HomeMy WebLinkAboutM2013-0006 - Alternative Material & Methods1" Q m- boon
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECE1VE0 $y
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY
BUILDING DIVISION MAR 12 2013
3300 Newport Boulevard I P.O. Box 1768 1Newport Beach, CA 92658
www.newoortbeachca.gov_ 1(949) 644-3275
CASE NO.:
REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION TO PROVISIONS
OF TITLE 15 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL
CODE
(See Reverse for Basis for Approval) (Fee $257)
❑ REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE MATERIAL
OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION
(See Reverse for Basis for Approval) (Fee $257)
❑ REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM DISABLED
ACCESS DUE TO PHYSICAL OR LEGAL
CONSTRAINT (Fee $6,494)
(Ratification by the Board of Appeals will be required.)
For above requests, complete Sections 1, 2 & 3
below by printing In ink or typing.
JOB ADDRESS:
SITE ADDRESS: 4AO W . Bmv Avc.
Owner Ntnri 4 H>.6e Ift'L4 Ct..6
Address a ao V4. bay A..c .
Ntwre.•I BLAeI,, CA Zip i.ir.61
Daytime Phone ( 44 4) 6 4 3- a a i o
P-'\, DEVELOPMENT `,r
®
®� FA°EWPORT a�4
III FOR STAFF USE ONLY III
Plan Check # a 7. "- 2,0 I's # of Stories N /A.
Occupancy Classification
14
UseofBuilding Lmrt
M . # of Units
Project Status ,F! M n
+i rj [—
ConstructionType 'l�li fi
Verified by 'trig
No. of Items I
Fee due Jk 7 G -7
DISTRIBUTION:
❑ Owner
❑ Plan Check
❑ Petitioner
❑ Inspector
❑ Fire
❑ Other
PETITIONER ADDRESS:
Petitioner 6t14[w.ae. Liesta 6."r Bw7 lev
fPeUHonect or engineer) r
Address aSoe V,& C,:60la N..1ne. �Ve..Po
Sa„ Qae(vt . CA Zip 40a31
Daytime Phone ( Ste) f Y S - 31 ZO.
I Z I REQUEST: Submit plans if necessary to illustrate request Additional sheets or data may be attached. II
3 USTIFICATION/FINDINGS OF EQUIVALENCY: CODE SECTIONS: Cry . f Ive—r--+ I
1 feaely — }\Avb.e s?D 4taala»
e4 A 4 A me In... a..'f il..k. t.e.( r4. t\
II
II Position 5e..r.. r,-.,,..ta. I
Petitioners e
Signature We 74rCf4s CA Professional Lic. # c S. e o t 9 Date Na.e4 11 . We 19
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
DEPARTMENT ACTION: In accordancewith: ❑ CBC Appendix 104.11 CBC Appendix 104.10
(Alternate materials & methods) W (CBC Modification)
❑ Concurrence from the Fire Marshal is required. ❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved ❑ Written Comments Attached
By: Dale
❑ Request (DOES) (DOES NOT) lessen any fire protection requirements.
❑ Request (DOES) (DOES NOT) lessen the structural integrity
The Request is Granted ❑ Denied (See reverse for
❑ Granted (Ratification required) appeal Information)
Conditions of Approval:
Signatt Posili /
Print Name - of 4:..
APPEAL OF DIVISION ACTION TO THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS (See Reverse)
(Signature, statement of owner or applicant. statement of reasons for appeal and filing fees are required.)
CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER:l'[�f��F�xa C� Fonns{regmodif 01126/12
Guidelines for Approval of Alternate Materials, Design and Methods of
Construction
Basis For Approval
For the Building Official and Fire Marshal or their designated agent to approve a request for modification or a
request for alternate material or method of construction, he/she must determine that special, individual reasons
exist that make compliance with the strict letter of the Code impractical and that equivalency is provided. The
resulting condition must be in conformance with the spirit and purpose of the Code provisions involved and that
such modification does not lessen fire protection, structural integrity or occupant safety. The applicant must provide
sufficient information with this application to allow the above evaluation to be made.
Reguirements for Submittals ^
The applicant design professional shall prepare a Written Report that describes the alternate proposal along with the
applicable data listed below-,
• State specific code provisions for which altemative is requested and why request is being submitted.
