ICR ---� 2-78R tso z-3c J, \ ' NO � 0 tiry 1 13 12 2-3A 1 14 ' 2 3B 2 2A 2 1CR i 1 FORD ROAD G � , STREET 80' 40' 0' 80' 160' GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=80' X � TJfil✓$}' LY/ Ili J/N7 MLffiYdW� � n:YtiiiCr'PXNYY4i�'k.�'Y. *••yUG' "...?(3»..»L*.:]!3ar i',i ��i �Ks , Adams • Streeter CIVIL ENGINEERS INC. 15 Corporate Park, Irvine, CA 92606 Ph: 714 474-0330 Fax: 714 474-0251 email: ASIASI@ix.netcom.com �a- LEGEND p sa[s nusw srau .wc•^u w lb w.va[6 Rr rM [u yV5 w Mflwa M( °].N AS.A. ■ir X NEWPORT BEACH, CA pdC]F ay 40xE5 w 22 S] cva'- 1 AS YA 62 Sx �6° Si ra °S y ,F� I ) °S a x lAt ,KA YA 1 + it a n S'I! Si St 10 IS ]x 1 Sync M > ]°� w•Z 1° N YS ]° Y x1 I ]Y x°37 x Y 1°� LEGEND �, m Q prs S[].tM $CdLR �A`b-'4i3 11 1] Ix p pA M !IR R� IM RCt WS \y I q Ip AM MiO,F fY•'! --1 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP OF COMPANIES 4401 ATLANTIC AVENUE SUITE 200 LONG BEACH, CA 90807 30 January 1998 ESCI98-ADM/CNB-01 City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA. 92658-8915 Attention: Ms. Genia Garcia Associate Planner PHONE: 562-984-2079 FAx: 562-988-0129 SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) Dear Ms. Garcia: In accordance with your request, this letter has been prepared to provide you with an update of the status of the environmental aspects of the project associated with the redesignation and redevelopment of the former Ford Aeronutronic/Loral property (Site) from use as an industrial to a residential site. BACKGROUND As you are aware, the Site was historically used for aerospace and defense -related activities that included the use of a variety of hazardous substances. The use of these chemicals resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the Site. Ford Motor Land Corporation (FMLC) retained an environmental consulting firm, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. (now Arcadis Geraghty & Miller [G&M]) to investigate the extent of the soil and groundwater contamination, conduct health risk assessments to evaluate whether such contamination posed public health issues, and develop and implement a soil and groundwater remediation plan. These activities have been conducted under the authority and requirements of state and local environmental regulatory agencies, primarily the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Orange Comity Health Care Agency (OCHCA). The City of Newport Beach retained Environmental Services Consortium, Inc. (ESCI - formerly Environmental Management Services [EMS]) to act as a monitor for the project on behalf of the City. As the City monitor, ESCI initially reviewed the research related to Site usage and the resulting identification of "Areas of Potential Environmental Concern" (APECs) and the associated soil and % groundwater investigation activities that had been conducted by G&M, participated in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, and attended meetings with the involved regulatory agencies and with Ford, G&M and the City of Newport Beach. ESCI also reviewed and evaluated all associated project reports and agency communication, and provided recommendations on behalf of the City, where appropriate. This included the technical evaluation of the health risk assessments (HRAs) prepared by G&M for the Bayridge and Belcourt areas, current residential areas that had formerly been part of the Site, and the post-remediation HRAs prepared for the main or northern area, and the ATC or southern area of the Site. In addition, ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities that were performed as part of the pre -demolition phase of the project. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS Demolition and Corrsiruction-relater[ Activities Asyou are aware, facility decommissioning activities, including pre -demolition building decontamination of regulated materials, have been completed. This activity comprised the removal of building components that constituted hazardous waste, or that were environmentally regulated in some manner, and the decontamination of building surfaces. This activity was conducted in accordance with procedures specified in a Project Demolition Manual submitted to the City by FMLC and reviewed by ESCI, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 1-7,10,17,18, and 23. ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities, and co -signed the Prc-Demolition Building Certifications issued for each of the buildings at the Site. Those aspects of the above -referenced mitigation measures that apply to construction in general at the project Site are continuing to be implemented. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Activities Soil remediation activities at the Site were conducted under the oversight of the RWQCB and OCHCA, and in accordance with health -based cleanup levels (HBCLs) (levels evaluated to be protective of human health) that were developed by Ford and G&M, reviewed by ESCI on behalf of the City of Newport Beach, and approved by the OCHCA. Mitigation Measures 9,10,17,19,21,22 and 23 were implemented during soil remediation activities for soil that had been identified as contaminated prior to the demolition and grading, and also for any additional contaminated soil identified during demolition and/or grading. Based on documentation reviewed and meetings attended by ESCI, soil remediation has been completed to the satisfaction of the R\VQCB and the OCHCA. Onsite groundwater remediation was conducted during 1995 and 1996 under the authority of the RWQCB in accordance with a Groundwater Remedial Action Plan (RAP) approved by the RWQCB, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 8,11,20,21,22, and 23. The RAP addresses groundwater impacts in the main area or the northern portion of the Site, and in the southern area of the Site, formerly known as the "ATC" area. ESC198-AD]MICNB-01 2 ESCI UPDATE'98 - CNB Groundwater remediation activities were completed