The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05 - Supporting Proposition 42 - Transportation Congestion Improvement ActFebruary 12, 2002 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. s TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 42, TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2002- in support of Proposition 42, the Transportation Congestion Improvement Act on the March 5, Primary Election Ballot. DISCUSSION: In 2000, the Transportation Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) was enacted which directed the State's portion of sales tax from the sale of motor vehicle fuel to be used for specified transportation purposes for a period from FY 2003 -04 to FY 2007 -08. After FY 2007 -08, these revenues would revert back to the State's Retail Sales Tax Fund as before enactment of the TCRP. The estimated amount of gasoline sales tax is currently estimated at $1 billion annually. Proposition 42 was placed on the ballot by the Legislature through the enactment of Assembly Constitutional Amendment 4 (Dutra). In general, Proposition 42 reaffirms the TCRP and permanently allocates the State's portion of gasoline sales tax to transportation improvements beyond 2007/08. Starting in fiscal year 2008109 and each fiscal year after, the measure proposes allocating the gasoline sales tax funds to be used for State and local transportation purposes as follows: 20%- Public transit and mass transportation; 40 %- Transportation capital improvement projects, subject to the laws governing the State Transportation Improvement Program, or any successor program; 20% - Street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or storm damage repair conducted by cities; and 20% - Street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or storm damage repair conducted by counties. The projected gasoline sales tax in 2008109 is estimated at $1.4 billion, increasing annually thereafter depending on prices and consumption. SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 42, TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENTACT February 12, 2002 Page 2 Supporters of this measure maintain that the additional funds will reduce the funding backlog within the State's Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and directly fund local transportation projects starting in 2008/09. The reduction of traffic congestion, increases in jobs, improvements to traffic safety, and stimulation of the economy are also cited by the supporters. The measure is widely supported by Police, Fire, & Public Safety organizations, taxpayer advocacy groups, Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) such as Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) and Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), local governments, businesses, and Chambers of Commerce (see attachment B from Taxpayers for Traffic ReliefNes on 42). The text of the measure is included in Attachment C. Additional information from the State Legislative Analyst's Office web page is also included in Attachment D. Respectfully submitted, WORKS DEPARTMENT G. Badum, Director Attachments: Attachment A Resolution 2002 - supporting Proposition 42 Attachment B, Taxpayers for Traffic ReliefNes on 42 Flyer Attachment C, Proposition 42, Text Attachment D, State Legislative Analyst's Office web page RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 42 WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help make our roads safer and reduce traffic without higher taxes by requiring the gasoline sales taxes we already pay be used to improve mass transit, highways, and local roads; and WHEREAS, traffic is paralyzing travel within the Los Angeles metropolitan area including Orange County, now ranked the number one most congested urban area in the country, San Francisco /Oakland second, San Diego sixth, and Sacramento, San Jose and San Bernardino /Riverside following close behind; and WHEREAS, with our neglected transportation system needing attention, California has the most deteriorated roads in the nation and more than 6,000 of our bridges and overpasses are structurally deficient or no longer meet highway safety or design standards; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will provide a stable and on -going source of transportation funding that will make it possible to plan for our future transportation needs; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will guarantee funds to every city and county to help improve local transportation infrastructure; and WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help speed up highway safety and traffic relief projects; and expand and improve mass transit systems; and WHEREAS, all Proposition 42 projects will be subject to an annual audit and standard accounting practices to ensure they are delivered on time and on budget; and WHEREAS, by speeding up transportation projects thousands of new construction and other jobs will be created, our economy will be stimulated and every dollar invested in our highways will result in almost six times that in economic benefits. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that the City SUPPORTS Proposition 42. Adopted this 12th day of February 2002. ATTEST: City Clerk f:\ users\ pbw \shared\resolutions\propositon 42.doc 2 Mayor ATTACHMENT "B" ISAFER ROADS AND TRAFFIC RELIEF December 2001 Dear Local Government Official, Please join the League of California Cities in supporting Proposition 42, the Transportation Congestion Improvement Act, on the March 5, 2002 statewide ballot. As you may already know, Proposition 42 would allocate a portion of the existing state sales tax on gasoline to cities and counties to be used for transportation improvements. Cities and counties combined will receive 40 percent of the Proposition 42 revenues. Twenty percent of will be earmarked for cities for local street repairs and maintenance. Twenty percent of the revenue will be earmarked for counties for local road repairs and maintenance. Another 20 percent is provided to public transit agencies, and the remaining 40 percent goes to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), which is primarily composed of locally - identified projects. Proposition 42 is an important measure for all cities and counties as it would provide a much needed on- going reliable source of funding for our streets, roads and other local transportation projects. Proposition 42 is especially important now as many local transportation sales tax measures are set to expire over the next few years. I hope that you and your council will join the League of California Cities and the Yes on Proposition 42 campaign coalition of law enforcement and transportation officials, business, labor unions and taxpayers in supporting this measure. Enclosed please find a sample support form and resolution. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact campaign coalition director Ted Green at (310) 996 -2671 (tgreen @woodwardmcdowell.com) or campaign internal education director Jason Barnett at (650) 340 -0470 Qbarnett @woodwardmcdowell.com). Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, Christopher McKenzie Executive Director, League of California Cities TAXPAYERS FOR TRAFFIC RELIEF /YES ON 42 • A COALITION OF TAXPAYERS, CONSTRUCTION, BUSINESS, LABOR, ENGINEERS AND COMMUTERS 11300 West Olympic Blvd. #840 • Los Angeles, CA 90064 • 310 /996 -2671 • Fax 310/996.2673 111 Anza Blvd. #406 • Burlingame, CA 94010 • 650/340 -0470 • Fax 6501340 -1740 website: www.yesprop42.com • e -mail: info ®yesprop42.com 44 !1 1 SAFER ROADS AND TRAFFIC RELIEF SAFER ROADS -- TRAFFIC RELIEF - WITHOUT NEW TAXES Requires the gasoline sales tax -A TAX WEALREADY PAYAT THE PUMP - be used to improve highways, local roads and mass transit. An annual audit of Prop. 42 funds will be required to help guarantee transportation projects get delivered on time and on budget. Improve Highway, Bridge and Street Safety California's once safe and beautiful highways are now the third most deteriorated roadways in the nation, and growing less safe by the day. More than 6000 California bridges and overpasses are structurally deficient or no longer meet highway safety or design standards. Prop. 42 will provide desperately needed funds to help fix potholes and repair dangerous roads, highways, bridges, intersections and school routes — in every city and county in the state. Speed Up Traffic Relief and Mass Transit Projects Los Angeles has the most congested traffic in the country. San Francisco /Oakland is second, San Diego sixth, and Sacramento, San Jose and San Bernardino /Riverside follow close behind. Prop. 42 guarantees gasoline sales taxes — taxes we already pay — will be used for transportation improvements. It will help speed up the delivery of planned traffic relief projects on highways and local roads, and expand local bus and commuter services, such as VTA in San Jose, Sacramento light rail, MUNI, Green and Blue lines in L.A., the San Diego trolley, BART, Caltrain, Capitol Corridor, Southern California's MetroLink, ACE, and the Coasters in San Diego. Create Jobs and Stimulate the Economy Speeding up transportation projects has the added benefit of creating thousands of new jobs in construction, engineering and related services — at a time when we need them the most. Every dollar spent on highway improvements generates about six times that amount in economic benefits. Join California Highway Patrol Commissioner Dwight Helmick, the California Organization of Police and Sheriffs (COPS), California Fire Chiefs Association, California Office of Emergency Services Director Dallas Jonf California Taxpayers' Association, California State Automobile Association -AAA, Automobile Club of Southern California -AAA, California Transit Association, Transportation California, California Alliance for Jobs, California Taxpayer Protection Committee, California State Association of Counties, League of California Cities, California Chamber of Commerce, labor unions, seismic safety engineers, local and state transportation officials, seniors, commuters, transit riders, parents and many others. YES on PROP. 42 SAFER ROADS - TRAFFIC RELIEF - WITHOUT NEW TAXES TAXPAYERS FOR TRAFFIC RELIEF /YES ON 42 • A COALITION OF TAXPAYERS, CONSTRUCTION, BUSINESS, LABOR, ENGINEERS