• Describe by code section those provisions for which alternative is desired.
• Compare the proposed alternative versus the code requirements in terms of structural strength, suitability,
effectiveness, fire resistance, safety.and health impacts affecting the building or user of the building.
• Demonstrate that the proposed altemative is compatible with balance of code requirements.
• When applicable, specify how authoritative consensus document(s) are used to substantiate proposal.
(Reference draft ICC Building Performance Code Commentary Section 1.4.2:3 for background information).
• Provide assumptions, references, and documentation of evaluation methods utilized. This includes intended
use, input data, anticipated outputs, and limitations of computer models and other analytical tools or methods.
• Specify when and where special inspection and testing are required and the standards of acceptance for
demonstrating compliance. Show how the proposed alternate, if accepted, will be identified on the job site.
• Where land use restrictions and building setbacks are required, deed restrictions may be an appropriate
method to ensure continued compliance.
• State how and where alternate proposal is incorporated within construction plans and prepare plan
amendments as necessary. The design professional has the responsibility to coordinate all construction
documents and ensure compatibility between documents.
• The report and design documents shall be dated, signed and stamped by the design professional according to
the plan submittal procedure.
• For alternate methods of design requests, the applicant shall set performance criteria for his design.
Performance criteria shall be reviewed, amended and approved by the Building Official prior to start of design.
Alternative Desian ReviewNerifieation
The Building Official has the responsibility to review design submittals for compliance to'the adopted codes and
procedures. if the Building Official does not have the expertise on staff -to make a thorough and competent review,
the Building Official shall select a consultant that possesses the necessary qualifications to perform a third -party or
peer review. Cost of peer review shall be paid by applicant to the Building Department prior to commencing the
review.
• Verify that all applicable information and justifications listed above as requirements for submittals is received and
verify that evaluation and design methods used by designer are appropriate to the alternative proposed.
• Verify products ' are being used in accordance with their listing conditions as required by recognized listing
agencies. If not available, require documentation and/or testing to demonstrate compliance with intent of code
and intended use.
• Evaluate performance of material and possible flaws that could affect performance of material in its installed
state.
• The reviewer shall document that the submittal has been reviewed and accepted as meeting the alternative
materials, design, and methods of construction provisions of the code_ If the Building Official is not satisfied that
the applicant has met the conditions, the request should be denied in writing with the applicable reason(s).
Inspection/Field Verification
The alternate proposal as approved in the construction documents must be verified by inspection, and, where
.necessary, testing as follows:
• To verify that alternate materials, systems and fabricated products comply with accepted design criteria and the
manufacturer's and engineers installation procedures, inspectors should check product labeling, certification,
quality assurance processes, and testing, as applicable.
• When appropriate, an approved third party quality assurance inspection and testing service may be required for
continuous and complex inspection and testing activities. This is intended to verify that construction complies
With the code and the approved plans.
Appeal from the determination or action of the Building Official or Fire Marshal or their designated agent may be
made to the Building Board of Appeals. To appeal, the applicant must provide special individual reasons that make
compliance with the strict letter of the Code impractical. Appeals or ratifications pertaining -to State Disabled
Access Standards require complete evidence to substantiate that the proposed design is equivalent to that
prescribed by that standards or that due to legal or physical constraints, compliance with the standards or providing
equivalency would create an unreasonable hardship.
Appeals must be submitted on the Appeal Form available at Permit Counter accompanied by the, proper fee. You
will be notified in writing of the appeal hearing's time and date.
ATTACHMENT 1
3. JUSTIFICATION /FINDINGS OF EQUIVALENCY:
1. The City of Newport Beach — Harbor Design Criteria — Section 2.h.1.a (On page 11)(See
Attachment 1) specifies 50 psf live load for commercial Dock, Dead Load (DL)+ Live Load (LL)
freeboard of 15". Also DL min freeboard is 18" and DL max freeboard is 24"
The density of water is 64 Ibs/ft3. If you design for max 24" DL freeboard and 75% floatation
(25% is for holes on dock for pile anchor system and pontoons are not completely rectangular
and allow water flow (circulation) to prevent debris collection). When 50 psf live load is applied
to the dock, the dock will sink by 50/(0.75x64)x12" = 12.5". Hence DL+LL freeboard would be
24"-12.5"=11.5". However the Min DL+LL freeboard required per City of Newport Beach —
Harbor Design Criteria is 15". Hence it is NOT possible to achieve 50 psf live load AND DL+LL
freeboard of 15".
