HomeMy WebLinkAbout01_Via Koron LLA_PA2013-119COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
100 Civic Center Drive, P.O. Box 1768, Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915
(949) 644 -3200 Fax: (949) 644 -3229
www.newportbeachca.gov
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT
August 15, 2013
Agenda Item No. 1
SUBJECT: Via Koron Lot Line Adjustment - (PA2013 -119)
116 Via Koron
Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2013 -006
APPLICANT: Fuscoe Engineering
PLANNER: Benjamin M. Zdeba, Assistant Planner
(949) 644 -3253, bzdeba @newportbeachca.gov
ZONING DISTRICT /GENERAL PLAN
• Zone: R -1 (Single -Unit Residential)
• General Plan: RS -D (Single -Unit Residential Detached)
PROJECT SUMMARY
A lot line adjustment application to adjust the underlying legal lot lines on a site that has
been historically developed with a single structure. The applicant is requesting to
remove the lot line between Lots 650 and 649 and to shift the lot line between Lots 649
and 648 north 7.5 feet to create two 37.5- foot -wide parcels for single - family residential
development. The structure on the site crossing the property lines will be demolished
prior to map recordation. There will be no change in the number of parcels.
RECOMMENDATION
1) Conduct a public hearing; and
2) Adopt Draft Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2013- approving Lot Line
Adjustment No. LA2013 -006 (Attachment No. ZA 1).
1
2
Via Koron Lot Line Adjustment
Zoning Administrator August 15, 2013
Page 2
• The applicant requests to adjust the interior lot line between two contiguous lots
located in the R -1 Zoning District (Single -Unit Residential). The subject property
and those within the vicinity are developed with single -unit residences.
• The General Plan designates the subject property as Single -Unit Residential
Detached (RS -D) which is intended for detached single - family residential
dwelling units on a single legal lot and does not include condominiums or
cooperative housing.
• The property is improved with a single - family residence that was constructed
across two legal lots and a portion of another lot. As conditioned, it will be
demolished prior to recordation of the lot line adjustment, if approved.
• The proposed lot line adjustment would remove the interior lot line between Lots
650 and 649 and would shift the northerly lot line of Lot 648 to the north 7.5 feet,
thereby creating two 37.5- foot -wide parcels of land for single -unit residential
development. The resulting net areas of the proposed Parcels 1 and 2 would be
3,300 square feet. The minor boundary adjustment will have no impact with
access to the subject properties from Via Koron and Via Lorca to the rear.
• Typical lots within the surrounding area are 30 feet in width and 88 feet in depth
with a resulting area of 2,640 square feet. It should also be noted that lots at the
end of each block are wider varying between 35 and 40 feet in width. The
proposed lot configuration is compatible with the surrounding area.
• The number of lots will remain unchanged as a result of the boundary
adjustment. The site is currently comprised of two legal lots and a portion of
another lot. The lot line adjustment, as proposed, will result in two legal lots.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project has been reviewed, and qualifies for a Class 5 (Minor Alterations in Land Use
Limitations) categorical exemption pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations (Section 15305, Article 19 of Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act). The Class 5 exemption consists of minor
alterations in land use limitations in areas with an average slope of less than 20 percent,
which do not result in any changes in land use or density, including but not limited to
minor lot line adjustments not resulting in the creation of any new parcel.
The proposed lot line adjustment is consistent with all of the requirements of the Class 5
exemption.
TmpIt:05 -24 -13
Via Koron Lot Line Adjustment
Zoning Administrator August 15, 2013
Page 3
PUBLIC NOTICE
Notice of this application was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to all owners of
property within 300 feet of the boundaries of the site (excluding intervening rights -of-
way and waterways) including the applicant and posted on the subject property at least
10 days before the scheduled hearing, consistent with the provisions of the Municipal
Code. Additionally, the item appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted
at City Hall and on the City website.
APPEAL PERIOD:
An appeal may be filed with the Director of Community Development within ten (10) days
following the date of action. For additional information on filing an appeal, contact the
Planning Division at (949) 644 -3200.
Prepared by:
V
Be ja i M. eba
As ' tant Planner
GR/bmz
Attachments: ZA 1 Draft Resolution
ZA 2 Vicinity Map
ZA 3 Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2013 -006
TmpIt:05 -24 -13
-4
Attachment No. ZA 1
Draft Resolution
5
0
RESOLUTION NO. ZA2013-
A RESOLUTION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT NO. LA2013 -006 TO ADJUST THE BOUNDARIES
OF PARCELS LOCATED AT 116 VIA KORON (PA2013 -119)
THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
1. An application was filed by Fuscoe Engineering, with respect to property located at 116
Via Koron, and legally described as Lots 648, 649 and the Southwesterly' /2 of Lot 650 of
Tract No. 907 in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as per
map recorded in Book 28, Page(s) 25 to 36, inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps, in the
Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, requesting approval of a lot
line adjustment.
2. The applicant proposes to adjust the underlying legal lot lines on a site that has been
historically developed with a single structure. The applicant is requesting to remove
the lot line between Lots 650 and 649 and to shift the lot line between Lots 649 and
648 north 7.5 feet to create two 37.5- foot -wide parcels for single - family residential
development. The structure on the site crossing the property lines will be demolished
prior to map recordation. There will be no change in the number of parcels.
3. The subject property is located within the Single -Unit Residential (R -1) Zoning District
and the General Plan Land Use Element category is Single -Unit Residential Detached
(RS -D).
4. The subject property is located within the coastal zone. The Coastal Land Use Plan
category is Single -Unit Residential Detached - (10.0 - 19.9 DU /AC) (RSD -C).
5. A public hearing was held on August 15, 2013 in the Corona del Mar Conference Room
(Bay E -1st Floor) at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach. A notice of time, place and
purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal
Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the
Zoning Administrator at this meeting.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION.
1. The project has been reviewed, and qualifies for a Class 5 (Minor Alterations in Land Use
Limitations) categorical exemption pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations (Section 15305, Article 19 of Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act).
2. The Class 5 exemption consists of minor alterations in land use limitations in areas
with an average slope of less than 20 percent, which do not result in any changes in
rW,
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2013-
Page 2 of 6
land use or density, including but not limited to minor lot line adjustments not resulting
in the creation of any new parcel. The proposed lot line adjustment will not change the
number of existing parcels, will not result in any change in use or density, and is
consistent with all of the requirements of the Class 5 exemption.
SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS.
In accordance with Section 19.76.020 (Procedures for Lot Line Adjustments) of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set
forth:
Finding:
A. Approval of the lot line adjustment will not, under the circumstances of the particular
case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the
general welfare of the City, and further that the proposed lot line adjustment is
consistent with the legislative intent of this title.
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. The proposed lot line adjustment will not change the single -unit residential use
of the lots involved, and will maintain consistency with the General Plan Land
Use Designation, Single -Unit Residential Detached (RS -D), which is intended
for detached single - family residential dwelling units on a single lot.
*'
2. The lot line adjustment will nit result in a development pattern which is
inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood as the request is to reapportion
two and a half legal lots into two separate parcels for future single -unit
development which is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan and
zoning designations.
3. The proposed lot line adjustment is consistent with the purpose identified in
Chapter 19.76 (Lot Line Adjustments) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
The lot line adjustment constitutes a minor boundary adjustment involving two
full lots where the land taken from one lot is added to the abutting lot and the
existing boundary line of the half lot is removed. The original number of lots will
remain unchanged after the adjustment.
4. The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, does not affect open space
areas in the City, does not negatively impact surrounding land owners in as
much as it affects an interior lot line between two adjacent lots, and will not in
itself be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood.
04 -24 -2013
N
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2013-
Paqe 3 of 6
5. Public improvements and infrastructure currently exist within the neighborhood
and the lot line adjustment, in and of itself, will not result in the need for
additional improvements and /or facilities.
Finding:
B. The number of parcels resulting from the lot line adjustment remains the same as
before the lot line adjustment.
Facts in Support of Finding:
The residence on the subject property was originally constructed across two
legal lots and half of another legal lot, Lot 648, 649, and half of 650 of Tract No.
907. The proposed lot line adjustment will remove the interior lot line between
Lots 649 and 650 and will adjust the interior lot line between Lots 648 and 649.
No additional lots will result from the adjustment and the number remains the
same as before the lot line adjustment.
Finding:
C. The lot line adjustment is consistent with applicable zoning regulations except that
nothing herein shall prohibit the approval of a lot line adjustment as long as none of
the resultant parcels is more nonconforming as to lot width, depth and area than the
parcels that existed prior to the lot line adjustment.
Facts in Support of Finding:
The lot line adjustment will take 1,320 square feet of land from Lot 650 and add
to Lot 649. Lot 648 will gain 660 square feet from Lot 649. The resulting net
areas of the proposed Parcel 1 and 2, which are both 3,300 square feet, is
consistent with the range of lot sizes in the vicinity within Tract No. 907.
2. The proposed parcels comply with all applicable zoning regulations, are not
more nonconforming as to lot width, depth and area than the parcels that
existed prior to the lot line adjustment, and there will be no change in allowed
land uses, density, or intensity on the properties.
3. Typical lots within the surrounding area are 30 feet in width and 88 feet in depth
with a resulting area of 2,640 square feet. Lots at the end of each block are
wider varying between 35 and 40 feet in width. The proposed lot configuration is
compatible with neighboring lots in the surrounding area.
Finding:
D. Neither the lots as adjusted nor adjoining parcels will be deprived of legal access as a
result of the lot line adjustment.
04 -24 -2013
I
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2013-
Page4of6
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. Legal access to the subject properties from Via Lorca will not be affected by the
lot line adjustment.
Finding:
E. That the final configuration of the parcels involved will not result in the loss of direct
vehicular access from an adjacent alley for any of the parcels that are included in the
lot line adjustment.
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. The final configuration of the lots involved will not result in the loss of direct
vehicular access from any street for any lots included in the lot line adjustment.
Vehicular access to the existing residential property is taken from the Via Lorca
and the final configuration will not change this.
Finding:
F. That the final configuration of a reoriented lot does not result in any reduction of the
street side setbacks as currently exist adjacent to a front yard of any adjacent key,
unless such reduction is accomplished through a zone change to establish appropriate
street side setbacks for the reoriented lot. The Planning Commission and City Council
in approving the zone change application shall determine that the street side setbacks
are appropriate, and are consistent and compatible with the surrounding pattern of
development and existing adjacent setbacks.
Facts in Support of Finding:
1. The final configuration of the parcels does not result in a requirement for revised
setbacks since the lots are not proposed to be reoriented. The setbacks shall
continue to apply to the adjusted parcels per the Zoning Code development
standards in the same way that they applied to the previous parcel configuration.
Therefore, the lot line adjustment does not result in the reduction of any existing
setbacks.
SECTION 4. DECISION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Newport Beach hereby approves Lot Line
Adjustment No. LA2013 -006 (PA2013 -119), subject to the conditions set forth in
Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
2. This action shall become final and effective ten days after the adoption of this
Resolution unless within such time an appeal is filed with the Director of Community
04 -24 -2013
10
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2013-
Paqe 5 of 6
Development in accordance with the provisions of Title 19 Subdivisions, of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 151h DAY OF AUGUST, 2013.
Brenda Wisneski, AICP, Zoning Administrator
,40"
G�
-Ndlr�
04 -24 -2013
11
Zoning Administrator Resolution No. ZA2013-
Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless
specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval.
2. Prior to the release for recordation of the lot line adjustment, the applicant shall apply for
a building permit to remove the existing single - family residence, and all work fulfilling this
requirement shall be completed and finaled by the Building Division.
3. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the second, new single- family residence. Fair
Share Fees consistent with the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit
issuance shall be paid for one dwelling unit.
4. The applicant is required to obtain all applicable permits from the City's Building Division
and Fire Department for construction or demolition. The construction plans must comply
with the most recent, City- adopted version of the California Building Code. The
construction plans must meet all applicable State Disabilities Access requirements.
5. To the fullest extent permitted by law, applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold
harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees,
and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages,
actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and
expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of
every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly
or indirectly) to City's approval of the Via Koron Lot Line Adjustment including, but not
limited to, Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2013 -006 (PA2013 -119). This indemnification shall
include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit,
attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action,
causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by applicant, City, and /or the
parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The applicant shall indemnify the City for
all of City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the
indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The applicant shall pay to the City
upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements
prescribed in this condition.
6. This approval shall expire and become void unless exercised within 24 months from the
actual date of review authority approval, except where an extension of time is approved
in compliance with the provisions of Title 20 Planning and Zoning of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code.
04 -24 -2013
12
Attachment No. ZA 2
Vicinity Map
13
VICINITY MAP
Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2013 -006
PA2013 -119
116 Via Koron
14
Attachment No. ZA 3
Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2013 -006
1.5
10
Recording
Requested by and Mail to:
City of Newport Beach
Public Works Dept
Attn: Subdivision
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
City of Newport Beach
���qr
O�` 9
o'airoa"�p
Lot Line Adjustment /Lot Merger
Application
Address(es) or Property Involved:
Owner(s) Affidavit
I (We) hereby certify under penalty of perjury that 1) 1 am (we are) the record owner(s) of all parcels
proposed for adjustment by this application, 2) 1 (We) have knowledge of and consent to the filing of
this application, 3) the information submitted in connection with this application is true and correct;
and 4) 1 (We) consent to the recordation of these documents.
RECORD OWNERS:
Parcel 1
NAME: J
JAD Capitol Part r i
ited Liabilty C
Company
Signature of peel owner S
Signature of parcel owner
Parcel 1
NAME: S
Scott A. Lisso , Trusteo7of the Lissoy Family Trust U /D /O 6117/96
Signature of parcel ow r S
Signature of parcel owner
Parcel 2
NAME: J
JAD Capitol P rtners LC a C l
lifornia Limited Liabilty C
Company
Signa pa cel owner S
Signature of parcel owner
Parcel 2
NAME: S
Scott A. "ssoy, Trusteeof the Lissoy Family Trust U /D /O 6/17/96
Cc
Signature of parcel o er S
Signature of parcel owner
e0u 1 U1 ,1 sae OIyI IOkUl� inuai nc noia„cer,, using cne appropnaie aural anacnea and completed by a Notary Public.
Approved for Recording CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City Surveyor:
Date:
X1U sem \P LMShared \I ntranetD0Gs%Applications \LAB, LM9nfo.docz
Updated 6/15111
17
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF California )SS
COUNTY OF ()Mn r)-t°
On
, Notary Public, personally appeared
Ii I
who proved to me on th bas' of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledg o me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by
his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
Instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
JEN BLTLETT
COMMISSION A 1864312 p
My Comm. Expires Sept. 11, 2013
This area for official notarial seal.
OPTIONAL SECTION
CAPACITY CL4 MED BY SIGNER
Though statute does not require the Notary to fill in the data below, doing so may prove invaluable to persons relying on the
documents.
INDIVIDUAL
Q CORPORATE OFFICER(S) TITLE(S)
Q PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL
Q ATTORNEY -IN -FACT
0 TRUSTEE(S)
GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR
O OTHER .... _ _.
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING,:
Person Name of Person or Entity Name of or i
s.L.....71 .
OPTIONAL O
Though the data requested here is not required by law, it could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED BELOW
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT:
NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
CALIFORNIA ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
On May 20. 2013, before me, C. A. Morden . Notary Public, personally appeared ---- - - - - --
--- -Scott A. Lissov- - ----, Ao proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
perso whose name(s) subscribe the within instrument and acknowledged to me
A==t executed the same in hi authorized capacity(aes), and that by
is eiF signatures) on the instrument the person(o, or the entity upon behalf of which the
persons) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
C. A. MORDEN
' Commiaalon M 1961409
i . `� Notary Public - California
Signature j' - Orange County
My Comm. Ez Ires Noy 27, 2015 r
(Seal)
ATTENTION NOTARY: Although the information requested below is OPTIONAL,
it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to another document.
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT:
Title or Type of Document: City of Newport Beach Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Mercer Application re Existinc Parcel AP
No. 423-201-04 --
Date of Document: TBD Number of Pages 4 + 2 Notary Acknowledgments --
Signer(s) other than named above: None --- - - - - -- —.
CAPACITY(IES) CLAIMED BY SIGNER:
Signer's Name: Scott A. Lissov. Trustee of the Lissov Family Trust U /D /O 6/17/96
❑ Individual
❑ Corporate Officer - Title(s):
❑ Partner- ❑ Limited ❑ General
❑ Attorney in Fact
0 Trustee
❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other:
Signer is Representing: the Lissoy Family Trust U /D /O 6/17/96
19
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LA 2013 -
(LEGAL DESCRIPTION)
OWNERS
EXISTING PARCELS
PROPOSED PARCELS
AP NUMBER
REFERENCE NUMBER
JAD Capitol Lissoy Trust
423 - 201 -04
PARCEL 1
JAD Capitol / Lissoy Trust
423 - 201 -04
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 1:
THE SOUTHWESTERLY 1/2 OF LOT 650 OF TRACT NO. 907, IN THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PER MAP FILED IN
BOOK 28, PAGES 25 TO 36, INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF
LOT 649 LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND
NORTHEASTERLY 7.50 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 649 OF SAID
TRACT NO. 907.
CONTAINING 3300 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT B, ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE
A PART HEREOF.
PARCEL 2:
LOT 648 OF TRACT NO. 907, IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 28, PAGES 25 TO 36,
INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 649 OF SAID TRACT LYING
SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND NORTHEASTERLY 7.50
FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 649.
CONTAINING 3300 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS
ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT B, ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE
A PART HEREOF.
�cpvUNl`�`�
THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION.
A
DATE S AY OF 2013. #
sTl (S
F OF CpUF��
J
SHEET 1 DF 1
20
EXHIBIT "B"
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LA 2013 -
(MAP)
OWNERS
EXISTING PARCELS
AP NUMBER
PROPOSED PARCELS
REFERENCE NUMBER
JAD Capitol Lissoy Trust
423 - 201 -04
PARCEL 1
JAD Capitol / Lissoy Trust
423 - 201 -04
PARCEL 2
— VIA PIAZZA LIDO
CENTRo)
TRACT NO 007
III
665
co II I
40' 661
20' 20' 24'
12' 12'
N72'31'00 0W 88.00'
0O 660
I P Pao so $ 0
lie $ 640
wi n 3so M IOJ
n W
N72'31'00'W 88.00' g
g a
— — — —
—�
SCALE: 1" =40' 153 ,L
Per
Q I 648 P so fl
-5500 s
> 1 I
N72'31'00"W 88.00' 1
4 0'
847 24
20' 20' '
1 M.M. 28 / 26 86 12' 12'
_� UJrD
LEGEND:
EXISIIING LOT LINE TO REMAIN
--------- - - - - -- EXISTING LOT LINE TO BE REMOVED
ADJUSTED LOT LINE sf is 5311 r
/ 9lF OF CAl\F��`�
S
�3 SHEET ] OF ]
21
EXHIBIT "C"
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LA 2013 -
(SITE PLAN)
OWNERS
EXISTING PARCELS
AP NUMBER
PROPOSED PARCELS
REFERENCE NUMBER
JAD Capitol / Lissoy Trust
423 - 201 -04
PARCEL 1
JAD Capitol / Lissoy Trust
423 - 201 -04
PARCEL 2
— VIA PIAZZA LIDO
CENTRO)
TRACT NO 907
III
00 866
40'
20' 20' 861 24'
12' 12'
N72'31'00'W 88.00' SCALE: 1 " =40'
Z 6
Q
- -- I
O I pP�Ca g
.5300 640 10
I w
72'31'00'W 88.00' g
h�
gi 4 WDE PUBLIC
z UTIUTY EASEM
n 64 P P�CEL nrs� PER BOOK 361�T
Q I Q PAGE 113 OF O.R.
S500
14721VOON 8&00'
40' 847 24
20, 120, '
M.M. 28 / 26 -88 12' 12' UN
I I I
LEGEND:
EXISTING LOT UNE TO REMAIN sl !S 5341
--------- - - - - -- EXISTING LOT UNE TO BE REMOVED or
ADJUSTED LOT UNE S1�13
- — — — — — — - EASEMENT LINE SHEET 1 OF 1
22
Additional Materials Received
Mosher Comments for Items B, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
August 15, 2013, Zoning Administrator Agenda Comments
Comments submitted by: Jim Mosher (iimmosheravahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach
92660 (949 -548 -6229)
B: Minutes of Month July 25, 2013
corrections to passages in italics are shown in strikeo ° ^u underline format.
1. Page a rag raph 6: "A member of the general public inquired about the parking location
for the Gir outs facility." I haven't had a chance to review the audio minutes, but I seem
to recall that a NQ me point in the hearing (although perhaps not at this point) the couple in
attendance, who I Nieve identified themselves as residents from across Balboa Boulevard,
expressed additional cbcerns about the general intensification of use, reasoning that what
they thought was a doublin 'n size compared to the existing facility would lead to
significantly increased use, trip nd activity and thereby create a disturbance to neighbors.
I remember they also questioned t safety of the fire ring, but did so after the hearing had
ended.
2. Page 3, line 3 from end: "They are separate aNddistinct and it is not appropriate to include a
reference to the lease term terms as a condition approval." (? — I think this was meant to
be "terms" [conditions], as in the previous sentence, r er than "term" [length], but I could
be wrong)
3. Page 4, full paragraph 4 "The Zoning Administrator commented the proposed changes to
the draft resolution and instructed staff to correct the typographical or in Finding A2,..."
Note: regarding the revision to Condition 18, 1 think the change was ropriate, but it
occurred to me after the hearing that even if entry to the building and gro ds will be by
means of an electronic key system, in the event of power failure the system st have
some kind of manual alternative using physical keys, and it is probably those ph ical
keys that the Fire Department wants available on site in a device "such as" a Knox x.
Item 1. is Koron Lot Line Adjustment (PA2013 -119)
1. Neither the staff report nor the proposed resolution provide the public with much clarity
as to the whether there is a continuing problem with the other development on this block.
In particular, the adjustment maps shown on the last two pages (handwritten 21 and 22)
appear to show that after this action Lot 650 will be reduced to an unusably narrow
fragment, and comparison with the aerial photo on handwritten page 14, suggests that
between the present property and Strada Centro there are four numbered residential
developments (120, 122, 126 and 130) on two and one -half legal lots (half of 650, 651,
and 655).
a. Is the applicant the owner of all of legal lot 650? Or just a portion of it?
Additional Materials Received
Mosher Comments for Items B, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
August 15, 2013 Zoning Administrator agenda comments - Jim Mosher Page 2 of 5
b. If additional adjustments to 650, or the other legal lots, are necessary to make
them conform to the actual pattern of development, how does this action impact
them?
2. In the proposed resolution, I do not understand how required Finding C can be made.
After this action legal lots 648 and 649 (Parcels 1 and 2) will be consistent with the
regulations, but the surviving legal lot 650 will be reduced to half its present width, which
certainly less conforming than it is now.
3. As Section 1.4 indicates, the properties are in the Coastal Zone, and a reminder that an
application for a Coastal Development Permit is needed to determine consistency with
the Coastal Act (including whether the adjustment is consistent with the dwelling units
per acre requirement cited in Section 1.4 — something that is not addressed in the
resolution or staff report) should be included as a Condition of Approval.
4. Regarding Condition of Approval 3, are there any other benefit/development fees (parks,
affordable housing, etc.) required if a new dwelling unit is developed (see, for example,
Conditions 15 and 16 to Item 2)?
2. 416 Orchid Parcel Map (PA2013 -124)
1. In the Discussion portion of the staff report, does the statement regarding the square
fbelage of the previous single family residence (bottom of page 1) refer to the entire
resi ce, or to the garage only?
2. With regar o Conditions 15 and 16, wasn't the requirement to pay these fees triggered
by the approvaXo develop a duplex?
a. The staff rep (page 3), says "these fees are subject to change and the
tentative parcel h7Qp is subject to conditions of approval that require the applicant
to pay the fees in -e tat the time of payment, not those in- effect at the time of
approval." But, there is language about the timing of the payments in the
Conditions of Approval as w ' en. Does there need to (or should there ?) be?
3. Also, is there a separate "Fair Share"
Item 3. 606 Acacia Parcel Map (PA2013-
1. This is essentially the same staff report and pro
same comments apply.
(see Condition 3 of Item 1)?
as for Item 2, so the
2. In addition, with regard to Finding K, Comment 3 for Item 1 (abdNQ about the Coastal
Act requirements applies, and again neither the staff report nor the olution indicates
what the resulting number of dwelling units per acre will be.
3. Condition of Approval 11 is slightly ungrammatical. It was probably meant to y
something like: "Prior to recordation of the parcel map, install new sod or low
groundcovers of the type approved by the City throughout the portion of Acacia
fronting the development site." ( ?)