HomeMy WebLinkAboutOCEAN BOULEVARD NEAR NARCISSUS AVENUE•
0'
RECEIVED
Planning
bepartment
NOV2O 1984
CITY p.AF
NEWP RRT BCK
C/+UF
November 16, 1984
TO: ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
FROM: Public Works Department
SUBJECT: BLUFF RESTORATION NEAR NARCISSUS AVENUE PRODUCED
Attached for the Committee's review and comment are drafts of
the Notice of Determination and the Negative Declaration for the subject
improvements.
The Public Works Department will supply the Committee with any
additional information which may be required to make findings and recom-
mendations in this matter.
Irwin Miller
Administrative Assistant
IM:jw
Att.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
BLUFF RESTORATION NEAR NARCISSUS AVENUE PRODUCED
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW --NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
A preliminary environmental review of the project for the Bluff Restora-
tion Near Narcissus Avenue Produced has been performed. The review was
conducted in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, the State "Guidelines for Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970," and the City's "Policies and Procedures
for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act."
The environmental statement has been reviewed and was approved by City's
Environmental Affairs CommiiHbe. ! 4 t
As a result of the preliminary review, it has been determined that:
1. The project is approved.
2. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
3. An environmental impact report has not been prepared. A Negative
Declaration has been prepared and is attached hereto.
Benj min B .Nolan
Public Works Director
BBN:jw
11-16-84
BLUFF RESTORATION NEAR NARCISSUS AVENUE PRODUCED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
BY
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. PROJECT LOCATION: The bluff restoration will occur below Inspiration Point,
south of Ocean Boulevard near Narcissus Avenue produced in Corona del Mar.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An ocean -facing cave -tunnel at the base of Inspiration
Point bluff poses an attractive nuisance to the public, and progressive
erosion of the bluff through the cave -tunnel may be endangering the integ-
rity of Inspiration Point bluff trail to the Corona del Mar State Beach.
The cave -tunnel will be bulkheaded and backfilled with concrete, as will
the eroded area of the adjacent bluff. The slope surface of the trailside
eroded area will be a soil -cement mixture, stabile and capable of sustain-
ing plant growth. All exposed concrete and soil -cement will be blended in
color and texture to match that of the adjacent natural material.
An asphalt curb will be extruded along the existing trail to restrict storm
runoff to the trail. A concrete splash pad will be built at the bottom of
the trail to protect against erosion of the beach and trail.
i 1 t
3. PROJECT GOALS: The project will provide mitigation of an attractive nuisance;
restoration of the integrity of Inspiration Point bluff trail to the Corona
del Mar State Beach and the public sewer main thereunder; erosion protection
for the bluff to Corona del Mar State Beach; and erosion protection along
the base of the trail.
4. EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT: There will be no significant long-term irre-
versible or irretrievable effects on the environment. There will be minimal,
acceptable short-term distrubances of the environment due to construction
activity.
5. BASIS FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION: This project is consistent with the General
Plan Policies of the City of Newport Beach and could not have a significant
effect on the environment.
6. INITIAL STUDY: The City of Newport Beach Public Works Department has pre-
pared this Negative Declaration and its Initial Study in accordance with
Article 7, Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970. Copies of the Initial Study may be
obtained from said department during normal business hours.
Benjamin B. Nolan '
Public Works Director
BBN:jw
BLUFF RESTORATION NEAR NARCISSUS AVENUE PRODUCED
INITIAL STUDY
BY
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
A. CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
This project is in accord with the spirit of the General Plan Policies of
the City of Newport Beach; in particular, the "Public Safety Element" and
the "Recreation and Open Space Element."
'r
B. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
An Environmental Checklist Form has been completed and is attached hereto.
The following statement „referenced to questions presented on the check-
list explain all "yes" add "maybe" a'nsWerst:
II.1.a thru d
An existing ocean -facing cave -tunnel and a trailside
eroded area is to be backfilled with portland cement
concrete. The slope surface of the trailside eroded
area will be soil -cement, capable of sustaining plant
growth. An asphalt curb will be extruded along the
existing trail and a splash pad will be installed
along the base of the trail for erosion protection.
All exposed soil -cement and concrete will be blended
in color and texture to closely match that of the
adjacent natural material.
• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I. Background
1. Name of Proponent Pobfie Works Dep. ar t insa ' •
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent L'isof of Newper# Rua
33Gb Alepor l3odl evdrd . N wn�g�ath C�
1714) 64a• at)/
3. Date of Checklist Submission .January 25, 14$4
4. Agency Requiring Checklist Cry of Nearer* Dtaeh
5. Title of Project Muff- Reetbnaflbn near Worts swj Atm. Predaasi
II. Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.)
•
I!( t it t
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering of the
soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or.
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water, erosion
of soils, either on or off the site?
f. . Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands,.or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion.which may modify
the channel of a river or stream or
the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet
or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
X
•
rES MAYBE NO
•g. Exposure of people or property to
geological hazards such as earth-
quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
x
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air quality? _ c�
b. The creation of objectionable odors? , K
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in
climate, either locally or regionally? X
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements, in either.
marine o'r fresh waters? X
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff?
c. Alterations to the course of flow of
flood waters? t
d. Change in the amount of surface water
in any water body? X
e. Discharge into surface waters or in
any alteration of surface water
quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity? •
f. Alteration of the direction or, rate
of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
4. . Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)?•
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a barrier
to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shelljfish,t benthici organisms,
or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species 'of animals?
c. . Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
animals?
•
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6. Noise. Will the proposal 'result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
7. Light and Glare. Will, the proposal produce
new light or glare?
8.' Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
!t
X
.k
•
YES MAYBE NO
Ot
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve
a risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulhtion. Will theE(_
proposal result in:
a.
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
d. 'Alterations to present patterns of
'circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
e. . Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? .
f. •Increase in traffic hazardous to
-motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered governmental services in any of the
following areas:.
YES MAYBE NO
a. Fire protection? or
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of
energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a
need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to ttjq(follpwing ptglit1ies:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c'. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b.• Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
18. Aesthetics. 'Will the proposal result in the
.obstruction of any scenic vista or view open•
to the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically
offensive site open to public view?
X•
x
X
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or quantity
of -existing recreational opportunities?
20. Archeological/Historical. Will the
proposal result in an alteration of
a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object' or' building?
'21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining.levels, threaten to
.eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or_eliminate important
examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage
of long-term, environmental goals? (A
short-term impact on the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively brief
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
•
c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited,•but cumu-
latively considerable? (A project
may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on each
resource•is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental.
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
• YES
r
MAYBE NO
i<
K
it
November 16, 1984
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
P.O. Box 687
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Subject: Bluff Restoration Near Narcissus Avenue Produced
Dear Sir:
Enclosed is a Notice of Determination for the subject property.
A Negative Declaration has been prepared and is on file in our Planning
Department.
If you have any questions, please call me at (714) 644-3311.
Very truly yours,
Irwin Miller
Administrative Assistant
IM:jw
Enc.
cc: Planning Department - Pat Temple