The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPOINT DEL MAR_DEIR11111111111111111111111111111111 *NEW FILE* Point Del Mar DEIR SCREENCHECK SUBMITTED: March 14, 1986 DRAFT EIR CIRCULATED: Avril 18, 1986 FINAL EIR CERTIFIED: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT POINT DEL MAR NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA SCH 084052306 EIR PREPARED FOR: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 1768 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92685-8915 EIR PREPARED BY: SANCHEZ TALARICO ASSOCIATES 359 SAN MIGUEL DRIVE, SUITE 200 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 APRIL 1986 A U ii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................ v GENERAL SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .....................viii INTRODUCTION..............................................................1 Environmental Procedures..............................................1 Previous Environmental Documentation..................................I Project Sponsors and Contact Persons..................................2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.......................................................4 Project Location......................................................4 Project Characteristics.. .4 Proposed Actions......................................................5 LOCAL AND REGIONAL SETTING...............................................26 Existing Onsite and Surrounding Adjacent Land Uses...................26 Local Setting........................................................26 Regional Setting.....................................................30 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION MEASURES AND LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION ..........................37 Land Use/Aesthetics..................................................38 Transportation/Circulation...........................................51 Onsite Noise.........................................................66 Public Services/Noise.. .6 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED R.67 Introduction.. ........ .......,67 No Development.. . ......................67 Design Altenative: Fifth Avenue Edge Treatment ......................67 LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ............................70 The Relationship Between Local and Short -Term Uses of the Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long -Term Productivity..........................................70 Significant Irreversable Environmental Changes Which Would Be Involved in the Proposed Actions Should It Be Implemented ....... 70 Growth -Inducing Impacts..............................................71 SUMMARY OF UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED........................................72 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS FOUND TO BE INSIGNIFICANT .............................73 iii SUMMARY OF EXISTING CITY POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS .......................74 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES...........................................76 PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS TO THE REPORT.................................77 PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED DURING PREPARATION OF THE REPORT.....................................78 REFERENCES...............................................................79 APPENDICES Appendix A - I Appendix B - I Appendix C - r Appendix D - C Appendix E - I II It iv POINT DEL MAR LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Regional Location........................................7 Exhibit 2 Vicinity Map.............................................8 Exhibit 3 Regional Aerial Photo....................................9 Exhibit 4 Preliminary Site Plan...................................10 Exhibit 5 Tentative Tract Map.....................................12 Exhibit 6 Landscape Plan..........................................13 Exhibit 7 Grading Plan Exhibit 8 ............................................15 View Plane.. .15 Exhibit 9 Typical Cross Section...................................16 Exhibit lOa-d Elevations..............................................17 Exhibit lla-c Typical Floor Plans .......................: ..........21 Exhibit 12 Planned Community Development Plan.. .24 Exhibit 13 Local Aerial Photo......................................27 Exhibit 14 Local Projects..........................................29 Exhibit 15 Committed, Approved, and Proposed Projects..............36 - Exhibit 16 Existing General Plan...................................39 Exhibit 17 Master Bikeways System..................................42 Exhibit 18 Existing Zoning.........................................44 Exhibit 19 Existing Daily Volumes & ICU Values.....................52 Exhibit 20 Directional Distribution.................................54 Exhibit 21 Project Daily Volumes...................................56 Exhibit 22 Future CNEL Noise Contours .............................63 Exhibit 23 Sound Walls.............................................65 Exhibit 24 5th Avenue Treatment Alternative ........................68 TABLES Table A Project Statistics......................................11 Table B Proposed Residential Development Standards..............25 Table C Trip Generation.........................................53 Table D Critical Intersections - 1988 ...........................58 Table E ICU Summary 1988........................................59 Table F Future Traffic Noise Levels with Project................62 I v I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project is located on a 6.6-acre site in southeast Newport Beach (Corona del Mar community) near the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast Highway. The site is bordered on the east by Goldenrod Avenue, on the north by Sea Lane, on the west by MacArthur Boulevard, and on the south by Fifth Avenue, East Coast Highway, and a Mobil service station. The proposed project site is 6.6 gross acres (5.2 buildable acres). The project is proposed as a single-family residential development comprised of 43 detached single-family units (8.27 units per buildable acre). Four types of units are proposed, ranging from 1,650 square feet to 2,000 square feet in size with an average unit size of 1,700 square feet (Exhibit 4). Access to the project is proposed from one street entrance along Fifth Avenue and one entrance along Sea Lane. No access will be provided directly onto MacArthur Boulevard, East Coast Highway, or Goldenrod Avenue. Parking will be provided in accordance with the project's Planned Community text, at a minimum of 2.0 covered offstreet spaces per unit. An additional 0.5 onstreet parking spaces per unit will be provided for guest parking. A total of 142 parking spaces are proposed including 120 offstreet and 22 onstreet parking spaces. The applicant has requested the approval of a zoning amendment to establish a Planned Community District Development Plan and Development Standards, a Tentative Tract Map, Traffic Phasing Ordinance compliance, a grading permit, and certification of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report by the City of Newport Beach. PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified in September, 1985, for a General Plan Amendment (GPA 83-1D) for the Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard project known previously as Brisa del Mar (SCH #84052306). The Brisa del Mar project consisted of a 96-unit multi -family senior citizen housing project. The requested General Plan Land Use Element Amendment was a change of designation from low -density residential to multi -family residential. An alternative to the Brisa del Mar project was adopted. The adopted amendment changed the General Plan land use designation from low -density residential to medium -density residential with a maximum of 45 dwelling units. I 0 I I I vi ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS , For a tabular summary of potential impacts, mitigation measures, and the level of significance after mitigation, please refer to the General Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures, and Level of Significance After Mitigation provided in the following section. The project, on a cumulative basis, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will contribute to increased traffic on local roadways. ALTERNATIVES The Final EIR for GPA 85-1(D) Brisa del Mar contained a range of alternatives which were analyzed and compared to the original project. Additional alternatives other than those contained in the original Brisa del Mar EIR are analyzed in this Supplemental EIR. The following alternatives were discussed in the original Brisa del Mar project EIR: No Development, No Project, One Hundred Percent Affordable, One Hundred Percent .Senior, and Increased Density. The No Project alternative assumed development under the existing General Plan. The No Development alternative would retain the site in its existing condition and assumes no further development of the site. The One Hundred Percent Affordable alternative assumed all the basic characteristics of the Brisa del Mar project with the exception that all the 96 proposed units would be affordable as opposed to only 84 units. The One Hundred Percent Senior alternative assumed the basic characteristics of the Brisa del Mar project with the exception that the rental policy of the complex would restrict renting of units to senior citizens at least 55 years old. The Increased Density: All Seniors/All Affordable alternative would consist of a senior citizen housing complex at a density of 45 units per gross acre. This would result in about 300 units averaging 600 square feet in size. The -following alternatives are discussed in the Alternatives section of this Supplemental EIR. The No Development alternative (also discussed in the Brisa del Mar EIR) would retain the site in its existing vacant condition and would consequently be environmentally superior to the proposed project. This alternative would, however, delay the City's objective of providing adequate housing, and is thus not considered consistent with General Plan goals and policies. The Design Alternative, Fifth Avenue Edge Treatment, would allow for a 5- to 7-foot crib or retaining wall which would be constructed along Fifth Avenue to compensate for a portion of the 10- to 12-foot grade differential between Sea Lane and Fifth Avenue. The remainder of the differential would be compensated through the site. To provide privacy to units along Fifth Avenue, an additional six-foot screening wall would be constructed behind the crib wall starting at an elevation 5 to 7 feet above Fifth Avenue. F1 Ll vii I This alternative is considered environmentally inferior to the project due to aesthetic impacts resulting from the crib and screening walls. ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM EFFECTS Implementation of the project represents a long-term commitment of the site to urban use. Development of the site would result in long-term impacts by contributing to degradation of local water quality and will increase the demand for public services. Please refer to the Brisa del Mar Final EIR for a discussion of these impacts. The project will also contribute to increased traffic generation. Project implementation will irreversibly commit the currently vacant site to an urban land use., preventing any potential future open space use of the site. Implementation of the project will have a long-term impact on the scenic quality of the area since the site will no longer appear as an undeveloped area. rSeveral irreversible commitments of limited natural resources would result from implementation of the project. These resources include, but are not limited to, water, native vegetation, sand and gravel, asphalt, petrochemical construction materials, various metals,'and forest products. The proposed project would involve an irreversible commitment of labor and capital investment and an increased demand for social and public maintenance services. Alternative energy sources, such as solar energy, are not in widespread local use and it would likely be some time before a real savings in finite energy supplies (e.g., oil and natural gas) can be realized. Therefore, the project would result in. an irretrievable commitment of finite energy resources. Due to the small size and infill nature of the project, it is not expected to increase development pressures on the few remaining undeveloped parcels in the surrounding local area. ANALYSIS OF SHORT-TERM EFFECTS Short-term impacts of development due to construction activities include localized increases in noise, dust, and vehicular emissions associated with construction vehicles and an increase in erosion and sedimentation to nearby drainage systems. Please refer to the Brisa del Mar Final EIR for a discussion of these impacts. The only immediate short-term benefit of the project would be construction - related employment. I I I moo "Mft�"w MON so General Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures EXISTING CITY POLICIES AND POTENTIAL ADVERSE REQUIREMENTS AND LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES AFTER MITIGATION LAND USE AND AESTHETICS The project will be converted from vacant land to residential use which will change the open space characteristic of the site to an urban residential setting. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect, The plan will be subject to approval by the Planning Department, the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Department, and the Public Works Department. The landscape plan shall include a maintenance program which controls the use of fertilizers and pesticides. The landscape plan shall place emphasis on the use of drought -resistant native vegetation and be irrigated via a system designed to avoid surface runoff and overwatering. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floorplans, elevations, and sections. The project shall be designed to eliminate the light and glare spillage onto adjacent properties. Signage and exterior lighting shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. All mechanical equipment, vents, and other service equipment shall be shielded and screened from view by architectural features. A plan depicting the exact location, height, and type of material for all walls separating the project from adjacent uses shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the approval of any grading and/or building permits. The plan shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. Implementation of these measures will reduce potential land use impacts to a level of insignificance. an M�_ WW"01 4010 NOM Sam" M MI NSIMON W so EXISTING CITY POLICIES AND POTENTIAL ADVERSE REQUIREMENTS AND LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES AFTER MITIGATION .TRAFFIC The proposed project will generate an Prior to approval of Tentative Tract Map No. Project specific traffic impacts will be estimated 430 daily vehicle trip ends. 12209, the project shall comply with the City mitigated to a level of insignificance. On a of Newport Beach Updated Traffic Phasing cumulative basis, the project, in concert with Ordinance (TPO revised 1986). Said compliance other past, present and reasonably foreseeable shall first be approved by the City Traffic projects, will contribute to increased traffic Engineer via certification of a revised on local roadways. traffic report ,prepared in accordance with .guidelines for the update TPO. The project shall be required to contribute a SUM equal to its -fair share" of future ' circulation system improvements as shown on the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways and any other mitigation measrues as may be required. ONSITE NOTSE Unacceptable future onsite noise levels Prior to the issuance of building permits for Onsite noise impacts will be reduced to a will result from traffic volume on each of the planned units, an acoustical level of insignificance. MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast engineering study shall be performed based on N, Highway. actual pad, property, and roadway grades, and X building locations and orientations to assure that the exterior building shells of each structure will be sufficient to reduce existing and future noise levels to an acceptable intensity. Prior to occupancy of any unit, a qualified acoustical engineer shall be retained by the City at the applicant's expense to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that noise impacts do not exceed 65 CNEL for outside living areas and active recreation areas and 45 CNEL for interior living areas. All construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 8 a.m. to 5 p.m, on Saturday and Sunday. Any mechanical equipment and emergency power generators will be screened from view and shall be shound-attenuated so as not to exceed 55 dBA at the property line. EXISTING CITY POLICIES AND POTENTIAL ADVERSE REQUIREMENTS AND LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES AFTER MITIGATION There are no potential impacts from the project related to the public education system in the City of Newport Beach. The units which are located inside the 65 CNEL contour and have any partial view of Pacific Coast Highway or MacArthur Boulevard shall be mitigated to experience outdoor noise levels less than 65 CNEL and indoor noise levels less than 45 CNEL. Specific provisions shall be determined prior to obtaining any grading permit and shall be installed in accordance with alternative design methods and recom- mendations outlined in the noise report for the Point del Mar project. Noise barrier heights presented below and graphically illustrated in Exhibit 23 shall be integrated into project site design. Walls shall be of heights specified below, con- structed of masonry material, and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits. See Mitigation Measure 4 for recommended specific wall types. Lots Barrier Height (Feet) of Noise Wall From Pad Level Lots 24 to 35 6.0 Lots 36 to 37 8.0 Lots 38 to 43 8.0 PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES Mitigation is not necessary due to lack of potential impacts. Due to existing conditions, impacts caused by the project are below a level of significance. x 1 I I This Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) addresses potential environmental impacts of the proposed 43-unit, single-family residential, Point del Mar residential project. The project site is located near the I intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast Highway in the Corona del Mar area of the City of Newport Beach, California. The applicant has requested the approval an amendment to establish a Planned Community District Development Plan and Development Standards, approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Traffic Phasing Ordinance compliance approval, grading permit, and certification of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report by the City of Newport Beach. The City of Newport Beach has principal responsibility for the project's approval and supervision. Consequently, the City is the Lead Agency 'for preparation of this EIR. This EIR is intended to serve as an informational document, for use in decision making by the City of Newport Beach and other responsible agencies regarding the proposed project. ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES This Supplemental EIR has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), as amended (Public Resources Code, Section 21000, at seq.) and the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Quality Act of 1970, as amended (California Administra- tive Code, Section 15000, at seq.). This report also complies with the rules, regulations, and procedures for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act adopted by the City of Newport Beach. PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified in September, 1985, for a General Plan Amendment (GPA 83-1D) for the Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boule- vard project known previously as Brisa del Mar (SCH #84052306). The Brisa del Mar project consisted of a 96-unit, multi -family, senior citizen housing project. The requested General Plan Land Use Element Amendment was a change of designation from low -density residential to multi -family residential. The EIR analyzed all relevant impacts of the 96-unit project which was proposed at a density of 16.02 du/buildable acres. The EIR also analyzed a range of alternatives including a reduced density and non -senior housing project. An alternative to the Brisa del Mar project was adopted. The adopted amendment changed the general plan land use designation from low -density residential to medium -density residential with a maximum of 45 dwelling units. r 1 I I 2 I This EIR analyzes relevant environmental issues of the currently proposed 43-unit Point del Mar project. Some environmental topics were analyzed sufficiently for this project in the previous Brisa del Mar Certified Final EIR (SCH #84052306) and will not require further analysis. These include the following topics: ' Air Quality ' Earth Resources ' Water Resources ' Biological Resources ' Cultural Resources ' Public Services/Utilities 1 Issues analyzed in this Supplemental Focus EIR include: Land Use and Aesthetics ' Transportation/Circulation On -site Noise ' Schools ' PROJECT SPONSORS AND CONTACT PERSONS I 1 11 I I I n The Lead Agency in preparing this Environmental Impact Report is the City. of Newport Beach. The environmental consultant to the City is Sanchez Tal- arico Associates of Newport Beach, California. The project sponsor for this project is Real Estate Development Corporation. The landowner is The Irvine Company. The project is being managed for the sponsor and property owner by Urban Assist, Inc. Preparers of and contributors to this report are listed on Page 62. Key contact persons are as follows: City of Newport Beach: Environmental Consultant: Ms. Patricia Temple Environmental Coordinator City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 (714) 644-3225 Ms. Annette Sanchez Baesel Principal Sanchez Talarico Associates 359 San Miguel Drive, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 640-1700 Real Estate Development Corporation (Applicant): IUrban Assist, Inc.: I I I J I r r 1 3 Mr. Patrick G. Hayes President 18302 Irvine Boulevard Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 544-2234 Mr. David Neish Principal 3151 Airway Avenue, Building A-2 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 556-9890 1J 4 i '• PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project is located on a 6.6-acre site in southeast Newport Beach near the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast Highway I in the Corona del Mar area. The project site is shown in its regional and local perspectives on Exhibits 1 and 2, respectively. The site is bordered on the east by Goldenrod Avenue, on the north by Sea Lane, on the west by MacArthur Boulevard, and on the south by Fifth Avenue, East Coast Highway, and a Mobil service station (Exhibit 3). PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project site is 6.6 gross acres (5.2 buildable acres). The project is proposed to be developed as a single-family development com- prised of 43 detached, single-family units (8.27 units per buildable acre). Four types of units are proposed ranging from 1,650 square feet to 2,000 square feet in size (Exhibit 4), with an average unit size of 1,700 square feet. ' Access to the project is proposed from one street entrance along Fifth Ave- nue and one entrance along Sea Lane. No access will be provided directly onto MacArthur Boulevard, East Coast Highway, or Goldenrod Avenue. Parking will be provided in accordance with the project's Planned Community text, at a minimum of 2.0 covered offstreet spaces per unit. An addi- tional .5 parking spaces per unit will be provided onstreet for guest park- ing, A total of 142 parking spaces are proposed including 120 offstreet and 22 onstreet parking spaces. Exhibit 4 illustrates the proposed site plan. Table A provides the project statistics. Exhibit 5 illustrates the proposed tentative tract map. Exhi- bit 6 depicts the landscape plan. Exhibit 7 illustrates the grading plan. Exhibit 8 depicts view plans to various units and cross -sections along MacArthur Boulevard, Exhibit 9 illustrates a typical cross section from Sea lane to Fifth Avenue. Exhibits l0a-d depict elevations of the four unit types. Exhibits lla-c illustrate proposed floor plans. The applicant desires to meet the City of Newport Beach's affordable hous- ing requirement offsite. In accordance with the City's Housing Element Implementation Plan, 20% of the 43 units are required to be affordable to ' low and moderate income households. The project's requirement (9 afford- able units), is proposed to be satisfied offsite at the Baywood residential project in Newport Beach. Parkland requirements can be fulfilled via park in -lieu fees dedicated, in accordance with the City of Newport Beach Park ' Dedication Ordinance. A LI I i I L_ I i i I I I I [1 I C I I 5 ADOPTION OF PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT PLAN AND REGULATIONS The site is zoned PC (Planned Community). The applicant has requested approval of an amendment to the change of zone to adopt a planned community district plan and specific regulations. The proposed Planned Community Development Standards for the 6.6-acre resi- dential site would permit the following uses: Single Family Dwellings Detached Condominiums/Townhomes Custom Lots Temporary model complex, leasing office, and appurtenant'uses Signs The Planned Community Development Standards would allow 43 residential dwelling units. The Planned Community Development Plan is depicted on Exhibit 12. Table B provides a brief summary of the proposed development guidelines for residential uses. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Exhibit 5 illustrates the proposed Tentative Map of Tract No. 12209 which delineates the property boundaries of the project site, 43 individual lots, existing infrastructure and easements, and proposed easements. The property is proposed to be subdivided into 43 numbered lots for residential purposes, and two lettered lots for private streets and common areas. PROJECT PHASING Commencement of construction is proposed for Summary, 1986 with completion and occupancy of units scheduled for 1987. The project will be constructed in one phase. PROPOSED ACTIONS Implementation of the proposed project will require the following discre- tionary actions. 