Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEXCEPTION PERMIT 39 AMENDED1 , y� U, b a, ; �. I1 W J O 00, W I' II a r�W •LL W rc W �; /`� f' - ' . ... .. T � � Gam• � W .W cr ~ i /9La 1-9 cc orb W 0.0 YA us 1,— -.27 Fl 'c- :�7" (( H :.' • - . � Gam^-/ ����' Y �'�'%� J _ 3 —17 t� < cc v �Cl t o F DATE... WMEETING m l; i AG �NDA ITT o � a c U-0 t pp�,ID,�T0�1 �� Q } CD Wz a o w' CJ 'y N >. W' I cc O a cr LU C cr ON KA UA CC ul CL 1 2 � . . rr.w..nr+xw�wJ .t., tM•hM4'aR•,Y. •'!+%•M'..M+.aRfi.x�'irrY 14'.: - 'Y,..',..•: � iC'.•„�_r.- .�.,...._...... �._..._..�.�-�._�.._.. ..._... ✓ _. .-... �V• z ...t' __ .�..,...,•.r«•„� .. .�.+ a»...+•.++1�'!nA, .. . 1 ��. � �'K A3'7 �l•�,7iMw+M� 's.'4 '�i�� -� �L{+� _ w'hidn ., .. i.7 iCS�'a1'.L�..f'.ih.. � .1. ♦ ��� 1 :c^' ' ".^�a '. "`'T �: � .. 'l.%1�{xl:' V•• •,x,x.W.w...wr. r. .`l•.'rV x=Cr :Y• x/7JN 1. 1' �� V,e.� �54. , C , '�%�� '. 7 r. a h _Etc �q; 8f1"♦ .N ' Y7N - _ v.�...-.�.•� -- 7-7 IL IL Ix LU Im ,.._. e•....._._.•. -- - t .,. +'y ' •..mA,n t'tr� ..:::,. . ier.. r .'.: • .... t•'b �i•., tt t• t -' ,•_,,,,,,w,,.,,•.,r : {,>.�. ..i,. ..r.✓'.... ..I;C�f.F".,t:1L ^}�%c;V3w. - 00 L . ..,.a. .v-w.t"`l'�t--.. `:e,�. .- �:... ��. ta^L+P.:�. e. ti ^r �... � .n.U.�' �''�'�fti+ `���t�'�.. �+1`z°"F.• q'r,,.y.5:r '.:..,'�-, .w�"..y.a, ."'.:`.i, . . . , � �,: �. , r", ._. _, ..�_��, � - �x,Irycw/.a6:�.7rawMse'ak'� Y.....'r`•r+r' n+va :x"�' .. - .u' �.� R A = . . • taw• 4� .?...�' .. .mac CL CC E`_ %/"�',.�✓rC/ . set 9 Op bt� �A CIO, XCH V16 w�l�����j778G-3v�1 ri • 1 J I� wh wh o i ��� •W t . LL LL LU cc - W- i' cc 0 W uj W / W W V � 0. a • l uj ��� 1.LU All qKul W UA 50 '.Uj C z. t ° GOP4 ° l I: z Z1. FP 3� a QY r i J 1 P � :., r `, t i i,i i- k•� i [t} . rn W cc a f(A • y/ t� cc LU � f ..• z I W ~ W Esm . fL I a,uj c9. ui WJ 0 a t� .a ;tw t hF Fa, t.s:.4 7F td -1 > `'�` �'�!` •. �2>! � r f � W 8 W.. ., 'M.r..✓ ' i r`'-t i; �jjf }, jV •J- ?!� y ',y yr i�, Y1 ij1 hsi'n'•r� Yy� fya,»" a.r• � 1���P�� r i .ar•. . '., � �� . a} 4 v ) r au,�h; +�' zf> iS, r ',f�i ,•�,, .4x e�1�,y^4 # ?'. i�� � r 4 , 16 Uj .M1 t • 1 +.L S 0. 1L 2 � •1cc ._. .,, - ... . • ,..,... ,,., ..., . , ,•. a =, fi Yf a 1 h y b b ^ •L% +d • a tr t q t i2 K l r pQ " ✓ It y,t Q,'. ! FFI � S ti? M _ ..' :•. .. , -"' :" !'• .i' ,t i�?�S � 4,,'r _,.T• '.c r.�}2. Y��%�ij,� }� `�Fy't _ ' t �.jn - a, .'6_, tea....,-"y.-,..� •.:. .. ,. --'.:. dr e� ?. , _ r Lam./ 0 �-a l 2. t t Z tF res tF 0 � ca �► n e `tt 3G4 � +a W ul ifs n �i ' � - .. -- .. ...... ... .. '......_ :....:... :. ..: .:....:... .. ....: ... � .�:..;.a.._..:-�c2:1fiS,,.:rtu'..3.i',t'z,:w.4.c•u.,rzcY.:r.-.t:^.:*sftl•�c�re-nsc*rca�_3`kw.�. ._..",'^dR'.N . � : +'• - .......__......uo.a...er.xrn ..- s-rry - .x..+. .x.t cvv"u _u-. t. i 4e: ...�.... M .a rzrfl. ..-, h...,. ,i.:l.:... _. S,. X � .. ..... .. ,. .... ... .. ,, . <..r ., ...:., _. �_._._ ._.....w........�._..-....-...__....._.."..."._...._..,.—.....,.._._..._.._..-.......��...,.. •...wrw,, ...��.......rv..lw-w....a .. ...-. ...«.. nl sd; - � o . a v p. m C cc r U y a r• R AIL :-� Lower Flour PLut r r:i ti c.r• , r u• i �. t; p W US t— DN 106 d E W W W E 1 _ �2 C 3 f"t4 • i 742 SF . 5= 6 LL 1320 SF C y d C•� 880SF t1'8SF C5tSF O. + •cS0 cF t , ■ ■ ^:. '. VIA LIDO s W. E.2 DRUG t Mco a: 991 SF "� I■ __ — . _ m ;ECURITY PACIFIC BANK 956SF'd ■ e ■ 1004 SF E. C `0 ' • ru x 23 VSF ■ UP Mezzanine Floor Plan 2725 S.F. TO AL Em f LOBBY • ti O • ti:. y !• W A • M s MrrraDine Floor PLzn w o Suite LOBBY —, m b 0 Suite 200 VIA LIDOLn cc O 1 * „ 8 20t tsaSSF DRUGC Sr 377 792 SF `496 SF 941 SF ■ SF • , a ite 203 l I t _ N ?60 SF w u .■4 ins` "' -c - - - t _ 2'� LA m f 0SF� I__Suite 202 1096 SF z , z ® _ _ A Development Of'. r- d ■ •. ■ D�. _ le •C7......` O OUTDOOR 20SF f '� • ..} COURTYARD S,�ite 202A " ~ �. N r ® = • 430 SF I` • to 2C9 I. i 48 SF t1 Suite 204 a , O 727 SF W 1940vest Orangetsood A1'enue �ijl Sile)h■ ■md floor Pbalm conceP• i lug tad mpment uuleipued lsruts Suite 20 % I' utdsquucloot■ges.Actuilhyo°turd Orange, CA92GG$•2050 ' w •' U • square kont; m■y ctutn,c In the r= = ?t:t:e 2'05 finalPl°°s I.eai�ing .Informata<on: W 5u:e 41E,N +379 SF 897 SF 695 SF (71.4) 978- ] 244 ' ♦ Z FI LE cIIs1oN aiumffa ra n .