HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-10-09_Attachment_2_Summary_Parking_Data_Summer_2013N
NELSON
NYGAARD
MEMORANDUM
To: Brenda Wisneski, City of Newport Beach
From: Nelson\Nygaard Project Team
Date: August 30, 2013
subject Summary of Balboa Village Parking Data and Windshield Survey (Summer
2013)
PURPOSE OF THIS MEMORANDUM
This memorandum presents a summary of the summer 2013 data collection effort in the study
area encompassing Balboa Village and the residential sub -area area west of it. It includes an
overview of the data collection and survey methodology, data results, and a summary of key
findings. This data serves as an assessment of parking occupancy and turnover during the peak
visitor season.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Parking Supply, Utilization, and Turnover
The summer parking analysis yielded various key findings related to parking supply, regulations,
utilization, and turnover in the study area. In sum, finding on- street parking along many "front
door" block faces and beach -front lots can be difficult, especially during summer weekend days
when many on- and off - street facilities meet or exceed target occupancy rates. The specific
findings of the parking analysis are summarized below:
1. The study area has a large supply of parking which is split roughly evenly
between the area's on- and off- street facilities. A total of 2,o65 spaces exist in the
study area, 929 of which are located on- street (45 %), and 1,136 spaces of which exist in
various off - street lots and garages in the study area (55 %).
2. While the parking supply is underutilized during summer weekdays, various
"hot- spots" of demand exist. On Thursday counts, at no point did overall on- or off- street
utilization reach target levels, though some of the mostly unregulated blocks along Bay
Avenue, Balboa Boulevard, and Adams Street reached or exceeded target levels.
3. On summer weekends, district -wide parking supplies generally met overall
demand at most times, though during peak periods most facilities met or
exceeded target utilization rates. On Saturday, utilization peaked at 96% during the 2 -4
PM count period. During this peak period, the majority of the study area's on- and off - street
facilities met or exceeded target utilization rates. While some over - utilized on- and off - street
116 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 500 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 415 -284 -1544 FAX 415- 284 -1554
www.nelsonnygaa rdxom
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
facilities are located in relatively close proximity to facilities with significant capacity, it is
clear that during weekends the parking supply in the study area is utilized above target rates.
4. Vehicle turnover varies by day, though the largest portion of vehicles parking
within the study area do so for shorter periods of time. The largest portion of
vehicles parked in the study area during all count times did so for less than two hours. On
Thursday, 35% of vehicles parked between 0-2 hours and on Saturday 29% did so. In general,
more vehicles stayed parked for longer periods of time on Saturday than on Thursday, likely
due to residents not commuting to work and staying parked for longer periods of time, as well
as more long -term visitor trips, such as those made by beach - goers, that typically occur on the
weekend. These trends roughly follow observed trends in the spring data; however, it should
be noted that overall turnover was higher in the spring (cars parked for shorter periods of
time) as compared to the summer.
5. The sub -areas exhibit different parking utilization and turnover trends.
Occupancy was typically lower in the Balboa Village sub -area than in the residential sub -area,
though the peaking of demand was much more heavily pronounced in Balboa Village. On
Saturday, utilization in Balboa Village surpassed that of the residential sub -area during only
two count times, peaking at 98% (2 -4 PM). The turnover data shows that between the two
sub - areas, vehicles parked for much shorter periods of time in the Balboa Village than in the
residential sub -area on both days, as expected given the differences in land use. The Balboa
Village's shops, restaurants, and other venues attract short-term porkers, while the on -street
blocks of the residential sub -area are most likely used by long -term parkers such as
employees, Catalina Flyer patrons and residents.
6. Comparing spring occupancy levels to summer rates, overall utilization is higher
in the summer, but follows the same general trends as observed in the spring.
During all collection efforts, off- street facilities exhibited a gradual peaking in the early
afternoon and on- street spaces were utilized most heavily in the late evening.
Windshield Survey
The windshield survey effort yielded the following key findings:
1. Residents represent a significant portion of the parking demand in the study
area, though the number of visitors increases in the summer months. The largest
portion of survey responses came from residents who live west of Balboa Village (39 %),
followed those who reside within Balboa Village itself (25 %). Approximately 7% of survey
respondents are employees in the area, while the remaining 26% of respondents identified as
one of four types of visitor (much higher than the spring survey, when only 12% of
respondents identified as a visitor). While it may very well be that residents were more
inclined to fill out and return the surveys than visitors and /or employees, it is clear that many
residents are parking on- street.
2. A significant portion of the on- street parking supply in the study area is used for
longer term parking. Most survey respondents were parked on- street overnight or for
multiple nights (58 %), while 12% reported that they had parked for eight hours. This held
true across all respondent types: employees, residents, and visitors (except for visitors coming
for shopping /dinning and to frequent the beach). These figures are roughly equivalent to
spring results, when 59% of respondents parked overnight and 15% parked for eight hours.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 12
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
3. Motorists are mostly aware of the public off- street facilities in the study area,
but still choose to park on- street. Over 84% of survey respondents were aware of all
public off - street facilities in the area. This is slightly lower than spring results (go %),
indicating that increased visitation means more parkers are unaware of off- street options and
would therefore benefit from an improved parking wayfinding system.
4. The general availability of free on- street parking seems to encourage high levels
of on- street demand. Approximately 28% of survey respondents said they did not want to
pay for parking, electing instead to search for a free on- street space. Approximately 28% of
respondents mentioned that the on- street space was the most convenient one to their
destination, while 15% said the on- street parking was the easiest type of parking to find.
5. A significant portion of resident survey respondents state that they do not have
sufficient off - street parking to store their vehicle(s). Approximately 41% of residents
in the study area �ither do not have access to private off - street parking or do not possess an _ _ - Comment [bl]: Confifm what we mean by this
adequate number of spaces. It is unclear whether that lack of parking is due to physical
limitations or whether residents are using their garages or driveways for other purposes.
6. Summer employees of Balboa Village seem less open to the idea of an Employee
Permit Program. A total of 50% of employee survey respondents said they would be willing
or might be willing to pay a small annual parking fee if it guaranteed them a convenient off -
street parking space, while 50% said they would not be willing. This differs from the spring,
when 77% said they would or might be willing to pay a fee.
7. Catalina Flyer Visitors represent the visitor type with the longest length of stay.
Most stayed parked either for 8+ hours (19%), or overnight /multiple nights (75 %).
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
As shown in Figure 1, the study area is bound by 7a Street to the west and A Street to the east..
Two smaller sub -areas were created for the purposes of this analysis. The "Balboa Village' sub-
area (areas east of Adams Street) contains most of Balboa Village's shops and businesses, as well
as its largest off - street parking lot (Balboa Pier Lot). The "residential" sub -area (area west of
Adams Street) is the predominately residential portion of the study area.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 13
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 1 Study Area Boundaries and Block IN
•�
On- Street Perking
< Off - Street Parking Lot
�� ♦ Study Area Boundary
0
F,
Residential
a
.i
4
i
all Vi7lagee 44 �
0
Base C- IS'oou�® SCAG KPi
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 14
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Inventory and Regulations
Parking inventory (number of spaces per facility) and regulations were determined through field
observations. Along some blocks of the study area, the on -street inventory was not clearly
delineated by striping. In these cases, surveyors made educated assumptions of inventory based
on a common size for an on- street parking space, typically 20 feet, or observed utilization.
Furthermore, only off- street facilities that were accessible (i.e. not gated or closed for
construction) were counted.
Occupancy and Turnover
Staff conducted a comprehensive occupancy and turnover study for both on- and off- street spaces
using trained data collection workers. The count days and times were:
• Thursday, June 20Th, 2013 from 8 AM - 8 PM, every two hours (plus 9 - u PM)
• Saturday, June 22 ^a, 2013 from 8 AM - 8 PM, every two hours
• Thursday, July 18u, 2013 from 8 AM - 8 PM, every two hours (plus 9 - 11 PM)
Saturday, July 2oa, 2013 from 8 AM - 8 PM, every two hours
Thursday, August 8U, 2013 from 8 AM - 8 PM, every two hours (plus 9 -11 PM)
Saturday, August 10c', 2013 from 8 AM - 8 PM, every two hours
Counts were conducted on these days in order to provide as wide a range of parking conditions as
possible, as parking demand tends to fluctuate a great deal by day of week and time of day. The
count periods specifically captured parking activity during a typical weekday and weekend at
different stages of the peak summer visitation period. Each block face and off -street lot was
counted every two hours at approximately the same time of each counting period. The weather
was mostly sunny on all six count days, ranging from a high of 79 on July 18rh to a low of 76 on
August 1ou.
In addition to analyzing parking occupancy, parking duration data (for on -street spaces) was also
collected to gauge how often each space experiences "turnover" (or, in other words, how long cars
stay parked in spaces on a block -by -block basis). This data was collected during the same periods
as the occupancy data and involved surveyors noting the last four digits of each license plate,
which can be used to identify vehicles without collecting any personal information.
Windshield Survey
Surveys were left on all vehicles parked in on- street spaces during count times and were
distributed throughout the day to any car without a survey on the windshield, so that vehicles
coming later in the day were also surveyed. The survey was in the form of a postcard pre -
addressed to City Hall with the additional option to submit responses online. To incentivize
responses, all respondents were entered in a drawing for a free parasailing session for two with
Balboa Boat Rentals (June) or free four all day passes to Fun Zone Entertainment's three
Boardwalk rides (July and August).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 15
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
PARKING INVENTORY AND REGULATIONS
Parking Type, Amount, and Regulations
As shown in Figure 2, a total of 2,ci spaces were documented in the on -street blocks and off -
street lots of the study area. Overall, there are a total of 925 on- street spaces in the study area,
representing 45% of the publicly - available parking supply. A total of 1,136 spaces exist in various
off -street lots and garages in the study area°.
Of the on- street spaces, the vast majority (83 %) are unmarked, while 15% are metered.
Comparatively, the Balboa Village area has mostly metered on- street parking (78 %), while the
residential sub -area has a significantly lower proportion of metered parking (9 %). Virtually all of
the surveyed off- street parking is located in Balboa Village; the residential sub -area only has one
off- street lot (an 8 -space lot at the Public Library on Balboa Boulevard and Island Avenue).
Overall, 58% of the study area's parking supply is in Balboa Village, while 42% of it exists in the
residential sub -area. Figure 3 shows on- street parking regulations in the study area.
Figure 2 Parking Inventory and Type by Study Sub-Area
I Only includes those off - street facilities that were surveyed.
s Unmarked spaces are defined as those with no posted restrictions; Metered spaces are defined as those with public packing
meters; Green spaces are defined as those with posted short -Fenn time limits (green curb); Loading spaces are defined as those
reserved for loading purposes only (yellow or white curb): Disabled spaces are defined as those reserved for handicapped
individuals with appropriate placards (blue curb).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 16
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 3 On- Street Parking Regulations
OwStreet Parking Regulations
Metered
Green
Disabled
Loading
— Unmarked
— No Parking
i
Study Area Boundary
4 V
Y.