1. Certification of an Environmental Impact Report. Acceptance of an environmental document as having been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guide- lines, City Policy K-3, and certification that the data were considered in final decisions on the project. I I i 11 1 1 I .1 I I 1 2. Approval of Planned Community Amendment. Request to establish Planned Community Development Standards and adopt a Planned Community Development Plan for the development of the Point Del Mar Community District. Amendment procedures are discussed in Section 20.51.045 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 012209. Approval that the Tract Map of Tentative Tract 12209 is in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code Subdivision Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. 4. Traffic Phasing Ordinance. Acceptance of a traffic study prepared pur- suant to Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1, and approval of the project based on data contained therein for the ultimate purpose of issuance of building and grading permits. 5. Grading Permit. The project will require approval of a grading permit los angeles county ' REGIONAL LOCATION POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach sanchez talarico associates EXHIBIT 1 2C0 i i 3 !•\- H. 73V/N LAX6i C/4 -�� \ ;�� ..:,:;;• \ "�v U �?,r�'P,CCIF/C Yl6FY 1 \,� � j 2 C/TY OF �n� /fl6r�Ql1/AL AA2K \ �' 1 NEW .QT IiEaC r MONY6w'EY Wes• /1 9 g AA(YO.f/ Ot ✓3��/R/fPl6QY01.2 <C „ CRESTN I�NiiI�7' !'5-39 O¢ CR. CAP. COO r1CFJ r'�_ V [ LA G �I rIFI r'ln nr.Wl G 7:0 I ': VICINITY MAP POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach CIR. INT6'RME*014m .rWoOL oR� ].,Qq E I L I E E S I § E a E Rij E R E i E A4J -lnnnnrnrinrnn nnnnnnnnnn Sanchez talarico associates 0 400 80 EXHIBIT 2 --y'LQ ANGG �' `� ,0:'�i J 0. !►1r, " -'`' jfd/ a.. ' "`e EOUN7N'` d"IAIRPOIkt,`-, '�J �U'''`rf, Y i„' r . NEWF :, :� BAY ` dr 'IF .1, � qf , " tiN yVn`w`.`d t + .r; 4,ft, a;n .♦ L� j /�V�� L • C`r� , 0 IF ANVO ��ti;.: . ��u1 .w'%%rf��r^Ia •[7,;_'�i.•.i -�!. s•... r .� - � a�tT �.w'i �.� IF V ,'•iIF, A,IF qY Y i, T." act,>3 G°- . \+ 1 +" 71 WX K— o, •±J�C=z'}uj3,�E, �... ^ {"� [fr a ;,� � r,j�i, �v �,s. ,��'° �M aj; •. •��^+w,•,-�rt "•y{{[t�t ('�ii� w;^' �• 4• ' ,� .Ei,*. _ �'+7f',�✓ 'lj�'' t'r i� !�S r � +wy i2 �_ _ S` "' ^ , 4.�q� l� "' J yi• M r > �_ +: y'j } ,�.�',y.,. �^�� - �� ,.y' y`{'` � � � Cyr �.'�vF •S, �i•A !��,.<i !;ti_. I• '�.Jr ��. ✓� y1i+r� rry�ry�E�Y; ��h l4'�•(�''l� ��.,j ]�• 'r`�n'3'-,y'`�A"' \\l` ' iT rd�I� Wvv `�� C-t'Act {' ra• ryXT ` �! ��7T ''"uF '\'r ;1 "y�LS, �' IF M �' "a %�'" `„aq..i, • + ' 11 V�a �yj � +�� ;�' '"�:,+a;;�."t. � �,�•,X IF •.f, "0.�Y r i -ri::•4stz�' "a, ..� � � :, y �qJ•, ,.r r r� ; fl!' �Yrz/3,r ^t' {�)�f{,, PC,1�:�Q:� -Cffl ST�'�yy�..�fl�;�' � �''•`�t. .5t?�'s�'�""�� ,� �Qh�K�'F• �LI•i4 lir"J�"'• &��I.�Ll�r• y� .' 1.�'�'�,lVx��.!p F'+�«_/.v. +il�i%�,✓ , � •T�r",�*�+n'Per'''•,+`�,��a�,,,y,+!'+qT,.,-4r�•4 ��'!°��k'^9^." CF1CgpS[fj.`_+�ny,�?V�E' ^IV'' .'. f .:'�^�^.+K 0..0..=.^. .'�`�''+'rt.'u � �'..CS"?,�•�Y;,'rMi:�YY�tt,e75.t':�.%'�'id��i4r.tiE'�Y��'`�w�wr_.a .a ` REGIONAL AERIAL PHOTO POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach 1 sanchez talarico associates r%m EXHIBIT 3 M IM M M=1= M rIMI M IM==!== i M SITE PLAN POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach Source: Fuscoe Williams Lindgren & Short sanc:iez talarico associates no scale EXHIBIT 4 Site Area Summar Gross Acres Buildable Acres Project Characteristics Plan 1: Plan 2: Plan 3: Plan 4: Total Number of Units: Parking Spaces 11 TABLE A PROJECT STATISTICS 6.63 5.20 9 10 12 12 43 Offstreet covered (garage): 86 Driveway: 34 Onstreet: 22 Total Spaces 142 Parking Ratio (spaces/unit):' 3.3 ': Ratio includes onstreet, garage and driveway spaces. i i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 PACIPJC '- CAST SECTION A -A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12209 1' POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach 1 'VESNNO TENTATIVE M W TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12209 mt/..4 V IOIMaa�eM FOR. BLACK 93, IRVIP:ES SUBDIVSICN BLK :32 i� INTERIOR STREET (PRIVATE) 1 r.[ ende otvu/.uR cw v..f e[ro. ant am wa[.[ulv:[o _M__ ST1 C Ei 001Mx1.1 n t 4. cs...r aextun arou.w unf M[ y ut M a..eu f Ffa</R [uwLxO iN rt M� M•CI •w up Mf y ut f}f4nOTO M1[Atla44.lxO WD MRO fW`MfK �/� .2o s=chez talarico associates no. scale EXHIBIT 5 ,SO Jy ESTIMATED EARTHWORK FILL : 17,500 cyd3. > P\'N ` ° "J 0 CUT : 4,000 cyds ■ 4 1 �\ \ \ r �u \ \ \ \ `` � y `29 � \ • 11 P•'avgq � � + __ \_ v� `\if G �O\ \ \=" 1 /A2 '1 nn+ O \ a �" _ - • � oc were � jj�{z`/� + ° � /o � yq.4 eon ,` •��\\ i�\\ `. , 'z o%°ry � ��" - Imo— __� 1 _ ____ _ _____ ______ _ _ ______ __ ---- C. Al ' `� �. .�� ____ _r______ vr9'al7 s ` \ / „y. • • rt• ye '�- .. ` \'`` \ p \ , ` pF .IM1T•, ` • 11�aI`4 /' ' `�A - x w . - • A In t ' V\ \ A0 .\'v s`io1 ?. 2 r ° *9 4. 5 __ T - - \ \ ya x 6 .. i�\ 1 \\�y\E%2 �.I 1 f s.lxe. _ _.J m-u:i Hr-r+za s 7 !>'m "° F < 1 \Y \ ` " 9 '3�� _' '` a"'e• -&��' S 10 11 -fit\ 3 14 1 18 1 9 \ /\ _�2• ` ` \ I__114 ` `�. 11M 19a- OF •1a91 CF •ril4 ��• �•ILS 6F -1'alb pF qF -n1P Li -ISw GF-131 GF ]IYLT 33p -9ii ✓ \ • Z• • \ �\ \1�l �_ y4p pF`r � PrT� G pb•1'YS �IIy IZN PM•1y4 I.Iy�Ll PM-12.1 Ply I,A2 P/trlila P.N-19w] IIp r414 P � 926 IlD•li}p 1161]i] \ P4 �.a �\. ` ` " qF• _ley 11 - I - _ f _ d 'D. �:•`; \ \ ti � 3�,� \1st � _\,�a. a..w ..F r �1 '� �` ' W•' [:\ \ 4\\ w�l�+ .r.f/ .. _ ~'M1T cl.'�+` °��-a -.j'_ _ 'F _ _ �`^T t3�N .�:{`�y. 1 'J` �• \1 �J ,_ t _ _ __ � ` -__ 7� �-,-____ \� �P� _ ` V •-'"� ^0k' t9P / P{k � •"+%'l�gO,a� \ ` � ,....I _ W' ". ,q� �-�_ _34'" •33 - 32 �31- `- 30 - `------ t36 6 ` cF -u1w 6F-1u.9 W-.Ii, °F-mw aFtinal 24 \ 23 22 21 'w 1 \'�"• LOT B _ '9F /GF-nl,�, ryy�n9p PID i1{x v/p ns4 PnTS P.�1'CP _ \ \ ,aS •IYI^ -nit -13p8 r :,•• � \. P/ALC PM -.ILO i/O• PI611B S4 P 1146 PM•1901 �1319 I • \\\ �1l ' �\• , II&S 'GO` IIBS�-PM•1�91 I'`y YIBS-PHF`r188 PM-1'An IIAn9<j . • • a _ - vA°.Iwx p/D• Iwa P_fEi?4^ vIO•HDp Plpgly a'1 \ \ EF.rozz �� i `_ `� •� � / � ` \ �.� rx ..m 3 P� qi'l � ' 3p ry 5 e \ \ ", q -_ 1 _ :r- _ �yy ,T s p` p p �dry I ` o 3d• 4A ` ,•` °- - ,•\ Sbt/ -� �� LOT A TM AVE RAC%F�- �"" w II i"�� ✓ ' _. `� —� J OAST CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN Sanchez tCilarico GRADING PLAN -� F+ FOR associates CORONA DEL MAR SITE POINT DEL MAR \- REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CO. Cityof Newport Beach rn P Source: Fuscoe Williams Lindgrerj &Short le EXHIBIT 7 MacARTHUR BLVD. VIEW 1 MacAR' VIEW 2 VIEW 3 VIEW 4 VIEW PLANE EXHIBIT POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach i Refer to Grading Plan for location of View Planes 4' Source: Fuscoe Williams Lindgren & Short Calderon Nakamura & Associates sanchez talarico associates n EXHIBIT 8 SE, TYPICAL CROSS SECTION POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach ENUE Source: Fuscoe Williams Lindgren & Short Calderon Nakamura & Associates I1C0 nno scale EXHIBIT 9 KI&RT 19!�M t� f LWr ELEVATIONS POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach WK EWAUCN Source: Calderon Nakamura & Associates CfS�OC1CIteSC11Ci 1C0 4 rle EXHIBIT 10B ELEVATIONS POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach Source: Calderon Nakamura & Associates Sanchez talarico assoaates rle EXHIBIT 10C I` its ji iCS r ELEVATIONS POINT DEL .. City of •• Beach 11 �Qq N f >m 4 Source: Calderon Nakamura & Associates sanchez talarico associates rle EXHIBIT 10D 2a?z K* IOre UWJ. 2 CM TYPICAL FLOOR PLANS POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach frllxllI Source: Calderon Nakamura & Associates Sanchez talarico CxSSOCiclbs re EXHIBIT 11 A - At 3 TYPICAL FLOOR PLANS POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach t Source: Calderon Nakamura & Associates sanchez talarico associates n EXHIBIT1 IB I I I I I I 11 a I I I 1 ,L I Im TYPICAL FLOOR PLANS POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach M14 1x L- P121, ' cIP I I i i 1. Source: Calderon Nakamura & Associates sctnchez talarico associates rno e EXHIBIT 11 C I I 1 I r 11 I I I I r I PLANNED COMMUNITY ' DEVELOPMENT PLAN POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach sanchez talarico associates re EXHIBIT 12 1 25 TABLE B PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY STANDARD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Maximum Building Height 32 feet Setbacks from Streetsl MacArthur Boulevard 35 feet Fifth Avenue 10 feet Sea Lane 10 feet Goldenrod Avenue 10 feet Setbacks from Private Streetsl Structures 5 feet Garages: Without sidewalk 5-7 feet, or 18 + feet With sidewalk3 5 feet, or 18 + feet Setbacks from Property Lines Between residential structures 8 feet Garages 3 feet (from side property line) Houses or living areas 4 feet Parking Offstreet (covered) 2.0 per unit Onstreet 0.5 per unit Fences, hedges and walls - height maximum 8 feet4 1 Setbacks to structures measured from property line. 2 Setbacks to structures measured from back of curb. 3 Measured from back of 4 foot sidewalk. 4 Except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to 3 feet. C J 26 LOCAL AND REGIONAL SETTING EXISTING ONSITE AND SURROUNDING ADJACENT LAND USES The 6.63-acre vacant parcel is bounded by MacArthur Boulevard to the west, Sea Lane to the north, Goldenrod Avenue to the east and Fifth Avenue and East Coast Highway to the south. The site, presently undeveloped, slopes gently to the south, with a small cluster of trees and undergrowth covering an easement (Metropolitan Water District) located in line with Fernleaf Avenue. Exhibit 13 presents an aerial view of the project site and the surrounding land uses. Residential land uses border the site on the north, southeast and south. These uses include the The Shores Apartments to the north along Sea Lane and a mix of attached and detached units in the neighborhood to the south and southeast. To the east of Goldenrod Avenue lies Harbor View Elementary School and Community Youth Center and Grant Howald Park. A service station lies to the southwest on the corner of MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast Highway. To the west of MacArthur Boulevard is Newport Center. ' LOCAL SETTING The project site is located in a residential neighborhood along the western edge of the Corona del Mar area in Newport Beach. The surrounding area is characterized by a mix of older and modern homes including single-family detached and attached units as well as multi -family units. An established commercial area fronts onto East Coast Highway through Corona del Mar south and southeast of the project site. Recreational opportunities in the area consist of the Grant Howald Park, Begonia Park, Corona del Mar State Beach, and the bluff walk above the beach. ' Development potential in the Corona del Mar area is limited to redevelopment of older residential and commercial lots and development of the few vacant parcels remaining in the area. Currently, within the vicinity there are several proposals for development which have been recently approved, are under review by the City or are ' under construction which could affect the project neighborhood. These include the following: Jasmine Park Homes/Fifth Avenue and Marguerite (under construction) ' Corona del Mar Seniors Project/Fifth Avenue Parcel (approved) Buck Gully Open Space (approved) Point del Mar/Fifth Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard (under review) ' Corona del Mar Homes - Summerwind (under construction) ' 2600 East Coast Highway Redevelopment (approved) Crown House Senior Residential (approved) Newport Center and Peripheral Sites CPA 85-1B (under review). I LOCAL AERIAL PHOTO saachaesalarico POINT DEL MAR rnCity of Newport Beach EXHIBIT 13 28 ' There are also several planning and transportation studies which involve the area which includes the Corona del Mar Specific Area Plan and the ' widening of Coast Highway west of MacArthur Boulevard. Exhibit 14 depicts the location of each project site or planning area. Point del Mar is the subject of this EIR. The other projects are the focus ' of other environmental documentation and are briefly described below. The Jasmine Park project is bounded by Harbor View Drive to the north, ' Marguerite Avenue to the east, Grant Howald Park to the south, and Jasmine Creek/Harbor View Elementary School to the west. The project, currently under construction, involves development of 9.6 acres into a gated residential community, comprised of 47 attached single-family units and a ' private recreation -area. Project approval included a General Plan Amendment (GPA), amending the Land Use, Residential Growth, and Recreation and Open Space Elements of the General Plan. The CPA entailed a change in General ' Plan designation from Low -density Residential (4 or less dwelling units per buildable acre) to Medium -density Residential (4.1 to 10.0 d.u. per buildable acre) with a maximum ceiling of 47 units. ' The Fifth Avenue Parcel includes 13.2 gross acres bounded by the Oasis Senior Center, Marguerite Avenue, Harbor View residential tract, Buck Gully and Fifth Avenue. The project approved in December 1985 entailed amendment and Tentative Tract Map to allow 110 attached condominium (fourplex) units designed for sale to senior citizens. The site is located immediately adjacent to the Oasis Senior Center. ' The Buck Gully site (GPA 83-1A) consists of 55 gross acres. The site is a relatively narrow drainage swale extending along the eastern boundary of the City from Fifth Avenue to San Joaquin Hills Road. The western edge of Buck Gully is formed by the Harbor View residential tract. The area changed under the General Plan from Recreational and Environmental Open Space with an alternate use of Low -density Residential to Recreational and Environmental Open Space with no alternate use. ' The Corona del Mar Homes - Summerwind project involves 40 single-family and duplex -residential units south of Pacific Coast Highway on Carnation and ' Dahlia Avenues. The project is currently under construction and partially occupied. A commercial redevelopment has been approved at the corner of East Coast ' Highway and Dahlia Avenue. This project at 2600 E. Coast Highway includes 21,776 square feet of commercial office development which will replace small businesses on this corner lot. y% r/yi ' Ii ��c ®1„ {.if y✓ g�'S'\, P��r�:•Y ,e 4E1., +tr✓.fQ:M�'ae :Y.M�G e r �. .ygi ✓ .:;w I TOWN 9 \\ CENTER 'j r uR • �� — J «� rye ? gyp'. rp NU. 60,.i / a °^•. .. ` .• :. 1 veil C 19 � wri � r1,M1, e \ \ � ��'�m-� I ray pA�� er�� ew� { Fi errs • 1 r� v r faw ii ONL O 8 ; ^ ,y 4. • � rP aix efi :4 -N ♦ ` J hn y9. �•rl�y CSC ?P WCC� ,6c a; CNANNEL__ � ° p error 1. JASMINE PARK HOMES 6. CORONA DEL MAR SPECIFIC PLAN 2. CORONA DELMAR SENIORS PROJECT 7.2600 EAST COAST HIGHWAY 3. BUCK GULLY OPEN SPACE 8. CROWN HOUSE SENIOR HOUSING 4. POINT DEL MAR 9. NEWPORT CENTER GPA 85-1(B) 5. CORONA DEL MAR HOMES LOCAL PROJECTS POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach Sanchez talarico assocatese m iL EXHIBIT 14 1 30 A senior citizen congregate living facility at 3901 East Coast Highway in Corona del Mar was approved in December 1985. The Crown House Senior Housing project, which includes 77 residential units and various senior citizen and recreation amenities, involved a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Local Coastal Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and use permit. A General Plan Amendment for the expansion of Newport Center and Peripheral sites (11 sites total) is currently under analysis and review by the City. This project, GPA 85-l(B), involves an expansion of office, residential, and retail uses in Newport Center and on peripheral sites adjacent to the Center. The proposed project includes approximately 1.28 million square feet of office/institutional, a 2.5 acre transit terminal, 152,450 square feet of retail use, 488 residential units, and 103,200 square feet for restaurants. Evaluation of the GPA (currently in progress) includes comprehensive analyses of the site and surrounding area's land use compatibility, traffic/circulation, commercial space demand, and residential and affordable housing balance in the vicinity, among other issues. REGIONAL SETTING The City of Newport Beach General Plan and zoning regulations as they pertain to the project area are fully discussed in the Land Use section of this EIR. However, from a city-wide and regional perspective, other planning programs have been developed to guide and control future development in the City. These programs are discussed in the following paragraphs. COMMITTED PROJECTS The City requires that all projects in excess of 10,000 square feet of gross floor area, or ten units, or generating traffic of more than 130 average daily trips (ADT) comply with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) (adopted December 1985). Once a project has received all necessary approvals, including TPO approval, it is considered a "committed" project for purposes of projecting traffic generation related to future development. Projects within Newport Beach which are committed or constructed, but not fully occupied, are listed below and shown in Exhibit 15. The traffic analysis of this project is based upon consideration of the proposed project as well as committed projects listed. The methodology level of detail and conclusions in this traffic analysis based on these projects is adequate under the requirements of CEQA. A revised study in conformance with recent amendments to the TPO is to be conducted prior to approval. The results of this study shall be included in the Final EIR. If new impacts are identified, a limited public recirculation in conformance with CEQA will be conducted. 31 COMMITTED PROJECTS - MARCH 1986 Name Use Quantity 1. Hoag Hospital ' 2. Aeronutronic Ford 3. Civic Plaza I 4. Corporate Plaza 5. MacArthur Court 6. Newport Place 7. Shokrian 8. Sea Island 9. Harbor Point Homes 10. Martha's Vineyard 11. Valdez 3101 W. Coast Hwy 12. Coast Business Center 13. Koll Center Newport and No. 1 TPP 14. Amendment No. 1 Ford Aero TPP 15. Mollard - 1511 & 1252 Superior 16. Banning/West Newport Ranch 17. Park Lido 18. Heritage Bank 19. Big Canyon Area 10 20. Fun Zone (Revised) 21. Marriott Hotel 22. YMCA (Expansion) 23. Allred Condos 24. Four Seasons 25. Block 400 Medical Community Facility Residential Library Art Museum Restaurant Theater Office Office Office Office Residential Residential Restaurant Office Office Office Office Industrial Medical Office Office Industrial Residential Medical Office Bank General Office Medical Office Residential Carnival Rides Retail Restaurant Hotel Community Facility Residential Hotel Office 268 beds 300 units 14,000 sq.ft. 10,000 sq.ft. 8,000 sq.ft. 20,000 sq.ft. 101,150 sq.ft. 258,000 sq.ft. 127,970 sq.ft. 24,000 sq.ft. 132 units 21 units 2,290 sq.ft. 15,831 sq.ft. 41,494 sq.ft. 37,000 sq.ft. 7,650 sq.ft. 120,000 sq.ft. 25,000 sq.ft. 235,600 sq.ft. 164,400 sq.ft. 406 units 65,269 sq.ft. 6,100 sq.ft. 17,465 sq.ft. 13,323 sq.ft. 21 units 1,237 sq.ft. 9,265 sq.ft. 8,499 sq.ft. 234 rooms 45,000 sq.ft. 50 units 325 rooms 80,000 sq.ft. 32 II n r 1 t 1 1 1 COMMITTED PROJECTS - MARCH 1986 (CONT'D.) Name Use Quantity 26. Sheraton Hotel Expansion Hotel 119 rooms 27. North Ford Residential 888 units Park 12 acres Commercial 50,000 sq.ft. 28. MacArthur Court "Block C" Office 295,000 sq.ft. 29. National Education Office 41,250 sq.ft. 30. Belcourt - Area B Residential 130 units 31. Carver Office Savings/Loan 7,500 sq.ft. 32. Corona del Mar Homes Residential 40 units 33. Big Canyon Villa Apts. Apartments 80 units 34. 1400 Dove Street(TPP A #7) Office 16,154 sq.ft. 35. 1100 Quail Street Office 1,091 sq.ft. 36. Superior Avenue Medical Office 43,470 sq.ft. 37. KCN TPP Amend #4 Office 10,198 sq.ft: Restaurant 5,000 sq.ft. Retail 10,000 sq.ft. 38. Villa Point Residential 154 units 39. 2901 W. Coast Highway Retail 6,303 sq.ft. Office 23,380 sq.ft. Restaurant 13,078 sq.ft. 40. Auer Office - Block 500 Office 23,550 sq.ft. 41. Newport Place TPP Amend 8 4,130 sq.ft. 42. Newport Aquatic Center Recreation 18,228 sq.ft. 43. 2600 E. Coast Highway Office 21,776 sq..ft. 44. Jasmine Park Residential 47 units 45. MacArthur Associates Bank/Office 36,460 sq.ft. 46. Newporter Inn Hotel 104 rooms 47. Newport Lido Medical Medical Office 85,170 sq.ft. 48. Pacesetter Homes Office 55,000 sq.ft. 49. Fashion Island Retail 66,000 sq.ft. 50. Crown House Senior Residential 77 units 51. Corona del Mar Senior (Fifth Ave. Parcel) Residential 100 units t 11 1 I 1 I 33 APPROVED BUT NOT COMMITTED PROJECTS The following projects have received approval by the City Council, but have not yet complied with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. Consequently, they are not considered committed projects. APPROVED BUT NOT COMMITTED PROJECTS Name Use Quantity A. GPA 81-2 1. Caltrans West Residential 143 units 2. Office/Industrial Office/Industrial 439,000 sq.ft. B. Newport Center Residential Residential 307 units C. GPA 83-1 D (Fifth Ave./ MacArthur Blvd.) Residential 45 units PROPOSED PROJECTS In addition to committed and approved (but not committed projects), several other projects and plans are in the planning process. These projects and plans require additional approvals by the City and/or other governmental agencies and are listed below. Statistics for specific area plans indicate additional allowable development based upon existing zoning. PROPOSED PROJECTS Name Use Quantity D. GPA 84-2 Camelback St./ ' Postal Service Site ' E. GPA 86-1A Cannery Village McFadden Square 1 t Office/Retail or Mini Storage Maximum Development Office Restaurant Retail Marine Commercial TOTAL 60,000 sq.ft. 180,000 sq.ft. 225,305 sq.ft. 81,729 sq.ft. 509,064 sq.ft. 243,660 sq.ft. 1,089,758 SQ.FT. 313 DU 34 PROPOSED PROJECTS (CONT'D.) Name Use Quantity Anticipated: Office 220,820 sq.ft. Restaurant 81,729 sq.ft. Retail 221,863 sq.ft. Marine Commercial 146,196 TOTAL 670,609 SQ.FT. 313 DU Existing: General Commercial (includes office) Restaurant Industrial Specialty Retail TOTAL F. GPA 86-1B 4881 Birch St./ Office/Restaurant Plaza de Cafes Restaurant G. GPA 86-1C 3601 Jamboree/ Mixed Uses Including: Sporting House Office/Residential/ Restaurant/Athletic Club Athletic Club 446,906 sq.ft. 51,900 sq.ft. 84,403 sq.ft. 98,980 sq.ft. 682,189 SQ.FT. 212 DU 115,000 sq.ft. <8,400> 200,000 - 300,000 sq.ft. <50,000> H. GPA 86-1D 1177 Camelback/ Gas Station 1,000 - 1,200 sq.ft. AT&T Service Yard Fast Food Restaurant(1) 6,000 - 5,800 sq.ft. I. GPA 86-1E Freeway Reser- Retail Nursery 2 acres vation East/Amlings Relocation J. GPA 86-1F 4656-4678 Office 215,000 - 225,000 Campus Drive <28,625> Gas Station <remove> K. GPA 86-1G Santa Ana N/A N/A Heights/Preannexation 35 PROPOSED PROJECTS (CONT'D.) Name Use Quantity L. Koll Center Newport Office/Restaurant 1,100,000 sq.ft. <2-3 buildings> M. McLaughlin/Bank of Office/Retail/ America P-C Amendment Restaurant 300,000 sq.ft. Office <21,511> N. Victoria Station Site Office 60,000 sq.ft. P-C Amendment Restaurant <8,400> 0. Hoag/Caltrans East Hospital Support Maximum P-C Amendment Facilities 250,000 sq.ft. P. Castaways Point Restaurant 24,000 sq.ft. P-C Amendment Marina/Office/Storage 3,000 sq.ft. Q. Mariners Mile Motel Motel 52 rooms Traffic Study R. Riverside/Avon Retail 6,743 sq.ft. Traffic Study S. DeAnza Office/Restaurant 92,000 sq.ft. Traffic Study T. Newport Center/Edwards Theater 600 seats Traffic Study U. GPA 85-1(B) Commercial 247,250 sq.ft. Office 1,229,000 sq.ft. Residential 488 units Institutional 50,000 sq.ft. Transit Facility 2.5 acres V. Corona del Mar Specific Commercial Plan C � d ' I �'�a��Y1�'�� ' ��© � ��j�/�i mod' �`�'.sC��.6 •' ' � � d ��Q�Q, C .� C� . � t • 13 WKI71, [ °" Jt/ A ZOO \ .S I ��i ® \ � I . i ty',ryeo.',°� �'w rb.`••id � I r �j,<li�v ` � ��, f�.,' �l�tr �'• �' , ✓��C":.' _ ,.:= C,•-III t ,C �� .. ��(,�,� yi' � 19��ii ..;h.E4� '.� tt,�j :.fir;� �t"t/' •, i��L;,��,l �:i�\.'..,��yt� �q� - -- •, / OTC �` � � ��®® ��© •��' ��Rr\�••.\�"�• kti .�,,,, I'��f't �:."1 i[!'Y -> '!.`��.,,,�, ii r-�•5>A��"'-,:, o` � ,' Cl' . ;C��.'o Q®000�oaoC;�r�� ^ Yw4,\. W� �•.,-� '� j:J_�:�'e fir..+ , . = �- � �l ,1 �:t. ��:``�� . 1 •� t \ �• '" 1� � AIKC �^i , • 1 � /3 ;� 9 K;•'�r!�" � �•.,�I 3 ;la \\� � t"v�'• d�i\ C� ��'�� .�-,•,}Site{�. �'A--'f-.42 i. _r r \ 49`.\�� F, .t1-J'""' / — ikI: L a-= 'l `� a w. ,a t t ` �'-`�.��. 'E1 N: ''• t5i� ;ti T�r"':Tn '^� �':"='�, �'''� 1t,; 1 INN C "�'dd`®"C"6yam C �\�\✓/'•'��\/\�a , ',' i -[•+c �i�i�i��waC/Lv�_'ae�>?F��J��¢40r' e'=•'/;_"( '^`:,`�-� •''".i' [..., rvgr .[w't�(i�i�. .+'_ r.rv`+i !i� cr�C�,.yam,""d'/'+L. •-?:Dt';�^ c1a°':a�:�`ti�t1.. ``�•vFt 3- •t' .`_ j; � �� __ .y_, I 'I71}- a` � , �hpl b•.__ 1, �^�;' : •> �\6� �C \ sa� 11 E \V=='�f"� :l _-� •��wv �` '�_.—� � ,�,v.. + 4 ` i •t3� ..B �\1e,—• / r tli`uhL y 11 ; • �; I c i c � ',, - 4�.`.,;` ''' ', 7p-� ,n��r..naae�' '� z 6.-c w..e[ �,.... ��,..• r , r.5r'' Jl' nnC >1 �'c,�'{'•.,-�� i,R"s '"-v_:� '�Z' r—�;°'4`�w`'i�`i.. „�" `=Y F --� mZ �, 16 •1/43t�' � [`� �� C" � a� ,;i/., ._ 6 F; ��.•. \t _� !•�� ' ,bu [i . `'r's�� }4t��F ':_ C�E.iC3C�,_•_�. �. x / \�� qq ]i•cl• .�;/' Lcle•`_�� )✓sb^.. �.y?.`�r �UV `: .°>+a"`.�'r:i-�e<Ba�.r �..:yfa dEeL•...,.i �Q..7... 2 rverran 11,1:v V 0'3 >ill, _ -'•�. � �' v cyres. ��; �_ a>.� fr___I�'f-r'--�,1 Zrei ='�'�=-1-.... �WWlo,CW© �' `Y71��ts .p: "o •__�_ �. �c�i��te(.i(,� /}��j/}yam �' 0"�i ,, I _�_ 1 ( 'IjIIjf11t1', l 11•,t.,�d �\�.�,: I.D^ ,$::.3. r{,t..:;:-�.'•u,�a:. a-....;... ..-I', �__" \ 'd ��7 �-"4f�1 � rune+-� Y �-7t70 ��IGl�)( � = S[�� 'i �•.is,4 O /�Y+I. I��a�� 5 SCxM 2O /lM��. � \� �'� ,l 1 « ... -..,. .. V i. : 1 i F i � c..a 1 F ,.__" _ ( :.kx..xe,. / 1 •s (,� 9 —��'-- a RII^.. na k O �= „,,,t'_ .,.�- � � $... � `u�?FJ CC-.. r,._"`"��F .� �.'-� i.,a (t.a3. ,}�i.•>,' . , � ��1TDlti r �^.,, �� ..�--___�:._, - � r ; - . � l�tl,i n '-�oal� � I �7J � q � .�' I- �'f��, • o� "='^ < r f'_�� e=;=4 �J . ` � r. �` rv, •. <� �yrc t,.."u L I s _ �' �7U ..i ��e� � � �"��r�6��t1,,`� � i �>.;.• 5, l., "_'_ Jt`_•�. �rDJri•, p� 1 (: e } a ''=2r..` oo r a 7l . f ✓ -� if . _ •L�'i } - • • i 15 L' ate") � • %' n`:r•pv�,o�T"C.-.' �-- Siiii:aci=. :a4 ao (% C l) ,r:. n, .-•. 'rcyv�� Qs, o �."_'+✓ f� i- 1-_� NCa^�c�•.. �� ' pit:, /% 'w��. ^nyp0�%�'�CNQ�.�a�'�wut�.`�-.mot .