Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout18 - Dredging in Newport Harbor11 March 22,1999 Council Agenda Item No 18 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council j From: Timothy Riley, Fire and Marine Chief✓ Subject: Dredging in Newport Harbor BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting on February 8,1999, Councilman Noyes asked about the feasibility of the City purchasing a dredge for such things as channel dredging projects or dredging in other specific areas within the harbor. A pre- requisite to discussing whether the City should purchase a dredge would be a review of the responsibility for dredging within Lower Newport Bay. The attached Exhibit #1 indicates the area of primary dredging responsibility for the Army Corps of Engineers. Exhibit #2 indicates areas of primary responsibility for the County of Orange and Exhibit #3 indicates those for the City of Newport Beach. As is evident from the exhibits, the agency having the largest responsibility for Lower Harbor Dredging is the Army Corps of Engineers. The Army Corps surveys their area of responsibility once a year and those surveys are available to the City. The current survey will be completed within the next two months and it is staff's proposal to augment that survey to include the areas for which the City has responsibility. The remaining areas of responsibility, within the Lower Bay, lie between the bulkhead line and the pierhead line. This, by Council Policy, is the responsibility of the harbor permittee (adjacent private property owner). Dredging is done here by the harbor permittee through contracts with private dredging contractors. Dredging within the navigational channels, as a result of the nature and volume of the material, requires ocean disposal. This would necessitate not only the purchase of a dredge (hydraulic or clamshell) but also a dump barge and tugboat. Two harbors relatively close to Newport Beach that have their own dredging operations are the City of Long Beach and the City of Santa Cruz. In their view, owning a dredging operation is such an extremely expensive undertaking that it is only justified when you are the primary agency with dredging responsibility. In their opinion the costs are so high, ownership is a position of last resort. The City of Santa Barbara has prepared plans to purchase a dredging operation but will put it into effect only if the Army Corps of Engineers stops funding the dredging in their harbor, again as a consequence of the expense. March 22,1999 Council Agenda Item No The City currently owns a dredge that was purchased to maintain depth within its reservoirs. It was designed for shallow water dredging. It could not be used for the type of dredging necessary in the Lower Bay navigational channels. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the above, rather than purchase the equipment to allow the City to do dredging, the City should monitor and augment depth surveys regularly. Then, in conjunction with the County of Orange, lobby the Army Corps of Engineers vigorously to assure that they do timely projects in the lower 'harbor to maintain adequate navigational depth. Those projects that are solely the City's, responsibility should be budgeted for and contracted out as required. 0 0 W, I aaa O� .a a o I A cl i \ �1 / ��I /��' �llll Cld oa�3N O C�- I Aga , r d os. _ � � L,�Q����OO� ��� N = V si Ills loo /lip U WEB Is ;!m& 4. k V 0 F -,% .1mi awnr., us, Wool s N �eeeeee ����� ♦ n W ,. Rrr. Y �p V IT IMG( N Y• � .:� fh�� Wes. 3 _a ° f ® G 4 i S ♦ n m ♦ m ♦ R i Cld GB 3,yr`D ^O oa�3tY y 4�4� 3 O V