HomeMy WebLinkAboutEXCEPTION PERMIT 291
EXCEPTION PEMIT APPLICATION No • CT• i
CITY OF..NEWPORT BEACH Application Rec`d by '
Fee: S
PLUMING DEP
3300 Newport :Boulevard
P. 'O.-Box 1768
N�rt' Beach, CA 92658-6915
(724) 644-3200
Applicant {Print) Bank of Newport IMeg4tU, Lq0(, � re4-L l`H PF2nne
Nailing Address 2101 E. (]oast Highway
Property Owner Bai�x of NMM= Phone
Aiailing-Address 2101 E. Coast Rig3t�Y, Newpart Beach, CA 92660
Address :of Property Involved 210 Coast a
Purpose of Application: (describe fully) To obtain permission to Place one additional
iriterna3ly illuminated sign to the Coast Highway frontage o_f the building. There is one
existingsi cn this fronta The si is tel 30 feet in
Zone C-1 Present Use Bank Hewers Building
Legal Description of Property Involved (if too long, attach separate' sheet)
Ijot' 2, Tract No. 1027'1, C.itY of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California
."Will'proposal not be contrary to the purpose of the Sign Ordinance?
The t�tsl scnia.�+2 footaue of both signs alone Coast Hicthway are well within tk�e limit
set ° the: si ordir�xoe. Si ► .t� s l �w 1 5
,Exceptional or;extraordinary circumstances involved?e building has l been:identiflE
acid x :_by.theexisting signs. Conversiar� to a ti tenant
_ i i catY on o ma3or tenant. � <,t, ie� ' Tip 1 �F is '� u• ,craw
i7�tt ����T i'� .t.r'•�(L�.�IL.. Zti1 S12E ?'t�+�-i �e-� hJ�{uw� �t�tcil�rt�{Zt.r/�tr �"..�r�t�SS'.
Wtiy.is.an eicception permit. necessary to protect'a WtIbstantial property right? since fhe
;MEWis amverted into ' a multi -tenant bui lda ng, thP-re is a substan
building ° • bang
ri ua;_ 91�g ma3or tenant s ent: c rtw �qn yes `
ma or t m►xn� xn aooep a c. exposure* t if:tI t� tizYtt4C T t e Ott �r� �n�f
Why'will l paroposal snot be, detrimental to the neighborhood? The new illuminated sign Will
facing Coast.,.Highway and FashionIsland, so .will: have no a on surm�� t res
new sign ex han t� sl and on the
new sign wx nc
pose s .h.tt
s a e that the
_ i ae elly.a� ±be_ i ua-IMP5sic _4
OWNER' S AFFIDA JIT_�
se and say that (I
i13 (we) Y
sai) (we are) the .owner(s) of the prcperty(ies) involved in this application. (I) (We)
further certify, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing statements and answers
herein contained and the information -herewith submitted are in all resets true and
correct to the best of ,(my) (our) knowledge, and belief. j�-�
Signature
NOTE: An agent may sign for the owner if 1"Tithor cation from the .reco owner
is filed with, the application, "3`
DO NO., COMPLETE APPLICATION BBLOK ----
THIS LINE
Date Piled `
Fee Pd.=�Receipt No.
Sari Date (1f) _ t
P. C. Action :" Dante
zz"
'`A�peal C.C.Hearing '
n •'ate t •t, .�+�
;s��?
July 2, 1987
Heath & Company
3225 Lacy Street
Los Angeles, CA
Res Sign Permits
2101 East Coast Highway
Newport Beach, CA
Dear Mr. Montgomery:
Please accept this letter as -your authorization to commence
the application process for the signs we discussed earlier
today.
We understand you will charge the Bank a rate of $65.00 per
hour and you 'estimate eight (8) hours to complete the
process.
Should you have any questions or require further information
please do not hesitate to call.
That all signs shall conform with Chaptd+r 20.06 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
7.\wer
trash receptacles for patrons shall be
in convenient loeationa inside uric! outside
lding.
8.That washout area for refuse containers be
d n such a way so as to allow direct
e i o the sewer system and not into the
sto drains, unle3ss otherwise approved by
ilding artment.
9.11 mechan al equipment and trtanh areas
e screened.
10. That a minimum of t parking spaccs,st rhn21 be
provided on -site for am oyee parking,
11. That the Planning Commissi may add to or modify
conditions of approval of is use permit, or
recommend to the City Counci the revocation of.
this use permit, upon a dete nation that the
operation which is the subject of Ss use permit,
causes injury, or is detrimental the health,
ROLL CALL'
INDEX
LOCATION: Parcel; No. 1 of Marcel Map 1 2-28, 29
(Resubdivision No. 659), locatod at 210.1
East Coast Highway, westerly of Avocado
Avenue, adjacent to Irvine Terrace.'
ZONE: C-2
APPLICANT: Bank of Newport/Merrill Lynch Realty,
_
Newport. Beach
OWNER: Bank of Newport, Newport Beach
The discussion was opened in connection with this item,
and Mr. Joe Beasley .appeared before tho Planning
Commission on behalf of the Heath Sign Company and the
applicant. Mr. Beasley stated that he ban reviewed and
concurs with the findings and conditlona In Exhibit
"Alf.
Commissioner Pomeroy addressed the proposed illuminated
sign and he stated his concerns that the sign could
cause glare. in the night view and in the site plane of
nearby residents. Following discussion between
Commissioner Pomeroy and Mr. Beasley regarding the
illuminated sign, Chairman Person recommended a
condition that the illumination of the proposed sign be
of less intensity than the existing wall sign facing
East 'Coast Highway on the Bank of Newportbuilding.
Mr. .Beasley stated that he would agree with the
recosianended condition. ,
There being. no others desiring to appear and he heard,
the discussion was closed at this time.
Commissioner Merrill stated his concerns regarding the.
number of signs that could be installed on the Bank of
Newport Building. William Laycock, Currant Planning
Manager explained that the Sign Ordinance requires an
Exception Permit if there would be more, than three wr;ll
signs on the building, and he further commented that 6
multi -tenant building may have one :gall fsigr, per
business plus one 25 square foot directory. wall` sign.
Further' discussion followed' regarding the :limitations
of wall signs and ground signs within' the,, Sign
Ordinance.
Motion
x
Motion was made to approve .Exception Permit No. 29
subject to the findings and conditions in 'Exhibit "A"
including the. ' addition of Condition. No.', 3 which would
atnte that the: illumination , of the",:propa$ed wall `sign -,
stia.11 be: `less;• intenffe than :the exA,Ating illuminated
Ail eyes
will sign facing East CcAst Highway. Motion voted. on,
MOTION 'CARRIED.
PtNDINGS2
1. That t1he proposed signs will be compat}.tile with
surrounding land uses.
2. That the proposed signs will not have any si(lnif{_
cant environmental impact.
3. The proposed signage and graphics are consistent
with the character and design of the building,
4. That the total square footage of all wall signs is
well below the maximum permitted.
5. That the signs will be oriented towards Past Coast
Highway and will not affect t:hri adjoining
residential area.
6. That the approval of this exception permit is
consistent with the intent of the previously
established conditions of Use Permit no. 1857
concerning the protection of the adjoining
residential area from light and glare genertf.ed
from the subject project.
Y'1
,"
Planning ° Couani ssion `Heed
i •Agenda Item No.
{
f C7'TY DB' NEWPORT REACH
V.
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT Ekception'rQrmit No. 29 (Public 'Heaiin ) '
Request to 'permit 'tha 1nstallation'`o£ ,a , £ctt rU wall
sign `on the existing � Bank' `of `Newport; Building � loeated
in the 0`=1' District. <' The ' proposal also,` -includes' a
request to enlarge_ one of two existing,.grouM signs
.located on the site so as to establish said sign as..'a
multi -tenant sign which identifies secondary. tenants
thin the building. _
,. wi
LOCATION: Paxcel No 1, of Parcel Mal) 152-281 29 (Ragubdivision
No. 659) , _ located af: 2101 East Coast Highway, :IPe•gterly
of Avocado Avenue, adjacent•tc Irvine Terraon,
Eg1,IE s C:-1 '
APPUCPXTs Bunk of'Newport/-Merrill Synch Realty', Newport Beach
01,61FR%{ Bank ! oof, Newport; Newt - t ' Beach `
�lica�ion ,,
This s a 'request.-'to`.parmit the installationof " a fourth 'wall. sign :on.
