No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-28 - Denying an Appeal and Upholding the Decision of the Planning Commission to Approve a Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit to Demolish an Existing Pump Station and Construct a New Pump Station and Associated Force Mains atRESOLUTION NO. 2024-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A MAJOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING PUMP STATION AND CONSTRUCT A NEW PUMP STATION AND ASSOCIATED FORCE MAINS AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 250 EAST COAST HIGHWAY (PA2023-0076) WHEREAS, Section 200 of the City of Newport Beach ("City") Charter vests the City Council with the authority to make and enforce all laws, rules, and regulations with respect to municipal affairs subject only to the restrictions and limitations contained in the Charter and the State Constitution, and the power to exercise, or act pursuant to any and all rights, powers and privileges, or procedures granted or prescribed by any law of the State of California; WHEREAS, an application was filed by Orange County Sanitation District ("Applicant"), with respect to property located at 250 East Coast Highway, and legally described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Property"); WHEREAS, the Property is operated by the Applicant with an existing 4,800 square foot pump station, known as the Bay Bridge Pump Station, which is a part of its wastewater collection system; WHEREAS, the Applicant requests a major site development review and coastal development permit for the following: ® demolition of an existing pump station and construction of a new approximately 7,500 square foot pump station that includes a new underground pump room, electrical room, odor control facility, and a generator room; installation of new 25-inch dual force mains by micro -tunneling beneath East Coast Highway from the Project across the Newport Bay Channel, to a new valve vault located below grade in the public right-of-way at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive; and Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 2 of 18 • temporary use of approximately 18,000 square feet of Lower Castaways Parkas a temporary construction staging area ("Staging Area") ("Project"); WHEREAS, the Project is subject to review and permitting approval by numerous agencies including the Orange County Sanitation District, Caltrans, California Coastal Commission ("CCC"), California State Lands Commission, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, private property owners, and the City; WHEREAS, the Property is designated Mixed -Use Water 2 (MU-W2) by the General Plan Land Use Element and located within the Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Staging Area is designated Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM) by the General Plan Land Use Element and located in the Castaways Marina Planned Community (PC-37) Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Property and Staging Area are located within the coastal zone and therefore, the Project requires a coastal development permit; WHEREAS, the Property is designated Mixed -Use Water Related (MU-W) by the Coastal Land Use Plan ("CLUP") and located within the Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Staging Area is designated Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM -A) — (0.0 — 0.30 FAR) by the CLUP and is located within the Castaways Marina Planned Community (PC-37) Coastal Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Property is comprised of approximately 14,592 square feet which consists of the Applicant's existing 4,879 square foot property along with an additional 9,713 square feet being acquired from the adjacent property; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on January 18, 2024, in the Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with California Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ("Ralph M. Brown Act") and Chapters 20.62 and 21.62 (Public Hearings) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("NBMC"). Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this public hearing; Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 3 of 18 WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC2024-002 by a majority vote (4 ayes, 2 nays, 1 recusal) approving the Project; WHEREAS, on January 31, 2024, John Erskine, representing the Bayside Village Marina LLC ("BVM"), owners of the Bayside Village Marina and related recreational marine commercial uses at 300 E. Coast Highway, as well as the Bayside Village Marina Mobilehome Park, filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision on January 31, 2024-,and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on April 23, 2024, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and Chapters 20.62 and 21.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as follows: Section 1: The City Council has considered the decision of the Planning Commission and determined that modifications to the Project made by the City Council, if any, are not major changes that require referral back to the Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation. Section 2: The City Council does hereby uphold the Planning Commission's approval of a major site development review and coastal development permit subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: In accordance with Subsection VII (C) (Back Bay Landing PCDP Implementation/Site Development Review— Findings) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth for the Project: Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(1): The development shall be in compliance with the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan, including design guidelines, and any other applicable plan or criteria related to the development. Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 4 of 18 Facts in Support of Finding with Section VII(C)(1): 1. The Property is categorized as Mixed -Use Water 2 (MU-W2) by the General Plan Land Use Element, which is applied to waterfront locations in which marine related uses may be intermixed with buildings that provide residential on the upper floors. For nonresidential buildings, the MU-W2 has a maximum floor area to land ratio ("FAR") of 0.5. The Property is 14,592 square feet in area and the Project is 7,244 square feet, resulting in a FAR of 0.49. Additionally, the Property is a part of Anomaly 80 of the General Plan Land Use Plan. Anomaly 80 includes the Property as well as 100 Bayside Drive, which is the site of the future Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Village and sets a development limit of 131,290 square feet for nonresidential development within the Anomaly. The Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning District sets additional nonresidential development limits for the future Back Bay Landing development, which is 61,534 square feet for commercial and 32,500 square feet for dry stack boat storage, for a total of 94,034 square feet of future nonresidential development. The addition of the 7,244 square foot pump station results in a total of 101,278 square feet, which is within the development limit of Anomaly 80. The Project is a replacement of an existing pump station, which has existed at the Property since 1966, and provides essential infrastructure to adjacent neighborhoods. The replacement facility is designed in part to ensure continued safe operation of the facility with modern equipment meeting current code standards to safeguard against sewage spills. 2. The Property is categorized as Mixed -Use Water Related (MU-W) by the CLUP, which is intended to provide for commercial development on or near the bay in a manner that will encourage the continuation of coastal dependent and coastal - related uses and visitor -serving uses, as well as allow for the development of mixed -use structures with residential uses above the ground floor. For nonresidential buildings, the Mixed -Use Water Related (MU-W) has a maximum FAR of 0.5. Additionally, CLUP Policy 2.1.9.1 limits the maximum floor area to what is established in General Plan Land Use Element Anomaly 80, as discussed in Fact 1 in support of Finding VII(C)(1) above. Furthermore, the additional size of the proposed station, including the new odor control building is necessary to meet current functional requirements of a modern pump station. 3. The Property is located in the Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning and Coastal Zoning District. Specifically, the Property is categorized by PC- 9 as Planning Area 1 (Mixed -Use Area) where a wastewater pump station is a permitted use. Per Section 2 of PC-9 (Development Limits and Land Use Plan), Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 5 of 18 the Orange County Sanitation District wastewater pump station shall not be counted towards square footage development limits of the PC. Per Section 3 of PC-9 (Permitted Uses), the initial construction of any new structure, or the significant reconstruction or major addition to an existing structure requires a Site Development Review pursuant to Section VII of PC-9. 4. Per Section IV (B) (Development Standards — Permitted Height of Structures), the maximum building height within Planning Area 1 shall not exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs. The height of the buildings is measured from a baseline elevation of 14 feet NAVD 88, as required by Exhibit 3 of PC-9. The proposed electrical and generator building features a sloped roof design with parapet walls which is 22 feet. The proposed odor control building features a flat roof design with parapet walls which is 15.5 feet. All proposed buildings comply with the required height requirements of PC-9. Furthermore, the proposed height of the building accounts for the raised floor to floor protection, electrical and mechanical equipment for station operation, and screening for rooftop HVAC equipment. 5. Per Section IV (A) (Development Standards — Setback Requirements), a minimum 10-foot landscape buffer is required to be provided to the back of sidewalk. Additionally, in Section IV (E) (Development Standards — Landscaping), a detailed landscape and irrigation plan is required which demonstrates compliance with applicable landscaping requirements specified in the NBMC. Furthermore, landscaped areas shall only consist of native plants or non-native drought tolerant plants which are non-invasive. Per Section A.4.d of Section IV, encroachments may be permitted through a Site Development Review. While the Project provides a 10-foot landscaping buffer on a small portion of the East Coast Highway frontage, the remaining landscape along East Coast Highway varies between approximately 9 feet and 6 feet in depth. However, the proposed landscaping meets the intent of PC-9, which includes reflecting the Project's coastal marine location, providing creative plant combinations, installing an efficient irrigation system, and preserving and enhancing view corridors. The Project includes low-water, drought tolerant plants which includes a mixture of deer grass, slipper plant, foxtail agave, and red yucca plant types located at the East Coast Highway frontage of the Project. Since the Project includes property line walls along East Coast Highway for security purposes, the proposed landscape is appropriate to break up the mass of the walls and improve the overall aesthetics of the Project as viewed from East Coast Highway. The proposed plants are relatively low profile in height and will not diminish any view corridors as identified in PC-9. Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 6 of 18 Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(2): The development shall not be incompatible with the character of the neighboring uses and surrounding sites. Facts in Support of Finding with Section VII(C)(2): 1. The Property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Bay Bridge. Adjacent to the Property is the Bayside Village Marina, which includes visitor serving uses and a recreational vehicle storage parking lot. This adjacent property is intended to be developed with a future mixed -use waterfront village in accordance with PC-9. Additional surrounding uses include the Bayside Village Mobile Home Park to the north and east across Bayside Drive, a restaurant and the Balboa Marina to the south across East Coast Highway, and various commercial uses to the southeast including a gas station, shopping center, and automobile dealerships. 2. The existing Bay Bridge Pump Station structure was constructed in 1966, and consequently upgraded with new pumps, piping, and ventilation in 1995. In 2014, an additional pump was added for increased capacity and reliability. The existing pump station is over 50 years old and requires replacement to serve the City, which pumps wastewater flow generated by residents and businesses west of Newport Bay, including Balboa Island and Crystal Cove. The pump station receives wastewater from a pump station in Crystal Cove, and pumps wastewater to another treatment facility located in the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed pump station has modernized architecture which improves the neighborhood aesthetics. 3. The construction of replacement force mains located on the western side of the Bay Bridge is not incompatible with neighboring uses, which includes the Bayshore Apartments to the south, a boat marina directly east, and the end of the Bay Bridge to the north. The construction of a new vault to house the force mains is a necessary part of the pump station. The new force mains are an upgrade to aging infrastructure that will better serve the surrounding area and is screened from public view within an existing vault. The existing vault, which is located on both the public right-of-way and private property, is to be abandoned in place. The public right-of-way area where the new vault is proposed includes new landscaping to further enhance the area for pedestrians, motorists, and nearby residents. Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 7 of 18 4. The Project includes structures that are 22 feet and 15.5 feet tall. While it is taller and larger in area than the existing pump station, it is not out of scale with the existing and potential future surrounding uses. The architectural design utilizes a cantilevered roof overhang with a low profile and integrates materials and details which are consistent with surrounding coastal uses. The design includes a variety of colors and finishes such as stone and stucco to create architectural interest. Furthermore, to ensure architectural compatibility with the potential future Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Project, a condition of approval stipulates that at the request and to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, the Applicant shall make future alterations to the exterior fagade for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of a future approved Back Bay Landing Mixed - Use Project. Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(3): The development shall be sited and designed to maximize the aesthetic quality of the project as viewed from surrounding roadways, properties, and waterfront, with special consideration given to providing a variety of building heights, massing, and architectural treatments to provide public views through the site. Facts in Support of Finding with Section VII(C)(3): 1. Fact 4 in support of Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(1) is hereby incorporated by reference. 2. Fact 4 in support of Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(2) is hereby incorporated by reference. 3. Section 5 (Design Guidelines) of PC-9 provide guidelines intended to express the desired character of the future mixed -use waterfront village that helps achieve overall consistency of architectural quality. The guidelines call for a "coastal architectural theme" and flexible design, provided a project follows principles of quality design and exhibits a high level of architectural standards and compatibility with surrounding area. The Project is designed with a modern coastal architectural theme, incorporating a modern design with a cantilevered roof overhang and an integration of materials and details that is compatible the surrounding coastal context. The buildings avoid long, continuous blank walls with a simple fagade composition of a base and top separated by different colors. There is a mixture of heights and roof types (sloping and flat) to create visual interest. Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 8 of 18 4. The Project emphasizes clean lines, simplicity and avoids excessive ornamentation, which will more easily allow for future modifications per PC-9 design guidelines so that it would be visually consistent with the future Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Village. Per Section 5.D.10, the building exterior will be aesthetically improved with entirely new buildings and perimeter walls to reflect PC-9 design standards. The Project considers future residents, businesses, and patrons of the Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Village by including louvers which are designed to conceal the odor control facility, and screening for on -site mechanical equipment. The simple clean lines and avoidance of excessive ornamentation allows the coast's natural beauty to be prominent which is consistent with the concept of coastal architectural design. 5. Landscaping is proposed along the East Coast Highway frontage, which further reduces the massing of the property walls. The landscape buffer also enhances the appearance of the public right-of-way so that the Project does not appear walled off from public viewsheds. The landscape buffer will improve the overall aesthetic of the Project from East Coast Highway, which is identified as a coastal view road by the CLUP. 6. The Project is designed to preserve the six view corridors conceptually identified by PC-9. The existing view of the Back Bay bluff to the north of the Project, as well as views of the bay through other portions of the future Back Bay Landing, are not obstructed by the Project. Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(4): Site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas, pedestrian and vehicular access ways, landscaping and other site features shall give proper consideration to functional aspects of site development. Facts in Support of Finding with Section VII(C)(4): 1. The Property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Bay Bridge. This adjacent property is the site of the future Back Bay Landing project, which is a mixed -use waterfront village which has not yet been constructed. Currently, vehicular access to the existing pump station is through a curb cut on East Coast Highway, followed by gates that are opened for vehicles to Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 9 of 18 access. The existing access is challenging due to traffic on East Coast Highway and the necessity for vehicles to drive across the public right-of-way. 2. While an access gate will remain adjacent to East Coast Highway, it will be used only for when access at the Bayside Drive entrance is temporarily hindered. To improve access, the Applicant proposes access through a permanent access easement taken through Bayside Drive and into the Back Bay Landing property at 100 Bayside Drive. As described by the certified environmental impact report ("EIR"), the Project would require a maximum of approximately 15 vehicle trips per week for staff to perform period maintenance, inspections of facilities and equipment, and/or chemical deliveries. Since a similar number of trips are required for the existing pump station, the Project is not expected to result in additional vehicle trips. 3. The overall layout of structures is efficiently arranged on a constrained lot and is designed to accommodate service vehicle access and maneuvering requirements. 4. Fact 5 in support of Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(1) is hereby incorporated by reference. Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(5): The development shall not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. Facts in Support of Finding with Section VII(C)(5): 1. The Project provides essential infrastructure to the surrounding community for waste management and a pump station has existed in this location for many decades. Orange County Sanitation District has aging infrastructure throughout the City and it is typical for utilities such as the Project to be replaced and upgraded. The Project improves an existing pump station, which serves the overall community as part of a larger wastewater collection system. 2. The Project includes a new odor control room, which the existing facility currently lacks. The odor control room is included to mitigate odors from the Property to the surrounding neighborhood and includes treatment for both liquid and vapor phase Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 10 of 18 waste. The odor control room accounts for a significant portion of the expanded footprint of the Project. 3. The Project includes buildings both below and above grade which are larger in area than the existing pump station. The above -grade structures include an electrical room, generator room, and odor control structure. The electrical room includes increased clearances between electrical equipment per Orange County Sanitation District standards which provides safety for electricians while performing maintenance. The new underground pump also requires a larger underground footprint to meet current industry standards. Since the existing pump station was constructed nearly 60 years ago, increases in working clearances and equipment types and sizes is expected which leads to the overall increase in the Project footprint. 4. The Project uses equipment with lower noise. The highest noise producer of the Project is the standby generator, which is to be used in emergency situation if there is a power outage. The generator is proposed to be enclosed in a building with sound attenuation panels and is not expected to negatively affect surrounding uses. 5. The Applicant has provided a Site Photometric Plan and Lighting Plans which describe the Project's lighting around the Property. There are lights proposed to be attached to the Electrical Room, Generator Room, and Odor Control Area, with minimal lighting around the interior of the perimeter security walls. The Project's lighting is conditioned to comply with the outdoor lighting standards of the NBMC and will not negatively affect surrounding uses. As conditioned, the Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated. 6. If the pump station facility were to fail, sewage would build up in upstream sewers and could result in an overflow from the lowest elevation manhole upstream from the Property. Furthermore, backups and/or spills could occur at specific residences or businesses that have sewer laterals lower than the lowest elevation manhole. If the force mains in the bay were to fail, a sewage spill could occur into the bay. The Project seeks to upgrade the existing pump station and provide improvements to an existing utility which serves a large portion of the city. Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 11 of 18 Section 4: In accordance with Section 21.52.015(F) (Coastal Development Permits - Findings and Decision) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings as set forth: Findinq of Consistency with Section 21.52.015(F)(1): The development shall not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. Facts in Support of Finding with 21.52.015(F)(1): 1. Facts 2 through 5 in support of Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(1) are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. Facts 1 and 2 in support of Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(2) are hereby incorporated by reference. 3. A Coastal Hazards Report and Sea Level Rise Analysis was prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc. dated October 1, 2023, for the Project. The current maximum bay water elevation is 7.7 NAVD 88 (North American Vertical Datum of 1988 ("NAVD88") Based on the State of California's Sea Level Rise Guidance, the sea level rise for the Los Angeles region is 6.6 feet NAVD 88, under the H++ scenario. Since the life expectancy of the new pump station is approximately 50 years, the 6.6-foot sea level rise for the year 2080 is appropriate to use for evaluation of the Project. Therefore, the sea level is estimated to reach approximately 14.3 feet NAVD88 (7.7 + 6.6 feet NAVD 88). The finished floor elevation of the electrical room and entrance to the dry well is 15.5 feet, which provides more than adequate protection from sea level rise. The generator room has a finished floor elevation of 14.17 feet. While slightly under the 14.3-footsea level rise elevation projection, the generator is proposed to be mounted on a 2-foot-high fuel tank and the generator panels will be mounted 3.5 feet above the finished floor, which will provide adequate protection from flooding. For the Odor Control area, there is a proposed finished floor elevation of 14 feet. Equipment within the area is proposed to be mounted on pads higher than 14.3 feet NAVD 88, to protect from cases of flooding. Additionally, temporary flood barriers such as sandbags can be deployed for openings during flooding situations. Finally, the Applicant is proposing to waterproof a portion of the Odor Control area's block walls to provide additional protection from flooding. Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 12 of 18 4. The Project includes the construction of upgraded replacement force mains, which run from the Property onto the western side of the Bay Bridge through micro - tunneling. The new force mains are an upgrade to aging infrastructure that will better serve the surrounding area and is screened from public view within an existing vault. The existing vault, which is located on both the public right-of-way and private property, is to be abandoned in place. The public right-of-way area where the new vault is proposed includes new landscaping to further enhance the area for pedestrians, motorists, and nearby residents. 5. The Applicant submitted a Construction Management Plan ("CMP") prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc., dated October 2023, which documents the construction phase implementation, construction requirements and quality control, and traffic control associated with the construction of the Project. The CMP discusses construction easements at the Property for construction access as well as offsite staging areas at Lower Castaways Park and the Orange County Sanitation District Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. A Temporary License Agreement was approved by City Council on September 12, 2023, allowing for the siting of office trailers, temporary staging and storage of construction equipment and materials, and the parking of vehicles to support the Project during construction. The agreement is for a limited basis only and includes a term until December 31, 2028, or the completion of the Project, whichever first occurs. The CMP also includes a Traffic Control Plan which includes closing of necessary sidewalks during construction hours and re -opening during non -working hours. The Traffic Control Plan has been reviewed by the City's Public Works department and has been determined to be sufficient to minimize traffic impacts during the construction period. 6. The Property is located in an area known for the potential of seismic activity and liquefaction and is required to comply with the California Building Code ("CBC") and City's Building Division standards and policies. Geotechnical investigations specifically addressing liquefaction are required to be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. Permit issuance is also contingent on the inclusion of design mitigation identified in the investigations. Construction plans are reviewed for compliance with approved investigations and CBC requirements prior to building permit issuance. 7. The Property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Back Bay Bridge. East Coast Highway and Bayside Drive (south of East Coast Highway) are identified as a Coastal View Roads by the CLUP. The Property Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 13 of 18 currently includes multiple pump station buildings, visible mechanical equipment, security block walls and vegetation which impair the view of the back bay. This specific pump station has existed since its original construction in 1966. Additionally, the adjacent Recreational Vehicle Storage parking lot includes many recreational vehicles which also impair the view of the bay. The Project includes a 22-foot high electrical and generator room above a subterranean pump room on the west of the property. There is also a 15.5-foot-high odor control building to the east of the property. Site walls are proposed for security purposes but do not exceed the height of the proposed buildings. From East Coast Highway, the Project does not impair the existing view of the bay and maintains a view of the Back Bay bluff to the north. Two nearby Public Viewpoints are identified as part of a pedestrian trail at Castaways Park, located approximately 1,500 feet northwest of the Property. When viewing the Property from Castaways Park, East Coast Highway, the Back Bay Channel and marina, and Recreational Vehicle Storage are within immediate view, while a commercial shopping center and Promontory Point residences are located further east across East Coast Highway. Although the Project proposes to replace the existing pump station buildings with taller buildings, the views from Castaways Park are mostly unchanged. Parts of East Coast Highway may be impaired by the new structures, but the marina, commercial shopping center, and Promontory Point are not affected by the Project. The Project does not interfere with any of the identified Public Viewpoints due to the large distances from them. The Project may be in the distant viewshed of the Public Viewpoints but will not interfere with the public views that are currently provided. 8. Under Section 21.35.050 (Water Quality and Hydrology Plan) of the NBMC, due to the proximity of the development to the shoreline and the development containing more than 75% of impervious surface area, a Water Quality and Management Plan ("WQMP") is required. The Applicant submitted a Non -Priority Project Water Quality Plan ("NPP"), prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc., and dated October 17, 2023. An NPP is required for new development or significant redevelopment projects that do not meet the criteria for Priority Projects as defined by the County's Model WQMP, but instead qualify as Non -Priority Projects as defined in the Drainage Area Management Plan. The NPP provides stormwater Best Management Practices ("BMPs") that are planned for controlling discharges of pollutants from the Project. Finding of Consistency with Section 21.52.015(F)(2): Conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act if the project is located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 14 of 18 any body of water located within the coastal zone. Facts in Support of Finding with 21.52.015(F)(2): 1. The Property does not currently provide nor inhibit public coastal access. The Property is located in close proximity to potential lateral access to the Back Bay Channel, as designated by the CLUP. The lateral access is a small beach located along the Back Bay Landing property, which ranges from 250 feet north and 550 feet west from the Property. The Project consists of the replacement of an existing pump station with an upgraded pump station. Access to the bay remains available Back Bay Landing. Therefore, the Project will not impact public access to local coastal resources. 2. The Project includes installation of force mains in a new subterranean utility vault within a small portion of the public right-of-way area on the southwestern side of the Bay Bridge. This public -right-of-way includes an existing fence which leads to a walkway to the north side of the bridge. There is no direct access to the water in the area of the vault and therefore the Project does not affect public access in this location. 3. The Project includes temporary construction staging at Lower Castaways Park, which is approximately 1,100 feet west of the Property, and across the Bay Bridge. Lower Castaways Park is not identified as a Public Park by the CLUP. The construction staging is temporary for the duration of construction for the Project, as stipulated by the Temporary Lease Agreement between the City and the Applicant. The temporary construction staging does not alter access to the bay. The Applicant is only using a portion of the park, which has been historically used for construction staging and off -site parking since the City acquired the property. The staging site is buffered and screened from adjacent right of ways by existing landscaping which is to remain. The portion of the Staging Area that is open and available for public parking and access is not affected by the Project. The public access for small vessel launching into the bay is also unaffected. Section 5: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are incorporated into the operative part of this resolution. Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 15 of 18 Section 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 7: On the basis of the entire environmental review record, the Project (inclusive of recommended conditions of approval) will not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously analyzed in the EIR and Addendum, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" adopted by OC Sanitation District for the Project. In February of 2021, the Applicant, as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act, approved the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) and certified an EIR for Project No. 5-67 pursuant to CEQA set forth in the California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and its implementing State regulations set forth in the California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 ("CEQA Guidelines"). On April 1, 2021, Bayside Village Marina filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate against the Applicant in Orange County Superior Court alleging that the EIR failed to comply with CEQA on numerous grounds (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30- 2021-01194238.) On December 16, 2022, the Court issued a ruling that upheld the EIR in all respects except one (not having identified project construction staging area). Thereafter, the Court issued a limited writ directing OC Sanitation District to sufficiently identify project construction staging areas. In response to the Court ruling, OC Sanitation District prepared an Addendum to the EIR for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project which was certified by OC Sanitation District Board on July 23, 2023 pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines which authorizes a lead agency to prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but one of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have not occurred. The Addendum clarifies the use of the Lower Castaways Park in the City as a construction Staging Area and adds a new construction staging area at OC Sanitation District's Plant No. 2, located in the City of Huntington Beach, for soil storage/drying activities and determined that Project No. 5-67, as modified by the Addendum, would not result in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 16 of 18 the severity of previously identified significant impacts in accordance with Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 8: Pursuant to Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR is required unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. Substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or C. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable due diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; ii. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerable different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 17 of 18 The Addendum analyzed the impacts associated with temporary use of the Staging Area for construction of the Project. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in either the EIR or the Addendum nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, the previously adopted Addendum addresses all environmental impacts associated with the Project. Section 9: The City Council finds that judicial challenges to the City's CEQA determinations and approvals of land use projects are costly and time consuming. In addition, project opponents often seek an award of attorneys' fees in such challenges. As project applicants are the primary beneficiaries of such approvals, it is appropriate that such applicants should bear the expense of defending against any such judicial challenge, and bear the responsibility for any costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which may be awarded to a successful challenger. Resolution No. 2024-28 Page 18 of 18 Section 10: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution. ADOPTED this 23rd day of April, 2024. Will O'Neill Mayor ATTEST: ii �i/ I.-Am1... � <<. City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Aaroh C. Harp City Attorney Attachment(s): Exhibit "A" — Legal Description Exhibit "B" — Conditions of Approval Exhibit "C" — Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Addendum EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 EXMIT "A-1" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 5-67-01 (FEE) ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange State of California, being that portion of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 93-111 filed in Book 278, Pages 40 through 45 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Orange County, described as follows: COMMENCING at the easterly terminus of that certain course in the centerline of the East Coast Highway shown as "North 8736'58" West 160.15 feet" on said Parcel Map No. 93-1111 said point also being marked with a "spike and washer tagged DOH per Caltrans F.B. SR. 81-115/1 l" per said Parcel Map No. 93-111; thence along said centerline North 87°36'58" West 160.15 feet to the northwesterly terminus thereof, said point also being marked with a "spike and washer tagged DOH per Caltrans F.B. SR. 81-115/11" per said Parcel Map No. 93-111; thence leaving said centerline at right angles North 02°23'02" East 85.94 feet to a line shown as "North 87°36' 16" West 123.34 feet" in the southerly boundary of said Parcel 3, said line also being the northerly Right -of -Way line of the East Coast Highway as shown on said Parcel Map No. 93-11 and also shown on a Caltrans Right -of -Way Map No. 25491-C for 07-ORA-1 18.3; thence along said southerly line of Parcel 3 North 87°36' 16" West 65.10 feet to the intersection of the southerly boundary of said Parcel 3 and the easterly line of Parcel 1 Dedicated to the Orange County Sanitation District in a document recorded September 10, 1965 in Book 7661, Page 741 of Official Records, in the Office of said Orange County Recorder, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 13°39'41" East 71.32 feet; thence North 76°24'23" West 173.32 feet; thence South 13°39'46" West 79.83 feet to a line shown as 'North 66°24'24" West 284.74 feet" in said southerly boundary of Parcel 3; thence along said southerly boundary of Parcel 3 the following six (6) courses: (1) South 66024'24" East 8.72 feet to an angle point therein; (2) South 73°06'54" East 43.65 feet to an angle point therein; (3) South 83106'23" East 60.83 feet to an angle point therein; (4) North 0114610" West 60.00 feet to an angle point therein; (5) North 88°13'14" East 60.00 feet to an angle point therein; Page 1 of 2 OC SAN 22-03-8 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION PARCEL 5-67-01 (FEE) (6) South 01 °46'46" East 70.87 feet to an angle point therein to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 9,713 Square Feet more or less. EXHIBIT "A-2" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. 08/17/2021 Stevefi C. Slocum, P.L.S. 9044 Date Michael Baker International 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, California 92707 Project No. 163755 14:lpd3ta5.1637551CADD`.4lapping�E.xhibdslPump Station Legals and E.xhibits�Lcgal',163755-OOA I -Legal Fee Parcel doex Page 2 of 2 OC SAN 22-03-9 � NEWPORT gAY HARBOR CHANNEL UPPER BAY RECORD REFERENCES: R1 CALTRANS RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP NO. 25491-C. R2 PARCEL MAP NO, 93-111. P.M.B. 278/40-45. -0 a � � A �\ R11014.00' mr o L=313.64' a SPIKE AND WASHER "DOH" PER CALTRANS FB. 81-115/11 AND PM 93-111. P.M.B. \ 27B/40-45 N87'36'58"W 160.15' \ (R2) P.O.C. ( , PARCEL 1 � EXHIBIT nA-2n SKETCH M ACCOWANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION PARCEL M7-01 (FEE) CONTAINING: 9,713 S.F. MORE OR LESS SHEETINDEX moicATES SHEET WmBER PARCEL 5-67-01 lap YSIDE D�VE SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, CA 92707 (949) 472-3505 , MBAKERINTL.COM ALQ ST 13, 2021 N 163755 lieriuri.au..mNwoNo�tel�strvVxvwvr�roaecm�.w s.r;as Teo ewmf ,Uw�ssmu - wwn r¢ r.w..ac mx�..v..s. OC SAN 22-03-10 ��e/zc� ev ti I SSE 1" .Ao' i tl tv N L N I S66'24'24"E 8.72' VARIES I VARIES (R2) S73'06'54"E 43.65'� ➢ n ,...1 (R2) S83'06'23'E 60.83' J O w S'LY LINE OF PARCEL 3 OF 1 P.M. NO. 93-111, P.M.8. c r 278/40-45 AND N'LY R.O.W -~ OF EAST COAST HIGHWAY g LINE PER CALTRANS R.O.W. MAP N0. 25491-C c14=1+,y 1 4„ � r y T.P.O.B. PARCEL 5-67-01 (FEE) v� A . �AQ a �o �S NI Ara +r 60 11L2 � A 10 N13'3�E 71.32' S'LY LINE OF PARCEL 3 OF PM 93-111. P.M.B. 278/40-45 AND N'LY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF EAST COAST HIGHWAY PER CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY MAP NO. 25491-C o+, VPR1�`S 4 V ARtES SPIKE AND WASHER "DOH" PER L CALTRANS F8. SR-81-115/11 AND P.M. NO. 93-111, P.M.B. 278/40-45 an EXHIBIT 'A-2" N SKEMTOA00011PANYA $ P.O.C. LEGAL DESCRvnON FOR PARCEL 1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SPIKE AND WASHER "DOH' PER BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION CALTRANS F8. SR-81-115/11 PARCELS-67.01 (FEE) AND P.M. NO. 93-111. CONTAINING: 9,713 S.F. MORE OR LESS P. M.B. 278/40-45 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS I N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L 5 Huttor. Centre Onve, Suite 500 Santa Ana. CA 92707 (949) 472-3505 • MBAKERINTL.COM ALQ15T 13. 2021 JN 163755 v�a,rn-eay.,e.rmmseuwwon�mt.�cs>ssVimWwtrmmamsV+wsr.na�wswoxmrrn,cvssma-uenui.u- --, OC SAN 22-03-11 Exhibit "B" Conditions of Approval Planning Division The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans, and building elevations stamped and dated with the date of this approval (except as modified by applicable conditions of approval). 2. The Project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. A material violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be caused the revocation of this Major Site Development Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. 4. The major site development review and coastal development permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Sections 20.54.060 and 21.54.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code unless an extension is otherwise granted. 5. Any change in operational characteristics, expansion in the area, or other modification to the approved plans, shall require an amendment to this Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit or the processing of a new Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit. 6. A copy of the Resolution, including conditions of approval Exhibit "A" shall be incorporated into the Building Division and field sets of plans before issuance of the building permits. 7. Before the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect. These plans shall incorporate drought -tolerant plantings and water -efficient irrigation practices, and the plans shall be approved by the Planning Division. 8. All landscape materials and irrigation systems shall be maintained by the approved landscape plan. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and growing condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. All landscaped areas shall be kept free of weeds and debris. All irrigation systems shall be kept operable, including adjustments, replacements, repairs, and cleaning as part of regular maintenance. 9. The site shall not be excessively illuminated based on the luminance recommendations of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, or, in the opinion of the Director of Community Development, the illumination creates an unacceptable negative impact on surrounding land uses or environmental resources. The Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated. 10. Before the issuance of a building permit., the applicant shall prepare a photometric study in conjunction with a final lighting plan for approval by the Planning Division. The survey shall show that lighting values are "1" or less at all property lines. 11. All exterior lighting shall be shielded with light rays confined within the boundaries of the Property. Site lighting shall not create a public nuisance by shining onto public streets or adjacent sites. 12. All mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be fully screened from view from East Coast Highway, Bayside Drive, and the surrounding properties (including from above) and shall be sound attenuated in accordance with Chapter 10.26 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 13. The odor control room shall be screened with louvers. The mechanical equipment shall be screened from view of future adjacent residents. 14. Site lighting shall be designed so light generated on -site does not spill on to adjoining properties or rights -of -way. On -site lighting shall be designed so that light sources are not visible from East Coast Highway, Bayside Drive, or from adjacent properties. 15. Before the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay any unpaid administrative costs associated with the processing of this application to the Planning Division. 16. All noise generated by the proposed use shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 10.26 and other applicable noise control requirements of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The maximum noise shall be limited to no more than depicted below for the specified periods unless the ambient noise level is higher: Between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM Between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM Location Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Residential Property 45dBA 55dBA 40dBA 50dBA Residential Property located within 100 feet of a commercial property 45dBA 60dBA 45dBA 50dBA Mixed Use Property 45dBA 60dBA 45dBA 50dBA Commercial Property N/A 65dBA N/A 60dBA 17. All trash shall be stored within the building or within dumpsters stored in the trash enclosure (three walls and a self -latching gate) or otherwise screened from view of neighboring properties, except when placed for pick-up by refuse collection agencies. The trash enclosure shall have a decorative solid roof for aesthetic and screening purposes. 18. The exterior of the Project shall be always maintained free of litter and graffiti. The owner or operator shall provide for daily removal of trash, litter debris, and graffiti from the premises and on all abutting sidewalks within 20 feet of the premises. 19. The applicant shall ensure that the trash dumpsters and/or receptacles are maintained to control odors. This may include the provision of either fully self- contained dumpsters or periodic steam cleaning of the dumpsters if deemed necessary by the Planning Division. Cleaning and maintenance of trash dumpsters shall be done in compliance with the provisions of Title 14, including all future amendments (including Water Quality related requirements). 20. Deliveries and refuse collection for the facility shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and Saturdays and between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on Sundays and Federal holidays unless otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development and may require an amendment to this approval. 21. Prior to construction, a waterproofing curb or similar design feature shall be constructed around the proposed structures as an adaptive flood protection device based on the State of California's Sea Level Rise Guidance H++ Scenario, per the approved plans and Coastal Hazards Report dated October 2023. Flood shields (sandbags and other methods) can be deployed across the openings to protect and prevent flooding to the structure. 22. Prior to construction, the property owner shall submit a notarized signed letter acknowledging all hazards present at the site, assuming the risk of injury or damage from such hazards, unconditionally waiving any claims of damage against the City from such hazards, and to indemnify and hold harmless City, its City Council its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements, and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City's approval of the development. 23. This approval does not authorize any new or existing improvements (including landscaping) on California Coastal Permit Jurisdiction, State tidelands, or public beaches. Any improvements located on tidelands, submerged lands, and/or lands that may be subject to the public trust shall require a coastal development permit (CDP) approved by the California Coastal Commission (Coastal Commission). Prior to construction, the applicant shall provide a copy of said coastal development permit or CDP waiver or documentation from the Coastal Commission that subject improvements are not subject to the permit requirements of the Coastal Act and/or not located within the permit jurisdiction of the Coastal Commission. 24. No demolition or construction materials, equipment debris, or waste, shall be placed or stored in a location that would enter the sensitive habitat, receiving waters or storm drains or result in impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat areas streams, the beach, wetlands or their buffers. No demolition or construction materials shall be stored on public property. 25. The applicant is responsible for compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty_ Act (MBTA). In compliance with the MBTA, grading, brush removal, building demolition tree trimming, and similar construction activities shall occur between August 16 and January 31, outside of the peak nesting period. If such activities must occur inside the peak nesting season from February 1 to August 15, compliance with the following is required to prevent the taking of native birds under MBTA: A. The construction area shall be inspected for active nests. If birds are observed flying from a nest or sitting on a nest, it can be assumed that the nest is active. Construction activity within 300 feet of an active nest shall be delayed until the nest is no longer active. Continue to observe the nest until the chicks have left the nest and activity is no longer observed. When the nest is no longer active, construction activity can continue in the nest area. B. It is a violation of state and federal law to kill or harm a native bird. To ensure compliance consider hiring a biologist to assist with the survey for nesting birds, and to determine when it is safe to commence construction activities. If an active nest is found, one or two short follow-up surveys will be necessary to check on the nest and determine when the nest is no longer active. 26. Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Good Housekeeping Practices (GNPs) shall be implemented before and throughout the duration of construction activity as designated in the Construction Erosion Control Plan. 27. The discharae of anv hazardous materials into storm sewer systems or receivin waters shall be prohibited. Machinery and equipment shall be maintained and washed in confined areas specifically designed to control runoff. A designated fueling and vehicle maintenance area with appropriate berms and protection to prevent spillage shall be provided as far away from storm drain systems or receiving waters as possible. 28. Debris from demolition shall be removed from work areas each day and removed from the project site within 24 hours of the completion of the project. Stockpiles and construction materials shall be covered, enclosed on all sites, not stored in contact with the soil. and located as far away as possible from drain inlets and any waterway. 29. Trash and debris shall be disposed of in proper trash and recycling receptacles at the end of each construction day. Solid waste, including excess concrete, shall be disposed of in adequate disposal facilities at a legal disposal site or recycled at a recycling facility. 30. The Applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program of the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Environmental Impact Report No.5- 67 (SCH2O16111031). 31. At the request and to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, the Applicant shall make future alterations to the exterior facade for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of a future approved Back Bay Landing mixed - use project. 32. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements, and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City's approval of Back Bay Pump Station Replacement including, but not limited to, a major site development review, conditional use permit, and coastal development permit (PA2023-0076). This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorney's fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit, or proceeding whether incurred by the applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing the such proceeding. The applicant shall indemnify the City for all the City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages that which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions outlined in this condition. The applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City under the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. Fire Department 33. Premise identification shall be provided per the Newport Beach Fire Department guidelines. 34. A knox box for emergency access shall be provided. 35. NFPA 704 Placarding for onsite hazards shall be provided. Public Works Department 36. The Traffic Control Plan shall be further review and approved by the City of Newport Beach and Caltrans prior to construction. 37. All work within Caltrans right-of-way requires an encroachment permit from Caltrans. 38. The Applicant shall comply with the approved Construction Management Plan and Traffic Control Plan. Any deviations to these plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director prior to implementation. 39. The Applicant shall maintain all landscaping in the public right-of-way adjacent to East Coast Highway, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 40. Construction activities shall comply with Section 10.28.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Noise -generating construction activities shall be consistent with a Traffic Management Plan and Construction Management Plan approved by the Public Works Director. 41. All conditions and provisions stated in the Temporary, Non -Exclusive and Revocable License Agreement Between the City of Newport Beach and the Orange County Sanitation District for Use of City Property shall be adhered to. 42. The construction staging area at Lower Castaways park shall not impact the public's ability to access designated public parking. EXHIBIT "C" Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Addendum EIR No. 5-67 Available separately due to bulk at: https://www.ocsan.gov/about-us/transparency/eir-documents/-folder-807 Addendum to EIR No. 5-67 Available separately due to bulk at: https://www.ocsan.gov/home/showpubiisheddocument/34145/638253730131970000 Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. SP-178) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINAL I DECEMBER 2017 �� w r FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT SCH NO. 2016111031 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Contact: Mr. Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst 714.962.2411 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Contact: Mr. Alan Ashimine 949.472.3505 December 2017 JN 143698 This document is designed for double -sided printing to conserve natural resources. Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Section1.0: Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1-1 Section 2.0: Comments and Responses................................................................................................ 2-1 Section3.0: Errata.................................................................................................................................... 3-1 Section 4.0: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program............................................................. 4-1 Final 9 December 2017 i Table of Contents Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final 9 December 2017 ii Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) Section 15088, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), as the lead agency, has evaluated the comments received on the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). The DEIR for the proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (herein referenced as the project) was distributed to responsible and trustee agencies, interested groups, and organizations. The DEIR was made available for public review and comment for a period of 45 days. The public review period for the DEIR (established by the CEQA Guidelines Section 15105) commenced on June 21, 2017 and ended August 4, 2017. The Final EIR (FEIR) consists of the following components: • Section 1.0 — Introduction • Section 2.0 — Responses to Comments • Section 3.0 — Errata • Section 4.0 — Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Due to its length, the text of the DEIR is not included with this document; however, it is included by reference in this FEIR. None of the corrections or clarifications to the DEIR identified in this document constitutes "significant new information" pursuant to Section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. As a result, recirculation of the DEIR is not required. Final . December 2017 1-1 Introduction Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 1-2 Introduction 2.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project 2.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS 2.1 CEQA REQUIREMENTS Before approving a project, the California EnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA) requires the Lead Agency to prepare and certify a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15120 through 15132 and Section 15161, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (SCH #2016111031). This Responses to Comments section, combined with the DEIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and errata sheet comprise the FEIR. This Responses to Comments section includes all components required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15120 and is included in the FEIR. 2.2 PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS - DRAFT EIR The DEIR was circulated for review and comment to the public, agencies, and organizations. The DEIR was also circulated to State agencies for review through the State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research. The 45-day public review period ran from June 21, 2017 to August 4, 2017. Comments regarding the DEIR received in writing during the 45-day public review period from the public, local, and State agencies have been incorporated into this section. 