"Layout and Design Guideline for Marina Berthing Facilities" —July 2005 by California Dept of
Boating and Waterways (See Attachment 2) (Referred in The City of Newport Beach — Harbor
Design Criteria — Section 2.a.2 page 5)(See Attachment 1) recommends 25 psf live load and DL+
LL Freeboard of 10".
Proposed dock system allowable live load capacity is 35psf. We propose to post a sign at the
entrance of the Dock showing Max Dock Occupancy. Occupancy will be based on 200 lb/person.
Newport Harbor Yacht Club Marina is used for recreational boats (Max boat size 42'). Design DL
Freeboard of 22" is desired for these boats. General Calculation for DL+ 35 psf LL Freeboard is
22"-35/(0.75x64)x12"=13.25" Hence Min DL+LL Freeboard requested is 13" instead of 15".
The dock structure is 11.25" tall (lY2" Deck+ 9" Waler+%" Plywood Diaphragm). Pontoon
under the structure provides floatation. At DL+ LL (35 psf) the pontoon shall have at least 2"
(13"-11.25") of freeboard remaining (Reserve Buoyancy).
s This is phase two of approved plan check 1855-2012. See attached Request for
Modification to provisions of title 15 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
Case No. 2012-46. Approved Nov. 14 2012.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
WATERFRONT PROJECT GUIDELINES
0 1 SIL41 VWX 0111'' i
HARBOR DESIGN CRITERIA
COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES
r
E
1
\`/ FQ Rr/
2008 EDITION
utilized as shown, or in combination with one another, in an overall marina dock
scheme.
2. LAYOUT AND DESIGN (Commercial & Residential)
a. General
G7
� I�tio F
I�I
L6
(1) Layout and design of harbor facilities shall be based upon the use
of the facility defined as follows:
(a) Single or joint residential
(b) Multi -residential
(c) Commercial
1) Passenger
2) Recreational boat marina
(2)
(3) See the attached Harbor Standard Drawings for plans, sections
and details of typical conditions for vessel moorings and docks,
gangways, platforms, seawalls, and beach profiles. These
Standards are to be considered minimum requirements for the
cases represented and, at the City of Newport Beach Building
Department discretion, may not apply to the specific project
submitted. The Building Department reserves the right to
mandate deviation from the Standards, if particular project
conditions require special consideration.
Slip and Boat Overhang into Adjacent Fad
(1) Berths shall not be occupied by vessels more than 3 feet longer
than the berth or slip, or in the case of fairways with a 1.75 x Lb
width, not more than 10% of the length of the finger.
(2) For berths either parallel or perpendicular to a main channel,
vessels can extend beyond the limits of the slip by as much as the
beam of the boat.
h. Flotation and Freeboards:
(1) Sufficient flotation shall be provided to support dead load plus
live load with freeboards as noted below. Higher live load
requirements may be required by the City of Newport Beach,
under special circumstances as may be deemed appropriate by the
Building Department.
(a)
Exception: For alterations to existing docks, match the
original design loads and freeboards.
(b) Residential Docks: Live load of 25 pounds per square
foot with a dead plus live load freeboard of not less than
10 inches. Under dead load only, the minimum freeboard
is 14 inches, and the maximum is 24 inches.
(c) Weight of seawater, for the purposes of flotation
calculations, shall be 64 pounds per cubic foot.
(2) The flotation shall use expanded polystyrene cores. The use of
hollow pontoons shall not be allowed.
(3) Docks shall have pontoons composed of outer shells of either
concrete (1" minimum thickness) or an ultra -violet stable plastic
such as fiberglass or cross -linked polyethylene (1/8" minimum
thickness). Other alternative materials must be submitted to the
City for review and approval, per the "Request for Alternate
Material or Method of Construction" appeals process. Exposed
foam flotation is not allowed.
(4) Residential Docks: In addition to the pontoon encapsulation
types noted above, residential docks may also use spray -on
elastomeric encapsulation systems for pontoons. Spray -on
products must demonstrate resistance to ultra -violet rays, solvents
that may be present on the water surface, and environmental
conditions imposed by saltwater contact. Minimum spray -on
product thickness shall be 100 mils.
11
ATTACHMENT 2
� \ \
I
� . .
C2. Loading
C2.1 Dead Load (DL)
C2.1.1 The total dead load of a
floating dock system is the
combination of concentrated and
uniformly distributed weights of all
framing, decking, nuts, bolts,
washers, connectors, flotation
pontoons, and all permanently
attached equipment such as pipes,
lines, pumps, utilities, fuel facilities,
sewage systems, fire suppression
systems, gangways, lighting, storage
boxes, utility cabinets, etc. The determination of total dead loads should also
include the estimated weight of items that will be stored in storage boxes, and
the weight of the fluids in various utility lines and related equipment.
Dead Load on a Dock:
Electrical Transformer Cabinet
C2.1.2 Care must be taken in locating various dead load elements to insure
that flat and reasonably level deck surfaces are maintained throughout the
service life of the dock system. Overloaded storage boxes or large diameter
water lines on only one side of a dock can alter the freeboard and deck slopes.
C2.1.3 Cross slopes under dead load only shall not exceed 2% (1:50) on
docks that are part of an accessible route.
C2.1.4 The dead weight of lumber and wood timbers utilized in a floating dock
system should be assumed to weigh not less than 35 lbs. per cubic foot at
specified moisture contents following pressure treatment.
C2.2 Uniform Live Load (ULL)
25 pounds per sq ft minimum
C2.2.1 25#/ftz is a guideline that is time tested and can be relied upon to be
reasonable in its application. Floating docks in marinas should meet all
freeboard and deck slope guidelines under the minimum ULL.
C2.2.1.1 There may be circumstances in which the application of a
25#/ft2 ULL is actually in conflict with practical dock design and construction
considerations under unique local conditions.
C2.2.2 Snow and ice loads will be part of the ULL in certain locations.
Sustained snow loads and ice buildup can exceed 25#/ft2, depending on water FMI
content. These loads can linger for weeks or months unless the docks are
cleared or warmer weather returns. It is prudent to check with local authorities
for required or recommended design snow and ice loadings.
SECTION C Berthing - Page 24
C2.2.3 ULL of 40#* may be
necessary for design purposes in
marina locations where floating dock
systems are subjected to regular
and repeated high volumes of
pedestrian traffic and the movement
of goods, materials, supplies, cargo,
etc. Special events such as boat
shows where queuing for shuttles,
ferries, etc., may call for the higher
ULL on impacted marinas.
C2.3 Live Point Load (LPL)
400 pounds minimum
hign volume rt"voul- 9.4I.-
C2.3.1 Floating docks in marinas are to meet all freeboard and deck slope
requirements under a minimum LPL of 400#, applied at any point on the deck
not closer than 129 from any edge. This realistically addresses the center of
gravity of the general array of heavy objects that are likely to be roped over the
surface of, or temporarily placed upon a marina dock. A typical LPL might be an
outboard engine, stacked boxes of supplies for a cruise, or an adult person in a
heavy-duty battery -powered wheelchair. The 400# LPL will cover the majority of
typical temporary loads that are likely to occur on a marina dock.
C2.3.2 Where the application of a heavier LPL is anticipated, especially along
an accessible route, design loads require careful attention with regard to
freeboard and cross slopes.
C2.3.3 Where applied along an accessible route, the minimum 400# LPL
shall be applied concurrently with the minimum 2MM z ULL to insure that
maximum cross slopes are not exceeded.
C2.4 Lateral Loads (WinL, CL, Wavl-, IL)
Lateral loads on a dock system may result from winds, currents, waves, and
impacts. Such loads may be imparted to docks, boats tied up to docks, or both
concurrently. Such loadings may be influenced by seasonal factors that may
dictate that two or more types of lateral loads be applied concurrently.
C2.4.1 Wind loads (WinL) on the projected vertical surfaces of docks and
berthed boats should be not less than 15#/fe, applied above the water surface.
If established wind data at specific locations dictates, a higher unit WinL may b
necessary.
C2.4.2 Current loads (CL) should be calculated on the basis of the maximum
currents, flood flows, tidal flows, and/or other site -specific lateral (horizontal)
moving water loadings that can be anticipated at a given marina site. The
determination of current loads must include consideration of reversals of flow
SECTION C Berthing - Page 25
definition of "neap' cannot be
identified in terms of feet or
miles, but must be determined
by the character of the river
itself, including bends, tangents,
forks, stream flows, velocities,
levee characteristics and the
presence of other physical
features that influence where
quantities of debris would likely
flow during a flood event.
C2.5.2 Wildlife loadina can occur in E
marinas, involving ducks, geese, sea lions, harbor seals and other natural
residents that live in and near the water. When such a condition occurs with
wildlife, it can cause partial or total shutdown of a marina. Along the coast
where certain marine animals are protected by federal law, and enforced by
NOAA Fisheries, it may be very difficult or illegal to remove wildlife from docks
and boats for certain periods of time. When such events occur in a marina,
solutions can usually be worked out cooperatively with personnel from federal,
state and local environmental authorities.
.lea Lions In oomb
W
bea Dons on uoacs
h
fi Ac'
SECTION C Berthing - Page 27
ATTACHMENT 3
INEWPORT HARBOR YACHT CLUB DOCK REHABILITATION -PHASE II
T-1 TITLE SHEET
L-0 PHASE I APPROVED PLAN CHECK
HARBOR DESIGN CRITERIA STANDARD DRAWING SHEET 01
HARBOR DESIGN CRITERIA STANDARD DRAWING SHEET 02
HARBOR DESIGN CRITERIA STANDARD DRAWING SHEET 03
HARBOR DESIGN CRITERIA STANDARD DRAWING SHEET 04
HARBOR DESIGN CRITERIA STANDARD DRAWING SHEET 05
L-1 EXISTING OVERALL DOCK LAYOUT
L-2 DOCK LAYOUT
L-3 FLOAT LAYOUT - I
L-4 FLOAT LAYOUT - 2
L-5 FRAMING PLAN
L-6 FRAMING LAYOUT DETAILS - 1
L-7 FRAMING LAYOUT DETAILS - 2
L-8 SECTIONS & DETAILS
P-0 PLUMBING NOTES
P-1 PLUMBING LAYOUT & DETAIL
FP-0 FIRE PROTECTION NOTES
FP-1 FIRE PROTECTION LAYOUT
FP-2 CLASS 3 FIRE PROTECTION DETAILS
E3.0 ELECTRICAL NOTES, LAYOUT & SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM SOUTHLAND ENERGY
CONSULTANTS
E2.0 ELECTRICAL DETAILS SOUTHLAND ENERGY CONSULTANTS
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
SITE ADDRESS:
720 WEST BAY AVENUE,
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92629
OWNER:
NEWPORT HARBOR YACHT CLUB
720 WEST BAY AVENUE
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92661
ATTN: TOM HOGAN
ENGINEER:
TIM BAZLEY, P.E.
BLUEWATER DESIGN GROUP
2500 VIA CABRILLO MARINA, SUITE 200
SAN PEDRO, CA 90731
(310) 548-3132 - VOICE
(310) 548-1924 - FAX
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
REPLACE EXISTING FLOATING DOCK WITH SIMILAR NEW DOCK.
MAINWALK WIDTH INCREASED FROM 4' TO 6TO MEET CURRENT
HARBOR STANDARDS. EXISTING PILE TO REMAIN IN PLACE.
a�C l 511 .•. n.5 9 W an PE r ' gg T�1 �fi
,3E9994�r.V`D
(�i (N)
N 19h4 ..
