HomeMy WebLinkAbout19 - Final Tract Map No. 15479, Bonita Canyon Located North of Bonita Canyon Drive and East of Battersea; Planning Area 26 (Bonita Canyon)�Ewcpgr CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Hearing Date: January 25, 1999
p` a COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Agenda Item No.: 19
PLANNING DEPARTMENT Staff Person: Scot E. Ferris
eoa' 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD 644 -3231
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
(714) 644-3200: FAX (P4) 644-3250
REPORT TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Final Tract Map No. 15479, Bonita Canyon
Located North of Bonita Canyon Drive and East of Battersea; Planning
Area 26 (Bonita Canyon).
ACTION: Approve Final Map of Tract 15479 with the finding and subject to the
condition of approval set forth in the attached Exhibit "A ".
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 -39 and Lettered Lots "A" through "J" of Tract 15479
ZONE: PC (Bonita Canyon)
OWNER: The Irvine Company
Points and Authority
• Final Map procedures are set forth in Chapter 19.16 of the Municipal Code.
bo
IE
VICINITY MAP
rr40ZMA
Final Tract Map No. 15479
1 Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses
Current Development:
Graded Vacant Lot
To the north:
Is the S.J.H.T.C.
To the east:
Vacant Land
To the south:
Are Single Family Residential Homes with Vacant Land Beyond
To the west:
Are Single Family Residential Homes.
Page 2
Background
On January 12, 1998 the Newport Beach City Council approved a resolution to amend its sphere
of influence to include Planning Areas 26, 27 and 28, and to annex Planning Area 26A (Bonita
Canyon). The City Council also approved a development agreement with the Irvine Company
and an Agreement Respecting Detachment/Annexation of Planning Area 26A with the City of
Irvine. These agreements provide for the orderly transition of development responsibilities from
Irvine to Newport Beach as land development takes place.
At its meeting of October 2, 1997, the City of Irvine Planning Commission approved Tentative
Tract Map No. 15479 for the subdivision of Lots 18 and 20 of Tract 15317 into 103 numbered
lots and 18 lettered lots for the development of 103 single family detached dwelling units (a copy of
the staff report is attached). Final Tract Map 15479 records a 14.44 acre portion of the approved
Tentative Tract Map, which is being developed with 39 numbered lots, and 10 lettered lots for 39
single family detached dwelling units. The balance of the Tentative Tract Map area will be subject
to additional Final Map approvals.
A copy of the previously prepared environmental document and traffic study are available in the
Planning Department for review of Planning Area 26 (Bonita Canyon).
Proposed Final Tract Map and Recommendation
Procedures in Section 19.16.150 of the Municipal Code provide that if the City Council determines
that a Final Map is in conformity with the Tentative Map and is satisfied with the plan of
subdivision, it shall approve the map. The City of Newport Beach Planning and Public Works
Departments have reviewed the Final Map of Tract Number 15479 and are satisfied with the plan of
the subdivision. In addition, the required Subdivision Agreement and bonding have been submitted
to and approved by the Public Works Department for the on -site improvements. Staff is of the
opinion that the Final Map conforms with the approved Tentative Map and therefore, recommends
approval of the Final Map, with the finding and condition set forth in the attached Exhibit "A ".
Staff has not included an exhibit for denial, since the Final Map conforms with the tentative map.
Submitted by:
SHARON Z. WOOD
Assist t City Manager
Prepared by:
SCOT E. FERRIS
Associate Planner
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Excerpt of City of Irvine Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 2, 1997
Final Map of Tract No. 15479
Attachments available in the Planning Department:
Environmental Impact Report for Planning Area 26 (SCH #95091032)
Page 3
EXHIBIT "A"
FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 15479
Final Map of Tract No. 15479
Finding:
That the Final Map of Tract No. 15479 substantially conforms to the Tentative Map of said
Tract, with all changes permitted and all requirements imposed as conditions to its
acceptance.