2.3 FINAL EIR The FEIR allows the public and Lead Agency an opportunity to review revisions to the DEIR, the responses to comments, and other components of the EIR, such as the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, before project approval. The FEIR serves as the environmental document to support a decision on the proposed project. After completing the FEIR, and before approving the project, the Lead Agency must make the following three certifications as required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15090: • That the FEIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; • That the FEIR was presented to the decision -making body of the Lead Agency, and that the decision -making body reviewed and considered the information in the FEIR prior to approving the project; and • That the FEIR reflects the Lead Agency's independent judgment and analysis. These certifications, the Findings of Fact, are included in a separate Findings document. Both the FEIR and the Findings will be submitted to the Lead Agency for consideration of the proposed project. Final . December 2017 2-1 Responses to Comments v SAN7 r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 2.4 WRITTEN COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES All written correspondence from those agencies or individuals commenting on the DEIR is reproduced on the following pages. The individual comments on each letter have been consecutively numbered for ease of reference. Following each comment letter are responses to each numbered comment. A response is provided for each comment raising substantive environmental issues. Added or modified text is underlined, while deleted text will have a ,.`..�tt through the text, and is included in a box, as the following example shows: "Text from EIR" COMMENT LETTERS A total of 14 comment letters were received by OCSD, as outlined below. State Agencies 1. Scott Morgan, Director, State Clearinghouse, State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit, August 7, 2017. 2. Gayle Totton, B.S., M.A., Ph.D., Associate Governmental Project Analyst, Native American Heritage Commission, July 14, 2017. 3. Johnson P. Abraham, Project Manager, Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch, Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress, Department of Toxic Substances Control, July 11, 2017. 4. Yatman Kwan, AICP, Branch Chief, Regional-IGR-Transit Planning, State of California Department of Transportation District 12, August 4, 2017. Regional/Local Agencies 5. Patrick Alford, Planning Program Manager, City of Newport Beach, August 4, 2017. 6. Richard Vuong, Manager, Planning Division, Orange County Public Works, August 2, 2017. 7. Tamera Rivers, Management Analyst, Orange County Fire Authority, July 25, 2017. Interested Parties and Individuals 8. Allyson Presta, Partner, Palmo Investments, GP, June 22, 2017. 9. Andrew Salas, Chairman, Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizhnation, July 18, 2017. Final . December 2017 2-2 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 10. Dan Miller, Senior Vice President, Irvine Company, August 3, 2017. 11. James Chuang, Senior Environmental Specialist, Southern California Gas Company, August 4, 2017. 12. John Erskine, Nossaman LLP, August 4, 2017. 13. Patricia Martz, Ph.D., President, California Cultural Resources Preservation Alliance, Inc., July 8, 2017. 14. Rebecca Robles, United Coalition to Protect Panhe, July 5, 2017. Final . December 2017 2-3 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-4 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 7 rL ur rN STATE OF CALIFORNIA a ° Governor's Office of Planning and Research • .o w,. State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor August 7, 2017 Kevin Hadden Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Subject: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project SCH#: 2016111031 Dear Kevin Hadden: d m 4 T P � L'1 2 �OF CAI.* Ken Alex Director The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Draft EIR to selected state agencies for review. On the enclosed Document Details Report please note that the Clearinghouse has listed the state agencies that reviewed your document. The review period closed on August 4, 2017, and the continents from the responding agency (ies) is (are) enclosed. If this comment package is not in order, please notify the State Clearinghouse immediately. Please refer to the project's ten -digit State Clearinghouse number in future correspondence so that we may respond promptly. Please note that Section 21 l04(c) of the California Public Resources Code states that: "A responsible or other public agency shall only make substantive comments regarding those activities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to be carried out or approved by the agency. Those comments shall be supported by specific documentation." These comments are forwarded for use in preparing your final environmental document. Should you need more infonnation or clarification of the enclosed comments, we recommend that you contact the commenting agency directly. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please contact the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. Sincerely, colt Morgan Director, State Clearinghouse Enclosures cc: Resources Agency 11 1400 TENTH STREET P.G. BOX 30.14 SACRAAIENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 TEL (91G)445-OG13 FAX (91G) 32:1-3018 www.opr.ca.gov Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base 5CH# 2016111031 Project Title Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project Lead Agency Orange County Sanitation District Type EIR Draft EIR Description The proposed project would replace the Bay Bridge Pump Station and associated force mains. The project would bring the pump station facility and force mains to current design and reliability standards to ensure continuous service for the Newport Coast service area. The primary project components consist of: 1) pump station improvements; 2) Newport Bay Channel crossing force main improvements; and 3) West Coast Hwy crossing force main improvements. Lead Agency Contact Name Kevin Hadden Agency Orange County Sanitation District Phone 714-962-2411 email Address 10844 Ellis Avenue City Fountain Vai[ey Fax State CA Zip 92708-7018 Project Location County Orange City Newport Beach Region I -at 1 Long 33' 37' 00.58" N 1 117' 54' 03.7" W Crass Streets East Coast Hwy and Bayside Dr Parcel No. 4410-132-60, 117-801-10 Township 6S Range 10W Section 26 Base SBM Proximity to: Highways 1 Airports Railways Waterways Newport Bay Channel Schools Numerous Land Use Bayside Village Boat Launch and Storage and Multi -Unit Residential/recreational and Marine Commercial and Mixed Use - Water 2 Project Issues Agricultural Land; Air Quality; Archaeologic -Historic; Biological Resources; Coastal Zone; Drainage/Absorption,, Flood Plain/Flooding; Forest Land/Fire Hazard; Geologic/Seismic; Minerals; Noise; Population/Housing Balance; Public Services; Recreation/Parks; Schools/Universities; Septic System; Sewer Capacity; Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading; Solid Waste; Toxic/Hazardous-, Traffic/Circulation; Vegetation; WaterQuality; Water Supply; Wetland/Riparian; Wildlife; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Cumulative Effects; Other Issues; Aesthetic/Visual; Tribal Cultural Resources Reviewing Resources Agency; California Coastal Commission; Department of Conservation; Department of Fish Agencies and Wildlife, Region 5; Office of Historic Preservation; Department of Parks and Recreation; Department of Water Resources; California Highway Patrol; Caltrans, District 12; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 8; Department of Toxic Substances Control; State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality; Air Resources Board, Major Industrial Projects; Native American Heritage Commission; State lands Commission Date Received 06121/2017 Start of Review 06/21/2017 End of Review 08104/2017 12 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 1 Scott Morgan, Director, State Clearinghouse State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit August 7, 2017 1-1 This letter acknowledges that the State Clearinghouse submitted the DEIR to selected State agencies for review and that the DEIR review period closed on August 4, 2017. The comment states that the Lead Agency (OCSD) complied with the public review requirements for draft environmental documents pursuant to CEQA. As such, no further response is necessary. 1-2 This comment includes the State Clearinghouse Document Details Report and does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. It should be noted that attached to this letter from the State Clearinghouse was correspondence related to the project from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). These comment letters from the NAHC and DTSC are included as Response to Comment Letter No. 2 and No. 3, below. Final . December 2017 2-7 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-8 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 2 STATE OF CALIFOR IA _ _ EdmundG. Brown Jr. Goyam-r NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION`S Environmental and Cultural Department -v 1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691 Phone (916) 373-3710 July 14, 2017 Kevin Madden Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 sent via e-mail: khadden@ocsd.com Re: SCH# 2016111031, Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project, Community of Newport Beach; Orange County, California Dear Mr. Hadden: The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project referenced above. The review included the Introduction and Project Description, and the Environmental Analysis, section 5.4 Cultural Resources, and section 5.12 Tribal Cultural Resources prepared by Duke C R M and Michael Baker Z 1 International For the Orange County Sanitation District. We have the following concerns: 1. There are no mitigation measures specifically addressing Tribal Cultural Resources separately. Mitigation measures must take Tribal Cultural Resources into consideration as required under AB-52, with or without consultation occurring. Mitigation language for archaeological resources is not always appropriate for or similar to measures specifically for handling Tribal Cultural Resources. For sample mitigation measures, please refer to the 2-2 California Natural Resources Agency (2016) "Final Text for tribal cultural resources update to Appendix G: Environmental Checklist Form," http:llresources-ca.gov/cega/docs/ab52/Clean-final-AB-52-App-G-text-Submi"go.pdt The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)', specifically Public Resources Code section 21084.1, states that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before a lead agency, that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report (EIR) shall he prepared. In order to determine whether a project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, a lead agency will need to determine whether there are historical resources with the area of project effect (APE). CEQA was amended in 2014 by Assembly BI11 52. (AB 52).' AB 52 applies to any project for which a notice of preparation or a notice of negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration is filed on or after July 1, 2015. AB 52 created a separate category for "tribal cultural resources"5, that now includes "a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environments Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource-7 Your project may also be subject to Senate Bill 18 (SB 18) (Burton, Chapter 905. Statutes of 2004), Government Code 65352.3, if it also involves the adoption of or amendment to a general plan or a specific plan, or the designation or proposed designation of open space- Both SB 18 and AB 52 have tribal consultation requirements. Additionally, if your project is also subject to the federal National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.) (NEPA), the tribal consultation requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 19664 may also apply. Consult your legal counsel about compliance with AB 52 and SB 18 as well as compliance with any other applicable laws. Agencies should be aware that AB 52 does not preclude agencies from initiating tribal consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with their jurisdictions before the timeframes provided in AB 52, For that reason, we urge you to continue to request Native American Tribal Consultation Lists and Sacred Lands File searches from the NAHC- The request forms can be found online at: http:llnahc-ca._gov/resourcesYtorms/. Additional information regarding AB 52 can be found online ' Pub- Resources Code § 21000 et seq- z Pub. Resources Code § 21484-1; Cal- Cade Regs-, 111.14, § 15064,5 (b); CEQA Guidelines Section 15064-5 (b) Pub. Resources Code § 21080 (d); Cai. Code Regs-, tit- 14. § 1b064 subd.(a)(1); CLUA Guidelines § 15064 (a)(1) Government Code 65352.3 s Pub- Resources Code § 21074 s Pub. Resources Cade § 21084.2 ' Pub. Resources Code § 21084.3 (a) 8 154 U-S.C- 300101. 36 C-F.R. § 800 et seq 23 at http://nahe.ca.gov/wo-content/uploads/2015/10/AB52TribalConsultation CalEPAPDF pdf, entitled "Tribal Consultation Under AB 52: Requirements and Best Practices". The NAHC recommends lead agencies consult with all California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of your proposed project as early as possible in order to avoid inadvertent discoveries of Native American human remains and best protect tribal cultural resources. A brief summary of portions of AB 52 and SB 18 as well as the NAHC's recommendations for conducting cultural resources assessments is also attached. Please contact me at gayle.totton@nahc.ca.gov or call (916) 373-3710 if you have any questions Sincerely, �41 � ey.le2ttor. B.S., M.A., Ph.Q ciate overnmental Project Analyst Attachment cc: State Clearinghouse 2-3 Pertinent. StptgJQry IRformatlon: Under AS 52. AB 52 has added to CFQA the additional requirements listed below, along with many other requirements: Within fourteen (14) days of determining that an application for a project is complete or of a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, a lead agency shall provide formal notification to a designated contact of, or tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice. A lead agency shall begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving a request for consultation from a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project-9 and prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration or environmental Impact report. For purposes of AB 52, "consultation shall have the same meaning as provided in Gov. Code § 65352.4 (Se 18)." The following topics of consultation, if a tribe requests to discuss them, are mandatory topics of consultation: a. Alternatives to the project. b. Recommended mitigation measures. c. Significant effects.' 1. The following topics are discretionary topics of consultation: a. Type of environmental review necessary. b. Significance of the tribal cultural resources. c. Significance of the project's impacts on tribal cultural resources. If necessary, project alternatives or appropriate measures for preservation or mitigation that the tribe may recommend to the lead agency. 11 With some exceptions, any information, including but not limited to, the location, description, and use of tribal cultural resources submitted by a California Native American tribe during the environmental review process shall not be Included in the environmental document or otherwise disclosed by the lead agency or any other public agency to the public, consistent with Government Code sections 6254 (r) and 6254.10. Any information submitted by a California Native American tribe during the consultation or environmental review process shall be published in a confidential appendix to the environmental document unless the tribe that provided the information consents, in writing, to the disclosure of some or all of the information to the public." ff a project may have a significant impact on a tribal cultural resource, the lead agency's environmental document shall discuss both of the following: a. Whether the proposed project has a significant impart on an identified tribal cultural resource. b. Whether feasible alternatives or mitigation measures, including those measures that may be agreed to pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21082.3, subdivision (a), avoid or substantially lessen the impact on the identified tribal cultural resource.14 Consultation with a tribe shall be considered concluded when either of the following occurs: a. The parties agree to measures to mitigate or avoid a significant effect, if a significant effect exists, on a tribal cultural resource; or b. A party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached.15 Any mitigation measures agreed upon in the consultation conducted pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2 shall be recommended for inclusion in the environmental document and in an adopted mttigation monitoring and reporting program, if determined to avoid or lessen the impact pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21082.3, subdivision (h), paragraph 2, and shall be fully enforceable. "' If mitigation measures recommended by the staff of the lead agency as a result of the consultation process are not included in the environmental document or if there are no agreed upon mitigation measures at the conclusion of consultation, or if consultation does not occur, and if substantial evidence demonstrates that a project will cause a significant effect to a tribal cultural resource, the lead agency shall consider feasible mitigation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21084.3 (b).17 An environmental impact report may not be certlfled, nor may a mitigated negative declaration or a negative declaration be adopted unless one of the following occurs: a. The consultation process between the tribes and the lead agency has occurred as provided in Public Resources Code sections 2108D.3.1 and 21080.3.2 and concluded pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2. b. The tribe that requested consultation failed to provide comments to the lead agency or otherwise failed to engage in the consultation process. s Pula. Resources Coda § 21080.3.1, subds. (d) and (e) ° Pub Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (b) 1i Pub_ Resources Code § 21(18G-3.2 (ay 12 Pub. Resources Code § 21080.3.2 (a) "Pub_ Resouroes Cade § 23082.3 (c)(1) d Pub. Resources Code § 21082.3 (b) 5 Pub. Resources Code § 21080.3.2 (b) Pub_ Resources Code § 21082.3 (a) " Pub. Resources Code § 21082.3 (e) 2-4 c. The lead agency provided notice of the project to the tribe in compliance with Public Resources Code section 210t30.3.1 (d) and the tribe failed to request consultation within 30 days.19 This process should be documented in the Tribal Cultural Resources section of your environmental document. Under SB 18: Government Code § 65352.3 (a) (1) requires consultation with Native Americans on general plan proposals for the purposes of "preserving or mitigating impacts to places, features, and objects described § 5097.9 and § 5091.993 of the Public Resources Code that are located within the city or county's jurisdiction. Govemment Code § 65560 (a), (b), and (c) provides far consultation with Native American tribes on the open -space element of a county or city general plan for the purposes of protecting places, features, and objects described in Sections 5097.9 and 5097.993 of the Public Resources Code. • SS 18 appfie s to local governments and requires them to contact, provide notice to, refer plans to, and consult with tribes prior to the adoption or amendment of a general plan or a specific plan, or the designation of open space. Local governments should consult the Governor's Office of Planning and Research's "Tribal Consultation Guidelines," which can be found online at: https:/Avww.opr.ca.gov/docs/09_14 05 Updated -Guidelines 922.pdf • Tribal Consultation: If a local government considers a proposal to adopt or amend a general plan or a specific plan, or to designate open space it is required to contact the appropriate tribes identified by the NAHC by requesting a "Tribal Consultation List." If a tribe, once contacted, requests consultation the local government must consult with the tribe on the plan proposal. A tribe has 90 days from the date of receipt of notification to request consultation unless a shorter timeframe has been agreed to by the tribe.le • There is no Statutory Time Limit on Tribal Consultation under the law. • Confidentiality: Consistent with the guidelines developed and adopted by the Office of Planning and Research,20 the city or county shall protect the confidentiality of the information concerning the specific identity, location, character, and use of places, features and objects described in Public Resources Code sections 50 97. 9 and 5097.993 that are within the city's or county's jurisdiction.21 • Conclusion Tribal Consultation: Consultation should be concluded at the point in which: o The parties to the consultation come to a mutual agreement concerning the appropriate measures for preservation or mitigation; or o Either the local government or the tribe, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached concerning the appropriate measures of preservation or mitigation.22 NAHC Recommendations for Cultural Resources Assessments: Contact the NAHC for: o A Sacred Lands File search. Remember that tribes do not always record their sacred sites in the Sacred Lands File, nor are they required to do so. A Sacred Lands File search is not a substitute for consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project's APE. o A Native American Tribal Contact List of appropriate tribes for consultation concerning the project site and to assist in planning for avoidance, preservation in place, or, failing both, mitigation measures. The request form can be found at http://nahc.ca.gov/resourcestforms/. Contact the appropriate regional California Historical Research Information System (CHRIS) Center (hltp://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?paue_id=1058) for an archaeological records search. The records search will determine: v If part or the entire APE has been previously surveyed for cultural resources. a If any known cultural resources have been already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE- * If the probability is low, moderate, or high that cultural resources are located in the APE. o If a survey is required to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. If an archaeological inventory survey is required, the final stage is the preparation of a professional report detailing the findings and recommendations of the records search and field survey. o The final report containing site forms, site significance, and mitigation measures should be submitted immediately to the planning department. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum and not be made available for public disclosure. o The final written report should be submitted within 3 months after work has been completed to the appropriate regional CHRIS center. 1B Pub. Resources Code § 21082.3 (d) 1e (Gov. Code § 65352.3 (a)(2)). p pursuant to Gov. Code section 65040.2, 21 (Gov. Code § 65352.3 (b)). (Tribal Consultation Guidelines, Governor's Office of Planning and Research (2005) at p. 18). 4 2-4 examples of Mitigation Measures That May Be Considered to Avoid or Minimize Significant Adverse Irnpots to Tdi Cultural Resources: a Avoidance and preservatlon of the resources in place, including, but not limited to: ■ Planning and construction to avoid the resources and protect the cultural and natural context. ■ Planning greenspace, parks, or other open space, to incorporate the resources with culturally appropriate protection and management criteria. c Treating the resource with culturally appropriate dignity, taking into account the tribal cultural values and meaning of the resource, including, but not limited to, the following: ■ Protecting the cuitural character and integrity of the resource. ■ Protecting the traditional use of the resource. ■ Protecting the confidentiality of the resource. c Permanent conservation easements or other interests in real property, with culturally appropriate management criteria for the purposes of preserving or utilizing the resources or places. o Please note that a federally recognized California Native American tribe or a non -federally recognized California Native American tribe that is on the contact list maintained by the NAHC to protect a California prehistoric, archaeological; cultural, spiritual, or ceremonial place may acquire and mold conservation easements if the conservation easement is voluntarily conveyed. a Please note that it is the policy of the state that Native American remains and associated grave artifacts shall be repairiated.24 The lack of surface evidence of archaeological resources (including tribal cultural resources) does not preclude their subsurface existence. o Lead agencies should_ include in their mitigation and monitoring reporting program plan provisions for the identification and evaluation of inadvertent) discovered archaeological resources.25 In areas of identified archaeological sensitivity, a certified archaeologist and a culturally affiliated Native American with knowledge of cultural resources should monitor all ground -disturbing activities. o Lead agencies should Include in their mitigation and monitoring mporting_12mgram plans provisions for the disposition of recovered cultural items that are not burial associated in consultation with culturally affiliated dative Americans. o Lead agencies should include in their mitigation and monitoring reporyngprogram plans provisions for the treatment gngi dlspo ition of inadvertentIy discovered Native American human remains. Health and Safety Code section 7050.5, Public Resources Cade section 5097.98, and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, section 15064.5, subdivislons (d) and (e) (CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5, subds. (d) and (e)) address the processes to be tollowed in the event of an inadvertent discovery of any Native American human remains and associated grave goods in a location other than a dedicated cemetery- 2'(CM Code § 015.3 (c)). za (Pub. Resources Code § 5097,991). par Cal. Codo Hegs., tit. 14, sectior1 15064.5(f) (C EQA (iuKlatines section 15064.50)). 5 2-4 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 2 Gayle Totton, B.S., M.A., Ph.D., Associate Governmental Project Analyst Native American Heritage Commission July 14, 2017 2-1 This is an introductory comment outlining the items reviewed by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 2-2 The comment indicates that there are no mitigation measures specifically addressing Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). Based on Section 5.12, Tribal Cultural Resources, of the DEIR, based on the cultural resources investigation, the findings of the records search and field survey, and the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) consultation process, OCSD has determined that no TCRs are known to exist on the project site. However, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 was included to minimize impacts in the event unknown TCRs are discovered during on -site ground disturbing activities. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 includes provisions related to the identification of TCRs and protocol to be followed in the event TCRs are discovered. As such, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 was determined to be sufficient to minimize impacts in this regard to a less than significant level (minor editorial revisions to CUL-1 are noted below to provide clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process). Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure CUL-1 on DEIR page 5.4-16 have been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure CUL- 1 has been revised as follows: CUL-1 Prior to ground -disturbing activities, a qualified archaeologist shall provide an Archaeological Monitoring Protocol Plan for the project. The archaeologist shall provide training to a Contractor's Representative regarding the Archaeological Monitoring Protocol Plan and the identification of archaeological resources. The training shall be open to Native American tribal representative(s), to assist the Contractor's Representative in identifying potential tribal cultural resources. The plan shall identify procedures for the event that potential resources are discovered by the Construction Contractor. If evidence of potential subsurface archaeological resources is found during site disturbance/excavation activities, these activities shall cease within 50 feet of that area and the construction contractor shall contact the Orange County Sanitation District Resident L'ngiffeef. Construction activities shall be allowed to continue in other areas of the site. The Resident Engineer shall then retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the discovery prior to resuming grading/construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find. If warranted, the archaeologist shall collect the resource, and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of the significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resource), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. Final . December 2017 2-14 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project If the archaeologist determines that the find is prehistoric or includes Native American materials, affiliated Native American groups shall be invited to contribute to the assessment and recovery of the resource, as applicable. The archaeologist and any applicable Native American contacts shall collect the resource and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resources), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be followed. Work within the area of discovery shall resume only after the resource has been appropriately inventoried, documented, and recovered, as applicable. 2-3 This comment discusses CEQA requirements pertaining to historical resources, AB 52, and Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), as well as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) guidelines pertaining to tribal consultation requirements. The project is not subject to the requirements of SB 18 or NEPA. As noted within Section 5.12, of the DEIR, OCSD fully complied with the requirements of AB 52 during preparation of the DEIR. 2-4 This comment provides a brief summary of portions of AB 52 and SB 18 and NAHC's recommendation for conducting cultural resources assessments, and does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. Final . December 2017 2-15 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-16 Responses to Comments Matthew Rodriquez Secretary for Environmental Protection July 11, 2017 Department of Toxic Substances Contro Barbara A. Lee, Director 5796 Corporate Avenue Cypress, California 90630 Mr. Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 khaddenaocsd.com & CEQA(a7ocsd.om COMMENT LETTER 3 Edmund G. Brawn Jr. Governor DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT (SCH# 2016111031) Dear Mr. Hadden: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has reviewed the subject EIR. The following project description is stated in the EIR: "Locally, the project site includes sewer pump station improvements located within a property located at 300 East Coast Highway. The project also includes sewer force main improvements that would extend from the proposed pump station, proceed westerly beneath the Newport Bay Channel to a disturbed area within the southern portion of Castaways Park, and extend south beneath West Coast Highway to connect to the existing Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) force main system; refer to Exhibit 3-2, Site Vicinity." Based on the review of the submitted document DTSC has the following comments - The EIR states, "As noted in Section 5.7.1, Existing Environmental Setting, elevated levels of DDT/DDE pesticide contamination have been reported in the Newport Bay Channel. However, these contaminates are anticipated to be present in topsoils along the channel as a result of deposition. As such, proposed HDDlmicrotunneling force main crossing beneath the Newport Bay Channel would occur in deeper soils and is not anticipated to involve these contaminated topsoils." However, the EIR states, "The proposed pump station site is entirely disturbed, and is currently occupied by RV storage facilities and a driveway providing access to the facility." DTSC recommends investigation and mitigation, as necessary, to address potential impact to human health and environment from residual pesticides. 31 32 0 Printed on Recycled Paoer Mr. Kevin Hadden July 11, 2017 Page 2 2. The EIR further states a number of facilities in the vicinity of the project site that have been known to handle, store, and/or transport hazardous materials, especially gasoline. DTSC is unable to evaluate whether vapor sampling and/or potential vapor intrusion risk was adequately addressed due to lack of relevant detailed information in the EIR. DTSC recommends soil gas sampling and vapor intrusion risk evaluation on sites with releases of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). 3. If Pump Station Electrical Room or Pump Station Generator Facility currently exist on the project site, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination related to transformers may be a possibility. DTSC recommends evaluation, proper investigation and mitigation, if necessary, on onsite areas with current or historic PCB -containing transformers. 4. If soil contamination is suspected or observed in the project area, then excavated soil should be sampled prior to export/disposal. If the soil is contaminated, it should be disposed of properly in accordance with all applicable and relevant laws and regulations. In addition, if the project proposes to import soil to backfill the excavated areas, proper evaluation and/or sampling should be conducted to make sure that the imported soil is free of contamination. 5. If during construction/demolition of the project, soil and/or groundwater contamination is suspected, construction/demolition in the area should cease and appropriate health and safety procedures should be implemented. If it is determined that contaminated soil and/or groundwater exist, the EIR should identify how any required investigation and/or remediation will be conducted, and the appropriate government agency to provide regulatory oversight. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (714) 484-5380 or email at Johnson.Abraham(cDdtsc.ca.gov. Sincerely, Johnson P. Abraham Project Manager Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress kl/sh/ja cc: See next page_ 33 3-4 3-5 M 3i Mr. Kevin Hadden July 11, 2017 Page 3 cc: Governor's Office of Planning and Research (via e-mail) State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044 State.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov Mr. Dave Kereazis (via e-mail) Office of Planning & Environmental Analysis Department of Toxic Substances Control Dave. Ke_reazisa-d_tsc. ca. gov Mr. Shahir Haddad, Chief (via e-mail) Schools Evaluation and Brownfields Cleanup Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress Shah ir. H addad(cOtsc. ca.gov CEQA# 2016111031 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 3 Johnson P. Abraham, Project Manager, Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch, Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress Department of Toxic Substances Control July 11, 2017 3-1 This is an introductory comment with a brief project description. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 3-2 The commenter suggests that the topsoil at the proposed pump station site could have residual pesticides, since the DEIR identifies it along the channel. Based on the Back Bay Landing Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), sediment within the bay reported elevated levels of dichlorodiphenyl trichloroethane (DDT) and dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethylene (DDE) pesticide contamination. This material is anticipated to come from upstream sources that have resulted in runoff and transport of sediment to the project site through the Newport Bay Channel. The proposed pump station site is located outside of the channel's ordinary high water mark and is not anticipated to involve this channel deposit material. Further, the pump station site was not historically developed with agricultural or other uses associated with the potential application of DDT/DDE-related pesticides. Thus, the pesticide contamination is limited to the Newport Bay Channel and not the pump station site. 3-3 This comment indicated that there is potential for release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and vapor encroachment at the project site due to reported contamination in the project vicinity. However, the DEIR Section 5.7, Ha,-ards and Hazardous Materials, does consider potential off -site sources to impact soil gas at the project site. The DEIR identifies the following off -site facilities, which have been known to handle, store, and/or transport hazardous materials: • Mobil #18HGK 301 CoastHighway: The facility adjoins the project site to the southeast across East Coast Highway. This off -site property released gasoline to the groundwater. However, this facility received case closure by the Regional Water Quality Control Board on July 28, 2005. Further, the Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA indicated that groundwater direction was to the west-southwest (away from the proposed pump station site). Groundwater contamination remained at the site upon receiving case closure, including methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) at 224 parts per million (ppm). However, the plume was reported to be stable and limited to the area beneath the facility and a portion of Bayside Drive, to the south of East Coast Highway (which is greater than 200 feet from the proposed pump station). According to the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB's) online database (GeoTracker), confirmation soil borings and sampling were conducted in 2003 and (according to the assessment results) concentrations of contamination in the soil were not present that would warrant a vapor hazard survey. Thus, this off -site facility is not anticipated to present a vapor encroachment concern. Final . December 2017 2-20 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project X"ort Beach Cars LLC, 445 East Coast Highwq : The facility is located approximately 380 feet to the southeast of the project site. This off -site property released gasoline to the groundwater. The Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA indicated that groundwater direction was to the southwest (cross gradient from the proposed pump station site) and that contaminant concentrations at the facility are low. According to the GeoTracker database, a Plume Time Travel report (prepared on October 20, 2005, and updated on September 1, 2006 and January 10, 2008) estimated the plume to be approximately 100 feet long by 20 feet wide. The model demonstrated a maximum plume distance of 100 to 150 feet from the source area by the year 2012, and predicted that the contamination migration would not extend offsite. This facility received case closure by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) on November 22, 2010. With the project site more than 380 feet away and assuming that vapor does not typically travel further than 100 feet from the edge -of -plume, this off -site release has not resulted in a vapor encroachment concern to the proposed pump station site. FormerARCO Service Station Site, 200 Coast Hi bwa : The facility is situated off -site to the west of the project site (at 200 West Coast Highway). This off -site property released gasoline to the groundwater. According to the GeoTracker database, this site achieved case closure by the RWQCB on May 5,1998. Based on the Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA historical aerials, the facility is located at the northwest corner of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive. Given the distance of the facility from the proposed pump station site (greater than 1,500 feet cross -gradient), this off -site release has not resulted in a vapor encroachment concern to the proposed pump station site. Shell Oil (Formerj, 990 Coast Highayaj: The facility is located approximately 0.47-mile southeast of the project site. Based on the distance of this facility to the proposed pump station site (greater than 0.45 mile), this off -site release has not resulted in a vapor encroachment concern to the proposed pump station site. 3-4 This comment indicates a possibility of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination due to the presence of on -site transformers. Based on the Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA, PCB was not observed on, or around, the project site, including the existing pump station facility. Several dry transformers, free of internal cooling fluids, were observed on -site and had no indications of leaks or spills. PCB -containing equipment is not anticipated with regard to the existing pump station facility. 3-5 This comment discusses the proper sampling and disposal of contaminated soil. No soil import/export is proposed as part of the grading activities for the pump station site. Proposed drilling activities would involve channel materials. The DEIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-3 and HAZ-4 are recommended to reduce impacts regarding potential contaminated channel materials prior to disposal. Thus, as concluded in the DEIR, impacts regarding contaminated soils as a result of soil import/export would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of the recommended mitigation. 3-6 As discussed on DEIR page 5.7-14, site disturbance and demolition activities could expose construction workers to a variety of unknown hazardous materials. However, Mitigation Measure HAZ-4 would reduce potential impacts from unknown hazardous materials that Final . December 2017 2-21 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE could result in accidental conditions at the project site. If unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered during construction by the contractor, which he/she believes may involve hazardous wastes/materials, the contractor would be required to complete the following (Mitigation Measure HAZ-4): • Immediately stop work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, removing workers and the public from the area; • Notify the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Engineering; • Secure the areas as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Engineering; and • Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator. 3-7 This comment is a closing statement providing contact information for questions. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-22 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 4 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ❑ISTRICT 12 1750 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUITE 100 SANTA ARIA, CA 92705 PHONE (657) 328-6267 FAX (657) 328-6510 TTY 711 www.dot.ca.go►+ August 4, 2017 Mr. Kevin Hadden Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA f92708 Dear Mr. Hadden, Making Con.servarion a California Way of Life. File: IGRICEQA SCH#: 2016111031 12-ORA-2017-00621 SR 1 Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the review of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project. The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability. The project consists of upgrading the Bay Bridge Pump station, Newport Bay Channel, and West 4-1 Coast Highway crossing force main improvements to design and reliability standards. The project is located between Dover Drive and Bayside Drive in the City of Newport Beach and in proximity of Caltrans Right -of -Way (ROW) on State Route 1 (SR 1). Caltrans is a responsible agency and has the following comments: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 1Stormwater 1. Section 3 of the DEIR states that a Caltrans Encroachment Permit will be required for work that encroaches or discharges onto State right of way. A Waster Quality Management Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required for Caltrans 4 2 review prior to encroachment permit approval. For specific details for Encroachment Permits procedure, please refer to the Caltrans' Encroachment Permits Manual at: http://www.dot-ca.gov/hg/traffops/developsenv Mrmitsl 2. Due to the close proximity of the project to the Newport Channel, a separate dewatering permit may be needed from. the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Groundwater extraction and similar waste discharges from construction, remediation, and 4.3 permanent groundwater extraction projects to surface waters are regulated under the general permit, Order No. R8-2007-0041, NPDES No. CAG918002, as amended by Order No. R8-2009-0045. 3. Please be advised that Caltrans Encroachment Permit prohibits the discharge of groundwater onto State facilities. 4-4 "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" Orange County Sanitation District August 4, 2017 Page 2 Please continue to coordinate with Caltrans for any future developments that could potentially impact State transportation facilities. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact 4-5 Maryam Molavi at (657) 328-6280 or mar_yam_molavi(ddot.ca.gov. Sincerely, 7'�a t n a Kwan, AICP Branch hief, Regional-IGR-Transit Planning District "Provide a safe, sustainable, Integraled and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and ltvability" �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 4 Yatman Kwan, AICP, Branch Chief, Regional-IGR-Transit Planning State of California Department of Transportation District 12 August 4, 2017 4-1 This is an introductory comment with a brief project description. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 4-2 This comment acknowledges the inclusion of the required Caltrans Encroachment Permit in the DEIR. The commenter states that a Water Quality Management Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is required for Caltrans review prior to Encroachment Permit approval and provides a link to the Caltrans' Encroachment Permits Manual for more details regarding Encroachment Permits procedures. OCSD would adhere to the Caltrans Encroachment Permit approval requirements. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. 4-3 This comment discusses the potential requirement of a separate dewatering permit due to the close proximity of the project to the Newport Channel. The project requires a General Construction Permit through the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board as required under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ [as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-006-DWQ], NPDES Number CAS000002). Section 5.7, Ha,-ards and Hazardous Materials, page 5.7-13 of the DEIR discusses potential impacts related to dewatering. As stated in the DEIR, the General Construction Permit would ensure that any harmful pollutants or hazardous materials contained within the Newport Bay Channel would be properly handled and disposed of to prevent unsafe exposure to construction workers. Thus, compliance with General Construction Permit would reduce a potential dewatering impact to a less than significant level. 4-4 This comment states that the Caltrans Encroachment Permit prohibits the discharge of groundwater onto State facilities. The Caltrans Encroachment Permit process would ensure that all permit approval requirements are met. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. 4-5 This comment is a closing statement requesting continued coordination with Caltrans for future developments that could impact State transportation facilities and provides contact information for questions. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. Thus, no further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-25 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-26 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 5 CITY OF NEWPORT REACH 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 949 644-3200 newportbeachca.gov/communitydevelopment August 4, 2017 Via Electronic & Regular Marl khadden(a-)ocsd.com Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Re: Comments on Public Review Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project Dear Mr. Hadden, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Public Review Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project (the "Project"). 5-1 The City of Newport Beach ("City") submits the following comments: 1. Project Description a. The project description does not include the gravity sewer construction on East Coast Highway adjacent to the Balboa Marina West property. This construction would significantly impact traffic flow on Coast Highway and could necessitate nighttime work, thus resulting in noise impacts to adjacent residences. The City does not support this project component due these impacts. Relocation of this construction to the south and outside of the Coast Highway right-of-way would significantly reduce these potential impacts. 2. Mitigation Measures a. AES-2: Revise Mitigation Measure language to accurately reflect approval process. As currently written, it states that the pump station plans shall be submitted to City for review, but approval is required by OCSD Director in consideration of comments received from City. However, the pump station is located in the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Zoning District, 5-Z I-V 011 which requires review and approval of Site Development Review permit by 5 5 the City's Planning Commission. b. AES-4: Lighting Plan will require review and approval by the City through the required Site Development Review permit.-4 c. N-1: Revise Mitigation Measure language "City" instead of "Town". ! 5-5 d. TRA-1: The Construction Management Plan will also require review and approval by Caltrans for closures and impacts to their jurisdictional roadways and by the City Public Works Department for road closures, staging, and impacts to City roadways. The Construction Management Plan needs to ensure bike trails remain open during construction or re-routed to ensure connectivity. 3. Page 2-8, the reference to Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PCDP) requires correction to the most current version (November 22, 2016) adopted and included with the City's certified Local Coastal Program (LCP) Implementation Plan. The Back Bay Landing PCDP included in the LCP is similar to the original version adopted by the City on February 25, 2014; however, there are slight changes, including the elimination of the 65-foot public view tower. Any reference to the PCDP should be the November 22, 2016 version. 4. Page 5.1-12, the building height limitation referenced as subsection b) describes a 65-foot height limit for a public view tower; however, that height limit allowance was eliminated from the final Back Bay Landing PCDP version adopted by the City as part of the LCP on November 22, 2016. Please revise height limit references to match the November 22, 2016 adopted version. 57 5-S 5. Page 5.1-13, the Architectural Theme Design Guidelines referenced is from the old PCDP version and has been revised as part of the final November 22, 2016 5-9 adopted version. Please use the most current version. Lower Castawa Lower Castaways is a 4-acre open space area owned by the City located at the northeast corner of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive. This site will be developed as a public park. Exhibit 3-4 (Conceptual Site Plan) and Exhibit 3-6 illustrate the force mains and temp pipe staging impacting a large portion of the City's Lower Castaways site, with the force mains running through the middle of the site. However, exhibit is not consistent with paragraph on Page 3-11 project description that states preferred location of force mains is on southern portion of the Lower Castaways site. 510 I a. The location of the force mains and pipe staging as illustrated on the exhibits is not acceptable to the City as it would severely encumber the site and limit future use of the site. b. Although the project description narrative acknowledges the City,s preferred location on the southern portion of the site, the DER does not analyze 510 potential biological impacts that could result from placing the force mains in that location. Environmental analysis must take into account potential impacts associated with constructing the force mains on the southern portion of the site. c. The City is not acceptable to utilizing Dover Drive for pipe staging and instead would request that Bayside Drive be utilized for pipe staging as that would result in less traffic impacts associated with road closures. The DER 511 should analyze potential environmental impacts associated with the alternative pipe staging area and illustrate on an exhibit. 2. Force Main Improvements (Page 3-12) description states that work would occur within existing disturbed area and pipe staging would occur along Bayside Drive. 512 The work area described and shown on Exhibit would preclude use of the entire site for any other purpose during construction. Cumulative Projects List The cumulative project list included in Table 4-1 (Page 4-2) is out of date and includes projects that have been denied, including AutoNation and 150 Newport Center ❑r. Also, other projects listed as under construction are complete, such as Santa Barbara Condos, Newport Marina ETCO, Newport Beach Country Club. The most current version is attached. Biological Resources Analysis Table 5.3-1 includes policy analysis related to potential biological impacts, concluding that since the project would not affect ESA or ESHA, no survey/analysis would be required. However, as discussed in the project description, the City preferred force main alignment is to be located as closely as possible to the southernmost edge of the Lower Castaways site. That portion of the property is currently vegetated. A biological assessment shall be conducted to ensure potential biological impacts are adequately avoided or mitigated. The policy analysis should be updated to reflect the additional analysis. 513 544 Land Use and Relevant Planning On Page 5.9-8, the second paragraph of LCP summary is outdated. The LCP was certified by the California Coastal Commission on January 13, 2017 and become effective on January 31, 2017. The City's certified LCP will be the standard of review for the coastal development permit. Transportation/Traffic 1. Construction related traffic impacts associated with staging and pipe stringing is discussed related to Dover Drive; however, the City preferred location for pipe stringing is to occur on Bayside Drive. Therefore, please include an alternative analysis of potential construction related impacts on Bayside Drive related to pipe stringing. 515 516 2. East Coast Highway is incorrectly referenced as Pacific Coast Highway throughout the document. The highway is East Coast Highway east of the bridge and West Coast 517 Highway west of the bridge. 3. Pages 1-2, 2-14, 3-2, required permits from the City include a Site Development Review permit for the construction of the pump station. The Site Development 5-18 Review Permit requires Planning Commission approval. Please feel free to contact me at (949) 644-3232 or PAlfordenewportbeachca.gov if you have 5 ,19 any questions. Sincerely, Patrick J. Alford Planning Program Manager Attachment: Cumulative Projects List Cumulative Projects List This list has three parts: Reasonably Foreseeable Projects, CIP (Capital Improvements Program) Reasonably Foreseeable Projects, and Approved Projects Reasonably Foreseeable Discretionary Projects with CEQA review or Traffic Study: Legend: Projects Pending Coastal Commission Review Project Proposed Land UseFdProject Description Location DeterminatioWStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner A conditional use permit, minor site development review, tentative tract ■ Coastal Development map, and coastal development permit Permit No. CD2017-D25 to demolish an existing 9,%2-square- • Site Development and foot commercial building and Construct Application submitted on March 9, Permit Na PerNa. SD2D17- Makana Ullman Sail Lofts a new mixed -use structure with 1,171 d10 and 4i2 291n Street Class incomplete status. Anticipated D03 (PA2017-059) square feet of retail moor area and one Class 32 CEOA Exemption. . Conditional Use Permit Nova 2,347 square foot dwehling unit on Lot No. UP2017-D05 17 and construct three residential a Tract Map No. NT2017- dwelling units ranging from 2,484 D01 (County Tentative square feet to 2,515 square feet over Parcel Map No. 16108) Lots 18 and 19, Newport Pointes A Site Development Review for the development of a mixed -use residential project consisting of 350 rental units 1701 Corinthian Way, 4251, Application submitted on May 31, ■ Site Development Review and 7.500 square feet of retail use on a 4253 & 4255 Martingale Way, 2017. Under review for application No. SD2017-004 Rosalinh 5.7-acre property known as MacArthur 420D, 4220 & 4250 Scott Completeness. Anticipated EIR and . Tentative Tract Map No. Ung Square. The application includes requests for building height adjustment Drive and 1660 Dave Street Traffic Study (TBDj NT2017-002 and a Tentative Tract Map for future condominium purposes. Rev- 2017-06-13-ru F:V lx eVCpp gne edWdm MP. m ❑ y epn CEOP Gmule np_P gJ.p_Li. pumulel m� a eW Cu rentd— ur N G Project Proposed Land UseslProject Location DeterminationlStatus Disrretionary Actions Project Description Planner Harbor Pointe General Plan Amendment, Planned a General Plan Senior Living Community Text Amendment, Amendment No. (PA2015-210) Conditional Use Permit, and Major Site GP2015-004 Development Review for a new a Planned Community approximately 90,000-square-foot Scoping meeting held on August 15, Text Amendment No. convalescent and congregate rare 201& Project being revisited and PD2015-006 Benjamin facility with 121 beds (about 108 care 101 Bayview Place redesigned by appica nl1developer. Site Development Zdeha units). As proposed, the facility will be EIR preparation on hold as of June 6, developed with one level of 2017_ Review No. SD2015-007 subterranean parking and four levels of a Conditional Use Permit Irving area. The project site is currently No. UP2015-047 developed with a sini restaurant a Mitigated Negative and supporting surface parking area. Declaration Benjamin zdeba Little Corona Final MND adopted on March 22. a Mitigated Negative Infiltration (PA2015- Installation of a diversion and infiltration Little Corona Beach 2016. Project is on hold due to Declaration John 096) (15X14) device an a public beach area. difficulties presented at Coastal a Capital Improvement Kappeler, Commission review. Program. City Council Public Works a Planned Community Development Plan Amendment ■ Site Development Plan . Transfer of Koll Newport Development of mixed use residential Application submitted and deemed Development Right Rosalinh Residential of up to 260 units, 3,000 sf.. retail and 4400 Von Karman Ave. complete. EIR preparation is a Traffic Study (PA2015-024j one -acre park. underway_ a Tentative Tract Map Ling a Development Agreement a Environmental Impact Report Rev! 2017-06-13-ru F'WNf61CD0�SMrcEKdmInWYMXny_nnAYon�CEUA+AumaNlw_PloJed_LiMCurtMuiVf�roJWe curcantaocx w AI C Project Proposed Land tlsesfPro)eCt Description Location DeterminationlStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner • General Plan Amendment • Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment Demolition of an existing one-story, • Zoning Code Amendment (Zone 26,219 square foot commercial building Change) and a 55-space subterranean parking • Planned Community garage; and the construction of a Development Plan 70,295 square -foot, 4-story ocean Adoption literacy facility located on the 600 East • Transfer Development Bay parcel; removal of a 63- metered 600 East Bay, 209 Allocation ExplcpDcean space surface parking lot (aka: Palm Washington Street, 600 and Application submitted 0412212014. On . Site Development Rasalinh (PA2014-069) Street Parking Ii located on the 209 608 Balboa Avenue, and 200 hold per applicant's request. Review . Conditional Use Permit Ung Washington Street, 600 and 608 Palm . Traffic Study pursuant to Balboa Avenue, and 200 Palm parcels City's Traff€c Phasing and the construction of a 31 Ordinance (TPO) 141,000 square foot, 5-level off -site Tentative Parcel Map parking structure; and a 6,500 square and Alley Vacation footage Floating classroom to be located • Harbor Development on the waterside of the project, Permit • Coastal Development Permit (by California Coastal Commission) . Environmental Impact Report Rev: 2017-01 F ipepff'.CUpIShm•QrWmin,p��nn�np_pros;cmpEpA+CumuYAire_Progecl_L:alkumukltire-praJxm_wrcanl.aocx Project Proposed Land UseslProject Location DeterminationIStatus Discretionary Actions Project Description Planner . General Plan Amendment, Coastal Land Use Plan Request for legislative approvals to Amendment. Code accommodate the future redevelopment The project was approved by City Amendment, Planned of a portion of the property with a Council on February 11. 