� ^". i•,.. s.. . >.rw n .r rx•.�.. � ...._ _........._ .._, ..,.......�...._..�_...-v �_.._..._.._,__...,-�.::.r ._.r.!....._.....,1._. .. ...,lt _. ..a ..._...«.-....... _.,..-..__ ...... _ .. »._. _ __»-....�_.............:.._....._._..._._....��__.�__.__..r..__._.r.._�..�._ ... \y V '+6�e•:trs7'M'7N>sptv5nifiPa( ' 1 � \ { ��. fir.`.` 1, -• •. .. �. ------------- VJAU0:�;D • I 1 •(L--- Fi�1 v •, ly 1. "..• ., . r. Imo• r• ,, ` - . - :tom^ �.�• a: •y.• .i�'',..• _ ..... �1 E7 {ram ! � � J.'.• ..�,. •. Z i lei ..��'u"(��:'iki}r ^�I. J. {�" � .. .t .• .. •1, •-,• •.! ,r . \� y lei � k• � ��;; �:�'' j, l f) '` ,�.�� .-: S '�"ir��'� ' �• ... - I �, i�f 1l �Lrl �1`r+t�.�i+'U �i �'. ��y 'f� t.� !!!'.•%A1 t�:(. �. F•ti t. rr�,t .';'i: t �hS11 ,1\r a 1}''�'bt$ r:�h•'r, ��•, ., •l �ii •RT `f '•1 • "��.a. �i�. -• -1, .. _ y s` �j�-"ty���nr! - •°»�L��y�' "�rl""�n��,�.;vti�s.:?:..1...• I,.1.:H�:...�.. �: '•. ku� Co I'rjr;dGT g�'�11,1.f� HA�PlCtANP STAL 3 \\ c `\\ .. .. \ _Jr 1 ' j OL ' o �• li v'�� � t r ' Data: scW.: Drawn: 1�•-�, ,, fI ' F . Job: / August 8,1991 COMMISSIONERS Mill UTES: 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEAU ROLL CALI_ INDEX Excemion Permit No. 39 (Amen I d) Item No. 3 Request to amend it previously approved exce.-,tion hermit which HP 39A permitted the installation of various identification sitsfor each tenant in two ' of the multi -tenant buildings anti three freestanding Approved, monumentsigns, in the Via Lido Plaza Shopping Center, located in the C-1-H District. The proposal includes the deletion of various identification signs for tenants, to be replaced by 2 tenant directory wall signs. LOCATION: Parcel No, I of Parcel Map 85-1 kResu ;( vision No.. 16), ocated M34I7.0475 Via Lido, on the southerly side or Via Lido, between Newport Boulevard and Via Oporto, in Via Lido Plaza. E: C-1-H APPLICANT: Young Electric Sign Company, Ontario OWNER: Fritz DUda Company, Orange 3 ited that the Public - Wbrks on Webbo City Engineer, st, 3epartment has concerns regarding the monument sign at the orner of Ne ort Bo0levard and Finley Street, 1-1 WP ecmplained that 'Itandard 110'.L allb%vs the sign to be closer to the sidewalk than ould.be appropriate; and stuff would prefer that adequate sight istance be provided for. pedestri,alls rind, bicycles that may be on lie sidewalk. Mr. Webb recommended that. Condition No. 41 Exhibit "A'.', be modified, to require the o'lid'. portion of the -nonunient portion Of the sign that is higher than 2 feet be at least feet back from the sidewa lk. Mr, Webb described the area where he 9 feet would, be, measured frorn all the .corner ,of Newport v 3oule ard and Finley Street to the,parking, lot of the Via Lido "I aia Shopping Center., 'I e d iscus'sion was opened'in connection with this item, and, Mr. en Jackson appeare&before'.,ithe Planning 6illmission on behalf .'the.property. owner. r. n re Condition 0. n f M Jackso f6rred to,Cond`6 n'N 5'i xhibi t -'W', stating 'That, the ,previously approv6d under canopy ;jgns and wall signs for tenants , number III, u I Ing,"C"hall no I rn r. 59 * B 'Id' 's on rbe te je Perinit d, w r e e ein, h reqppste that the.under-cal"lopy j CC)ty MISSlONE1R5' MiNUT 3 ;. August 8, 1991 CITY OF NEWPORT BEAU! ... ROLL CALL INDEX Standard 110-L.. Mr. Webb explained that Standard 110.1., sloes not address,a situation where the stop bar painted on the street is not along the prolongation of the property line,and the intent is to modify the Standard to state "prolongation ,of property line, or stop bar and traffic control device," Commissioner Glover expressed her support of - the condition recommended by the Public Works Department on bebalf of the school children tiding bicycles to school via Newport Boulevard. In response to comments posed by the Planning Commission, Mr. Fleemstra and Mr.' Webb discussed the feasibility of redesigning and lowering the monument sign, tend a compromise of the: location of the sign. Mr. Jackson reappeared before the Planning Commission.wherein he stated that the property owner would agree to locating the monument sign eight feet hack from the corner of Newport Boulevard and Finley Street. _ Acting Chairman Edwards explained that