HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - 03-27-2001City Council Meeting
April 10, 2001
Agenda Item No. 1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Minutes D
Regular Meeting
March 27, 2001- 7:00 p.m. ��� INDEX
STUDY SESSION - Cancelled.
CLOSED SESSION - 5:30 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT -None.
RECESSED AND RECONVENED AT 7:00 P.M. FOR REGULAR MEETING
ROLL CALL
Present: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Heffernan, Mayor Adams
Absent: Proctor (excused)
Pledge of Allegiance - Council Member Bromberg.
Invocation by Bishop Mike Browning, Newport Beach Stake - Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints and member of the Police Department
Chaplain Program.
Proclamation proclaiming April 1 - 7, 2001, as National Library Week
presented to the Chairman of the Board of Library Trustees, Patrick
Bartolic. Mr. Bartolic thanked the City Council and the community for
their support of the library system. He stated that Newport Beach is
consistently ranked among the top five libraries in the country.
CITY COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS OR MATTERS WHICH COUNCIL
MEMBERS WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
DISCUSSION, ACTION OR REPORT (NON- DISCUSSION ITEM):
Council Member Bromberg requested that the agenda for the City
Council meeting of April 10, 2001, include an item dedicating the site
above the Central Library as a passive park. He added that the site
should also include a parking lot to be used by the Central Library.
• Mayor Adams noted that the City Attorney's office is currently working
on providing the City Council with an inventory of the open space
within the City. City Manager Bludau confirmed that the inventory
should be available by the City Council meeting of April 24, 2001.
Council Member Bromberg additionally requested that the City move
forward with the process for having a park at the site above the Central
Library. He stated that this should be placed on a City Council agenda
in the next month or six weeks, and would be separate from the item
previously requested. He noted that this would only begin the process.
Volume 54 - Page 165
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
INDEX
• Council Member Bromberg congratulated Lily Mackey, who will
become the first woman to be installed as the exalted ruler of the
Newport Harbor Elks Club on April 1, 2001.
• Mayor Adams clarified with City Manager Bludau that the process for
initiating a park at the site above the library would begin with the
Parks, Beaches & Recreation (PB &R) Commission. City Manager
Bludau stated that it would be helpful to the PB &R Commission if some
direction was provided by the City Council beforehand.
• Mayor Pro Tern Ridgeway requested that the Planning Director provide
the City Council with a report on the Open Space Element of the
General Plan.
• Mayor Adams requested that a future Study Session item include a
report on what the City is doing in response to the energy crisis, as well
as what is being done to prepare for it.
• Council Member Heffernan requested that a future agenda item include
a discussion by the City Council on when Study Sessions should be
held, referring to a conflict by himself and Council Member O'Neil with
Hoag Hospital Board meetings.
ORAL REPORTS FROM CITY COUNCIL ON COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway to move the item to after the Public
Comments section of the agenda.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Heffernan, Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Proctor
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AND ORAL STATUS REPORT
1. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FOR MARCH 22, 2001.
Motion by Council Member Glover to move the item to after the Public
Comments section of the agenda.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote
Ayes: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Heffernan, Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Proctor
CONSENT CALENDAR
READING OF MINUTES /ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Volume 54 - Page 166
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
2. MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR AND REGULAR
MEETING OF MARCH 13, 2001. Waive reading of subject minutes,
approve as written and order filed.
3. READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. Waive reading in
full of all ordinances and resolutions under consideration, and direct City
Clerk to read by title only.
RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION
4. AD HOC GENERAL PLAN UPDATE COMMITTEE. Adopt Resolution
2001 -17 correcting the membership list of the Ad Hoc General Plan Update
Committee to include a member of the Harbor Committee, which had been
inadvertently removed last December, and rescinding Resolution
No. 2000 -102.
CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS
5. SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH
NEWPORT BEACH CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, PROVIDING
FOR AN ELECTION ON AN AGENCY SHOP PROVISION. Approve
the Supplemental Memorandum of Understanding (MOLT).
6. LEASE AGREEMENT FOR SHIPYARD/RETAIL STORE AT BALBOA
YACHT BASIN (WITH BASIN MARINE, INC.). Item continued to
April 10, 2001; and appointed Council Member Heffernan and Mayor Pro
Tem Ridgeway to a subcommittee to discuss the lease provisions.
7. PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT MOBILE LAPTOP COMPUTERS.
1) Award bid to purchase 35 replacement mobile laptop computers for use in
marked police vehicles used by sworn personnel from 'Dell Computer
Corporation" for $83,580.00 from Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Budget
No. 7017- C1820539; 2) award bid to purchase screen coating overlay for 35
mobile laptop computers for use in marked police vehicles used by sworn
personnel from 'Dell Computer Corporation" for $5,915.00 from CIP Budget
No. 7017- C1820539; and 3) award bid to purchase "touch screen" retrofit for
35 mobile laptop computers for use in marked police vehicles used by sworn
personnel to "CPU Computer Repair" (as authorized by 'Dell Computer
Corporation ") for $23,931.25 from CIP Budget No. 7017- C1820539.
