Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03 - Indemnity for Piers�gwapar CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH City Council Staff Report Agenda Item No. 3 October 8, 2013 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Public Works Department David A. Webb, Public Works Director 949 - 644 -3330, dawebb @newportbeachca.gov PREPARED BY: Chris Miller, Harbor Resources Manager 949 - 644 -3043, cmiller @newportbeachca.gov APPROVED: TITLE: Adoption of Ordinance No. 2013 -15 Amending Section 17.60.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code to Require Commercial Tidelands Users to Defend and Indemnify the City of Newport Beach ABSTRACT: Adoption of Ordinance No. 2013 -15 amending Section 17.60.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code to require commercial tidelands users to defend and indemnify the City of Newport Beach. RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2013 -15 amending Section 17.60.060 which requires commercial tidelands users to defend and indemnify the City. FUNDING REQUIREMENT: There is no funding requirement associated with this agenda item. DISCUSSION: At its meeting of September 24, 2013, the City Council elected to not change the existing process for transferring piers that encroach in front of a neighbor's property. These types of transfers will continue to be reviewed by the Harbor Commission pursuant to the existing provisions in the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The City Council did approve the first reading of the proposed amendment to the Municipal Code relating to commercial pier lessees or permittees indemnifying the City as described in Attachment A. Ordinance No. 2013 -15 amends Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 17.60.060 to include language requiring commercial tidelands Page 1 of 63 Adoption of Ordinance No. 2013 -15 Amending Section 17.60.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code to Require Commercial Tidelands Users to Defend and Indemnify the City of Newport Beach October 08, 2013 Page 2 users to defend and indemnify the City of Newport Beach through commercial pier permits and leases. Attachment B is a copy of the staff report considered by the City Council at its September 24, 2013 meeting. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. NOTICING: This agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers this item). Submitted by: David A. Webb Public Works Director Attachments: A. Ordinance No. 2013 -15 Amending Section 17.60.060 B. Staff report from September 24, 2013 Page 2 of 63 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. 2013 -15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTION 17.60.060 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO REQUIRE COMMERCIAL TIDELANDS USERS TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH WHEREAS, pursuant to the 1978 Beacon Bay Bill, as amended, ( "Beacon Bay Bill ") the City of Newport Beach ( "City ") acts on behalf of the State of California as the trustee of tidelands located within the City's limits, including Newport Harbor; WHEREAS, Section 1(b) of the Beacon Bay Bill and Title 17 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ( "NBMC ") allow the City to authorize third parties to use tidelands for commercial and noncommercial purposes for a term not to exceed fifty (50) years; WHEREAS, the City allows persons to operate and maintain commercial and noncommercial piers upon the tidelands under an annually issued permit or lease; and WHEREAS, the City desires to codify the indemnity obligation previously approved by the City Council for commercial tidelands permits and leases. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach ordains as follows: Section 1: Subsection "F" is added to Section 17.60.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: F. All persons that receive a commercial permit or lease, whether it is a new permit or lease or a transferred permit or lease, from the City to use public trust lands shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, hold harmless and defend (with counsel approved by the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, volunteers and representatives from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, Page 3 of 63 losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a "Claim" or collectively, "Claims "), which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to the permit or lease including, but not limited to, the issuance of any permit or lease, the transfer of any permit or lease, the entry into any permit or lease, permittee's or lessee's occupancy or use, or permittee's or lessee's guests, invitees, sublessees, or licensees occupancy or use, of the public trust lands, or improvements including, but not limited to, any use involving petroleum based products, hazardous materials, hazardous waste and /or other hazardous substances as defined by City, County, State or Federal laws and regulations. The permittee's or lessee's obligations in this indemnity shall not extend to the degree any Claim is proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, subject to any immunities which may apply to the City with respect to such Claims. This indemnification provision and any other indemnification provided elsewhere in an individual permit or lease shall survive the termination of said permit or lease and shall survive for the entire time that any third party can make a Claim. This indemnity obligation shall apply independent of whether it is explicitly placed within a particular commercial permit or lease. Section 2: The recitals provided in this ordinance are true and correct and are incorporated into the substantive portion of this ordinance. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional. 2 Page 4 of 63 Section 4: The City Council finds the introduction and adoption of this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Alternatively, the City Council finds the introduction and adoption of this ordinance is not a project under CEQA Regulation Section 15061(b)(3) because it has no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. I //1 /// 3 Page 5 of 63 Section 5: The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance, or a summary thereof, to be published pursuant to Charter Section 414. This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, held on the 24`" day of September, 2013, and adopted on the 8th day of October, 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEMBERS NOES, COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS KEITH D. CURRY, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: THE CI -y' TTORNEY'S OFFICE AARON C. HARP, CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: LEILANI I. BROWN, CITY CLERK 0 Page 6 of 63 Attachment B TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Public Works Department David A. Webb, Public Works Director 949- 644 -3311, dawebb @newportbeachca,gov . PREPARED BY: Chris Miller, Harbor Resources Manager 949- 644 -3043, cmiller @newportbeachea.gov APPROVED: TITLE: Consideration of Ordinance Amending Newport Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Relating to Piers that Encroach in Front of Adjacent Properties and .Commercial Indemnity, Respectively ABSTRACT: The City of Newport Beach ( "City") manages public tidelands on behalf of the State of California. Through this management, the City allows private individuals to construct and maintain piers. A small number of these piers encroach in front of adjacent upland properties. Currently, when these encroaching piers are transferred, a new permit is required to be processed by the Harbor Commission rather than by staff through an administrative process. At the August 13 and September 10, 2013 City Council meetings, the City Council directed staff to return with an ordinance that allows staff to administratively process intra- family transfers, while maintaining Harbor Commission review for all other encroaching pier permits. The revised ordinance removes language allowing for transfers between related business entities, clarifies existing language and codifies commercial pier indemnity requirements in the Newport Beach Municipal Code ( "NBMC "). RECOMMENDATION: (Select only one) 1) Conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 2013 -15 amending NBMC Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 to allow certain administrative transfers of encroaching tidelands permits, clarify existing language, codify 'commercial pier indemnity language and pass to a second reading on October 8, 2013; or 2) Do not amend the NBMC and maintain the current process. 1 of 57 Page 7 of 63 Consideration of Ordinance Amending Newport Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Relating to Piers that Encroach in Front of Adjacent Properties and Commercial Indemnity, Respectively September 24, 2013 Page 2 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: There are no funding requirements associated with either recommendation. DISCUSSION: As discussed at the August 13 and September 10, 2013 City Council meetings, there are a small number of piers that encroach in front of adjacent abutting upland properties (i.e., piers /floats encroach over the extension of their property lines into water area in front of a neighbor). These piers have existed for some time, and were allowed to encroach for various reasons at the time they were built decades ago. NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) currently requires that a new permit be approved by the Harbor Commission when an abutting upland property associated with a pier permit changes ownership. This is in contrast to the majority of pier permits within Newport Harbor that are administratively processed by Harbor Resources staff. Please see the previous staff reports in Exhibits C and D. Essentially, what is before the City Council is the question of whether the small number of piers in Newport Harbor ( <10) that encroach in front of adjacent upland property should be processed by the Harbor Commission or staff when transferred between family members. There have been some questions regarding what the ordinance will do and not do if adopted. If adopted, the ordinance will: Allow family members to submit pier transfer applications for administrative review by Harbor Resources staff upon transfers in uplands ownership among family members or the death of a permittee. If adopted the ordinance will not. Change the requirement that all other encroaching pier applications be submitted for review by the Harbor Commission, including, but not limited to: (1) changes in the use of existing piers; (2) applications not involving family members; (3) changes in the use of abutting upland property; and (4) destruction of the existing pier. The attached ordinance relates to all similarly situated piers and is not focused on any individual permittee. The attached ordinance does not approve or even consider any applications that have been submitted, or may be submitted, to change the existing uplands use associated with an encroaching pier. If adopted, a person will still be required to obtain all separate approvals required to operate a business from the encroaching pier (e.g., Marine Activities Permit, etc.). 