HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - 5-22-01June 12, 2001
Agenda Item No. 1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Minutes
Study Session
May 22, 2001- 3:40 p.m. DRAFT INDEX
ROLL CALL
Present: Heffernan, O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, Proctor, Mayor
Adams
Absent: None
CURRENT BUSINESS
1. CLARIFICATION OF ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
Regarding Item 21 (EQAC's Comments on Crystal Cove Historical District),
Council Member Glover stated that the subcommittee that will be reviewing
the responsibilities of the Environmental Quality Affairs Committee (EQAC)
and the Economic Development Committee (EDC) should require that any
project outside the City limits come back to Council before EQAC works on it
so that Council could vote on whether to use City staff. Council Member
Proctor expressed concern that taking a position on the Crystal Cove issue
might affect the City's efforts with the State Department of Parks and
Recreation on the CalTrans West Project. He believed it is important that
the City have a little more control over some of these issues before they are
addressed.
Regarding Item 12 (Professional Services Agreement for Balboa Village
Project Management Service), Mayor Adams believed that the insurance
limit of $500,000 is too low and expressed concern that there is no
requirement for Errors and Omission (E & O) insurance, even though an E &
O requirement is in the contract. Public Works Director Webb reported that
the engineer's primary duty is to act as a coordinator between the City and
other engineers, and will not be doing any formal designing. Assistant City
Attorney Clauson reported that she and the Risk Manager looked at the
contract and determined that this was not a high risk factor for the type of
work the engineer would be doing. She added that they also looked at the
type of automobile insurance the engineer has. Mayor Adams stated that his
company has almost identical contracts doing almost identical types of
service and that he has never had a city reduce their insurance limits
because of the type of work. He asked if this contract is consistent with the
City's other engineering contracts.
2. BUDGET REVIEW.
2001/2002 Budget
(40)
City Manager Bludau introduced Public Information Officer Gail McElroy.
Ms. McElroy stated that she is excited to be working for the City and with
Council.
Volume 54 - Page 257
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
Mr. Bludau explained that the "wish list" is an ongoing list of issues that are
raised by Council but are not in the proposed budget. He indicated that
Council can place an item on the list at any time, preferably before the
entire Council so everyone is aware of what is on the list. Council will be
given the wish list at the next meeting and, prior to adopting the budget, it
will decide which items on the list will be funded.
Council Member O'Neil requested that an item be placed on the wish list to
give $75,000 to the Corona del Mar Business Improvement District (BID) for
landscaping and other improvements. He added that the BID will provide
some matching funds and noted that this was approved last year. He also
requested that the same amount that was appropriated to Michaels Media
be included on the wish list.
In response to Council Member Glover's questions, Public Works Director
Webb reported that $600,000 is already included in the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) budget for Mariner's Mile for the first phase of
the project.
Mayor Adams reported that the Nature Center requested a $100,000
contribution over a three year period. He stated that he already requested
that the City budget $33,000 this year and review it again next year.
Council Member Glover indicated that she received a call from the Film
Festival organizers who are requesting $75,000 this year. Administrative
Services Director Danner believed that it would be appropriate for the Film
Festival to make a case for the City to spend public funds on this.
Regarding the Newport Village Site, Council Member Bromberg requested
that $35,000 be set aside for the preparation of a conceptual plan for
developing the site as a passive park. He also requested that the City
provide matching funds if the Balboa Island Museum and Historical Society
raises $350,000.
Council Member Proctor requested that money be set aside for the CalTrans
West Project.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway indicated that he has a list that he will provide to
staff, but noted that the drainage issues on Balboa Boulevard from 16'b
Street to 19th Street and on Newport Boulevard from 19�b Street to 21a'
Street do not appear on the budget this year. Mr. Webb explained that some
of the future projects in that area were not shown in the budget since they
were not programmed to have money spent on them next year; however,
they can be added into the final CIP. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway requested a
list of which Balboa Village projects are to be funded in the future and what
year the funding will occur. He also pointed out that there is no reference to
the Lifeguard Headquarters' communication, video, and emergency power
which had a budget of $380,000 last year. Mr. Webb stated that this might
have been included in the oil spill program. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway noted
that the Washington Street Plaza and fagade was budgeted at $786,750 over
five years but nothing was budgeted this year. Mr. Webb indicated that the
Washington Street restroom replacement is listed as a separate project for
Volume 54 - Page 258
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
$210,000 in Phase I and the surrounding streetscape is part of Phase 11 or
III of the Balboa Village Project. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway also pointed out
that, in the CIP budget on page 48, the Balboa Village Improvement Project
has a budget of only $5,105,942 when it was previously budgeted at
$7 million. He stated that Council needs to understand the money
allocations for this since it is a three year project and expressed concern that
there may not be money set aside for this project. Regarding beach restroom
improvements (page 57), walkway and lighting replacements (page 58), and
beach access walkway replacements (page 60), Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway
stated that those projects did not get done last year. He received
confirmation from Mr. Webb that the amounts budgeted are the same as last
year's budget. He stated that almost all of the oil spill moneys that were not
used were rebudgeted and that a lot of the projects are scheduled for
construction after the beginning of the fiscal year or in the fall.
Council Member Heffernan requested that $50,000 be included in the budget
to supplement the $350,000 shortfall in the completion of the landscaping
along the frontage of MacArthur Boulevard. Mr. Webb stated that he is
working on a possible funding source.
Human Resources Director Livingston reviewed the services that the
Human Resources (HR) Department provides. She reported that the
department has seven employees and that they are requesting two new
positions (Office Assistant and HR Analyst). She indicated that the Office
Assistant will handle telephone calls and counter traffic, while the HR
Analyst will handle classification and compensation functions, employee
relations, the performance evaluation system, and training on legal
mandates. She stated that these positions are needed to improve service
delivery, comply with legal regulations, provide consistency and equitable
treatment to all employees, and improve the overall effectiveness of the
employees in the organization. She indicated that they are currently not
able to provide all the services that are needed, particularly the performance
evaluation system and training programs.
In response to Council Member Glover's questions, Ms. Livingston stated
that HR not only has a lot of interaction with employees but also with
applicants. She indicated that they answer questions regarding applying for
jobs, City benefits, and other aspects that deal with becoming an employee.
Further, they also deal with retirement and retiree medical issues.
Ms. Livingston stated that HR's largest expense is in Account 8080
(professional and technical services) which is used for fingerprinting
employees, conducting employee physicals, DMV checks, labor relations,
testing services, and occasional external legal advice; however, she pointed
out that they are not asking for an increase in that account.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway's questions, Mr. Danner reported
that, from 1995 to 1999, HR was a division of the Administrative Services
Department, was transferred to the City Manager's Office in 1999, and
became its own department last year. Mr. Bludau stated that HR is critical
in tying the organization together and providing standards and fairness
throughout the organization. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway noted that the City
Volume 54 - Page 259
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
did have legal problems due to a shortfall in HR. Ms. Livingston indicated
that some of the HR Analyst's duties can be handled by a consultant;
however, it is very expensive. She believed that someone internally should
be doing these duties since it happens regularly as departments evolve.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway's question, Ms. Livingston
indicated that the HR Analyst position should be budgeted if only one
position could be funded. Council Member Bromberg stated that he
understands how human resource networks work because he has a
litigation/employment law practice and indicated that the Achilles heel for
any organization is a weak human resources department. He added that the
trend over the years for major corporations has been to downsize human
resources and bring in less qualified people.
Assistant City Attorney Clauson reported that the City Attorney
Department budget is basically the same as last year's and that the
department still has three attorneys and two secretaries. Regarding
Account 8080, she indicated that this was previously used for specialized
legal advice; however, it was increased last year and this year to
accommodate additional expenditures for legal issues that arose from the
Consent Decree with the County on the John Wayne Airport (JWA) issue
and settlement agreement extension.
Mr. Danner distributed an organizational chart of the Administrative
Services Department which is made up of the Administrative, Fiscal
Services, Management Information Systems (MIS), Revenue, and
Accounting Divisions. He reported that the department has 49 full -time
employees and five or six part -time employees. He noted that he is not
requesting any new employees and emphasized that, since the reductions in
the mid- 1990s, it has been a struggle to get up to where they think they have
the right number of people.
Mr. Danner reported that the two major things that are facing the
department over the next fiscal year is the new accounting software and the
implementation of the Governmental Accounting Standard Board (GASB)
Statement 34 which completely changes the way the City does its accounting
and financial reporting. He noted that they did not ask for extra funding for
GASB 34 in the proposed budget, but Item 17 on the regular agenda does
request funding for this year in order to issue a contract. He believed that
this is probably all that is needed to implement GASB 34.
