The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1 SUNRISE - SOILSmil LOir 4000 AU. 10 1 f 14 f .�4tstiLKl err INC PAGE 03I0& January 30, 20as Profect 3392-8I Paradise pools 176$6 Coninnei Way IUVerside, California 92504 Attention: Mx, AleX .Logo Subject: Geotec finical Evaluation Report Proposed Cabana Coustructi n I Sunrise Ne ort Cow Caiifarrua Dear Mr. Lugo: M—MODUC a) As requested, we are the -requested, sed a are Pt oAding this letter o f California. 'twtion at Your r rty l ioal d in Newport ti Cofor. Property p located � Newpb� C b) We venders ast' over a basemen that �e p�posed construction wYIX include a sm, gle�stoxy cabana G) We have visited the sit® to observe the exi ftg 2• CON'CLUSXOr S condition AIVO RECO N"I)A JONS 2.1 Ge�al a) ".is our opinion that the site will be �' a geotechnical suitable far the proposed develo hnplamented during co coon, tang that our recotYunendations are b} We are of the opinion that the stxuc spread footungs, founded in the underl � cow be ' '°xt d on shallow c} We are also Fetent soils. of the opinion that with due and real Proposed Gon$'Mction will not a oz�able construction be axfboted adverselyfinger adjacent p1eoaut�ions, the 6y acljaMmg prop operty ttor will 2712 ryoa Avama,, 7it�tin, 4Callfnrnie 92780 ffica (71q) StlS-"M Fax (714)105.80 -nteil: glab"'C4A'OhuleXp.nOt rJGf VJlf tCJCJCY lYJ: lb 1 f14ld4titiYb LTI INC Paradise Pools Jan.tiary 30, 2008 Project 3392-81 Page 2 PAGE 04/08 d) The design rocommendations in, the mport phase when soil cortditiotts in the excavations becomeOWd be exposed, Mding ring the e) The earthwork operations should be observed by a representative of a geoteclunical engineer. 2i gEaAft 2.2.1 . rocess�f pQ�Site Soils a) No Overexcavation below the opos necessary, subject to review during cot,atructloned otings is deemed b) The subgrade soils below the proof rolled prior to the concret pour. slab -on -grade should be c) Any loosening of reworked or native material, conscgUent to the Passage of coangmction tMffic, weathering, etc., should be. made good prior to further construction. 2.2.2 a pr ial Selection Aber the site has been stripped of any debris, excavated on -site soils are considered satisfactory for reuse in the constructionof on -site fills, with the following provisions: a) No organic contents are perrnitted in the fail soils; b) Concrete pieces or rocks greater than 4 inches in diameter should not be incorporated in compacted fill below slab�on-grade. 213 Comtiactioa lteQ»ements a) kewmJci g/compaction shall include inoistareoac -c�tio»ing/dtyin optimum as needed to bring the soils to slightly above the optimmoisturecontent. A,ll reworked soils attd structural Tills should be densifxed to achieve at least 90 percent relative compadion with refdrence to laboratory compaction standard. The optimum moisture content and MaXiMum dry density should be detemmined in the laboratory iuu WCOWance with A,STM Test Designation D1557. b) .Till should be compacted in lifts not exceeding 8 inches (loose). gar et i znatJ 1 b; l b 1 114 l848828 LTI INC PAGE 05I00 Paradise Fools January 30, 2008 F, Oject 3392.gl Page 3 2.2.4 Excava �onditaians E�'cavatian aF on -site ea.rthmoving Or trenching eluipment, s May be accomplished vAth standard 2.2.5 Sulph to Ctmten, �'lae sulphate exposure for the sub soils should be tested d ode soils May be s'"ere. ne subgrade sulphate contents. �g the final stage of grading to verify the 2.2.7 gWiMCo� l AlI grading and earthWork should be Ceotechnical E neer in order to icy° ed urtclor the observation Of selection. of satisfactory materials proper subgrade structural fill. g , Placezaaent and � px'ePm'a4on, Sufficient notification prior to s compaction of all instruction is essential to make certain that the w r 'r and e.RA +vork observ0d and tested. work 'will be adequately 2.3 flab-on�ade a} Concrete floor slabs may be founded on the reworked compacted fill. The subgrade existing soils or hon�ction mpedlProvidea � should be proofropedas been loosened by thepassage , unyielding su rbee especially, prior to passe a of if the surface g construction tr2►f�fiic. b) We understand that the slab are acceptable froxn a fini will be re inrced center, both ways and will be 5 inches thick. with #3 bars on 1$.,inch reinio.Ircenient eotec ni The slab thiclmess and the .g cal paint of view. G) The subgrade should be ,kept moist prior to the concrete pour 2.4 ad Foundations . re The proposed sutures can be Founded on shallow Presented as follows should be adopted; spread footings. The criteria 2-4.1 Dluxensions/lsmbedtzxent Number OfStoriet Minimym Wtdtb� Olean: xupported .Minimum Footing -edm 7'dk nesR Minimum i~iuubednr�eut (in) flow Lowest P9nisl�ed (;rode 12 1.5 7 it) 1.5 tJZt Ul I ZUtjti 1 J: lb 1 (14 tJ48820 LTT INC Paradise Pools January 30, 200S Project 3392.s f Page 2.4.2 ,Allowable B is Ca avi (Notes: EmbWMjMt Depth (�) Allowable king Capacity 1.5 (II 11100 PAGE 06/0B • These values mareased . loads, such as induced by wind oars Weone-flforjrd inCe5; the Gasp ofshort-duration �or The allowable bearing capacity additional foot fncrea in the may be increased by 20 2,500 lb/fit; width or in the depth to a percent for each. maximum value of * At least 4x#4 baea should be at the bottom; provided in wall footings, two on top and two • Pla""" areas should not be sited adjacent to sited next to the walls the foQtin shot walls, In case planter areas are .chest should be deepened by additional six • booting excavations should be obsery ed by the of veliil the footings are excavated in the competent soils d are Engineer to na otae type • Footing excavations should be kep t moist pz;jor top the conoretE pour; • It should be, 'leem adversely affected b bedMent depth.& do not become reduced or Y erosion, softening, planting, digging, .) 2.4.3 Seal_ e_ m Total and differential settlements under spread footings within tolerable "Wits and are not ex expected to be distance of 40 feet peed to exceed l inch and M. inches over a horizontal dis respectively. bYIb1/Ybbt{ 1(J:lb 17147348820 Paradise Pools JaUUM7 30, zoos .Project 3392,81 Page 5 IS L eral pressures LTI INC PAGE. 07/08 a) Trohtaeirxifollowing lateral, pressures are ]recommended for the design ng sttu�ctures. srgn 'of lateral Force Soil Profile Pressure pb/ft'/#t depth) Unrestrained wall .Rigidly Supported Active Fvssure Level Wall 42 At -Rest pressure _ Level Passive Resistance - 65 (ignore upper 1.5 ft. Level 250 b) Friction coefficient: 0.3 combining friction with as (includes a Factor of Safety of 1.5). While p passive roice reduce passive by 113. c) These values apply to the existing soil, and to coin pacted bacMI generated from in -situ mat"" 'Mported material should be evaluated separately. It is recommended that Where feasible, imported backfill be utilized, for a width equal to uvular wall height, and not less than 1.5 feet. aPProxit:aately one -quarter the d) Bookfill should be placed under en&.eering control. e) Subdrains comprised of 4-inch porforated SpP_ 5 or equivalent l'VC i covered in a zninimutn of one cubic foot per linear foot of filter wxappOd in Arock and ftfil 140N filter fabric should be provided behind retai�tting walls. 3. I.I�M. l TIONS a) Our findings, interpretations, analyses and recommendations are based on observation and our professional ex professional judgments ca laezlence; and the projections we make are other warranty is nfo�.ing to the usual standards of the pmt`e4sion. No ty herein expressed or implied. b) In the event that during constrUction, conditions are Ex o significantly diffe t from those described in this p sed which are to the attention of the GeotechWcal Engineer. wort' they should be brought a-'iaiiZaali 1a:lb 1I14lj48821? L7i INC PAGE 08/08 I"mdise Pools January 30, 2008 I'rojmt 3392-81 Page 6 III oPpoftnity to be of serWcc is Si r zclY ?plCGlat If You of Anther assistance, please call, Y have any quess or if W6 can be Very truly yours, OL013 A L G•EQ-ENGMEFRjNG, INC. Mohan B. Upasani PrinciPal CmfecWcal Engi C,,, RGE 2301 (EXP. March 31, 2009) MIMAK: fdr