HomeMy WebLinkAboutEXC045_EXCEPTION PERMIT #45, ACE PARKING 4678 CAMPUS DRIVE- OFFSITE SIGN0
EXCEPTION PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
3300 Newport Boulevard
P. O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915
(714) 644-3200
Applicat on Rec'd by
Fee: $
a(l
�Gh
Applicant (Print) Are I?Ax Atv!t -DP>A Xrykma Co Phone t6)) `721 0143
Mailing Address-qC-P-J' (Ij okAngg r.AAo."( ;.k A ME-J7kl -f 13*Act.L 92r.Lrr
Property Owner M�ZutmE C Phone6yp�Zq
Mailing Address A69)o NUIC q.raltAt- ca %L' %+& A )J&W purr.-t zg-- 4 Ca cuw p
Address of Property Involved '%-7 6 CAMPVS
Purpose of Application (describe fully) ",� - 4t f1 Qi
U
Zone / / / " )- 19
Present Use
Legal Description of Property Involved (if too long, attach separate sheet)
N JR SWI Jo-r (9
-h2ar3: t 216.1 (a_ BIOCV- >.
/ f+a�¢l 42'2 ill n7
✓ Why will proposal not be contrary to the purpose of the Sign Ordinance?
-tkr= et4L, e-tt2. -"A&X& AA1Qk%K1 froT+� d-ew, �c�j„/�T:t[lee C'i�y�P-delawj-e
No u A;%M TN 10
exceptional or extraordinary circumstances involved? h"ibi2LSts6D c t+r, J,0eA -tots
%,-A wcrt- vu%Xe4 *- f tkwe, Pulo(L 2a3n7E df-- W A!Y
✓ Why is an exception permit necessary to protect a substantial property right?
Why will proposal not be detrimental to the neighborhood? 17--Vftvjt �% 4t' L"62
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT
VKI) (we)_ ,_SaA I„tt ::)) OM N� C0thoftl depose and say that (I
am) (we are) the owner(s) df the property(ies) involved in this application. (I) (We)
further certify, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing statements and answers
herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and
correct to the best of (my) four) )*�dJhglief.
NOTE: An agent may sign for the own4--1 written authorization from the record owner
is filed with the application.
Date Filed 6 - J -
Hearing
DO NOT COMPLETE APPLICATION BELOW THIS LINE
-Fee Pd. 2,�� 0>� Receipt No. /&--%�
PAID
.,.
Actioni // �ii Jam'✓ /ii � �l% a � tiS'n
C.C.Action Date
b
i
0
:4
Planning Commission Meeting October 20, 1994
Agenda Item No. 1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Exception Permit No. 45 (Discussion)
Request to permit the installation of an new double-faced, off -site
information sign for airport parking at MacArthur Court, on property
located in the M-1-A District.
LOCATION: Lot 19, Tract No. 5169, located at 4680 MacArthur Boulevard, on the
southwesterly corner of MacArthur Boulevard and Campus Drive,
across from the John Wayne Airport.
ZONE: M-1-A
APPLICANT: Ace Parking, Newport Beach
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Application
This is a request to permit the installation of a new double faced off -site directional sign for
airport parking at MacArthur Court, located on property at the intersection of MacArthur
Boulevard and Campus Drive, in the M-1-A District. Section 20.06.060 of The Newport
Beach Municipal Code provides that off -site signs are subject to securing the approval of
an exception permit by the Planning Commission.
Environmental Significance
The proposed sign has been reviewed and it has been determined that it is categorically
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 11
(Accessory Structures).
Conformance with the General Plan
The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the subject property for
"Administrative, Professional and Financial Commercial" uses. The subject off -site sign is
a permitted use within this designation and is ancillary to the E-Z Airpark parking lot,
TO: Planning Commission - 2
located to the east across MacArthur Boulevard, in the Koll Center Planned Community
District. The proposed off -site sign is consistent with the Land Use Element policies and
guidelines.
$_object Pr ,perty and Surrounding Land Uses
The subject property, which is the proposed location for the new off -site sign, is currently
a vacant, former service station site and is located on the southwesterly corner of MacArthur
Boulevard and Campus Drive. The proposed sign will advertise the E-Z Airpark pay
parking lot located in the MacArthur Court office complex, and will be directional in nature.