Condition:
That all conditions imposed by the City of Irvine Planning Commission in conjunction with
its approval of the Tentative Map of Tract No. 15479 shall be fulfilled.
Page 4
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 97 -1969
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
IRVINE APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15479
(FILE NO. 29370 -TT) TO SUBDIVIDE LOTS 18 AND 20 OF TRACT
15317 INTO 103 NUMBERED LOTS AND 18 LETTERED LOTS FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF 103 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNITS;
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HARBOR VIEW NORTH AND
BONITA CANYON ROAD. WITHIN PLANNING AREA 26; FILED BY
TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES
WHEREAS, Taylor Woodrow Homes has submitted an application for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15479 (File No. 29370 -TT) to
subdivide Lots 18 and 20 of Tract No. 15317 totaling 30.3 gross
acres into 103 numbered and 18 lettered lots for the development
of 103 single family dwelling units; and
WHEREAS, the Subdivision Committee of the City of Irvine
reviewed the subject application at a public meeting held on
September 10, 1997 and recommended Planning Commission approval
subject to conditions; and I
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Irvine has
considered information presented by the Community Development
Department, the applicant and other interested parties at a public
hearing held on October 2, 1997.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Irvine
DOES HEREBY FIND.
SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 6 of the City of Irvine CEQA
Procedures and Section 15168(e) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the
project is covered by the previously certified Program EIR for
Planning Area 26 Zone Change 18903 -ZC which serves as a Program EIR
for the proposed project (SCH No. 95091032). The effects of the
project were examined in the Program EIR and all feasible
mitigation measures and alternatives developed in the Program EIR
are incorporated into this project. Based on public testimony and
independent judgement, the Planning Commission determines that no
new environmental effects could occur and no new mitigation
measures are required. The Program EIR is, therefore, determined
to be adequate to serve as the EIR for this project and satisfies
all requirements of CEQA.
SECTION 2. Mitigation measures identified in the Program EIR
have been incorporated into the project, or have been previously
applied. These measures mitigate any potential significant
environmental effects thereof.
1 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
i
SECTION 3. Pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 7. 11.4 (C) ,
all required Fish and Game filing fees have been paid subsequent
to certification of the Program EIR for Planning Area 26 (SCH No.
95091032).
SECTION 4. The findings required by state law regarding
justification of Citywide, village -wide and project specific
development fees for public facilities as a result of this project
approval have been met as follows:
Citywide fees for public facilities are collected in
conjunction with the issuance of building permits for
development projects and consist of the following:
A. San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Area of Benefit
Charges.
B. Development surcharge fees to recover wear and tear costs
from construction site traffic.
C. A systems development charge.
Resolutions have been adopted by the Irvine City Council which
establish the connection between the development projects and
the public improvements based on the following nexus:
A. The area of benefit charges for the San Joaquin Hills
Transportation Corridor are based on the assumption that
future state and federal revenues are projected to be
inadequate to construct said transportation corridors in
• timely manner; and that future development should pay
• share of the cost of implementing new transportation
corridors to ensure that the transportation system will
be adequate to serve said development and that this share
of the corridor costs should be proportional to the
traffic generated by the development.
B. The impact of construction vehicles using City streets
causes wear and tear which significantly reduces the life
of the surface of City streets beyond normally expected
use and the cost of impacted wear and tear on City
streets should be borne by the development projects which
create the impact. The wearing surface on City streets
is reduced by fifty percent by commercial/ industrial
construction traffic which causes significant increases
on City maintenance costs.
C. The implementation of a systems development charge
provides a predictable and equitable funding source for
capital improvements by requiring development projects
to "buy into" the pre- existing City infrastructure so
2 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
that the impact of new growth on existing improvements
will be borne equitably by new development.
3. All of the Citywide fees identified in this section are based
on this project's proportional share of the cost of the
improvement as identified in the appropriate City Council
resolution.