in 1996. In a letter dated 4 November 1996 the RWQCB approved the closure of the groundwater remediation system, which has subsequently been dismantled and removed from the Site. Ongoing monitoring of the groundwater is currently being required by the RWQCB. Post -development groundwater remediation at the Site has not been required by the RWQCB. Offsite groundwater contamination found to be present to the north of the Site is being addressed as a separate issue by FMLC and the RWQCB, and is not expected to result in the placement of any equipment onsite. Health -Risk Assessments Human health risk assessments for the Belcourt and Bayridge areas were prepared by G&M, evaluated by ESCI, and reissued by G&M on behalf of FMLC. Soil and groundwater contamination in these areas were found to pose no risk to human health. The risk assessment reports were submitted to the OCHCA, who concurred with the conclusions of these studies. Site -specific data collected during the soil and groundwater remediation were used by G&M to prepare post-remediation/pre-development health risk assessments for the northern and southern areas of the Site, as required by Mitigation Measure 21. These assessments concluded no risk to human health was present in the areas studied at the Site. The health risk assessments were independently evaluated by OCHCA and ESCI, who concurred with the conclusion of these studies. Should you have further questions regarding the status of this project or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours truly, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. i Lyn ethrington, REA, M Principal Environmental gel ntist cc: File John Douglas, Principal Planner, City of Newport Beach Eric Pearson, P.E., Environmental Control Manager, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Thomas E. Culek, Environmental Control Engineer, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Gary Boettcher, Project Manager, Arcadis Geraghty & Miller ESC198-ADIWCNB-01 3 ESCI UPDATE 198 - CNB 1840MVf . • SIR ,•rg,FARGfU�BANK': '�`„ ''••" J••..•....: ��'+../��\./~n.'•�✓ "`•,�'^+•+J•.y. .+•`.tilt' �w,yy i/ v� •J-yam_ � w. ��y�'w �r1� _ •J� •••"•. ". .tom..-.. ^'n w. •..•i++�\.�..". •.'�/ ^. +J• �yu".n"•..�. fir+^ •/' ,. ./•'.,rw' ,rr wy "�+ ,wV r - ..• n� �ti.rv-. '.-HOMES- -12 �y'ti. _ �/.•..`ram PACOC:6Alr}iC1aE&'- •AFTEFi12QD Y8;`,r,•r•ti .•`=•= Ps VOID '��. � ..-•`...'w;,..�' �; .> ra�.4a zr. Htt a i s 4L + � yg�+I��� -- ,..:..: �•,.. ,.; � .771 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 C�[IFOM1N'' RECEIVED BY: PERRY2 TODAY'S DATE: 10/30/97 43104708 PARK FEES -ZONE CASH RECEIPT RECEIPT NUMBER: 02000138680 PAYOR: PACIFIC BAY HOMES • REGISTER DATE: 10/30/97 TIME: 14:49:44 TRACT#15332 $100,000.00 ---------------- TOTAL DUE: $100,000.00 CASH PAID CHECK PAID CHECK NO' TENDERED CHANGE $,00 $100,000.00 6482 $100,000.00 $.00 IF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP OF COMPANIES 4401 ATLANTIC AVENUE SUITE 200 LoNo BEACH, CA 90807 30 January 1998 ESCI98-ADM/CNB-01 City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA. 92658-8915 Attention: Ms. Genia Garcia Associate Planner PHONE: 562-984-2079 FAX: 562-988-0129 SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC BAY HOMES (FORD MOTOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) Dear Ms. Garcia: In accordance with your request, this letter has been prepared to provide you with an update of the status of the environmental aspects of the project associated with the redesignation and redevelopment of the former Ford Aeronutronic/Loral property (Site) from use as an industrial to a residential site. BACKGROUND As you are aware, the Site was historically used for aerospace and defense -related activities that included the use of a variety of hazardous substances. The use of these chemicals resulted in soil and groundwater contamination at the Site. Ford Motor Land Corporation (FMLC) retained an environmental consulting firm, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. (now Arcadis Geraghty & Miller [G&M]) to investigate the extent of the soil and groundwater contamination, conduct health risk assessments to evaluate whether such contamination posed public health issues, and develop and implement a soil and groundwater remediation plan. These activities have been conducted under the authority and requirements of state and local environmental regulatory agencies, primarily the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the Orange Comity Health Care Agency (OCHCA). The City of Newport Beach retained Environmental Services Consortium, Inc. (ESCI - formerly Environmental Management Services [EMS]) to act as a monitor for the project on behalf of the City. As the City monitor, ESCI initially reviewed the research related to Site usage and the resulting identification of "Areas of Potential Environmental Concern" (APECs) and the associated soil and N .groundwater investigation activities that had been conducted by G&M, participated in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report, and attended meetings with the involved regulatory agencies and with Ford, G&M and the City of Newport Beach. ESCI also reviewed and evaluated all associated project reports and agency communication, and provided recommendations on behalf of the City, where appropriate. This included the technical evaluation of the health risk assessments (HRAs) prepared by G&M for the Bayridge and Belcourt areas, current residential areas that had formerly been part of the Site, and the post-remediation I3RAs prepared for the main or northern area, and the ATC or southern area of the Site. In addition, ESCI monitored the ousito building decontamination activities that were performed as part of the pre -demolition phase of the project. CURRENT PROTECT STATUS Demolition and Construction -related Activities As you are aware, facility decommissioning activities, including pre -demolition