Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3b - Staff Presentation - PA2012-102Reside Vlprnpi German' Bngharn House, central Mau., about 7750 tNelmpne mt raes Wed In small rr h4rBerai:n/ 1r aee hom 2.30a square ft9rh�l�_huuse (IWy neighbor] Exclaims against my New House and thinks that it is too bg, and.. too bgh. Diary of Ebenezer Parkrnan. I minister in Massachusetts, 1751 u >.opt, ,CgGlFp 0.N P �jiannin Dimin it 1. 2. 3. 5. Al Revise required findings Proportional setbacks Maintain pre- merger floor area limits Avoid creating nonconformities Exempt substandard lot mergers City -wide application Mergers of more than 2 lots Community Development Department - Planning Division z Mr. :4 • • Section 19.68.030 (H): n 5. The lots as merged will be consistent with the surrounding pattern of development and will not create an excessively large lot that is not compatible with the surrounding development. Community Development Department - Planning Division I V 5. The lots as merged will be consistent with the pattern of development in the vicinity and will result in a lot width, depth, or orientation, or development site that is not compatible with the adjoining and adjacent development. In making this finding, the review authority may consider the following: a. Whether the merged lots would significantly deviate from the development pattern of adjoining and adjacent lots in a manner that would result in a material detriment to the use and enjoyment of other properties; b. Whether the merged lots would be consistent with the character or general orientation of other lots in the vicinity. c. Whether the merged lots would be conforming or in greater conformity with the minimum lot width and area standards for the Zoning District. Community Development Department- Planning Division Zr I V 5. The lots as merged will be consistent with the pattern of development in the vicinity and will result in a lot width, depth, or orientation, or development site that is not compatible with the adjoining and adjacent development. In making this finding, the review authority may consider the following: a. Whether the merged lots would significantly deviate from the development pattern of adjoining and adjacent lots in a manner that would result in a material detriment to the use and enjoyment of other properties; b. Whether the merged lots would be consistent with the character or general orientation of other lots in the vicinity. c. Whether the merged lots would be conforming or in greater conformity with the minimum lot width and area standards for the Zoning District. Community Development Department - Planning Division ., r 5. The lots as merged will be consistent with the pattern of development nearby and will not result in a lot width, depth or orientation, or development site that is incompatible with nearby lots. In making this finding, the review authority may consider the following: a. Whether development of the merged lots could significantly deviate from the pattern of development of nearby lots in a manner that would result in an unreasonable detriment to the use and enjoyment of other properties; b. Whether the merged lots would be consistent with the character or general orientation of nearby lots; or c. Whether the merged lots would be conforming or in greater conformity with the minimum lot width and area standards for the Zoning District. Community Development Department- Planning Division 6 ., r 5. The lots as merged will be consistent with the pattern of development nearby and will not result in a lot width, depth or orientation, or development site that is incompatible with nearby lots. In making this finding, the review authority may consider the following: a. Whether development of the merged lots could significantly deviate from the pattern of development of nearby lots in a manner that would result in an unreasonable detriment to the use and enjoyment of other properties; b. Whether the merged lots would be consistent with the character or general orientation of lots; or c. Whether the merged lots would be conforming or in greater conformity with the minimum lot width and area standards for the Zoning District. Community Development Department - Planning Division 10 %or6ft FIXED -- -- -- * - -- -- -- -- -- - -- --- -; .............................. i soft 10% or 6 ft i :............................. I !- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- .- . -. -.i VARIED Community Development Department - Planning Division 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 *To- T W, Bal. Island :T.71 40 CdM Bal. Peninsula _�1I Post - Merger Increase Pre -meger Lot 2 Floor Area Pre - merger Lot 1 Floor Area Community Development Department - Planning Division 9 4 -ft. side setback = 8.33% increase 5 -ft. side setback = 4.17% increase 6 -ft. side setback = 0.00% increase Community Development Department - Planning Division 10 nor Area Limits 4 -ft. side setback = 8.33% increase 5 -ft. side setback = 4.17% increase 6 -ft. side setback = 0.00% increase Community Development Department - Planning Division 10 ytvnica i La BALBOA PENINSULA iI1- t N57'4B'00'E 80.00' RPSR)BNCB Ire TO BE REMOVED �m PARCEL 1 -i N52Y6'00'E 911.00' 1 O 'W rr1 32ND STREET DZ -n M I CORONA HIGHLANDS O' 169 6• �. saDnwc Li �` ,� 91 r � of C L N 4'7 -WI 150.51' 35.00 N 05'47 W E 100.00 _ O 8 8 u' a m1°�° 14'-6' PARCEL2 gi= L0l" :70 � ;.0' 12 �+ PARCELI 6' �` 0.137 AC. 6' ai 0.070 AC. NNO'1p "E N 05.a0' N 59.4r W'E 1"' most. swndc U :_ 5' 2' ._ O Community Development Department - Planning Division is m4-1 Lonina • • i7"1: is ' Uppef, Newpot ! ,Bay Estates �. trsth#ff i. M,a(riner's/ ,,yD <Irmo Jer Sores PACIFIC OCEAN Newport ,,,���111��� 0 3,498 3,931 Be h • e GIs Feel �A 6r .G\ 4110 �1 Har \View ^ g �- Cameo/ Shorediffs MKNIm0�EUaynnwatle MM MO MKmaM�o esvOe lMeavery WPM MIa � c�e.i4e4.m.....1M aira�men e..a.M u.+mnxe..m m.��4. nmN.m'm a nv�.+am nam a rn.eey m .m a.u: MgOry; 30�AlIpMlei ganMYq Eap I�uOR'.'./.'.u[b0eeYCan wA, '♦S Community Development Department - Planning Division r ER 12 �jL ustr Lot Cow is Bo%ita gCary yon One Fora Road. �.�► >.i� .1•, igCanyon Harbor Vi •.> W: Ilk ` [[[ Spyglas p I �., Nevfport PACIFIC OCEAN y Coiast MKNIm.� Euaynnwatle MM Mf [eKmaM�o eswe iM ¢avery W �M dla Newport -e 0 3,49fi 6931 c�a.ieaa m...e. m. c ^ra trepan Eeacn ene nsamrr,Ka,m Bebl'll �- �aimCU�i rtsmwaM erounmvK✓1MRVnv miming�a emmsus �...o.+' GIS Owt M.s.n: zoosx,i Nao: wm+�nar EKein.yrc..w.Ky.••nu cam avm�n �*• Community Development Department - Planning Division r� i ll rA ru. 13 ■ Revised Findings Subjective, uncertainty for property owners Case by case Revised Development Standards Variations in lot size, width, area, and orientation Floor area limits v. lot coverage areas Lack of common standards, more uncertainty Community Development Department - Planning Division i4 1 For more information contact: Patrick J. Alford, Planning Manager 949 - 644 -3235 PAlford @newportbeachca.gov www. newportbeachca.gov