HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/14/2014 - Regular MeetingCity Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
January 14, 2024 — 7:00 P.M
I. STUDY SESSION - 5:00 p.m.
II. CONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. FOR REGULAR MEETING
III. ROLL CALL
Present: Council Member Gardner, Council Member Petros, Mayor Pro Tern Selich, Mayor Hill,
Council Member Curry, Council Member Henn, Council Member Daigle
IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Pro Tern Selich
V. INVOCATION - Council Member Curry
VI. PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Cultural Arts Grant Checks
City Manager Riff introduced new Library Services Director Tim Hetherton and deferred to
him for a presentation.
Library Services Director Hetherton thanked Council for its continued promotion and support
of arts within the City and stated that this year's list of grantees will provide quality
programming for residents and the community at large. He introduced and deferred to the
Chair of the Arts Commission, Rita Goldberg.
Rita Goldberg, Chair of the Arts Commission, addressed the disbursement of funds that have
been allocated to worthy arts entities that share the City's vision of providing quality arts
programming for the benefit of residents of Newport Beach. She noted that the Arts
Commission is charged with enhancing and supporting the arts and providing cultural
programming and thanked Council for its support and Arts Commissioner Arlene Greer who
spearheaded this year's granting process. Grant recipients included Baroque Music Festival,
ExplorOcean, Festival Ballet Theater, Newport Film Festival, Seaside Musical Theater, South
Coast Repertory Theater and Southland Opera.
Mayor Hill congratulated Library Services Director Hetherton on his appointment
Presentation by City Arts Commissioner Robert Smith
Arts Commissioner Robert Smith announced that a Request for Proposal (RFP) soliciting
sculptors who may be interested in loaning art to the City for installation in the Civic Center
Park was posted online. He reported that Arts Orange County is managing the program and
Volume 617 Page 405
City of Newport Beach
City Council Regular Meeting
January 1.4, 2014
that the installation will be between August 2014 and summer of 2016. Ten (10) sculptures
are being sought with three (3) or four (4) alternatives. He addressed the Subcommittee and
its members noting that it was formed to make the initial selection which will occur on March
28th. The matter will be presented to the Arts Commission on April 17th and to Council in
the beginning of May. He encouraged anyone who knows of artists that may be interested, to
visit www,caUforentry.org. He added that the goal is to hold an inaugural event in September
2014.
In response to an inquiry by Council Member Gardner, Mr. Smith stated that the application
provides the necessary information including installation costs, honorariums available, artist
responsibilities, the City's responsibility and Peter Walker's Master Plan for Sculptures.
VII. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
VIIL CITY COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS OR MATTERS WHICH COUNCIL MEMBERS
WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA (NON - DISCUSSION ITEM)
Council Member Daigle reported attending one of the gatherings held by the City on selecting a
trash cart where three sizes of carts were displayed. She reported that the new carts have wheels
and that the City has sent each resident a letter with a code that can be used for online registrations
and added there is also a postcard by which residents can submit their orders. She reported that the
deadline is January 20, 2014 to ensure that residents obtain the cart of their choice and noted that
the City is ahead of schedule compared to other communities. Carts will begin to be delivered the
end of March through early May and noted that the service does not apply to areas that have
existing contracts. She urged residents to contact the City Manager's office with questions or
concerns.
Additionally, Council Member Daigle reported that Fletcher Jones Mercedes has been the number 1
Mercedes dealership in the country, for the fifteenth straight year and they have been a steady
producer for the City in terms of sales tax revenue. She listed improvements that have taken place
around the area and reported that Lower Big Canyon is an area that needs a make -over. She
reported that the Irvine Ranch Conservancy has a lot of resources and creativity and is holding a
stewardship opportunity on Saturday, January 18, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. where residents can help pull
invasive plants.
