The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About00 - Non-Agenda ItemsReceived After Agenda Printed September 23, 2025 Non Agenda Item From: Ad lever To: City Clerk"s Office Subject: City Council - 09/23/2025 Date: September 22, 2025 3:31:40 PM Attachments: Slide 09-23-2025 City Council Public Comment - Leverenz.pdf [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button above. Good day, I would like that attached, available for call up on the BIG screen, should I speak during Public Comment on non -agenda items at the 09/23/2025 City Council Meeting. Thanks again, for all the Clerk's Office does : ) Adam From: planet Thunderstriker To: City Clerk"s Office Subject: Public Comments 9-23: Formal Public Record Notice — Cross -Jurisdictional Pattern of Record Suppression, Request for Immediate Acknowledgment and Preservation (Newport Beach) Date: September 22, 2025 4:00:08 PM [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button above. Dear City Clerk and Members of the Newport Beach City Council, This message is a formal public -record submission and legal notice. It is placed into the public record and preserved in multiple civic archives to ensure transparency of receipt and response. Summary / Purpose Over the past two years I have repeatedly submitted oral comments and written documentation to multiple civic bodies (including but not limited to Newport Beach, Irvine, UC forums, Santa Barbara, and Tucson / Pima County). Those submissions document a cross - jurisdictional pattern of omissions, erasures from agendas/minutes, procedural interruptions during public comment, and other irregularities consistent with deliberate suppression of civic participation. Some of those underlying materials will be archived at civic. cerebrolusi on.xyz I am writing now to place Newport Beach specifically on formal notice of the following facts and requests: Specific omissions and record problems you must acknowledge • My timely submission regarding a clerk complaint, delivered during a Council meeting and intended for the public record, is not included in any agenda packet or the minutes. This omission is fully documented in my public comment archive. • Other dates on which I spoke to Newport Council (and submitted written materials) likewise do not appear in the agenda packet or official minutes that were available to the public; those absent entries are documented in my archived submissions. • A FOIA/CPRA request I filed (referenced in my prior submissions) has not been honored: responsive public records and a complete agenda/minutes log covering the relevant timeframes have not been produced. Evidence of public -facing alteration / narrative distortion • A saved screenshot in my archive shows a Google meeting result summary that misrepresents the substance of my civic participation and appears designed to change the public perception of what I actually said. This is not clerical shorthand; it is a recharacterization that materially alters the record. I am preserving that screenshot and related search evidence in the public archive linked below. Institutional context that increases legal exposure • The Council agenda at the most recent meeting included the Council's 9th contract amendment and the Clerk's 4th contract amendment (reappointments/contract actions). The combination of repeated record omissions and simultaneous contract/appointment actions raises reasonable questions about institutional insulation and conflict of interest that should be addressed by an independent review. 4. Cross jurisdictional pattern (Tucson / Pima County as context) • The misconduct I am documenting in Newport is not isolated. Irvine's inactivity on oral/written comments resulted in multiple criminal infractions. Santa Barbara had multiple departments with various issues. My Tucson / Pima County submissions document related issues (forced -medication concerns, multiple counsel assignments, and law -enforcement handling irregularities) that demonstrate this is a multi jurisdictional pattern of suppression and obstruction rather than a single local oversight. Legal framing criminal, not merely civil • On the basis of the persistent pattern of omissions, interruptions, and evidence of record alteration, I am documenting potential criminal exposure for a range of offenses (for example: obstruction of justice, misprision of felony, official misconduct, deprivation of rights under color of law, and white-collar suppression of public records). This submission is not a demand for civil redress only — it is notice that criminal allegations are being documented. Requested, Immediate Actions 1. Confirm in writing that this email and all attached materials will be immediately preserved in full in the official public comment record and agenda/minutes archive. Provide a citation / docket number / agenda packet identifier for that entry. 2. Produce certified copies of the Newport Beach agenda and minutes that cover the dates I previously submitted comments (including the meeting where I submitted the clerk complaint and all other dates I spoke). If any submitted document is missing from your archive, identify precisely what is missing and explain why. 3. Produce the logs and correspondence (including internal emails, clerk notes, and any record change history) that relate to your public -facing agenda/minutes pages, and the specific Google/search result snapshot referenced in my archive. If records have been edited, provide a redline/audit trail showing what was changed, by whom, and when. 4. Explain the connection, if any, between recent reappointments / contract amendments (Council: 9th amendment; Clerk: 4th amendment) and these omissions. If any official(s) implicated in these omissions are involved with or benefited from those actions, recusal and independent investigation are required. 