AND COMMUTERS 11300 West Olympic Blvd. #840 • Los Angeles, CA 90064.310/996 -2671 • Fax 310/996 -7673 12M 111 Anza Blvd. #406 • Burlingame, CA 94010.650/340 -0470 • Fax 650/340 -1740 website: www.yeSprCp42.com • e -mail: info ®yesprop42.com Alameda Extending rail service to Livermore Widening Rte. 84 from 4 to 6 lanes from Livermore to Sunol Westbound truck climbing lane over Altamont Pass • Adding train service across the Dumbarton Bridge Contra Costa • Extending rail service to Antioch Speeding up work on fourth bore for Caldecott Tunnel Expansion of 680 /Route 4 interchange Improvements to State Route 4 Fresno Extension of Highway 180 from Highway 33 to 1 -5 Improvements to Highway 99 • Traffic improvements to and widening of Herndon Avenue Expansion of public transit Kern Widening and improving Highway 99 Widening and improving State Route 58 in Bakersfield Los Angeles Improving the San Diego Freeway (405) and the Ventura Freeway (10 1) interchange and travel over Sepulveda Pass Countywide freeway improvements including 1- 5,1 -10, Route 14, Route 60, and U.S. 101 • Expansion of Metro Rapid Bus service Expansion of rail service to Pasadena, East Los Angeles and West Los Angeles • Construction of a Busway in the San Fernando Valley along the Burbank /Chandler corridor Marin /Sonoma Speeding up widening of 101 Expansion of ferry service • New 580/101 connecting ramps Napa /Solano Wideningfrmproving 80 /680 /Route 12 interchange Widening 680 to 6 lanes north of the Benicia Bridge • Expansion of Route 29 from Route 12 to Solano County Orange County Fixing freeway bottlenecks on the 405 from Warner to Beach Blvd., the 55 freeway, the 5 and the 91 • Expansion of MetroLink commuter rail service by doubling existing Metrolink during peak period operations and adding new service from Fullerton to Laguna Niguel Increasing "Bus Rapid Transit" service on Beach and Harbor Blvds. Riverside • Railroad grade separation on major streets • Improving MetroLink Service Improvements to 1 -215 11/29 • Widening of 1 -15 from Temecula to Corona Construction of a new East -West corridor between Riverside and Orange County Interchange improvements along 1 -10 in Coachella Valley • Improvement of local bus services Sacramento Light rail from downtown to Sacramento International Airport • Improvements on Hwy. 50 and 1 -80 east of downtown Improvements to local roads and local bus service San Bernardino Improvements to 1 -10 Widening of 1 -215 between San Bernardino and Riverside Widening of 1 -15 in the Cajon Pass • Expansion of MetroLink commuter rail service San Francisco Improvements to Doyle Dr. approach to Golden Gate Bridge Speeding up extension of light rail service underground into Chinatown Replacement for Transbay Terminal San Diego Widening of 1 -5 throughout the county Widening of 1 -15 from Kearney Mesa to Escondido Rail transit expansion and improvements San Joaquin Valley Widening and improvements to Highway 99 • Expansion of ACE commuter rail service to Bay Area Expansion of public transit system San Luis Obispo • Widen Route 46 to four lanes from Paso Robles to Fresno San Mateo Speeding up interchange improvements along 101, including Willow Road, University Avenue and Broadway Widening Route 92 from 4 to 6 lanes between 101 and 280 Speeding up electrification of Caltrain from SF to Gilroy Santa Clara • Speeding up work on widening 01 from 6 tall lanes from Metcalf Road to Cochrane Road Widening 880 to 8 lanes from Route 237 to 101 Speeding up construction of BART from Warm Springs to San Jose Ventura • Widening Route 23 between Moorpark and Thousand Oaks Widening 101 freeway from Johnson Ddve in Ventura to Vineyard Avenue in Oxnard Let's SAFER ROADS AND TRAFFIC RELIEF Who Supports Prop. 42 on the March 5, 2002 Statewide Ballot? (as of 12/13/01) Police, Fire and Public Safety California Highway Patrol Commissioner Dwight Helmick California Highway Patrol Commissioner M. J. Hannigan (Retired) California Highway Patrol Commissioner J.E. "Jim" Smith (Retired) California State Office of Emergency Services Director Dallas Jones California Fire Chiefs Association California Organization of Police and Sheriffs (COPS) Taxpayer Protection California Taxpayers' Association California Taxpayer Protection Committee National Tax Limitation Committee Butte County Citizens for Better Government Fullerton Association of Concerned Taxpayers Kern County Taxpayers Association Marin United Taxpayers Association Orange County Taxpayers Association Shasta County Taxpayers Association United Californians for Tax Reform Waste Watchers Transportation and Highwgy Safety Automobile Club of Southern California -AAA California State Automobile Association - AAA Structural Engineers Association of California California Transit Association California Commuters Alliance California Association of Councils of Government California Rebuild America Coalition TAXPAYERS FOR TRAFFIC RELIEF /YES ON 42 • A COALITION OF TAXPAYERS, CONSTRUCTION, BUSINESS, LABOR, ENGINEERS AND COMMUTERS 11300 West Olympic Blvd. 4840 • Los Angeles, CA 90064.310/996 -2671 + Fax 310/996 -2673 111 Anza Blvd. #406 • Burlingame, CA 94010. 