Council Member Curry commented on Proposition 13 and its protections and reported receiving an
email from City Councils United for Change, a front group for evolvecahfornia.org, a Bay Area
organization, seeking to implement a split roll whereby they would change the Proposition 13
formula as it relates to commercial property. He stated that this would have a disastrous effect on
the California economy raising property taxes on commercial properties that would result in higher
rents and prices for everyone, increased store vacancies and a significant loss of jobs. He proposed
adding for Council's consideration at its next meeting, a resolution in. opposition to changing
Proposition 13.
Additionally, Council Member Curry reported that Mayor Chuck Reed, from the City of San Jose,
has proposed a measure to change the way in which pensions can be negotiated. The measure would
allow the City to enter into negotiation with its bargaining units to stop the accrual of benefits in a
certain plan and introduce a different tier adding that this would enable the City to achieve savings
for existing employees. He asked bringing the matter for Council discussion in order to take a
position on the measure.
Council Member Gardner asked if Council Member Curry is suggesting waiving Council's usual
method of asking the City Manager to bring back an item to determine if Council would like to talk
about it. Council Member Curry stated that could be done as well.
Volume 6 1. - Page 406
City of Newport Beach
City Council Regular Meeting
January 14, 2014
Council Member Gardner stated she would love if staff eliminated "kind of from their vocabulary to
which City Manager Kiff requested specifics. Council Member Gardner provided an example and
the need for increased specificity.
Council Member Petros reported he attended a meeting on December 11, 2013 regarding the
proposals of the Newport Mesa Unified School District to construct facilities around the Corona del
Mar High School Track (Stadium). He reported that the meeting was well - attended and that the
proposals are not those of the City but rather of the District. He encouraged residents who have
concerns regarding the matter, to contact the District. He noted that the City is also following these
matters and that he will be following it up from the dais and if residents have concerns that they
would like Council to address, he urged them to contact him with same.
Mayor Pro Tern Selich reported that the Land Use Element Amendment Committee (LUEAQ met
on January 7, 2014 and finished its policies review except for a few minor items. The next meeting
will be on February 2, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. in the Friends Room where the Committee will be looking at
the preliminary results of the traffic study and discuss the few remaining policies. He added that
January 15, 2014 at 12:30 p.m. in the Newport Coast Room, the General Plan/Local Coastal Plan
Implementation Committee will meet and will be getting an update on coordination efforts with the
Coastal Commission and discussing Coastal Canyon overlays.
In addition, Mayor Pro Tern Selich requested that staff bring back for Council, consideration at the
first meeting in February, the issue of reducing speed limits on Tustin Avenue between 21st and
23rd Streets. He was approached by area resident representatives and was presented with
information that the full Council should hear.
Mayor Hill reported that he and his wife attended a presentation by ExplorOcean on the Titanic and
commented positively on the presentation and event. Additionally, he announced the Annual OASIS
Open House on January 15, 2014 and encouraged residents to attend as well as Newport Restaurant
Week which will be celebrated January 17th through January 26th. Regarding the latter, he
reported that the MyNB phone app has a direct link with additional information. Mayor Hill
encouraged residents to order their new trash carts by January 20, 2014 adding that they are free.
In response to Council Member Henn's inquiry, City Manager Kiff announced that Council will be
holding its Strategic Planning /Priorities meeting on Saturday, January 25, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. in the
Community Room and that formal notice will be provided.
Council Member Henn noted this is an important opportunity for Newport Beach citizens to
participate in the priority - setting process in which Council engages and encouraged residents to
attend.
IX. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR
Christopher Hanna, Boy Scout Troop 741, thanked the City and Michelle Clemente from the Marine
Education Department and the ACORN Group, for helping him complete his Eagle project and
provided a brief description of same.
X. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. READING OF MINUTES AND ORDINANCES
i. MINUTES FOR THE DECEMBER 10, 2013 REGULAR MEETING. [100 -20141
Volume 61- Page 407
City of Newport Beach
City Council Regular Meeting
January 14, 2014
Waive reading of subject minutes, approve as amended, and order filed.