.,
the. existing Bank o Newport Building located ih the C4 zll;ertrict
T ie' pxoposal also includes a ' request to :"enlarge one o% two existing :
ground signs located on' the aite, so as ;to -`,establish stud.: sign • as , a
multi tenant sign which i`dent4£ies secondary tenants' within ,, the•
building; . s. a
An exception permit is -required inasmuch as Section 20.06.070'Bi o£`'the:
Municipal ,Code' limits the of wall signs on. a `building to a
jnumber
maxim'iim :of three and limits ,the.:niimber o`E ground`--`aigris. on` a'"site :to no
;Wore: than one,. Exception permit procedures are set ' forth ' sn Section
20.06,090`of the Newport' Beach Municipal Code.
Environmental Significance"
The proaose'd `ii4fi have; been °revisviad and it has been `d®tarmined that
they are exempt 1ro�n :the requirements of thc� C�ti'li£ornia .
,
^categorically,
Environmental Quality Act under Class 11.'(Accessory Structuxes).
C•orifsizmaxi6d` th the' `Gene'ral'' Plan gr id Lcical� Caaetal Pragraa{
Th6 Land Use Element Gf 'rthe General, Plan Ciegignates ttte ,sirs fox a
raixtuzece` 'Cam iszcial" Y and' "Administraitive
Profeasional and L~iraiic al y Commerci, ` 'saes, The `T.s�ca1 ''.C�astal
ti
.y
/ Z'4 Pl ann Coea:.i sas an 3 d
;: ..
cor�ditii�ns of the �*s ,'persnzt, bl
howevex they: were considerod.,necessary
acf..ions 'in -order to ' ccxrtply , with : the .intent cif .;;previously' esttsbiS aher3
canditians concerning -landscaping, and .the protectioxa.'.of the adgi»ing
residQntial. ".area` from: slight and.:glare.., ,Staff.. .is not aware 'Qi any
pr6blems thAt have arisen in `connection with�,,this , use permit; .in, the
intervening 6 years. .
Analy6ig
The appl'iidant proposes: to, install a 30t ; sq:.ft. intcrnally:.;il`i.uml:tated
wall sign: on .the northerly - sidle :of.. the Bank :of Newport ' building,
adjacent to East Coast. Highway. 'his', sign... will,.ne in addit;ian to
three 100t sq.ft. wall. signs for the Bank of Newport which currently
exii�t `on ;.the north' .;east,' 'and ;west sides:, of -the-building. Thum:; the
,. . ..
" ,
fatal` area of: aS l".waYl. signs on the;; building, will" be 330t sqo ft .-... (3
signs t� '100±. sq. ft :=>�' 300 sq-.-£t: + • l -;sign ,,@ 30t sq ft.: 330f.: sq.ft. )
un&r'` Sebtion 20,06:070 'of --the Municipal: Code. 'signs on,: any .front:age
ofI to �buil:ding'may'acc-upy lisp` to 40% cif 'a building face, not to': exceed
200" sq.ft. In'this case, a`200 sq ftiwall, sign,could be perml,tt;ed on
each of the three different frontagesof the building for. a''total of
600 sq.ft. of , signs. The proposed square footage of signage is well
below that which could be permitted without the approval of All sxchp-
tion permit.
Thee applicant also -proposes to.. -ins tall .a :new 7± fto.high,double faced
monument' 'sign having an area _of::62.5-:: sq.;ft:. per._ face at, ttie', northerly ..:
side' of "the °property, 'adjacent :,to East ;Coast Nign,!aay., .where a ,.double
Faced > monumenC `sign_ with:; an .:area o£...,35 :sq.ft..: per face currently. `
exists.' 'The: new'. sign -.will' the>: Aank..of; Newport sign face,
..
curr.'ently utili ed; a1'ong•'e'with,.A tenant directory listing a har occu„ .
pants'of thi"building The existing grounQ.sign,lat the easterly side
of.the 'site li.4ting'onlry •the Bank, of:!Newp9r.t will be, r. a, necl ...,. ,..
i
LgMjicant�'"s Statement.of SuEport
In accordance -with Section 20.a6.090'B of the Nawport BQgch Municipal,
code,.inGirder `to grant;'an exception, permits ;the :ilanntn;g,,Commies!ori,
must find that the granting of such permit is .necessary to protect a
substantial propertyright, will not ba .contrary', to. thy;- purpose of
this chapter ,astherein set forth,:. And .will not ,'be ` materially" detri-
mental to : the . health, safety, comr'ort• Ur .general wclfara Of,;:.;pic�sons„
residing, in the, neighborhood, or detrimental or injurious to>propert:y
or, improvements in :the neighborhood, or to the;.general,welfare,.of the
City.
In response to the 'above requirements, the applicant hatC. submitted thc�;
following ''statements, in support of, his application,:
will 'the proposal not be contrary t0';the purpose of the Sign
Ordinance?.: Thetotal ;sgtisre afaotage, of;:; :,signs along Coast ;
nghway ,'.are ,,i+e�ll'= within ;the , l'itnit, ;;set ; kry ,fit"e : sigr, -ordinance: .
Sign:,-' codapzcsvisions . £or 'bull dings; ff th more .:.than one,
tenant
�`
.. It
S1 � 1 CY t� f Y{•1 it 4fui' �� C �Y l� 17 itr 1 �Ji k.:
ins cowissiOlT
1
Program,. Land Use Plan designates the site for,"Retail; and Service
CcYnmexciai" uses only. Theaa documents da;,not. address. the`use of"
signs in such areas; therefore, no conflict appears to exist
Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses.
The subject property is presently''developea with the Bank. of. Newport'
building and related- ,parking,:,, . To;; the , . ; Past .Coast
;
Highway are office buildings..ln:. the"'Corpo ate Plazas plange
g� Y ried Communitiy;
to :the ;'southeast'..Is; an; -,office- building .'and,"; across Rvo ads Avenue,
single family1,Xesidence,s. otsouthwest are
condominiums; and to tide : northwest:.are single fa. ' residences to
Irvine Terrace.
Background>
On March 2, 1978, the. Planning Commission approved. bso Permit No.
185.7, ..which -permitted the aonztruction of the, Bank -of Newport ,;office .
building •located :.within, then Unclassified District. , ; Saidapprovalalso
permitted the . structure::to :exceed the basic height li.ini.t within the
32/50 Foot height Limitation District. A drive -up teller facility and
a 50 foot high flagpole were also approved.. `Phe,_:approved plan,'
provided for two ground reigns. Wall signs were not addressed by Use
Permit,; Ho. 1857, ;.;ho,We.ver,. there are three, existing wall signs_;.un ,: tiie .
building- which fully conform to the City's Sign Ordinance. Attached
for the Planning Commissioni'.a information :is a:;excerpt the. Planning
.of
Commission minutes dated March 2, 1978, for Use Permit No. 1857.
On February,19, 1981, a resident of Irvine Terrace, adjacent to the
subject property, appeared before :the ..Planning Commission, 'ani3'..ex
pressed . c,ancern �rc.garding ;various .aspects of,,the, completed develop-.,
meat, specifir�lly, 2:fghting:.of t.hq ;wall sign, .'on the went side; of .'the„
building, 'parking : Aot, ;illumination, ,interior,; illwnination and' site ,
screening, -",The . P-lianntnly'4,.Coram"sion reviewgd:'Use 7P�+zmit No. `':�857 'ait
its meeting of. ;,H$rch- a,;.1981,,;and considered the revocation ofk`th- use
permit at its meetings of 'April 23, 1381,'and July 23 1991 Prior- `to;
the July 23, 1981 meeting, the .applicant agreed to take the :foIiow1.ag'
act" cMS r ,
1 Ce61se; ila�unintztion. o£ the,yall sign�'on the west side of the-
bulld4tng: .
