Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutInitial StudyCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: 4. Project Location: 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: 6. General Plan Designation: 7. Zoning: 8. Description of Project: Big Canyon Subdivision City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915 Russell Bunim, Planning Department (949) 644 -3210 1 Big Canyon Drive Newport Beach, CA Big Canyon Country Club Parks and Recreation to Residential Big Canyon Planned Community The City of Newport Beach has completed an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Big Canyon subdivision and single - family dwelling project. The property consists of a graded pad surrounded by disturbed areas of vegetation primarily with native and non - native ruderal species and a steep slope to the east vegetated primarily with native scrub species. Surrounding the property are single - family detached dwellings to the south and east, and single - family attached dwellings to the west. The golf course is contiguous to the site at the north with more single - family detached dwellings beyond. The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 1.9 acre parcel for the development of one single - family dwelling which requires the approval of a three -part application: 1) A Parcel Map to subdivide a 1.9 acre portion of the golf course into a legal lot, 2) General Plan amendment to create a new lot on the General Plan Land Use Map and change the land use from "Parks and Recreation" to "Single Unit Residential — Detached ", and 3) Amend the Big Canyon Planned Community (PC) to change the land use from "Golf Course" to "Low Density Residential" and modify the appropriate text and PC Land Use Map. 9. Surrounding Land Uses: Current Development: Golf course To the north: Golf course with single-family detached dwellings beyond To the east: Single-family detached dwellings To the south: Big Canyon Drive with single-family detached dwellings To the west: Single-family attached dwellings CHECKLIST Page 1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use Planning ❑ Population & Housing ❑ Geological Problems ❑ Water ❑ Air Quality • Transportation/ Circulation • Biological Resources • Energy & Mineral Resources • Hazards • Noise • Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: • Public Services • Utilities & Service Systems • Aesthetics • Cultural Resources • Recreation I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Submitted by: David Lepo, Planning Director Date 0 0 N 0 0 CHECKLIST Page 2 Prepared by: Russell Bunim, Assistant Planner Date CHECKLIST Page 3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Q I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ Q ❑ CHECKLIST Page 4 b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ R3 ❑ ❑ ❑ R3 ❑ ❑ CHECKLIST Page 5 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impeded the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 CHECKLIST Page 6 e) Have soils incapable of adequately ❑ ❑ Q ❑ supporting the use septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the ❑ ❑ ❑ Q public or the environment through routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? CHECKLIST Page 7 Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated i) Rupture of a known earthquake ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground ❑ ❑ Q ❑ shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, ❑ ❑ Q ❑ including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or ❑ ❑ Q ❑ the loss of topsoil? C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil ❑ ❑ ❑ Q that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as ❑ ❑ Q ❑ defined in Table 18- 1 -13 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately ❑ ❑ Q ❑ supporting the use septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the ❑ ❑ ❑ Q public or the environment through routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? CHECKLIST Page 7 VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: CHECKLIST Page 8 Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated b) Create a significant hazard to the ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 included on a list of hazardous materials sites which complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project within an airport land ❑ ❑ Q ❑ use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or ❑ ❑ ❑ p physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: CHECKLIST Page 8 CHECKLIST Page 9 Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a) Violate any water quality standards ❑ ❑ Q ❑ or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater ❑ ❑ Q ❑ supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing ❑ ❑ Q ❑ drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing ❑ ❑ Q ❑ drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of a course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water ❑ ❑ Q ❑ which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade ❑ ❑ Q ❑ water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year ❑ ❑ ❑ Q flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood ❑ ❑ ❑ Q hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? CHECKLIST Page 9 i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? XI. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other aoencies? Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ CHECKLIST Page 10 b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ❑ ❑ R1 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 23 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ Q v CHECKLIST Page 11 XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project: a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Other public facilities? XIV. RECREATION Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact ❑ Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ a) Would the project increase the use ❑ ❑ 2 ❑ of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction of or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? opportunities? XV. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ R3 ❑ ❑ CHECKLIST Page 12 b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Potentially Less Than Less than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact ❑ Incorporated 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ R3 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ CHECKLIST Page 13 d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Potentially Less Than Less than Significant Significant with Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ Q No Impact El El f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient ❑ ❑ Q ❑ permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and ❑ ❑ Q ❑ local statutes and regulation related to solid waste? h) Include a new or retrofitted Strom water treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g. water quality treatment basin, constructed treatment wetland), the operation of which could result in significant environmental effects (e.g. increased vectors and odors)? XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major period of California history or prehistory? 0 0 0 FM- 51 0 El El CHECKLIST Page 14 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) C) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Less Than Less than Significant Significant with Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 No Impact El CHECKLIST Page 15 SOURCE LIST The following enumerated documents are available at the offices of the City of Newport Beach, Planning Department, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California 92660. 1. Final Program EIR — City of Newport Beach General Plan 2. General Plan, including all its elements, City of Newport Beach. 3. Title 20, Zoning Code of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 4. City Excavation and Grading Code, Newport Beach Municipal Code. 5. Chapter 10.28, Community Noise Ordinance of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 6. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Management Plan 1997. 7. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Management Plan EIR, 1997. CHECKLIST Page 16