2 of 57 Page 8 of 63 Consideration of Ordinance Amending Newport Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Relating to Piers that Encroach in Front of Adjacent Properties and Commercial Indemnity, Respectively September 24, 2013 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. NOTICING: This agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers this item). Submitted by: David A. Webb Public Works Director Attachments: A. Ordinance No. 2013 -15 Amending Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 B. Redline version of amended NBMC Sections C. Previous staff report from September 10, 2013 D. Previous staff report from August 13, 2013 3 of 57 Page 9 of 63 ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO. 2013 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT - BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS 17.35.020(F) AND 17.60.060 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFERS OF TIDELANDS PERMITS AND TO REQUIRE COMMERCIAL TIDELANDS USERS TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH WHEREAS, pursuant to the 1978 Beacon Bay Bill, as amended, ( "Beacon Bay Bill ") the City of Newport Beach ( "City ") acts on behalf of the State of California as the trustee of tidelands located within the City's limits, including Newport Harbor; and WHEREAS, Section 1(b) of the Beacon Bay Bill and Title 17 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ( "NBMC ") allow the City to authorize third parties to use tidelands for commercial and noncommercial purposes for a term not to exceed fifty (50) years; and WHEREAS, the City allows persons to operate and maintain commercial and noncommercial piers upon the tidelands under an annually issued permit or lease; and WHEREAS, a small number of piers encroach in front of adjacent abutting upland property not leased or owned by the permittee; and WHEREAS, currently when a permit associated with a pier that encroaches in front of adjacent abutting uplands property is transferred the new permittee is required to seek a new permit from the Harbor Commission; and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the NBMC to allow these types of permits to be transferred administratively, when the transfer is between family members; and WHEREAS, the City desires to codify the indemnity obligation previously approved by the City Council for commercial tidelands permits and leases. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach ordains as follows: 4 of 57 Page 10 of 63 Section 1: Subsection 17.35.020(F) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code is hereby revised in its entirety to read as follows: F. Encroaching Piers and Floats. 1. In areas where existing piers and floats encroach in front of abutting upland property owned or leased by others, a new permit approved by the Harbor Commission shall be required upon: a. Any change in type of existing use of the piers and floats; b. Any change in type of existing use of the abutting upland property owned or leased by the permittee; and/or c. Any destruction of the pier and float in which over sixty (60) percent of the replacement value of the pier and float has been destroyed. 2. In areas where existing piers and floats encroach in front of abutting upland property owned or leased by others, an existing permit may be transferred, to the extent permitted by this Subsection, or a new permit obtained upon: a. Any change of the existing ownership or lease of the abutting upland property owned or leased by the permittee; b. The death of the permittee. In accordance with Subsection 17.60.030(C)(4), the City Manager or Harbor Resources Manager shall have authority to process an administrative transfer - of an existing permit pursuant to Subsections 2(a) and (b) between Immediate Family Members. For purposes of this Subsection, "Immediate Family Members" shall mean the permittee's grandfather, grandmother, father, mother, brother, sister, wife, husband, child or grandchild. The Harbor Commission shall process all other permits required by this Subsection. 3. At least ten (10) calendar days before the Harbor Commission, City Manager or Harbor Resources Manager acts on a permit under this Subsection, the owner of the abutting upland property, in front of which the harbor facility encroaches, shall 2 6 of 57 Page 11 of 63 be notified in writing of the time and place at which the permit will be considered. 4. Appeals arising under this Subsection related to permits or leases shall be processed under Section 17.60.080, or any successor section. Section 2: Subsection 17.60.060(E) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code is hereby revised in its entirety to read as follows: E. Commercial uses provided under this Title 17 are exempt from any provision requiring involvement of the owner or long -term lessee of an abutting upland property. This Subsection's sole purpose is to allow a person to apply for a commercial pier permit or lease in front of abutting upland property not owned or leased by the person applying for the commercial pier permit or lease. Section 3: Subsection "F" is added to Section 17.60.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: F. All persons that receive a commercial permit or lease, whether it is a new permit or lease or a transferred permit or lease, from the City to use public trust lands shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, hold harmless and defend (with counsel approved by the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, volunteers and representatives from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a "Claim" or collectively, "Claims "), which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to the permit or lease including, but not limited to, the issuance of any permit or lease, the transfer of any permit or lease, the entry into any permit or lease, permittee's or lessee's occupancy or use, or permittee's or lessee's guests, invitees, sublessees, or licensees occupancy or use, of the public trust lands, or improvements including, but not limited to, any use involving petroleum based products, hazardous materials, hazardous waste and /or other hazardous 3 6 of 57 Page 12 of 63 substances as defined by City, County, State or Federal laws and regulations. The permittee's or lessee's obligations in this indemnity shall not extend to the degree any Claim is proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, subject to any immunities which may apply to the City with respect to such Claims. This indemnification provision and any other indemnification provided elsewhere in an individual permit or lease shall survive the termination of said permit or lease and shall survive for the entire time that any third party can make a Claim. This indemnity obligation shall apply independent of whether it is explicitly placed within a particular commercial permit or lease. Section 4: The recitals provided in this ordinance are true and correct and are incorporated into the substantive portion of this ordinance. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional. Section 6: The City Council finds the introduction and adoption of this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQX) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Alternatively, the City Council finds the introduction and adoption of this ordinance is not a project under CEQA Regulation Section 15061(b)(3) because it has no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Section 7: The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance, or a summary thereof, to be published pursuant to Charter Section 414. 4 7 of 57 Page 13 of 63 This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, held on the _ day of 2013, and adopted on the._ day of 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES. COUNCILMEMBERS NOES, COUNCILMEMB ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS KEITH CURRY. MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: THE �CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AARON C. HARP, CIlAA' ATTORNEY ATTEST: LEILANI I. BROWN, CITY CLERK 5 8 of 57 Page 14 of 63 ATTACHMENT B Redline Versions of Amended NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Amendment of NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) Allowing Intra- Family F. Encroaching Piers and Floats. 1. In areas where existing piers and floats encroach in front of abutting upland property owned by others, a new permit approved by the Harbor Commission shall be required upon: 4a. Any change in type of existing use of the piers and floats; 2b. Any change in type of existing use of the abutting upland property owned or leased by the permittee; and /or 4c. Any destruction of the pier and float in which over sixty (60) percent of the replacement value of the pier and float has been destroyed. 52. -In areas where existinq piers and floats encroach in front of abutting upland property owned by others, an existing permit may be transferred, to the extent Permitted by this Subsection, or a new permit obtained upon: a. Any change of the existing ownership or lease of the abutting upland Property owned or leased by the permittee; b. The death of the permittee. In accordance with Subsection 17.60.030(C)(4), the City Manager or Harbor Resources Manager shall have authority to process an administrative transfer of an existing permit pursuant to Subsections 2(a) and (b) between Immediate Family Members. For purposes of this Subsection, "Immediate Familv Members" shall mean the permittee's grandfather, grandmother, father, mother, brother, sister, wife, husband, child or grandchild. The Harbor Commission shall process all other permits required by this Subsection. 9 of 57 Page 15 of 63 3. At least ten (10) calendar days Bbefore the Harbor Commission, City Manager or Harbor Resources Manager acts on athe new permit under this Subsection, the owner of the abutting upland property, in front of which the harbor facility encroaches, shall be notified in writing of the time and place m,,,eet:q —aat which the Rew—permit will be considered. 4. Appeals arising under this Subsection related to permits or leases shall be processed under Section 17.60.080, or any successor section. Amendment of NBMC Section 17.60.060 to Clarify Indemnity Obligations & Abutting Upland Property Requirements 17.60.060 Public Trust Lands. The following restrictions shall apply to public trust lands under either a permit or a lease: A. Leases /Permits. In the event public trust lands are used by an entity other than the City, then that entity shall enter into a lease or permit with the City. Such leases shall provide lessees with a leasehold interest in the property for a period of at least five years, not to exceed a period of time as limited by the City Charter or applicable State law. Such permits shall provide permittees with an interest in the property for a period of twelve (12) months or less. B. Land Use. Leases and permits shall be for uses consistent with the public trust and Section 17.05.080. Preference shall be given to coastal- dependent uses. C. Public Access. Public access shall be provided in a manner consistent with applicable law. D. Revenue. Rent under this section shall be based upon fair market value, as determined by the City Council. Such determination shall be based, in part, upon the findings of a City - selected appraiser. E. Commercial uses provided under this Title 17 are exempt from any provision requiring involvement of the owner or long -term lessee of an abutting upland property. This Subsection's sole purpose is to allow a person to apply for a commercial pier 10 of 57 Page 16 of 63 permit or lease in front of abutting upland property not owned or leased by the person applvina for the commercial pier permit or lease F. All persons that receive a commercial permit or lease, whether it is a new permit or lease or a transferred permit or lease, from the City to use public trust lands shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, hold harmless and defend (with counsel approved by the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, volunteers and representatives from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a "Claim" or collectively, "Claims "), which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to the permit or lease including, but not limited to, the issuance of any permit or lease, the transfer of any permit or lease, the entry into any permit or lease, permittee's or lessee's occupancy or use, or permittee's or lessee's guests, invitees, sublessees, or licensees occupancy or use, of the public trust lands, or improvements including, but not limited to, any use involving petroleum based products, hazardous materials, hazardous waste and /or other hazardous substances as defined by City, County, State or Federal laws and regulations. The permittee's or lessee's obligations in this indemnity shall not extend to the degree any Claim is proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, subject to any immunities which may apply to the City with respect to such Claims. This indemnification provision and any other indemnification provided elsewhere in an individual permit or lease shall survive the termination of said permit or lease and shall survive for the entire time that any third party can make a Claim. This indemnity obligation shall apply independent of whether it is explicitly placed within a particular commercial permit or lease. 