8. BAYSIDE DRIVE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS (C -3198) -
ACCEPTANCE AND COMPLETION. 1) Accept the work; 2) authorize the
City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion; 3) authorize the City Clerk to
release the Labor and Material bond 35 days after the Notice of Completion
has been recorded in accordance with applicable portions of the Civil Code;
4) release the Faithful Performance Bond one year after Council acceptance;
and 5) approve a budget amendment (BA -037) increasing the appropriation
in Account No. 7012- C5100008 in the amount of $22,229.35 and increase the
revenue estimate for General Fund Account No. 5100 -5864 in the amount of
$22,229.35 for the additional contract work and subsequent reimbursement
by Pacific Bell.
Volume 54 - Page 167
.0 �•
Res 2001 -17
Ad Hoc General
Plan Update
Committee
(24)
C -2059
City Employees
Association MOU
(38)
C -3404
Balboa Yacht
Basin
(38/51)
C -3405
Mobile Laptop
Computers
(38)
C -3198
BA -037
Bayside Drive
Storm Drain
Improvements
(38/40)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
9. NEWPORT HEIGHTS STREET IMPROVEMENTS (C -3313) -
ACCEPTANCE AND COMPLETION. 1) Accept the work; 2) authorize the
City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion; 3) authorize the City Clerk to
release the Labor and Material bond 35 days after the Notice of Completion
has been recorded in accordance with applicable portions of the Civil Code;
and 4) release the Faithful Performance Bond one year after Council
acceptance.
10. Item removed from the Consent Calendar by Council Member
Heffernan.
11. BUDGET AUGMENT FOR HOUSING ELEMENT PREPARATION
AND RELATED BUDGET AMENDMENT (BA -038). 1) Approve BA -038
to transfer $7,000 from Account No. 2710 -7000 (Salaries) to Account
No. 2710 -8080 (Services - Professional and Technical); and 2) authorize the
City Manager to execute an amendment to the Professional Services
Agreement with Hogle- Ireland, Inc., to provide for completion of the Housing
Element.
MISCELLANEOUS ACTIONS
12. REVISION TO COUNCIL POLICY A -6, "OPEN MEETING POLICIES"
AS IT PERTAINS TO THE ORDER OF BUSINESS FOR COUNCIL
MEETINGS. Approve revisions to Council Policy A -6.
13. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION
WITH TRACT NO. 15012 (EASTERLY SIDE OF DOVER DRIVE
BETWEEN 16TH STREET AND WESTCLIFF AVENUE). 1) Approve the
improvement plans and specifications and accept the public improvements
constructed in conjunction with Tract No. 15012; 2) authorize the City Clerk
to release the faithful performance bond (Bond No. 1114.1572 -864);
3) authorize the City Clerk to release the labor and material surety (Bond
No. 1114 - 1572 -864) in six months provided no claims have been filed; and
4) authorize the City Manager to sign a letter accepting maintenance
responsibility for the bluff side of the Bluff Top trail in six months.
14. BUDGET AMENDMENT (BA -039) TO APPROPRIATE $10,000.00 OF
A $47,951.43 DONATION FROM THE ESTATE OF ROY RAYMOND
REIBER TO ENHANCE CHILDREN'S SERVICES AT THE BALBOA
BRANCH LIBRARY. Approve BA -039.
519. SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH
NEWPORT BEACH PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL
ASSOCIATION REGARDING LIUNA PENSION PLAN. Approve
supplemental Memorandum of Understanding (MOLT).
520. Item removed from the Consent Calendar b y Council Member
Heffernan.
Motion by Mavor Pro Tern Ridr-eway to approve the Consent Calendar,
except for the items removed (10 & S20), and noting the continuance of Item
Volume 54 - Page 168
C -3313
Newport Heights
Street
Improvements
(38)
BA -038
Housing Element
(40/68)
Council
Policy A -6
(69)
Tract 15012
Dover Drive
Public
Improvements
(TT15012)
BA -039
Children's
Services
(40/50)
C -2051
Prof/Tech Association
LIUNA Pension Plan
(38)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
R.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Heffernan, Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Proctor
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
10. ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE
ALLEY RIGHT -OF -WAY ADJACENT TO 405 & 405 V2 GOLDENROD
AVENUE, CORONA DEL MAR (N2000 -254).
Council Member Heffernan stated that he had specific questions regarding
the text of the encroachment agreement and also wanted clarification on how
many feet the extension would be.
Public Works Director Webb stated that the encroachment agreement was
requested by the developer of the property to extend the alley by
approximately sixteen feet. He stated that this would allow the alley to be
used as access to a garage at a new structure to be built on the lot and would
alleviate using Goldenrod Avenue for access to the property, as is currently
being done.
Mayor Adams confirmed with Public Works Director Webb that the design
agreements have indemnification provisions and insurance requirements for
design negligence, through a fairly standard hold harmless agreement.
Council Member Heffernan confirmed with Public Works Director Webb that
the height at the end of the alley extension from the slope would be
approximately eight to ten feet.