2. READING OF ORDINANCES. Waive reading in full of all ordinances under
consideration, and direct City Clerk to read by title only.
B. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION
3. MIRAMAR DRIVE CODE AMENDMENT (PA2013 -211) - 2022, 2026, 2032, 2034,
2038, AND 2042 MIRAMAR DRIVE. 1100 -20141 Conduct second reading and adopt
Ordinance No. 2013.29, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach
Adopting7.oning Code Amendment No. CA2013 -006 to Change the Rear Alley Setback
From 6 Feet to 0 Feet for Six Properties on Miramar Drive (PA2013 -211), 1) finding that
the amendment is categorically exempt under Section 15305 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 5 (Minor Alterations in Land
Use Limitations) and 2) approving Code Amendment No, CA2013 -006.
C. RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION
4. RESOLUTION UPDATING THE LIST OF DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES FOR
2014 UNDER THE CITY S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE. [100 -20141 Adopt
Resolution No. 2014.1, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach,
California, Adopting an Updated Designated Employees List for 2014.
D. CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS
6. BAY AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITA ".LION - NOTICE OF COMPLETION
AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT NO. 4840 (CAP12- 0003). [381100 -20041 a)
Accept the completed work and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion
for the project; b) authorize the City Clerk to release the Labor and Materials Bond 65
days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded in accordance with applicable
portions of the Civil Code; and c) release the Faithful Performance Bond one year after
acceptance by the City Council. Council Member Henn recused himself from this
item since he lives within 500 -feet from the subject property.
REQUEST TO INSTALI. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PUBLIC
RIGHT -OF -WAY AT ISLAND AVENUE BAY AND EDGEWATER AVENUE (C-
5706). [381100 -20141 a) Waive City Council Policy L -7, Encroachments and Bay
Access on Buena Vista Boulevard - Edgewater Avenue between Bay Avenue and
Fernando, to allow private gates, walls, landscaping and signage within the proposed
bridge entry /portal; b) waive City Council Policy L -8, Private Encroachments in the
Public Right -of -Way Ending at the Ocean Front or at Newport Bay, to allow the
proposed bridge entry /portal at a height of 10 feet, 8 inches tall and low walls to
encroach up to 32 feet into the public right -of -way; and c) direct staff to prepare an
Encroachment Agreement with Owners for the proposed private improvements within
the Edgewater Avenue right -of -way, and authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to
execute the Encroachment Agreement.
8. REQUEST TO RETAIN EXISTING PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE
PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY AT 3400 OCEAN BOULEVARD (C- 5707). [381100-
2014] a) Waive City Council Policy L -6, Private Encroachments in the Public Rights -of-
Volume 61 - Page 408
City of Newport Beach
City Council Regular Meeting
January 14, 2014
Way, to allow block walls, railings and entry stairway taller than 3 feet in height
within the Marigold Avenue public right -of -way; and b) direct staff to prepare an
Encroachment Agreement with property owners for the existing private improvements,
and authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the Encroachment
Agreement.
9. MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE GIRL
SCOUT LEADERSHIP CENTER WITHIN MARINA PARK (C- 1955). [381100-
20141 a) Approve the Memorandum of Agreement for Construction of the Girl Scout
Leadership Center within Marina Park by and between the City of Newport Beach and
the Girl Scouts of Orange County (GSOC) defining each party's role for construction of
the new GSOC facility; and b) direct the Mayor to execute the Memorandum of
Agreement and delegate authority to the City Manager to execute all documents
necessary to implement the terms of the Agreement to complete the Girl Scout
Leadership Center facility within the City's Marina Park.
10. GEOTECHNICAL AND WATER QUALITY PLAN REVIEW - APPROVAL OF
AMENDMENT NO. 1 OF THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH BAGAHI ENGINEERING (C- 5526).' [381100 -20141 Approve Amendment No.
