Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/20/1972• t'O CAL Present Absent 0 E Motion Second Ayes Abstein NERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Regular Planning.Commission Meeting •� s Place: Council Chambers 3 Time: 7:30 P.M: Date: April 20, 1972 MINUTES INDEX x x x x x x x EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. V. Hogan, Community Development Director David R. Baade; Asst. City Attorney Benjamin B. Nolan, City Engineer STAFF MEMBERS James D. Hewicker, Asst. Community Development Dir William R. Laycock, Zoning Administrator Rodney L. Gunn, Senior Planner Helen Herrmann On motion of Commissioner Heather, seconded by Commissioner Agee, and carried, the minutes of April 6, 1972 were approved as written. Commissioner Glass joined the meeting. Chairman Dosh announced that the staff had request (d a continuance until May 4, 1972 of Item No. 15 on the agenda and that if there was no one in the audience who desired to speak on this item, he would entertain a motion for continuance. Item #15. Request to permit a 738 unit addition to the USE Versailles on the Bluffs at Newport, a Planned PERMIT Community development NO. T-537 Location: Por. Lot 172, Block 1, and Portion of CONTINUED Lot 169, Block 2, Irvine's Subdivi- N�— sion located at the southeasterly M —T corner of Hospital Road and Superior Avenue. Zone: P -C Applicant: Donald J. Scholz.& Company, Costa Mesa Owner: William J. Cagney, Newport Beach x This item was continued until May 4, 1972. x x x x x x Page l . X • COMMISSIONERS CALL S CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 20, 1972 MINUTES INDEX Item #1 Commission's review and hearing of Interim Parks and Recreation Plan for adoption as an Element of INTERIM P R K the Newport, Beach General Plan. TIN - Director of Community Development Hogan pointed out PUT- that this item had been continued from the meeting of March 16, 1972 for the .purpose of making certain RECOM- amendments to the plan; that the amendments had MENDED been made and a new copy of the Plan with the amendments distributed to the Commission. FUT_ PWROVAL Senior Planner Gunn reviewed with the Commission the three,primary areas of concern at the previous meeting; the first one being the "Fun Zone" which had been referred to the Parks, Beaches.and Recrea- tion Commission who expressed no interest and addressed a letter to this effect to the City Council, who ordered the letter filed. The second item was Balboa Island, which the staff restudied and five locations for general play lots were indicated on the map. The third item was in the Corona del Mar area and the proposal for that particular area was expanded to include the land between Marguerite Avenue and the existing Community Youth Center. Mr. Gunn noted further that concern had been ex- pressed by the public in the 38th Street area about the timing of that particular proposal and there seemed to be some confusion as to the relationship between the bond issue and the Interim Park Plan. Based on studies of projected population.in the area, the proposal within the Interim Park Plan was to expand the 38th Street park between what is now existing and the channel. Mr. Gunn pointed out that the Interim Park Plan was a 20 year plan; it did not necessarily mean that implementation would take place within the next year; to the contrary, some of the proposals could take 20 or 30 years and might never be implemented; therefore the staff recommendation.for the 38th Street park.re- mained the same. Director Hogan noted.that even.though the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission had turned down the inclusion of the "Fun Zone" property, the City Council had requested that this area be considered, as park property and the Planning Commission could either agree with the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission or recommend that it be included. Page 2. COMMISSIONERS N N p+ s &L CALL J CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 20, 1972 MINUTES INDEX Mr. James M. Dodds, an attorney, addressed the Commission and stated that he had been contacted by several of the residents in the 38th Street park area. He noted that there were approximately 23 homes in.the proposed acquisition site and the concern of these homeowners.was the length of time they could stay. If it were a matter of 20 years they would not be concerned; if it were a matter of one.,year they were quite concerned. He stated further that the homeowners would appreciate it. if the Planning Commission would go on record that this was a 20 year acquisition program; that no condemnation would be taken on the 38th Street park site but that the property would be acquired . as it became available. Mr. Dodds commented further that the acquisition cost figure.was un- realistic. The Commission discussed the entire Plan, and particularly in regard to the 38th Street park, and it was suggested that a footnote be added that some.of the Commissioners had strong reservations regarding the