Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/15/1972/ COMMISSIONERS y N L CALL m Present. Absent L7 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Regular Planning Commission Meeting Place: Council Chambers Time: 7:30 P.M. Date: June 15, 1972 MINUTES iNnex xxxx xx x EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. V. Hogan, Community Development Director David Rc Baade, Asst. City Attorney Benjamin B.'Nolan,.City Engineer. STAFF MEMBERS James D. Hewicker, Asst. Community Development Dir. William R: Laycock, Zoning Administrator William R. Foley, Senior Planner Helen Herrmann On motion of Commissioner Agee, seconded by.Commis- si.oner; Martin,.and carried, the minutes of May 18, 1972 were approved as written. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** On motion of Commissioner Heather, seconded by Commissioner Glass, and carried, the minutes of, June 1, 1972 were approved as. written.. Chairman Dosh.announced that requests had been received for continuance of.Items No. 3, 9 and 13.and if there was no one'present who desired to be heard on these matters, they would be continued to a later date. Item #3. Request to permit a- convention center, including USE 3 meeting rooms, exhibit space and shops, to the PERMIT Newporter Inn. @',97 Location:. Portion of Block 55 of Irvine's Sub- CONTINUE division, located.at 1107 Jamboree URTTC- Road at the northwest.corner of Jam- J=20. boree Road and Back.Bay Drive. Zone: Unclassified Applicant: Del E. Webb.Hotel Management Co., Las Vegas Owner:, The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Page 1. COMMISSI -2NERS hmoo,§S_�(ftvx Rdh CALL Motion Second, All Ayes 0 Motion Second All Ayes Motion Second, All Ayes CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES INDEX The applicant requested a continuance until July 6 1972; however the staff requested that this item be continued until July 20, 1972 1n order to have ample time to-review a traffic report.which is to be prepared by the applicant. x x Use Permit No. 1597 was continued until July 20, 1972: Item #9: Request to create 2.parcels of land for restaurant RESUBDI- sites, 1 parcel for office.use, and l parcel for IT SION off - street parking. N 3 3 Location:. Lot :l and _a portion .of Lot 2, of CONTINUED Tract•3232, located at -the southeast UNTIL corner of Marine Avenue.and Bayside Un-7 -6 Drive adjacent to the - Island. .Balboa bridge. Zone: C -1 -H Applicant: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Owner.: Same as applicant. x This item was continued until July 6, 1972 at the x request'of the staff. Item #13. Request to amend.the Planned Community Development AMENDMENT Standards for "North Ford ", to permit the expansi N of land uses and the-updating of-the development, standards. CONTINUED UNTIL Location:. Portion of Blocks 56 and 57, Irvine's Subdivision, located. between Jamboree J6C�-6 Road and MacArthur Boulevard and between Bison Avenue and,.the extensio of Bonita Canyon Road. Zone: P -C Applicant: The Irvine Company, Newport.Beach Owner: Same as applicant.. x This item was continued until July 6,,1972 at the x requett.of the applicant. Page .2. COMMISSI9NERS 4 N N RA CALL m S • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Lune 15. 1972 INDEX E Commissioner Martin stepped down prior to discussion of the.following two items in order.to avoid a. conflict :of interest: .Item #1. Request to permit a 51 unit condominium.develop -. USE ment.in a C,l District. Maximum height- -to be-41 PERMIT feet; including elevator shafts. Nb -7�91 DENIED Location:. All or part of the following lots: 1 through 7, Block B, Bayside Tract WI 0 T and 1 through 6, Block.7, Balboa, PR�ViD C Tract; located at 600 East Edgewater Avenue between.Palm.,Street and Washington Street, and on the east side of.Palm.Street between East Balboa Boulevard and East Bay Avenue. Zone: C -1 Applicant: JAK-Construction Co., Costa Mesa Architect: Rolly Pulaski,.Newport Beach Owner: Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Co., Orange Chairman Dosh reviewed this application with the Commission, as well.as the memorandum from the City Attorney and Advance Planning Division, a letter from the applicant and various correspondence, that had been received, It was noted that since the application had been before the Commission on April 6, 1972 a revised plan had been.received reducing the number of units from.51 to 47. It was noted further that the change of use was the,basic premise on which the application should be con- side red. Mr. John Konwiser.of JAK Construction Company. addressed the Commission and stated that the application involved three basic items: one, the change in.the application since the April 6th meet- ing, two, land use and,three, the easement in front of the bay property_ fronting on the "Fun Zon ". He passed out a copy of the tentative map cut off at the bottom showing the foot of the.property along the,bay with the area which would be -a public walkway indicated in color: He also intro - duced three letters supporting his proposal,.one from Mr. Roger W. Hannaford of the Bay Department.Store, the other two from residents in.'the area, Mr. & Mr . Page .3. E COMMISSIgNERS 0) N l0 � 3 fD N N £ N `D ) ^S N N LL CALL ° m CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 15, 1972 MINUTES INDEX Dwight Gick and Mr. Arthur E.. Svendsen. Mr. Konwiser explained in detail the changes that had been made in the.plan and read into the record a portion of the Central Balboa Study, the basis on which he had started this project. A rendering showing all of the proposed elevations of the pro- posed building was displayed as well as a colored land use map showing 118 different parcels in the area and indicating their use; also a diagram show- ing the intended improvement of the walkway along the waterfront. Mr. Konwiser also reviewed in detail the staff report and attachments that had been transmitted to the Commission. Mr. Bruce Harrington of Kalmbach, DeMarco, Knapp & Chillingswor.th, attorneys, addressed the Commis- sion regarding the northerly portion of the property, or the "sidewalk area ". Mr. Rodger Howell, attorney for the Santa Ana Vall Irrigation Company and Mr. D. C: Hansen, Manager of the Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company addressed the Commission regarding this application. The following persons spoke in favor of the applica- tion: Mr. George Perlin of 412 E. Balboa Boulevard, Mr. Dave Kirchner who lives on Miramar Drive, . Mr. Roy Collins who owns property at Main Street and Balboa Boulevard, Mr. Larry Deane, President of Deane Development. Company, Mr. Tom Loon, architect of 301 Abalone Ave., Balboa Island, Mr. Jim Hydemus, a new resident of Balboa, Joan Schirtzer, a resident of Newport Beach, James Pellegrine, a.resident of the Peninsula, Mr. Bob Lynvall who does not live in the City but who lived here years ago. Mr. Jack Wassall, 409 E. Edgewater, Vice President of the Balboa Improvement Association who stated that a local newspapers had stated that their Association was neutral in the matter but he wished to state that the Board of Directors had voted 75% in favor of the project. . Mr. Peter Marshall, who lives on Balboa Island Hazel Jones, a resident on the Peninsula for 22 years. Mr. Louis Briggs Mr. Ed Darrow - 4 - COMMISSIONERS v x m� w tLoo caL Motion Second No Vote Taken Motion Second s s A stain Absent. n LJ Motion Aecond Ayes Abstain Absent CITY OF 'NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES June 15. 1972 INDEX The following persons spoke in opposition: Mr. Tom Shelton, a resident of Newport Beach, Mr. Allan Beek, a resident of Beacon Bay. Mr. John Currough, a representative of Development Research Associates, the City's economic consultants for the General Plan addressed the.Commission and explained their recommendations for this area.' Following discussion, Commissioner Glass commented that while the majority of the audience present were of the opinion that the "Fun Zone" was not a very desirable use of -the property, there has not been an application: for a.commercial use, so the question before the Commission was not the "Fun x Zone" versus a condominium but primarily one of x land use, therefore he recommended denial. Further discussion ensued regarding the location where commercial use should be.concentrated . on the x Peninsula, following which the application was x denied without prejudice. x x x x x Chairman Dosh called a five minute and the x .recess Commission reconvened at 9:35 P.M., Commissioner x Adkinson being absent and Commissioner Martin ab- staining from discussion of the following item. Item #2. TENTATIVE Request to create 2 parcels for development as condominiums and one parcel to remain as bulkhead. N0. 7796 Location: All or part of the following lots: 1 through 7,Block B, Bayside Tract. DENIED and l through 6, Block 7, Balboa Tract located at 600 East Edgewater Avenue between Palm Street and Washington Street, and'on.the east side of Palm Street between East Balboa Boulevard and.East.Bay Avenue. Zone: C -1 Applicant: JAK Construction Co., Costa Mesa Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost,& Asso., Costa Mesa Owner:. Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Co., Orange X, This:Tentative Map had been filed in conjunction X with the previous use permit and based on the actin xx x x x taken on that application, Tentative Map Tract.No. x 7796 was denied. x Page 5. 0 0 COMMISSI9NERS D y CALL i CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 15, 1972 MINUTES INDEX Commissioner Martin returned to the dais. Request to amend portions of Districting Maps No. Item #4. AMENDMENT 34 and 35 from an Unclassified District to a P -C N_ 3"r3 (Planned Community) District:to provide for the classification and development of approximately CONDITION 177.38 acres, bounded on the northeast by Campus LLY Drive, on the southeast by Jamboree Road, and on APPROVED the west by MacArthur Boulevard, to permit a com -. bination.of uses including, but not limited to, light industrial, research and development, commer cial and service.facilities, and an Orange County, Courthouse. Location:. Portion of Block 50, Irvine's Subdivi- sion, located at the northeasterly corner of MacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Road.(The Collins Radio property). Zone: Unclassified Applicant: Collins Radio Company, Newport Beach Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach (Collins Radio Company - 95 year.lease Chairman Dosh reviewed the staff report regarding this proposed development.in detail; also letters. and memorandums that had been received and trans- mitted to the Commission. Director of Community Development Hogan noted that a meeting had been held on Monday, June.12, 1972, with the City of Irvine to discuss this proposal in particular and the development of the property in that area in general. Those in attendance were Commissioners.Hazewinkel and Martin, Director of Community Development Hogan, Assistant Director Hewicker, the City Manager of the City of Irvine, two members.of the Council of the City of Irvine and the Planning Consultant for the City of Irvine Mr. Hogan read into the record a letter that was received following the meeting from the Municipal Liaison Committee of-the City of Irvine signed by Gabrielle Pryor, Councilwoman and John Burton, Councilman. Mr. Hogan pointed out that from a staff point of-view it was felt that a joint plan - ning effort.was needed, not only by the two cities in this particular area, but in any of the other property that might be adjoining in other juris- dictions. Page 6. COMMISSIQNERS N a FA CALL 5_ `0 3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH lune 15. 1972 MINUTES INDEX The Commission discussed this at length, as well a the traffic problem, possible increased use of.the Airport; and the difference in the intensity of us between industrial and.commercial development. Mr. John Watson addressed the Commission and challenged two of its members stating he felt they should step down; Commissioner Martin because he.' is employed by McDonnell Douglas and Commissioner Hazewinkel because his firm, a division of Kaiser - Aetna will provide the funds for this .project.. Mr. Don Kol1, the developer, addressed the Commis- sion and stated that Aetna Life was not his partne in this project, as yet; they were a proposed partner. It was pointed.out that Mr. Martin's situation was discussed when the application was previously befo e the Commission and it was the opinion of the Assistant City Attorney that Mr. Martin did not haN e a conflict of interest. Commissioner Hazewinkel asked the Assistant City Attorney for his opinion • regarding his position and after consideration, the reply was that based upon.the facts as they were presented, the Assistant City Attorney did no feel there was a conflict of interest. Chairman Dosh stated he had complete confidence in the ability of the two Commissioners to make an unbias d. decision in this matter. Mr. Ernest Wilson. addressed the Commission in behalf of the.Collins Radio Company and stated tha many hours had been spent with the staff on this project and he.felt.the results showed. He noted. further that they understood all of the recommenda- tions made. Mr. Larry Moore, Associate Planning Administrator for the Irvine Company addressed the Commission stating that approval of this project might result in a development that would not be compatible with the surrounding area and that it might be over- loading