HomeMy WebLinkAbout15 - Dog Parks, Harbor Permit Late FeesCITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Staff Report
September 09, 2014
Agenda Item No. 15.
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Dave Kiff, City Manager— (949) 644 -3002, dkiff @newportbeachca.gov
PREPARED BY: Dave Kiff, City Manager
PHONE: (949) 644 -3002
TITLE: Direction to Staff on Dog Parks, Harbor Permit Late Fees
ABSTRACT:
Per Council Policy A -6, any Council member may ask the City Council at a public meeting to return to the
Council with specific direction as to whether staff should spend time and resources researching or
developing specific policy issues. This helps ensure that resources are not wasted on an item that City
Council may not ultimately adopt.
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff to:
a) Ask the Harbor Commission to examine whether provisions of the code and resolutions should be
changed regarding late fees or charges for harbor permits or uses at the Balboa Yacht Basin; and
b) Ask the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Commission to look at possible locations for more dog parks,
including areas for small dogs, in the community.
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
There is no fiscal impact related to this specific decision item, but depending on the direction Council takes,
some expense can be incurred to research and staff specific issues.
DISCUSSION:
Section C3 of Council Policy A -6 reads as follows:
Items may be placed on a City Council agenda in the following manner:
A. A Council Member may ask during the Council meeting that a matter be brought to the City Council at a
future meeting. The matter will be brought back at the next Council meeting (if possible). At that Council
meeting, if a majority of the City Council wishes to examine the issue, staff will prepare an appropriate
report and return to the City Council with greater detail for discussion and /or action.
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Council Member Gardner asked that the items mentioned in the
recommendations section be brought back for formal direction.
15 -1
This item recurs on an intermittent basis. It is an attempt to minimize any waste of staff or volunteer time
and resources in a direction that might not be in line with the desires of the City Council. In the spirit of
those limited resources, we do not take the time to spell out the nuances of the issues about which we
seek guidance. If readers have a specific interest in any one of the issues shown in the recommended
action(s), they should attend the Council meeting and participate in the discussion as a part of public
comments about this item.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
This action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Sections 15060
(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA
Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in
physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
NOTICING:
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at
which the City Council considers the item).
15 -2