Chris Taylor, 2706 Bayside Drive, stated that the item is related to Item
No. 16 and possibly the items should be discussed together. Mr. Taylor
provided a handout from the State of California website which discussed the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and what constitutes a project
under CEQA. Mr. Taylor added that the Coastal Commission also feels that
it has rights for jurisdiction over the improvements. Mr. Taylor asked that
the agreements be separated into specific property benefits and obligations.
Lastly, he asked that it be determined if the improvements comply with
Council policies.
Mayor Adams asked if the encroachment was considered private or an
extension of a public alley being funded by a private entity. Public Works
Director Webb stated that it is considered to be a nonstandard improvement
in the public right -of -way, but would be maintained by the private property
owner. He added that it is considered nonstandard because it is a structure
rather than a fill. Mayor Adams stated that many structures exist in the
City. Mayor Adams further confirmed with Public Works Director Webb
Volume 54 - Page 169
EPN 2000.254
405 Goldenrod and
405 1/2 Goldenrod
(65)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
-
that the City is receiving a benefit from the extension in that it removes the
access currently being used on Goldenrod Avenue.
Mayor Adams confirmed with Public Works Director Webb that Item No's. 10
and 16 were separated on the agenda because they do not depend on each
other. Public Works Director Webb additionally noted the supplemental
staff report that was distributed the prior Friday that contained the correct
agreement.
In response to Mayor Adams' question about proper CEQA documentation,
Planning Director Temple stated that the alley improvement is intended to
serve two lots, each containing a proposed duplex. She stated that the
duplex developments are not considered projects under CEQA because they
are non - discretionary in nature. She added that the actual encroachment
itself is a discretionary approval, subject to CEQA, but would be considered
exempt due to its size.
Mayor Adams confirmed with Public Works Director Webb that the
encroachment permit allows the private party to build a structure on public
right -of -way.
Susan Carol, 2710 Bayside Drive, asked for the City Council to protect her
property from the alley extension, which would put a concrete automobile
turnaround approximately fifteen to twenty feet above her home and
approximately one car length from her bedroom window. She stated that the
concrete structure would be unsightly and was only being done so that the
square footage could be maximized at the subject lots. She stated that
Goldenrod Avenue should be used as access to the property. Ms. Carol
added that the concrete structure will have a negative impact on the slope,
the existing staircase and her property. She stated that she sees no public
benefit to allowing the alley extension.
Mayor Adams confirmed with Planning Director Temple that the subject lots
are considered substandard per the City's subdivision standards because of
their size, although she noted that they are typical of the lot configurations
in old Corona del Mar.
Mayor Adams confirmed with Public Works Director Webb that the City's
policy is to use alleys for access before using streets. He also confirmed that,
on paper, the alley currently ends on Bayside Drive. Based on these two
confirmations, Mayor Adams asked why the alley extension is considered
discretionary. He stated that it should have been the City's direction. Public
Works Director Webb explained that the encroachment permit for the
extension was applied for separately from the development on the lots.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway confirmed that Ms. Carol's house and the staircase
were in existence when she purchased her home.
Mayor Adams explained that the staircase was privately constructed in the
public right -of -way.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway confirmed that Ms. Carol's property contains a
Volume 54 - Page 170
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
11011 �•
duplex, which is approximately the same size as the residences at 2706 and
2700 Bayside Drive. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway confirmed with Public Works
Director Webb that the alley could not be extended to the existing parking
area adjacent to the properties on Bayside Drive because of the steepness of
the slope. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway suggested that the property owners on
Bayside Drive should consider maximizing the value of their properties by
expanding them and using the access from the proposed extended alley.
Ms. Carol stated that it couldn't be done due to existing height restrictions
placed on the properties by the Brandt's. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway
suggested that possibly the Brandt's, or the new owners, would consider
removing the height restrictions. Ms. Carol stated that she is willing to
attempt to work something out and suggested that maybe the item should be
postponed while everyone gets together and a solution is sought.
Harriet Harris, 2706 Bayside Drive, stated that Item No's. 10 and 16 are
directly related. She stated that the existing driveway on Goldenrod Avenue
should be used rather than the proposed extended alley, which will hang
over an existing property owner's residence.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway confirmed that Ms. Harris owns her property and
that there is a height restriction. He asked if it would help if the height
restriction were removed. Ms. Harris stated that she was in attendance at
the current meeting in support of Ms. Carol and couldn't speak for her on the
idea, but that maybe it could be considered.
In response to Mayor Adam's question about the possible effect of removing
the height restriction, Ms. Harris stated that she didn't know how an upper
garage could be achieved.
Lisa Cushman, 2700 Bayside Drive, asked that the City Council do the right
thing. She stated her full support for Ms. Carol's position. Ms. Cushman
stated that the liability issues need to be looked at more closely. She stated
that someone will have to take responsibility for any damage done to the
surrounding properties during the construction of the alley extension. She
stated that other options for access, such as Goldenrod Avenue, need to be
looked at.
Chris Cushman, 2700 Bayside Drive, asked the City Council to consider the
children that might play in the alley and what would happen if they fell from
the structure. He stated that it needs to be determined who will bear the
responsibility of the structure.