11 of 57 Page 17 of 63 ATTACHMENT C = CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH City Council Staff Report Agenda Item No. 21 September 10, 2013 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Public Works Department David A. Webb, Public Works Director 949 - 644 -3311, dawebb @newportbeachca.gov PREPARED BY: Chris Miller, Harbor Resources Manager .gov APPROVED: TITLE: 6nsidbf tIon of Ordinance Amending Newport Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Relating to Piers that Encroach in Front of Adjacent Properties and Commercial Indemnity, Respectively ABSTRACT: The City of Newport Beach ( "City') manages public tidelands on behalf of the State of California. Through this management, the City allows private individuals to construct and maintain piers. A small number of piers located upon the tidelands encroach in front of adjacent upland properties. When these encroaching piers are transferred, a new permit is required to be processed by the Harbor Commission rather than by staff through an administrative process. At the August 13, 2013 City Council meeting, the City Council directed staff to return with an Ordinance with clarifying language that allows staff to administratively process some transfers. Additionally, the tidelands permits and leases recently adopted by the City Council require commercial tidelands users to indemnify the City. For ease of use, it is proposed this indemnity obligation be placed within the Newport Beach Municipal Code ( "NBMC"). RECOMMENDATION: (Select only one) 1) Conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 2013- 15 amending NBMC Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 to allow certain administrative transfers of encroaching tidelands permits and to require commercial tidelands users to defend and indemnify the City, and pass to a second reading on September 24; or 2) Do not amend the NBMC and maintain the current process. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: There are no funding requirements associated with either recommendation. 1 of 26 12 of 57 Page 18 of 63 Consideration of Ordinance Amending Newport Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Relating to Piers that Encroach in Front of Adjacent Properties and Commercial Indemnity, Respectively September 10, 2013 Page 2 DISCUSSION: As discussed at the August 13, 2013 Council meeting, there are a small number of piers which encroach in front of adjacent abutting upland properties (i.e., piers /floats encroach over the extension of their property lines into water area in front of a neighbor). These piers have existed for some time, and were allowed to encroach for various reasons at the time they were built decades ago. NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) currently requires that a new permit be approved by the Harbor Commission for these encroaching piers. The attached proposed Ordinance would allow staff to administratively process some transfers. Specifically, the City would have this authority when there is a change in ownership of the abutting upland property owner (i.e. immediate family members), a change in ownership of any entity that owns the upland property (i.e. between entities owned /controlled by the same person), or upon death of the permittee. Also included in this proposed Ordinance is clarifying language for an appeal, as well as codifying the indemnity obligations previously approved by the City Council for commercial tidelands permits and leases (see Exhibit B). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. NOTICING: This agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers this item). Public Works Director Exhibits: A. Ordinance No. 2013- 15 Amending Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 B. Redline Version of Amended NBMC Section C. Previous staff report from August 13, 2013 2 013 of 57 Page 19 of 63 Exhibit A ORDINANCE N0.2013 - 15 AN 012 DIN ANICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS 17.85:020(F) AND. v-.6.0.900 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH. MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW CERTAIN AWINISTRATIVE TRANSFERS. OF'TIDELANDS P. ERMIT$ AND TO REQUIRE COMMERCIAL, TIDELANDS USERS. TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY: THE CITY 6r :NEWPORT BEACH WHEREAS, pursuant to the :.1978 Beacon Bay :Bill, as .amended, ( "Beacon Bay Bill') the City of .Newport Beach ( "City) acts. on behatf of the State of Callfo n, 'as the trustee. of tidelands located within file City's limits, including Newport Harbor; . WHEREAS, Section 1(b) of the Beacon Bay. Bill and Title 17' of the N.ewpoit Beach :M Uhl cip..gI Code . { "NBMCk) . allow the City to authorize third :parites to use tidelands toe commercial: and ,noncommercal :purposes for a, term not to :exceed fifty (50)' . Years!. WHEREAS, the 'City allows ..persons ; to operate and :maintain commercial `and nancorrmerci.al:niers upon . the tidelands under an annually issued perms of lease; WHE Ill _AS, a small number of ,piers encroach m front of adjacent abutting upland property not coiitrol(etllowned by the;nerm(ttee; WHEREAS, currently when apermitassociated with:6 pler that:eneroacles:iq front of adjacent abutting uplands property s..transto0d the new perm tee is required to seek :a new permit from the. Harbor Commission; UVHEREAS, the. City desires 'fo amend the NBMC to allow these typeslof permits to be transferred administratively; when. thE, transfer is kietween family mernkers or entities controlled /owned. by the sal e person; and WHEREAS, the City desires to . codify the indemnity obligation .previously approved by the City Council far cornrnercial.Welands. permits and ceases... NOW THEREFORE, the City Councii:of the City af:Newport Beach ordain=s as follows,` Section 1: Subsection 17.35.020(F) of the Newpoft Beach Municipal Code is hereby revised In its entirety to read, as follows: F. Encroaching Piers and. Floats 1. In areas where existing piers and floats encroach in front of abutting upland property owned by others, a new permit approved by the Harbor Commission shall be required upon: a. , Any change in type of existing use of the. piers and floats: b. Any change in type of existing use of the abutting upland property owned by the permittee; and/or c.. Any destruction of the ple.r and float in which over sixty (60) percent of the replac.ernent value of the pier and float has been destroyed. 2. In areas where existing piers and floats encroach in front of abutting upland property -owned 15y others, a permit shall be transferred; to the extent permitted by this Subsection, or a new permit emnit obtained upon: a. Any change of the existing ownership of the abutting upland property owned by the permittee; b. Any change of thQ.exI sting ownership of any :entity that owns the abutting upland property; or 6; The death of the permittee in accordance with Subsection 17.60.031D(.C)(4),- the City Manage I r or Harbor . Resources Man.ager.shall have authority to process an administrative transfer of a permit pursuant to Subsections 2(a),(b) and (c) between Immediate Faimily Members or between :entities ties wholly owned1contr011ed by the he saiTio person, . F5,rpurpDses of this s Subsection, "Immediate Family Members" shall r,nean, the permItto%e'.s grandfather, grandmother, father, mother, her, brother, sister, wfe, husband, or child. The. Harbor Commission Shall processall other permits required by this Subsection. 3. At least ten (10) calendar days before the I-lairboT Commission, City Manager or Harbor Resources Manager acts on 15 of 57 4 of 26 Page 21 of 63 a permit under this Subsection, the owner of the abutting upland property, in front of which the harbor facility encroaches, shall be notified in writing of the time and place at which the permit will be considered. 4. Appeals arising under this Subsection related to permits or leases shall be processed under Section 17.60.080, or any successor section. Section 2: Subsection 17.60.060(E) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code is hereby revised in its entirety to read as follows: E. Commercial uses provided under this Title 17 are exempt from any provision requiring involvement of the owner or long -term lessee of an abutting upland property. This Subsection's sole purpose is to allow a person to apply for a commercial pier permit /lease in front of abutting upland property not owned or leased by the person applying for the permit. Section 3: Subsection "F" is added to Section 17.60.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: F. All persons that receive a commercial permit /lease, whether it.is a new permit /lease or a transferred permit /lease, from the City to use public trust lands shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, hold harmless and defend (with counsel approved by the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, volunteers and representatives from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a "Claim" or collectively, "Claims "), which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to the permit/lease including,. but not limited to, the issuance of any permit /lease, the transfer of any permit /lease, the entry into any permit /lease, permittee's /lessee's occupancy or use, or permittee's /lessee's guests, invitees, 16 of 57 Page 22 of 63 sublessees, or licensees occupancy or use, of the public trust lands, or improvements including, but not limited to, any use involving petroleum based products,, hazardous materials, hazallous waste and/or other hazardous substances as defined by City, County, State or Federal laws and regulations. The pen'InitteeWlessee's obligations in this; indemnity shall not extend to the degree. any Claim. is. -proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful rhisconduct of the City, subject to any immunities which may apply to the OW With respect to such Claims. This indemnification, provision and any other indemnification provided elsewhere in an indMdual perrnitflezise shall survive the termination Of said P6mFilt/166S6 and shall survive. for the entire time that any third party can make a Claim. This indemnity Obligation shall apply in I dependent of whether it is explicitly placed Within a particular , commercial permit/lease. Section 4.* The recitals provided in this ordinance are true and correct and are incorporated Into the substantive portion, of this ordinance. Section 5: If 'any section, subsection, sentence, dause or phrase of this ordinance is., for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions , of this ordinance. The City C a odholl hereby. declares that it would have Passed this ordinance, and each Section, subsection, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, Subsections, sentences,, clauses. and phrases be declared .unconstitutional, Section 6- The City Council finds the approval of this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CLOX),pursuant to Sections 16.060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in. a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3 ) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15M) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code Of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting , in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Alternatively, the City Council finds the.approval of this ordinance is not a project under CEQA Regulation Section 15061(lo)(3) because it has no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, Ell 17 of 57 6 of 26 Page 23 of 63 Section 7: The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance, or a summary thereof, to be published pursuant to Charter Section 414. This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, held on the — day of 2013, and adopted on the day of 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEMBERS NOES, COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS KEITH CURRY, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: THE CIT EY'S OFFICE C0( AARON C. HARP, CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: LEILANI I. BROWN, CITY CLERK 5 18 of 57 7 of 26 Page 24 of 63 Exhibit B Redline Versions of Amended NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Amendment of NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) Allowing Intra- Family & Related Business Transfers F. Encroaching Piers and Floats. 