Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCliff Drive 2• • August 27, 1985 TO: ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: (1) CLIFF DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT ADJACENT TO CLIFF DRIVE PARK (2) RIVERSIDE AVENUE RELIEF STORM DRAIN, PHASE 2 Attached for the Committee's review and comment are drafts of the Notices of Determination and the Negative Declarations for the subject improvements. The Public Works Department will supply the Committee with any additional information which may be required to make findings and recommendations in this matter. fieam Irwin Miller Administrative Assistant IM:jd Att. ;b r3 9 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CLIFF DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT ADJACENT TO CLIFF DRIVE PARK ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW --NOTICE OF DETERMINATION A preliminary environmental review of the project for the construction of the Cliff Drive street improvement adjacent to Cliff Drive Park has been performed. The review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the State "Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970," and the City's "Policies and Procedures for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act." The environmental statement has been reviewed and was approved by the City's Environmental Affairs Committee. As a result of the preliminary review, it has been determined that: 1. The project is approved. 2. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 3. An environmental impact report has not been prepared. A Negative Declaration has been prepared and is attached hereto. Benjamin B. Nolan Public Works Director AIM:jd 8/22/85 CLIFF DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT ADJACENT TO CLIFF DRIVE PARK NEGATIVE DECLARATION BY CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. PROJECT LOCATION: The street improvement is located along the south side of the 2700 and 2800 blocks of Cliff Drive, between San Bernardino and Riverside Avenues in the City of Newport Beach. 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A storm drain catch basin and approximately 150 linear feet of 18-inch diameter storm drain pipe will be installed at the Redlands Avenue intersection. Approximately 1,150 linear feet of curb and gutter will be installed along Cliff Drive Park between San Bernardino and Riverside Avenues. 3. PROJECT GOALS: The project is needed to (1) restrict access of privately owned vehicles onto Cliff Drive Park, (2) control storm runoff more effec- tively, and (3) protect park irrigation and landscape improvements. 4. EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT: There will be no significant long-term irrever- sible or irretrievable effects on the environment. There will be minimal, acceptable short-term disturbances caused by construction activity. 5. BASIS FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION: This project is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Newport Beach and could not have a significant effect on the environment. 6. INITIAL STUDY: The Public Works Department of the City of Newport Beach has prepared the Negative Declaration and its Initial Study in accordance with Article 7, Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Copies of the Initial Study may be obtained from the Public Works Department during normal business hours. Benjamin B. Nolan Public Works Director LRD:jd 8/16/85 CLIFF DRIVE IMPROVEMENT ADJACENT TO CLIFF DRIVE PARK INITIAL STUDY BY CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT A. CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN This project is in accord with the General• Plan of the City of Newport Beach; in particular, the "Recreation and Open Space Element" and the "Conservation of Natural Resources Element." B. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM An Environmental Checklist Form (attached) has been completed as a portion of this study. The following statements, referenced to ques- tions presented on the checklist, explain all "yes" and "maybe" answers: II.I.b & c Existing unimproved Cliff Drive right-of-way adjacent to Cliff Drive Park, approximately 1,150 feet long by 6 feet wide, will be excavated for construction of curb, gutter, two catch basins, and pavement to join the existing pave- ment. II.3.b Construction of new curb and gutter, catch basins and con- nector pipes, and pavement will reduce the absorption rate and increase the runoff rate correspondingly over the existing unimproved portions of the Cliff Drive right-of- way; however, the water erosion of soils in the right-of- way will also be reduced by catch basin and connector pipe construction. II.14.e Construction of pavement widening and storm drain•improve- ments will result in the need for periodic pavement main- tenance and cleaning of debris from inlet catch basins, respectively; however, a correspondingly .lesser amount of debris and silt will need to be cleaned from Cliff Drive and Cliff Drive Park subsequent to construction of the improvements. 5/9/84 411 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM PT 't.4. I. Background 1. Name of Proponent Cie of NAd Arlo Oath 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent Pabf jy Work* Dep*; -3105 Weapor* BJvei.; Newport Beach; CA • (ono 640•tfll - - 3. 'Date of Checklist Submission Mph/ ,� 11,04- 4. Agency Requiring Checklist CNy kV Ne[/ff7Orr Oath 5. Title of Project Cale Or Der, adj. ' Litt` Dr Petrk II. Environmental Impacts • (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction'or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. . Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands,.or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO L • ES MAYBE NO b g. Exposure of people or property to geological hazards such as earth- quakes,•landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air, Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result In: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of. flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity, of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? - h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as • flooding or tidal waves? X X x X • 4. . Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:. a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops'; and aquatic plants)?• b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants?. c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the Normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of ,animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal 'result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? • J. Light and Glare. Will, the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO k k k 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? 10. Risk•of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an. explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? • 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? 'c. Substantial impact •upon existing transportation systems? d. 'Alterations to present patterns, of .circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. •'Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. •Increase in traffic hazardous to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas:. YES MAYBE NO • . • 411 YES MAYBE NO a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities; including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? IC' • b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of .new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? ._ b. Communications systems? c. Water? _ X d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? • f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation• of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b.- Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? • • • • YES MAYBE NO 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of•existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to •eliminate a plant or 'animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or'endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-termimpact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? k