building decontamination of regulated materials, have been completed. This activity comprised the removal of building components that constituted hazardous waste, or that were environmentally regulated in some manner, and the decontamination of building surfaces. This activity was conducted in accordance with procedures specified in a Project Demolition Manual submitted to the City by FMLC and reviewed by ESCI, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures I-7,10,17,18, and 23. ESCI monitored the onsite building decontamination activities, and co -signed the Pre -Demolition Building Certifications issued for each of the buildings at the Site. Those aspects of the above -referenced mitigation measures that apply to construction in general at the project Site are continuing to be implemented. Soil and Grouudtvater Renterliatl_on Activities Soil remediation activities at the Site were conducted under the oversight of the RWQCB and OCHCA, and in accordance with health -based cleanup levels (HBCLs) (levels evaluated to be protective of Truman health) that were developed by Ford and G&M, reviewed by ESCI on behalf of the City of Newport Beach, and approved by the OCHCA. Mitigation Measures 9,10,17,19,21,22 and 23 were implemented during soil remediation activities for soil that had been identified as contaminated prior to the demolition and grading, and also for any additional contaminated soil identified during demolition and/or grading. Based on documentation reviewed and meetings attended by ESCI, soil remediation has been completed to the satisfaction of the RWQCB and the OCHCA. Onsite groundwater remediation was conducted during 1995 and 1996 under the authority of the RWQCB in accordance with a Groundwater Remedial Action Plan (RAP) approved by the RWQCB, and in accordance with Mitigation Measures 8,11,20,21,22, and 23. The RAP addresses groundwater impacts in the main area or the northern portion of the Site, and in the southern area of the Site, formerly known as the "ATC" area. ESC198-ADWCNE-01 2 CSCL UPDATE '98- CNB r Groundwater remediation activities were completed in 1996. In a letter dated 4 November 1996 the RWQCB approved the closure of the groundwater remediation system, which has subsequently been dismantled and removed from the Site. Ongoing monitoring of the groundwater is currently being required by the RWQCB. Post -development groundwater remediation at the Site has not been required by the RWQCB. Offsite groundwater contamination found to be present to the north of the Site is being addressed as a separate issue by FMLC and the RWQCB, and is not expected to result in the placement of any equipment onsite. Health -Risk Assessments Human health risk assessments for the Belcourt and Bayridge areas were prepared by G&M, evaluated by ESCI, and reissued by G&M on behalf of FMLC. Soil and groundwater contamination in these areas were found to pose no risk to human health. The risk assessment reports were submitted to the OCHCA, who concurred with the conclusions of these studies. Site -specific data collected during the soil and groundwater remediation were used by G&M to prepare post-remediation/pre-development health risk assessments for the northern and southern areas of the Site, as required by Mitigation Measure 21. These assessments concluded no risk to human health was present in the areas studied at the Site. The health risk assessments were independently evaluated by OCHCA and ESCI, who concurred with the conclusion of these studies. Should you have further questions regarding the status of this project or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Yours truly, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONSORTIUM, INC. i Lyn ethrington, REA, M Principal Environmental Scientist cc: File John Douglas, Principal Planner, City of Newport Beach Eric Pearson, P.E., Environmental Control Manager, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Thomas E. Culek, Environmental Control Engineer, Ford Motor Land Services Corporation Gary Boettcher, Project Manager, Arcadis Geraghty & Miller E5C198 MhUCNB-01 3 ESCI UPDATE 198 - CNB NEWPORT BEACH, CA pacif' aN- HOMES q °�•• 4`� + rtAct ya yt: a at ! ! t • •� i to t7 ! rl I]]10 l" M 'f eat t a t1 M �y i ► y & W � Ittr 1 �* r sr ►►r+ a x r ✓• a r�r x t1 r U t tt ! ! H 16 !t 1! ,S � ,p � �► wH2f' ]...�[] _ tr cp N6 r i /pt► % ! trlt qk !! sal tMtlels oacp !►y v]0 YO 61Y. x U l7M >7 11 / 17 y� yt x 1[i01, ! Oy lxl7 f Ky s 17 31 I ] K�]jli'a 7W 6ty 11110 a y i yl• It y 1" {yi ►[x lq yt x Jul '11 � 07r 7/ It f! 11 1► Ip, M au t NOtu p •yF'y xfl •]]Y 77 C p rt , fl t6 ftp [[ N," W]r C !1� 1150 ]!, 1[t T�•31 as K _ "' „ s ! :J�'`°' sr �s y,7t tw *s► t e' p O �, w zi f wtl � us 7 c >dw yln .x l" omu►.ro• t°1+ ♦ �° [ is,w " Ila 1 » U N 1+ Hr lW + ]iY ,.i] * xA tt to t7, 11 •�.lj �° ea 117t s° 1 !] � 00 {! tt'~ ]► " �,1i] � ► Iw ptl r ` � °► x R+1 t 's'y] y +1j1 yr# °°70 •+► �t T N� r 6 C t1 t7 t! r+1 t ► q1 tl r `I��o ° �` ♦ sJ �: yl �[ to re �' A°, KACT s+ra i 41 jj Hy t7 �fil Ny 46 l u N t r la r 1 t fr ly Is x34 y an a to so of A 111 1 [ >M r l/ an ew LEA— Is Ix 0 p ro,s ro,ls+�c Sr" tgplLM^011 u u It M to •NIl•R no f•.t woo WIf 11 r a .11• Ft0.0 n'L too T m NEWPORT BEACH, CA. PdCIE ay HOMY 2 N.'04 �• i• Iy��Si :�•� t3 tt j.Xa t !! /_ /t N A IdS 140 1 !! Z♦ f to „!t „ its t. 3 . 31 y � as >< 6 LEGEND /+ s` C],ms aws,•o uY�c scpnvma 1{ 1 MF (I* fwt w wri • 1 M 4lG4 In1 W, Q or r 130601Ator IWA"s o al 30 a !• s !7 71 s, Ix D,!= w• M !! yi, t31 Y61 �T 0 � Yf 34 f+ !7w � 31 p < !p N• m NEWPORT BEACH, CA ■i+K �;x u K W pacif' a)- HOMLS a .e u as i1 i as in ion s ne 43 494 s .. N 7P MC �3 /� 47034 T M yy 0 'S 4/ 46m < �+F 4N yw� 7 i� M .