SECTION 5. In accordance with Subarticle 3 of the City of
Irvine Subdivision Manual, the following findings required for
approving a vesting tentative tract map as set forth in have been
established:
A. The proposed nap IS consistent with applicable general and
specific plans.
The proposed vesting tentative tract map is consistent with
Zone Change 18903 -ZC, which rezoned the vacant land in
Planning Area 26 consistent with the General Plan. The land
uses shown on the map reflect the current zoning categories
and underlying General Plan designations.
H. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision IS
consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
The proposed layout of the land is consistent with the General
Plan designations. The circulation system shown on the
General Plan land use map is reflected on the proposed vesting
tentative tract map and the necessary circulation improvements
have been included in this resolution.
C. The site IS physically suitable for the type of development.
The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of
the development in that the proposed project site is generally
flat in nature and there appears to be no significant,
physical characteristics that would prohibit development. The
Program EIR contained a geotechnical analysis which further
analyzed the suitability for development of the project site.
Additionally, the City of Irvine Grading and Excavation Code
requires the submittal of a Soils Engineering Report, which
will discuss the suitability of the proposed project site for
development.
D. The site IS physically suitable for the proposed density of
the development.
The zoning of the land affected by the vesting tentative tract
map is consistent with the underlying General Plan
designations and adopted building intensities. The zoning
permits a maximum of 31.0 dwelling units per acre in the 2.4
3 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
I
Medium High Density Residential zoning districts. However,
the applicant proposes to build a maximum of 3.4 dwelling
units per acre, which is within the permitted density range.
E. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are
NOT likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor
substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat.
The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements
will alter the existing environment. An Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) was prepared for the site in conjunction with
previously approved Zone Change 18903 -ZC. The EIR contains
mitigation measures to reduce the potential impacts to biotic
resources and is consistent with the Natural Communities
Conservation Program (NCCP).
F. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is
NOT likely to cause serious public health problems.
The design of the subdivision in not likely to cause serious
public health problems. Construction of all improvements and
facilities will be in accordance with City standards and under
City inspection.
G. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will
NOT conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large,
for access through or use of, property within the proposed
subdivision.
The proposed vesting tentative tract map will not conflict
with any existing or proposed public easements. The map has
been reviewed to ensure that all proposed easements are in
conformance with applicable City standards.
H. Any discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an
existing sewer system would NOT result in violation of
existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, pursuant to
Division 7 of the Water Code of the State of California.
The proposed project is a vesting tentative tract map that
will include additions to the existing sewer system. Any use
of the existing sewer system and any new additions to the
system shall be in conformance with all applicable regional
and state requirements.
I. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
HAVE BEEN satisfied.
4 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
0
As stated in Section 1 of this resolution, the vesting
tentative tract map is a subsequent activity under a
previously certified Program EIR for Planning Area 26.
Mitigation measures from the EIR have been incorporated into
this resolution.
SECTION 6. Based on the above findings, the Planning
Commission of the City of Irvine DOES HEREBY APPROVE Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 15479 (File No. 29370 -TT), subject to the
following conditions:
Prior to the Release of a Final Map by the Citv
Standard Condition 1.1
This subdivision necessitates the construction of public and /or
private infrastructure improvements. Prior to the release of a
final map by the City, the applicant shall construct, or enter into
an agreement and post security, in a form and amount acceptable to
the City Engineer, guaranteeing the construction of the following
public and /or private improvements, marked with "x" and listed
below, in conformance with applicable City standards and the City's
Capital Improvement Policy. Items not required in conjunction with
this project are marked "n /a".
X a. Street improvements including, but not limited to:
pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive
approaches, street lighting, signing, striping.
n a b. Traffic signal systems, interconnect and other traffic
control and management devices.
X c. Storm drain facilities.
a d. Subdrain facilities.
DL e. Landscaping and computerized irrigation control system
(for all public streets, parks and public areas).
