The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About13 - General Plan Land Use Element Amendment - PowerPoint (Staff)1 AffM- 9W I �' CHAPTER 3 Land Use Element �I .v \�IF00 Agenda Item No. 13 July 8, 2014 General Plan Land Use Element Amendment r July 8, 2014 Background ■ May 2013 — City Council initiates Land Use Element amendment planning process ■ July 2013 to April 2014 — Thirteen Land Use Element Advisory Committee (LUEAC) meetings, open to the public ■ March 17 to April 30, 2014 — Draft SEIR released and public review ■ April 10, 2014— Public information meeting ■ May 8, 2014 & May 22, 2014— Planning Commission study sessions ■ June 5, 2014— Planning Commission public hearing and recommendations Foundation Consistency with and build on 2006 General Plan's Vision, Goals, and Policies ■ Preserved and enhanced character as a unique residential community ■ Conservative growth strategy — Accommodate development that enhances fiscal health and account for market demands, while maintaining and improving the quality of life ■ Changes in use and /or density in areas that are: ■ Economically underperforming ■ Reduce commuting distance between home and jobs ■ Enhance the values distinguishing Newport Beach as a special place to live for its residents . Scope of Amendments The proposed the land Use Element Amendment consists of changes to: 1. Designations on Land Use Plan maps; 2. Land use capacity (Table LU2, Anomaly Locations); 3. Policies and related text; 4. Glossary; and 5. Implementation Programs. Study Areas — Reference Map wr m a..w...m ...11 Yot NEWPORTBE/ GENERALPLAN Figure LU1 GENERALPLAN OVERVIEW MAP aow.mel wwbbxbeotl. Cammx<I.I d.rrM..MCei�i�i,.�.. rMplLwMtl emmxea -fineru enmxa. -x -c nreme -kW mn w.mwatl Cammer<I.I OMlta pxrkla M�r' urnru Cnnmxve Onvr R�{rxera mvn.rm r< C Xn�m. cm�mx.n on.. IMU.nklwxnm r.5uppoXlrq OMrkre ®n en OM.nXSUpoanu.� MItM-VeedpilN. �Iw x, x Pxat hblltu9amiiuElk mtl InaIXUXauI I W pmx rawx _ >a. msnm Dram n�swu.�Xwaxw xma. n kxmx . ssmre.a.x . ,asau e.x. e :nxv�'m ��. sbmdx..emxen UP Revised Designations 1 2 11 1526 Placentia (King's Liquor) 813 East Balboa Boulevard Gateway Park Multi -Unit Residential (RM) Two -Unit Residential (RT) Commercial Corridor (CC) General Commercial (CG) Mixed -Use Vertical (MU -V) Parks and Recreation (PR) Convenience Market Day Spa Small City Park Revised Designations lj 0— wji4-4,164 � V �/J, F-m �T AT RT AT' S 0.T RT �T RT RT AT AT AT IY AT AT AT AT I mu AT Ri AT cc OAT RT AT RT AT FT p FT cc R7 PF RT Ri RT RI RT RT W,� MU-H4 ft,l MU-H4 RT RT 11 g MU-H4 ■ I T MU H4 MUHfl Map Reference 11 -T Gateway PaM 7 �- Reduced Future Development Capacity 3 Westcliff Plaza 6 Newport Coast 66,000 SF Center 7 Newport Coast 74,000 SF Hotel 8 Bayside Center 9 Harbor View Center 10 The Bluffs 15 Newport Ridge -356 DUs (various areas) Harbor View Center,,, ti 138,500 SF 141,787 SF 112,986 SF 103,712 SF - 15,514 SF - 37,825 SF +10,000 SF +200 SF 2,150 rooms 1,104 rooms -1,001 rooms +45 rooms 66,000 SF 65,284 SF -366 SF +350 SF 74,000 SF 71,993 SF -1,875 SF +150 SF 54,000 SF 50,312 SF -3,538 SF +150 SF 2,550 DUs 2,187 DUs -356 DUs +7 It;.. 50 .y Reduced Future Development Capacity I� f ro Map Rehmnn 6 �,r. Map Reference l f, .e+.00n coin care, nawon wwr Rae �.