The MacArthur Court complex contains a mixture of professional and business uses, and is
located on the southeasterly corner of the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Campus
Drive (see attached vicinity map). To the north of the subject property, across Campus
Drive, is the John Wayne Airport; and .to the south and southwest is the Bircher Building
site and related office parking lot.
Backizround
On April 22, 1993, the Planning Commission approved Traffic Study No. 86, which was a
request to allow the conversion of 200 excess parking spaces in the MacArthur Court office
complex to a pay parking facility used for John Wayne Airport passengers. Said pay parking
facility is the use which is advertised by the subject off -site sign.
On March 16,1994, the Code Enforcement Division notified the applicant that the subject
off -site, sign was erected without the benefit of proper building permits or Planning
Commission approval. The applicant responded, indicating his intention to submit an
exception permit application, which was subsequently received.
On July 7, 1994, the Planning Commission approved Exception Permit No. 45, which was
a request for the retention of an as -built, double-faced, illuminated sign on the subject
property, for airport parking at MacArthur Court. An excerpt of the Planning Commission
minutes, dated July 7, 1994, is attached for Commission review. Condition No. 5 of said
approval stated that, 'The applicant either remove the sign at the end of 90 days or come
back to the Planning Commission at the end of 90 days with a redesign of the sign."
Inasmuch as this approval was for a period of 90 days, the applicant has redesigned the
subject, off -site sign so that it has a more permanent appearance, which is the subject of this
application.
Analy5i
The proposed redesign of the subject sign may be seen on the attached elevations, indicating
the dimensions and proposed colors of the sign. The sign is approximately 13 feet in height,
with an area of 64 square feet, and will be externally illuminated. The proposed sign will
replace the existing off -site directional sign which is located on the southwesterly corner of
! •
TO. Planning Commission - 3
Campus Drive and MacArthur Boulevard. The existing sign has an overall height of 13 feet,
and has an area of 56 square feet. The existing sign is double-faced and is externally
illuminated. It is intended that the sign direct motorists travelling south on MacArthur
Boulevard into the MacArthur Court complex, although it may also be viewed by motorists
travelling east and west along Campus Drive or north along MacArthur Boulevard.
Upon staff inspection of the subject E-Z Airpark site, the applicant has removed the two
on -site signs which were located on the MacArthur Court site, and which advertised the E-Z
Airpark facility. Said signs were removed in accordance with Condition No. 3 of Exception
Permit No. 45, as approved by the Planning Commission on July 7, 1994. The proposed sign
is similar to the two Irvine Company "future facility" signs that were removed.
Widening of Campus Drive
The City Traffic Engineer has indicated that the future widening of Campus Drive will begin
as soon as January of 1995. The existing curb along the subject property will be ]elocated'
;approximately 30 feet south of its current -placement. Staff is of the opinion that, should the
Commission approve the proposed sign, its location should reflect the proposed Campus
Drive widening. Such a condition has been included in the attached Exhibit "A."
Applicant's Statement of Support
In accordance with Section 20.06.090B of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, in order to
grant an exception permit, the Planning Commission must find that the granting of such a
permit is necessary to protect a substantial property right, will not be contrary to the
purpose of Chapter 20.06, and will not be materially detrimental to the health, safety,
comfort or general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood, or detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood, or to the general welfare of the
City.
In response to the above requirements, the applicant has submitted the following statements
in support of his application:
1. Why will the proposal not be contrary to the purpose of the sign ordinance? 'The
sign ordinance allows for directional signs, and the subject sign presents no hazard
to the public."
2. What exceptional or extraordinary circumstances are involved? "The advertised site
location is not viable from the public right-of-way."
3. Why is an excQtion permit necessary to protect a substantial proper rientr
"Without proper signage the subject business would suffer a lack of exposure that
other property owners enjoy that have right of way visibility."
4. Why will the proposal not be detrimental to the neighborhood? "It provides better
directional information to people looking for airport parking in a busy intersection;
thereby enhancing safety."
TO: Planning Commission - 4
Specific Findings and Recommendations
Should the Planning Commission wish to approve this application, the findings and
conditions set forth in the attached Exhibit "A" are suggested. However, should the
Commission be of the opinion that adequate signage for the E-Z Airpark could be provided
on -site, appropriate findings for denial are set forth in the attached Exhibit "B."
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. BEWICKER, Director
DANA O. ASLANT
Associate Planner
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Exhibit 'B"
Vicinity Map
Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes, dated July 7, 1994
Elevation of Proposed Sign
Color Indications of Proposed Sign
Photographs of Former On -site Signs and Existing Off -site Sign
F.\WP51\PLANNING\DAM-A\EP\EP452
TO: Planning Commission - 5
EXHIBIT "A"
FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
EXCEPTION PERMIT NO.45
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed redesign of the sign is more compatible with surrounding land
uses than that of the existing sign.
2. That the proposed sign will not have any significant environmental impact.
3. That the granting of this exception permit will not be contrary to the purpose of
Chapter 20.06 of the Municipal Code, and will not be materially detrimental to the
health, safety, comfort or general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood,
or detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood, or to
the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the proposed dimensions
and colors of the sign.
2. That the location of the proposed sign shall reflect the future widening of Campus
Drive, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer
and the Public Works Department, prior to tl�e issuance of a building permit.
3. That the applicant shall obtain a building permit for the proposed sign from the
Building Department.
4. That the proposed temporary sign shall be removed in conjunction with the
development of the subject, vacant property.
TO: Plaa• g Commission - 6
EXHIBIT "B"
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL
EXCEPTION PERMIT NO.45
FINDINGS:
1. That the Planning Commission determined that in this case, the location of the
proposed sign would be detrimental to persons, property and improvements in the
neighborhood, and that the applicant's request would not be consistent with the
legislative intent of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
2. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances involved with the
property which make the signage necessary to achieve the identification of the E-Z
Airpark facility.
3. That adequate signage for the pay parking facility could be .provided on site.
4. That approval of this request could set a precedent for future applications for off -site
directional signs in the area:
,CA,N
CIS
P C A•,r P.0
�l a
VICINITY MAP
A
I)
tl •
I
1 I} -t-A ~ .icr...P•C
--
DISTRICTING MAP NEWPORT BEACH CAIIFO
• "4•I 4'.RKiW1l /LfKt411µ r�..-� YINll1l[ II[[Ot411LL
pia ••� Y4ot[ Lulryf R4DL Y\14 1_i �l� � U[FC COYY[DCO[ �
_11.1 j CYAti [b{LYT14 CG-i •� K4U4 wuYpG¢
`11 1 '� M1L{T[D Kl\nt[ MYIT IQ YDfLTl4 Y•1 � YWWIRVIM[ [
• 1 IM W •M b. y [ i ^� COYIrnO D4fwC} 1 'Y� �•' YXl Ulll�tD I D•D .
I I i I i I
� om
EXCEPTION PERMIT NO. ��
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
I\
!O $9�Q0 ff O O SOS O
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
aui i, 177T
ROLL CALL
INDEX
,Posting of the A eg nda:
Posting
of the
William Laycock, Current Planning Manager, stated that the
Agenda
Planning Commission Agenda was posted on Friday, July 1, 1994,
front of City Hall.
Request for ntin e•
Request
for
Continuant
Mr. Laycock stated that the ap nt, Burnham USA Equities, has
requested that Item No. 3, Genera n Amendment No. 94-1(A),
Local Coastal Program Amendment No, and Amendment No.
�805,
regarding the Granville Apartments, prop located at 1001-
1147 Granville Drive, be continued to the July 21, 4, Planning
Commission meeting, to allow further discussions with th sting
tenants.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to continue Item No. 3 to the July
Ayes
*
*
*
*
*
21, 1994, Planning Commission meeting. MOTION CARRIED.
Absent
*
sss
Excel tion Permit No. 45 (Discussion)
Item No.1
equest to permit the retention of an as -built, double-faced,
EP 45
llumihated information sign for airport parking at MacArthur
ourt, on property located in the M-1-A District.
Approves
CATION: Lot 19, Tract No. 5169, located at 4680
MacArthur Boulevard, on the southwesterly
corner of MacArthur Boulevard and Campus
Drive, across from the John Wayne Airport.
ONE: M-1-A
PLICANT: Ace Parking, Newport Beach
WNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
-2-
1W
COMMISSIONERS to • MINUTES
.oAo oo�o'�,�o�os
00 9F- 0'�t��'�oy'Qostio
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Jul 1YYq
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Commissioner Gifford referred to the photograph of the on -site
directional "Airport Parking Sign" that is attached to the staff
report, and she asked if the sign meets the requirements of the
existing Sign Ordinance. William Laycock, Current Planning
Manager, replied that the two "future facility" signs that are
located on the property should have been removed when
MacArthur Court was built, and the signs were not permitted as
permanent signs; however, they meet the square footage
requirements but exceed the permitted height for ground signs.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Ridgeway, Mr.
Laycock replied that the Koll Center Newport Planned Community
development standards allow ground signs to be 4 feet high, 150
square feet per face within 20 feet of a property line adjacent to
a street. If the sign would be outside of the 20 foot setback
adjacent to a street then a ground sign would be allowed to be up
to 200 square feet per face. Mr. Laycock further replied that no
one from Koll Center management contacted staff regarding the
signs.
Mr. Tony Actisdano, 4680 MacArthur Boulevard, appeared'before
the Planning Commission. Mr. Actisdano stated that the
aforementioned "future facility" signs have been removed since the
photograph was taken. The existing off -site sign is located on the
vacant lot across the street at the southwesterly corner of
MacArthur Boulevard and Campus Drive.
Chairman Glover suggested that the existing off -site sign be
redesigned so as to blend in more aesthetically with the adjacent
area. 'Mr. Actisdano confirmed that the sign design would be
improved.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Ridgeway and
Commissioner Gifford, Mr. Laycock explained that off -site signs
require an ExceptionYermit, and a Building Permit is required for
the as -built construction. The City does not become involved with
the aesthetics of a sign. Mr. Laycock further replied that if it
would be the desire of the Planning Commission to request the
-3.
COMMISSIONERS •
�ofo���Oo�O� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
T
Jul r
ROLL CALL
INDEX
applicant to reduce the size and appearance of the off -site sign,
the Planning Commission could continue the item and request that
the applicant come back to the Commission with revised plans of
the off -site sign.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr.
Actisdano explained 'that the off -site sign is located on an
undeveloped parcel of land that will be removed with the widening
of Campus Drive. The intent was to have the temporary sign on
the property from six months to one year, and the sign has been
on the property since March or April,1994. Mr. Actisdano stated
that it would not be a burden to redesign the sign; however, a
monument sign would cost approximately $30,000.00.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Ridgeway, Mr.
Actisdano explained that the applicant is utilizing the 201 excess
parking spaces at MacArthur Court until The Irvine Company
constructs additional office space on the property. Commissioner
Ridgeway determined that he could not support the existing sign
wherein he suggested that the applicant request The Irvine
Company to install a monument sign that would benefit the entire
project, or he suggested that the applicant come back with a
redesign of a cost -efficiency sign that would .have a permanent
look. Mr. Actisdano responded that he would agree to meet with
the Planning Department to discuss an appropriate temporary
design of the off -site sign.
Commissioner Pomeroy suggested that the application be
continued for 60 to 90 days to allow the applicant additional time
to come back with a redesign of the sign, and it is feasible that the
widening of Campus Drive would occur. Rich Edmonton, City
Traffic Engineer, replied that it is possible that the sign could be
relocated on the property inasmuch as after the widening of
Campus Drive a small parcel would remain.
Commissioner Edwards concurred with a continuance of the
application for 90 days inasmuch as it is not definite what could
-4-
\C
COMMISSIONERS 0 MINUTES
l0'naO�%kk
�
�� �pf��t��0�0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
. I nAA
JUI / 177Y
ROLL CALL
INDEX
happen to the property and that may have a determination of the
appearance of the sign.
Robin Flory, Assistant City Attorney, explained that the off -site'
sign was installed without the benefit of a building permit or
Planning Commission approval, and if the application would be
continued, then the Commission would allow a violation for an
additional 90 days. She suggested that if it is the desire of the
Planning Commission to approve the application, that the
temporary sign be approved with a specific deadline for review by
the Planning Commission.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Exception Permit No.
Ayes
*
*
*
*
*
45, subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A" for a
Absent
*
period of 90 days. Add Condition No. 5 stating that the applicant
either remove the sign at the end of 90 days or come back to the
Planning Commission at the end of 90 days with a redesign of the
sign. MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the as -built sign is compatible with surrounding land
uses.
2. That the as -built sign will not have any significant
environmental impact.
3. That the granting of this exception permit will not be
contrary to the purpose of Chapter 20.06 of the Municipal
Code, and will not be materially detrimental to the health,
safety, comfort or general welfare of persons residing in the
neighborhood, or detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the neighborhood, or to the general
welfare of the City.
-5-
COMMISSIONERS
0
MINUTES
I�
�fOCJ'�.� &d,�9y
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
u
ROLL CALL
INDEX
CONDITIONS
1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with
the approved plot plan and elevation.
2. That the applicant shall obtain a building permit for the as -
built sign from the Building Department.
3. That the two, on -site signs, which are temporary in nature
and advertize the E-Z Airpark facility, shall .be removed
prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed
as -built off -site sign. Said signs may be replaced in
accordance with the Koll Center Planned Community
development standards and the Uniform Building Code.
4. That the sign shall be removed in conjunction with the
development of the subject, vacant property.
5. That the applicant either remove the sign at the end of 90
days or come back to the Planning Commission at the end
of 90 days with a redesign of the sign.
Variance No 1 (Continued Public Hearin
item No.2
Request to permit the construction of a single family dwelling on
v1196
roperty located in the 12-1.5 District which exceeds 1.5 times the
uildable area of the site. The proposal also includes
Approved
odifications to the Zoning Code so as to allow the proposed
ture to encroach 14 feet into the required 20 foot front yard
etbac nd 7 feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setback; a
quest to c truct 6 foot high walls along the side property lines
hick encroach feet into the required 20 foot front yard
etback; and two carp s aces located on the front one-half of
he lot, partially open on bo 'des (where the Code requires that
aid covered,parking spaces steal a side walls and an. operating
arage door), The modification also in es the following second
-6-
�a
ANEZA025.PLT 9/23/94 7:27:32 0
*Scale: 1:1.19 H:9.751 L:6.000In
4747-N Oceanside Blvd.
Oceanside, CA 92056
MacArt hhair C ou in
E-Z AirPark Offshe
Anhr 0) Lrt
®® Peir Div
15'
-„
24 ]H ir. Courtesy Sh ut fle
-7
SCALE '/e"= I"
15rr
brr
ANEZA025.PLT 9/23194 7:27:32 jo
. Scale: 1:1.19 R 9.751 L: 6.000 In
i
JAY -MAR DESIGNS
4747-N Oceanside Blvd.
Oceanside, CA 92056
� rya - 614y
MacArthur Court
S-Z AirPark Offshe P I V sys
¢e green
A 0 o00
1A+HI�F_
O (All TrXT)
F(arkang
5 I t r It)"".71,
MRS III -. OMm I �letlttic
h
SCALr: I/e = i', I --I
COLOR 111/010T/DNS
6
Form or . oi�- s, t�
T I 8
�rrnp�S ,Dri �e //��r�GuC✓ ,fbO�cl.�ria✓c>'
Cp.t� aL � i r� ��-s'ei✓`�-�lYJerCQr�'G�.rr ✓ �c�U /el/a �d
Parkin;;
i 1
Di re�fion�( 5�5�
c_U rvlpvs s k-ivc �il�cQr�hct ✓ �ou�fevc�✓�
COMMISSIONERS • •
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Request for Continuance:
Request
for
Mr. Hewicker stated that, Jerry King, representat' for Item No.
Continuan
3, applicant Warren Levy, Use Permit N 3429, regarding
property located at 1200 West Coast High , requested that this
item be continued to the Plannin ommission meeting of
November 10, 1994.
In response to a question ed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr.
King appeared before t lanning Commission. He explained
that the reason fo he requested continuance is to allow
additional time t tain a signed off -site parking agreement from
an adjacent erty owner.
Motion
*
000
Motio as made and voted on to continue Item No. 3 to the
Ayes
*
*
*
*
PI "ng Commission meeting of November 10, 1994. MOTION
Absent
ARRIED.