X f. Sewer, reclaimed and /or domestic water systems, as
required by the appropriate sewer and water districts as
well as the Orange County Fire Authority when
appropriate.
X g. Monumentation
n/a h. Riding, Hiking and Bicycle trails adjacent to or through
the project site.
X i. Undergrounding of existing overhead and proposed utility
distribution lines.
5 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
* Denotes Mitigation Measure
0
n a j. Transit - related improvements depicted on the approved
tentative map or as follows:
Standard Condition 1.8
Prior to the release of a final map by the City, the applicant
shall submit one (1) set of computerized data of the final map
which is compatible with the City ARC /INFO system or DXF (Autocad)
system in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. Maps should
be tied to County of Orange control points (latest revision). Refer
to "Specifications for Digital Submission" as maintained by the
Surveyor's Office of the County of Orange for specific requirements
of individual submittal.
Standard Condition 1.11
This subdivision may include existing survey monuments which may
be disturbed through construction activities. Certain existing
survey monumentation may be deemed necessary for preservation and
perpetuation subsequent to final construction improvements
associated with this project. All survey monuments deemed
necessary for perpetuation as recommended by the design Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer shall be identified and
shown on the final map for perpetuation. Such survey monuments
shall be preserved and referenced before construction and if
disturbed replaced after construction pursuant to pursuant to
Section 8771 of the Business and Professions Code. Prior to
release of a final map by the City, the applicant shall submit to
the City Engineer a statement noting whether any monuments will be
disturbed.
Prior to the Issuance of Preliminary or Precise Grading Permits
Standard Condition 2.2
Prior to the issuance of precise grading permits, the applicant
shall submit a groundwater survey of the entire site. The analysis
shall be prepared by a geotechnical engineer versed in groundwater
analysis and shall include the following information and analysis:
a. Potential for perched groundwater intrusion into the
shallow groundwater zone upon build -out.
b. Analysis for relief of groundwater buildup and properties
of soil materials on -site.
C. Impact of groundwater potential on building and
structural foundations.
6 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
* Denotes Mitigation Measure
10
d. Proposed mitigation to avoid potential for groundwater
intrusion within five feet of the bottom of the footings.
tandard Condition
This subdivision will result in soil disturbance of five (5) or
more acres of land. Prior to the issuance of preliminary or
precise grading permits, the applicant shall provide the City
Engineer with evidence that a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed
with the State Water Resources Control Board. Such evidence shall
consist of a copy of the NOI stamped by the State Water Resources
Control Board or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, or a
letter from either agency stating that the NOI has been filed.
Standard Condition 2.9
This subdivision may include existing survey monuments which may
be disturbed through construction activities and deemed necessary
for preservation by the City Engineer. If such monuments will be
disturbed, the applicant shall have a licenced Land Surveyor or
qualified Registered Civil Engineer tie out monumentation affected
by the project and submit "preliminary corner records" to the City
Engineer. After approval by the City Engineer, the applicant shall
file the corner records with the County Surveyor. Prior to the
issuance of a preliminary grading permit evidence of such filing
shall be furnished to the City Engineer.
Standard Condition 2.10
Prior to the issuance of precise grading permits, the applicant
shall submit, and the Director of Community Development shall have
approved, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). The WQMP shall
identifying the Best Management Practices (BMP's) that will be used
on the site to control predictable pollutant runoff.
* Condition 2.11
Prior to issuance of precise grading permits, consideration shall
be given in the soils engineering report for designing building
pads to include over excavation of a minimum of five feet, to allow
for excavation for shallow footings and utility trenches
(Mitigation Measure GS -3).
* Condition 2.12
During all site preparation, grading and construction activities,
particulate control measures, consistent with Tables 1 and 2 of
AQMD Rule 403, shown in Figures 3 -9 and 3 -10 in the EIR, shall be
7 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
* Denotes Mitigation Measure
implemented by the construction contractors, for the control of PM10
related emissions (Mitigation Measure AQ -1).