Eric Welton, representing the Brandt estate, stated that the property is in
escrow. He stated that he did not know of the height restrictions, but is
willing to consider having them removed and is open- minded on the subject.
He stated that the alternative to the alley extension is using the access off of
Goldenrod Avenue but that the aesthetics of the street need to be considered,
given the number of pedestrians that use the street from the footbridge.
Mr. Welton stated that his basis for applying for the encroachment
agreement was due to the suggestion by Public Works Director Webb that
the existing curb cut should be closed up and access prohibited on Goldenrod
Avenue. Mr. Welton stated that the extension plan includes camouflaging
Volume 54 - Page 171
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
.1 �•
the alley and taking appropriate safety measures.
Mayor Adams stated that he is concerned about the lack of detail provided in
the plans that were submitted. He stated that it would be difficult to vote on
the item without having more information on such things as the vertical
dimensions and the inclusion of a fence or guardrail at the end of the alley.
Mayor Adams further stated that it is also unclear what the distance is from
the edge of Ms. Carol's residence to the proposed structure, but that it looked
like it was less than 26 feet. Mayor Adams stated that the plans submitted
were only hand drawn with no engineer's seal. Mr. Welton stated that the
agreement could possibly be approved with certain provisions added by the
City Council.
Council Member Bromberg asked Mr. Welton if he would consider
postponing the item while the idea of removing the height restrictions is
discussed. Mr. Welton stated that he would have to confer with the Brandt
family regarding the contractual obligations. He added that he didn't think
additional time would make a difference. Council Member Bromberg stated
that a removal of the height restrictions could make a difference and that
two weeks would allow for that discussion to take place.
Mayor Adams stated that he was not prepared to vote on the item due to the
level of detail provided. Mr. Welton stated that staff has gone to a lot of
trouble and that a lot of time has already been spent on the issue. Mayor
Adams stated that the plans do not include dimensions, provisions for the
safety of children or precise distances. Mr. Welton stated that staff already
has the information and that he's in a time bind. Mayor Adams added that
vehicle access to parcels in Corona del Mar should come from the alleys.
Council Member Glover stated that deals should not be negotiated during
City Council meetings. She stated that the City Council should instead give
staff some guidance on what information they need and have it come back at
a future meeting.
Council Member Heffernan suggested that when a private landowner is
encroaching on public right -of -way that the indemnity obligations in the
encroachment agreement should extend to protect the City, as well as the
adjacent property owners. Additionally, he suggested that subordination to
any liens be included in the agreement.
Mayor Adams stated that the bigger issue is determining why a private
property owner is being asked to maintain a public alley.
Council Member O'Neil stated that he understands the concerns of both
sides. He stated that he didn't know if the removal of the height limitation
could be done in a two -week period. He stated that the adjacent property
owners are opposed to the extension because it will create a dangerous
situation. He stated that he does support the policy for using alleys for
access, but that he'd defer to the rest of the City Council if additional
information is desired. He added that he didn't think either side would
change their position in the next two weeks.
Volume 54 - Page 172
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated that there could be a benefit to the adjacent
property owners if the height restrictions are removed.
Council Member Bromberg stated that he already visited the property on his
own, but requested that Mr. Welton meet him at the property in the next two
weeks.
Mayor Adams stated that he would communicate with staff his feelings on
the issue and the additional information he would need to make his decision.
Andrew Goetz, 503 Goldenrod Avenue, stated that he is the architect for the
project and that detailed exhibits are available. He noted that the alleys in
Corona del Mar have five -foot setbacks and it is not uncommon to have
residences so close to alleys.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway confirmed with Mr. Goetz that the heights of the
buildings are allowed to reach 29 feet, as long as the average is maintained
at 24 feet.
Per Mayor Adams's question, Mr. Goetz estimated the distance from the end
of the alley extension to existing ground as 16 feet from the furthest point.
Mr. Goetz added that the conditions for approval require that more than a
guardrail be provided, as part of addressing the safety issues. Mr. Goetz
stated that a point on the back corner of Ms. Carol's residence was used in
determining the distance to her property. Mayor Adams expressed his
concern and dissatisfaction for using such a deceptive measurement.
Council Member Glover stated that staff followed City policy when not
allowing access from Goldenrod Avenue.
Mayor Adams added that if the alley extension can work safely and have no
intrusion on the existing properties, then staff took the right step.
Council Member Heffernan confirmed with Mayor Adams that the alley
currently ends where it does due to the grade difference. Mayor Adams
agreed that it's a judgment call for the City Council on whether to extend the
alley beyond this point.
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Rideewav to postpone action until action is
taken on Item No. 16.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote
Ayes: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Heffernan, Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Proctor
520. RESOLUTION 2001 -18 RELATING TO THE CITY S INTENTION TO
SUBMIT AND CERTIFY A LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM (LCP) FOR
THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH.
Volume 54 - Page 173
"Zip]
Res 2001 -18
Local Coastal
Program (LCP)
(68)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
INDEX
Council Member Heffernan asked if the anticipated cost to certify the LCP
was the same as when the City applied for the grant. Deputy City Manager
Kiff stated that it depends upon the work plan that is ultimately adopted.
City Manager Bludau added that the work being done on the general plan
update should decrease the cost. Deputy City Manager Mff further clarified
that the Coastal Commission recently encouraged the City to reapply for a
new grant. Council Member Heffernan confirmed that the action at the
current meeting would be to proceed with the certification whether or not
the grant is received.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway further clarified that the action at the current
meeting was only to indicate the City's intention to submit and certify an
LCP. City Manager Bludau stated that the City is intending to certify the
LCP after the general plan update. Deputy City Manager Mff stated that
staff would proceed with getting the LCP certified unless the City Council
adopts a resolution contradicting the proposed resolution being considered at
the current meeting.
Council Member Heffernan asked how the City could have gone on so long
without a certified LCP. Assistant City Manager Wood stated that the City
has an LCP land use plan, but that it is not certified with the Coastal
Commission. Deputy City Manager Kiff added that the State legislature is
looking at the City's proposal relating to Newport Coast and asking why the
LCP isn't certified.
Motion by Council Member Glover to adopt Resolution 2001 -18 relating
to the City's intention to submit and certify a Local Coastal Program (LCP)
for the City of Newport Beach.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Heffernan, Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Proctor
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jim Hildreth, 120 The Grand Canal, stated that he is concerned that
residential pier RP80100011 at the southwest end of The Grand Canal is a
safety hazard. He stated that the City-installed ladder does not provide for
safe access and he doesn't understand the reason for the mooring location at
the northwest end. Mr. Hildreth provided a list of the documents he is
requesting copies of.
Mayor Adams stated that the Public Comments section of the agenda does
provide the opportunity for anyone to speak on any non - agendized issue. He
added, however, that Mr. Hildreth has already been provided with a public
hearing and that the issue has been resolved as far as the City is concerned.
Russell Niewiarowski, Santa Ana Heights, stated that the John Wayne
Airport (JWA) Bristol Street wall project is being revisited by engineers.
Volume 54 - Page 174
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
Additionally, he stated that the City of Costa Mesa has decided to contribute
money to the airport fight. Lastly, Mr. Niewiarowski announced that at the
most recent Orange County Regional Airport Authority (OCRAA) meeting
there was support for the Pilot's Plan, which is a reasonable alternative to
the current controversial airport plan. Despite these accomplishments,
Mr. Niewiarowski stated that there are some negative impacts being
generated by the same people who support an airport at El Toro.
ORAL REPORTS FROM CITY COUNCIL ON COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES
Council Member Glover reported that the John Wayne Airport (JWA)
Settlement Extension Ad Hoc Committee met earlier in the day. She stated
that it was decided to implement a plan to meet with the JWA Charter Cities
to inform them of the City's efforts to extend the settlement agreement and
seek their support. Additionally, it was decided that resolutions supporting
the extension of the settlement agreement be posted on the JWA website,
which she noted would probably be accessible within the next two weeks.
Lastly, Council Member Glover reported that the committee decided to hire a
consultant to mail information to the City's residents informing them of the
JWA settlement agreement and the City's efforts to extend the agreement.
Council Member Glover reported that the Watershed Executive Committee
continues to work on having cleaner water in the bay and that there needs to
be a concerted effort by all of the contributing cities to accomplish this. She
stated that the intent of Senate Bill 816 (S13816), sponsored by Ross
Johnson, is to keep the inland, upstream cities working voluntarily toward
water quality solutions. She stated that it is very important to receive
voluntary cooperation from these cities and have them understand the effect
of urban runoff. Council Member Glover stated that SB816 provides for a
long -term solution.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway reported that the Orange County Water District
(OCWD) and the Consolidated Sanitation District of Orange County
(CSDOC) would be voting the following evening on the Groundwater
Replenishment System project. He stated that the project would process
reclaimed water, then pump it back up to the ponding basins in Anaheim
and allow it to percolate back into the Orange County aquifer. He noted that
75% of the water used in the City comes from the aquifer. He stated that the
upcoming vote would be for the design phase of the project, which is Phase 1,
and that he would be voting in support of the project. Mayor Pro Tem
Ridgeway concluded by stating that the project will take the County's
dependency off of imported water.
Per the request of Mayor Adams, City Manager Bludau reported that the Ad
Hoc General Plan Update Committee decided at its meeting the day prior
that a recommendation would be made to the City Council at its meeting of
April 10, 2001, on the public outreach portion of the general plan update and
the committee of public representatives that will be formed.
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FOR MARCH 22, 2001 [meeting
cancelled due to lack of a quorum].
Volume 54 - Page 175
INDEX
Planning
(68)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
to receive and file written report.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Heffernan, Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Proctor
PUBLIC HEARINGS
15. BALBOA VILLAGE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
RENEWAL PUBLIC HEARING AND LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS
FOR THE 2001 -2002 FISCAL YEAR.
Assistant City Manager Wood stated that at the City Council meeting of
March 13, 2001, the annual report for the Balboa Village Business
Improvement District was approved. Additionally, a resolution was adopted
that indicated the City's intention to levy assessments to continue the
district for another year. She stated that no protests have been received
objecting to the levy.