2. Turn'aitf all parking lat.lighting at 8i66 p;rn,`except for
•
that req' uired for se6iliity purposes.
;t ,
3nstallt additional g Ztndscapi,n, incc luding mature tre-s, at ,.
. . ...,
that westerl
' t Y Portion a£�,the4 site.,
.Instruct,
.rill employees., to 'draw drapes on" • the $ecoiid: floor 'o£
the westerly •.sideof ,the k�uil ing ,,.a tar f normal :working
house: gen®rally
• .a t s x 7 ";' c� :€if r) 1 ` filj t > ..# - f '. 1
Rn uly1 2;3, , 1981, >rhe F F► Anning Commission voted not 'to re ... [rse
1
Permit ; Np; } ,857„ Tha aksava actipns Were not formaiiy c►do d ' as
p
Y t ✓f 3: 1 1 ,
j
r,
' pl Conmiission 3.
,5 TO n ag . ,r
v
euse iti however ,they_: were considered , necessary
' conditions.'of perm_.:..
.th.. ...
actions . in order,' to ~:comply -with the ; int$nt of prev iousiy" eatablishea .
coriditiiins concerning 'landscaping, and the; protection--, of the adjoining
res% entDil _area '£tari;`2ight ana .glares Staff: i;j ..not aware of any
problems 'that have arisen in connection; with .;this use permit in the
intervening 6 years,
Analysis ;',,
The applicant' proposes to install a 30i: sq. ft., internally :.Illuminated
wall sign, on the_:side of ;the, sank of Newport building,
adjacent to East Coast Highway. This sign, will be in .additioon, to
three100i sgift. wall signs' for the Bank of rteriport which currently
exist::on :the . north; east,. and west sides of the •building. : ; Thus,- -the
total' area ' -of 'all' wall: signs cn the. ,build ,ng %Will, be 330# sq:;ft (3
signs @ '100t' sq.ft. •a 300 .sq ft. 1:.sign @ 30f sq.ft. .330t sq.ft.
Under''section " 20 06.070 of:-tha:,,'Municipal Code, - signs on any frontagQ
of .a 'building may `occupy':up. to 40% of ,a ,building. face, not to rxceed
20d'sq.it In this case, sq.ft.wall sign could be permitted on
each of the three different frontages of thebuilding for a total of
600 sq.ft. of signs. The proposed square footage of signage is we:.l
below that which could be permitted without.tho approval of an excep-
tion permit. .
The applicant `also proposes tog. install , a new 7t, ft. high, double faced
monument `sign having :an: area of 62.5 : sq, .f t. per, face, at,:.the northerly .
side of the''property, :adjacent; to East ;Coast Vighway, .where a d"ouble
faced monument=' sign with4.4 an area; of . 35 , sq. ft. :,per face . Currently
exists. ' 'mh6 'new ` `sign _will : contain:, the ,,Bank;. of Newport- coign ,face
currently utilized, 'along ,with .a tenant directory._ listing other occur-..
pantsexisting" ground ,sign -,at . the eastarl.y" fide
of `tile situ listing':on1 '.the Bank, of Newport will be retained...;. ,
Applicant's.Statement of Support
In accordance with Section 20.06.090 B of.the Newport BeOch Municipal-
Code, in `order to grant an exception permit, the:Planninq Commis ion
must find that the granting _of ` such. permit is necessary, to pkOtect4 a. .
substantial property' right, will not be con to the purpoce of
this chapter as therein set forth, and will not be'�materially detri�
mental to' the :Health; safety, ; comfort, or,,gener$l wAtaxe 6f,,pe`xeons".
residing 3n .the neighborhood,, or detrimental dt ihJuridu� W property
or improvements:. in the neighborhood, or' to the` : general welfare, of the "
City.
In response to _floe above requirements, the applicant has ;submitted ,the, "
following, `stat emsnts:in.support.of his application:'
whir will the Piro al obe ontrytc-theaucpaae of ::her Sign,
.Ordinance? Thy ,'tdtal sgtiare ;' footage' of.: both >�,signs along Coast
Eiighway''' are we 11 :within :;tire ;, limit, set.sign . ordinancw..
r
Sign code ' lacks . proviaicnffi . fez :buildings. with , mora than ." once
tenant.
�i
TO:pit Ciissian -4
a fk
'J
t.
`toihat ''exceptional or' `extraordinary .:circumstances ::are involved' ,
The 'building`: has ' long been'':, identified..: and.. recognized
sting° `signs., Conversion to -a multi -tenant; building; requires
add t.ianal idpntifica`*ion of `the, major tenant. < Se6pp4ly ;the size
` of' thiij• building development , is largerAn: size than the ;average .
commercial business.:
Why is an exception permit necessary_ to j2rotect'a substantial
property right? Since the building is being converted into a
multi -tenant .building, - thereis �. 'substantial: -property,right ,in,
yivfng the major tenant sufficient:public,'.expersure. Client is.
trying;to be recognized in area:
Why- will 'the pr8lpo AI " not,*.-'.bedetrimental .. i:z> the neighborhood?
The new illuminated'sign will'. be faging, Cdast .HigYcoray And.. Fashion,
"island; 'so willbare no e: ect on' .the surrounding residential. ,
neighborhood, ,.;2he n sign +will "hc.:smAller .than the, existing,
sign'an$''cn the apposite end of the. building,' and thc� -building
of such a "scale': that •the'new sign will not,, -,.adversely- affect. the.
t visual impression 'of the building. .
SEncific Findings and:Recommendation'
It is staff's opinion that the proposed sign exception is a reasonable
request in'asinuch ' 'as `the `'total sign � area will be : less than• would be-
pei�ni tted'' under ' the Sign ' Ordinance and the additional si.gnage ,is .
needed to i&fify'°.6thei tenants': of the :'building..: Furt}ier ;t.`�e signs ,
will'' . be 'osier tied tos�ard East .Coast Highway and 'should. not .a,ifect the ,
nearby 'residential°' areas,' `a'ri9 _will .:be: consistent; with :the ,intent ;,af ,:
the pl`anni'ng Coirimi�osian> at th6 time revocation . of Use germit .:No . 1857 .
was` ` considered . , staff 'xecosrmiends approval oE'; Exception:;.Permit No 29 ,
and suggests`'tlaat the Planning', Commission` take suc;�. action gubject.:to
the:findings,`and conditions `of approval set forth in the attached
Exhibit "A"
iJA?YNG-DEPl� LATiTMEt�T ' :.s
.7A14ES D;'`HEW1dKER'z Director
SANDRA L.'`UENiS
SP
C F,1' # .7.r ill• t f tr ,.L� t
Attachments Exhibit "A"
r`' ; s Via Xiit Koo
Excerpt.' b£' Tanning;Commission: Minutos
Ddte Mrerch 2 .1978, Pcr`Use Permit No, 1557
Plat`°°tPdaii='and AZ evat'ions =
7 3:
ira+
9G
� TO-�' P,lh �-5:
�� �gjComtitissio2a
EXHIBIT "A"
PINDDIGS 7:ND CONDIT:tONS OE APPROVAL FAIR
EXCEPTION PERMIT NO. 29
FINDINGS:
z 1. That the proposed signs, will be'< cor"tible with
,:... surrounding land uses.
;
2. That the proposed signs will not have arty gignifi- .
„..... cant `environmental.3mpact
3.. The 'proposed 'si'qn age and, graphics are, oonoistent
f, with the character and des,tgn.,of the building.
�� e total square footage of all wail signs ics
F
i.
-well below the maximum permitted.
.., :.
5. That,'the signs will be oriented towarda gagt Coast
Highway and will not affect the adjoining
.residential area.
6. That the appraual of this exceptionyozmit is
consistent with., the 'intent of the previously
established conditions ..of ,Use Permit No. 1857
concerning .''the "protection of the. adjoining
s residential .6'rea''.from- light and glare generated
w,
from the.subject'project.;..