Regarding the Fiscal Services Division, Mr. Danner reported that Account
8030 pays for the maintenance and repair of all the printing machines,
remittance processing machines, and equipment at the warehouse; Account
8070 pays for the rental of copier and printing equipment that the City does
not own; and Account 8140 pays primarily for paper. Regarding the MIS
Division, Account 8030 pays for repair and maintenance of all the City's
computer equipment, except for what is budgeted separately in the Police
Department; Account 8110 pays the telephone bills; and Account 8200 pays
for computer - related supplies. Regarding the Revenue Division, Account
8050 pays for postage on the billings; Account 8080 pays for contingency
audits, and sales tax and property tax analysis services; and Account 8140
Volume 54 - Page 260
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
pays for all of the specialized billing torms. Regarding the Accounting
Division, Account 8076 pays for extra help, especially during the audit
period; and Account 8077 pays for the City's annual audit.
Mr. Danner reported that the three CIP projects that they are responsible
for are the development services software (permit system); the Citywide
document imaging system; and the telephone replacement and upgrade.
In response to Council Member Glover's questions, Mr. Danner believed that
the document imaging system is successful and that the departments that
are using the system are happy with it. City Clerk Harkless reported that
her office received the initial installation of the document imaging system
and that it is still an ongoing process. She stated that Council packets from
August 1998; and ordinances, resolutions, and minutes from incorporation
are available online, as well as on the internet. She added that her office is
starting to work on scanning the deeds into the system. She indicated that
the Fire Department, Revenue Division, Building Department, and Police
Department are using the document imaging system. Mayor Pro Tem
Ridgeway stated that he would like to have all of the Planning Department's
files inputted onto the system. Ms. Harkless indicated that her staff scans
documents in their spare time, but the Police Department hired someone
full -time to scan documents. She added that staffing takes up the biggest
expense and time for the departments using the document imaging system.
Mr. Bludau agreed that the system has been very successful and that it
would benefit departments, like Planning and Building, who have a great
deal of records and files.
Police Chief McDonell utilized a PowerPoint presentation and reported that
the Police Department budget totals $27.4 million. He stated that the
$908,000 increase reflects Council- approved MOU salary increases. He
pointed out that two Police Officer positions in patrol and traffic are being
funded by grants to offset some of the costs associated with the pending
annexations and that the traffic officer was funded this year, which only
created a partial impact on the proposed budget. He indicated that 83.1% of
the total budget is related to salaries and benefits, 15% is for maintenance
and operations ($4.1 million); less than 1% is for capital outlay ($15,000);
and 1.7% is for other funds ($166,000). He stated that the budget is divided
into divisions, with most of it being devoted to field- related services. He
indicated that the adjustments that were approved during the City Manager
review process were based on contractual obligations.
Noting that Account 8080 contains no additional funding for consultants,
Chief McDonell reported that it does provide funding for crossing guards,
California Highway Patrol and Sheriffs assistance for July Fourth, the
homeless shelter contract, the Cal -ID system, building maintenance, blood
testing, and physical exams. He emphasized that the department has no
significant program changes and that the maintenance and operations
budget and capital outlay budget are flat when compared to last year. He
further reviewed the programs associated with the Chief of Police Office,
Support Services Division, Patrol Division, Traffic Division, and Detective
Division. He added that they have done a good job of using civilians in the
Police Department.
Volume 54 - Page 261
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
Chief McDonell reported that they have received about $3.7 million in
Federal and regional grants since 1996. He indicated that the grants have
been used to fund and upgrade the vehicle mobile -data computers, provide
an automated report writing system, purchase ten laser radar units for
speed enforcement, provide technology to capture citation and field
interview data and download it into the databanks to print citations,
purchase a fingerprinting device for juvenile detainees, develop programs
that provide greater technology to law enforcement, civilianize the crime
scene function and establish a civilian crime analyst position, establish a
records management system, and pay for one motor officer, ten police
officers over a three year period, two community service officers, one crime
scene investigator, one dispatcher, one non -sworn crime prevention
specialist, and two sworn police officers in the crime suppression unit.
In response to Council Member O'Neil's questions, Chief McDonell stated
that rolling blackouts may have an impact in the department's overtime and
that they can only plan for them like any other emergency. Mr. Bludau
added that it could be handled better if the City were given advanced
warning.
Fire Chief Riley stated that the Fire Department's total budget for this year
is $18,805,394 which is a $1,553,898 (3.5 %) increase from the previous year.
He pointed out that the budget does include the addition of a fire station in
the airport area. He reported that the six divisions of the department are
Fire Administration, Emergency Operations, Fire Prevention, Emergency
Medical Services Management, Training and Education, and Ocean
Safety/Lifeguard. He stated that there are 136 full -time employees and
there will be about 180 seasonal employees to manage the City's beach
activities. He indicated that 84.2% of the budget is for personnel costs;
14.9% is for maintenance and operations; and 0.75% is for capital outlay.
Chief Riley reported that the overtime cost is broken down into three
categories: vacation/relief, uncontrolled absences, and planned overtime.
He stated that, in the early 1990s, the Fire Department conducted overtime
studies to see if there was a way to hire supplemental staffing. It was
determined, at that time, that utilizing overtime to cover vacations and
uncontrolled absences was a more economical way to provide staffing for
vacancies. He added that the current overtime system was established
through the deletion of ten full -time employees. He stated that, with the
increase in the number of new employees, overtime costs will continue to
decrease and remain a viable, cost effective means to provide coverage. He
pointed out that, if there was no overtime for the fire station near the
airport, the overtime budget would only increase 1.22 %.
Chief Riley stated that the significant increases are due to the establishment
of an airport fire station; new firefighter induction costs; the hiring of a
contract grant writer; the MetroNet Fire Communications System; the joint
training program with Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach; the new
medical equipment for the paramedic program; and the junior lifeguard
program. He pointed out that the annexation of Newport Coast is
programmed for January 2002 and would add a fire station and a position to
the fire prevention program, which would total about $1.245 million.
Volume 54 - Page 262
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
Regarding the turnover rate, Chief Riley stated that a large number of
employees were hired in the 1960s and 1970s, and that today those
employees are reaching retirement age. He stated that there will be an
increase in retirement and that a 50% turnover rate is expected over the
next five to six years. He added that Newport Beach is a destination
department in which firefighters want to stay for the duration of their
career.
Regarding salaries, Chief Riley stated that the labor relations team
compares the City's salaries with other cities as part of the negotiation
process. Council has historically kept the salaries of the City's Fire and
Police employees relatively high compared to others in the County and
indicated that the Fire Department is one of the top five paid agencies in the
County.
Regarding the fire station in the airport area, Chief Riley indicated that they
are still evaluating potential sites for a permanent fire station and that they
assumed Council would want to wait until it could be built within the City
limits. He indicated that the budget only reflects operational costs, not land
purchase or development costs. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway expressed
concern that this is not budgeted at this time as a CIP. Assistant City
Manager Mff reported that the costs are programmed into the fiscal impact
analysis and that it will show up in the 2002 -2003 budget. Chief Riley added
that there are a lot of things that are programmed for expenditure upon
annexation. When Newport Coast is annexed, there will be a tremendous
amount of things that will show up in January that will need to be discussed
with Council. Mr. Bludau stated that they are not sure what the land will
cost or when the annexation will happen. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway
believed that the fire station is a current issue and not an annexation issue.
Chief Riley stated that he assumed that Council did not want to acquire
property or begin the development of a fire station until after the annexation
is completed. He noted that the fire station is on a temporary site with a two
year lease. If annexation did not happen, he stated that Council may decide
not to have a fire station in that area. He added that they are also counting
on significant revenue from Newport Coast to help offset the cost for this
type of activity. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway requested that the purchase of
the property be included on his wish list.
Planning Director Temple stated that the Planning Department budget is
the same in most areas as last year's budget. She reported that the
Planning Department consists of Administration/Planning, and the
Economic Development Division. She indicated that there are 18 full -time
employees and one part -time employee, and that, of the 18 full -time
employees, 15 are in Administration/Planning and two of those are clerical
support staff. The 13 employees provide advanced planning, current
planning, and code enforcement services for the City, and support for the
Planning Commission. She stated that the three Economic Development
staff include one clerical staff member and two professional positions to staff
all the economic development activities and the Community Development
Block Grant administration. She added that the two employees report
directly to Assistant City Manager Wood. Ms. Temple noted that staffing
also includes two new positions (Senior Planner and Assistant Planner)
Volume 54 - Page 263
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
which were approved in the 2000.2001 budget; however, two vacancies still
exist in the department. She added that the budget does not include any
new positions.