Mayor Adams opened the public hearing.
Gay Wassall - Kelly, 409 E. Edgewater, President of the Balboa Merchants
Owners Association (BMOA), thanked the City Council for its continued
support of Balboa Village. She stated that revitalization continues in the
area, and a website should be accessible within the next two weeks to help
market the area. Ms. Wassall -Kelly listed some of the upcoming events in
the area.
There being no further testimony, Mayor Adams closed the public hearing.
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway to adopt Resolution 2001 -19
confirming the levying of the assessments since the protests represented less
than 50 percent of the total assessment amount.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Heffernan, Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Proctor
16. REX BRANDT TRUST FOR AMENDMENT NO. 909 & LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT NO. 2000 -013 (2720 & 2730 BAYSIDE DRIVE).
Mayor Adams opened the public hearing.
Eric Welton - announced that he supports Ms. Carol's • request for a
continuance.
Volume 54 - Page 176
INDEX
Res 2001 -19
Balboa Village
Business
Improvement
District
(27)
EPN 2000 -254/
Lot Line
Adjustment 2000 -013/
2720 Bayside Drive and
2730 Bayside Drive
(65)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
Motion by Council Member O'Neil to continue the item to the City
Council meeting of April 10, 2001, along with Item No. 10.
It was decided that staff would make the determination on whether the two
items would be heard together or separately.
Chris Taylor, 2706 Bayside Drive, stated that the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) should be invoked on the application and that an initial
study should be done to determine if there are any impacts. He added that it
should also be identified if the Coastal Commission has jurisdiction.
Mayor Adams asked if the motion could include direction to staff to address
the issue of whether CEQA would apply.
Council Member O'Neil agreed to amend his motion.
The amended motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Heffernan, Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Proctor
17. MEASURE S GUIDELINES (contd. from 2/27/01 & 3/13/01).
City Attorney Burnham stated that Measure S was approved by the voters in
November, requires voter approval of certain general plan amendments and
encourages the adoption of guidelines. He stated that this is the fifth City
Council meeting where the guidelines have been discussed. City Attorney
Burnham stated that staff included the modifications made at the previous
meetings in the most recent version of the guidelines and added that
through the process of making the modifications and gathering more
information, a modification to the trip rate table was also made. City
Attorney Burnham explained that Measure S requires voter approval of
major amendments to the general plan, which are amendments that
significantly increases the amount of traffic that allowed uses can generate.
He stated that staff was previously recommending that the highest trip rate
for any allowed use be used but after looking at the trip rate table, has
determined that this methodology won't work. City Attorney Burnham
stated that staff is now recommending a blended rate. He introduced Joe
Foust of Austin Foust & Associates, who helped prepare the blended rate
with staff.
City Attorney Burnham provided a new draft of the guidelines that included
the discussed changes. Additionally, he suggested that changes to peak hour
trips and peak hour trip rates also be made. He specifically suggested that
the first sentence in peak hour trips be changed to read, "...multiplied by the
Entitlement (the appropriate quantity of the relevant unit of
measurement)... ". Additionally, he suggested that the language in the first
sentence of peak hour trips be changed to read, "...average weekday rate
Volume 54 - Page 177
Measure S
Guidelines
(68)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
I IN 01
during the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic... ".
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway confirmed with City Attorney Burnham that the
newest draft guidelines were provided to the proponents of Measure S.
Phil Arst, Measure S proponent, stated that much progress has been made
but he has a few recommended changes. Mr. Arst presented a handout
which included the recommendations and stated that the first item provides
more clarification for the peak hour trip rate. He stated that a heading
should be added to the three entries in the peak hour table that are for
general land use categories. City Attorney Burnham agreed with the
recommendation. Mr. Faust concurred.
Mr. Arst stated that the second item was in regards to the specific definition
of proposed projects. He requested that the permitted use of the project also
be specified. City Attorney Burnham stated that the trend over the years
has been to submit more precise proposals, but he didn't feel that it was
appropriate to place this requirement in the Measure S guidelines. He
stated that it would be appropriate to place it elsewhere in the Council Policy
Manual. Mr. Arst agreed with the City Attorney's recommendation.
Planning Director Temple stated that this would accommodate most general
plan amendments which are project - specific, but added that provisions will
still be needed for projects that are not specific in nature. Mr. Arst hoped
that a limit to traffic would be included.
Mr. Arst stated that his third request is to include parking structures in the
definition of floor area if they contribute to increased traffic.
Mayor Adams stated that some believe that parking structures do not
contribute to traffic. Mr. Arst stated that a parking structure below grade
would allow for more intensity on the site.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated that greater intensity would increase the
floor area, which is what is already looked at during the analyses and that
the parking structure only accommodates the intensity of the use.
Mayor Adams stated his concurrence that parking structures should not be
included in the floor area.
Mr. Arst stated that his fourth request is to include hotel rooms in the
definition of a dwelling unit, per the definition provided in the Newport
Beach Municipal Code (NBMC).