- 'A c ,.o it _ RN 4 a f f 0 \ R4a e RT RI Rl. R! RT RT n M:M fli RT p RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT E RT Map Reference 8 ° eer�eXMe, R1 Map Reference 9 6 12 ¢ Map Referann 1 Ramos c. n- c�mi mn flxm y..eois,nm I I.::, Increased Future Development Capaci Regional Office: +500,000 SF; Newport Varies — Varies — Multiple Regional Commercial V 5 Center /Fashion Various (No Change) Multiple Island Properties +50,000 SF; Properties Multi - Family: +500 units 17 18 12 Regional Commercial 150 Newport Office (CO -R) to 8,500 sq ft. 125 Hotel Rooms 125 Hotel Center Drive Mixed Use Horizontal Rooms (MU -H3) 100 Newport Regional Commercial l 15,000 sq ft. Mixed Use Center Drive Office (CO -R) 17,500 s q ft. Commercial 32,500 sq ft. Harbor Day Private Institution 0.35 FAR +14,244 sq ft. 0.40 FAR School (99,708 sq ft.) (113,952 sq ft.) r' Increased Future Development Capacity M V oe Pa OD CN RS-0 PF OS C. �RSZ Is. l� o= Map Reference 17 & 18 Cam, -'q Map Reference t 8 12 �L I 100 g 150 N Harbor View Center (9) ewpon Center Di Harbor Dav School (121 GF as -D S RS 4 Increased Future Development Capacity Office Airport Office and Office 545,000 sq ft. Saunders Supporting Uses 306,923 sq ft. +238,077 sq ft. and and Properties (AO) to Mixed Use Office Residential Residential 329 Horizontal (MU -H2) +329 DUs units Retail 278,264 sq ft. General 288,264 sq ft. +11,800 sq ft. Office and The Hangars Commercial Office Office Office 11,800 sq ft. (CO -G) - 10,000 sq ft. Retail Retail: Retail +85,000 sq ft. 85,000 sq ft. Mixed Use 250,176 sq ft. Residential Residential Lyon Communities Horizontal (MU -H2) Office +g50 replacement units +850 units Hotel Hotel + 150 Rooms +150 Rooms - 250,176 sq ft. Mixed Use: LAP Companies Mixed Use Mixed Use: 46,044 sq ft. or 46,044 sq ft. or 4699 Jamboree and Horizontal (MU -H2) 46,044 sq ft. Congregate Care: 148,000 Congregate 5190 Campus Office sq ft. Care: 148,000 sq ft. (trip neutral) Increased Future Development Capacity ExWbng: AiWd and Sopponmg Uaes (AO) Proposed: MixM -Use Hamontal (MU -H2) See Table LU2 - Creale An aly 83 ,s N See Table LU2 - Anomaly 4 New and Revised Policies Reflect legislative changes since 2006 • Climate change • Complete streets (linked with land use policies addressing walkable neighborhoods and districts) Reflect policy and regulatory documents adopted since 2006 • Lido Village Design Guidelines • Balboa Village Master Plan • Energy Action Plan fir 0 New Policies — Health & Sustainability • Environmental Health • Healthy Population • Recreational Centers • Locally -Grown Food • Community Connectivity • Regulating Sustainable Development • Existing Structure Reuse • Sustainable Sites and Land Development • Revitalization of Obsolete and Underused Properties • Heat Island Effect • Orange County Sustainable Communities Strategy F♦ Al i r� New and Revised Policies Consistency with proposed revisions to land Use Diagram Text modifications to improve understandability and usability • Additional detail • Clarification Correct errors Glossary Revisions New Terms ■ Climate Action Plan, Climate Change, Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG), Greenhouse Gas Emission (GHG) Reduction, Infill, LEED Certified, Sustainability ■ Whole System, Embodied Energy and Heat Island Effect Amended ■ Definitions for "Compatibility" and "Policy" Implementation Programs Revisions New Programs • Prepare a Climate Action Plan, • Administer the Energy Action Plan, • Maintain and Implement Energy Management Plans and Encourage Conservation Environmental Review Significant and Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ■ Greenhouse Gas Emissions -City would not achieve long -term GHG reduction goals ■ Noise and Vibration - new construction would result in temporary, high vibration levels ■ Population and Housing- increase in population beyond SCAG projection ■ Transportation and Traffic —cumulative traffic and Caltrans facilities SEIR Traffic Findings Impacted* Intersections — With Existing Lane Geometrics *Change in LOS from E to F or .01 increase at a deficient intersection (LOS E or F) Notes: No i/s impacts with 2006 General Plan Recommended Improvements Same result for Project Alternative Impacted Freeway Mainline and Ramp Segments ■ 6 Freeway Mainline Segments (same result for Project Alternative) ■ 2 Freeway Ramp Segments (for Project Alternative, 1 Freeway Ramp Segment) Level of Service (LOS) Intersection Impact? 