2014. The Community mixed -use waterfront project. The 300 E. Coast Highway Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment Development Plan, Lot Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan Generally located at the for the project was approved by the Line Adjustment, Traffic Jaime (PA2011-218) would allow for the development of a northwesterly corner of east California Coastal Commission on Study, and Murillo new enclosed dry stack boat storage Coast Highway and Bayside December 10, 2015 Environmental Impact facility for 140 boats. 61,534 square Drive Site Development Review and Report —approved feet of visitor -serving retail and Coastal Development Permit . CLUP Amendment recreational marine facilities, and up to anticipated to be filed in 2018. approved 49 attached residential units. . Site Development Review B Coastal Development Permit required City of Newport Beach Public Access Balboa Marina and Transient Docks and Expansion of ISIMND was approved by City • ISIMND Expansion Balboa Marina Council on November 25. 2014. SDR . Site Development (PA2012-1Q3j 201 E. Coast Highway and CUP were approved by the City Review Patrick (PA2015-113) 24 boat slips in February 2016. The CDP was . Conditional Use Permit Alford 14.252 SF restaurant approved by the CCC in February CDP (Coastal • 664 SF marina restroom 2017 Commission) Project approved by the City ■ General Plan February 2014- Coastal Land Use Amendment Demolition of the approximately 20,500 720 West Bay Avenue, 800 Plan Amendment application • Coastal Land Use Plan Newport Harbor square foot yacht club facility and West Say Avenue, 711-721 withdrawn from California Coastal Amendment Jim Yacht Club construction of a new 23.163 square West Bay Avenue, and 710- Commission in September 2015, • Zoning Code Campbell (PA2012-091) foot facility. The yacht club use will 720 Balboa Boulevard Coastal Commission considers a Amendment remain on the subject property. Coastal Development Permit for the . Planned Development repiacement yacht club on Marchl0. Permit 2016. Under construction ■ Conditional Use Permit PC Development Plan A 275-room, 201,498-square-foot, hotel • Site Development on 14.3 acres. Amenities include a West side of the Newport Review Newport Dunes coffee shop, gift/sundry shop, business Dunes Resort Swimming APPlication incomplete. . Conditional Use Permit Patrick Hotel (PA2016-175) center, function rooms, spaMtness Lagoon at 1131 Back Bay . Coastal Development Alford facilities, restaurant, pool, tennis courts, Drive. Permit sand volleyball courts and picnic area. . Environmental Impact Report Rev_ 2017-06-13-ru F:wsersiCooVSn.re6V.dmmWlannng_oinvo�ICEoniCum�lewe_Projmt_Lise—muim—_prove &_wrrenl.do w 14 t' Project Proposed Land UseslProject Location DeterrninationlStatus Discretionary Actions Project Description Planner AELUP: Airport Environs Land Use Plan; COP: Coastal Development Permit; CUP: Conditional Use Permit; cy: cubic yards; DA: Development Agreement: DTSP: Downtown Specifx Plan: EIR: Environmental Impact Report; FAA: Federal Aviation Adminislratlon: GP& General Plan Amendment: gsC gross square feet; HOGS: Huntington Beach Generating Station; I- 405: Interstate 405 freeway; IBC, Irvine Business Complex: IS: Wiat Study: ITC: Irvine Technology Center: LAFCO: Local Agency Formatlan Commission; LCP: Local Coastal Program: MCAS: Marine Corps Air Station; MND: Mitigated Negative Declaration; ND: Negative Declaration; PA: Planning Area; PC: Planned Community; sf; squarefeet; SP7 Specific Plan: SR-73: State Route 73; TDR: transfer of development rights; TPM: Tentative Parcel Map; TTM: Tentative Tract Map; VTTM: Vesting Tentative Tract Map; ZC: Zone Change Rev' 2017-06-13-ru F:1Lfx CDDlSbar�m )Pranning_DeeWi lCEgA%CumuleWe_Prcpa _wrremktl� CIP Projects with CEQA review: Project Proposed Land Uses/Project Location Determinationlstatus Discretionary Project Description Planner Benjamin Zdeba Little Corona Final MND adapted an March 22. • Mitigated Negative Infiltration (PA2015 Installation of a diversion and infiltration Little Carona Beach 2016. Project is on hold due to Declaration John 096){75X14) device on a public beach area. difficulties presented at Coastal . Capital Improvement Kappeler, Commission review. Program, City Council Public Works Widens the westbound side of West . IS/Negative Declaration Coast Highway at Old Newport . Capital Improvement Old Newport Boulevard to accommodate a third Consultant was selected for project Program, City Council Patrick BIvd.NUest Coast through lane, a right turn pocket and a g 9 Intersection of Old Newport design in March of 2016, Negative g 9 Arciniega, Hwy Widening bike lane. Realignment of Old Newport Boulevard and West Coast Declaration draft is completed. City is Public [t5R19j Boulevard maximizes the right turn Highway requesting lead agency status from Works pocket storage length and improves Cal Trans. roadway geometries. Lower Sunset View Possible pedestrian overcrossings, An RFP for design services was sent . Capital Improvement And Fan, y Park Bridge, Parking parking and park uses for Lower Sunset Intersection of West Coast in December of 2015, CEQA Program, City Council Public Lot and Park View Park. Highway and SuperiorAvenue determination TBD. Works (15R09) • Mitigated Negative Balboa Island Project initiated in 2011. A consultant Declaration Bob Stein, Seawall New seawall along the Grand Canal Balboa Island has been selected for the project • Capital Improvement Public Reconstruction and on the west end of Balboa Island, design. The RFP process has not yet Program, City Council Works (151-111 ) been initiated for the MND. Arches drain outlet is the endpoint for . Capital Improvement two large storm drains that collect and Program, City Council deliver runoff from neighboring areas to Newport Harbor. The west storm drain collects runoff from Hoag Hospital and Arches Storm Drain areas upstream and the east storm Project initiated in 2015. CEOA John Diversion drain runs along Old Newport Newport Boulevard north of determination TBD (exemption?). Kappeler, {t6X11] Boulevard and into Costa Mesa Coast Highway Anticipated project start date, Public upstream of 151h Street. A conceptual September 2016. Works plan to divert dry weather flows from these two subwatersheds to the sanitary sewer system has been prepared. Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F:LLlae.alCf]O'Sheied41dmi0Nannug_D:rieio.r+CEalilCumulelrve_Pmjed�Lialkumufa6ueyraje Cta_U-4.d— Project Proposed Land Uses/Project Location DeterminatlordStatus Discretionary Actions Project Description Planner Restores a drainage reach subject to City Council authorized project in • Capital Improvement John Bayview Heights erosion and creates a wetland at the Headlands area of Li Upper Bay May of 2015. Agency permit Program, City Council I(appeler, Drainage Treatment and of the reach to benefit downstream of Mesa Drive applications were submitted March of Public (15xil) environmental water q ual ity. 2016. CEQA determination TBD (exemption?) Works Divert about one third of the dry- . Mitigated Negative weather flow from the creek into a Declaration bioreactor. The bioreactor strips . Capital Improvement selenium and other impurities from the Program, City Council flaw. Clean flow is returned to the creek Big Canyon Rehab to reduce the concentration of pollutants within the stream by 30-35 Big Canyon, downstream of Resource agency applications John Kappeier, Project percent. Storm flows from Jamboree Jamboree Road and south of submitted March of 2016. Draft MND Public 115XI12j Road also will be directed to the top Big Canyon Creek issued for public comment March 4, 2016. Works level of this bioreactortwetlands to strip roadway pollutants from the flow before the flow rejoins the creek. Partial streambed and canyon restoration are components of this project. • Capital Improvement Patrick Bay Crossings Replaces deteriorating water Program, City Council Arciniega, Water Main transmission mains pursuant to the Newport Harbor A consultant has been selected for Public Replacement Water Master Plan and Bay Crossing the project design. CEQA TBD Works (16W12) Water Transmission Study. Rev: 2017-06-13-ru FiV� CDDZhamd45dminWiann-g_Diviw ICEQAWumutaf m PWJvd_LiwbwmWa0m_ projws_cu.ronl da IN ca Discretionary Projects with CEQA review and Traffic Study Approved by the City and Percent Occupied: Project Proposed Land Uses Location DeterminatlonfStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied Planning Commission . Minor Use Permit No. ENC Preschool Environmental Nature Center 745 Dover Drive Approved 01l2112016. Class 32 CEQA Exemption. Plans UP2015.020 Makana Nova Yes 0 (PA2015.079) Preschool have not been submitted for Traffic Study No. plan check at this time. TS2015-001 Park Avenue Demolish and replace Park Avenue MND adopted/approved by . Mitigated Negative Bridge bridge that connects Balboa Island Balboa Island City Council November 25. Declaration No. Gregg Ramirez No 00A Replacement (PA2014-135) and Little Balboa Island. 2014' Under construction NQ201d-OD2 • Site Development Review No. S02014- 005 The project includes the re- Application submitted on Minor Use Permit No. subdivision of four lots into three 1cts 20350 & 2036D 08lD512014. UP2014-032 Birch Newport for commercial development and for Birch Street Application and Addendum to • Traffic Study No. Executive condominium purposes, and the M N D approved by Planning TS2014-006 Jaime Murillo Yes 0% Center construction of two, 2-story medical [Formerly 20352 — Commission on • Parcel Map No. PA2014-121 I } office buildings totaling 64,000 9 9 20412 Birch St} permit issued bough grading permits issued Np2014-D17 square feet in gross floor area and a February 25, 2016. 324-space surface parking lot. • Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration (PA2006- 2&0) Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F xJmra%CD11ShawdV%dmimP1enmg_DivmnICE0AC—kllre_PrDjae Llsticum MmpmJecla_cu .do AI ca Project Proposed land Uses Location DaterminationlStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied The project irid udes a Tentative Tract Map application to subdivide a 4.7-acre site for 83 residential lots and a Site Development Review Application submitted on • Tentative Tract Map application for the construction of 83 0612012014. No. NT2014-002 single -unit residences, private An MN was prepared. The . Tragic Study No. streets, common open space, and project was approved and the TS2014-007 Ebb Tide landscaping. The Planned 1560 Placentia MND was adapted by the Planned Development (PA2014-110) Community Development Plan is Drive Planning Commission on Permit No. PL2015- Jim Campbell Yes 01 proposed to establish guidelines for August 6, 2015. development of the project site Under construction. 001 consistent with the General Plan. Completion of initial phases • Mitigated Negative The Code Amendment is proposed to anticipated in late 2017 or Declaration No. amend the Zoning Map to change the early 2018. ND2015-002 Zoning District from Multiple -Unit Residential (RM) to Planned Community [PC]. . General Plan Project approved by the City Amendment General Plan Amendment, Coastal September 2014. • Coastal Land Use Land Use Plan Amendment, and Plan Amendment Lido House Zoning Amendment to change site Coastal Development Permit . Zoning Code Hotel from Public Facilities to Visitor- 3300 Newport issued February 2016- Amendment at the former serving commercial and increase the Boulevard and • Site Development Jim Campbell Yes 0% city hall allowable building height. Demolition 475 32"1 Street Demolition complete and new Review complex of former city hall buildings and the construction underway. . Conditional Jse {PA2013-217} construction of a 13C1-room upscale Permit hotel. Fire Station ill to remain at Completion of construction • Ground Lease current location. anticipated by summer of . Environmental Impact 2018. Report Construction of two building and a 2011, 2043, 2121. Class 32 CEQA exemption, three -level parking structure, an and 2131 June 19. 2014: Planning Site Development WesYcliif addition to an existing building, and Westcliff Drive. Commission Approved. Review Medical the demolition of 25,339 square feet Bounded by Demolition complete and Jim Campbell Yes Q I (PA2013 154) of building area. The project would Westctiff Drive, construction underway. Traffic Study result to four buildings totaling 7 Irvine Avenue, Completion by the end of Lot Merger square feet. The total amount off off- off- and Sheringtan 2018- street parking would be 382 spaces. Place. Rev: 2017-06-13-ru r+u:eacornsnarnawdm. �nni� ion ceoa cumuuuw_Prged_wncvm�uawyrq•as_wmnr.aax Project Proposed Land Uses Location Determinationf5tatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied • General Plan Building permits have expired Amendment and require a new plan check . Coastal Land Use submittal and updates to the Plan Amendment Request for the demolition of an 3303 and 3355 Building Code. Discretionary applications are still valid since Zoning Code Lida Villas existing church and office building Via Lida tract map was submitted to Amendment (DART) and legislative approvals for the Generally Public Works for recordation. . Planned Community Makana Nova No 0% (PA2012-148) development of 23 attached three- bounded by Via Application approved Development Plan story townhome condominiums. Lido. Via Oporto, and Via Malaga. November 12. 2013. CLUP Site Development Amendment approved by CCC Review on March 12. 2014. CDP application Approved by CCC • IS/Mitigated Negative on 10/0912014. Declaration . Tentative Tract Map Amendment to the North Newport Center Planned Community (NNCPC), which is the zoning document that establishes land uses, Villas Fashion development standards, and • Transfer of Island procedures for development within The project was approved by Development {Formerly San seven sub -areas of the Newport 1101 San Joaquin the City Council on August 14, Planned Community Jaime Murillo Joaquin Plaza Center Area of the City. Primarily the Hills Road 2012. Text Amendment Yes 10% Apartments) request involves increasing the e Development Benjamin Zdeba (PA2612-020) residential development allocation Under construction. Agreement within the NNCPC from 430 dwelling . Traffic Study units to a total of 524 dwelling units (increase of 94 units) and allocating the units to the San Joaquin Plaza sub -area - Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F:lUaeraYCt)dShmedAdmin0eming_DideionKEQMOumWabw Prged_Lisfi mulavve j r jack_—n[ dmx Project Proposed Land Uses Location Determination/Status Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied • PC Development Plan EIR, Tentative Tract Map, Amendment and Traffic Study, and AHIP were Adoption Uptown approved by City Council on • Tentative Tract Map Newport Development of 1.244 residential Jamb 4a21ree 212612013. The PC • Traffic Study (TPG) Mixed Use units and 11.500 sf, of commercial o Rd Jamboree Development Plan and • AHIP Rasalinh Ung Yes 0°/': Development retail Development Agreement were . DA (PA2011-434) approved on 311212013. ■ Airport Land Use Construction for Phase 1 Commission development is underway ■ Environmental Impact Repo rt • PC Development Plan Amendment Approved by the City Council Transfer of MacArthur at on October 25. 2011. PC Development Rights Dolphin -Striker Demolition of a 7,9K-sf restaurant 4221 Dolphin- Development Plan approved • c Study (TPO) Way and development of 12,351 sf Sinker Way on November 22, 2D11, The CUP CUP Rvsalinh Ung Yes 901c (PA2010-135) commercial retail. project is completed. The - Waiver of DA freestanding building pad is constructed but not occupied. . Modification Permit • Mitigated Negative Declaration 10 Big Canyon Mitigated Negative Declaration for ISIMND approved 12/2012011, (PA2010-D92] rough grading for development of a 10 Big Canyon Project has not been . ISIMND Makana Nava No 0% single-family residence. constructed. Amendment to Sayview Planned On June 22, 2010 City Council Community (PC-32) text to add approved Resolution Nv. D.I.S.C. 3507 outpatient surgery and medical office 2010-070 finding that Traffic Jamboree Rd as permitted uses and to add a Parking requirement of 11200 square 3501 Jamboree Study No. TS201D-002 . PC Amendment and 361 for such uses. Includes Traffic Rd. and 301 complies with the TPO and on . Traffic Study complies Melinda Whelan Yes 100% Bayfeet Circle study pursuant to TPO for conversion Bayview Circle July approved with TPO (PIA20w (PA2D1D Oli2] of 38. 759 square feet of general a ce 0-12 Ordinance No. office and retail to outpatient surgical ne Co approving Planned Community center, Amendment No- PD2010004. Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F:Hhan�CODt4n�©AWWm+�Wwnnie�GvalamCEn+1+.Cumul�Y.n Pmkc�LhKumuGeVayrgecn wnens.¢acx Project Proposed Land Uses Location DeterminationlStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied Building permits for residential portion issued 0311712017. Commercial portion submitted for plan check June 30, 2014. Application approved by • Site Development Planning Commission on Review Plaza Corona Development of 1,750 sf new office 1103113, Stair Approval No. • Variance del Mar space and six (6) detached ig hwaEast Coast Highway Coast y SA2013-015 (PA2C13-245) . Conditional Use Makana Nova No 0 (PA2010-081 ) townhomes. approved December 10, 2013 Permit and Staff Approval No. Tentative Tract Map SA2014-April 10, 2015 to allow . Modification Permit the reconstruction of Gallo's and reduction of commercial scope. CEQA Class 32 exemption. Modification Permit Old Newport Demolition of 3 existing buildings to ISIMN❑ and project approved ■ Traffic Study PA Project construct a new 25,000 sf medical 328. 332, and 340 on March 9, 2010. Demolition ■ Use Permit Jaime Murillo Yes 0°h ( 047] office building. building. Old Newport Blvd and grading permits issued . GP Amendment March 6, 2015. . Mitigated Negative Declaration ■ EIR Hoag • GP Amendment Memorial Reallocation of up to 225,000 sf of 1 Hoag Dr, Final EIR certified and project . Planned Community Hospital previously approved (but not northwest of West approved on May 13, 2008- No Development Plan Presbyterian yt constructed ]square footage from the Coast Hwy and new major development has (PC) Tex! Amendment Jim Campbell Yes 0°Io Master Plan Lower Campus to the Upper Newport Blvd been constructed or is planned . Development Update Project Campus. in the near future. Agreement (PA2007 073] Amendment COP {CCC) Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F wwm+CDashaadwdminwia--,N_DiOsimICEGACumuW m Proj.d Livb Lah a prq.u._w�I.d= Project Proposed Land Uses location Determination)Status Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied Residanti ai development including 201--207 EIR the following: (a) the demolition of the Camation Ave Final EIR was certified and • GP Amendment existing residential structures on the and 101 Bayside project approved by the City • Coastal Lard Use Poject AERIE r AERI 1.4-acre site; (b) the development of PI; southwest of on July 14, 2009, A CDP has Plan (CLOP) 5-198) 8 residential condominium units; and Bayside Drive been approved by the Coastal Amendment Jim Campbell No 0% (c) the replacement, reconfiguration, between Bayside Commission. Project is under . Zone Change and expansion of the existing PI and Carnation construction with completion . Tract Map gangway platform, pier walkway, and Ave, Corona del anticipated by mid 2018. . Modification Permit dark facilities on the site. Mar ■ CDP (CCC) Newport FOR certified in February Site Plan Review Mar Manna — A mixed use development consisting 23t70 Newport 2006. TentaWe Tract Map extended in October 2Q10. The Use Permit ETCO of 27 residential units and Boulevard project is under construction . Tentative Tract Map Jim Campbell 0% Development approximately 36,000 square feet of and is anticipated to be • Environmental Impact (PA2Q01-210) retail and office uses complete by summer 2017. Report An ISIMND was released for public review on April 11. ■ GP Amendment 2011. The MN❑ was certified • Code Amendment and the project approved by ■ CUP Mariners A 19,905-sr, two-story commercial 100 West Coast the City Council on August 9, ■ Variance Pointe building and a three-story parking Highway 2011. Construction completed . Site Development Jaime MuIllo Yes 66% (PA2010-114) structure. on October 30, 2014, and Review tenants are beginning to . Traffic Study occupy suites. (43% occupied, . Mitigated Negative 23% TI in process, 34% Declaration vacant). Newport Demolition of 2 existing connected 4699 Jamboree The City Council approved the ' GP Amendment • PC text amendment Business Plaza Project buildings to construct a new 46.044 Road and 5190 project on January 25, 2011. The project has not been . Tentative Parcel Map Janet Brown o 01 (PA2008-164) gross square foot business plaza. Campus Drive constructed.Declaration Mitigated Negative Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F.wwalcoovshmeduaminwiu�i,LoMmmceon+cumum. we Proj. Project Proposed Land Uses Location DeterminationlStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent occupied Increase the maximum allowable An ISIMND was released for PRIES Office entitlement by 11,544 gross sT; public review on May 19, 2070. • GP Amendment Building B increase the maximum allowable 4300 Von Kerman The MIND was certifled and the ■ PC Text Amendment Project entitlement in office suite B by 9.917 Ave project approved by the City ■ Parcel Map Janet Brown ❑ I (PA2007-213) net sf to allow for development of a Council on February 22. 2011. ■ Mitigated Negative now 2-lave€ office building over a Project has not been Declaration ground -level parking structure. constructed. AELUP: Airport Environs Land Use Plan: CDP: Coastal Development Permit; CLIP: Conditional Use Permit; cy: cubic yards: DA: Development Agreement; DTSP: Downtown Speeiftc Plan: FIR- Environmental Impact Report: FAA Federal Aviation Administration: GPA- General Plan Amendment: gsf: gross square feel; HBGS: Huntington Beach Generating Station; 1-405: Interstate 405 freeway; IBC: Irvine Business Complex; IS: initial Study; ITC: Irvine Technology Center; LAFCO: Local Agency Formation Commission; LCP: Local Coastal Program; MCAS: Marine Corps Air Station; MNO: Mitigated Negative Declaration; NO: Negative Declaration: PA: Planning Area; PC: Planned Community; sT: square feet: SP: Specific Plan: SR-73: State Route 73: TOR: transfer of development rights; TPM: Tentative Parcel Map; TTM: Tenlafve Tract Map; VTTM: Vesting Tentative Tract Map: ZC! Zone Change Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F.WserelCDDYShamdlAdminTlenning_DmmniCEORiG-149re_ProleaLigt Aabm_prulepe_wnem.do flit N 40 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 5 Patrick Alford, Planning Program Manager City of Newport Beach August 4, 2017 5-1 This is an introductory comment. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 5-2 The City of Newport Beach expressed concern regarding the construction of the proposed gravity sewer improvements along East Coast Highway. In response to the City's concerns, OCSD has provided a potential option to construct the new gravity sewer on the Balboa Marina West property, which is owned by the Irvine Company. The optional alignment would traverse the property from a west to east direction, beginning at the gravity sewer connection within Bayside Drive and terminating approximately 645 feet within the Balboa Marina West property parking lot; refer to Exhibit 1, Gravity Sewer Alignment Obtion. OCSD is currently discussing this option with affected property owners (including the Irvine Company). If the property owners agree to this optional alignment, the construction of the gravity sewer would occur in conjunction with the construction of the Balboa Marina West Expansion project. As shown in Exhibit 1, the optional alignment would occur within a previously disturbed area (i.e., a paved parking lot) associated with the Balboa Marina West facility. As noted in the City's comment, this optional alignment would occur at a slightly greater distance from the nearest sensitive receptors (residential uses northeast of the intersection of East Coast Highway/Bayside Drive). As such, it is not anticipated that implementation of this optional alignment would result in a new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of an impact that has been identified in the DEIR. If the affected property owners do not agree to this optional alignment, the gravity sewer improvements would be required to remain along East Coast Highway, as described on DEIR pages 3-7, 3-10, and 3-12. However, as noted in Section 5.11, Transbortation/Trac, of the DEIR, short-term impacts along East Coast Highway would be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-1. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would require engineering drawings and specifications that would implement a variety of measures to minimize traffic impacts. The engineering drawings and specifications would be subject to approval by OCSD, Caltrans, and the City to ensure that impacts would be minimized to a level below significance. 5-3 To address this comment, Mitigation Measure AES-2 has been revised as follows. In addition, minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure AES-2 on DEIR page 5.1-17 have been included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process. AES-2 Prior to construction of the new pump station facility, OCSD shall submit design plans of the proposed pump station to the City of Newport Beach Director 0 Gaffiffitifiky Development for review and approval the City's Planning Commission or delegated authority for Site Development Review and to determine consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP design guidelines. Tke Orange County Safikation District Difeefor of R*neer-i� shall pfovide I—ew afid approval of design plans, in consideration of coffiments received Final . December 2017 2-45 Responses to Comments v v x Al fill J mom ®� menial-. - _. $ r r *Coast.Hlgh�quilr A r - 9' } # ♦ �i elm lipIlk Michael Baker �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 5-4 Comment noted. To address this comment, Mitigation Measure AES-4 has been revised as follows. In addition, minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure AES-4 on DEIR page 5.1- 19 have been included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process AES-4 Prior to construction of the proposed pump station, the eantraetor sh&U provide lighting plans shall be provided to the Orange County Sanitation District r,.reeto f of LfMif ee for review and approval, and to the City of Newport Beach for review and approval the City's Planning Commission for Site Development Review. The lightinplan shall mating illustrate consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP regulations for lighting. Per these requirements, all outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed, located, and maintained to minimize impacts to adjacent sites and to not produce glare onto adjacent sites or roadways. 5-5 To address this comment, Mitigation Measure NOI-1 has been revised as follows. In addition, minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure NOI-1 on DEIR page 5.10-16 have been included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process. NOI-1 Prior to the initiation of construction, the Orange County Sanitation District shall confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications stipulate that: • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. The Orange County Sanitation District shall provide a qttftli€ieel "Noise Disturbance Coordinator." The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement rye measures to comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. The een aet naffie and th construction hotline telephone number d Dii-st.l-r-Lb flee Geor-dinato shall be clearly posted on -site. • When feasible, construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • T ical construction activities that produce noise shall not take place outside of the allowable hours specified by the City of Newport Beach Final . December 2017 2-47 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Municipal Code Section 10.28.040 (7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays; construction is prohibited on Sundays and/or federal holidays). Alternative work hours may be designated by the City to reduce other impacts, such as traffic. 5-6 To address this comment, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 has been revised as follows. In addition, minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure TRA-1 on DEIR page 5.11-6 through 5.11-8 have been included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process. TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, en6neering drawings and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District D -_ _fer of Maine_ r-_�� California Department of Transportation_ and the City Public Works Department. The Gaiistfuetieft Manageffient Pla These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: • Traffic control for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open during construction or re-routed to ensure continued connectivity, OGTA Bus stop access imp shall be mined coordinated with OCTA. At least three business days before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the Newport Befteh Fire Depaftment, Departffient, and City of Newport Beach Public Works Department, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for uninterrupted emergency access. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project. • Identify any off -site construction staging or material storage sites. • Specify the hours during which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets. • Require the Contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited, to, gravel and dirt resulting from its operations. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange Final . December 2017 2-48 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project County Sanitation District, of any material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas. • Hauling or transport of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except what is required to provide direct access to the project site. • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All constructed -related parking and staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on -site or within other off-street areas. • Construction -related lane closures will would only occur between the hours of 9tGO 8:30 a.m. and 3 00 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. • Use of a construction flagperson to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions, particularly during peak travel hours, and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway, Dover Drive, and Bayside Drive are affected. •This Genstimuetion Alanageffient Plaft The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). 5-7 The comment states that the most recent version of the Bay Back Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PDCP) was adopted on November 22, 2016. However, after further dialogue with City of Newport Beach staff, it was confirmed that the Aprl 26, 2016 version is indeed the latest document. The DEIR has been revised to reflect this version of the PCDP. Paragraph one on DEIR page 2-8 has been revised as follows: Final . December 2017 2-49 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) (adopted February 25, 2014, Ordinance No. 2014-4(PA2011-216) and Amended April 26, 2016, Ordinance No. 2016-8). The Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) (Back Bay Landing PCDP) is a redevelopment plan involving a mixed -use waterfront project. This project would construct a dry stack boat storage facility for 140 boats, 61,534 square feet of visitor -serving retail and recreational marine facilities, and up to 49 attached residential units. The Back Bay Landing PCDP establishes appropriate zoning regulations governing land use and development of the Planned Community site, consistent with the General Plan and CLUP. The Back Bay Landing PCDP provides a vision for the land uses on the site, sets the development standards and design guidelines for specific project approvals at the Site Development Review and Community Development Plan approval stage, and regulates the long term operation of the developed site. Section 10.0, page 10-2 of the DEIR has been revised as follows: City of Newport Beach, Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9), Adopted February 25, 2014 and Amended April 26. 2016. 5-8 As explained in the previous response, the most recent version of the PCDP was adopted on April 26, 2016. The following revisions were made to reflect this amended version of the PCDP. DEIR pages 5.1-11 and 5.1-12, Subsection B, Permitted Height of Structures has been revised as follows: B. Permitted Height of Structures 1. Building Height The maximum allowable building height shall be 35 feet for structures with flat roofs and 40 feet for structures with sloped roofs (minimum 3:12 pitch), except as follows: a) As illustrated on Exhibit 3, Building Heights, 100 feet from back of curb along Bayside Drive within the eastern portion of Planning Area 1, maximum allowable building height shall not exceed 26 feet for flat roofs and 31 feet for sloped roofs. Final . December 2017 2-50 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project e- b) Within Planning Area 1, maximum allowable height for any parking structure shall not exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs. 4} e) All other exceptions to height shall be regulated pursuant to Section 20.30.060.D of the Municipal Code. 5-9 Comment noted. DEIR pages 5.1-13, Subsection A, Architectural Theme has been revised as follows: A. Architectural Theme The development shall be designed with a Coastal Mediterranean architectural theme. This architectural theme is influenced by the elifnate of the comes froffi, and appli— rovided. Thick and textured > buH nose borders, terraeott e0lors Lh —s. --al and stofie details are discussed. The style is marked by the us windows and doors, e ;s, and decoraeve ir-on tfim. The intent fis flat to select a histofically specific or rigid architectural style for the project, but to help shap the ehar-aeter- of the area and r-eflee, ill_ _. The development shall be designed with a Coastal architectural theme. This architectural theme is influenced by the marine climate of the California coastline. with varied historical vernacular and casually elegant palette, with building forms and massing that define and create unique and often seamless indoor/outdoor spaces. The project would follow principles of quah�n. exhibitinga high level of architectural standards and shall be compatible with the surrounding area, sensitive to scale. proportion, and identity with a focus on place -making. Massing offsets. variation of roof lines, varied textures, openings, recesses, and design accents on all building elevations shall be provided to enhance the architectural design. The intent is not to select a historicall�pecific or rigid architectural style for the project, but to create an active, mixed -use village. 5-10 This comment states that the location of the force mains within the Lower Castaways Park site and pipe staging along Dover Drive is not acceptable to the City as it would severely encumber the site and limit future use of the site. The City expresses a preference that the force mains be constructed in the southerly portion of the Lower Castaways Park site. As a means of resolving this concern, OCSD has investigated the possibility of shifting the force main improvements to be within the southerly portion of the site; refer to Exhibit 2, Conce tual Site Plan. The temporary construction staging area would encompass the entire Lower Castaways Park site as analyzed in the DEIR. The shift of the force mains further south would move the borehole locations and work areas further to the south, in addition to the force main alignment that would occur via horizontal directional drilling (HDD) or microtunneling. Final . December 2017 2-51 Responses to Comments F�...GOABT HIGFPNAV Source: Michael Baker International, August 29 2017, Note: This plan is considered conceptual and subject to minor refinement during the final design phase. LEGEND ALIEEN VE 9A FACILmf51PUMP STATION. ELEGTULAL. I GOMiAOL GENEEA.ri OPEN CUr AEEA IALT $1 PIPELINES I FM TUNNEL GREENING NEW— EUANNPL BY HWW I MN'EOTUNNr1 0 EECAYA . O—UEANGE F.NN00 MICEONNNELING ACROSS I -- CALrEANO MIR OF WAY a• o �� / �p / a.m rs.Po i FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NOT TO SCALE E=-Pl1 Cog BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT INTEENAlIOConceptual Site Plan C6/17 dN 143698 Exhibit 2 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE By shifting the alignment south, construction activities would encroach into a vegetated area within the southerly extent of the Lower Castaways site (whereas the DEIR assumed the work area would be limited to unvegetated areas only). Based on a review of site conditions, the southern half of Lower Castaways Park is entirely disturbed, primarily consisting of bare ground and gravel, with the western and southern perimeters dominated by non-native ornamental trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Dominants include eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.), acacia (Acacia sp.), ngaio tree (1Vlyoporum laetum), giant cane (Arundo donax), Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis), and Hottentot fig (Carpobrotus edulis), with patches of native saltgrass (Disticblis spicata) scattered throughout. The eastern portion of the Lower Castaways site consists of bare ground where recreational water craft parking and access to Newport Bay waters is located. Special - status species with the potential to occur within this area are primarily limited to nesting birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code, particularly during the bird breeding season (typically January through July for raptors and February through August for other birds). Mitigation Measure BIO-1 of the DEIR would implement requirements to minimize impacts to nesting birds consistent with the MBTA, and would reduce impacts to a level below significance (minor editorial revisions to BIO-1 are noted below to provide clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process). A small drainage feature is located in the northwest portion of Lower Castaways Park where off -site storm flows surface from a heavily -buried culvert and re-enter another heavily -buried culvert approximately 40 feet to the west before being conveyed off -site; however, this feature is outside of the area proposed for development. Based on analysis provided within the DEIR and a review of on - site conditions, the slight shift of the force main facilities to the southerly portion of Lower Castaways Park would not result in any new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of an impact that has been identified in the DEIR. Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure BIO-1 on DEIR page 5.3-10 has been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 has been revised as follows: BIO-1 To the extent feasible, construction activities shall be scheduled outside of the nesting season (typically February 15 to August 15) to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds. However, if construction must occur during the nesting season, all suitable habitat surrounding the project site shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist prior to commencement of site disturbance activities. If an active avian nest is discovered in proximity to the project site during the nesting bird survey, construction activities shall stay outside of a 300-foot buffer around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer shall be expanded to 500 feet. A biological monitor shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest in order to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. The buffer area and limitations on construction may be reduced upon coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, provided the nesting behaviors are not disrupted by construction activities. Once the young have fledged, normal construction activities shall be allowed to occur. Final . December 2017 2-53 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 5-11 In response to the City's concerns regarding pipe staging, OCSD has provided a potential option for pipe staging activities along Bayside Drive as shown on Exhibit 3, Temporary Pipe Stringinn Alignment Option. The optional construction pipe staging alignment would be approximately 1,457 feet in length and would extend approximately 250 feet from the HDD/microtunneling pit to Bayside Drive, continue approximately 990 feet east along Bayside Drive, and would terminate approximately 220 feet northeast of the guard shack associated with the Newport Dunes Resort Marina. The pipe staging areas would encompass proposed pipe stringing activites, which would involve placing piping above ground within existing roadway right-of-way and below ground, using a steel casing sleeve, within the existing driveways in order to maintain traffic flow. If this optional alignment is selected, the pipe stringing activities would occur for approximately 4 to 6 weeks in conjunction with the construction of the proposed force mains. During this time, existing street parking and sidewalk access would be affected. However, these temporary impacts would be short-term and would cease upon completion of pipe stringing activities. As parking and sidewalk access would remain on the other side of Bayside Drive during this time, these temporary impacts would be less than significant. This potential pipe stringing option would occur entirely within disturbed areas (existing roadway) and would not involve substantial ground disturbance, aside from driveway locations to maintain access to adjacent properties. In addition, Mitigation Measures AES-1, which would ensure staging areas are sited and screened to minimize visual impacts (minor editorial revisions to AES-1 are noted below to provide clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process), NOI-1 (refer to Response 5-5 above), and TRA-1 (refer to Response 5-2 above) would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. If this optional alignment is not selected, the pipe stringing would occur along Dover Drive as analyzed in the DEIR. Based on analysis provided within the DEIR and a review of the proposed optional pipe stringing alignment, this option would not result in any new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of an impact that has been identified in the DEIR. Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure AES-1 on DEIR page 5.1-16 has been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure AES-1 has been revised as follows: AES-1 Prior to issuance of any grading and/or demolition permits, whichever occurs first, ft Gefistfuefien Alftnftgefnent Pla engineering drawings a�pecifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation DistrictDi_____ ofFng ______ These documents shall, at a minimum, indicate the equipment and vehicle staging areas, stockpiling of materials, fencing (i.e., temporary fencing with opaque material), and haul route(s). Staging areas shall be sited and/or screened in order to minimize public views to the maximum extent practicable. Construction haul routes shall minimize impacts to sensitive uses in the project area by avoiding local residential streets, as feasible. Final . December 2017 2-54 Responses to Comments J ♦:- � ":\ >> ` - f � jL, ;,cam. wr `m y Bayside Cave J�ft •�..� ti lob IPA lo � oar_ _ �� " �—� � � ! �/ � �� - �j. �� .� � .� . 9• -East Coast Highwj ay. Michael Baker Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project 5-12 Refer to Response 5-10, above. 5-13 Comment noted. The list of cumulative projects provided in Section 4.0, Basis of Cumulative Anal sis, Table 4-1, Cumulative PraLects List was derived based on information provided by the cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa. The geographic areas were determined based upon the project's scope and anticipated area in which the project could contribute to an incremental increase in cumulatively considerable impacts. DEIR pages 4-2 through 4-5, have been revised as follows: Table 4-1 Cumulative Projects List Location Proposed Land Use Status City of Newport Beach 2 Dncirinn+iol Tower 850 con Clemente Drove ' mp h �"�rr `'' Deyelepmen+ of o 100 uni+ Dod+i d-enol TPA D.nnoro+inn of CIA 2 Auden ghway, Newport BeaGh and Qnniinn Conility. planning nfT CnyOrommPn+;;l Docent. Traffie GeRsultant to be k4Rt #ie� 3 150 Newport Genter Newport Beash Drnnoratinn of CID 4 ad � �� nlnninn r+ Rai &VAr d from � — .rnn+ onrl ` 3201 nln,.,nnr+Rn��ln„nr,+ improvements; southbound through lane aleRg to 32nd C+rnn+ terminating as o gdStree �d. Coastal �°"�'"'�'� DeyelepmeR+ Permot Ossued Newport BeaGh 1 Ullman Sail Lofts 410 and 412 29th Street Development of a mixed -use Anticipated CEQA structure with 1.171 square feet of retail floor area, one 2.347 square foot dwelling unit and Exemption. three residential dwelling units ranging from 2.484 square feet to 2,515 square feet. 2 = Newport Dunes Hotel 1131 Back Bay Drive Development of a 275-room. Application incomplete. 201,498 square -foot hotel on 14.3 acres. Amenities include a coffee shop_giftlsundry shop. business center, function room spa/fitness facilities, restaurant. pool, tennis courts, sand volleyball courts and picnic area. Final . December 2017 2-56 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status Construction of a 70,295 square - foot, 4-story Ocean Literacy Facility. This project would 600 East Bay, 209 include removal of 63-metered Application 53 ExplorOcean3 Washington Street, 600 and space surface parking lot; submitted April - 608 Balboa Avenue, and construction of 388 spaces; 2014. On hold per 200 Palm, Newport Beach construction of a 141,000 applicant's request. square -foot, 5-level off -site parking structure and 6,500 square -foot floating classroom. Redevelopment project involving Approved. a mixed -use waterfront project. °meets This project would construct a proposed Site 300 East Coast Highway, dry stack boat storage facility for Development 64 Back Bay Landing Newport Beach 140 boats, 61,534 square feet of Review and visitor -serving retail and Coastal recreational marine facilities, Development and up to 49 attached residential Permit anticipated to be filed in 2018. units. City of Newport Beach public access and transient dock and expansion of balboa marina 201 East Coast Highway, including 14,252 square feet of 75 Balboa Marina West Expansion Newport Beach restaurant, 12 transient boat Approved. slips, 26 24 private boat slips, 664 square feet of marina restroom, and reconfiguration of a 294-space parking lot. 720 West Bay Avenue, 800 Awaiting Coastal West Bay Avenue, 711-721 Construction of a 23,163 square- Developmen 96 Newport Harbor Yacht Club West Bay Avenue, and foot Yacht Club Facility. Permit Approval 710-720 Balboa Boulevard, Under Newport Beach Construction. s A- -;; s t H g h w a y, Development of 1,375 residential dwelling a 75e Awaiting Go units resort uses, 75,000 square feet approximately 51 A none„elm Permit App l. gress of and approximately parklands, 257 3 gross of aGFeS permanent open spaG.- OR held at the 4..0 Gente Newport BeaGh GUFFeRt+he West Newpei4 Gemmi inifii �tho Got �} Manager's Offioe Y Widening of westbound West Old Newport Boulevard/West Intersection of Old Newport Coast Highway at Old Newport 1-Ind-e-F review ND 417 = Coast Highway Widening Boulevard and West Coast Boulevard to accommodate a draft complete. Highway, Newport Beach third through lane, a right -turn pocket, and a bike lane. Final . December 2017 2-57 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status Intersection of West Coast Construction of a pedestrian 8 Lower Sunset View Park Highway and Superior overcrossings, parking, and park CEQA Bridge, Parking Lot, and Park Avenue, Newport Beach uses for lower Sunset View determination TBD. Park. Balboa Island Seawall Balboa Island, Newport New seawall along the Grand Awaiting City's 43 9 Reconstruction Beach Canal and on the west end of Request for Balboa Island. Proposal (RFP). Newport Boulevard north of Divert dry weather flows from 44 Arches Storm Drain Diversion Coast Highway, Newport west and east storm drains CEQA 10 Beach (subwatersheds) to the sanitary determination TBD. sewer system. Big Canyon, downstream of 4-5 Big Canyon Rehab Project Jamboree Road and south Divert dry weather flows from Final MIND in 11 of Big Canyon Creek, the creek into a bioreactor. Progress. Newport Beach Replaces deteriorating water 46 Bay Crossings Water Main Newport Harbor, Newport transmission mains pursuant to CEQA 12 Replacement Beach the Water Master Plan and Bay determination TBD. — Crossing Water Transmission Study. 4-7ENC 745 Dover Drive, Newport Construction of an Approved. 13 Preschool Beach Environmental Nature Center CEQA Exemption. Preschool. U Park Avenue Bridge Balboa Island, Newport Replacement of Park Avenue Under 14 Replacement Beach Bridge. construction. Construction of 83 single -unit residences, private streets, common open space, and 4-9 1560 Placentia Drive, landscaping. Proposed Zoning Approved Under 15 Ebb Tide Newport Beach Code Amendment from Multiple- construction. — Unit Residential (RM) to Planned Community (PC). A Planned Community Development Plan is proposed. Construction of a 130-room 3300 Newport Boulevard upscale hotel. General Plan 20 Lido House Hotel and 475 32Nd Street, Amendment, Coastal Land Use Under 16 Newport Beach Plan Amendment, and Zoning construction. Amendment to change zoning from Public Facilities to Visitor. Construction of four buildings CEQA exemption. 2011, 2043, 2121, and (two buildings, three -level Approved. 24 Westcliff Medical 2131 Westcliff Drive, parking structure, and an Demolition permit 17 — Newport Beach existing building) totaling 73,722 +sued Under square feet with 382 spaces of construction. off-street parking. Final . December 2017 2-58 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status Building permit apprEwal; p'1 2-2 3303 and 3355 Via Lido Construction of 23 attached regorrda+inn of +ran+ � expired. 18 Lido Villas , Newport Beach three-story townhome Application, CLUP — condominiums. Amendment, and CDP application approved. Amendment to the North Newport Center Planned Community (NNCPC) increasing Villas Fashion Island (Formerly the residential development 23 1101 San Joaquin Hills allocation with the NNCPC from Under San Joaquin Plaza 19 Apartments) Road, Newport Beach 430 dwelling units to a total of construction. 524 dwelling units (increase of 94 units) and allocating the units to the San Joaquin Plaza sub- area. 24 10 Big Canyon 10 Big Canyon, Newport Rough grading for development Approved. Not yet 20 Beach of a single-family residence. constructed. 2-5 Newport 138aGh Country Club 1600 Goo+ Ggas+ Highway, Go.nstrur-,tion of 213 square- Under ' and hag storage 328, 332, and 340 Old Approved. 26 Old Newport GPA Project Newport Boulevard, Construction of 25,000 square- Demolition and 21 Newport Beach foot medical office building. grading permits are issued. Reallocation of up to 225,000 2 Hoag Memorial Hospital 1 Hoag Drive, Newport square feet of previously 2 Presbyterian Master Plan Beach approved (but not constructed) Approved. Update Project square footage from the Lower Campus to the Upper Campus. Construction of 8 residential condominium units and 29 AERIE Project 301-207 Carnation Avenue replacement, reconfiguration, Under 23 and 101 Bayside Place, and expansion of the existing construction. gangway platform, pier walkway, and dock facilities. Can+a Rarhara Drive, Under GonstFUGtion. units totaling approximately 205,232 netsquare feet, apprEWmately 97,231 gmss square feet of subterranean west Drive. Newport bGaGn ')(11 no rking spagec on_Ae ma+ely 79,140 square fgg+ of open snag and Final . December 2017 2-59 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status 30 Newport n a—€TGQ no""^t Mixed Use deyelopmen 27 13Rder GORMFUGti GORSiStiRg of residential and mately 36,000 Newport 138 square 4ses- City of Costa Mesa 4 Improvements to Lions Park; new signage, library building, IS/MND public 3 Lions Park, 570 West 18th and caf6; and renovation and review period 24 Lions Park Projects Street, 1845 and 1855 Park repurposing of the existing ended March 4, — Avenue, Costa Mesa Donald Dungan Library building 2017. to the Neighborhood Community Center. Proposes a new mixed -use development. Phase I has IS/MND Addendum 32 Westside Lofts Mixed -Use 1640 Monrovia Avenue, constructed a 185-unit assisted prepared July 25 Development Project Costa Mesa living facility. Phase II would 2016. construct 42,000 square feet of commercial office uses. Notes: 1. Refer to Exhibit 4-1, Cumulative Proiect Locations. 2. City of Newport Beach, Cumulative Projects List, http://www.newportbeachca.gov/Pln/CEQA_Cumulative/cumulative projects _current.pdf, accessed March 27, 2017. 3. For projects with multiple addresses, the address with the nearest proximity to the project site was depicted in Exhibit 4-1. Written Correspondence: Minoo Ashabi, Principal Planner, City of Costa Mesa, March 27, 2017. 5-14 5-15 5-16 Refer to Response 5-10, above. Comment noted. Section 5.9, Land Use and Relevant Planning, DEIR page 5.9-8, second paragraph, has been revised as follows: The City's LCP and associated Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP) were apprave certifie by the CCC on January 13. 2017, and are &tpeeted to be..,._.. _ becam effective in on lanuaxy 31 2017. The CLUP sets forth goals, objectives, and policies that govern the use of land and water in the coastal zone within the City of Newport Beach and its sphere of influence consistent with the General Plan. The City's CLUP identifies the Coastal Act coastal resources planning and management policies that are relevant to Newport Beach. The CLUP addresses Coastal Act policies within three chapters: Land Use and Development; Public Access and Recreation; and Coastal Resource Protection. Each section or subsection begins with the identification of the Coastal Act sections that are relevant to Newport Beach, followed by a narrative of the local setting and policy direction adopted by the City to address the requirements of the Costal Act and a listing of specific policies. Refer to Response 5-11, above. Final . December 2017 2-60 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 5-17 Comment noted. DEIR pages 5.2-6 and 5.10-6, Tables 5.2-2 and 5.10-2, Sensitive Receptors have been revised as follows: Table 5.2-2 Sensitive Receptors Type Name Approximate Distance from Project Site (feet) Orientation from Project Site Location/Description Residential Residential Uses 25 North Single Family Residences 25 East Single Family Residences 25 South Single Family Residences 50 West Single Family Residences Hyatt Regency Newport Beach 3,705 East 1107 Jamboree Road Hotels Balboa Inn 5,269 South 105 Main Street Newport Harbor High School 1,925 Northwest 600 Irvine Avenue Horace Ensign Intermediate School 2,765 Northwest 2000 Cliff Drive Harper Elementary School 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Schools Mariners Elementary School 4,785 North 2100 Mariners Drive Newport Elementary School 4,850 Southwest 1327 West Balboa Boulevard Children's Center By the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Newport Heights Elementary 4,981 Northwest 300 E 15th Street Newport Harbor Lutheran Church 910 North 798 Dover Drive St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church 2,047 Northwest 600 St Andrews Road Places of Worship St. John Vianney Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 Marine Avenue Christ Church by the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church 5,172 Southwest 1441 West Balboa Boulevard Hospitals Newport Bay Hospital 1,265 North 1501 East 16th Street Balboa Branch Library 4,277 South 100 East Balboa Boulevard Libraries Mariners Library 5,182 North 1300 Irvine Avenue Bob Henry Park 1,370 North 900 Dover Drive Back Bay View Park 2,904 Southeast Jamboree Road and Ranifis Eat Coast Highway Back Bay Golf & Fitness 3,724 Northeast 1107 Jamboree Road Recreation/Parks Genoa Park 3,791 West 232 Via Genoa Harper Park 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Galaxie View Park 4,750 Northeast 1554 Galaxy Drive Pinkley Park 4,794 Northwest 360 Ogle Street, Costa Mesa Cliff Drive Park 4,840 Northwest 298 Riverside Avenue Note: 1. Distances are measured from the exterior project boundary only and not from individual constructionprojects/areas within the interior of the project site. Source: Goo le Earth, 2017. Final . December 2017 2-61 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 5.10-2 Sensitive Receptors Type Name Approximate Distance from Project Site (feet) Orientation from Project Site Location/Description Residential Residential Uses 25 North Single Family Residences 25 East Single Family Residences 25 South Single Family Residences 50 West Single Family Residences Hyatt Regency Newport Beach 3,705 East 1107 Jamboree Road Hotels Balboa Inn 5,269 South 105 Main Street Newport Harbor High School 1,925 Northwest 600 Irvine Avenue Horace Ensign Intermediate School 2,765 Northwest 2000 Cliff Drive Harper Elementary School 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Schools Mariners Elementary School 4,785 North 2100 Mariners Drive Newport Elementary School 4,850 Southwest 1327 West Balboa Boulevard Children's Center By the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Newport Heights Elementary 4,981 Northwest 300 E 15th Street Newport Harbor Lutheran Church 910 North 798 Dover Drive St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church 2,047 Northwest 600 St Andrews Road Places of Worship St. John Vianney Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 Marine Avenue Christ Church by the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church 5,172 Southwest 1441 West Balboa Boulevard Hospitals Newport Bay Hospital 1,265 North 1501 East 16th Street Balboa Branch Library 4,277 South 100 East Balboa Boulevard Libraries Mariners Library 5,182 North 1300 Irvine Avenue Bob Henry Park 1,370 North 900 Dover Drive Back Bay View Park 2,904 Southeast Jamboree Road and Pasifis East Coast Highway Back Bay Golf & Fitness 3,724 Northeast 1107 Jamboree Road Recreation/Parks Genoa Park 3,791 West 232 Via Genoa Harper Park 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Galaxie View Park 4,750 Northeast 1554 Galaxy Drive Pinkley Park 4,794 Northwest 360 Ogle Street, Costa Mesa Cliff Drive Park 4,840 Northwest 298 Riverside Avenue Note: 1. Distances are measured from the exterior project boundary only and not from individual constructionprojects/areas within the interior of the project site. Source: Google Earth, 2017. 