Condition 2.13
Construction contractors shall use low emission mobile construction
equipment during all site preparation, grading. and construction
activities, where feasible (Mitigation Measure AQ -2).
Condition 2.14
Construction contractors shall maintain all construction equipment
engines tuned consistent with the manufacturer's specifications
during all site preparation, grading and construction activities
(Mitigation Measure AQ -3).
* Condition 2.15
Construction contractors shall use low sulfur fuel for stationary
construction equipment as required by AQMD Rules 431.1 and 431.2
and shall use existing power sources and clean fuel generators as
feasible, during all site preparation, grading and construction
activities (Mitigation Measure AQ -4).
Condition 2.16
Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project applicant/
contractor shall coordinate with the applicable utility companies
to determine their needs to accommodate new conduits and to protect
existing facilities on PA 26 during construction (Mitigation
Measure PS -1).
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
Standard Condition 3.1
This subdivision includes lots or parcels which may be subject to
noise impacts. Prior to the issuance of building permits for each
structure other than a parking structure on such lots or parcels,
the applicant shall submit a final acoustical report prepared to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The
report shall show that the development will be sound- attenuated
against present and projected noise levels, including roadway,
aircraft, helicopter and railroad, to meet City interior and
exterior noise standards. The final acoustical report shall
include all information required by the City's "Acoustical Report
Information Sheet" (form 42 -48). In order to demonstrate that all
mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project, the
report shall be accompanied by a list identifying the sheet(s) of
the building plans which include the approved mitigation measures.
PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
* Denotes Mitigation Measure
U
Condition 3.4
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
submit, and the Director of Community Development shall have
approved, a completed Occupancy Disclosure form for the project.
The approved disclosure form, along with its attachments, shall be
included as part of the rental /lease agreements and as part of the
sales literature for the project. The disclosure statement shall
include information, current as of the date of submittal, with
respect to each item marked with an "x" on the list below. The
items marked "n /a" need not be included.
X a. Noise resulting from aircraft and /or helicopter
operations from MCAS Tustin or MCAS E1 Toro.
X b. Receipt of the City's Earthquake Preparedness packet.
n/a c. Special Flood Hazard Area information for areas subject
to inundation.
X d. The potential for the Marine Corp Air Station, E1 Toro
to be developed as a:
1. Commercial airport,
2. Cargo airport, or
3. Mixed use development.
The statement shall include a vicinity map showing the
project location and the location of the Marine Air Corp
Station, E1 Toro, with an accurate depiction of the
location of the existing air station runways.
Condition 3.6
Prior to the issuance of building
submit a construction phasing plan
Orange County Fire Authority. This
emergency vehicle access is adequate
Condition 3.7
permits, the applicant shall
for that subdivision to the
plan shall demonstrate that
(Mitigation Measure PS -2).
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
provide the City verification from the geotechnical engineer that
settlement monitoring during prescribed waiting periods between the
completion of earthwork and construction has been completed
(Modified Mitigation Measure GS-11).
9 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
* Denotes Mitigation Measure
13
Prior to the Issuance of Certificates of Use and Occunanc
Standard Condition 4.1
Prior to the issuance of certificates of use and occupancy, each
fire hydrant shall have a "Blue Reflective Pavement Marker"
indicating its location'on the street or drive per Orange County
Fire Authority standards. On private property, these markers are
to be maintained in good condition by the property owner.
Prior to the Exoneration of Securit
Standard Condition 5.1
Prior to the exoneration of any security, the applicant shall
submit one (1) duplicate mylar of the final map and all public or
private improvement plans, two (2) copies (one original and one
duplicate) of 35mm microfilm of the final map, public or private
improvement plans, final structure calculations, and computer
analysis, if any, for all buildings, and the record drawings of
grading, landscape, and improvement plans to, and in a manner
acceptable to, the City Engineer. The microfilm shall be in 4 "x
6" jackets with 6 frames per jacket. The computer analysis may be
submitted on standard IBM compatible floppy disks.
Standard Condition 5.2
Prior to the exoneration of any security, the applicant shall
submit one (1) set of computerized data, which is compatible with
the City ARC /INFO system or DXF (Autocad) system, of the record
drawings of landscape and improvement plans to, and in a manner
acceptable to, the City Engineer. Maps should be tied to County
of Orange control points (latest revision). Refer to
"Specifications for Digital Submission" as maintained by the
Surveyor's Office of the County of Orange for specific requirements
of individual submittal. When requested by the City Engineer, the
applicant shall submit one (1) set of computerized data of computer
generated structural analysis and calculations.
Standard Condition 5.4
This subdivision may include existing survey monuments which may
be disturbed through construction activities and deemed necessary
for preservation by the City Engineer. If such monuments were
disturbed, the applicant shall have a licensed Land Surveyor or
qualified Registered Civil Engineer re- establish any such
monumentation damaged or destroyed during construction of project
and file the corner records with the County Surveyor. Prior to the
exoneration of any security evidence of such filing shall be
furnished to the City Engineer.
10 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
* Denotes Mitigation Measure
I'1
Miscellaneous
standard Condition 6.2
The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days
of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of
building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure
to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of
required permits or the revocation of the approval of this
application.
Standard Condition 6.3
The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
of Irvine or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim,
action, or proceeding against the City agency or its agents,
officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an
approval of the local agency, advisory agency, appeal board, or
legislative body concerning this subdivision, which action is
brought within the time period provided for in Section 66499.37 of
the Subdivision Map Act. The City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and will cooperate
fully in the defense.
Condition 6.7
On- street parking shall be prohibited along the interior streets
where the landscape islands will be installed. The no parking
areas shall be as follows:
A.
"D"
Street:
along
the
street frontage
for
Lots
9,
10,
13,
14, 17,
21, 22,
25,
26, and;
B.
"E"
Street:
along
the
street frontage
for
Lots
27,
28,
30,
31, 33,
34, 38,
39,
41, 42, 44, 45,
48,
and;
C.
"F"
Street:
along
the
street frontage
for
Lots
49,
50,
53,
54, 56,
57, 60,
61,
64, 66, 67, 69,
70,
72,
74,
75,
and;
D.
"G"
Street:
along
the
street frontage
for
Lots
88,
93,
98,
and 103.
Condition 6.8
The applicant shall install reflectorized markers at the nose of
the landscape medians within the cul -de -sacs of Streets "A ",
"E", "F ", and "G" to alert motorists.
11 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
* Denotes Mitigation Measure
Condition 6.9
The applicant shall establish one -way, counter clockwise, traffic
in the areas of the landscape medians. It is recommended that a
R7 -type, or equivalent, sign be erected at the nose of the median
which would also serve as the reflector requested above, in
Condition 6.8.
* Condition 6.10
Limits on Truck Speed. During all site preparation, grading and
construction, the speed of trucks shall be limited to 15 miles per
hour (mph) while traveling on the PA 26 site (Mitigation Measure
N -2).
* Condition 6.11
Pile Drivers. The use of pile drivers shall be avoidfd to the
greatest extent feasible during construction and no pile driving
shall commence prior to 8:00 AM (Modified Mitigation Measure N-
4) .
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Irvine at a regular meeting held on the 2nd of October 1997, by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: GALLAGHER, KELLY, KLEINPETER, PEOTTER
NOES. N/A
ABSENT: FLEISCHMAN
ABSTAIN: N/A
Unless an appeal is filed by 5:00 p.m. on October 20, 1997, the
application shall become effective on October 21, 1997.
J 934----
SECRETARY
er /tey- wood /29370 -tt.pc -reso
12 PC Resolution No. 97 -1969
* Denotes Mitigation Measure