-•� -��• "„\j i, THE COMMITTED 1 , sanchez talarico AND PROPOSED PROJECTS % ;- associates 1 POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach EXHIBIT 15 I 37 O I ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION MEASURES AND LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION I I I I I I I I I I I I 38 11 LAND USE AND AESTHETICS SETTING Existing Onsite and Surrounding Land Use The 6.63-acre project site is bounded by MacArthur Boulevard to the west, Sea Lane to the north, Goldenrod Avenue to the east, and Fifth Avenue and East Coast Highway to the south. The site is undeveloped and slopes gently to the south. A small cluster of trees and undergrowth cover the Metropolitan Water District easement located in line with Fernleaf Avenue. Residential land uses border the site on the north, southeast, and south. These uses include The Shores Apartments to the north and mixed attached and detached units to the south and southeast. East of Goldenrod Avenue are Harbor View Elementary School, Community Youth Center, and Grant Howald Park. A service station lies to the southwest on the corner of East Coast Highway and Dahlia Avenue. West of the site is MacArthur Boulevard with Newport Center further west. Small commercial businesses align East Coast Highway south and southeast of the site. Existing Land Use Plans General Plan Land Use Element The City's Land Use Element proposes that the City build on its existing "grouping of villages" theme and character and, where possible, strengthen both the physical identity and functional efficiency of the village theme. In September 1985 the project site was redesignated (General Plan Amendment CPA 83-1D) from Low -Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on the Land Use Plan of the City General Plan. Medium -density is defined by the City as separate or attached residences of more than four dwelling units per buildable acre with a maximum density of ten units per buildable acre. Surrounding areas are designated on the Land Use Plan as depicted in Exhibit 16. Generally, the site is situated on the western edge of a residential area of Corona del Mar. Surrounding land use designations are varied. A Multi -Family Residential designation is immediately north along Sea Lane, with Low -density Residential to the northeast. Governmental, Educational/Institutional, and Recreational and Environmental Open Space are shown on the Land Use Plan to the east. They reflect the existing Harbor View Elementary School and Grant Howald Park. Two -Family Residential is designated to the south. Alternate use of Retail and Service Commercial and Administrative, Professional, and Financial Commercial are designated to the southwest and further south along East Coast Highway. Retail and Service Commercial and Multi -Family Residential is the prevalent land use designation west of MacArthur Boulevard. I LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL GOVERNMENTAL, EDUCATIONAL, & INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL M RECREATIONAL &ENVIRONMENTAL OPEN SPACE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREAS WITH ALTERNATE USES PER LAND USE ELEMENT mRETAIL & SERVICE COMMERCIAL EXISTING GENERAL PLAN POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach Sanchez talarico associates80d EXHIBIT 16 40 General Plan Recreation and Open Space Element The City's Recreation and Open Space Element provides a program for preservation, acquisition, improvement, use and maintenance of recreational and open space resources throughout the community. The City recently amended the Recreation and Open Space Element (CPA 81-2F, adopted February 1985). The revised element proposed no significant changes to existing and proposed park facilities in the project area. According to the Recreation Element, recreational needs in the project area are expected to be met by existing and proposed facilities within the Corona del Mar and Harbor View service areas. The nearest open -space area is Grant Howald Park, southeast of Harbor View Elementary School. General Plan Housing Element i� The City's Housing Element identifies goals and objectives for alleviating potential housing problems. The Element contains a number of Program and Performance Objectives. Those which relate to the Point del Mar project include: Applicable Program Objectives: Objective 1: To promote and facilitate the improved capability of the private housing industry to produce and provide housing for the population of the City. N Objective 3: To promote the development of an increased level of new housing production, consistent with sound planning and environ-mental standards. Objective 5: To achieve an appropriate balance between employment and housing. Objective 6: To encourage the housing development industry to respond to the housing needs of the community as well as the demand for housing as perceived by the industry. Objective 7: To promote and assist in the development of housing for low and moderate -income households. Objective 10: To promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, or color. Objective 12: To provide for the development of a variety of housing types and products for all income levels of the community. 41 ■ Applicable Performance Objectives: ' To produce 2,648 new units including 973 affordable to City very - low, low, and moderate income families. Increase housing production from the current average of 260 units per year to 525 units per year. Process necessary General Plan Amendments for Fifth Avenue/Mac- Arthur Boulevard, Marguerite Avenue, and Fifth Avenue parcels. ' To provide new housing opportunities for low -and moderate -income households, wherever possible, and to encourage the industry to allocate at least 10% of the annual production goal to affordable housing for low -and moderate -income households. General Plan Circulation Element i The Circulation Element designates MacArthur Boulevard as a Primary Couplet (3 lanes each direction) one-way couplet with Avocado Avenue between East Coast Highway and north of San Joaquin Hills Road. These couplets provide similar circulation capacity as a major roadway defined by the City. East Coast Highway west of MacArthur Boulevard is a major six -lane divided roadway. East Coast Highway east of MacArthur is designated as a primary four -lane divided road. Improvements to portions of these roads are planned as future street projects. Fifth Avenue and other 'streets surrounding the parcel are local roads and are not outlined on the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways. No additional improvements to local streets are anticipated to be necessary for implementation of the Point del Mar project. The Circulation Element designates major and secondary bikeway and pedestrian paths in the City. Fifth Avenue is a secondary bikeway on the City Master Plan of Bikeways. Exhibit 17 illustrates bikeways in the vicinity. General Plan Noise Element This Element of the General Plan assesses the area's current noise environment and contributors of the increasing noise problem in the City's growing urban environment. The Element's "noise control program" includes all practicable City actions towards reduction of noise from motor, aircraft, and stationary sources, and mitigation of its adverse effects. A full assessment of noise sources, control, and mitigation is included in the noise section of the previously certified Final Brisa Del Mar EIR and this Supplemental EIR. I 0 LEGEND BACKBONE BIKEWAY SECONDARY BIKEWAY MASTER BIKEWAYS SYSTEM POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach N . Sanchez talarico associatesQ 0 81 -0 v IL EXHIBIT 17 I 0 0 icy r�k I - II t a 43 General Plan Conservation and Natural Resources Element The Conservation and Natural Resources Element discusses existing resources, current programs for conservation, and actions to be taken to assure conservation of natural resources of the City. The Element is intended to satisfy the State requirements and includes six sections: Bay and Ocean Water Quality, Air Quality, Beach Erosion Control, Mineral Resources, Archaeological and Paleontological Resources, and Energy Conservation. Analyses of the above mentioned categories, where applicable, are provided in appropriate sections of this Supplemental EIR and the Certified Final Brisa del Mar EIR. Contact with State and local agencies, documented in Appendix A, has allowed a full review of City policies, resource conservation, and impacts. General Plan Public Safety Element Public safety involves potential natural physical hazards, disaster planning, and risk reduction. Hazards of specific concern in Newport Beach are geologic, flood, and fire hazards. The subject site is located within Category 1 Fire Hazard Area of the Newport Beach Public Safety Element, characterized by fast propagating natural areas with very dry, natural foliage, and rugged terrain. Flood and geologic hazard analyses have been executed by professionals for the proposed project in accordance with policies of the City under this Element of the General Plan, and are fully discussed in the Water Quality and Earth Resources sections of the Certified Final Brisa del Mar EIR. City of Newport Beach Zoning The project site is currently zoned Planned Community under the City Municipal Code, although a Planned Community Development Text has not yet been adopted by the City. Most of the surrounding areas to the north, east, and south are under residential zoning. The area to the south along East Coast Highway is under Commercial zoning and the majority of Newport Center immediately to the west is zoned either planned community or commercial. Existing zoning of the area is graphically illustrated in Exhibit 18. .1 Z\i...,_ gar K j� kS v I —OJ4f M�•-IC �. PC Ily- � � r OF :YfEl-lO/ZlAG T LiEeC y �Nr""r PC / CANYO.b / :J'6RY0lR . cap. Soo Ifp RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL Rl� I MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING ZONING POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach COMMERCIAL OFFICE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL !-. PLANNED COMMUNITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ;. ea�`F.'.:: OPEN SPACE sanchez talarico associatesaoo, EXHIBIT 18 45 PROJECTS IMPACTS Existing Land Uses and Land Use Plans The project site will be converted from vacant land to residential use. The uses are not incompatible with surrounding land uses which are predominant- ly residential in character. The density of the project is less than that of the multi -family uses north of Sea Lane and similar to or less than the surrounding single-family residential neighborhood further north, northeast, and southeast. The following is a list of existing or approved development in the area which provides a density comparison with the proposed project. Proposed Project 8.27 du/buildable acre The Shores Apartments 16.09 du/buildable acre Corona del Mar Seniors Project (Fifth Avenue Parcel/GPA 83-1A) Jasmine Park (GPA 83-1A) 9.50 7.02 du/buildable acre du/buildable acre Corona del Mar Homes - Summerwind 12.73 du/buildable acre r The project will not produce significant levels of light/glare, traffic, noise, or air pollutants which could degrade the living environment in the surrounding neighborhood. *' General Plan Amendment 83-1D, approved in September, 1985, amended the City of Newport Beach General Plan. The Land Use Element was amended to designate the site for Medium -Density Residential with a limit of 45 units onsite. The proposed project is consistent with this Element as amended. A majority of the land in the City is developed and the existing General Plan is reflective of that development. In terms of future allowable development, the City of Newport Beach General Plan and zoning establish that a majority of the vacant land in the City will be developed for residential development or preserved for recreation and environmental open space uses. Future allowable higher density residential development will *' be in the older areas in the community or located in close proximity to major commercial and transportation centers. The majority of the future additional allowable development will be as incremental increases, occurring as presently -developed properties recycle. The proposed project, if approved, is consistent with this overall development pattern. The proposed density is consistent with adjacent properties. The conceptual design of the project is compatible with the adjacent land uses. The proposed density (8.27 units per buildable acre) is compatible with adjacent residential and commercial areas. The neighborhood of the project site is developed with single-family dwellings, duplexes, and apartments. The only recent changes to the General Plan in old Corona del Mar are listed below. �i `f i II II 1 0 W GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) DATE APPROVED ' GPA 83-1B (Summerwind) March 1984 ' GPA 83-1A (Jasmine Park) April 1985 ' GPA 83-1D (Point del Mar) September 1985 ' GPA 83-1A (Corona del Mar Seniors December 1985 Project) ' GPA 85-1C (Crown House) December 1985 A comprehensive revision of the Recreation and Open Space Element was adopted by the City in February 1985. The Recreation and Open Space Element review, initiated in 1983, was precipitated in part by a need to restudy the park provisions in the City, particularly in the Corona del Mar area. Corona del Mar has a small area of undeveloped land remaining. Therefore, each development or redevelopment proposal needs to be closely reviewed by the City to establish its relationship to park needs within the area. The closest park to the project site is the Grant Howald Park. Begonia Park is located at First Avenue and Begonia Avenue south of East Coast Highway. A public view park will be provided as part of the Jasmine Park project (GPA 83-1A) which is currently under construction. This park will be located at the southwest corner of Marguerite Avenue and Harbor View Drive. Also, an expansion to the Oasis Park site has been approved at the corner of Fifth Avenue and Marguerite Avenue. The proposed project is subject to the Park Dedication Ordinance (PDO). The tentative subdivision or parcel map is the triggering measure for the application of the PDO (Section 19.50 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code). The project applicant proposes to meet the park dedication requirement through payment of in -lieu fees or offsite park dedication. The PDO requires .01125 acre of park per unit. In -lieu fees are $447,008 per park acre. Initial estimates are that about 0.48 acres of park or $214,602.24 in in -lieu fees are required. As a result of the dedication of the 12 acre North Ford Park there are two excess park credits which have been allocated to the North Ford property owner (The Irvine Company). The applicant proposes to request the use of a portion of these park credits to offset Point del Mar's park requirement in -lieu fees. The project applicant proposes to satisfy the City's affordable housing requirements offsite. Implementation of the project will require 20% of the 43 units to be affordable units (provided within the City). The proposed project will satisfy its obligation of 20% affordable units via the Baywood project in the City. This provision will adequately fulfill the City affordable housing requirements, and pursue the General Plan Housing Elements Objectives 6, 7 and 12. I i*x U I `J I 47 In 1984-85, GPA 83-1E for Newport Center was approved. It allowed for the construction of 60 market rate units in Newport Center if 60 matching affordable units were built on this site. The original Brisa del Mar project proposed in 1985 included 84 affordable units. Due to concerns related to density and land use compatibility, an alternative General Plan Amendment was approved in September 1985 allowing for a maximum of 45 units. Consequently, it is not possible under General Plan Amendment 83-1D to provide the needed 60 units. However, as discussed in Local and Regional Setting, the Newport Center GPA 85-1B includes a comprehensive analysis of the vicinity's exiting and future housing supply. It should be noted that the Newport Center GPA 85-1D EIR will provide the City relevant updated information regarding Newport Center and the surrounding area's affordable housing. The Point del Mar project will, in any case, comply with the City's affordable housing requirements. Description of the Project/Views from Surrounding Uses The project consists of 43 single family detached houses. The site plan is "L" shaped. Two rows of houses face onto a single internal street which intersects with Sea Lane and Fifth Avenue. A landscaped pedestrian walkway will provide pedestrian access from Sea Lane. Exhibits lOa-d (pages 17-20) illustrate renderings of the typical architectural style and elevations proposed for the project. Exhibit 6 (page 13) depicts the proposed landscape plan. Exhibit 8 illustrates site cross-sections/view planes which depict the edge treatment along MacArthur Boulevard. Exhibit 9 illustrates edge treatment along Sea Lane and Fifth Avenue. Portions of the site can been seen from all surrounding roadways and properties. A view analysis was prepared by J.L. Webb and Associates for the Brisa del Mar project. A portion of this analysis is reproduced on Exhibit 18 of the Final EIR for Brisa del Mar. The currently proposed pad elevations and buildings heights for Point del Mar result in maximum structure heights identical to or less than the points analyzed in the original View analysis. The following three paragraphs are a reiteration of the original View analysis in the Brisa del Mar Certified Final EIR. There are no views of the site or the proposed buildings from homes along Pebble Drive and Setting Sun Drive. Homes along Harbor View Drive, east of Goldenrod Avenue, have minor views of the site interrupted by existing houses and vegetation at lower levels. Residents will have isolated views of the tops of buildings and the northwestern edge of the site. The project will not block views of the ocean or Corona del Mar. The project will essentially blend into the existing visual environment below. 48 Existing views of the site from the rear yards of homes along Harbor View Drive (west of Goldenrod Avenue) and Goldenrod Avenue (south of Harbor View Drive) are also limited. Views of the site are blocked by the existing Shores apartment complex and mature vegetation on the slopes below the houses. Only a few view corridors of the site are available. Through these corridors, residents will see glimpses of the upper story of the buildings. Views of the ocean and Corona del Mar will not be blocked. Within The Shores apartment complex, only those apartments facing onto Sea Lane have views of the site. The second story units view the site, Corona del Mar residential and commercial areas, and have glimpses of the ocean in the distance above treeline. The project will block all views of residential and commercial uses along Fifth Avenue and East Coast Highway. It will also block the limited views of the horizon/ocean. The edge treatment on MacArthur Boulevard consists of setbacks ranging from 25 to 72 of the feet from the property line as depicted in Exhibit View planes are given in Exhibit 7. As shown on 8. Locations Exhibit 7, the majority of the setback area on MacArthur Boulevard measures 25 feet. The wider setback areas (up to 72 feet) are along the site's northern and southeastern border with MacArthur Boulevard. The setback area is predominantly comprised of a landscaped 2:1 slope leading up to the proposed grade of the project site. At the top of slope along MacArthur Boulevard will be a 6 to 8 foot wall and aleppo pines which are intended to screen the rear yards of units backing up to MacArthur Boulevard. A low ground -cover of container shrubs and vines will be planted down the slope. Pad elevations of lots along MacArthur Boulevard range from 4 feet above grade of MacArthur Boulevard in the central portion of the site to approximately 7 feet above grade in the site's southwest corner. Adjacent residences which face onto Fifth Avenue will have views of a six foot screen wall which screens onsite back patio/yard areas; the upper story of units; the Fifth Avenue project entrance; and a screen wall and landscaped areas at Fifth Avenue/Goldenrod which screens a small four space parking area. Small flowering trees (oleander) will be planted along Fifth Avenue in a 6 foot wide landscaped area with a ground cover of container shrubs and vines. Building Height Maximum building height as proposed by the P-C Text will be 32 feet. Changes and vents will be permitted as set forth in Section 20.02.060 of the City's Municipal Code. 1 I I 49 Signing and Fencing The P-C Text proposes that fences are to be limited to a maximum height of eight feet. Wing walls (not including retaining walls) are limited to eight feet in height. Landscaping The landscape plan is illustrated in Exhibit 6 (Page 13). As proposed, all perimeter areas (including the MacArthur walkway, common areas, and project entrances edge and all slope areas), from Fifth Avenue and Sea Lane will be landscaped and maintained with a variety of vegetation. This would include: aleppo pine along MacArthur; ficus retusa trees along the internal streets, ficus rubignosa at the Sea Lane entrance, onsite walkway, and at the Fifth Avenue/Goldenrod Avenue corner; oleander and melalcuca trees at the Fifth Avenue entrance and along Sea Lane, Goldenrod Avenue and M Fifth Avenue; and, a variety of groundcovers, vines throughout the site. lawn and container shrubs and CUMULATIVE IMPACTS There are no significant cumulative impact related to land use/aesthetics created or contributed to by the Point del Mar project. EXISTING CITY POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS The following measures will be required in accordance with existing City policy and requirements. A. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The plan will be subject to approval by the Planning Department, the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Department, and the Public Works Department. B. The landscape plan shall include a maintenance program which controls the use of fertilizers and pesticides. C. The landscape plan shall place emphasis on the use of drought -resistant native vegetation and be irrigated via a system designed to avoid surface runoff and overwatering. D. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floorplans, elevations, and sections. E. The project shall be designed to eliminate light and glare spillage onto adjacent properties. `� L I I 50 J MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Signage and exterior lighting shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. 2. All mechanical equipment, vents, and other service equipment shall be shielded and screened from view by architectural features. 3. A plan depicting the exact location, height, and type of material for all walls separating the project from adjacent uses shall be submitted• I to the City for review and approval prior to the approval of any grading and/or building permits. The plan shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. 4. Perimeter walls constructed for screening or sound attenuation purposes shall be designed in an aesthetically pleasing manner, such as M slumpstone or stucco block with a brick or stone cap. In no event shall fences such as grape -stake, common cinderblock or chain link be allowed. LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION Implementation of these measures will reduce potential land use impacts to a level of insignificance. It I I I 11 I I I I I TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 51 A traffic study was prepared for the Point del Mar project by Weston Pringle and Associates in March, 1986. The report contained in this EIR (Appendix B) complies with all requirements of CEQA. The City of Newport Beach has additional transportation requirements of development projects as set forth in the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO), which is currently under revision (April, 1986). The traffic report utilized in this Draft EIR has been prepared as an interim study in compliance with the original ' TPO. A revised traffic report prepared in compliance with the updated TPO, will be submitted and approved during this project's review period, prior to project approval. The following section is a summary of the interim report which is contained as Appendix B of this Supplemental EIR. SETTING The project site is located between Sea Lane and Fifth Avenue, and between MacArthur Boulevard and Goldenrod Avenue in the Corona del Mar community of Newport Beach. Sea Lane and Fifth Avenue are both two lane facilities with on -street parking permitted. Sea Lane extends northeasterly to Harbor View Drive and MacArthur Boulevard.. Fifth Avenue provides connections to north -south streets which extend from Coast Highway to Harbor View Drive. The intersection of Coast Highway and Goldenrod is signalized. Existing daily traffic volumes are illustrated on Exhibit 19. Also indicated on Exhibit 19 are 1985 ICU values at major intersections throughout the City. ' PROJECT IMPACTS 1 Trip Generation In order to examine the potential traffic impacts, it is necessary to estimate the number of trips that would be generated by the project. The trip generation rates utilized in this study are listed in Table C. These rates have been accepted by the City Traffic Engineer and utilized in the City of Newport Beach for similar uses. As indicated in Table C, the 43 dwelling units would generate an estimated 430 daily trip ends with 45 occurring during the PM peak hour. Trip Assignment In order to assign project traffic to the street system, it was necessary to develop a trip distribution pattern. The trip distribution for the site is illustrated on Exhibit 20 and is based upon regional land use and circulation patterns and previous studies. Estimated project trips from Table C were assigned to the street system in conformance with this I I LEGEND 43 a DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME, IN THOUSANDS 0.6614 a ICU VALUE I� S> Z� _ 0 � d V48 T45 59 0 59 fCQ., N 99166 V/ h N J/ m 0.7194 ct 0.6867 J0, 5PN c� M 0.7257 i94 a 0733' 3 51 �g0pST HW0Y cFG n1► 1.0401 EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ICU VALUES POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach r�r+. 0.6500 42 a. a 9 O J ¢ a 8 1.0235 I 30 1.1300 34 0.9760 Source: Weston Pringle & Associates Sanchez talarico associates r%m EXHIBIT 19 a 53 TABLE C TRIP GENERATION TRIP ENDS PER GENERATED TIME PERIOD DWELLING UNIT TRIP ENDS(') Daily 10.0 430 2.5 Hour Peak In 1.4 60 Out 0.6 25 PM Peak Hour In 0.7 30 Out 0.3 15 (1) For 43 dwelling units. Z ai BRSTO I�S TBRISTOL S �ONI.