5-18 Mitigation Measure AES-2 on DEIR page 1-2 has been revised, as noted within Response 5- 3. DEIR page 2-14 does not exist and DEIR page 3-2 is an exhibit. DEIR pages 3-16 and 3- 17 discusses permits and approvals, and the City's Site Development Review process is cited as a required permit/approval. As such, no further response is necessary. 5-19 This comment is a closing statement providing contact information for questions. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-62 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 5-20 The commenter attached an updated cumulative projects list, which has been incorporated as part of Response 5-13. Thus, no further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-63 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-64 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 6 ■ PubhcWorks Integrity, Accountability, Service, Trust Shane L. Silsby, Director August 2, 2017 NCI.-15-043 Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92709 Subject: Notice of Availability for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Dear Mr. Hadden: The County of Orange has reviewed the Notice of Availability for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project and has no comments at this time. We would like to be advised of any further developments on the project. Please continue to keep us on the distribution list for future notifications related to the project. Richard Vuo anager, Plan ' sion OC Public Works Service Area/OC Development Services 300 North Flower Street Santa Ana, California 92702-4048 Richard.Vuong@ocpw.ocgov.com 300 N. Flower Street. Santa Ana. CA 92703 P.C. Box 4048. Santa Ana. CA 92702.4048 www.ocpublicworkr,.com 714,667,8800 1 Info@0CPW.00gov.carn 61 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 6 Richard Vuong, Manager, Planning Division Orange County Public Works August 2, 2017 6-1 This letter acknowledges that the Orange County Public Works received and reviewed the DEIR and has no comments. The commenter requests continued communication of further developments and future notifications related to the project. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-66 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 7 From: Rivers, Tamy (mailto:TamyRivers@ocfa.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 7:29 AM To: CEQA <cega@ocsd.com> Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Report - Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project To whom it may concern: Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. Orange County Fire Authority has no comments. Y+HF Tamera Rivers Management Analyst { Orange County Fire Authority Office: 714-573-6199 We visualize problems and solutions through the eyes of those we serve. 71 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 7 Tamera Rivers, Management Analyst Orange County Fire Authority July 25, 2017 7-1 This letter acknowledges that the Orange County Fire Authority received and reviewed the DEIR and has no comments. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-68 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 8 From: ALRON7099@aol.com [mailto:alron7099@aol.com Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 5:23 PM To: CEOA <cega@ocsd.com> Cc: Dix, Martin <MDIX@OCSD.COM>; msinacori@newportbeachca.go� Subject: BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION Hello: I am the property owner at 2888 Bayshore Drive; Newport Beach, CA 92663 Could you please tell me exactly how this might impact my property (both land side and water side) as we are 8_1 reconfiguring the marina, and bringing in new power and a transformer to our north property side? I look forward to hearing from you Thank you, Allyson Presta, partner PALM❑ INVESTMENTS, GP phone 949-759-1275 fax 949-759-1288 mobile 949-874-1725 email: ALRON70992AOL.COM or accounting(a7prestaproperties.com �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 8 Allyson Presta, Partner Palmo Investments, GP June 22, 2017 8-1 This commenter requests additional information pertaining to project implementation and potential impact to the property located at 2888 Bayshore Drive and the property's planned improvements. The DEIR analyzes temporary and permanent impacts within the existing OCSD easement adjacent to the 2888 Bayshore Drive property. Construction activities associated with this project are not anticipated to occur on the 2888 Bayshore Drive property. The project is not anticipated to result in any potential conflicts with planned improvements on the 2888 Bayshore Drive property. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. Thus, no further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-70 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 9 GAMIELENO SAND OF M15510N INDIAN5 --- ICIZ.H NATION historieallm }mown as The San Ga6riel F)and of Mission f ndians recognized by the State of California as the aboriginal tribe of the Los Angeles basin Orange County Sanitation District July 18, 2017 Re: AB52 Consultation request for the Bay Bridge Pump station and Force mains replacement project located: 300 East Coast Highway Dear Kevin Hadden, Please find this letter as a written request for consultation regarding the above -mentioned project pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1, subd. (d). Your project lies within our ancestral tribal territory, meaning descending from, or a higher degree of kinship than traditional or cultural affiliation. Your project is located within a sensitive area and may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of our tribal cultural resources. Most often, a records search for our tribal cultural resources will result in a "no records found" for the project area. The Native American Heritage Commission, ethnographers, historians, and professional archaeologists can only provide limited information that has been previously documented about California Native Tribes. This is the reason the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) will always refer the lead agency to the respective Native American Tribe of the area because the NAHC. is only aware of general information and are not the experts on each California Tribe. Our Elder Committee & tribal historians are the experts for our Tribe and are able to provide a more complete history (both written and oral) regarding the location of historic villages, trade routes, cemeteries and sacred/ religious sites in the project area. Therefore, to avoid adverse effects to our tribal cultural resources, we would like to consult with you and your staff to provide you with a more complete understanding of the prehistoric use(s) of the project area and the potential risks for causing a substantial adverse change to the significance of our tribal cultural resources. Consultation appointments are available on Wednesdays and Thursdays at our offices at 901 N. Citrus Ave. Covina, CA 91722 or over the phone. Please call toll free 1-844-390-0787 or email gabrielenoindians@yahoo.com to schedule an appointment. ** Prior to the first consultation with our Tribe, we ask all those individuals participating in the consultation to view a video produced and provided by CalEPA and the NAHC for sensitivity and understanding of AB52. You can view the video at: http: nahc.ca.gov/2015/ 12/ab-52-tribai- trainingn With Respect, Andrew Salas, Chairman Andrew rjalas. Chairman Nadine 5alas. Vice -Chairman C�ristina5windall Martinez.secretary Al6crt Peru, lrcasurer � Mactha Gor¢alez Le treasurer 1) Richard Gradias, Chairman of !tic council of L18ers rQ P5x 59i, Covina, CA 9 r 7x3 www.gga6HeIenoindians.org ga6Helenoin+ians@yakoo.com 91 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 9 Andrew Salas, Chairman Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation July 18, 2017 9-1 This comment from the Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation requests consultation with OCSD in accordance with AB 52. However, as discussed on pages 5.12-2 and 5.12-3 of the DEIR, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation and OCSD completed the AB 52 consultation process in early 2017. Based on the DEIR, impacts related to tribal cultural resources were determined to be less than significant with implementation of recommended mitigation. Thus, no further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-72 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 10 G"Ok IRVINE COMPANY Since 1864 August 3, 2017 Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Bay Bridge Pump Station Draft Environmental Impact Report Comments Dear Mr. Hadden: Irvine Company appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the Bay Bridge Pump Station Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). Irvine Company previously submitted a comment letter, dated December 8, 2016, during the review period for the Notice of Preparation and Initial Study/Environmental Checklist which included a number of concerns related to the proposed alignment of the new dual force mains and the proposed work areas on the Balboa Marina parking lot, among others. During subsequent meetings between Irvine Company, OCSD and other parties, Irvine Company requested that the DEIR analyze a project that would traverse the Back Bay Landing site and cross the Newport Bay channel north of Coast Highway in order to reduce impacts to Balboa Marina. We note that the proposed project identified in the DEIR is for the northern alignment of the pump station and force mains, of which Irvine Company is generally supportive. The Conceptual Site Plan in the DEIR presents a project that is significantly improved with a northern alignment (north of Coast Highway) for the dual force main placement and channel crossing, the relocation of the pump station 300' northeast of the existing pump station location, and the identification of alternative work areas that will not impact the Balboa Marina project site. This alignment provides significantly fewer impacts to Irvine Company property. We do note that the originally proposed alignment south of Coast Highway is included as a project Alternative in the DEIR and do not support that Alternative for the reasons stated in our meetings and our comment letter of December 8, 2016. We would like to take this opportunity to comment on additional components of the proposed project and request additional information or clarification on the following: Construction Schedule - While the DEIR does provide construction duration (weeks) for some segments of the project, such as gravity sewer improvements, it does not include a detailed construction schedule. Please provide estimated timeframes for all project components. We note that the total project timeline is 44 months. 10 1 102 10-3 550 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 949.720.2000 Mr. Kevin Hadden August 3, 2017 Page 2 of 2 2. Section 3.3 of the Project Description notes that the existing force mains would be abandoned once the new pump station facilities are complete. We assume this directly relates to the existing force mains which run adjacent to and beneath the Balboa Marina parking lot. Please provide detail about the process for such "abandonment" including the timing for the process, anticipated environmental impacts, and whether any equipment staging on the Balboa Marina site will be required to effectuate the abandonment. 3. With respect to the issue of the sewer lines on Balboa Marina property, the DEIR does not identify the impacts that will occur on the Balboa Marina site related to the existing sewer lines. In recent correspondence with Adam Nazaroff, OCSD Project Manager, Mr. Nazaroff confirmed that no provision has been made to address the impact on Balboa Marina if the existing sewer must be redesigned and installed in order to reach Bayside Drive before connecting to a City sewer. We appreciate Mr. Nazaroff s coordination and look forward to meeting with OCSD to discuss this issue on August 15. We request that the Responses to Comments identify the potential significant impact to Balboa Marina and provide an analysis of the proposed sewer system and how it impacts the existing sewer serving the marina. We are concerned that impacts will be extensive and may include the need to build a new on -site sewer system to take the discharge from the existing Balboa Marina, Yacht Broker office, marina restrooms, SOL restaurant and the future Balboa Marina restaurant to Bayside Drive. Based on engineering review, it appears that the proposed on -site system will be lower than the existing or proposed sewer on Bayside Drive requiring additional equipment in order to connect to OCSD's sewer. Please note that once we have met with OSCD, we anticipate submitting additional comments. 10-4 90-5 We appreciate OCSD's communication and coordination with Irvine Company over the past two years and are pleased with the new alignment analyzed in the DEIR. Thank you in advance for your 10-6 responses to the above -requested information. Sincerely, IRVINE COMPANY Dan Miller Sr. Vice President Entitlement and Public Affairs c: Shawna Schaffner, CAA Planning, Inc, �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 10 Dan Miller, Senior Vice President Irvine Company August 3, 2017 10-1 This is an introductory comment that summarizes a comment letter provided by the Irvine Company during the review period for the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the proposed project. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 10-2 This comment includes a summary of the project description and notes that the Irvine Company is not supportive of the "Existing Pump Station Site Rehabilitation" alternative presented in Section 7.0, Alternatives to the Proposed Prot. This comment is noted; since it does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue, no further response is necessary. 10-3 The proposed project conservatively assumes a total of 44 months for the completion of construction, and the analysis of the DEIR related to air quality, noise, traffic, and other topical areas is similarly considered to be conservative in nature. While durations for primary components of the construction process have been estimated with the DEIR, a detailed construction schedule for all project components would be determined during Final Design, and shared by OCSD with affected stakeholders and property owners. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 10-4 The existing force mains that traverse the Balboa Marina property and cross the Newport Bay Channel would be abandoned in place and filled with slurry. This method of abandonment would minimize potential impacts (ground disturbance, trenching, etc.) to the Balboa Marina and Newport Bay Channel. The existing force mains would be filled and abandoned following completion and operation of the new force mains. Equipment and activities associated with abandonment of the existing force mains would occur within areas previously analyzed in the DEIR, and would not affect the Balboa Marina property. 10-5 Refer to Response 5-2, above. 10-6 This comment is a closing statement. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-75 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-76 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 11 soCalGas A Sempra Energy utoity 08/04/2017 Mr. Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Re., Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force stains Replacement Project Dear Mr. Hadden: 1 a m es Chu ang Senior Environmental Specialist Southern California Gas Company Sempra Energy utilities GT17E2 555 Fifth Street Los Angeles, Ca. 80013 Tel: 213.244-5817 Fax: 323 518 2324 Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) appreciates the opportunity to review and respond to the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project. SaCalGas understands that the proposed project would replace the existing Bay Bridge pump station and associated force mains and include improvements to the pump station, the Newport Bay Channel crossing force main and the West Coast Highway crossing force main. Activities for the pump station improvements would involve construction of new pump station facilities and replacement of several portions of the existing OCSD gravity sewer system. Activities for the force main improvements would involve construction of 3,985 linear feet of force mains for the Newport Bay channel crossing to connect the new pump station to the existing OCSD force main system, and further force main alignment extension to connect the an existing OCSD valve vault near West Coast Highway. We respectfully request that the following comments be incorporated in the administrative record. 111 • SaCalGas has a 5-inch distribution pipeline that runs along the southbound lanes of North Bayside Drive at its intersection with East Coast Highway, and a medium pressure distribution line that runs along the 11 2 eastbound on State Highway 1 just beginning after the Bay Bridge. ■ SaCalGas recommends that the project proponent call Underground Service Alert at 811 at least two business days prior to performing any excavation work for the proposed project. Underground Service Alert will coordinate with SaCalGas and other Utility owners in the area to mark the locations of buried 11-3 utility -owned lines. Once again, we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (213) 244-5817 or 11-4 Envreview((Dsemprautil ities.com. Sincerely, Joes Chuang Senior Environmental Specialist Southern California Gas Company cc. Jennifer Pezda, SoCalGas �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 11 James Chuang, Senior Environmental Specialist Southern California Gas Company August 4, 2017 11-1 This is an introductory comment that provides a brief summary of the project description. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 11-2 The location of the 5-inch distribution pipeline and the medium pressure distribution line are noted along the southbound lanes of North Bayside Drive at its intersection with East Coast Highway and along the eastbound on State Highway 1 just beginning after the Bay Bridge, respectively. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. 11-3 This comment recommends that the project proponent contact Underground Service Alert to mark the locations of buried utility -owned lines. The project contractor would adhere to State and local regulations including utility coordination prior to construction. 11-4 This comment is a closing statement providing contact information for questions. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-78 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 12 UJ NOSSAMAN «P VIA EMAIL AN❑ U.S. MAIL August 4, 2017 Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Email: CEQA[a)QCSD.com 18101 Von Karman Avenue Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92612 T 949.833.7800 F 949.833.7878 John P. Erskine a 949.477.7633 jerskine@ncssaman.com Refer To File #: 400244-0001 Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Main Project (Project No. SP-178) Dear Mr. Hadden: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD") Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") for the Bay Bridge Pump Station ("BBPS") and Force Main Project ("the Project"), As noted in Section 3.0 Project Description of the DEIR, the Project is proposed to be relocated on approximately 10,000 square feet of the 31.4 acre Back Bay Landing Project ("BBL Project") near the entrance to our client's property, approximately 300 feet northeast of the pump station's current location on East Coast Highway. The following comments are primarily focused on compatibility of the Project with the BBL project, particularly as it pertains to OCSD's Regulatory Review and Permitting Schedule and Construction and Disassembly / Site Restoration Schedule and Process. We are also providing several needed corrections to the Project Description and requests for additional clarification of the exact nature of various components of the Project. Our comments are as follows: 1.3 Goals and Objectives OCSD should explain the relationship between the "peak wet weather flow conveyance capacity" and the increase in the BBPS from 15 MGD to 18.5 MGD. If the existing BBPS location poses a safety issue in terms of the current direct access from East Coast Highway (as described in Goals and Objectives #3), how will the "Existing Pump Station Site Rehabilitation Alternative" avoid significant conflicts with access through the BBPS project from Bayside Drive, similar to the safety issues currently experienced at the East Coast Highway access point? 121 122 12-3 56118840.v1 nossaman.com August 4, 2017 Page 2 3.2.1 Project Setting (Existing Conditions Project Description Issues) The proposed BBPS (relocation) site is "disturbed," but to be clear should be described as a fully improved and partially paved facility, providing storage for RV's and trailered boats, as well as parking for the Bayside Village Marina, a coastal -dependent use. The site also includes 12-4 areas leased for kayak and SUP rentals and launching, and parking for and access to Pearson's Port Fish Market. As commented below, the proposed OCSD project, which includes construction staging areas, as well as unidentified additional staging areas that are foreseeably needed, will create 12-5 significant disruption of the current BBL recreational and marine commercial uses and our proposed BBL Project. 3.3 Project Characteristics The Project's new pump station facility was previously identified in the Notice of Preparation issued on November 10, 2016, as being located on approximately 9,500 square feet to accommodate a state-of-the-art odor control facility and other equipment. The current proposal is for the facility to be on 10,000 square feet. Could OCS❑ construct the necessary facilities and equipment on a smaller footprint, including partial or complete undergrounding of pump station equipment and has this been done on other pump stations in California? Could the two 10-foot diameter tanks included in the vapor -phase odor control system be undergrounded? Pg 3-10 provides an indication that the proposed pump station building would include features, architecture, and screening consistent with the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PCDP), and Section 5.1 Aesthetics (pg. 5.1-17) states that the new pump station structures would be required to be generally consistent with the BBL PCDP. We would expect that all of the project components be completely consistent with the PCDP, and request that Mitigation Measure AES-Z be modified to include concurrent submittal of design plans to bath the City Community Development Director, and to BBL representatives for review and approval. 3.4 Construction 12-5 Construction of the proposed Project is scheduled to take almost four (4) years, exclusive of demolition 1 disassembly of the existing pump station and site cleanup. Can construction be expedited and how long will the disassembly process take (the DER does not 12.7 describe this process or the timeline for same)? Pump Station Improvements and Force Main Improvements generally describe construction activities that require significant, long-term disruption of current and proposed uses on the BBL Project site, the City's Castaways Park, Pearson's Port Fish Market in the County tidelands area of the Newport Harbor Channel, as well as lane closures on East Coast Highway and Bayside Drive. Please provide more specific information on impacts created by: — 80,000 sq. ft. of staging area (Exhibit 3-6) and potential impacts to marina access and parking; — 20,000 sq. ft. of Castaway's Park; 12-S 56118840-0 August 4, 2017 Page 3 — Additional temporary construction easements needed for heavy equipment associated with microtunneling that will occur on the bayfront and potential impacts to Pearson's Port, our existing kayak and SUP rental businesses, public access to tidelands area, marina gangways and docks, etc.; — Impacts to street parking currently available on Bayside Drive caused by expected lane closures; — Additional staging areas west of the staging area shown in Exhibit 3-6 needed during the relocated pump station buildings construction. 12-9 This Construction section 3.4 (see also 5.2-12) does not provide sufficient clarity with respect to full remediation of the existing pump station and force mains. OCSD must clarify that all existing facilities, including the existing force mains and particularly the existing pump station 12-9 facility will be removed and a fully remediated, compacted site clean to residential standards, be provided. 5.11 Traffic As outlined above, the potential four -and -a -half year occupation of the BBL Project site will not only disrupt existing uses but proposed project development of the BBL Project. In addition, lane closures, particularly on Bayside Drive, will adversely impact access to existing recreational and marine commercial businesses. Traffic Mitigation Measure TRA-1 (pg. 5.11-6) requires CCSD to prepare a Construction Management Plan ("CMP") to be submitted for review and approval by OCSD's Director of 12-10 Engineering, containing fairly standard and non-specific elements. TRA-1 should be expanded and should identify, prior to issuance of construction permits, identification of specific lane closures, as well as timing and duration of same, identification of all OCSD-related construction, engineering and management parking, alternative BBL Project site access, and, a requirement that the CMP be provided to and reviewed by the BBL Project representatives and reviewed and approved by the City of Newport Beach Public Works Director. Thank you for your review and response on these comments. 1 12-11 Sincerel J P. Erskine of Nossaman LLP JPE.dif 56118840. v 1 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 12 John Erskine Nossaman LLP August 4, 2017 12-1 This is an introductory comment that provides a brief project description and summary of the nature of the comments provided in the letter. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 12-2 Since 2003 OCSD has conducted several studies evaluating hydraulics within the Newport Force Main Network (NFMN). OCSD's Technical Memorandum No. 3 Hydraulic Assessment, prepared by Malcom Pirnie, Inc., dated December 2010 (2010 Hydraulic Assessment) documents the hydraulic assessment of current and future NFMN configuration and flows, identifying hydraulic deficiencies and recommending solutions to contain flows within the collection system under both normal and adverse operating conditions. Based on the 2010 Hydraulic Assessment, current peak wet -weather flows for the Bay Bridge pump station is 16.9 MGD and projected peak wet -weather flows for year 2030 is 18.5 MGD. The 2010 Hydraulic Assessment concluded that the Bay Bridge Pump Station is hydraulically deficient under all existing and future scenarios for peak wet -weather flow conditions and recommended upsizing the pump station to convey year 2030 peak wet -weather flow of 18.5 MGD. 12-3 This comment is related to the safety risk of the existing driveway access to the site as proposed in the "Existing Pump Station Site Rehabilitation" Alternative. The existing driveway has been used since the existence of the current site and OCSD has no record of vehicular accidents with pedestrians or oncoming traffic. OCSD can continue to use the existing site and driveway access. However, the preferred alternative site off of Bayside Drive contains a reconfigured pump station that would allow improved maneuverability for OCSD operations and maintenance vehicles. In addition, traffic volumes along Bayside Drive are considerably lower than volumes along East Coast Highway. 12-4 Comment noted. DEIR page 3-1, paragraph 3, has been revised as follows: The proposed pump station would be located on the same 31.4-acre parcel, approximately 300 feet to the northeast. The proposed pump station site is efitirely disturbed full improved and partially b�, and is currently occupied by RV storage facilities, which includes trailered boats, parking for the Bayside Village Marina, parking and access to Pearson's Port Fish Market_ area for kayak and stand-up naddleboard (SUP) rentals and 1 u and a driveway providing access to the facility. An existing fence that serves as the northerly boundary of the RV storage facility also bisects the proposed pump station site in an east/west orientation. 12-5 As explained in DEIR Section 5.9, Land Use and Relevant Planninga, the existing and proposed pump station sites are located within Planning Area 1 of the PCDP, which is currently occupied by an RV storage facility, trailered boats, parking for the Bayside Village Marina, parking and access to Pearson's Port Fish Market, and an area for kayak and stand-up paddleboard rentals and launching. Due to the duration and scope of the project, the project Final . December 2017 2-82 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE may involve some disruption to the current BBL recreation and marine commercial uses. These impacts would be mitigated to the extent possible by minimizing construction, hauling, transport, and lane closures during evening hours, holidays, and weekends. The project would further minimize interference with recreational opportunities in the Newport Channel by implementing microtunneling processes rather than conventional dredging. Alternate routes can be provided for access to the west end of the Back Bay Landing property. 12-6 A 10,000 square -foot site is preferred. Facilities can be designed on smaller footprints and possibly be located underground, but this would add to construction costs, decrease maintenance access, increase maintenance costs, and decrease equipment reliability. A smaller site would make the option of relocating the pump station less attractive. OCSD is willing to submit design plans concurrently with BBL to the City. Please note that OCSD is exempt from Uniform Building Code review. OCSD is willing to submit plans to BLL for review and comment. 12-7 Construction can be expedited. OCSD is committed to streamlining and minimizing the duration of construction activities to the extent possible, but the complexity and scale of the project would be more expensive and would have greater public impacts (i.e., nighttime construction activities). Additionally, deconstruction of the existing pump station facility would occur once the new pump station facilities are completed. OCSD has estimated the duration of this project component, but a detailed construction schedule for all project components would be determined during Final Design and shared with affected stakeholders and property owners. 12-8 The disassembly process can be a minimum of four months. However, it can take a year longer if the existing pump station deep foundations require removal. Impacts to property owners and their tenants due to construction easements would be addressed when they are being negotiated. Specific impacts to street parking on Bayside Drive would be coordinated with the City of Newport Beach Public Works and advanced communications would be sent to the surrounding public. 12-9 The project would comply with all Federal, State, and local rules and regulations including those pertaining to site remediation of hazardous materials, if necessary. The DEIR includes Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-4, which relate to asbestos -containing materials, lead -based paints, force main construction, and the discovery of unknown wastes (minor editorial revisions to HAZ-1, HAZ-2, and HAZ-4 are noted below to provide clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process). The existing force mains would be abandoned in place and filled with slurry to minimize potential impacts to affected properties and the Newport Bay Channel (refer to Response 10-4, above). The pump station and associated structures are planned to be removed a maximum of five feet below the ground surface. Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 on DEIR page 5.7-15 have been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure HAZ- 1 has been revised as follows: HAZ-1 Prior to demolition activities, an asbestos survey shall be conducted by an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and California Division of Final . December 2017 2-83 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) certified building inspector to determine the presence or absence of asbestos containing -materials (ACMs). If ACMs are located, abatement of asbestos shall be completed prior to any activities that would disturb ACMs or create an airborne asbestos hazard. Asbestos removal shall be performed by a State certified asbestos containment contractor in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403. Contractors performing ACM removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District of Hfigifleer-i • Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure HAZ-2 on DEIR page 5.7-16 have been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure HAZ- 2 has been revised as follows: HAZ-2 If paint is separated from building materials (chemically or physically) during demolition of the structures, the paint waste shall be evaluated independently from the building material by a qualified Environmental Professional. If lead -based paint is found, abatement shall be completed by a qualified Lead Specialist prior to any activities that would create lead dust or fume hazard. Lead -based paint removal and disposal shall be performed in accordance with California Code of Regulation Title 8, Section 1532.1, which specifies exposure limits, exposure monitoring and respiratory protection, and mandates good worker practices by workers exposed to lead. Contractors performing lead -based paint removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Rngiiieerin . Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure HAZ-4 on DEIR page 5.7-16 have been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure HAZ- 4 has been revised as follows: HAZ-4 If unknown wastes are discovered during construction by the contractor that are believed to involve hazardous waste or materials, the contractor shall comply with the following: • Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, and remove workers and the public from the area; • Notify the Orange County Sanitation District T_'ir-eeter- of Eftg4 ee~ • Secure the area as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District and • Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Materials Division's Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator (or other appropriate agency specified by the Director of Engineering). The Final . December 2017 2-84 Responses to Comments `OJN�Y SA NI T4I�oN � � O Z 9 9 2 OtF Off? THE Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator shall advise the responsible party of further actions that shall be taken, if required. 12-10 As noted above in Response 5-6, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 has been modified to note that engineering drawings and specifications would be subject to approval by Caltrans and the City of Newport Beach, in addition to OCSD. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 includes a range of minimum requirements that would be necessary within the engineering drawings and specifications, and OCSD acknowledges that additional provisions related to items such as access and parking (developed in consultation with the City and Caltrans, and based on final design) may be required. Based on the analysis provided within the DEIR, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would reduce short-term project -related traffic impacts to a level below significance. 12-11 This comment is a closing statement. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further comment is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-85 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-86 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 13 �m C- L K. P.A. California Cultural Resource Preservation Alliance, inc. P.O. Box 54132 An alliance of American Indian and scientific communities working for Irvine, CA 92619-4132 the preservation of archaeological sites and other cultural resources. July 8, 2017 Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District Re: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEIR for the above -mentioned project. We appreciate that the City of Newport Beach and Orange Sanitation District acknowledges the fact that the City of Newport Beach has a long cultural history and is culturally sensitive. Based on the information provided 13-1 in the Cultural Resources Appendix, we agree that the project has a low potential to impact intact archaeological materials and concur with Mitigation Measure CUL-1. Sincerely, Patricia Martz, Ph.D. President �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 13 Patricia Martz, Ph.D., President California Cultural Resources Preservation Alliance, Inc. July 8, 2017 13-1 This letter acknowledges that the California Cultural Resources Preservation Alliance, Inc. received and reviewed the DEIR and agrees with the findings related to cultural resources and recommended Mitigation Measure CUL-1 in the DEIR. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-88 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 14 From: Rececca Robles [mailto:rebroblesl@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 9:19 PM To: CEQA <cega@ocsd.com> Subject: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project DEIR Report July 5,2017 Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District Re: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEIR for the above -mentioned project. We appreciate that the City of Newport Beach and Orange Sanitation District acknowledge the fact that the City of Newport Beach has a long cultural history and was home to our ancestors prior to settlement by Euro-Americans. Based on the information provided in the Cultural Resources Appendix, we agree that the project has a low potential to impact intact archaeological materials and concur with Mitigation Measure CUL-1. In the event that buried cultural materials are discovered during construction, we wish to be notified. Sincerely, 14-1 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 14 Rebecca Robles United Coalition to Protect Panhe July 5, 2017 14-1 This letter acknowledges that the United Coalition to Protect Panhe received and reviewed the DEIR and agrees with the findings related to cultural resources and recommended Mitigation Measure CUL-1 in the DEIR. OCSD has noted that the United Coalition to Protect Panhe requested notification in the event buried cultural materials are discovered during project construction. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-90 Responses to Comments 3.0 ERRATA This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project 3.0 ERRATA Changes to the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) are noted below. A double -underline indicates additions to the text; strikeout indicates deletions to the text. These changes are considered minor and editorial in nature, and do not affect the conclusions of the environmental document or require recirculation of the EIR. Section 2.0, page 2-8, 1st paragraph • Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) adopted February 25, 2014, Ordinance No. 2014-4 A20ll-216 and Amended A ril 26 2016 Ordinance No. 2016-8 . The Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) (Back Bay Landing PCDP) is a redevelopment plan involving a mixed -use waterfront project. This project would construct a dry stack boat storage facility for 140 boats, 61,534 square feet of visitor -serving retail and recreational marine facilities, and up to 49 attached residential units. The Back Bay Landing PCDP establishes appropriate zoning regulations governing land use and development of the Planned Community site, consistent with the General Plan and CLUP. The Back Bay Landing PCDP provides a vision for the land uses on the site, sets the development standards and design guidelines for specific project approvals at the Site Development Review and Community Development Plan approval stage, and regulates the long term operation of the developed site. Section 3.0, page 3-1, 3rd paragraph The proposed pump station would be located on the same 31.4-acre parcel, approximately 300 feet to the northeast. The proposed pump station site is entirely distu fully improved and partiallpaved, and is currently occupied by RV storage facilities, which includes trailered boats_ parking for the Bayside Village Marina marking and access to Pearson's Port Fish Market_ area for kayak and stand- up ^naddleboard (SUErentals and launching3 and a driveway providing access to the facility. An existing fence that serves as the northerly boundary of the RV storage facility also bisects the proposed pump station site in an east/west orientation. Section 4.0, pages 4-2 — 4-5, Table 4-1, Cumulative Projects List Table 4-1 Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status City of Newport Beach 2 Recirlential Tn�nier Drive, Recirlential Tnuier Preparation of CIR Klownnd Pont, 2 41teNatiom Highway, Newport BeaGh Development of a 33,926 square feet ALitemobile Sales arSer�tise basil PapAing of Cn4onmenta1 DOGUrnent. Tr Ss.ns,_ltartte he I rJen� tiff 3 150 Newport renter NewW_Be Preparation of CIR M_RM9Fe&s: UPA&- Final . December 2017 3-1 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status 4 NewperN32Rd MedifisatigR Newport Boulevard frorn Via Lode to30�, a 3201 Newport RA, dpw;rd Roadway imnr onto; Newport Boulevard from Via L do Approved. Coastal novel n rad C+roo+ terming+'nn as o PeFmot issued ' Aloumnr+ Roonh Newport Beach nd StFee Development of a mixed -use structure with 1,171 square feet of retail floor area. one 2,347 1 Ullman Sail Lofts 410 and 412 291h Street Anticipated CEQA square foot dwelling unit and Exemption. three residential dwelling units ranging from 2,484 square feet to 2,515 square feet. Development of a 275-room, 201,498 square -foot hotel on 14.3 acres. Amenities include a coffee shop, gift/sundry shop. 2 = Newport Dunes Hotel 1131 Back Bay Drive Application incomplete. business center, function room spa/fitness facilities, restaurant, pool, tennis courts, sand volleyball courts and picnic area. Construction of a 70,295 square - foot, 4-story Ocean Literacy Facility. This project would 600 East Bay, 209 include removal of 63-metered Application 53 ExplorOcean3 Washington Street, 600 and 608 Balboa Avenue, and space surface parking lot; construction of 388 spaces; submitted April 2014. On hold per 200 Palm, Newport Beach construction of a 141,000 applicant's request. square -foot, 5-level off -site parking structure and 6,500 square -foot floating classroom. Redevelopment project involving Approved. a mixed -use waterfront project. Amendments This project would construct a pmpesed Site 64 Back Bay Landing 300 East Coast Highway, Newport Beach dry stack boat storage facility for 140 boats, 61,534 square feet of visitor -serving retail and Development Review and Coastal recreational marine facilities, Development and up to 49 attached residential Permit anticipated to be filed in 2018. units. City of Newport Beach public access and transient dock and expansion of balboa marina 7-5 Balboa Marina West Expansion 201 East Coast Highway, Newport Beach including 14,252 square feet of restaurant, 12 transient boat slips, 26 24 private boat slips, Approved. 664 square feet of marina restroom, and reconfiguration of a 294-s ace parking lot. Final . December 2017 3-2 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status 720 West Bay Avenue, 800 Awaiting Coastal West Bay Avenue, 711-721 Construction of a 23,163 square- DevelopmeRt 96 Newport Harbor Yacht Club West Bay Avenue, and foot Yacht Club Facility. 710-720 Balboa Boulevard, Under Newport Beach Construction. -9 Newport Banning RanGh Development of 1,375 residential dwelling a 75_ Awaiting Development Permit nnnrn„al units resort uses, 75,000 square fee of nOMmernial Y&e_ approximately 51 n Newport-BeaGh gross of and approximately parklands, 252.3 aGF86 of gross permanent West NeWPE)14 Community 9-9-2- 15t"&Fee OR hold at the 4-0 Gente or+ Reaoh (G urren+ the West Newport Community Qenter-. direr+ion of the -riff, Managers Offi, e lesat♦en-) Widening of westbound West Old Newport Boulevard/West Intersection of Old Newport Coast Highway at Old Newport ceder %view ND 447 = Coast Highway Widening Boulevard and West Coast Boulevard to accommodate a draft complete. Highway, Newport Beach third through lane, aright -turn pocket, and a bike lane. Intersection of West Coast Construction of a pedestrian 8 Lower Sunset View Park Highway and Superior overcrossings, parking, and park CEQA Bridge, Parking Lot, and Park Avenue, Newport Beach uses for lower Sunset View determination TBD. Park. Balboa Island Seawall Balboa Island, Newport New seawall along the Grand Awaiting City's 4-3 9 Reconstruction Beach Canal and on the west end of Request for Balboa Island. Proposal (RFP). Newport Boulevard north of Divert dry weather flows from Arches Storm Drain Diversion Coast Highway, Newport west and east storm drains CEQA 10 Beach (subwatersheds) to the sanitary determination TBD. sewers stem. Big Canyon, downstream of 4-5 Big Canyon Rehab Project Jamboree Road and south Divert dry weather flows from Final MND in 11 of Big Canyon Creek, the creek into a bioreactor. Progress. Newport Beach Replaces deteriorating water 46 Bay Crossings Water Main Newport Harbor, Newport transmission mains pursuant to CEQA 12 Replacement Beach the Water Master Plan and Bay determination TBD. Crossing Water Transmission Study. 4-7 745 Dover Drive, Newport Construction of an Approved. 13 13 ENC Preschool Beach Environmental Nature Center CEQA Exemption. Preschool. 4 Park Avenue Bridge Balboa Island, Newport Replacement of Park Avenue Under 14 Replacement Beach Bridge. construction. Final e December 2017 3-3 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status Construction of 83 single -unit residences, private streets, common open space, and 49 1560 Placentia Drive, landscaping. Proposed Zoning AppFeved Under 15 Ebb Tide Newport Beach Code Amendment from Multiple- construction. = Unit Residential (RM) to Planned Community (PC). A Planned Community Development Plan is proposed. Construction of a 130-room 3300 Newport Boulevard upscale hotel. General Plan 20 Lido House Hotel and 475 32nd Street, Amendment, Coastal Land Use Under 16 Newport Beach Plan Amendment, and Zoning construction. Amendment to change zoning from Public Facilities to Visitor. Construction of four buildings CEQA exemption. 2011, 2043, 2121, and (two buildings, three -level Approved. 24 Westcliff Medical 2131 Westcliff Drive, parking structure, and an Dornlition permit 17 — Newport Beach existing building) totaling 73,722 issued Under square feet with 382 spaces of construction. off-street parking. Building permit approval; PGR 2-2 3355 Via Lido, Construction of 23 attached � expired 18 Lidoand Lido Villas Newport Beach three-story townhome Application, CLUP — condominiums. Amendment, and CDP application a roved. Amendment to the North Newport Center Planned Community (NNCPC) increasing Villas Fashion Island (Formerly the residential development 23 1101 San Joaquin Hills allocation with the NNCPC from Under San Joaquin Plaza 19 Apartments) Road, Newport Beach 430 dwelling units to a total of construction. 524 dwelling units (increase of 94 units) and allocating the units to the San Joaquin Plaza sub- area. 24 10 Big Canyon 10 Big Canyon, Newport Rough grading for development Approved. Not yet 20 Beach of a single-family residence. constructed. Newport BeaGh Country Club 16-0606 East Ge-ast Highway, GeRstrur-AeR of 51,213 square rnnc� MFUGfOOT f0Gt Glubho, se. And April lRC—. NewportGh gGlf f-Anilifioc a Dorf horn 328, 332, and 340 Old Approved. 26, Old Newport GPA Project Newport Boulevard, Construction of 25,000 square- Demolition and 21 Newport Beach foot medical office building. grading permits are issued. Final . December 2017 3-4 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status Reallocation of up to 225,000 22 Hoag Memorial Hospital 1 Hoag Drive, Newport square feet of previously �� Presbyterian Master Plan Beach approved (but not constructed) Approved. Update Project square footage from the Lower Campus to the Upper Campus. Construction of 8 residential condominium units and 28 AERIE Project 301-207 Carnation Avenue replacement, reconfiguration, Under 23 and 101 Bayside Place, and expansion of the existing construction. gangway platform, pier walkway, and dock facilities. miniurnS Pf9j �g �e r rnnc n.^� units totaling approximate! 205,232 not square foot foot of wes squareDrive, subterranean parking otn Unfiirn o for a total of ')!11 enoroc nn_cito �Beatrtt parking approximately 79,140 square feet of epen spaGe and foot of rooreationol area. n 30 Newport Marina _ GTC-0- Development Newport BeaGh Mixed Use development nnncictinn of 277 rocirlontiol unite Unde rnnet T and approximately ,000 uSe� City of Costa Mesa 4 Improvements to Lions Park; new signage, library building, ISIMND ublili c 34 Lions Park, 570 West 18t" and cafe; and renovation and review period 24 Lions Park Project3 Street, 1845 and 1855 Park repurposing of the existing ended March 4, Avenue, Costa Mesa Donald Dungan Library building 2017. to the Neighborhood Community Center. Proposes a new mixed -use development. Phase I has IS/MND Addendum 32 Westside Lofts Mixed -Use 1640 Monrovia Avenue, constructed a 185-unit assisted prepared July 25 Development Project Costa Mesa living facility. Phase II would 2016. construct 42,000 square feet of commercial office uses. Notes: 1. Refer to Exhibit 4-1, Cumulative Protect Locations. 2. City of Newport Beach, Cumulative Projects List, http://www.newportbeachca.gov/Pln/CEQA_Cumulative/cumulative projects _current.pdf, accessed March 27, 2017. 3. For projects with multiple addresses, the address with the nearest proximity to the project site was depicted in Exhibit 4-1. Written Correspondence: Minoo Ashabi, Principal Planner, City of Costa Mesa, March 27, 2017. Final . December 2017 3-5 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Section 5.0, pages 5.1-11- 5.1-12, Subsection B B. Permitted Height of Structures 1. Building Height The maximum allowable building height shall be 35 feet for structures with flat roofs and 40 feet for structures with sloped roofs (minimum 3:12 pitch), except as follows: a) As illustrated on Exhibit 3, Building Heights,100 feet from back of curb along Bayside Drive within the eastern portion of Planning Area 1, maximum allowable building height shall not exceed 26 feet for flat roofs and 31 feet for sloped roofs. e- b) Within Planning Area 1, maximum allowable height for any parking structure shall not exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs. 4} e) All other exceptions to height shall be regulated pursuant to Section 20.30.060.D of the Municipal Code. Section 5.0, page 5.1-13, Subsection A A. Architectural Theme ..�•_��r_�_w_�!essr��i!��asr�•_��.�s��,�� _ . _ _. _ �e�ss�er����.