Condition No. 4, as it is presently written,,'requires the approval of the- City'T]raffie Engineer. n response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Mr. Webb replied that he.would'accept a modification to Condition No. stating that: the monument sign shall be located between.S:feet to 9 feet from the corner of Newport Boulevard and Finley Street, t the discretion of the City 'l"raffi Engineer. ere being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public caring vas closed at this time. Motion* otion was made to approve Exception Permit No. 3 (Amended) ' ublect''to the; findings and conditions in Exhibit' 'A", .amnd. ondition No. 4 stating "...that the; sign structure higher than 2 feet bove, the"`curb elevation Ishall be,a minimum of S feet to`.9.'feet ehin&the. sidewalk, as,determined by the CRY Trailic Engineer Ayes * * * * * * nd modify.. Condition No,.5,.deleting,"under canopy signs and".`. tuasgnt ` *` otion.was voted on, MOI'ION CARRIED. 12� tit 1 21 � FiNDJNGS: 1: That the proposed signs will be compatible with surrounding land uses. That the proposed signs will not have any significant environmental impact. That the proposed tenant directory signs represent a reasonable request considering the close proximity of the subject tenant spaces, 4. That the proposed signs maintain a unified design which is compatible with the architecture of the buildings and will serve to enhance the overall appearance of the center. S. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the `proposed development. 6. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.06.090 of the Municipal Code, 7. That the granting of this exception permlt , will,: notbe contrary to the purpose of Chapter 20.06 of ta:; Municipal, Code and will not be materially detrimental to, Yiealth, safety, comfort or general welfare of persons resr":►g in the neighborhood, or ` detrimental or injtf;:ious to property or improvements in the neighborhoods. , or fo ` the general welfare of the City. S. That the approval of this exception permit is necessary 4o protect a substantial property right and`will not be contrary to the purpose -of Chapter 20.06 of the Municipal , Code (Sign, Ordinance), and will not be materially detrimental to the health, safety, conifortor general welfare of persons , residing in the neighborhood, or detrimental or injurious to . property or improvements in the neighborhood, or to the general welfare of the City. -13 Op ill►IM►t1 Newport boulevard and. Via Oporto, in.,Via Lido Playa., A'PLrCANT "Young Ltectric .Si .'coin 4hy �ntarra' VVL> Fritz iiucia Company;, Oxane s s a Rukgrm At its meeting of July 18, 1991, the Planning C)mmission continued this application"tn' its ;meetari4 of August g, 1991Jn., orderjto give_:the,applican sufficie t- time:to r vise his Ia in much �as - the F -5 gf P . S t l .?; tom. f , : z sterplan,Eas{subrnittecl by the applicant, did nat accuratcly,,reflc 'the eisti>ag perking lo.E stri ing an. the, site Staff way also a concei�is that the'i'ree sta`nd�r,g t,n�E ..r, star, ma ument- a r we.. b tie , ,x;,� t, , , 4p ,., , , { ►, F d, , Y, Comra�ss�on in conjunction with JExcep oh Permit Nn: 9 .ri .y mt ht ono fitl iritps�thei jxistingIabidsc-aping:area along. I�7ewport 1 ouleVar without pass��Iy encro �rhjng;�ntar the. a jacen� jeg4irSd .piarking, spa es .* i' a `ap_p_,1ican has,'resubmitted r :accu>?ate tytlabs to reflect'?ie precise Iocat�on o£ tic [irollQsed mo u signas;weYl as the '� r t v(` 2' existang parkin striping:la Q t °oL, ,,.; t (. C`.t r: r. ,ri a RYX3 t•...ir? rig tt' S', r t 1� F 0: Plan Commission - 2 • r`�. ^" J, g R?o Application This is a request to amend a previously approved exception permit which permitted the installation of various identificatibn'signs for each tenant in two of the multi -tenant buildings and three freestanding monument signs in the Via Lido Plaza Shopping Center, located In the C-1-H District. The proposal includes the deletion of various identificationn marts for tenants, to be replaced by 2 tenant directory wall signs, whereas only one building directory wall sign is permitted by the Municipal Code, asset forth in Section 20.06,070, Sign exception procedures are set forth in Section 2606:090 of the` Miihicipal Code, F..nvironmental Significance This project'ha's been reviewed; -and' it has' been determined that it is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act;under Class 1. (Existing Facilities) Conf&rmance with- the General Plan' 'and the T.,oca� �"�V�SI.t�:PrOgr�m �sl� Ite PI ►ri . The subject property is designated'fot" "Ftefail. and Service Commercial" use by the Land Use l lement of the General.Plan and the Local.%.;oastal Program Land Use Plan. The existing ices in the subJec4 shopping center are consistent with` th�3, `designation. ' i Subject PropeTiy and Surroun tom' 'anr� Tcrc T'nG subjects property is located in the Via Lido Plaza Shopping `Center which includes a Pavilions .Place Market, the, Edward's Lido Theater, a Security Pacific National Bank, and a mixtiure of smaller comerdial'.uses:" To thenorth; across"Via l✓ido, ,'r'are '`vanous commercial uses; to the west, across Newport Boulevard, is a mixture of commerOal uses; to the south is the Newport Beach. City MI comp16' and'to the'east; across Via t7porto; are commercial uses. i'd1 f. S..'7, •?i` '�"ij o , r n' July 19 199Q, tNe Plann�n ' iCotriniss�ian a r' ve ` I . �T pp o d �Mceptinn Pe, t' T�ica 39..i(an `ezcerp i.` J 1 #I' i 2 D' i r of the mintiteS dated Jtiily 19199Q`�1s attached,for C6mmassuin review); �Said`exeeptton Jr rrtJ i i'Iy_ sir v{.. tS C- r. i i,: .4 i TJ perch t allow ii t}ic ih'siallation 'of vartot s wall and `under` -can opy `tenant sign` ge 'pltc 1 sJ f' i!{.^ .. rD ftiCfdt J G ! t ii ✓ f. 8yt( '•t 1C 4r �, r (; r1 + , t ii. t r exception permit also allowed a froe standrng pole `sign along, `the Newpdrt'Boulc;v2trd :troiifage i af`xth'''ropey; 'as ',well' as 't`wo"nioritxnetYt id`entacation 'ighs ' at' two access ' IriveWays � '7'he''appticant"-glow pf8pdse 'to, e'lete t e `a '"roved` indtvid'u"al''sigtzapet±©r Y3 rf , i i ,f.v. at . 14 'f:♦ 1 i '1'!'�• 'p, 111 ( z` tenants huinbers 5` through 9 & file interior side of iulding C (as shown o :th% oft bed site plan) and replace these with two, multi -tenant directory sigh' (apprtlxinta ely,2 cacti) listing only those tenants mentioned above. The directory signs '11 be placed on the .wall in, the two locations shown on the attached site plan. f. Tt3: Planning Comiuissl6n , 3 in accordarfc with Sectioit''20 06.070, B.; of the 'MunicipW :Code; the folid-Aing signs are permitted for the center: Three wall signs per building, however, a multi -tenant building may have one wall 'srgn bier business; not to exceed a tot .,of 200 square feet per liuildling frontage and one ;5 squar'e fo'ct builPtrt directiiry wall' sign listing terttnts,. i. r One perpendicular sign ( i.e. roof,'projecting, or monument) per building or building .,site, of to exceed 200 square feet. Exception PermitN6. 39'allowed three mibm rents signs on the subject par�;el, one of which was to be located on the westerly side of'ttie center fronting on, Newport Boulevard. This monument sign was to, permanently replace the existing temporary sign located at the westerly side,of the plaza The approved two=faced sign'(containing.appr6i imately 175± square feet)' consisted of a logo of Via Lido Plaza on, top, with'signs identifying the major tenants below the logo. Themonument sign was approved to m dhhaln a`height of 25 feet. Although approved, the sign has not yet been installed. _ r Tlic 'applicant is now proposing'to substitute the previously aooroved monument sign with a new 25 foot high monument sign that resembles a sail boat; with tbe'Aenants listed on one sail, and Pavilions Place and Via Lido Plaza listed on the other sail. Via. Lido Plaza will also be Identified on the base of the monume'fif'Mgn " The`'proposed .sign contains approximately. 