650/340 -0470 • Fax 650/340 -1740 website: www.yesprop42.com • e -mail: info ®yesprop42.com California Association for Coordinated Transportation * Infrastructure Delivery Council Rail Passenger Association of California RAILVOTE Self -Help Counties Coalition Metropolitan Transportation Commission (Bay Area) Amador County Transportation Commission California Association of School Transportation Officials, Chapter 1 (San Bernardino County) Contra Costa Transportation Authority Council of Fresno County Governments Fresno County Transportation Authority * Glenn County Transportation Commission * Livermore/Amador Valley Transit Authority* Madera County Transportation Commission Mendocino Council of Governments Merced County Association of Governments Modoc County Transportation Commission Transportation Agency for Monterey County* Napa County Transportation Planning Agency Nevada County Transportation Commission Orange County Transportation Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission Sacramento Area Council of Governments San Diego Association of Governments San Joaquin Council of Governments Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Tulare County Association of Governments Ventura County Transportation Commission Transportation California The Transit Coalition Business, LaboN Local Goverrim.ent. Education and Others California Alliance for Jobs California Chamber of Commerce California State Association of Counties League of California Cities Marian Bergeson, Former Member, California State Board of Education Associated General Contractors of California California Business Roundtable California Conference of Carpenters California State Council of Laborers Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union 3 (Northern California) International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 12 (Southern California) State Building and Construction Trades Council of California County of Plumas * County of Siskiyou County of Tuolumne City of Brea City of Clayton City of Marina American Public Works Association, Sacramento Chapter Lake County /City Area Planning Council Hon. Dan Donahue, Councilmember, City of Vallejo and Board Member, Solano Transportation Authority Hon. Kevin R. Jenkins, School Board Member, Hanford High School District Hon. Vern D. Moss, Supervisor, Madera County * Hon. Bill Overman, Supervisor, Siskiyou County Hon. Julie Pierce, Mayor, City of Clayton and Commissioner, Contra Costa Transportation Authority Hon. Richard Shoemaker, Supervisor, Mendocino County Hon. Joan Smith, Supervisor, Siskiyou County * Chris Stampolis, Chair, Planning Commission, City of Santa Clara Dr. David Stine, President, San Bernardino County School Board Hon. Tom Stallard, Supervisor, Yolo County Amalgamated Transit Union, California Conference Board American Council of Engineering Companies Asphalt Pavement Association California Association for Local Economic Development California Building Industry Association California Business Alliance California Business Properties Association California Cast Metals Association California Cement Promotion Council California Dump Truck Owners Association Q California Hotel & Lodging Association California Moving and Storage Association California State Association of Electrical Workers Construction Materials Association of California Engineering and Utility Contractors Association * Engineering Contractors' Association Flasher /Barricade Association Laborers International Union Regional Council of Rural Counties Northern California District Council of Laborers Southern California Contractors Association Structural Engineers Association of Southern California Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Apple Valley Chamber of Commerce Associated General Contractors of California, San Diego Chapter Avignon Home Owners (Valencia) Bay Area Council Clovis Chamber of Commerce Construction and General Laborers' Union, Local 291 (San Rafael) Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California, Peninsula Chapter Downey Chamber of Commerce El Centro Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau Escondido Chamber of Commerce Fontana Chamber of Commerce Greater Fresno Chamber of Commerce Gilroy Chamber of Commerce Hayward Chamber of Commerce Imperial County Building and Construction Trades Council Industry Manufacturers Council Inland Empire Economic Partnership Laborers International Union, Local 220 (Bakersfield) Laborers International Union, Local 270 (Santa Cruz) Laborers International Union, Local 294 (Fresno) • — new lining Laborers International Union, Local 585 (Ventura) Laborers International Union, Local 1082 (El Monte) Long Beach Area Chamber of Commerce Los Altos Chamber of Commerce * Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce Los Angeles /Orange Counties Building & Construction Trades Council Marin Builders Exchange Greater Merced Chamber of Commerce Milpitas Chamber of Commerce Nevada County Contractors' Association Newport Harbor Area Chamber of Commerce North Coast Builders Exchange (Santa Rosa) Ontario Chamber of Commerce Orange Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau * Otay Mesa Chamber of Commerce Plumbers and Steamfitters Union, Local 62 (Castroville) Redwood City/San Mateo County Chamber of Commerce Greater Redding Chamber of Commerce Rialto Chamber of Commerce Greater Riverside Chamber of Commerce Sacramento Builders' Exchange San Diego Building and Construction Trades Council San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council San Luis Obispo County Builders Exchange San Rafael Chamber of Commerce Santa Clara Chamber of Commerce Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group Solano Economic Development Corporation South Lake Tahoe Chamber of Commerce Sunnyvale Chamber of Commerce * United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 839 (Salinas) Ventura Chamber of Commerce Victorville Chamber of Commerce Visalia Chamber of Commerce ATTACHMENT NCR Official Ballot Label for Proposition 42: TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT. ALLOCATION OF EXISTING MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL SALES AND USE TAX REVENUES FOR TRANSPORTATION PURPOSES ONLY. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Requires, effective July 1, 2003, existing revenues resulting from state sales and use taxes on the sale of motor vehicle fuel be used for transportation purposes as provided by law until June 30, 2008. Requires, effective July 1, 2008, existing revenues resulting from state sales and use taxes be used for public transit and mass transportation; city and county street and road repairs and improvements; and state highway improvements. Imposes the requirement for a two - thirds of the Legislature to suspend or modify the percentage allocation of the revenues. Fiscal Impact: Starting in 2008 -09, about $1.4 billion in state gasoline sales tax revenues, increasing annually thereafter, would continue to be used for state and local transportation purposes. Proposition 42 Text: Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 4 - -A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Article XIXB thereto, relating to transportation. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST ACA 4, Dutra. Transportation funding: sales and use tax revenues. The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on the gross receipts from the sale in this state of, or the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of, tangible personal property. That law requires revenues derived from those taxes to be deposited in the Retail Sales Tax Fund. Existing law requires the balance of that fund remaining after various specified allocations to be allocated to the General Fund. This measure would, for the 2003 -04 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, require all moneys that are collected during the fiscal year under the Sales and Use Tax Law, with respect to the sale or use of motor vehicle fuel, and that are required to be transferred to the General Fund pursuant to that law, to instead be transferred to the Transportation Investment Fund. This measure would, for the 2003 -04 to 2007 -08 fiscal years, inclusive, require moneys in that fund to be allocated for transportation purposes as provided in a specified statute. This measure would, for the 2008 -09 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, require moneys in the fund to be allocated only for transportation purposes specified by this measure, and would specify the allowable percentage amount to be allocated for each specified transportation purpose. This measure would allow the Legislature to suspend or modify these requirements under certain circumstances, if the act so providing is approved by 2/3 of the entire membership of each house of the Legislature. WHEREAS, California's continuing economic prosperity and quality of life depend, in no small part, upon an expansive and efficient transportation system; and WHEREAS, The need to maintain, expand, and improve California's multimodal transportation system increases as California continues to grow; and WHEREAS, Public investment in transportation has failed to keep pace with California's growth, and additional fiscal resources are needed simply to maintain, much less expand, California's transportation system; and WHEREAS, The failure to address California's transportation funding needs will drain economic vitality, compromise public safety, and erode quality of life; and WHEREAS, It is now necessary to address California's transportation problems by providing additional state funding, in a manner that protects existing constitutional guarantees set forth in Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution, for the funding of public education; now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Assembly, the Senate concurring, That the Legislature of the State of California at its 2001 -02 Regular Session commencing on the fourth day of December 2000, two - thirds of the membership of each house concurring, hereby proposes to the people of the State of California that the Constitution of the State be amended by adding Article XIXB thereto, to read: ARTICLE XIXB MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL SALES TAX