HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/19/1975!I' COMMISSIONERS
f• m
Tim � rnre v
R
� m
Present
Absent
Motion
Ayes
Absent
a
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
Place: City Council Chambers
Time: 7:00 P.M.
Date_ - Tuna 10 _ 1g7r
MINUTES
- -._ -- __..- ._ -
INDEX
X
X
X
X
X
X
EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS
R. V. Hogan, Community Development Director
Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney
Benjamin B. Nolan, City Engineer
STAFF MEMBERS
James D. Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning
Tim Cowell, Advance Planning Administrator
William R. Foley, Environmental Coordinator
Shirley Harbeck, Secretary
X
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 15, 1975
X
X
X
X
X
X
were approved as written.
X
Item. #1
Request to amend a previously approved use permit
USE
that permitted the construction of a racquet club
EITMIT
in the Unclassified District so as to permit the
NO. 1492
construction of additional tennis courts on the
MENDED
property, and the acceptance of an offsite park-
ing agreement.
APPROVED
C NNDI --
Location: Lot A of Parcel Map 10 -20 (Resub-
TIUNTTLY
division No. 240), Parcel 1 of Par -
cel Map 35 -13 (Resubdivision No.
294) and a portion of Block 93,
Irvine's Subdivision, located.at
1602 East Coast Highway, on the
northerly side of East Coast High-
way, westerly of Newport Center
Drive, adjacent to Newport Center.
Zone: Unclassified
Applicant: International Bay Clubs, Inc.,
Newport Beach
Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Staff recommended an additional condition which
would provide that there shall be no professional
tournaments or exhibits scheduled until such time
as the additional parking illustrated on the site
Page 1.
0
Moti
Ayes
Abse
COMMISSIONERS
(� m
m m
� Z ,mo p N
rAl1 M'
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
June 19. 1975
MINUTES
— '— -
- M
MAMA
plan has been provided.
Public hearing was opened in connection with this
matter.
Bob Bein of Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates,
appeared before the Commission and concurred with
all the recommendations except Condition No. 8,
wherein he requested that the opening time be
changed to 8:00 A.M. rather than 9:00 A.M. as many
people like to play tennis early in the morning
and no complaints have been made in this regard.
He also requested that the phrase "or unless.adequ t
to
parking arrangements are first approved by the
Director of Community Development" be added to
the additional condition recommended by the staff.
J. R. Blakemore, Harbor View Hills, appeared
before the Commission and commented on the light-
ing of the courts, possible reduction of glare,
and assurance that the lights would be out by
10:00 P.M.
Bob Bein appeared before the Commission and ex-
plained the lighting system which would be used.
He also advised of the club rules whereby the
lights would be out by 10:00 P.M.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
on X
X M
Motion was made that Planning Commission make the
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X f
following findings:
nt X
X
1. The proposed development is consistent with
the General Plan, and will be compatible with
surrounding land uses.
2. Adequate offstreet parking spaces and traffic
circulation have been provided for the propose
development.
3. The required parking spaces on a separate lot
from eighteen of the tennis courts is justifi-
able since the properties are in the same owne -
-
ship and will be maintained as an offstreet
parking lot for the duration of the tennis
club facility on the adjacent property.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
n m
.111na 10 1071Z
MINUTES
INDEX
residing and working in the neighborhood or be
detrimental or injurious to property and im-
provements in the neighborhood or the general
welfare of the City.
and approve the amendment to Use Permit No. 1492,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved plot plan.
2. That a minimum of one parking space /250 sq.ft.
of building gross floor area and three parking
spaces /tennis court shall be provided on the
parking lot site. The parking lot shall be.
paved with asphalt, concrete or other street
surfacing material of a permanent nature. An
amended parking layout shall be approved by
the Department of Community Development if the
ingress and egress driveways to the site are
widened at a later date.
3. That a landscape plan shall be approved by the
•
Director of Parks, Beaches and Recreation.
The landscaping and watering system shall be
installed in accordance with the approved plan
and shall be properly maintained.
4. That all exterior signs shall be approved by
the Director of Community Development.
5. That all storage of trash shall be shielded
from view within the clubhouse or within an
area enclosed.by a wall not less than six feet
in height.
6. The lighting fixtures.shall be designed, locat
ed and maintained so as to shield the light
source and confine glare to the site area.
7. Prior to securing a final utility release, the
applicant shall submit to the Department of
Community Development a statement from a
licensed electrical engineer certifying that
the lights have been installed in accordance
with Condition No. 6.