expenditure necessary for a park at that location. Parks, Beaches and Recreation Director Stewart addressed.the Commission and stated that the Parks Beaches and Recreation Commission had reviewed this area on a long range program and felt the park expansion was necessary because it was in a residential area where, by population projections, there was quite a deficiency. Motion x Following further discussion, Commissioner Second x Adkinson moved that the Interim Parks and Recreati n All Ayes Plan be forwarded to the City Council for adoption with a letter stating that the Commission recogniz d. the concern of the property owners in the 38th Street.area whose land would be.encumbered by the plan and that they should receive some assurance that.it was a long range program; also that some o the Commissioners were concerned that the proposed 38th Street park involved too much money for.the use that would be obtained from it. Motion x Commissioner Heather read into the record Resolution Second x No. 751.adopting the Interim Parks and Recreation. �11 Ayes Plan. Page 3. COMMISSIONERS y w y N . ID �m w OL CALL m ? w "` Cs Pi • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES April 20, 1972 INDEX Request to realign lot lines to create 2 lots each Item #2. RESUBDI- 24.32 feet in width where widths of 28.57 feet and -VTS� 20.07 feet now exist. NUTTT� Location: Lot 6 and Portion of Lot 5, Block 339, DENIED Canal Section, located at 3911 Marcus. Avenue on the southwesterly side of Marcus.Avenue between 39th and 40th Streets. Zone: R -2 Applicant: Charles Ward, Newport Beach Owner: Ralph Kerry, Los Angeles Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission and.noted that it had been continued from the meeting of April 6, 1972 so the staff: could research whether this was a legal lot split and that it had been determined that it was. He noted further that the staff had recommended denial because of.the garage encroachments necessary to provide the required parking. Assistant Director Hewicker addressed the Commis- sion and stated that the applicant had worked out a solution to the,garage. problem with the Building Official whereby he would be-able to provide legal sized garages which would not encroach into the required '3 foot setbacks and that a revised plot plan showing this type of configuration had been submitted. Mr. Hewicker explained the details of the type.of garage structure that could be -built to comply with the parking requirements. He pointed out that this would still not eliminate the problem of constructing two buildings on lots of less width than had been anticipated when the property was originally subdivided. Mr. Don Heubner, General Contractor, represented, the applicant.and stated that they had been able to revise their plans in such a way to provide the clearance desired by the Planning and Building Divisions to meet all requirements of the Code, without encroachments. He stated further that he believed it would be a better development with two equal sized lots. A discussion ensued during which it was pointed out, Page 4. COMMISSIONERS wy Nc � N N N � OLL CALL w Motion Second Ayes Noes. • Motion Second. All Ayes • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES April 20, 1972 INDEX that while the present Code required a minimum lot area of 5,000 sq,ft:, some of the older areas in the City.existed at the time of the adoption of the ordinance, however that the ordinance did provide minimum standards for the development of these smaller lots. It was felt that increasing the density by permitting substandard lots was.not in the interest.of good planning and that since this was a continuing problem, that.a policy should be established so developers would be aware of the position of the Commission. x x Following further discussion, the application was denied. x x x x x x Item #3. USE PERMIT NE —T388 Request to permit live entertainment and patron dancing in conjunction with an existing restaurant Location: Lot 13, Tract 5169, located at 4647 MacArthur Boulevard on the westerly APPROVED side of MacArthur Boulevard between Birch Street and Campus Drive. Zone: M -1 -A Applicant: Far West Services, Inc., Santa Ana Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Chairman Dosh reviewed this application with the Commission. x Following discussion during which it was:.pointed out that noise should not be a problem in this particular instance as there are no residences. in the area, the application was approved, subject to the following condition: x 1. That the dance floor be at least four hundred square feet in area. Item #4. AMENDMENI Request to amend a portion of Districting Map No. 11 from a C -1 District to an R -2 District. N0. Location: Lots 8, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16, Block APPROVED 12, East Side Addition to Balboa Tract located at 806, 808, 810, 812 and 814 East Ocean Front, 815 East Balboa Page 5, COMMISSIPNERS a A�t N S Re CALL Won Second Ayes Noes. • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES April 20, 1972 INDEX Boulevard and 107 "A" Street, between Main Street and "A" Street and between. East Ocean Front and East Balboa Boulevard. Zone: C -1 Initiated by: City of Newport Beach Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission and pointed out that because of the size of the lots and the lack of adequate off - street parking for commercial uses in the area, residential zoning was more appropriate than comme cial, especially since some of the lots were alrea developed residentially. - y The following persons.spoke in opposition: Marguerite Whitford who owns Lot 16 and Tom Clarke who owns 812 E.. Ocean Front. Following discussion, Amendment No. 317 rezoning the specified properties from C -1 to R -2 was recom x mended to the City Council for approval, witp the x. further recommendation that a front yard setback x x x x of five feet along East Ocean Front on Lots-12, 13 x x 14, 15 and 16, Block 12, East Side Addition to Balboa Tract, be established. Chairman Dosh announced that the following two items would be discussed concurrently inasmuch as they were:re7ated, however, separate motions on each item would be in order. Item #5. Consideration of amendments to Section 20.08.191 'AMENDMENT of the Newport Beach Municipal Code relating to N0. 316 parking requirements for Industrial Zoning Dist- ricts and adding Section 20.30.080 requiring APPROVED parking in the M -1 District. Initiated by: City..of Newport Beach Item #6. Consideration of amendments to Sections 20.30.030 AMENDMENT and 20.30.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code N to require use permits for all non - manufacturing uses in the M -1 District. DENIED Initiated by. City of Newport Beach Page 6. COMMISSIONERS 9 2 4 x �m N CALL 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 20, 1972 MINUTES INDEX Chairman -Dosh noted that Amendment No. 316 had beer. continued from the meeting of March 2, 1972 so tha it could be considered concurrently with Amendment No. 318; also that representatives of the Cannery Village Merchants. Association had indicated they would present certain studies and data for con- sideration. Assistant Director Hewicker stated that no further information had been received sine that time, however Mr. Kausen, President of the Cannery Village Merchants Association had indicate he would be unable to attend this evening's meetin and would submit a letter requesting a continuance but a letter had not been received. The Commission discussed this amendment at length and Commissioner Glass expressed concern about the requirement "but in no event shall there be less than 10 parking spaces for each establishment ". He stated that in view of the small lots in this area this would not be feasible and there should be some modification of this requirement. • Mr.. James M. Dodds, Senior Warden of St. James Episcopal Church at 3209 Via Lido inquired as to what effect this ordinance would have on the church. Assistant Director Hewicker stated that this would have no bearing on the church as it is located in a commercial district and the subjec under discussion is the industrial area. Following further discussion, Amendment No. 316 Motion . N was recommended to the City Council for approval Second x with the deletion of reference to a minimum of All Ayes 10 parking spaces required for wholesale or indus- trial establishments. Director Hogan pointed out that the reason for Amendment.No. 318 was to give the Commission an opportunity to deal with the parking problem on an individual basis as applications came in for commercial uses. The Commission discussed this proposed amendment at length and it was felt that since the parking problem had been solved by the previous action, this.additional requirement of a.use permit for commercial uses would slow down the revitalization • of the area. Following discussion, Commissioner Martin made a motion that this amendment be dropped from con- sideration and not forwarded to the City Council, Page 7. COMMISSI9NERS N fD CALL m fD Motion Second Ayes Noes • Stion Second All Aye CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES April 20, 1972 INDEX x x x x x x x x x The motion was seconded by- Commissioner Glass but Ao vote was taken as it was- pointed out that the Council had specifically requested that this ordinance be considered by the Planning Commission and that any amendment initiated by the City required Council action. A substitute motion was made that Amendment No. 31 be forwarded to the City Council with a recommenda tion of denial. Request..to subdivide 37.3 acres into -2 lots for Item #7. TENTATIV development as condominiums. MMTP T_VCT NO Location: Portion of Lots 1 and 2, Tract.463, located on the westerly side of Superior Avenue, north of Pacific CONDITIO Coast Highway and at the southerly ALLY end of Monrovia Avenue. AFMVED Zone: R -3 -B -2 and Unclassified Applicant: Robert H. Grant Corp., Anaheim Engineer: V.T.N., Irvine Owner: Beeco Ltd., Santa Ana Chairman.Dosh reviewed