Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/04/1990REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING COMMISSIONERS PLACE: City Council Chambers MINUTES TIME: 7:30 P.M. DATE: October 4, 1990 2& CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX Present * * * * * All Commissioners were present. (Commissioner Pers6n arrived at 7:55 p.m.) EX- OFFICIO OFFICERS PRESENT: James Hewicker, Planning Director Robin Flory, Assistant City Attorney x x x William R. Laycock, Current Planning Manager Patricia Temple, Advance Planning Manager Don Webb, City Engineer Dee Edwards, Secretary • x x x Minutes of September 20. 1990: Minutes of 9 -20 -90 Motion Motion was made and voted on to approve the September 20, Ayes * * 1990, Planning Commission Minutes. MOTION CARRIED. Abstain Absent Public Comments: Public Comments No one appeared before the Planning Commission to speak on non - agenda items. Posting of the Agenda: Posting of the James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the. Planning Agenda Commission Agenda was posted on Friday, September 28, 1990, in front of City Hall. October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS C) � a � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLL CALL INDEX Request for Continuances: Request for James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the applicant, Continuance Eugene A. Cerko, has requested that Item No. 5, an appeal of Modification No. 3729, regarding property located at 2515 Bamboo Street, be continued to the October 18, 1990, Planning Commission meeting. * . Motion was made and voted on to continue Modification No. 3729 Ayes to the October 18, 1990, Planning Commission meeting. MOTION No CARRIED. Absent s x x Resubdivision No. 943 (Public Hearing) Item No.1 8943 Request to resubdivide an existing lot into a single parcel of land for a two family residential condominium development on property located in the R -2 District. Approves LOCATION: Lot 10, Block 17, Section B, Newport Beach, located at 1720 West Ocean Front, on the northeasterly side of West Ocean Front, between 17th Street and 18th Street, on the Balboa Peninsula. ZONE: R -2 APPLICANTS: Harold and Anne Harriman, Costa Mesa OWNERS: Same as applicants ENGINEER: Alpine Consultants, Laguna Hills The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Todd Schooler, Architect, appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Schooler concurred • with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ". -2- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS .o d � �� � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLL CALL INDEX There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion Motion was made and voted on to approve Resubdivision No. 943 Ayes * * * subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ". M011ON Absent * CARRIED. FINDINGS: 1. That the design of the subdivision will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. . 3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. CONDITIONS: 1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to occupancy, and that the parcel map be prepared using the State Plane Coordinate System as a basis of bearing. 2. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 3. That each dwelling unit shall be served with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 4. That all vehicular access to the property shall be from the adjacent alley. -3- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS MINUTES ��o Ny� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX 5. That disruption caused by construction work along roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. 6. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits 7. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code. 8. That Coastal Commission approval shall be obtained prior to the recordation of the parcel map. 9. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been • recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. Amendment No. 718 (Public Hearing) Item No.2 Request to amend the Villa Point Apartments Planned Community A718 Development Standards so as to allow the construction of an (R1236) architectural tower within Area 2 of the Planned Community. Said Approved amendment will establish a maximum allowable footprint for the tower of 14 feet by 14 feet (196 sq.ft.) and a maximum allowable height of 45 feet. The proposed amendment will also establish a minimum setback of 500 feet from Jamboree Road, 200 feet from East Coast Highway and 40 feet from Back Bay Drive for the architectural tower. LOCATION: Portions of Blocks 94 and 55, Irvine's Subdivision and Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 12 -21 (Resubdivision No. 242), located at 1100 East Coast Highway, on the northeasterly corner of East Coast Highway and Jamboree Road, in the Villa Point Apartments Planned Community. -4- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS MINUTES 0 0� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX ZONE: P -C APPLICANT: Regis Contractors, Inc., Newport Beach OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated. that the revised copy of the Resolution submitted to the Planning. Commission includes a finding that the project is not located within the boundaries of the Newport Center Sight Plane. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. David McMahan, appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant. Mr. McMahan stated that the tower would link Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Villa Point Apartments; that it is proposed to be 13 feet higher than the maximum ridge heights of the apartment building so as to add a focal point to the development; that it would enhance the project architecturally; that . it would be located in the project's interior so as not to be viewed from the back bay area or from East Coast Highway; and the Mediterranean architecture will blend in with the entire project and the surrounding area. Mr. McMahan stated that several residents of Sea Island approved the proposal after they reviewed the proposed plans. He addressed the letter from Villageway Management to the City dated October 3, 1990, on behalf of the Island Lagoon Homeowners Association whereby, he explained that the residents expressed concerns without reviewing the proposed plans. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr. McMahan replied that the bell tower is architecturally compatible with the project, that the tower was necessary to differentiate Phase 1 from Phase 2, that the tower will be primarily visible to the residents, and there is no intent to draw interest from outside of the development. In response to a question posed by Chairman Debay, Mr. McMahan explained that the tower is proposed to be located in the recreational area of Phase 2. • In response to questions posed by Commissioner Glover, Mr. McMahan described from the plans on display the difference in -5- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS 0 o; • \ O CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLL CALL III Jill I INDEX height between the 32 foot high apartment buildings and the 45 foot high tower, and the location of the buildings that would conceal the tower from East Coast Highway. Mr. McMahan, Chairman Debay, Commissioner Pers6n, and Mr. Hewicker discussed the proximity of the Island Lagoon residents to the project, and the feasibility of the tower obstructing their view. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy regarding a view obstruction from Spyglass Hill or Harbor View Hills, Mr. McMahan explained that the tower is not proposed to be so high that it would block any views outside of the subject area. Mr. Hewicker addressed the term "bell tower ", and he questioned if the applicants intend to install a noise generating unit in the tower. Mr. McMahan explained that 'bell tower" is a descriptive term with no intention of installing bells or other types of noise making devices. . Mr. Barry Allen, 1021 White Sails Way, Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning Commission, , and he addressed the Resolution's finding that the tower is not located within the boundaries of the Newport Center Sight Plane. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. * Motion was made to adopt revised Resolution No. 1236, recommending to the City Council the approval of Amendment No. 718, amending the Villa Point Apartments Planned Community Development Plan. Following a discussion between Commissioner Edwards and Mr. Hewicker, it was suggested that the record reflect that the intent of the applicant is not to install bells or other types of noise making devices in the bell tower, and that said wording will be added to the Villa Point Apartments Planned Community text. The maker of the motion agreed to add the foregoing suggestion to the motion. r * * * * * Motion was voted on to approve the foregoing motion as amended. * MOTION CARRIED. -6- COMMISSIONERS October 4, 1990 MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROL CALL INDEX Use Permit No. 3394 (Public HearinE) Item No.3 Request to permit the establishment of a take -out pizza restaurant UP3394 with incidental seating and on -sale beer and wine on property Approved located in the C -N -H District. The proposal also includes a request to waive a portion of the required off- street parking spaces. LOCATION: Lots 5 and 6 and a portion of Lot 7, Tract No. 4225, located at 1741 Westcliff Drive, on the southwesterly side of Westcliff Drive, between Irvine Avenue and Dover Drive, in the Westcliff area. ZONE: C -N -H APPLICANT: Atlantic - Pacific Pizza Bakery, Inc., Costa Mesa OWNER: Westcliff Center Associates, Newport Beach Chairman Debay questioned if the waived parking would create problem for future tenants. James Hewicker, Planning Director, explained that the parking requirements for the building are based upon the total square footage in the building. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. John Craft and Mark Frazier, applicants, appeared before the Planning Commission wherein they concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. * Motion was made and voted on to approve Use Permit No. 3394 All Ayes subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A'. MOTION CARRIED. FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed development is consistent with the Land • Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with the surrounding land uses. -7- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS y 0 �0. "P � A vL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLE CALL INDEX 2. That the project will not have any significant environmental impact. 3. That adequate parking is available on -site to accommodate the proposed facility. 4. That the waiver of the development standards as they pertain to walls, parking lot illumination, landscaping, and a portion of the required parking will not be detrimental to, adjoining properties. 5. The Police Department has no objections with the proposed development. 6. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3394 will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood, or be • detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City. CONDITIONS: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan and floor plan. 2. That the development standards pertaining to traffic circulation, walls, landscaping, parking lot illumination, and that a portion of the required additional parking spaces (21 spaces) shall be waived. 3. That the seating and dining area shall be incidental to the take -out restaurant and any introduction of table service will require amending the use permit. A maximum of 38 seats shall be permitted. 4. That the hours of operation shall be limited between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. daily, and that any increase in hours shall be subject to the approval of an amendment to Use Permit No. 3394. -8- COMMISSIONERS g� C�YPo 40 � N October 4, 1990 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROL7 CALL INDEX 5. That trash receptacles for patrons shall be located in convenient locations inside and outside the building. 6. That grease interceptors shall be installed on all fixtures in the take -out restaurant where grease may be introduced into the drainage systems in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code, unless otherwise approved by the Building Department and the Public Works. Department. 7. That kitchen exhaust shall be designed to control .fans smoke and odor to the satisfaction of the Building Department. 8. That all signs shall conform to the provisions of Chapters 20.06 of the Municipal Code. 9. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from Westcliff Drive and Sherington Drive and adjoining properties. 10. That a washout area for refuse containers be provided in such a way as to allow direct drainage into the sewer system and not into the Bay or storm drains unless otherwise approved by the Building Department and the Public Works Department. 11. That the employees shall park their vehicles on -site at all times. 12. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this use permit upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this amendment causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 13. That this use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section • 20.80.090 A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. -9- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS MINUTES 10 � \ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX Use Permit No. 1908 (Amended)(Public Hearing) item No.4 Request to review the Planning Commission's June 7, 1990 UP1908 (A) approval of Use Permit No. 1908 (Amended) which permitted a change in the operational characteristics of the existing Carmelo's Approved Restaurant so as to permit nighttime dancing in conjunction with a live entertainment dance combo whereas the previous live entertainment was limited to classical or semi - classical music. The approval also included a request to change the permitted closing. hours of the restaurant facility from 11:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday and 12:00 midnight, Friday and Saturday, to 12:30 a.m., Sunday through Thursday and 1:30 a.m., Friday and Saturday. The approval also included 4 additional seats on the outdoor patio (28 seats total) and the provision of 4 additional parking spaces in an existing off -site parking area, across the alley from the restaurant, by using tandem spaces. LOCATION: Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Map No. 158 -41 • (Resubdivision No. 645) located at 3520 East Coast Highway, on the northerly side of East Coast Highway, between Narcissus Avenue and Orchid Avenue, (restaurant site); and Lots 1, 3 and a portion of Lot 5, Block 441, Corona del Mar, located on the northwesterly side of Orchid Avenue, between East Coast Highway and Second Avenue, in Corona del Mar (off -site parking lot). ZONE: C -1 APPLICANT: Carmelo Manto, Newport Beach OWNER: First Interstate Bank, Newport Beach William Laycock, Current Planning Manager, addressed the letter from Acoustical Impacts International, dated September 12, 1990, that was attached to the staff report wherein he stated that the measurements of the noise from the live entertainment were performed on September 8, 1990, at 11:00 p.m, and not August 14, • 1990, as reported in the letter. -10- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS MINUTES I IQ � \ 0' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROL CALL INDEX In response to questions posed by Chairman Debay and Commissioner Edwards, Mr. Laycock replied that public notices were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the restaurant site, and so the Planning Commission has the authority to revise the original conditions of approval if it is their desire to do so. He indicated that staff did not receive complaints concerning the restaurant since the Planning Commission meeting of June 7, 1990, and the Police Department stated that no complaints had been reported to their department. James Hewicker, Planning Director, addressed the complaint in the staff report that was reported by a staff member indicating that the front entry door was allowed to remain open for an extended period of time during the live entertainment which was in violation of Condition of Approval No. 10. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Jerry King, J. A. King and Associates, appeared before the • Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant. Mr. King indicated that the adjacent neighbors were contacted when acoustical adjustments were being made at the restaurant and subsequently, the restaurant has not received any noise complaints. Mr. King concurred that the main entrance door to the restaurant was left open during the summer months up to 11:00 p.m.; however, he stated that the double French doors are securely locked and sound proof glass has been installed adjacent to the band. Mr. King explained that the main entrance doors remain open during the warm summer months to allow the waiters to serve food and drinks to the patrons sitting on the patio. He said the only other alternative to service the patio would be to modify the front end of the restaurant and to create a different type of access. In response to a question posed by Chairman Debay, Mr. King replied that the main entrance doors stay open during the early evening to accommodate the patron and waiter traffic; however, the doors are closed at 11:00 p.m. Mr. King explained that the results of the noise test demonstrated that the open double doors behind the band that are now securely locked were the problem, and not the main entrance doors. Mr. • King requested that the Planning Commission modify Condition No. 10 so as to allow the main entrance doors to remain open -11- COMMISSIONERS .o � NO\ 1 ,a October 4, 1990 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROM CALL INDEX during the summer months. Mr. King stated that with the exception of Condition No. 10, the applicant has complied with all of the conditions approved by the Planning Commission on June 7, 1990. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Di Sano, Mr. King replied that the applicant has made every attempt to personally contact residents that previously expressed concerns regarding the noise emitting from the restaurant. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr. King replied that the applicant has requested that Condition No. 10 be modified to delete the main entrance door from being closed when live entertainment is in progress. He further replied that he did not have the decibel ratings that were measured by Acoustical Impacts International available at the meeting. Commissioner Pomeroy referred to the staff report which states that the acoustical study indicated "the level of such noise cannot be measured • inasmuch as it is equal to or lower than the surrounding traffic noise." In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pers6n, Mr. Hewicker replied that the Planning Commission has the option to modify Condition No. 10 if desired. Commissioner Di Sano and Commissioner Pers6n discussed the feasibility of modifying the condition to permit the main entrance doors to remain open during the hours of live entertainment. Commissioner Pomeroy suggested that the condition be amended to state "that the main entrance door facing East Coast Highway may remain open from June 1 to October 15 to facilitate summer patio use." Chairman Debay commented that the neighborhood has not complained about noise emitting from the restaurant, and the Planning Commission has the option to bring back the use permit if there are future complaints. Chairman Debay concurred with the suggestion to modify the condition. Mr. Hewicker suggested that the Planning Commission reconsider requesting specific dates to allow the main entrance doors to remain open inasmuch as there are warm evenings throughout the year. Commissioner Pomeroy concurred with Mr. Hewicker's suggestion. • In response to a question posed by Chairman Debay, Mr. Hewicker replied that the Planning Commission may call back the use permit -12- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS MINUTES o & 'A\\� \ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL INDEX if there are future noise complaints and Condition No. 10 were amended. Mr. King stated that the applicant has given the adjacent neighbors the applicant's personal office telephone number if they have any complaints. In response to questions posed by Chairman Debay, Mr. King replied that appetizers and drinks are primarily served to patrons who are sitting and talking on the patio. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. * Motion was made and voted on to approve Use Permit No. 1908 (Amended) subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit 'Was All Ayes approved on June 7, 1990, with the modification to Condition No. 10 that "..and all doors and windows of the restaurant and lounge shall remain closed during such activity except for the main entrance door facing East Coast Highway in Corona del Mar." • MOTION CARRIED. Condition No. 10: That live entertainment in the restaurant shall be limited to a four piece combo and that all music and live entertainment shall be confined to the interior of the building and all doors and windows of the restaurant and lounge shall remain closed during such activity, except for the main entrance door facing East Coast Highway. i Y i Modification No 3729 (Continued Public Hearing) Item No..5 Request to consider an appeal of the Modification Committee's M3729 approval of the subject application which included a request to construct a wall and wrought iron fence that would encroach 10 cont. to to -la -90 feet into the required 10 of front yard setback along Bamboo Street. Said fence would range from a height of 6 feet 11± inches to 7 feet 5± inches, where the Zoning Code allows a maximum of 3 feet in height for any construction in the required 10 foot front yard setback. The Modification Committee's approval limited the height of the wall and wrought iron fence to 6 feet in height -13- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS �O x CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROLL CALL 11 Jill i INDEX measured from natural grade and required that it maintain a 5 foot front yard setback adjacent to Bamboo Street. LOCATION: Lot 58, Tract No. 4893, located at 2515 Bamboo Street, on the northwesterly side of Bamboo Street, between Biwa Street and Bison Avenue, in Eastbluff. ZONE: R -1 -13 APPLICANT: Eugene A. Cerko, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant APPELLANT: Same as applicant James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the applicant has requested that this item be continued to the Planning Commission • meeting of October 18, 1990, so that adjoining property owners and other interested parties may attend the meeting. * Motion was made and voted on to continue Modification No. 3729 Ayes * * * to the October 18, 1990, Planning Commission meeting. MOTION No * CARRIED. Absent s r a Discussion Items: Discussion Items General Plan Amendment No. 90 -3 #I Request to initiate amendments to the Land Use and Recreation and Open Space Elements of the Newport Beach General Plan as GPA 90 -3 follows: Approved A. Request of Larkin, Inc., doing business as Kenlar Hotels, to amend the Land Use Element to eliminate the additional 119 hotel rooms shown for the Sheraton Hotel site and change the entitlement to retail commercial allowing approximately 41,750 sq.ft. The actual retail amount will be -14- COMMISSIONERS � 1Cd d �0 �t �' tP October 4, 1990 CITY OF, NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ROL CALL INDEX determined by the amount of excess land available after reviewing the existing hotel's parking requirements, at a floor area ratio of 0.35. * Motion was made and voted on to recommend to the City Council All Ayes that the proposed Amendment be initiated and staff be directed to proceed with the preparation of any necessary environmental documents and set for public hearing before the Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. B. Proposal of the City of Newport Beach to review the Recreational and Environmental Open Space and Governmental, Educational and Institutional facilities land use categories, and the application of these categories to property in the City. The purpose of this review is to standardize the way these two land use classifications are applied. Patricia Temple, Advance Planning Manager, stated that Items B and C also involve amendments to the Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan. * Motion was made and voted on to recommend to the City Council All Ayes that the proposed Amendment be initiated and staff be directed to proceed with the preparation of any necessary environmental documents and set for public hearing before the Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. C. Request of Marvin P. Gussman in behalf of Lido Manna Village to amend the Land Use Element of the Newport Beach General Plan to change the land use designation of the City National Bank property from Retail and Service Commercial to Multi - Family Residential. This request will allow conversion of the existing building to a residential condominium project. The proposal also includes a request to change the floor area limit for the balance of Lido Marina Village from the established FAR of 0.5/0.75 to a specific square footage which reflects the existing floor area in order to allow for renovation and reconfiguration of the • -15- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS MINUTES 0 I& CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROL CALL INDEX existing commercial development. This request would remove the property from the provisions of the flexible FAR limitations, include the building bulk limits which include above grade covered parking. Motion was made and voted on to recommend to the City Council that the proposed Amendment be initiated and staff be directed to proceed with the preparation of any necessary environmental documents and set for public hearing before the Planning All Ayes Commission. MOTION CARRIED. Amendment No. 717 Request to initiate an amendment to Title 20 of the Municipal #2 Code establishing a policy regarding height limits in flood hazard i areas. A717 set for Don Webb City Engineer, discussed the proposed changes to the t5' g� P P g Public definition of building height relative to some existing City Hearing regulations. In the Cannery Village area, the minimum finished 11 -18 -90 floor elevation, and the point from which to measure height, was established at 6.27 feet MSL, or three inches higher than the 6 feet MSL established for most areas by the Federal Flood Plane Maps. The 6.27 feet MSL was suggested by the Public Works Department because that is the required height for bulkhead coping in order address extreme high tides and storm driven surf conditions as well as flood hazards. Staff expects to establish a minimum floor elevation of 6.27 feet MSL City wide. He therefore recommended that 6.27 MSL be considered the measuring point instead of 6.0 MSL for those areas so designated on the Federal Flood Zone Maps. Chairman Debay referred to a project on Balboa Island whereby • property owner had elevated the floor of a structure, constructed • patio that was equal to the elevation of the floor, and a fence around the patio was built higher than the City allowed. She questioned how a similar situation would be addressed in the • future. James Hewicker, Planning Director, explained that the language in the Cannery Village /McFadden Square area only mandates that the habitable living area be revised. Mr. Webb -16- October 4, 1990 COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROL CALL INDEX explained that to avoid a similar Balboa Island scenario, the interpretation of the height of construction in the front yard setback areas should be included in the proposed amendment. In response to questions posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Mr. Webb suggested that the areas listed under Table 1, be adjusted from 6.0 MSL to 6.27 MSL. Motion was made and voted on to initiate Amendment No. 717, All Ayes and set for public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting of November 8, 1990. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 p.m. Adjournment THOMAS EDWARDS, SECRETARY CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION i -17-