Ms. Temple reported that 74% of the budget is for salaries and benefits; and
26% is for operations and capital outlay. She indicated that this proportion
represents a notable departure from prior budget years when about 90% of
the budget was devoted to personnel costs. This is due to the addition of
significant projects into the operations budget which are contained mostly in
Account 8080. She added that these also provide for large pending projects
(General Plan Update consultant and budgetary support for the new
Citywide sign regulations) for the upcoming fiscal year. Ms. Temple stated
that they boosted their discretionary funds in Account 8080 from about
$16,000 to $35,000. She explained that occasionally a special project will
need consultant assistance to respond to Council requests and that they do
not intend to spend that money just because it is there. She believed that
having some moneys identified for unanticipated special studies is
appropriate in the Planning Department. Ms. Temple reported that, in the
Administration/Planning Division, they included more in the capital outlay
budget to help upgrade some of the older computers. Regarding Account
8250 (special departmental expense), she explained that this represents the
Planning Commission's stipend of $60 per meeting and is also used to match
the amount the City's business improvement districts assess themselves.
She reported that the economic development budget is status quo from this
and prior budget years, but pointed out that Account 8060 (publications and
dues) covers the cost of membership in the Orange County Business Council.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway's questions regarding document
imaging, Ms. Temple reported that the department's filing system is fairly
complex. She indicated that getting the use permits on the system is
certainly a priority, but in order for the files to be used they have to be
organized and indexed carefully. She stated that, in anticipation of using
the system, they have first been working on the structure of the files and the
numbering system to make it easier for people to find what they are looking
for. Further, single projects may be related to other projects that may
involve multiple applications like general plan amendments, zoning
amendments, use permits, development agreements, and environmental
impact reports. She added that they also have D and E size sheets in their
file and that they would need to contract out, like the Building Department
currently does, to have those scanned. Ms. Temple reported that the
Building Department also charges a microfiche fee and copying fee to cover
their expenses. The Planning Department has never charged any type of
microfiche fee as part of the application fee, but they may need to look into
this. She stated that the department also has a large cabinet with old
microfiche that would need to be contracted out to include in the system.
Further, since their files tier one upon the other, the utility of the new
applications and files may not be as effective if the old files are not scanned.
Ms. Temple indicated that they were slotted to be the second department to
implement the system, but they have been so busy and do not have the staff
resources to do it right now. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated that almost
90% of the cities he works in charges an application fee for microfiching. He
suggested indexing the files by address and believed it is an opportune time
Volume 54 - Page 264
City of Newport Beach
Study Session Minutes
May 22, 2001
to start imaging using the current files, rather than just using a filing folder.
Ms. Temple reported that they have an internal committee that is looking at
all of these issues when they have the time in order to develop the indexing
and management system. She indicated that they currently index the files
by address, applicant, GIS number, assessor parcel number, and a variety of
other ways.
In response to Council Member Proctor's question regarding the 12%
increase in the budget, Ms. Temple explained that, in prior years, many of
the large planning studies were placed in the CIP; however, this year, the
substantial increase is included in the departmental budget (Account 8080).
She pointed out that the account was previously amended from $16,000 by
making shifts from salary savings into that account to cover the Housing
Element Update and another study.
PUBLIC COMMENTS — None.
ADJOURNMENT — 5:50 p.m.
�,tttxyexye *,t * *�xx�x *a,w«fmr
The agenda for the Study Session was posted on May 2, 2001, at
3:25 p.m. on the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of
Newport Beach Administration Building.
City Clerk
Recording Secretary
Mayor
Volume 54 - Page 265
INDEX
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
May 22, 2001 - 7:00 p.m.
INDEX
STUDY SESSION (Special Meeting) — 3:40 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION — 6:00 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION REPORT — None.
...................
A. RECESSED AND RECONVENED AT 7:05 P.M. FOR REGULAR
MEETING
B. ROLL CALL
Present: Heffernan, O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Bromberg, Proctor,
Mayor Adams
Absent: None
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway
D. INVQCATIQN — Reverend Monsignor Daniel Murray, Our Lady of Mt.
Carmel Catholic Church.
E. PRESENTATIONS
Presentation to Dr. Brian Chesnie and John Montgomery by Fire
Chief Tim Riley. Fire Chief Riley announced the strategic partnership in
public safety between the Newport Beach Fire Department, Hoag Hospital,
Hoag Heart Institute and Dr. Brian Chesnie, and the donation of an automatic
external defibrillator (AED) to the Fire Department by Dr. Chesnie and
another one by John Montgomery. Fire Chief Riley presented plaques of
appreciation to Mr. Montgomery, Steve Moreau, Senior Vice President of Hoag
Hospital, Dr. Joel Manchester, Medical Director of Hoag Heart Institute, and
Dr. Chesnie. Dr. Chesnie stated that heart disease is the number one cause of
death and requires a quick response to aid survival.
F. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
G. CITY COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS OR MATTERS WHICH COUNCIL
MEMBERS WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA FOR
DISCUSSION. ACTION OR REPORT iNON- DISCUSSION ITEM):
Council Member Bromberg requested a report on the situation with
the Newport Harbor High and Corona del Mar High swimming pools,
which are open to the public. He specifically asked for information on
Volume 54 - Page 266
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
the amount of usage at the pools and if it was expected that they
would have to be closed down.
• Council Member Bromberg congratulated the supporters of the Balboa
Theater on the groundbreaking earlier in the day and the presentation
of the "Bulldozer Ballet ".
• Council Member Bromberg asked if the funds for CalTrans West had
been set aside. City Manager Bludau stated that half of the funds had
been set aside in the upcoming budget.
• Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway announced the Balboa Merchant and
Owners Association sunset concert on the beach, Swing into Summer
with Swingtown, to be held on May 24, 2001, at 6:30 p.m. in the
gazebo at the base of the Balboa Pier.
• Council Member Heffernan requested that a future agenda include
association height restrictions. He stated that bigger homes are being
built and some associations are disregarding height limits.
• Council Member Heffernan announced that a special showing of Pearl
Harbor would take place at the Big Edwards Cinemas in Newport
Center on May 26, 2001, at 8:00 a.m. He stated that a $20.00 donation
would cover the movie and also help the veterans.
• City Manager Bludau announced that Steve Badum has been selected
to replace Public Works Director Webb, who would be retiring in June.
City Manager Bludau introduced Mr. Badum and stated that he would
begin his employment with the City on June 18, 2001.
H. CONSENT CALENDAR
READING OF MINUTESIORDINANCES AND RE OLUTION
1. Item removed from the Consent Calendar by a member of the
audience.
2. READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. Waive
reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions under consideration,
and direct City Clerk to read by title only.
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
3. Item removed from the Consent Calendar by Mayor Pro Tem
Ridgeway.
RESOLUTIONS FOR ADOPTION
4. RECYCLING SERVICE FEE. Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -32
authorizing the recycling service fee to be set at $2.36 per month per
residential unit effective July 1, 2001.
Volume 54 - Page 267
INDEX
Res 2001 -32
Recycling Service Fee
(40/44)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
5. AWARD OF NON - EXCLUSIVE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
FRANCHISE TO OCEAN WASTE AND RECYCLING. 1) Adopt
Resolution of Intention No. 2001 -33 to award a Non - exclusive Solid
Waste Franchise to Ocean Waste and Recycling and set a public
hearing for June 12, 2001; and 2) introduce Ordinance No. 2001 -5
granting a Non - exclusive Solid Waste Franchise to Ocean Waste and
Recycling, and pass to second reading on June 12, 2001.
6. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING COMMUNITY CONSERVANCY
INTERNATIONAL'S GRANT REQUEST FOR UPPER
NEWPORT BAY RESTORATION. Adopt Resolution No. 2001 -34
statmg the City's support for a grant request to the State Coastal
Conservancy for a restoration project in Upper Newport Bay to be
conducted by Community Conservancy International (CCI).
7. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 74 (ISLAND
AVENUE FROM EDGEWATER AVENUE TO BAY AVENUE
AND WEST BAY AVENUE FROM ISLAND AVENUE TO 7TH
STREET ON THE BALBOA PENINSULA) FOR
UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES. 1) Adopt Resolution
No. 2001 -35 making findings on a petition for, adopting a map
showing the proposed boundaries of, and making appointments for
Assessment District No. 74; 2) adopt Resolution No. 2001 -36 declaring
intention to order the construction of certain improvements in
proposed Assessment District No. 74, declaring the improvements to
be of special benefit, describing the district to be assessed to pay the
costs and expenses thereof, and providing for the issuance of bonds;
3) adopt Resolution No. 2001 -37 giving preliminary approval to the
report of the assessment engineer, setting the time and place for a
public hearing as July 10, 2001 and ordering the intention of
assessment ballot procedure for Assessment District No. 74; and
4) approve the Special Counsel agreement with Robert Hessell.
CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS
8. LEASE AGREEMENT FOR BALBOA YACHT BASIN WITH
BASIN MARINE, INC. (contd. from 3/27/01, 4/10/01, 4/24/01 &
5/8/01). Continue to June 12, 2001.
9. WEST NEWPORT SOUND WALL REPLACEMENT (C -3358) —
ACCEPTANCE AND COMPLETION. 1) Accept the work; 2)
authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion; 3) authorize
the City Clerk to release the Labor and Materials bond 35 days after
the Notice of Completion has been recorded in accordance with
applicable portions of the Civil Code; 4) release the Faithful
Performance Bond one (1) year after Council acceptance; and 5)
authorize a budget amendment (BA -049) transferring $1,690 from
unappropriated Gas Tax Fund balance to Account No. 7181- C5100563.
INDEX
Ord 2001.5
Res 2001 -33
Non - Exclusive
Solid Waste
Collection
Franchise
(44)
Res 2001 -34
Upper Newport
Bay Restoration
Grant Request
(51)
Res 2001 -35
Res 2001 -36
Res 2001 -37
Assessment
District 74
(89)
[No Report]
C -3358
BA -049
West Newport
Sound Wall
Replacement
(38/40)
10. 32nd STREET/BALBOA BOULEVARD REHABILITATION AND I C -3245
Volume 54 - Page 268
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
Volume 54 - Page 269
30TH STREET/ NEWPORT BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN
32nd StlBalboa Blvd
IMPROVEMENTS (C -3245) — COMPLETION AND
Rehabilitation and
ACCEPTANCE. 1) Accept the work; 2) authorize the City Clerk to
30ffi St/Newport Blvd
file a Notice of Completion; 3) authorize the City Clerk to release the
Storm Drain
Labor and Materials bond 35 days after the Notice of Completion has
Improvements
been recorded in accordance with applicable portions of the Civil Code;
(38)
and 4) release the Faithful Performance Bond one (1) year after
Council acceptance.
11.
CITY S SUPPORT FOR ORANGE COUNTY COASTKEEPER'S
C -3421
CAULERPA TAXIFOLIA NEWPORT BAY SURVEY AND
BA -050
EDUCATION PROJECT (BUDGET AMENDMENT AND
Caulerpa Taxifolia
AGREEMENT AUTHORIZATION). 1) Approve a budget
Newport Bay
amendment (BA -050) authorizing the expenditure of $8,100 to support
Survey and
Orange County CoastKeeper's Caulerpa taxi /olia Newport Bay Survey
Education Project
and Education Project; and 2) authorize the City Manager to execute
(38/40)
an Agreement with CoastKeeper to complete the Scope of Work
associated with the Caulerpa Survey and Education Project.
12.
APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
C -3379
WITH EMMET BERKERY FOR BALBOA VILLAGE PROJECT
Balboa Village
MANAGEMENT SERVICES. Item continued.
Project (38)
13.
USE OF THE CHANGE KIOSK AT THE NEWPORT PIER.
C -3422
1) Authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with the Newport
ATM/Newport Pier/
Beach City Employees Federal Credit Union that authorizes the
NB Employees
NBCEFCU to install and operate an automatic teller machine at the
Federal Credit
kiosk near the Newport Pier; and 2) authorize the Director of Public
Union
Works to execute an encroachment permit for restaurant menu
(38)
display at the kiosk.
MISCELLANEOUS ACTIONS
14.
APPOINTMENT TO THE AD HOC CITY COUNCIL AIRPORT
Ad Hoc City
ISSUES COMMITTEE. Confirm Mayor Adams' appointment of
Council Airport
Council Member Bromberg to the Ad Hoc City Council Airport Issues
Issues Committee
Committee (replacement for Council Member Heffernan).
(24)
15-
LEGAL PUBLICATIONS FOR ONE -YEAR CONTRACT
Legal
COVERING FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2001 TO JUNE 30, 2002.
Publications
Authorize the City Clerk to publish a notice advertising for bids to be
(32)
received on or before the hour of 4:00 p.m., on Thursday, June 14,
2001 for a one -year contract covering the publishing and printing of
legal notices, or other material required to be published and circulated
in the City of Newport Beach.
16.
SUPPORT FOR THE GREEN RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION.
Green
1) Authorize Mayor Adams to issue a letter to Newport Beach's
Restaurant
restaurants recommending membership in the Green Restaurant
Association (GRA)
Association; and 2) authorize the City to join the GRA for one year at
(61)
$950.
Volume 54 - Page 269
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
17. GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD BOARD (GASB)
STATEMENT NO. 34. Approve a budget amendment (BA -047) in the
amount of $40,000 to provide various clerical, accounting, and
engineering valuation services related to the implementation of GASB
Statement No. 34, which will utilize General Fund, unappropriated
surplus fund balance.
18. APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENT TO TRANSFER $1,020
FROM THE SURFING RESERVE FUND AND $18,500 FROM
THE TENNIS RESERVE FUND TO AN EXPENDITURE
ACCOUNT PER COUNCIL POLICY I -2 WHICH PROVIDES
THAT 20% OF THE REGISTRATION FEES FROM TENNIS
INSTRUCTIONAL CLASSES BE SET ASIDE ANNUALLY FOR
THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT,
REFURBISHMENT OF COURTS OR DEVELOPMENT OF NEW
RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS OR FACILITIES. Approve
BA -048.
19. NEW COUNCIL POLICY ON DISCRETIONARY GRANTS (A -12).
Adopt amended Council Policy A -12 ("Discretionary Grants ").
20. BUDGET AMENDMENT, CIOSA REIMBURSEMENTS FOR
CASTAWAYS TRACT NO. 15012. Approve a budget amendment
(BA -051) authorizing an appropriation in the amount of $699,186 for
the reimbursement of CIOSA Improvements for Tract 15012, Taylor
Woodrow Castaways in Account Nos. 7431- C5100605 and 7432 -
05100605.
21. Item removed from the Consent Calendar by Council Member
Glover.
S26. 2001 -02 PROPOSED BUDGET HEARING; 2001 -02
APPROPRIATION LIMIT HEARING. Schedule a public hearing
on the City's proposed budget and appropriation limit for the 2001 -02
fiscal year on June 12, 2001; and direct the City Clerk to publish a
notice of said hearings.
S27. REQUEST FOR AN ENDORSEMENT LETTER FROM THE MAX
COMPANY FOR PUBLICATION OF A NEWPORT BEACH
LIFESTYLE BOOK. Authorize staff to prepare an endorsement
letter for the City Manager's signature.
Motion by Mavor Pro Tem Rids-rewas to approve the Consent
Calendar, except for those items removed (1, 3 and 21), and noting the
continuance of Item No. 12.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Proctor, Bromberg,
Mayor Adams
Volume 54 - Page 270
INDEX
BA -047
Governmental
Accounting
Standard
Board (GASB)
(40)
BA -048
Tennis Court
Refurbishment)
Recreational
Programs/
Facilities
(40/62)
Discretionary Grants/
Policy A -12 (69)
BA -051
Tract 15012
CIOSA
Reimbursements/
Castaways
(40 /TT 15012)
Budget Hearing/
Appropriation
Limit Hearing
(40)
Newport Beach
Lifestyle Book
(52)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
I. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR AND REGULAR
MEETING OF MAY 8, 2001.
Jim Hildreth, 120 The Grand Canal, requested that more of his
speech, as read from his letter, be included in the regular meeting
minutes of May 8, 2001.
Mayor Adams stated that the letter will be referenced in the minutes,
if it is not already, but a verbatim of his speech will not be done.
Motion by Mayor Pro Tern Ridgeway to waive reading of subject
minutes, approve as amended and order filed.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Proctor, Bromberg,
Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
3. MODIFICATIONS TO CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE NBMC — LOUD
AND UNREASONABLE NOISE.
Deputy City Attorney Ohl stated that staff has submitted
recommendations for changes and modifications to Section 10.28 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code. He stated that the major change is a
requirement that police officers give suspected violators a warning.
He explained that this has been added to assist the City in providing
the District Attorney's office with evidence of the willful element of the
crime. He stated that a provision has also been added at the end to
indicate that violations are misdemeanors.