REVENUES AND TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUNDING SECTION 1. (a) For the 2003 -04 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, all moneys that are collected during the fiscal year from taxes under the Sales and Use Tax Law (Part 1 (commencing with Section 6001) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code), or any successor to that law, upon the sale, storage, use, or other consumption in this State of motor vehicle fuel, and that are deposited in the General Fund of the State pursuant to that law, shall be transferred to the Transportation Investment Fund, which is hereby created in the State Treasury. (b) (1) For the 2003 -04 to 2007 -08 fiscal years, inclusive, moneys in the Transportation Investment Fund shall be allocated, upon appropriation by the Legislature, in accordance with Section 7109 of the Revenue and Taxation Code as that section read on the operative date of this article. (2) For the 2008 -09 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, moneys in the Transportation Investment Fund shall be allocated solely for the following purposes: (A) Public transit and mass transportation. (B) Transportation capital improvement projects, subject to the laws governing the State Transportation Improvement Program, or any - successor to that program. (C) Street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or storm damage repair conducted by cities, including a city and county. (D) Street and highway maintenance, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or storm damage repair conducted by counties, including a city and county. (c) For the 2008 -09 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, moneys in the Transportation Investment Fund shall be allocated, upon appropriation by the Legislature, as follows: (A) Twenty percent of the moneys for the purposes set forth in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). (B) Forty percent of the moneys for the purposes set forth in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). (C) Twenty percent of the moneys for the purposes set forth in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). (D) Twenty percent of the moneys for the purpose set forth in subparagraph (D) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). (d) The transfer of revenues from the General Fund of the State to the Transportation Investment Fund pursuant to subdivision (a) may be suspended, in whole or in part, for a fiscal year if both of the following conditions are met: (1) The Governor has issued a proclamation that declares that the transfer of revenues pursuant to subdivision (a) will result in a significant negative fiscal impact on the range of functions of government funded by the General Fund of the State. (2) The Legislature enacts by statute, pursuant to a bill passed in each house of the Legislature by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two - thirds of the membership concurring, a suspension for that fiscal year of the transfer of revenues pursuant to subdivision (a), provided that the bill does not contain any other unrelated provision, (e) The Legislature may enact a statute that modifies the percentage shares set forth in subdivision (c) by a bill passed in each house of the Legislature by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two- thirds of the membership concurring, provided that the bill does not contain any other unrelated provision and that the moneys described in subdivision (a) are expended solely for the purposes set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b). N W O N a b w G 0 0 a H 7 O 0 a 0 a N O O N ATTACHMENT ND" 4, E w b N O al x cd -0 H y v O p > 0 t O y � b Y •tC h U fA _; iC [•r 0 vi x cd •d �y O h � � � ca 00 0.y biD a0i 69 bq to w L c ❑y W sOy I y •C •� m N XU U w . to fy o �w o r a �0 c Imo ocl U-0 .� �" '• N O.. '� O cd O �I 4 O O O al °� q 0. h cxd N^ U U O ti ,V cd 0 0 1 �y W w vOi y ,b U 0 >• cc� itl O b 'b❑ N W S O O O 0 O s. t'b p 1+�1 G c'-' •-• N m N cd v? m �ocd cmd b C's O �.o m o m �� o pu C� o o o •d tu M o o M U 0 3 x > m 70o w s g odo cda °� c^o� o O a o c H al o0 a o ao ° O Y y w " .U-• y b �y A N W O y. O H N ccl N CD 3 U N U y a.+ E t4 OU a 0 =s o 8� cl E •o o a>i ci 4 O is O� .. ��—. ``" w O�•O Y N W C' O N > � � w � � � � > 17 � � •� 0. :Q U X in U fl � � � h i7 rO. [ •� N w 0 N a 0 a 0 L a rm a) a: O O y O V Cd Y 0 0 a ) a •° a`°i a b ° ❑ °° a � � o � „ •C y .� 00 0 °' o 20 po � b ° •� a 0 � � .9: •o ° a fA Y y y •�+ � o " a °' ° o ob 40 o 53 °� c 0 0 o y a o H a •C a) N as ~ ° o a � > a b y 6 a ° > 0 b w h� C's w a `� ° •ti o a� � � � oo �•� o a) a) V N 0 i a a •° a g'cd y C C J cd •C U a) O Y E� ° V N •YC '• A O u to a G N 78 Vl u aa) y„ aa) 4 O cli 0 h a) w b ❑ tu 9U ° O') m L7 a) U O 0 O a `� b .� •Ob w 00 y to O' a) b _ ❑ O 7 `n C w 3 y h w 69 b0 C V O O ^' �' 'wC.. � O Y N Q > 0 O L en CN ca tu ❑ O b0 y � 0. O O +� � ,�., O C A O a) o w z C d m o 0 0. O C q �C rn U �W V� 0. c2 h 00° to cC`�y 'C •a cu i °' y O a) 0 t N 0 0 V 0 s 6 d) AD O y ❑ O 0 O O a) � U a) N N O O O p� cd O C C 7 U ci ca ow to b° 0. o E o m °' S o `r0 fji 0.°l ci 0 y O V y .Q 5 N O O cli M 0