Mayor Adams stated that the NBMC already provides a definition for hotel
rooms. City Attorney Burnham stated that it is important that the Measure
S guidelines reflect the expressed purpose of Measure S and stay as
consistent as possible to the text of Measure S. He stated that the
proponents increase the potential for litigation or invalidation of the
measure by including guidelines that go outside of the intentions of Measure
S.
Mr. Arst stated that the fifth request is to have the City Council review
Volume 54 - Page 178
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
small entitlements and determine if they are valid. City Attorney Burnham
stated that the City Council should avoid considering Measure S when
determining whether to approve a general plan amendment.
Council Member Glover agreed that the City Council shouldn't be making
these decisions and that some projects are market driven.
City Attorney Burnham summarized staffs response to the requests by
Mr. Arst. He stated that there is support for clarifying the definition of peak
hour trip rate in the Measure S guidelines, support for the concept of
providing more specific definitions of proposed projects but not within the
Measure S guidelines and no support for the other three requests.
Mr. Arst, City Attorney Burnham and Mayor Adams recognized the work of
those involved in developing the guidelines, and Tom Hyans, Measure S
proponent, recognized Jean Watt, Mr. Arst and staff.
Motion by Mavor Pro Tern Ridgeway to adopt the proposed guidelines as
submitted by the City Attorney at the current meeting with the change to
the trip rate table as requested by Mr. Arst, and the changes to peak hour
trips and peak hour trip rate as suggested by City Attorney Burnham.
Council Member Bromberg stated that he previously supported the inclusion
of parking structures in the floor area calculation, but that the analysis he
has heard from staff makes a lot of sense and he didn't want to hold up the
guidelines. He complimented the City Council for its support of Measure S,
as approved by the voters.
Council Member Heffernan stated that the guidelines will be adhered to and
used appropriately.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Heffernan, Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Proctor
18. REQUEST OF AIRPORT WORKING GROUP (AWG) AND CITIZENS
FOR JOBS AND THE ECONOMY (CJE) FOR FUNDING.
Council Member Glover stated that she is a member of the Airport Issues
Committee, as are Council Members Proctor, who is chairman, and
Heffernan. She stated that in Council Member Proctor's absence, Council
Member Bromberg attended the meeting that was held earlier in the day
and she chaired the meeting. Council Member Glover stated that her motion
would include the recommendations voted on at the meeting by the
committee, after discussing the proposed grant agreements.
Motion by Council Member Glover to authorize the Mayor to execute the
proposed grant agreements subject to: 1) a modification of the AWG grant
agreement to make the grant conditional on AWG's written agreement,
Volume 54 - Page 179
INDEX
Airport Working
Group (AWG) and
Citizens for
Jobs & the
Economy (CJE)
Fund Request/
El Toro Airport
(54)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
i01�'
acceptable to the City Attorney to support the Council's efforts to extend the
John Wayne Airport (JWA) Settlement Agreement; 2) a modification to both
agreements to make the contracts between AWG and CJE and their
respective consultants and vendors require the consultants and vendors to
comply with the grant agreements; and 3) making it clear that the public
outreach program grant is limited to a maximum of $3.54 million.
Council Member Glover announced that the vote was two to one with
Council Members Glover and Bromberg voting in favor of the
recommendation and Council Member Heffernan voting against it.
Dr. Virgil Galey, 211 Via Ravenna, member of AWG, stated his support for
the funding. He stated that the battle with South County is difficult and the
funding will help get the message out. He stated that Lido Isle residents
recently came up with approximately $40,000 to help support the effort for
the nonexpansion of the John Wayne Airport.
Ann Watt, 20261 Spruce Avenue, Santa Ana Heights, stated that there are
two good reasons not to fund AWG and CJE, if their grant is to promote an
airport at E1 Toro. Firstly, she stated that the City should have asked for
requests for proposals from more than two firms. Secondly, she stated that
since the consulting firm that was hired to campaign against Measure F
failed, additional funding is not deserved. Ms. Watt stated that AWG's role
is to fight the expansion of the John Wayne Airport, while the Orange
County Regional Airport Authority's ( OCRAA) role is to promote the use of
El Toro for a regional airport. Ms. Watt stated that the City Council is
placing too much trust and faith in AWG. She suggested that the City look
at firms that have no ties to Orange County or ulterior motives. She
suggested that OCRAA be funded.
Russell Niewiarowski, Santa Ana Heights, agreed that some funding should
go to OCRAA, as they are the organization that is most likely to make a
positive difference in getting an airport at E1 Toro. He noted that the AWG
and CJE agreements state that they only need to spend the money on work
related to the proposed commercial aviation reuse of El Toro, which leaves it
unclear on whether money is going to John Wayne Airport or E1 Toro or
both. Mr. Niewiarowski additionally suggested that the east/west runways
need to be removed from the plans and everyone needs to work together
towards a unifying theme that works.
Tom Naughton, 1700 Port Margate Place, presented a slide illustrating John
Wayne Airport departures in May, 2000. He stated that there have been a
number of misconceptions about what can be used as an airport in Orange
County, indicating that some believe that John Wayne Airport could
accommodate the needs of the region. He noted that some of the beliefs held
by the El Toro Re -Use Planning Authority ( ETRPA) are incorrect. He stated
that ETRPA at their meeting the day prior took steps to support Measure F.