Residential
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 17
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Pricing
The study area contains both priced on -street and off -street facilities. Metered on -street spaces
are located along Balboa Boulevard, Bay Avenue, and Palm Street and have time limits ranging
from 30 minutes, one hour, and two hours. Meters in Balboa Village are priced at $t.5o per hour.
Various public, "pay" lots are located at Balboa Boulevard and Palm Street, at East Bay Avenue
and Washington Street, and at Peninsula Park at the end of A Street. The pricing structures of
Balboa Village's paid lots are as follows:
• Balboa Pier Main Lot (Lot A)
- Autos: $1.5o per hour, $15 max for 24 -hour period
- RV's (No Camping): $1.5o per hour, $15 max for 24 -hour period (Per Space
Occupied)
- Buses: $50 for 24 passengers or less; $too for 25 passengers or more
- Motorcycles: $0.75 per hour, $7.50 max for each 24 -hour period
- Peak Holidays (Memorial Day, July 4th, and Labor Day): $25 flat rate
• Newport Landing (Lot P)
- Catalina Flyer
Monday - Thursday, $ro per day
Friday - Saturday, $12 per day
Sunday, $15 per day
— Whale Watching boats - $6 with validation
— Fishing boats - $8 with validation
Public Lots (Lots B, C, D, and L)
— $t.Bo per hour (meter)
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 18
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
:•Z•L•Pl - k [•f /d a rj i�1 ;7: [•]7 ;7
This section provides an overview of the results from the parking occupancy and turnover data
collection efforts. It includes a summary of the methodology and the key findings for both the
complete study area, as well as the Balboa Village and residential sub- areas. Unless otherwise
specified, the data presented below is an average of all three summer collection efforts (June,
July, and August). However, specific month by month data is presented where appropriate. This
section also offers comparisons to the spring data collection effort conducted in March.
Parking Occupancy3
Target occupancy rates of 85% and go% are effective industry standards for on- and off - street
spaces, respectively. In other words, maintaining 15% and 1o% vacancy rates for corresponding
on- and off- street stalls will help ensure an `effective parking supply." It is at these occupancy
levels that roughly one space per block is available, making searching or "cruising" for parking
unnecessary and allowing off- street lots to maintain adequate maneuverability. Occupancy rates
below these targets indicate a diminished economic return on investments in parking facilities.
Overall Study Area
As shown in Figure 4, overall study area occupancy was significantly higher on Saturday across all
count periods. On Saturday, occupancy peaked at 96% (2-4 PM), and was above 6o% across all
count times. On Thursday, occupancy peaked at only 7o% (2-4 PM). These trends were similar to
the spring, though average summer occupancy was higher than spring occupancy during all but
onetime period (4 -6 PM Saturday).
3 All occupancy calculations omit the 24 spaces in Lot E (on Balboa Boulevard between Main Street and A Street) from the total
inventory because that facility was closed for constructon during the count periods.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 19
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 4 Combined Parking Occupancy by Day (Summer and Spring)
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show parking occupancy by space type for Thursday and Saturday,
respectively. On Thursday, on- street utilization rates remained relatively constant, exhibiting a
low of 59% (8 -10 AM), and a peak of 76% (9-11 PM). The additional 9 PM count conducted on
Thursday indicates that occupancy for on- street spaces increases in the evening on weekdays as
more residents return home and park their vehicles for the night. Figures 15 and 16 further
illustrate this trend.
Off- street occupancy was lower than on- street occupancy during all Thursday count times, and
exhibited a more condensed peaking trend. Off- street occupancy was lowest at 8 -10 AM (33 %)
and highest at 2 -4 PM (86 %). At no point did on- or off- street occupancy reach target levels (85%
and 95% for on- and off- street facilities, respectively).
On Saturday, on- street utilization remained relatively constant, exhibiting a low of 82% (8 -10
AM) and a peak of 94% (4 -6 PM). Conversely, off- street occupancy varied quite drastically, with a
low of 44% (8 -10 AM) and a high of 98% (2 -4 PM).
Comparing spring occupancy levels to summer rates, utilization is higher in the summer, but
follows the same. general trends as observed in the spring (off - street facilities exhibit a gradual
peaking in the early afternoon and on- street spaces are utilized most heavily in the late evening).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 10
— Thursday(Summer)
—Saturday(Summer)
Thursday (Spring)
— Saturday (Spring)
100
80%
°.6
/ /
70'k
70
/
/
60%
50 °k
/
°k
n
40
v
30%
°w
°k
dO
0
10 °k
n
°
`e
0%
8-10AM 10AM -12
12 -2PM
2-4PM 4.6 PM 6-8PM 9-11 PM
PM
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show parking occupancy by space type for Thursday and Saturday,
respectively. On Thursday, on- street utilization rates remained relatively constant, exhibiting a
low of 59% (8 -10 AM), and a peak of 76% (9-11 PM). The additional 9 PM count conducted on
Thursday indicates that occupancy for on- street spaces increases in the evening on weekdays as
more residents return home and park their vehicles for the night. Figures 15 and 16 further
illustrate this trend.
Off- street occupancy was lower than on- street occupancy during all Thursday count times, and
exhibited a more condensed peaking trend. Off- street occupancy was lowest at 8 -10 AM (33 %)
and highest at 2 -4 PM (86 %). At no point did on- or off- street occupancy reach target levels (85%
and 95% for on- and off- street facilities, respectively).
On Saturday, on- street utilization remained relatively constant, exhibiting a low of 82% (8 -10
AM) and a peak of 94% (4 -6 PM). Conversely, off- street occupancy varied quite drastically, with a
low of 44% (8 -10 AM) and a high of 98% (2 -4 PM).
Comparing spring occupancy levels to summer rates, utilization is higher in the summer, but
follows the same. general trends as observed in the spring (off - street facilities exhibit a gradual
peaking in the early afternoon and on- street spaces are utilized most heavily in the late evening).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 10
96Y.
80%
°.6
/ /
70'k
70
/
/
60%
50 °k
/
°k
40
30%
°k
20
10 °k
°
Figure 5 and Figure 6 show parking occupancy by space type for Thursday and Saturday,
respectively. On Thursday, on- street utilization rates remained relatively constant, exhibiting a
low of 59% (8 -10 AM), and a peak of 76% (9-11 PM). The additional 9 PM count conducted on
Thursday indicates that occupancy for on- street spaces increases in the evening on weekdays as
more residents return home and park their vehicles for the night. Figures 15 and 16 further
illustrate this trend.
Off- street occupancy was lower than on- street occupancy during all Thursday count times, and
exhibited a more condensed peaking trend. Off- street occupancy was lowest at 8 -10 AM (33 %)
and highest at 2 -4 PM (86 %). At no point did on- or off- street occupancy reach target levels (85%
and 95% for on- and off- street facilities, respectively).
On Saturday, on- street utilization remained relatively constant, exhibiting a low of 82% (8 -10
AM) and a peak of 94% (4 -6 PM). Conversely, off- street occupancy varied quite drastically, with a
low of 44% (8 -10 AM) and a high of 98% (2 -4 PM).
Comparing spring occupancy levels to summer rates, utilization is higher in the summer, but
follows the same. general trends as observed in the spring (off - street facilities exhibit a gradual
peaking in the early afternoon and on- street spaces are utilized most heavily in the late evening).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 10
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 5 Parking Occupancy by Space Type, Thursday (Summer and Spring)
Figure 6 Parking Occupancy by Space Type, Saturday
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 111
—On -street (S ummer)— OR- street (Summer)
On- street(Spdng) Off-street (Spring)
100%
98%
94'/.
90%
t w.
°w
70%
�
n
I
V
V
60%
40% �
de-
O
O
V
w
50%
6
20%
w
`O
10%
e
0%
8 -10AM
10AM -12PM 12 -2PM 2 -4PM 4-6 PM 6-8PM
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 111
�
�
40% �
�
30 °h
20%
10%
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
In looking at off - street facilities by lot type (publicly -owned versus privately- owned), on
Thursday, public facilities were utilized at higher rates than private ones during all count times
except 8 -10 AM, as shown in Figure 7. Neither lot type approached target occupancy rates,
however; public facility utilization peaked at yo% (2 -4 PM), while private facility utilization
peaked at 52% (2 -4 PM).
On Saturday, public facilities were utilized at higher rates than private ones during all count times
but two (4 -6 PM and 6 -8 PM), as shown in Figure 8. The utilization of public off- street facilities
exceeded target rates during two count times, 12 -2 PM and 2 -4 PM (96% and 99 %, respectively).
Private off - street facility utilization peaked at 88% (4 -6 PM).
Figure 7 Off- Street Occupancy by Lot Type, Thursday
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 112
— Public Private
100%
—
90°%
—
80°%
70%
70%
n
52%
e
50%
do
%
30%
20%
10°%
0°%
8-10AM 10AM -12 12 -213M 2 -4PM 4-SPM 8-815M 9-11 PM
PM
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 112
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 8 Off- Street Occupancy by Lot Type, Saturday
— Public Private
99%
100%
880
80 °h
e 70%
de
o
V
60%
o /
50%
go
w 40%
O
30%
20%
10%
0% -
8 -10AM 10AM -12PM 12 -213M 2 -4PM 4-6 PM 6-8 PM
Figures 9 through 14 map peak -hour overall utilization in the study area for the June, July, and
August collection efforts, by day, as follows:
• June
- Thursday Peak: 9 -11 PM (51 %)
- Saturday Peak: 2 -4 PM (97 %)
• July
- Thursday Peak: 2 -4 PM (83 %)
- Saturday Peak: 4 -6 PM (94 %)
• August
- Thursday Peak: 2 -4 PM (83 %)
- Saturday Peak: 4 -6 PM (96 %)
These maps show the utilization level for each individual block face and each individual lot during
the peak hour parking demand. The maps reveal various "pockets" of high demand on blocks and
in some lots in the study area during Thursday's counts, as shown in Figures 9, u, and 13. For
example, some blocks along Bay Avenue, Balboa Boulevard, Adams Street, and others in the north
and eastern portions of the study area reached or exceeded target levels. Compared to July and
August, during June's Thursday peak, high rates of utilization were more heavily concentrated in
on- street facilities.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 113
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newpod Beach
On Saturday, occupancy peaked in the mid -go %'s range during the June, Judy, and August peak
periods. During this peak time, the majority of the study area's on- and off- street facilities met or
exceeded target utilization rates. While some over - utilized on- and off - street facilities are located
in relatively close proximity to facilities with significant capacity, parking supply on summer
weekends the in the study area is quite heavily utilized, with many facilities (on- and off- street)
l00% occupied. It should also be noted that a few blocks of the metered spaces along Balboa
Boulevard are consistently underutilized, however, even during peak periods.