Council Member Glover asked for an explanation of what happens
when the police are called out to a property due to an excessive noise
complaint. Deputy City Attorney Ohl stated that the police will first
attempt to contact the property owner, or the responsible party, and
obtain voluntary compliance. He stated that if voluntary compliance
is not obtained, the police officer can decide whether to issue an
administrative citation, issue an infraction or make an arrest for a
misdemeanor.
Mayor Adams noted the newest revision to the ordinance that was
distributed at the current meeting. Deputy City Attorney Ohl
confirmed that a typographical error was corrected and a provision
Volume 54 - Page 271
INDEX
Ord 2001 -4
Noise Ordinance
(68170)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
was added that allows Code Enforcement Officers to also enforce the
provision.
Council Member Glover asked how the recommended changes
strengthen the current ordinance. Deputy City Attorney Ohl stated
that it requires that the police officers give a warning first, which
should provide sufficient evidence for the District Attorne}'s office to
proceed forward with criminal charges.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway received confirmation from Deputy City
Attorney Ohl that it is expected that law- abiding citizens would
receive the warning and provide voluntary compliance.
Council Member Bromberg asked if it is the police who will decide on
the parameters to use when determining whether to issue an
administrative citation, issue an infraction or make an arrest for a
misdemeanor. Deputy City Attorney Ohl stated that it is up to the
police to make the decision and that it currently exists in the code this
way also.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway's question, Deputy City
Attorney Ohl stated that besides willful intent, the loud and
unreasonable element must also be proven.
Jim Hildreth, 120 The Grand Canal, stated that the police already
issue warnings. He disagreed with the recommended changes.
Pastor Muzic Martin, His Way Ministries, Santa Ana, stated that he
ministers at the Newport pier area and at one point was singled out by
the police, called a black man and frisked. He stated that his students
sing and are proud of their faith. He stated that some individuals
might be prejudiced and shouldn't be given the power to cause
someone to be arrested for unreasonable noise.
Charles Griffin, 732 Bison Avenue, stated that there are
circumstances when a gathering will occur through word -of -mouth and
it may not be the fault of the property owner. He stated that the
police officers need to be trained.
Pastor Katheryn Martin, His Way Ministries, stated that His Way
Ministries is licensed by the City and obeys the ordinances. She stated
that they have conducted research on acceptable decibel levels in the
McFadden Square area, and feel that they have the right to do what
they're doing. She stated that the police have harassed them and
singled them out, and that Orange County News (OCN) also did a spot
on them associating them with the loud noise in the City. She stated
that their only intent is to send out a positive message and provide a
good deed.
Phyllis Sandoval stated that a lot of people enjoy listening to the
singing and music of the students from His Way Ministries. She
Volume 54 - Page 272
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
stated that it's a positive message that's needed and is helping people
improve their lives.
Russell Niewiarowski, Santa Ana Heights, stated that he supports the
ordinance, but thinks that "loud and unreasonable" needs to be
defined. He stated that what is loud and unreasonable to one person
may not be to another person. He also mentioned natural sounds,
such as birds.
Don Kazarian, 3412 Ocean Blvd., stated that the City Council should
be careful with the power it passes out. He noted that a contractor on
his property recently received an unnecessary citation. Mr. Kazarian
stated that common sense needs to be used.
Dennis Rodman, 4009 Seashore Drive, stated that the modifications to
the ordinance are being done because of him. He asked for a definition
of unreasonable noise, and referred to the noise and the people on the
streets during the Fourth of July weekend. Mr. Rodman stated that
he gets harassed every day, both at home and at his restaurant, and
suggested that the police need proper training. Mr. Rodman stated
that he shouldn't be liable for the people in the streets and the noise
they make.
Michael Molfetta, Mr. Rodman's attorney, stated that Mr. Rodman is
frustrated by the way he feels he's been singled out. Mr. Molfetta
stated that as a former prosecutor and defense attorney in the City's
jurisdiction, he has dealt with the wording of the ordinance. He stated
that the ordinance needs to provide more guidance to the police on
what should be considered unreasonable noise and how disturbances
should be handled. Mr. Molfetta stated that Mr. Rodman's celebrity
status attracts people.
Council Member Proctor stated that he has known Mr. Molfetta for
some time and that they both work in the same field. He stated that
the law for disturbing the peace, California Penal Code 415, is not
much different than the proposed ordinance, but the ordinance
attempts to tie in the property owner and requires a warning be issued
first. He asked Mr. Molfetta how he thinks the ordinance could be
improved. Mr. Molfetta stated that the ordinance is reactionary to
things that have occurred in the recent past and such words as
"reasonable" and "willfully" need to be further defined.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated that he also has worked as a criminal
defense attorney. He read from Section 10.28.007 of the proposed
ordinance and stated that it would be difficult to improve the
definition of loud and unreasonable. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated
that the proposed ordinance has several standards and he's satisfied
that they're legitimate. He added that the proposed ordinance is
written for law- abiding citizens, he is in support of it and agrees with
the warning system.
Volume 54 - Page 273
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
Council Member Bromberg stated that he has also worked as a
defense attorney and referring to comments made earlier by
Mr. Molfetta, stated that with celebrity status comes a certain amount
of responsibility. Council Member Bromberg stated that every
circumstance is unique and Mr. Rodman, based on the location of his
home on the peninsula and his celebrity status, needs to provide some
control and reasonableness. Council Member Bromberg stated that
the proposed ordinance is solid and has been needed for a long time.
Mr. Molfetta stated that his mention of celebrity status was only in
regards to the people that may gather outside of Mr. Rodman's home
when he has a party. He stated that the police may come, they may
issue a warning, Mr. Rodman may comply but he shouldn't be held
willfully responsible for the uninvited people that may continue to
gather in the streets outside his home. Mr. Molfetta stated that it
needs to be defined as to when the property owner's responsibility
ends.
Council Member Bromberg stated that there can be a problem with
the invited guests and those invited by word of mouth. The property
owner needs to bear the responsibility.
Council Member Proctor stated that it would be inappropriate and
unlawful to hold a property owner accountable if he has complied with
the police. Mr. Molfetta stated that the ordinance still needs to be
fine- tuned.
Council Member Bromberg stated that the ordinance will not be
perfect, but the City needs to address the problems with party houses.
He stated that common sense and caring are needed.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated that the City has an alcoholic
beverage ordinance and the issue of when the responsibility of
restaurants and commercial entities ends was debated when adopting
the ordinance. He stated that it was decided that when the restaurant
had done everything within its power, then responsibility has been
met. Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated that both ordinances are only
trying to maintain peace and quiet in the community.
Council Member Heffernan stated his concern about the lack of
objective standards, although feels that the proposed ordinance is as
close as the City is going to get. He explained that he's concerned
about enforcement and consistency in applying the law. Council
Member Heffernan stressed that the police must be properly prepared
and enforce the ordinance without bias.
Council Member Glover asked if playing a musical instrument would
be considered as loud and unreasonable noise. Deputy City Attorney
Ohl stated that it is assumed that the police will use proper discretion
when applying the law, and take into account volume and time of day.
Per Council Member Glover's comment, Deputy City Attorney Ohl
Volume 54 - Page 274
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
added that noise complaint calls made by neighbors with personal
vendettas is also taken into account.
Mayor Adams confirmed with Deputy City Attorney Ohl that the
current ordinance is also subject to the same subjectivity.
Council Member Proctor confirmed with Deputy City Attorney Ohl
that the standard for loud and unreasonable noise is that which
annoys a reasonable person. Deputy City Attorney Ohl added that the
loud and unreasonable section has already been held to be
constitutional.
Council Member Glover stated her concern for people being allowed to
continue leading their daily lives.
Mayor Adams stated that no new dilemma is being added to the
decisions already being made by the police.
City Manager Bludau noted that the person calling in a noise
compliant does not establish the loud and unreasonable factor, it's the
police who establish it.
Council Member Proctor stated that it needs to be clear that the only
changes being proposed are to make the property owner responsible
after receiving a notice and making the violation a misdemeanor.
Bob Small, 391h Street, stated that the voice of reason is important and
disagreed with a property owner being subject to arrest for actions
taken by the renters of his property. Mr. Small suggested that
continuous complaints of noise should result in fines, which could be a
profit center for the City. He stated that people should be allowed to
party from time to time. Regarding the Fourth of July, Mr. Small
stated that little is done other than rerouting people. In conclusion,
Mr. Small stated that the problems in the peninsula area have long
been trash, traffic and noise, and suggested that the focus be shifted to
these problems.