the master planned system for the area: Mr. Jim Federhardt of Alan M. Voorhees and Mr. Robert Jaffe, Traffic Engineer for the City of Newport Beach addressed the Commission regarding • the traffic analysis. Mr. Daniel Emory, Chairman of the Airport Noise Abatement Committee, spoke in.opposition to the application;.Mr. Allan Beek supported Mr. Emory in his remarks. Page 7. COMMISSIONERS s Y w jo 0 N 5 rd CALLN� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 15,1972 MINUTES INDEX A motion to approve the-application subject to the recommendations of the staff.was made by Commis - sioner Agee and seconded by Commissioner Heather but further discussion ensued prior to registering of a vote and a substitute motion was made.by Commissioner Martin to restrict the development to 50% of the land area for 4 years and to.permit the remaining plan to be phased . in quarters. This motion failed for lack of a second. Following further discussion, the application was.. Motion x recommended to the City Council for approval, Second x subject to the following conditions: Ayes x x xx x Noes x 1. The revisions to the P -C Text.as outlined Absent x in.the report from the Department of Community Development dated June 12, 1972. 2. The recommendations of the Traffic Con - sultant as outlined in the revised traffic report dated May 1972. 3. The 5 conditions of the Assistant Public • Works Director as contained in a memorandum dated May 24, 1972. 4. The ll conditions of -the City Engineer as contained in.a memorandum dated June.9, 197 5. The recommendations of the City-Traffic Engineer as contained in a memorandum dated June':9, 1972: 6. The following additional conditions: A. That Campus Drive shall be widened to provide dual left turn lanes at Van Karman Avenue;. B. That the developer shall provide the Commission.with a schedule or phasing of development in conjunction with a schedule of traffic facilities -im- provement, satisfactory to the Commis- sion after the final approval of the project, before any approval is given for any further action such as subdi- vision, building permits; etc. C. That a, memorandum from the Planning Commission be sent to the City Council to the effect.that the City's approval Page 8. COMMISSIONERS AMM-Nrl"' " ltdb CALL �1DS • 11 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES June 15. 1972 INDEX IT J of this .project and the City's stated policy on the Airport appear to be in conflict and the Commission wishes to bring this to the attention of..the Council for its resolution. Item #5. USE PERM Request to permit a parking lot in.an R -1 District adjacent to a C -1 District.. _N0 11 DENIED Location: Lot 43,.Block B, Tract 673, located at 408 Hazel Drive, near the north- east corner of East Coast Highway,in Corona del Mar: Zone: R -1 Applicant: Melvin A. Osterhoudt, Newport Beach Owner: James D. Ray Chairman Dosh reviewed this application.with the Commission as well correspondence and petitions received in opposition to the.project and one letter in favor. Assistant..Director Hewicker pointed out that acces to the property was difficult because the media ,of divider in Coast Highway and upon being questioned City Traffic Engineer Jaffe stated any.opening of the median would be a very serious error and he would object very strenuously to it. Mr. C. A. Higbie, attorney, represented the appli- cant and stated that.Mr. Osterhoudt was ready to conform to all of the requirements of the staff. Mr. John Allard, associated with Don Franklin Realty and a homeowner in'Corona del Mar addressed the Commission and stated he had made an analysis of the 63 signatures on the petition and he challenged some of them.as not being homeowners. as well as multiple signatures for the.same address in some cases. Mr. Len Seltzer of 519 Hazel Drive spoke in opposi- tion and stated that he.and his wife had obtained all of the signatures; that:most of them were home owners and that this application would affect people who were tenants as well.. Page 9. IT COMMISSIONERS y $ N N R& CALL F Motion, Second Al Aye. i Motion Second All Ayes • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES June 15, 1972 INDEX The following persons also spoke in.opposition: Mr. Jim Johnston of 416 Hazel Drive; Mrs. Polly Johnston of 416 Hazel Drive; Mr. William DeMayo of 511 Hazel Drive; Nancy Sattler of 527 Hazel Drive; Laurie Clark a tenant at 412 Hazel Drive; Mr. Bill Ginter of 525 Hazel Drive.. x Following discussion, Use.Permit Application No. 1601 was denied. Item #6. Request approval of the Final Map of.a portion.of FINAL MAP a previously approved Tentative Map for condomin- TR NO. ium development. Location: Lot Lot 2 and a portion of Lot-1 of CONDITION Tract 463 located on the westerly side of Superior Avenue, north of APP VED Pacific. Coast Highway and at the. southerly end of Monrovia Avenue. Zone: R -3 -B -2 and Unclassified Applicant: Robert H. Grant Corp., Anaheim Engineer:, V.T.N., Irvine Owner:. Beeco Ltd., Santa Ana Chairman Dosh..reviewed this.Final Map.with.the Commission. Mr. Warren Toman represented the Grant Corporation and stated that they were in agreement with the staff recommendations. Following discussion, Final Map Tract No. 7852 x was recommended to the City Council.for approval x subject to the following conditions: 1. That all conditions of approval for - Tentative Map of Tract No. 7817 and the revised conditions of approval for Use Permit No. 1585 be fulfilled. 2. That provision be made for dedication and improvement of a fifteen foot. radius corner cut -off at the north- westerly corner.of the intersection of the new public street with Superior Avenue. Page .10. COMMISSIONERS s 9 9 R CALL s 11 Motion Second Ayes Noes CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES June 15. 1972 INDEX N- Item #7. RESUBDI- Request to create.one parcel, 3.279 acres in size for potential residential development. —VISION Location:. Portion of Lot 1, Tract.463,.located on the westerly side of Superior CONDITIO Avenue, north oU.,Pacific Coast. —TIry- Highway. APPROVED Zone: R -4 -UL Applicant:. Grant Company of California, Anaheim. Owner: Same.as applicant Engineer:. V.T.N., Irvine Chairman Dosh reviewed this application with the Commission: Mr. Warren Toman represented the Grant Company and stated that they were.in agreement with the staff recommendations: Following discussion, Resubdivision.No. 345 was X approved subject,to the following conditions: X x x x. x x 1. That a.parcel map be filed. X 2. That all improvements be.constructed as required by ordinance.and the Public Works Department: 3. That an agditional 20 -foot wide strip of.. street right of way be dedicated along Superior.Avenue; and that all public im- provements.including curb and gutter, sidewalk, street pavement; street lighting, and parkway trees be completed, with the new pavement extended to join the existing pavement.' 4. That all parkway trees be.planted in accordance with the specifications.and requiremet� its of the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation{ Department; that the standard street,.tr6e inspection of $3 per tree be paid; and that a.parkway sprinkler system with a bubbler head for each tree be constructed. Page 11. N- COMMISSI9NERS v w w RA CALL N� N m s3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 15. 1972 MINUTES INDEX 5. That water and sewer service to this resubdivision be provided by.the City of Newport Beach. 6. That all vehicular access rights to Superior Avenue be dedicated to the, City of Newport Beach. 7. That any acreage fees established by. the West Newport Water System Master Plan study be.paid. 8. That any public utility easements to be dedicated across the parcel.be a minimum of 10 -feet wide, with greater widths provided where required by the Public Works Department, 9. That a.,standard.subdivision agreement. be executed and appropriate surety be, provided if it is desired to record the parcel map or obtain building permits. • prior to completion of the public im- provements. 10. That there be no interference with con - tinued use of the existing vehicular way along the northeasterly boundary of the parcel unless, and until it is established . that the rights of.:others to such use either do not exist or are terminated. Item #8. AMENDMENT To consider adding Chapter 20:13 to the Newport Beach Municipal Code establishing the R -1.5 Dis- N trict: APPROVED Initiated by: The City of.Newport Beach. Chairman Dosh..pointed out that this zone as,des -. cribed did not presently apply to any area in the City of Newport Beach. It was the creation of .a specified zone, with attendant,regulations, which might be.used at some future..date as a zone change, or as suggested zoning for a new area, or to apply to an older area. • The Commission questioned whether Section 20.13:03 regarding height limits should be amended; however Director of Community Development Hogan noted that the height limit would depend to some extent.on the Page 12. COMMISSIONERS Y 2 N RGACAL L m Motion Second All Ayes • MI&on Second Ayes Noes Abstain Absent. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES June 15. 1972 INDEX X, x location.. If this particular ordinance were applied to any area then it would be made to con - form.to the amendment and to any height.Which might be adopted for the area where this ordinance might apply. Following discussion; Amendment..No. 327 was recom- mended to the City Council for approval: Request to realign lot lines.to create-lots 24.17 . Item #10 RESUBDI- feet and 33:01 feet in width where widths of VISION 20.09 feet and 37,09 feet now exist: N77-37-4 Location:. Lots 4 and 5, Block.339, Canal Section DENIED located at 3907 and.3909 Marcus Avenue.on the southwesterly side of Marcus Avenue between 39th and 40th Streets on Newport .Island. Zone:_ R -2 Applicant: Charles M. Ward, Jr., Newport Beach Owner: June R. Metzleur, Newport..Beach Chairman Dosh reviewed this application with.the Commission noting that a.similar application in- volving Lots..5 and 6 had been denied on April 20, 1972, appealed to the City Council, who sustained the findings of the Planning Commission. The. applicant now has arranged to purchase 4.08 feet from the property owner to the east and has pro-, posed a different realignment of,lot lines. Mr. David Delancy, attorney, represented the appli cant in support of the application stating that if it were denied, a duplex could still be built on Lot 5, which is 20.09 feet.wide, with a steel beam carport'at the rear of the lot. Assistant Director Hewicker pointed out that the required garage.size was V x 20' inside measure- ment for each unit and that without.the resubdivi- sion, two garages or carports could not be.con -. strutted unless a modification were applied for and approved: X, Following lengthy discussion, the.a licati.on 9 y pp x x x x was denied. x X, x Page 13. COMMISSI -9NERS N S 3 0 N R CALL • Motion Second All Ayes is CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES June 15, 1972 INDEX Item #11: Request to permit a subdivision of 20.8 acres into TENTATIVE a Planned Residential Development consisting of 64 RWF-TRT—CT- residential lots, 1 green area lot, 1 tennis club Abp lot, and 1 maintenance area lot: (SECOND Location: Portion of Blocks 51 and 52 of Irvine's REVISION) Subdivision, located westerly of Eastbluff Drive and southerly of Vista CONDITION del. Oro (the southwest corner of ALLY Eastbluff Drive and Vista del Oro). APPROVED Zone: R- 4- B -2 -UL, C -N -H and R -3 -B Applicant: I.D.H., A Joint Venture (Holstein Company), Costa Mesa, Engineers: Raub, Bein, Frost and Associates Costa Mesa Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Chairman Dosh reviewed the application.with the Commission. Mr. Robert Bein represented the applicant and stated that they had read the staff report.and were in agreement with the recommended conditions. Following discussion, Tentative Map Tract No. 6905 x was recommended to the City Council for approval x subject "to the following conditions: 1.. That "all improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and-the Public Works .Department. 2. That Section 19.20.110 of the Subdivision Ordinance requiring that lots abut on a street be waived in accordance with the provisions.of Section 19.32 030 provided adequate access.is furnished. 3. That Section.19:20.110 of the Subdivision Ordinance regarding size and shape of lots be waived in accordance with the provisions of.Section 19.32.030: 4. That all grading be in accordance with grading plahs.and reports.approved by the Public Works Director and a qualified Soils Engineer. Upon completion of the Page 14. COMMISSIONERS s F9p N w C' N .S RIM CALL a CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 15. 1972 MINUTES INDEX r grading, the Civil Engineer and the,Soils Engineer shall certify that the.grading has been completed according to the plans and the requirements of the grading.ordi- nance: Permanent.reproducible copies of the grading plans on standard size sheets shall.be furnished to the Public Works Department. 5. That the design of the proposed private streets.be in.accordance with the City's Private Street,.Policy and be approved by the Public Works Department. 6. That:construction of the proposed private. streets be inspected by.the Public Works Department.and that a. standard inspection fee be paid. 7. That the remaining public improvements.on the southerly half of Vista del Oro adjacent to Tract 6905 be,completed. 