- &V 44 .0 N • s NEWPORT BEACH, CA pacif' a\' HOMES •t a � -•- -•• .yu f i/ 4.' a T's + t t e e � ",o w tt' t7" nwc t � � r7ACT .ol ,t a M le / r • lllltfl 1 Iw0 /o M ,y i\ i 1s310 M iJ� 3�� i // t! e, � e s Y•i x /e . U ��'' 1 e" % u u t+ ale >•t At �/ / �� i'w t/ +OS I 1/w KeJ ` ;f Ip Ae % t wtt eMt 10 � OiDbCls aMe JOM yRy\\Y�at a JOx\ Y/t � U � 701 w 7 1/ 1/ t0 t A s q• JO tt � 61 JM x11 A' r P ,i Mt i 11,1 !Iw %J7 i `t J+ 1 i ,l• i TI•t/ OJY 77 6 tb N e 1 t1 tb N b tt l+MC ,µ J{ /t 1 i t1 , 't\rJ 2{� eeK � y it S � A 710� 10110 � wf1 pw J/i to� N i wT1 SO .M.-O y l � .l� t1,1 A {0 ,qTl ► a+ 0* i i t � M\ le w to I1wa o I/ i Ow '�► • s \ it io po /1" 47eisii7 Iti Ie 11 • sy 7 \u� i A u• Si 'W /t p •11 A w ! 11 r, • u { 39 t/ 1 tt r t i q Mt! ti i i >t J7 t o • is t y 1 to t/, y x\ tl l/ i A to to 0 / • 44 to Tf � s/ w17 irP LEGEND_ a ex A p 1o's ia/s+w sr"\�wos t1 n R Its N W N=s K, ItA I la YY's �. I10i� m a i+ o % •Is1,-,1 ILA 46 to r U ces,t a6 •y, it p N • as {e N •q ! H >Y ! a N X se q ft6 i6, M +a e11 a 4 !� US to Mill a S LEGEN A u [=],o's'o<su: sr" moorce'6 14 Is I6 11 N W ssyta Ko (.x W^l WPS a a w w k D•e ^x NEWPORT BEACH, CA paci!f aN- HOM[f t a M 'at 17ot elo � r Ira H, u 7� M r � ouuw D�•R c ao � A asa7 66• S o7 at 1 Naze oea 084 u3 Rai, War old is So pHw 71a )a{6 Na 064 a{a a {e Nts a•a 11 aNc {? {6 37 {f a� a . a • N{7 { to U O it �{ r 6 N all ma 6 •s y6N y Na 48t q, S/ {ea {I „ • N ' 'I Ss ew oa r •o• m w 17 WI I I li 6 NEWPORT BEACH, CA paciE' a� HOMES ttr V r' 7, N to sd U i{ 1{ ly It jt 14 • -jr y,µ rr. if Wil ► IT tr It ►o rl A Nt w< % rQ Nw I1137 q• < 67 $1 t P• �t UK IutD II Us 6 f1 t1 tb t1 iy r4 q yr 11 • nib yt , �ytl,• 2,40 60 064 340 % {! N y, ♦ 61 rD MC N t3 .r• ` l{ {rq t {r u r r Dy C o.W µ /r • a .. 6r so �1 .a u a ai it34 t o w{I N0Isttt N t 41 46 b {Ir y1 'M tt {t N r /y t yt H D xt Y [ % • 11• • srtt r% % 36 t7 0 to t :t to , Mom' >a rl Y to A 36 • yl r r N C • • �� >e o s %• to i 30 r / to WIT t•, LE_ GEND_ Moo r�,o+s %PtA� R'Y:f ,NGb+M ,NgIC I(• f•.r tlYCi LLVD y, RaD+o ml a w VINmi V V IL) AVAij LEGEND []Lois R[W[SI�, Sr" [rWWAtas w [a+ eWe[as a. rwu [wa WAM a NIM, mr VINZ LEGEND C] E015 NEM51-rA sr" KOI AI"s 10 E01 AWOEps VEp f0Mj IM! W.-S 48A MOND TYPE m vlviri r urcL nuAv NEWPORT BEACH, CA A pacif' a)F r HOMES rc 0 �02�S1b(14 PC AM 0A" 7r•66 72 N •to tw �p 3K tea ,»481Y4a� 44 000Y tea p7 C^ T4 fa 9 F 14 38 10�177 JWRER 9 20 21 trA 34 37 8 0 0�1 •12 iM 75rM 31016 7 0 5 Oa 07 g E e 22 31C 1D 11D1 '� EOryO &r ORDy A �> 1.8 7 7ax A 3D lea ,q 03 04 z3 UP 33 32 3�x � r1 � •� 2 /, 77 zs 31a tp tx x tea � 11a a3 ° H t I 2922 232423� .4 �,b 10 � H 1 2 3 4 E 09 7p �X� 7DR Otx62 2Ste Y'31tM Y x 31 1e ub1 D COyRSE DRM �? AA Joe 6f m 26 27 Y' u TRACT tea tx tpt Sec � 0 C ♦? � R s44f3 ;41 /p E � � 15390 to 7 V to ant � , tgt !ate Ie e0 4Y � 5 � 3xA � � M 69 2g 3a !7 x 4 u Og �� lea 3w tea w 8 a H 3r » tc ut 3e x 48µR 84 y? °!ntA a7 zc 10 16 14 '33 12 j� atA 9 �F 56 1:9 u 9{ �`93` 7,3 39 H 49ta tC 83 di rre 9 H 7RFE pp tp RF1+E�Es ORrvE p 30 IEA ywePwes pYYE SOIaR �02 13 M -a7.Ove F 1g 1920 2! A t 00 29 51 yA xgl qq 17 tw tw x 3eaE 90 iw 37 53 1 tc 57 31 3m 3 P3 321gv,:b 52% 3880 ld rD » 3M m ti 101 YI xe to � � 53 u tM 79 14 16 Ig 19 1a 96 iea98 52 ec %e 66 � 32 xA . t1 .K U c1 54 to 78 0 e RORk iRE H lea t1a 1D IBa tk 3YA to ,•w' °7,26 • , 55 >A ua?7 29 2P 19 2a 25 24 23 22 34r1kc to 39 51 u lD 55 33 to 241 y20 30a `'t 20° tpROilS M0>: 33 ../'NE. 5a K au70 » x A D1Ot Xf 40 50 3u xR 54 34 /C e` 57 a .ae70 v �tE 2120 199 583e ta74 �,y0 36 3! 27 Z�. lea sa 3a 3� tx 41 0 49 tc TRACTG �35t�p 123 22, v. x OYSTER BnY DIDvE 25 ly0 TRACT '0 CiM 42 a 36, AMR to .4^ C 15390 310R I 481M a tc 73 Z i 51 tDR 43 37 IB �� �6 gptM 3e 72 20 oE° 33 32 47' a0 497a tx 47 %r; tav A A o1G t alb xA71 F � 04 'Sy x �? E leoLu3 ,ea 11° tp° �A to a H 82 ,M 70 .D x 64 40 46 iW3A 3 xR .Q'y 47 tw 46 47 40 a 13 a� 1 O 00 jq 4 Alt 55 C OpD u 46 1M tpA 44 I A 49 06b5 59 00 EK 62 67 twR to 3a tea 44 a• ' � � �6 eTR:K y`" 3 2 .9• JJ � la 4Y� 00 � 43,14 �% to A V Jy Ie a TRACT 2 �•�0 ^ 9'141 !0 7Aa1 bl 47 e15387 42— m 9940 26� ! F DEO^OURst aftw f 40 41x 40 4 24 99 3 38 26 t a 3a > E x t la w tM 23 231 Is le 37 27°' 3 A w 31 22 3 rM ,pE� 28 y9 A 30 xR 21 rE i A x 'tl' A AA'\ 35 ° ' 31 iM � 19 0 5 to 3/ 33 32 tat t YR L.�ybO a 38 6le C lw q 3L la 'E"17 Btst LEGEND „ 15 93C eRO SraCK "FIEAnORS 11 10 LOIS REOOES 14 13 12 1 00 LOI bu,BERS PER rEw mAcr YAPS >s to to 3a taR BOA9w0 IYAE H FORD ROAD CI uty.6 r ull,v rcvtiL NEWPORT BEACH, CA pacif' a}= HOMES 0 '31 2AAB 13C i, k4 aCR ~ ACR �O 04�4A • _ i^ 2DR IE Apt 2BC g 52151t564 8 ? 8=544 '$�,, 05� �DA 07 73tC � 3p 11 12 19 14 16 1g � A�'° rp i iB 'ttA 3 ABR OAa ABY tcR 0gM C'" 74gR O 9 ° F JUPRER DRrvE 1g 202 94 ? 83? 038 041 42 4'b IM 75tIR 3BU8 7 B 5 i' S8 87 g E o 22 AtA $ ICR �+ LONC &Y DRNE A 7 78 x A IBC to ABOR lD 33323 x2B2 �1 7 OR AZ Z Ac 7720 30M to Aec 2E +BCF 2 2 25 2423 +0 1518 B 1 2 2Ca 02 9.5 DR ]AR ABR GnJ%k OLD COURSE I ICDFI 129�458=C 3U 4$ryti VE EDOEMOOO DRIVE ? B 8 IB 9 1� 3 4 3�� AA 4ti' 2 5 c : eo, qx7 46r,in -41 40 E , +� TRACT ABCB tBC Adl IBC 8 } �} tE ACV IBa� 1NA� �a to 90 k xa 5 i53® IG xr a, aA 59 2g xR 41 JC Rom• 4 to 62 IBCR ADa =BCR SBC i 8 C H >r• =e k u =B x 49µq � 04 � 12 ,1 oghA B7 D 19 15 14 13 12 � xR AD .aa� wR 68 29 AB 34 538 —g9 49tCR AC 89 7pj 2 8 OAK TaEE DRryE. 1p 8 OLENEAGLES ORKC 30 ID, - B SAwORASS.DwvE 507pt S1 82 19 =Bp .-3m- ByA -- 0 61wt x 81 F l7 18 19 20 21 A _ 8319 a3 32 31 30 29 � 527e to 1B tec ABC lE lq=p 3 IBD97 53 t9 4c 57 310 DB 80 vn !7 1s 1oR Q+St xR tB1UIx xR 532w IR79 14 16 18 18 9b IKR30 KW' 62tt xa 68 3220 to 54 AB BR78 0 BIC NORM NE B =FFA ABOR 1D 7BG ABC 1BW' I YAIB :x .o 1 =B °7 20 jY 55 sL AA¢77 23 p2 19 20 25 24 23 22 34tx AE199 51 AB 2D 56 � 33 u 44 25 201- .I g 50 AC YR78 LA9 ?1 $8 7J3R i HONORS ' w+M1'E I •%ANE 6 �e x A 3 �Bot ,kp 40 $ 50 xR ><n 64 x 34 w� Lt 19 57 a ABR75 24ea N 6 29 90 31 32 B TRACT x + 2� SBOq tca74 ,y0 3p 91 27 2a 2BCR to 1pB aF A&,' 41 49 AE C 35ABR 23 x2, v,I x OYSTER BAY DRNi 25 0 TRACT b Cf Sa70 1p1 tw f w' +B,1 2 N C 15390 IBCR 1 m 42 48 =Ax 35 y, tc 58,AR AA73 7•B Z oA / 51 tat 492w IBc 43 37 10 \ 10 A 80 BB 72 25 JHOtA b 33 92 b2 60 47 38 tBR SG 81 2Ca71 .F 1N 9y, x +d E 253 M14 3g=2rn teR 70 30 .d�' 47 tec64 4g 47146 A q4 45 tEB Ac 84 tB y A0 2pl 4I, DaNE F Ae 1 Z '7'Mb 0 40 �66 C COLON B1 5x q5 OR 1 1 S �y 0� ? ya 4 •tcl. 49 Ap g 57 bg 59 , tec Ax^ 44 2A A 43IBT 9 2 1NY4" 3� xR 42 60 Dee ABCit =FA m � •J 3g tg to TRACT 141 40 61 47 �15381 422c P +5 2 40 F 2bOLD �..