�_ The development shall be designed with a Coastal architectural theme. This architectural theme is influenced by the marine climate of the California coastline_ with varied historical vernacular and casually elegant palette_ with building forms and massing that define and create unique and often seamless indoorloutdoor spaces. The project would follow principles of quality designer exhibiting a high level of architectural standards and shall be compatible with the surrounding area; sensitive to scale, proportion, and identity with a focus on places. Massing offsets. variation of roof lines, varied textures, openings, recesses- and design accents on all building elevations shall be provided to enhance the architectural design. The intent is not to select a historicallv specific or rigid architectural stvle for the nroiect_ but to create an active. mixed -use iv lla�e• Final . December 2017 3-6 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Section 5.0, page 5.1-16, Mitigation Measure AES-1 AES-1 Prior to issuance of any grading and/or demolition permits, whichever occurs first, ft engineering drawings and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Engineering. The Gens"etion " anage~~e~~ Plaii These documents shall, at a minimum, indicate the equipment and vehicle staging areas, stockpiling of materials, fencing (i.e., temporary fencing with opaque material), and haul route(s). Staging areas shall be sited and/or screened in order to minimize public views to the maximum extent practicable. Construction haul routes shall minimize impacts to sensitive uses in the project area by avoiding local residential streets, as feasible. Section 5.0, page 5.1-17, Mitigation Measure AES-2 AES-2 Prior to construction of the new pump station facility, OCSD shall submit design plans of the proposed pump station to the City of Newport Beach Direetor of Community for review and approval by the City's Planning Commission or delegated authori for Site Development Review and to determine consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP design guidelines. The Orange County Sanitation District Director ef Engineer-ing sha4l provide final review and approval of design plans, in Consideration of Section 5.0, page 5.1-19, Mitigation Measure AES-3 AES-3 All construction -related lighting fixtures (including portable fixtures) shall be oriented downward and away from adjacent sensitive areas (including residential and biologically sensitive areas). Lighting shall consist of the minimal wattage necessary to provide safety at the construction site. A construction safety lighting plan shall be submitted to the Orange County Sanitation District r,...,,, tef of E~~iiieer n for review and approval prior to any nighttime construction activities. Section 5.0, page 5.1-19, Mitigation Measure AES-4 AES-4 Prior to construction of the proposed pump station, lighting plans shall be provided to the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Efigineerin for review and approval_ and to the City of Newport Beach for review and aPnroval by the City's Planning Commission for Site Development Review. The lighting=plan shall Kati illustrate consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP regulations for lighting. Per these requirements, all outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed, located, and maintained to minimize impacts to adjacent sites and to not produce glare onto adjacent sites or roadways. Final . December 2017 3-7 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Section 5.0, pages 5.2-6 and 5.10-6, Tables 5.2-2 and 5.10-2, Sensitive Receptors Table 5.2-2 Sensitive Receptors Type N2MA Approximate Distance from Project Site (feet) Orientation from Project Site Location/Description Residential Residential Uses 25 North Single Family Residences 25 East Single Family Residences 25 South Single Family Residences 50 West Single Family Residences Hyatt Regency Newport Beach 3,705 East 1107 Jamboree Road Hotels Balboa Inn 5,269 South 105 Main Street Newport Harbor High School 1,925 Northwest 600 Irvine Avenue Horace Ensign Intermediate School 2,765 Northwest 2000 Cliff Drive Harper Elementary School 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Schools Mariners Elementary School 4,785 North 2100 Mariners Drive Newport Elementary School 4,850 Southwest 1327 West Balboa Boulevard Children's Center By the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Newport Heights Elementary 4,981 Northwest 300 E 15th Street Newport Harbor Lutheran Church 910 North 798 Dover Drive St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church 2,047 Northwest 600 St Andrews Road Places of Worship St. John Vianney Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 Marine Avenue Christ Church by the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church 5,172 Southwest 1441 West Balboa Boulevard Hospitals Newport Bay Hospital 1,265 North 1501 East 16th Street Balboa Branch Library 4,277 South 100 East Balboa Boulevard Libraries Mariners Library 5,182 North 1300 Irvine Avenue Bob Henry Park 1,370 North 900 Dover Drive Back Bay View Park 2,904 Southeast Jamboree Road and P-ad& Est Coast Highway Back Bay Golf & Fitness 3,724 Northeast 1107 Jamboree Road Recreation/Parks Genoa Park 3,791 West 232 Via Genoa Harper Park 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Galaxie View Park 4,750 Northeast 1554 Galaxy Drive Pinkley Park 4,794 Northwest 360 Ogle Street, Costa Mesa Cliff Drive Park 4,840 Northwest 298 Riverside Avenue Note: 1. Distances are measured from the exterior project boundary only and not from individual construction projects/areas within the interior of the project site. Source: Google Earth, 2017. Final . December 2017 3-8 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 5.10-2 Sensitive Receptors Type Name Approximate Distance from Project Site (feet) Orientation from Project Site Location/Description Residential Residential Uses 25 North Single Family Residences 25 East Single Family Residences 25 South Single Family Residences 50 West Single Family Residences Hyatt Regency Newport Beach 3,705 East 1107 Jamboree Road Hotels Balboa Inn 5,269 South 105 Main Street Newport Harbor High School 1,925 Northwest 600 Irvine Avenue Horace Ensign Intermediate School 2,765 Northwest 2000 Cliff Drive Harper Elementary School 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Schools Mariners Elementary School 4,785 North 2100 Mariners Drive Newport Elementary School 4,850 Southwest 1327 West Balboa Boulevard Children's Center By the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Newport Heights Elementary 4,981 Northwest 300 E 15th Street Newport Harbor Lutheran Church 910 North 798 Dover Drive St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church 2,047 Northwest 600 St Andrews Road Places of Worship St. John Vianney Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 Marine Avenue Christ Church by the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church 5,172 Southwest 1441 West Balboa Boulevard Hospitals Newport Bay Hospital 1,265 North 1501 East 16th Street Balboa Branch Library 4,277 South 100 East Balboa Boulevard Libraries Mariners Library 5,182 North 1300 Irvine Avenue Bob Henry Park 1,370 North 900 Dover Drive Back Bay View Park 2,904 Southeast Jamboree Road and Pasifis Est Coast Highway Back Bay Golf & Fitness 3,724 Northeast 1107 Jamboree Road Recreation/Parks Genoa Park 3,791 West 232 Via Genoa Harper Park 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Galaxie View Park 4,750 Northeast 1554 Galaxy Drive Pinkley Park 4,794 Northwest 360 Ogle Street, Costa Mesa Cliff Drive Park 4,840 Northwest 298 Riverside Avenue Note: 1. Distances are measured from the exterior project boundary only and not from individual construction projects/areas within the interior of the project site. Source: Google Earth, 2017. Section 5.0, page 5.3-10, Mitigation Measure BI0-1 BI0-1 To the extent feasible, construction activities shall be scheduled outside of the nesting season (typically February 15 to August 15) to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds. However, if construction must occur during the nesting season, all suitable habitat surrounding the project site shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist prior to commencement of site disturbance activities. Final . December 2017 3-9 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project If an active avian nest is discovered in proximity to the project site during the nesting bird survey, construction activities shall stay outside of a 300-foot buffer around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer shall be expanded to 500 feet. A biological monitor shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest in order to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. The buffer area and limitations on construction may be reduced upon coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife_ provided the nesting behaviors are not dim ted by construction activities. Once the young have fledged, normal construction activities shall be allowed to occur. Section 5.0, page 5.4-16, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 CUL-1 Prior to ground -disturbing activities, a qualified archaeologist shall provide an Archaeological Monitoring Protocol Plan for the project. The archaeologist shall provide training to a Contractor's Representative regarding the Archaeological Monitoring Protocol Plan and the identification of archaeological resources. The training shall be open to Native American tribal representative(s), to assist the Contractor's Representative in identifying potential tribal cultural resources. The plan shall identify procedures for the event that potential resources are discovered by the Construction Contractor. If evidence of potential subsurface archaeological resources is found during site disturbance/excavation activities, these activities shall cease within 50 feet of that area and the construction contractor shall contact the Orange County Sanitation District Resideiit €ngifteer. Construction activities shall be allowed to continue in other areas of the site. The Resident Engineer shall then retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the discovery prior to resuming grading/construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find. If warranted, the archaeologist shall collect the resource, and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of the significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resource), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. If the archaeologist determines that the find is prehistoric or includes Native American materials, affiliated Native American groups shall be invited to contribute to the assessment and recovery of the resource, as applicable. The archaeologist and any applicable Native American contacts shall collect the resource and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resources), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be followed. Work within the area of discovery shall resume only after the resource has been appropriately inventoried, documented, and recovered, as applicable. Section 5.0, page 5.7-15, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 HAZ-1 Prior to demolition activities, an asbestos survey shall be conducted by an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) certified building inspector to determine the presence or absence of Final . December 2017 3-10 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project asbestos containing -materials (ACMs). If ACMs are located, abatement of asbestos shall be completed prior to any activities that would disturb ACMs or create an airborne asbestos hazard. Asbestos removal shall be performed by a State certified asbestos containment contractor in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403. Contractors performing ACM removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District Direete- of L'. fTin .er-i ~ Section 5.0, page 5.7-16, Mitigation Measure HAZ-2 HAZ-2 If paint is separated from building materials (chemically or physically) during demolition of the structures, the paint waste shall be evaluated independently from the building material by a qualified Environmental Professional. If lead -based paint is found, abatement shall be completed by a qualified Lead Specialist prior to any activities that would create lead dust or fume hazard. Lead -based paint removal and disposal shall be performed in accordance with California Code of Regulation Title 8, Section 1532.1, which specifies exposure limits, exposure monitoring and respiratory protection, and mandates good worker practices by workers exposed to lead. Contractors performing lead -based paint removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District a Engifleer-in • Section 5.0, page 5.7-16, Mitigation Measure HAZ-4 HAZ-4 If unknown wastes are discovered during construction by the contractor that are believed to involve hazardous waste or materials, the contractor shall comply with the following: • Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, and remove workers and the public from the area; • Notify the Orange County Sanitation District Dire_~_r o_`Efig-~--r--~a; • Secure the area as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District oaf Efigiiaeer-i ; and • Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Materials Division's Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator (or other appropriate agency specified by the Director of Engineering). The Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator shall advise the responsible party of further actions that shall be taken, if required. Section 5.0, page 5.9-8, 2nd paragraph The City's LCP and associated Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP) were Vpreved certified by the CCC on Septeffiber 8 January 13, 2017, and became effective iia on anua 3-1 2017. The CLUP sets forth goals, objectives, and policies that govern the use of land and water in the coastal zone within the City of Newport Beach and its sphere of influence consistent with the General Plan. The City's CLUP identifies the Coastal Act coastal resources planning and management policies that are relevant to Newport Beach. The CLUP addresses Coastal Act policies within three chapters: Land Use and Development; Public Access and Recreation; and Coastal Resource Protection. Each section or subsection begins with the identification of the Coastal Act sections that are relevant to Newport Beach, followed by a narrative of the local setting and policy direction adopted by the City to address the requirements of the Costal Act and a listing of specific policies. Final . December 2017 3-11 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Section 5.0, page 5.10-16, Mitigation Measure N0I-1 NOI-1 Prior to the initiation of construction, the Orange County Sanitation District shall confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications stipulate that: • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. • The Gontraeto Orange County Sanitation District shall provide a qttahfied "Noise Disturbance Coordinator." The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint as deemed aeeeptable by the Iubliee Works Dir-eeter, or deli itee and comply with the City Noise Ordinance. The contact name and fhe construction h lin telephone number For- the shall be clearly posted on -site. • When feasible, construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Typical construction activities that produce noise shall not take place outside of the allowable hours specified by the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 10.28.040 (7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays; construction is prohibited on Sundays and/or federal holidays). Alternative work hours may be designated by the Citv to reduce other impacts_ such as traffic. Section 5.0, page 5.10-16, Mitigation Measure N0I-2 NOI-2 Prior to initiation of construction of the Newport Bay Channel force main crossing, the Orange County Sanitation District shall verify that all construction plans and specifications include temporary barriers (noise attenuating panels) around the horizontal directional drilling (HDD)/microtunneling equipment (launch and receiving sites) with at least the following specifications-. Alternate specifications and/or materials may be utilized provided they demonstrate an equivalent level of noise attenuation. • Noise -producing equipment shall be shielded from nearby areas of human occupancy by erecting sound barriers of at least 24-feet in height which completely surround the work site and break the line -of -sight between the noise source and the receptors. Equipment shall be located in positions that direct the greatest noise emissions away from sensitive areas. Final . December 2017 3-12 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project The frame of the barrier shall be located around the HDD/microtunneling eaui ment and consist of 3-inch by 3- inch by 0.065-inch thick steel tubing with welded joints. Alternatively, the frame can be constructed from lumber, but must be of sufficient strength to be structurally stable. The temporary construction noise barrier shall consist of four layers of material attached to the frame with metal screws: — 18 ounce tarp; — 2-inch thick fiberglass blanket R-7.5; 1/2 -inch thick weatherwood asphalt sheathing; and 7/16-inch sturdy board siding. The temporary construction noise barrier shall have a surface density of 4.84 pounds per square foot. Section 5.0, pages 5.11-6 — 5.11-8, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, ft Ganstruction Management Pla engineering drawings and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District D eeteref l ee ing, California Department of Transportation_ and the Citv Public Works Department. Plan These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: Traffic control for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open during; construction or re-routed to ensure continued connectivity. 04;T-,4,Bus stop access im acts shall be ffiaiiitaine coordinated with OCTA. At least three business days before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the Ne"ert City of Newport Beach Public Works Department, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for uninterrupted emergency access. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project. • Identify any off -site construction staging or material storage sites. Specify the hours during which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets. Final . December 2017 3-13 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project • Require the Contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited; to,, gravel and dirt resulting from its operations. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District D .. c E.. gi g ( o f the D v of any material which -------- -----a-------tea �--�r�'--------- - -- ------------i� may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas. • Hauling or transport of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited,except what is required to provide direct access to the pro'ect site. • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All constructed -related parking and staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on -site or within other off-street areas. • Construction -related lane closures will would only occur between the hours of 9:-00 8:30 a.m. and 3-:00 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the Citv. • Use of a construction flagperson to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions, particularly during peak travel hours, and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway, Dover Drive, and Bayside Drive are affected. •This Construction Management Pla Th�ine�g dregs and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). Section 10.0, page 10-2 City of Newport Beach, Back Bay I unding Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9), Adopted February 25, 2014 and Amended April 26. 2016. Final . December 2017 3-14 Errata 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CEQA requires that when a public agency completes an environmental document which includes measures to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects, the public agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring plan. This requirement ensures that environmental impacts found to be significant will be mitigated. The reporting or monitoring plan must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6). In compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for the proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is intended to provide verification that all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project are monitored and reported. Monitoring will include 1) verification that each mitigation measure has been implemented; 2) recordation of the actions taken to implement each mitigation; and 3) retention of records in the project file. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program delineates responsibilities for monitoring the project, but also allows the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) flexibility and discretion in determining how best to monitor implementation. Monitoring procedures will vary according to the type of mitigation measure. Adequate monitoring consists of demonstrating that monitoring procedures took place and that mitigation measures were implemented. Reporting consists of establishing a record that a mitigation measure is being implemented, and generally involves the following steps: • OCSD distributes reporting forms to the appropriate entities for verification of compliance. • Departments/agencies with reporting responsibilities will review the Environmental Impact Report, which provides general background information on the reasons for including specified mitigation measures. • Problems or exceptions to compliance will be addressed to OCSD as appropriate. • Periodic meetings may be held during project implementation to report on compliance of mitigation measures. • Responsible parties provide OCSD with verification that monitoring has been conducted and ensure, as applicable, that mitigation measures have been implemented. Monitoring compliance may be documented through existing review and approval programs such as field inspection reports and plan review. • OCSD prepares a reporting form periodically during the construction phase and an annual report summarizing all project mitigation monitoring efforts. Final . December 2017 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE • Appropriate mitigation measures will be included in construction documents and/or conditions of permits/approvals. Minor changes to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, if required, would be made in accordance with CEQA and would be permitted after further review and approval by OCSD. Such changes could include reassignment of monitoring and reporting responsibilities, plan redesign to make any appropriate improvements, and/or modification, substitution or deletion of mitigation measures subject to conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. No change will be permitted unless the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program fails to satisfy the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. Final • December 2017 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING CHECKLIST Mitigation Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks AESTHETICS AES-1 Prior to issuance of any grading and/or demolition Review and Prior to Issuance Orange County permits, whichever occurs first, engineering Approval of of Grading/ Sanitation District drawings and specifications shall be submitted for Construction Demolition review and approval by the Orange County Management Plan Permits Sanitation District. These documents shall, at a minimum, indicate the equipment and vehicle staging areas, stockpiling of materials, fencing (i.e., temporary fencing with opaque material), and haul route(s). Staging areas shall be sited and/or screened in order to minimize public views to the maximum extent practicable. Construction haul routes shall minimize impacts to sensitive uses in the project area by avoiding local residential streets, as feasible. AES-2 Prior to construction of the new pump station facility, Site Development Prior to Orange County OCSD shall submit design plans of the proposed Review; Final Construction of Sanitation District pump station to the City of Newport Beach for review Review and Pump Station and approval by the City's Planning Commission or Approval of Facility delegated authority for Site Development Review Design Plans and to determine consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP design guidelines. AES-3 All construction -related lighting fixtures (including Review and Prior to Nighttime Orange County portable fixtures) shall be oriented downward and Approval of Construction Sanitation District away from adjacent sensitive areas (including Construction Activities residential and biologically sensitive areas). Safety Lighting Lighting shall consist of the minimal wattage Plan necessary to provide safety at the construction site. A construction safety lighting plan shall be submitted to the Orange County Sanitation District for review and approval prior to any nighttime construction activities. Final . December 2017 4-3 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation -Ogg Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks AES-4 Prior to construction of the proposed pump station, Review and Prior to Orange County lighting plans shall be provided to the Orange Approval of Construction of Sanitation District County Sanitation District for review and approval, Outdoor Lighting the Pump Station and to the City of Newport Beach for review and Plan approval by the City's Planning Commission for Site Development Review. The lighting plan shall illustrate consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP regulations for lighting. Per these requirements, all outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed, located, and maintained to minimize impacts to adjacent sites and to not produce glare onto adjacent sites or roadways. AIR QUALITY AQ-1 Prior to ground disturbance associated with the Review of Project Prior to Issuance Orange County project, the Orange County Sanitation District shall Plans and of any Grading Sanitation District confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans, and Specifications; Permit; During specifications stipulate that, in compliance with Construction Construction SCAQMD Rule 403, excessive fugitive dust Inspections emissions shall be controlled by regular watering or other dust prevention measures, as specified in the SCAQMD's Rules and Regulations. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off -site. Implementation of the following measures would reduce short-term fugitive dust impacts on nearby sensitive receptors: • All active portions of the construction site shall be watered every three hours during daily construction activities when dust is observed migrating from the project site to prevent excessive amounts of dust; • Apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging Final • December 2017 4-4 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Process Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks areas to reduce the need for watering a er dust is observed to be migrating from the site. More frequent watering shall occur if dust is observed migrating from the site during site disturbance; • Any on -site stockpiles of debris, dirt, or other dusty material shall be enclosed, covered, or watered twice daily, or non -toxic soil binders shall be applied; • All grading and excavation operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour; • Disturbed areas shall be replaced with ground cover or paved immediately after construction is completed in the affected area; • Track -out devices such as gravel bed track - out aprons (3 inches deep, 25 feet long, 12 feet wide per lane and edged by rock berm or row of stakes) shall be installed to reduce mud/dirt trackout from unpaved truck exit routes. Alternatively, a wheel washer shall be used at truck exit routes; • On -site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 miles per hour; • All material transported off -site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust prior to departing the job site; and Final • December 2017 4-5 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks • Trucks associated with soil -hauling activities shall avoid residential streets and utilize City - designated truck routes to the extent feasible. AQ-2 Prior to the initiation of construction, the Orange Review of Project Prior to Orange County County Sanitation District shall ensure that all trucks Plans and Construction; Sanitation District that are to haul excavated or graded material on -site Specifications; During shall comply with State Vehicle Code Section 23114 Construction Construction (Spilling Loads on Highways), with special attention Inspections to Sections 23114(b)(F) and (e)(4) as amended, regarding the prevention of such material spilling onto public streets and roads. This requirement shall be indicated on plans and specifications for the proposed project. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO-1 To the extent feasible, construction activities shall Completion of Within 3 Days Orange County be scheduled outside of the nesting season Pre -Construction Prior to Initiation Sanitation District; (typically February 15 to August 15) to avoid Clearance Survey of Ground Project Biologist potential impacts to nesting birds. However, if for Nesting Birds Disturbing construction must occur during the nesting season, Activities all suitable habitat surrounding the project site shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist prior to commencement of site disturbance activities. If an active avian nest is discovered in proximity to the project site during the nesting bird survey, construction activities shall stay outside of a 300- foot buffer around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer shall be expanded to 500 feet. A biological monitor shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest in order to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. The buffer area and limitations on construction may be reduced upon coordination with the California Final • December 2017 4-6 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure In Reporting Monitoring and Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number L Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks Department of Fish and Wildlife, provided the nesting behaviors are not disrupted by construction activities. Once the young have fledged, normal construction activities shall be allowed to occur. CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-1 Prior to ground -disturbing activities, a qualified Review of and Prior to Issuance Orange County archaeologist shall provide an Archaeological Training of any Grading Sanitation District; Monitoring Protocol Plan for the project. The Regarding Permit; During Project archaeologist shall provide training to a Contractor's Archaeological Construction Archaeologist; Representative regarding the Archaeological Monitoring Construction Monitoring Protocol Plan and the identification of Protocol Plan; Contractor archaeological resources. The training shall be During open to Native American tribal representative(s) to Construction assist the Contractor's Representative in identifying potential tribal cultural resources. The plan shall identify procedures for the event that potential resources are discovered by the Construction Contractor. If evidence of potential subsurface archaeological resources is found during site disturbance/excavation activities, these activities shall cease within 50 feet of that area and the construction contractor shall contact the Orange County Sanitation District. Construction activities shall be allowed to continue in other areas of the site. The Resident Engineer shall then retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the discovery prior to resuming grading/construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find. If warranted, the archaeologist shall collect the resource, and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of the significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resource), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. Final . December 2017 4-7 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks If the archaeologist determines that the find is prehistoric or includes Native American materials, affiliated Native American groups shall be invited to contribute to the assessment and recovery of the resource, as applicable. The archaeologist and any applicable Native American contacts shall collect the resource and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resources), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be followed. Work within the area of discovery shall resume only after the resource has been appropriately inventoried, documented, and recovered, as applicable. CUL-2 Prior to ground -disturbing activities, a qualified Review of and Prior to Issuance Orange County paleontologist shall provide a Monitoring Protocol Training of any Grading Sanitation District; Plan for the project. The plan shall identify Regarding Permit; During Project procedures for the event that potential recoverable Monitoring Construction Paleontologist; fossils are discovered by the Construction Protocol Plan; Construction Contractor. The qualified paleontologist shall have During Contractor a B.S. or B.A. in geology and/or paleontology with Construction demonstrated competence in research, fieldwork, reporting, and curation. The paleontologist shall provide training to a Contractor's Representative regarding the Monitoring Protocol Plan and the identification of paleontological resources. If during initial ground -disturbing activities, the Contractor's Representative determines that sediments encountered are unlikely to contain recoverable fossils, no further monitoring shall be required. Final . December 2017 4-8 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure -difProcess Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks owever, a ossi or -suspected ossi is encountered during ground disturbing activities, the following steps shall be taken: • The fossil site shall not be touched, moved, or disturbed in any way. • Work shall stop in the immediate area, and a minimum 50-foot buffer shall be marked with brightly colored flagging. No further disturbance in the flagged area shall occur until the Contractor has cleared the area. • The Contractor's Representative, construction foreman or supervisor shall be immediately notified. • The Contractors Representative shall quickly examine the find and make a determination of significance. If the find is not significant, the foreman shall be informed when it is acceptable to resume work in the area. • If the Contractor's Representative is unable to make a recommendation regarding the find, the qualified paleontologist shall be notified to assess the find. As necessary, the qualified paleontologist shall develop a plan of mitigation which would likely include salvage excavation and removal of the find, removal of sediment from around the specimen, research to identify and categorize the find, curation of the find in a local qualified repository, and preparation of a report summarizing the find. Final • December 2017 4-9 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks IALS HAZ-1 Prior to demolition activities, an asbestos survey shall Asbestos Survey; Prior to Orange County be conducted by an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Asbestos Demolition of Sanitation District Response Act (AHERA) and California Division of Abatement (if Existing Pump Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) certified necessary) Station building inspector to determine the presence or absence of asbestos containing -materials (ACMs). If ACMs are located, abatement of asbestos shall be completed prior to any activities that would disturb ACMs or create an airborne asbestos hazard. Asbestos removal shall be performed by a State certified asbestos containment contractor in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403. Contractors performing ACM removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District. HAZ-2 If paint is separated from building materials Review of Paint Prior to any Orange County (chemically or physically) during demolition of the Waste Evaluation Demolition Sanitation District structures, the paint waste shall be evaluated Activities; During independently from the building material by a Demolition qualified Environmental Professional. If lead -based paint is found, abatement shall be completed by a qualified Lead Specialist prior to any activities that would create lead dust orfume hazard. Lead -based paint removal and disposal shall be performed in accordance with California Code of Regulation Title 8, Section 1532.1, which specifies exposure limits, exposure monitoring and respiratory protection, and mandates good worker practices by workers exposed to lead. Contractors performing lead - based paint removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District. Final . December 2017 4-10 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure 71 Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks HAZ-3 The construction contractor shall retain a Phase Spoils Sampling During Orange County II/Site Characterization Specialist to conduct During Construction Sanitation District; sampling of spoils associated with horizontal Construction Phase II/Site directional drilling/ microtunneling activities for force Characterization main construction prior to proper disposal of soil Specialist; materials off -site. The sampling shall determine Construction whether the spoils contain hazardous wastes, and if Contractor so, the spoils shall be disposed of in accordance with Federal and State requirements. HAZ-4 If unknown wastes are discovered during Observation During Construction construction by the contractor that are believed to During Construction Contractor; Orange involve hazardous waste or materials, the contractor Construction County Sanitation shall comply with the following: District; Hazardous Waste/Materials • Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the Coordinator suspected contaminant, and remove workers and the public from the area; • Notify the Orange County Sanitation District; • Secure the area as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District; and • Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Materials Division's Hazardous Waste/ Materials Coordinator (or other appropriate agency specified by the Director of Engineering). The Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator shall advise the responsible party of further actions that shall be taken, if required. Final • December 2017 4-11 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure9 Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY HWQ-1 Prior to site disturbance activities and as part of the Preparation and Prior to Orange County project's compliance with the NPDES requirements, submittal of a Construction; Sanitation District; a Notice of Intent (NO1) shall be prepared and Notice of Intent Construction Construction submitted to the State Water Resources Quality (NOI) General Permit Contractor Control Board (SWRCB), providing notification and intent to comply with the State of California Construction General Permit. HWQ-2 The proposed project shall conform to the Review and During Orange County requirements of an approved Storm Water Pollution Compliance with Construction Sanitation District; Prevention Plan (SWPPP) (to be applied for prior to Approved SWPPP Construction site disturbance) and the NPDES Permit for General and NPDES Contractor Construction Activities No. CAS000002, Order No. Permit; 2009-0009-DWQ (as amended by 2010-014-DWQ Construction and 2012-006-DWQ), including implementation of Inspections all recommended Best Management Practices (BMPs), as approved by the State Water Resources Quality Control Board (SWRCB). HWQ-3 Upon completion of project construction, the Orange Notice of Following Orange County County Sanitation District shall submit a Notice of Termination Completion of Sanitation District Termination (NOT) to the State Water Resources (NOT) Construction Quality Control Board (SWRCB) to indicate that construction is completed. NOISE NOI-1 Prior to the initiation of construction, the Orange Review of Grading Prior to Initiation Orange County County Sanitation District shall confirm that the Plan, Building of Construction; Sanitation District Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications Plans, and During stipulate that: Specifications; Construction Construction • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, Inspections shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. Final • December 2017 4-12 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number -gigs Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Process Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks • The Orange County Sanitation District shall provide a "Noise Disturbance Coordinator." The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement measures to resolve the complaint and comply with the City Noise Ordinance. The construction hotline telephone number shall be clearly posted on - site. • When feasible, construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Typical construction activities that produce noise shall not take place outside of the allowable hours specified by the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 10.28.040 (7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays; construction is prohibited on Sundays and/or federal holidays). Alternative work hours may be designated by the City to reduce other impacts, such as traffic. Final • December 2017 4-13 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Process Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks NO1-2 Prior to issuance of Demolition or Building Permits, Review of Plans Prior to Issuance Orange County the Orange County Sanitation District shall verify that and Specifications of Demolition or Sanitation District all construction plans and specifications include Building Permits; temporary barriers (noise attenuating panels) around During the horizontal directional drilling Construction (HDD)/microtunneling equipment (launch and receiving sites) with at least the following specifications. Alternate specifications and/or materials may be utilitzed provided they demonstrate an equivalent level of noise attenuation. • Noise -producing equipment shall be shielded from nearby areas of human occupancy by erecting sound barriers of at least 24-feet height which completely surround the work site and break the line -of - sight between the noise source and the receptors. Equipment shall be located in positions that direct the greatest noise emissions away from sensitive areas. • The frame of the barrier shall be located around the HDD/microtunneling equipment and consist of 3-inch by 3-inch by 0.065-inch thick steel tubing with welded joints. Alternatively, the frame can be constructed from lumber, but must be of sufficient strength to be structurally stable. • The temporary construction noise barrier shall consist of four layers of material attached to the frame with metal screws: — 18 ounce tarp; — 2-inch thick fiberglass blanket R-7.5; Final • December 2017 4-14 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks — /z-inch thick weatherwood asphalt sheathing; and — 7116-inch sturdy board siding. • The temporary construction noise barrier shall have a surface density of 4.84 pounds per square foot. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, engineering Review and Prior to Orange County drawings and specifications shall be submitted for Approval of the Construction Sanitation District; review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation Construction Caltrans; City of District, California Department of Transportation, and Management Plan Newport Beach the City Public Works Department. These documents Public Works shall, at a minimum, address the following: Department • Traffic control for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open during construction or re-routed to ensure continued connectivity. • Bus stop access impacts shall be coordinated with OCTA. • At least three business days before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for uninterrupted emergency access. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. Final • December 2017 4-15 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Process Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project. • Identify any off -site construction staging or material storage sites. • Specify the hours during which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets. • Require the Contractorto keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited to, gravel and dirt resulting from its operations. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District , of any material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas. • Hauling or transport of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except what is required to provide direct access to the project site. Final • December 2017 4-16 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Process Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All constructed -related parking and staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on -site or within other off-street areas. • Construction -related lane closures would only occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. • Use of a construction flagperson to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions, particularly during peak travel hours, and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway, Dover Drive, and Bayside Drive are affected. • The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device MUTCD . Final • December 2017 4-17 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 4-18 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program • !! WIJ', .s Bay Bridge Pump Station an�c Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. R"r ''der i J U LY 2023 Pre ared far. `p < Orange County i=tation Distr41Ict- Prepared by: _ Michael Baker International Bay Bridge Addendum I. Summary As Lead Agency, the Orange County Sanitation District ("OC San") prepared an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (the "previously analyzed project"). The OC San's Board of Directors ultimately certified an EIR for the previously analyzed project on February 24, 2021. On March 1, 2021, OC San submitted a Notice of Determination ("NOD") for the Final EIR to both the State Clearinghouse and the Orange County Clerk's Office ("County Clerk's Office"). The County Clerk's Office posted the NOD on March 1, 2021, and the State Clearinghouse posted the NOD on March 2, 2021. On April 1, 2021, Bayside Village Marina filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate against OC San in Orange County Superior Court alleging that the EIR failed to comply with CEQA on numerous grounds. (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238.) On December 16, 2022, Judge William Claster of the Orange County Superior Court issued a ruling that upheld the EIR in all respects except one. The Court issued a limited writ directing OC San to correct deficiencies in the EIR's description of the project's proposed construction staging areas. (Minute Order, pp. 1, 16.) The Court's December 16, 2022, ruling is attached hereto as Attachment I (the "Ruling"). The EIR explained that construction staging will occur somewhere in the "Adjacent Pump Station Work Area" ("Adjacent Area") shown in yellow on Exhibit 3-6 of the EIR. The EIR considered all potential impacts that could occur in the Adjacent Area including, among others, impacts on biological resources, aesthetics, cultural resources, archeological resources, transportation, noise, land use plan consistency, and emergency response. Lower Castaways Park is within the Adjacent Area. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 5.1-17, 5.3-2, 5.3-15, 5.3-21, 5.4-14, 5.5- 1, 5.5-3, 5.9-8, 5.9-9, 5.9-12, 5.9-14, 5.9-15, 5.9-16, 5.9-17, 8-9.) The City of Newport Beach submitted a comment letter to OC San stating that the "City will likely neither support a permanent nor temporary easement through Lower Castaways Park" because the City plans to develop the site with park facilities. In responses to comments, OC San stated that, should Lower Castaways not be available, construction staging would occur elsewhere within the Adjacent Area. The Court found that, assuming Lower Castaways is not available, "it is unclear whether creating a staging area in the limited, designated space is even possible." (Ruling, p. 7.) The Court concluded that no specific location with adequate square footage had been identified in the EIR, nor was there any analysis as to whether Mitigation Measures AES-1 and TRA-I would apply to any area other than the Lower Castaways. (Ruling, p. 7.) The Court also noted that Mitigation Measure TRA-I implies that construction staging could occur outside the Adjacent Areas. Mitigation Measure TRA-I states in relevant part, "[construction drawings shall] identify any and all construction staging or material storage sites located outside of the project area." (Ruling, p. 7.) The Court further noted that counsel for the District stated in a prior hearing that the lowest responsible bidder will have complete discretion 1 1780344.1 to decide where staging will occur and how many staging sites will be necessary. (Ruling, p. 7.) The Court explained that because the EIR's analysis failed to account for impacts that could occur elsewhere, and the low bidder could place the project elsewhere, it would make Mitigation Measure AES-1 "toothless." (Ruling, p. 8.) The Court also questioned whether AES-1 imposes enforceable standards. (Ruling, p. 8.) OC San has prepared this Addendum to the EIR in response to the Ruling. This Addendum provides additional information regarding the proposed use of the Lower Castaways as a construction staging area and adds a new construction staging area at OC San Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach for soil storage/drying activities. The Addendum also modifies TRA-I to eliminate any reference to additional construction staging or material storage areas and, per a new condition of project approval, states that the construction contractor will not have discretion to select staging areas. Finally, the Addendum modifies and addresses the enforceability of Mitigation Measure AES-1. Mitigation measures for public projects are considered enforceable when they are incorporated into the project design. (Public Resources Code § 21081.6(b); 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15126.4(a)(2).) A resolution incorporating AES-I into the project design will be considered contemporaneously with this Addendum. Collectively, these clarifications and additions are referred to as the "Modified Project." As set forth in detail below, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. As a result, an addendum is appropriate. (CEQA Guidelines §§ 15162, 15164.) II. Applicable CEQA Principles When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review documentation shall be required unless one or more of the following events occurs: 1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; 2 1780344.1 B. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or D. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. When none of the above events has occurred, yet minor technical changes or additions to the previously adopted negative declaration are necessary, an addendum may be prepared (CEQA Guidelines § 15164(b).) Circulation of an addendum for public review is not necessary (CEQA Guidelines § 15164(c)); however, the addendum must be considered in conjunction with the adopted Final EIR by the agency's decision -making body (CEQA Guidelines § 15164(d).) III. Project Description: The Modified Project A. Construction Staging 1. Lower Castaways Park On May 22, 2023, the City of Newport Beach ("City") signed a Letter of Intent For Entering Into a Licensing Agreement — Lower Castaways Park ("Letter of Intent") attached hereto as Attachment 2. Per the Letter of Intent, OC San would lease 18,000 square feet of the lower portion of Castaways Park, located at 100 Dover Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, from the City for use as a construction staging area in connection with the project. The City and OC San intend to memorialize these details in a licensing agreement at a future date. OC San will use a designated staging area at Lower Castaways Park, shown on Exhibit 1, for the following activities: staff parking; construction office trailers; storage, loading, and unloading of equipment and material; and refueling. The staged construction materials would include piping, conduits, shoring, formwork, rebar, and other materials necessary for construction. Equipment such as pumps, HVAC equipment, cranes, and electrical panels will be stored on raised mobile platforms, pallets, or other protective barriers to protect the equipment and prevent spills or the spread of materials. Staged construction equipment at this location may include trucks, lifts, excavators, loaders, cranes, and other equipment necessary for the construction. In addition, it is anticipated that the contractor will use a mobile diesel storage unit onsite to refuel the construction equipment. Soil and dredged materials will not be stored on the property. 2. OC San Plant No. 2 The Modified Project will utilize an approximately 30,000 square foot portion of OC San's Plant No. 2 as an additional construction staging area (Plant No. 2.). Plant No.2 is located 1780344.1 at 22212 Brookhurst Street, in the southernmost part of the City of Huntington Beach, and adjacent to Huntington State Beach. Plant No. 2 is triangular in shape and bounded by Brookhurst Street on the west, the Santa Ana River Channel on the east, and a lagoon on the South where Talbert Channel discharges into the Pacific Ocean. Residential development is located west and north of the site across Brookhurst Street. The Talbert Regional Park and Banning Ranch are located east of the site across the Santa Ana River channel. Plant No. 2 is approximately 111 acres in size and is developed with facilities related to various aspects of the wastewater treatment and disposal process, offices, and internal access roads. Under the Modified Project, excavated soil will be hauled from the project site to Plant No. 2 where it will be stockpiled and dried. Once dried, loaders would be utilized to stow stockpiles onto hauling trucks and either be hauled back to the project site or to a permitted landfill for disposal. Construction materials/equipment at Plant No. 2 would include, but not be limited to, hauling trucks, construction worker vehicles, loaders, and soil stockpiles. It should be noted that hauling trucks would not typically be stored overnight at Plant No. 2. Exhibit 2 shows the Plant No. 2 construction staging area. 11A4 PRIME PIUMPSTAnOH AND FORCE AUIfISREP1ACE1lENr PROJECT JFDOER IAM THE EIYL.N.. IAFACT FEPOEFT Proposed Lower Castaways Paris Staging Area f 0r E A wx Tf OMA EsMhk 1 The Modified Project's soil hauling assumptions, based on the addition of a construction staging area at Plant No. 2, are set forth in Tables 1-1 through 1-3. Hauling is anticipated to commence in the Fall of 2025 and conclude in the Fall of 2028. 4 1780344.1 Table 1-1 Soil Hauling Schedule From Project Site to OC San Plant No. 2 Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Soil Hauling Schedule Number Duration Activity Quantity Unit of Trucks' Start Complete (Calendar Days) Pump Station 8,281 cy 828 913/2 121912025 97 025 Existing Pump 4112/ Station Demolition 89 cy 9 2028 5/28/2028 46 and Odor Control TOTAL 8,370 cy 837 Note: 1. Assume each truck carries 10 cubic yards. 2. CalEEMod included assumption of construction commencement in the Fall of 2024. This is a conservative assumption, as the model assumes tha as time progresses, technology improves, reducing emissions. Table 1-2 Soil Hauling Schedule From OC San Plant No. 2 Back to the Project Site for Backfill Soil Hauled from Plant Number 2 Back to the Project Site for Backfill Soil Hauling Schedule Number Duration Activity Quantity Unit of Start Complete (Calendar Trucks' Days) Station 200 cy 20 9/19/2025 9/26/2025 7 -Pump Existing Pump Station Demolition and Odor 219 cy 22 1111/2027 121312027 32 Control TOTAL 419 cy 42 Note: 1. Assume each truck carries 10 cubic yards. 2. CalEEMod included assumption of construction commencement in the Fall of 2024. This is a conservative assumption, as the model assumes that as time progresses, technology improves, reducing emissions. 1780344.1 Score° Gaay: Earn Rn Ua0 Ma MKDGE NMP STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONWIVAL IMPACT REPORT Proposed Plant No. 2 Staging Area I N T E R M A T 1 0 M A L fxh I bit 2 1780344.1 Table 1-3 Soil Hauling Schedule From OC San Plant No. 2 to Olinda Alpha Landfill ff Soil Hauling from Plant Number 2 Off -Site for Disposal Soil Hauling Schedule Number Duration Activity Quantity Unit of Start Complete (Calendar Trucks' Days) Pump Station 7,863 cy 786 6/2/2025 9/19/2025 109 Existing Pump Station Demolition and 9 cy 9 12/20/2027 1 /28/2028 39 Odor Control TOTAL 7,872 cy 795 Note: 1. Assume each truck carries 10 cubic yards. 2. CalEEMod included assumption of construction commencement in the Fall of 2024. This is a conservative assumption, as the model assumes that as time progresses, technology improves, reducing emissions. 3. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 In response to the Ruling, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 is modified below to: (1) eliminate the previous reference to, "Identify any and all construction staging or material storage sites located outside of the project site;" and (2) to add references to the "City of Huntington Beach" due to the addition of a construction staging area at Plant No. 2 which is located in the City of Huntington Beach. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 appeared in full on pages 1-20 to 23 and 5.11-7 to 9 of the EIR. TRA-1 is hereby edited as reflected below in each of the places it appeared in the EIR. Strikethrough indicates deleted text and double underline indicates an addition: TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, engineering drawings and specifications, and/or contractor shop drawings shall be prepared by the Project Engineer, or designee, and submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, and the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department. These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: • Traffic control protocols shall be specified for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation, including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Disruption to traffic circulation shall be minimized to the greatest extent feasible. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open, to the greatest extent feasible, during construction or shall be re- routed to ensure continued connectivity. 7 1780344.1 • Bus stop access impacts shall be coordinated with, and approved by, the Orange County Transportation Authority. • At least one week before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, City of Newport Beach Public Works Department and Caltrans, as applicable, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for planning temporary detours or identifying alternative emergency access routes where appropriate. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project to reduce impacts to local streets and plan for traffic control signage and detours along identified haul routes to minimize impacts to existing traffic flow. • Specify the hours during which hauling activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets such as traffic control barricades, cones, flaggers, and warning signs. • Require the contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited, to gravel and dirt resulting from project construction. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District, of any project material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent City of Newport Beach} City of Huntington Beach, and Caltrans streets or areas. • Hauling of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except when required to provide direct access to the project site and in compliance with the approved project haul routes. • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. 8 1780344.1 • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All construction -related staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on the project site or within additional off-street staging areas previously identified and arranged. • Construction -related lane closures would only occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. • Use of a construction flagperson (as deemed appropriate by the Orange County Sanitation District) to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions (particularly during peak travel hours) and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway are affected. • The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). 4. Condition of Approval: the Construction Contractor Does Not Have Discretion to Select Staging Areas In response to the Ruling, OC San has prepared a condition of approval for the Modified Project ("Condition"). The Condition will be considered for approval contemporaneously with this Addendum. The Condition states, "The constructor contractor will not have discretion to select any construction staging or material storage sites. The construction staging or material storage sites for this project are identified in the Addendum to the certified Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Environmental Impact Report." B. Mitigation Measure AES-1 The EIR for the previously analyzed project included the following mitigation measure to address potentially significant short-term visual impacts. (EIR, p. 1-2.) Specifically, the EIR concluded that project construction activities could temporarily degrade the visual character/ quality of the site and its surroundings. (EIR, p. 1-2.) The EIR concluded that these impacts would ultimately be less than significant with incorporation of Mitigation Measure AES-1. AES-1 is modified for clarity below. Mitigation Measure AES-1 appeared in full on pages 1-2 tc 3 and 5.1-16 of the EIR. AES-1 is hereby edited as reflected below in each of the places it appeared in the EIR. Strikethrough indicates deleted text and double underline indicates an addition: 9 1780344.1 AES-1 Prior to issuance of any grading and/or demolition permits, whichever occurs first, engineering drawings and specifications shall be prepared by the Project Engineer, or their designee, and submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Engineering. These documents shall, at a minimum, indicate the equipment and vehicle staging areas, stockpiling of materials, screening/fencing (, and haul route(s). Staging areas shall be sited away from public views, to the extent feasible and reasonable. afid4 r- Sere o� utilizing temporary fencing with opaque ter-i-aConstruction haul routes shall minimize impacts to sensitive uses in the project area by avoiding local residential streets. Staging areas shall be screened utilizing temporary fencing with opaque materials to buffer views of construction equipment and materials for the duration of construction. In response to the Ruling, AES-1 will be incorporated into the project's design pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(b) and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15126.4(a)(2). (See Corresponding Resolution of the Orange County Sanitation District Receiving and Filing the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project No. 5-67 and Approving the Modified Project.) IV. Environmental Assessment A. Aesthetics/Light and Glare The potential aesthetic/visual impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.1-16, 5.1-17, 5.1-18.). Plant No. 2 is a fully developed utility facility which contains numerous structures that vary in height, mass, and function. The tallest structure at Plant No. 2 is Surge Tower 2, which stands at 86 feet above -grade, located on the southeast portion of Plant No. 2, adjacent to the Santa Ana River trail. Residential communities with views of Plant No. 2 are located in the cities of Huntington Beach to the northwest and Newport Beach to the southeast. Long distance views of Plant No. 2 can also be seen from the east in the City of Costa Mesa. Under existing conditions, Plant No. 2 is generally screened by fencing and landscaping, including trees, partially blocking views into Plant No. 2 from the surrounding areas. As a result of these visual barriers and the relatively flat topography of the landscape surrounding Plant No. 2, the majority of the facilities within Plant No. 2. are not publicly visible, beyond those facilities that are located along the Plant's frontages or that are multiple stories tall. 10 1780344.1 A 17-mile portion of SR-1 from Jamboree Road in Newport Beach to the northern city limit of Seal Beach is an eligible state scenic highway but has not been officially designated. (Caltrans 2019). This portion of SR-1 provides prominent views of the Pacific Ocean in the south, and occasional views of marshland and wetlands in the north, when not interrupted by the urban development within the cities of Huntington Beach and Seal Beach. Plant No. 2 is located approximately 500 feet north of SR-1. The Modified Project would utilize an approximately 30,000 square foot portion of Plant No. 2 as a construction staging area for soil stockpiling and drying. Construction materials/equipment at Plant No. 2 would include, but not be limited to, hauling trucks, construction worker vehicles, loaders, and soil stockpiles. It should be noted that hauling trucks would not typically be stored overnight at Plant No. 2. Although the proposed soil stockpiles may be visible from outside of Plant No. 2, the staging and drying of these soils would be temporary and would cease upon completion of construction. Further, pursuant to AES-1, construction materials/equipment would be screened utilizing temporary fencing with opaque materials at the designated staging areas to limit public views of staging activities. No nighttime lighting would be required for the soil stockpiling/storage at Plant No. 2. The Modified Project would also require the operation of hauling vehicles that would be visible during hauling between the project site and Plant No. 2. These hauling vehicles, however, would only operate temporarily during construction. At the completion of construction, these vehicles would cease operations. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project, none of which would be located at Plant No. 2. Based on AES-1 and the short-term duration of hauling and storage activities at OC San's fully developed Plant No. 2, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to aesthetics. B. Air Quality The potential air quality impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.2-13, 5.2-14, 5.2-15, 5.2-16, 5.2-17, 5.2-19, 5.2-20, 5.2-24, 5.2-25.) Plant No. 2 is located within the South Coast Air Basin and thus is within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District ("Air District"). The Modified Project would be subject to the Air District's rules and regulations including, without limitation, Rule 401 (visible emissions); Rule 402 (nuisance); Rule 403 (fugitive dust); and Rule 431.2 (sulfur content of liquid fuels). The Modified Project's soil hauling schedule is anticipated to commence in Fall of 2025 and conclude in Winter of 2028. Soil hauling would include 8,370 cubic yards of export from the project site to Plant No. 2. Approximately 419 cubic yards of the 11 1780344.1 exported soil would be hauled back to the project site to be used for backfilling purposes. The remaining 7,872 cubic yards of exported soil would be hauled from Plant No. 2 to a permitted landfill facility for disposal. This would result in a total of 1,674 soil hauling truck trips. These trips, however, would be temporary and would cease upon completion of construction. The Modified Project's potential air quality impacts were modeled and compared to the applicable Air District thresholds as set forth in Table 1-4. Table 1-4 Modified Project -Generated Construction Emissions Emissions Source Pollutant (pounds/day)',z ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Year 1 4.50 40.7 40.0 0.08 2.36 1.75 Year 2 18.0 31.6 33.6 0.07 2.21 1.31 Year 3 2.70 23.2 25.4 0.05 1.83 0.99 Year 4 2.61 22.4 25.0 0.05 1.77 0.93 Year 5 0.33 2.90 3.85 0.01 0.31 0.09 Maximum Daily 18.0 40.7 40.0 0.08 Z36 1.75 Emissions SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Notes: 1. Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod version 2022.1. Emissions shown represent worst -case during summer and winter. 2. The reduction/credits for construction emissions are based on "mitigation" included in CalEEMod and are required by the SCAQMD Rules. The adjustments applied in CalEEMod includes the following: properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily; cover stockpiles with tarps; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. The emissions results in this table represent the "mitigated" emissions shown in Attachment 3. 3. CalEEMod included assumption of construction commencement in the Fall of 2024. This is a conservative assumption, as the model assumes that as time progresses, technology improves reducing emissions. Source: Refer to Attachment 3 for assumptions used in this analysis. As indicated in Table 1-4, criteria pollutant emissions for ROG, NOx, CO, S02, PM10, and PM2.5 during construction of the Modified Project would not exceed the Air District's significance thresholds. Although odors could potentially be generated by vehicle exhaust emissions during construction staging activities, such odors would disperse rapidly and would not occur at magnitudes that would affect substantial numbers of people. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to air quality. 12 1780344.1 C. Biological Resources The potential biological resources impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.3-13, 5.3-14, 5.3-15, 5.3-16, 5.3-17, 5.3-19, 5.3-20, 5.3-21, 5.3-23, 5.3-24, 5.3-25.) Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. The vast majority of the soils on site have been significantly altered due to compaction and construction of the facility. There is no native or natural vegetation within Plant No. 2; the only vegetation that exists on site consists of ornamental grass, shrubs, and trees. Thus, Plant No. 2 does not present suitable habitat for sensitive/special-status biological resources and the proposed soil drying and stockpiling at Plant No. 2 would not adversely impact any sensitive/special-status biological resources. Due to the presence of ornamental trees at Plant No. 2, there is a potential for nesting birds to be present during the soil drying / stockpiling activities. As a result, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 would apply to the Modified Project, with the following modifications: BI0-2 Should construction activities occur within the nesting season, all suitable habitat surrounding the project site and Orange County Sanitation District OC San) Plant No. 2 shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist, defined as an individual with a bachelor's degree or above in a biological science field and demonstrated field experience, within three days prior to commencement of site disturbance activities. If an active avian nest is discovered in proximity to the project site or OC San Plant No. 2 during the nesting bird survey, construction activities (those activities that could result in direct or indirect impacts to active nests either through noise, light, or physical contact) shall stay outside of a 300- foot buffer around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer shall be expanded to 500 feet. The qualified biologist shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest in order to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines that nesting behavior is adversely affected by construction activities, the qualified biologist shall halt construction activities that result in the adverse effect and file a written report to OCSDOC San and the construction contractor stating the recommended course of action. The buffer area and limitations on construction may be reduced upon approval by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and only if the nesting behaviors are not disrupted by construction activities, as determined by the qualified biologist. Once the young have fledged, normal construction activities shall be allowed to occur. 13 1780344.1 There are no riparian habitats or wetlands on Plant No. 2. While the Santa Ana River Trail adjacent to Plant No. 2 is a significant movement corridor for multiple species, all of the Modified Project's soil drying and stockpiling activities would be located exclusively within Plant No. 2. The ornamental trees within Plant No. 2 are not located on public rights of way and, therefore, would not be subject to any tree preservation ordinances. Although Plant No. 2 is located with the Orange County Transportation Authority Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP), the site is designated as "Developed" in the NCCP, and is not within an area designated as Permit Area, Natural Habitats, or Agriculture. (NCCP figure 1-2.) The NCCP does not impose any requirements on areas designated as "Developed." Further, Plant No. 2 is not located within the plan areas of any habitat conservation plans other than the NCCP. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. Based on BIO-2 and the short-term duration of hauling and storage activities at Plant No. 2, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to biological resources. D. Cultural Resources The potential cultural resources impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.4-15, 5.4-16.) No cultural resources, including historic or archeological resources, have been recorded at Plant No. 2. Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. The vast majority of the soils on site have been significantly altered due to compaction and construction of the facility. The Modified Project's soil drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction, would cease when construction is completed, and would not require any ground disturbing activities that could impact previously undiscovered cultural resources or human remains. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to cultural resources. 14 1780344.1 E. Geology and Soils The potential geology and soils impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.4-15, 5.4-16.) Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. The vast majority of the soils on site have been significantly altered due to compaction and construction of the facility. No paleontological resources have been documented within Plant No. 2. Further, Plant No. 2 is not within a designated Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or within potential earthquake -induced landslide zones as designated by the California Geological Survey. The proposed soil drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 under the Modified Project would be temporary during construction, would cease when construction is completed, and would not require any ground disturbing activities that could impact previously undiscovered paleontological resources. The proposed soil drying / stockpiling would not directly or indirectly exacerbate the existing potential for fault rupture, ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. The Modified Project would be required to comply with Air District Rule 403. This Rule requires that excessive fugitive dust emissions be controlled with regular watering or other dust prevention measures. Further, compliance with OC San established protocols and existing regulations, including the implementation of stormwater best management practices (BMPs) per the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Construction Stormwater standards (e.g., sediment traps, straw bale barriers, wind erosion/dust control, and filter berms, among others) would minimize the potential of erosion at Plant No. 2 during construction. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to geology and soils. F. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The potential greenhouse gas emissions impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.6-11, 5.6-12, 5.6-13.). The Modified Project calls for hauling of soils both to and from Plant No. 2 during project construction. These proposed hauling activities are summarized in Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. Additionally, the Modified Project calls for soil drying / stockpiling at 15 1780344.1 Plant No. 2 during project construction. The Modified Project's soil haul trips and drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction and would cease when construction is completed. The Modified Project's GHG emissions would be created by off -road construction equipment and on -road vehicles (haul trucks and worker vehicles). The Modified Project would generate a total of 1,743 MTCO2eq during construction, which is equivalent to approximately 5 8. 11 MTCO2eq/yr when amortized over 30 years; refer to Attachment 3, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Data. As such, the Modified Project would not result in GHG emissions in exceedance of the Air District's 3,000 MTCO2eq/yr significance threshold. Consequently, the Modified Project would not result in any potentially adverse construction related GHG impacts. The Modified Project would not interfere with implementation of any GHG reduction goals for 2030 or 2050 set forth in Assembly Bill (AB) 32, Senate Bill (SB) 32, Executive Order (EO) B-30-15, and EO 5-3-05 because the Modified Project would not exceed the Air District's 3,000 MTCO2eq/yr significance threshold. Therefore, the Modified Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to greenhouse gas emissions. G. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The potential hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.5-15, 5.7-13, 5.7-14, 5.7-15, 4.7-16, 5.7-17, 5.7- 20.). Plant No. 2 is located within the City of Huntington Beach. The Huntington Beach Fire Department includes the Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division, which is responsible for coordinating the City's emergency preparedness and response activities. Additionally, Plant No. 2 is located within a Tsunami Hazard Zone. Evacuation routes for the Tsunami Hazard Zone near Plant No. 2 include northbound Bushard Street and northbound Brookhurst Street. It should be noted that no existing or proposed K-12 schools are located within 0.25-mile of Plant No. 2. Also, Plant No. 2 is not located within a wildland fire hazard area or within an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport. Five underground storage tanks (USTs) are currently in use at Plant No. 2. Further, multiple structures at Plant No. 2 contain asbestos -containing materials (ACM) 16 1780344.1 and lead -based paint (LBP). In addition to ACM and LBPs, universal waste may be present on -site including, but not limited to, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury thermometers, and fluorescent light bulbs. Storage of hazardous materials on -site for Plant No. 2 operations also include, but are not limited to, compressed gasses, diesel fuel, and water treatment chemicals (hydrogen peroxide, sulfuric acid, salts, and flocculants). Plant No. 2 is not listed on the California Environmental Protection Agency's Cortese List pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5. However, multiple closed leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) cases and UST removals have been documented with the Orange County Health Care Agency, Environmental Health Department. Multiple plugged oil and gas wells are located within the Plant No. 2 boundary. Additionally, multiple active oil and gas wells are located within 0.25-mile of Plant No. 2. The Modified Project's proposed soil drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction, would cease when construction is completed, and would not involve any demolition of on -site structures or ground disturbing activities. Further, the Modified Project's use of potentially hazardous materials associated with truck hauling operations, including oils, lubricants, and vehicle fuels, would comply with applicable Federal, State and local regulatory requirements. It is acknowledged, however, that Plant No. 2 is situated in the proximity of identified evacuation routes for the Tsunami Hazard Zone, and there is a potential for impacts related to interference with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan due to hauling activities. As a result, Draft EIR Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would apply to the Modified Project, with the following modifications: TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, engineering drawings and specifications, and/or contractor shop drawings shall be prepared by the Project Engineer, or designee, and submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, and the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department. These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: • Traffic control protocols shall be specified for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation, including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Disruption to traffic circulation shall be minimized to the greatest extent feasible. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open, to the greatest extent feasible, during construction or shall be re- routed to ensure continued connectivity. • Bus stop access impacts shall be coordinated with, and approved by, the Orange County Transportation Authority. 17 1780344.1 • At least one week before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, City of Newport Beach Public Works Department and Caltrans, as applicable, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for planning temporary detours or identifying alternative emergency access routes where appropriate. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project to reduce impacts to local streets and plan for traffic control signage and detours along identified haul routes to minimize impacts to existing traffic flow. • Specify the hours during which hauling activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets such as traffic control barricades, cones, flaggers, and warning signs. • Require the contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited, to gravel and dirt resulting from project construction. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District, of any project material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent City of Newport Beach,, City of Huntington Beach and Caltrans streets or areas. • Hauling of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except when required to provide direct access to the project site and in compliance with the approved project haul routes. • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully 18 1780344.1 responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All construction -related staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on the project site or within additional off-street staging areas previously identified and arranged. • Construction -related lane closures would only occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. • Use of a construction flagperson (as deemed appropriate by the Orange County Sanitation District) to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions (particularly during peak travel hours) and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway are affected. • The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). With compliance with TRA-1, temporary construction -related impacts would be less than significant. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. Based on TRA-1 and the short-term duration of hauling and storage activities at Plant No. 2, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to hazards and hazardous materials. H. Hydrology & Water Quality The potential hydrology and water quality impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.8-16, 5.8-17, 5.8-18, 5.8-19.). Plant No. 2 is located within the Santa Ana Region Basin Plan ("Basin Plan") and, thus, is within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board ("RWQCB"). The Modified Project would be subject to the Basin Plan's water quality objectives, plans, and policies for surface water quality. Additionally, Plant No. 2 is located within the Orange County Groundwater Basin and, therefore, is within the jurisdiction of the Orange County Water District ("OCWD"). As such, the Modified Project would also be subject to the OCWD Management Plan's goals to protect and enhance the groundwater quality of the Orange County Groundwater Basin, protect and increase the sustainable yield of the basin in a cost-effective manner, and increase the efficiency of OCWD's operation. 19 1780344.1 Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. The vast majority of the soils on site have been significantly altered due to compaction and construction of the facility. Plant No. 2 is located in a 500-year flood zone or an area protected from the 100-year flood by an adjoining levee or dike, thus, the Modified Project would be located outside a Special Flood Hazard Area and would not impede or redirect flood flows. The Modified Project's soil drying / stockpiling activities would be temporary during construction, cease when construction is completed, and would not require any ground disturbing activities that could interfere with groundwater recharge or substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area. Nevertheless, compliance with OC San's established protocols and existing regulations, including the implementation of stormwater best management practices (BMPs) per the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Construction Stormwater standards (e.g., sediment traps, straw bale barriers, wind erosion/dust control, and filter berms, among others) would ensure the Modified Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, or otherwise substantially degrade surface quality from construction activities. No new significant impacts pertaining to potential soil erosion/runoff would result in this regard. The Modified Project would not result in any new significant impacts pertaining to increased water demand during construction, compared to that considered in the Draft EIR. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to hydrology and water quality. I. Land Use and Planning The potential land use and planning impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.9-8., 5.9-9, 5.9-12, 5.9-14, 5.9-15, 5.9-16, 5.9-17). Plant No. 2 is designated as Public (P) land use and zoned Industrial Limited (IL) and Residential Agriculture with an Oil Overlay (RA-0). (City of Huntington Beach 2015). The Public land use designation provides for government administrative and related facilities, such as public utilities, public parking lots, and similar uses. The IL zoning designation allows for sites of moderate- to low -intensity industrial uses, commercial services, and light manufacturing. The RA-0 zoning designation is intended to serve as a transition or holding zone for property with current agricultural activities and as a zone where restricted residential development is permitted. The RA-0 also provides areas to accommodate oil operations without drilling. 20 1780344.1 The Modified Project's proposed soil drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction, would cease when construction is completed, would not require or result in changes to land uses or zoning designations at Plant No. 2, and would not physically divide an established community. Additionally, the proposed soil drying / stockpiling activities are a permitted activity/use within the RA-0 zone and, as such, would not conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies outlined in the City of Huntington Beach's Local Coastal Program and General Plan Coastal Element Land Use Plan. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. Overall, the Modified Project would be consistent with applicable land use plans, policies, and regulations, including the Local Coastal Program, General Plan and Municipal Code. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to land use and planning. I Noise The potential noise impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3- 13, 5.10-12, 5.10-13, 5.10-14, 5.10-15, 5.10-16, 5.10-17, 5.10-18). Also, Plant No. 2 is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport. The Modified Project calls for hauling of soils both to and from Plant No. 2 during project construction. These proposed hauling activities are summarized in Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. Additionally, the Modified Project calls for soil drying / stockpiling at Plant No. 2 during project construction. Construction hauling activities at Plant No. 2 would occur between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM and no activities would occur in the nighttime hours. As such, these activities would not result in substantial noise increases in the vicinity, compared to the existing condition. The hauling / soil drying / and stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 will not call for any equipment that could result in vibration impacts (such as pile driving equipment). The Modified Project, however, could result in short-term construction noise impacts associated with off -road construction equipment and on -road vehicles (haul trucks and worker vehicles). The Modified Project would generate up to 40 hauling trips per day; refer to Attachment 3, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Data. Hauling trips involving the placement at, and removal of, soil from Plant No. 2 would avoid sensitive residential communities and would be along freeways and major roadways, except when directly accessing Plant No. 2. Hauling trips would occur during daytime hours (and would cease after 5:00 PM), would not significantly increase existing traffic noise levels along the hauling routes, and would not result in a substantive temporary or long-term increase in noise. Further, implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would require 21 1780344.1 all construction equipment, including haul trucks, to be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers to reduce noise. Overall, noise impacts associated with the additional haul truck trips would be temporary and cease upon completion of construction. Mitigation Measures NOI-1 would apply to the Modified Project, with the following modifications: N0I-1 Prior to the initiation of construction, the Orange County Sanitation District shall confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications require that: • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. • The Orange County Sanitation District shall provide a "Community Liaison'`Teise Dist ,,.t,. nee !'',.,.«,ainate " The Community LiaisonNeiFse Distur-bance Geer-,aina4e shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Community Liaison'`Teise Dist ,,a,, nee r-v,,,,,.,ainate shall determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement measures to resolve the complaint and comply with the City of Huntington Beach and City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinances. The construction hotline telephone number shall be clearly posted on -site. • Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, etc.) to the greatest extent possible. • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Construction activities that produce noise shall not take place outside of the allowable hours specified by the City of Huntington Beach and City of Newport Beach Municipal Codes, with the exception of the 24 hour per day operation of microtunneling (pursuant to Mitigation Measure NOI-2). Alternative work hours may be designated by the City to reduce other impacts, such as traffic. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. 22 1780344.1 The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to noise. K. Population and Housing The potential population and housing impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 8-1). Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. OC San staff provide operational and maintenance activities at Plant No. 2. Additionally, there are no existing residents or housing at Plant No. 2. The Modified Project would require construction workers to haul soil, and to both place and remove soil from Plant No. 2. It is anticipated that these construction workers would be located within the greater Orange County / Los Angeles area. As a result, the Modified Project would not cause a substantial change in the labor force resulting in unplanned population growth in the area. Soil drying and stockpiling within Plant No. 2 would not require the relocation or displacement of any people or housing. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to population and housing. L. Public Services The public facilities impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 8-1). Plant No. 2 is located within the City of Huntington Beach. The Huntington Beach Fire Department and Huntington Beach Police Department provide fire and police services to the City of Huntington Beach, respectively. The Modified Project would require construction workers to haul soil, and to both place and remove soil from Plant No. 2. It is anticipated that these construction workers would be located within the greater Orange County / Los Angeles area. As a result, the Modified Project would not cause a substantial change in the labor force resulting in unplanned population growth in the area. Soil drying and stockpiling within Plant No. 2 would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire, police, school, parks and recreational, or other public service facilities. 23 1780344.1 The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to public :Y�irfsK�� M. Recreation The potential recreation impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 8-1). Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. There are no recreational, educational, or visitor -oriented opportunities at Plant No. 2. It is anticipated that these construction workers would be located within the greater Orange County / Los Angeles area. As a result, the Modified Project would not cause a substantial change in the labor force that could result in new residents using existing recreational facilities or requiring additional recreational facilities. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to recreation. N. Transportation The potential transportation impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.11-6, 5.11-7, 5.11-8, 5.11-9, 5.11-10, 5.11-11). Plant No. 2 is located within the City of Huntington Beach. Transit services near Plant No. 2 are provided by the Orange County Transit Authority with the closest bus stop approximately 0.5-mile north of Plant No. 2 at the intersection of Hamilton Avenue and Brookhurst Street. Plant No. 2 is located near existing roadway facilities including Brookhurst Street, Bushard Street, and Banning Street. Existing bicycle facilities include Class 1 multi -use bike paths along the Santa Ana River Trail and Class 2 bike lanes along Bushard Street and Banning Street. It should be noted that an additional Class 2 bike lane is proposed along Brookhurst Street. Existing pedestrian facilities are provided along the Santa Ana River Trail, Huntington Beach Bike Trail, Brookhurst Street, Bushard Street, and Banning Street. The Modified Project calls for hauling of soils both to and from Plant No. 2 during project construction. These proposed hauling activities are summarized in Tables 24 1780344.1 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. Additionally, the Modified Project calls for soil drying / stockpiling at Plant No. 2 during project construction. The proposed soil haul trips and drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 under the Modified Project would be temporary during construction and would cease when construction is completed. The Modified Project would include a total of 1,674 truck trips from soil hauling activities, which would generate an increase in short-term vehicle trips on the circulation system during construction. Such hauling activities are not anticipated to require lane closures or to interfere with existing pedestrian/transit/bike access. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would apply to the Modified Project, with the following modifications: TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, engineering drawings and specifications, and/or contractor shop drawings shall be prepared by the Project Engineer, or designee, and submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, and the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department. These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: • Traffic control protocols shall be specified for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation, including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Disruption to traffic circulation shall be minimized to the greatest extent feasible. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open, to the greatest extent feasible, during construction or shall be re- routed to ensure continued connectivity. • Bus stop access impacts shall be coordinated with, and approved by, the Orange County Transportation Authority. • At least one week before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, City of Newport Beach Public Works Department and Caltrans, as applicable, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for planning temporary detours or identifying alternative emergency access routes where appropriate. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project to reduce impacts to local streets and plan for traffic control signage and detours along identified haul routes to minimize impacts to existing traffic flow. 25 1780344.1 •lden4i y any and all eens motion staging or— fnater-ial star -age loeated outside of the pr-qjeet site. • Specify the hours during which hauling activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets such as traffic control barricades, cones, flaggers, and warning signs. • Require the contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited, to gravel and dirt resulting from project construction. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District, of any project material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent City of Newport Beach., City of Huntington Beach. and Caltrans streets or areas. • Hauling of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except when required to provide direct access to the project site and in compliance with the approved project haul routes. • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All construction -related staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on the project site or within additional off-street staging areas previously identified and arranged. • Construction -related lane closures would only occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. • Use of a construction flagperson (as deemed appropriate by the Orange County Sanitation District) to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions (particularly during peak travel hours) and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway are affected. Pill 1780344.1 • The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). As required by Mitigation Measure TRA-1, the project's construction management plan (CMP) would identify construction vehicle hauling routes, necessary traffic controls and detours, and a construction phasing plan to reduce impacts to local streets and plan for traffic control signage and detours along identified haul routes. The CMP would also specify the hours during which hauling activities could occur and would require traffic control barricades, cones, flaggers, and/or warning signs to reduce construction -related impacts to adjacent streets. Hauling of oversized loads would be limited between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday, and no hauling would be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Further, use of local streets within residential communities for truck hauling activities would be prohibited, except when required to provide direct access to the project site or Plant No. 2. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. Based on TRA-I and the short-term duration of hauling and storage activities at Plant No. 2, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to transportation. O. Tribal Cultural Resources The potential tribal cultural resources impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.12-12, 5.12-13). No tribal cultural resources have been identified within Plant No. 2 which is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. The vast majority of the soils on site have been significantly altered due to compaction and construction of the facility. The Modified Project's proposed soil drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction, would cease when construction is completed, and would not require any ground disturbing activities that could lead to the discovery of previously unknown or undiscovered tribal cultural resources. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to tribal cultural resources. 27 1780344.1 P. Utilities The potential utilities impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 6.1, 6.2, 6-14). Plant No. 2 is serviced by existing infrastructure operated by various public and private entities. Existing infrastructure includes OC San pipelines that run parallel to or intersect with existing water transmission and delivery pipelines, stormwater drainage pipelines and channels, overhead electrical wires and underground electrical conduit, underground natural gas pipelines, and overhead and underground telecommunications lines. The Modified Project calls for hauling of soils both to and from Plant No. 2 during project construction. These proposed hauling activities are summarized in Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. Additionally, the Modified Project calls for soil drying / stockpiling at Plant No. 2 during project construction. The Modified Project's proposed soil haul trips and drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction and would cease when construction is completed. Such activities would not require any increases in the use of water, electrical, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, compared to that analyzed in the EIR. As such, no new physical changes to the environment would result in this regard. Further, these activities would not result in an increase in the generation of wastewater or solid waste. Last, these activities would not result in any changes in impervious surfaces or the need for additional stormwater facilities. It is anticipated that these construction workers would be located within the greater Orange County / Los Angeles area. Therefore, the Modified Project would not result in population growth that could increase demand on utilities and service systems, including demand for water, wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage, electricity, natural gas, telecommunications, or solid waste services. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to utilities. Q. Wildfire Wildland fire hazards were analyzed in the EIR (Draft EIR p. 8-11 and 8-12). Plant No. 2 and surrounding areas are not located within very high, high, or moderate fire hazard severity zones. 28 1780344.1 Therefore, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts pertaining to wildfires. R. Other CEQA Considerations / Energy The potential energy impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR (Draft EIR p. 6-1, 6-2, and 6-7 through 6-18). Plant No. 2 is located within the City of Huntington Beach. Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company provide electricity and natural gas services to the City of Huntington Beach, respectively. Construction -related energy usage at Plant No. 2 would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of energy, electricity, natural gas, or petroleum. The Modified Project calls for hauling of soils both to and from Plant No. 2 during project construction. These proposed hauling activities are summarized in Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. Additionally, the Modified Project calls for soil drying / stockpiling at Plant No. 2 during project construction. The proposed soil haul trips and drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 under the Modified Project would be temporary during construction and would cease when construction is completed. The Modified Project would include a total of 1,674 truck trips from soil hauling activities, which would generate an increase in short-term vehicle trips on the circulation system during construction. However, the total fuel consumption of the Modified Project is estimated to increase the County's annual energy consumption by less than 0.01 percent, which would have a nominal effect on the local and regional energy supplies. Further, the Modified Project would adhere to all Federal, State, and local requirements for fuel efficiency (e.g., low carbon fuel standards, as applicable). The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to energy. 29 1780344.1 Attachment 1 ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO.30-2021-01194238 RULING 30 1780172.1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE Civil Complex Center 751 W. Santa Ana Blvd Santa Ana, CA 92701 SHORT TITLE: BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC vs. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING/ELECTRONIC CASE NUMBER: SERVICE 130-2021-01194238-CU-WM-CXC I certify that I am not a party to this cause. I certify that the following document(s), dated, have been transmitted electronically by Orange County Superior Court at Santa Ana, CA. The transmission originated from Orange County Superior Court email address on December 16, 2022, at 2:21:32 PM PST. The electronically transmitted document(s) is in accordance with rule 2.251 of the California Rules of Court, addressed as shown above. The list of electronically served recipients are listed below: NOSSAMAN LLP NOSSAMAN LLP JERSKINE@NOSSAMAN.COM JFLYNN@NOSSAMAN.COM WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, APC WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, APC BHOGIN@WSS-LAW.COM BPATTERSON@WSS-LAW.COM WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, APC RHAGER@WSS-LAW.COM Clerk of the Court, by: .". , Deputy CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING/ELECTRONIC SERVICE V3 1013a (June 2004) Code of Civ. Procedure, § CCP1013(a) DATE: 12/16/2022 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL COMPLEX CENTER MINUTE ORDER TIME: 02:16:00 PM DEPT: CX104 JUDICIAL OFFICER PRESIDING: William Claster CLERK: G. Hernandez REPORTER/ERM: None BAILIFF/COURT ATTENDANT:. None CASE NO: 30-2021-01194238-CU-WM-CXC CASE INIT.DATE: 04/01/2021 CASE TITLE: BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC vs. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CASE CATEGORY: Civil - Unlimited CASE TYPE: Writ of Mandate EVENT ID/DOCUMENT ID: 73909236 EVENT TYPE: Under Submission Ruling APPEARANCES RE PETITIONER'S WRIT OF MANDATE There are no appearances by any party. The Court, having taken the above -entitled matter under submission on 12/14/2022 and having fully considered the arguments of all parties, both written and oral, as well as the evidence presented, now issues its ruling. The Court's ruling is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Court orders clerk to give notice. DATE: 12/16/2022 MINUTE ORDER Page 1 DEPT: CX104 Calendar No. BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Petitioner Bayside Village Marina LLC (Bayside) seeks a writ of mandate compelling Respondent Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD" or the "District") to vacate and set aside its approval of (1) the OCSD's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains ("BBPS") replacement project ("Project") located on East Coast Highway in Newport Beach, and (2) the certification of the Recirculated Environmental Impact Report ("REIR") for the Project. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS a limited writ as set forth below. I. BACKGROUND Bayside is the owner of 31.4 acres of property located at East Coast Highway in the City of Newport Beach, California between Newport Channel and Bayside Drive. (ROA 25, First Amended Verified Petition (Petition), ¶ 9; AR230.) Approximately 24 acres of Bayside's property are developed with mobile homes, and the remaining seven acres contain an outdoor storage space of RVs and small boats, parking and restrooms facilities for the Bayside Marina, a kayak rental and launch facility, parking and access to Pearson's Port seafood market, and marine service equipment storage under the Coast Highway Bridge ("BVM Property"). (AR230, 011290.) The seven acres are being developed as the "Back Bay Landing" Project, which is a mixed -use development that will be implemented pursuant to the Newport Beach- and Coastal Commission -approved Back Bay Planned Community Development Plan ("PCDP"). It will have a boat storage facility, retail stores and recreational marine -related facilities and residential units. (AR226, 230, 3274, 7539-97; Petition, ¶ 9.) Bayside is also the developer of this Back Bay project. (Petition, ¶ 9.) OCSD owns and operates the BBPS, which is located at 300 East Coast Highway in Newport Beach, just east of the Newport Bay Channel. (ROA 103, Opp., p. 8; AR186.) BBPS transports sewage or wastewater through pipelines to OCSD's Ruling Page 1 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 sewage treatment plant in Huntington Beach and is a piece of critical infrastructures that conveys 50-60% of the total wastewater flow generated in Newport Beach. (ROA 103, Opp., p. 8; AR186.) BBPS is located on the southern boundary of Bayside's property, is surrounded on three sides by that property, and is adjacent to the Back Bay Landing Project. (AR230, 3206.) The District's Project involves the construction of a new, larger pump station extending 100 feet to the west of the existing pump station and the installation of new force mains. (AR186 and 237.) The new pump station facilities will include a pump station, generator and odor control facilities. (AR186, 230.) Planning on the Project started in 2013. (AR3206.) Since the Bayside Property, and particularly the Back Bay Landing Project, surrounds the Project, from 2014-2016, Bayside and OCSD exchanged information and worked together to discuss alternatives for the Project. (See e.g., AR3206, 6371-72, 7040-43,7090, 7324, 7342-43, 15667, 16128-131.) In June 2017, OCSD published a draft EIR that analyzed a version of the Project involving the demolition of the existing facility, construction of a new and larger facility adjacent to Bayside Drive and installation of force main improvements beneath the Newport Bay Channel north of the Bay Bridge. (AR236, AR9383-84.) The District never presented the 2017 Final EIR to its Board of Directors for approval due to conflicts with the planned development of the Back Bay Landing Project. (AR236, AR1501-1506.) In July 2019, OCSD published a recirculated EIR with three alternatives for the Project. (AR236, AR11613-14.) During the public comment period, there were concerns regarding the three conceptual site plans, including confusion about one of the alternatives known as the South Pump Station. (AR236.) OCSD did not present the 2019 EIR to the OCSD Board. Ruling Page 2 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Instead, OCSD decided to select one conceptual site plan and construction method and update the EIR in its entirety. (AR236.) The concept chosen and analyzed in the 2020 recirculated EIR (REIR) is the Adjacent Pump Station, which is essentially the South Pump Station alternative in the 2019 REIR. (AR237.) The Final EIR (FEIR) was published in January 2021 and approved on March 1, 2021. (AR1-3.) II. OVERVIEW OF CEQA PROCESS "CEQA is a comprehensive scheme designed to provide long-term protection to the environment. [Citation.]" (Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105, 112.) It applies to "discretionary projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies." (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080(a).) "In enacting CEQA, the Legislature declared its intention that all public agencies responsible for regulating activities affecting the environment give prime consideration to preventing environmental damage when carrying out their duties. [Citations.] CEQA is to be interpreted 'to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language.' [Citation.]" (Mountain Lion Foundation, supra, 16 Cal.4th at p. 112.) An EIR, which has been described as "the heart of CEQA" (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564), "is required for any project that a public agency proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment. [Citations.] An EIR must describe the proposed project and its environmental setting, state the objectives sought to be achieved, identify and analyze the significant effects on the environment, state how those impacts can be mitigated or avoided, and identify and analyze alternatives to the project, Ruling Page 3 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 among other requirements. [Citations.]" (Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 465-66 (Ballona).) Once a draft EIR is prepared, the public must be notified, and the draft and all documents it references must be made available for public review and comment. (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21091(a), 21092; CEQA Guidelines, § 15087. 1) The public agency acting as the lead agency then prepares a final EIR, which must include comments received from the public and from other agencies concerning the draft EIR, responses to those comments, and any revisions to the draft EIR. (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15088, 15132; Ballona, supra, 201 Cal.App.4th at p. 466.) III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Overview Bayside asserts that the EIR description of the Project and its environmental setting is "inaccurate and unstable." "The fundamental goal of an EIR is to inform decision makers and the public of any significant adverse effects a project is likely to have on the physical environment. [Citations.] To make such an assessment, an EIR must delineate environmental conditions prevailing absent the project, defining a baseline against which predicted effects can be described and quantified. [Citation.]" (Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (2013) 57 Ca1.4th 439, 447.) This generally includes providing "a description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project, as they exist at the time the notice of preparation is published, or if no notice of preparation is published, at the time environmental analysis is commenced, from both a local and regional perspective." (Id., at p. 448; see CEQA Guidelines, § 15125(a).) 1 References to the CEQA Guidelines are to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq. Ruling Page 4 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 "Without accurate and complete information pertaining to the setting of the project and surrounding uses, it cannot be found that the [EIR] adequately investigated and discussed the environmental impacts of the development project." (San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 713, 729 (San Joaquin Raptor).) Thus, [i]f the description of the environmental setting of the project site and surrounding area is inaccurate, incomplete or misleading, the EIR does not comply with CEQA." (Cadiz Land Co. v. Rail Cycle (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 74, 87.) B. Failure to Identifv Neighboring Commercial Operations Bayside contends that repeated use of the phrase "RV Storage facility" obscures "the site's coastal -dependent, visitor serving uses." (Pet. Supp. Br. at p. 16.) Indeed, a number of businesses on the west side of the Project site (e.g., Southwind Kayaks, Gondola Adventures) are not mentioned by name anywhere in any EIR. While it is true that these businesses are not referenced by name and that the site is referred to as an RV Storage facility (presumably since RVs are stored near where the actual construction will take place), those references do not create an inaccurate picture of the Project. In fact, the EIR refers to these businesses on the west side of the Project as "commercial" or "commercial recreation marine uses" in a number of places. (AR230, 234, 260, 392, 436.) The businesses also are listed on Table 3-1 under "General Commercial." (AR235.) The fact that the site is called an RV Storage facility is not misleading when considering the EIR as a whole. The above -cited references to commercial activity and the various maps/photos of the Project site overcome this alleged shortcoming. Ruling Page 5 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 A related purported flaw in the EIR's Project description is the failure to address the potential adverse physical impacts Project construction would have on these businesses. On the contrary, such analysis is found at AR 473-482 regarding noise and vibrations during construction, and at AR 302-305 with respect to air quality. In terms of traffic, the EIR makes clear that access to the Project site will be shared via Bayside Drive by construction vehicles and users of the commercial facilities. As to the added construction and operational traffic, the EIR addresses these issues at AR499 and in Impact Statement TRA-4. C. Construction Staging Area Description Bayside contends that the Project description is inaccurate and, indeed, is an "unstable moving target" by virtue of the failure to describe and evaluate a construction staging area. The Court agrees. The 2020 REIR includes several references to construction staging. Page 3-11 states: "Portions of the adjacent private property (currently a RV storage area) and Lower Castaways Park could be temporarily utilized for construction staging, if these areas are available during construction of the proposed project." (AR241.) Then, in response to a letter from the City of Newport Beach stating that the Lower Castaways would not be available (AR1120), the 2021 FEIR noted: "Should Lower Castaways not be available, construction staging would occur within other proposed areas of disturbance (as identified in the project boundary shown on 2020 Recirculated Draft EIR Exhibit 3-4)." (AR1127.) Exhibit 3-4 is a Proposed Conceptual Site Plan that shows the areas (highlighted in yellow) where the proposed project construction will take place as well as the Lower Castaways. (AR238.) A virtually identical site plan (also highlighted in yellow) is found at Exhibit 3-6 which is entitled Adjacent Pump Station Work Areas. (AR243.) According to OCSD's supplemental brief, based on the unavailability of the Lower Castaways, "the construction staging will occur Ruling Page 6 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 somewhere in this Adjacent Pump Station Work Area." (OCSD Supp. Br. at p. 12.) Based on this statement, the District argues in its supplemental brief that it satisfied CEQA since the EIR "considered all potential impacts that could occur in the Adjacent Area." However, based on a review of Exhibits 3-4 and 3-6, it is unclear whether creating a staging area in the limited designated space is even possible. With the exception of the Lower Castaways, the Coast Highway and the Newport channel, it appears that the areas highlighted in yellow are where virtually all of the construction actually will take place. Certainly, no specific location with adequate square footage is identified, nor is there any analysis as to whether Mitigation Measures AES-1 and TRA-1 would apply to any area other than the Lower Castaways. Perhaps a more significant problem with the statements in both the FEIR and supplemental brief about an alternative site in the project area is that they may well be inaccurate. Indeed, TRA-1 tends to contradict OCSD's supplemental brief by virtue of acknowledging that future staging areas may be located off -site: "[construction drawings shall] identify any and all construction staging or material storage sites located outside of the project site." (AR206 [emphasis added].) Compounding this problem, counsel for the District told the Court at an earlier hearing that the lowest responsible bidder on the Project will have complete discretion to decide where staging will occur and how many staging sites will be necessary. (August 4, 2022 Transcript at pp. 11-12.) Importantly, by not limiting that comment to sites within the yellow -highlighted boundaries of Exhibits 3-4 or 3-6, the District appears to acknowledge that staging sites not identified in either the REIR or FEIR might be utilized. Given that uncertainty, Bayside's argument regarding a lack of a complete, accurate and stable project description has merit. More specifically, the District's argument (OCSD Supp. Br. at p. 12) that the EIR considered all environmental impacts (biological, noise, aesthetics, etc.) in the Ruling Page 7 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Adjacent Area fails to account for any potential impacts that might occur if the construction staging area occurs elsewhere. Without identifying the area or areas where staging will occur, the public is left in the dark about whether that staging will have any effects on the environment at location(s) yet to be identified. Counsel's statement that the lowest responsible bidder will have complete discretion with regard to construction staging also renders the mitigation measures of AES-1 toothless. AES-1 purports to minimize aesthetic impacts of construction by requiring the District's Director of Engineering to personally approve construction staging areas, transport routes, etc. before grading or demolition permits are issued. To the extent AES-1 actually imposes enforceable standards (which the Court questions), it cannot be reconciled with the vesting of complete discretion in the lowest responsible bidder. IV. CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES "An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decisionmaking and public participation. An EIR is not required to consider alternatives which are infeasible. The lead agency is responsible for selecting a range of project alternatives for examination and must publicly disclose its reasoning for selecting those alternatives. There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason." (CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.6(a).) The EIR identified five alternatives to the Project to analyze in detail: the "no project" scenario, the "adjacent project/microtunneling" scenario, the "origina Ruling Page 8 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 northeast pump station with horizontal directional drilling" scenario, the "rehabilitate in place with microtunneling" scenario, and the "pump station south relocation with microtunneling" scenario. (AR539-540.) Nearly 40 pages of analysis are devoted to comparing each of these alternatives to the Project. (AR540-578.) Bayside does not challenge the analysis presented. Rather, it faults the EIR for failing to discuss two additional alternatives: the "Expand -in -Place" scenario and alternative alignments for the dual force mains south of East Coast Highway. "Courts will defer to an agency's selection of alternatives unless the petitioners (1) demonstrate that the chosen alternatives are " "'manifestly unreasonable and ... do not contribute to a reasonable range of alternatives,"' " and (2) submit evidence showing the rejected alternative was both "feasible" and "adequate," because it was capable of attaining most of the basic objectives of the project, taking into account site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, and other relevant factors. [Citation.]" (South of Market Community Action Network v. City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.Sth 321, 345.) The Court assumes for the sake of argument that the "Expand -in -Place" scenario and the alternative alignments for the dual force mains are both feasible and adequate. That is, the Court assumes Bayside