� TAG "I tA�- 3 a c� D a a SPN HQ L/h O F N J 3 > 5% 0 G 10% 5 z m 15%' ca 50 20% COAST Hyyy w PYACIF 1G � F QA DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach Q %,\L;l Source: Weston Pringle & Associates Sanchez talarico associates EXHIBIT 20 55 ' distribution. Exhibit 21 illustrates estimated project daily traffic at selected locations. In addition, this distribution was utilized to assign project traffic to intersections utilized in the analysis. Site Access and Parking ' Vehicular access is ,proposed on both Fifth Avenue and Sea Lane. The Site Plan (Exhibit 4, Page 10) indicates a 32 foot wide street extending south and east from Sea Lane through the project. Residential units are proposed on both sides of this street which terminates at Goldenrod Avenue but does not connect to Goldenrod Avenue. A second access is provided to Fifth Avenue and forms the fourth leg of the intersection of Fifth and Fernleaf Avenues. The connection to Sea Lane is on the outside of a horizontal curve which provides improved sight distance and is on the westerly end of the site. A total of 142 parking spaces are indicated on the site plan. This ' includes 86 covered stalls, 22 on -street and 34 driveway spaces for a ratio of 3.3 spaces per dwelling unit. Of the on -street spaces, 11 are provided in special parking areas that are perpendicular to the street and are not the usual "on -street" type spaces. With the 32-foot street width, parking on one side of the street can be permitted. Adequate signing should be posted to indicate the no parking areas within the project. The site plan provides for the safe movement of vehicles and has adequate access for both normal use and emergency vehicles. On -site parking is also adequate to serve the proposed uses. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ' The City requires that all projects in excess of 10,000 square feet of gross floor area, or ten units, or generating traffic of more than 130 average daily trips (ADT) comply with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) (adopted December 1985). Once a project has received all necessary ' approvals, including TPO approval, it is considered a "committed" project for purposes of projecting traffic generation related to future development. Projects within Newport Beach which are committed or constructed but not fully occupied, are listed in the Local and Regional Setting section, Appendix B and shown in Exhibit 15. The traffic analysis of this project is based upon consideration of the proposed project as well as committed projects listed. The methodology level of detail and conclusions in this traffic analysis (based on the committed projects) is adequate under the requirements of CEQA. A revised study in conformance with recent amendments to the TPO is to be conducted prior to approval. The results of this study shall be included in the Final EIR. If new impacts are identified, a limited public recirculation in conformance with CEQA will be conducted. I I 8RIS70L JaZ1,11, ji� a o 65 0 85 W7 Qc` J/ m SPi c g5 N SOS COAST JjWr SEA LN. Source: Weston Pringle & Associates PROJECT DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES a latzes#alarico G POINT DEL MAR r%m City of Newport Beach EXHIBIT 21 57 r. The potential traffic impact has been completed to conform to the criteria of the City of Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance. A total of nine intersections were identified by the City Traffic Engineer for inclusion in A the analyses. The first required analysis is the "One Percent" test. An intersection is defined as critical by the Ordinance when the project traffic exceeds one percent of existing plus committed project plus regional growth traffic on any approach to an intersection during the 2.5 hour peak period. Since the project is scheduled for completion in 1987, the analyses were completed for 1988 as required by the Ordinance. ' Appendix B contains the "One Percent" analysis sheets for the nine intersections analyzed. The results are summarized in Table D. Review of Table D indicates that one of the intersections fails the "One Percent" test and 15 are critical in terms of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. The intersection which failed the one percent test is Coast Highway and Goldenrod Avenue. .' Additional analyses were completed for this critical intersection. These additional analyses consisted of ICU calculations for the intersection. The ICU analyses included consideration of existing, committed project and regional growth traffic as well as project traffic. Table E summarizes the results of the ICU analyses which are contained in Appendix B. Review of Table E indicates that the Coast Highway and Goldenrod Avenue has an ICU ' value greater than 0.90 for existing and future conditions. The project does not result in an increase of the ICU value within the accuracies of the procedure. With this procedure, there is no change in the ICU value as a result of the project. y! In summary, the project would not have a traffic impact as defined by the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. All intersections examined either passed the ' "One Percent" test or had ICU values unchanged with the project and no improvements. STANDARD CITY POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS F. Prior to approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 12209, the project shall comply with the City of Newport Beach Updated Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO revised 1986). Said compliance shall first be approved by the City via acceptance of a revised traffic report prepared in accordance 1„ with guidelines for the updated TPO. G. The project shall be required to contribute a sum equal to its "fair share" of future circulation improvements system as shown on the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways and any other mitigation measures as may be required. w 'J 58 TABLE D CRITICAL INTERSECTION IDENTIFICATION - 1988 2.5 HOUR PERCENTAGES NB SB EB WB Coast Highway & Dover Drive - 0.1 0.2 0.1 Coast Highway & Bayside Drive -- 0.2 0.1 Coast Highway & Jamboree Road - -- 0.2 0.1 Coast Highway & Newport Center Drive 0.1 0.2 0.2 Coast Highway & Avocado Avenue - -- 0.3 0.2 Coast Highway & MacArthur Boulevard -- 0.7 0.3 0.3 Coast Highway & Goldenrod Avenue - 1.7 0.3 0.2 Coast Highway & Marguerite Avenue -- -- 0.1 0.2 MacArthur Boulevard & San Joaquin Hills Road 0.5 0.8 -- -- (1) NB — Northbound SB — Southbound EB — Eastbound WB — Westbound 1-1 IF 59 TABLE E ICU SUMMARY - 1988 INTERSECTION ICU VALUES Existing Existing Existing (1985) +Committed +Committed +Regional +Regional +PrM ant Coast Highwa; 60 ' MITIGATION MEASURES t There are no applicable mitigation measures. LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION ,' 1 I I [J F Compliance with the above mitigation measure mitigates project specific transportation impacts to a level of insignificance. On a cumulative basis, this project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future' project, will incrementally contribute to increased traffic on the local circulation system_ i V II I 1 I I 61 ONSITE NOISE SETTING A noise assessment was conducted for the Brisa del Mar (GPA 83-1D) Certified Final EIR by Mestre Greve Associates in 1984. The report included a comprehensive noise assessment of that project. Subsequent to EIR certification of GPA 83-1D, the project has been revised as described herein under "Project Description". It was determined by the City of Newport Beach (lead agency) that a supple- mental noise assessment to analyze onsite noise impacts from adjacent road- ways would be necessary for the Point del Mar project. This conclusion was reached because the site plan is significantly different from the one analyzed in the Brisa del Mar EIR and there are revised future traffic projections along MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast Highway. The following section is a summary of existing onsite noise data and supplemental assessment, included as Appendix C of this Supplemental EIR. All other potential noise impacts were adequately addressed and mitigated in the Certified Final Brisa del Mar EIR. The existing noise environment on and surrounding the project site is described in the Brisa del Mar Certified Final EIR, page 59. Generally, the existing noise effecting the project site is derived from adjacent roadways. The roadways impacting the project site include MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast Highway. As described in the Certified Final EIR, existing and future noise' levels measured onsite were based on the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), which is the predominant rating scale used in California for land use com- patibility noise assessment. The Brisa del Mar Certified Final EIR pro- vides a discussion of existing noise levels onsite. The established noise limits for residential land limits (City of Newport Beach General Plan Noise Element) in the City are 65 CNEL for exterior living areas and 45 CNEL for the indoor noise levels. These standards were used in the onsite noise assessment for the Point del Mar project. PROJECT IMPACTS As is for existing conditions, future noise impacts onsite will be due to traffic noise from MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast Highway. To project future noise levels which would impact the project site, traffic volumes reported in the City of Newport Beach traffic projection "Increased -trend" model were used with the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Model. Increased -trend growth assumes build -out of the Newport Beach General Plan with added traffic projections for projects proposed, but not yet approved in the City of Newport Beach and the City of Irvine. The traffic volumes used are 11 62 presented in Table 1, Appendix C. These volumes, based on the "Increase -trend" model, assume volumes on roadways at ultimate buildout of the area. Traffic mix and time distributions from the model were used in ' this analysis. The modeling results are reported in Table F in the form of distances to the 60, 65, and 70 CNEL contours. These projections do not take into account any barriers or topography that may reduce noise levels. TABLE F tFUTURE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS WITH PROJECT Distance to CNEL Contour From Centerline of Roadway (Feet) Roadway 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL MacArthur Boulevard 116 250 538 Pacific Coast Highway 105 227 490 The results are illustrated in Exhibit 22. The exhibit indicates that the >� residences along MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast Highway will experience noise levels in excess of 70 CNEL without mitigation. These onsite noise levels are considered unacceptable for residential development. Mitigation will be required to achieve the noise limitations (65 CNEL outdoor and 45 CNEL indoor) set by the City of Newport Beach standards,. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS There are no significant cumulative impacts created by the Point del Mar project. For a complete discussion of cumulative noise impacts please ' refer to the Certified Final Brisa del Mar EIR on file with the City of Newport Beach. EXISTING CITY POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS The following measures are required in accordance with existing City policies and are also included in the Brisa del Mar CFEIR. ' H. Prior to the issuance of building permits for each of the planned units, an acoustical engineering study shall be performed based on actual pad, property, and roadway grades, and building locations and orientations to assure that the exterior building shells of each structure will be sufficient to reduce existing and future noise levels to an acceptable intensity. �`•�`�t {�`• 1 k Source: Mestre Greve Associates ' my , 1 W` Z' Q . • 1 t 'r: • W•. LU A '� :1 FUTURE CNEL NOISE CONTOURS POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR CORONA DEL MAR SITE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CO. Sanchez talarico associates nO scale EXHIBIT 22 5 I I I i �I 64 I. Prior to occupancy of any unit, a qualified acoustical engineer shall be retained by the City at the applicant's expense to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that noise impacts do not exceed 65 CNEL for outside living areas and active recreation areas and 45 CNEL for interior living areas. J. All construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8 a.m, to 5 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. K. Any mechanical equipment and emergency power generators will be screened from view and shall be sound -attenuated so as not to exceed 55 dBA at the property line. MITIGATION MEASURES 5. The units which are located inside the 65 CNEL contour and have any partial view of Pacific Coast Highway or MacArthur Boulevard shall be mitigated to experience outdoor noise levels less than 65 CNEL and indoor noise levels less than 45 CNEL. Specific provisions shall be determined prior to obtaining any grading permit and shall be installed in accordance with alternative design methods and recommendations outlined in the noise report for the Point del Mar project. 6. Noise barrier heights presented below and graphically illustrated in Exhibit 23 shall be integrated into project site design. Walls shall be of heights specified below, constructed of masonry material, and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits. (See Mitigation Measure 4 for recommended materials for use with walls). Barriers can be of any combination of beam and wall. LOTS BARRIER HEIGHT (IN FEET FROM PAD LEVEL) Lots 24 to 35 6.0 Lots 36 to 37 8.0 Lots 38 to 43 6.0 LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION Implementation of the above measures will mitigate all potential impacts to a level of insignificance. Source: Mestre Greve Associates Nw � r.a \ - 93 co -. tg ' } "i f •• n root .; 1 �� :fit. Q♦ • � . ` - e �-'�. _ _ = : .-�-----'---- Y* -_ - --- - .j s. _ q0 Wes• AV V\ i21 Dl w LU u Z. _,4 _'\'. .• �� if P 01, i . ACIFjL.�CO�ST \ SOUND WALLS POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach Ps _ / ' 34' 33 32 r..... .36� t raW r. iL ? 7 ../ 10 61 WA ^- LH 14 RM• bM1l R�vo 1Y 24 23 22 211 r Mr. YY • J r-.w r. r..W 20 H.f AVE .. ♦• W�- - v •� CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR CORONA DEL MAR SITE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CO. Sanchez talarico associates nG scale EXHIBIT 23 m I I 1 II 1 1 I n H PUBLIC SERVICES/SCHOOLS SETTING The previous EIR for Brisa del Mar GPA 83-1D discussed the impacts of all pertinent public services and utilities with the exception of education. During the study for the Point del Mar project, the Newport -Mesa Unified School District was contacted to examine current levels of service and possible constraints created by the proposed project. Appendix D of this report contains correspondence from the School District. The project is within the boundaries of the Newport -Mesa Unified School District. Public schools serving the site include Harbor View Elementary School located 1/4 mile from the project site and Corona del Mar Intermediate and High School which is 4 miles from the project site. Corona del Mar Intermediate and High School serves grades 7-12 . PROJECT IMPACTS Enrollment in the Newport -Mesa Unified School District has been declining for the past 15 years. The enrollment capacity of Harbor View Elementary is 744 and it presently maintains a current enrollment of 661. Corona del Mar Intermediate and High School has a capacity of 2746 students and presently enrolls 2044 students. Based on a factor of 0.2 students per unit provided by the District, the project is expected to generate 9 students. Because of enrollment levels below capacity, the school district does not foresee any impacts from the increase in students on the level of service they currently provide. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS There are no cumulative school -related impacts created by the Point del Mar project. EXISTING CITY POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS There are no applicable city policies and requirements. MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation is not necessary due to the lack of significant impacts on the school district. LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION Due to existing conditions, impacts caused by the project are below a level of significance. 11 I 67 I ■. ALTERNATIVES INTRODUCTION The intent of this section is to evaluate alternatives which may be capable of eliminating or reducing to a level of insignificance any significant adverse impacts associated with the project. The Final EIR for GPA 85-1(D)-Brisa del Mar contained a range of alternatives which were analyzed and compared to the original project. This section discusses additional alternatives other than those contained in the original Brisa del Mar EIR. The following alternatives were discussed in the original Brisa del Mar project EIR: No Development, No Project, One Hundred Percent Affordable, One Hundred Percent Senior, and Increased Density. The No Project Alternative assumed development under the existing General Plan. The No Development alternative would retain the site in its existing condition and assumes no further development of the site. The One Hundred Percent Affordable alternative assumed all the basic characteristics of the Brisa del Mar project with the exception that all the 96 proposed units would be affordable as opposed to only 84 units. The One Hundred Percent Senior alternative assumed the basic characteristics of the Brisa del Mar project with the exception that the rental policy of the complex would restrict renting of units to senior citizens at least 55 years old. The Increased Density: All Seniors/All Affordable alternative would consist of a senior citizen housing complex at a density of 45 units per gross acre. This would result in about 300 units averaging 600 square feet in size. NO DEVELOPMENT As stated in the Brisa del Mar EIR, this alternative would retain the site in its existing vacant condition and would consequently be environmentally superior to the proposed project. The alternative will remain under consideration during the review process. This alternative would, however, result in a delay in the City's objective of providing adequate housing, and is thus not considered consistent with General Plan goals and policies. DESIGN ALTERNATIVE: FIFTH AVENUE EDGE TREATMENT An alternative to the proposed edge treatment along Fifth Avenue was evaluated early in the design process. It was rejected in favor of the proposed edge treatment illustrated in Exhibits 6 and 9. It was rejected because of adverse aesthetic impacts which would be experienced by residents along Fifth Avenue. The alternative is illustrated in cross-section in Exhibit 24. Under this alternative a 5 to 7 foot crib or retaining wall would be constructed along Fifth Avenue to compensate for a portion of the 10- to 12-foot grade differential between Sea Lane and Fifth Avenue. The remainder of the differential will be compensated for through grading of the site for �9 d 0 a 1 a 10' MIN. !' I 13' ---- r_-_-__ '9' /' 93' 1' YI GARAGE GARAGE I 9' 90WN. 9CPEENI LIVING AREA WAIL I , I I`I i Sth AVENUE CRI9 WALL t� SECTION A - A Source: Fuscoe Williams Lindgren & Short 1� FIFTH AVENUE TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE Sanchez talarico associates POINT DEL MAR City of Newport Beach soale EXHIBIT 24 69 building pads. To provide privacy to units along Fifth Avenue, an + additional six-foot screen wall would be constructed behind the crib wall starting at an elevation 5 to 7 feet above Fifth Avenue. This would result in a 10 to 14 foot wall along Fifth Avenue. The wall would create a sterile and wall -lined corridor along Fifth Avenue which is considered significantly inferior to the design proposed as part of the project. The proposed project would have only a 6 foot screen wall along Fifth Avenue. 11 I F1 l� U f 70 LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY Implementation of the project represents a long-term commitment of the site to urban use. Approval of the currently proposed project is one of a series of steps prior to development of the site. Specific approvals needed are listed on pages 5 and 6 of this Supplemental EIR. Development of the site would result in long-term impacts in contributing to degradation of local water quality and will increase the demand for public services. Please refer to the Final EIR for Brisa del Mar for a discussion of these impacts. The project will also contribute to increased traffic generation.. Short-term impacts of development due to construction activities include localized increases in noise, dust, and vehicular emissions associated with construction vehicles and an increase in erosion and sedimentation to nearby drainage systems. Please refer to the Final EIR for Brisa del Mar for a discussion of these impacts. The only immediate short-term benefit of the project would be construction - related employment. A long-term benefit includes the provision of additional housing. SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES WHICH WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED ACTION SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED Approval of the requested project will allow for the construction of the proposed residential development. Project implementation will irreversibly commit the currently vacant site to an urban land use, preventing any potential future open space related use of the site. The surrounding area, however, has become developed and is primarily characterized as a residential neighborhood. Several irreversible commitments of limited resources would result from implementation of the project. These resources include, but are not limited to, water, native vegetation, sand and gravel, asphalt, petrochemical construction materials, various metals, and forest products. rl The project site,, in its current state, provides open space to nearby residents. Implementation of the project will have a long-term impact on the scenic quality of the area since the site will no longer appear as an i� undeveloped area. ■� The proposed project will involve an irreversible commitment of labor and capital investment and an increased demand for social and public maintenance services. Alternative energy sources, such as solar energy, are not in widespread local use and it will likely be some time before a real savings in finite energy supplies (e.g. oil and natural gas) can be realized. Therefore, the project will result in an irretrievable commitment of finite energy resources. IGROWTH -INDUCING IMPACTS Development of the site will transform currently undeveloped land into an urbanized environment. Most of the surrounding area has been developed. The City of Newport Beach General Plan and zoning call for urban residential development of the project site. Short-term employment opportunities would be made available by construction of the project. The project will assist in meeting the area's housing demands. Project completion would result in increased demands for utilities and community services. No new extension of services or utilities is required. Due to the small size and infill nature of the project, it is not expected to increase development pressures on undeveloped parcels in the surrounding region or the local area. A I �l 72 SUMMARY OF UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED This summary briefly lists those significant adverse impacts which will result with implementation of the project. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION �l The project, in combination with other existing and committed projects, is expected to have a significant cumulative adverse impact on traffic conditions on the local circulation system. 73 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS FOUND TO BE INSIGNIFICANT This summary briefly describes those effects which were determined to be insignificant, as well as those potentially significant effects which can be mitigated so as to be insignificant. 1. The project site will be converted from vacant land to residential use. 2. Project development will alter views from adjacent roadways and properties. 3. The project will generate 430 daily trip ends to local roadways. 4. A portion of the site will experience noise levels exceeding residential noise standards before mitigation. 5. The project is expected to generate 9 new students to the local education system. I l t I 74 SUMMARY OF EXISTING CITY POLICIES AND REOUIREMENTS A. A landscapeandirrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The plan will be subject to approval by the Planning Department, the Parks, Beaches, Recreation Department, and the Public Works Department. B. The landscape plan shall include a maintenance program which controls the use of fertilizers and pesticides. C. The landscape plan shall place emphasis on the use of drought -resistant native vegetation and be irrigated via a system designed to avoid surface runoff and overwatering. D. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floorplans, elevations, and sections. E. The project shall be designed to eliminate light and glare spillage onto adjacent properties. F. Prior to approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 12209, the project shall comply with the City of Newport Beach Updated Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO revised 1986). Said compliance shall first be approved by the City via acceptance of a revised traffic report prepared in accordance with guidelines for the updated TPO. G. The project shall be required to contribute a sum equal to its "fair share" of future circulation system improvements as shown on the City's Master Plan of Streets and Highways and any other mitigation measures as may be required. H. Prior to the issuance of building permits for each of the planned units, an acoustical engineering study shall be performed based on actual pad, property, and roadway grades, and building locations and orientations to assure that the exterior building shells of each structure will be sufficient to reduce existing and future noise levels to an acceptable intensity. I. Prior to occupancy of any unit, a qualified acoustical engineer shall be retained by the City at the applicant's expense to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that noise impacts do not exceed 65 CNEL for outside living areas and active recreation areas and 45 CNEL for interior living areas. 75 J. All construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. K. Any mechanical equipment and emergency power generators will be screened from view and shall be sound -attenuated so as not to exceed 55 dBA at the property line. 1 t 2 IA Ii I 76 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES Signage and exterior lighting shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. All mechanical equipment, vents, and other service equipment shall be shielded and screened from view by architectural features. 