It should be noted that the 18o -space Newport Landing garage remained well below target
occupancy rates during all count periods, even when the overall parking system was heavily
utilized. Indeed, the lot peaked at only 69% occupied during the 2 -4 PM Saturday count. This may
point to a need of increased wayfinding to this specific facility, or an opportunity to work with the
garage's owners to institute a new fare structure that makes spaces more appealing to a wider
base of parkers. Currently, rates in the garage are $to per day Monday — Thursday, $12 per day
Friday through Saturday, and $15 per day on Sundays, and are geared mostly towards Catalina
Flyer travelers. See Appendix A for occupancy maps4 during all survey days and count times.
4 Lot E (on Balboa Boulevard between Main Street and A Street) is shown as "green" on all maps, but was closed for construction
during the count periods.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 114
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 9 June Study Area Peak Occupancy, Thursday 9.11 PM
R
...,A.------------------
F
armry W.y'
IS
U n
B
0
ra h rP fx �xt
Ile
Residential
O pa
Pave GIG Sauce: GCAG. E5R1
Parking Occupancy
Off - Street Parking Lot
�Less than 75%
!� J 75 % -89%
w9G%or more
Number of Spaces
On- Street Parking Spaces
Less than 75%
75 % -84%
T85% or more
Number of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
$No, Area forms.,
n 68 . a 6
A r a "a
S
79 1 18
R 24
592
Balboa Village
Nelson%ygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 115
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 10 June Study Area Peak Occupancy, Saturday 2 -4 PM
NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 116
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 11 July Study Area Peak Occupancy, Thursday 2 -4 PM
3P,',
M1 / ry
6'yuua d�M! IJ
.B iz
0 � a
/ /a
�G 4
OitNlluu, �a tl `\
Residential \
N
8wG Sonee, SLAG. ESRI
Parking Occupancy
011�51 -1 Parking La1
Les Man 75%
® 75 %- 89ek
Wig% or more
Number of Spaces
On- Street Porking Spoors
— Les Mwn 75%
— 75%-84%
TM 85 %ormore
amber of Spaces
No Parking Span s
- -� Smtly Ana Boundary
180
7 ,r8012 8 a�'.
9 68 0
2``'
�IB
lage
dv
a
NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 117
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 12 July Study Area Peak Occupancy, Saturday 4 -6 PM
- - --
IJ
/m 9 ry /ry
6
BilLO�pIrJ� 1) iJ
' 6
8 8 0 M1
IJ
If I
F_
f
Residential
N
Bne GIG Somata SNAG. ESHI
la 7'
IJ 2adylp l6
or.,mu r
\ ` rt ��9 •
B 11 �9
t4 lage ;
Nelson%ygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 118
Parking Occupancy
Off - Street Parking Lot
nLess than 75%
75 %- 89%
�o°r or ma'.
Number of Spares
On- Srreer Parking Spaces
Less Mon 75%
)5 %- 8A%
Tp 85 % or more
'.•
`Number of Spaces
•
•,
— No Parking Sao —
y
-__- Smdy Area Boundary
\ ` rt ��9 •
B 11 �9
t4 lage ;
Nelson%ygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 118
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 13 August Study Area Peak Occupancy, Thursday 2 -4 PM
' '
'-- � -- _ - - - "-
a°
n
P ry
" 1, BarA ✓ry I4
m
uouBlnf !' 1, '•• " Iq 7 6
IS a ry4M1 ^ �5
1s IB a 20 q P` y
13 Gy
0 12 25 13
o 13
Iq 12 �
n I IB
19 q
firm
Iq
Residential r
a ✓..nmr1
N,
Bag GIG SsUrce: SGG. ESRI
Parking Occupancy
Off -SSrs es Parlor, Las
® Lass Man ]5 °/.
0 P5 %- 89%
9 T or more
Number of Spaces
On-Serees Parking Spaces
- Len Man 75
- ]5 %- 84%
TP 85% or more
`Nambe, of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
- Study Area Boundary
7
se 0
,....� �4' }., •`.%nom
,79 24
� s
NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 119
KA4 lage
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 14 August Study Area Peak Occupancy, Saturday 4 -6 PM
e.
ra ��
ie
15 /jN 6
11
�M lrary
/Y
Residential
\rv'
les
Bata GIS Source SGG, Bunt
Parking Occupancy
Off Street Parking Lot
u Less Mon 75%
]5 %- 89%
9VA or mare
Number of Spaces
On- Street Parking Spaces
Less Man ]5° A
]5 % -84%
\ 85% or more
Number of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
Study Area Boundary
g /
8
^r
Nelson%ygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 120
Ilae
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Study Sub -Areas
Looking at the two study sub - areas, overall utilization was greater in the residential (7� Street to
Adams Street) sub -area across all Thursday count times. Occupancy peaked at 77% during the 9-
11 PM count period, and was at its lowest during the loAM -12PM count period (59 %), as shown in
Figure 15. In the Balboa Village sub -area, occupancy varied more drastically, rising from a low of
29% (9 -11 PM), to a high of 70% (2 -4 PM).
Figure 15 Parking Occupancy by Location, Thursday
I
On Saturday, utilization remained steady in the residential sub -area, but at significantly higher
utilization rates than on Thursday. As shown in Figure 16, utilization peaked at 93% (4 -6 PM)
from a low of 84% (8 -io AM). Utilization in Balboa Village surpassed that of the residential sub-
area during two count times, peaking at 98% (2 -4 PM).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. � 21
— Balboa Village
Residential
100%
90%
77%
80%
e
70%
e
�
60%
e
V
50%
N
40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0%
8-10AM 10AM -12 12 -2PM
2 -4PM 4-6PM 6-8PM 9-11 PM
PM
I
On Saturday, utilization remained steady in the residential sub -area, but at significantly higher
utilization rates than on Thursday. As shown in Figure 16, utilization peaked at 93% (4 -6 PM)
from a low of 84% (8 -io AM). Utilization in Balboa Village surpassed that of the residential sub-
area during two count times, peaking at 98% (2 -4 PM).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. � 21
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 16 Parking Occupancy by Location, Saturday
On Thursday, on -street occupancy reached or surpassed target rates in Balboa Village during two
count periods, but never in the residential sub -area, as shown in Figure 17. In Balboa Village, on-
street utilization peaked at 9o% (2 -4 PM), while in the residential sub -area utilization peaked at
77% (9 -11 PM).
On Saturday, however, on- street occupancy surpassed the 85% target rate in both sub -areas
during four count periods (12 PM through 8 PM), peaking at 97% (6 -8 PM) in Balboa Village and
94% (4-6 PM) in the residential sub -area, as shown in Figure r8.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 122
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 17 On-Street Parking Occupancy by Location, Thursday
100%
90%
80%
70%
6
80 °k
O
m 50%
R
a 40%
O
30%
20%
10%
0%
— Balboa Village — — Residential
i
8-10AM 10AM -12 12 -2PM 2 -4PM 4-6PM 6-8PM 9-11 PM
PM
Pi.... I lln.S}ron1 Oar4inn rlr... v Fv I nra�inn SehiMmi
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 123
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
It should also be noted, however, that the underutilized metered parking spaces along Balboa
Boulevard slightly distort the picture of on -street demand in the residential sub -area. As shown in
Figure iq, removing the metered spaces results in higher levels of occupancy for on -street spaces
in the residential sub -area. On Thursday, on- street occupancy peaked at 77 %. However, when
removing the metered spaces, occupancy peaked at So %. On Saturday, however, occupancy rates
were roughly equal with or without metered spaces.
Figure 19 On- Street Parking Occupancy in Residential Sub -Area by Day, Including and Excluding
Metered Spaces
—
Thursday — Saturday -Thursday (No Meters) — — Saturday(No Meters)
100%
94
90%
.... .
94%
60°h
80% -
—
77Na
m 700
c
� �
60%
v
e
m 50%
V
R .1/�
N 40%
O
30%
20%
10%
0%
8-10AM 10AM -12 12 -2 PM
2-4PM 4-6PM
6-813M 9.11PM
PM
As noted in previous sections, off -street parking is heavily concentrated in the Balboa Village sub-
area, as 18 of the 19 off -street facilities are located east of Adams Street. Therefore, as shown in
Figure 20 and Figure 21, off -street occupancy in Balboa Village area mirrors overall off -street
occupancy in the entire study area on both days. In the residential sub -area, there is only one off -
street garage.
On Thursday, off -street occupancy was higher in the Balboa Village sub -area across all count
times, peaking at6g% (2 -4PM), as shown in Figure 20. On Saturday, off- street occupancy was
again higher in the Balboa Village sub -area during all but one count period, peaking at 98 % (2-
4PM), as shown in Figure 20.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. � 24
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 20 Off- Street Parking Occupancy by Location, Thursday
100%
90%
80%
70%
n
� 60 °k
V
O
m 50%
V
N
40%
O
30%
20%
10%
0%
— Balboa Village — — Residential
69%
8-10AM 10AM -12 12 -2PM 24PM 4.6 PM 6-8 PM 9-11 PM
PM
Figure 21 Off- Street Parking Occupancy by Location, Saturday
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 125
— Balboa Village -- Residential
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
e
m
50%
N
6
O
30%
20%
10%
0%
8-10AM 10AM -12PM 12.2 PM 2 -4PM 4.6 PM 6.8 PM
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 125
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Parking Turnover
In addition to parking occupancy data, parking turnover data was collected for all on- street block
f nces.s,e As shown in Figure 22, the largest portion of vehicles parked in the study area during all
count times did so for less than two hours. On Thursday, 35% of vehicles parked between 0-2
hours and 57% parked for less than four hours. On Saturday 29% parked for less than two hours
and 48% parked for less than four hours. In general, more vehicles were parked for longer
periods of time on Saturday than on Thursday, likely due to residents not commuting to work and
staying parked for longer periods of time, as well as more long -term visitor trips that typically
occur on the weekend. These trends roughly follow observed trends in the spring data; however, it
should be noted that overall turnover was higher in the spring (cars parked for shorter periods of
time) as compared to the summer.
Figure 22 Vehicle Turnover by Day, Entire Study Area (Summer and Spring)
Comparing the two sub - areas, it is clear that vehicles on Thursday parked for shorter periods of
time in Balboa Village than in the residential sub -area, as expected given the differences in land
use. Balboa Village's shops, restaurants, and other venues attract short -term parkers, while the
on- street blocks of the residential sub -area are most likely used for the storage of resident vehicles
or long -term employee or visitor parking. As shown in Figure 23, the majority (65 %) of vehicles
5 Turnover is defined as the number of vehicles parked on a block -face divided by the inventory. In other words, the higher the
turnover figure, the less time the average vehicle was parked on a block -face lo, the greater the amount of vehicular turnover).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 126
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
parking in Balboa Village did so for o -2 hours, while only 30% of vehicles in the residential sub-
area parked for less than two hours.