7. That the granting of this exception will not be
_contrary to the ';purpose cif.Chapter ::`20.06 ;;:af ;the
Municipal Code, 'and wiil not -be materially : detrt-
mental to', the.' health,'.: salfety, comfort dz,_:"general
,notiang n welfare of .persons residf
or detrimental or injurious to propa�rty or: im--
provements in theneighborhood,.or to the general,
,.'
welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS i- ;
1. That development, .shall:' be'' in substantial canfox;
'
mance with tho approved zplotiplan and elevations;'
!
z:: That the applicant 'shall obtain a : bvi Zding .per�a3 t
for the proposed` sign,`p:r r to <their installation'.
I
f,
l:
y
cit ew
?r
1'
Burch 2 p 197$
dRR511. ALL
MOUIRX
6. All exterior lighting shall ;lbe app.ro'Ve''d by
the Department,,, of; Community t.Development.
7. Any direct vehicular access from the.sAte to
°�.. I'rvi ne � Avenue or-:.Bri stol' St teet,_i ri the future
heIl bez>aiPprovbd`-hy the City Trafffe ,Cngineer:
8. That a�T9.,foot,°wide strip of land along 'Irvine
Avenue: be.;. icated to' the public for atre;et
and 'highway.`pu ' ses,
9, That the proposed new" -building be
.provided
with domestic water servit`s i-nt confdrmance
with the requirements and stWivords of the
Santa:Ana"Heights'Water, Company,,'
10. That: the;proposed:new`building be prov
with -a sewer connection in conformance wit
the `requirements of the Costa Mesa Sanitary
District.
Commissioner 'Sa,l`aI-is,'ste'pped down; from `thi dais;;;'
'a0drrefriini e'& from de :ibera>tton�-on,: items ' 5; ,6,
;and'`�7,'
due:'to a= possible c'onf.l.ict°of interest.'
y
'"and W7°.were heard `concurrently E
{'
becaise='�'o'f :thet+rj 'rela-t:ionship, however*,=` separate
action Vas taken; o'n eich i tem
i.
Item H5
Request to permit°;the.construction of a Bank pf
USE PEtthilT
;{ i
Newps�rt office complex that exce ds{,the bas'ic;;
�.rj ::
he,i, ht 1 imi t within 32/50 Foot Nei- ht= Lima ta��.
,the.
tion' Otstr'ict" t'n the",,(Unclassified 0#s;trict,r; and
APPROVED.
the .accepxance `.of .:an environmentai docrement7, `;The
prop osal,.als`a'"�iri'cl'udes- a,dr:ive-up xe1i1e,r ifacixlity
SLY'
and :,a 72' high fIag,..po;Ie .:A po`rtian`of, tfie¢ e.xistf
i ng Sandp;i per Inn; -,and -related ,comm8roiaT lus,es}. A
i
wi11'be. removed fr.am the site tn. conjunction :itch;34
prapbsed "d•evel'opment ' F,ut�ttet�more, ,t(hen c`6n
r,
. ,..} 15a ti <.+ �..�
3,
,: ]'.
1 '7.
.. - ur
.,
.`din M_w-'ti AN',A C' tA'V'i+l*lji N/+_♦i9 A,9 M*'M[YM �'. r11"A �,�[! i-�{YNA'-#st A.!A .inn
.-. .. ..
� Y `T :tttal con'damt-rri um �i'uni+tsf" $s:,fp:ropo ed 3a`>t the' rear !
3...c_. .
COMte ISSIONERS
C1
f r�iI�wuTES
'w
I
Harch 2, 1978
POLL CALF,
ONCE ;I
of the , sub jeoct property:; , . A, por. tion of the,; exist
i ng :rho te1. CG;nplex wi 1 ,.aI so,.(be co.nverte'd .into,
residential condominium units.
Location. Lgt.:.182, ;Tr.act:No;'281 aaca.te'dat'
1101 and .2121 Ea t ' Coast Ni`ghway.
and 777 Avocado Avenue on.property
::bounded;'by: East .Coast H ghvtay,
Avocado . Avenue, Kewamee pri ve, an,d '
Zahma =,Drive, adjacent to :1rvine
Terrace.
.Zones Unclassified
App�l,ican :!=Bank;of: Newport,.;. Newport Beach
i_
Owner:_ Same ;as App;licana
' 'Item 06
!
Request �to amend a portion of Districting..Map�No
'AMENDMENT
:24'. from- th,e: Unc<l ass;i.fJ ed D ,strict; to I the R-3
R53
DJ strict; ,and.;th'e:'Cn;l Di s ;establ ish
i
. :rict, .and,.to
yard: setbacks; for,e,xist,i:ng;dnd proposed'Cevelop'
iAPPROVED
ment on the site.
-
Location:: Lot 182, ..Tract No. 2813,. 1ocatedf at.
:2110.1 sand zlrif Eas,t�.,.C. lgit�ray ah
7r77; Avocado Avenue;, on, property.
,bounded; by East Coast;-: Highways!
Avocado Avenue, Kewamee Drive,:'a: d
Zahma Dri ve, ad�iacent to'. Irvf ne
'
Terrace.:'
Zone: 'Unclassi'fi ed
;poi icant ,�8anl�,.of ,��ewpo;rt,.,Newpa'rt' Beach
0.wner> fir.' .:Sdne�:asc AP-p1zicant��,
-
-
r�
S
f YRi/ 1 •L 1 �3<�jj t f { �P
j
,I �/� m,r 07, '1
�' 1.
1
_
!
x. xl ., i. t t:F ` V f. }t Y �.. .,7 .i�i)s. � 7 F! _� t t •i
Reque t to;: ages,t�i
t
:.: A
TEN7A;IVE
,
f
sub,divide��5,;07 nto�one1ot ,1'or _;
mul"ti;�p�la�fam��ly:,r s;i�denb�a1 cun,domin#um 6 lop�m6na,t
u °
a,nd, one 1o;t .for NCommnercial dpvel o,pmen,t,3 adjacent Ito
i i
Irvine Terrace. 1
f
L o'ca�t`i o n':
zo he.,.
'Appil fcan t
'dwner:
'�ngi Weer:
'Staff` pre
a supplem
Kam's Res'
condition
access be
ti ons of
�ecreatio
parking,'
8'01Fick
beTore ch
'gen'ara
'
'recommen
park1:ng `a
fi rs"V cl
and apar
If
p`a rk'i ng
pc des"tr,i
estaura
too `Yell
�
f c'
-the trav`
ue tuns
'a` -cc e'ss','
r.
r,
'com yeti
o f' th a -.a .
Sion 'an
;,
t
Val Skar
I. h e� CY�rrm
,r@1�U�,S tA.;
ti
'
r�
l t�
;�':,,�
i{��
ks#
}
a
�;.�'�F'
et
UI
Jr
79�zsr�Y'�rt'��'ti:�i�!.4,
/t;"fit ,Y�ry,. .l
kti i��4`l
INO+i3t r.r,� �e
Lot 182,"Tract `No `2.813; located at
Z101 and '2121"` Fast Gvast, Hfghray
and 777 ;Avocado Avenue on property
"b�o'unded by 'East ,Coast �H � ghway,
Avocado Avenue, 'Kewamee; 0rive, and
' ahma 'Drive, ''adj'acent'to' Irvine`
`Terrace.
