HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS8 - Beacon Bay PropertyCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
May 18, 1970
SS Item
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: BEACON BAY PROPERTY
In January the attached preliminary analysis of alternatives avail-
able to the City with respect to the future use of the City -owned Beacon Bay
property was received from the firm of Development Research Associates and
forwarded to the City Council for information purposes. Partially as a re-
sult of the Balboa Bay Club election held during the preceding week, this
matter was never formally reviewed at any Study Session or regular Council
meeting subsequent to the submittal of the report.
Development Research Associates was advised in writing in January
not to spend any more time on this project until given further notice from
the City, Approximately $1,900 of a $5,000 appropriation had been paid to
DRA up to that point and completion of the study has been held in abeyance
until such time as the City Council expressed itself to desire a more thorough
documentation of the long-range alternatives relative to the use or disposition
of the property. You will note that the preliminary documentation of alterna-
tives includes a recommendation on Page Five of the report that the City
retain the services of an appraiser to document the current values of the
property as it relates to those who have any financial interest in the Beacon
Bay community. Such an appraisal may be necessary if the City intends to
take any action at this time regarding the future use and/or disposition of
the property. This would also be particularly desirable if the electorate
is to inevitably be asked to decide what the ultimate disposition of the
property should be. It is estimated that a full appraisal of the property
would cost approximately $10,000.
Whether any further effort should be undertaken with regard to the
property in question at this time is a matter which the City Council will
have to determine. It would seemingly be desirable for the City Council to
express itself on the following two questions:
2
1. Should the City proceed further with the firm of Development
Research Associates to complete the economic analysis which
that firm addressed itself to in late 1969, or should that
contract be officially terminated in view of the recent lease
extension request withdrawal by the Beacon Bay Community
Association (copy attached); and
2. Should the City have the Beacon Bay property formally appraised
as a means of assisting the City in making decisions regarding
the alternatives which have been set forth in the preliminary
DRA report, ie. trade the property for Civic Center property
at Newport Center, etc.
The City staff will appreciate some direction on this matter one
way or the other in order that this project will not be further held in limbo
and in order that desired actions by the City Council can be reflected through
appropriate expenditure projections to be set forth in the fiscal 1970-71
municipal budget.
HARVEY L. HURLBURT
HLH:JPD:sr
Atts.