�•� 41 IAR 38 � 2. _ �OURSE ORryE F 40 x 43 44 45 45 y 38 28 = 4B4 DfA a t[ x zw 21 � 39 Ae z DB x 2a 37 27� 1 YB M OB 22 = 38 s H- 28 29 90 xA 21 4 x `t'Y A '� tAR 20 B 35 0 31 IAF 0 6 tB .\ 34 i3 32�19 9R is C frffi q 17 A 15 Iw -B IBA LEGEND A15 9 x = L07S REQUESTING SE'BACK ODDIfICADONS IS 13 1x 11 1� 50 LOT NUMBERS PER FIML TRACT t=ARS le to IV 11% ABa BUIDWO ME B One Ford Road Building Setback Modification Requests May 20,1997 Lot No. Tract Garage Building Appurtenance PoA GArea�e P � 4 , IS, .9;= lej 71 15332 X 94 15389 X i 15390_ X X 4 15390 X 9 415390 X X 11 15390 X X 13 15390 X 17 15390 20 15390 X 23 15390 30 15390 33 15390 X >=�71Nr� I ✓v �✓ri✓ �a Q Ao 39 15390 p/ t� 43 15390 7 J r 47 15390 9 15391 13 15391 GA 7 0l) 7, ,�5=738 �v 71 G vy 7'a" _ _ 7.a3,51rD, ,30= f, 7n 1. 10i1 I One Ford Road Building Setback Modification Requests May 20,1997 Lot No. Tract Garage Buildine Appurtenance 71 15332 X X 94 15389 X 1 15390 X X 4 15390 X 9 `15390 X X 11 15390 X X 13 15390 X 17 15390 X 20 15390 X 23 15390 X 30 15390 X X 33 15390 X 36 15390 X X 39 15390 X X 43 15390 X X 47 15390 X X 9 15391 X 13 15391 X r Lot No. Tract 71 15332 94 15389 1 15390 4 15390 9 `15390 11 15390 13 15390 17 15390 20 15390 23 15390 30 15390 33 15390 One Ford Road Building Setback Modification Requests May 20, 1997 Gazaa Building Appurtenance X X X X X X X 9 M It t p X X FA Lot No. Tract 71 1533 94 1538 1 1539 4 1539 9 `1539 11 15390 13 15390 17 15390 20 15390 23 15390 30 15390 33 15390 36 15390 39 15390 43 15390 47 15390 One Ford Road Building Setback Modification Requests May 20,1997 Garage Building Appurtenance 2 X X 9 X p X X 0 X 0 X X X X tm X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 15391 X 13 15391 X X One Ford Road i Building Setback Modification Requests May 20, 1997 Lot No. Tract Garaee Buildine Appurtenance 71 15332 X % 94 15389 X 1 15390 X X - 4 15390 X 9 `15390 X X 11 15390 X X 13 15390 X 17 15390 X 20 15390 X 23 15390 X 30 ,- 15390 X X 33 15390 X 36 15390 X X 39 15390 X X 43 15390 X X 47 15390 X X J ' 9 15391 X 13 15391 X w I!ICS O w a GRAPHIC SCALE: f . 2nA FLOOR ENCROACHMENT ROOF OVEMMNG ENCROACHMENT SUWNO SETBACK 328 329 �� 330 331 332 53 54 55 f 2-2A 2-38R 2-2C 56 57 334 5 ; 33 If 2-1 B 58 5g 336 2-3A - - �--- 2-1 CR 2-28 1 L i61 1 m• ,, � q n UO 345 '5 OM 344 ICU tl. 316 41- 1-1A 1-4C ua, C s. STREET - /� 2O - _ C 0 � 50 m — 70 345 2-2 tf C r"Y 344 69 II 2-3BR 67 R r-- \342 1 of __ 346 2-3A' W' �d NL r n I 1 1 1 --- 347 2728 Will mularq;j 76 Ig I# 2-3C LP- 1 R 0 0 ' LEGEND ' Tntl FLOOR V CMWWEN! ' ROOF OYVWM ERCROICAMEMT ' BO4DIRO WM CK r-- J -3D 3-38C 3-1D 3-4BCR 7 O o , D7 O O I F� x, O O 0 0 #� I 3-1p O 3-2E 3-4BC s� N n E x � U Z m C F— J a �rn z W j � Z 5 >- ma U. 0 W } N F S U LU \ w,e,e e c w w CRAPMC SC ' I' - LEGEND l I I,M FLOOR ENCRWORAEM ROOF OVERFNW ENCROACHNEN! 16 _ BULLDIAY. SE'f&CK I o 14 15 0 3-1 C O 17 —30 3-4ER i -3 3-36C I j I ) 4BC 9 / 3, I I — - r. ff _I % eCR \ - -------------- f ------------ 7) Oipa i 1\✓1 r1 3-4BCR 68 O 5 ! � 66 0 67 ° ol O 24 6S D:� I If /1 27 -2E `�t l >, 69 3_4$CR �C � 5 22 6 f ; 3, -- - - �� 30LU a , x o V -� z o LL LU 5 to ni PRrT NIL �10112 PLAN Na 3 or16,,,,s, _I. ►� ® m IIIIIIE ®� �u y , I I J � ON - -_ --� • . � N aIs h` d ofCL uj Q 0) W J /+ 1 Z m }¢ R 2 , lq LL O W N H 364 V cc M W O � O ysy Z VI i I it rl. ..r. - - LEGEND 3-4BCR 3-1BC 3-4DR 1 caRacE sEraeac O Ind FLOOR EMOROICHMEM 2 3 356 4�3D 351 \\\\ MOP ovERxwc ENORCkCHMENF O d SUILUM &794CK z 9 80 81 w kk ` � V 92 91 isi i 16 15 14 i l C13 3-38C 3-4DR 3-28CR n a ° \\ 12 - R 4 4� 6-r' i 3 e; _ 210 J L--' I pbp y — 8 i fr _ 13 8 .. { 365 ,� O c -r_�-- 1 4-3AR 4-3CR 1 62 36� s— 19 367 ii T 18 m F 1 ,5 368 369 0 3-46CR h o 0 3-1 BC - a 14 ! 3�0 17 C C9 O -1 366 15 16 17 4-2D i 3-2DR 99 ° rn 1 4 D 4_ R O o 98 4-1 i 97 -- �. Z Q p 4-3AR 1 n 1 B _— - J LL i 0 W —_, ww 3 W 23 a : 4 ,., 25 3-2BCR R 3-1D 3-3BC - -- 3 _ 48C v ,� w sir Q \� LEGEND CARCE SEWK IM FLOOR ENCRORCNNEN! ROOF OM9 WVO EMCROICNMENF - 23 D r'0 3-1BC 5 24 �; -3BCR 0 2I J; r _ _1D 3 3BC 3-48C r' tn S -4BC 11s 39 I' r 11 3-4ER r 1 5-48 o 60 5-2D s 14 f -- , }j f { i r ? 1 f 40 0 i 1 3-3DR ,I 50 66 ( 59 54 5-3CR 5-3ER b 30 29 0 o }, O 3-2BC 3-1ER 1 31 ���' 121 41 0 4-+ 0111 l 3-3DR 3- BC I' 49 re`'% U 109 �215-o 22 122 42 O48 3- 2 D �^° o I - �1 J ' _ [} 5-2AR 68 Y fill s o N 123 3_1BC ` %3j : `e o - 1z5 5-30R �a 6 _ 127 44 128 O 46 45 3-30 ' 4-73-4ER a z IN3-1BCR 46 70 R� 48 ' �t 3_48CR 1 ER 7` s8 f m O 3ER u 5_ 0 a Z rn ,�� , _ ✓ LL ' �, C W -� _ �� (A 55 _ _ " 45 71 �' o �s us 5 4BR ,.«_,•" � � - GRACE SET84L'K -. ,. ..• 1M FLGGR EXCRGACX6IEM PRQECf N0. i !A p LA i 2 PN Na ` I ROOF OVERIWJG ENCR6ICXMEM Iw 62 ` �I I ! &AIDING SETRACK T ci c scaE: r-m 4 1Qa16g„g G / /(� Vzl� 1 �lz NO 13 ❑ .m., ...,. _. . O I I `CA \ \ r U I a i V � < Z ui m F O a O C7 r 0 Z 5a r Ly m l O W Y W ~ W U � Mir wr r r it W GRAPHIC SC4E: / �I 16 '2C 2()4 ,38 A4 20 un ��.�. � � \ OCR LEGEND GARAGE SffS4CK Sid nWR EWROCWW MW OWJ*AW VCRWCPiMEAff &ADiNG SffgCK A wiffire ff --- m w GIMPW SCALF, I' - -- T -- -- A -- O 0 1114 V14 m M I _ � O u 0111 its ' \ * if ;I N IR- x —Z LU 0 i CL 30 0) LL 0 ui ui Ir FROCUT No. ' PLAN ft / f t,. ``` SHEEr 120FIDOM r 1 DIP, L O 55 s -bq 1 57 c5o)O / R .59 PA ^> '� LEGEND,� c t o- O GARAGE SEWK �`._ y - ■ Ind FLOOR ENCROACHMENT 28 s 4-1 B I E aoor omwL+Nc EneRacmcxr �• �� j404 ® MUM WM CK i B" STREET V C7 uj $ m F O 6 rn 4 l ° 2 I — ----� � m ti O H 5/ ° i W 4eR 43 ° 44 46 166 24---� y } 5 45 1 v 5'3CR 5-2A } 5-2C �- 2— 1g cc (.. 