1 of the Professional Services Agreement with Bagahi Engineering for contract
professional services for an amount not to exceed $720,000. Continued from the
December 10, 2013 City Council meeting.
E. MISCELLANEOUS
11. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AND ACTION REPORT FOR
DECEMBER 19, 2013. 1100 -20141 Receive and file.
12. APPOINTMENTS BY THE MAYOR TO COUNCIL COMMITTEES, CITY
COUNCIL/CITIZENS AD HOC COMMITTEES, JOINT GOVERNMENTAL
COMMITTEES, AND CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEES. [100 -20141
Confirm the appointments outlined in the staff report.
13. APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER TO THE CORONA DEL MAR BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (BID) ADVISORY BOARD. [100 -20141 Appoint Ms.
Jessica Prause, representing The Port Theater, to the .BID's Advisory Board for Fiscal
Year 2013 -2014.
Motion by Mayor Pro Tern Selich seconded by Council Member Curry to approve the
Consent Calendar, except for the item removed (Item 5); and noting Council Member Henn's recusal
on Item 6 since he lives within 500' of the subject property.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Gardner, Council Member Petros, Mayor Pro Tom Selich, Mayor Hill, Council
Member Curry, Council Member Henn, Council Member Daigle
XI. ITEM REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
5. CORONA DEL MAR POCKET PARK - ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION
Volume 61 - Page 409
City of Newport Beach
City Council Regular Meeting
January 14, 2014
DELEGATING AUTHORI'T'Y TO THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL
DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO ACCEPT REAL PROPERTY (CAP14 -0026) (C- 5612).
1381100 -20141
Council Member Daigle pointed out the need for a legal description of the property in the
Resolution.
City Attorney Aaron Harp reported that there is a legal description for that property that can
be incorporated into the Resolution and suggested including that as part of the motion.
Motion by Council Member Daigle, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Selich to adopt
Resolution No. 2014 -2, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach
Delegating Authority to the City Manager to E.wcute All Documents and Agreements Related to
the Acceptance of Real Property for the Corona del Mar Pocket Park Project, with the inclusion
of the legal description.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Gardner, Council Member Petros, Mayor Pro Tem Selich, Mayor Hill,
Council Member Curry, Council Member Henn, Council Member Daigle
XII. PUBLIC COMMENTS
George Schroeder reported that he serves on the Board of Directors for Speak Up Newport and
announced their 33rd Annual Mayor's Dinner on February 7, 2014. He stated that the event is at
capacity and encouraged anyone who has received an invitation but has not yet responded to visit
their website or send an email.
Jim Mosher commented on the retention of audio recordings of public meetings. fie noted the ease
of storing recordings and stated they are not only the best and most- accurate record, but provides an
opportunity for those to listen at their leisure, He stated that until recently, the City had been
posting finks to meetings on its website, but that in late November the links had disappeared. He
added that he was told that the City has instituted a new Policy whereby no links to any meeting
recordings other than those of the full Council would ever be posted and that recordings of all
meetings other than those of Council and the Planning Commission would be destroyed as soon as
the minutes of the meeting had been approved. He opined this is a terrible Policy from the public's
perspective and asked that the matter be placed on a future agenda for discussion.
City Attorney Harp reported that the City Clerk has been working on the City's Records Retention
Policy to do a comprehensive update and the matter will be brought before Council by the beginning
of March which would be a good time to review the retention schedule and how the City provides
access of records to the public. He reported that all City Policies are consistent with legal
requirements.
XIH. ORAL REPORTS FROM CITY COUNCIL ON COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES
Council Member Daigle stated that she serves on the Airport Land Use Commission and that this
Thursday they will discuss the Back Bay Landing and structure heights. She stated she does not
anticipate any objections from the Commission. Additionally, she referenced the school stadium
project and noted that the money for the project originated from State Redevelopment money ($1.5
million). She stated that Newport Beach does not have a redevelopment agency but will be getting
half of that money.