U'61assified
Bank of`Newp�rt, Newport beach
Same as�AppIicant
Robert 'Bean; "Wi'11'iam Fro:s t b
'As'sociates`, 'Newport Beach'.
serited and revidwed with the :Cpmmis'sion`
ental report''reIative to the parking "for '
t�urant 'and recommended additional ,
s of''approvaI� to�Iprovide for;'PA rking and
twee >properties. Staff answered ques'-'
th6',6nmissaoh, relative to'�"densi.�ty,
n faci I ti es, drai nag", setbacks,: and
following'Which , 'publ"ic earings were opened.
er,` Ficker & Ruffing,'Architectsi� appeare
.'e Commission.,on behalf`'�af -the applicant
lly agreed with'th'e*°staff r'epor�t and
dat�ohs and commented on` the adequacy ;of
rid their ,intent to= make this, project a
a{s`s oevelopment' w'i"th' cmmplete landscaping'
a men t_;ref urbishing.., Ha reviewed -the
aj+out°& and'conurre,d with providing
an access` 6etwe''en the`sfte 'and kan's
n t b U,t wa`s s ome0a tlt're'1 uc to n't w i th res"pec t'
u1 ar 5access between':the` 'properti es because'.
f i s 1 ' t
nb contrpl over fCam s Restalarant or the,:
for th'e restaurain't` ''t Mr FickerJ.` answered
s:of the,-gP011 sion{`lre'latAve.to"a1 ernative
circulaytjon, p' srkingj s,etbat s,i.project;
on,1re{cr�ea'tional atnenities, ref6rbishf4o
pai°tments proppsed foh condomini un converr
d' dens.
i ty • w
o', 15C11; Bayadere 1`e. race';t ap' eared before
i`ss icin` ins favor''�of qthe'�op;o;sed� project' and
•hi9t, -�'�Ar:: r,.wnwiikw ,x: l9 w..i.+.
,on •,the :,need for -a. -stop sign o.fi .Avacado;at Yewame
and a ;.sAgnal at-Avow,ado and Coast'Highway.:
Jim Fo,rsy,th:e, ,20.15 Chabasco Drive, appeared befo
..,the,!, MMISSIon and '.voi:ced concern withtheir, los
;of pr,iva.cy a,nd Frequos,ted that a higher wall be
constructed on the,..parking structurQ as well as
along the :street; He also questioned ;the.adequa
of landscaping.in the..site distance.cone and. Bal
Frost appeared before' the Commission``tb 'clarify
the: meaning„and lloca,ti,on of the site,,dis'tance. co
Donald; -Christianson,, mice "Presiden,t o,f, the .I;rv,in
Terrace Homeowners Association, appeared before
the;;Coipmi-ssion,,in .favor of the -development and
fel t ;i t•,w,as a ,welcome; improvement to the area,
He commented on the landscapingand advise,'that
the Homeowners, Association ,was present]Y in -the
process of re ].andscap� ng; the ;,are6, ,and 'requested
,.
that the .app Acant;,get toget Er. with'the associa
t 'on •J,n 'order- to; coordinate ..the ,�anos,capin
aavjd;1,Smiley, 518 Acigel ita, appeare'd,'before the
Commissiop.: nd voiced concern with the height
variance -and, possib l,i ty o�f<'settirig'a precedent:
Eleanor Forsysthei 2015, Chabi sca, appeared before
the;,tommiss,ion..-to,,commen,t #n{.;favor of',the .devel6
merit,;,howe er; she;�neques,ted'that;;a 6'foat''wa11�
'
constructed, on :the parking; str.u`ctur�; rethe'r, than
the, pr oposed 4 .;fo,ot wall., bescause anythingless i
wo.ul tl. ,crea a a, tipss of pLri vary onf' their pra�perty
F
5 ;
B:
kex, appeareorbefo're the' Commission - in
response,x,to the : re,ques,t:. or a: 5F f4,o`t" wal r and
pointed uux; that, he;;par.k'ingistru;ctuhe would W
$e,t back fu,rlther{ than th`ur ex`isttl t;g apartments
which are o be:. em'elr shed aod, that a `.9 foe
�fe1t£
wall w'iXh` landscap.ng wou?d, b,e mor."e deslrablet.an
siti �dl p,ravzi4de 'the ncce{s;sa•ry, p,r,i Vpcys on adjacent
1<
pr.operty �p any ,case�,t;ne reque$;ted, the opp�or°,tu
to war, w1�th tjh:a,omnun,.t°yJlassoc�iatianon is 3-�
t
t,
-matter xa,thar.,�,than havia. 4 a eci;fi,c height;
!!9 P
de'sigrra t thi ,` `a
ted `a s ti me;;{r . �«�,.
Prtlann7�hg4 Comm�ss�on discussed: parkxin}/�{i at Kam's
fie$ t,�ur,ant ;.and} ^ acne/ss¢ oanne,c onJf etweeh the
{eE
;J;ot,an'41 that,{of`;,theKproposed; oevelppmThey`
tl)
a1`sa� a}f traffic,$i�ne
s,�
�,t
5d�iscu4s,sted5;instalFlatip�n %tlie,
a t o,�and iCoas{t�, v�o�ced', ca�ki� ,6(t{'
,�Yb �i�ghway; pond
3
Page 1Z rs i
r
4 a c ) rL 4 t
t �'�
xn ',5:.3?�}. ,t .1,.. `_,ttLM�..e•
1f. 3,.;h+�,l
..,rt...et't�'-�
rt.'u<.
•.s+.:i`:f:,..�
r�
.. fir et-"_'b�v,^..t.:+,i7a.,�;3,:usb, .G.4i%:..;t :�4 �.,._Gs``IEvrc2 i*`,.:"}X �'�,..,..�i�.. ..,-.IB�fc?�rJ�ro Y�:=L ,LL�;i�,,.�7!. u,'i. P'FU3. ��'
wrs{.L' BALL^
with° the'Ampact of. the :proposed' development on: t�
..
res,i,dentfa'ls:neJghbor.hood-without a traffic, signal
.at ,that A nters`ecti on .t Staf.f..'adv'i sed th.� t the
,-.:proposed
:s gn'aI .was: high ,onr.,the• priori ty? l i st
:but could not :be tmoue; -spec .-fic because; of the
pe.rmi;t process; an&Ancreased .shortage of funding;
Bill .Ficker -appeared before the Commission to
concur on the needfor a signal at the intessec-
t,ion of Avocado', and Coast -'-Highway. and advised
they would .be: wil.l,ingi <to, p"artfcipate in 6 share
of the funding for the signal in order: to achieve
installation -as, soon] as possible.
There being no others desiring to appear; and be
heard,;,the: public: hearings were closed.
!lotion ;
X
r :
F.ol.lowling di.scus:si.on',: motion; -was made that: Plann
Ayes
X
X
Xc
X
X.
Commiss4on �accep.t the` envtronrmental document;' th-,
Absent
X
X.
the, fo1iowing 'fxindi>1gs 'be Wade:
�. The proposed development is consistent.with
;the. Generatl. Plan, and-Is';:compatible Wvith
i
sur.roundfng land' uses. :
2. - Adequate offstreet parking spar,-, 4ri l l . be
provi: &'for''the';p'ropos'edsdevelopment.
Is
z
3. s The. projert wi:.7l.not have any significant
-
envi ronmen tal =i mpatc t t ,
4. The building height would resul+ti in more;
pub,1Ac vtis'uafl cpen spate5than i's; required by
_+
,thew bas i.c hed gh t . 1.i mirt�. J+ ,
5. 'The building height would result' anmare. �^
,des I f- a b I e3rchi tect`ural= treatment afj they
d'S
;� build°'ing rand • a stronger; and, more. appealing
visual: char�i'cter; o.f. the` a're%a than i st re' qui rei
:by the' basic height limit ; ?
'hei.,bui l ding h`e� gh't wo�r�l dr' not res u'1 t' �i n unde i
able ort abraptiscalcrrelationsh'ips berg; -
created between the structure and existing
�deve,lopt
+
t 1....