Abstain
xsx
Exception Permit No 45 (Discussion)
Item No.i
Request to review the installation of a new double-faced, off -site
EP 45
information sign for airport parking at MacArthur Court, on
property located in the M-1-A District.
Approved
LOCATION: Lot 19, Tract No. 5169, located at 4680
MacArthur Boulevard, on the southwesterly
comer of MacArthur Boulevard and Campus
Drive, across from the John Wayne Airport.
ZONE: M-1-A
APPLICANT: Ace Parking, Newport Beach
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
-2-
COMMISSIONERS •
• A
;\RAC°41-1&VQ`19 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Commissioner Edwards and James Hewicker, Planning Director,
discussed the feasibility of the Planning Director or the
Modifications Committee reviewing similar requests in the future
as opposed to the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Adams and Don Webb, Public Works Director,
discussed the affect that the construction of the widening of
Campus Drive would have on the placement of the off -site
information sign.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Exception Permit No.
Ayes
*
45 subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". MOTION
Absent
*
CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed redesign of the sign is more compatible
with surrounding land uses than that of the existing sign.
2. That the proposed sign will not have any significant
environmental impact.
3. That the granting of this exception permit will not be
contrary to the purpose of Chapter 20.06 of the Municipal
Code, and will not be materially detrimental to the health,
safety, comfort or general welfare of persons residing in the
neighborhood, or detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the neighborhood, or to the general
welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with
the proposed dimensions and colors of the sign.
2. That the location of the proposed sign shall reflect the
future widening of Campus Drive, and shall be subject to
the review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer and
-3-
yCOMMISSIONERS .
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
the Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
3. That the applicant shall obtain a building permit for the
proposed sign from the Building Department.
4. That the proposed temporary sign shall be removed in
conjunction with the development of the subject, vacant
property.
se Permit No. 3542 Public Hearin
Item No..
Req st to change the operational characteristics of an existing
UP3542
restaur t with on -sale beer and wine, on property located in the
Approved
RSC-H D rict, so as to allow the use of valet and tandem parking
in conjuncti with the existing restaurant use.
LOCATION: Lots 24 and 25, Tract No. 1210, located at
00 West Coast Highway, on the northerly
si of West Coast Highway, across from
Bay ores.
ZONE: RSC-H
APPLICANT: Dolce Ristera e, Newport Beach
OWNER: B. Manovi, Newpo Beach
Commissioner Adams requested a clarificati of Condition No.
12, Exhibit "A", recommending that develo ent standards
pertaining to walls, a portion of the landscaping, underground
utilities be waived. William Laycock, Current PI Manager,
explained that development standards for restaurants quire 6
foot high walls to be constructed along all interior lot lin , and
reduced to 3 feet in height adjacent to a street. Staff opine at
the adjoining commercial properties would not be affected and
-4-
ANEZA025.PLT 9/23/94 7:27:320
*Scale: 1:1.19 H: 9.751 L: 6.000 in
4747-N Oceanside Blvd.
Oceanside, CA 92056
13 dI
MacA t hair Court
E-Z AlrPark O¢f ibte
Anhrpatt
0
00 aog
peir Day
24 Hr. Courtesy shuttle
,n
0
JAY -
CUSTOM COMMERCIAL
SIGNS
September 23, 1994
Newport Beach Planning Dept.
Attention: Dana
As described in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 7, 1994, enclosed
is the redesign of the as -built, double-faced airport parking sign at MacArthur Blvd. and
Campus Dr.
Please call me if you need any further information.
Thank you,
Jeffrey J. Boyer
JJB/jb
4747 Oceanside Blvd„ Suite N ■ Oceanside CA 92056 0 (619) 945.1266 ■ (714) 472-3849 0 FAX (619) 945.9366
i
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
Date: June 20. 1994
_ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION
XyUBLC WORKSbEPAL2TMENT X_ "PLANS`ATIACHED (PLEASE RETURN)
X TRAFFIC ENGINEER
FIRE DEPARTMENT PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT.
_BUILDING DEPARTMENT
_PARKS & RECREATION
X POLICE DEPARTMENT
_MARINE SAFETY
_GRADING
REVENUE
APPLICATION OF: Ace Parldng
FOR: Exception Permit No. 45
DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the retention of an as -built double faced off -
site directional and information sign for airport parldng at
MacArthur Court, on property located in the M-1-A District.