8. That the improvements on the.westerly. half, of Eastbluff Drive adjacent.,to Tract 6905 be completed. 9. That the requirement for a perimeter of public streets be waived,in accordance with.the provisions of Section 20.50.080. 10: That the boundary of the final tract map be checked by the County Surveyor before being submitted to the City for approval. 11. That Section 19.16.030 of the Subdivision. Ordinance regarding map scale be waived provided maps drawn accurately to a scale of 1" = 100' are furnished the Public Works Department. 12. That water, sewer and storm drainage con- cepts be subject to further review and approval by the Public Works Department., In particular, the relative,locations of the community pool and 30'.' R.C.P. storm, drain may require realignment of the . storm drain. 13, That the. location of all fire hydrants be approved by the,Fire.Department. Page 15. COMMISSIONERS Y O �N (D N O £ O N 3 a• �' -s Rdb CALL F 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES June 15. 1972 INDEX J 14. That all off - street parking meet the City minimum standards. 15. That the types and location of street trees be provided to the specifications. of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department and that the standard inspection fee of $3 per tree be paid. An underground sprinkler system shall be installed in the parkway with :a bubbler head for each street tree to insure adequate irrigation. 16. That the developer shall be responsible for all precautionary actions necessary to protect the quality of the waters.of Newport Bay and Harbor during grading operations, and shall prepare and submit erosion control plans and specifications designed to prevent deposition of sediment. 17. That an amendment to Use Permit No. 1422 -B be processed and approved prior to, or concurrent with, the submittal of the final map. Ite� #12 Request to create one lot with a gross area of FI AN LAP 0.439 acres for condominium development in pe Corona del Mar. Location: Lots 7 and 9 and Portions of Lots 5, CONDITION 11 and 13 of Block 231 of Corona del LLLYY —� Mar, located on the westerly side of A1MVED Dahlia Avenue (vacated), northerly of Seaview Avenue. Zone: R -3 Applicant; Freeman Ray Company, Costa Mesa Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., Costa Mesa Owner: Same.as applicant. Chairman Dosh reviewed -the application with the Commission. Mr. Robert Bein represented the applicant and stated they are.in agreement with the conditions as stated. Following discussion, Final Map Tract No. 7789 was Page 16. COMMISSIONERS v y N 3 � � N N £ a CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH June 15, 1972 MINUTES INDEX r Motion x recommended to the City Council for approval, sub - Second x ject to the following condition: All Ayes 1: That all thirteen conditions of approval of Tentative Map Tract No. 7789 be fulfilled ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Ayes xx x xx Chairman Dosh asked for a vote.of approval of the Abstain x staff's.copy of the Height Limit.Ordi.hance and the Absent x related.map for forwarding to'the City Council. He noted that Commissioner Martin was abstaining because he hadn't seen the map. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Motion x Resolution No. 760 was adopted setting a public Second x hearing for July 20, 1972 to consider an ordinance All Ayes of the City of Newport Beach adding Sections to the Newport Beach Municipal Code to provide for public notification procedures for Use Permits, Amendments, Variances and Modifications. Motion x Resolution No. 7.61 was adopted setting a public Second x hearing for July 6, 1972 to consider an ordinance Ayes x x xx x of the City of Newport Beach which proposes to Abstain x rezone a Portion of Lot 1, Tract 463, located on Absent x the westerly side of Superior Avenue, north of Pacific Coast Highway from an R -4 -UL District to an R -3 District. Chairman Dosh read into the record a letter from the League of Women Voters of Orange Coast regard- ing their. Observer Program and noting that Mrs. Nathaniel Bercovitz would be attending Planning Commission meetings during the 1972 -73 year. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Director of Community Development Hogan pointed out that until new Commissioners are appointed, the present Commissioners would continue to serve. • On motion of Commissioner Heather, seconded by Com- missioner Glass, and carried, the meeting as adjourned at 1:35 A �O ueline E. Heather, Secreta y Newport Beach City Planning Commission