5-1 E _ --- I 6�2 173 I �� I PROJCTT No. I 170 169 ( I 65 23SHEEPLAN tw t 168 2R 3 QQ V r r r, 46 - - 5-2c 23 65 2 .RAR av ra re r e av �o cOPW scue P- v 8 176 29 6-18 vNN 6-3 �P ry - -- A co NCO 9 Y �_ V �\ \ 34 6-2 �2 6-4BR APR 6� \ LEGEND 2n0 FLOOF ENCRQ9CFMENf t ROOF OVEFMANO ENCRO<CHMEM 0 lam/ W Is Iv s v ar/ a 75— 5-2A i5-2C 769 167 26 1 I 6-2 I 1 ' 174 O27 XZ a 1b z \ LU m O J a \\ z �. � O z m }a � /r M n V O Q W to ~ W oo I I I I _ L _ 6 i co Ul 210 ° Imo' O cs ' Ip I N W 1 2n W D N J N r 1 N W 1 I I I o I I N N N N i 1dR n W N ' ' N 1 } �C3{f U S � � t Ul lit 111 fill ( (70) Do COI i C,4 O ,) OAj �- N wO woo N ' r f O r t coo � � �o I ; m F p I O o \ H CL 'ti, I oc O r LEGEND �, — — — — 1 c rn ME GARAGE SET84CK Yrq BOOR ENCROACHMENT / I 1LL .. OVERHANG ENCROACHY M , O 0 , r ` y NO SL75W ` W r / PROJECT ft PLAN Ra SHEET 16 s+m MESSAGE CONFIRMATION 07/01/97 17:27 ID=PUBLIC-WORKS DATE S,R-TIME DISTANT STATION ID MODE PAGES 07/01 01,17" 310 274 1646 CALLING 02 POSSIBLE ERROR PAGE: 02 RESULT � J I .7e'�Cy /S,'32 SETBACK MODIFICATION RISON AVENUE -I- INDEX MAP o m 16; 20 2C 1A 27 21 ONE FORD ROAD NEWPORT BEACH, CA "paci r. ay HOMES IA 58 58 60 38R 2cR 70 sPANis81 B 03 \G sea 69 q0a aDR IE 2 acRle eR4cR�0 64 065 � 72zB LI 10 11 12 � 3D tec 4ER 3ec 4 7 44 66 \eR 0'� 73+c a 13 4DR 14 15 iH 17 �BRlaEA 3 60 M C'" 743BR O 3FR 9 F JUPITER DRIVE 8 2Q 0 21 4AA 38 041 42 A3 4CR iAR �A 'i51AR JBCRB 7 8 5 68 67 e E ° 22 3ER VC DAY•ORIVf A ti \9e �817 78 x JBC ID 4BCR JD a9CR 3ER 6'- 84 23 2AR I8�JB a8R 4PR 'x' AZ ?' 1 AO 7728 38CR 10 49C 2E 78CR 83 H 24 2 25 24 23 ,e �y �6 1 2 4BCR 3ER 3 4 E 89 ao zDR B2 25+e OLD COURSE DRIVE 0 % ��� ggg81J, 282� IA aC 39 +C 4A ��'4y' 'E 7 8 >> 2 -01, 1 2 3 4 5 ➢�dT AA E \b TRACT 48cR ISC 4DR JBC 8 E �* E 80 a 27 5 15390 92BC IER 7 47doq k85 ROMYp 4R. 81A 52 39CR 40R 29CR 3BC IBCA 3BCR 69 H 28 xR 0 484AR 84 0 �`� ' f;o oR4�p 7 2C 18 15 14 13 12 �� JO 4n 9 a �. aDR 5B 29 4B 2DCR B 5028R J\ 82 13 70 7Qgg 3CR,, 8 B 13AR8 9T20 OgA,E AIO ^r.• OLENEAGLES DRIVE G 30 tER 51Jut 2C 81 F 17 21 53 +8 4C 57 9 +ec 4BC aE 38rR 3 37 0 31 3DR 52 t8 3e 80 c +D 2s yR '.�- ,; eat 84oA � o 53 ?a tut 79 14 18 18 17. 18 36 W 52 2C 3ER 56 32 qCR IBCR38 54 48 2BR78 G BIG HORN IVE $ 28CR 40CR 1D 30CR 48C JBCR , o 65 sA 4AR77 23 22 19 28 25 24 23 22 IBC AER 39 51 4B aD 55 g3 u 56 4C 3AR76 I SOR, IAA ' . v'rL ? 30R /•A µ0NOR5 DRryE o 19 57 to 4eR75 2¢� 34 6 29 30 31 3`Z 3acR 3DR 40 D 50 3Ea xR 64 w 34 3D 2x0 29R 58 3B tcR74 23 2,°,�p 31 27 SAE 2BCR IER JDR APF' 48C 41 49 4c 7RACTG m 35 49R OYSTER BAY DRIVE 253,R 2� TRACT 30 CT 2D 42 5038 \ol d C 15390 3BCR 1 48 2AR 362A ,0 59JAR 4A73 qe 2 oa ,t 51 tDR 1g 72 26 Ea°% ''3$ 32 yL 50 2ER IBC 43 371 ' x zcrs 71 F ,a�"0 ' 3E` zc ' ,d` zBc�3 49 t 47 31R 38 BR 6 3w 4AR 3 • x,,;, E 54 3BCR 4BCR 1ER h5 sgE.4 46 IER 4C A 0 70 ,o 47 tec 48 47 48 R+vE F 55 C COIONAL 0 45 4BR 6 D h tAR s� 81 62 AR 44 MycF 49 58 57 58 59 60 t fc 40CR 44 2A yCh'. �• 7+ 1\1A 3� 2 3r �? PU 4D 39C 48CR 2ER 3DR g 38 IB 340s `� .50 / 43 t9R \0301 t 41 40 TPACT 41 51tB 478 42 0155332C ��tAR 39\ 4C 25� .. F .. OLD COURSE DRIVE `i•' 413E 2 40 43 44 45 46 3 38 28 2 4eR 3CR 2A It 20 a 24 12CR 39 4B „ 37 z t 2AR 23 2 3B 3E K J NEWPORT BEACH, CA pacif' ay HOMES c 1B b3 64 56 58 57 6B b9 gp qA 3BR+ 70 < DRrvE •• 1 B 0 1` � SPANISH B6 \ B 3&R 89 � 713A J I 2DR lE � 2A 4a 4DR 0 � 52 516 1948 R16 Y 44 �Pa� 8g5 x e007 79>c U !0 11 12 j3 4 15 38 17 18 1�' •�q 4BR 14A 4BR ICR 661H C"' 743BR O 3ER 9 ° F JUPRER DRNE ig 2p 34 837 8 8 04142 4 Ipp 751AR 3Ba+e 7 8 5 88 87 6 E ° 21 22 IONC A : 1B0. sC017 3BC 1D 48CR 3Dt BAY•DRryE 1 , 10 78 3C A °z 3D 2BCR •YR p3 04 23 2/R c 33 32383c2g2 2 2 2 24 93A� 2 ti* ; 77 2e a 10 2 4BC 2E ? 4BCR JER �� 2BCR 2�83 ° B c}�24 to 3 4 E 88 yp y1 �� 3c 82 k 25 1 2 3 4 3 IA 1C 3B 1C U � %�, OLD COURSE DRNE ya J� °'8 03 �� 2320R EDGEW 3 8 7 8 9 10 .r�R tiry 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 3 24140 E � , \R TRAC7 4BCg Iec 4aa 3Bc 3 8 C �� IE 80 op 27 4A 4CR 1BR '�• 1k 305 75390 92BC IER 7 ?��P ?� R I� 48R ��� k8$ /qDN� 4 A6 to 82 38CR 40R 2BCR 3BC 1 ]BCR B ?�¢ 2A 69 B 20 3cR 14 2B 4 f2 °po a A 8 18 15 !4 13 BCR ��' 40 -� 3aR c u 3B 2C 484Ae 04 0 ,1 7j•, RryE 7 2c 12 Il 8ER 9 58 29 4B 34 5 38 3 3 39 491CR 4C 83 w . ao J B OAR TREE DR I p 28CR '• WWGRA55 DRNE 9 0 9 q2' •• _�•"' GLENEAGLES DRNE G 30 IER 30 29 513uE x BI 8lic3R _ Jgq ,_., 83� F 17 18 4Bc 2E0 s 1 A 6318 4c 57 31 3DR 33 3e 2cR 5218 3880 0 1D 2e 3Mt ia' I6 2DR 18C 334DR 3�37 ' N 3cR IB 532A tMt 79 14 IS�ry' 'BIG HORN 18 10 4BCR 96 iBCR 3B 62 x 3ER 68 ,38 2Ca 3A4 IB 2C lA' W ' S4 48 BR78 G NE B 2gCR 1D ]BCR 1BC 3BCR 20 x 55 J\ 4m77 23 22 19 20 25 24 23 22 341� 4�3g 51 /B 20 55 33 IA 24 2•J26! aNE 58 IC 31R 78 ' JDR JAR 18 230 JDBR •A HONORO DRNE 33 09 C �E ep 57 a 4ea75 24 s4 29 3p � 3BCR sae 40 1) 50 sER 3ca 64 �34 � 1uaT 19 IBR yfi qp 26 TRACT 31 3 TRACT 313x 2BR �5938 tut74 �6 3� 31 2� AE 2BLR IER 3DR ARF 4BC 41 49 4C G 3548R 23 g2 y, OYSTER BAY DRNE 253w y0 5 B 3BR uR \C •93 'Z�l OaN C ?Soso 3BCa t CT 2D 42 48 tw d7 38 u 59fAR 4A qe Ia AA• 51 10H 43 37 TG 18 �� �6 A , 80 3e 72 26N�ao0a 3� 33 32cA` z y2 50 49204 Be 47 sDa 18R je 15 . 81 zcR 71 F y y. g3 4NE 3E 38 M 82 1Ba 70 3\0 3ecR 4 t� 44 6 0t40 w 1cR14 3 zcR 3c 6q 4 47 48 45 F 1 4 et 482BR 55 C COLONW DRNE 45 43R a1>> n�oO ,^0 yy 6A. 1 �� 3AR 4 43 y�'9Ce 4gAR sE io 8 59 5B 59 50 ,0C BBCR 44 7A 'i74' ri^ 'll 4p 2D 3BC /BCR 2ER �q2 2Gt os2 $ 50 491BR Ir 3g BTRACT 0 'A \0002 t 41 40 41 6178 47 0 87 / 42 x .� 4 40 25 �.. F OLD COSUR • 39 .. ..._. _.. E DRIvrNE F. 40 3E 1&4 42 43 44 45 48 3 38 26 2 4Rq 3CR 7A 1E 2C 1B 24 120N 39 48 2AR 23 238 3E 2R 37 184 3 \B 38 22 E, x 3 IAR 3 33 , R L28 Ze 30 — 2CR 21 4 _V' A AR 20� B 35 ° 31 IA4 C b t0 34 33 32 xR 19 40R 2 oR �R$y�0 2B 16 3 2C - C\ 28R 7 a IS ICR 17 3 i&t LEGEND IA 15 g r-----1 LOTS REOUESTING SETMK MODIFICATIONS \14 13 12 11 1ti0 3C ` 50 LOT NUMBERS PER FINAL TRACT MAPS 39 2A ICA 3A 1 48R BUILDING TYPE n SETBACK MODIFICATION INDEX MAP BISON AVENUE _•�-"• f xR +B U 38 SN IB 2C 2B 24 2J2Y Y ,OGEE 212C 23 22 2A x SBa Ica 3`a M A / ONE FORD ROAD NEWPORT BEACH, CA pacif' ay HOMES 2CR in x 4ER 5.x, 2AB60� 73 U 30 11 � 2 13 14 IS 18 17 18 19 2 743BR O ]ER 9 F JUPRER DRIVE G •/ B8 87 R E x o 21 22 tAjt 76+� SBCRB B 6 $ JER ,eR j817 78 x A StD 48Ca W JD 28M ,2R 65 64 23 1 7728 JBCR Io 4BC 2E ? 