HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-83 - Setting the Deadlines for Filing of Rebuttal Arguments in Response to Direct Arguments Filed For and Against the Initiative Measure to be Submitted to the Voters at the General Municipal ElectionRESOLUTION NO. 2025-83
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, SETTING THE
DEADLINES FOR FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS
IN RESPONSE TO DIRECT ARGUMENTS FILED FOR
AND AGAINST THE INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE
SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT THE GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3,
2026
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of Newport
Beach, California ("City") on November 3, 2026, at which there will be submitted to the
registered voters of the City the following initiative question:
MEASURE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN -
AMENDMENT Yes
Shall the measure to amend the City of Newport Beach's
General Plan Land Use Element allowing 2,900 new affordable
housing units (2,160 reserved for extremely low-, very low-, and
low-income households; and 740 for moderate -income
households) with densities of 20 - 50 dwelling units per acre,
plus State of California allowed housing density bonuses, in No
Dover/Westcliff (174), Newport Center (870), West Newport
Mesa (406), Airport Area (929), and Coyote Canyon (521), be
adopted?
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Elections Code ("Elections Code") Section
9282, the proponents of an initiative measure may file a written argument for, and the
legislative body may file a written argument against, an initiative measure;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 9285, the City Council, by
majority vote, may adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal arguments in
response to direct arguments filed for or against the initiative measure; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide for the filing of rebuttal arguments
in response to direct arguments filed for or against the initiative measure.
Resolution No. 2025-83
Page 2 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City Of Newport Beach, California,
does resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:
Section 1: Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9285(a), when the Elections
Official has selected the arguments for and against the initiative measure which will be
printed and distributed to the voters, the Elections Official shall send a copy of the
argument in favor of the initiative measure to the authors of the argument against the
initiative measure and a copy of the argument against the initiative measure to the authors
of the argument in favor of the initiative measure.
Section 2: The author or a majority of the authors of an argument relating to an
initiative measure may prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exceeding two
hundred fifty words or may authorize, in writing, any other person or persons to prepare,
submit or sign the rebuttal argument. A rebuttal argument may not be signed by more
than five authors.
Section 3: Rebuttal arguments shall be filed with the Elections Official, signed,
with the printed names and signatures of not more than five of the authors submitting it,
or if submitted on behalf of an organization, the name of the organization, and the printed
name and signature of at least one of its principal officers, by 5:00 p.m. on June 25, 2026.
Rebuttal arguments shall be accompanied by the form statement required by Elections
Code Section 9600.
Section 4: Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct
arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately follow the direct argument which it
seeks to rebut.
Section 5: Rebuttal arguments shall be made available for public examination
for no fewer than ten calendar days following the deadline for submission of those
materials, in accordance with Elections Code Section 9295.
Section 6: All previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments
for City measures are hereby repealed.
Section 7: The rebuttal provisions provided herein shall apply only to the
General Municipal Election to be held on November 3, 2026.
Section 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
Section 9: The City Clerk shall deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the
Orange County Board of Supervisors and the Orange County Registrar of Voters.
Resolution No. 2025-83
Page 3of3
Section 10: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not
affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City
Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section 11: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are
incorporated into the operative part of this resolution.
Section 12: The City Council finds the adoption of this resolution is not subject to
the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Public Resources Code
Section 21080(b)(1) because submission to the voters of a voter -sponsored initiative is a
ministerial duty required by Elections Code Section 9215, and is therefore not subject to
CEQA pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(1) (the activity does not involve the exercise of
discretionary powers by a public agency), 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as
defined in Section 15378), and 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or
reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) of the CEQA
Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3.
Section 13: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the
City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution.
ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2025.
ATTEST:
Lena Shumway
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Aaron C. Harp
City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ; ss.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH }
I, Lena Shumway, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify
that the whole number of members of the City Council is seven; the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-83 was
duly adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of November, 2025,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Mayor Joe Stapleton, Mayor Pro Tern Lauren Kleiman, Councilmember Noah Blom,
Councilmember Michelle Barto, Councilmember Robyn Grant, Councilmember Sara J.
Weber, Councilmember Erik Weigand
NAYS: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of said
City this 19th day of November, 2025.
Lena Shumway
City Clerk
City of Newport Beach, California