175 square feet (similar to that of the previously approved sign). However, the rn osed location 'of this monument sign,has'lieeri :han'"ed ,from `its``ori final approved P, pg , g PP iocatibn (approximately in'the'rniddle of"the Newp'6tt�Boui6vard frontage -width) toa�new location at the intersection of Finley Avenue° and Newport: Boulevard. The City Traffic Engineer. has indicated concern over this location, inasmuch as there is a considerable amount oftbicycle and foot tr4 c'cressing F�nley'Avenue in the `southb©ur d=clirPpt an, antl the pr6po°i6d IoCation ifiL' ree=standing `sign` is in'tl a dhect.line 6Usight'for vehicles on zhe east side of New Boulevard and does not conform to City STD-110 L:_ A condition' h, been�add ,d to'Exhibit "' 'that'limtts airy signage-'at venue and:New )'Or! Boulevard'to the'move n ted `stand U'II R 6 'S SS' t. e11e11 Ja 1212{ ` t E r 1`, , r l r 311i! In accordance with Section 20.06.090E of the Newport Beach,Municipal Code; yin order -to_ grant an exception permit, the PIanning Commission must find that the granting of such permit is necessary to protect a substantial .property .rig 't;'swill nt�t be' contrary° th'..tl e purpose of, Chapter 20.06, and, will. not be materially° detrimental' td� tile' 'liealtlt,^ of ty, comfort or, 'general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood, or detrimental or injurious to property or, improvements in the neighborhood, or to the genera)Velfare of the (~.pity. 1 r TO: Plg commission:- 4 7 In respo1.nse_td,the, above requirements, the applicant has:submitted.the following statements in support of the application: r r , Vyjly `�w�ll time, proposal ,not be con j� ry to the put�ose`ordinance`t "In keeping,withjhe intent of;ihe igi ordi:nanse, this prgaptisai l }will eliminate quantity cf. signs and eliminat, clutter. Also; thisr Will; c`stablish 'a unified, planned theme ; for ,secondary; signage." 2. Mat exceptional or eit a .din g cir instances are idvolved? "Several tenant leaseholds are.located in a,smallT area ..,AlSo,,parking lots,, are located on'two opposite,sides,of the:property" _ z 3 Why te an excenliAn ne�rmtt neCgSSatV to prr%= a 'suhst ntial ,nr'ope lri r "individual tenant sign will cause substantial damage W walls, clutter the area and possibly, he;inconsistentwith .the t)aenje pi the cente}. 4. Wh will the posal not be dexrimental tot neighborhood? `'' n ' design is; complinientary to,.the,surrounding environment and in, keeping with the ,nautical theme. of Via Lido.': , Spf,ljfic Firdinp-s,and.Reggrnmgnditions U is-; th estaffs opinion that, the, amendment to the existing sign prgram i5 a'`reasohAble request: inasmuch; as; the subject tenant spaces,are located. on the'interior of the shopping Center and, are>in yery c lose„ proximity to, one 4nother.`; < f'y �r ��rf €,It as also, siaffs ,opinion ffi the deign of;the proposed signs will t o to harmony with the architecture: of•the:build pgs,r nhaz�cing the general appearance, of tine c�eve1opinenL' = � t ( r t;' I I" j ,Should the Planning Ggmmission wish to approve this appucation ,as proposed, tine f h ings and conditions set forth in the attached lubit "�`t are suggested �} lit is�staffs opuuon .that na findings; for denial may re�sonatily be made in this case, and therefore no eicliili{'for denial has been provided. However, should information be,presegte+d at.the pueetang which would warrant the denial of this application, .the Planning' Commission 'may wish to take ,..1 ,ri:. 4J P�1 Y>, +� I .%•�;S tf �t{r•{='i � ,1 t_-.• PLA I IEPA.RTMENT , JAI►E ]p: yHWICI�ER, Directmr a (C= -;By f 4�•i �_ � �, x! ��.i ��li ��)7 (3'j {, !'t s'.,f..+i'� � ' : `� i ., 'Jf •' DANA O ASi:A l Associate Planner .t, uses. 2. That the proposed signs will not have any significant environmental impact. 3. That the proposed tenant directory signs represent a reasonable request considering the close proximity of the subject tenant spaces. �� r�'t ♦+,ram ,vn. F Q curr ty[IvtAr ` ' �•/ M1�' low 4r l Lt S�''s r• 'r �' M � 1 ry ROLL CALL t. I140Ek S. a owing a is ion netweEn Me Flanning OrnmiStIon a, IiRr'' Gomez Yndicated `that "the applicants intend to install a smaller` ; k "sigh'` than the previous pylon "sign 'that was located on; the 4ite, In response to a posed by Commissioner Meriil[regttrding question the Security Pacific Bank Building, Mr: Gomez, ,explained! that uniform signage on said building will be considered ,wiaen the ; ileve opment 'plans concerning-, are completed and sul?mittedto the City:' - - 4 i Motion was made and voted on to approve Exception Permit No Motion , All Ayes 3`r+'subject to. the findings and -conditions in Exhibit "A%' including modified' Condition' No: 4 as ''prdviously stated'. :Mt TiO'N CARRIED. FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed signs will be compatible with surrounding land `uses: j That{ tNe `proposed' "signs ' will ,- not have : any significant environmental `im'pact. 3 ' That the proposed sign program;_ as approved, represents 'a { reasonat. a request! cdnsidering � the size of the shoppirg ` center and he'number of tenants: 4. That the proposed signs maintain a unifiedi design �whieh is compatible with the architecture of the building 'and will serve, to'ea}iancethe overall.appearance.