Mr. Naughton stated that he presented the departures slide to the Orange
County Board of Supervisors earlier in the day, as well as the slide he
presented next, which was an illustration of the John Wayne Airport arrivals
in May, 2000.
Volume 54 - Page 180
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
1 DII
Bruce Nestande, 119 Via Jucar, stated that the interests of the citizens in
Newport Beach are being jeopardized by the actions of ETRPA. He stated
that CJE has been involved for many years in the promotion of a dual -
airport system. He stated that WE has been a good steward of the funds
and feels that the citizens of Newport Beach would support the City
Council's continued involvement in seeking the expansion of the settlement
agreement in conjunction with a second airport at E1 Toro, along with a
vigorous public information program.
Charles Griffin stated that the funding for the airport is a complex situation.
He stated that oversight should be provided on the use of the funds and the
public should understand how the money is to be spent. He agreed that
OCRAA should be funded and a reasonable alternative should be studied by
the County. He stated that an alternative plan could work from the north in
El Toro or other approaches using the Global Positioning System (GPS). He
stated that the airlines need to be encouraged to use the GPS technology.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated that the City supports a dual - airport
system and El Toro needs to remain as an alternative. He stated that
OCRAA will be doing the regional airport planning, while part of the
expenditures being proposed at the current meeting will be spent on
education of the extension of the JWA Settlement Agreement. Mayor Pro
Tem Ridgeway stated that as uncomfortable as it may be, the City has to live
with its current partners. He confirmed that there is oversight, but he has
the same doubts as many of the speakers.
Per the request of Mayor Adams, City Attorney Burnham described the
nature of the agreements. City Attorney Burnham stated that the
agreements have a substantial amount of oversight and noted the public
outreach program, which requires that all material be approved by the City
Attorney and the City Manager prior to distribution. He stated that there is
also stronger accounting and reporting requirements than in prior
agreements, and specific restrictions on what the grant funds can be used
for.
Mayor Adams additionally noted that the agreements are set up in such a
way that the City Council can still retain other firms, if necessary.
Council Member Heffernan stated that he feels that the proposed action is
the wrong direction for the City to be taking at this time. He stated that he
is not soft on the airport issue, but feels that AWG and CJE have a harsh
reputation in the County and should not receive additional funding from the
City. Council Member Heffernan pointed out that the statutes state that
once a new initiative is certified and can be distributed for signatures, the
City can't spend any more money opposing or supporting it. He also objected
to the poor oversight of the past grants and feels that the City could be liable
for the inappropriate use of public funds. Additionally, he stated that AWG
and CJE had poor performances in the past and the City should have sought
bids from other firms. Council Member Heffernan stated that he doesn't feel
that AWG or WE will follow the terms of the City's policy. He also
disagreed with the fact that there is no coordination with the money being
proposed for AWG and CJE, and that being sent to OCRAA. Lastly, Council
Volume 54 - Page 181
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
� bt
Member tletternan stated that the past messages from AWG and
been too aggressive.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated that the City is in a time element that
dictates different actions. He stated that the City's policy is to continue with
the airport agreement. He stated that everyone should feel reenergized by
the recent actions of ETRPA.
Council Member Glover stated that she is looking for a solution. She stated
that the City Council is working with staff and the Orange County Board of
Supervisors to extend the JWA Settlement Agreement. She added that the
Board of Supervisors are giving OCRAA $5 million and she respects them for
doing so. She stated that both AWG and CJE have worked on the airport
issue for a number of years, and will work in continuum with OCRAA. She
stated that AWG and WE have had some setbacks, but it is due to varying
circumstances. She added that the airport issue can't be controlled. Council
Member Glover stated that the City has to continue doing the best it can and
spending the public funds responsibly. She, additionally, noted that nearly
every legal battle has been won and El Toro still remains as an open option.
Council Member Bromberg stated that he'd like those that support an
airport at El Toro but oppose the City's approach to get behind the project.
He stated that it is time for unity.
Council Member Heffernan stated that he's a team player who looks at the
horizon, and that the City is planning to commit itself to a lot of money and
not in the most pragmatic way.
Mayor Adams clarified that the proposed grant agreements are not
wholesale grants, but are only modest initial grants with the remainder of
the funds to be spent over the upcoming year. He stated that a
determination on how to spend the majority of the funds will be made later
and that this is only the start.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, O'Neil, Mayor Adams
Noes: Heffernan
Abstain: None
Absent: Proctor
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - None.
- 10:35 p.m.
The agenda for the Regular Meeting was posted on March 21, 2001,
at 4:05 p.m. on the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of
Newport Beach Administration Building. The supplemental agenda for the
Regular Meeting was posted on March 23, 2001, at 3:45 p.m. on the City Hall
Volume 54 - Page 182
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
March 27, 2001
Bulletin Board located
Administration Building.
City Clerk
outside of the City of Newport Beach
Recording Secretary
Mayor
Volume 54 - Page 183
IN 1