Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRiverside Avenue Cliff Drive Tustin Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and Clay StreetTO: FROM: SUBJECT: Environmental Affairs Committee Public Works Department Tustin Avenue Storm Drain Attached for the Committee's Notice of Determination, the Environmental Fact Sheet for The Public Works Department additional information which recommendations. Irwin Miller Management Analyst IM:sec Attachments RECEIVED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT a.)ITY OF NEWPORT BEACH e MAY 2 11990 AM PM 71819110111112111213141516 May 21, 1990 review and comment are drafts of the E.I.R. Negative Declaration and the the subject project. will supply the Committee with any may be required to make findings and ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW --NOTICE OF DETERMINATION BY CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TUSTIN AVENUE STORM DRAIN A preliminary environmental review of the project for Tustin Avenue Storm Drain has been performed. The review was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the State "Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970", and the City's "Policies and Procedures for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act". The environmental statement has been reviewed and was approved by. the City's Environmental Affairs Committee. As a result of the preliminary review, it has been determined that: 1. The project is approved. 2. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 3. An environmental impact report has not been prepared. A Negative Declaration has been prepared and is attached hereto. aU Benjamin B. Nolan Public Works Director IM:sec 5/9/90 TUSTIN AVENUE STORM DRAIN NEGATIVE DECLARATION By City of Newport Beach Public Works Department 1. Proiect Location: The proposed improvements are located in Riverside Avenue, Cliff Drive and Tustin Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and Clay Street in the City of Newport Beach. 2. Proiect Description: Dual 24-inch diameter storm drain pipes or reinforced concrete box sections will connect to an existing RC box in Riverside Avenue at Pacific Coast Highway and extend north easterly on Riverside Avenue to Avon Street. From that point, a single 24-inch diameter storm drain pipe will be laid uphill in Riverside Avenue, Cliff Drive and Tustin Avenue to terminate at Clay Street. Inlets to the drain will be built along Riverside Avenue (1), Cliff Drive (2) and Tustin Avenue (4). 3. Proiect Goals: The proposed project will provide the subteranean drainage system needed to keep Avon Street, Riverside Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway from inundating during and after intense rain storms. The improvements whould eliminate the need to close these streets as the result of storm activity. 4. Effect on the Environment: There will be no significant long-term irreversible or irretrievable effects on the environment. There will be minimal, acceptable short-term disturbances caused by construction activity. 5. Basis for Negative Declaration: This project is not inconsistent with the General Plan of the City of Newport Beach and will not have a significant effect on the environment. 6. Initial Study: The Public Works Department of the City of Newport Beach has prepared this Negative Declaration and its Initial Study in accordance with Articles 6 and 5, respectively, of Chapter 3, Guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Oualitv Act. Copies of the Initial Study may be obtained from the Public Works Department during normal business hours. i&mtre Benjamin B. Nolan Public Works Director / J 4g 30 (?9a Date TUSTIN AVENUE STORM DRAIN INITIAL STUDY By City of Newport Beach Public Works Department A. Conformance with the General Plan: This project is consistent with the environmental plans and goals established by the General Plan of the City of Newport Beach. B. Environmental Checklist Form: An Environmental Checklist Form has been completed as a portion of this study. The following statements, referenced to questions presented on the checklist, explain all "yes" and "maybe" answers: II.1.b. Trenches will be excavated in Tustin Avenue, Cliff Drive, and Riverside Avenue for placement of 24-inch diameter storm drains. The storm drain trenches will then be backfilled; compacted and resurfaced with asphalt. II.3.b. The proposed construction of a storm drain system may slightly reduce absorption rates and increase the rate and amount of surface runoff. II.14.e. The proposed construction will necessitate routine maintenance of the storm drain; however, that effort is exceeded by current maintenance requirements along Avon Street, Riverside Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway after storms inundate and deposit silt and debris upon this low lying area. II.16.e The proposed construction provides for the extension of a subterranean drain system into a drainage area where no such facility exists. wa • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. Background 1. Name of Proponent Csty d Ne or't Otach 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent ARV A1e#ptb"f 61✓a% Rorer Zearh,. CA 42443 aQ+rr r tl yol Lxltn (eta.) 644'3311 3. Date of Checklist Submission Mar~ah 001 1440 4. Agency Requiring 'Checklist 6V od nleluroe-t teach - 5. Title of Project Tvrrin Avenue Stnrtrm Vrait9 II. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements,. compaction or oVercovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? The destruction, coveringor ;,,: 'modification'of any'unique geologic; or physical,',features?fr`i'1� '.. ... t>;rr;,a✓; . '� '.fir t,. Any•increa'se,'.in wind or.water;erosion�;� of soils; either, on'or:off, -the 'site?' Changes in deposition,orrerosionpof;• beach sands; 'or' chahgesAn 'siltation; deposition or, erosion which'may:mod.i>fy;; the channel of. a' "river(orstreamyor•';,+. the bed of the ocean:• or.' any bayi hlet't ' or- l ake? YES MAYBE NO YES MAYBE NO g. Exposure of people or property to geological hazards such as earth- quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Ar b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in •climate, either locally or regionally? h 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or• direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Al b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but*not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts..." or excavations? ' h. Substantial reduction in: the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? x X YES MAYBE--- NO ' 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. •Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _2L c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal ,result in: a. . Increases in existing noise levels?.:••, ; b. Exposure of.people'to severe noise • levels? • . 7. 'Light and Glare.• Will, the proposal produce new light or glare?: Land Use.. Will the proposal result in a.,, substantial alteration. of the present or .• planned land use of'an area?' 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. •Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Generation of•substantial additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing perking'facilities, or demand for;;•new parking?„ Substantial'.impact,upon' existing . • transportation systems? Alterations to present;patterns•.of,, ?tircu1ation or Anovemew4 of.people •;' and/or -.goods? " • ?°.A1 terati one vto.'- waterborne traffic?' ;i" • r ' ;`. Increase 'in' ;traffic hazardous to motor,,vehicles;, bjcyclir pedestrians? r;; •,. . Public Services. 4il'1'the'proposal;'have',a ,effect upon,. or resultAh.:,a'heed for.fnew•or;' ahtered;:governmental'+serVi•ces l•nAany,'ofth'e following areas; YES MAYBE NO YES MAYBE NO a. Fire protection? k b. Police protection? X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new 'sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e.. Storm water drainage? f. Solid. waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any''health,hazard'or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?; b Exposure of people.to potential, health hazards?. 18. Aesthetics. Will'the proposal result in the obstruction of.any's'cenic'vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of anaesthetically offensive site open.to public view? x• • 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of•existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a•plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term 'impacts -will endure well into the future.) c. Does -the projecthave•impacts which are individually limited;: but cumu- latively considerable? (A project may impact on two'or more .separate resources.where the impact on,.each resource•is relatively small, but where the effect'of the total of ' - those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project haveenvironmental effects which will•cause substantial'' adverse effects.,on,human,beings, either directly;.or.indirectly? YES ._MAYBE WO_ K