3. A plan depicting the exact location, height, and type of material for all walls separating the project from adjacent uses shall be submitted to the City for review, and approval prior to the approval of any grading and/or building permits. The plan shall be approved by the Planning Department and the Public Works Department. 4. Perimeter walls constructed for screening or sound attenuation purposes shall be designed in an aesthetically pleasing manner, such as slumpstone or stucco block with a brick or stone cap. In no event shall fences such as grape -stake, common cinderblock or chain link be allowed. 5. The' units which are located inside the 65 CNEL contour and have any partial view of Pacific Coast Highway or MacArthur Boulevard shall be mitigated to experience outdoor noise levels less than 65 CNEL and indoor noise levels less than 45 CNEL. Specific provisions shall be determined prior to obtaining any grading permit and shall be installed in accordance with alternative design methods and recommendations outlined in the noise report for the Point del Mar project. 6. Noise barrier heights presented below and graphically illustrated in Exhibit 23 shall be integrated into project site design. Walls shall be of heights specified below, constructed of masonry material, and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits. (See Mitigation Measure 4 for recommended materials for use with walls). Barriers can be of any combination of beam and wall. LOTS BARRIER HEIGHT (IN FEET FROM PAD LEVEL) Lots 24 to 35 6.0 Lots 36 to 37 8.0 Lots 38 to 43 6.0 77 PREPARERS OF AND CONTRIBUTORS TO THE REPORT PREPARERS Sanchez Talarico Associates Annette M. Sanchez Baesel Fred Talarico CONTRIBUTOR Transportat Noise Asses Graphics De 78 PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED DURING THE PREPARATION OF THE EIR City of Newport Beach Planning Department Patricia Temple Bret Bernard Public Works Department Rich Edmonston The Irvine Comip Bernard Maniscalco Real Estate Development Corporation. Patrick G. Hayes Urban Assist, Inc. Dave Neish Newport Mesa Unified School District Dale C. Wooley Fuscoe, Williams. Lindgren and Short Donald Lindgren Raymond Tokihiro Richard Wilson Calderon Nakamura Architects Fernando Calderon Robert Mitchell and Associates Robert Mitchell Gary Patton u I I [-1 I I II -1 79 REFERENCES Mestre Greve Associates, 1984. Noise Assessment for Brisa del Mar Residential Community. Prepared for Sanchez Talarico Associates, Newport Beach, CA. Newport Beach, City of, 1973a. Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. Newport Beach, CA. Ibid., 1973b. Recreation and Open Space Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. Newport Beach, CA. Ibid., 1974a. Circulation Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. Newport Beach, CA. Ibid., 1974b. Conservation of Natural Resources Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. Newport Beach, CA. Ibid., 1975a. Public Safety Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. Newport Beach, CA. Ibid., 1975b. Residential Growth Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. Newport Beach, CA. Ibid., 1977. Environmental Analysis of the Newport Beach General Plan. Newport Beach, CA. Ibid., 1984a. Housing Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. Newport Beach, CA. Ibid., 1984b. Draft Recreation and Open Space Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. Newport Beach, CA. Ibid., 1984c. Zoning Code of the City of Newport Beach. Newport Beach, CA. The Irvine Company, 1984. Draft Planned Community District Regulations for Point del Mar. Newport Beach, CA. Weston Pringle Associates, 1984a. Traffic Report for Brisa del Mar Resi- dential Community. Newport Beach, CA. Ibid., 1984b. _Cumulative Traffic Analysis for the Fifth Avenue Corridor Projects. Newport Beach, CA. APPENDICES a� �V 1f I APPENDIX A PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ��W PpRr °4f CITY OF NEW PORT BEACH V ` T P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT EIR DATE: To: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN FROM: City of Newport Beach'i Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O.Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915, PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH YOUR AGENCY'S COMMENTS BY November 27,_ 1985 PROJECT TITLE: Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard Project • PROJECT LOCATION: boundecL on the west y MacArthur Bivd. , on the sou E. Coast Hwy., on the east by Grant Howald Park, on the north b DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND MAJOR LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: U SEE ATTACHED o CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE: Patricia Temple Environmental Coordinator (1.4) 644- 22 DESCRIBE SPECIFIC PERMIT AUTHORITY OF YOUR AGENCY RELATED TO -THIS PROJECT: LIST SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: (Use additional pages as necessary) Z U iC Fi z z 0 P. �N�77 CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE: LEAD AGENCY: October 28, 1985 DATE RECEIVED.BY -- RESPONSIBLE-AGENCY: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach DATE RESPONSE F BY LEAD AGENCY: h by Sea Iran( CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 NONSTATUTORY ADVISEMENT OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT EIR PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH YOUR COMMENTS BY: November 27, 1985 PROJECT TITLE: FIFTH AVENUE/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: y MacArthur Blvd,, on the south by E..Coast Hwy., on the east by Grant Howald Park, and on the north DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND MAJOR LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: Sea iene, U z SEE ATTACHED • o a CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE: Patricia Temple *Environmental Coordinator (714) 644-32 DESCRIBE SPECIFIC AREA OF EXPERTISE OR INTEREST: LIST SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: (Use additional pages as necessary) a a a a [N� (R7 H 2 ~ CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach i I I i I FIFTH AVE NUE /MACARTHUR BOULEVARD PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION It is the intent of the City of Newport Beach to have a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project known as the Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard parcel. The proposed project will allow for the development of 45 detached single—family residential dwelling units on approximately 6.26 gross acres. The project site is bounded on the west by MacArthur Boulevard, on the south be East Coast Highway, on the east by Goldenrod Avenue, and oa the north by Sea Lane. The environmental analysis will use the concept of a Supplemental Focus EIR. The EIR will address those issues identified by the City of Newport Beach at a level of detail commensurate with their level of potential significance and with the level of detail available in project data. The topics to be analyzed are listed below. Other relevant environmental issues were sufficiently addressed in the previous SIR for the subject site (refer to EIR for Brisa del Mar, SCH# 84052306),. LAND USE AESTHETICS TRAFFIC ONSITE NOISE SCHOOLS The proposed project has the potential to have a significant effect on all of the above listed topics as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines on the above listed topics. At this time, the project applicant is seeking the City's approval of Planned Community District Regulations, Tentative Tract Map, Traffic Phasing Ordinance, Grading Permit, certification of an Environmental Impact Report, and other approvals as may be deemed appropriate and necessary by the City of Newport Beach to allow for implementation of the project. los angeles county 1•. i—••--•• •— •� san bernardino county a /• Anaheim Orappa •' ( a� QM"l riverside county, Santa , Ana � ` �..__`• m Ineo \ hxwnn a a, 1 SUM '•� #; l Sa 9ton eta ea°awelirt SITEJE T pacific ocean � I / �iicha Son aapstran Cino ..l t San Clemente" � san diego county FIFTH AVE,/MACARTHUR BLVD, PROJECT sanc btztalarko REGIONAL LOCATION ° City of Newport Beach E "5 •:. PO � ui as ti-�= 7W/N LAKIf C/4 i � ' C/TY OF �r .i-lF...t'!CYIIAL BG2.C� S NEiY/$�.eT BEG /Y(oNTEKEY Cl .. ✓jKEPBeY j I GONYGN �� I I I C eear o e. CAP. COO •�i C "OiYLA< 1AT" lrOld7Z MvaoG D It la � SG�Fi. E 9 19C�C9C9C�1^. FIFTH AVE./MACARTHUR BLVD, PROJECT. Sanchez talarico ates VICINITY MAP as�cSoo City of Newport Beach LL Bill Murphy MQp'g Joanne Schneider Dept. Housing & Comm. Dev. Reg. Water Quality Cont., !8 921 loth St., 5th Floor, Sacramento 6809 Indian Ave., Suite 200 , Riverside, CA 92506 James M. Doyle Dept. Parke & Recreation P.O. Box 2390 Sacramento, CA 95811 Dept. Fish & Game Hilary Baker Fred A. Worthley Jr., Mgr. O.C. Sanitation Dist. 245 W. Broadway, Suite 350 10844 Ellis Avenue Long Beach, CA 90802 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Ted Pukushima D.M. Glover State Land Commission So. Calif. Gas Co. 1807 13th Street P.O. Box 3334 Sacramento, CA 95814 Anaheim, CA 92804-3334 Dick Hsu Judith Clark Orange County Transit District Newport Beach Pub. Library 11222 Acaccia Parkway 856 San Clemente Drive Garden Grove, CA 92642 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Helen Dietz Newport -Mesa Unif. School Dist. P.O. Box 1368 Newport Beach, CA 92663 L.C. Arthiagton Pacific Bell 3939 E. Coronado, let Floor Anaheim, CA 92807 Randy Nakashima Newport Beach Police Dept. P.O. Box 7000 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Perry Valentin City of Costa Mesa 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Loretta Allen Native Amer. Hetitage Com. 915 Capitol Mall, Room 288 Sacramento, CA 95814 Ken Fellows Dept. Water Resources 1416 Ninth St. Sacramento, CA 95814 Ed Moore City of Irvine 2810 McCaw Ave. P.O. Box 19575 Irvine, CA 92713 Harvey Collins Department of Health 714 P Street, Room 430 Sacramento, CA 95814 Nick del Cioppo Office of Historic Preservation 1050 20th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Wayne Ballentini Dept. Transportation 87 120 Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dan Couaty State of California office -of Planning & Research 1400 loth St., Room 121 4�.—. ...u� 'A ncOtt I LJ I i I i I 11 C.V. Wright Southern Calif. Edison Co. 7333 Holes Avenue Westminster, CA 92683 Harbor View Hills Comm. Ass. P.O. Box 54 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Don Jones Ms. Jane Lyon Newport Beach Fire Dept. 1014 Sea Lane 475 32nd Street Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Bill Olson Clerk of Board of Supervisors County of Orange EMA-EAD P.O. Box 687 P.O. Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA Mary Kelly Caltrans Planning 92648 1120 'N' St. Sacramento, CA 95814 June Catalano City of Laguna Beach 505 Forest Avenue Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Friends of Upper Newport Bay P.O. Box 2001 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Ms. Jean Morris 1032 Sea Lane Corona del Mar, CA 92653 Mr. Barry Allen 1021 White Sales Way Corona del Mar, CA 92625 SPON Jean Watt 4 Harbor Island Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dept. of Fish and Game Carl Wilcox 442 Swarthmore Lane Costa Mesa, CA 92626 The Irvine Company 550 Newport Center Drive P.O. Box I Newport Beach, CA 92658-0015 Brian Farris South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. 9150 E. Flari Drive El Monte, CA 91731 Department of Fish end Ceme NSA's Robert Tharratt 1416 Ninth St. Sacramento, CA 95814 California coastal Ca®iesion Cary Holloway 631 Howard St., 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Department of Health Services Stuart B. Richardson, Jr. 2151 Berkeley Nay Berkeley, CA 94704 Department of Transportation Planning Branch Nary Rally 1120 'N' St. Sacramento, CA 95814 Department of Boating and Waterways William H. Iwa 1629 5 St. Sacramento, CA 95814 State Water Resources Control Board Joan Jurancich P.O. Box 100 Sacramento, CA 95801 Native American Heritage Comm. Loretta Allan 915 Capitol Wall, Room 208 Sacramento, CA 95814 Office of Resources, Energy, and Permit Assistance Christine Coggin 1400 Tenth St. Sacramento, CA 95814 Dept. of Parka and Recreation Office of Historic Preservation Nicholas del Ciappo P.O. Box 2390 Sacramento, CA 95811 U.S. Army Corps of Hnginaera Planning Division Carl F, Eason P.Q. Box 2711 Los Angeles, CA 90053 California,Regionai Water Quality Control Board Cordon Anderson 6809 Indiana Avenue Riverside, CA 92506 Department of General Services James Hargrove 1125 Tenth St. Sacramento, CA 95814 Public Utilities Commission Ceorge Borah 350 McAllister St. San Francisco, CA 94102 California Energy Commission Sheri McFarland 1516 Ninth Street, Room 200 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dept. of Parke and Recreation James Doyla P.O. Box 2390 Sacramento, CA 95811 Celtrans; District 7 Kea Steels 120 S. Spring St. Los Angeles, CA 90012 Commander (dpl) City of Huntington Beach llth Coast Guard District Planning Department Union Bank Building 2000 Main St. 400 Oceangate, Suite 908 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Long Beach, CA 90822 Orange Co. Flood Control District Southern California Edison Co. ' Mr. Brunner C.V. Wright 400 Civic Center Drive West 7333 Bolas Ave. Santa Ana, CA 92702 P.O. Box 2069 Westminster; CA 92683-1269 John Wayne Airport Mr. Murray Cable Irvine Unified School District 2941 Alton Avenue 18741 Air Way North Irvine, CA 92714 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Dept. of Water Resources Newport -Mesa Unified School District Ren'Fellows 1857 Placentia Avenue 1416 Ninth St. Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Sacramento, CA 95814 State Lands Commission Coast Comm. College District Ted Fukushima 1370 Adams Avenue 1807 13th St. .Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Sacramento, CA 95814 ° Dept. of Housing Southern California Gas Co. and Community Development D.M. Glover 921 Tenth St., Sth Floor P.O. Box 3334 Sacramento, CA 95814 Anaheim, CA 92803 FHWA County Sanitation District Ray Okinaga Thomas M. Dawes P.O. Box 1915 P.O. Box 8127 Sacramento, CA 95809 Fountain Valley, CA ' 92708 ILI I I� I I ii U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Jack panther 24000 Avila Rd. Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Air Resources Board Regional Programs Division Anne B. Geraghty, Manager 1102 Q St., P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95814 Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Mark F. Mispagel, Chief 1120 'N' St. Sacramento, CA 95814 Department of Conservation Dennis J. O'Bryant 1416 Ninth St., Room 1354 Sacramento, CA 95814 Department of Fish and Came Fred A. Worthley, Jr., Reg, Mgr, 245 W. Broadway, Suite 350 Long Beach, CA 90802 South Coast Air Quality Management District 9420 Telstar Avenue E1 Monte, CA . 91731 Orange County Transit District Dick Hsu P.O. Box 3005 Garden Creva, CA 92642-3005 SCAG Mark Alpers 600 S. Commonwealth Avenue Suite 1000 Loa Angeles. CA 90005 Orange County Eavironmental Management Agency Robert Busby P.O. Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Harbor Patrol Orange County Sheriff's Dept. 1901 Bayside Drive Corona del Mar, CA 92625 L Park Lido Association Alice Nail, President 434 Orion Nay Newport Beach, CA 92663 Promontory Bay Homeowners Assoc. ' Richard Bare, President • Villsgeway Manegement, Inn. P.O. Box 4708 _ Irving, CA 92716 Shorecliffs Comeunity Assoc. Mr. John Killefer, President 161 Shorecliff Rd. Corona del Her, CA 92625 Spyglass Hill Come. Assoc. Mr. John Burrows, President Villasaway Management, Inc. P.O. Box 4708 levins, CA 92716 Nest Newport Beach Assoc. Newport Center Assoc. Sterling wolfs, Jr., President Ms. Karen Kennedy, Managing Director 6204 W. Ocean front 180 Newport Center Drive, Suite 180 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Plaza Homeowners Came. Asada. Newport Terrace Homeowners Assoc. Earle William Burke, President Chaneeford Mounce, President mercury Property management Co. Management Services Co. 4670 Barranca Parkway 1234 B. Normandy Place Irviaa� CA 92714 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Rendezvous Condominium Assoc. Newport Shores Coon, Assoc. Management Services Company Mr. Ray Quinn, President 1234 Normandy Place 477 Prospect State Ana, CA 92705 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Saudeaatle Community Assoc. Harbor view Broadmoor Jim B. Peterson, President Community Assoc. Villagaway Management, Inc. Bill Cunningham, President P.O. Box 4708 1223 Goldenrod Irvine, CA 92716 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Sea Pine Come. Assoc. Channel Reef Community Association Helen Thomson, President Harold Welch, President Villagaway Management, Inc. 2525 Ocean Blvd. P.O. Box 4708 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Irvine, CA 92716 Sea Island Comm. Assoc. Newport Island, Inc. Phil Wiltse, President Mr. Stewart Hayward, President tusk Management Co. P.O. Box 1162 P.O. Box C-19560 Newport Batch, CA 92663 Irvine, CA 92713 Sea Wind Newport Came. Assoc. North Bluff Ville Come. Assoc. Al Wolfendan, President Len Czarnowski, President Villagevay Management Village Nay management P.O. Box 4708 P.O. Box 4708 Irving, CA" 92716 Txving, CA 92716 Villa Balboa Comm. Assoc. Mai Kai Community Association Bill Lund, President John Long, President Mercury Property Management Management Services Company 4670 Barranca Parkway 1234 B. Normandy Place Irvine, CA 92714 Santa Age; CA 92705 I 1 Villa Granada Community Assoc. China Cove Condominiums Assoc. Lorraine Halverson Steve Arganbright, President Mercury Property Management 317 Dahlia Place Corona del Mar, CA 92625 4670 Barranca Pkwy. Irvine, CA 92714 Seaview Community Assoc. Corona Highlands Property Owners Assoc. Larry Freedmen Villageway Management, Inc. Jerry Esterbrook, President P.O. Box 4708 92716 516 De Anza Corona del Her, CA 92625 Irvine, CA Balboa Coves Comm. Assoc. Mariners Community Association Claudia Weyer, President Allan Beek, President 08 Balboa Coves 1945 Sherington, Apt. G-107 Newport Beach, Ca 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Balboa Improvement Assoc. Unwind Community Assoc. Mary Jane Sanborn, President Bruce Torrence, President P.O. Box 825 Villageway Management Balboa, CA 92661 P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA' 92716 Bay Island Club, Inc. Little Balboa Island Property Owners Association Douglas B. Fletcher, President 3416 Via Oporto, Suite 300 Mr. Bing Girling, President Newport Beach, CA 92663 P.O. Box 74 Balboa Island, CA 92662 Bayside Cove Community Assoc. Mariners Community Assoc. Mercury Property Management Allan Beek, President 1945 Sherington, Apt. 0-107 4670 Barranca Parkway CA 92714 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Irvine, Bayside Village Homeowners Assoc. Newport Condominium Association ' Arthur J. Sullivan, President Chanceford Mounce, President 300 E. Coast Highway, Sp.C12 Management Services Co. Newport Beach, CA 92660 1234 E. Normandy Place Santa Ana, CA 92705 Beacon Bay Comm. Assoc. Newport Heights Comm. Assoc. Dan Guggenheim, President Steve Dobbin, President 4 Beacon Bay 330 Santa Ana Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92663 The Bluffs Homeowner, Assoc. Claude Whitney, President P.O. Box $167 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Broadmoor Hills II Comm. Assoc. Cameo Community Assoc. Dr. Bruce Walter, President Maxine Handley, President 2821 Bluewater 3810 E. Coast Highway, Suite 4 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Seaview Assoc. Broadmoor Hills Canyon Crest Comm. Assoc. Larry Freedmen, President Sheila Walkers, President P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 Villageway Management, Inc, P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, Ca 92716 Breakers Drive Assoc. Canyon Lakes Comm. Assoc. Bob McAllister, President Ben Hazewinkel, President ' 3116 Breakers Drive Villageway Management, Inc. Corona del Her. CA 92625 P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 I LEAP Clement Shute Shute-Myhely-Nainbarger 396 Hayes St., Suite 1 San Francisco, CA 94102 Margo W. W. Beach Front Ocean Island Lagoon Assoc. Newport Newport Beach, G 92663 John Callandro, President merit property management, Inc. 27285 Lan gambles, Suite 180 mission Viejo, CA 92691 Susie Pickar 110 Ninth St. Lido Park Comm. Assoc. Newport ]teach, CA92661 C.A.H.B. 14600 Ooldeavest, Suite 102-A Westminster, CA 92683 The Irvin* Company Dave Linda Isla Comm. Assoc. Newport centerki Judy Harry, President management Services Co. New ort tat h,CA,Drive Newport beach, G 92663 1234 I. Normandy Place Santa Ana, G 92705 Pillar 6 guying Architects Willies Cotolido Community Assoc. Cr Newpoortrt Cantor Driveport Sohn Sipple, President av New Bach, CA 92660 490 Morning Canyon Rd. Clark Board Corona del Hat, CA 92625 of the of SupervisorsCameo P.O. Hon 687 Shores Community Assoc. Sane* Ana, CA 92702 Roger Hardaers, President 723 Cameo Highlands Dr. Corona del Mar, G 92625 Teleprompter 902 W. 16th St. Cameo Shores Community Assoc. Newport Batch, G 92663 Me• Pat Ingle 3610 S. Coast Nighvay, Suite 4 Corona dal Mar, G 92625 Airport land Use Commission N. Airport Nay Balcour. Dili Comm. Assoc. Sant Santa An, CA 92702 Viilagsway Management, Inc. P.O. Box 4708 Irving, CA92716 Stave marble Daily Pilot HalcaurC Park Assoc. P.O. Box 1560 Bon Whita, President Villagaway Management, Inc. Costa Hasa, G 92626 P.O. Box 4708 Irvin, G 92716 of Oraage Coat. Women Voters Orange o! Os Belcourt Master Assoc. 1 Hampshire Ct. c/o Merit Property Management Newport Beach, CA 92660 27285 Las Rambles, Suits 180 Mission Viejo, G 9269L Audubon Society Sea and Saga Chapter Harbor View Comm..Asson. P.O. Box 1779 Those* Sparks, President Santa Ana, CA 92702 Villagavay Management, Inc. P.O. Box 4708 Irving, CA 92716 Po! Irving Coast Bo P.O. Box 714 Lido Marina Villa a g Corona del Her, G 92625 Traweek Western Property Mgt. Co. P.O. Box 6348 Oraoga, CA 92667 Friends of Upper Newport Bay Don Strauss P.O. Box 2001 101 Via Venezia Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Bert Sims Brian Jeannette Sutton News Group 470 Old Newport Blvd. 2721 E. Coast Highway Newport Bench, CA 92663 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Tom Thomson Corona del Mar Chamber of Ccmmeres P.O. Box 5100 Jean Eiger, President Balboa Island, CA 92662 2855 E. Coast Corona del Mar," Highway 92625 Ron Covington Newport Harbor Area 707 Orchid Chamber of Commerce Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Jim Dale, President 1470 Jamboree Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 Janice Debay 5107 Seashore Dr. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Mary tau Zoglin 10 Surfeide Ct. Balboa Library Newport Beach, CA 92663 100 E. Balboa Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92661 Eric Elder 1107 B. Balboa Blvd. Corona del Mar Library Balboa, CA 92661 420 Marigold Avenue Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Bernard Pegg 2633 Bamboo St. Mariners Library Newport Beach, CA 92660 2005 Dover Dr. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Jackie Heather 1500 Dorothy Lane Newport Center Library Newport Beach, CA 92660 856 San Clemente Dr. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Rena Eoppelman 4627 Camden Dr. Irvine Ranch Water District Corona del Mar, CA 92625 18802 Bardeen Avenue P.O. Box D-1 Irvine, CA 92716-6025 Chriss Street City of Costa Mesa 619 Heliotrope Corona dal Mar, CA 92625 Clark, Planning Director Dougg Planning Department P.O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa. CA 92626 Bobby Lovell City of Irvine 1242 W. Ocean Front Newport Beach, CA 92661 Larry Bogle, Planning Director Planning Department P.O. Box 19575 Irvine, CA 92713 I Bayshorea Community Assoc. Rem Burbank, President c/o Viliagoway Management, P.O. Box 4703 Irvine, CA 92716 Big Canyon Community Assoc. Berate Samson, President Villegeway Management, Inc. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 Canyon Island Comm. Assoc. Bryan Saxender, President Villagaway management, Inc. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92116 Canyon Bills Coma. Assoc. Bill Baker, President Inc. Villagaway Management, Inc. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 Canyon Point Comm. Assoc. San Togve, President c/o Mercury Property management 4670 Barraoca Parkway Irvine, CA ' 92714 Canyon mesa Come. Assoc. James Jertmon, President Villagevay Management, Inc. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 Canyon View Corn. Assoc. Mr. Jack L. Hanson, President 14 Rue Cannes Newport Beach, CA 92660 central Newport Beach Corn. Lee Mallory III, President 1916 Court Ave. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Cliff Haven Comm. Assoc. Barbara Whitford, President 406 Snug Harbor Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dover Shores Corn. Assoc. Peter Drummond, President Villagaway, management, Inc. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 Corona del Mar Come. Assoc. Mr. Richard Nichols, President P.O. Box 516 Corona del Mar,, CA 92625 Cameo Highlands Property Owners Assoc. Jerry Bsterbrook, President 516 Be Anaa Dr. Corona del mar, CA 92625 Baetbluff Homeowners Comm. Assoc. Susan Doering, President David Redford s Associates 3822 Campus Drive, Suite 204 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Four Seasons Association Margo Butler, President 2508 University Drive Newport Beseh, CA 92600 Harbor Island Comm. Assoc. James Rogers, President c/o Mrs. Pattatier 833 Dover Drive, Suits 21 Newport Beachi CA 92663 Aeeoc. Barber View Hills Homeowners Comm. Assoc. Gary Poseroyj President 2907 Bbbtide Corona del mar, CA 92625 Harbor Ridge Crest Comm. Assoc. Arion Plata, President Campbell Property Service, Inc. 1714 Clark Avenue Long Beach, CA 90815 Harbor Ridge Estates Maint. Assoc. Richard Rease, President Campbell Property Service, Inc. 1714 Clark Ave. Long Baach,'CA 90815 Newport Hills Comm. Assoc. Alice King, President Villagaway Management, Inc. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, CA 92716 Harbor View Xnolls Comm. Assoc.. John Pisher, President Villageway Management, Inc. P.O. Box 4708 Irvine, Ca 92716 Lido Sands Corn. Assoc, Judy White, President 4820 River Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92663 Balboa Island Business Assoc. Mr. Howard Ray lavy, President 333 Onyx Balboa Island, CA 92662 Balboa Island Improvement Assoc. A.Z. Taft, President 123-1/2 Carat Balboa Island, CA 92662 Balboa Peninsula Point Assoc. Tom Pendell, President 1412 B. Ocean ?coat Balboa, CA 92661 I 1 I LJ I I I Versailles Association Don Pander, President Mercury Property Management Co. ' 4670 Barranca Parkway Irvine, CA 92714 Irvine Cove Comm. Assoc. Dr. Terry Root, President 2523 Monaco Drive ' Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Irvine Terrace Comm. Assoc. Pay Lachman, President 1151 Dove Street, Suite 110 . Newport Beach, CA 92660 Jasmine Creek Comm. Assoc. Edwin Edglay, General Manager 110 Jasmine Creek Drive Corona del Mar, CA 92625 I 1 r� 141 I1 C I1 IM II I Harbor Hills Homeowners Assoc. J. Pierce, President Merit Property Management, Inc. 27285 Lae Rambles, Suite 180 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Newport Crest Homeowners Assoc,. Frank Fabro, President P.o. Box C-19560 Irvine, CA 92713 Newport Upper Bay Estates Mr. Joseph Meshi, President 2268 Golden Circle Newport Beach, CA 92660 North Bluff Bay View Comm. Assoc. John Coombe, President Mercury Property Management 4670 Barranca Parkway Irvine, CA 92714 North Bluff Park Comm. Assoc - Joe Scott Mercury Property Management 4670 Barranca Parkway Irvine, CA 92714 Spyglass Ridge Comm. Assoc. Terry Stahl, President 1618 Reef View Circle Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Harbor View Hills Comm. Assoc. Larry Weeshoes, President Management Services Co. 1234 E. Normandy Place Santa Ana, CA 92705 Newport Crest Homeowners Assoc. 201 Intrepid St. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Canyon Hills Community Assoc. Bill Baker 3 Lockmoor Lane Newport Beach, CA 92660 Lido Sands Community Assocr Ses island Oommunity Assoc+ Judy White Phil Wiltse 4820 River Avenue 19 Sea Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Batch, CA 92660 Linda Isla Commun. Assoc Spyglass Ridge Comm. Assoc. George Carver Everett Stahl 26 Linda Isle 1618 Roof View Circle Newport Reach, CA 92660 Corona del mar, CA 92625 Little Balboa Island Assoc. Versailles Association George Ingle$ mercury Property Mgt., Ines P.O. Box 74 4670 Barranca Parkway Newport Beach, CA 92660 Irvine, CA 92714 maiUi Community Assoc. Villa Balboa Comm. Assoc. Management Services Co. mercury Property Mgt., Inc. 17601 17th 8t., Suits 218 4670 Barranca Parkway Tustin, CA 92680 Irvine, CA 92714 Villa Granada Comm. Assoc. David Rossi 835 Amigos Way 14 Newport Basch, CA 92660 Newport Heights Coma. Assoc. Corona del Her Hobert Clarka Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 3444 Jean Eiger Newport Beach, CA 92663 P.O. Box 72 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Newport Hills Comm. Assoc. Newport Harbor Area Daniss Newcomer Chamber of Commerce 1747 Port Manleigh Rod Rodhaim Newport Beach, CA 92660 1470 Jamboree Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Shores Comm. Association Gil mcCoskaj 219 Orange Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Terrace Condo. Assoc. Management Services Co. 17601 l7th St., Suite 218 Tustin, CA 92680 Newport Upper Day Estates Joseph Hashi 2268 Golden Circle Newport Beach, CA 92660 North Bluff Sayview, Comm. Assoc. John Coombe 2900 Quadada Newport Beach, CA 92660 North Bluff Park. Comm. Assoc. Bob Balknapp 2638 Vista del Oro Newport Beach, CA 92660 I I1 II I Lavena Hayton 235 Poppy Avenue Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Mr. H. Roes Hiller Chairman, Friedne of OASIS 1627 Baycliff Circle Corona del Mar, CA _ 92625 Mr. Edgar Williams President, Friend of OASIS 105 No. Bay£ront Balboa Island, CA 92662 Mr. J.R. Blakemore 2509 Harbor View Drive Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Mr. John P. Kelley 717 Goldenrod Avenue Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Mr. Barry Allen Harbor View Hills Assoc. 1021 White Sails Way Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Mr. Gene Lyons 1014 Sea Lane Corona del Her, CA 92625 Sharon Dawson 721 Goldenrod Avenue Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Peggy Calls 717 Goldenrod Avenue Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Mr. Larry Alford Harbor View Elementary School 900 Goldenrod Newport Beach, CA 92625 Balboa Coves Community Assoc. 20 Balboa Coves Newport Beach, CA 92663 Balboa Improvement Assoc. Charles Bauman 150 Miramar Balboa, CA 92661 Balboa Island Business Assoc. Howard Silver c/o Balboa Island T-Shirt Co. 19 Marine Avenue Balboa Island, CA 92662 Balboa Island Improvement Assoc. Natalie Fogarty 16 Garnet Balboa Island, CA 92662 Bayside Cove Community Assoc Jim Caswell 1008 Bayside Cove East Newport Beach, CA 92660 Bayside Village Homeowners Assoc Hatt Gemmell 107 Lexington Circle Newport Beach, CA ' 92660 Bayshores Community Assoc. Malcolm Roes 2611 Bayshore Drive Newport Beach, CA 92663 Beacon Bay Community Assoc. Tom Ray 58 Beacon Bay Newport Beach, CA 92660 Belcourt Hill Community Assoc. Wolf Stern 49 Southhampton Court Newport Beach, CA 92660 Big Canyon Community Assoc. Bernie Samson 3 Iverness Lane Newport Beach, CA 92660 The Bluffs Homeowners Assoc. Caryle M. Levinson 400 Carlotta Newport Beach, CA 92660 Cameo Community Assoc. Maxine Hundley 4645 Gorham Drive Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Canyon Crest Community Assoc. Sheila Walterns 1 Cherry Hills Lane Newport peach, CA 92660 Canyon Crest Estates Homeowners Association Dennis O'Connor 5 Canyon Crest Corona del Mar, CA 92625 I Harbor Ridge Estates Maintenance Association Ken Agid 29 Montpellier Newport Beach, CA 92660 Harbor Hills Homeowners Assoc. Canyon Island Community Assoc. Merit Property Mgmt. R.A. HcKietrick Susan Finley 11 Rua Fontaine 24422 Ave de Is Catlota, 1460 Newport Botch, CA 92660 Laguna Bills, CA 92653 Harbor View Hills Comm. Canyon Lakes Community Assoc. Management Services Co. Howard Land 17601 17th St., Suite 218 16 Rua Villars Tustin, CA 92680 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Harbor View Comm. Assoc. Canyon Hass Community Assoc. Phil Glasgow Betty Robinson 1842 Port Margata 5 Rua Hontreaux Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Harbor View Knoll Comm. Assoc. Corolido Community Assoc. John Fisher John Simple 2770 Hillview Drive 490 Morning Canyon Road Newport Beach, CA 92660 Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Irvine Cove Common. Assoc. Corona Highland Property Thomas Pitcher Owners Association P.O. Box 2490 Mike Miller Newport Beach, CA 92663 468 DsAna 'Irvine Terrace Comm. Assoc. Corona del Her, CA 92625 Eastbluff Apt. Owners Assoc. San Van Landinghan Villogsway Mgt. Co. 1501 Santsualla Terrace P.O. Box 4708 Corona del Her, CA 92625 Irvine, CA 92716 Island Lagoon Assoc. Esetbluff Homeowners Comm. John Hartunian He. Carrier Reid 27 Ocean Vista Total Property Management Newport Batch, CA 92660 18025 Sky Park East, Suite H Irvine, CA 92714 Jasmine Creak Common. Assoc. Fashion Island Mgt. Assoc. Christine McGraw Barbara Roppolo 110 Jasmine Creak Drive I62 Fashion island Corona del Her, CA 92625 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Lido Isle Common. Assoc. Four Four's Lido Isla Comm. Assoc. Association Ms. 2ada Taylor 701 Via Lido Bond • 2514 University Dr. Newport Beach Newport Beech, CA 92660 CA, 92663 Lido Marina Village Harbor Island Comm. Assoc. Traweek Western Property Philip Lyons Management Company 9 Harbor Island P.O. Box 6348 Newport Botch, CA 92660 Orange, CA 92667 China Cove Cone. Assoc Harbor Ridge Crest ' Steve Arganbeight Community Association 317 Dahlia Place Arland Flaum ' Corona del Mar, CA 92625 2 Lucerne Newport Batch, CA 92660 1 IJ CITY OF NEW PORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT EIR DATE: TO: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN FROM: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O.Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH YOUR AGENCY'S COMMENTS BY November 27, 1985 PROJECT TITLE: Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard Project PROJECT LOCATION: bounded on a westy lac r ur v . , on the sou E. Coast Hwy., on the east by Grant HOwald Park, on the north b DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND MAJOR LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: z W SEE ATTACHED c a w a CONTACT PERSON. TITLE: PHONE: Patricia Temple Environmental Coordinator ( 1.4 644- 22 DESCRIBE SPECIFIC PERMIT AUTHORITY OF YOUR AGENCY RELATED TO THIS PROJECT: u w LIST SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: (Use additional pages as necessary) iJ/�Cr/>';C �r l/ fiA_S .1 Pa/FLzgd 4AJ /✓on74 F -'5/ 0 //t/ I&E, L�JA;e- [ ZVI/� /UV/c1t aLi7f- 7y m M z Z O w y W a CONTACT PERSON: �{j�II/.o� � ,i,J/� TITLE: PHONE: 2 r' L12•�iusaiL i /S�-iG6-6...3� DATE MAILED BY LEAD AGENCY: October 28, 1985 DATE RECEIVED BY RES/P/ONSIBLE-AGGENCY: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach '?' A, � 41 �e a`01r�,' <a �/ j, 'ice 044/4 h by Sea la MO @ nn M I CITY OF NEW PORT BEACH OCT 2 9'685 P.O. BOX 1766,NEWPORT BEACH, CA9265M915 ADMINISTRATION NEWPORT BEACH NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAF (UGIIRBRARr I DATE: To- WHOM IT MAY CONCERN FROM: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O.Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH YOUR AGENCY'S COMMENTS BY November 27, 1985 PROJECT TITLE: Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard Project' PROJECT LOCATION: J=nded on a west y MacArthur Blvd,, on the sou E. Coast Hwy., on the east by Grant Howald Park, on the north b DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND MAJOR LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUESs z SEE ATTACHED CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE - Patricia Temple Environmental Coordinator 14 644- 22 j LIST SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS- (Use additional pages as; necessary) None. Neighboring Branch Libraries can accommodate increased M use at present. z 0 a :n M CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PRONE: Helen Spencer Acting City Librarian 644-3180 AGENCY: October 28, 1985 DATE RECEIVED BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: 10/29/85 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach DATE RESPONSE RECE] BY LEAD AGENCY: RECEIVE S PlG-4 nnil DePaame:+t CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. 11 i I 1 h by, Sea If r� a F 1l;r Community Develooment Department City of Irvine. 17200 Jamboree Road, P.O. Box. 19575, Irvine. California 92713 (714) 6603600 November 4, 1985 Pat Temple Environmental Coordinator CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 RE: NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT EIR FIFTH AVENUE/ MACARTHUR BOULEVARD PROJECT Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the NOP for the subject project. The City of Irvine has no comments on the project. Please continue to keep us informed of projects which could potentially impact the City. Sincerely,, AICP Planner/Environmental Coordinator EM/db cc: John Murphy Mary Roush I j$`, RECEIVED �' Planl�irk9 �`"Y DCpa�"rt!!ili - 1+OV i21985 i Y- If/Yy MURRAYSTOR) Q,� ' 1 �, DIRECTOR, EMA -y Np�, ^d;M • ROBERT O. FISHE 4 U NTY O F �r^ r DIRECTOR OF PLANNINCJ Py.\ ; aJ LOCATION: •'� , '�L 12 CIVIC CENTER P40 s a RANG E ry P.O.ABOX 40a1� rF % SANTA AN A, CA 9270240 MAILING ADDRES444S��,,, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAG ENT AGENCY SANTA ANA, CA 92702 404� PLANNING TELEPHONE (714) 8344843 FILE November 22, 1985 NCL 4174 Patricia Temple City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Subject: NOP - Pifth Avenue/Mac Arthur Boulevard Project Dear Ms. Temple: The County of Grange Environmental Management Agency has reviewed the above referenced Notice of Preparation. The proposed EIR will address the environmental impacts associated with development of 45 detached single-family residential dwelling units on approximately 6.26 acres. The project site is located in the City of Newport Beach and is bounded on the west by Mac Arthur Boulevard, on the south by East Coast Highway, on the east by Goldenrod Avenue and on the north by Sea Lane. We have no comment. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Notice of Preparation. We look forward to working with you on this project. We would appreciate receiving three copies of the Draft EIR when they become available. If you have any questions, please contact Sara Anderson at 834-5550. Very truly yoourss�t Michael M. Ruane, Chief EMA/DSP, Capital Projects SA:khPL01-34 5326 17 LJ I IOUTHERR CALIFORRIA ' AfIOCIRTiOR Of GOVERnMEnTf 600 touth Commonwealth Avenue •tulte 1000 • Lof Hngeler• California • 90005.213/385-1000 I IDATE: November 27, 1985 F I TO: Ms. Patricia Temple Environmental Coordinator City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard P. 0. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 FROM: Metropolitan Clearinghouse SUBJECT: FIFTH AVENUE/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD PROJECT SCAG FILE NO. OR-34065-NP Thank you for submitting the Notice to Prepare the environmental document for the referenced project for SCAG review. SCAG staff does not have comments at this time but looks forward to reviewing the environmental document when available. Sincerely, J6 a. WENDY A. 'MURPHY Clearing Ouse Official WAM:wp6 f`��Iy•aa mannir D3[05 1985 -' CIT( if Nejgpof S 13'✓'04. CALIF. lC \Ni 1 I 1 n Ll COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS '` OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA > i P.O. BOX 6127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 '+10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708.7018 h0[ COU" (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 December 31, 1985 r City of Newport Beach Planning Department P. 0. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Attention: Patricia Temple, Environmental Coordinator Subject: Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard Project ' As you are aware, in July, 1984 the Sanitation Districts commented on the origi- nal project, which included 120 residential units on 6.25 acres at Fifth Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard. At that time the District requested certain flow com- parisons between our initial planning pArameters of 1550 gallons per day per acre for low density residential, and the proposed development. Subsequently, the Districts have reviewed other EIR's in adjacent areas and have requested a careful evaluation be made of all flows expected to eminate from all new and future developments, particularly those areas which flow through the Bay Bridge Pump Station (which includes this project). While it is noted that the ' Supplmental EIR currently being prepared for the project is not expected to address public services, this office did want to go on record once again con- cerning the need for careful coordination with the Sanitation Districts to insure adequate sewerage facilities are available to serve all planned develop- ment. Please forward a copy of the Draft EIR for the Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard Project upon its completion. If you have any questions or need information from this office, please do not hesitate to call. Hilary J. J'BaOerA Senior Administative Assistant hjb �pN2 192� U' c1: c 1• F �L�. C. I I �gW Po CITY OF NEW PORT BEACH u P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 c�cipa�`r NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT EIR DATE: TO: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN FROM: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O.Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH YOUR AGENCY'S COMMENTS BY November 27, 1985 PROJECT TITLE: Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard Project PROJECT LOCATION: bounded on a west y MacArthur Blvd. , on the sou E. Coast Hwy., on the east by Grant Howald Park, on the north b DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND MAJOR LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: z SEE ATTACHED a a w a CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE: Patricia Temple Environmental Coordinator (14) 644- 22 u I LIST SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: (Use additional pages as necessary) z z a z 0 a y ONTA99 PERSON(// , TITLE: I PHONE: , _ „ -% DATE MAILED EW LEAD V AGENCY: October 28, 1985 DATE RECEIVED BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach DATE RESPONSE BY LEAD -a6E= h by Sea Z 77R EC 'iarrin5 NOV131985 --- !L CIVOF NsvPOP.T �� CAUI . r' . I DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES P.O. Box 6598 LOS ANGELES .i' ` ip� lZ�.� -� W 90055 /S y Nov 1985 City of Newport Beach Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 , Attention: Patricia Temple Notice of Preparation of DEIR for Fifth Avenue/ MacArthur Project dated October 28, 1985. The Department of Water Resources' recommendations on the subject document r are attached. The recommendations are related to water conservation and flood damage prevention. Consideration should also -be given to a comprehensive program to use reclaimed water for irrigationtpurposes in d�der to free fresh water supplies for beneficial uses requiring high quality water. For further information, you may wish to contact John Pariewski at 213-620-3951. Sincerely, Robert Y. D. Chun, Chief Planning Branch Southern District Attachment cc: Office of Planning and Research ' State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 I r I Department of Water Resources Recommendations for Water Conservation and Water Reclamation ' To reduce water demand, the following water conservation measures should be implemented: ' Required by law: 1. Low -flush toilets (see Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code). 2. Low -flow showers and faucets (California Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 6, Article 1, T20-1406F). ' 3. Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating systems (California Energy Commission regulations). Recommendations to be implemented where applicable: Interior: ' 1.. Supply line pressure: recommend water pressure greater than 50 pounds per square inch (psi) be reduced to 50 psi or less by means of a pressure -reducing valve. 2.. Flush valve operated water closets: recommend 3 gallons per flush.' 3. Drinking fountains: recommend equipped with self -closing valves. 11 [_1 I 1 4. Pipe insulation: recommend all hot water lines in dwelling be insulated to provide hot water faster with less water waste and to keep hot pipes from heating cold water pipes. 5. Hotel rooms: recommend posting conservation reminders in rooms and rest rooms.* Recommend thermostatically -controlled mixing valve for bath/shower. 6. Laundry facilities: recommend use of water -conserving models of washers. 7. Restaurants: recommend use of water -conserving models of dishwashers or retrofitting spray emitters. Recommend serving drinking water upon request only.* Exterior: 1. Landscape with low water -consuming plants wherever feasible. 2. Minimize use of lawn by limiting it to lawn dependent uses, such as playing fields. *The Department of Water Resources or local water district may aid in developing these materials. 1J 3. Use mulch extensively in all landscaped areas. Mulch applied on top of soil will improve the water —holding capacity of the soil by reducing evaporation and soil compaction. 4. Preserve and protect existing trees and shrubs. Established plants are often adapted to low water conditions and their use saves water needed to establish replacement vegetation. 5. Install efficient irrigation systems which minimize runoff and evaporation and maximize the water which will reach the plant roots. Drip irrigation soil moisture sensors and automatic irrigation systems are a few methods of increasing irrigation efficiency. 6. Use pervious paving material whenever feasible to reduce surface water runoff and aid in ground water recharge. 7. Grading of slopes should minimize surface water runoff. S. Investigate the feasibility of utilizing reclaimed waste water, stored rainwater, or household grey water for irrigation. 9. Encourage cluster development which can reduce the amount of land being converted to urban use. This will reduce the amount of impervious paving created and thereby aid in ground water recharge. 10. Preserve existing natural drainage areas and encourage the incorporation of natural drainage systems in new devel'pments. This would aid in ground water recharge. 11. Flood plains and aquifer recharge areas which are the beat sites for ground water recharge should be preserved as open apace. LI t U H I Department of Water Resources Recommendations for Flood Damage Prevention In flood -prone areas, flood damage prevention measures required to protect a proposed development should be based on the following guidelines: 1. All building structures should be protected against a 100-year flood. It is the State's policy to conserve water. Any potential loss to ground water should be mitigated. 2. In those areas not covered by a Flood Insurance Rate Map or a Flood Boundary and Floodway Map, issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the 100-year flood elevation and boundary should be shown on the Environmental Impact Report. 3. At least one route of ingress and egress to the development should be available during a 100-year flood. 4. The slope and foundation designs for all structures should be based on detailed soils and engineering studies, especially for all hillside developments. 5. Revegetation of the slopes should be done as soon as possible. 6. The potential damage to the proposed development by mudflow should be assessed and mitigated as required4 7 r. A,.... e6..,. 1A ha I;m,'rpA hn el ., mnnhha hn mi nimiop nrnh l am aaa no; a fhpel I Q !7 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT November 7, 1985 Ms. Patricia Temple Environmental Coordinator City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Dear Ms. Temple: /s, RECg-fy r'eC,ili�"t I NO C" 3198 CAl _„CH SUBJECT: NOP DEIR FIFTH AVENUE/MAC ARTHUR BOULEVARD PROJECT f We have reviewed the proposed project as described in the NOP and have the following comments: ' • OCTD currently operates service on one route on Pacific Coast Highway adjacent to the project site as shown on the attached route schedule and map. • In order to ensure accessibility to the available transit service for residents and visitors of this complex, a paved, lighted and handicapped accessible pedestrian walkway should be provided between the project buildings and the sidewalks on Pacific Coast Highway. Existing stops located less than one -quarter mile from the project site are shown in Table 1. We appreciate the opportunity to provide input to this DEIR and would like to receive a copy of the DEIR when it is made available for public review and comment. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me or Sine Zarifi at (714) 971-6549. Sincerely, awahat, (mod 'dlm to G Christine Huard -Spencer Environmental Coordinator CBS:WN Attachments: Route Map and Schedule for OCTD Route 1 List of Bus Stops within one -quarter mile of project site. I L 0 P.O. BOX 3005 • CAROEN GROVE. CALIFORNIA 92842 • (714) 971-6200 11 TABLE 1 EXISTING OCTD BUS STOPS WITHIN ONE QUARTER MILE OF FIFTH AVENUE/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD PROJECT SITE NB Pacific Coast Hwy/NS Goldenrod Avenue NB Pacific Coast Hwy/OPP Avocado Avenue SB Pacific Coast Hwy/FS Avocado Avenue SB Pacific Coast Hwy/NS Goldenrod Avenue NB, SB: Direction of travel on Pacific Coast Highway — northbound, southbound. NS, FS, OPP: Location of stop relative to intersection between Pacific Coast Highway — nearside, farside or opposite "T" intersection. � J .ransrsar e a� +naw�oeswor SEFMCETO: Long Beach Long Beach C'nie Center (Peak Hans Only) Circle Business Center ' (Weekday Ott Peak Orgy) VA Hospital Cal Slate Lag Beach Seal Beach Sunset Beach i Huntington Beach i Newport Bach Balboa Island Newport f Fashlon Wand Ce Emeratd Bay Laguna Beach Monarch Bay 'Danspotnt ' Capistrano Bach San Clemente K-Mart Plaza .sw�u.r rMs�ew cararewoer�an. \ s�aaoamc. m m m m m m i i S m m m m m m m m m m � l• ROUTE 1 MON THRU FRI NORTHBOUND SAN CLEMEM TO LONr4 peso BOLDFACE T m r.rn......• ... ... .. 614A 531A 547A 557A 605A 614A 620A 631A 6491 601A 609A 616A 6 8 045 701 7� 719 654 702 .. 640 645 652 704 721 731 728 736 745 729 703 ]OB 715 732 . 721 807 747 755 804 $12 745 803 820 $29 838 842 821 839 803 8 8 815 802 821 839 850 859 " ' 914 835 840 847 904 $51 990 920 929 B17 826 932A ... 910 952 1001 1938 947 856 1002 912 959 939 958 1016 1027- 1036 1019' 108 1034 .. 010 947 952 959 7016 1035 1053 110/ 1045 1051 1103 1109 1113 1122 1131 1140 1146 1023 1028 1035 1052 1111 1129 1140 ••• 1058 1103 1110 1127 1146 1204P 1149 1158 1207P 1216P 1222P 1133 1138 1145 1202P 1221P 1239 ' 1215P '1224P 1233P 1242 181 1257• 1208P 1213P 1210P 1237 1256 114 1 ZS 1259 108 117 126 132 1243 1248 1255 112 131 149 134 143 152 201 207 200 209 218 227 236 2402 . 116 122 129 148 206 228 151 157 204 g 2211 241 303 316 3ZW 335 309 318 ... . 344 353 336P"" 316 338 351 400 410 419 428 446 340 346 3f3 330 350 412 425 434 ••• 340 346 353 4f0 430 544 453 502 520 452 505 514 524 533 . $42 520 410 416 48 ... 601 .- 455 501 50-8 525 545 60} 65�5 SN r 618 542 554 648 657 703 ... 612 617 624 638 655 711 653 701 ' 77110 I718 7657. 732 .. . 712 717 724 738 755 8t1 8� 731 740 748 757 802 871 840 - 800 BOS . • . • • . ,812 826 From Seventh and Studebaker to the Lang Beach Terminal, Passengers v 11 be discharged only. ROUTE 1 MON THRU FRI SOUTHBOUND LONG BEACH TO SAN CLEVERM BOLD FACE MUSS IROICATE PEAK HOURS Peak flan! tavtlay On Friday, 69aea 8 36PM 3 c wn y y c y O © 0 © © © O © © © O ' 534A 541A 549A 556A WA 621A 640A 654A 659A 706A 607A ... 625A 633 640 648 655 706 720 739 754 758 804 625 ... 649 659 707 716 724 735 751 015 831 837 844 701' 719 729 737 746 754 805 821 $45 901 907 914 736 ... 754 $04 812 821 829 840 856 92D 936 942 949 804 ... 822 832 040 849 857 908 924 B48 1004 1010 1017 850 ... 908 918 926 935 943 99 1010, 1034 1050 1056 1103 98 ... 943 90 1001 1010 1018 1029 1045 1109 1125 1131 1138 ... 1009A 1017 1026 1035 1044 1052 1104 1120 1145 1202P 1209P 1216P ... 1044 1052 1101 1110 1119 1127 1139 ' 1165 IMP 1237 1244 1251 ... 1119 1127 1136 1145 1154 1202P 1214P 1230P 1255 112 119 126 1154 1202P 1211F 1220P 1229P 1237 1249 105 130 147 154 201 ... 1234P 1242 1251 100 109 117 129 145 210 227 234 241 ... 114 122 131 140 149 157 209 28 250 307 314 321 • ... 148 156 205 214 223 231 244 300 325 345 352 359 ... 223 231 240 '249 258 206 319 335 400 420 427 434 ... 258 306 315 324 333 341 354 410 435 455 502 509 ' 333 341 350 359 408 416 429 • 445 510 530 537 544 358P' ... 416 425 434 443 451 504 58 545 605 612 619 433 ... 451 500 509 518 526 539 555 620 640 647 654 508 .... 526 MS _ 644 553 601 ' 614 630 . 655 715 722 729 645 ... 603 613 622 631 639 650 705 726 741 747 753 620 ... 638 648 667 706 714 725 740 801 816 822 828 ... 