40CR 440 28CR 63 ° $ 242AR ,e �615 1 2 3 4 E 88 20 2DR 82 25 to OLD COURSE DRI >0 �1 '4 x 2DR VE A. �e6 81 ev, 26 � a wt � M ti ?A 305 TRA 0 48CR IBC 4, JBC 2BC 1E� (! ,=}�.G ,E B9 r 27 igOHIY 4 a 6 to 2 JBCR 40R 2BCR JBC 19 8 }M�¢' 2A 59 $ SCa oq�A 83ata7 0 38 15 14 13 1 �R w JDa 28 58 29 48 G {. 9 2 $ OAK TREE DRNE lO PBCA 8 CLENFACLES DRIVE G 30 IER 3x3R 7 'JCR`s 8xa g 17 18 10 20 21 b3 tB 4c 57 j tD 2B 3Ia "2D' 19 2DR 10C BC 7E 3BCp 3B4DR SBC37 0 31 MR 5 10 18 IBCR 98 g 52 2C 3ER 58 G B C HORN IVE I$ 2BDR 4BLR 1D 3BCR 4BC 36JBCR � � 32 2Cx 23 E2 19 28 25 24 23 22 347� 4ER 39 551 43 2D 55 33 u JDR /Aq 21 '20 305R HONORS onIyE 28 30 1 A 3 JBCR Jpq 40 50 JEa xR 54 W' 34 28 0 teR .N D 33 2 c+ 28 130 31 27 20 2BCa IER wR ��' 4BD 41 49 4C 7RACYG 3648R >D 25 +0A 2� C 7 5390 SBCR 2D 42 48 2AR 5�3 36 2A a AL 51 td 0 F 28��No6P0 Y3 8 2 3 2 50 492Ea Iec 43 47 38 37 xR BR 30 x E 4B 447 tER 4oa A4 81Ea 4C � SA A5 F b fah `b5 A7 482� tx 55 C 48 co QNUL OR NE AS 481 3 44 D hryr tut SEA 60 01 82 43 �ceo 49 sD 40 8 57 50 5� 3OR 7BC 4BCR 44 2A 2u+ 42 50 Sx 43 '38 7B IBR 41 40 4CR 51tB 47p 5R361 42x 39 411 . 25 •�.. F _OLD COURSE E DRN.r./ 41 x I&4 42 43 44 45 48 F 40 3 38 26 2 4BR SCR 2A IE 2C TAR 23 12� 39 +B SE 2R 37 2 � mg J 1B Ja 22 2 JB 3 Iut 3 38 A !28 l 30 'A 2m 21 4 JC AR 20 0 35 ° 31 IAR G I) is 34 3 32 x,R 18 4BR 24M 1�y� to 18 8 2c C, 28R " 7 ]` 16 ICR17 Z B IBR LEGEND A15 9 L07S REOUES7ING SE'BACK MODIFICATIONS „F•-•� 11 18 x SETBACK MODIFICATION INDEX MAP BISON AVENUE `•�•�'•• zw 28 ONE FORD ROAD NEWPORT BEACH, CA pajgf ay HOMES 58L57�58j8g180JBR @ IA xCR 70 . 1 -�L ++._sPAnlsI @ g3 It sea 09 +CR O 1BC 4Dt 1948 7R 10 544 �A8g5x tea0 73tc lJ !0 11 12 j3 4 18 iB jry 18R °e+p +eR 08M C^ 74380. O JER JUPRER m 19 2 r 37 1g x" x u 4C x1• $ B E 21 • 9 04142 R8 tAR ri 761AR ]BCR 7 8 5 �" 88 87 g o 22 LONC A ABR Ata JBG ID +BCR JER r - Bar DPoVE yR,l � j017 78 x A m aD x�a ,yR 65 84 23 zAR 3 28 219 aA JB 7BR AIR x' A2 7+ �4 77 2B I JBCR 10 4BC 2E 4BCR rql xLkq 63 ° H 24 2 2 25 24 23 Ae 18 �8 1 2 3 4 E @9 xDa 90 7D 82 �2 257E 4BR J9 IA � URSE DRNE �l �' x g @ @ Je Ica ti�,yti`6 oLD co �2 �rH 3gB �81 s 28xDR DD DRIVE>> 2 lsa 1 2 3 4 8 4A TRACT +BCR IBc +Da JBc 8 C > IE 80 7a 27 41 40 •• -1 � 15390 x� 7Ea } �' Ira 4De 4B1u le 3Da 5 B R 47JgR JC@$ ,RD'1'WO 4 to 52 JBCR 40R 28CR 3BC 1 }BLB ?�¢ 2A 59 H 28 JCR JB x 48uR 84 2 ; f;� ogyEA 87 xc '10 15 14 13 2R !� , q rD a'r 3DR 58 29 AS { 39 E 491Ca +C 03 ,7D J� ,�• B OAK TREE pgNE 10 �•8 GLENEAGLES DRIVE >RNE 50zB¢ >A 82 8 13 Tgp -SCR• 8ya • 2 A •— C 30 lER D 29 51aw x B1 F 17 IB 19 20 1 �• 5318^ +c 57 qq 7Bc +ec xE 3 x31 MR B 7CR 5218 3B BD 5 7D z8 yR '� qI � 3@4DR �37 c � 53 u fAa 79 6 52 x 3ER 58 D IA u $4 +B 28R7@ G am Noah 1 B 18 xecR +aCa 1D 3BfR r� 35JacR IecR 3 57 ?.a55 y, +AR77 23 28 19 28 25 24 23 22 341ec oaNt 58+C 3IA 7@ JOR I,Lq ZB123c9, 705R IAA NON00.8 ORryE 5 n 3 3BCR Juv 40 50 3ER xR 64 '� 34 ZO 19 5858 i�74 . 24eR yf'0 as 31 27 20 29R 3ER 1 36 +ec 41 B TRACT 3D 18R Z 00 g Bc JC OYSIER BAY DRNE 25Jw �9 TRACT » xCT xD 42 49 +c 5038 G 35 +eR +A tc 73 tiB OpN C 15390 35ec1R tp+1 48 xAR 36 2A At 597AR 18 A 80 3072 28N�NotPDt,�t,, zC 32cF1 z 62 60 49xFA IBC 43 47 3DR 371eR 81 zcR 1 F 5 y 3 40p JE 38 7E 3 @z2ra teR 70 3�D x 54 ygCR 4B071Ea 45 44 451ER 4C 84 1B ,,yy `` 0 47 7Bc 40 47 46 p 462BR 55 C COLONIAL DRNE 45 AST 0 8 +D $p 44 D hyJ tM Jr37 81 82 1 �Oo gb ? aw 43 �ceo2, 40 4058 57 56 z 83DR tec +eca 44 u A,8�srlcK°Rc� �� 2 ATE- SBA 2CR 42 7 50 3ec +ecR 431BR ug 0 y IAR zr8 1a TRACT Ay40P 41 40 41 51 475387 42x IAR39 40 25 F OLD CD SE DRIVE x F 40 41 _.., _ IBR 42 .g3 44 45 4@ •`• 3 38 26 x rBy xw 1E 2C IB 24 120 39 40 37 xAR 23 2 JB x zR 38, H` 128 •./' 30 rA 22 a 3 4 JC `tl'' A L U 20 35 ° 31 IAa G 519 34 33 32 � xR 19 +BR x AAR ��Ay,50 xB 18 6 2C C xBR 7 >A 10 ICR17 � 81ea LEGEND IA 15 9 = LOTS REOUESTING SETBACK MODIFICATIONS 0 x T 16 l "IG J NEWPORT BEACH, CA ci�'' pa� ay HOMES xR xA 40 3C iBTi65y 2D2 IE 4pg 52515 948 RIB 544�005� \eR Sh 73tc 4 !0 110213 14 ig 38 Try �BRll[R '� 4BR 3'R 4BR iCR ?A g0'N Co 747BR O SFR 9 F 41.11 DRNE 9 2 34 38 37 8 g JC to ¢ M x 8 � 88 87 E o 21 4AR • 04142 A3 tAR '� 75+�+ JBCR 7 8 b i' 8 22 m 4A LONG BAY pRryF A ti ti g17 78 x A 3pC tp 4BCR 30 2BGR 3ER 85 84 23� 2ix 1 93 32383 2g 19 3B 2 4AR 2212 tF, 77 ze 3BCR ID 4� x 4 E� 28CR 63 2 2 2 23 24 23 2 �e ly 15 H 1 2 3 4 E 89 j R zn 2011 82 �i 25 to 21R 12 3 ¢ 6 to 7C 38 tC 4A .�A ti�lb lix B OLD COURSE DRIVE 0 9 ij x � 81 28 8 ♦ry .. , ' 6 � EDCEtyp00 pR 7 8 9 10 ,�1� R I � 45 4 3 24140 E .. 1 �� pe TRACT" 4BCR 1BC 4DR JBC 2AC 8 C E 80 p»27 4A ,b 15390 y tER 7 4CR tBq gp �� 4�t • 48pER tg 36 iq 3pR 5 C JBCR �1 2A 59 25 xR 473BR JC8 OHN• 4 to g2 JACK 4pR 2BCR 3BC 1 3 6' H 11 28 4C to 3B 2C '484A4 84 0 �`' ; ooD pR,�A 8 •18 I5 14 33 12 1� 3[R 10 a�" 3pR 58' 29 48 34 598 y 9 39 B 50? I i44� 9 78O B ON( TRaE pRNfl 10 8 GLENEAGLES DRIVE G 30 IER SABWGRPSS DRIVE 2m+ 3. 62 ..- 8 1g SJGR.. 1g 19 20 21 A 53 33 3g 31 30 29 c j•513ut x 81 F 17 tx 4x 2E 3 19 4c 57 31 3DR xR tg u Je 2cR 6218 38 80 o tp 2e yR ' :2p 2d ° 384� w37 0 532A tu179' 14 15 Ig .1? 111 18 OR3b 62zc JER 58 • �Z 322CR DIG H 1D JBCR 4BC JRCR tBCR 30 �' rc 3Aq '2IB 1C IA , u 64 48 gR76 G ORN NE B pgER 40CR o 55N 4AR77 23 2E 13 28 25 24 NOR23 22 34,x 4u 38 51 4e 2D 56 33 to 129 250 27 28 � 58 4C 3AR78 3pR • uR BI '20:. wsR HO`+ NE 33 c C� BAY DRIVE u 157 a 4BR75 24 2e x A 3 JBCR 3DR 40 50 3EN 3CR 54 W 34 w 4E tDR � 10 3 .. 20 29 0 31 3 B 21 x zeR TRAc'Y � TUR 20 19 583g tcR74 08 � .,AQ t 27 LE 2BCR tER 3DR t,RF 4BC 43 3b49R 23 22 2A Ol'BEER BAY DRI 25yR 20 TRACT ap CY 2D 42 49 4c G 5d38 7BR tCR +01 N C 15390 ,` JBCR tOR] 487AA 382A w 59tAR 4A73 a0 2 °R 51 18 ♦0 80 3B 72 25 �,oF-ae�R 33 32 b`b 50 492ER fBc 43 473DR 37IBR 815 1 A, 81 2cR 71 F 9. 