2006 GP GP LUE Amendment AM PM AM PM AM PM Irvine Av. / University Dr. C E C E - Yes MacArthur BI. / Ford Dr. C E C E - Yes Von Karman Av. / Alton Pkwy. D E E F - Yes *Change in LOS from E to F or .01 increase at a deficient intersection (LOS E or F) Notes: No i/s impacts with 2006 General Plan Recommended Improvements Same result for Project Alternative Impacted Freeway Mainline and Ramp Segments ■ 6 Freeway Mainline Segments (same result for Project Alternative) ■ 2 Freeway Ramp Segments (for Project Alternative, 1 Freeway Ramp Segment) Preferred Alternative NO AIRPORT AREA PROJECT ALTERNATIVE Eliminates proposed land use changes to the Airport Area subarea ■ Is the Environmentally Superior Alternative ■ Lessens impacts for all environmental impacts including significant impacts (GHG, construction vibration, traffic and population) ■ Meets most project objectives ■ Would not eliminate any significant unavoidable impacts to Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise & Vibration, Population & Housing, but would reduce the Transportation & Traffic impacts by eliminating a significant impact to one ramp ■ Reduces environmental impacts and is less intense Proposed Project — Airport Area ExWbng: Airport and Supporting Uaes (AO) Proposed: MixM -Use Hamontal (MU -H2) See Table LU2 - Creale Ar aly 83 4 g «2 40 Opp AO See Table LU2 - Anomaly 4 \�1 1 U 0 / � Y®INS / WNS WNI / a� / LHS I/ w OS Map Reference 4 Airport Area Planning Commission Recommendation E[NUnp: Airport eM Supportnp Ue (AO) SEIR Traffic Impact Comparisons LUE Amendment Project Total Future Average Daily Trips (ADT) Comparison 975,000 - - - -- - - -- : - - - -- - - -- : - - Total ADT: Total ADT: Total ADT Total ADT 945,518 954,055 943,284 947,935 950,000 -------------------------- - - - - -- ---------------------------------------- 925,000 --- 900,000 - V-1t ---------- - - - - -- �- Future ADT ; Future ADT : Future ADT ]k54,592 1fe31�28__ ___� 152.357 875,000 825,000 800,000 Existing 2013 ADT: 790,927 Future ADT: 157,008 2006 GP— 2014GP— 2014 GP— 2014GP- Future ADT Future ADT Future ADT Future ADT (Adopted) (Proposed (Proposed Project) Akernative — (PlanningCommission No Airport Area) Recommendation) CHAPTER 3 Land Use Element General nd Use Element Amendment July 8, 2014 Exhibits ■ No. CC 1 Draft Resolution SEIR including ■ A Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Resolution • Draft SEIR (under separate cover) • Draft SEIR Appendices A through I (under separate cover) ■ Final SEIR (under separate cover) • a. Introduction to Final SEIR • b. Response to Comments • c. Corrections and Additions to the Draft SEIR ■ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ■ B Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Consideration Exhibits ■ No. CC 2 Draft Resolution — ALUC Override ■ No. CC 3 Draft Resolution — General Plan Land Use Element Amendment ■ A Amended Land Use Element (Text, Policies, Glossary, and Implementation Manual) ■ B Amended Anomaly Table (Table LU2) and Affected Attachment Name ■ No. CC 4 LUE Committee Policy Recommendations ■ No. CC 5 Land Use Amendment and ADT Tables ■ No. CC 6 Planning Commission No. 1946 Exhibits 0 0 0 0 0 No. CC 7 Planning Commission Minutes, June 5, 2014 No. CC 8 ALUC Letter, June 11, 2014 No. CC 9 Charter Section 423 Analysis No. CC 10 Fiscal Impact Analysis No. CC 11 Financial Feasibility Memo (Airport Area) No. CC 12 Public Comments No. CC 13 Correspondence from May 22, 2014 Planning Commission Study Session No. CC 14 Correspondence from June 5, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting