HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/03/2013 - Planning CommissionNEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Council Chambers — 3300 Newport Boulevard
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
REGULAR MEETING
6:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER — The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE —Vice Chair Hillgren
III. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Brown, Hillgren, Kramer, Myers (arrived 6:52 p.m.), Toerge, and
Tucker (arrived 6:39 p.m.)
ABSENT (Excused): Ameri
4/3/2013
Staff Present: Brenda Wisneski, Deputy Community Development Director; Leonia Mulvihill,
Assistant City Attorney; Tony Brine, City Traffic Engineer; Marlene Burns, Administrative Assistant;
and Patrick Alford, Planning Manager
IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chair Toerge invited those interested in addressing the Planning Commission to do so at this time.
Jim Mosher spoke on fairness and equity. He referenced recent ethics training and comments made
at the session and addressed the process for allowing public comments on agenda items. He felt that
the public is not given equal time for commenting on agenda items thereby presenting an inequity.
There being no others wishing to address the Planning Commission, Chair Toerge closed the public
comments portion of the meeting.
V. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCES
Deputy Community Development Director Wisneski reported that regarding Item No. 3, staff
determined that the meeting date on the public hearing notice was unclear therefore, the meeting
needed to be re- noticed and suggested scheduling the item to the Planning Commission meeting of
April 18, 2013.
Regarding Item No. 4, a request was received from the appellant and agreed to by co- appellants to
continue the matter to April 18, 2013, because representatives could not attend at this time.
Commissioner Tucker arrived at this juncture (6:39 p.m.).
Interested parties were invited to address the Planning Commission.
Desmond Levin, M.D., commented on Item No. 3 and wondered why they were not notified of the
continuance.
Chair Toerge noted that this was not a request from the applicant, but rather a noticing error.
Page 1 of 5
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Sandy Haskell inquired whether Item No. 3 will be re- noticed.
4/3/2013
Ms. Wisneski affirmed that the item will be re- noticed and will be heard at the new City Hall facility.
Motion made by Chair Toerge and seconded by Commissioner Kramer and carried (5 — 0 — 2), to
continue Items No. 3 and 4 to the Planning Commission meeting of April 18, 2013.
AYES:
Brown, Hillgren, Kramer, Toerge, and Tucker
NOES:
None
ABSTENTIONS:
None
ABSENT:
Ameri and Myers
VI. CONSENT ITEMS
ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF MARCH 21, 2013
Recommended Action: Approve and file
Chair Toerge introduced the item noting that there were written comments received from Jim Mosher.
Interested parties were invited to address the Planning Commission on this item. There was no
response and Chair Toerge closed public comments.
Motion made by Commissioner Tucker and seconded by Chair Toerge and carried (3 — 0 — 2 — 2), to
approve the minutes of March 21, 2013, as amended.
AYES:
Hillgren, Toerge, and Tucker
NOES:
None
ABSTENTIONS:
Brown and Kramer
ABSENT:
Ameri and Myers
VII. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
ITEM NO. 2 NEWPORT NORTH CENTER MONUMENT SIGNS APPEAL (PA2012 -168)
Site Location: 1200 Bison Avenue
Planning Manager Alford presented the report addressing location and prior approval by the Zoning
Administrator. He reported that the decision was appealed by Council Member Daigle. He addressed
the project site, proposed location of the signs, types of signs, site plan, details of the appeal, Zoning
Administrator's authority, neighborhood compatibility, conditions of approval and the photometric
analysis conducted by the applicant. He presented findings and recommendations.
Ensuing discussion pertained to landscaping in front of the signs and installation of a dimmer.
Interested parties were invited to address the Planning Commission on this matter.
Dan Miller, The Irvine Company, reported that businesses within neighborhood shopping centers want
signage and an attempt is made to consolidate them to avoid a proliferation of signs. He addressed
Page 2 of 5
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4/3/2013
the size of the signs, lighting and distances to adjacent residences. He noted that the proposal is
compatible with other neighborhood centers within the City.
Commissioner Myers arrived at this juncture (6:52 p.m.). He recused himself and departed the
Chambers.
Bob McCaffrey commented on the length of the report and addressed the traffic pattern. He reported
speaking with representatives from the City and the OCTA in relation to the cited traffic study but they
were not able to provide a source of the data. He questioned the accuracy of the data for traffic and
lighting and reported that the latter did not take into account the nearby planned community. He
stated that he would not have a problem with a sign, but expressed concerns regarding the lighting of
the sign. He distributed a list of existing businesses in the area.
In response to Vice Chair Hillgren's inquiry, Mr. McCaffrey stated that originally, there was concern
regarding traffic flow into the center from Jamboree Road and Bison Avenue. He added that lighting
is the main issue of concern and reported there are twenty businesses in the center and that only
three will be named on the sign. He stated that he felt overwhelmed and wondered why the sign
needs to be lit until 10:00 p.m.
Jim Mosher addressed the stream of requests for commercial signs, noting that most of the requests
come from The Irvine Company. He addressed the lack of information related to a modification
permit, noted that the PC text has been amended several times and felt that the PC text addresses
this sign type and it is clear that the PC text allows only one multi- tenant sign for the entire center and
that individual ground signs must be kept back twenty feet from the property line. He felt that The
Irvine Company should not burden residents with an additional sign and suggested that a discrete
sign directing people into the center would be less obtrusive.
Mr. Miller reported that the traffic analysis on Bison Avenue is five -years old and the numbers relative
to MacArthur Boulevard are more up -to -date. He stated that his company is trying to accommodate
as many businesses as possible and felt that the proposed sign is a good compromise.
In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Tucker, Mr. Miller reported that he would be willing to
forego installing a twenty -foot directory sign and a restaurant pole sign.
In response to an inquiry from Vice Chair Hillgren, Mr. Miller stated that he would be willing to review
the matter in the future to make appropriate adjustments in terms of lighting. He felt that with the
existing lights in the area, differences will not be perceptible.
There being no others wishing to address the Planning Commission, Chair Toerge closed public
comments for this item.
Commissioner Kramer felt that the Zoning Administrator applied the correct standard review on the
matter and acted reasonably. He felt that the proposed sign does not pose an additional burden on
residents and indicated that he will support the original Zoning Administrator decision.
Commissioner Tucker stated agreement with Commissioner Kramer's comments and felt that The
Irvine Company's proposal is appropriate.
Page 3 of 5
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4/3/2013
Motion made by Commissioner Tucker and seconded by Commissioner Kramer and carried (5 — 1 —
1), to adopt Resolution No. 1911, denying the appeal, upholding and affirming the decision of the
Zoning Administrator and approving Modification Permit No. MD2012 -016 with the attached Findings
and Conditions adding that as long as the monument sign is installed, no tenant directory sign or
restaurant pole sign will be installed.
Assistant City Attorney Mulvihill suggested that a condition be added indicating that no tenant
directory sign or restaurant pole sign will be installed.
Mr. Alford suggested that the modification permit not be valid if a directory sign or restaurant pole is
installed.
Ms. Mulvihill reported that staff will work with the applicant regarding the matter.
AYES:
Brown, Hillgren, Kramer, Toerge, and Tucker
NOES:
None
ABSTENTIONS:
None
ABSENT:
Ameri
RECUSAL:
Myers
Commissioner Myers entered the Chambers and took his place on the dais
ITEM NO. 3 441 OLD NEWPORT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING (PA2011 -056)
Site Location: 441 Old Newport Boulevard
This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 18, 2013, as moved under
Requests for Continuances.
ITEM NO. 4 KNIGHT RESIDENCE (PA2013 -044) AND OU RESIDENCE (PA2013 -043)
Site Location: 312 Hazel Drive and 316 Hazel Drive
This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 18, 2013, as moved under
Requests for Continuances.
VIII. STAFF AND COMMISSIONER ITEMS
ITEM NO. 5 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - None
ITEM NO. 6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Ms. Wisneski referenced the pending agenda for April 18, 2013, noting that the meeting will take place
in the new Civic Center facility. She referenced the Housing Element and offered to respond to
questions from the Commission.
Ms. Mulvihill reported that the City received notice of a commencement of a CEQA action regarding
the Uptown Newport project as well as a subsequent letter stating that the action was withdrawn.
Page 4 of 5
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4/3/2013
ITEM NO.7 ANNOUNCEMENTS ON MATTERS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MEMBERS WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION,
ACTION, OR REPORT
Ms. Wisneski asked the Planning Commissioners to arrive early on April 18, 2013, for training.
ITEM NO. 8 REQUESTS FOR EXCUSED ABSENCES - None
IX. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, the meeting was
adjourned at 7:16 p.m.
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for April 18, 2013, at 6:30 p.m.
The agenda for the Regular Meeting was posted on March 28, 2013, at 4:25 p.m. on the City Hall Bulletin
Board located outside of the City of Newport Beach Administration Building, 3300 Newport Boulevard.
Page 5 of 5