has met the second prong of its burden. However, Bayside fails to meet the first prong of its burden. "The 'key issue' is whether the range of alternatives discussed fosters informed decisionmaking and public participation. [Citation.]" (Cherry Valley Pass Acres & Neighbors v. City of Beaumont (190 Cal.App.4th 316, 354.) Bayside complains that two alternatives were not considered, but it identifies no authority holding that the failure to consider a specific alternative or alternatives automatically renders the range of Ruling Page 9 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 alternatives considered "manifestly unreasonable" or insufficient to "foster informed decision ma king." (Compare id., at p. 355 ["Though one or more of these 328 imaginable alternatives may have represented the optimum number of residences that could have profitably been built while minimizing the agricultural impacts of the project to the fullest extent possible, the range of alternatives discussed in the EIR was sufficient to foster informed decisionmaking on this very question."].) V. INCONSISTENCIES WITH PLANS A. Overview Bayside contends the EIR is fatally flawed because it fails to disclose the Project's inconsistencies with the PCDP, the Newport Beach Local Coastal Program ("LCP"), and the Coastal Act. An EIR must discuss "any inconsistencies between the proposed project and applicable general plans, specific plans and regional plan." (CEQA Guidelines § 15125(d).) This includes inconsistencies with the Coastal Act. (Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1209, 1233.) A determination of consistency "comes to this [C]ourt with a strong presumption of regularity. [Citation.] To overcome that presumption, an abuse of discretion must be shown. [Citations.] An abuse of discretion is established only if the city council has not proceeded in a manner required by law, its decision is not supported by findings, or the findings are not supported by substantial evidence. [Citation]." (Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.App.4th 704, 717.) "It is, emphatically, not the role of the courts to micro -manage these development decisions. Our function is simply to decide whether the city officials considered the applicable policies and the extent to which the proposed project conforms with those policies, whether the city officials made appropriate Ruling Page 10 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 findings on this issue, and whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence." (Id., at pp. 719-20 [emphasis in original].) In addition, Bayside's opening brief suggests the EIR is inadequate to the extent it fails to explain why the District found the Project consistent with applicable plans. (Pet. Opening Br. at p. 19, lines 6-8.) Because EIRs need only evaluate inconsistencies with plans, no analysis is required if the project is consistent with plans. (North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Morin Municipal Water Dist. Bd. of Directors (2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 614, 632 [citing City of Long Beach v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 889, 918-19].) Insofar as Bayside argues the explanation of consistency is inadequate (as opposed to arguing the finding of consistency is an abuse of discretion), this challenge fails. B. PCDP Inconsistency The PCDP contains zoning regulations that dictate acceptable land uses in each "Planning Area" it covers. It is undisputed that both the current pump station and the new pump station to be built as part of the Project are in Planning Area 1. According to the PCDP, "Wastewater Pump Station" is a permitted land use in Planning Area 1. (AR7615.) Bayside nevertheless contends the Project is inconsistent with the PCDP. It argues that the PCDP "identifies the existence of the BBPS, however, only at its current size and location, not the expanded size and altered location contemplated by the Final EIR." (Pet. Opening Br. at p. 18.) The claimed inconsistency apparently arises from conceptual drawings attached to the PCDP (for parking plans, public spaces, etc.) that show the BBPS in its current location in the context of the larger planning area. (See AR7650-7663.) That is, as the Court understands the argument, because the conceptual drawings show the current BBPS, any deviation is an inconsistency. Ruling Page 11 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 As the District points out in opposition, the PCDP imposes specific numeric limits on the square footage of commercial, residential, marina, and dry dock use in Planning Area 1, but not wastewater pump use. (AR7612.) The conceptual drawings do not on their face appear to limit the size or the location of the pumping station, only to show it in relation to other then -existing uses for planning purposes. The only explicit limitation placed on a wastewater pump station by the PCDP is that it must be in Planning Area 1. As to Bayside's contention that AR7549 allows the pump station also to be in Planning Area 2 (a contention that the Court will accept even though it does not appear that AR7549 is in the record filed with the Court), that fact does not establish PCDP inconsistency. Accordingly, the Court cannot say the finding of consistency is unsupported by substantial evidence. C. LCP Consistency Bayside contends the Project is inconsistent with policy 2.1.9 of the LCP because that policy "mandate[s] protection and expansion of coastal -dependent over commercial/industrial uses." (Pet.'s Opening Br. at p. 17.) As the District points out, nothing in policy 2.1.9 or its associated sub -policies discusses the relative priority of coastal -dependent uses vis-a-vis utility uses like the Project. (Furthermore, it appears the only hard-and-fast priority is that coastal -dependent uses are prioritized over residential uses, not over commercial/industrial uses. See policy 2.1.9-1, at AR11289.) In any event, the City correctly notes that relative priority matters only if the Back Bay Landing development and the Project are a zero -sum game in terms of developed square footage. Under the PCDP, square footage for a wastewater pump station does not count against commercial, residential, marina, or dry dock square footage. (See AR7612.) The Court cannot say the finding of consistency is unsupported by substantial evidence. Ruling Page 12 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 D. Coastal Act Consisten Bayside contends the Project is inconsistent with multiple sections of the Coastal Act, in particular Pub. Resources Code §§ 30213, 30221, 30222, 30224, and 30253(e), and policy 3.2.1-1 of the LCP, which similarly requires protection of coastal recreation opportunities. The Court agrees with the District that § 30222 is inapplicable. On its face, that statute prioritizes "visitor -serving commercial recreational facilities designed to enhance public opportunities for coastal recreation ... over private residential, general industrial, or general commercial development, but not over agriculture or coastal -dependent industry." Again, the Project is a utility use, not one of the categories enumerated in this statute. Of the remaining provisions, the only one discussed in any detail in Bayside's briefing (opening, reply, or supplemental) is § 30253(e) of the Coastal Act. The remainder are simply referred to in laundry lists without discussion of any particular alleged inconsistencies. Because Bayside bears the burden of showing an abuse of discretion, the Court finds the failure to specifically discuss §§ 30123, 30221, and 30224 of the Coastal Act, as well as policy 3.2.1-1 of the LCP, means Bayside has not shown an abuse of discretion in the District's finding of consistency. As to § 30253(e), it provides: "New development shall ... [w]here appropriate, protect special communities and neighborhoods that, because of their unique characteristics, are popular visitor destination points for recreational use." "Where appropriate" is an important qualifier here, as the District flags a competing provision of the Coastal Act, § 30231, which provides: "The biological productivity and the quality of coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries, and lakes appropriate to maintain optimum populations of marine organisms and for the protection of human health shall be maintained and, where feasible, restored Ruling Page 13 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 through, among other means, minimizing adverse effects of waste water discharges and entrainment ...." The administrative record contains evidence that the current pump station is deteriorating and does not meet current standards for construction, electrical equipment, or maintenance. (AR187.) The record also contains evidence that failure of the system could result in the release of sewage into Newport Bay. (AR187, 245.) Section 30231 of the Coastal Act imposes a mandatory policy for protecting water quality (it "shall be maintained"), while § 30253(e) only imposes a duty to protect recreational use "where appropriate." On this record, the Court cannot say the District lacked substantial evidence to conclude its duties under § 30231 prevailed over its duties under § 30253(e), and thereby to conclude the Project is consistent with the Coastal Act. Put another way, Bayside must show the District abused its discretion in finding the "where appropriate" qualifier in § 30253(e) inapplicable here, and it has not met its burden to do so. VI. ADEQUACY OF RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Bayside contends the District's response to comments prior to certification of the FEIR is inadequate. The Court agrees with the District that Bayside failed to exhaust its administrative remedies on this issue. "[T]he time for complaining about the inadequacy of [the District's] responses was when the issue was before the agency and any alleged deficiency could be explained or corrected." (Towards Responsibility in Planning v. City Council (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 671, 682.) Bayside points to nothing in the record indicating that the alleged inadequacy of the District's responses was raised at the administrative stage. As a result, this challenge is barred. Bayside responds that the foregoing statement from Towards Responsibility is dictum unnecessary to the holding. This is true enough, as the Court of Appeal in that case found the agency's response to comments adequate on the merits. But Ruling Page 14 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 "[t]o say that dicta are not controlling [citation] does not mean that they are to be ignored; on the contrary, dicta are often followed." (9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (6th ed. 2022) Appeal § 532.) And while Bayside cites a number of cases on page 21 of its supplemental brief holding that inadequate responses to comments may render an EIR defective, none of those cases discusses the effect of the challenger's failure to raise the inadequacy issue before the agency. VII. REMEDIES AND CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, Bayside's petition is GRANTED on the ground that the description of the construction staging area is inadequate, and for the related reason that AES-1 is a toothless mitigation measure as a result. Bayside asks the Court to set aside the District's Project approvals and EIR certification. Public Resources Code § 21168.9 gives the Court discretion to fashion a narrower remedy. "The 1993 amendments to section 21168.9 expanded the trial court's authority and 'expressly authorized the court to fashion a remedy that permits some part of the project to go forward while an agency seeks to remedy its CEQA violations. In other words, the issuance of a writ need not always halt all work on a project.' [Citation.]" (San Bernardino Valley Audubon Soc. V. Metropolitan Water Dist. of Southern California (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 1097, 1104- 1105.) "The choice of a lesser remedy involves the trial court's consideration of equitable principles." (Id., at p. 1104.) As discussed above, Bayside's challenge is largely unsuccessful. And the vast majority of Bayside's challenge has little, if anything, to do with construction staging issues. The Court therefore finds the remainder of the Project severable from the construction staging issues. The Court further finds severance will not prejudice full and complete compliance with CEQA, because the remainder of the Project is CEQA-compliant. (Pub. Resources Code § 21168.9(b).) Ruling Page 15 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 In considering equitable principles to fashion a remedy, the Court is especially mindful of the severe risk to the environment that would be posed by the outdated pumping station and force mains failing and spilling raw sewage into Newport Bay. Furthermore, as explained in the District's filings in the companion eminent domain case, permitting from the relevant authorities is expected to take 9-12 months, with construction not starting for another six months after that. (See OC Superior Court case no. 2022-01251890, ROA 92, at pp. 2-3.) Based on representations made at the hearing, it appears that the City will not allow the permitting process to start without OCSD approval of the Project and its certification of the EIR. Of course, stalling that already lengthy process increases the risk of the very sewage spill the Project seeks to prevent. Because the issues with construction staging are both severable and appear to be readily correctable, and given the overriding need for the Project, OCSD will not be required to withdraw its approvals for the Project and certification of the EIR. As explained by the court in Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee (2012) 210 Cal. App. 4t" 260, 287-88: In our view, a reasonable, commonsense reading of section 21168.9 plainly forecloses plaintiffs' assertion that a trial court must mandate a public agency decertify the EIR and void all related project approvals in every instance where the court finds an EIR violates CEQA. Such a rigid requirement directly conflicts with the "in part" language in section 21168.9, subdivision (a)(1), which specifically allows a court to direct its mandates to parts of determinations, parts of findings, or parts of decisions. Such a rigid requirement also conflicts with the language in section 21168.9, subdivision (bl, limiting the court's mandates to only those necessary to achieve CEQA compliance and, if the court makes specified findings, to only "that portion of a determination, finding, or decision" violating CEQA. (Italics added.) Ruling Page 16 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Accordingly, the Court will impose the limited remedy of requiring OCSD to bring the EIR into CEQA compliance with respect to the construction staging issue and the related question of the enforceability of AES-1. Because the District's CEQA noncompliance involves construction issues, this means no construction or other physical activity may take place at the Project site until the District is in compliance with CEQA. Whether bringing the EIR into compliance can be accomplished via a supplemental EIR (CEQA Guidelines § 15163) or an addendum (CEQA Guidelines § 15164) will be left to OCSD to decide. Note that the Court's order includes only these mandates, which are necessary to achieve compliance with CEQA. (See Pub. Resources Code § 21168.9(b).) In order to avoid unnecessary delay that increases the risk of a sewage spill, the District may continue to seek the necessary permits from the City, Coastal Commission, etc. to move forward with the Project, and it may continue to pursue the companion eminent domain action. Bayside shall prepare a proposed order in accordance with this ruling and provide it to OCSD for comments before submitting it to the Court. Ruling Page 17 Attachment 2 LETTER OF INTENT FOR ENTERING INTO A LICENSING AGREEMENT — LOWER CASTAWAYS PARK ("LETTER OF INTENT") 31 1780172.1 ti 1A P0'4� O U }. _ C'�CI fi0 May 22, 2023 Orange County Sanitation District Rob Thompson, General Manager 10844 Ellis Ave Fountain Valley, CA 92708 100 Civic Center ©rive Newport Beach, California 92660 949 644-3001 1949 644-3020 FAX newportbeachca.gov Re: Letter of Intent for Entering Into a Licensing Agreement — Lower Castaways Park Dear Mr. Thompson: This Letter of Intent reflects the City of Newport Beach (City) intent to enter into a Licensing Agreement with the Orange County Sanitation District (OC SAN) to utilize portions of Lower Castaways Park as construction staging area for the Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement project. The City understands as follows: o WHEREAS, the City is the owner of the real property located at 700 Dover Drive, Newport Beach, California, 92660 (the "Property"), known as "Castaways Park" and depicted in yellow on Exhibit "A" attached hereto; o WHEREAS, OC San wishes to lease 18,000 square feet of the lower portion of the Property etas depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto) for use as a staging area in connection with the future construction of the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project ("Project"), a public infrastructure project; and o WHEREAS, the City desires to lease the Property to OC SAN for the sole purpose of such use. e WHEREAS, the parties intend to enter into a licensing agreement at a future date to memorialize the duties and obligations of each respective party for the use of the Property, Based on this understanding and the mutual covenants and intentions stated herein, the City intends as follows: 1. The City is preparing a licensing agreement for use of the Property as construction staging area for the Project. The term of the licensing agreement will cover the construction period. This document is a Letter of Intent only. It is not intended to be, and shall not constitute in any way, a binding or legal agreement, or impose any legal obligation or duty on either of us. If this document is not replaced by a valid binding contract signed by authorized representatives from each company, it shall have no force or effect whatsoever. Letter to OC Sanitation District May 15, 2023 Page 2 If the foregoing reflects our mutual statement of intention, please sign, and return the enclosed copy of this Letter of Intent. Sincerely, race K. Leung City Manager City of Newport Beach Orange County Sanitation District Confirmed this Z3'" day of M.y 2023 By: / % /� Title: C9Pv�a✓ft / / tG�n�LJ!'f . D� �5'1" WS MAP WAS r'RLPAHLV FtW ORAWF =iirr Assnsvd ov r. Y,um 13E5 trx.Y. Rft ASSE550h MAKES RU CUARANT:F AS 15 ! IS ACCfI!fACY kLFt 45S0ai'S ANY T fAdIL ! IF f'uH ,�idtR USES- Alu -0 Rt HDIRL'Df!CED. ATL RICHTS RFSEHY19, O.COP WGHT PRANCE -rDWrr 4SM.55LV 2002 POR. E. 112, S.E. 114. SEC. 27. T 6 S. R 10 W Exhibit A Castaways Park Q LAH X[Y i 425 - 03 i 1 - PARCEL MAP P.M. 001-50 Noll - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK d MARCH 1966 TRACT NO. 1125 M.M. 39-7.8 PARCEL_ NUMBERS TRACT NO. 15012(omended) M.M. 753-23 to 32 inc. SHOWN IN ClRCVS ASSESSOR'S MAP 800K 117 PAGE 80 COUNTY OF ORANGE I " - 3E,�, 117- 80 PAGE 1 OF 3 Exhibit B Lease of Property — Castaways Park Attachment 3 AIR QUALITY / GREENHOUSE GAS / ENERGY DATA 32 1780172.1 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report Table of Contents 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information 1.2. Land Use Types 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated 2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated 2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated 3.2. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated 1 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.3. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated 3.4. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated 3.5. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated 3.6. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated 3.7. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated 3.8. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated 3.9. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated 3.10. Demolition (2028) - Mitigated 3.11. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated 3.12. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated 3.13. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated 3.14. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated 3.15. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated 3.16. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated 3.17. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated 3.18. Demolition (2028) - Mitigated 3.19. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated 2/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.20. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 3.21. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.22. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.23. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated 3.24. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 3.25. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.26. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.27. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated 3.28. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 3.29. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.30. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.31. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.32. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.33. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.34. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.35. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.36. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.37. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.38. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.39. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated 3.40. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated 3.41. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated 3.42. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated 3.43. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated 3.44. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated 3.45. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated 3.46. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated 3.47. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated 3.48. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated 3.49. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated 3.50. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated 3.51. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated 3.52. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated 3.53. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated 4/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.54. Architectural Coating (2025) - Mitigated 3.55. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated 3.56. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated 3.57. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated 3.58. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated 3.59. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated 3.60. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated 3.61. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated 3.62. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated 3.63. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated 3.64. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated 3.65. Trenching (2026) - Unmitigated 3.66. Trenching (2026) - Mitigated 3.67. Trenching (2027) - Unmitigated 3.68. Trenching (2027) - Mitigated 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 5/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.1.1. Unmitigated 4.1.2. Mitigated 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated 4.3.1. Mitigated 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated 4.4.1. Mitigated 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated 4.5.1. Mitigated 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 6/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.6.1. Unmitigated 4.6.2. Mitigated 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated 4.7.2. Mitigated 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated 4.8.2. Mitigated 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated 4.9.2. Mitigated 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated 4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated 7 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated 5.2.2. Mitigated 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated 5.3.2. Mitigated 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies 5.5. Architectural Coatings 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies 5.7. Construction Paving 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors 8/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated 5.9.2. Mitigated 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.1.2. Mitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment 5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 5.11.2. Mitigated 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated 5.12.2. Mitigated 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 9/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.13.1. Unmitigated 5.13.2. Mitigated 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated 5.14.2. Mitigated 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.15.2. Mitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 10/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2.2. Mitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores [. ���fl"�Fi�:�7:Z�[1C�i[�Ti1f•C�11T-��. 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores 7.4. Health & Equity Measures 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures 11 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 8. User Changes to Default Data 12/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Project Name Construction Start Date Operational Year Lead Agency Land Use Scale Analysis Level for Defaults Windspeed (m/s) Precipitation (days) Location County City Air District Air Basin TAZ EDFZ Electric Utility Gas Utility App Version 1.2. Land Use Types Bay Bridge (with Dredging) 7/1 /2023 2028 Project/site County 2.50 16.2 33.61636544504624,-117.90701330233207 Orange Newport Beach South Coast AQMD South Coast 5917 7 Southern California Edison Southern California Gas 2022.1.1.13 13/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 General Light 14.5 1000sgft 0.33 14,500 1,000 Industry Other Asphalt 16.0 1000sgft 0.37 0.00 0.09 Surfaces 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Construction C-2* Construction C-10-A Construction C-10-C Construction C-11 Construction C-12 Energy E-1 Waste S-1 /S-2 Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Unmit. 5.37 4.50 40.7 40.0 0.08 1.74 0.96 2.36 1.60 0.21 1.75 - Mit. 5.37 4.50 40.7 40.0 0.08 1.74 0.96 2.36 1.60 0.21 1.75 - % - - - <0.5% - - - - Reduced Limit Heavy -Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Water Exposed Surfaces Water Unpaved Construction Roads Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Sweep Paved Roads Buildings Exceed 2019 Title 24 Building Envelope Energy Efficiency Standards Implement Waste Reduction Plan 9,573 9,573 0.39 0.30 4.72 9,624 9,573 9,573 0.39 0.30 4.72 9,624 14 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Unmit. 4.53 18.0 34.0 33.6 0.07 1.39 0.99 2.21 1.28 0.20 1.42 - 8,134 8,134 0.34 0.20 0.09 8,177 Mit. 4.53 18.0 34.0 33.6 0.07 1.39 0.99 2.21 1.28 0.20 1.42 - 8,134 8,134 0.34 0.20 0.09 8,177 Reduced Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily (Max) Unmit. 2.39 2.18 17.6 18.2 0.04 0.68 0.51 1.19 0.62 0.12 0.74 - 5,011 5,011 0.21 0.11 0.92 5,051 Mit. 2.39 2.18 17.6 18.2 0.04 0.68 0.51 1.18 0.62 0.12 0.74 - 5,011 5,011 0.21 0.11 0.92 5,051 % - - - - - - <0.5% <0.5% - - - - - Reduced Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Unmit. 0.44 0.40 3.22 3.32 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.14 - 830 830 0.04 0.02 0.15 836 Mit. 0.44 0.40 3.22 3.32 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.14 - 830 830 0.04 0.02 0.15 836 % - - - - - - <0.5% <0.5% - <0.5% <0.5% - - - - - - - Reduced Exceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Daily Max) Threshol - 75.0 100 550 150 - - 150 - - 55.0 - - - - - - - d Unmit. Yes No No No No Yes - No Yes - No - - - - - - - Mit. Yes No No No No Yes - No Yes - No - - - - - - - Exceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Average Daily) Threshol - 75.0 100 550 150 - - 150 - - 55.0 - - - - - - - d Unmit. Yes No No No No Yes - No Yes - No - - - - - - - 15/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Mit. Yes No No No No Yes - No Yes - No 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 2024 5.37 4.50 40.7 40.0 0.08 1.74 0.62 2.36 1.60 0.15 1.75 - 2025 3.33 2.78 24.5 26.8 0.07 0.92 0.96 1.88 0.84 0.21 1.05 - 2026 0.67 0.55 4.64 5.95 0.01 0.11 0.57 0.68 0.10 0.10 0.20 - 2027 0.64 0.52 4.51 5.89 0.01 0.09 0.57 0.66 0.08 0.10 0.18 - Daily - Winter (Max) 2024 4.53 3.79 34.0 31.2 0.07 1.39 0.59 1.98 1.28 0.14 1.42 - 2025 4.35 18.0 31.6 33.6 0.07 1.21 0.99 2.21 1.11 0.20 1.31 - 2026 3.22 2.70 23.2 25.4 0.05 0.87 0.96 1.83 0.80 0.19 0.99 - 2027 3.13 2.61 22.4 25.0 0.05 0.81 0.96 1.77 0.74 0.19 0.93 - 2028 0.40 0.33 2.90 3.85 0.01 0.05 0.26 0.31 0.05 0.05 0.09 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 2024 1.74 1.46 13.1 12.3 0.03 0.54 0.21 0.76 0.50 0.05 0.55 - 2025 2.39 2.18 17.6 18.2 0.04 0.68 0.51 1.19 0.62 0.12 0.74 - 2026 0.82 0.68 5.80 6.92 0.01 0.18 0.46 0.64 0.16 0.08 0.25 - 2027 0.66 0.54 4.71 5.93 0.01 0.12 0.42 0.55 0.11 0.08 0.19 - 2028 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - 2024 0.32 0.27 2.39 2.25 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.09 0.01 0.10 - 16/194 9,573 9,573 0.38 0.13 2.88 9,624 8,543 8,543 0.39 0.30 4.72 8,646 931 931 0.04 0.03 0.54 940 928 928 0.04 0.03 0.49 937 8,134 8,134 0.33 0.12 0.07 8,177 7,892 7,892 0.34 0.20 0.09 7,959 5,212 5,212 0.20 0.08 0.05 5,241 5,201 5,201 0.20 0.08 0.05 5,230 587 587 0.02 0.01 0.01 592 3,112 3,112 0.12 0.04 0.43 3,128 5,011 5,011 0.21 0.11 0.92 5,051 1,253 1,253 0.05 0.03 0.26 1,262 1,050 1,050 0.04 0.02 0.20 1,058 32.2 32.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 32.5 515 515 0.02 0.01 0.07 518 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 2025 0.44 0.40 3.22 3.32 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.14 - 2026 0.15 0.12 1.06 1.26 < 0.005 0.03 0.08 0.12 0.03 0.01 0.04 - 2027 0.12 0.10 0.86 1.08 < 0.005 0.02 0.08 0.10 0.02 0.01 0.03 - 2028 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 2024 5.37 4.50 40.7 40.0 0.08 1.74 0.62 2.36 1.60 0.15 1.75 - 2025 3.33 2.78 24.5 26.8 0.07 0.92 0.96 1.88 0.84 0.21 1.05 - 2026 0.67 0.55 4.64 5.95 0.01 0.11 0.57 0.68 0.10 0.10 0.20 - 2027 0.64 0.52 4.51 5.89 0.01 0.09 0.57 0.66 0.08 0.10 0.18 - Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) 2024 4.53 3.79 34.0 31.2 0.07 1.39 0.59 1.98 1.28 0.14 1.42 - 2025 4.35 18.0 31.6 33.6 0.07 1.21 0.99 2.21 1.11 0.20 1.31 - 2026 3.22 2.70 23.2 25.4 0.05 0.87 0.96 1.83 0.80 0.19 0.99 - 2027 3.13 2.61 22.4 25.0 0.05 0.81 0.96 1.77 0.74 0.19 0.93 - 2028 0.40 0.33 2.90 3.85 0.01 0.05 0.26 0.31 0.05 0.05 0.09 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 2024 1.74 1.46 13.1 12.3 0.03 0.54 0.21 0.76 0.50 0.05 0.55 - 2025 2.39 2.18 17.6 18.2 0.04 0.68 0.51 1.18 0.62 0.12 0.74 - 2026 0.82 0.68 5.80 6.92 0.01 0.18 0.46 0.64 0.16 0.08 0.25 - 2027 0.66 0.54 4.71 5.93 0.01 0.12 0.42 0.55 0.11 0.08 0.19 - 17/194 830 830 0.04 0.02 0.15 836 207 207 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 209 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 0.03 175 5.34 5.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.38 9,573 9,573 0.38 0.13 2.88 9,624 8,543 8,543 0.39 0.30 4.72 8,646 931 931 0.04 0.03 0.54 940 928 928 0.04 0.03 0.49 937 8,134 8,134 0.33 0.12 0.07 8,177 7,892 7,892 0.34 0.20 0.09 7,959 5,212 5,212 0.20 0.08 0.05 5,241 5,201 5,201 0.20 0.08 0.05 5,230 587 587 0.02 0.01 0.01 592 3,112 3,112 0.12 0.04 0.43 3,128 5,011 5,011 0.21 0.11 0.92 5,051 1,253 1,253 0.05 0.03 0.26 1,262 1,050 1,050 0.04 0.02 0.20 1,058 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 2028 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - 2024 0.32 0.27 2.39 2.25 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.09 0.01 0.10 - 2025 0.44 0.40 3.22 3.32 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.14 - 2026 0.15 0.12 1.06 1.26 < 0.005 0.03 0.08 0.12 0.03 0.01 0.04 - 2027 0.12 0.10 0.86 1.08 < 0.005 0.02 0.08 0.10 0.02 0.01 0.03 - 2028 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 32.2 32.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 32.5 515 515 0.02 0.01 0.07 518 830 830 0.04 0.02 0.15 836 207 207 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 209 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 0.03 175 5.34 5.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.38 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Unmit. 0.13 0.44 0.17 0.77 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 438 454 1.66 0.02 3.77 504 Mit. 0.13 0.44 0.16 0.76 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 385 396 1.17 0.02 3.77 434 % - - 4% 1% - - - - - - - 30% 12% 13% 29% - - 14% Reduced Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Unmit. 0.02 0.34 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 435 451 1.66 0.02 3.77 502 Mit. 0.02 0.34 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 382 394 1.17 0.02 3.77 432 % - - 4% 4% - - - - - - - 30% 12% 13% 29% - - 14% Reduced Average - - - - - Daily (Max) Unmit. 0.10 0.41 0.17 0.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 437 453 1.66 0.02 3.77 503 Mit. 0.09 0.41 0.16 0.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 384 395 1.17 0.02 3.77 434 18/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 % - - 4% 1% - - - - - - - 30% 12% 13% 29% - - 14% Reduced Annual (Max) Unmit. 0.02 0.08 0.03 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 2.67 72.3 75.0 0.27 < 0.005 0.62 83.4 Mit. 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 1.87 63.6 65.5 0.19 < 0.005 0.62 71.8 % 1 % < 0.5% 4% 1 % 4% 4% - 4% 4% - 4% 30% 12% 13% 29% 2% - 14% Reduced Exceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Daily Max) Threshol - 55.0 55.0 550 150 - - 150 55.0 - - - - - d Unmit. - No No No No - - No - - No - - - - - - - Mit. - No No No No - - No - - No - - - - - - - Exceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Average Daily) Threshol - 55.0 55.0 550 150 - - 150 - - 55.0 - - - - - - - d Unmit. - No No No No - - No - - No - - - - - - - Mit. - No No No No - - No - - No - - - - - - - 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.11 0.43 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.60 19/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 402 402 0.03 < 0.005 - 403 Water - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Refrig. - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.13 0.44 0.17 0.77 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 438 454 1.66 0.02 3.77 504 Daily, - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area - 0.33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Energy 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 402 402 0.03 < 0.005 - 403 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.02 0.34 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 435 451 1.66 0.02 3.77 502 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.08 0.40 < 0.005 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.78 1.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.78 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 402 402 0.03 < 0.005 - 403 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.10 0.41 0.17 0.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 437 453 1.66 0.02 3.77 503 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.01 0.07 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 66.5 66.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 66.7 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 20 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Waste - - - - - - - - 1.60 0.00 1.60 0.16 0.00 - 5.61 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.62 0.62 Total 0.02 0.08 0.03 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 2.67 72.3 75.0 0.27 < 0.005 0.62 83.4 2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ��II Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.11 0.43 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.60 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 349 349 0.03 < 0.005 - 350 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.13 0.44 0.16 0.76 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 385 396 1.17 0.02 3.77 434 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area - 0.33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 349 349 0.03 < 0.005 - 350 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.02 0.34 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 382 394 1.17 0.02 3.77 432 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 21 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.08 0.40 < 0.005 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.78 1.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.78 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 349 349 0.03 < 0.005 - 350 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.09 0.41 0.16 0.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 384 395 1.17 0.02 3.77 434 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.01 0.07 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 57.8 57.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 58.0 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.08 0.00 - 2.81 Refrig. 0.62 0.62 Total 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 1.87 63.6 65.5 0.19 < 0.005 0.62 71.8 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 22 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - Winter (Max) Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 23 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.2. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.3. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for daily. MT/vr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.4. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 22.0 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.0 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.93 3.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.13 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 27 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n 28 / 194 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.5. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - 29 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 22.0 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.0 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.93 3.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.13 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 / 194 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.6. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.6 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.6 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.7 14.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.4 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.43 2.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.55 31 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.7. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n 33 / 194 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.6 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.6 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.7 14.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.4 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.43 2.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.55 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.14 0.12 1.04 1.30 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 34 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.2 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.8. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.2 22.1 22.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.4 14.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.1 3.65 3.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.38 2.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.51 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.14 0.12 1.04 1.30 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.2 36 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.9. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.42 1.81 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.2 22.1 22.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.4 14.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.1 3.65 3.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.38 2.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.51 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 37 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 38 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 2.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.9 29.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.7 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 1.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.13 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.10. Demolition (2028) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.42 1.81 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment 39 / 194 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 2.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.22 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.11. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - Daily, - - - - Summer (Max) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.9 29.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.7 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 1.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.13 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 40/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.12. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n 42/194 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 22.0 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.0 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.93 3.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.13 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 43/194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 22.0 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.13. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.0 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.93 3.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.13 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.6 45/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.14. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.6 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.7 14.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.4 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.43 2.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.55 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.6 47/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.15. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.6 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.7 14.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.4 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.43 2.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.55 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.14 0.12 1.04 1.30 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.2 49/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.16. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.2 22.1 22.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.4 14.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.1 3.65 3.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.38 2.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.51 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.14 0.12 1.04 1.30 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.2 51 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.17. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.42 1.81 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.2 22.1 22.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.4 14.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.1 3.65 3.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.38 2.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.51 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 52 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 53 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 2.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.9 29.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.7 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 1.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.13 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.18. Demolition (2028) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.42 1.81 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment 54 / 194 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 2.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.22 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.19. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - Daily, - - - - Summer (Max) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.9 29.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.7 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 1.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.13 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 55 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 1.46 1.22 10.9 9.21 0.03 0.43 - 0.43 0.40 - 0.40 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.46 1.22 10.9 9.21 0.03 0.43 - 0.43 0.40 - 0.40 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.52 0.44 3.92 3.32 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.14 - 0.14 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.10 0.08 0.71 0.61 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,843 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,843 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,020 1,020 0.04 0.01 - 1,024 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169 169 0.01 < 0.005 - 170 56 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.20. Grading (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - 57 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237 237 < 0.005 0.01 0.97 241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.4 82.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 83.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.6 13.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 13.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.46 1.22 10.9 9.21 0.03 0.43 - 0.43 0.40 - 0.40 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movement Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.46 1.22 10.9 9.21 0.03 0.43 - 0.43 0.40 - 0.40 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.52 0.44 3.92 3.32 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.14 - 0.14 - Equipment Dust - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.10 0.08 0.71 0.61 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,843 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,843 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,020 1,020 0.04 0.01 - 1,024 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169 169 0.01 < 0.005 - 170 58 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.21. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237 237 < 0.005 0.01 0.97 241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.4 82.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 83.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.6 13.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 13.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.39 1.17 10.1 9.05 0.03 0.40 - 0.40 0.37 - 0.37 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.39 1.17 10.1 9.05 0.03 0.40 - 0.40 0.37 - 0.37 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.49 0.41 3.58 3.21 0.01 0.14 - 0.14 0.13 - 0.13 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 60 / 194 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,844 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,844 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,004 1,004 0.04 0.01 - 1,007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.65 0.59 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - Daily, - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 61 / 194 166 166 0.01 < 0.005 - 167 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.88 236 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221 221 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 224 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.4 79.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 80.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.22. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.39 1.17 10.1 9.05 0.03 0.40 - 0.40 0.37 - 0.37 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.39 1.17 10.1 9.05 0.03 0.40 - 0.40 0.37 - 0.37 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.49 0.41 3.58 3.21 0.01 0.14 - 0.14 0.13 - 0.13 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,844 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,844 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,004 1,004 0.04 0.01 - 1,007 62 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.65 0.59 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 63 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166 166 0.01 < 0.005 - 167 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.88 236 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221 221 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 224 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.4 79.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 80.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.23. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.24. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166 166 0.01 0.03 0.35 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166 166 0.01 0.03 0.01 174 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.8 59.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 62.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.90 9.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.4 65 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) �l Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - Dust - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen 66 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.25. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - 67 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166 166 0.01 0.03 0.35 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166 166 0.01 0.03 0.01 174 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.8 59.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 62.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.90 9.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.4 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movement Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.26. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 163 163 0.01 0.03 0.01 171 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 19.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.12 3.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 70 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 163 163 0.01 0.03 0.01 171 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 19.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.12 3.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.28 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.27. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual 71 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.28. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.7 80.7 0.01 0.01 0.17 84.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.7 80.7 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 84.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.9 27.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 29.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.63 4.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.86 72 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) �l Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - Dust - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen 73 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.29. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - 74 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.7 80.7 0.01 0.01 0.17 84.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.7 80.7 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 84.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.9 27.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 29.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.63 4.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.86 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movement Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.30. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.3 79.3 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 83.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.2 10.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 77 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.3 79.3 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 83.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.2 10.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.78 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.31. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual 78 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.08 0.02 0.95 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.07 - Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.07 0.02 0.98 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.07 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.32. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 778 778 0.06 0.13 1.64 819 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 778 778 0.06 0.13 0.04 818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.5 40.5 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 42.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.71 6.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.05 79 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) �l Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - Dust - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen 80 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.08 0.02 0.95 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.07 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.07 0.02 0.98 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.07 - Average - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.33. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - 81 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 778 778 0.06 0.13 1.64 819 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 778 778 0.06 0.13 0.04 818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.5 40.5 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 42.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.71 6.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.05 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.02 0.88 0.39 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 - 722 722 0.06 0.12 1.52 760 82 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.20 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 158 158 0.01 0.03 0.14 166 Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 26.2 26.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 27.5 3.34. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 83 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.07 0.02 0.88 0.39 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 - Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.20 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 84 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 722 722 0.06 0.12 1.52 760 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 158 158 0.01 0.03 0.14 166 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.2 26.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 27.5 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.35. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite 85 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.07 0.01 0.83 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.19 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.36. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen : 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 685 685 0.06 0.11 1.44 721 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150 150 0.01 0.02 0.14 158 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.9 24.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 26.1 86 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.07 0.01 0.83 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 87 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 685 685 0.06 0.11 1.44 721 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.19 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Annual - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.37. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - 150 150 0.01 0.02 0.14 158 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.9 24.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 26.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.28 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 - Daily, Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.38. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - 89 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 233 233 0.02 0.04 0.49 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.83 3.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.67 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.28 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 - 233 233 0.02 0.04 0.49 245 90 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.39. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.83 3.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.67 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 91 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.05 0.05 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.4 61.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 64.6 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.4 61.4 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 64.5 92 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.40. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.5 11.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 12.1 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 1.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.01 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 93 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.05 0.05 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.4 61.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 64.6 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.4 61.4 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 64.5 94 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.41. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.5 11.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 12.1 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 1.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.01 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.19 0.19 - 0.03 0.03 n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.03 0.03 - 0.01 0.01 n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 96 / 194 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.3 60.3 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 63.4 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.3 60.3 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 63.3 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.42. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment 97 / 194 43.1 43.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 45.2 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.13 7.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.49 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Demolitio - - - - - - 0.19 0.19 - 0.03 0.03 - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.03 0.03 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 98 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.3 60.3 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 63.4 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.3 60.3 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 63.3 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.1 43.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 45.2 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.43. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.13 0.11 0.96 1.20 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.17 0.17 - 0.03 0.03 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 7.13 7.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.49 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 161 161 0.01 < 0.005 - 161 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.18 0.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.03 0.03 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 26.6 26.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 26.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.1 59.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 62.2 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.2 59.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 62.1 20.4 20.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 20.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 41.0 3.37 3.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.46 6.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.79 100 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.44. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for daily. MT/vr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.13 0.11 0.96 1.20 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.17 0.17 - 0.03 0.03 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 161 161 0.01 < 0.005 - 161 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.18 0.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.03 0.03 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.45. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated 26.6 26.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 26.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.1 59.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 62.2 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.2 59.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 62.1 20.4 20.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 20.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 41.0 3.37 3.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.46 6.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.79 102 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.56 0.47 4.50 5.70 0.01 0.18 - 0.18 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.56 0.47 4.50 5.70 0.01 0.18 - 0.18 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.62 2.05 < 0.005 0.06 - 0.06 0.06 - 0.06 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.04 0.03 0.30 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 409 409 0.02 < 0.005 - 411 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.8 67.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 68.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 103 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.46. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.56 0.47 4.50 5.70 0.01 0.18 - 0.18 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 75.8 75.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.21 79.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.9 76.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 77.8 75.8 75.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 79.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.1 28.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 28.4 27.3 27.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 28.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.65 4.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.71 4.52 4.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 104 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.56 0.47 4.50 5.70 0.01 0.18 - 0.18 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.62 2.05 < 0.005 0.06 - 0.06 0.06 - 0.06 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.04 0.03 0.30 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 105 / 194 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 409 409 0.02 < 0.005 - 411 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.8 67.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 68.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.8 80.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 82.0 75.8 75.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.21 79.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.9 76.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 77.8 75.8 75.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 79.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.47. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.53 0.45 4.25 5.68 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.03 0.03 0.26 0.34 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment 106 / 194 28.1 28.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 28.4 27.3 27.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 28.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.65 4.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.71 4.52 4.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.0 69.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 69.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.4 11.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 11.5 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.48. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.5 75.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 76.4 74.6 74.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 77.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.64 4.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.70 4.52 4.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.75 0.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 107 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.53 0.45 4.25 5.68 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.03 0.03 0.26 0.34 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 108/ 194 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.0 69.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 69.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.4 11.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 11.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.5 75.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 76.4 74.6 74.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 77.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.64 4.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.70 4.52 4.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.49. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.53 0.45 4.25 5.68 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.06 0.05 0.51 0.68 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - 109 / 194 0.77 0.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.75 0.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136 136 0.01 < 0.005 - 136 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.5 22.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 22.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - 75.5 75.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 76.4 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 74.6 74.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 77.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.13 9.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.25 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 8.90 8.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.30 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.51 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.53 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.47 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.54 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.53 0.45 4.25 5.68 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 Equipment 110 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.06 0.05 0.51 0.68 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 111/ 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136 136 0.01 < 0.005 - 136 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.5 22.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 22.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.5 75.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 76.4 74.6 74.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 77.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.13 9.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.25 8.90 8.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.51 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.53 1.47 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.51. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.52 0.44 4.08 5.67 0.01 0.15 - 0.15 0.13 - 0.13 - 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - Daily Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.72 1.00 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - 200 200 0.01 < 0.005 - 201 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 33.3 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - Daily, - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - Winter (Max) 112 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.52. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.52 0.44 4.08 5.67 0.01 0.15 - 0.15 0.13 - 0.13 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 74.2 74.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 75.1 73.2 73.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 76.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.2 13.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.4 12.9 12.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.19 2.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.22 2.13 2.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 113 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.72 1.00 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.53. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated 200 200 0.01 < 0.005 - 201 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 33.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.2 74.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 75.1 73.2 73.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 76.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.2 13.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.4 12.9 12.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.19 2.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.22 2.13 2.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 114 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 - 134 Equipment Architect - 14.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.84 Equipment Architect - 0.20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 Equipment Architect - 0.04 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - 115 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - 30.8 30.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.43 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.43 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.54. Architectural Coating (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) �l Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 - 134 Equipment 116 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Architect - 14.3 - - - Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Architect - 0.20 - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Architect - 0.04 - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - Daily 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.8 30.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 117 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.55. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 2.89 2.42 22.7 19.8 0.04 0.96 - 0.96 0.88 - 0.88 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 2.89 2.42 22.7 19.8 0.04 0.96 - 0.96 0.88 - 0.88 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 1.04 0.88 8.20 7.16 0.02 0.35 - 0.35 0.32 - 0.32 - Equipment 0.43 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,537 4,537 0.18 0.04 - 4,553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,537 4,537 0.18 0.04 - 4,553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,641 1,641 0.07 0.01 - 1,647 118 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.50 1.31 < 0.005 0.06 - 0.06 0.06 - 0.06 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.10 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 272 272 0.01 < 0.005 - 273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 305 305 < 0.005 0.01 1.25 309 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 290 290 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 294 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106 106 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 108 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.6 17.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 119 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.56. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for daily. MT/vr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 2.89 2.42 22.7 19.8 0.04 0.96 - 0.96 0.88 - 0.88 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 2.89 2.42 22.7 19.8 0.04 0.96 - 0.96 0.88 - 0.88 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 1.04 0.88 8.20 7.16 0.02 0.35 - 0.35 0.32 - 0.32 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.50 1.31 < 0.005 0.06 - 0.06 0.06 - 0.06 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - 4,537 4,537 0.18 0.04 - 4,553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,537 4,537 0.18 0.04 - 4,553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,641 1,641 0.07 0.01 - 1,647 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 272 272 0.01 < 0.005 - 273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.10 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.57. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 305 305 < 0.005 0.01 1.25 309 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 290 290 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 294 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106 106 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 108 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.6 17.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.82 0.69 6.67 8.28 0.01 0.35 - 0.35 0.32 - 0.32 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.10 0.09 0.82 1.02 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 122/ 194 1,379 1,379 0.06 0.01 - 1,384 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170 170 0.01 < 0.005 - 171 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.1 28.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 28.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.9 33.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 34.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.03 4.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.58. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.82 0.69 6.67 8.28 0.01 0.35 - 0.35 0.32 - 0.32 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.10 0.09 0.82 1.02 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - 123 / 194 0.67 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,379 1,379 0.06 0.01 - 1,384 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170 170 0.01 < 0.005 - 171 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.1 28.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 28.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.59. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.64 1.37 12.6 12.7 0.04 0.49 - 0.49 0.45 - 0.45 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 33.9 33.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 34.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.03 4.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,837 3,837 0.16 0.03 - 3,850 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 124 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.64 1.37 12.6 12.7 0.04 0.49 - 0.49 0.45 - 0.45 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.58 0.48 4.44 4.50 0.01 0.17 - 0.17 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.11 0.09 0.81 0.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 125 / 194 3,837 3,837 0.16 0.03 - 3,850 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,356 1,356 0.06 0.01 - 1,361 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 225 225 0.01 < 0.005 - 225 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.88 236 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221 221 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 224 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.60. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.64 1.37 12.6 12.7 0.04 0.49 - 0.49 0.45 - 0.45 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.64 1.37 12.6 12.7 0.04 0.49 - 0.49 0.45 - 0.45 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.58 0.48 4.44 4.50 0.01 0.17 - 0.17 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment 79.2 79.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 80.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,837 3,837 0.16 0.03 - 3,850 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,837 3,837 0.16 0.03 - 3,850 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,356 1,356 0.06 0.01 - 1,361 126 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Off -Road 0.11 0.09 0.81 0.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 225 225 0.01 < 0.005 - 225 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.88 236 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221 221 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 224 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.2 79.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 80.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 127 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.61. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.94 1.62 14.6 13.5 0.03 0.61 - 0.61 0.56 - 0.56 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.35 0.29 2.64 2.44 < 0.005 0.11 - 0.11 0.10 - 0.10 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.06 0.05 0.48 0.44 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.08 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 128/ 194 2,781 2,781 0.11 0.02 - 2,790 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 503 503 0.02 < 0.005 - 505 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.2 83.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 83.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 299 299 < 0.005 0.01 1.13 303 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.62. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.94 1.62 14.6 13.5 0.03 0.61 - 0.61 0.56 - 0.56 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.35 0.29 2.64 2.44 < 0.005 0.11 - 0.11 0.10 - 0.10 - Equipment 129 / 194 52.1 52.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 52.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.63 8.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,781 2,781 0.11 0.02 - 2,790 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 503 503 0.02 < 0.005 - 505 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Off -Road 0.06 0.05 0.48 0.44 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.08 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.63. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.2 83.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 83.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 299 299 < 0.005 0.01 1.13 303 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.1 52.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 52.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.63 8.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 130 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 2.80 2.35 21.3 19.3 0.05 0.87 - 0.87 0.80 - 0.80 - 4,763 4,763 0.19 0.04 - 4,779 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.51 0.42 3.84 3.49 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - 861 861 0.03 0.01 - 864 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.70 0.64 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 143 143 0.01 < 0.005 - 143 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - 284 284 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 288 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 131 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average Daily Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.64. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - Daily, - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 2.80 2.35 21.3 19.3 0.05 0.87 - 0.87 0.80 - 0.80 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.51 0.42 3.84 3.49 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - 132/ 194 52.1 52.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 52.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.63 8.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,763 4,763 0.19 0.04 - 4,779 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 861 861 0.03 0.01 - 864 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.70 0.64 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - Daily Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.65. Trenching (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - 143 143 0.01 < 0.005 - 143 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 284 284 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 288 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.1 52.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 52.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.63 8.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 133 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.91 1.60 14.1 12.5 0.03 0.60 - 0.60 0.55 - 0.55 - 2,720 2,720 0.11 0.02 - 2,729 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.69 1.49 < 0.005 0.07 - 0.07 0.07 - 0.07 - 325 325 0.01 < 0.005 - 326 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.04 0.03 0.31 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 53.8 53.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 53.9 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.08 0.08 0.08 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - 279 279 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 282 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average - - - - - Daily 134 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.66. Trenching (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.91 1.60 14.1 12.5 0.03 0.60 - 0.60 0.55 - 0.55 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.69 1.49 < 0.005 0.07 - 0.07 0.07 - 0.07 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.04 0.03 0.31 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment 135 / 194 33.7 33.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 34.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.59 5.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,720 2,720 0.11 0.02 - 21729 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325 325 0.01 < 0.005 - 326 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.8 53.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 53.9 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.08 0.08 0.08 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.67. Trenching (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 279 279 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 282 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.7 33.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 34.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.59 5.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.87 1.57 13.6 12.3 0.03 0.57 - 0.57 0.52 - 0.52 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.11 0.10 0.83 0.74 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 137/ 194 2,720 2,720 0.11 0.02 - 2,729 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165 165 0.01 < 0.005 - 166 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.3 27.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 27.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 274 274 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 277 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.9 16.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.68. Trenching (2027) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.87 1.57 13.6 12.3 0.03 0.57 - 0.57 0.52 - 0.52 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.11 0.10 0.83 0.74 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - 138 / 194 2.79 2.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,720 2,720 0.11 0.02 - 2,729 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165 165 0.01 < 0.005 - 166 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.3 27.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 27.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.6. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available. 4.1.2. Mitigated Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.5. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available. 4.2. Energy 274 274 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 277 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.9 16.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.79 2.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 139 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 203 203 0.01 < 0.005 — 203 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 203 203 0.01 < 0.005 — 203 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 203 203 0.01 < 0.005 — 203 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — 203 203 0.01 < 0.005 — 203 Annual — — — — — — — General — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.6 33.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.7 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.6 33.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.7 140 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 158 158 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 158 158 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 158 158 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — 158 158 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Annual General — — — — — — — — — — — — 26.2 26.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 26.3 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 26.2 26.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 26.3 141 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 199 199 0.02 < 0.005 - 199 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 199 199 0.02 < 0.005 - 199 Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 199 199 0.02 < 0.005 - 199 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 199 199 0.02 < 0.005 - 199 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 32.9 32.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 33.0 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 32.9 32.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 33.0 142 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 - 191 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 - 191 Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 - 191 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 - 191 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 31.6 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 31.6 143 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Consum — 0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings Landsca 0.11 0.10 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.60 pe Equipme nt Total 0.11 0.43 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.60 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Consum — 0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings Total — 0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Consum — 0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products 144 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Architect - < 0.005 - - - - ural Landsca 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 pe Equipme nt Total 0.01 0.07 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 4.3.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Consum - 0.31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - er Products Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Landsca 0.11 0.10 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.60 pe Equipme nt Total 0.11 0.43 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.60 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Consum - 0.31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - er Products Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings 145 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Total — 0.33 Annual — — Consum — 0.06 — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings Landsca 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 pe Equipme nt Total 0.01 0.07 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated Daily, Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 — 61.1 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 — 61.1 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) 146 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 General - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 4.4.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) 147 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 General - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 148 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Annual General - - - - - - - - - - - 1.60 0.00 1.60 0.16 0.00 - 5.61 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 1.60 0.00 1.60 0.16 0.00 - 5.61 4.5.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 149 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Annual General - - - - - - - - - - - 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.08 0.00 - 2.81 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.08 0.00 - 2.81 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Light Industry Total - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 150 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Light Industry Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — General — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.62 0.62 Light Industry Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.62 0.62 4.6.2. Mitigated Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Light Industry Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Light Industry Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 151 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 General — — 0.62 0.62 Light Industry Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.62 0.62 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual Total 4.7.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 152 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.8.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 153 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.9.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 154 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Daily, — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 155 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal 156 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequest ered Subtotal Remove d Subtotal Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Avoided — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 157 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated i Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 158 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Sequest Subtotal Remove d Subtotal Daily, Winter (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequest ered Subtotal Remove d Subtotal Annual — — — — — — — — — — — Avoided Subtotal Sequest ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 159 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule Pump Station Demolition Demolition 7/1/2026 10/31/2026 5.00 88.0 — Exist. PS Demolition & Demolition 9/27/2025 01/28/2028 5.00 30.0 — Odor Control - Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Demolition 9/27/2025 1/28/2028 5.00 30.0 — Odor Control - Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station Earthwork & Grading 7/1/2024 06/30/2025 5.00 261 — Below Grade Concrete Construction Micro tunneling - Soil Grading 07/01/2024 02/28/2025 5.00 175 — Hauling to Plant Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Grading 07/08/2024 03/07/2025 5.00 175 — Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Grading 03/25/2025 04/18/2025 5.00 19.0 — Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauling Grading 05/26/2025 09/12/2025 5.00 80.0 — to Plant Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauled Grading 06/02/2025 09/19/2025 5.00 80.0 — from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled Grading 09/19/2025 09/26/2025 5.00 6.00 — from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 160 / 194 Exist. PS Demolition & Demolition 9/27/2025 Odor Control - Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station Above Grade Building Construction 07/1/2025 Building Construction including MEP Generator and Odor Building Construction 11/01/2026 Control Building Construction Pump Station Architectural Architectural Coating 11/1/2025 Coating Force Main Pipeline Trenching 7/1/2024 Trenching East of Newport Bay Micro tunneling Only Trenching 07/01/2024 Dredging Only Trenching 01/01/2025 Force Main Pipeline Trenching 07/01/2025 Trenching West of Newport Bay Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching 10/1/2025 Trenching Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching 11/01/2026 Trenching 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauling to Plant Number 2 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 12/3/2027 5.00 25.0 — 1 /31 /2026 5.00 154 — 3/31 /2027 5.00 108 — 11 /7/2025 5.00 5.00 — 12/31 /2024 5.00 132 — 9/1 /2024 5.00 45.0 — 6/30/2025 5.00 129 — 9/30/2025 5.00 66.0 — 12/31 /2025 5.00 66.0 — 1 /31 /2027 5.00 65.0 — Average 1.00 e 33.0 0.73 161 / 194 Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station Cranes Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Excavators Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Other Construction Diesel Earthwork & Below Equipment Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Pumps Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Rollers Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station Above Cranes Diesel Grade Building Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Grade Building oes Construction including MEP Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 6.00 475 0.50 Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 162 / 194 Pump Station Above Pumps Diesel Grade Building Construction including MEP Generator and Odor Cranes Diesel Control Building Construction Generator and Odor Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Control Building oes Construction Generator and Odor Pumps Diesel Control Building Construction Pump Station Air Compressors Diesel Architectural Coating Force Main Pipeline Other Construction Diesel Trenching East of Equipment Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Pumps Diesel Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rollers Diesel Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Cranes Diesel Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Excavators Diesel Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Trenching East of oes Newport Bay Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average 1.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Average 1.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Average 1.00 6.00 475 0.50 Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 163 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Micro tunneling Only Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 24.0 118 0.42 Equipment Dredging Only Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Dredging Only Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 500 0.50 Equipment Dredging Only Pumps Diesel Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Dredging Only Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 oes Force Main Pipeline Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 475 0.05 Trenching West of Equipment Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Pumps Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 11.0 0.74 Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Trenching West of oes Newport Bay Temporary Gravity Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 475 0.42 Sewer Trenching Equipment 164 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Temporary Gravity Pumps Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 11.0 0.74 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Sewer Trenching oes Permanent Gravity Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 475 0.05 Sewer Trenching Equipment Permanent Gravity Pumps Diesel Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 84.0 0.37 Sewer Trenching oes 5.2.2. Mitigated Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal 165/194 Pump Station Cranes Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Excavators Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Other Construction Diesel Earthwork & Below Equipment Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Pumps Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Rollers Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station Above Cranes Diesel Grade Building Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Grade Building oes Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Pumps Diesel Grade Building Construction including MEP Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 6.00 475 0.50 Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Average 1.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 166 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Generator and Odor Cranes Diesel Average Control Building Construction Generator and Odor Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average Control Building oes Construction Generator and Odor Pumps Diesel Average Control Building Construction Pump Station Air Compressors Diesel Average Architectural Coating Force Main Pipeline Other Construction Diesel Average Trenching East of Equipment Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Pumps Diesel Average Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rollers Diesel Average Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Cranes Diesel Average Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Excavators Diesel Average Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average Trenching East of oes Newport Bay Micro tunneling Only Other Construction Diesel Average Equipment Dredging Only Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 1.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 1.00 6.00 475 0.50 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 1.00 24.0 118 0.42 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 167 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dredging Only Other Construction Diesel Average Equipment Dredging Only Pumps Diesel Average Dredging Only Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average oes Force Main Pipeline Cranes Diesel Average Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Excavators Diesel Average Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Other Construction Diesel Average Trenching West of Equipment Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Pumps Diesel Average Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rollers Diesel Average Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average Trenching West of oes Newport Bay Temporary Gravity Cranes Diesel Average Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Excavators Diesel Average Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Other Construction Diesel Average Sewer Trenching Equipment Temporary Gravity Pumps Diesel Average Sewer Trenching 1.00 8.00 500 0.50 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 1.00 8.00 475 0.05 3.00 8.00 11.0 0.74 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 1.00 8.00 475 0.42 3.00 8.00 11.0 0.74 168 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Temporary Gravity Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Sewer Trenching oes Permanent Gravity Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 475 0.05 Sewer Trenching Equipment Permanent Gravity Pumps Diesel Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 84.0 0.37 Sewer Trenching oes 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated One -Way Trips per Day Pump Station Earthwork & Below - - - - Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Vendor - 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Grade Concrete Construction 169 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Pump Station Earthwork & Below Onsite truck Grade Concrete Construction Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of — Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Worker Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Vendor Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Hauling Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Onsite truck Newport Bay Pump Station Demolition — Pump Station Demolition Worker Pump Station Demolition Vendor Pump Station Demolition Hauling Pump Station Demolition Onsite truck Pump Station Above Grade Building — Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Worker Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Vendor Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Hauling Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Onsite truck Construction including MEP Generator and Odor Control Building — Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Worker Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Vendor Construction HHDT 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 6.09 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2.38 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 6.09 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2.38 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 170 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Generator and Odor Control Building Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Onsite truck — — HHDT Construction Pump Station Architectural Coating — — — — Pump Station Architectural Coating Worker 2.44 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Pump Station Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Pump Station Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Pump Station Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT Micro tunneling Only — — — — Micro tunneling Only Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Micro tunneling Only Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Micro tunneling Only Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Micro tunneling Only Onsite truck — — HHDT Dredging Only — — — — Dredging Only Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Dredging Only Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Dredging Only Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Dredging Only Onsite truck — — HHDT Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of — — — — Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Worker 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Onsite truck — — HHDT Newport Bay Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching — — — — 171 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Worker 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Onsite truck — — HHDT Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching — — — — Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Worker 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Onsite truck — — HHDT Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant — — — — Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Hauling 2.34 20.0 HHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 1.14 20.0 HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 172 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 11.2 20.0 HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant — — — — Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Hauling 10.3 20.0 HHDT Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 9.82 20.0 HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 173 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 3.34 20.0 HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.30 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.30 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 174 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.88 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 5.3.2. Mitigated Pump Station Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Onsite truck — — HHDT Grade Concrete Construction Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of — — — — Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Worker 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Onsite truck — — HHDT Newport Bay Pump Station Demolition — — — — 175 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Pump Station Demolition Worker Pump Station Demolition Vendor Pump Station Demolition Hauling Pump Station Demolition Onsite truck Pump Station Above Grade Building — Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Worker Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Vendor Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Hauling Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Onsite truck Construction including MEP Generator and Odor Control Building — Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Worker Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Vendor Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Hauling Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Onsite truck Construction Pump Station Architectural Coating — Pump Station Architectural Coating Worker Pump Station Architectural Coating Vendor Pump Station Architectural Coating Hauling Pump Station Architectural Coating Onsite truck Micro tunneling Only — Micro tunneling Only Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 6.09 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2.38 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 6.09 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2.38 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT HHDT 2.44 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 176 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Micro tunneling Only Vendor Micro tunneling Only Hauling Micro tunneling Only Onsite truck Dredging Only — Dredging Only Worker Dredging Only Vendor Dredging Only Hauling Dredging Only Onsite truck Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of — Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Worker Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Vendor Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Hauling Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Onsite truck Newport Bay Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching — Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Worker Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Vendor Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Hauling Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Onsite truck Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching — Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Worker Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Vendor Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Hauling Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Onsite truck Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant — Number 2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 177 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Hauling 2.34 20.0 HHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 1.14 20.0 HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 11.2 20.0 HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant — — — — Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Number 2 178 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Hauling 10.3 20.0 HHDT Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 9.82 20.0 HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 3.34 20.0 HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.30 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 179 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.30 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.88 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies Non -applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 180 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.5. Architectural Coatings Pump Station Architectural 0.00 Coating 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities Pump Station Demolition 0.00 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor 0.00 Control - Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor 0.00 Control - Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station Earthwork & 0.00 Below Grade Concrete Construction Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to — Plant Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled — from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled 2,120 from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauling to — Plant Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauled from — Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal MX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,114 1,994 0.00 8,281 7,863 21,750 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 181 / 194 7,250 0.00 125 125 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 •& Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Pump Station - Soil Hauled from 200 — 0.00 0.00 — Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor 0.00 0.00 0.00 307 — Control - Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies Non -applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 5.7. Construction Paving General Light Industry 0.00 0% Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.37 100% 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh) kWh per -. • 2025 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005 2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005 2026 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005 2027 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005 2028 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated Total all Land Uses 0.00 0.00 e �� 0.00 0.00 182 / 194 1 �� 1 �� 1 �� Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.9.2. Mitigated Total all Land Uses 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.1.2. Mitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 0 0.00 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Snow Days day/yr Summer Days day/yr 5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated Snow Days day/yr Summer Days day/yr 21,750 M M 7,250 M 0.00 250 0.00 250 M M 183 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) General Light Industry 139,095 532 0.0330 0.0040 620,628 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 5.11.2. Mitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) .. - • - • General Light Industry 108,730 532 0.0330 0.0040 594,240 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated General Light Industry 3,353,125 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 5.12.2. Mitigated General Light Industry 3,353,125 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 12,960 1.10 12,960 1.10 184 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated General Light Industry 18.0 — Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 — 5.13.2. Mitigated General Light Industry 8.99 — Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 — 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated EquipmentLand Use Type .- Refrigerant Quantity (kg)•. - General Light Industry Other commercial A/C R-410A 2,088 0.30 4.00 and heat pumps 5.14.2. Mitigated General Light Industry Other commercial A/C R-410A and heat pumps 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 2,088 0.30 4.00 18.0 Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced 185 / 194 Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Mitigated Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor •. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency• • Fire Pumps Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor •.2. Process Boilers Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr) E Equipment Type l Fuel Type Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres Mitigated Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres •. Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2.2. Mitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary Cal -Adapt midcentury 2040-2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100. Temperature and Extreme Heat 8.66 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.25 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned 187 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal -Adapt, 2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about 1/4 an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft. Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 0 0 N/A Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A 188 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2 Wildfire 1 1 1 2 Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2 The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. Exposure Indicators AQ-Ozone 51.9 AQ-PM 53.4 AQ-DPM 21.9 Drinking Water 32.3 Lead Risk Housing 27.7 Pesticides 0.00 Toxic Releases 82.9 Traffic 53.1 Effect Indicators — 189 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 CleanUp Sites Groundwater Haz Waste Facilities/Generators Impaired Water Bodies Solid Waste Sensitive Population Asthma Cardio-vascular Low Birth Weights Socioeconomic Factor Indicators Education Housing Linguistic Poverty Unemployment 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A Economic Above Poverty Employed Median HI Education Bachelor's or higher High school enrollment Preschool enrollment 17.1 22.1 22.0 77.3 2.52 2.59 0.54 39.9 3.87 50.7 13.3 14.0 51.3 score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions 88.70781471 45.27139741 83.11305017 92.82689593 100 20.87771077 to other census tracts in the state. 190 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Transportation Auto Access 72.44963429 Active commuting 16.25818042 Social — 2-parent households 66.14910817 Voting 61.02912871 Neighborhood — Alcohol availability 47.26036186 Park access 81.35506224 Retail density 67.93276017 Supermarket access 57.84678558 Tree canopy 26.26716284 Housing — Homeownership 40.39522649 Housing habitability 62.49197998 Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 49.21083023 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 59.77158989 Uncrowded housing 82.07365584 Health Outcomes — Insured adults 70.40934172 Arthritis 71.8 Asthma ER Admissions 92.4 High Blood Pressure 71.3 Cancer (excluding skin) 17.3 Asthma 83.3 Coronary Heart Disease 74.7 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 89.8 191 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Diagnosed Diabetes 95.3 Life Expectancy at Birth 88.6 Cognitively Disabled 87.2 Physically Disabled 84.3 Heart Attack ER Admissions 98.1 Mental Health Not Good 92.6 Chronic Kidney Disease 85.5 Obesity 92.8 Pedestrian Injuries 42.0 Physical Health Not Good 95.9 Stroke 84.7 Health Risk Behaviors — Binge Drinking 3.2 Current Smoker 92.8 No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 97.5 Climate Change Exposures — Wildfire Risk 0.0 SLR Inundation Area 61.5 Children 92.8 Elderly 46.6 English Speaking 88.0 Foreign -born 9.9 Outdoor Workers 81.8 Climate Change Adaptive Capacity — Impervious Surface Cover 37.9 Traffic Density 39.9 Traffic Access 23.0 192 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Other Indices — Hardship 9.2 Other Decision Support — 2016 Voting 81.5 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 12.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 76.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low -Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 7.4. Health & Equity Measures No Health & Equity Measures selected. 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed. 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures No Health & Equity Custom Measures created. 8. User Changes to Default Data Land Use Construction: Construction Phases Provided by the applicant As provided by the applicant Construction: Off -Road Equipment Per construction questionnaire. "Other Construction Equipment" = vibratory hammer pile driver 193 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Construction: Dust From Material Movement Construction: Trips and VMT Construction: Architectural Coatings Operations: Architectural Coatings As per the information provided by the applicant. As per the information provided by the applicant. As per SCAQMD Rule 1113. As per SCAQMD Rule 1113 194 / 194 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE ; ss. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH } I, Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council is seven; the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 2024-28 was duly introduced before and adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 23rd day of April, 2024; and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Mayor Will O'Neill, Mayor Pro Tern Joe Stapleton, Councilmember Robyn Grant, Councilmember Erik Weigand NAYS: Councilmember Noah Blom, Councilmember Lauren Kleiman RECUSED: Councilmernber Brad Avery IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of said City this 24th day of April, 2024. a6ki*Mz Lei ani I. Brown City Clerk Newport Beach, California F- \�FpR�%