HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/13/2013 - Study Session,
City Council Minutes
Study Session
August 13, 2013 — 4:30 p.m.
1. ROLL CALL - 4:30 p.m.
Present: Council Member Gardner, Council Member Petros, Mayor Pro Tern Hill, Mayor
Curry, Council Member Selich, Council Member Henn
Excused: Council Member Daigle
IL CURRENT BUSINESS
1. CLARIFICATION OF ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR
Regarding Item 10 (School Resource Officer Program Agreement), Council Member
Gardner inquired regarding the functions that the School Resources Officer does.
City Manager Kiff reported that tasks range from safety checks to truancy and acts as a
go- between between the student population and the surrounding community.
Regarding Item No. ld (Request to Install a New Driveway Approach at 201 Sapphire
Avenue), Council Member Gardner commented on avoiding having driveways in certain
areas and inquired on an adjacent alley.
Public Works Director Webb reported there are two units on the subject lot which is
subdivided.
Regarding Item No. 10 (School Resource Officer Program Agreement), Council Member
Petros reported this was to be provided to fulfill the obligations and roles of the school
district and listed other issues the City may possibly add to the mix.
City Manager Kiff reported that those issues are for a Civilian position, not the School
Resources Officer who is typically on campus. He indicated other matters could be
considered at another time.
Mayor Pro Tem Hill commented on Item No. 3 (Consideration of Ordinance No, 2013 -14
Amending the Harbor Commission's Purpose and Responsibilities), requesting a written
update on the Eelgrass issue and comments on stone groins.
2. TREES: CITYWIDE URBAN FOREST MAINTENANCE PROGRAM [1700 -2013]
Deputy Municipal Operations Director Pisani introduced the item and deferred to staff
for a report.
Park and Tree Superintendent Serena provided a PowerPoint presentation on the City's
Volume 61 - Page 244
City of Newport Beach
City Council Study Session
August 13, 2013
Urban Forest Maintenance Program. He addressed the goals of an, Urban Forestry
Program, the make -up of the City's urban forest and Budget Highlights.
Discussion followed regarding the Tree Reforestation amount and its historical
pattern.
Park and Tree Superintendent Serene overviewed Council Policies G -1 (Retention or
Removal of City Trees), G -3 (Preservation of Views), and G -6 (Maintenance and
Planting of Parkway Trees). Regarding tree maintenance, he reported that pruning is
the most significant task and reported that up to 14,000 trees are pruned per year. He
addressed the general pruning cycle, removal of trees, planting and emergency
services. He noted that removals are generally for diseased or dying trees and detailed
the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission's role. He presented information
regarding the Arbor Day Foundation awards including criteria for becoming a Tree City
USA and addressed challenges to Urban Forest Management.
In response to Council Member Gardner, Park and Tree Superintendent Sereno
reported that palm and eucalyptus trees are susceptible to disease because of the City's
climate.
Park and Tree Superintendent Serene continued reporting on challenges to the urban
forest, including development pressures, planting the wrong tree in the wrong place,
watering and soil types. He noted that the City will be downsizing the urban forest
because parkways can't support certain trees. He presented a list of pending Tree
Division projects including a Request for Proposal for tree maintenance services, and
revisions to the Street Tree Designation List.
In response to Council Member Gardner, Park and Tree Superintendent Sereno
confirmed there is a long -term vision for the urban forest based on population density,
species and age diversity; however, staff is also reactive because trees are living and
growing things and there are constantly exotic pests being brought into the area. He
reported that the City uses pest- managements best practices and limits the amount of
pesticides used and referenced a working relationship with the Civic Center landscape
architect in determining the types of trees to plant. He addressed staffs efforts in
selecting the right tree for the location and that trees will be smaller in the future
which will reduce the size of the canopy in the urban forest.
Mayor Pro Tom Hill commented on the notification Council receives regarding each tree
removal and noted that in every instance the phrase "without replacement due to
budget" has been included. He asked how staff will prioritize the trees that will be
replaced.
Park and Superintendent Serene reported there is a standing Iist of trees needing
replacement based on budgetary cutbacks but that staff is currently replacing trees as
they are being removed.
Mayor Pro Tom Hill requested distributing the list of removed trees, electronically.
Ken Jaggers distributed a hand -out to Council and commented on the large number of
trees missing in and around his neighborhood. He felt that the budget is inadequate for
the replacement of trees and encouraged Council to look aggressively at the matter. He
estimated that the number of trees needing replacement is in the thousands.
Volume 61 - Page 245
City of Newport Beach
City Council Study Session
August 13, 2013
City Manager Kiff stated that sometimes there is an issue of species availability and
wondered whether enough resources are available.
Deputy Municipal Operations Director Pisani felt that the budget is sufficient for this
fiscal year but that the matter merits consideration for the next fiscal year.
Discussion followed regarding the costs of replacing trees.
Bob Shelton commended staff for their efforts but felt that part of the problem relates to
the burdensome and contradictive Policies in existence. He also expressed concerns
with the high cost of tree replacement and the ability to make choices on the species.
Barbara Shelton spoke on association view issues and'expressed concerns with over -
trimming. She distributed a hand -out to Council. In addition, she inquired on the
possibility of removing trees inside the parkways allowing individual homeowners to do
something else with the parkway.
Jim Mosher referenced comments he submitted in writing and believes it is a problem
that the Municipal Operations Department has no presence in City Hall. Additionally,
he felt that consideration should be given to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Commission's (PB &R) role in the process and suggested that Council direct PB &R to
study the problem in depth and addressed the problem of vacancies and the tree list.
Karen Tringali, Corona del Mar Resident Association, commented on the loss of large
canopy trees during the last few years, addressed lessons learned and reported that
there are blocks within Corona del Mar Village that are vacant of trees. She asked that
Council make the matter a top priority for future plans.
Council Member Gardner commented positively on having PB &R review the Policies
and wondered if the City can improve the pace of replacing some of the trees.
Council Member Henn indicated he would like to see a plan where progress can be
made in planting trees in some of the denuded areas, increasing the population of trees
as well as replacing them.
Discussion followed regarding the possibility of planting 24" box trees rather than 36"
box trees depending on the availability of species.
Mayor Curry expressed the need to accelerate the pace of replacing and planting trees.
& SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) ENERGY LEADERSHIP
PARTNERSHIP - ENERGY ACTION PLAN [100 -20131
Public Works Director Webb introduced the Item and deferred to staff for a report.
Deputy Public Works Director Thomas provided a PowerPoint presentation addressing
details of the Energy Action Plan. He addressed levels of participation in the
partnership, funding for the plan, objectives of the program, action steps, details of the
reduction goal, baseline and target goal of reduction and department acceptance.
Additionally, he highlighted on projects completed which have resulted in substantial
energy savings.
Volume 61 - Page 246
City of Newport Beach
City Council Study Session
August 13, 2013
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Hill, Deputy Public Works Director Thomas advised that
the LEED certified building savings resulted from the design of the Civic Center if we
would not have implemented the LEED measures.
Deputy Public Works Director Thomas presented a list of future projects with the
respective energy savings and addressed increased community outreach.
Council Member Gardner inquired on ways to reach residents on conservation.
Janelle Godges, Southern California Edison, commended City staff and addressed
moving customers towards times of use noting that the time of day electricity is used is
just as important as the amount of electricity used. She noted there are a variety of
programs for customers to reduce their energy usage and bills.
In response to Council Member Petrol's inquiry, staff reported that preparation of the
plan is strictly voluntary and has been patterned after AB 32,
Council Member Petros commented positively on the plan noting that it is good
planning and a wise use of resources. He commented against chasing a mandate from
Sacramento and felt that if the City is going to do this; it should do it because iva good
for the community.
Deputy Public Works Director Thomas noted that this is being done on a proactive basis
and not in reaction to any mandates.
Council Member Henn expressed concern associated with these programs, specifically,
regarding solar panel conversions. Ms. Godges stated that what the City is proposing is
to become a leader in the community. As the City moves up in the tier level it will get
higher incentives and rebates. She added that solar rates are comprised of the costs of
electricity and offsets the load on the grid during peak, critical times.
Deputy Public Works Director Thomas addressed funding sources, energy policies, and
tracking and monitoring energy usage, as well as next steps.
Council Member Gardner encouraged staff to print on both sides of the paper.
Mayor Curry commended staff for the action plan.
Jim Mosher commented that the alternative of having no street lights is even more
energy efficient than providing lights that are not needed in some places.
Brief discussion followed regarding alternate street lights.
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS, INCLUDING PUBLIC COMMENTS ABOUT ITEMS ON THE
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
City Attorney Harp announced items to be considered under the Closed Session Agenda.
Jim Mosher pointed out recent instances where the public may perceive a misuse of the
limited privilege of Council to hold Closed Sessions.
Volume 61 - Page 247
City of Newport Beach
City Council Study Session
August 13, 2013
IV. ADJOURNMENT - 5:54 p.m.
The agenda for the Study Session was posted on August 8, 2013, at 4:34 p.m. on the
City's website; on August 9, 2013, at 8:00 a.m. on the City Hall Electronic Bulletin
Board located in the entrance of the City Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center
Drive; and on June 9, 2013, at 8:00 a.m. in the Meeting Agenda Binder located in the
entrance of the City Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive.
Recording Secretary
Mayor
City Clerk
Volume 61 - Page 248