1. In areas where existing piers and floats encroach in front of abutting upland property owned by others, a new permit approved by the Harbor Commission shall be required upon: I-a. Any change in type of existing use of the piers and floats; 2b. Any change in type of existing use of the abutting upland property owned by the permittee; and /or - ee- 4c. Any destruction of the pier and float in which over sixty (60) percent of the replacement value of the pier and float has been destroyed. 52. -In areas where existing piers and floats encroach in front of abutting upland property owned by others, a permit shall be transferred, to the extent permitted by this Subsection, or a new permit obtained upon: a. Any change of the existing ownership of the abutting upland property owned by the permittee; b. Any change of the existing ownership of any entity that owns the abutting upland property, or C. The death of the permittee. In accordance with Subsection 17.60.030(C)(4), the City Manager or Harbor Resources Manager shall have authority to process an administrative transfer of a permit pursuant to Subsections 2(a),(b) and (c) between Immediate Family Members or between entities wholly owned /controlled by the same person. For purposes of this Subsection 19 of 57 8 of 26 Page 25 of 63 "Immediate Family Members" shall mean the permittee's grandfather, grandmother, father, mother, brother, sister, wife, husband, or child. The Harbor Commission shall process all other permits required by this Subsection. 3. At least ten (10) calendar days Bbefore the Harbor Commission, City Manager or Harbor Resources Manager acts on athe nev., permit under this Subsection, the owner of the abutting upland property, in front of which the harbor facility encroaches, shall be notified in writing of the time and place aaeeting —iaat which the aew—permit will be considered. 4. Appeals arising under this Subsection related to permits or leases shall be processed under Section 17.60.080, or any successor section. Amendment of NBMC Section 17.60.060 to Clarify Indemnity Obligations 17.60.060 Public Trust Lands. The following restrictions shall apply to public trust lands under either a permit or a lease: A. Leases /Permits. In the event public trust lands are used by an entity other than the City, then that entity shall enter into a lease or permit with the City. Such leases shall provide lessees with a leasehold interest in the property for a period of at least five years, not to exceed a period of time as limited by the City Charter or applicable State law. Such permits shall provide permittees with an interest in the property for a period of twelve (12) months or less. B. Land Use. Leases and permits shall be for uses consistent with the public trust and Section 17.05.080. Preference shall be given to coastal- dependent uses. C. Public Access. Public access shall be provided in a manner consistent with applicable law. D. Revenue. Rent under this section shall be based upon fair market value, as determined by the City Council. Such determination shall be based, in part, upon the findings of a City - selected appraiser. 20 of 57 9 o 26 Page 26 of 63 E. Commercial uses provided under this Title 17 are exempt from any provision requiring involvement of the owner or long -term lessee of an abutting upland property. This Subsection's sole purpose is to allow a person to apply for a commercial pier permit/lease in front of abutting upland property not owned or leased by the person applying for the permit. F. All persons that receive a commercial permit/lease, whether it is a new Permit/lease or a transferred permittlease, from the City to use public trust lands shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, hold harmless and defend (with counsel approved by the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) the City. its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, volunteers and representatives from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, iudgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a "Claim" or collectively. "Claims "), which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to the Permittlease including, but not limited to, the issuance of any permit/lease, the transfer of any permit/lease, the entry into any permittlease, permittee's /lessee's occupancy or use, or permittee's /lessee's guests, invitees, sublessees, or licensees occupancy or use, of the public trust lands, or improvements including, but not limited to, any use involving petroleum based products, hazardous materials, hazardous waste and /or other hazardous substances as defined by City, County. State or Federal laws and regulations. The permittee's /lessee's obligations in this indemnity shall not extend to the degree any Claim is proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, sublect to any immunities which may apply to the City with respect to such Claims. This indemnification provision and any other indemnification provided elsewhere in an individual permittlease shall survive the termination of said permit/lease and shall survive for the entire time that any third party can make a Claim. This indemnity obligation shall apply independent of whether it is explicitly placed within a particular commercial permit/lease. 21 of 57 10 of 26 Page 27 of 63 �gWVpRT = CITY OF w NEWPORT B EA b C�(IFOP��p City Council Staff Report Exhibit C Agenda Item No. 20 August 13, 2013 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Public Works Department David A. Webb, Public Works Director 949 - 644 -3311, dawebl)@newportbeaclica.gov PREPARED BY: Chris Miller, Harbor Resources Manager APPROVED:Q TITLE: Consideration of Ordi \)nces Amending Newport Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Relating to Piers that Encroach in Front of Adjacent Properties and Commercial Indemnity, Respectively ABSTRACT: The City of Newport Beach ( "City ") manages public tidelands on behalf of the State of California. Through this management, the City allows private individuals to construct and maintain piers. A small number of piers located upon the tidelands encroach in front of adjacent upland properties. When these encroaching piers are transferred, a new permit is required to be processed by the Harbor Commission, rather than by staff through an administrative process. The City Council may consider amending these transfer provisions to allow for administrative processing. Additionally, the tidelands permits and leases recently adopted by the City Council require commercial tidelands users to indemnify the City. For ease of use, it is proposed this indemnity obligation be placed within the Newport Beach Municipal Code ( "NBMC "). RECOMMENDATION: (Select only one) 1) Conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 2013 -15 amending NBMC Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 to allow certain administrative transfers of encroaching tidelands permits and to require commercial tidelands users to defend and indemnify the City, and pass to a second reading on September 10, 2013; or 2) Conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 2013 -15 repealing NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) to allow the administrative transfer of all encroaching tidelands permits and amending NBMC Section 17.60.060 to require commercial tidelands users to defend and indemnify the City, and pass to a second reading on September 10, 2013; or 22 of 57 11 of 26 Page 28 of 63 Consideration of Ordinances Amending Newport Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.35,020 fl and 17.60.060 Relating to Piers that Encroach oach in Front I f A I Properties and Commercial Indemnity, Respectively August 13,2013 Page 2 3) Select neither option I or 2 and maintain the current process. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: There are no funding requirements associated With either recommendation. DISCUSSION: Within. Newport Harbor, there are a small, number of piers which encroach in front of adjacent abutting upland land propertles.(Le,, .piers /floats encroach over the extension of their property lines into Water area in front of a neighbor), Those piers have existed for some time, and were. allowed to :encroach for various ! I reasons at the time. they were built. See examples in Exhibit A. NBMC Section 17,85.020(F). currently re.ouires that a new permit be approved by the Harbor Commission for piers that encroach in front of adjacent ent upland property owned by others upon any of the-fopowing conditions: 1, Any change In type of existing use of the piers and floats; 2. Any change in type Of existing use of the abutting upland property owned by the permittee; 3. Any change of bAstIng ownership of the abutting upland property, owned by the permitted; or upon the death of theperi-nittee; 4. Any destruction of the pier and float in which over sixty (00) percent of the replacement Value of the bier and float haa boon destroyed. In an effort to improve the pier permit transfer process staff has, prepared two alteirriative ordinances for tho.QIty Council's consideration designed to address piers that encroach in front of adjacent abutting upland properties,. The first ordinance, attached as Exhibit B, amends NBMC Section 17.36.020(F) to allow certain transfers between family members or between related entities to be processed administratively, Without the need for Harbor Commission review; This is ordinance also arnends NBMC Section 17.60,066 to codify the indemnity obligations previously approved by the City Council for commercial tidelands permits and leases. The second ordinance, attached as Exhibit C, repeals NBMC Section 17.a5.020fl in its entirety and allows for the administrative transfer of all pier permits. This ordinance also amends NBMC Section 17.60.060 to codify the indemnity obligations previously approved by the City Council for commercial tidelands permits and leases. There are no proposed Indemnity obligations for iron- commercial (&,g., residential) tidelands users Linder either ordinance, The redline amendments to the NBMC are shown in Exhibit D. 23 of 57 12 of 26 Page 29 of 63 Consideration of Ordinances Amending Newport Beach M unicipalCode Sections I 735,0.20(F) and 47.60.060 Relating - to Piers that Encroach in Front of Adjacent Properties and Commercial I , ridemnity, Respectively August 13, 2013 Page 3 These proposals originated through the City Council and were not taken to the Harbor Commission for consideration, ENVIRONMENTAL. REVIEW: Staff rocommendq the City Council find this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("QEQA") pursuant to Sections 15000(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 1 , 6060(c)(8) (the activity is not 0 project as defined Section 1 6378) of the cEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. NOTICING: This agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown 'Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers this item), Submitted.by: tual Dhvid A. —115b Public Works Director Exhibits: A. Examples of Encroaching Corn me.rcial Piers B. Ordinance No. 2013-_15__ Amending Sections 17.35;020(F) and 17.60,060 C. Ordinance No. 2013-_lr2_ Repealing Section 1735,020(F) and Amending Section 17.60.060 D, Redline Version of Amended and Repealed NBMC Sections 24 of 57 13 of 26 Page 30 of 63 �l t i r•H 11011 o e1�Ar.. t ` Ak .I Nervp ,i l Bead, GIS O , 0 40 80 G r \" Feel , :. 14' Exhibit A Disclaimer; Every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of the data provided. however. The City of Newport Beach and Its employees and agents disclaim any and all responsibitity, from or relating to any results obtained in Its use. Imagery: 2009.2011 pholos provided by Eagle Imaging www.eagteaedal.00m n of 57 14 of 26 Page 31 of 63 I 09 r �o,y♦ J� J' Newport Beach GIS y J O �s, °9 f 0 4�. 1 1023 . 1027 -1033 ,1; 1025_ 1029 1031 i 1'r a r 1101 A,r. ,may 'der 26 of 57 15 of 26 Page 32 of 63 Disclaimer: Every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of the data provided, however, The City of O Newport Beach and Its employees and agents disclaim any and alt responsibility from or relating to any results obtained in Its use 100 200 D Imagery: 2009.2011 photos provided by Eagle Feel Imaging vnvw.eagleaedal.com 26 of 57 15 of 26 Page 32 of 63 Exhibit B ORDINANCE NQ. 2013 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS 17.35.020(F) AND 17.60,060 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFERS OF TIDELANDS PERMITS AND TO REQUIRE COMMERCIAL TIDELANDS USERS TO. DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY THE CITY O.F.NEWJPORT BEACH WHEREAS, pursuant to the he 1978 Beacon eacon Bay Bill, as amended, "Beacon Bay, Bill") the City of Newport Beach ('.City'.) acts on behalf, of the State of.Qalifornia as the trustee of tidelands located within the City's limits, Including Newport Harbor; WHEREAS, Section 1(b) of the Be0opn Bay Bill and Title 17 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("NBIVIO") allow, the City to authorize third pairties to use tidelands for commercial and noncommercial purposes for a term not to exceed fifty (50) years; WHEREAS, the City 'allows persons to operate and maintain commercial and noncommercial piers upon the tidelands under on annually issued permit or lease; WHEREAS, a small number of plers encroach in front of adjacent abutting uplandproporly not controlled/owned by the permittee; WHEREAS, currently when a permits986clated with a pier that encroaches in front of adjacent abutting uplands property is transferred the now Permittee Is required to seek a new permit fronn the Harbor Commission; WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the NBIVIC to allow these types of permits to be transferred administratively, when the transfer is between family members or entities controlled/owned by the same person; and WHEREAS, the City desires to cod , ify the Indemnity obligation previously approved by the City Council for commercial tidelands permits and leases. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach ordains as follows: 27 of 57 16 of 26 Page 33 of 63 Section 1: Subsection F(5) is added to Subsection, 17.35.020iF),of the Newport Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: 5. This subsection shall not apply to the transfer of a permit between family members or between entities owned /controlled .hy the same person. Permits failing under this exception may be transferred administratively subject to approval proval by the City Manager or.Harbor Resources Manager I I n accordance With Section 17.60.030(C)(4). Section 2: Subsection "F" is added to Section 17.60.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.t.o read as follows: F. All persons that receive a commercial permit or lease from the City to use .public trust lands shall as a condition of receiving the commercial permit or lease defend and ].hd.erhnlfV the City. Unless different la'nQuage is provided within a specific commercial permit or le,9se, the following indemnity Wriguage shall be Included, in substantially the same form, within every commercial, permit and lease" To the fullest extent permitted by.law, permitte6/1'essee shall indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by the City, which approval shall not. be unreasonably withheld) and hold harmloss the City, Its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, volunteers and representatives from and against any and all claims, demands,. obligations; damages, ,actions, causes of action, suits, lossesi Judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses of every kind and nature Whatsoever (individually, a "ClaliW or collectively, which may arise frorn or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to this permit/lease including, but not limi.ted . to, permittee's/lessee's occupancy and use, or permittee's/lessee's guests, invitees, sublessees, or licensees occupancy and use, of the public trust lands, or improvements Including, but not limited to, any use involving petroleum based products, hazardous materials, hazardous waste and/or other hazardous substances as defined by City, County, State or Federal laws and regulations. The perm)ttee's/lessee's obligations in this indemnity shall not extend to the degree any Claim is proximately caused by the 2 28 of 57 17 of 26 Page 34 of 63 sole negligence or Willful. miscond uct, of the City, subject to any immunities which mazy apply to the City with respect to such Claims. This Inderrinif i6a,tiori provision and any other indeinnification provided elsewhere in this permit /lease shall survive the termination Of (Ills permit/lease and shall survive for the entire time that any third paiiy can make a Claim. Section 3: The recitals provided In this ordinance are true and correct and are incorporated into the Substantive portion:of this ordinance. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reasorl, field to be Invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or conStitUtiOnality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it Would have passed thi I s ordinancO, and each section,. subsection, claus:0 or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or More sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional. Section 5 The City Council finds the approval .of this ordinance is riot subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (TEQA') purwant to Sections 16060(c)(2) (,the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14; Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly. or indirectly. Alternatively, the City Council finds the approval of this ordinance is not a project under CEQA Regulation Section 1.5061(b)(3) because it has no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Section 6: The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this ordinance. The City Clerk shall C@UGe this ordinance, or a summary mmary thereof, to be published pursuant to Charter Section 414. 3 29 of 57 18 of 26 Page 35 of 63 This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, held on the _ day of , 2013, and adopted on the day of 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEMBERS NOES, COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS KEITH CURRY, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE iA '-V�r I AARON C. HARP, CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: LEILANI I. BROWN, CITY CLERK 30 of 57 19 of 26 Page 36 of 63 Exhibit 0 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA REPEALING SUBSECTION 1736,020(F) AND AMENDING SECTION 11I.60..066 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO REQUIRE, COMMERCIAL TIDELANDS USERS TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY THE, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH WHEREAS, pursuant to the 1078 Beacon Bay 8111, as amended; ("Bbacon Bay Bill") the City of Newport Beach ( "City") acts on beh,ailf -of the State: of California as the trustee of tidelands located vVithin.the City's limits, including Newport Harbor; WHEREAS, 8ection 1(b) of the. Beacon Bay 0111 and Title 17 of the Newport .d e Beach Municipal Co . ("NBMIU) allow the City to authorize third parties to use tidelands for commercial and noncommercial purposes fora term not to.exceed fifty (50) years; WHEREAS, the City allows persons to operate and maintain commercial and noncommercial piers upon the tidelands underan annually issued permit or lease; WHEREAS, a small number of plers encroach in front of adjacent abutting upland property.not controlled/owned by the permittee; WHEREAS, CLIfr6rifly When a ppirrnit associated With a pier that encroaches in front of adjacent abutting uplands property is transferred the new oermittee is required to seek a new permit from the Harbor Cornm , Ission; WHEREAS, the City desires to repeal N$MC Subsection 1736.020(17) to allow these types of permits to be transferred administratively, similar to the transfer of other tidelands permits; and WHEREAS, the City desires to codify the indemnity obligation previously approved by the City COLIII611 for commercial tidelands permits and leases; ses. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach ordains as follows: Section 1: Subsection 17,35,020(F) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code is hereby repealed In Its entirety, 31 of 57 20of26 Page 37 of 63 Section 2: Subsection "F" is added to Section 17.60.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code to read as follows: F. All persons Ihat receive a commercial permit or lease from the City to use public trust lands shall as.a condition of receiving the commercial permit or lease defend and indemnify the City. Unless different language is provided within a spec ific. commercial permit or lease, the following indemnity language shall be included; in substantially the same form, within every commercial permitand.lease: To the fullest extent permitted by-law; permittee /lessee shall indemnify, defend. (with. counsel approved by the City, .which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) and .hold harmless the City, ifs elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, volunteers and representatives from and against any and all: claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits,. Ioss.es, judgments, fln ,s, penalties; liabilities; 'costs and expenses of every kind and nature whatsoever' (individually; a "Claim" or collectively; "Claims "% which may.anse from or in any manner; relate (directly or indirectly) to this permit /Lease including, but not limited to, permittee's /lessee's occupancy and use, or permittee's /lessee's. guests, iiwitees,. sublessees, or licensees occupancy and use, of the public trust lands, or Improvements including, but not limited to, any use involving petroleum based products, hazardous materials, hazardous waste and /or other hazardous substances as defined by Clty; County, State or Federal laws and regulations. The permittee's /lessee's obligations in this indemnity shall not extend to the degree any Claim is proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, subject to any immunities which may apply to the City with respect to such Claims. This indemnification provision and any other indemnification provided elsewhere in this permit /lease shall survive the termination of this permit /lease and shall survive for the entire time that any third party can make a Claim. 2 32 of 57 21 of 26 Page 38 of 63 Section 3: The recitals.,provided in this ordinance are true and correct and are incorporated into the substantive portion of this ordinance. Section 4: If any section, sribseetion, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance, The City Council hereby declares. that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase hereof; irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional. Section 5: The City Council finds the approval of this. ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQN) pursuant to Sections 16060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) .(the 8 tivlty is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CE-QA., GUidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title, 14, Chapter 3, because it has. no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment; directly or indirectly. Alternatively, the City Council finds the approval of this ordinance is not a project under C.EQA Regulation Section '15061(b)(3) because it has no potential for causing a significant effect of the environment. Section ti: The.Mayor shall sign and the 0ity.Clerk. shall attest to the passage of this. ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance, or a summary thereof, to be published pursuant to Charter Section 414. 33 of 57 22 of 26 Page 39 of 63 This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, held on the _ day of , 2013, and adopted on the day of 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEMBERS NOES, COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS KEITH CURRY, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: THE CITY OFFICE �0 a.') AARON C. HARP, CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: LEILANI I. BROWN, CITY CLERK 4 34 of 57 23 of 26 Page 40 of 63 Exhibit D Redline Versions of Amended NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Amendment of NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) Allowing Intra- Family Transfers F. Encroaching Piers and Floats. In areas where existing piers and floats encroach In front of abutting upland property owned by others, a new permit approved by the Harbor Commission shall be required upon: 1. Any change in type of existing use of the piers and floats; 2. Any change in type of existing use of the abutting upland property owned by the permittee; 3. Any change of existing ownership of the abutting upland property owned by the permittee or upon the death of the permittee; 4. Any destruction of the pier and float in which over sixty (60) percent of the replacement value of the pier and float has been destroyed. 5. This subsection shall not apply to the transfer of a permit between family members or between entities owned /controlled by the same person. Permits falling under this exception may be transferred administratively subject to approval by the City Manager or Harbor Resources Manager in accordance with Section 17.60.030(0)(4). Before the Harbor Commission acts on the new permit, the owner of the abutting upland property, in front of which the harbor facility encroaches, shall be notified in writing of the meeting in which the new permit will be considered. Repeal of NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) F--- €nereaehing-Riers- and- Faoats -fn areas- where- exist+ng4ers- andfleat "nsreach4n front-of abutting upland pfepe # yowlzed -iy- others a flew -permit- approve"y-the- Harter Commission shall- be- regtiireeWperi; a-- Anyehange in- type -of existing use.ef- the- piemand floats; 35 of 57 24 of 26 Page 41 of 63 2. - - Any - shaege -in- type -ef- existing -use- ef- theabutting- uptand- property -ewned-by the- peffnittee; 3. Any - change- of- ex+Shn"wnershtp- V4e-ab6it R"piand- Weperty awned -by the permittee ewpen-thet-ieath -ef the per-rnittee-, 4.— Any- dest+usHen- e#- ttie�ierand- #leaf- in- wMlsh- ever - sixty-- {�9}- persenF of -flue reptasemenf value -e#- the - pier - and- float-has-been destfeyed. Bef ere4he- Harbof- Gemmissionaete -en -tire new- permit- theawner ef-the- abutting -- upland pfeperty- in- frent- of -whiG the- hafbef-fasiRy- ensfeashes, shall- be-- net+fied- in-wfiting -ot therneeting- in- whieh- the- newlpermit- will-be- considered: Amendment of NBMC Section 17.60.060 to Clarify Indemnity Obligations 17.60.060 Public Trust Lands. The following restrictions shall apply to public trust lands under either a permit or a lease: A. Leases /Permits. In the event public trust lands are used by an entity other than the City, then that entity shall enter into a lease or permit with the City. Such leases shall provide lessees with a leasehold interest in the property for a period of at least five years, not to exceed a period of time as limited by the City Charter or applicable State law. Such permits shall provide permittees with an interest in the property for a period of twelve (12) months or less. B. Land Use. Leases and permits shall be for uses consistent with the public trust and Section 17.05.080. Preference shall be given to coastal- dependent uses. C. Public Access. Public access shall be provided in a manner consistent with applicable law. D. Revenue. Rent under this section shall be based upon fair market value, as determined by the City Council. Such determination shall be based, in part, upon the findings of a City - selected appraiser. 36 of 57 25 of 26 Page 42 of 63 E. Commercial uses provided under this Title 17 are exempt from any provision requiring Involvement of the owner or long -term lessee of an abutting upland property. vermittee's /lessee's occupancy and use, or permittee's /lessee's guests, invitees, sublessees, or licensees occupancy and use, of the public trust lands, or improvements including, but not limited to, any use involving petroleum based products, hazardous materials, hazardous waste and /or other hazardous substances as defined by City, County, State or Federal laws and regulations. The permittee's/lessee's obligations in termination of this permit/lease and shall survive for the entire time that any third party can make a Claim. 37 of 57 26 of 26 Page 43 of 63 IiA RYS..CARMACx ATTORNEY AT LAW t�} 3 .. 474 E. 17th Street, Suite 201 Costa Mesa, Caftmla 92627 Tat 649-6v-5548 Fax: 949. 842 =1598 E -mail: ficar muck @pacbell;ttei. August 15, 2013 Newport Beach City. Council City ofNewporf )3eacli 100 Civic:Cemer Drivo Newport Beach; CA .9.2.660 Re:. Newpor7. Peach Gt ty.. CouncitRegttlarMeeting�August13 ,2013 Current.Buslness Agenda Item No, •20 Honorable. Council Mdmbers: i represent Sohn Vallely, owner ofthe property at 508 South Bay Front, Balbga . Islapd, I have:tilso beer(. aresrctent of Newport Beach for almost 40. years Mr: Vallely's property is o ne ofthe pmperhes ide.d6fred by City staff as affected by the proposed. amendments tb NBMCSecfrona I735 .020 {F):and 17:60,060 Item No 2t). on the Agenda. for August 13, 2013. It as my understanding these proposed amendments ootne from the City Attorney s offi and have beeri under discussion for seine time . However, probalsly fair to say the Vallely doek suuati6hJziay have protnpted. rite C ttyAttomey's. office.to propose the amendments at thra tune. My.understending:is that the Vallel y. dock presents a srtti ition;not ericountered.prevrausly.by the City's cuiretit HarborResoiiroe Department, lrut.one that'wi1I a encoumered'for other properties rri;the future. Inrttal.iy, it is iniport.wt. to understand w. a.i- r. Vailely asked the door. Resaufces Depaitinent to. do Ms Vallely's parents awned and resided at 508. South Bay Front for over 75 years Foliowisg:his mother's: death in 2012, and the adrnirlistradoiu of . his mother's tins( that held title to 508 South Bay Front,: Mr ValIely's trust tiecalne the owner of the property iVr: Vallely'subsequeutly appliedfar a transfer of the. commercial pier permit, held: t n the cane of his pizenfs' ttifst, to his: trust There is.nothng more to the application — it rs aitripiy a requesf to change the narrie.on th8.commercial.pier permit following the parent /child transfer.. . Citing curtest N]3MC Section..17 35:020(F)(3), the Harbor Resource Manager took the position that W Validly. piust, go through the process ofi applying fora new eonunefdal pier. permit: Mr. Vallely disputes tl is interpretation and is prepared to file a writ inSuperior Court to compel the trans(m :Among other reasons, Mr. 'Vallely disputes rho decision because Section 17.60.060 {F} p empty commercial piers from the provisions of ScO on 1735.020(F)(3). 38 of 57 - Page 44 of 63 Newport Beaoh City Council City of Newport Beach August 15, 2013 Page 2 of.4 At Tuesday night's council meeting; several speakers during public comment grossly inisrepreaented the status :of the Vallely dock matter. In watching 'the meeting on television, it appeared to me some Members might.have been influenced by these misrepresentations, or concerned about the proposed amendments based on these misrepresentatibns.. For that reason, I feel it is necessary -to correct the misrepresentations. so Members kiavo the correct information. First, contrary to the repeated representations of the adjacent property owner at S 10 south Bay Front, and-her attomey, the Vallely dock is Api an illegal structure or use. The attomey should know better than to make sueh an incorrect representation to the Council, Councilman Selich corrected the speakers when he stated that the dock was not illegal; but rather a "legal iron- conformm use." A "legal ionconfornting use" is "a lawful use oxisting on the effective date of the zoning restriction and continuing since that time fn nonconformance to the drdinance." (City of Los Angeles v. Gag# (1954 127 Ca1.App,24 442,:463.) Aproperty owner has a. vested right to continue lawful uses of property and is not required to obtain a special use permit ut order.to continue lawful preexisting uses. (City of Ukiah v, County of .Mendaeino (1987) 196 Cal,App.3d 47, S6.) Transfer of title does not affect the right.to continue a lawful nonconforming use which runs with the land. (Hanson Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors oftV`evatla County (1996).12 Cal.4" 533; 540.) 508 South Bay )Front was purchased. by Roland Vallely, John Vallely's father, in 1935: The property had an existing pier. On April 27.j.19 & Rbliiid Vallely was granted �'SAT�r A4anortenrnt Rarmithv tla'drinv l'nrnii ti�iXnrriiivare to rrinctnsnt t.xin ixrnerilnn the extended property a boat rental andfoz boat slip rent, property taxes on this dock; speci their property, for over 75 years. According to City staff re; or harbor polioies when Roland 1938. When policies were adopt( "encroached" across a neighbor's Harbor Penult Policies.) The Val permits rmd existing policies for f iacent property at 5.10 South Bay Front. OnJuly 18; cil granted Mr. Vallely's request to install an approval of the owner of 510 South Bay. -Front and istructedbave been used and maintained in the same, years, Trio Vallely family has operated the mi o.na as For the enti re 75 years. The Vallely family has paid: ;ally listed by the tax assessor as an improvement to rts in 1965 and 1966, there were no City pier permits lely constructed the additions to the pier m* 1936 and it was legal to construct comnetcialpiers that (tended property line. (Section i -B of the, former ly dock was a 1aw£ut use in compliance with original lost thirty years. On Tanuary9,1967, the City 39 of 57 Page 45 of 63 Newport Beach City Council City of:Newport Beach August] 5; 2013 Page 3.o f4 authorized the addition. of Section 29 to the then Harbor Permit Policies. This Section 29 periai aed to the: elimination of encroaching. pier and float facilities. At that time, the Vallely commercial dock becairie a "legal non- conforiing use, and:remains a "legal non- conforming use" to this day. The dock is not an illegal structure or use. The language of prior:Section 29 carries forward almost verbatim in today's Section 17;3s.azo�F�. Second, contrary to what several speakers represented to the Council;_ Mr. Vallely has not applied lot a new business permit and has not expanded or changed the 75 -year use:of the dock. The information provided by these speakers is :a complete fabrication. The Vallely familyhas held a business license for their commercial use for almost 75 years — first in the name of 2toland Vallely, and since 1972: in the name of the Vallely Family Trust. The business licensc:is renewed annually bypayirg the license .fee. John Vallely recently renevveii the license as required by paying "the annual fee, acid, since his trust is now the propert y owner, put the license m . b is trust's name. Thercisno application for a new license. Nothing has changed with the respect to the dock or its use. The representations that Mr: Vallely is doing something that changes the parking situation as it has always existed are:false. The dock space is exclusively leased to boat owners, just as it has been for over the last 30 years, Finally, let me provide some history on the adjacent property- 510 South Bay Front. I feel it is important since that property owner now opposes the amendments to these ordinances; 510 is the end property of the.city block that was originally, zoned for eommercial use. It borders Opal Street with-the City's.iiidr extending from the end of Opal Street. An aerial photograph taken in 1952 shows a sandwich strop stand at 510, the: Vallely dock, commercial businesses, a gas dock, etc., along the block. The commercial block is currently zoned Mix Use Water Related, which allows commercial uses. Vallel_y's commercial use is an approved use. According to John Vallely, who grew up at 508 next door, soinetrme.in.ihe 1970,'5. the owner of 510,.applied for and down -zoned the 510 property i i .order to build a duplex on the property. In other words, a prior owner of 510, for that owner's own econorme benefit, created a situation wherein 510 became 'alone, residontial +zoned property at the end of the commercial -zoned block. There are to this day "encroaching" commercial docks on the entire 50,0 block, and on the 400 block on the other side of the ferry at Agate Street; This situation was visible to anyone who purohased 5IO,,yetthe currant owner of . 510 now opposes amendments to the ordinances that would allow.these commercial dock owners to be treated like everyone else in the harbor, i.e., to be allowed to- tragsfer their commercial dock permit to afamily member or related entity without applying fora new permit: 40 of 57 Page 46 of 63 Newport Beach City Council City of Newport Beach August 15,.2013 Page .4 ok .I've already indicated the prior property owner at 510.gave his approval to construct the "encroaching" dock m.1938, approval that was subs equentlyput in a written, notarized letter: The current :owner of 510 doesn't Nvant to recognize Vallely's vested right to maintain the existing dock, aright that vested between the property owners when her predecessor at S 10.approyed the construction of the dock and Vallely paid for the construction. This vested right runs with the land and is transferable to subsequent:owners. Instead, the current: owner at 510 is trying to accomplish her goal, the removal of the encroaching dock, by urging the City to rcquire Valiwy to apply fora new permit for the dock — one that she will strenuously oppose: Vallely's'position is that his right to the ourrentpemait is also a vested right between Vallely and the City, that the current pertnit is transferable as a matter of law, and that the, City may not requite Vallely apply fora new permit. Members may recognize this position as asserting what is coni brily . referred to as "grandfathere& rights; Vailely is assertic g:rights held before changes to City ordinances: The bottom line is that the current owner of 510 South Bay.Front.knows that as between her and Vallely, she has no legal right to remove the encroaching dock. She bought the property with full knowledge of the encroachment, and had every right to investigate Vallely's vested right to maiutain the dock pursuant to the prior owner's perriission to buildit. She threatened legal action through her same attorneynine years ago, but has done nothing Because she knows :she has no remedy at law, blow; she is trying to reach her goal by opposing amendments to the that that would treat Vallely like. everyone else in the harbor amendments that should avoid legal action between Vallely and'tbe_ City: T would lie more than happy to discuss the Vallcly dock situation with any Member. 41 of 57 Page 47 of 63 ATTACHMENT D = CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH City Council Staff Report Agenda Item No. 20 August 13, 2013 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Public Works Department David A. Webb, Public Works Director 949 - 644 -3311, dawebb @newportbeachca.gov PREPARED BY: Chris Miller, Harbor Resources Manager APPROVED: TITLE: Consideration of Ordi Ices Amending Newport Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Relating to Piers that Encroach in Front of Adjacent Properties and Commercial Indemnity, Respectively ABSTRACT: The City of Newport Beach ( "City ") manages public tidelands on behalf of the State of California. Through this management, the City allows private individuals to construct and maintain piers. A small number of piers located upon the tidelands encroach in front of adjacent upland properties. When these encroaching piers are transferred, a new permit is required to be processed by the Harbor Commission, rather than by staff through an administrative process. The City Council may consider amending these transfer provisions to allow for administrative processing. Additionally, the tidelands permits and leases recently adopted by the City Council require commercial tidelands users to indemnify the City. For ease of use, it is proposed this indemnity obligation be placed within the Newport Beach Municipal Code ( "NBMC"). RECOMMENDATION: (Select only one) 1) Conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 2013 -15 amending NBMC Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 to allow certain administrative transfers of encroaching tidelands permits and to require commercial tidelands users to defend and indemnify the City, and pass to a second reading on September 10, 2013; or 2) Conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 2013 -15 repealing NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) to allow the administrative transfer of all encroaching tidelands permits and amending NBMC Section 17.60.060 to require commercial tidelands users to defend and indemnify the City, and pass to a second reading on September 10, 2013; or 1 of 16 42 of 57 Page 48 of 63 Consideration of Ordinances Amending Newport Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.35.020.(F) and 11.60.060 Relating to Piers.that Encroach in Front of Adjacent Properties and Commercial Indemnity, Respectively August 13, 2013 Page 2 3) Select neither option I or 2 and maintain the current process. FUNDING.REQUIREMENTS: There are no funding requirements associated with either recami-nandation DISCUSSION: Within Newport Harbor, there are a small number of piers which encroach in front of adjacent abutting upland properties (ie., piers/float"F encroach over the extension of their property lines into water er area in front of a neighbor). These plots have existed for some tirrie, and were. allowed to encroach for various reasons at the time they were built. See examples in Exhibit A. NBMC Section 17. 36;020(P) currently requires that a new permit be approved by the Harbor Commission for pier's that encroach in front of adjacont upland property owned by others upon any of the following conditions., 1. Any change in type of existing LISR of the piers and floats; 2. Any change in type of existing use of the abutting upland.property owned by the permittee; 3. Any change of existing. ownership of the abutting upland property owned by the perrnittee or upon the death ofthe permittee; 4; Any destruction of the plot and floa in which over sixty (60) percent of the I t y replacement value of the pier and float has been destroyed; In an effort to improve the pier permit transfer process staff has prepared two alternative ordinances for the City Council's consideration designed to address plots , that oncro'aGh in iront,of adjacent t abutting upland properties. The first ordinance, attached as Exhibit B, amends NBMC Section 17,35.020(F) to 611QW certain transfers between family members or between related entities. to �bo. processed administratively, I tratively, without the need for Harbor Commission review. This ordinance also amends NBMC Section 17.60.060 to codify the Indemnity obligations previously approved by the City Council for commercial tidelands permits and leases: The second ordinance, attached as Exhibit Ci repeals NBMC Section 17.35,020(F) in its entirety and allows for the administrative transfer of allpier. permits. This ordinance also amends NBMC Section 17.60.060 to codify the indemnity obligations previously approved by the City Council for commercial fidelandg permits and leases. There are no proposed indemnity obligations for non - commercial (e.g., residential) tidelands users under either ordinance. The redline amendments to the NBMC are shown in Exhibit D. 43 of 57 2 of 16 Page 49 of 63 Consideration of Ordinances Amending Newport Beach Municipal Code Sections 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Relating to Piers that Encroach in Front of Adlacent Properties and Commercial Indemnity,. Respectively I I I August 13, 2013 �Page 3 These proposals originated through the City Council and were not taken to the Harbor Commission for consideration, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject, to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK') pursuant to Sections 1.5060(c)(2) (the activity Will not result in a. direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and. 1 W60(q)N. (the activity is not a project . a . s defined efined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14., Chapter 3, because It has no potential for resulting i in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. NOTICINOc This agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at Which the City Council considers this item). Submitted by: A Dbvid A. VX1515 Public Works Director Exhibits: A. Examples of Encroaching Commercial Piers B, Ordinance. No. 2013 -a1 Amending Sections 17,35.020(F) and 17.60.060 C. Ordinance No. 2013- ij _ 5 Repealing Section 17.35,020(F) and Amending Section 17.60.060 D. Redline Version of Amended and Repealed NBMC Sections 44 of 57 3 of 16 Page 50 of 63 Exhibit A ♦ J4. P � r P I � s % • +/y • 1 e i I 'V Disclaimer: Every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of the data provided. however, The City of Newport Beach and Its employees and agents disclaim any and all responsibility from or relating to s any results obtained In its use. 0 40 80 '- Imagery: 2009 -2011 photos provided by Eagle Feel Imaging w.+.eagleaedal.com yn2nm 45 of 57 4 of 16 Page 51 of 63 r Newport Beach GIS OW.", r O c i 7) •°mgr io 1025 1029 1031 n, f iC7 1101 J I �TR7 4A•. ; 46 of 57 5 o 16 Page 52 of 63 _ t ;I r Disclaimer: Every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of the data provided, however, The City of Newport Beach and Its employees and agents disclaim any and all responsibility from or relating to any results obtained in its use 100 200 Imagery: 2009 -2011 photos provided by Eagle Feet Imaging www.eagleaedal.com 46 of 57 5 o 16 Page 52 of 63 Exhibit B ORDINANCE NO. 2013 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA AME N. . . DING SE I 17.35.0120(F I AND 17.60.060 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFERS OF TIDELANDS PERMITS AND TO REQUIRE COMMERCIAL TIDELANDS USERS TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY THE CITY OF:NEWPORT BEACH WHEREAS, %pursuant. to the 1978 Beaton Bay Bill,.as amended, ("Beacon Bay Bill") the 01 , ty of Newport Beach on.behalf of the State of Califomia as the trustee offidelands. located within the Cfty°s limits, including Newport Harbor; WHEREAS, Section 1(b) of the Beacon Bay Bill and T"itle. 17 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (''NBMG') allow the City to authorize third parties to use tidelands for commerci . al.and noncommercial purposes for a term notto exceed fifty (66) years; WHEREAS, the. City allows persons to operate and maintain commercial and noncommercial piers upon the tidelands under an annually; ssued permit or lease.; WHEREAS, a small number of piers encroach In front of adjacent abutting upland property not controlled/owned by f he permittee; WHEREAS, currently when 6 permit associated with a pier that encroaches in front of adjacent abutting uplands properl:y is transferred the new per.mittee is required to seek anew permit from the Harbor Commission; WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the NBMC to allow these types of permits to be transferred adminisiratively, when the transfer is between family members or entities controlled/owned by the.same person; and WHEREAS, the City desires to codify the indemnity obligation previously approved by the City Qouncil for commercial tidelands permits and leases. NOW THEREFORE., the City Council.of the City .of Newport Beach ordains as follows; 47of57 6 of 16 Page 53 of 63 Section 1. Subsection F(5) is added. to Subsection 17,35,020(F) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, to read as follows: 5, This subsection shall not apply to the .transfer of a permit between family members or between entities owned/controlled by the same $0 falling per n. Permits fallin tinder this. exception may be transferred administratively subject to approval by the City Manager or Harbor Resources Manager in accordance withSectiori 17.60-030(C)(4). Section 2: Subsection "F" is added to Section ITKOK of the Newport Beach Municipal Code to road as follows: F. All persons that receive a commercial permit or lease from the City to use public trust lands. shall as a condition Of receiving the commercial permit or lease defend and indemnify the City. Unless different , . language is provided within . a specific commercial permit or lease, the following indemnity language ;shall be included, in vubstantially the same f6rm,.withJn every commercial permit and 16ase: To the fullest extent. permitted by law, permittee/lessee shall Indemnify,, defend (with counsel approved by the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, volunteers and representatives from and against any and all claims, dernands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, Judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a ''Claim'' or collectively, "Claims'), which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to this permit/lease including, but not limited to, permittee's/lessee's occupancy and use, or permittee's/lessee's guests, invitees, sublessees,, or licensees occupancy and use, of the public trust lands, or improvements including, but not limited to, any use involving petroleum based products, hazardous materials, hazardous waste andlor other hazardous substances as defined by City, County, State or Federal laws and regulations. The pormittee'sliessee's obligations in this indemnity shall not extend to the degree any Claim is proximately caused by the &A 48 of 57 7 of 16 Page 54 of 63 sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, subject to . I any Immunities which may apply to the City with respect to such Claims. This indemnification provision and any other indemnification provided elsewhere in this permittlease shall survive the termination of this permit /lease and shall survive f h. or the entire time that any t ird . . party can make, a Claim. Section 3.: The recitals provided in this ordinance are true and correct and are incorporated into the substantive portion of this ordinance. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence,, clause or phrase of this ordinance 18, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity ity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby: declares that it Would have passed, this ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or mQi �-e sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional, Section 5: The City Council finds the approval of this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 1.6060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the C.EQA Guid6lines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Alternatively, the City Council finds the approval of this s ordinance is not a project under CE-QA Regulation Section 15061(b)(3) because it has no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Section 6, The Mayor shall slip and the City Clerk shall attest to the 'passage of this ordinance: The City C - lerk shall cause this ordinance, or 8 summary thereof, to be published pursuant to Charter Section.414. 3 49of57 8 of 16 Page 55 of 63 This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, held on the _ day of , 2013, and adopted on the day of 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEMBERS NOES, COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS KEITH CURRY, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE cr-�rl AARON C. HARP, CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: LEILANI I. BROWN, CITY CLERK 0 6 of 16 50 of 57 Page 56 of 63 Exhibit C ORDINANCE NO. 2013 AN ORDINANCE. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA REPEALING SUBSECTION 17,351026(F) AND AMENDING SECTION 17.601.060, OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE TO REQUIRE COMMERCIAL TIDELANDS USERS TO, DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. WHEREAS, pursuant to the 108 Beacon Bay 5111, as amended, ("Beacon Bay Bill") the City of Newport Beach acts 'on. of the State of California as the trustee of Odeltinds located within the City's.11m.its,.including Newport Harbor; WHEREAS, Section. 1(b) Of the beacon Bay $111 and title 17 of the Newport Beach Municipal. Code. ("N.BMC") allow the City to authorize third parties to use tidelands for c.ornmercl.al. and q6n.cornmercial purposes fora term not to exceed fifty (5 0) years; WHEREAS, the. City allows pers,ons. to operate and maintain commercial and noncommercial plers.. upon.the.tidelaftds under an:annu.blly Issued parmit or lease; WHEREAS; a small number of piers encroach in front of adjacent abutting uplan,d pVbpbrty not controlled/ownedby the permittee, WHEREAS., currently when a permit associated with :a pier that encroaches in front of adjacent abutting upland. s property is transferred the new pormittee is required to seek a rh the Harbor Cornrnis.6iom new permit from WHEREAS, the City desires to repeal NBMC Subsection 117.35.020(17) to allow these types of permits to be transferred administratively, similar to the transfer of other tidelahc1spermits; and WHEREAS, the City desires to codify the indemni - ty obligation previously approved by the City Council for commercial tidelands: permits and leases. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach ordains as follows: Section 1: Subsection 17.35.020(F) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety, 51 of 57 10 of 16 Page 57 of 63 section 2: Subsection, "F is added to Section 17.60.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code to read as follows'; F. All persons that receive a commercial permit or loose from the City to use public trust lands shall as a condition of receiving the commercial permit or lease defend and indemnify the City. Unless different language is provided Within 1 specific commercial Perm!' or lease, the following Indemnity language shall. be included, in substantially the same. form, within every, commercial permit and lease; To the fullest extent permitted by law, p.ermittee/lessQe shall indemnify, defend (with h counsel approved by the C - ity, which approval shall not be unreasonably Withheld) and hold .harmless the City, its elected. officials, officers, em.01 . oyees, agents; attorneys, Volunteers and representatives frorri. and ,against any and all clairrig,.demands, obligations, ons, deanaQes, actions, causes of action, suits,. losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses of every kind and nature Whatsoever (individually, a "Claim" or collectively; which. May arise from, or in on . y manner relate (directly or indirectly) to this. his. permittlease including, but not limited, to, permittee's/lesspe's: occupancy and use, Or 0. ermitteo'sliessee's guests, Invitees, sublessees, or licensees occupancy and use, of the public trust lands, or improvements. includingi but not:11mited to, any use Involving petroleum based products, hazardous materials, hazardous waste and/or other hazardous substances as defined by City, County, State or Federal laws and. regulations. The permittee's/lossee's obligations in this indemnity shall not extend, to the degree any Claim is proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, subject to any Immunities which may apply to the City with respect to such Claims. This Indemnification provision and any other indemnification provided elsewhere in this permit/lease shall survive the termination of this permit/lease and shall survive for the entire time that any third party pan make a Claim. 2 52 of 57 11 of 16 Page 58 of 63 Section 3: The recitals provided in this ordinance are true and correct and are incorporated into the substantive:portion of this ordinance: Section 4; If any section, Subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be. invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall Pot affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase. hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional. Section 5: 'the City Council finds the approval of this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (''CEQA ") pursuant to Sections 15060(c.)(2) (the activity will not result in .a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment} :and 150.60(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 1537$) of the -CEQA GQidelines, California Code of Regulatio €is, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Alternatively, the .City Council finds the approval of this ordinance is not a project Linder CEQA Regulation Section 15061(b)(3) because it has no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment: Sectian.6: The-Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance, or a summary thereof, to be published pursuant to Charter Section.414,. 53 of 57 i M. M[.� Page 59 of 63 This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, held on the _ day of , 2013, and adopted on the _ day of 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEMBERS NOES, COUNCILMEMBERS, ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS KEITH CURRY, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: THE CITY OFFICE AARON C. HARP, CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: LEILANI I. BROWN, CITY CLERK 0 130116 54 of 57 Page 60 of 63 Exhibit D Redline Versions of Amended NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) and 17.60.060 Amendment of NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) Allowing Infra- Family Transfers F. Encroaching Piers and Floats. In areas where existing piers and floats encroach in front of abutting upland property owned by others, a new permit approved by the Harbor Commission shall be required upon: 1. Any change in type of existing use of the piers and floats; 2. Any change in type of existing use of the abutting upland property owned by the permittee; 3. Any change of existing ownership of the abutting upland property owned by the permittee or upon the death of the permittee; 4. Any destruction of the pier and float in which over sixty (60) percent of the replacement value of the pier and float has been destroyed. 5. This subsection shall not apply to the transfer of a permit between family members or between entities owned /controlled by the same person. Permits falling under this exception may be transferred administratively subject to approval by the City Manager or Harbor Resources Manager in accordance with Section 17.60.030(C)(4). Before the Harbor Commission acts on the new permit, the owner of the abutting upland property, in front of which the harbor facility encroaches, shall be notified in writing of the meeting in which the new permit will be considered. Repeal of NBMC Section 17.35.020(F) 55 of 57 14 of 16 Page 61 of 63 2. Any -Ghangean - type- oVexisting ase- of,-tbe- ab4tting -upland-propert"wRed -try the permiltee 3. Any..change ef- existing- ewaersh0 -of - the- abuit+n"piar"roperty -owned by the permittee-Gr4 pen the d - Gf_tge -Permi teei 4 - Any - dcetFRstien- ef-the4erand-- fleat4F�-whish- ever- siMy--(6o}- percent -ef44e repiasernent vatue ef- the - pier- and-iloat-has-been destfeyed. Befsre the -Harbor- GGmrPj&sion asfs- er+the new permlf- t#e$wn�he-at)Wtting- upland prepert in front -of %AONsh- the - harbor- facility ensreashes -s#att be- notified in- writ+ng-ef the - meeting-in -whi&- the - new- penmitwill be rensidered. Amendment of NBMC Section 17.60.060 to Clarify Indemnity Obligations 17.60.060 Public Trust Lands. The following restrictions shall apply to public trust lands under either a permit or a lease: A. Leases /Permits. In the event public trust lands are used by an entity other than the City, then that entity shall enter into a lease or permit with the City. Such leases shall provide lessees with a leasehold interest in the property for a period of at least five years, not to exceed a period of time as limited by the City Charter or applicable State law. Such permits shall provide permittees with an interest in the property for a period of twelve (12) months or less. B. Land Use. Leases and permits shall be for uses consistent with the public trust and Section 17.05.080. Preference shall be given to coastal- dependent uses. C. Public Access. Public access shall be provided in a manner consistent with applicable law. D. Revenue. Rent under this section shall be based upon fair market value, as determined by the City Council. Such determination shall be based, in part, upon the findings of a City - selected appraiser. 56 of 57 15 of 16 Page 62 of 63 E. Commercial uses provided under this Title 17 are exempt from any provision requiring involvement of the owner or long -term lessee of an abutting upland property. F. All persons that receive a commercial permit or lease from the City to use public trust lands shall as a condition of receiving the commercial permit or lease defend and indemnify the City. Unless different language is provided within a specific commercial permit or lease, the following indemnity language shall be included, in substantially the same form, within every commercial permit and lease: To the fullest extent permitted by law, permitteellessee shall indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, volunteers and representatives from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a "Claim" or collectively, "Claims'), which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to this permit/lease including, but not limited to, permittee's /lessee's occupancy and use, or permittee's /lessee's quests, invitees, sublessees, or licensees occupancy and use, of the public trust lands, or improvements including but not limited to, any use involving petroleum based products, hazardous materials, hazardous waste and /or other hazardous substances as defined by City County, State or Federal laws and regulations. The permittee's /lessee's obligations in apply to the City with respect to such Claims. This indemnification provision and anv other indemnification provided elsewhere in this permit/lease shall survive the termination of this permit/lease and shall survive for the entire time that any third party can make a Claim. 57 of 57 16 of 16 Page 63 of 63