this Tentative Map with the Commission. Assistant Director Hewicker noted that since the staff report had been sent to the Commission, a report had been received from the Fire Marshal and it.was suggested - that -an additional condition be added to those already suggested, as follows: 12. That all fire and emergency.access roads shall.be improved to an unobstructed width of 20 feet and easements for their use shal be granted to the City of Newport Beach. Mr. Ron Dickerson represented the applicant and stated that they agreed to all the suggested condi- tions. x Following discussion, Tentative Map Tract No. 7817 x was recommended to the City Council for approval subject to the following conditions: Page.8. COMMISSIONERS � s N £ L CALL N �> CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 20 1972 MINUTES INDEX 1. That all conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 1585 be fulfilled. 2. That all public improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 3. That an additional 20 feet of right -of -way be dedicated along Superior Avenue; and that all improvements be constructed, with the new pavement extending out to join the existing pavement. 4. That all vehicular access rights to Superior Avenue, except at the intersection of "A" Street, be dedicated to the City. 5. That Section 19.16.030 of the Subdivision Ordinance regarding map scale be.waived provided maps drawn accurately to a scale of 1" = 100' are furnished to the Public Works Department. • 6. That the.boundary of the final tract map be checked by the County Surveyor before. being submitted to the City for approval. 7. That easements be a minimum of 10 feet wide, with greater widths provided where.. required.by the Public Works Department. 8. That off -site easements for sewer and storm drainage facilities be a minimum of 15 feet wide; and that the easements be graded and provided with a surface treatment which will permit accessibility of maintenance vehicles under all weather conditions. 9. That all grading be in accordance with grading plans and reports approved by the Public Works Director and a qualified Soils Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the Civil Engineer and the Soils Engineer shall certify that the grading has been completed according to the plans and the requirements of the grading ordinance. Permanent reproducible copies of-the "as- • built" grading plans on standard size sheet shall be furnished to the Public Works Department. Page 9. COMMISSIONERS s � S N fD y y f. �, S � p 3 3 OL CALL N " s ; • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES April 20, 1972 INDEX N- In developing the grading plan, special attention shall be directed to an interim protection plan to prevent erosion and siltation problems prior to completion of the grading work: It is imperative that the grading operations for this devel.op- ment.do not create conditions that will adversely affect.the quality of the receiving waters. 10. That the interior private street system conform to the City's private street policy except for minor modifications which may be approved by the Public Works Department; that the structural and final geometric design be- approved by the Public Works. Department; and that the construction of the private street improvements be inspecte by the Public Works Department and the standard plan check and inspection,fees.. be paid. 11. That the subdivider be responsible for constructing the off -site sewer and storm drainage facilities required for the tract; and that any work affecting the facilities of the Orange County Sanitation.Districts or State Division of Highways be accom-. plished in accordance with permits obtained from each respective agency. 12. That all fire and emergency access roads shall be improved to an unobstructed width of 20 feet.and easements for their use shall be granted to the City of Newport Beach. Item #8. Request to realign lot lines.to create 3 R- 3.1ots. RESUBDI- that will be approximately equal in size. I�dlq_ NT 338 Location:. Lots 11, 12 and 13, Tract 884,.located at the northeast corner of West Balboa Boulevard and 9th Street. CONDITIO _Ar_LT- AT VED Zone: R -3 Applicant: James Tyson II, Newport Beach Engineer: Hall and Foreman,_ Inc., Santa Ana Owner: Cornelia P..Tyson, Cor.ona.del Mar Page 10. N- COMMISSIO z NERS N N � w £ o N I9 3 N 3 Re CALL Motion Second All Aye • Motion Second All Ayes • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Anvil 9n 1079 Tmnry Chairman Dosh reviewed this application,with the Commission. Mr. James Tyson, the applicant was present and answered questions of the Commission. Following a.short discussion, Resubdivision No. X_ 338 was approved subject to the following conditio : x B 1. That a.Parcel Map be filed: Item #9. TENTATIVE Request for a one year extension of a previously approved tentative map. NAT Location:. Portion of Block 51, Irvine's Subdivi- TRACT NO. 7TT7- sion, located at the.northwest corner of Eastbluff Drive and Vista del Oro. RE UEST Zone: R -3 -B F EXTENSION APPROVED Applicant: I.D.H., a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa Owner: The.Irvine Company, Newport Beach Chairman Dosh reviewed this request for a one year extension of Tentative Map Tract No. 7167 with the Commission. Mr. Robert.Bein, of Raub, Bein, Frost and Associates answered questions.of the Commission regarding a surcharge being placed on the ground to insure stability as well as questions regarding the siltation basin. x Following discussion, a one year extension was x approved. Item #10. USE PERMIT Request for an extension of a previously approved use permit allowing a residential use in a C -1 -Z District. Location: Lot 2, Block 10, Balboa Tract, located E UEST at 703 East Balboa Boulevard, on.the ENSION south side of East Balboa Boulevard between.Washington Avenue and Main APPROVED Street. Page 11. COMMISSIONERS Y y w y N �a A(%�; N � u' - R CALL " Motion Second Ayes Noes • L CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES April 20. 1972 INDEX X xxx x x x,. xx Zone: C -1 -Z Applicants: Mr. and Mrs. Marshall Fields, Balboa Owners: Same as applicants Chairman Dosh reviewed this request for extension with the Commission. Following a short discussion, Use Permit No. 151.5 was extended for a period of one year. Request.to permit the temporary establishment of a. Item #11. USE yacht club with on- sale:alcoholic beverages located PERMIT within 200 feet of a dwelling district. _NT._T!�92 Location: Lot 5, Tract 3232, located at.1353 CONTINUED Bayside Drive -on the southerly side of.UN`Tr- Bayside Drive between Jamboree Road _MTTT and the Bahia Corinthian Yacht Club. Zone: C -1 -H Applicant: Shark Island Yacht Club, Newport Beach Owner:. The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission. During the discussion regarding this application, the Commission indicated its concern regarding the fact that-the off-site parking was located approximately 950 feet.from the clubhouse. Mr. Bill Williamson, Commodore of the Shark Island Yacht Club was present and answered questions of the Commission. He stated that the club had a six passenger electric surrey which would be used to shuttle members.-from the parking area to.the yacht club. Upon being questioned, Mr. Williamson stated that there were 230 members in the club and he estimated that the maximum members present at any one time would be 40 to 50; any large parties would be held at the Bahia Corinthian Yacht Club. Mr: R. P. Brown.of 1321 Bayside Drive spoke in opposition and Mr. A. H. Beasley of 1319 Bayside Drive also spoke in opposition. Mr: Beasley stated Page 12. COMMISSIONERS y 2 ¢ N N } N N IA !+ QLL CALL �� 3N F� s April Motion Second Ayes Noes • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES 90. 1079 INDEX that he had previously lived at 919 Bayside Drive, next to the former location of the Shark Island Yacht Club and that he had moved to his present location because of the noise. Following further.discussion, a motion to condition- ally approve was made by Commissioner Glass and seconded by-Commissioner Adkinson. No vote was taken on this motion. A substitute motion was made to continue - this -item until May 4, 1972 so that the staff could check wit the Police Department regarding any complaints that may have been received; staff also was asked to check with the Traffic Department regarding the "surrey" going.back.and forth on Bayside Drive. x The application was continued. until May 4, 1972. x x xxx x x Chairman Dosh called a 5 minute recess and the Commission reconvened at 9:55 P.M. with all members present. Item #12. USE Request to permit: the sale of beer and wine in con- junction with a restaurant located within 200 feet TMIT of a. dwelling district. W. TT93 CONDITIOP Location: Lot 8, Block 436, Corona del Mar, located at 420 Iris Avenue, on the I�Lr—y southerly side of Iris Avenue between A P120VED First Avenue and East Coast Highway Zone,: C -1 -H Applicants: Jean D. Willmas and Jean R. Maxey, Corona del Mar Owner: Morris Smith, Newport..Beach Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission and noted that two letters of opposition had been received, one from P. L. Hummel of 416 Heliotrope Avenue and the other from John C. Daviso of 421 Iris Avenue. Mr: Davison also attached a copy of a letter of protest addressed to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. Miss Willmas, the applicant was present and sub- mitted a petition in favor of her request signed Page 13. COMMISSI9NERS cD w v ° £ fl w OLL CALL • Motion Second Ayes Noes • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES April 20, 1972 INDEX by people living on Iris Avenue between First Street and Pacific Coast Highway and also some living on Iris Avenue beyond First Street; also another statement signed by her customers. Miss Willmas stated that she was not interested in a beer bar, she would not be serving tap beer, only bottle beer. Her place Df.business had originally been a coffee bar, which she still main- tained, but she had extended