+of the center. ' j" ? fitrnQ -6f this 'exception, °per. mit ev►11 not be' 5. - l6i �tiie' `& 0 G ai`flit 7, i 0 - contrary t6-tl a purpose of Cfiaptdt 20:05 of the:1 Municipal Code and will not.'bc `materit lly"d`etritnei tal to the health, ;safety, contort or general welfare of persons �estdiOg`in'th neighborhood; bi'detrimentaf �6i`P,snjurious to property or ; ne { a in the neighborhood, or bi.1 te;`general ,'improvements ;a'welfae''`df th`e'C�fy.; J 1yy i {7 6; That the approvai''af this exception permij is' nee s ary to E protect a substantial propertyright and:wrlt nptercgntrary t to the purpose of 'Chapter 20.06,of'`the Municipal, ` S, (Sign Ordinance), and will not be nmenalty detrimental t j ,1 C 1 jjjj : f It J, 990 MMIS§1ONlE�t$ ,� A MIN TM s .. ROLL;' CAI:L ;'` .CNOty Pe bealtlt, safety, orPfort o geg: ,r, ,i#r att, O 'persons t residing in the,neighborhood, ar detrimeritall ar injurious "to rq or`-,.itn rgv.pT nts in the neighborhood, ol� to the „p Pam; P. :.. ,� general welfare of "the City. ONDIDONS 1: 'Iinat development shall be�in substant 4� ,onfbimance with the: approved plot plan ;and elevations;, picept as note below. 2.: 'That the applicant shalt obtain appropriate peren�ts Issued' by the Building Department for the proposed signs. 3. That the applicant sliall obtain an encroachment perm it;for t rated an the Ji is along Vi banners to , . �. P� ,ga , the existing Lido. 4. That the height of the; , monument sign ;shall be' in accordance with the Agreement executed between i the prolyerty ,owner, and; the: City dated February 22,1990 ' (i.e. a maximum height of:25 feet,." Tbat all monument,aigns<shall be built or relocated in :.. ;accordance, with Standard-l�? L, unless otherwise approved by, the City "Traffic:lEngineer Ev!ston:No, 934;.(P�bl�c Heafm? _ ;. ; Item No.2 S :Request tq ... ubdivide an ex}sttog,lot into a single pucel of lod R934 3 , fort a tv�p farm eside}t}ialA c¢ntio�ntnym purposes an pfopecty } Approved ;_located:' il�,t�3C;,t. -`"< LOCATION.;; f•,,l,at 115, k 7, River Section; located ;at+. F 9 I 1 5... 4.l i n cd , a; 7 f „3,711; esc lb�a Boulevard, s on they southwes erly side est Balboa BoulOar{d, between 37th Street an tit Street, ih Nest } :)New pqr • _ { t 4 Ord ff:, zoN , ,, a ` 4 1 7 t #" t , I?xoplion Permit No. 39 (Amended) (Discussion) ra No.6 l Request to amend a previously approved exception permit which t:F`w,-39A permitted the installation of various identification signs for each tenant in two of the multi -tenant buildings and three freeawnding�>ntIa to monument signs in the Via Lido Plaza Shopping Center, located in-n-i the C-1-H District. The proposal includes the deletion: of various identification signs for tenants, to be replaced by 2 tenant directory wail signs. LOCATION: Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Maly 85-1 (Resubdivision No. 516), located at 3417-3475 i Via Lido, on the :southerly side of Via Lido, I between Newport Boulevard and Via Oporto, ! I in Via lido Plazsr. ZONE: C- I-H APPLICANT: Young Electric Sign Company, Ontario OWNER: Fritz Duda Company-, Orange James Hcwicker, Planning Director, recommended that the c,ubject application by continued to the meeting of August 8, 1.991, inasmuch as the applicant has been requested to resubmit accurate plans to reflect the precise location of the proposed monument sign. Motion * The motion was made and voted 'on to continue this item to the All Ayes August 8, 1991, Planning Commission meeting. MOTION CARRIED. sf, Permit No, 3420 (Continue(lPublk Hearing) Item No.7 Request to. per`'rri4 