8. Use of the tennis courts shall be confined to
.
the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. daily.
All court lights will be out by 10:00 P.M.
9. The .use of outdoor loud speakers shall be
limited to individual paging units at each
Page 3.
0
COMMISSIONERS
n M
m o
CALL
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
I In In7z
MINUTES
INDEX
court and a public address system at the
competition court during major tournaments.
10. That an offsite parking agreement shall be
approved by the City Council, guaranteeing
that the required number of parking spaces
shall be provided on the site adjacent to the
expanded tennis club facility.
11. There shall be no professional tournaments or
exhibitions scheduled until such time as the
additional parking illustrated on the site
plan has been provided or unless adequate
parking is provided satisfactory to the
Director of Community Development.
Item #2
RESUB-
DIVISION
Request to create three parcels of land for
recreational development
Location: Lot A of Parcel Map 10 -20 (Resubdi-
N0. 492
vision No. 240), Parcel 1 of Parcel
Map 35 -13 (Resubdivision No. 294)
and a portion of Block 93, Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 1602 East
APPROVED
CONDI-
TIO— NAY
Coast Highway, on the northerly
side of East Coast Highway, west-
erly of Newport Center Drive, adja-
cent to Newport Center.
Zone: Unclassified
Applicant: International Bay Clubs, Inc.,
Newport Beach
Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates,
Newport Beach
Public hearing was opened in connection with this
matter.
Bob Bein of Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates
appeared before the Commission on behalf of the
applicant and concurred with the staff report
and recommendations.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Page 4.
COMMISSIONERS
T r T a m< y
Z m fn
CALL r
Motion
Ayes
Absent
•
n
LJ
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
June 19 1975
'
INDEX
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission make the
X
X
X X
X
following findings:
X
1. That the proposed map is consistent with
applicable general and specific plans.
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed
subdivision is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
type of development proposed.
4. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substan-
tially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife
or their habitat.
5. That the design of the subdivision or the pro-
posed improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
6. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements will not conflict with
any easements, acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision.
7. That the discharge of waste from the proposed
subdivision will not result in or add to any
violation of existing requirements prescribed
by a California Regional Water Quality Control
Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with
Section 1300) of the Water Code.
and approve Resubdivision No. 492, subject to the
following condition:
1. That a Parcel Map be filed.
Item #3
Request to amend a previously approved use permit
USE
that allowed the construction of a restaurant with
PERMIT
on -sale alcoholic beverages and a wine tasting-
NO'. "T 71
sales facility in the C -2 -H District so as to
ENDED)
permit a larger identification sign and the
addition of a directional parking sign on the
APPROVED
site.
CONDI-
T NALLY
Location: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 60 -30
( Resubdivision No. 425) located at
Page 5.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Y m
!+
D 1^
m �
,
Yto Pell T .1 una 1Q 107E
MINUTES
- -_
- - -
.INUCA
3300 West Coast Highway, on the
northerly side of West Coast High-
way, east of Newport Boulevard on
Mariner's Mile.
Zone: C -2 -H
Applicant: Sequoia Wine Cellars, Newport Beach
Owner: Sequoia Pacific Realco, Santa Ana
Public hearing was opened in connection with this
matter.
John Allenstein, representing Sequoia Pacific,
appeared before the Commission and advised of the
problem with their signing in that two separate
businesses are located on the property, i.e., a
restaurant and a wine - tasting /liquor store, how-
ever, patronage of the liquor store is minimal
during the evening hours because people are
unaware that it exists. He felt there was a
need for a larger sign containing more information
•
as to the existing businesses.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Motion
X
Following discussion, motion was made that
Ayes
X
X
Y
X
X
Planning Commission make the following findings:
Absent
X
1. That the size and basic configuration of the
major freestanding sign originally approved
by the Planning Commission in conjunction with
the development of the site is adequate and
relates well to both the Sequoia Wine Cellars/
Amelia's site and surrounding land uses.
2. That the approval of Use Permit No. 1671
(Amended) with the conditions recommended by
staff, would be consistent with the Planning
Commission's proposed sign ordinance.
and approve the amendment to Use Permit No. 1671,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That the size of the major freestanding sign
shall not exceed 50 sq. ft. It may be
.
internally or externally illuminated.
2. That the height of the proposed sign shall
not exceed 12 feet.
Page 6.
Motion
Ayes
Absent
•
COMMISSIONERS
m
1 T
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
June 19. 1975
MINUTES
INUCA
3. That the size of the directional sign shall
not exceed 6 sq. ft.
4. That the final plans shall be approved by the
Director of Community Development.
Item #4
USE
P�2E MIT
Request to amend a previously approved use permit
for the Warehouse Restaurant so as to permit
dining and special events including live entertain.-W.—T-711
ment in the open patio area adjacent to the rest -
N
aurant.
Location: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 63 -11
CONT. TO
JULY 17
(Resubdivision No. 447) located at
3450 Via Oporto, on the northeast-
erly side of Via Oporto, easterly
of Central Avenue in Lido Village.
Zone: C -1 -H
Applicant: Donald M. Koll, Newport Beach
Owner: June Johnson and Calvin Rohrs,
Newport Beach
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Planning Commission continued this matter to the
meeting of July 17, 1975.
X
Item #5
Request of Don Koll Co., Inc. to amend an existing
Off -Site Parking Agreement in conjunction with a
five story building located at 3360 Via Lido so as
to permit the enlargement of the first floor area
for a proposed bank. (Discussion)
OFF -SITE
PARKING
�EEMENT
APPROVED
Location: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 60 -43
located at 3360 Via Lido, on the
northeasterly side of Via Lido,
southeasterly of Via Oporto, in
Lido Village and Lot 1, Tract 1235
and a portion of Lot 2, Tract 1117
(Lido Village Parking Structure).
Zone: C -1 -H
Applicant: Don Koll Co., Inc., Newport Beach
Owner: Same as Applicant
Page 7.
COMMISSIONERS
yG1 �" D T 7 m
(� p T r
Z p N
A CALL
Motion
Ayes
Absent
0
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
June 19. 1975
MINUTES
-
invex
Staff explained the need for 5 parking spaces as
opposed to the 4 spaces requested by the applicant
Tim Strader, representative of the applicant,
appeared before the Commission and agreed with the
staff's computation and recommendation. He ans-
wered questions of the Commission relative to
directional signing for the additional parking.
Staff advised that four spaces would be left for
daytime use in the parking structure should this
request be approved.
Mr. Gould, representing the Elks Lodge, appeared
before the Commission and advised that if the
request was for daytime parking only, they had no
objection, as their agreement for parking in the
structure was from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.
X
Following discussion, motion was made to approve
X
X
X
X
X
X
the amendment to the off -site parking agreement
X
guaranteeing that a minimum of five parking
spaces would be provided in the Lido Village
parking structure for the proposed development at
3360 Via Lido.
Planning Commission requested that a summary be
prepared, indicating the number of spaces in the
parking structure, to whom they are assigned, and
the hours for which they are assigned.
Item #6
USE
Request to permit live entertainment in conjuncts
with an existing restaurant.
PERMIT
N . l757
Location: Lot 1 and a portion of Lot 2, Block
225, Section A of the Newport Beach
APPROVED
Tract, located at 409 28th Street,
CONDI-
on the northerly side of 28th
TIONALLY
Street, easterly of Newport Boule-
vard in Cannery Village.
Zone: C -1
Applicant: E1 Ranchito #4, Newport Beach
Owner: Grace Wedekind, Newport Beach
Staff distributed a letter of protest received
from Mrs. Rae Coates.
Public hearing was opened in connection with this
matter.
Page 8.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
(1 p m
ROCALL : p N June 19, 1975
MINUTES
�nuex
Joseph Avila representing the applicant, appeared
before the Commission to answer questions relative
to the request and concurred with the staff report
and recommendations.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission.make the
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
following findings:
Absent
X
1. The proposed development conforms with the
General Plan.
2. That the introduction of live entertainment on
a daily basis in the subject restaurant facil-
ity will not be detrimental to any surrounding
uses so long as the proposed use is confined
to the interior of the restaurant building and
no sound amplification is used which can be
heard outside of the structure.
3. The Police Department has indicated that it
•
does not forsee any problems with the.proposed
live entertainment.
4. Adequate parking for the restaurant use exists
in the vicinity.
5. The approval of Use Permit No. 1757 will not
under the circumstances of this case be detri-
mental to the health, safety, peace, moral
comfort and general welfare of persons residin
and working in the neighborhood or be detri-
mental or injurious to property and improvemen
s
in the neighborhood or the general welfare of
the City.
and approve Use Permit No. 1757, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That the live entertainment shall be limited
to a maximum of one musician.