656 704 714 723 732 740 751 806 827 842 848 854 ... 756 $04 814 823 832 840 851. 905 927 942 948 954 • From the Lang Beach Terminal to Seventh and Studebaker, passengers nay baud only whose destination is beyond Seventh and Studebaker. I 12 13 ROUTE ISAT NORTHBOUND SAM C12M M TO LONG BEACH i J. �•S ta> 'w u• to K '� > ciii £q£c 3t� w w vj wd W W 0 Q Q Q Q 700A 705A 712A 727A 745A 801A WA 819A B26A 834A • 643A 800 805 812 827 945 90t 912 SIB 93 934 943 '. ••• Sao 95S 905 912 WS45 tool toll Iota 1026 1034 1043 ••. ••• ••- 1055 IWD "Do 1007 1107 'MS 1125 1045 1102 1115 1123 1/3S 1145 list 1145 12UP 1215P 1223P 1235P 1245P 1254P ... ... 1155 IZCP 12DIP 1225P 1245P 102 115 123 135 145 154 1255P 100 to7 125 . 145 2D2 215 223 235 26 254 ••• ••• 146 ' 151 150 221 26 306 319 327 339 350 •" 400 245 346 - 251 351 258 39 221 $45 406 419 427 439 450 ... SOD ••• 421 445 506 619 SD 539 00 a0A ... .. 446 451 458 521 545 606 619 627 6S 650 7W 5% got 610 625 645 706 719 727 737 748 .756 ••• ' •• mg 704 7t0 725 70 806 Ww an 848 ••• ••• 7% 804 BID 825 84S 906 919 on 937 90 ... ... ... ROUTE ISAT SOUTHBOUND Laic e6Aal TG sAx 4;tE116N1E .$cT cYR i 4Y 3 u cY cRa x r w w w w w w 0 Q O Q Q Q ••• .•• ... 541A 549A 557A 6MA 615A =A 649A 702A 71BA 716A ... ... ... "1 60 657 7CS 715 730 742 802 809 Big ' . • . ... ... T11 742 757 B05 815 830 80 _ 902 909 916 go .... S27A 936 944 954 1002 1015 1= lX3 1111100 111177 1124 ... ... 1027 1036 1044 laS4 1102 1/1S 1130 1153 •1210P 1217P 1224P •.. ... 1127 1136 1144 1154 1202P 12t5P 1230P 1253P 110 117 124 ... ... 1227P 1236P 1244P 12S4P 102 115 130 • t53 210 217 224 ... ... 125 134 142 152 2DO 213 230 257 314 321 320 ... ... 225 234 242 252 3DD 313 330 357 414 421 428 ... ... 3A 337 3N 3% 4C1 415 430 452 SDa 6t4 S21 ... ... 427 437 446 4S6 504 515 00 W2 US 614 all ... ... W7 537 So Wa 604 615 630 652 LOB 714 721 ... ... 627 637 646 as 704 715 730 752 US $14 821 ROUTE 1 SUN & HOL NORTHBOUND SAWCLO M IFOLONGBSAM s Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O 0 0 w 700A 7o5A 712A WA 745A 801A 812A 813A 84A 834A WA ... ... aW WS 812 627 S45 901 912 913 926 934 943 ... ... 900 905 912 927 90 tool 1012 1015 1026 1034 1043 ... ... 955 1000 1007 1025 , 1045 1102 1115 1123 1135 1145 1154 ... ... 1055 1100 1107 1125 1145 12W -1215P 1223P 1235P 1245P 1254P ... ... 1165 1200P 1207P IMP 126P 102 115 123 135 145 154 ... ... i255P 100 107 125 16 202 215 223 235 245 254 ... ... •146 151 158 22t 245 BOB 319 3V 339 350 40D ... ... 246 251 258 321 36 406 419 427 439 450 500 ... ... 346 351 3% 421 445 506 Z19 527 539 550 600 ... ... 446 451 453 521 545 ' 6W 619 627 B33 650 700 ... ... 559 6D4 eta 625 - SG 706 719 727 737 743 758 ... ... 659 704 710 726 745 WS 819 B27 837 80 ... ... ... 79 804 810 US 1815 .908 919 S9 937 90 ... ... ... ROUTE 1 SUN & HOL SOUTHBOUND LONG 186ACIi 70 SAM 4S.13"M r r r r r $ � r r s i 1 r K ti 3W V7 V Y (� ii 4al 2 _ 619A MA 709A 716A 64/A 60A 657A 705A T15A 730A 743 802 aW 816 ••• �•• ••• 741 749 757 805 815 830 842 S02 W9 916 ••• 841 849 $57 905 915 930 90 1002 100 1016 •• . ... WA 936 944 954 1002 1015 1030 im 1110 1317 1124 • loa 7036 IC44 1054 1102 111S 113D 1153 IMP 1217P 1224P ... 1127 1t36 it" 1154 1202P 1215P 1230P 12S3P 110 117 124 •.. 1227P 1236P 1244P 1254P 102 115 130 1S3 210 217 224 .• 125 134 142 152 2DO 213 230 257 314 321 328 . ... 225 244 242 252 300 313 330 357 414 421 420 327 337 346 03W 404 415 43D 452 SM 514 521 •• ••• 427 437 446 456 504 515 530 552 SW 614 621 ••• ••• 527 537 Us 5% 604 $15 630 652 708 714 721 ... ... 627 637 645 656 704 715 73o 752 608 $14 521 14 15 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m I STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor 'DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, P.O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 90051 Q (213) 620-5335 h n 1 I I1 October 31, 1985 Notice of Preparation Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Blvd. Project Ms. Patricia Temple Planning Department City of Newport Beach P. O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Ms. Temple: We have received the Notice of Preparation for the project referenced above. CALTRANS will be a Responsible Agency for this project should it involve any encroachment into state right-of-way. Your study should examine the effect of the project on traffic in the area and especially on Route 73 (MacArthur Blvd.) and on Route 1 (Pacific Coast Highway). Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this NOP. Contact person for our agency will be Ron Kosinski at (213) 620-3755. Very truly /y)oours, A. W. B. BA LANTINE, Chief Environmental Planning Branch P.ECEtVF. I `16 hIa:1Pl�•i�, \ lY}.'.pafGrs'.ti `Il ILL'. Nova 1985 Q- v CI.v Llc NE'!FY ii? BEACH. �� CALIF. STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY G DEPARTMENT OF BOATING AND WATERWAYS 1629 S STREET �•� SACRAMENTO, CA 9581+7291 (916) 445-6281 s' �C E l �.:(5V 71985 Ms. Patricia Temple o..,7,1, a �' Environmental Coordinator NO "'n City of Newport Beach b� Planning Department Nev P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Dear Ms. Temple: FIFTH AVENUE/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD PROJECT The Department of Boating and Waterways is not agency and does not issue any permits. However, we and may comment upon U.S. Corps of Engineer public proposed projects and environmental documents whic n h a regulatory do review ' notices for are submitted to us by the State Clearinghouse. For review purposes, the Department's interests lie in the following areas: ' 1. Potential for Navigation Hazards- To what extent might the proposed project affect safe navigation in California's waterways? ' 2. Beach erosion - Will the proj,ectlaffect the stability of coastal or bay beaches? Flood control projects, including ' dams and reservoirs, can have an impact on the transport of sand from rivers to coastal beaches. All coastal projects that intrude into the ocean are analyzed by Department coastal engineers. 3. Boating and Boating Facilities- To what extent might the proposed project affect existing or planned small craft harbors or launching facilities? To what extent might recreational boating activities be affected? 4. Public Trust- Placement of permanent residences or other ' fa�1 t es that would not be open to the public are analyzed by the Department in regard to public trust. The public trust doctrine holds that public lands and waterways , are to be used for public benefit. If you have further questions, please contact Barbara Kierbow at (916) 323-9488. ' Sincerely, n ' WILLIAM H. IVERS Director ' cc: State Clearinghouse ' 11 Southern Callfornia Edison Company P. O. BOX 2069 7333 BOLSA AVENUE WESTMINSTER. CALIFORNIA 92683.1269 October 30, 1985 ", 9 RE Cf/y JDa nRi. U r!? pR NQV' City of Newport Beach C/1g85A Planning Department £ NPo?T 3300 Newport Boulevard CA(/B�Cy P.O. Box 1768 Z Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Attention: Patricia Temple Subject: Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard Project Gentlemen: This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company and that the electric loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth which Edison is planning to meet.in this area. Unless the demand for electrical generating capacity exceeds our estimates, and provided that there are no unexpected out- ages to major sources of electrical supply, we expect to meet our electrical requirements for the next several years. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; however, excluding any unforeseen problems, our plans for new generation resources indicate that our ability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods will be adequate during the decade of the 180's. Current conservation efforts on the part of Edison's customers have resulted in energy savings. Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal. i I I I I Very truly yours, M. D. Martin Service Planner MDM/rm i DISTRICT OFFICE SERVING. CORONA DEL MAR • COSTA MESA • FOUNTAIN VALLEY • HUNTINGTON BEACH MIDWAY CITY • NEWPORT BEACH 0 ROSSMOOR 0 SEAL BEACH • SUNSET BEACH • WESTMINSTER I 7glSSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COMPANY ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION . P. O. BOX 3334, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92803.3334 Oct. 301 1985 City of Newport Beach Planning Dept. 3300 Newport Blvd. s P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Attn: Patricia Temple Subject: EIR - fifth Ave/MacArthur Blvd Project This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed projectt but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above -named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main as shown on the attached atlas sheet without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. Residential Yearly (System Area Average) Single-family 1095 therms/year/dwelling unit Multi -family 4 or less units 640 therms/year/dwelling unit Multi -family 5 or less units 580 therms/year/dwelling unit These estimates are based on gas consumption in residential units served by Southern California Gas Company during 1975 and it should not be implied that any particular home, apartment or tract of homes will use these amounts of energy. This is particularly true due to the State's new insulation requirements and consumers' efforts toward energy conservation. I I C We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy programs-, please contact this office for assistance. LA/du attachment Sincerely, /Y I $ M.T. Roseen Technical Supervisor SEW PORT CITY OF NEW PORT BEACH u s P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 NONSTATUTORY ADVISEMENT OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT EIR DATE: TO: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN FRO14: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O.Bok 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH YOUR COMMENTS BY: November 27, 1985 I I� PROJECT TITLE: FIFTH AVENUE/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD PROJECT I PROJECT LOCATION: y ac r ur Blvd. , on the sou y E.•Coast Hwy., on the east by Grant Howald Park, and on the north byl DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND P WOR LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: Sea ne, SEE ATTACHED PERSON: TITLE: PHONE: Patricia Temple •Environmental Coordinator (714) 644-32 5 LIST SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: (Use additional pages as necessary) }`OL1rkiV dK 6:o14eel Q 1:U GN ec(Se �"rc� �i r 0 ^' �4sl4.en ,�L N C at .,G%% � r z ~ COP' T PERS TI :( � PHONE: +. 7 0 — Z wV DATE PfAILED BY LEAD DATE RECEIVED BY DATE RF _�' "hRECEt*ED AGENCY: INTERESTED PARTY: BY 12 GENC1�60 October 28, 1985 r.� (��an !�F0 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach I DATE: T0: I I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 NONSTATUTORY ADVISEMENT OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT EIR WHOM IT MAY CONCERN FROM: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O.Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH YOUR COMMENTS BY: November 27, 1985 PROJECT TITLE: FIFTH AVENUE/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: Bounded on tne WeSt. by aC r Ur Blvd., on the SOU by E..Coast Hwy., on the east by Grant Howald Park; and on the north •� DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND MAJOR LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: Sea ane. U Z SEE ATTACHED a a CONTACT PERSON: -ITLE: PHONE: Patricia Temple. -Environmental Coordinator (714) 644-32 DESCRIBE SPECIFIC AREA OF E)LDERTISE OR INTEREST: , SG�dlCCc LIST SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: (Use additional pages as necessary) a ' a a � So. C/�L. G�/.Sa.•J ) ��/C '�J�[ /2J/e✓ Sti'10�: cc �'L/}itJAIL�fL �9S" U ZE / ~ CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE: DATE MAILED BY LEAD AGENCY: October 28, 1985 DATE RECEIVED BY INTERESTED PARTY: /O/z DATE RESPONSE R BY LEAD AGENCY: by 5 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach DATE: TO: CITY OF NEW PORT BEACH I� P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 ,• , NONSTATUTORY ADVISEMENT OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT EIR WHOM IT MAY CONCERN R Ic C is l y = `�•. NOV' 91985 -`'; r iJ FROM: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300-Newport Boulevard P.O.Box 17GS Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH YOUR COMMENTS BY: November 27, 1985 PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT LOCATION by E.-Coast H y0 DESCRIPTION OF PI z c CONTACT PERSON: Patricia DE�CR�` SPECIFIC �[8/ �i FIFTH AVENUE/MACARTHUR BOULEVARD PROJECT Mounded ol'we"toy MacArthur v ., wy., on the east by Grant Howald Park. and SEE ATTACHED LIST ShECIPIC ENV U) nP '.l'.Lz: rpurgZ: *Environmental Coordinator 014 ICI I!I south north by, ane. 44-32 5 L�pC,/0110ERNS: (Use additional pages as ece de a �e a emu. f ew r' e-leu,tGLv ,4u DA�TJ' NAILED BY LEAD DATE RECEIVED BY Ap£NCY: INTERESTED PARTY: October 28, 1985 O'�1 VJ /C�tJl " a'�C9pddsf WaIr/.L:. 3 a,ze. 3300 Newport Boulevard, r r11 rnu+t• y DAM RESPONSE RECEIVED BY LEAD AGENCY: each c)', I %I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH V P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 y NONSTATUTORY ADVISEMENT OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT EIR DATE: TO: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN FROM: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O.Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 926SB-8915 PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH YOUR COMMENTS BY: November 27, 1985 PROJECT TITLE: FIFTH AVENUE/MACARTHUR BOUEVARD PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOU111dud 0,11 UILU wub to DV MacArthur Blvd, , on the sou by E,.Coast Hwy„ on the east by Grant Howald Park, and on the north r DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND MAJORILOCALIENVTRONMENTAL ISSUES: Sea ane, U Z SEE ATTACHED 0 c CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE: Patricia Temple ^.Environmental Coordinator (714) 644-32 CAMEO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION he�.te ,S<at.4(, d'dti LIST SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: (Use additional pages as necessary) by, M 5 H Continued growth in this area has percipitated traffic congestion wto the point of grid -lock on Coast Highway through Corona del Mar. A by-pass should be completed before any more building is considered, 0 F Z ~ COf:TACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE: Maxine Hundlev Communitv Liaison 760-0233 AGENCY: October 28, 1985 DATE RECEIVED BY INTERESTED PARTY: DATE RESPONSE e BY LEAD AGENCY: I 11 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach I II 1 I _J I I I I I 1 11 I we ` r Ip"1` r DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOS ANGELES DISTRICT. COOPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 2711 LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90053.2325 November 26, 1985 Office of the Chief Environmental Resources Branch Ms. Patricia Temple Environmental Coordinator City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 Dear Ms. Temple: Due to temporary funding limitations, we were unable to review the Nonstatutory Advisement of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard Project in the City of Newport Beach, which was transmitted from your office on October 28, 1985. We suggest, however, that the forthcoming document address environmental impacts pertinent to our responsibilities. Our specific responsibilities include, but are not limited to, investigation, design, operation and maintenance of water resource projects, including preparation of environmental guidelines in the fields of flood control, navigation and shore protection. We are also responsible for administration of laws and regulations for the protection, and preservation against pollution of the waters of the United States. If you have any questions, we suggest that you contact Ms. Lois Goodman at (213) 894-0237. We would appropriate, that time. appreciate the opportunity to review, axd comment if on the proposed EIR when it is issued, if funds are available at Sincerely, a F. Enaon lil,C ief, Planning Division I r' O� aEW Pp� F .� CITY OF NEW PORT BEACH U ' P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926.58.8915 NONSTATUTORY ADVISEMENT OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT EIR DATE: TO: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN FROM: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O.Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 PLEASE RETURN THIS NOTICE WITH YOUR COMMENTS BY: November 27, 1985 PROJECT TITLE: FIFTH AVENUE/MACAR'THUR BOULEVARD PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: weluy ac r ur v . , on a sou by E. Coast Hwy., on the east by Grant Hbwald Park, and on the north DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND MAJOR LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: Sea ne, SS f " u z SEE ATTACHED O p� N CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHO14E: Patricia Temple *Environmental Coordinator (714) 644-32 LIST SPECIFIC ENVIRONME�NTTAAL CONCERNS: N z H CONTACT PERSON. _ i �_ TITLE: AGENCY: October 28, 1983 (Use additional pages as necessary) INTERESTED PARTY: ///11TS PHONE: DATE RESPONSE B BY LEAD AGENCY: I 1 11 u I L by'l I r. 5 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach r I I I I APPENDIX B TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS t 1 I 1 I L I TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING March 19, 1986 Ms. Karlee Nevil Sanchez-Talarico Associates 359 San Miguel Drive, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 ' Dear Ms. Nevil: This letter summarizes our review of traffic factors related to the Point del Mar ' project in the City of Newport Beach. The study is based upon information provided by you and the City of Newport Beach and previous studies in the area. This study has been prepared to provide traffic analyses for an EIR on the project and to ' satisfy the requirements of the City of Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance. ' The project is located between Sea Lane and 5th Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard and Goldenrod Avenue in the City of Newport Beach. A total of 43 detached, single ' family units are indicated on the site plan. Vehicular access is proposed on both Fifth Avenue and Sea Lane. 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Sea Lane and Fifth Avenue are both two lane facilities with on -street parking ' permitted. Sea Lane extends northeasterly to Harbor View Drive and MacArthur Boulevard. Fifth Avenue provides connections to north -south streets which extend from Coast Highway to Harbor View Drive. The intersection of Coast Highway and Goldenrod is signalized. Existing daily traffic volumes are illustrated on Figure 1. Also indicated on ' Figure 1 are 1985 ICU values at major intersections throughout the City. TRIP GENERATION In order to examine the potential traffic impacts, it is necessary to estimate the number of trips that would be generated by the project. Studies have been conducted by government agencies and consultants to determine trip generation characteristics of various land uses. The rates utilized in this study are 1 2651 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE • SUITE 110 • FULLERTON, CALIFORNIA 92631 • (714) 871-2931 LEGEND 43 a DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME, IN THOUSANDS 0.6614 • ICU VALUE ,.. 1 v! y a g o o I 48 45 59 �q OS97 h 9 N Q¢. ,9115 _A EXISTING DAILY VOLUMES AND ICU VALUES WESTON PRINGLE AND ASSOCIATES ... SrTls'-=.. v � 00 O:0019 } 99 °a 1.1300 IA235 0 , 34 0.9780 III �I rroua■ I ' -2- ' listed in Table 1 and are rates that have been utilized in Newport Beach for similar uses. In addition, the City Traffic Engineer has indicated his accept- ance of these rates. As indicated in Table 1, the 43 dwelling units would gene- rate an estimated 430 daily trip ends with 45 occurring during the PM peak hour. Table 1 TRIP GENERATION Point del Mar ' TIME PERIOD TRIP ENDS PER GENERATED DWELLING UNIT TRIP ENDS(1) ' Daily. 10.0 430 2.5 Hour Peak In 1.4 60 ' Out 0.6 25 PM Peak Hour ' In 0.7 30 Out 0.3 15 t(1) For 43 dwelling units. ' TRIP ASSIGNMENT In order to assign project traffic to the street system, it was necessary to ' develop a trip distribution pattern. The trip distribution for the site is illustrated on Figure 2 and is based upon regional land use and circulation ' patterns and previous studies. Estimated project trips from Table 1 were assigned to the street system in conformance with this distribution. Figure 3 illustrates estimated project daily traffic at selected locations. In addition, this distribution was utilized to assign project traffic to intersections uti- lized in the analysis. z n im 0 1 1 5% 20% wI PACIFIC li DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION V� --"=:. WESTON ARINGLE AND ASSOCIATES FIGURE 2 p a 0 o 65 85 O 1 1 WESTON PRINGLE AND ASSOCIATES SPi 85 11 BON ITA 3 v n J04 �,j/N 85 N 105 y.. COAST HW SEA LN. O N PROJECT DAILY VOLUMES FIGURE 3 -3- 1 7 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS The potential traffic impact has been completed to conform to the criteria of the City of Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance. A total of nine inter- sections were identified by the City Traffic Engineer for inclusion in the ' analyses. The first required analysis is the 'One Percent" test, An inter- section is defined as critical by the Ordinance when the project traffic ex- ceeds one percent of existing plus committed project plus regional growth traf- fic on any approach to an intersection during the 2.5 hour peak period. A list of committed projects was provided by the City for inclusion in this study and these projects are listed in Table 2. Since the project is scheduled for com- pletion in 1987, the analyses were completed for 1988 as required by the Ordi- nance. Appendix A contains the 'One Percent" analysis sheets for the nine intersections analyzed and the results are summarized in Table 3. Review of Table 3 indicates , that one of the intersections fails the 'One Percent" test and.is critical in terms of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. This intersection is: ' Coast Highway and Goldenrod Avenue Additional analyses were completed for this critical intersection. These addi- tional analyses consisted of ICU calculations for the intersection. The ICU ' analyses included consideration of existing, committed project and regional growth traffic as well as project traffic. Table 4 summarizes the results of the ICU analyses which are contained in Appendix B. Review of Table 4 indicates that the Coast Highway and Goldenrod Avenue has an ICU value greater than 0.90 for existing and future conditions. The project does not result in an increase , of the ICU value within the accuracies of the procedure. With this procedure, there is no change in the ICU value as a result of the project. In summary, the project would not have a traffic impact as defined by the revised Traffic Phasing Ordinance. All intersections examined either passed the 'One Percent" test or had ICU values unchanged with the project and no Improvements. , I 1 -4- ' Table 2 COMMITTED PROJECTS Point del Mar ' Hoag Hospital Flagship Hospital Pacesetter Homes Big Canyon 10 Aeronutronic Ford Fun Zone Back Bay Office Marriott Hotel Civic Plaza St. Andrew's Church ' Corporate Plaza YMCA Koll Center Newport Allred Condos ' MacArthur Court Morgan Development National Education Office Four Seasons Hotel North Ford Block 400 Medical Newport Place Sheraton Expansion Shokrian Sea Island MacArthur Court, Amend. No. 1 National Education (RSVD) Baywood Apartments Ford Aeronutronic, Amend. No. 2 ' Harbor Point Homes Carver Granville Office Rudy Baron Corona del Mar Homes ' Martha's Vineyard Big Canyon Villa Apts. Valdez 1400 Dove Street Coast Business Center 1100 Quail Street Koll Center NPT. No. 1 Ross Mollard Koll Center Amend. No. 4A Banning/Newport Ranch Ford Aeronutronic Amend. No. 1 Park Lido North Ford, Amen. No. 1 Newport Aquatic Center Heritage Bank •Villa Point 2600 E. Coast Highway Block 500 Newport Center University Athletic Club Jasmine Park ' Superior Ave. Medical Office MacArthur Associates 2901 W. Coast Highway Newporter Inn ' Fashion Island Newport Lido Medical Crown House Corona del Mar Senior Project -5- Table 3 CRITICAL INTERSECTION IDENTIFICATION Point del Mar - 1988 LOCATION 2.5 HOUR PERCENTAGES NB SB EB WB Coast Highway & Dover Drive - 0.1 0.2 0.1 Coast Highway & Bayside Drive - - 0.2 0.1 Coast Highway & Jamboree Road - 0.2 0.1 Coast Highway & Newport Center Drive - 0.1 0.2 0.2 Coast Highway & Avocado Avenue - - 0.3 0.2 Coast Highway & MacArthur Boulevard - 0.7 0.3 0.3 Coast Highway & Goldenrod Avenue - 1.7 0.3 0.2 Coast Highway & Marguerite Avenue - - 0.1 0.2 MacArthur Boulevard & San Joaquin Hills Road 0.5 0.8 - - INTERSECTION Coast Highway & Goldenrod Avenue Table 4 ICU SUMMARY - 1988 Point del Mar ICU' VALUES x s ing xis " (1985) +Committed +Committed +Regional +Regional +Project 1.13 1.28 1.28 10 ' SITE ACCESS AND PARKING ' The site plan indicates a 32 foot wide street extending south and east from Sea Lane through the project. Residential units are proposed on both sides ' of this street which terminates at Goldenrod Avenue but does not connect to Goldenrod Avenue. A second access is provided to Fifth Avenue and forms the ' fourth leg of the intersection of Fifth and Leaf Avenues. The connection to Sea Lane is on the outside of a horizontal curve which provides improved sight distance and is on the westerly end of the site. 7 L P I 1 A total of 142 parking spaces are indicated on the site plan. This includes 86 covered stalls, 22 on -street and 34 driveway spaces for a ratio of 3.3 spaces per dwelling unit. 'Of the on -street spaces, 11 are provided'in special parking areas that are perpendicular to the street and are not the usual "on - street" type spaces. With the 32 foot street width parking on one side of the street can be permitted. Adequate signing should be posted to indicate the no parking areas within the project. The site plan provides for the safe movement of vehicles and has adequate access for both normal use and emergency vehicles. On -site parking is also adequate to serve the proposed uses. SUMMARY This study has examined traffic factors related to the proposed Point del Mar project in the City of Newport Beach. The study of potential traffic impacts is based upon a maximum of 43 dwelling units. The analysis was completed to conform to the requirements of the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance and on this basis, no traffic impacts were identified. Site access and parking provisions were also examined and found to be satisfactory. The following are the principal findings of the study. 