LOCATION: 4678 Campus Drive
REPORT REQUESTED BY: June 24, 1994
COMMISSION REVIEW: July 7, 1994
COMMENTS: „J%yt/cc
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
_ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION
X PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
X TRAFFIC ENGINEER i
_FIRE DEPARTMENT
_BUILDING DEPARTMENT
_PARKS & RECREATION
X POLICE DEPARTMENT
_MARINE SAFETY
_GRADING
REVENUE
APPLICATION OF:
FOR:
Ace Parking
Date: June 20. 1994
X P]✓W ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN)`
_PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT.
Exception Permit No. 45
DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the retention of an as -built double faced off -
site directional and information sign for airport parking at
MacArthur Court, on property located in the M-1-A District.
LOCATION: 4678 Campus Drive
REPORT REQUESTED BY: June 24,, 1994
COMMISSION REVIEW: July 7, 1994
COMMENTS:'
Si nature: 7� �iJ(t)a4AJ Date: 2-3
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION
XPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
X TRAFFIC ENGINEER
_FIRE DEPARTMENT
_BUILDING DEPARTMENT
_PARKS & RECREATION
}C POLTCE DEPARTMENT r
_MARINE SAFETY
_GRADING
REVENUE
APPLICATION OF:
FOR:
Ace Parking
Date: June 20. 1994
X PLANS. ATTACKED (KtA$E RETURN)
_PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT.
Exception Permit No. 45
DESCRIPTION: Request to permit the retention of an as -built double faced off -
site directional and information sign for airport parking at
MacArthur Court, on property located in the M-1-A District.
LOCATION: 4678 Campus Drive
REPORT REQUESTED BY: June 24, 1994
COMMISSION REVIEW: JulypD7, 1994
rnmw.NTS: AO PfX CCC- rc cz �q
Fj
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915
PLANNING DEPARTMENT (714) 644-3215
May 31, 1994
Anthony J. Actisdano, Vice President
c/o Ace Parking Management, Inc.
4680 MacArthur Court, Ste. A
Newport Beach, Ca. 92660-1826,
Subject: Off -site Electrical Sign at the Corner of MacArthur Boulevard and Campus
Drive, Newport Beach
Dear Mr. Actisdano:
Pursuant to your letter of March 16,1994, relative to the installation of the above noted sign
without permits, we regret to inform you that the application for the sign permit still has not
been submitted by Jaymar Designs. All we obtain from them are promises that they will
soon be pulling a permit and that they are doing the drawings.
We are left now with little alternative other than having to refer this matter to the office
of the City Attorney for appropriate action.
Thank you again for your assistance in the past and for your efforts of cooperation.
Unfortunately, Jamar Designs must have priorities other than resolving this issue for Ace
Parking.
To discuss this letter you should contact Jim Sinasek between 7:30 and 8:30 a.m. or 4:00 and
4:30 p.m. at the above phone number.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D.,HEWICKER, Director
a
Supervisor
xc: ; / Traffic Study File 86
Ace Parking Management, Inc., 645 Ash St., San Diego, Ca. 92101-3211
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach
Ace Parking
Management, Inc.
Scott A. Jones
Chairmen
CEO
Robert R. Laser
President
The Mission: Convenient parking with outstanding service
March 16, 1994
Mr. Jim Sinasek
City of Newport Beach
Planning Department
P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-8915
Dear Mr. Sinasek:
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
"Tv OF NEWPORT BEACH
AM MAR I7 1994 PM
718191101111121112131 A6
A
Pursuant to our conversation of today regarding the installation of a
lighted sign on the corner of MacArthur Blvd. and Campus Drive
Newport Beach.
I would like to first thank you for bringing to our attention that our sign
vendor has not gone through proper channels in obtaining the necessary
Approvals for the installation of this sign. Immediately following our
conversation I contacted them and advised them of this.
I have been informed that they were not aware of requiring any
approvals for the changes made to the two existing signs, and the new
sign was an oversight.
This of course does not solve your problem, they have informed me that
they will be contacting both The Building and The Planning
Departments today and file all necessary paperwork required.