the menu. Upon being questioned, Miss Willmas stated that her hours of operation were from 8:30 to 5:30 P.M. during the week and from 8:00 to 5:00 P.M. on Sundays. She indicated that she would be willing to have these hours specified as a condition of approval of the use permit. The following persons spoke in favor of the applica- tion: Mr. Paul Peterson of 900 Sea Lane, Mr. Frank Jordan of 2732 East Coast Highway and Mr. Jerry Hill of 404 Iris Avenue. Mr. John Davison of 421 Iris Avenue spoke in oppo- sition. Following discussion, Use Permit Application No x 1593 was.approved subject to the following condi- x tion.. X x x NX X x 1. The hours of.operation shall be limited from 8:30 A.M. to 5:30 P.M. during the months of October through April and from. 8:30 A.M. to 7:30 P.M. during the months of May through September. Item #13 Request to permit a maintenance and equipment yard USE and 6 holes of.a 9 hole golf course and driving range to be located in an Unclassified District. PUMIT NU—.T-594 Location: Portion of Lots 101, 102 and 103, Tract.706 and portion of abandoned DENIED Birch Street, located at 2301 Mesa Drive on the southerly side of Mesa Drive easterly of Irvine Avenue. Zone: Unclassified Applicant: Pacific Coast,Mfg. Co;, Golf Division, Glendale. Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Page-14. COMMISSIONERS v s a o a N 0 0 CALL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 20, 1972 MINUTES INDEX Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission. Assistant Director Hewicker noted that the staff had been in contact with the Orange County Plannin Department; that the application had also been referred to the Orange County Flood. Control District but a reply had not been received;.that the Orange County Department of Real Property Services had been contacted and the staff understood that they had been discussing for several years the establis - ment of a similar type of use on the clear.zone. that is owned by the County just northerly of the subject property. Mr. Hewicker had also telephone Mr. Ron Chandler, Assistant:Director.of Aviation for Orance County, who expressed concern regarding the lighting. Mr. Hewicker noted further that there were a large number of people present at the meeting who owned horses and who were concerned with the equestrian • access to the Back Bay. Mr. Chris Jones, one of the partners of Pacific Coast Manufacturing Company addressed the Commis- sion and displayed renderings of the proposed clubhouse facility and of the interior of the building, which would be located on County property. Mr. Al Krieger, City,Councilman and past Mayor of Monterey Park, where there is a similar facility, spoke in favor of the application. He asked that the record show that he did not have a financial interest in the project but was speaking only as to the reliability of the Company and the applicant. The following persons.addressed the Commission regarding equestrian access, lighting, annexation,. the danger of the driving range, access for hikers, traffic and pedestrian access: Mr. Bob Carter of 20345 Acacia Street, Santa Ana Heights; Mrs. Frank Scroggs of Costa Mesa; Mr. Don Metcalf of 20454 Cypress.Street, Santa Ana Heights; Mr. Reed Flory of 20345 Acacia Street, Santa Ana Heights; Mr. Guy Gottschalk of 20342 Acacia Street, Santa Ana.Heights; Mr. Gardner Stoddard of- 1742 Orchard Street; Mr; John O'Flynn of 20382 Cypress Street, Santa Ana • Heights; Mrs. Raymond Davis.who lives,on Mesa Drive and would have the largest piece of property bordering the golf course; Mr. Edward Cook, President of the Homeowners Association of Anniversary Lane; Mrs. Florence Wilkinson who lives about.one mile from the proposed golf course; Mr. Jay Oliver of Page 15. COMMISSIONERS w N fA:�A� J J N w IOLL CALL �� w emotion cond *otio yes. Noes. Motion Second Ayes Noes Abstain • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ADril 20. 1972 INDEX 20321 Acacia Street and Mr. Harry Rooney of 20362 Cypress Street. Mr. Charles Buchanan, Commercial Leasing Department of the Irvine Company, who was present at the meet- ing on another matter,stated he was unfamiliar wit the access problem but that first consideration would be given to the lessee. Upon being questioned, he stated that the lease had been consumated. Mr. Richard Hufft, General Manager of Pacific Coast Manufacturing Company addressed the Commission regarding the lighting,landscaping and architecture of the clubhouse. Upon being questioned, he state that they would be serving alcoholic beverages. Following a lengthy discussion during which some of the Commissioners expressed concern regarding the lighting, equestrian access, a pedestrian under - crossing, hours of operation, and annexation of the property now within the County, as well as. X fencing, a motion to conditionally approve the X application failed to carry. x x X x x A substitute motion by Commissioner Agee to con- tinue the application in order to obtain additional information failed for lack of a