Figure 23 Vehicle Turnover by Location, Thursday
These trends held true on Saturday. As shown in Figure 24, the majority (58 %) of vehicles parking
in Balboa Village did so for 0-2 hours, while only 25% of vehicles in the residential sub -area
parked less than two hours. Roughly one in three vehicles parked in the residential sub -area were
parked throughout the entire survey period (to+ hours).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. � 27
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 24 Vehicle Turnover by Location, Saturday
70%
60%
a
3
w
s 50%
c
m
a 40%
9
O
Y
130%
w
m
v
20%
`e
10%
0%
■Balboa Village Residential
0-2 HRS 2 -4HRS 4-6 HRS 6-8HRS B -10HRS 10-HRS
Figure 25 through Figure 30 map vehicle turnover by block -face for Thursday and Saturday
surveys, by month. For the purposes of this map, turnover is defined as the number of vehicles
parked on a black -face divided by the inventory. In other words, a higher number indicates that
more vehicles were parked on the block during the day and that the average vehicle was parked
for a shorter amount of time.
On the Thursday count days, the turnover rate was most typically highest along stretches of Bay
Avenue, Island Avenue, Coronado Street, Fernando Street, and Main Street, blocks that are
proximate to the Balboa Village sub -area (as shown in Figures 25, 27, and 29). On the Saturday
count days, turnover was lower overall, though pockets of higher turnover were concentrated
along Bay Avenue, Lindo Avenue, Medina Way, Island Avenue, Palm Street, and portions of
Balboa Boulevard (Figures 26, 28, and 30). During all count days, turnover was typically highest
in or near the heart of the Balboa Village, or along metered block faces.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 128
Figure 25
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Map of Turnover by Block -Face, Thursday (June)
Parking Turnover Rate
OnSmeer P.Am,
Lass Mon 1.0
- _.d•_______ 1.0 -1.4
v€ ra`M1
w more
Nummbb er of Spaces
Zero Parking spaces
Ity Smdy Area Bmndary
14 ZZ116
bor
Is
IS 8 ld
_r Ie U tf �� v ]
ke rma
Residential /z /
Balboa Village
\J
m va M
ewe GIS Sa.: SLAG, ESRI e
NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 129
Figure 26
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Map of Turnover by Block -Face, Saturday (June)
Parking Turnover Rate
On -Stteer Parking
_ - Lea than 1.0
-- ______ t.0 -1.a
ode Z
2.0
\ Wmbar o of f Spaces
Zero Parking Spaces
13 h ry �� - 3� _ - - -� Ssudy Area BawWory
1 �
�14 e j 1b
J'YFVe ry ry
I J
WlOnagp� 1
aq /
f JS IJ
��x 19 11 h
Wenrmm�
P1J
39 4d
K
Residential
1
]
Balboa Village •�
era. GIS Scum'. SLAG. ESR1
NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 130
Figure 27
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Map of Turnover by Block-Face, Thursday (July)
Parking Turnover Rate
On -511eel Parking
_ Lou Man 1.0
GA
_ 1.5 -1.9
— h T zo or mere
i Number of Spaces
Zero Parking Spaces
c i
r 13 ry e SNdy Area Boundary
h `klvave 1` e Z ry F ry
h
v &q 1 1p B 4ry h / e•,, \,
d
IS 4
IS
20
It SS \' 6
f� )0 Ig h 7� I s
�� it 6 s !I
ah 19
nray
i �� ly I( Soso
AQ 1 Ike, s.
_ Residential tl It
se
4� ry
Balboa Village
Nl 9Jyy
-s
Same Gl55ourca: SCAG ESRI�o "/ •"`"
Nelson%ygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 131
Figure 28
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Map of Turnover by Block -Face, Saturday (July)
la
-----------------------
A—
` /
k e"
I I & f6 F/_
1
W
va
FtO
Sam GiS SCmm: SCAG. ESRI
6
8 ! TO 4
Iv a
13 zz
Residential
eryM >
1 /
Parking Turnover Rafe
On-Strew Parking
Lee than 1.0
0 -1.A
S -1.9
x
T 10 or more
`Number of Spaces
Zero Parking Spaces
_., Smdy Ara. Boundary
NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 132
J
17,
Balboa Village
°T
9
i-
Tv
NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 132
J
17,
Balboa Village
Figure 29
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Map of Turnover by Block-Face, Thursday (August)
0'
IJ
! I d
II brAw IE /
la
e
IS e
1 e� /° 20 a n M1
�M
Le $ /n )5N
I
1 4 e
1 71
0.eMSiml /\
1�
Residential
A
1
Sou GIS Sown: SCAG, ESRI
Parking Turnover Rate
On- Street Parking
Less from 1.0
2.0 or more
Nunber of Spaces
Zero parking Spaces
Study Area Boundary
CF4
Balboa Village j
NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 133
Figure 30
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Map of Turnover by Block -Face, Saturday (August)
zv ry
�at
a
nF
F ,
ry ry
4 4N ry
—
6
\\ fB
4
l�
1I� �OA
11
Parking Turnover Rate
On -Sneer Parking
Lou Mwn I.0
1.0-1.4
2.0 or more
_ lZmker of SPatel
Zero Parking Spaces
_ -.I Stvdy Areaeomdory
Residential
Balboa Village
me
t LN)
Saw GIB Sta'. SCAG Sort R
rts
NelsonWygaard Consulfing Associates Inc. 134
.i
Ile
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Key Findings
As described above, the parking analysis yielded various key findings related to parking supply,
regulations, utilization, and turnover in the study area. In sum, finding on -street parking along
many "front door" block faces and beach -front lots can be difficult, especially during summer
weekend days when many on- and off -street facilities meet or exceed target occupancy rates. The
specific findings of the parking analysis are summarized below:
1. The study area has a large supply of parking which is split roughly evenly
between the area's on- and off- street facilities. A total of 2,o65 spaces exist in the
study area„ 929 of which are located on- street (45 %), and 1,136 spaces of which exist in
various off -street lots and garages in the study area (55 %).
2. While the parking supply is underutilized during summer weekdays, various
"hot- spots" of demand exist. On Thursday counts, at no point did overall on- or off - street
utilization reach target levels, though some of the mostly unregulated blocks along spaces
along Bay Avenue, Balboa Boulevard, and Adams Street reached or exceeded target levels.
3. On summer weekends, district -wide parking supplies generally met overall
demand at most times, though during peak periods most facilities met or
exceeded target utilization rates. On Saturday, utilization peaked at 96% during the 2 -4
PM count period. During this peak period, the majority of the study area's on- and off -street
facilities met or exceeded target utilization rates. While some over - utilized on- and off -street
facilities are located in relatively close proximity to facilities with significant capacity, it is
clear that during weekends the parking supply in the study area is utilized above target rates.
4. Vehicle turnover varies by day, though the largest portion of vehicles parking
within the study area do so for shorter periods of time. The largest portion of
vehicles parked in the study area during all count times did so for less than two hours. On
Thursday, 35% of vehicles parked between 0-2 hours and on Saturday 29% did so. In general,
more vehicles stayed parked for longer periods of time on Saturday than on Thursday, likely
due to residents not commuting to work and staying parked for longer periods of time, as well
as more long -term visitor trips that typically occur on the weekend. These trends roughly
follow observed trends in the spring data; however, it should be noted that overall turnover
was higher in the spring (cars parked for shorter periods of time) as compared to the summer.
5. The sub -areas exhibit different parking utilization and turnover trends.
Occupancy was typically lower in the Balboa Village sub -area than in the residential sub -area,
though the peaking of demand was much more heavily pronounced in Balboa Village. On
Saturday, utilization in Balboa Village surpassed that of the residential sub -area during only
two count times, peaking at 95% (2 -4 PM). When parsing the turnover data between the two
sub - areas, it is clear that vehicles parked for much shorter periods of time in the Balboa
Village than in the residential sub -area on both days, as expected given the differences in land
use. The Balboa Village's shops, restaurants, and other venues attract short-term parkers,
while the on- street blocks of the residential sub -area are most likely by long -term parkers
such as employees, Catalina Flyer patrons and residents.
6. Comparing spring occupancy levels to summer rates, utilization is higher in the
summer, but follows the same general trends as observed in the spring. During all
collection efforts, off -street facilities exhibited a gradual peaking in the early afternoon and
on -street spaces were utilized most heavily in the late evening.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 135
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newpod Beach
1 1 A Il 1911:1 l4, psill AAA M
In tandem with parking occupancy and turnover collection, a windshield survey was conducted to
gather information about the types of people (resident, employee, and visitor) parking on- street
in the study area and their reasons for doing so. Approximately 22,000 vehicle surveys were
distributed (about 4,000 for each month) and a total of r,rol vehicle surveys were returned with
responses, yielding a response rate of 9 %. while this is not a scientific survey, and respondents
self - selected to participate, the results do offer a representative picture of parking behavior.
The following section chronicles the results of the windshield survey, beginning with a high level
analysis of all of the summer responses combined, as compared to responses collected in the
spring. This section also includes a more fine - grained analysis of the summer survey results cross -
tabulated by the following respondent types:
• Employees
• Residents (Balboa Village, west of Balboa Village, and mooring /dock renter)
• Visitors (beach trip, Catalina Flyer traveler, shopping /dinning trip, and other)
Combined Results
As shown in Figure 32, the largest portion of summer survey responses came from residents who
live west of Balboa Village (3996), followed those who reside within Balboa Village itself (25%).
Approximately' 7% of survey respondents are employees in the area, while the remaining 26% of
respondents identified as one of four types of visitor. In all, a greater mix of visitors responded to
the summer survey as compared to the spring survey.
Figure 31 Survey Respondent Type
■Summer ■Spring
Visitor (Catalina Flyertraveler) 4%
2%
Visitor (other recreation)
Visitor (shopping, dining or other)
V isitor (beach trip)
Mooringrdock renter
Employee working in Balboa Village
Resident of the Balboa Village
Resident west of the Balboa Village
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
%<of survey respondents
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 136
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Number of Reepena rfls (N) = 480 (Spring): 1,083 (Summer(
Most survey respondents were parked on- street overnight or for multiple nights (58 %), while 12%
reported that they had parked for eight hours. As shown in Figure 32, only 2% of survey
respondents parked for less than one hour, 5% between r — 2 hours, 9% between 2 — 4 hours, and
9% between 4 — 8 hours. These results roughly mirror the results of the spring collection effort.
Figure 32 Survey Respondent Length of Stay (All Respondents)
■Summer ■Spring
Less than 1 hour 2�/'
5' /e
1 -2 hours 5%
5%
2- 4hour5 9/'
4-8 hours 14%
9%.
8-hours 12%
15%
Overnight or for multiple nights 59%
59%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 80% 70%
%of survey respondents
N =425 (Sprig); 1,010 (Summer)
Survey respondents were also asked their reasons for parking on- street in Balboa Village. As
shown in Figure 33, the majority of summer respondents (47 %) listed not having a parking space
at their residence as a reason for doing so, while an additional 28% said they did not want to pay
for parking, electing instead to search for a free on -street space. An additional 28% of
respondents mentioned that the on- street space was the most convenient one to their destination,
while 15% said the on- street parking was the easiest type of parking to find.
A lack of knowledge of lots does not appear to be major concern; only 3% of respondents listed
not knowing of off- streets lots as a reason for parking on- street. A total of 14% of survey
respondents said that while they have private parking at their residence, they are unable to do so
for various reasons. These reasons could potentially include the use of garages for storage space,
or households that own more vehicles than private off- street parking spaces.
In all, summer survey responses roughly mirrored those collected in the spring; however, a larger
percent of summer respondents listed the lack of available off- street parking as a reason for
parking on- street (9% summer, 2% spring), indicating increased utilization of off -street lots
during summer months.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. � 37
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 33 Reasons for Parking On-Street, All Respondents
■Summer ■Spring
I did not knownhere the public parking lots in Balboa
Village are located
Lack of available parking inthe parking lots
Uncomfortable leaving myvehicle in a parking lot
I have a Blue Pole or Master Parking Permit
I have a parking space atmy residence, bull could
not park there
O"treet parking was readily available and easier to
find
Most convenientlocationto my final destination
I did not want to pay for parking
I do not have a parking space at my residence for this
vehicle
N =455 (Spring); 1,DBD (Summer)
56%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
%of respondents
Finally, survey respondents were asked if they were aware of the four main off -street facilities in
the study area. As shown in Figure 34, the vast majority of respondents are aware of all of the off -
street facilities, but still chose to park on- street Figures from the summer collection effort were
lower for all lots and it is likely that this is due to the larger number of visitors coming to the study
area who are less aware of off- street parking options.
Of the facilities, the Balboa Pier lot is the most well - known, while the Palm Street Parking Lot,
known by 84% of survey respondents, was the lot that may benefit the most from a wayfinding
and /or publicity strategy.
Figure 34 Survey Respondent Awareness of Off-Street Lots (All Respondents)
N =435 (Sprig); 1,D8D (Summer)
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 138
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Employees
Survey results were also analyzed by respondent type. As mentioned above, 7% of survey
respondents (a total of 71) identified as employees who work in the Balboa Village area. Of these
survey respondents, 50% said they would be willing or may be willing to pay a small annual
parking fee if it guaranteed them a convenient off- street parking space.
Employees were also asked how long they parked in the on- street space during the survey day. As
shown in Figure 35 and as expected for employees, most employees parked for longer periods of
time, with 33% of respondents parked for eight hours or more and 48% parked between four to
eight hours. As compared to the spring data, it appears employees generally parked for shorter
periods of time in the summer, perhaps due to the influx of temporary jobs associated with warm
weather activities.
Figure 35 Employee Survey Respondents' Length of Stay
N = 30 (Spmg); 53 (Summer)
When asked their reasons for parking on- street, the highest percentage (52 %) of employee survey
respondents elected `I did not want to pay for parking" as an answer, as shown in Figure 36.
Other cwmmonly selected answers included their on- street space being convenient to a final
destination, and on- street parking being readily available and easy to find, selected by 51% and
33% of employee respondents, respectively. Comparing the spring and summer data sets, a higher
percentage of employees stated that a lack of available parking . in off - street lots was one reason
they parked on- street, mirroring the occupancy data presented in the previous section of this
memorandum.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 139
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 36 Employee Survey Respondents' Reason for Parking On- Street
■Summer ■Spring
I did not knowwherethe public parking lots in Balboa I%
Village are located 0%
Uncomfortable leaving my vehicle in a parking lot 1' 6%
I have a parking space at my residence, butt could IN 3%
not park there 0%
I have a Blue Pole or Master Parking Permit
Lack of available parking in the parking lots
I do not have a parking space at my residence for this
vehicle
Orrstreet parking was readily available and easierto
find
Most convenientlocabonto my final destination
I did not mot to pay for parking
N= 34 (Spring): 67 (Summerl
Residents
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 61
%of respondents
Survey respondents that identified themselves as residents of the area could pick one of three
resident categories to further describe their place of residence. These included:
• Resident of Balboa Village
• Resident west of Balboa Village
• Mooring /dock renters
As shown in Figure 37, most resident survey respondents, stayed parked overnight or for multiple
nights during the survey period. Approximately yo% of residents parked overnight or for multiple
nights. Summer survey respondent length of stay was very similar to spring survey respondent
length of stay.
6 It should be noted that moodngldock renters are grouped with residents for the purposes of this survey, even though not all of
these individuals live on board their boats.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 140
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 37 Resident Survey Respondents' Length of Stay
80%
70%
60%
f 50%
m
9
C
N
40%
O
30%
20%
10%
0%
■Spring ■Summer
net
LessthanI hour 1- 2hours 2- 4hours 4- 8hours 8-hours
N = 3401Sp qn ; 6661Summehl
Overnightorfor
muldplenights
When asked about their reasons for parking on- street, resident responses did vary somewhat by
resident type, as shown in Figure 38. Of respondents who identified as residents of Balboa Village .
and residents west of Balboa Village, the highest portions (41 and 46 %, respectively) chose not
having a puking space at their residence as a reason for parking on- street. Conversely,
mooring /dock renter survey respondents park on- street for mostly for its convenience (32%).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 141
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 38 Resident Survey Respondents' Reason for Parking On- Street
Answer
I do not have a parking space at my residence for this
Resident of
Balboa Village
41%
Resident west
of Balboa
Village
46%
Mooring1dock
renter
17%
vehicle
I have a parking space at my residence, but I could not
13%
6%
19%
park there
Most convenient location to my final destination
13%
14%
32%
Lack of available parking in the parking lots
12%
13%
0%
Uncomfortable leaving my vehicle in a parking lot
8%
5%
16%
1 did not want to pay for parking
4%
1%
4%
1 did not know where the public parking lots in Balboa
4%
10%
1%
Village are located
On- street parking was readily available and easier to
3%
5%
11%
find
I have a Blue Pole or Master Parking Permit
2%
0%
0%
N =442 (resident of Belbaa)', 648 (resident west of Balboa); 75 (mccil ltloc renter)
Visitors
Survey respondents that identified themselves as visitors to the area could pick one of four visitor
categories to further describe their reason for coming and parking in the area. These included:
Beach trip
• Catalina Flyer traveler
Shopping, dining or other
Other recreation
As shown in Figure 39, visitor length of stay varied by visitor type. Catalina Flyer travelers, as
should be expected, all stayed parked for four hours or more (m0st -75 %-- parked overnight).
Those visiting Balboa Village as part of a beach trip exhibited a more varied length of stay
distribution, with 25% parking between 2 and 4 hours, 279'. between 4 and 8, and 26% staying
overnight or for multiple nights. Those coming to Balboa Village for a shipping or dining trip
typically stayed for much shorter periods of time, with 52% of shopping /dining visitors
responding that they stayed parked for less than four hours.
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 142
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 39 Visitor Survey Respondents' Length of Stay
Time Parked
Less than 1 hour
Visitor
(beach)
4%
Visitor
(Catalina
Flyer)
0%
Visitor
(shopping,
dining, etc.)
4%
Visitor
(other)
0%
1 -2 hours
14%
0%
16%
8%
24 hours
25%
0%
32 °%
10%
4 -8 hours
27%
6%
20%
10%
8+ hours
4%
19%
8%
4%
Overnight or for multiple
nights
26%
75%
20%
6707
N =96 (beach trip); 48 (Catalina Flyer travail 79 (shopping/dinning Ing; 49 (other recreation)
As shown in Figure 40, beach trip visitors most often cited not wanting to pay for parking (3r 1
on- street parking being the most convenient to their final destination (22 %), and on- street
parking being readily available (r9 %) as their reasons for parking on- street. Conversely, Catalina
Flyer travelers seem to be mostly influenced by on- street parking being free of charge, as 58% of
Catalina Flyer traveler respondents cite not wanting to pay for parking as their reason for parking
on- street. Visitors who came to Balboa Village for shopping and /or dinning parked on- street
because of its convenience (28 %), it being free of charge (23 %), and off- street lots being full
(18 %).
Figure 40 Visitor Survey Respondents' Reason for Parking On- Street
Answer
I do not have a parking space at my residence
Visitor
(beach)
3%
Visitor
(Catalina
Flyer)
1 %
Visitor
(shopping,
dining, etc.)
3%
Visitor
(other)
1%
for this vehicle
I have a parking space at my residence, but 1
3%
0%
3%
3%
could not park there
Most convenient location to my final
228
98
288
238
destination
Lack of available parking in the parking lots
17%
12 %
18%
10%
Uncomfortable leaving my vehicle in a parking
1%
3%
2%
1%
lot
I did not want to pay for parking
31%
58%
23%
48%
1 did not know where the public parking lots in
5%
6%
5%
3%
Balboa Village are located
On- street parking was readily available and
19%
7%
14%
10%
easier to find
I have a Blue Pole or Master Parking Permit
0%
3%
3%
0%
N =146 (beach trip); 67 (Catalina Flyer traveled, 116 (shopping/dinning top), 77 (other recreation)
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 143
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Nei Beach
Survey Responses by Sub -Area
Comparing the two study sub - areas, survey responses collected in the Balboa Village sub -area
mostly identified as non- residents (77 %), whereas those collected in the residential sub -area
mostly identified as residents (7o %). Figure 41 shows the distribution of respondent type by sub-
area.
Figure 41 Survey Respondent Type by Sub-Area
■Relsidential ■Balboa Village
Viskor(other) �5%
Visitor(shoppng, dining, eta) +T 6Y° ,
36 /.
Visitor (Catalina Flyer) 4Ni
Visitor(beach) 9%
18'%
Ivlooring/dak renter O % 0%
Residentwest ofBalboa Village 11 /° ° 40%
Resident of Balboa Village % 26%
14 /.
Employee working in Balboa Village 6'h
1 Y'.
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
%of survey respondents
N = 56 (Balboa Village); 1,D17 (Residen6ap
Length of stay also varied by sub -area; as shown in Figure 42, more than half of all responses
collected in the Balboa Village sub -area (68 %) represented vehicles that were parked for four
hours or less. Conversely, in the residential sub -area, a majority of respondents stayed parked for
8 hours or more (72 %).
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. � 44
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 42 Survey Respondent Length of Stay by Sub -Area
Time Parked
Less than 1 hour
Balboa
Village
13%
Residential
1%
1 -2 hours
30%
3%
24 hours
25%
8°%
4 -8 hours
9°%
15%
8+ hours
8%
12%
Overnight or for multiple
nights
15%
60%
N =53 (Balboa Village(; 947 (Residential)
Finally, reasons reported for parking on- street also varied somewhat by sub -area. In Balboa
Village, convenience (26 %), availability (2o %), and permits (15 %) were the most popular
responses. In the residential sub -area, a lack of parking at residence (31%), free on- street parking
(Iq %), and convenience (17 %) were the most popular responses. Figure 43 shows all reported
reasons for parking on- street by sub -area.
Figure 43 Survey Respondent Reasons for Parking On- Street by Sub -Area
Answer
I do not have a parking space at my residence for this vehicle
Balboa
Village
5%
Residenfl.
31%
1 have a parking space at my residence, but I could not park there
6%
9°%
Most convenient location to my final destination
26%
17^%
Lack of available parking in the parking lots
14%
5%
Uncomfortable leaving my vehicle in a parking lot
2%
4%
I did not want to pay for parking
6%
19%
I did not know where the public parking lots in Balboa Village are located
60%
2%
On -street parking was readily available and easier to find
20%
g°%
I have a Blue Pole or Master Parking Permit
15 °%
5°%
N= 56 (Balboa Village); 9,612 (Rasidentaq
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. 145
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newpod Beach
Key Findings
The windshield survey effort yielded the following key findings:
1. Residents represent a significant portion of the parking demand in Balboa
Village, though the number of visitors increases in the summer months. The
largest portion of survey responses came from residents who live west of Balboa Village
(39 %), followed those who reside within Balboa Village itself (25 %). Approximately 7% of
survey respondents are employees in the area, while the remaining 26% of respondents
identified as one of four types of visitor (much higher than the spring survey, when only 12%
of respondents identified as a visitor). While it may very well be that residents were more
inclined to fill out and return the surveys than visitors and /or employees, it is clear that many
residents are parking on- street.
2. A significant portion of the on- street parking supply in Balboa Village is used for
longer term parking. Most survey respondents were parked on- street overnight or for
multiple nights (58 %), while 12% reported that they had parked for eight hours. This held
true across all respondent types: employees, residents, and visitors (except for visitors coming
for shopping /dinning and to frequent the beach). These figures are roughly equivalent to
spring results, when 59% of respondents parked overnight and 15% parked for eight hours.
3. Most are aware of the public off - street facilities in Balboa Village, but still
choose to park on- street. Over 84% of survey respondents were aware of all public off -
street facilities in the area. This is slightly lower than spring results (90 %), indicating that
increased visitation means more parkers are unaware of off -street options and would
therefore benefit from a system of parking wayfinding.
4. The general availability of free on- street parking seems to encourage high levels
of on- street demand. Approximately 28% of survey respondents said they did not want to
pay for parking, electing instead to search for a free on- street space. Approximately 28% of
respondents mentioned that the on -street space was the most convenient one to their
destination, while 15% said the on -street parking was the easiest type of parking to find.
5. A significant portion of resident survey respondents state that they do not have
sufficient off - street parking to store their vehicle(s). Approximately 41% of residents
in the study area �ither do not have access to private off- street parking or do not possess an _ - - Comment [1,2]: ConFtm what we mean by this
adequate number of spaces. It is unclear whether that lack of parking is due to physical
limitations or whether residents are using their garages or driveways for other purposes.
6. Summer employees of Balboa Village seem less open to the idea of an Employee
Permit Program. A total of 50% of employee survey respondents said they would be willing
or might be willing to pay a small annual parking fee if it guaranteed them a convenient off -
street parking space, while 50% said they would not be willing. This differs from the spring,
when 77% said they would or might be willing to pay a fee.
7. Catalina Flyer Visitors represent the visitor type with the longest length of stay.
Most stayed parked either for 8+ hours (19 %), or overnight /multiple nights (75 %).
Nelsoniftgaard Consulting Associates Inc. 146
r_T=TkTDv�_1
Parking Occupancy Maps
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 44 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 8 AM to 10 AM (June)
Parking occupancy
OIf-Streel Porkimg Lot
Less Mon 75
pP' ------ . _ 75 %. 89%
W0%or more
0 =° 'xry ,� A� /'_' •••••• Number of bpams
Cm-street Parking Spores
G —Len Man 75%
ry r "'Jfff e3 75 % -84%
Y
a _ ry ry ry —47z, 85% armors
I� ftwq Id of bpams
No Parkin, bpams
em Llon ti n ••
6
rs Ie Po _ `'0.i - - __ -i Study Area Boundary
n a .
el :
It 12 IJ ' t
Ia A h.2nndlNld a� a ISO
/� •.
� P . F�♦
11 1j 0
B c �q •••
Residential y e Is r
Aa, 9 '68// Bs ••6
1I
7
79 __� � 74
16
592
Balboa Village
mo
Baas GIS tt—e: G G, ESRI � � •�
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -1
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 45 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 10 AM to 12 PM (June)
8 6 y
Residential / 8 .r
18 69 9
M,r
9 2a 7 4 Jr 6
� `11
7
r
79 1 24
18
599
Balboa Village
(N)
79
Pefa Gut Source : SLAG. ESRI Q
Nelson%ygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -2
Parking Occupancy
Off Street Parking Lot
_
Less than 75%
o
]5 %- 89%
N' m�
- --------
0% more
rN
W
Number of Spaces
On Street Parking Spaces
3
+ea
Less Mon 75%
r
M1 34 _ s
13
75%-84%
n
n ^
�B 85% or more
y W¢er 16
I m
ry
'Number of Spaces
I�
41'Xly' 1l '^
6 ° ^
No Parking Spaces
IS
LS 18
B i ° o
20
Study Area Boundary
- 11 10 12
25 ` 6 / S
�
n B%
IS 1J 1
1B ry
om c
19
//g
r
a a /ra,e /6 @
188
a
8 6 y
Residential / 8 .r
18 69 9
M,r
9 2a 7 4 Jr 6
� `11
7
r
79 1 24
18
599
Balboa Village
(N)
79
Pefa Gut Source : SLAG. ESRI Q
Nelson%ygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -2
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 46 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 12 PM to 2 PM (June)
Parking Occupancy
Off - Street Parking Lot
Less than 75%
75 % -e9%
ry - -- 9g% or more
e Number of Spaces
OnSnen Pohhg spaces
a - 3 Fgp4 — Lea than 75%
IE — 75 % -e4%
/m ry w ry ry ry T95 %or mere
ly dtypy 16 / \Number of Spaces
I7 b e — No Parking Spaces
IS 15 18 e 8 20 J ry ° _ er . _ _. Smdy Area Boundary
10 12 }5 ` 4
I)
14ayen 0
Residential F I} B r
17q q
a" "rwl 9 68 m %'.
1 \t Y�
°M1 4 "ff
«I- F
Q79 22
78
592
Balboa Village
% 79
Base GIS S.— SCAG ESRI
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -3
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 47 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 2 PM to 4 PM (June)
oa
a ry
4 ry ry ry
oaalw„ h ° ^ la ) e
8
IS ie a To 4
a/
IJ 10 !T TS n !g N 4
�n @ S
/9 4
Parking Occupancy
Off -sheet Porking Lot
_ Lea mom ]Seu
®75% -89%
WO Yo or more
Number of spnces
On -sfinet Parking Space,
Leas Man 75%
75 % -84%
T85% or more
Number of Spoces
No Parking Spaces
SNdy Are. Baundar,
Om'anfronf a o a 'a Ii r
a 88
13 Bn(ry&
M T
B
Residential .�1`y
12 9
9
J
79 R4
18
,Q.
592
R,di,o.I Village
(N)
rb 4P .
Sau GIS Swm: SCAG, ESR1
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A-4
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 48 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 4 PM to 6 PM (June)
Parking Occupancy
Off Street Parking Lot
Less than 75%
75 %- 89%
0 % or more
Number ofSpaces
On Street Parking Spaces Leaman75%
13 "$ 75 % -84%
I m 4 n _ ••• BM 85% or ma
b,,,, re
LI va�, 16 � 'Number of Spaces
••`,`.• - No Parking Spares
15 8 4 9 M1 ° ( •• SMdy Area Boundary
H °
20
j' a l4ont _ IS Il r lH, 1 \\
19 /9 " � , `ir7
so
8 6 fa�/a
41 9
Residential 11 B 12 r 4, ,9
e
s J
79 24
592
- Balboa Village
(N)
79
Hou, Gut Sawp: SLAG. ESRI Q
Nelson%ygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -5
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 49 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 6 PM to 8 PM (June)
Parking Occupancy
Off -Sxeel Parking lnt
Less Man 75%
+
75%-89%
-ry "� 91 o or more
Namber of Spaces
On- Streel P.Mr, Spaces
—Lea M.. 75%
I] �
$ - 75 %- Be%
T 85 %or more
n
I� iern. 14 lb /l 6 PWmberofng Spo
1• la b _ No PorNin9 SPacea
. a
is If IO )o 0 h '� /°yp . _ _ 5" Area Boundary
���
10 12 23
e 11 12 Ij 1 y • i/ r
Residential 12
6
•� l,. 11
X`
M � 79 2�
18
592
Balboa Village
N
FM Is
eaeGls cru_sceG. ESai
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -6
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 50 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 9 PM to 11 PM (June)
11
19
lom, m,n� h
IS
1$ 19 a li
0 1]
� –
it
e=M fIgA
Residential
4eMfi�/
Parking Occupancy
OH- Street Parking WI
- Lau than 75%
® 75 %- 89%
�m/. rmoue
wrnll of SPaces
On -Strout Parking Spaces
— Lea than 75%
— 75 %- B4%
x 85 %or —r. TNumber of Spaces
W Parking Spaces
�y a ,__• Study Area Boundary
9
� � 7
'
i 0 `\ i a 6 rn9
12 I 6 �L 9
9 7 9 . r 6
ry "11
$
79 1 19
594
Balboa Village
N
Base GISS. —SCFG. ESRI f«
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -7
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 51 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 8 AM to 10 AM (June)
S �
0 '
i
}
n
la �1-Rrt l6 ry /
T h
BaWaBlp �1 1S I a N I� � e M1 n M1
I5 la g 2p �
I] 10 IT e TS
•� e M li .� IT 1j
ly l4
Parking Occupancy
Off -Areet paMinp Lot
® Less Tan 75%
75 %- 89%
WWo or more
Wmber of Spaces
On -Sneer ford, Spaces
Less Tan 75%
- 75%-84%
T�
85% or more
\zlaer of spaces
W Parking Spares
_ _ J Study Area Boundary
is 16 R /p a 180
h �aM �a /1 n8 an
n
Residential /T 8 r
T 68 9 x
9 1 6
7 ',.
°' 11
7 � ] 7
"
24
I lage � j
O79
Tso soa
Sue.e.0 er... E.
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -8
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 52 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 10 AM to 12 PM (June)
II 9
6 _
o
li IB .e Ip! � k`
IE � i5
g 61g
IJ e¢ 12 13 19 M
19
Orrngml � a /
` IJ
W
/4�
Residential
e �m 6ro
B GIGG :GGAG. ESR1
Parking Occupancy
Off - Street Parking Lot
LA I� Less than 75%
Eli 75 %- 89%
—" Number of Spaces
On- Street Porktrg 5peces
— Lan Man 75%
—75%-84%
2 85 . er mero
TN mbar of Spaces
— No Porkinp Spc.