This has been placed on a priority basis, and I am sure you will be
hearing from them post haste.
I apologize for any problems this may have caused, and once again
thank you for making us aware of this. Should you have any other
questions please do not hesitate to call.
VA
Ah hoc ny J. Actisdano
Vice President
4680 MacArthur Court, Ste.A, Newport Beach, CA 92660.1826 (714) 724-0963 FAX (714) 724.1165
Corporate Office: 645 Ash Street San Diego, CA 921013211 (619) 23M624 FAX (619) 233-0741
AJA:ki Regional Offices. Pasadena, CA, Dallas, TX, and Portland, OR
Customer Service: 1-800-925-PARK (7275) r0��
Notice is hereby given that the p: nning Commission of the City of Ne ort Beach will hold a public
hearing on the application of Parking for Exception Permit No. Won property, located at 4678
Campus Drive.
This project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is categorically exempt under the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing will be held on the Z day of July 1994at the
hour of 7.30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard,
Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and
be heard thereon. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. For information call (714)
644-3200.
Anne Gifford, Secretary, Planning Commission, City of Newport Beach.
NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant.
O''�'a
-..,me �a toe
2 STORY
BLDG.
u
TOWER
TWO
6 = _.1
MAcART,Fi U R Cou RT
EW-A
S `Si`�1� THE IRVINE COMPANY
1.1
F
0
mL 3
2 -:
N
5
2
TSTIC
PROJECT SITE
i
Southwest portion
l of existing parkin
L{ area of MacArthur
c1 Court.
4
51
MAP
i
LEGEND •
I
I
INGRESS
EGRESS
N
W
E
S
0 80 FEET
o.'
�
MAcA
4
STORY /
BLDG. ( O
2 STORY
BLDG.
TOWER
TWO
M
2 STORY
BLDG.
04 a_aa
o� °o� Goy patios:
�00�,\ `ice I O�Oa•�e.
RCOURT
Syr► THE IRVINE COMPANY
m
SEE DETAIi L"A
I
MARCH /973
zoilz
_
C 01
E
CAMPUS
BIRCH
/PAULAR/NO AVE.)
DRIVE
?24 /B rp1
m LOT 9
;PAR. II 4 G
R A! 76 - 45 ^
Q
PAR @3, "-
LOr8 �
1.344 AC(C) a
—
PAR O 2 °
Q
PM /29-5
e891W
/307QC(C) .N
0
c �
i PAR. T/
�s4
Z2d /d
STREET
m
341 5z'
�-
Lor 5
rRACT NO. 7953
o.a^n�i y1
2,
p b
P],
IRVINE SUB. M M. I -BB
TRACT NO. 7953 Al M. 3/0-7 TO //INC. u
TRACT NO. 9063 M.M. 374-5, 6, 7
PARCEL MAP P. M. 6I-I, 68-I9, 76-45, //4-I9, /73-3/, l
445-12
NOTE -ASSESSORS BLOCK a ASSESSORS MAP
PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK445 PAGE 12
SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE,$,
t'�� ' �•tl� �i �• L��eu rt
E l 'girl"�ai-I: �ltt•�tr
-JC Lr p (0) LF
Fu, TJ
'L U,J
Fair Dz
"(Dulrta07 Chunk,
MrL
f
�PMS
1- wooer 'DR6CtLOAJ4L SG►.j -
5(v &
P O.Co3-.'9Alsw 1.-83S5 /4'L/? ` // ZJOyV ^/�
T B
O �4 Pow C S S 6419 ldd /
-�
i
~ To E ovE 577
f ti99 4B i5 E J009All
-ZOO /ZOO
f •
9
IQ
d 1 ( !%"�� �: i i� b gib• _ � �?ab �ipv�A'\ / `r j
S � �
s � I
o �
•sB E '9?0�. / � y 40 4.� ..... a al � �i lv •� � jo
3Q�ay_ o
"roe.,
�l o
loo
66y'y\'�na. po o n
Nq 68.
• � , - y�� - "�' 12"� � � � SSE � ��, � �.�
•sS, �� ,a° j� P\��P mat+- 'b
lb o
fol ��° �• 3� i o rrt = j ded,'coten f� Y �c oBtvc> a I