second. Commissioner Adkinson made a substitute motion, stating that even though he had voted for the approval of the application, he would make a motion x for denial so that the applicant could appeal to x the City Council. He included in his motion a x x x x recommendation to the City Council that if the x action of the Planning Commission were overruled, x that the Council consider the imposition of require - ments for equestrian access over the property, that the property be annexed to the City of Newport Beach subject to City standards and that stringent . rules for lighting and hours of operation be imposed. Item #14 USE Request to permit a cocktail lounge, live enter- tainment and dancing in conjunction with a pro- PERMIT posed restaurant, with tandem parking, located 95 within 200 feet of a dwelling district. CONDITIO Location: Portion of Lot 35 and Lots 36, 37 and LL 38, Tract 1210, located at 1100 West PPROVED Coast Highway, on the north side of Page 16. COMMISSIONERS . w N � wo wfAa CALL > m w '" CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ADril 20. 1972 MINUTES INDEX West Coast Highway opposite the Balboa Bay Club. Zone: C -1 -H Applicants: Erhan Gedik, Ergun Gecgil, and Anthony Daleo, Laguna Beach Owner: Larry Stein, Newport Beach Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission and pointed out that the staff had suggested an alternate parking plan from that submitted by the applicant which would provide a different.driveway situation between the park- ing areas.in order to avoid the possible backing, out of automobiles onto the street. City Engineer Nolan stated he believed that pro- viding circulation on the site between the two parking areas.was of sufficient importance that it should be added to the conditions of approval. • He noted that the addition of this requirement would result in a loss of parking spaces which would affect the permitted occupancy load. Zoning Administrator Laycock pointed out the suggested parking pattern on a map. Mr. Erhan Gedik was present at the meeting,and stated that he was in agreement with the staff's recommendations as.well as the alternate parking plan. He answered questions of the Commission regarding the dancing and live entertainment. He stated further that this would be a bonafide public dining place with authentic international cuisine; that it would not-be just a dancing and drinking bar per se and that there would not be loud "rock" music. Mrs. Joseph Gallant, President of Cliff Haven Community Association addressed the Commission stating that she was not against the restaurant, but felt that the cocktail lounge, live entertain- ment and dancing would create a noise problem for the people on the bluff. • Mr. J. D. Walling of 1113 Kings Road spoke:in opposition. Motion x Following discussion, the application.was approved Second x subject to.the following conditions: Ayes x x x x x Noes x x. Page 17. COMMISSIONERS OIL CALL O T h CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Anril 70 _ 1977 MINUTES INDEX 1. That this approval shall be fora period of one year.from the date of final determina- tion of the application,.and any request for extension shall be acted upon-by the Modifications.Committee. 2. Parking attendants shall be provided during the operations of the restaurant. 3. The occupancy load of the restaurant, as determined by the Fire Marshal and the Community Development Department shall not exceed 144 persons. 4. One on -site parking space shall be provided for each.three persons. The parking areas shall conform to all off - street parking standards, except that tandem parking spaces shall be permitted as indicated. On -site circulation between the two parking areas shall be provided as approved by.the City . Traffic Engineer. 5. A landscape plan shall.be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. Said plan shall indicate land- scaping throughout the site and include. minimum 5 foot wide landscape planters along West Coast Highway, except at approved driveways. Said planters shall consist of trees, shrubs and groundcovers to.the satisfaction of the Community Development Department, be irrigated with automatic watering devices,and be permanently main- tained. 6. The building shall be insulated in such a manner as to restrict the noise to the interior of the facility. 7. Air conditioning shall be installed and operable before the live entertainment commences, and doors and windows shall be kept closed during business hours. 8. All roof top mechanical equipment except . vents required by the Building Code, shall be screened from homes fronting view of on Kings.Road. Such screening to be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. Page 18. COMMISSIONERS s N L CALtL'O' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH April 20, 1972 MINUTES INDEX 9. Air locks (ie. double doors) shall be in- stalled at.all patron entrances. 