The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09/01/1977COMMISSIONERS 1 2 City of Newport Beach C% Regular Planning Commission Meeting • m i p Place: City Council Chambers Time: 7:00 P.M. t Date: September 1, 1977 ROLL CALL Present Rotion yes Absent u * X X X X X X *Arrived at 7:05 P EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. V. Hogan, Commu Dennis O'Neil, Cit, Benjamin B. Nolan, STAFF MEMBERS James D. Hewicker, Beverly Wood, Envi David Dmohowski, A Fred Talarico, Sen Robert Lenard, Ass Shirley Harbeck, S X Minutes of the Reg X X X X X X were approved as r X Request to amend p that permitted the related drive -in t on a temporary bas includes.the expan additional tempora drive -in teller un parking spaces. T an extenison of .th Location: A po Subd Coas Zone: P -C Applicant: Bank I Owner: The .M. city Development.Director V Attorney City Engineer * * * Assistant Director - Planning ronmental Coordinator ivance Planning.Administrator for Planner )ciate Planner acretary * * * MINUTES ular Meeting of August 18, 1977, >vised. * ** reviously approved use permits Bank of Newport facility and eller units.in. the P -C District is. The proposed development sion of the existing building, ry relocatable structures, a new it, and additional offstreet he applicant is also requesting e original use permit applicatior rtion of Block 93 of Irvine's ivision, located at 2166 East t Highway, in Corona del Mar. of Newport, Newport Beach Irvine Company,. Newport Beach Page 1. INOKX Item #1 USE PERMIT X759 AMENDED COMMISSIONERS City of �1 September 1: ROLL CALL Motion Ayes Abstain Absent Motion Ayes Abstain Absent Newport Beach 1977 nission continued this matter to the aptember 15, 1977. MINUTES • \ INO<X reate one parcel of land for commercial A portion of Block 93 of Irvine's Subdivision, located at 2166 East Coast Highway, in Corona .del Mar. P -C Bank of Newport, Newport Beach The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoc., Newport Beach. nission continued this matter to the aptember 15, 1977. fication for Local Coastal Planning. The City of Newport Beach ling Administrator Dmohowski reviewed port and the purpose of this public i is to identify coastal planning considered when the City prepares astal Program which is required by In addition to the key issues identifie in the report, Mr. Dmohowski recom- >ion of the issues of water quality in. J lower bay and the impact of energy the coastal zone as they pertain to Vewport Beach Page 2. 0 • X P.lanning Comi X X X X X meeting of S X x Request to c development. Location: Zone: Applicant: Owner: Engineer: X Planning Com X X X x X meeting of S x x Issue Identi Initiated by Advance Plan the staff re hearing whic issues to be the Local Co State law. by the staff mended inclu the upper an programs in the City of 1977 nission continued this matter to the aptember 15, 1977. MINUTES • \ INO<X reate one parcel of land for commercial A portion of Block 93 of Irvine's Subdivision, located at 2166 East Coast Highway, in Corona .del Mar. P -C Bank of Newport, Newport Beach The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoc., Newport Beach. nission continued this matter to the aptember 15, 1977. fication for Local Coastal Planning. The City of Newport Beach ling Administrator Dmohowski reviewed port and the purpose of this public i is to identify coastal planning considered when the City prepares astal Program which is required by In addition to the key issues identifie in the report, Mr. Dmohowski recom- >ion of the issues of water quality in. J lower bay and the impact of energy the coastal zone as they pertain to Vewport Beach Page 2. 0 • COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach Santamhar l_ 1977 MOLL CALL Planning Commission discussed various issues and requested inclusion of the.following: 1. Reference to the down -coast area. 2. The effect on taxes. 