HomeMy WebLinkAbout14 - BSCC FundsokaEWPOR@ CITY OF
i NEWPORT BEACH
Cq<fF00.H`P City Council Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 14
October 22, 2013
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Police Department
Jay R. Johnson, Chief of Police
949- 644- 3701,JJohnson @nbpd.org
PREPARED BY: Dale Johnson, Captain
949 -644 -3750, DJohnson @nbpd.org
APPROVED: �hb� 01
TITLE: Acceptance of Funds From the California Board of State and
Community Corrections
ABSTRACT:
The Police Department seeks to gain City Council approval to accept Local Assistance
law enforcement funds from the California Board of State and Community Corrections,
so that the City can receive approximately $47,042.65 in state funds and allocate these
funds where needed.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve Budget Amendment No. 14BA -017 to accept $47,042.65 from the
California Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) and deposit
into Revenue Account No. 1820 -486F for the Police Department.
2. Appropriate $20,000 to the Advertising Account No. 1810 -8010; and
appropriate the remaining $27,042.65 to the Patrol Overtime, Safety
Account No. 1830 -7041.
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
The Budget Amendment appropriates $47,042.65 in increased expenditure
appropriations for Fiscal Year 2013 -2014. The revenue was posted to Account #1820 -
486F for the Police Department. The expenditure will be appropriated to the Office of
the Chief of Police Marketing Account No. 1810 -8010; and to the Patrol Overtime Safety
Account #1830-7041.
Acceptance of Funds from the California Board of State and Community Corrections
October 22, 2013
Page 2
DISCUSSION:
Background:
Legislation associated with the California 2011 Budget Act established the BSCC as an
independent entity, effective July 1, 2012. The BSCC assumed the previous functions
of the Corrections Standards Authority, as well as other public safety programs
previously administered by the California Emergency Management Agency.
Due to the steady erosion of funding for city police agencies over the last several years,
local communities have experienced significant public safety impacts. To help mitigate
these reductions, funds were appropriated to create a new grant program for city police
departments. This funding recognizes the need for city law enforcement to be able to
provide front -.line services based upon their own regional needs.
Analysis:
As part of the 2012 Budget Act, $24 million for Local Assistance was appropriated for
city police departments, with the allocation formula to be developed by the BSCC in
consultation with the Department of Finance. The California Police Chiefs Association,
on behalf of local law enforcement agencies, presented to the BSCC an allocation
formula based upon regional needs in each county. The BSCC recognized the
importance of local agencies being able to best identify their own needs with regards to
the Use of resources and approved the formula.
Orange County agencies were allocated a total of approximately $1.43 million for 2012,
and the City of Garden Grove was identified as the fiduciary agent for Orange County
regarding this funding. Per the collective decision of county law enforcement
executives, the City of Garden Grove distributed funds to each agency based upon
population. This method determined the 2012 allocation to the Newport Beach Police
Department to be $41,048.20.
In 2013, Orange County agencies were allocated a total of approximately $1.64 million
and the City of Garden Grove was again identified as the fiduciary agent for Orange
County regarding this funding. Per the collective decision of county law enforcement
executives, the City of Garden Grove distributed a 2013 allocation of $47,042.65 to the
Newport Beach Police Department.
The Newport Beach Police Department will utilize these funds to mitigate the impacts of
AB 109 and Proposition 36.
4
Acceptance of Funds from the California Board of State and Community Corrections
October 22, 2013
Page 3
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will
not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378)
of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it
has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or
indirectly.
NOTICING:
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of
the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).