'Sy, 2c 6F' E 2K%3 3E 38 M 2cR14 3 gz2 ROAR t0 (l 3�0 3c 54 3BCR 49CR tER A5 44 4g t[R 4C 84 18 �a0 42 tx 48 47 48 DRIVE F 41112 48211R 55 C coLONut• 45 4BR xR12 5�5?�, 44 1) byA� tAR 3TA 58 59 80 81 82 c 49 4BCR 44 u ��1o�r�ST�C DPE3E T+� Z �1A 3e � 2C4R3 42 oP2i,` 50 AD ! 7 /8CBCP 2FA 3DR 7f1C � ,� � 3 qP tB 7D5 43 fBR �tRM1ea.1 TCT la.h.J�l t 41 40 ql 5118 470538 42x _. �1AR 39 40 25 ~ F 48 39 .._. OLD couR5E~`~'.`. 41 ORryE JE 1BR 42 43 44 45 18 F 40 4gq 3 37 26 2 3CR ?A tE 2c 2AR 23 2 2C 49 K 3E 2R a reR 127 3 N8 38 22 H�,•L28 30 4A xR 21 4 x 'tJ' A AR B 35 ° 31 tAR 20 G 5 t8 34 93 32 xR 19 1BR 2 AM �QSy,�2 28 le 8 x C 2BR18 ,cR 17 2 78 t&t LEGEND A 15 9 x = LOTS REOUESRNG SETBACK MODIFICATIONS • 11 18 q9 30 LOT NUMBERS PER FIN4L TRACT MAPS 14 13 1239 2A 1CR y' 4BR BUILONG TPE B FORD ROAD ._1. ..r — 29/ Planning Department Advance Division 5-30-1995 AERONUTRONIC FORD/BELCOURT PLANNED COMMUNITY 2 y / YwIl / Ll ��/ BUILDING/FINANCE TRANSFER SLIP Date: 610-4610 Building 010-4612 010-4614 010-4616 010-4618 010-4622 010-5008 010-4620 010-5002 010-5004 010-5000 010-5812 010-2405 010-2406 010-2410 010-2411 010-2415 010-2416 260-5890 270-4672 270-4674 010-2201 010-2211 010-226 010-5055 6-931%bld9fUp (valuation) . . . . Electrical ... . . ........ . . . Grading .. . . . . ....... .... . Plumbing ...... . . ........ . Heating . . .. . .... . ... .... . Pool/Spa . ............. .. . Special Building Fees . ... ... . .. . Grease Interceptor .. ........ . . Plan Check - Building . . . . . . . . . . . Plan Check - Grading .... . .. ... . Zoning a Subdivision Fees . . . . . . . . . Sale of Maps a Publications .. . ... . . San. Distr. 15 - Res. - $2350/unit. . . . . San. Distr. 15 - Comm. - $470/1000 sq. ft.. minimum $2350 (except additions) San. Distr. 16 - Res. 32350/unit. . . . . . San. Distr. 16 - Comm. $470/1000 sq. ft. . minimum $2350 (except additions) San Distr. 17 - Res. - S2350/unit . . . . . San Distr. 17 - Comm. - $470/1000 sq. ft. . minimum $2350 (except additions) Fair Share (Circulation a Transportation Fund) . . . . . . . . . . . . Excise Tax - Residential . . . . . . . . . . Excise Tax - Commercial .... . . . ... . Deposit Fees (Refundable) .. . . .. . .. . SJHTC Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Calif. Seismic Safety Fee .. . . . .. . . . Fire Department Fees (See Schedule) . . . . . S f CO �j°L'h0'Ck�/v ry i 04c-, l BUILDING/FINANCE TRANSFER SLIP Date: 010-4610 Building (Valuation) . . . . S 010-4612 Electrical ... . . . ..... . .... S 010-4614 Grading .. . ... ........... . f 010-4616 Plumbing . . ...... .. . .... .. f 010-4618 Heating . ..... .. .. .. .... .. $ 010-4622 Pool/Spa ............ ..... f 010-5008 Special Building Fees . . . . . . . . . . . f 010-4620 Grease Interceptor . . . . . . . . . . . . 010-5002 Plan Check - Building . . . . . . . . . . . f 010-5004 Plan Check - Grading . . . . . . . . . . . S 010-50DO Zoning 6 Subdivision Fees . . . . . . . . . S 010.5812 Sale of Maps S Publications . . . ..... f 010-2405 San. Distr. 15 - Res. - f2350/unit. . . . . S 010-2406 San. Distr. 15 - Comm. - $470/1000 sq. ft.. $ minimum $2350 (except additions) 010-2410 San. Distr. 16 - Res. f2350/unit. . . . . . f�_ 010-2411 San. Distr. 16 - Comm. $470/1000 sq. ft. $ minimum $2350 (except additions) 010.2415 San Distr. 07 - Res. - $2350/unit . . . . . f 010-2416 San Distr. 11 - Comm. - $470/1000 sq. ft. f minimum $2350 (except additions) 260-5890 Fair Share (Circulation i Transportation Fund) . . . . . . . . . . . . f 270-4672 Excise Tax - Residential . . . . . . . . . . f 270-4674 Excise Tax - Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . f 010-2201 Deposit Fees (Refundable) . . . . . . . . . . f 010-2211 SJHTC Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f 010-226 Calif. Seismic Safety Fee . . . . . . . . . . S 010-5055 Fire Department Fees (See Schedule) .. .. . S 6-93MU941IP BISON AVENUE /� V 54 V ��f 1 2-2A 2-3BR �2�� j- JJJ /".�I 2_18 2-JA-�-- 2-tc r 2-2e 60 --� 2-3C 6i /70 // _ _ 2-2C ----------- 4 8T } 44 jj 2-3BR i I I 1 549 2A 57 I I4 � 1_ 8 48 \ II 1{ i-41111 1-w. (1i 7-4AR i i_2C) 46 d6 I J2> l � 6.1 _R I A� � 45 II I 3KJ2s1 t J2a t-2 44 1_4Cj? \9 ut = szfi II O Jto rl s,a \e00 II I V s,z 9� i +t I 34 rry JfJ S14 10 1 I I I 1-48R 3-'-20R1I! 3fi t 3 eR 36 L . _L V Ste 7 \l\ \ � 11 r.11 Z-..�I '-2A /C40 41 t9Ts�i: r / �'►� 29 / /(tC 1�� z9tf ' 4C 2 ——7B" I `�+'yt 26 25 23 ® ^ ►i J�J_ t-JBR 7-2 I 24 I t,3CR V /2a�p 4AR t i L �t - L% 28�9�—..�,.,, yp,288 231 2JE 229 1 // a 34 35 I- I-2Bt� t-4C 37 I I 1 N as In 224 I Q -1A 1_38 1-2C ® - w i 223 - ��` 22fi 22] 22E Lu STREET - 1 i I I �It 32 O 2-30 2-3CR 2 232A 1 2-18 Q 2t9 I 222 221 21fi 14 i y I 215 27 I24 1 2�3pR 26-2" 2-I9 1— 1 1 I I 1 19 1 1 - 2! �3C I� 2-28R i 2 20E 23 22 2-A 2-38R 2-ICR z,a n Q , 2i1 1 2 I ``O2-1O 16 I2,2C X \ I I 15 I �® -38 / 1 �j4 � } 1! 2ay 2,2CR I % 6 6k \ p1 O W STREET _ BUILDINGS WITH SETBACK ISSUES LOT NUMBERS PER TRACT MAP LOT NUMBERS PER TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 5 R I"1w 4J 144 1 w� ;] 5-JcR 1 5�-2✓A t7o I O 29 6-J 6 18 (/c r- 33 34 b-2 F-6RR $�mT 11v-TA�u� t "F" STREET d I _ (—I 37 I I I --it 501 e O 57 -- - - - •8" STREET � — — � J/ 24 45 5-462C 1fis 2 2z R I 1 2-2CIt 68 1fi] f r0- I D 44 I 22 6/ \ 2-38 fi t61 21 W! 2 a 31AR ,a5 I I � 2 I I 2—,AR jtfi1 2 2-3CR / I • 1 82-2C � 1� 1f0 18 1 � I1 2- tEt La 1 2. 117 1 } 1 1P 12 \L2—� 2—� 2—iCA IE I I FORD ROAD_ 2,) ' uL , v' Fiv un cDaD4;c scaLE: 1n =Qo "dams Sireeter CIVIL ENGINEERS INC. Corporate Park, Irvine, CA 92606 714 474-0330 Fax: 714 474-0251 email: ASIAS!Oix.netcom.com I i i -ge, W,1;e "4�—e QUALITY ORIGl : NAL (S) '`P 1 ' - One Ford Road A Lot No. 71 4 94 Lf 4 9 11 13 17 20 23 30 33 36 L� 39 43 47 '1 9 13 Tract 15332 15389 15390 15390 `15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 15390 Building Setback Modification Requests ; Air May 20, 1997 Garaee Buildin Appurtenance t I x g�. x M X X - X n t f r. X X ZAN X X - ►.I 15391 X 15391 t X X 0 r J \ 112 ,f