3. Reference to the development of a parking lo' in Mariners Mile as a visitor.serving center 4. That parking and traffic flow be included.as constraint wherever the issue is pertinent. Publ.ic hearing was opened in connection with thi matter. The following persons appeared before the Plann'i Commission: Marilyn Arnold pointed out that two high -rise buildings, a condominium, and a motel were also • located on the Lido Peninsula. Dennis Reed, County Sanitation District No. 5, advised of the need for a trunk sewer through Areas 6, 8 and 9 and the down -coast area, to serve the down -coast area. Robert Winterbotham, Snug Harbor, commented on the apparent discrepancies with respect to tidelands. Marilyn Hendrickson, Chairman of the Citizens Advisory Bike Trails Committee pointed out that bikes were a major means of transportation and felt there were areas within the City that neede attention. She advised that a letter would be forthcoming giving mo.re details. Hal Thomas, 9082 W. Balboa, felt that the policy towards urban .runoff was in conflict, that the City's General Plan was in conflict with the State and Coastal Commission goals with respect to impact of planned growth around the upper bal on the reserve, and felt discussion of solar energy should be included. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Page 3. MINUTES a ng V INDIM COMMISSIONERS °o� v� °off pFyo1G��ly City .Of Newport . Beach MINUTES oti Seutember 1. 1977 MOLL CALL Planning Commission discussed the format of the report with respect to issue identification. The also discussed the issue of and possible conflict with respect to low income housing and possible need to increase the density to provide said low income housing. Motion X Following discussion, motion was made to re -open All Ayes the public hearing and staff was directed to revise the draft of Issue Identification for Loci Coastal Planning to include the issues previously identified by the Commission and public and, continued this matter to the meeting of Septembei 15, 1977, to review the revised draft and take . further testimony if desired. Request to permit the remodeling and construction of room additions on an existing duplex with the following nonconforming features: 1.) The exist- ing structure encroaches to within 7 in.ches.and to within 2 feet 6 inches ± of the side property lines (where the Ordinance requires 3 foot side yards); 2.) Two garage spaces exist with depths of 17 feet 6 inches ±. Two open parking spaces also exist in front of the existing garage with depths of 15 feet when measured to the front property line (i.e. 10 foot depths when measured to the required 5 foot front yard setback along West Balboa Boulevard). The Code requires three parking spaces with depths of 20 feet each; and 3.) The existing smaller dwelling unit on the sii has an area of 520 square feet ± (where the Unif( Building Code requires a minimum area of 600 square feet). The proposed development encroach( to within 2 feet 10 inches ± of a side property line (wh-ere the Ordinance requires a 3 foot side yard). Location: Lot 14, Block 109, Section B, Newpl Beach Tract, located at 926 West Balboa Boulevard, on the Balboa Peninsula. Zone: R -3 Applicant: Raymond Wolfe, Balboa Page 4. M it :e �rrt :S in INOLX Imuulri- COMMISSIONERS vc v oo P Sm iL �� City of Newport Beach MINUTES . X02 Sentember 1. 1977 ROLL CALL Owner: Same as Applicant Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Raymond Wolfe, '926 W. Balboa, appeared before the Commission in connection with this matter and reiterated the comments contained in his letter to the Planning Commission. He advised of three neighbors who were in favor the the remodeling ar answered questions of the Commission. Planning Commission and staff discussed the inter to bring the structure into conformance on an incremental basis and the enforcement problems attached thereto. Paul Ersom, 930 West Balboa, appeared before the Commission in favor of the request and felt the remodeling would be a tremendous improvement to • the property and the entire area. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed.. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission overrule the action. of the Modifications Committee; make the following findings: 1. That the removal of existing encroachments would be an unnecessary hardship on the applicant at this time: 2. That the existing garage spaces are adequate in depth for the parking of automobi.les and are required for the parking of automobiles. 3.. That there is sufficient space on the apron in front of the garage for the parking of at least one additional automobile. 4. That existing traffic conditions on Balboa Boulevard do not warrant the removal of vehicular access to the street at this time.: 5. That the proposed east side yard encroachmen is minor in nature. • 6. That the applicant's request in this particu case would not be detrimental to persons, Page 5. E. t t la INDIM COMMISSIONERS City of FS 9s.eooa ;y °s Fp ya, ;F as soy September 1 Newport Beach 1977 POLL CALL property and improvements in the neighborhooc and that the request is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. and grant the appeal, thereby approving Modifica- tion No. 2096, subject to the following conditior 1. That development be in substantial conformanc with the plans as submitted. 