7. the s'tructrare .loll! have no more' floor, areal
�,
i:'IIEr
than. cou1,d! have been ach16Vd`d wti;hou the `.usi
Per a ,,{
{ pag /(
'tr,,
9141
;.5'S')`,ell�S.WN!`
lH ��yy�
�y}
51':h'...'{I'.a.A:...•.��.�t2��.�._xiiiY.Y..}..2f*ii:GL::?+...:�KM'�1�:'iLt.✓..YV-:.^�_'(r..^y1�t��Crv]i�.•�',Y..5..t1. \1�.�'�.;:r 4..i1_-i.t?6.rZ$
9
COf IMISSIOt'JERF
h
¢ r t+y 1.��"•wf
Y�w NOw,
r �
March 2, 1978
,
The,approvaI of Use''�Permit No'. 1857 Dill; not,
unde'rAhe-circumstan ces :'of "th.is. case` be 4etri- '
—mental .,to the- ealth,. safety., peac+e,?'morals,
comfort :and; general-<,weafare of�;persons; res,id=
i ng and wo rk:i:ng Ain :the :n'ei ghb'orK Id `or, be
detrimen_ta.a 'or_� i:njurious to prap`eray and
improvements in the neighborhood: or .to the''
general `w.el fare. of;Ahe City. '
-and.that ,Use ,Permit No-, S5'7 be �app'roved', subject
to::the fol:l owa ng� condi ti ons�:
1. That all conditions of approval ,for tentative
map of Tract No. 10274 be fulfilaed,'
2.' That the; two control.l ed. entrances for Lo`t 2
be subject to further review by the Public
Works. De artmen .and tt1:Q! Fire Oe'partment�. In
a_ddi,t,ionp<< then ft
;i,na1, des ;gn of the' control-`
.two
ed� ent.r;ances, shall: be, approved,* by, the: Public
Works Department and the Fire Department.
;3 .,:;That: ft re s hyd.ra'nts� be provi ded a's red, , b
the Paib l z! Works ,Degatrtsnent-° and ;the
he
Department. ; .Fire'
18.'ft.,.com a '
P ct an`d tandem- park
-
i n g spaces'not be.permitted. The site plan .s
c:on.taIns� adequate` room to., i�edc�ce ,ovor0d.th;
s tal l s andi�,ai sl Lis' to.° ob�tatiw the `same: numpe`r. "
of parking stalas without compact :s `aces„
r
5 I,n.terior,, circulation; parking, t;raff:ic; control;
Si gn .l.ocat;ions; and :d;irect°ionaI s`ig,ns be
..
4.
approved b the*Traffic r
ff c En i Y g Weer.
i
Lp ti 2 _ :Co'n.dom�in i ums r .Access to' parking,
,.
,garages shall be` appro Ved.by .the!`Tra'.ff?ic'
Epg-jynper (24: ;ft...'epen, ngi:require.d.�'!
t
"- �baCk
7. Garages fo`r` Building No. 7 be se,i: ba;;k aD feet;
smin:imum;;f,romfpr.ivate road.,o�r mad6 flush 1�rith {
ui,l
8 i.ocatfion of the dr:ive�-tlp;bank te�ter; shall. be
5
approved by the Traffic Engineer£. f r
Cons true t i on the ..requi
shall ,`Meet r'ementSI for; . a
Fri re Zone N2 G 1 Di strict
¢
Page. ,14
t
r%OMME$SIONERS.
Alen -
March 2, 1978
MIOLL "CALL
1:0 Separate =permit required:,,for the saline
tank from the.,Fire Prevention Bureau
11 ,All .Construction:-sha11 "comply with `the `.Uni f
�uiIdi.n9 ,Code," 1973; Requirements
;Prior ;to;the..issuance of .grading and `bu:;ilydi
permi ts, ;;a cQmp] ete;'geo techn ica1 eval ua ti,on
..the site -wil l -be prepared by a 'qualified ;
engineer which will ,take: into account soils'
geology and seismic characteristircs, of :the
.,-,site. : T.he,,r;eport,will contain appropriate
recommendattgns for,,the.;design :and `engineer
of.,the ,:proposed project. a Finale project pla
will* be, subject-ta_the City's approval,
Grading opera tiuns, wA11 .,be 1 imi ted ';to day-
time ,hours.,per ;Ci ty:Code _and wil l: be
,conduc
under the supervision,of,.a qual'Af.ied soils'
engineer.
1 Suf:fici,en,t iexh!aust/ventillation equipment
wi1:1: be ., nsta11ed in ,structure
,'the,pArking
rto sati.s.;fy exi,s,ti,ng,building codes, taPcirig
into'acco:unt :the, additional emissions genes
ated at the drive -sup Iankfng facility.
A4., Runoff, from:the,comp,]e:ted project wi1`1 :be.
J
directed=to.:exi;sti:;ng; storm .drafins. Coristru
on wiiI ;be -s! b'ect to +erosion ,icgnt
meas,uresf approved ',by Ahe. Zi ty's=' gradi`ng
engineer.. A parking lot cleaning and main'.
y
f;
<tenance ,progriapi'will ;b;e; es tabI4shed for bot
:
r the.;comme,rr i<a;l"{ use r-and tithe 'resi dent a'l use,
-ire,povof the ,propeand "ii r;ty
ownebrs tomagi n,ta!i n:
:
l5. Introduced, landscaping will be repl,a.ced, on
,.
si;te'., ficn pa rt,t ;,cul a;r ,whine. l a0 s`ca'pi`Ag sjerve
s
t as a;scrp,e b,etwep;n res-i.d"ential 'arrd'`comme`rc
areas ; f, StrPo:t, ;tr:eess.w.;i l ] be . repl`ac�d a's
{
j requireti.�+, Final 14andsca e�' lans are<subec
f toh.e a.pprova] o.f Dij of 'Communlit
Deve;l.opme6t a,nd th'e":D,i'trector off ParksF,
Beaches. 'and Recrea`tion.. ;
D.
16,
, Res i,aie:n}ti al areas to thet wes t and south; of ;
f ;:
a y . the;fp.rpject�area,.wili be pratec'te` 'acous,ti�
tally ancl�destheticalily b'y a co�nbinttia of
-'aandscape.>
anddco'rative ;wa;11. teatent.
Particular at'terition ;w 11 be pa;idF to
`
$ a
_4,�'..5`s.�.zTY2Ct'Sl[<e iiit.^.YJit!�ip.'f'O
�IX7+7'::i
h
42
Page
k 1 Y 1-,...,iY ZJ f +�n„�".t,.,-t1" r. ',•t'ziiJi�^"`^.
ro.l
Y;�
COMMISSIONERS;,
-
�i.
t '� {^r,ibf�iOW ' 0, • t Livald
P
7! i a ,P'rM11 AftJTEB
March 2, 1978
ifilDtM �.
24. ::That.>the,proposed flag• pole shall riot exceed'
a :height of60 feet.
Moti on
•
X
. ` °
Motion :was made :Ihat ,Planning 'Commission nec'ommend
A-503
Ayes
,X
X :
X
:X
:,to, -the 'CiI'ty Council ',`the approval of Amendment No.
Absent
X
X
-503",and%that the,folloWing`setbacks `be. reflected
on Di s tri,cti ng Map. Rio: '24:
1: c A 12-,,>foot'setb'ack 'along'Avocado Uenue rn the
R-3 District: + ..
2. A 14 foot setback °along'Kewamee 'Dr�ivt�,
A 6 foot>'setback along 'Zahma Drive in the R-3
District.
,4. .A 0°:;foot seibaCk along ,the ::rear property. fine
e . opposite Kewamee Drive) in. the' R- 3
District. .
r5 ;A O foot -setback 'along:,.the 'property' l'i n'e
(� -e. oppositeIast Coast Highway); fn .th'e C 1
District.
Motion
X
Mot�a►� was made Ghat Planning Commis ion make the :
TT-10274
Ayes
X
X.
sX
X
X
fo? 16m i n�` f`fidings; i ...
Absent
X
;x'
"r.
Tn d r_
t- the . o' osed ma I o`
S consistent P n s to n'
p t wi.th
P'
4
`
.
appl•i.cabl`e 9en`era'l and, S, c"i;fic pans.
2 :That `the 'des,i n or 'im raVem 'g` p ent ;o,f 'the prc;rps
suUdivIsion ins' doinsiste`nt i `th a livable
pp
general and `sp'ec,i:f.ie.r,plan,.;
3. Thet��the site' is physTcaily suitable' for; the
type of development proposed
jj
1`
s;
a 7hatk iheiissite� is ph'y5��c 1'ly= sui table` for`'the,
7' p'ropb5'ed dens'aty Af< devol opinen t '
_r,�
r.That. �the.`de e�
sign th sub divisiptt;on
the
- proposed .imprbvements�wi1$°'not cause's�,bstan'
tenv ironmental ,'4amd9e�or' sub tan Tally
fi
, avoi:dably,: njure f th�ar wildlife or! `their' T .�
F
k ` habit t'at
Page 17' t t } 4
March 2. 1978
6Tha t-, the, design,,of::the.!subdivision, or the
proposed .,improvements are.7not I fk6ly to 'ca us
serious public health problems.
7. That the',design of the subdivision o'r, the
-�conflict
:,,proposed �, imp rove me n ts wiI1 �fiot'-co nic t , with;
any-;eas'ements, -.,acqUi red'by the_ p 'Ubl ic at`Iasi
7
1:
for. access through or;fuse.,�ofproperty, Wi t h'i i
the proposed subdi,viston.,.�.,,
8..:,; That.,the,',discharge:,,of :Waste. from thepropose
subdivision will :,not, -,result in or 'add to, any
vicIation of existing requiremen-ts, prescribe
by �za ., W&ter '.
-,.Ca,l i f o rn ta :,Re g i o na 1, Qua:l i ty, Contr
Board pursuant to Division 7 (c6mmenci'ng wit
, ,
Section 1300.) of :,theWater-;Code.
9. That the proposed development will' not` have
any;.:-signif.icant, ,:envir.onmentaI Ampact,
10. That each of the tenants .,of, the proposed
condominium,will be given 120 days,, wr i t te rt
::,,--no,t.i;ce44of ---Amtewttion .-rto,,`�cohVert'pribr: to
't� :term.i.nA,ti.on,,.of.�te,nan,cy ,due othe Propose&
conversion.*
1 That each of the tenants .of the proposed
c,ondominium'wail l. be given. notice, of: A'nl� exclu
e''rtghtlto, .,co n,tra c t, Jr>'A ,,`pullchase of
their;respe' til, e,,un,iits.
,6pon`the-same'-termsi
s� that ruch w :, j
and condi tion'units 11 be
i iM-ii
Y, offered :.tb je;,ge n'e raiV rp Ub 11c''o Ms' mo
rte�
j avp.rabl.e ten,an,t.:�
d�.r the I 1 0
_0 n,. #,q,Om.m e n d A o e.v �'CJ tyj. -Co,un 0 1 -the approva
qntativf!-, ap.:! .Jr ;102,74,1-subject• to the
, a cl.,
follow 0g;,.Cqjn , oo,
I ThAiv,.al-j
2 :That" there shall be.;.submitted a. dd06ra,tj:orI
Oino 'di.tins,i,and, ;Rbsi-Hitiohs '
,
-e.n,for: iabt thf A fit �rj n the,
'.o
�
-co nt,.n u'ed maintenance `'�,4of 'he.exfst nqandic
-iving;- enc n 9structures iand
U t, i I" i ly - to c; a'S,, s a,., r e q u Y, 6 me nt.
:*
0renfbrceabIe, meth- 0rbiI
or rep ACOMe-nt P iAhe,lstfriuc. Ures,J e e
f t -oh, h
J
n ,a ddfti'6nthe- CC&R'si..shall,,l ,ral.so inc U, e
prbspec,t ve:owners-d sc, bur&s re'Oi J. '
page . 8
VAI
re
f
;d
COMMISSIONERS
1P
NU ZA TES
10 706
y
March 2, 1978
140f6L VALL
sound-. Aransmi ss,ion between units an
40,56n.ce :,of s.ound,.attenualtion mate'ri
';c.0n5.truc,t'A on I,, such� .,do:,-n'Ot exi s t.
MR! a 11,, a 1,s'
sh Olnc] ude. ;a di sc I os
common sewer I ine or other common U
:,,Iound :tq.,, se co,ndomi nfum: eftrvi ce�Ah,
e,
lenanqe%_� ;-,e�s P . 0 . n sJ b i Ittits: lo f s a i d u
3 Fu.re,V,r-thermo the, C ity., s,ha':1 not - be,
.�,.responsibl e for any, future. probl6mi
subject: i u,t-1, lti,es:� i n conJunction'wj
proposed conversion..,
3. That. each ;t enan.t.2 of the, proposed co
shall , be, gi yen .120 days:: written not
Intentlon,to,,conve.rt, prfor, to terimi
tenancy' due to the proposed convOrS:
copy:.qf.sai.6 written; notice sha,11 6
to the Di rector, ot, Community Develo
evidence that this condition has '.be
Thatt each of, the.,tenants,'.,o.f the pro
co ndomi nJ um-� s=h.al I `be: gi ven,.- w ri tten
an ex clusi.ve right.,to 'contract fOr.�
of the i r,., res pecti ve'uni ts�i Upon-'. the:
;_,and,qondit. onsthat<-such units will
ly offered to the,general ;public
f a vo re' le_. to the tenant. The right
for, a ?,-,erj od oft- not; I ess than, t i xty
the dale, of 1 s u a n ce W the su.bdi,v
repoec;,issued pursuant to Sn!ction,;l
the B 6 .,�,.,.,,siness,,an4.,,Professio,hal..C6de,:
n 9
�t,th e , te -tves,4p rior;:Iwti t ten noti
i n ten tj one,nOt-1.to,,texercise,,the right
-,�'w
of d
r i t te n n o ti, c ei shall s i all be pro,
'�"Di'rectori,o C
om�6�1 .1Developmen't -a
thatJ, i met:.,�hs,,qondi tion fhas been met
That
' a 11 exi ti q'g �'dwdj;l i n95: shall: 6
and 'al -�bufl.�di,qga,code vfol,ati6ns `1
j
_..Abut --not,,J i,mi te,C,to,, rboottegged, conk
M ptwo P j!"at6,a' nedG,,dratna6e, s 's,f
h4r) re OAO nt 10rbblems' !s
r re-c t e d! pri}ta`co,nversion.,
6. That: al icens.ed ,e'l ectHca V,'.I,pl umb�,i n
pj cail nc441t�racO. is haIA:TreVlieiV;
A
.+
f4-AYS-n th i .�condtfb
Building .official.,'prior vtersl
ra
W4
�t
L D
i y
COMMISSIONERS r
` �t,,f` ,' � ,� ,,�, j� F� ��.,uu
40�C'a0, +9� ;. �p �G L ���� tl ®W or, L.��i��r�,�IUT�S
.}gyp 7►
.r
r
M,ar.ch 2, 1978
MOIL L' CALL
IPlsiitx
That'sIgh-t� distance for: a minimum p` 50 tiPH
be.: provi ded, .fors the: p'ri;vate drives tin East
Coast HI ghway.o . > Laridscap,i hg within the sight
distance cone' shall ,not�,',exceed twenty-four;
inches In height.t•:::In~• addition, _islght
distance shall be provided to the'satisfacM ,
'
tion of, th,e Publ is Works Department for ;tape
_:
bike trail.
18. That a corner cut-off with a radius :of twenty-
five feet 'at the corner of East Coast ;Highway
and Avocado Avenu,3 be dedicated to the public -
for street purp'oses.,
That; the 'curb return 'at-,the`.co'rner of 'East
Coast Highway, and, Avocado i Avenue be '.recon-
-structed to :a. radius oVUIrty'-five feet.
20. ;That a raised: median.ii(slan&be� cons tructed in
East Coast Highway to prevent left turns in
and out of'the.private drives. T'heraised
median island shall extend from fifty. feet
west=of the vesterJy side 'of :the westerly
drive: approach ,to? Avocador..Avenue. The design
sha1s.L be appr•oved;;by- the. Public `Works Depart-
ment.
21. That an ingress and egress , easement;.be
provided across, Loa ;2 ,:for `the benefi of_ Lot
22. That the water se`rvice(s) and set�er'connec
tion(s) be provided in a manner; satisfactory ,
to the Publ is Works Department:
y
'
23, That all work within East Coast Highway'bi
done-.unde.r an.�.e'ncroachment permit; issued by=
the Cal if:orn,i'ef Department of. Transportatibn,
z
24, That all work, wIt!h'in the Ci,.ty right -of way f
�'. and any sewer or water' connect s be: done
under An `encroachment permilt ,issuedi by the
Public Works oepar meat.
,
i
2S. - That a s,ta��dard subdivfision agreement with
accompanX..i ng = ectar..•i ty. be providgd if: i t I� t
desired :to record he final mapcbefore tine <
public improvements are completed, (idAtp;r
3 ?
T he. e final''
tb
map;mus� recorded befo(�etibui.lding
t
permits are issued')
_
.
Page
Motion I "X
Ayes 1 X X X
Absent 1 i I X
26. That.a P.C.C. sidewalk be constructed within
the City right-of-way. for Kewamee Drive.
The width and loca Lion of said sidewalk
shall be approved by the Public Works
Department.
Commissioner Balalis returned to the dais.
ADHTIONAL BUSINESS:
Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 1002,
`X X X finding that the proposed flood control and
drainage improvement on the Santa Ana River
., Channel within the City of Newport Beach are in
'-Conformance with the City's General Plan.
Staff re iewed with the Commission the plan of
approach connection with the General Plan
workshop me ings which begin Tuesday, March 7th.
There being no furt� r busines, Planning Commissior
adjourned the meeting.?�i 11:10 PM.
mE-,
X AWiNCE PLAIRNIhG 'DIVISION
X�PUBLIC 47M S DEPARTME14T
X TPAFPIC MIGINEER
X FIRE DEPAR7,94MT
X—PLAN RFEVIMI DIVISION
PARKS & RECREATION
�I,()L1'CE DEPkRTMENT
~MARINE, SAFE`T`Y.
—CPADING
CITY OF NEWPO T DEA C'ri
PLAWITNG DEPARTMENT
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
Date July 29, 1987
X PLANS ATTACHED (IPLFAC-F RETURN)
PL"NS ON FILE, III 31I,AMNING DEPT.
APPLICATION OF: Bank of, Newport/Merrill Lynch Realty
FOR: Exception Permit No. 29
REQUEST TO: Permit the installation of a fourth wall skin on the existin
Bank of Newport Puilding iocated in the C-1 District. 'Mrh proposal also
includes a request to enlarge,one of two existing ground located on the
sitors so as to L- stahlish said sign as a ,,nulti-tenant n1� vah#ch identifies
secondary tenants within the biII.c:inc}_:. T ��
LOCATION: 2101. East Coast Highway
REPORT REQUESTED BY: Auqust 10, .1987
C01,VMISSION REVIEW: August 20, 1987
COIfMMTS :
Si2nature Date
ii
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLAY7NING DEPARTMENT
PLAY) REVIEW REQUEST
X ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION) Date July 29, 1987
X_PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X PUYiS ATTACKED (PLEASE RETURN)
X_TP,AFFIC ENGXNEER
X FIRE DEPARTMENT PLANS 01; FILE IN PLANY.ING i}EP11.
XrPLAN REVIEW DIVISION
PARKS & RECREATION
POLICE DEPARTMENT
�I-%RINE SAFETY
`GRADING
APPLICATION OF: Bank Of Nei+wort/Merrill Lynch Realty
FOR Exception Permit No. 29
REQUEST TO: Permit the installation of a fourth .call sign on the existing.
Bank of Newport Building located in the C-1 District. The 1 alsp pro .os«_
includes_,..a request to enlarge one of two existing croumi Higns located on the
site so as to ecLablish said sign as a multi -tenant �aicn which identigiExs
,econda� tenants within the building.
LOCATION: 2101 East Coast Highway
REPORT REQUESTED BY: August 10, 1987
COMMISSION REVIEW: August 20, 1987
COMMENTS: >>
X ADVANCE PLAti?'IING DIVISION
X^PUBLIC 'WORKS DEPARTMENT
Y.~TMFFIC ENGINEER
Z FIRE DEPART14ENT
-PARKS & RECREATION
—PARKS
DEPAeRT14Et7T
-MARINE SAFETY
--MARINE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEA-071
PLANNING DEPARTHMIr
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
Datf! July 29, 1,987
X PLANS ATTACHED (PZXASE RETURN)
PUNS ON FILE .%17 PLANNING DEPT.
APPLICATION OF: Bank of. Newport/Merrill Lynch Realty
FOR: E ception Permit No. 29
REQUEST TO: Permit the installation of a fourth wall. im on the nxisting
f'ank of Newport Building located in the C-1 District. 'I}tn pro ral also
fnrludles a request to Lr� ground
arge one of two existirr�nrt located on the
Fiitr, so as to establish said sign as a multi -tenant nic�rt '.ritich icienLifies
necondary tenants within the building.
LOCATIOtJ: 2101 East Coast Highway
7tE.'PCiF<; REQUESTED BY: August 10, 1987
COMI,ISSION REVIEW: August 20, 1987
COMMENTS: j j)
•
X ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION
X_PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
X rRAFFIC ENGINEER
Y.^_FIRE DEPARTMENT
Y. PLAN REVIEW DIVISION
—PARKS & RECREATIO27
�POLIC E DEPARTMENT
�£J.ARI£4F.. SAFETY
—GRADING
CITY OF N .WP0RT BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
Date July 29, 1987
X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN)
PLANS ON FILE IN PLANUING DEPT.
APPLICATION Or: Bank of. Newport/Merrill Lynch Realty
FOR: Exception Permit No. 29
REQUEST TO: Permit the installation of a fourth wall nign on the existinr
Bank of Newport Building 'located in the C-J. Diytxic:t. _ The proposal also
includes a request to enlarge one of two cxf.r,ti.nJc ground Fsignn located on the
site so as to establish said sign as a niu.it:i,-tunant �tign wh�,ch .iientifien
secondary tenants within the building. .�.
7,Cr'ATION: 21.01 East Coast Highway
REPORT REQUESTED BY: August 10, 1987
CGMMSSION REVIEW: August 20, 1987
X ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISI014
X PUBLIC VORKS DEPARTMENT
X TRAFFIC ENGINEER
y FIRE DEPARTMENT
X-FLAN REVIEW DIVISION
-PARKS & RECREATION
--POLICE DEPARTMENT
--PO'
SAFETY
— PADING
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PW NING DEPARTMENT
PLAN REVIEW REQUEST
Date Jule 29t 1987
X PLANS AT?A'tiNED (PLEASE RETURfl)
PLANS ON FII,R IN PLANNING D► I'T.
APPLICATION OF: Bank of Newport/Merrill Lynch Realty
FOR: Exception Permit No. 29
REQUEST TO: Permit the installation of a fourth wall ni�rn on the existin
bank of Newport Building located in the C-1 District. The proposal also
Includes a request to enlarge one of two existing around rt9, ns located on the
*site so as to establish sand sign as a multi -tenant siq which identifies
secondary tenants within the isuildiny.
TJ�,CATION: 2101, East Coast 11i.gl1way
REPORT REQUESTED BY: August :ill, 1987
COP•04ISSION REVIEW: August 20, 1987
C014I4ENTS :
5igna
X_ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION
X PUBLIC FK)RKS DEPARTl4MJT
X'I'ItAFPIc ENGINEER
X_FIRi: DEPARTMENT
X PLAN REVIEW DIVISION
^PAPY.fi & RECREATION
POLICE DEPARTMENT
�MARJ?TE SAFETY
_GRAJJT NG
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACU
PLANNING DEPARTMEN-L
PLA?J R."7IEW REQUEST
Date July 29, 1987
X PT-ANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RE'Pt.1RN)
— PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING D1',PT.
APPLICATION OF: flank of Newr;ort/Merrill Lynch Realty
F'OA: Exception Permit No. 29
R1EQUEST
TO: Permit the
New
installation of
a fourth wall �3i.grt an the existing
of
includes
port Building
located in the C-1 District. PropasGl also
s1.te
a request to enlarge one of two
-The
existing ground si911s located on the
so
secondary
as to establish
tenants within
said sign as a
multi -tenant G c�n�which identifies
thc� building
LOCATION: 2101 East Coast_ Highway
REPORT REQUESTED BY: August 10, 1987
COMMISSION REVIEW: August 20, 1987
COMME!rrs: