HomeMy WebLinkAbout14 - Echo Beach Project Appeal - PowerPoint (Staff)7:-. WAMNMIF
1w, T7 ,
2
•
•
Project History
• Approved project formerly known as Seashore Village
• Tentative Tract Map, Modification Permit, Use Permit, & CRDP
• Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Planning Commission —April 17, 2oo8
• City Council — Junelo, 20o8
• Coastal Commission — October 16, 2oo8
• Expiration date- October 16, 2o16
Modified Plans- Request
Conformance Review
Reconfigured site and landscape plans
Elimination of duplex product types
Revised architectural style
for Substantial
Community Development Department - Planning Division
2
n
r,
i
T
r
1 LAS BRISAS APTS
54 UNITS �
Community Development Department - Planning Division
3
a: am • I •
EWPO
z
��q<,FOaN�I
0
12 single-unit
6 duplexes (12 units)
50,7o6 SF (1.23 FAL)
48 resident spaces /15 guest
28.2 % landscaping
b
a
.a r
�1 •�, rte �*�Y -
5 F A 5 H O R t D R IV E
!"M".. .'1...
Community Development Department - Planning Division
I.PII ^L IVL.
I
5
N-414-w" �j
24 single -units
So,g16 SF (1.24 FAL)
' xiv tx rvt.
r • s
L n � L
T 1 R 1 J ' u s 4o yR 23'
I II
1R
17
2 _ ISI Rlroan 12 r3�11t
ioo
TW } TUNi
:1 -- 2 N Wk � i -�r i n' ,7�i Jai i . 3 L L,3�
48 resident spaces /14 guest
34.1 % landscaping
— NIA
-- SE.A s ORE
D R IV F
Community Development Department - Planning Division
x =
I
iWeFeTfs-IM
T �l
F
m
A
i:�
SA
m
I
{
err =1
1 t l
tl.I
1W
Community Development Department - Planning Division
�� -,.-
.�
�I��
�_' �
Tentative Tract Map
Remains for 24 -unit airspace condos, not lots
Easements, imp., conditions remain applicable
■ Modification Permit
Encroachments allow neighborhood compatibility
Maintains min. setbacks approved
Use Permit
Midpoint height; no longer applicable
■ Coastal Residential Development Permit
07/13/2012
Replacement affordable housing units
Community Development Department - Planning Division
10
OhA ,
Impacts of project analyzed under previously
Adopted MND
Minor changes or additions allowed if no new or
substantially greater impacts
Addendum - evaluate potential differences in
impacts
Concludes impacts would be similar, conclusions of
MND do not change, no new mitigations measures
Community Development Department - Planning Division 11
Planning Ca
•
or
•
April 3, 2014
Revisions were minor
Required findings could be made
Unanimous vote- found to be in substantial
conformance with approved project
Environmental analysis covered by
Addendum
MND and
Community Development Department - Planning Division yz
Appeal filed on April 17, 2014
Major points:
New project
Improper deferral of revisions to P.C.
CEQA violations
Land use, aesthetics, and traffic impacts
Detailed responses included in staff report
Staff recommends upholding PC decision
Community Development Department - Planning Division
13
1
For more information contact:
Jaime Murillo, AICP
949-644 -3209
jmurilloQa newportbeachca.gov
www.newportbeachca.gov