2. That the trash area shall be screened from view. In discussing the motion, Commissioner.Heather felt the remodeling was a good improvement, howel she had some reservations with respect to the sil yards and access to the property. Commissioner Agee commented on the desirability to eliminate small rental units and the possible need to review policies and guidelines for the benefit of the Modifications Committee. Commissioner Frederickson commented on the limit) upgrading of an old structure and voiced concern with the setbacks and size of the parking facili Commissioner Hummel opposed the motion because o the encroachments into the side yards which limi light and air as well as the potential safety hazard because of increased flammability of olde structures. Commissioner Balalis felt that older.structures should be allowed to be recycled rather than . always requiring them to be torn down and new buildings constructed. Ayes X X X X X X Following discussion, the motion was voted on an Noes X carried. Page 6.. MINUTES INOLX I, Is :e ,er I !d :ec i • COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach SPntamhar 1. 1977 ROLL CALL . Request to permit the construction of a duplex it the R -2 District that exceeds the height limit it the 24/28 Foot Height Limitation District. The proposal also includes a modification to permit two open parking spaces in front of a two car garage, meeting the Ordinance requirement of foul parking spaces. However,.the two open parking spaces encroach to the front property line (where the Districting Map indicates a required 15 foot front yard setback along Dahlia Avenue). Furthei more, a modification is requested to permit a proposed second floor balcony to encroach to within 2'6" of the rear property line (where the Ordinance requires a 5 foot rear yard when abutt a 14 foot wide alley). Location: Lot 2, Block 332, Corona del Mar Tract, located at 400 Dahlia Avenu, adjacent to the proposed park on • Bayside Drive, in Corona del Mar. Zone: R -2 Applicant: Ken McFarland, Costa Mesa Owner: Andrew 6lassell, VII, Balboa Islan Motion X Planning Commission continued this matter to the Ayes X X X X X meeting of September 15., 1977. Abstain X Absent X Items #6 and #7 were heard concurrently because of their relationship. Request for site plan review of a one story . commercial building in a Specific Area Plan wher a specific plan has not been adopted. A modific tion to the Zoning Code is also requested since the required offstreet parking spaces encroach t the rear property line (where the Ordinance requires a 10 foot rear yard setback in the.0 -1, • District when the site abuts an alley). Page 7. MINUTES n INO&X Item #5 VARIANCE NT.—I 064 CONT. TO SEP . 15 Item #6 SITE PLAN e RE— a- W0—.6 o APPROVED CM DT__ COMMISSIONERS City of, fso2 September 11 ROLL CALL Newport . Beach 1977 MINUTES \ INO<X Lots 5 and 6, Tract 682, located at 2239 and 2247 East Coast Highway, on the westerly.corner of Acacia Avenue and East Coast Highway in Corona del Mar. C -1 Martin A. Mangold, Corona del Mar Same as Applicant establish one building site and elimi- iterior lot line where two lots now exist iermit commercial development.on the Lots 5 and 6, Tract 682, located at 2239 and 2247 East Coast Highway on the westerly corner of.Acacia Avenue and East Coast Highway.in.Corona del Mar. C -1 Martin A. Mangold, Corona-del.Mar Same as Applicant Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach rney O'Neil commented on the ordinance adopted relative to nonconforming uses )ssible effect on the off -site parking lack Shop. He advise.d that the intent . dinance was to cover on -site nonconform , therefore, would not apply in this case. 3ring was opened in connection with this igold, Applicant, appeared.before the i and distributed a letter which he read record. He concurred with the staff Page 8. I 4 Location: Zone: Applicant Owner: Request t nate an i so as to property. Location: Zone: Applicant Owner:, Engineer: City Atto recently and i is p for the S of the or ities and Public he matter. Martin Ma Commissio into the Newport . Beach 1977 MINUTES \ INO<X Lots 5 and 6, Tract 682, located at 2239 and 2247 East Coast Highway, on the westerly.corner of Acacia Avenue and East Coast Highway in Corona del Mar. C -1 Martin A. Mangold, Corona del Mar Same as Applicant