5. If you decline to investigate or cannot produce the requested records, identify the external office you will refer this to (e.g., County Counsel, California State Auditor, CA Attorney General's Office, or the appropriate federal authority). Provide contact information for the receiving office. 6. For the immediate protection of the record, preserve all backups, servers, and archivist systems relevant to Newport council agendas, minutes, and public comment logs — do not delete, alter, or allow any party to alter these systems pending the result of any independent audit. Consider this an explicit preservation notice. Why this is not "oversight" When these defects are repeated across multiple meetings and jurisdictions, and when omitted entries correspond with my submissions that include allegations of institutional misconduct, they cannot reasonably be dismissed as isolated clerical errors. The totality of the pattern (omitted comments, recharacterizing search results, failure to process FOIA/CPRA requests, simultaneous contract actions) is consistent with intentional suppression and white-collar concealment. It therefore requires independent administrative and/or criminal inquiry rather than only internal clerical correction. Closing This is a civic record, a legal notice, and a request for immediate administrative action. The integrity of the public record is a fundamental precondition of government legitimacy; repeated omissions and obfuscations destroy civic trust and demand remedy. I look forward to a prompt, written acknowledgment of receipt and confirmation of the preservation and audit steps requested above. Sincerely, Eplanet Thunderstriker (Michael Allan Miller II) [12ublic.comments0l Ugmail.com] civic. cerebrolusi on.xyz (archive) State Lands Commission draft report weighs in on Newport Beach mooring permits By Gabriel San Rornan Staff Writer Foilow Sept. 5, 2025 4,11 PM PT Assistant City Manager Seimone Jurjis told the Daily Pilot..... "The commission made their position clear," .... "People can't be buying and selling state tidelands. It's the public's lands, the state's lands. Transferability is going to have to come to an end at some point." Newport Harbor Mooring Battle Heads to State Lands Commission VoiceofOC Angelina Hicks Sep 9, 2025 "Jurjis said there is no legal way to continue allowing the sale and transferability of public state tidelands." CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR PEPARTWENT OFF -SHORE MOORING PERMIT 23 T111S QFF-5HQFtl MOpR#NG P�Rh111T {"rViooring Perrni#"} is issued as of this 31 day of October by the CITY OF NEW PORT BEACH, a California municipal corporation and char[2r city f"City"j, to the person(s) lister[ below, if more than one (1) person or entity, each shall be jointly and severally liable and all are collectively referred to as "Mowing Pernaittee" herein. Thais Mooring Permit Is Issued undex the foiinwiIng terms and conditions; 1] This Mcoring Permit is a licerls far the temporary use of the moDring location 1pecified herein and i5 revocable. The issuance of thil MooringPermit "s no't create or re resent any form o ra a ri ht ar rovide an i i ownershnterest in the underlying tidelands, which are held in trust by the City and owned by the neople of the State I>f CaliF i (NBMC Section 17.64_040(A),[R)(2):Q) Newport Beach Title 17 Harbor Code: Chapter 17.01 DEFINITIONS 7. Public Trust Lands. The term `public trust lands" shall mean all lams subject to the common lave public trust for commerce, navigation, fisheries, recreation, and other public purposes and includes all tidelands, submerged lands, the beds of na-Vigable lakes and rivers, and historical tidelands and sub- merged lands that are presently filled or reclaimed and which were subject to the public trust at any Chapter 17.40 LI4'E- BOARDS C. The issuance of a lip e-aboard permit to a mooring permittee is not transferrable and does not create any tenancy between the ' and the it - tee or other nersons livinLy aboard nor does it create to the mooring site.I Ord. 202 3 - r - . Ord. 00-5 1 (Exh. 1) (part), 2020: Ord. 013-11 § 1582 01 ; Ord. 008-2. § 1 (part), 2008) Chapter 17.60 HARBOR PERI4IITS AND LEASES 17.60.040 _Icoring Permits. A. Permit required. No person shall place, erect. construct, maintain, use or tie to a muon2 in the waters of Newport Harbor over itv-owne or i.e., an ousnore moonn2 i or in the nearshore peruneter of Newport Harbor perpen- dicular to the shoreline (i.e., an onshore mooring) without first having obtained a mooring permit from the Harbormaster or having otherwise complied with this section. A moorin ermit is in the nature of license for the mporary use of a specific location within N ekvport FlarFor. 1. Agree that the oaring permit does not pro- v1 a any Mxners p interest in the underlying tice- lands, which are held in trust by the City and oiNmed by the people of the State of alifornia; Clearly, Permits do not provide deed or title to land, submerged or otherwise. ,..:..�-:.fiRPLZ ` �. Wild video shows stolen yacht smashing into other boats in ... Ir"orinc rnw hn ci ihinr+t to 1 nnrn RAnrn �3 r�#;s any` :91 10_ � W�'. ol p1q. I 1,1 It oil i r1 ; b l r �'' 411