Motion by Council Member Proctor to introduce Ordinance
No. 2001.4 and pass to second reading on June 12, 2001.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated that he is satisfied that the police
respect freedom of speech and are well trained at maintaining citizens
rights.
Council Member Proctor stated that the proposed ordinance is aimed
at trying to improve enforcement without infringing on the public's
rights. He stated that the changes are minor and fair.
Council Member Heffernan stated that the proposed ordinance is too
heavy- handed and is not the tool needed to solve the noise problem.
He stated that it'll just be another layer and that what is already on
Volume 54 - Page 275
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
the books is enforceable. Council Member Heffernan noted that the
City is in the limelight over the issue and must treat everyone equally.
Mayor Pro Tern Ridgeway stated that the ordinance does comply with
the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote
Ayes: O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Proctor, Bromberg, Mayor Adams
Noes: Heffernan
Abstain: None
Absent: None
21. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE (EQAC)
COMMENTS ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FOR CRYSTAL COVE HISTORIC DISTRICT INVESTIGATIONS
& INTERIM PROTECTION PLAN.
Council Member Glover stated that she didn't have time to read the
comments from the Environmental Quality Affairs Committee
(EQAC). Assistant City Manager Wood explained that the comments
weren't available until earlier in the day because EQAC only met the
night before. Council Member Glover stated her concern for comments
being sent from the City when the City Council hasn't had the time to
conduct a public review.
Motion by Council Member Glover not to authorize EQAC to
transmit comments to the State Department of Parks & Recreation.
Mayor Adams stated that comments are due June 11, 2001, which is
prior to the next City Council meeting. He noted that the comments
from EQAC are consistent with the comments already made by the
City in regards to the notice of preparation, but agreed that Council
Member Glover brought up an important procedural issue that needs
to be addressed.
Council Member Proctor stated that oftentimes there's a bigger picture
to look at that a committee might miss. He explained that in this
situation, he has learned that the City is attempting to negotiate on
the CalTrans West property and there might be a conflict by sending
the comments.
Robert Hawkins, EQAC Chairman, stated that the committee debated
long and hard the night before in preparing the report for City Council
review. He stated that the comments would not be transmitted to any
agency without the City Council's approval. He noted that EQAC is
acting under its authority, but questioned commenting on an extra
City project.
Mayor Adams stated that the timing issue should not be interpreted
by EQAC as the City not being grateful for what they're doing.
Volume 54 - Page 276
INDEX
EIRlCrystal Cove
Historical District
(62)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
ull 1m.'7
Mr. Hawkins noted that the comments are not critical of the project
and are fairly neutral.
Laura Dietz, EQAC member, stated that the members are aware of
the process problem. She stated that it's a matter of timing and
possibly the EQAC meetings should be held on a different night.
Phillip Lugar, EQAC member, stated that all comments and
recommendations made by EQAC go to the City Council first. He
stated that EQAC serves at the pleasure of the City Council and that a
lot of time is spent by the members in performing their duties.
Council Member Glover stated that it's the City Council that hasn't
been clear in defining EQAC's responsibilities. She added that the
Crystal Cove item is a regional issue and the City Council has to look
at the overall picture when making its decisions.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Proctor, Bromberg,
Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
J. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jim Hildreth, 120 The Grand Canal, stated that the City - installed
ladder at the southwest end of the Grand Canal is placed there out of
spite, and is inadequate for recreational use and unsafe for the
partially - disabled. He stated that due to an accident, he has had
limited mobility since 1975 and is concerned that the structure will
cause him further injury. Mr. Hildreth read from Section 6250 from
the California Public Records Act, and requested that he be provided
with the documents he has been asking for.
City Manager Bludau stated that copies of all of the records that
Mr. Hildreth has requested from the City have been provided to him,
with the exception of the records that the City does not have
possession of.
Michael Safran, 36 Rockingham Drive, presented the City Council
with a token of appreciation from the Newport Beach Theater
Company for their assistance in introducing children's theater to
Newport Beach.
Jay Taylor, Santa Ana Heights, suggested that financial consequences
be linked to unreasonable uses of the John Wayne Airport (JWA). He
stated that he is concerned about the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) regulation that discusses limiting the use of an airport and if
flight restrictions being sought by the City would still be enforceable.
Volume 54 - Page 277
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
He suggested that the City propose to the County that a penalty be
considered that would be charged regardless of Federal law for
unreasonable flights. Mr. Taylor stated that this might also be of
interest to the South County cities and the acceptance of an airport at
El Toro.
Russell Niewiarowski, Santa Ana Heights, stated that he has always
been a strong advocate of an airport at E1 Toro and thinks that
everyone should be flexible in making sure that an airport at El Toro
happens. He stated that a new initiative will be proposed that will
amend Measure A to insure that the safest, quietest, most efficient
and most modern airport at El Toro be implemented.
Mr. Niewiarowski asked that a future agenda item include a
presentation of the initiative, which combines adding an open space
corridor and plans for a better airport.
H. ORAL REPORTS FROM CITY COUNCIL ON COMMITTEE
ACTIVITIES — None.
L. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AND ORAL STATUS-REPORT
22. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FOR MAY 17, 2001.
Planning Director Temple stated that the Planning Commission
agenda consisted of six items, one which was continued and two which
were minor informational reports. She stated that one item included a
clean -up amendment to a district, which would be agendized for the
City Council meeting of June 12, 2001.
Planning Director Temple stated that the other three items on the
agenda were policy oriented and included a review of the capital
improvement program, which was found to be consistent with the
General Plan. The Planning Commission also reviewed the proposed
Harbor and Bay Element of the General Plan and will also make a
recommendation for approval at one of the June City Council
meetings. Planning Director Temple stated that the final item on the
Planning Commission agenda was a preliminary discussion of a new
draft subdivision code. She stated that a consultant was hired to
prepare the new regulations, and that a public hearing will be held on
the matter at the Planning Commission's meeting of June 21, 2001.
Motion by Mayor Pro Tern Ridye_waz to receive the oral report on
the most recent Planning Commission actions; and receive and file the
written report.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Proctor, Bromberg,
Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Volume 54 - Page 278
INDEX
Planning
(68)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
La
Absent: None
23. AD HOC COMMITTEE TO REVIEW ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (EDC) AND ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE (EQAC).
Mayor Adams made the following appointments
Gary Proctor
(Council Member)
Steve Bromberg
(Council Member)
John Heffernan
(Council Member)
Chairman Ed Selich
(EDC Representative)
Chairman Robert Hawkins
(EQAC Representative)
Council Member Bromberg confirmed that Assistant City Manager
Wood would be the staff liaison.
Council Member Heffernan suggested that Council Member Proctor
act as Chairman of the committee. Council Member Proctor accepted.
Motion by Mavor Pro Tern Ridgeway to adopt Resolution
No. 2001.38 establishing the ad hoc committee, confirm the Mayor's
appointments and designate Council Member Proctor as the
Chairman.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Proctor, Bromberg,
Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
N. CURRENT BUSINESS
24. NEWPORT THEATER ARTS CENTER - AMENDMENT OF
COUNCIL POLICY I -6, SPECIAL EVENT AND LICENSE
AGREEMENT, HOUSE RULES, FEE SCHEDULE, AND
REQUEST FOR USE BY NEWPORT BEACH THEATRE
COMPANY.
City Attorney Burnham stated that at the City Council meeting of
April 10, 2001, a management agreement was approved that gave the
Friends of the Newport Theater Arts Center the exclusive right to use
the theater 46 weeks of the year. It also required that the Friends
designate three two -week periods when the theater could be used by
third parties. City Attorney Burnham stated that four documents
have been prepared that deal with the reserved periods.
Volume 54 - Page 279
INDEX
Res 2001 -38
EDC and
EQAC
(24)
C -3409
Policy I -6/
Newport Theater
Arts Center/
Newport Beach
Theater Company
(38/62/69)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
Motion by Council Member Glover to approve the modifications to
Council Policy I -6 with an amendment to delegate the authority to
designate Third Party use of the NTAC to the Friends of the NTAC,
the Permit, the House Rules and the Fee Schedule; and determine
that the Newport Beach Theatre Company meets the selection criteria
in Council Policy I -6 and approve their request to use the Theatre
during the first three (3) Reserved Periods.
Council Member Bromberg stated his concern for designating the
Friends such authority when it was represented to the Newport Beach
Theater Company, early in the process, that the City would participate
in the selection process. He stated that this commitment should be
kept.
Council Member Glover stated that the current obligations to the
Newport Beach Theater Company will be kept and that her
recommendation is only for future uses of the theater by third parties.
Council Member Bromberg stated that the commitment to have City -
involvement should be kept.
Council Member Glover stated that the theater is within a residential
district and is a small community theater. She stated that the City
Council should not have to look at the issue of who uses the theater
three times per year. She added that the Friends have standards that
they will apply and it is appropriate for them to make the selection.
Substitute Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway to approve the
modifications to Council Policy I -6 with an amendment to delegate the
authority to designate Third Party use of the NTAC to the City
Manager, the Permit, the House Rules and the Fee Schedule; and
determine that the Newport Beach Theatre Company meets the
selection criteria in Council Policy I -6 and approve their request to use
the Theatre during the first three (3) Reserved Periods.
Mayor Pro Tem Ridgeway stated that this would provide for a fair and
reasonable compromise.
Mayor Adams stated that it's good to have the authority with the City
Council, but delegating that authority doesn't limit it. He suggested
that possibly the delegation should be made to a department, however,
instead of the City Manager.
City Attorney Burnham stated that the policy is currently setup to
have the Community Services Director make the selection, with a
provision that the City Council can make the designation.
Amended Substitute Motion by —Ma -or Pro Tem Ridgeway to
approve the modifications to Council Policy I.6 with an amendment to
delegate the authority to designate Third Party use of the NTAC to the
Community Services Director, the Permit, the House Rules and the
Volume 54 - Page 280
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
Fee Schedule; and determine that the Newport Beach Theatre
Company meets the selection criteria in Council Policy I -6 and approve
their request to use the Theatre during the first three (3) Reserved
Periods.
City Attorney Burnham stated that he doesn't believe he gave the
Newport Beach Theater Company any representations as to what the
result would be regarding the selection process.
Council Member Glover stated that she could support the amended
substitute motion and asked what criteria the Community Services
Director would use. City Attorney Burnham stated that the criteria is
specified in the policy.
Mayor Adams stated that anyone who disagrees with a selection can
approach the City Council, since the City Council maintains the
ultimate authority.
The amended substitute motion carried by the following roll call vote
Ayes: Heffernan, O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Proctor, Bromberg,
Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
25. ENTITLEMENT STATUS OF THE NEWPORT VILLAGE SITE
(REQUESTED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROMBERG).
Planning Director Temple stated that the staff report clarifies the
current General Plan and zoning designations for the Newport Village
site. She stated that the current zoning does designate the site for
open space, but amendments may need to be made to be consistent
with the development of a park at the site.
Jan Vandersloot, Stop Polluting Our Newport (SPON), stated that
SPON has spent about ten years trying to get a park at the site and
feels that the staff recommendations support this endeavor. He asked
if the library exchange agreement wasn't already a General Plan
Amendment, however, designating the site as recreational/
environmental open space in the General Plan. He suggested that a
General Plan Amendment at this time may not be needed.
Dr. Vandersloot added that the City Attorney and the Planning
Director have indicated that it was only the zoning that was changed
in the library exchange agreement, but that he has since learned that
the library exchange agreement was a General Plan Amendment
itself. He concluded by stating that he supports the site remaining as
open space with a park created on it.
Per Council Member Bromberg's request, Planning Director Temple
stated that the library exchange agreement was a development
Volume 54 - Page 281
INDEX
Res 2001.39
GPA 2001 -2
Res 2001 -40
Newport Village Site
(45)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
agreement with a zoning amendment, but no action was taken in
regards to the General Plan. She stated that it would be helpful to
have the Land Use Element clearly reflect the multiple uses of the
site.
Motion by Council Member Bromberg to adopt Resolution
No. 2001 -39 initiating General Plan Amendment 2001 -2 for the
Newport Village Site and that the language include that the portion of
the Site between the Central Library and San Miguel Drive be
designated as a combination passive view park and restored
environmental open space with improvements limited to those
necessary to serve park visitors and parking for park and/or library
purposes; adopt Resolution No. 2001 -40 initiating an amendment to
the Newport Village Planned Community District Regulations; direct
staff to return to Council with plans, specifications and a budget
amendment for the improvement of a park on the Newport Village
site; and that the actions be completed within the next four months.
Council Member Heffernan confirmed that the council members were
clear that the parking would be jointly used by the library and the
users of the park.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Heffernan, O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Proctor, Bromberg,
Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
528. REPORT FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY
REGARDING THE PROPOSED EXTENSION OF THE JOHN
WAYNE AIRPORT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
City Attorney Burnham stated that the item involves a Memorandum
of Understanding (MOIL) between the City and the County, which
establishes the ground rules for the preparation of an environmental
document that will evaluate the impacts of the proposed extension of
the John Wayne Airport (JWA) settlement agreement. The City needs
the consent of the County Board of Supervisors to extend the
settlement agreement and the City Council has worked hard to get to
this point in the process.
Using a PowerPoint presentation, City Attorney Burnham stated that
the JWA settlement agreement came out of a lawsuit that was filed by
the County. The County was asking the court to validate the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the JWA Master Plan. The
settlement agreement was approved by the City, the County, the
Airport Working Group (AWG) and Stop Polluting Our Newport
(SPON) in 1985.
Volume 54 - Page 282
INDEX
C -3424
BA -053
JWA Settlement
Agreement)
Environmental
Impact Report
(38/40/54)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
City Attorney Burnham stated that the settlement agreement, which
expires on December 31, 2005, limits the number of noise - regulated
flights to 73 average daily departures, limits the number of gates to
14, limits the size of the terminal to approximately 338,000 square feet
and limits the number of passengers to 8.4 million annually.
City Attorney Burnham described some of the actions taken by the
City and the County to date, leading to a unanimous vote by the
County Board of Supervisors earlier in the day to approve the MOU
and three airport expansion alternatives. City Attorney Burnham
stated that the first alternative, Alternative A, was submitted by the
City and provides for no change in the curfew until 2026, but permits
4 new gates on January 1, 2005, an increase in the average daily
departures to 85 and an increase in the number of annual passengers
to 9.8 million. He stated that it also, like the current settlement
agreement, prohibits any change in the general aviation facilities at
the airport or the general aviation noise ordinance.
City Attorney Burnham stated that the County proposed the other two
alternatives, with Alternative B adding 4 new gates, and increasing
the annual passengers to 10.8 million and the number of average daily
flights to 85, all permitted on April 1, 2002. City Attorney Burnham
explained that Alternative B would also permit 2 additional cargo
flights on January 6, 2006, and would be less restrictive regarding
noise limits and master planning. Alternative C represents more
facility improvements and Further removes restrictions in place in both
Alternatives A and B. City Attorney Burnham stated that Alternative
C would permit 4 new gates on April 1, 2002, six new gates on
January 1, 2006, would allow for an increase in the number of average
daily flights to 85 on April 1, 2002, and to 100 on January 1, 2006, and
would have no cap on the number of annual passengers.
City Attorney Burnham stated that EIR 573 was prepared by the
County to evaluate the impacts of a commercial airport at El Toro. He
added that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires
the County to evaluate an expansion of JWA in EIR 573, in case El
Toro is not developed into a commercial airport. City Attorney
Burnham explained that the County developed two JWA expansion
alternatives to meet this requirement and they are known as
Alternatives F & G. Alternative F would allow 14 million annual
passengers in 2020, 29 air carrier gates and 8 commuter gates, a
terminal three times larger than the existing facility, and
approximately 75,000 additional flights per year. Alternative G would
increase the number of gates to 52, the terminal would be six times
larger, two runways would be utilized, the annual passengers would
increase to 25 million, 700 acres of land around the airport would be
condemned and 200,000 additional flights per year would be allowed.
City Attorney Burnham stated that the next step in the process to
extend the JWA settlement agreement is for the County to begin
preparation of the environmental document, with input from the City.
Volume 54 - page 283
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
He stated that the process is expected to include meetings with the
interested parties, such as the FAA, air carriers, and JWA corridor
cities. Although the EIR will be complicated to prepare, City Attorney
Burnham stated that it is hoped that the draft EIR will be completed
by November 1, 2001. He added that a 45 -day comment period would
follow, and hopefully board certification and approval would occur by
January 15, 2002, with City Council approval on January 22, 2002.
Mayor Adams pointed out that Alternatives F & G are the alternatives
that may happen if the JWA settlement agreement is not extended
and an airport at El Toro does not happen.
Council Member Glover stated that she serves as Chairman on the
JWA Settlement Extension Ad Hoc Committee and that Council
Members Proctor and O'Neil also serve on the committee. She stated
that although the County is the lead agency on the EIR, the City is
paying for it and would also pay for any litigation that might occur.