Volume 61 - Page 410
City of Newport Beach
City Council Regular Meeting
January 14, 2014
Council Member Henn reported that the Balboa Village Advisory Committee (BVAC) met on
December 11, 2013 where it finished the last portion of the work plan for the year and on January 8,
2014 where it finalized the overall recommendations for the year for Balboa Village including a
comprehensive set of recommendations for revitalization. These will move forward in a public
outreach process and will have a CEQA review and be presented to the Planning Commission and
Council for review and adoption later this year.
Council Member Henn stated that the Tidelands Management Committee met on December 18,
2013 and noted that the Tidelands Capital Plan will be regularly reviewed including updates and
changes to the plan which includes $20 -$30 million in spending for the benefit of the Harbor.
Additionally, the Committee reviewed the Harbor Commission's agenda and action items and
discussed the Harbor Commission's report on public piers in the Harbor and staff was asked to move
the process forward for Council consideration. Discussion also ensued regarding derelict vessels in
the Harbor and staff was asked to return with specific recommendations to address the issue. The
Committee also discussed the proposed Coastal Commission policy regarding sea -level rise.
Council Member Gardner reported that, at the Water Quality /Coastal Tidelands Committee
meeting, Wanda Cross from Regional Water Quality Control Board spoke regarding natural source
exclusion. She provided a brief description of the matter and addressed potential necessary
changes.
XIV. PUBLIC HEARING
14. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES ORDINANCE - CODE
AMENDMENT NO. CA2012 -004 (PA2012 -057). [100 -20141
Council Member Daigle recused herself from this item since she works in the industry
and has an economic conflict.
Community Development Director Brandt introduced the item, presented a brief background
and deferred to staff for a report.
Principal Planner Campbell presented the background including adoption of the existing
Ordinance, development of a comprehensive revision and extensive review by the Planning
Commission. He addressed highlights of the Ordinance, facility classifications, permit
requirements, review authority and the need for public hearings for each classification. He
reported the receipt of correspondence noting there is nothing significant in the
correspondence that would require changes and presented recommendations as stated in the
staff report.
In response to Mayor Hill's inquiry regarding the process for a new, free - standing structure
that has a stealth system, Principal Planner Campbell indicated that would be considered a
new, free- standing structure and would require Planning Commission review.
Council Member Gardner referenced a letter from -Paul O'Bovle relative to smaller cell sites
and requested the rationale for denying the issue. Principal Planner Campbell reported that
the matter was considered, that there is no definition for small cellular versus macro facilities
and that by establishing a special review process for smaller sites would provide a competitive
advantage for that type of technology, He stated that the City cannot make an Ordinance that
provides preferential treatment for one technology over the other.
Assistant City Attorney Mulvihill added that there was no defined size and without being able
to codify that, the concern was that as these applications come through, depending on the
Volume 61 - Page 411
City of Newport Beach
City Council Regular Meeting
January 14, 2414
design, it may be small enough and fit into a more- preferred priority. It is not known what is
being proposed until the application is reviewed and to define size in the Code would be
difficult, if not impossible at this time.
Council Member Henn noted that the decision is made at various levels and asked regarding
the appeal procedures for decisions in the three levels of approval.
Principal Planner Campbell reported that the decision of the Director can be appealed to the
Planning Commission and there is a fourteen -day time period in which to file the appeal. The
Planning Commission's decision cap subsequently be appealed to Council within the fourteen -
day appeal period. He noted that once Council makes its decision, if an applicant wants to
appeal, it would be through the courts.
Council Member Henn stated this is generally, a good improvement to the Ordinance.
Council Member Gardner inquired regarding the residential aspect of the Ordinance noting
they are not allowed on single - family residences asking whether it would make a difference if
the sites were small enough.
