HomeMy WebLinkAboutJ-2 - Consolidated Election Regarding Sale of Property at 4210 River AvenueCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
July 24, 1989
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: City Manager
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Agenda Item No. J2
LY TNT �;ITY COUNCIL
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACla
JUL 2 4 1989
SUBJECT: CONSOLIDATED ELECTION REGARDING SALE OF PROPERTY
AT 4210 RIVER AVENUE
Attached is information concerning the sale of
City property at 4210 River Avenue. Also attached are the
necessary resolutions consolidating said election with the
November 7, 1989 State-wide School District election. The
Registrar's office has indicated that within the City of
Newport Beach there may be four propositions on the ballot.
One is the 1/2� sales tax for transportation purposes, the
second is the school board election, the third is the sale
of the 4210 River property, and the fourth is the authori-
zation to extend the lease at the City/County Dock property.
Assuming four propositions are on the ballot, the cost to
the City of Newport Beach for the sale of the 4210 River
property would be 35� per registered voter. There are 46,396
registered voters in the City, which would make the cost to
the City $16,239. By way of contrast, the November '88
election cost the City approximately $17,000.
Also included in this packet is the recommendation
of the Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission concerning
subject parcel.
i
ROBERT L. WYNN r'
RLW:kf
Attachments
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department
July 24, 1989
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM NO. ,-) Z-
TO: Mayor and City Council
BY TN:° !;ITY COUNCIL
FROM: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Director CITY OF NEWPORT BEACII
SUBJECT: CITY PROPERTY - 4210 RIVER AVENUE J U L 2 4 1989
Recommendation:
Take appropriate measures to enable the sale of the City owned property at
4210 River Avenue and place the proceeds into a reserve fund to be used for
acquisition of park property.
nicriiccinn-
The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission at their meeting of July 5, 1989
extensively reviewed the subject parcel with regard to its value as a mini -
park. By a 5-1 vote it was determined that the property should be declared
surplus and not be used as a park. Reasons for this decision were:
1. There is an existing park in the area that serves the community.
2. Due to a residential building being between Channel Place Park and
the 4210 River parcel it could not be combined with the park.
3. The subject parcel is not identified in the Recreation and Open
Space Element of the General Plan as an existing park or listed as
a site for park development.
4. There is a need to establish a reserve fund for acquisition of
property for park purposes.
4ww 4wti4
Ronald