10. The restaurant shall close no later than 2:00 A.M. on any day. 11. Live entertainment shall terminate at 12:45 A.M. 12. This application shall conform.to Sections 5.28:010 through 5.28.100 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code regulating entertain- ment in connection with establishments. serving food and beverages. 13. Only.one pole sign and one wall sign identifying the proposed restaurant shall be.permitted on the subject property. 14. That unused drive approaches be.recon- structed with standard curb and sidewalk. 15. That the existing.easterly.drive approach be widened to a dimension approved by the City Traffic Engineer; and any conflict- ing utilities relocated as required. 16. That an encroachment permit be obtained from the State Division of Highways for work within the Coast Highway right -of -way. 17. That the types and locations of-street trees along West.Coast Highway be provided to the specifications of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department and the standard inspection fee of $3.00 per tree be paid. 18. All storage of cartons, containers and trash shall be shielded from view within a building or within an area enclosed by a wall or fence not.less,than six feet in height. 19. That a.two way drive be constructed between the proposed parking areas. 20. That a revised plot plan be submitted to the Community Development Department in- dicating the drive required by Condition No. 19, and the interior layout.revised to reflect.any change in occupancy. Page 19. COMMISSIONERS z J 0 Ams� RG CALL'a : • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES April 20, 1972 INDEX Item #16. Request to amend a portion of Districting Map No. AMENDMENT 9 from a C -1 District to an R -2 District. NU—.-3TT- Location: Lots 18, 19, 20 and the northerly APPROVED 12.5 feet of Lot 21, Block 219; Lots 4 through 12 and Lots.18 through 27, Block 220; and.Lots 4 through 8, Block 221, Section A of Newport•Beach Tract, located at 208 - 210 -212 20th Street; 209 through_225 20th Street; 202 through 220 21st Street and 207 through 217 21st Street. Initiated by: City of Newport Beach Chairman Dosh noted that this zone change had been initiated in -order to reflect existing and pro- posed residential developments on 20th and 21st Streets northeasterly of West Balboa Boulevard. It was pointed out that this area was considered for rezoning three years ago and that some of the people who did not desire a zone change at that time were now using the property as residential; that the 25' x 90' lots did not lend themselves to commercial development as adequate parking coul not be provided and that the owners were now request- ing use permits for residential development. Mr: Robert Seiling addressed the Commission in favor of the zone change and asked questions re- garding the rear yard setbacks. He was advised that rear yard setbacks are not established on the Districting Maps and that a 10 foot rear yard setback would apply. Mr. Michael Mead, attorney, appeared in behalf of the owners of approximately 7 of the lots, specifi - ally Lots 18, 195 20 and the northerly 12.5 feet of Lot 21, Block 219 on 20th Street, Lot 6 at 213 - 20th Street, Lot 21, Block 219 on 20th Stree as well as 206 and 208 - 21st Street. He stated that he did not believe that:the area was pre - dominantly residential and that Mr. Bob Roubian, who owns the Crab Cooker Restaurant had purchased Lots 18, 19, 20 and the northerly 12.5 feet of. Lot 21 which he intended to use for parking if it became necessary to rebuild his establishment. It was pointed out to Mr: Mead that parking on these lots would be possible through the use permit Page 20. COMMISSIONERS y s ¢ N = F y 0 �p N M 9L CALL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Anril 20_ 1979 MINUTES INDEX Procedure and he replied that if Mr. Roubian could be assured that this was possible, he would have no objection. Following further discussion Mr. Mead was asked if he would be satisfied if a statement of legislative history were put in the record that the Commission considered parking an appropriate use for the property in question and Mr. Mead replied that he would appreciate that and it would be sufficient. Mr. Steigerwal.d, who owns Harbor Glass Company at 222 and 224 21st Street addressed the Commission and asked if it would be possible to allow Lot 18 at 220 21st Street-to remain commercial as he hoped to expand his operation. Motion x Following further discussion, it was moved that Second x Amendment No. 319 be recommended to the City All Aye Council for approval, deleting Lot 18, Block 220, Section A, of.Newport Beach Tract located at 220 - . 21st Street, with the addition, as a part of legislative history that the Commission considered parking an appropriate use of the lots. contiguous to commercial property. Commissioner Martin requested permission to be absent on May 4, 1972, which was granted. On motion of Commissioner Adkinson, seconded by Commissioner Heather, and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 1:10 A.M. ac a Heather, Secretary Newport Beach City Planning Commission Page 21.