Principal Planner Campbell reported that discussion regarding access to residential areas was
discussed substantially by the Planning Commission. He added that the industry would fake
to have access to all zones and noted that this Ordinance addresses existing locations within
the current Ordinance and no new areas are being opened as staff feels there is adequate
access to residential areas within the public rigbt -of -way.
Additionally, Principal Planner Campbell indicated that one of the objectives of the ordinance
was to provide additional public notice for these facilities. He noted some scrivener's errors in
the Ordinance that will be fixed.
Mayor Hill opened the public hearing.
George Schroeder stated this is a good Ordinance and hoped Council would approve it. He
reported that most people he knows use cell phones as their primary telephone. He added
there are places on the Peninsula where his service drops and stressed that cell phones are a
public- safety issue. He urged the installation of cell towers in non - intrusive ways.
Paul O'Boyle commented on small -cell technology and noted that the Ordinance does not
address this. He commented on the process and recommended that the City define the size of
box it wants and wireless carriers will follow it. He stated that they have been defined in
other jurisdictions and commented on aesthetics.
Carver Chin, Crown Castle, addressed small -cell technology solutions and stated the industry
would like to see the Ordinance embrace and encourage small-cell solutions. He provided a
PowerPoint presentation comparing standard installations with small -cell installations and
addressed differences in the scale of development for each.
Dean Brown, California Wireless Association, noted that wireless networks are currently
adapting to capacity demands due to an 1800% increase in traffic over the last four (4) years
and substantial projected increases over the next five (5) years. He stated that the first
section of the Ordinance should acknowledge the important role that wireless infrastructure
plays in the community related to the economy, job creation, productivity and public safety
and that it is a utility and should be permitted under similar requirements as electricity and
gas. Be reported that additional sites are needed, especially in high- traffic areas and at peak
Volume 61 - Page 412
City of Newport Beach
City Council Regular Meeting
January 14, 2014
hours and addressed the need for small -cells for capacity reasons. He commented on the
screening standards and noted making comments in recent correspondence. He addressed
undergrounding and noted the City's high water tables and a requirement to vent
underground vaults.
Jim Mosher commended staff for its work on this process and for not caving in to the demands
of the wireless industry. He pointed, out that the process is still imperfect because there is a
class subject to zoning clearance and although there is an appeal period, the appellant would
not know of the decision within the time period to submit an appeal. Additionally, he
addressed requirements for submitting view simulations by the applicant and denying an
application based on impacts in the existing Ordinance but stated that language is vague in
the Ordinance being presented. lie stated that one of the major complaints has been
regarding notice to the public and felt that it is still not early enough within the proposed
Ordinance.
Hearing no further testimony, Mayor Hill closed the public hearing.
Responding to Council Member Gardner's inquiry on the classification for the photos shown in
Mr. Chiu's presentation, Principal Planner Campbell stated that they were correctly described
in the presentation as a Class 2 or 3 facility noting that it depends on whether they are in the
public right -of -way or not. He reported that typically, an applicant will meet with staff to
discuss a proposal to be installed at a specific location, the applicant will submit an
application and depending on the class, will go before the appropriate review authority. He
added, that there are very stringent timing constraints and that staff provides the analysis
and reports to the review authority, public hearing notices will go out and a public hearing
will be conducted and a decision made. He stated that staff will look for ways to screen the
antennas and that the process will not take additional time based on the class.
Assistant City Attorney Mulvihill added that the process is not complicated but that what is
being introduced is a public hearing process which is the concern of the industry. She added
that through this Ordinance, the industry is encouraged to design facilities that are small.
Staff's recommendation is to have the public hearing process.
In response to Mayor Hill's stating that the Zoning Administrator and Planning Commission
paths are significantly different, Principal Planner Campbell reported that the timeline is
similar but the cost is not. He added that cost has not been a significant factor according to
his experience.