2. That no brass, percussion, or any instruments
requiring electric amplification shall be used
3. That the live entertainment shall be confined
to the interior of the building.
4. That this approval shall be for a two year
period, and any extension shall be subject to
the approval of the Modifications Committee.
Page 9.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
RID CALL
0
•
lunc 1Q_ 1Q7r
MINUTES
Item #7
Request to appeal the decision of the Modification
MODIFI-
Committee so as to permit a 30 inch high retaining
CATION
wall and one tree to be maintained in the required
N0. 900
5 foot rear yard setback in conjunction with the
PE L
construction of a duplex on the property.
DENIED
Location: Lot 9, Block 335, Corona del Mar,
located at 409 Iris Avenue, on the
northwesterly side of Iris Avenue
between First Avenue and Bayside
Drive in Corona del Mar.
Zone: R -2
Applicant: Mr. Ron Yeo, AIA, Corona del Mar
Owner: Mr. and Mrs. T. Carter, Sacramento
Appellant: Same as Applicant
A letter received from Paul Hummel was distributed
to the Commission for review.
Public hearing was opened in connection with this
matter.
Ron Yeo, 604 Iris, Corona del Mar, Applicant and
Appellant, appeared before the Commission in
connection with this matter. He felt there was
no problem with keeping the tree and retaining
wall as they do not obstruct access to the garages
across the alley. He presented a petition in
favor of the request.
Planning Commission discussed maintenance of the
tree, utility lines through the tree, parking, and
maneuverability within the alley.
Mary Parks, 408 Heliotrope, owner of the property
across the alley, appeared before the Commission
in opposition to the request because the tree and
wall does impair the use of her garage.
Paul Hummel, 416 Heliotrope, appeared before the
Commission and felt there would be a significant
environmental impact if people are forced to park
on.the street because they cannot get into their
garage due to obstructions. He also commented on
the function of alleys, trees in general, and
reviewed the points covered in his letter which
was previously distributed.
Page 10.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
mt Z
Q cell T June 19. 1975
MINUTES
MUCA
Richard Parks, 19872 Ingreness, Huntington Beach,
appeared before the Commission and commented on
the type of tree in question and maintenance of.
same. He also commented on the problem of parking
in the alley and on the street.
Ron Yeo appeared before the Commission in rebuttal
and advised that should the tree be required to be
removed, the setback would still not be available
for parking because they plan to landscape the
area rather than pave it for parking. He also
advised that the owners had entered into a one -
year contract for maintenance of the landscaping,
and commented on the removal of a utility pole
located on the property without benefit of an
easement. Planning Commission questioned him as
to recent improvements made to the retaining wall
around the tree and anticipated maintenance of the
tree to keep it under control.
Richard Parks appeared before the Commission to
comment on the maintenance problem surrounding
this particular type of tree.
•
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Planning Commission discussed maintenance of trees,
utility lines and easements.
Based on the reasons that utility lines through
trees are the responsibility of the utility compan-
ies, maintenance of the tree was the responsibilit
of the property owner, other properties do not
observe the same setbacks as the property in
question, utility poles are as much an obstruction
as trees, maneuverability within the alley adjacen
to the subject property is improved, and other
obstructions in the alley create a greater impos-
Motion
X
ition, motion was made that the Planning Commissio
overrule the decision of the Modifications Committ
e
by approving Modification No. 900 and make the
finding that it is not detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of the
neighborhood, and is not detrimental or injurious
to property and improvements.
In discussing the motion, some of the Commissioner
•
felt that approval would establish an undesirable
precedent.
Amendmen
X
An amendment to the motion was proposed that in th
event of the death of the tree, it would not be
Page 11.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
m y
A
R
CALL
Ayes
Noes
Absent
0
•
MINUTES
June 19. 1975
1NUCA
replaced. The amendment was accepted as part of
the original motion by Commissioner Seely.
X
X
Y
The motion as amended was then voted on and failed
X
X
X
to pass, therefore the decision of the Modi ficatioy
s
X
Committee was upheld and the appeal denied.
Planning Commission recessed at 9:00 P.M. and
reconvened at 9:10 P.M.
Commissioner Hazewinkel stepped down from the dais
and refrained from deliberation on Item No. 8 due
to possible conflict of interest. He was deemed
absent and Commissioner Heather chaired this item.
Item #8
Request to establish one lot where two lots and a
TENTATIVE
portion of a third lot now exist so as to permit
MAP
the conversion of a 34 unit apartment building
TRACT
into a 34 unit residential condominium development
8917
Location: A portion of Lot 2 and Lots 3 and
APPROVED
4, Tract 3232, located at 1201 -1325
CONDI-
Bayside Drive, on the southwesterly
TIONALLY
side of Bayside Drive, easterly of
the Balboa Island bridge (Mai -Kai
Apartments).
Zone: R -3
Applicant: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Owner: Same as Applicant
Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost and Associates,
Newport Beach
Public hearing was.-opened in connection with this
matter.
Bob Bein of Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates,
appeared before the Commission on behalf of the
applicant. He clarified the matter of storm drain
easements through the property; agreed to the
additional storm drain easement adjacent to the
westerly boundary of.Lot 5, however, requested
that the easement be relocatable in nature because
Page 12.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
T y
P
� Z A u�
RO CALL ^ Jun 19 1975
MINUTES
e
�nuex
at such time as Lot 5 is developed, there may be a
better location for the storm drain other than
along the property line; agreed to a 12 foot
easement, but requested that the existing 4 foot
easement on the subject site be Quit Claimed back
to the owner.
Planning Commission discussed boat slips and the
adjacent marina, inspection of the units to
determine compliance with the Code, and common
areas between the units.
Paul Hummel, 416 Heliotrope, appeared before the
Commission and commented on condominium conver-
sions from a structural standpoint.
Richard A. Nelson, 208 Altura Drive, questioned
the role of the State Department of Real Estate
with respect to condominium conversions.
Vera B. Kruger, 1201 Dolphin Terrace, requested
clarification of the boundary line on the proposed
condominium conversion and verification that no
•
additional construction would take place. She
also commented on the soil stability of her
property.
Dick Herman, 1221 Bayside Drive, questioned the
responsibility of maintenance on the proposed
condominium conversion, allocation of parking
spaces, and stability of the bulkhead.
Tom Rabun, 1311 Bayside Drive, commented on park-
ing and possible structural failure of the build-
ings.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Planning Commission discussed number of bedrooms,
square footage of the units, occupancies of con-
dominiums compared to that of apartments, and
provisions for public access to the water.
Motion
X
Motion was made that the Planning Commission make
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
the following findings:
Absent
X
1. That the proposed map is consistent with app-
licable general and specific plans.
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed
subdivision is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans.
Page 13.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
T X T qa F
Z A P N
Q- rAlI m .lung 1Q 107F
MINUTES
'
INDEX
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
type of development proposed.
4. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed density of development.
5. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substan-
tially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife
or their habitat.
6. That the design of the subdivision or the pro -
posed improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
7. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements will not conflict with
any easements, acquired by the public at large
.
for access through or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision.
8. That the discharge of waste from the proposed.
•
subdivision will not result in or add to any
violation of existing requirements prescribed
by a California Regional Water Quality Control
Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with
Section 1300) of the Water Code.
and recommend to the City Council that Tentative
Map of Tract 8917 be approved, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That the boundary of the final map be checked
by the County Surveyor before being submitted
to the City for approval.
2. That Section 19.16.030 of the Subdivision
Ordinance regarding map scale be waived.
3. That The Irvine Company enter into an appro-
priate agreement with the City of Newport Beac
whereby The Irvine Company clearly assumes
responsibility for the possible storm drain
relocations established in City's letters
dated July 1, 1960 and February 16, 1962; and
that an additional 12 foot wide relocatable
storm drain easement along the westerly
•
boundary of Lot 5, Tract No. 3232 be conveyed
to the City of Newport Beach. The existing
4 foot easement shall be Quit Claimed upon the
dedication of the new easement.
Page 14.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
R� CALL
0
U
MINUTES
June 19. 1975
invex
4. That the condominium owners with boats shall
have the first right of refusal of the piers,
slips and side ties bayward of the site as
occupancies occur.
5. That there shall be submitted a declaration of
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions govern-
ing the maintenance and operation of the con-
dominium acceptable to the Director of Commun-
ity Development and the City Attorney.
6. That all units shall be inspected.and brought
into compliance with the applicable building
standards of the City at the time the build-
ings were constructed.
7. That two parking spaces (including at least
one covered space) shall be assigned to each
dwelling unit.
Commissioner Hazewinkel returned to the dais.