he conversion of . an existing legal, UP3420: nonconforming duplex whl Beds the height allowed in the 24/28 Height Iamitation Zone an exceeds 1..5 times the R957 buildable area of the site, into u two unit resi ci�dominium !Vproved project on property located in the R-2 District. =14- &BUILDING DEPARTMENT _PARKS & RECREATION X POLICE DEPARTMENT _MARINE SAFETY —GRADING APPLICATION OF: Young Electric Sign Company FOR: Exception Permit No. 39 (Amended) DESCRIPTION: Request to amend a previously approved exception permit which permitted the installation of various identification signs for each tenant in two of the multi -tenant buildings and three freestanding monument signs in the Via 1. ido Plaza Shopping Center, located in the C-1-H District. The proposal includes the deletion of various identification signs for tenants, to be replaced by 2 tenant directory wall signs. LOCATION: Parcel No. 1 of parcel Map 85-1 (Resubdivision No. 516), located at 3417-3475 Via Lido, on the southerly side of Via Lido, between Newport Boulevard and Via Oporto, in Via Lido Plaza. REPORT REQUESTED BY: July 8, 1991 COMMISSION REVIEW: July 18, 1991 COMMENTS: BUILDING DEPARTMENT' -'ARKS & RECREATION CX POLICE DEPARTMENT MARINE SAFETY —GRADING APPLICATION OF: Young Electric Sign Company FOR: Exception Permit No. 39 (Amended) &PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X P1_ANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RLTIURN) 2LTRAEFIC ENGINEER X,FIRE DEPARTMENT —PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING Ill YT, lz..,t>t4 ._.PARKS &` RECRE�.TION ,POLICE DEPARTMENT -MARINE SAFETY _..GRADING APPLICATION OF Young Electric Sign Company FOR: Exception Permit No. 39 (Amended) DESCRIPTION: Request to amend a previously approved exception permit which permitted the installation of various identification signs foc, each tenant in two of the multi -tenant buildings, and three freestanding monument signs in the Via Lido Plaza Shopping APPLICATION OF: Young Electric Sign Company FOR: Exception Permit No. 39 (Amended) DhSCRIPTION: Request to amend a previously approved exception permit which permitted the installation of various identification signs for each tenant in two of the multi -tenant bu dings and three freestanding monument signs in the Via Iado Plaza Shopping Center, located in the C-1-H District_ The proposal includes the deletion of various identification signs for tenants, to be replaced by 2 tenant directory, wall signs, Off- _ J v.- Paw' m� vt� , ` s • I off-►. �- �- �u S6�I ,t f ' F r, Y' 1� ti i �4� 1 v Y ...... S Y1 x�, .. MA,iDR 375 97 J7 ,' /3 PR/MaRY 450 25 25.. /3` ,CCONDARY jYO- 76 48 LOCAL 200 1. O © O Iva op 64a1 (rYo ) G GC � �j".r�lCCM• 1, The Limited Use Area is 'determined by the graphical method using the appro-, priate distances given in the,above table.' It shall be used for the purpose of prohibiting or clearing obstructions in order to maintain adequate sight distance at intersections. ;. 2. The Line of Sight line shall be shown at intersections on all landscaping plans, grading plans, and tentative tract plans cohere safe sight distance is ` questionable. In cases where an intersection is located on a vertical curve, a profile of the sight line may be required. 3. Walls or any obstructions that could restrict the view within the Limited Use Area shall not be permitted. { 4. The toe of the slope shall not encroach into the Limited U:;v Area, 5. The Limited Use Area shall be as near level as possible yet maintain proper drainage..: 6. Plants and shrubs shall be of the type that will grow no higher than 24 inches above,the ground within the Limited Use Areas. i ME 7. Points A and A' cre.the locations.of a driver's line of sight while in a vehicle at an intersection 10 feet back from the projection of.the prep- erty line. 'The distance .,Yis the distance measured from the centerline of is the road to the far right through traffic lane. The:distance Y' is equal to zero for T-intersections, y' 8. The distance S repr•esents.the safe stopping sight distance measured along the cente'r�l i rie of the road. 9. Points C'and C' are 'the `locations (centerline of the travel lanes) where the driver of, vehicle, traveling it a given speed, has the minimum stopping . sight distance required to: bring his vehicle to a safe stop. i,' 41 1PC1'� �. EC411-24L/N�. �.