Council Member Glover stated that the City is supporting Alternative
A and will need to be very prudent as the EIR phase is entered.
Council Member Proctor stated that it needs to be clear that
Alternatives F & G in the El Toro EIR could be devastating to
Newport Beach, which is why extending the settlement agreement and
getting an airport at El Toro is so important. He stated that the law
requires that three alternatives be studied in the JWA EIR, explaining
why there are Alternatives A, B and C.
Council Member O'Neil stated that the City Council understands that
another airport needs to be built to satisfy the future air
transportation and air cargo needs in the region. He stated that the
City has limited control over the issue, and has done what it can to
support Alternative A. He stated that the unanimous vote earlier in
the day by the five County supervisors was a great achievement, and
is encouraged that the City will be successful in its efforts.
Council Member Bromberg noted that some people who live in
Newport Beach don't care about the settlement agreement because
they feel that they aren't impacted by the flights out of JWA. Council
Member Bromberg stated that if an appropriate settlement agreement
and an airport at El Toro are not accomplished, that JWA will be
expanded and everyone will be impacted.
Council Member Heffernan stated that the citizens in Newport Beach
are generally uninformed on the problem. He stated that the citizens
should be motivated to get involved, that the issue will have a huge
impact on Newport Beach and that the City has reached a critical time
in the process.
Like the previous speakers, Mayor Adams commended the three
council members on the committee. He stated that the amount of time
spent on the issue has been extraordinary.
Volume 54 - Page 284
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
uiiDCR
Jay Taylor, Santa Ana Heights, requested that his comments made
during the Public Comments section of the agenda be incorporated
into this item as well (Volume 54, Page 277). He added that he feels
that his neighborhood faces a real air traffic disaster problem. He
complimented the time and effort that has been spent by the City, but
again suggested that financial consequences be tied to the use of JWA.
Council Member Proctor requested that City Attorney Burnham
discuss the legal issues of applying financial consequences with
Mr. Taylor.
Laura Dietz announced that on June 4, 2001, there will be a
discussion about E1 Toro, sponsored by the Corona del Mar Residents
Association. The meeting will take place at 7:00 p.m, at the Oasis
Senior Center.
Charles Griffin pointed out that CEQA requires that a no project
alternative be looked at when reviewing an EIR. He stated that a no
project alternative in this situation would be an extension of the
existing settlement agreement. He stated that with any of the three
alternatives, the noise will be increased.
George Margolin, 1701 Irvine Avenue, displayed an aerial shot of the
region and noted the no housing zone over El Toro. He stated that it's
a large area and asked that it be compared to the area around JWA.
He noted how devastating a larger airport at JWA would be for the
region.
Russell Niewiarowski, Santa Ana Heights, noted that Don Bren, an
influential celebrity in Newport Beach, is not involved in the airport
issue and should be. Mr. Niewiarowski stated that the City is
advocating an expansion of JWA by supporting Alternative A. He
stated that the current settlement agreement should be extended, as
is. He stated that there should not be an expansion of JWA and the
City should not be funding an EIR for an expansion. He stated that,
instead, the City should be supporting a runway alternative for El
Toro. He stated that an airport at E1 Toro is needed, but disagrees
with the City pursuing a two - airport system.
Council Member Glover stated that the committee has been meeting
with the other corridor cities and keeping them updated on the
progress being made with the extension of the settlement agreement.
She stated that the parties involved with the approval of the
settlement agreement also need to approve its extension, and someone
has to take the leadership to have this done. Council Member Glover
noted the past efforts of the Airport Working Group (AWG) and their
leadership in stopping JWA from being expanded previously. She
stated that the City is taking the leadership this time. She stated
that, like AWG, this involves protecting the corridor cities.
Volume 54 - Page 285
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
INDEX
Referring to the comments made earlier by Mr. Niewiarowski, Council
Member Bromberg stated that anyone who thinks that the settlement
agreement wouldn't be changed after 20 years is being unrealistic.
Council Member Bromberg stated that Mr. Niewiarowski isn't
supporting the efforts of the City.
Marcella Niewiarowski, Santa Ana Heights, stated that she is under
the flight path and that JWA has no buffer zone. She stated that her
brother, Russell, has spent a lot of time on an alternative runway for
El Toro that utilizes an existing buffer zone. Ms. Niewiarowski stated
that she would offer her time to fight for no expansion at JWA. She
stated that the City should not be pursuing an expansion of JWA.
Motion by Council Member Proctor to authorize the City Manager
to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding
preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR); authorize the
City Manager to execute agreements with consultants to prepare
portions of the environmental document so long as the expenditures
are within budgetary authority; and approve a budget amendment
(BA•053) designating $400,000 for purposes of completing the
environmental document on the project.
Explaining why Alternative A is being supported, Council Member
Heffernan stated that the City is standing alone on the issue and has
to give a little in order to reach its goals. He added that the citizens in
Newport Beach must recognize that the options are limited. He noted
that the City has spent over $10 million since 1981 on the airport issue
and is planning to spend another $4 million in the next twelve months.
He stated the issue is expensive, but important.
Mayor Adams stated that people have the right to criticize what the
City is doing, but complaints are usually the result of the City not
getting the full message out about the constraints and realities, noting
that it's a complex issue. Mayor Adams additionally pointed out that
it's the County, and not the City, that is responsible for a potential
airport at El Toro and the current JWA. He stated that the one thing
the City has is the settlement agreement and added that due to the
increased demand for air travel in the County, no one should think
that the settlement agreement wouldn't be changed when extended.
Mayor Adams stated his support for the compromise being
recommended in Alternative A.
Council Member Proctor added that Mr. Niewiarowski and Mr. Griffin
have done a disservice to the citizens in Santa Ana Heights. He stated
that what they fail to understand is that if an airport at El Toro
doesn't happen, JWA will expand into Alternatives F or G. He stated
that El Toro will be lost if the EIR process is delayed, which is what
Mr. Niewiarowski and Mr. Griffin are doing.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
Volume 54 - Page 286
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
Ayes: Heffernan, O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Proctor, Bromberg,
Mayor Adams
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
S29. PROPOSED GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND
THE AIRPORT WORKING GROUP (AWG) WITH REPORT
FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY.
City Attorney Burnham stated that at the City Council meeting on
March 27, 2001, grant agreements with Citizens for Jobs and the
Economy (CJE) and the Airport Working Group (AWG) were
approved. These funds were to be used to conduct a public education
program related to possible solutions to the current and future air
transportation needs of the County. He stated that staff is
recommending that the process be modified to terminate the grant
with CJE and grant the funds solely to AWG.
Motion by Council Member Glover to approve the following
recommendations of the Airport Issues Committee: authorize the
Mayor to execute the proposed grant agreement between AWG and
the City of Newport Beach, as amended; terminate the Grant
Agreement between CJE and the City of Newport Beach that is dated
March 28, 2001; and retain Dana Reed of Reed and Davidson and Fred
Woocher of Strumwasser and Woocher to act as special counsel
pursuant to the grant agreement and direct staff to notify AWG that
special counsel has been retained.
Laura Dietz, 325 Cameo Shores Road, asked what the funds could be
used for, given that they can't be used for any political ballot measure.
City Attorney Burnham stated that a statute prohibits the use of
taxpayer dollars to support or oppose the qualification, passage or
defeat of a ballot measure. The funds, however, can be used to
educate the public on various issues. He stated that the grant
agreement requires two attorneys to review any material before it is
duplicated and disseminated to the public. Ms. Dietz asked if the two
attorneys and the City Council would be the only ones to look at the
material. City Attorney Burnham stated that the two attorneys would
only be reviewing the material to determine if it can be funded with
taxpayer dollars.
Council Member Heffernan stated that he opposes the City funding
AWG, but supports the expenditure of money for public education.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote
Ayes: O'Neil, Ridgeway, Glover, Proctor, Bromberg, Mayor Adams
Noes: Heffernan
Abstain: None
Absent: None
Volume 54 - Page 287
INDEX
C -3425
Grant Agreement)
Special Counsel/
Airport Issues
(38)
City of Newport Beach
City Council Minutes
May 22, 2001
O. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - None.
P. ADJOURNMENT - 10:20 p.m.
The agenda for the Regular Meeting was posted on May 16, 2001,
at 2:15 p.m. on the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of
Newport Beach Administration Building. The supplemental agenda for the
Regular Meeting was posted on May 18, 2001, at 2:30 p.m. on the City Hall
Bulletin Board located outside of the City of Newport Beach Administration
Building.
City Clerk
Recording Secretary
Mayor
Volume 54 - Page 288
INDEX