Submitted by:
Attachments: A. Local Law Enforcement PCS Funding Distribution
B. Budget Amendment
BSCC Local Assistance Funding
Orange County Distribution
FY 2013 -14
City /CDP` Population" Population % - Distribution
Anaheim
336,265
11.29%
185,697.12
Brea
39,282
1.32%
21,692.87
Buena Park
80,530
2.70%
44,471.44
Costa Mesa
109,960
3.69%
60,723.70
Cypress
47,802
1.61%
26,397.91
Fountain Valley
55,313
1.86%
30,545.75
Fullerton
135,161
4.54%
74,640.56
Huntington Beach
189,992
6.38%
104,920.13
Irvine
212,375
7.13%
117;280.80
La Habra
60,239
2.02 %a
33,266.05
La Palma
15,568
0.52%
8,597.19
Laguna Beach
22,723
0.76%
12,548.42
Los Alamitos
11,449
0.38%
6,322.53
-New oft Beach
85,186
2.86%
47 042.65
Aliso Viejo
47,823
1.61%
'26,409.51
Coto de Caza
14,866
0:50%
8,209.52
Dana Point
33,351
1.12%
18,417.57
Ladera Ranch
22,980
0.77%
12,690.35
Laguna Hills
30,344
1.02%
16,757.00
Laguna Niguel
62,979
-2.12%
34,779.17
Laguna Woods
16,192
0.54%
8,941.78
Lake Forest
77,264
2.59%
42,667.84
Las Flores
5,971
0.20%
3,297.39
Midway City
8,485
0.28%
4,685.71
Mission Viejo
93,305
3.13%
51,526.24
North Tustin
24,917
0.84 %
13,760.03
Rancho Santa Margarita
47,853
1.61%
26,426,08
Rossmoor
10,244
0.34%
5,657.09
San Clemente
63,522
2.13%
35,079.04
San Juan Capistrano
34,593
1.16%
19,103.45
Stanton
38,186
1.28%
21,087.63
Sun "set Beach
971
0.03%
536.22
Villa Park
5,812
0.20%
3,209,59
Placentia
50,533
1.70%
27,906.06
Santa Ana
324,528
10.90%
179,215.55
Seal Beach
24,168
0.81%
13,346.40
Tustin
75,540
2.54%
41,715.79
Westminster
89,701
3.01%
49,535.98
Garden Grove
170,883
5.74%
94,367.48
Total
2,977,506.00
100.00%
1,644,281.44
FY13 -14 Allocation 1,646,178.00
Less Administrative Costs 1,896.56
FY13.14 Distribution 1,644,281.44
Incorporated City of Census Designated Place (CDP)
•' Based on California Department of Finance Census Data 2010
)CSD total:
388,713.42
Questions? Please contact:
Courtney Allison I Police Fiscal Analyst
Garden Grove Police Department
7141741 -5819 1 courta @ci.garden- grove.ca.us
City of Newport Beach
BUDGET AMENDMENT
2013 -14
EFFECT ON BUDGETARY FUND BALANCE:
X Increase Revenue Estimates
X Increase Expenditure Appropriations AND
Transfer Budget Appropriations NX
SOURCE:
from existing budget appropriations
X from additional estimated revenues
from unappropriated fund balance
EXPLANATION:
This budget amendment is requested to provide for the following:
NO. BA- 14BA -017
AMOUNT: $a7,oazss
Increase in Budgetary Fund Balance
Decrease in Budgetary Fund Balance
No effect on Budgetary Fund Balance
To increase revenue estimates and expenditure appropriations to accept Local Assistance Funding from the California
Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC). Funds will be used for front -line law enforcement services and marketing.
ACCOUNTING ENTRY:
BUDGETARYFUND BALANCE
Fund Account
Amount
Description Debit Credit
REVENUE ESTIMATES (3601)
Fund /Division Account Description
1820 486F PD Support Services - BSCC Local Law Enfrce Fund $47,042.65
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATIONS (3603)
Division
Number
Account
Description
Division
Number
1830
PD Patrol
Account
Number
7041
Overtime, Safety & 1/2 Time $27,042.65
Division
Number
1810
Police Chief
Account
Number
8010
Advert & Pub Relations $20,000.00
Division
Number
Account
Number
Division
Number
Account
Number
Division
Number
Account
Number
Division
Number
Account
Number
Division Number
Account Number
Signed:
°dr 10-16 -1-3
Fin cial Approval: Finance Director Date
Signed: — -i,L - I D
Administrative Approval .: City Manager Date
Signed:
City Council Approval: City Clerk Date
6