• �' t/.ver cw pi�sir xve,' ,Zl/CP,E9 OE9/c9N arzwY / Ol' aea'a e /,V ew 4 jo : ka SIGHT DISTANCE i'C- OR BICYCLE PATHS 1 26v C rd,96W.9 ' E3! G / f'2 �2G. r *� A� l^® A,�+ y�,l Y: OF IYE��,VTiT;.; BEA CH tN2kiMN: PATE " +I ,� . PUBLIC. VYaRKS alwPARTM NT PUBLIC waR�cs=a E _ , /1U'T� R 7fi c d,IV s,� 1 � �" .. .4S.zA FOR: Exception Permit No. 39 (Amended) DESCRIPTION: Request to amend a previously approved exception permit which permitted the installation of various identification signs for each tenant in two of the multi -tenant buildings and three freestanding monument signs in the Via Lido Plaza Shopping Center, located in the C-1-H District. The proposal includes the deletion of various identification signs for tenants, to be replaced by 2 tenant directory wall signs. LOCATION: Parcel No. 1 of parcel Map 55-1 (Resubdivision No. 516), —--.._� 'WA417 9A17C V:— 7 ..l.. al... -.at. —A.. ..i . —C A/.,— 5 June 26, 1991 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARrMMENT SUBJECT: EXCEPTION PERMIT NO. 39 (Amended) FINDINGS & CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FI27DIIlGS 1. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at largo for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 2. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.06.090 of the Municipal Code. CON DITIONS :_ 1. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 2. That the proposed sign for the Newport Boulevard frontage be constructed behind sidewalk far enough to provide sight distance when exiting the existing driveway in accordance with City Standard Plan 110-L for Major Highways. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. APPLICATION OF: 14OR: Young Electric Sign Company Exception Permit No. 39 (Amended) DESCRIPTION: Request to amend a previously approved exception permit which permitted the installation of various identification signs for each tenant in two of the multi -tenant buildings and three freestanding monument signs in the Via Lido Plaza Shopping Center, located in the C-1-H District. The proposal includes the deletion of various identification signs for tenants, to be replaced by 2 tenant directory wall signs. LOCATION: Parcel No. 1 of parcel Map 85-1 (Resubdivision No. 516), located at 3417-3475 Via Lido, on the sout!wrly side of Via (p Via WO Phil, a bnd=6 commcrci:l propcnty Bldg. A P.Mirna Pbcr of We M1�;t t S S.P. u Me en•ame to hilt u ?eninsula in Ncwpon Wk B Sheps harbor, conuitu-proximatcly 62,O0 squarc WX C Vis Lido DrugXj* ! i . 10 S.P. S 1P;K paQart tlpgl �; feet d pri,Ise reta , ice space. nic project Bw& _0 Irdanuft Lido 71>b z �� ' Q,TiX1 S P; t a is whored by Pxyltons Fbce Supemurka, Bldg, E Senui�it;ty Pa�saac 2 S97 F. S Pik it t gi 9g; ; t s idwa;ds Yia Udo Cm4w, and Security Pacific 7rtu) «�, ¢ Dank, and Reny other fax quality retailers. 62,442 SA fGae6ald Lnooare Leerc4tt I gm bag 574.Al `a VIALIDD ✓ > r in In OD J� . g • � � .r:. , it ��•,� g `Y:' d i y H s• I. .�'�,4 .t �, ntly1� '01: • ! r ` �� t 7` ,'� •;�a �y,���' j" f strlr fir{ 7,.v} Y �rr: �1,� •s, 'i ''�` �• L; .~ },� -.7X ; C h •,� 4 f ., �,i Yr ,,•�-r . { 'fir,. ,•t+�� :'�: r4.:kt ? P �•t _. .a:.. <-�. .l�.e�l..1f i.r.i' .V^, LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL. 1: PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK SS PAGES 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAPS, Its THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. f .PARCEL 4: A NON—EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT OVER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIDED PROPERTY: THAT PORTION OF SECTION 281 TOWNSHIP b, SOUTH, IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OFsORtINGE, nESCRIBFD AS: RANGE 10 WEST, S. B. B. & M. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THE WESTERLY 180 FEET OF THE' NORTHERLY 50 FEET OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN A QUITCLAIM DEED TO THE CITY OF NE!WPORT 13EACH RECORDED IN BOOK 1011, P►',GE 379 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY. �� � �� ��� � � �07