Council Member Petros addressed appeals and views and noted that the distinction is not the
size of the device but rather placement in the public right -of -way. Ile stated that there may
be a need to review the issue and provide some regulation over access, maintenance, liability
and insurance. He indicated that as far as driving the industry, the government is usually
bad at choosing sides and that what the City wants is to provide the broadest avenue so that
the consumer is the ultimate arbiter of the choice. He indicated that this is a fair amendment
which keeps the existing safeguards.
Motion by Council Member Petros, seconded by Council Member Gardner to
introduce Ordinance No. 2014.1, An. Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Newport
Beach Repealing Chapter 15.70 of the Municipal Code and Adopting Zoning Code Amendment
No. C42012 -004 Related to the Regulation of Wireless Telecommunications Pacilities (PA2012-
059), 1) finding that the amendment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15061(b) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines and 2) approving Code
Amendment No. CA2012.004, and pass to second reading on January 28, 2014.
Volume 61 - Page 413
City of Newport Beach
City Council Regular Meeting
January 1.4, 2014
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Gardner, Council Member Petros, Mayor Pro Tom Selich, Mayor Hill,
Council Member Curry, Council Member Henn
Recused: Council Member Daigle
XV. CURRENT BUSINESS
15, PUBLIC MEETING ON THE RENEWAL OF THE NEWPORT BEACH TOURISM
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (NBTBID). 1100 -20141
City Manager Kiff reported that Council has heard this issue numerous times and noted this
item pertains to renewal of the NBTBID.
Council Member Henn commented on a commitment to support the Arts Master Plan process
and indicated that is not mentioned in the documents.
Public Information Manager Finnigan reported that the matter will be brought back to
Council at its next meeting with agreements for the TBID and for the extension of the TOT
agreement.
Mayor Pro Tom Selich commented on the possibility of suggesting other uses for the money
than the arts. He stated that working with the Coastal Commission Implementation Plan,
one of the issues concerns affordable hotel rooms in the City. He indicated that it would be
appropriate to consider rather than using the money for the arts, getting a head start on an
affordable hotel room plan noting that the Coastal Commission is adamant about it and it
should be discussed and considered.
Council Member Daigle stated that she would appreciate a discussion of other uses and
expressed concerns with the creation of a money tax by having money from visitors going
towards the arts.
Jim Mosher commented on Visit Newport Beach promoting the City, in general, as a
destination. He stated that personally, he is not interested in having more people visit
Newport Beach and that he is not sure that any promotion is needed. He stated that the
TBID is a commercial venture to book rooms using a fee to charge other guests at those hotels
and felt the government should not be involved in that function. He noted they had offered
$150,000 for the arts at Council's last meeting but that matter was not included in the
documents. Additionally, he stated they never agreed to that at a public meeting nor did they
supply the annual reports that they were supposed to supply. He added there are problems
with this organization and stated that if Council supports it, the idea of mingling it with Visit
Newport Beach is a terrible idea.
Motion by Council Member Curry, seconded by Council Member Petros to hold a
public meeting on the proposed renewal of the NBTBID.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Member Gardner, Council Member Petros, Mayor Pro Tern Selich, Mayor Hill,
Council Member Curry, Council Member Henn, Council Member Daigle
XVI. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - None
Volume 61 - Page 414
City of Newport Beach
City Council Regular Meeting
January 14, 2014
XVII. ADJOURNMENT - Adjourned at 8:33 p.m. in memory of Myrtle Cox
The agenda for the Regular Meeting was posted on January 9, 5014, at 4:00 p.m. on the
City's website; on January 9, 2014, at 4:00 p.m. on the City Hall Electronic Bulletin Board
located in the entrance of the City Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive; and on
January 9, 2014, at 4:00 p.m. in the Meeting Agenda Binder located in the entrance of the
City Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive.
Recording Secretary
('?LLQ-SI�-
Mayor
Nmv —
Gity Glerk
Volume 61 - Page 415