Item #9
An amendment to the Land Use and Residential
GENERAL
Growth Elements to change the designation of
PLAN
approximately 50 acres of undeveloped land north
AMENDMENT
of the Pacific View Memorial Park from "Govern-
07.7-8
mental, Educational and Institutional" to "Low -
Density Residential," and the acceptance of an
APPROVED
environmental impact report. (Requested by
Broadmoor Homes, Inc.)
RES. 919
Staff briefly reviewed the request and presented
correspondence received subsequent to distribution
of the agenda.
Planning Commission discussed the environmental
impact report as it pertained to sanitary sewers,
water, utilities, grading, and soil stability. .
Public hearing was opened in connection with this
matter.
Larry Lizotte, Vice President of Broadmoor Homes,
appeared before the Commission to answer questions
in connection with this matter. He voiced concern
with the maximum number of dwelling units recom-
mended by the staff and requested that at least
Page 15.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
aAceu m p m June 19. 1975
- --
1nuex
3.5 units per acre be permitted.
Col. Archibald D. Scott, III, resident of Harbor
View Hills, appeared before the Commission in
favor of the request.
John Vibert, President of Pacific View Memorial
Park, appeared before the Commission in favor of
the request. He commented on the projected usage
of the remaining land and advised that at the
present rate of need, space would be available
for burial purposes for at least 50 years.
Carl Kymla, 700 Kings Road, appeared before the
Commission in favor of the Low - Density Residential
designation and felt this request was an appro-
priate amendment to the General Plan.,
Paul Hummel, 416 Heliotrope, appeared before the
Commission to comment on taxes.
Dennis Gray, 38 Mission Bay, appeared in favor
of the request as long as the existing views were
preserved.
Bill Burke, #1 Carmel Bay Drive, appeared before
the Commission and advised he had no objections
to the development, however, he was concerned
with the maintenance of landscaping and the use
of the land adjacent to his property for burial
purposes and requested that some assurance be
given in connection with these matters.
Dr. Perlitter, 36 Mission Bay Drive, appeared
before the Commission in favor of the amendment.
John Vibert, Pacific View, appeared before the
Commission to comment on the protection of views
adjacent to the Spyglass Hills homes and advised
of an air easement which was granted along the
boundary providing that there would be no con-
struction, or planting of trees, or allowing an
existing tree to go above the 430 foot contour
line. He also advised that projections for burial
purposes did not include the usage of approximatel
1.85 acres adjacent to the Spyglass Hills homes.
Planning Commission discussed the 1.85 acres with
respect to location, size, potential future usage,
•
and setbacks.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Page 16.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
D m = = v m
Z A
V
9
RArAlI m ,1imp 10 _ 1Q7r
MINUTES
-' - --
- - _ - -
11'YCA
Motion
X
Planning Commission desired further information
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
on the proposal to construct homes, therefore,
Absent
X
motion was made to re -open the public hearing.
Larry Lizotte, Vice President of Broadmoor Homes,
appeared before the Commission and advised of
their proposal to construct 175 detached single
family homes on terraced lots. The proposal would
also include recreational facilities consisting
of tennis courts, swimming pool, and grass play
areas; and a community association would be
established to provide for the maintenance of the
common areas.
Richard A. Nelson, 208 Altura Drive, appeared
before the Commission to comment on preservation
of open space.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Motion
X
Motion was made to accept the environmental docu-
ment and adopt Resolution No. 919, recommending
•
to the City Council that the Land Use and Residen-
tial Growth Elements of the General Plan be amende
as follows:
1. Revise the Land Use and Residential Growth
Plans (maps) to designate the 50 -acre site
north of Pacific View Memorial Park as Low -
Density Residential.
2. Add the following wording to Page 20 of the
Residential Growth Element: "6) Residential
development on the 50 -acre site north of
Pacific View Memorial Park shall be limited
to a maximum total of 175 dwelling units.
3. Revise the appropriate statistical charts in
the Residential Growth Element to reflect the
175 dwelling unit increase.
Motion
X
Motion was amended to add further language to the
Ayes
X
X
Land Use Element with respect to the nature and us
Noes
X
X
X
X
of the site as follows: "Any proposed development
Absent
X
of the property should attempt to minimize basic
land form change, provide landscaping, respect the
slopes, and preserve views from adjacent developed
property. The existing canyon on the north edge
•
of the site should have little or no modification
and be substantially retained as open space."
Motion failed.
Page 17.
Ayes
Absent
•
•
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
m Y
f+ 1^
MINUTES
< Z F A w
M June 19. 1975
INDEX
X
X
X
X
X
Y
The original motion was then voted on and carried.
X
Commissioner Hazewinkel stepped down from the dais
and refrained from deliberation on Item No. 10 due
to possible conflict of interest. He was deemed
absent and Commissioner Heather chaired this item.
Item #10
An amendment to the Land Use and Residential
GENERAL
Growth Elements to consider alternative land use
designations for the undeveloped property in
Newport Center located at Jamboree Road and Coast
PLAN
AMENDMENT
NO. 20
Highway (currently designated "Low- Density Resi-
dential") and at MacArthur Boulevard and Coast
PARTIALLY
Highway (currently designated "Administrative,
APPROVED
Professional and Financial" and "Recreational and
Marine Commercial "). (Requested by The Irvine
RES. 920
Company)
Staff reviewed the request with the Planning
Commission and answered questions in connection
therewith.
Public hearing was opened in connection with this
matter.
Al Auer, Vice President of Commercial Development
with The Irvine Company, appeared before the
Commission to comment on the constraints of the
planning process and the need for the change in
land use designation in order to proceed with the
development of the property. He advised of their
objection to the elimination of a commercial
designation on the property between MacArthur
Boulevard and Avocado Avenue.
Richard A. Nelson, 208 Altura Drive, President of
Irvine Terrace Homeowners Association, appeared
before the Commission and advised of their concern
with additional traffic which would be generated
by commercial development on the property between
MacArthur Boulevard and Avocado Avenue. He felt
that a corporate type of development would be more
desirable, however, any development without a
solution to the Coast Highway problem should be
given a great deal of_ consideration.
Page 18.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
T q
QACAIL T A P N .loon 10 107G
MINUTES
IMUCA
John Werlie, 126 Onyx, President of the Balboa
Island Improvement Association, appeared before
the Commission and advised that the Board of Direc-
tors felt that the undeveloped property located at
Jamboree Road and Coast Highway should remain
Low- Density Residential as anything else would
cause an increase in the traffic problems which
already exist in the area.
Paul Hummel, 416 Heliotrope, President of the
Corona del Mar Civic Association, appeared before
the Commission and advised that they.were opposed
to any development which would destroy the residen-
tial character of old Corona del Mar and were
opposed to any commercial development between
MacArthur Boulevard and Avocado Avenue.
J. R. Blakemore appeared before the Commission to
comment on the request and the traffic which would
be generated by the various developments. He
recommended that "Recreation and Marine Commercial'
be deleted from the property between Avocado Avenu
and MacArthur Boulevard and added to the property
•
at Jamboree Road and Coast Highway.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Planning Commission discussed and took separate
actions on each parcel under consideration.
Motion
X
As to the parcel of land located at Jamboree Road
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
and Coast Highway, motion was made that the Plan -
Absent
X
X
ning Commission reaffirm their original action as
set forth in Resolution No. 912
Motion
X
As to the parcel of land located between Avocado
Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard, motion was made to
eliminate "Recreation and Marine Commercial"
designation from the Land Use Element.
The motion was discussed and it was generally felt
that more study and consideration should be given
to this particular site, especially as to genera-
tion of traffic and circulation.
Motion
X
To allow for further input from the public, motion
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
was made to re -open the public hearing.
A0nt
X
X
Dave Neish, Manager, Planning Administration, The
Irvine Company, appeared before the Commission and
requested that they be given the opportunity to
present their plans and provide the data necessary
Page 19.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
m n N y p
m o m -� m< y
P P V
RACALL
Motion
Ayes
Noes
AV
Motion
Ayes
Abept
MINUTES
June 19. 1975
�nue�c
to make a decision as to the best possible land
use, therefore, it was requested that no change to
the land use designation be made at this time.
J. R. Blakemore appeared before the Commission and
voiced concern that recreational or commercial
facilities would be developed on the property
between Avocado Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard.
Richard A. Nelson, 208 Altura Drive, appeared
before the Commission to comment on the eliminatio
of the commercial designation.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Planning Commission discussed the property between
Avocado Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard and felt
that they did not have sufficient information at
this time on which to base a decision, therefore
X
a substitute motion was made that the possible
X
X
X
X
amendment to the land use designation on this
X
property be reconsidered at the October, 1975,
X
X
General Plan amendment hearings.
Resolution No. 920 was adopted, reflecting the
above actions.
Commissioner Hazewinkel returned to the dais.
Item #11
GENERAL
An amendment to the Recreation and Open Space
Element to include a greenbelt designation along
PL�CN —
the south side of Ocean Boulevard in Corona del
AWNDMENT
Mar, from Carnation Avenue to Poppy Avenue.
NO. 25
(Requested by Parks, Beaches and Recreation)
APPROVED
Public hearing was opened in connection with this
matter and there being no one desiring to appear
RES. 921
and be heard, the public hearing was closed.
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission adopt
X
X
X
X
X
X
Resolution No. 921, recommending to the City
X
Council that an amendment to the Recreation and
Open Space Element be made, revising the Open Spac
Plan (map) to add a greenbelt designation along th
south side of Ocean Boulevard, from Carnation
Avenue to Poppy Avenue.
Page 20.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
C T D T D m f
f+ m r
F
CALL
Motion
Ayes
Absent
Motion
Ayes
Absent
0
Ma'on
Absent
June 19. 1975
MINUTES
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
An amendment to the Circulation Element as it
pertains to Coast Highway in Corona del Mar
(easterly of MacArthur Boulevard). (Initiated by
Planning Commission)
Planning Commission continued this matter to the
meeting of July 17, 1975.
An amendment to the Land Use and Residential Growt
Elements to: 1) create a "Medium- Density Residen-
tial" category, 2) add a definition of "buildable
acreage ", and 3) revise the wording of certain
INDEX
Item #12
GENERAL
PLAN
AMENDMEN
NO. 24
CONT. TO
TELY
Item #13
GENERAL
PLAN
AMENDMENT
NO. 26
sections of the Elements. (Directed by City
Council)
CONT. TO
JULT 17
X
Planning Commission continued this matter to the
X
X
X
X
X
X
meeting of July 17, 1975.
X
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
Commissioner Hazewinkel stepped down from the
dais and refrained from deliberation on the follow
ing item, due to possible conflict of interest.
Commissioner Heather chaired this item.
Review of revised plans for Corporate Plaza to
determine whether or not they were in substantial
conformance with the tentative map which was
previously approved.
Requested by: The Irvine Company
Dave Neish with The Irvine Company appeared before
the Commission to review the various changes in
the plan and advised that the purpose of the
revision was to have one circuitous circulation
route within the development rather than two.
J. R. Blakemore appeared before the Commission to
comment on the site plane regulations attached to
the subject property.
X
following review and discussion, motion was made
X
X
X
Y
that Planning Commission make the finding that
X
X
the revised plan was in substantial conformance
with that of the tentative parcel map previously
approved.
Page 21.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
YC T ➢ T D m �L
f� m
? m y MINUTES
RAO ce« R` P a N June 19, 1975 - -
-- - --
INDEX
Commissioner Hazewinkel returned to the dais.
Motion
X
Planning Commission re -set the public hearing on
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
Amendment No. 447 for July 17, 1975, which was an
Absent
X
amendment to consider the addition of Section 20.
08.290, to Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal
Code which would require a use permit for new
development within areas designated for a Specific
Area Plan by the General Plan for which a Specific
Area Plan had not been adopted. (Res. No. 918)
Motion
X
Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 922,
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
setting a public hearing for July 17, 1975, to
Absent
X
consider an amendment to Section 20.07.040, Title
20, of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, pertain-
ing to the Open Space Option requirement.
•
Planning Commission reviewed and discussed the
Negative Declaration for the construction and
operation of an emergency heliport at Hoag
Hospital.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission accept
Ayes
X
X
X
X
the Negative Declaration in connection with the
Absent
X
construction and operation of an Emergency Heli-
port at Hoag Hospital.
Planning Commission scheduled their Annual
Meeting for July 1, 1975.
Motion
X
Planning Commission cancelled the Regular Meeting
Ayes
X
X
X
X
of July 3, 1975, due to the lack of business to be
Absent
X
placed on the agenda.
Commissioner Seely requested and received per-
mission to be excused from the meeting of July 17,
•
1975.
Page 22.
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
r T z x b m f
(� m
y m
MINUTES
P
DOrreii m ,lima 1Q_ 1Q79
---
----- "" ''
INDEX
Commissioner Williams requested and received
permission to be excused from the meetings of
August 7 and 21, 1975.
Motion
X
There being no further business, motion was made
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
to adjourn the meeting. Time: 12:30 A.M.
Absent
X
ot
AMES PARKER, Secretary
Planning Commission
City of Newport Beach
•
Page 23.