1. The project would generate an estimated 430 daily trip ends with 45 occurring during the PM peak hour. -7- 2. Of the nine intersections identified for examination by the City Traffic Engineer, eight passed the "One Percent" test of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance, 3. The intersection failing the "One Percent" test had an ICU value un- changed with existing, committed, regional growth and project traffic and no intersection improvements. 4. Site access and parking was reivewed and found to be adequate. 5. No mitigation measures were found to be required for this project. We trust that this study will be of assistance to you in the preparation of and EIR for the project. If you have any questions or require additional infor- mation, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, WESTON PRINGLE & ASSOCIATES Weston S. Pringle, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer State of California Numbers C16828 & TR565 WSP:bas N84521 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 It 11 11 ' APPENDIX A i ONE PERCENT ANALYSES 1 1 I 1 1 1 C� r� 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast HighWay @ Dover Drive/Bayshore Drive (Existing Traffic Volumes base on Avcrage wintert5pring 19 Approach Peek 2k Hour Approved Existing Regiopal Projects Projected 1� of Projected Project Direction Peak 2k Hour Drowth Peak 2k Nour Peak 2k Hour Pe1Y �tyHeour I Peak 2k H,r Volume Volume Yotuw Yolume #. Volume Northbound Southbound 2843 9� Eastbound 6016 '14 /037 Westbound 5282 �j �✓ ZZ O --- 6 a. j Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected , Peak 231 Hour Traffic Volume i Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I.C.U.) Analysis is required.' PROJECT: I 1� rl rl 11 11 FORM I r I C. . 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Highway 0 Bayside Drive (Existing Traffic Volumes b 5CU on Average inter pring 9 8 Approach Existing Direction Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Approved Regional Projects Growth Projected 1:, of Projected Project I j Volume Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Yolume Volume t Northbound l 1689 B Southbound 202 2oZ. Z Eastbound 6154 ! 3() C�/ /Z Westbound 6548 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected 'LP Peak 2lg Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater -than 1% of Projected ' Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. ire 1 �:1 �I PROJECT: DATE: 1 FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Highway @ Jamboree Road (Existing Traffic Volumes ass on Rver4ge Winter/Spring 19 Peak 2y Hour Approved O1re tion Pnkroach12y1Nang ur Volume RegionalGrowth Projects Peak Hour Projected Peak 2y Hour 10 of Projected peak 2y Hour Volume volume Volume Volume Northbound ' 938 southbound 5426 Eastbound 4790 Westbound 5792 1Ap� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2Ji Hour Traffic Volume a Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: Project Peak 2y H Volume FORM I J I . 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Highway @ Newport Center Drive (Existing Traffic Volumes based on verage Inter pring 1 8 IPeak LAPch Existing Peek 2k Hour 2h Hour Regional Growth Approved Projects Projected 1� of Projected Projecton j Volume Volume Peak 2h Hour Volume Peak 2y Hour Volume Peak 2y Hour I Peak 2y dour Voli, Volume Northbound Southbound 2774 '3oTj� 2 Eastbound 1 4396 2 Westbound 3221 • ' _ 6 0, Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 21g Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected '❑ Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 t 1 ' PROJECT: ' DATE: FORM I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast (Existing Traffic Highway @ Avocado Avenue Volumes sed on Average-Wintely3pring 9grr Approecn Directf=k Exis=P,*,&k y�pak ProjectsFP44k ected 19 of Projected 2y Noury HourvolVolumeuH Peak 2y Hour Voiume Northbound I 490 Southbound Eastbound 41'i_ 2 Westbound M Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2� Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required.' PROJECT: Projec Peek 2y; voter r FORM I ' I I .1 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Highway @ MacArthur Boulevard (Existing Traffic Volumes based on Average inter pring 19 8 Approach Direction Existing Peak 2h Hour Peak 2h Hour Regional Growth Approved Projects Projected 1 of Projected '— Project j Volume Volume Peak 2h Hour Volume Peak 2h Hour Volume Peak 2h Hour I Peak 2h Hour Volume i. Votume Northbound ISouthbound 2982 yi Eastbound 3979 SD 6 y 7 Westbound 3515 /lf/Z ! 3 a.3 ' Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Q Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2a Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. • t PROJECT: DATE: FDa`A T A I 1% Traffic Volume Analysis ' Intersection Coast Highway @ Goldenrod Avenue (Existing Traffic Volumes b sed on verage later pring 7ga 0 Approach Existing Direction Peak 2y Hour Peek 211 Hour Regional Growth Approved Projects Peek 2y Hour Projected Peak ■ ProjectedProject lPe volume voluma volume 2y Hour Volume k 2y ' Peak Volume �. Yoiume Northbound 337 Southbound 229 Eastbound i 5919 3 I 2 Westbound 3359 95E Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 2h Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization(I.C.U.) Analysis is required.' PROJECT: i' FORM I ' I n i t 1% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection Coast Highway @ Marguerite Avenue (Existing Traffic Volumes based on verage Inter pring 98 APproacn Existing Direction Peek 2h Hour Peak 2y Hour Regional Growth Approved Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project i Volume Volume Peak 26 Hour Volume Peak 2§ Hour Peak 2y Hour Peak 2y Hour Volume Volume Volume Northbound I 671 J? D southbound ! 799 8 ' Eastbound 4801 Y 8,3D 7 Jt 4estbound 3221 t � ��6 �� ✓ 2818 19.11� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected Peak 21 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization ' (I..C.U.) Analysis is required. 1 I n I 1 PROJECT: GATE: FORM I (Existing Traffic Approach Existing Direction Peek 21 Haur volume Northbound 2491 Southbound 4148 Eastbound 2459 �estbouhd 916 1% Traffic Volume Analysis on MacArthur Boulevard @ San Joaquin Hills Road Peek 2h Hour Approved Regional Growth Projects PeakHour projected Peak2h 1" of Projected Volume Maur Peek 2h Hour Volume 3Y7 ZB SZ � 9 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected PL Peak 2$ Hour Traffic Volume Project Traffic'is estimated to be greater than 1% of Projected ❑ Peak 2k Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. PROJECT: ProjtPeek 2u r Vol F0.N I 0 0 u I I APPENDIX B ' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ' CALCULATIONS lu I @.1 u I I I INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Intersection Coast Highway @_Goldenrod Avenue ( Existing Traffic Volumes Oases on Average Daily 'traffic Winter/Spring 19.85 Movenent LanesEXISTlGp, ED LRG JnesSCi,P. EXIST. PA.HR. Vol. EXIST. Y/C Rd10 REGIONAL GROWTH Volune COMMITTED PROJECT Volt" PROJECTED w%o Pro�act Vol'w YotiiCT V/C'E 10 NL 101 7 NR 38 p SL 53 3 Z. ST 1600 21 .0650* ,p • aig SR 30 EL 1600 1 28 .0176 , D0 ET 13200 2661 .8431 , •19,99 ER 3 37 WL 1600 35 •0219* `,1 WT 3200 1185 7.3725 Z Z7 , WR 7 YELLOWTIME .1000* (J, /l1 )41 1 I b�(D I EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH W/PRDPOSED INPROVEMENTS I.C.U. EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED PLUS REGIONAL GROWTH PLUS PROJECT I.C.U. ❑ Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90 ' 9 Projected plus project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90 ' ❑ Projected plus project,traffic I.C.U. with systems improvement will be , less than or equal to 0.90 ------------------------------------- Description of system improvement: , P PROJECT FORM I I J I I I I I I I I I I L.� APPENDIX C NOISE ASSESSMENT I I i I I ON -SITE NOISE UYIPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE POINT DEL MAR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 0 Fred Greve, P.E. MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES 280 Newport Center Drive Suite 230 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 760-0891 March 7,1986 ON -SITE NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE ri i� nW5510,130115, NJ CITY OFNEWPORT BEACH Noise Levels at the Project Site The noise levels at the project site will be due to traffic noise sources. Both MacArthur Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway traffic noise impact the project site. Traffic volumes reported in the traffic study for the Newport Center GPA 85-1(B) EIR were used with the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Model to project future unmitigated noise levels that would impact the project site. The traffic volumes used are presented in Table 1, and represent "mega -trend plus project" volumes. The traffic mix and time distributions presented early were used for the modeling of the roadways. TABLE 1 • r • • :t:t• Roadway MackthurBowevard Pacific Coast Highway Average Daily Traffic Speed 55600 50 62900 45 The modeling results are reported in Table 2 in the form of distances to the 601 65, and 70 CNEL contours. These projections do not take into account any barriers or topography that may reduce noise levels. TABLE 2 FUTURE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS WITH PROJECT Roadway Distance to CNEL Contour From Centerline of Road y (Feet) 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL MocArtlmrmwevard 116 250 538 Pacific Coast Highway 105 227 490 11 I The results are presented graphically in Exhibit 1. The exhibit indicates that the residential areas along MacArthur Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway will experience noise levels in ' excess of 70 CNEL without mitigation. The site is considered to be acceptable for residential development, however, an acoustical study is warranted prior to the issuance of building permits to insure that outdoor and indoor living areas area designed to achieve the applicable standards. Sound walls will be required in some locations, and some soundproofing may be necessary to achieve the indoor noise standards: MYTIGATION MEASURES Mitigation measures are needed to reduce noise levels in outdoor and indoor residential. The measures below are presented to demonstrate feasibility, and should not be interpreted as design specifications. A more detailed noise analysis will be warranted when final grading plans are developed. The FHWA Model described previously and future traffic volumes were used to assess the feasibility of sound barriers in reducing the noise levels impacting proposed residential areas. A 5 foot observer height as recommended in the FHWA Model was utilized. It was assumed that a noise barrier would be constructed at the top of slope and that the observer was located 5 feet from the barrier. It has been assumed that no second story balconies will face the roadway for units located inside the 65 CNEL impact zone. In general, second story balconies should not overlook major roadways due to potential noise impacts. However, if such balconies are planned -additional noise mitigation will be necessary. Noise barrier heights were calculated for sample locations. The noise barrier heights are presented in Table 2 and graphically in Exhibit 2. Walls should not contain holes or gaps, and should be constructed of slumpstone or other masonry material. TABLE 2 PRELIMINARY NOISE BARRIER RECOMMENDATIONS LOTS BARRIER HEIGHT (FEET) Lots 24 to 35 6.0 Lots 36 to 37 8.0 Lots 38 to 43 6.0 Residential indoor mitigation measures can not be formulated until more detailed site specific information is available. However, it should be noted that the residential units in the first row of buildings are of concern (i.e., Lots 24 through 43). Typically buildings with open windows only provide 12 dBA outdoor to indoor noise reduction. In areas where the noise level exceeds 57 CNEL the interior standard of 45 CNEL will not be achieved without additional measures. These houses will be required to have closeable windows and mechanical 1 MGA 2 •CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR CORONA DEL MAR SITE REAL ESTATE DEvELopmEur co- MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES Exhibit 1 - CNEL Noise Levels CGISULT1111 ENGINEERS ` \ A s --- - --- ---- r , k ait' AO ,L,.w>' ' 1 ?�X ,✓' �wei�' ..%_ ♦o.rm7� , oi• ^u.&.._u: 'r8.'.w a10:_ n•_. r11-w•w__ __ui' .,a. r 3 " I^�•,-— - 14 u-n.• u-n• u.H.�. -iwa Z \ ` 1 1..'a -{" pa _ `�• '-�- ../_ .^^-.rw _•ow• •,,..._ wo-nq no- m°. ,a•s II-+mi- wisu . no-rw: no- ,vo r .a •a yl": j � \, 3j_. Asa✓. %Vc d` .7 p I �'•, i _ � -�— — .,a ti! - •U) \•i i v.u34-,»'�. ' r3-3n_3_mom.30 IU CPnKxz 2136 22 yj \ �` �' � � f•.. .. r•nv 7n,tn r.n•a r.raa r.Haa ram, • �• 1 r- r., r.,u ZO • r.ray— au:na: n>wi ro-m• Ho-T✓a no-H,a '��'--• is \ t .� /ate•' `La wo-»a u°.nu +°P .YI. , wo�i. nc.w !_�aiY_ wrDo-.'�*a. ru�n•y 1 rsa nn.n.♦ ..e.nu r.rau; /`X• _ wm n...u. no- nv>. 61 TH AVE •n[rriy' > "� ' `.A ACl •'^'1 CO�sa'CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN CORONA DEL MAR SITE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CO. MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS Exhibit 2 - Sound Walls I ventilation must be provided to replace the lost of natural ventilation. Mechanical ventilation or a "summer switch" system as it is commonly referred to, allows the use of the heater fan to circulate the room air with fresh air. Additional, building, upgrades may need to be required, such as additional glazing or wall constructions. A condition of approval should be applied to the project to insure that exterior living areas achieve 65 CNEL and indoor areas achieve 45 CNEL. The condition should require that an acoustical study be prepared and appproved by the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The acoustical study should finalize the barrier heights and locations and identify building features that will be necessary to achieve the 45 CNEL in all indoor living areas. I I MGA 3 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I N I APPENDIX D I [I I NEWPORT-MESA Unified School District post office box 1368 • newport beach, california 92663 • (714) 760-3200 JOHN W.'N ICOLL, Superintendent December 23, 1985 Sanchez Talarico Associates 359 San Miguel Avenue, Suite 200 Newport Beach, California 92660 RE: Fifth Avenue/MacArthur Boulevard Supplemental EIR Dear Sirs: Attached are responses to your questions relative to the above -referenced supplemental EIR. District attendance boundary maps provided earlier to your office can be used to relate our present operating schools to the site. ` Please call if there are questions. Very truly yours, ' Dale C. Woolley, Director Research & Student Services r TeTephone: (714) 760-3295 I I TO: Dale wooley ', Newport -Mesa Unified School District 1. List the males and locations of the District's schools serving the site, , their capacity, current enrollment, and their distance from the site. School Grades Capacity Current Enrollment Distance from Site Harbor View K-6 744 661 one -quarter mile Elementary Corona del Mar 7-12 2746 2044 four miles High 2. What are the school generation factors at the elementary, intermediate, and secondary levels that you would use for this project? , We have been experiencing very little growth from new developments. We presently use a factor of 0.2 for K-12. 3. What are the current plans for expansion of your facilities (include use, location, capacities, and completion dates)? Include any of these which may serve the project site, The school district has been in a period of enrollment decline for the past 15 years, although it appears presently to be leveling off (1985-86 loss = 63 students). We do not have plans for expansion. We have two school facilities in the general area of the site that are presently closed for school use and leased on a short-term basis for alternative uses. I i� 2 4. Will the project create a need for the expansion of educational facilities or the addition of staff? If so, give a brief description of anticipated needs. ft No r 5. Is there revenue budgeted for such an expansion? If not, does the ' school district implement any development fees? How are these fees determined (eg. per housing unit) and what is the cost? No 6. Will the proposed project adversely impact the level of service you presently provide? No 7. What problems do you foresee in servicing this project? Identify any particular concerns. None } 3 8. What measures can you recommend for mitigating project impacts that may be incorporated into the project? None Prepared by: Title: Date: Phone number Dale C. Woolley Director, Research & Student Services December 23, 1985 (714) 760-3295 1 ' ' APPENDIX E PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS POINT *DEL MAR Newport Beach Planned Community District Regulations I I 1 I Planned Community Development Standards for ' Point Del Mar Ordinance No. Adopted by the City of Newport Beach City Council on 1985 I I I r [1 1 t Point Del Mar — Newport Beach ' Planned Community District Regulations Real Estate Development Corporation I 11 Introduction Section I Section II Section III Section IV Subsection A Subsection B Subsect Subsect Subsect Subsect Subsect Section V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Statistical Analysis 2 General Notes 3 Definitions 5 Single Family Residential 6 Permitted Uses 6 Maximum Building Height 6 17 INTRODUCTION The Point Del Mar Planned Community District for the City of Newport Beach, located northeast of Fifth Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard, has been developed in accordance with the Newport Beach General Plan. The purpose of this Planned Community (PC) District is to provide a method whereby property may be classified and developed for single family residential uses. The specifications of this district are intended to provide land use and development standards contained herein while insuring compliance with the intent of all applicable regulatory codes. Whenever the regulations contained herein conflict with the regulations of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the regulations contained herein shall take precedence. The Municipal Code shall regulate this development when such regulations are not provided within these district regulations. All development within the Planned Community boundaries shall comply with all provisions of the Uniform Building Code and various mechanical codes related thereto. 1 11 i 1 L 1 l_ J 1 1 1 11 1 i I 1 r 1 11 SECTION I. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Grossl Buildable2 Maximum Land Use Acres Acres DU's Residential Units 6.63 5.20 DU's 1. Defined as area within property boundaries. q3 2. Defined as the entire site within the project boundary excluding streets, park dedication areas with existing slopes greater than 2:1, and natural floodplain. Density Dwelling Units per Gross Acre: 6.79 Dwelling Units per Buildable Acre: (� ?.-;�% —2— I SECTION II. GENERAL NOTES I 1. Project Description , The Planned Community District encompasses 6.63 gross acres for single family residential development. , 2. Park Standards Park requirements shall be in accordance with the Park Dedication , Ordinance. 3. Water Service , Water within the Planned Community will be furnished by the City of Newport Beach 4. Sewage Disposal Sewage disposal facilities within the Planned Community will be provided by Orange County Sanitation District No. 5. Prior to the issuance of any building permits it shall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Planning Department that adequate sewer facilities will be available. ' Prior to the occupancy of any structure it shall be further demonstrated that adequate sewer facilities exist. 5. Grading and Erosion ' Grading and erosion control shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the City of Newport Beach Grading Ordinance and shall be , subject to permit" issued by the Building and Planning Departments. a. The grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and , permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants. b. The grading permit shall include, if required, a description of haul routes, access points to the site and watering and sweeping program designed to minimize impacts of the haul operation. C. An erosion and dust control plan, if required, shall be submitted and ' approved by the Building Department. d. An erosion and siltation control plan, if required, shall be approved ' by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Santa Ana Region. The velocity of concentrated runoff from any project shall be r evaluated and erosive velocities controlled as part of the project design. ' —3— I 1 1 1 1 I f. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared by a Civil Engineer and based on recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive soil and geological investigation of the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans on standard size sheets shall be furnished to the Building Department. 6. Archeological/Paleontological Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the site shall be examined to determine the existence and extent of archeological and paleontological resources in accordance with adopted City Policies. 7. Landscaping All landscaping shall be installed in accordance with landscape plans, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department and Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Department. 8. Any fire equipment access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 9. The final design of onsite pedestrian and bicycle circulation in any tract shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and the Planning Department. 10. Prior to the approval of the final tract map for residential development, applicant shall reach agreement with the City for compliance with the Housing Element of the General Plan. 11. 'Exposed slopes, if any, shall be stabilized as soon as possible to reduce erosion. —4— SECTION III. DEFINITIONS The following definitions refer to the permitted uses in the development standards contained in this Ordinance. 1. Buildable Acreage Buildable Acreage shall mean the entire site area within the project boundary excluding streets, park dedication, areas with existing natural slopes greater than 2:1, and natural flood plains. —5— ' SECTION IV. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The following uses and development standards apply. A. Permitted Uses 11 I LJ 1 L.1 I 1. Single Family Dwellings Detached 2. Condominiums/Townhomes 3. Custom Lots 4. Temporary model complex, leasing office, 5. Signs (as per City Code and as provided Community text). B. Maximum Building Height and appurtenant uses in Section V of this Planned All buildings shall comply with the height restrictions established by the City for this area and shall not exceed thirty—two (32) feet. Chimneys and vents shall be permitted as set forth in Section 20.02.060 of the Municipal Code. C. Setbacks from Public Streets The following minimum setbacks shall apply to all structures (not to include garden walls or fences) adjacent to streets. Said setbacks shall be measured from the property line. Setback from. Street Property Line MacArthur Boulevard 35' Fifth Avenue 10' Sea Lane 10' Goldenrod 10, D. Setbacks from Private Streets 1. A minimum setback of five (5) feet shall be required for all structures from private or non —dedicated streets measured from the back of curb. 2. Garages shall be set back from five (5) to seven (7) feet or greater than 18 feet measured from back of curb where no sidewalk exists and one (1) to five (5) feet or greater than 18 feet measured from back of four (4) foot sidewalk, where sidewalk exists. All units with driveways between 18 and 20 feet from back of curb, where no sidewalk exists or back of sidewalk where sidewalk exists shall utilize toll-t garage doors. Im E. Setbacks from Property Lines Garages set back three (3) feet from side property line and houses or living areas set back four (4) feet from property line. There shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet between residential structures. F. Rear Setbacks There shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet from Goldenrod, Sea Lane and Fifth Avenue and a minimum of thirty-five (35) feet from MacArthur, measured from the property line. G. Parking ek{C.&Ac_ A minimum of 2.0 covered off-street parking spaces shall be required. In addition .5 parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided for guest parking on street. H. Fences, Hedges and Walls Fences shall be limited to a maximum height of eight (8) feet, except within the front yard setback where fences, hedges and walls shall be limited to five (5) feet. Wing walls, where an extension of a residential or accessory structure is to be constructed may be eight (8) feet in height. Retaining walls are not considerd to be wing walls. At street intersections, no such appurtenance shall exceed two (2) feet in height measured from curb height within the triangle bounded by the right-of-way lines and a connecting line drawn between points thirty (30) feet distant from the intersection of the rigbt-of-way lines prolonged. The above applies except where noise attenuation is required. Trellis and beam construction shall be so designed as to provide a minimum of 50 percent of the total trellis area as open space for the penetration of light and air to the covered area. I. Architectural Features Architectural features, such as but not limited to cornices, eaves, and wingwalls way extend two and one-half (2-1/2) feet into any front, side or rear yard setback. -7- L� t I I P I I 1 r- SECTION V. SIGNS/RESIDENTIAL AREA A. Permanent Signs ' 1. Miscellaneous Directional/Information Signs ' Directional/Informational Signs, such as but not limited to "right turn only", "exit", "entrance", etc., shall be permitted. Said signs shall be kept to a minimud and shall be designed as a coordinated part of the overall project. Each sign shall not exceed four (4) ' square feet of sign area. B. Temporary Signs (Prior to and during construction) ' 1. Future Facility Signs A sign which informs the viewer, through graphic symbol and verbal ' reinformcements, of the type of facility planned for the site. 2. Merchandising Signs A sign which informs the viewer, through graphic symbol and verbal reinforcement, of the facility name, opening date, type of occupancy, owner -developer, and phone number for sales information. r I1 I:1 IC i I�1 k