� � Study Area Boundary
1811
6 v�r
6 "A
8 12 6B 9
r 6
l
r
79 24
-£18
592
Balboa Village
d
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -9
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 53 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 12 PM to 2 PM (June)
a
I]
Im 116
1�
IH
10
!,N)
B— GS&unvu: SCA EBP1
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -10
Parking Occupancy
Off -Street Parking lot
LA Len than 75%
O 75 % -89%
90% m more
Number of Spaces
On -Street Parking Spaces
Less than 75%
75%.84%
�M 85% or mom
`Namb.r of Spama
No Parking Spaces
- -j said, Area Boundor,
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 54 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 2 PM to 4 PM (June)
00
IJ
wi
N
Rasa GI55oUrce'.SGG ESRI
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -11
Parking Occupancy
ON- SSreer Parking Let
Less man 75%
175%-89%
Wo% or more
Number of Spaces
On -SSmes Porkag Spaces
Less Man 75%
75 %- 84%
TX 85% or more
�NUmber of Spaces
- No Parking Spaces
Smtly Area 8.ona.,
°4q ,
. 41 •
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 55 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 4 PM to 6 PM (June)
O
Bew GI55osae: 5C.,ESRI
-�m
mo] a /# <L
LI a�
19 /0
°eeM nl
Residential
°°'meal l � 9
Parking Occupancy
Off -Streer Parking I
® Lau than 75%
]5 %- B9r /.
�0% more
Numme ber of Sparoz
On- Street Parking Spaces
Less Man 75%
75%-84%
—47.=r % ar more
a Spaces
No Parking Spaces
- -_ Se,dy Area Boundary
°N
Lz
591 /
Balboa Village
NelsoMygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -12
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 56 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 6 PM to 8 PM (June)
P�boa
!N
8au Gm Scum:SGAG EGRI
Residential
"I"N'
,4.
0 a
B 12
9 6"
592
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -13
Parking Occupancy
Off - Street Parking Let
® Lass than 75%
75% - 89%
9G% or more
Number of Spaces
On -Street Parking spoces
Less Man 75%
75% -84%
M
or more
T85%
umber of Spaces
- No Parking Spaces
9
Study Area Boundary
• �.
0 a
B 12
9 6"
592
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -13
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 57 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 8 AM to 10 AM (July)
I! fl
4
9rr la ,L
a I! / J
Lry
8 y
H 20
10 1, 25 6
b � 11 1
.,. d
O�nnfron� � 1q a i `7_
Residential
O
Feel
Bw GIS Saew:9CAG. EGRI
r
\ B 12
mnrm, / 9 68 ,y.' f9 6
z z s
j
7
j� 79 24
`IB
592
Balboa Village
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -14
Parking Occupancy
Off - Street Porkhg Lot
18on 75%
I
u
�Loss
75 %- 89%
W9
0°a or more
Number of Spaces
On-street Parkin, Spaces
— Less Man 75%
75% 84°0
B or more
.,
T85%
NUmber of spaces
No Parking Spaces
9
SNdy Area Boundary
.,. d
O�nnfron� � 1q a i `7_
Residential
O
Feel
Bw GIS Saew:9CAG. EGRI
r
\ B 12
mnrm, / 9 68 ,y.' f9 6
z z s
j
7
j� 79 24
`IB
592
Balboa Village
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -14
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 58 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 10 AM to 12 PM (July)
Parking Occupancy
Off -51,o. Parking bl
Less Ihan 75%
-,$-- -_ � 75 %. a9%
---75%.89%
-- MWMorrore
Number of spaces
- £ OnSIr.1 Parking Spaces
ry
ry s t$
+.o 75%
1z�� 75 % -iN%
J a ry w ry ry 95 %er mero
16 = " Number of 5pcces
U
ry 1, z m .^ ,` - No Parking Spaces
XanOoablyd ° '^ 6
IS 8 a ,1 ry ^e � � SNdy Area Boundary
U I9 14 ^
as 3 E 9
to > r
eY ry li It 15 1 r
19 V n ♦'
h Icw Is 3a ioA,i r 180
m B
<
Residential "a8� z 11 �7
�' M `' 9
orsNn 9 a 7
v 11
t
7
79 70
i` la
i• �.. 597
Balboa Village
O
gew Gl55alace: SLAG. ESRI
FM e s
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -15
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 59 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 12 PM to 2 PM (July)
W�.
I]
i n ry
Iq BJY AVe 16 � ry/ h
Is g ^_ o
IS IB /a PO 6 / `£
IV IT
5 n 6
IB
6
N;
FeV
Sue GIS Sourme SCA ESRI
II ,
Residential IT /J!4,
B
J 6 yg
X 17 7 6
\g A 6
1
Q79c18
24
597
Balboa Village
NelsWiNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. A -16
Parking Occupancy
Off Street Parking Lot
Less Man 75Ss
u 75 % -89%
9 /. or more
Number of Spaces
On -Street Parking Spaces
— Lea Man 75%
75%-84%
T7 85 %.'more
'ee
,Number of Spores
.e
No Parking Spores
9
Study Are. Botm d.'y
II ,
Residential IT /J!4,
B
J 6 yg
X 17 7 6
\g A 6
1
Q79c18
24
597
Balboa Village
NelsWiNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. A -16
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 60 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 2 PM to 4 PM (July)
a /
—! x
lenvdlry' � 1> h ly b
M1 �M1
8
rs ra n +a
to '2
11 \l
19 /9
CYr'm figp ^' a
Residential
Gage G1Stt —e:SC G,E5R1
Parking Occupancy
Off-Street Porkin Lot
Less Mon 75%
75%- 89%
9VA or more
Number of Spaces
Cm-Street Parking Spores
hy„ — Len Man 75%
�»yee 75 % -84%
Tc 85% or more
`Number of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
Study Areo Boundary
61e 180 '.
F
ry
it
11 r a 14
ors g �a � 5
e v� 11
G 2
24
lage
NelsoMygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -17
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 61 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 4 PM to 6 PM (July)
i ` d
e� Is V re a ¢o d~ 7 I
10 12
O�unfron� 19 r ,f] ip4,Q id
Residential r
_ emndw,�
W
on
Fmt
Save GIS Sow: SLf6. ESR1
Parking Occupancy
Off -Strew Parking bs
® Len Man 75%
O 75 % -89°/
=190 N ummmore
Nber d Spxes
On -Strew Parking Sous
Lea Man 75%
75%-84%
T85 %or more
Nombw of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
$Ndy Area Boundary
ffio.yo to /lE0 '
f 12 6g
9
!/ g \6j / —
z
h{ ] 411,
lage
NelsoniNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -18
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 62 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 6 PM to 8 PM (July)
d
c�
3 n
se �r
h'
h n
2
Iil xl�rP -
IJ r
PalEw ewul IJ G
� If IB /a l0 / \e
f� 4
I°
eaan hmi
Residential
�N
Rex GIS SOUme: SLAG ESRI
Parking Occupancy
Off-Street Porking Lot
I� Less Man 75%
75 %- 89° e
W0% or more
Number of Spaces
On -Sweet Parking Spaces
Less IM1on 75%
75%-84%
e's T% 85% or mare
umber of Spaces
.� No Porking Spaces
SNd, Area Besmear,
°9
u�
• r 2 lY
J
P
24
�?18
592
Balboa Village
NelsonlNygaarcl Consulting Associates Inc. I A -19
79
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 63 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 9 PM to 11 PM (July)
16
r
Nel6wtlryp �^ � 16 � b
o a h,
k
1a za
14 LU 6
z 16
1 1B
Oman Fanl a
73 Ary6/ /b
/btu
Residential
oP a9nm/
N'
o
sso
Base Gi5 Sourw: SCAG. ESRI
1/ aPry
6 a 'mry
/z rr8 17 t er
9 9
7
6
z e, \�
41,
24
18
S92
BalfioaVillage
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -20
�e
79
Parking Occupancy
Off Street Parking Lm
I_I Less Man 75%
F-175% - 89%
WT,.r mare
Ni of Spaces
On -Street Parking Spaces
Less Man 75%
75%-84'/.
Tr 85 %arnnore
`.
`Number of Spaces
`.
No Parking Spaces
Study Are. Beard.,
/p
1/ aPry
6 a 'mry
/z rr8 17 t er
9 9
7
6
z e, \�
41,
24
18
S92
BalfioaVillage
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -20
�e
79
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 64 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 8 AM to 10 AM (July)
li IE
balLOa eIM„ 17 r IJ
or 7s"ee
f B
11 13
e h IJ
tr
Raze GIG SOUrte: to G ESRI
V 7
see
Ou-i nu _ 19 IIJ
% J
Residential
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -21
Parking Occupancy
Off-street Parking or
Less Mon 75%
75%-89%
�0%or mare
Number of Spores
On- Street Parent, Spaces
Less Man 75%
aC• illage
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 65 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 10 AM to 12 PM (July)
� 9
16
Plw , i5 11 tl.1M ", 6
5 �B1' e 20
Residential
(J
9ase Ge Eaum: Sca G. ESRI
Parking Occupancy
Off-Street Parking Lot
u Less than 75%
]5% 89%
W0 % or more
Number of Spaces
OmStreet Parking Spaces
Less Mon 75%
75%-84%
T85 % or more
\Number of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
SWdy Area Bwntlary
nre9 "
/J r
B
e 12 61
` , 9
9 `6
2
2 a s Ii
r/
s \`I`
24
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -22
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 66 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 12 PM to 2 PM (July)
1�
--
/3 h S
m 6
IJ
a' /
I) 6
IH ° }p 4~
p N�a n
/7
14 �
Oernnh.rr e � ° l9
/4
Residential
I,N)
B— GS&unoa: SCA ESRI
n..nrm,
Parking Occupancy
OI�ff - Street Parking lot
LA Lon than 75%
75 % -89%
9VA m mar.
Number of Spaces
On- Street Parking Spaces
Len Mon 75%
—75%.84%
—47.=r % or more
'. of Spaces
— No Parking Spaces
♦ j study Area Boundary
.a s
8 12 Lq
/ 6
s'4`.
NelsoniNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -23
it lage
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 67 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 2 PM to 4 PM (July)
Parking Occupancy
Off -Street Parking Laf
LA Len than 75%
••� /... -� O75 % -8i %
xa
if �� ormara
Number of Spaces
On -Street Parking Spaces
— [,en tban 75%
— 73%.84%
I m J 6 ry // /gyp �M
85% or man
q +6 ry c / / ,Number of Spaces
e +a P ry • • — No Parkin 5
^aIAOnWwI,a B y ry �/ 9 Pame
10 6 �ry m• ? F,6 Swdy Amaeoundary
]f 6 9 9
19 ��� wry +W 1q y M rf,
11 pb 16 �� �OVti s->
6i e� ✓ ` F�
i 0
Residential /z s
e.. 9 12 ,.�6
',gry
lage
INI
see
ease Gl55ourte: SLAG, ESR1 Xy
2
NelsoniNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -24
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 68 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 4 PM to 6 PM (July)
I
3
Ice a
klNVa Bry' ` '^ y
B �
8 e
3
I�
a$ 19 ly
04ni (ruol � o N
Residential
Bw GIS Saew:9CAG. EGRI
Parking Occupancy
Off -Sweet Parkhg Lot
® Len gmn 75%
E---175%-89%
W90'a or more
Number of Spaces
OmSrseef Parkin' Spaces
Less Mon 75%
75 %- 84°0
•
T85% or more
NUmber of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
SNd, Area Boundary
6 9
9
ge
NelsoMygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -25
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 69 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 6 PM to 8 PM (July)
Parking Occupancy
OH -Saeef Parking Lon
_ Less Man 73%
9 VI, or more
H
_ Namberofspaces
On -Sheet Pocking Spaces
1 Is, Ma
� — Less n 75%
h ° cc
85% or more
id / `y arioer of Spaces
]naaab. _ ry l9 y a
°Ljjj .a � if�1l� ie a / ry M1 ^ _ No Parking S
paces
B Study Area Boundary ao
9
a maupgl 11
eta 19 9
•.
ld dryry � °. ip.. ,, •.
eGal 3
` N "I '
Residential
a2 „...
I •t!
ti
44
Ilage
N
B— GISS -- SGG, ESRI ren +
NelsoMygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -26
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 70 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 8 AM to 10 AM (August)
O
Bw GIS Saew:9CAG. FSRI
1{
d aJ
18 u e To J h I
IB @ 25 `` 6
1, 1
V IJ g
Iq ,
4xNi(ryX / 13 , /�tM kryn"bld
Residential Y
^ <q 7
qog, 780
e o
8 c •n
17
9 68� 9
�7
T � 7
79 76
18
597
Balboa Village
79
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -27
Parking Occupancy
Off - Street Parka, Lot
11son 75%
I
u
�Loss
75 %- 89%
W9G°a
or more
Number of Spaces
Cm-street Parkin, Spaces
— Less Man 75%
75 %- 84°0
8 or more
-.,
T85%
NUmber of Spaces
s
— No Parking Spaces
rvg
SNd, Area Boundary
^ <q 7
qog, 780
e o
8 c •n
17
9 68� 9
�7
T � 7
79 76
18
597
Balboa Village
79
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -27
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 71 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 10 AM to 12 PM (August)
Parking Occupancy
Off -Strew Parking Los
® Less than 75%
rr -
el �a Nwnber of Spaces
0.,51.1 Parking $paces
Gyr - Lea Man 75%
F
" 1� \Numb
ly ?? � J `. er of 5p aros
�
&amx �
I A > = ,( No Parking Spaces
RtNCa Blnll I) 6 � / `
Ls 8 ° 4 S ;fro Study Area 8oundo,,
Is IH a ]° P ` 2 �'°x• --
13 10
e h loon 14 IS 7 `
IP a q -.
I] dr yy IS Al /p
4k a
Residential r Ii %Ali* J' �x9
t= u a% 9
Y
1
see
i
e 7
§ t
I large
O
Base GIB Sow SGG.ESRI se
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -28
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 72 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 12 PM to 2 PM (August)
o c.
Il � et Se°
N g n
flalAOaBlra,'' 17
is
8
IB a i0
0 IT
h IN IT 13
lirvari /ice
Residential
O
we
9w GIS Sourm: SC ,ESRI
01111�11
Parking Occupancy
Off -Street Parking Lot
Less Man 75%
O75 % -89%
W9 %or more
Number of Speaks
On -Street Parking Spaces
Lea Man 75%
- - 75 % -84%
T7 85 %mmore
Number of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
Study Area Boundary
eiy9 -
7
Leo'° v
188 �1
n e
\ 8
9 71 9
/ 7� s
Nf 1 �
r
t
79 _ a L 29
NelsoMygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -29
�a
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 73 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 2 PM to 4 PM (August)
-
I]
P
1, BarA ✓ry I4
sPno-
a°
n
n 4
ry
"
m
uouBlnf �!' 1) n Iq
"
6 '
IS '0 ry4M1
1s le a zP ° s
10 la 11 11 25 1] 13
� o �
n I 11
19 q
firm
Iq
Residential r
a ✓..nmr1
N,
Bag GIG SsUrce: SGG. ESRI
/I 0
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -30
Parking Occupancy
Off -SSrs es Parlor, Las
® Lass shan 75 °/.
75 %- 89%
�TA or more
Number of Spaces
On-SSrees Parking Spaces
Len Man 75%
75 %-84 %
r
T85% or more
umber of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
-
Study Area Boundary
24 /
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 74 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 4 PM to 6 PM (August)
I F� M1
� WvNre^ Id - h
NalOeadl�y l' I) ° 14
1s e
15 la a 1
1] "e-ee-4ee 21
/I N
Residential
O
Ire
Bew GIs SLAG. MRI
Parking Occupancy
Off -street Parking Lot
® Lers Mon 75%
® 75 % -W/o
97o or more
14—ber of spaces
On -Street Parking spaces
Leu Man 75%
— 75%-84%
- 77 e5 %etme.e
11:1r of Space.
Pie Parkin, spaws
- - -_ Smdy Area Boundary
7
160
e u�
8
12 \ //g
111 9
b
11
1 a` 4
79 24
NelsonINygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -31
d
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 75 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 6 PM to 8 PM (August)
rf n /M1
BelLO�pgN' I� b M1 4
I> n
a
IS IB o 10 V
o�r.anae �^
a rN�
/u
Residential
Base GIs Spurn: SLAG. ESRI
�9
\ 1 '
a t.
la ,.
\jam1
592
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -32
Parking Occupancy
Off Street Porking Wt
Less than 75%
175%-89%
9WA r mere
Namber M Spaces
OnSftm Parking Spaes
— Less flan 75%
a 75% 84%
�c 85 %ar none
`.amber M sp «e,
No Parking Spaces
_ _ J SNdy Area Boundary
Balboa Village
79
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 76 Study Area Occupancy, Thursday 9 PM to 11 PM (August)
13
9JryeyflM •l m 17 li d
Is a � B �
S 8 n 0
r' I] 10 11 ZS
14 1}
13
I9
O
. an
Bw GISSouw: SLAG. ESRI
d I
�WnfiMl
F Il lb /purd/rv116
e /0
4-
Rpcidiontial /
Parking Occupancy
Off - Street Parking Lot
Less than 75%
h 75 %- e9%
�o Ntm more
Number of Spaces
On-Street Parking Space s
Less Man 75° o
75 %- 94%
•S u85 %or mare
mber of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
Study Area Boundury
a 160
a
n�
B 12
9
a�,rvnw/ 9 . 6
79 ;' 24
592
79
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -33
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 77 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 8 AM to 10 AM (August)
/ - -.nj�, _
17 N
M1 .
m
IJ �
rs t
rs le
9 IT a 15
^r lye.
Residential
\N ;
Sass GIS Bouna'. SCPG ESPI
J ,0 7
as 14 o .L r Iso
°n
p e a 12 684e 1°";a„ 9
7 r 6
p �r a
F
79
597
Balboa Village
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -34
79
Parking Occupancy
Off - Street Parking Let
— Less than 75%
75%-89%
W9M ar mare
Namber of Spaces
On- Street Parking Spaces
4§
Lest than 75%
75%-84%
M1
u„ 85% or mare
mber of Spaces
No Porkag Spaces
,rwg
Sndy Area Boundary
a ti
J ,0 7
as 14 o .L r Iso
°n
p e a 12 684e 1°";a„ 9
7 r 6
p �r a
F
79
597
Balboa Village
NelsonlNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -34
79
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 78 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 10 AM to 12 PM (August)
13 M1
Ir
I
1)
�
It
Belpoaq�y' a `�
IS
is le
a:oeo Jmi 'k
i
Residential
N
an
ae« sis sa.c.: sug, ssw
4
Parking Occupancy
Off -stnam Parking let
® Lers than 75%
61 75 %- 89%
�0%ar mare
Number of spoons
OnSLreat POrkkg Spaces
Lea than 75%
75 % -84%
T2
85% or mero
•• ' rnloer of Spocas
•`. - No Parking SPaws
7 Study Area Soundary
sg
r�0. eau R9•
9 6
Q790 s,
Ia V
592
Balboa Vll layc
J-
NelsWNygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -35
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 79 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 12 PM to 2 PM (August)
Parking Occupancy
Off -Slr. Parking L.,
Less Man ]5'A
„ -- l5 % -99%
9o%or mere
.erg Number of Spacae
q On -Srreat Pocking Spcc.,
S y — Less Man 75%
a
75 % -84%
T95 % or more
Id n � / `Number a(5pmev
Baµbz& p 14 `
r(M I { e a d
_
N. Parkin,
20 4 SNdy Ae 59pmanrodns
y
15
d 9
oo- .,cam .I <a IP 74 1 .a � ��'•�
13 pry Id `o'' 88
M p�
Residential 1y 8 rY
1 *�
lage
O ,
aerie cls ESM
NelsoMygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -36
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 80 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 2 PM to 4 PM (August)
Parking Occupancy
Off-Street Parking Lot
_ u Less Man 75%
_ 9VI or more
Number of Spaces
On- Street Parking Spaces
Lou than 75%
IS x 75% -84%
d n xx SS% or are
�m la 16 n /p _ `Member of Spaces
Idmam. q Is No Parkin 5
// g pocas
/{ a C 20
r tl 2 I S P M1 d M1 n ' 0 /7 e'^ d
" r 1
'9 ` r q ,r e
Send, Are. d
118
)
0.em q 16 � 1c, 1 1W
Residential
1s
oµq
a
age
4W
Fec
Saw GIB Saurco SCPG ESRI
NelsonWygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -37
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 81 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 4 PM to 6 PM (August)
Nelsoi- Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -38
BALBOA VILLAGE PARKING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN — PARKING SURVEY
City of Newport Beach
Figure 82 Study Area Occupancy, Saturday 6 PM to 8 PM (August)
Il
uew BlvJ� � II„ 18 �a6 J/ �
Id
r
WuiFq,
Residential
Bw GIS Saew:9CAG. EGRI
Parking Occupancy
Off -Sweet Parkhg Lot
® Len 11son 75%
E---175%-89%
W90'a or more
Number of Spaces
Cm-street Parkin, Spaces
Less Man 75%
75 %- 84°0
2
T85% or more
PWmber of Spaces
No Parking Spaces
SNdy Area Boundary
rvg
'0
�i 8
12
9 q i
�Ilara i lage
NelsoMygaard Consulting Associates Inc. I A -39