CD.e@>y
I'L fi IIdO Uf < e
.y,
•`b ub�WwM
litlbltle
�%n
�.. it I�d,�
uxwne
a�E
a
wmn
4YM rr a0r
.y,., mwry:
tiv^@� r ate.Wyary"
A.
ya a y -
a Po 13 5
98aihW4 WI[Oaa L
„^M1N4
B41eon PrN4xww riNlpgllM N`y"'yn r'W
w� 4Y14e
HI
�
o.y' A
LWILA,a wIW
I.1
t
Nan4oi! 4
6 b I.Al
W�'^n 9xY1 'T d
ern.,
SWMm4
A T
SITE LQI*IIbN
Eat>(
Bnwoq PFMNSVl6
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT LOCATION AERIAL IMAGE
NOT TO SCALE
GRAPHIC SCALE
e o 15 32
Y'=1e'
PROJECT CONTRACTOR m
NEWPORT HARBOR oP"..1 84 2500 Via Cabrillo Marina, Sulte 200
AS NOTED. 02-14-13
SHELLMAKER INC. ��, q �, SanPedro,G90]31
YACHT CLUBr Tel: 310 MO 3132 2283-D
837 W. 17TH ST N. C d• lTITLE SHEET
� 720 W. BAY AVE. +r EXP.s 3a A3 1J � ax: 310 sae 132a Pr r-1
NEWPORT BEACH CA COSTA MESA, CA 92627 PV1 PaovivgevdEvgvee vgBeMcee JH .tee
T qYE 0r cnt1 '� Por Yerlvef and llatertroat Reeorle TB
95, 95'-6/2"
19' 6" 4'-31 15'-6" 4'-3' 14'-6" 4'-J" 14-6" 4'-J 19'-6112" 14'-6" 4'-3" 15'-6" 4'-J" 14'-6" 4'-J"
n NM��Iry j
F I
Ox ZL IL j
fl '�
5
Yp i��ry Rr. NO
3 a.
n'
Am/
b b
e e
'v
J4'-]1/2" 14'-4/2" INSTALL NEW FLOATNG DOCK
REMOb£ £XISNNG R.OARNG DOCK (1,]00 SO.. FT) PHASE ll = 1, 700 SO.. FL
�" ■ n �• ■ tj
v v
4'
a
■ ■
V d
EXISTING 12" 50. CONE PILE TO REMAIN (TIP.)
12' SQ.. GONG PILE TO REMAIN
30' a 104 30'
N
6'-3" a 6•-3"
I
Y
h it
■ 1n ■ i�
EXISTING FLOATING BOCK TO REMAIN IN PLACE (1,J01 50. FT.)
JSnNG437GANGAY EXISTING FLOATING DOCK TO REMAIN IN PLACE (1,301 Sq. FT) EXI511NC 4k3Y GANGWAY
N �
I
R
PIER
ENI511NG PIER
a�PILE
£XIS]]NC 'Y-PILE
C
�FTOTAL EXISTING DOCK AREA f,300 50. FL
VEXISRNC 4x3J GANGWAY AREA 146 S0. FT.
V-
TING a TOTAL WATER CO4£RAGE = I,51HS0. FT.GNG
CAT£ ENISATEDEAIOLIiIINJ SCOPF CqTFDNc ( BE REOLD = I, J00 S0. FT.`ACE 5' 5•17OP LOxTOTAL WATER AREA COLRAGE TO BE INSTALLED = 1.700 SO,, FL
EYFSits 6OCK L4 MU -PRi
NEWPORT HARBOR YACHT CLUB DOCK 3 SITE LAYOUT GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE 1"=10'
PROJECT CONTRACTOR xw h
NEWPORT HARBOR SHELLMAKER INC. 0 Fvs g ! 2500 Via Cabrillo Marina, Suite 200
�o� San Peara, CA 90733 AS NOTED 02-14-13
YACHT CLUB w m Teh 310 948 3132 2283-D
837 W. 17TH ST �' Ra. 5001a AwI31054819M DOCK LAYOUT
720 W. BAY AVE. txP.A PT L-2
NEWPORT BEACH CA COSTA MESA/ CA 92627
sr �P rlmw¢1 ma s¢9w. rbt3 s.ma.. ,�.,.
/ 4� aF cAUFW'a Aor Yetiv a aad Aatertro¢t Re.orle ey TB TB
RECEIPT NUMBER.: 08000001088
RECEIVED BY: SYAMADA
PAYOR.:
BLUEWATER.
DESIGN
TODAY'S DATE: 03/12/13
REGISTER DATE:
03/12/13
TIME: 11:25
29005002 PLAN CHECK. FEES
MODIFICATION 720 W
BAY AV
$2.57.00
TOTAL DUE:
-------------------
$257.00
$2S7.00
$.00
CHECK $257.00
REF NUM: 1797