HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0_Zoning Code Amendment_PA2012-179CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING COMMISION STAFF REPORT
January 17, 2013
Agenda Item No. 2
SUBJECT: Zoning Code Amendment Single Room Occupancy Residential Hotels
and Parking for Emergency Shelters - (PA2012 -179)
Code Amendment No. CA2012 -009
APPLICANT: City of Newport Beach Planning Division
PLANNER: Melinda Whelan, Assistant Planner
949 - 644 -3221, mwhelan @newportbeachca.gov
PROJECT SUMMARY
Pursuant to Housing Element Program HP 5.1.7, a Zoning Code Amendment to re-
insert a definition of Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Residential Hotels and to add
provisions that would permit SROs within the commercial and office zoning districts with
the approval of a conditional use permit. Additionally, the amendment is to provide
general parking standards for emergency shelters. Both were inadvertently excluded in
the 2010 Zoning Code Update.
RECOMMENDATION
1) Conduct a public hearing; and
2) Adopt the draft resolution recommending City Council approval of the Zoning Code
Amendment No. CA2012 -2009 regarding Single Room Occupancy (SRO)
Residential Hotels and parking for Emergency Shelters (Attachment No. PC 1).
1
2
Code Amendment for Housing
January 17, 2013
Page 2
Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Residential Hotels
Background
During the 2010 Zoning Code update the definition and provisions for SRO's were
inadvertently left out. Therefore, the City included Housing Program HP 5.1.7 in the
adopted 2008 -2014 Housing Element:
"Housing Program 5.1.7 Amend the Zoning Code to include a definition of Single
Room Occupancy (SRO) Residential Hotels and add provisions that would permit SROs
within the commercial and office zoning districts with the approval of a use permit. No
standard set of conditions or use restrictions on SROs shall be established; instead,
each application should be evaluated individually and approved based upon its own
merits and circumstances."
Proposed Amendment
Implementation of HP 5.1.7 requires the following SRO definition is added to Chapter
20.70.020 Definitions of Specialized Terms and Phrases under Visitor Accommodations:
"No. 6. Single Room Occupancy, Residential Hotels (SRO) SRO: (HUD definition):
Buildings with six or more guest rooms without kitchen facilities in individual rooms, or
kitchen facilities for the exclusive use of guests, and which are also the primary
residences of the hotel guests."
Add SRO as a use permitted with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) within Section
20.20.020 Commercial Zoning Districts Land Uses and Permit Requirements in Tables
2 -4 and 2 -5 under all of the Office and Commercial Districts. These changes are found
in Attachment No. PC1 in Exhibit A.
Emergency Shelters
Background
In 2008 the state enacted SB2 which provides legislation that requires the City to
designate zoning districts where emergency shelters (homeless shelters) will be allowed
without requiring a use permit or other discretionary review. The Zoning Code provides
two zoning districts, Private Institutions (PI) and Office - Airport (OA), which allow
emergency shelters by right. Section 20.48.100 also establishes specific development
standards. Parking requirements are referenced in 20.40.040, Table 3 -10. However,
parking for Emergency Shelters states "As required by conditional use permit ". This is
an inconsistency since emergency shelters are permitted by right with the PI and OA
zoning districts.
3
Code Amendment for Housing
January 17, 2013
Page 3
Proposed Amendment
Based on the inquiries with homeless service providers, it is the consensus that many of
the homeless they serve possess a vehicle. Staff conducted research with several cities
within Orange County and found a typical parking standard to be 1 space per 4 beds
plus 1 per staff. If the shelter i/s designed with rooms designated for family units then Y2
a parking space per bedroom for these family units is consistent with the needs of the
emergency shelter use. Staff has added these standards for the Emergency Shelter
Use within Table 3 -10 (Attachment No. PC 1 Exhibit A).
Environmental Review
All significant environmental concerns for the proposed project have been addressed in
a previously certified environmental document (Negative Declaration for the Housing
Element Update adopted by City Council on November 22, 2011), and that the City of
Newport Beach intends to use said document for the above noted project, and further
that there are no mitigation measures that should be considered in conjunction with said
project. Copies of the Negative Declaration for the 2008 -2014 Housing Element Update
are available for public review and inspection at the Planning Division in the Community
Development Department or at the City of Newport Beach website under archived
documents: http:// www. newportbeachca .gov /cegadocuments.
Public Notice
Notice of this application was published in the Daily Pilot on January 4, 2012, consistent
with the provisions of the Municipal Code. Additionally, the item appeared on the
agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the City website.
Prepared by:
Submitted by:
Melinda Whelan
Assistant Planner Br n a Wisnes i, ICP, Deputy Director
ATTACHMENTS
PC 1 Draft Resolution including Exhibit A
07/31/12
4
Attachment No. PC 1
Draft Resolution including Exhibit A
5
0
RESOLUTION NO. ## ##
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. CA2012 -009
REGARDING SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY RESIDENTIAL
HOTELS AND PARKING FOR EMERGENCY SHELTERS
(PA2012 -179)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
1. In 2008 the state enacted SB2 which provides legislation that requires the City to
designate zoning districts where emergency shelters will be allowed without requiring
a use permit or other discretionary review.
2. The City adopted a comprehensive update of the Zoning Ordinance in October of
2010. The definition and Zoning Districts where Single Room Occupancy (SRO)
Residential Hotels are allowed and a parking standard for emergency shelters were
inadvertently excluded.
3. The 2008 -2014 Housing Element includes Housing Program HP 5.1.7 committing the
City to define SRO's within the Zoning Ordinance and permit SROs within the
commercial and office districts as previously provided for; and identified that the City
complies with the requirements of S132. The 2008 -2014 Housing Element included a
certified Negative Declaration approved by City Council on November 22, 2011.
4. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on January 17, 2013, in the City
Hall Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A notice of
time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport
Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and
considered by, the Planning Commission at this meeting.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION.
That all significant environmental concerns for the proposed project have been addressed in
a previously certified environmental document (Negative Declaration for the Housing Element
Update adopted by City Council on November 22, 2011), and that the City of Newport Beach
intends to use said document for the above noted project, and further that there are no
mitigation measures that should be considered in conjunction with said project. Copies of the
Negative Declaration for the 2008 -2014 Housing Element Update are available for public
review and inspection at the Planning Division in the Community Development Department.
W
Planning Commission Resolution No.
Paqe 2 (3i3
SECTION 3. FINDINGS.
1. Amendment implements HP 5.1.7 by amending the Zoning Code to include a definition
of Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Residential Hotels and add provisions that would
permit SROs within the commercial and office zoning districts with the approval of a
conditional use permit.
2. Establishes a reasonable parking requirement for emergency shelters.
3. Both amendments act to implement Goals and Programs of adopted 2008 -2014
Housing Element.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby approves this Resolution
recommending City Council approval of Code Amendment (CA2012 -009), as provided in Exhibit
A of this resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF JANUARY, 2013.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
BY:
Michael Toerge, Chairman
I --ya
Fred Ameri, Secretary
Tmplt: 12/15/2011
2
Planning Commission Resolution No. _
Pace 3 of 3
EXHIBIT "A"
Revised Zoning Code Sections 20.20.020, 20.40.040 and 20.70.020
Tmplt: 12/15/2011
I
10
Amendment to Section 20.20.020 Commercial Zoning Districts Land Uses and Permit Requirements to
add the SRO Land Use to Tables 2 -4 and 2 -5:
1i
Commercial Office Zoning Districts
Permit Requirements
P
Permitted by Right
Conditional Use Permit (Section
TABLE 2 -4
CUP
20.52.020)
ALLOWED USES AND PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS
Minor Use Permit (Section
MUP
20.52.020)
Limited Term Permit (Section
LTP
20.52.040)
—
Not allowed
Land Use
See Part 7 of this title for land use
Specific Use
OA
OG
OM
OR
definitions.
Regulations
See Chapter 20_12 for unlisted uses.
Visitor Accommodations, Nonresidential
Hotels, Motels, and Time Shares
CUP
—
CUP
—
SRO Residential Hotel
CUP
CUP
CUP
CUP
1i
22
Commercial Retail Zoning Districts
Permit Requirements
P Permitted by Right
TABLE 2 -5
Conditional Use Permit (Section
ALLOWED USES AND PERMIT
CUP 20.52.020)
REQUIREMENTS
MUP Minor Use Permit (Section 20.52.020)
LTP Limited Term Permit (Section 20.52.040)
— Not allowed
Land Use
See Part 7 of this title for land use
Specific Use
cc
CG
CM
CN
CV
definitions.
Regulations
See Chapter 20_12 for unlisted uses.
Visitor Accommodations
Bed and Breakfast Inns
MUP
MUP
MUP
—
MUP
Section
20.48.060
Hotels and Motels
CUP
CUP
CUP
—
CUP
RV Parks
—
CUP
Time Share Facilities
—
CUP
—
—
CUP
Section
20.48.220
SRO Residential Hotel
CUP
CUP
CUP
CUP
CUP
22
Amendment to Section 20.40.040 Off - Street Parking Spaces Required Table 3.10 under the Emergency
Shelter Land Use add the following:
TABLE 3 -10
OFF - STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Land Use
Parking Spaces Required
Emergency Shelter
As requiFed by QARditiORal ISP o,....,,.
1 per 4 beds plus 1 per staff: and if shelter is designed with designated family units
then Yz a narking space per bedroom designated for family units
2�
Amendment to Section 20.70.020 to add No. 6 to the following Visitor Accommodations (Land Use)
definition:
"Visitor Accommodations (Land Use).
6. Single Room Occupancy, Residential Hotels (SRO) SRO: (HUD definition): Buildings with
six or more quest rooms without kitchen facilities in individual rooms, or kitchen facilities for the
exclusive use of quests, and which are also the primary residences of the hotel quests.
All other definitions within this Section remain the same and will be renumbered accordingly.
14
ADDITIONAL
MATERIALS
RECEIVED
Zoninq Code Amendment
Single Room Occupancy Residential
Hotels (SROs)
Parking for Emergency Shelters
Planning Commission
Public Hearing
January 17, 2013
STAFF PRESENTATION (PA2012 -179)
9161116910
Zoning Code Amendment
Re- insert Single Room Occupancy (SRO)
Residential Hotels definition, permit SROs in
Commercial and Office Districts with CUP
Add Parking Standard for Emergency Shelters
07/13/2012
Community Development Department- Planning Division
ifeM Me t •
:l•
Required by Government Code Section 65583 (c) (1)
HCD required Housing Element Program HP 5.1.7 to re- insert
definition and add provisions consistent with State Housing
Element Law
City Council approved the Housing Element including this
program on November 22, 2011
07/13/2012
Community Development Department- Planning Division
3ackground Emergency Shelters.
Clean -up item parking standards left -out of Code Update
■ Research conducted with other Cities and operators
Common rate required and recommended rate:
1 parking space /4beds + 1 /staff
If shelter designed with rooms for family units then 1/2a
parking space per family unit bedroom
07/13/2012
Community Development Department- Planning Division
it
07/13/2012 Community Development Department- Planning Division
Ah
65583(c)(1)
y
7
n
r
/co eN��
(c) A program which sets forth a schedule of actions during the planning period, each with a timeline
for implementation which may recognize that certain programs are ongoing such that there will be
beneficial impacts of the programs within the planning period, that the local government is
undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of
the housing element through the administration of land use and development controls, the provision
of regulatory concessions and incentives, the utilization of appropriate federal and state financing and
subsidy programs when available, and the utilization of moneys in a low- and moderate - income
housing fund of an agency if the locality has established a redevelopment project area pursuant to the
Community Redevelopment Law (Division 24 (commencing with Section 33000) of the Health and
Safety Code). In orderto make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of
the community, the program shall do all of the following:
(i) Identify actions that will be taken to make sites available during the planning period with
appropriate zoning and development standards and with services and facilities to accommodate that
portion of the city's or county's share of the regional housing need for each income level that could not
be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory completed pursuant to paragraph (3) of
subdivision (a) without rezoning, and to comply with the requirements of Section 65584.09. Sites shall
be identified as needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing
for all income levels, including multifamily rental housing, factory -built housing, mobilehomes,
housing for agricultural employees, supportive housing, single -room occupancy units, emergency
shelters, and transitional housing.
07/13/2012
Community Development Department - Planning Division
N
l
y
■ Housing Program 5.1.7 Amend the Zoning Code to
include a definition of Single Room Occupancy (SRO)
Residential Hotels and add provisions that would permit
SROs within the commercial and office zoning districts
with the approval of a use permit. No standard set of
conditions or use restrictions on SROs shall be
established; instead, each application should be
evaluated individually and approved based upon its own
merits and circumstances. (Imp 2.1, 25.1)
Responsibility: Planning Division, Planning Commission
and City Council
■ 2008 -2014 Objective: Adoption of the amendment shall
be completed by the end of Fall 2011.
07/13/2012
Community Development Department- Planning Division
7
1
For more information contact:
Melinda Whelan
949-644 -3221
mwhelan@newportbeachca.gov
www.newportbeachca.gov
Item No. 2a: Additional Materials Received
Planning Commission January 17, 2013
Zoning Code Amendment (PA2012 -179)
PLEASE DISTRIBUTE AND ENTER INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD
To: City of Newport Beach - Planning Commission
From: Denys Oberman,
Subject: COMMENT - JANUARY 17,2013 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM #2- ZONING CODE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW SINGLE ROOM OCCUPANCY
RESIDENTIAL HOTELS(SRO) and PARKING FOR EMERGENCY SHELTERS
City staff proposes to include a parking element for emergency shelters. We believe that this
recommendation is acceptable.
SROs- City staff proposes that the Zoning Code be Amended to include a definition of SROs, and allow
SROs within commercial and office zoning distincts, subject to approval of a Conditional Use
Permit(CUP).
We understand that SROs can serve a purpose as one solution to satisfy affordable housing goals.
However, the SRO can also serve to facilitate the introduction of increased transient population,
parolees and other boarding -house type facilities that the city currently does not permit .
We object to across the board zoning permitting SROs in any commercial or office zoned districts.
In many commercial, zoning or mixed use districts, an SRO would be inappropriate and incompatible
with planning objectives for the area, or be adverse to the social and economic integrity of the area. For
example, SROs could be located in a specific radius near the airport, but should NOT be permitted in any
area proximite to dense residential neighborhoods, schools, parks and beaches.
Furthermore, an SRO would have an environmental impact on the area(parking, noise,air quality
particularly with smoking), so it should be required to establish environmental compliance.
We object to the establishment of SROs ,as there is no practical means of distinguishing the use from
boarding house or parolee uses.There is no legal requirement mandating that the City allow SROs.In any
event,SROs should ONLY be allowed in specifically- designated commercial /industrial areas, and NOT in
any coastal or other dense residential or mixed use area. Additionally, they should not be permitted in
coastal areas such as Balboa Penninsula, Lido and Balboa Islands, Corona del Mar and West Newport
where there is high sensitivity to density and impact on neighborhood integrity.
Thank you for your consideration.
2b: Additional Materials Received
Comments on January 3, 2013 PC Meeting Agenda Item 2
The following comments on Item 2 on the January 17, 2013, Newport Beach Planning Commission
agenda are submitted by: Jim Mosher ( iimmosher(avahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach
92660 (949- 548 -6229)
Item 2: Zoning Code Amendment Single Room Occupancy Residential
Hotels and Parking for Emergency Shelters (PA2012 -179)
Regarding the proposed resolution and the snippets of modified code presented as Exhibit A,
we seem to have entered the brave new world permitted by the Measure EE changes to City
Charter Section 418, which formerly required reenactment of the code sections "at length."
Although this new, abbreviated process saves paper, it is apparent to me that deprives both the
lawmakers and the public from seeing the proposed changes in context.
Having gone to the extra work of trying to determine where these proposed changes would go, I
would like to make the following technical observations:
On handwritten pages 11 and 12 of the 14 page staff report, the fragments of what
purports to be Table 2 -4 from Municipal Code Section 20.20.020 differs from the
tables adopted in the Zoning Code adopted by Ordinance 2010 -21 as signed by then
Mayor Keith Curry and approved by then City Attorney David R. Hunt. Those tables
erroneously made references to 20.66.080 and 20.66.090, which have been
corrected here to 20.52.020 and 20.52.040. In a sense it is good that "errors' have
been corrected, but at the same time it may be worrisome to some that changes can
apparently be made without public knowledge or awareness, leaving one wondering
what other parts of the publicly adopted legislation might be regarded as "errors"
subject to change without notice in the on -line code?
• It is also difficult to verify the proposed insertions because the even - numbered pages
of this part of the Zoning Code, which would presumably have included the "Visitor
Accommodations, Nonresidential" sections of Tables 2 -4 and 2 -5 were omitted from
the adopted ordinance (or, at least, if they are there they are out of sequence and I
was unable to find them).
• On handwritten page 14, the statement that "All other definitions within this Section
remain the same and will be renumbered accordingly' is a bit confusing since the
definitions referenced were not numbered in the adopted Newport Beach Zoning
Code. Checking on -line, someone appears to have numbered them there, and
slightly modified their wording. Again, one wonders what else may have been
changed?
2b: Additional Materials Received
Comments on Jan. 17, 2013 PC Agenda Item 2 - Jim Mosher Page 2 of 3
I would further, and more importantly, like to make the following substantive comments:
• On handwritten page 3, I'm not sure I fully understand the proposed definition of "Single
Room Occupancy Residential Hotels," nor the rationale for why they would be permitted
"in all of the Office and Commercial Districts" rather than just the zones in which other
transient/residential uses are allowed (referring to proposed Table 2 -4) — that is, why are
they the least restricted in location? This seems a failure of planning.
On handwritten page 11, in Table 2 -4, it seems a further oddity to have "SRO
Residential Hotel' listed under the heading "Visitor Accommodations, Nonresidential'
Perhaps this makes sense when seen in a larger context, but as presented, it does not.
• On handwritten page 13, I'm not sure I understand the intended meaning of the
proposed Off - Street Parking Requirement for Emergency Shelters. Is it trying to say
there is an additional requirement of /z space for each bedroom in a "designated family
unit "? Or, for designated family units, does that replace the 1 space per 4 beds
requirement? I find the language unclear.
On handwritten page 14, regarding the proposed definition of "Single Room Occupancy,
Residential Hotels (SRO) SRO ":
o Is there supposed to be a comma between "Single Room Occupancy" and
"Residential Hotels "?
o Is the abbreviation "SRO" supposed to appear twice?
o As to the substance of the definition itself, where does this wording come from?
Why six and more rooms? Why the emphasis on kitchen facilities?
The text implies it is a HUD definition, but Googling on the text, the only
place I can find a similar definition is in the Oceanside Municipal Code.
The US Census Bureau
(http: / /www.census.gov /srd /papers /pdf /ssm2006- 03.pdf) has pages of
definitions including:
Federal: "'Single room occupancy housing' means a unit that
contains no sanitary facilities or food preparation facilities, or
contains one but not both types of facilities (as those facilities are
defined in 887.251 (a) and (b), that is suitable for occupancy by an
eligible individual capable of independent living." [SOURCE:
United States 1992 (USC 24CFR887.481 §. 887.481)]
San Diego, California: "a facility with more than five sleeping
rooms that is kept, used, maintained, advertised, or held out to the
public as a place where sleeping rooms are offered on a single
room occupancy (SRO) basis and intended for use as a primary
2b: Additional Materials Received
Comments on Jan. 17, 2013 PC Agenda Item 2 - Jim Mosher Page 3 of 3
residence for residential guests for a period of more than thirty
days." [SOURCE: City of San Diego 2003 (Municipal Code
1301:7 -5 -08 (A) §124.1.2).]
• The California Health and Safety Code provides the following definitions:
"50519. (b) (1) "Residential hotel" means any building containing six or
more guestrooms or efficiency units, as defined by Section 17958. 1,
intended or designed to be used, or which are used, rented, or hired out,
to be occupied, or which are occupied, for sleeping purposes by guests,
which is also the primary residence of those guests, but does not mean
any building containing six or more guestrooms or efficiency units, as
defined by Section 17958. 1, which is primarily used by transient guests
who do not occupy that building as their primary residence."
17958.1. Notwithstanding Sections 17922, 17958, and 17958.5, a city or
county may, by ordinance, permit efficiency units for occupancy by no
more than two persons which have a minimum floor area of 150 square
feet and which may also have partial kitchen or bathroom facilities, as
specified by the ordinance. In all other respects, these efficiency units
shall conform to minimum standards for those occupancies otherwise
made applicable pursuant to this part. "Efficiency unit, "as used in this
section, has the same meaning specified in the Uniform Building Code of
the International Conference of Building Officials, as incorporated by
reference in Chapter 2 -12 of Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations."
• Note that all these definitions, other than the one in Oceanside, allow kitchen
amenities.
o Under our proposed definition, does a regular hotel become an SRO if a person
lives there permanently? If six people use it as a residence, but the others are
normal hotel guests? Conversely, does an SRO lose its SRO status if some of
its occupants don't use it as their primary residence?
What category of use does an SRO become if it adds a kitchen? Or it has a
kitchen to feed the residents, but it isn't "exclusive "?
Again, without seeing the proposed changes in a larger context, and perhaps even then,
I find all of this very unclear.
Item No. 2c: Additional Materials Received
Planning Commission January 17, 2013
Zoning Code Amendment (PA2012 -179)
Amendment to Section 20.70.020 to add No. 6 to the following Visitor Accommodations (Land Use)
definition:
"Visitor Accommodations (Land Use).
6. Single Room Occupancy, Residential Hotels (SRO) SRO: (HUD definition): Buildings with
six or more quest rooms without kitchen facilities in individual rooms, or kitchen facilities for the
exclusive use of quests, and which are also the primary residences of the hotel quests.
All other definitions within this Section remain the same and will be renumbered accordingly.