establish one building site and elimi- iterior lot line where two lots now exist iermit commercial development.on the Lots 5 and 6, Tract 682, located at 2239 and 2247 East Coast Highway on the westerly corner of.Acacia Avenue and East Coast Highway.in.Corona del Mar. C -1 Martin A. Mangold, Corona-del.Mar Same as Applicant Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach rney O'Neil commented on the ordinance adopted relative to nonconforming uses )ssible effect on the off -site parking lack Shop. He advise.d that the intent . dinance was to cover on -site nonconform , therefore, would not apply in this case. 3ring was opened in connection with this igold, Applicant, appeared.before the i and distributed a letter which he read record. He concurred with the staff Page 8. I 4 COMMISSIONERS vaosss <� City of ot� o< OS ptp V G,ti 1 2 September 1 Newport Beach 1977 PIOLL CALL report and recommended conditions and answered . questions of the Commission concerning the reques There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make the All Ayes following findings: 1.. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and will not preclude the attainment of the General Plan objectives anc policies. 2. That the proposal will help to protect and.. preserve the value of.properties and encourac high quality development in this Specific Are Plan.area. 3. That the proposal will not conflict with the public benefits derived from expenditures of • public.funds for improvements and beautifica• tion of streets and public facilities within the Specific Area Plan area. 4. That the establishment, maintenance or opera of the use of the property or building will not, under the circumstances of the.particul+ case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of person! residing or working in the neighborhood of s proposed use or be detrimental or injurious property and improvements in the neighborh.00 or the general welfare of the City,and furth that the proposed modification for tandem parking spaces is consistent with the legis- lative intent of Title 20 of the Municipal Code. and approve Site Plan Review No. 6, subject to t following conditions: 1. That development shall be insubstantial conformance with the approved plot plan, and elevations, except as noted in.Condition No. 2. That a resubdivision be filed. • 3. That the conditions of resubdivision be ful- filled, including the dedication of a.15 foo Page 9. MINUTES t. e a do it ich to i er he t 5. mOKX SPR -6 COMMISSIONERS City of . Santamhar 1- Newport Beach: 1977 ROLL CALL radius corner cutoff at the intersection of Acacia and East Coast Highway. 4. That a 5 foot setback from the. alley to the offstreet parking spaces be provided. 5. That the building and parking lot design be modified so as to provide 16 parking spaces and maintain a minimum 24 foot aisle width. 6. That the parking lot shall be improved with wheel stops and marked with approved traffic markers or painted white lines not less than 4 inches wide in accordance with the approvec parking layout. 7. That the landscaped areas be permanently sprinklered and maintained. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make thf All Ayes following findings: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with, applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the propose subdivision is consistent with applicable gel and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivisi.on or the pr posed improvements will not cause subs.tantia environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not. likely to caus, serious public health problems.. 7. That the. design of the subdivision or the. proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public at lar Page 10. 4 MINUTES • INOKX R -558 • COMMISSIONERS 9c� v� o°s pF yv1cbc% City of Newport Beach MINUTES Sot SpntPmber.l. 1977 ROLL CALL for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. 8. That the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision will not result in or add to any violation of existing requirements prescribed by a California Regional Water Quality Contro Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 1300) of the Water Code. 9. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. and approve Resubdivision No. 558, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a parcel map be filed. 2: That all improvements be constructed as requi ed by ordinance and the Public Works Departme • 3. That a 15 foot radius corner cutoff at East Coast Highway and Acacia Avenue be dedicated to the public for street and highway purposes 4. That all vehicular access rights to East Coa<_ Highway be released and relinquished to the City of Newport Beach. Planning Commission recessed at 8:45 P.M. and reconvened at 8:55 P.M. Request to exceed the basic height limit in the 26/35 Foot Height Limitation District for a proposed office building, and the certification c an Environmental Impact Report. Location: Portions of Lots 1 and 2, Tract 32: located at 1101 Bays.ide Drive on.tl southeast corner of Bayside Drive and Marine Avenue, adjacent to the • Balboa Island bridge.. Zone: C -1 Page 11. 1 r- !nt ;t f 12, le INOKX COMMISSIONERS v n�sZt� City of 1 Spotpmhpr 1 POLL CALL Motion Ayes Abstain Absent Motion Ayes Abstain Absent Newport Beach 1977 Innovative Development Concepts, Irvine The Irvine Company, Newport Beach nission continued this matter to the aptember 15, 1977. MINUTES • \ INOtX I :subdivide two existing parcels into RESUB- s; one fora public park and boardwalk, DPI Dposed office building, and a residual NN ie existing amrina offices and yacht Portions of Lots 1 and 2, Tract 3232, located at 1101 Bayside Drive on the southeast corner of Bayside Drive and Marine Avenue, adjacent to the Balboa.Island Bridge. C -1 Innovative Development Concepts, Irvine The Irvine Company, Newport Beach . Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoc., Newport Beach nission continued this matter to the aptember 15, 1977. Dnsider an amendment to Title 15 and the Newport Beach Municipal Code as to sign regulations. The City of Newport Beach Page 12. 0 AMENDMENT No-74ff- APPROVEP R EV —ISED Applicant: Owner: X Planning Com X X X X X meeting of S X X Request to r three parcel one for a pr parcel for t sales. Location: Zone: Applicant: Owner- Engineer: X Planning Com X X X X X meeting of .S X X Request to c Title 20 of they pertain Initiated by 1977 Innovative Development Concepts, Irvine The Irvine Company, Newport Beach nission continued this matter to the aptember 15, 1977. MINUTES • \ INOtX I :subdivide two existing parcels into RESUB- s; one fora public park and boardwalk, DPI Dposed office building, and a residual NN ie existing amrina offices and yacht Portions of Lots 1 and 2, Tract 3232, located at 1101 Bayside Drive on the southeast corner of Bayside Drive and Marine Avenue, adjacent to the Balboa.Island Bridge. C -1 Innovative Development Concepts, Irvine The Irvine Company, Newport Beach . Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoc., Newport Beach nission continued this matter to the aptember 15, 1977. Dnsider an amendment to Title 15 and the Newport Beach Municipal Code as to sign regulations. The City of Newport Beach Page 12. 0 AMENDMENT No-74ff- APPROVEP R EV —ISED COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach MINUTES m v, vs osp ys 3s oz 02 September 1, 1977 ROLL CALL Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Dan Rogers, Chamber of Commerce, appeared before the Commission to comment on the proposed ordinan and advi.sed of the Chamber's support. He recom- mended that Section 20.60.030 include advertiseme as an intent and that Section 20.60.090 be change to provide that an owner or his agent may adverti property for lease, rent or sale and that the siz of the sign be changed to 3 square feet which is the standard size of "for sale" signs. He also suggested the addition of a provision to allow offsite directional signs. Staff advised that a provision relative to offsii directional signs would be very difficult to enforce and should be discouraged. L. W. Mallory, 1916 Court Avenue, appeared before the Commission and requested that the ordinance • be changed to provide the same language on real estate signs in residential, commercial and industrial districts in order to be consistent. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission commended the Chamber of Commerce and their associates for their work in connection with the .proposed sign ordinance. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission recommei to the City Council approval of Amendment No. 49 adopting the sign ordinance with the following changes: 1. That Section 20.60.030 read: "Intent and Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to provide minimum standards to safeguard life, health, property and the public welfare, and to provide the means for adequate identifica and advertisement of businesses by regulatin and controlling the design, location, and maintenance of all signs and sign structures in the City." . • 2. That Section 20.60.090 1. (a) (first paragra read: "In the R -A, R -1, R -1.5, R -2, R -3, an C -R Districts: One unlighted sign, not Page 13. ce nt d se id 3 ti ph d INOLX COMMISSIONERS City Of Newport Beach MINUTES � 9: � Opp Spy �'tp 01 • � itap r 02 Santamhar 1. 1477 POLL GAIL. . ..exceeding 3 square feet in area, to advertise the lease, rental or sale of the property upe which it is located. Such sign may show ohl; the telephone number.of the owner or his ages but shall not show the name, address, telephe number, or any other description or identifii tion of any person, firm or corporation. Planning Commission discussed the issue of real estate signs in residential, commercial and industrial districts. Commissioner Lynch felt that the request with respect to consistency of the language on tempor, signs in the various districts was reasonable an suggested that the proposed ordinance be changed to reflect the request. Commissioner Agee agreed and felt there has been an inconsistency in the past which should be corrected. He had no objection to the size of the signs but felt that the language allowed sho be the same in all districts. Commissioner Heather felt that the existing sign was consistent with that allowed.in the various P -C Districts and that signing in the commercial and industrial districts served a different purp than signs in residential districts. Motion X Following discussion, the motion was amended to Ayes X X X X provide that: Noes X X X 1. Section 20.60.090 1.. (b) sha.11.read as folio "In the R -4 District: One real estate sign n exceeding 12 square feet in. area which advertises the.sale, rental or lease of the premises upon which the sign is located. Su sign may show only the telephone number of t owner or his agent, but shall not show the name, address, telephone number, or any othe description or identification of any person, firm or corporation. 2. Section 20.60.090 2. shall read as follows:. "Commercial and Industrial Districts. Comme cial and industrial properties shall be permitted one real estate sign.not exceeding Page 14. In i It, Ine .a- Iry i it d ing )se NS' 3t ch 1e r r- INOILX COMMISSIONERS s s City of. Newport Beach Qo2 Sentember 1. 1977 ROLL CALL 12 square feet in area which advertises the sale, rental or tease of the premises upon which the sign is.located. Such sign may she only the.telephone number of the owner or hi! agent, but shall not show the name; address, telephone number, or any other description or identification of any person, firm or corporation. All Ayes The original motion as amended was then voted on and carried. Request to adopt a Concept Plan for the area generally bounded by 32nd Street and 24th Street on the north, Balboa Boulevard and the Pacific Ocean on the west, 19th Street on the south, and . Lower Newport Bay and the Rhine Channel on the east. Initiated by: The.City of Newport Beach Senior Planner Talarico reviewed Concept Plans I I1, III, and IV and advised of a parking .needs a economic feasibility study presently under way b Wilbur Smith and Associates. Public hearing was opened in connection with thi matter. Lois Carr, owner of property at 208 - 29th Stree questioned the closing of 29 and 30th Streets as well as the landscaping buffer, parking as.sessme districts, and more signalized intersections. Staff advised that at this point no details had been worked out and the purpose of the public hearing was to determine whether or.not there wa support for any of the various concept plans or parts thereof. Linda Jacobs, resident at 20th Street and Balbo< Boulevard, with a business at 30th Street and • Newport Boulevard, questioned the effect of.the. closing of 29th and 30th Streets on access to ti businesses and the possibility of more free Page 15. MINUTES . w n y s t n e INOax Item #11 CANNERY VILL'A'GE/ McFADDDEN SQUARE CflCEFT TLAt -- CONT. TO O0CT. 6 — COMMISSIONERS . City of. Newport Beach MINUTES 3 • September 1, 1977 ROLL CALL parking in the area. She also questioned the possibility of more public transportation or traff service to the facilities on the peninsula. Staff advised that the intent of the closure was keep traffic out of the residential area and that studies were presently under way relative to the parking and transportation problems. Al Boa, 1908 Court Street, disagreed with the concept of redevelopment and felt that people should be discouraged from coming into the area .a that parks should be constructed on vacant proper as it became available in order to provide more open space and less density. Hans Dickman felt that the water front should be left for boat shops and marine oriented businessE Louise Newton, 1908 Ocean Front, questioned whe 0 there would be any new standards adopted for redevelopment. Vivian Smythe, 2108 W. Ocean Front commented in favor of 'cleaning up the McFadden Square area anc landscaping the alley. Ilene Rapp commented in favor of landscaping the alley in McFadden Square. Zachary Sham, 501 - 31st Street, felt that any plan adopted should encourage redevelopment of tt area and that the concept of mixed residential ar commercial use was good. He commented on marine uses, parking and closing of certain street, and favored Concept Plan II1. John Shea,commented on the island of residential use within the commercial area in McFadden Square and felt it should be designated residential over commercial. He also voiced concern with the designation of tourist commercial and its defini- tion. Dave Patterson, 3712 Seashore Drive, felt that 0 Cannery Village area was marginal and on the verc of deterioration and that parking was the key to providing a viable and profitable area. Page 16. to nd ty S. er LA e le. INO<X • • " COMMISSIONERS of Newport Beach MINUTES sot September 1. 1977 POLL CALL Susan Staff, owner of seven lots in the 400 block of 29th Street questioned the continuance of existing uses which may be in conflict with an adopted Specific Area Plan and was advised that existing uses would be allowed to continue until such time as redevelopment may be proposed by the property owner. Betty Blakesly, owner of the "Intrigue" shop at 29th and Lafayette, advised of her preference foI catering to the local residents rather than the tourists. Adele Mallory, Court Avenue, felt that the islanl of residential uses in the commercial area of McFadden Square should not be permitted and the area should be designated for commercial use on the Specific Area Plan. Linda Jacobs felt that the peninsula should be geared. more towards the people who live and work . in the area rather than towards the tourist trade Peg Forgit, 2205 W. Balboa Boulevard commented of her experience with residential over commercial and advised there was nothing substandard about. this way of living especially if the property wa well maintained. There being no others desiring to appear and be Motion X heard at this time, motion was made to continue All Ayes the public hearing to the.meeting of October 6, . 1977, at 7:00 P.M. Progress Report in connection with Use Permit No 1717 o.f Richard Lee Lawrence in McFadden Square.. which was a request to permit the remodeling of existing commercial building that will include (1) the establishment of a new "take -out" restau rant, (2) the expansion of the existing "Alley West" Restaurant with existing on -s.ale alcoholi bevera es with.in.200 feet of a residential distr and (3� the establishment of a new 2 story cockt . lounge with live entertainment, dancing and on -s alcoholic beverages within 200 feet of a residen Page 17. 1 N O!x an juv-iii/ ACCEPTED c ict ail ale tia COMMISSIONERS City Of Newport eac h MINUTES. S °t September 1, 1977 FIOLL CALL Motion All Ayes INOLX waiver of the required parking , Block 21, Newport. Beach Tract �d at 2106 West Ocean Front on rthwesterly corner of West Front and McFadden Place,.in len Square. •d Lee Lawrence,.Newport Beach Is Applicant Attorney's report, motion was :ommission accept the progress ide in connection with this k • pointed Commissioner Frederickso )mmunity Development Citizens * * * her business, Planning Commissio ng. Time: 11:05 P.M.., L. BALALIS, Secretary ing Commission of Newport Beach Page 18. D district, and (4) a spaces. Location: Lot 15 locatE the nE Ocean MCFadf Zone: C -1 Applicant: Richal Owner: Same X In view of the City made that Planning report previously m matter. . ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Chairman Heather ap as liaison to the C Advisory Committee. There being no furt adjourned the meeti PAUL`t Plann C ty INOLX waiver of the required parking , Block 21, Newport. Beach Tract �d at 2106 West Ocean Front on rthwesterly corner of West Front and McFadden Place,.in len Square. •d Lee Lawrence,.Newport Beach Is Applicant Attorney's report, motion was :ommission accept the progress ide in connection with this k • pointed Commissioner Frederickso )mmunity Development Citizens * * * her business, Planning Commissio ng. Time: 11:05 P.M.., L. BALALIS, Secretary ing Commission of Newport Beach Page 18. D