HomeMy WebLinkAbout19 - FY 2002-2003 NPDES ProgramITEM 19
TO: Members of the Newport Beach City Council
FROM: Dave Kiff, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Implementation Agreement for FY 2002 -03 National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Program
RECOMMENDED (1) Authorize Mayor Ridgeway to execute the attached Implementation
ACTIONS: Agreement with the County of Orange to administer the countywide NPDES
Program.
(2) If approved within the FY 2002 -03 CIP, authorize the expenditure of $224,897
to the County of Orange for NPDES Administration expenses per the
Implementation Agreement.
QUICK SUMMARY Cities are directed to control runoff entering storm drain systems (called
AND TERMS: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems or "MS4s ") so that the runoff does not
hurt water quality at the end of the pipe. Newport Beach has more than 104
miles of MS4s that enter Newport Bay or the Pacific Ocean at about 212 locations.
Newport Bay is water quality- limited, meaning that it has been placed on the
federal Clean Water Act`s Section 303(d) List because of excessive sediment,
nutrients, fecal coliform, and toxic materials. The Newport Beach Marine Life
Refuge Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) lies off the coast of Corona del
Mar south of Poppy.
A 5 -year permit (Municipal Permit) issued by the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region (Regional Board) regulates the discharge
of runoff out of a city's storm drain system. On January 18, 2002, the Regional
Board adopted a new 5-year permit (through 2007) for the City, the County, and
24 other co- permittee cities. The permit tells us how to limit urban runoff, enforce
and report violations, educate residents and businesses, and to maintain Permit
compliance.
To implement the current Permit, cities in Orange County and the County of
Orange have agreed to continue a relationship of Lead Permittee (the County)
and Co-Permittees (cities). Implementation involves:
• Monitoring water bodies for contaminants (County's responsibility).
• Reporting on NPDES activities, like meeting attendance, educational
programs, and workshops (a Lead- and Co- Permittee responsibility).
• A detailed public education program (both)
• Development of municipal best management practices, like storm drain
cleaning and street sweeping standards (County's responsibility).
• Adhering to the municipal BMPs (our responsibility).
NPDES Item
June 2s, 2002
Page 2
• Enforcing our Water Quality Ordinance (our responsibility).
• Inspecting commercial and construction facilities (our responsibility); and
• More...
The requirements within the new MS4 permits (there are two different permits in
Orange County — one for the southern portion and one for the central and
northern portion) have caused a significant increase in the amount each co-
permittee will contribute to the County's administration effort. This amount is in
addition to the dollars each city will spend on municipal practices to keep the
storm drains and receiving waters clean.
Last year, the City's share of the countywide administration for NPDES was
about $36,300. This year it will be $224,897.00 (a 619% increase), an amount
budgeted in the proposed FY 2002 -03 CIF. Shares are based on population and
square miles.
I serve on the Orange County City Managers' Association's Urban Runoff Task
Force that has reviewed this administration budget with Vicki Wilson, the
director of the County of Orange's Public Facilities and Resources Division
(FF&RD). We have talked extensively about how expensive the NPDES Budget
has become. I believe that some of the expenses proposed for FY 2002 -03 could
be done by task forces of city and county representatives. The County has
agreed, but has still determined that their in -house staff resources cannot
effectively pull together the material for the task forces.
Thus, a significant portion of the FY 2002 -03 expenses involves fees for
consultants who will be, in some cases, merely culling existing documents and
data from other agencies and the Internet. All that said, I am resigned to the
expense and take as sincere the County's insistence that it will allocate its
resources such that left over amounts (if any) will be credited to the co-
permittees at the end of FY 2002 -03.
If the Council approves the Recommended Action, it will authorize Mayor
Ridgeway to execute the Implementation Agreement and to pay the County
$224,897 upon receipt of an invoice.
DETAILED For more detail about NPDES and the new MS4 permit, please see the City's
BACKGROUND: website (www.city.newport- beach.ca.us) and search for the staff report of
November 11, 2001 relating to NPDES.
ATTACHMENT: Attachment A - Implementation Agreement
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCRARGE E
STORMWATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
Agreement D02 -04
SYSTEM
This AGREEMENT, for purposes of identification numbered D02 -048, entered into
this day of , 2002, by the County of Orange, (herein called
the COUNTY), the Orange County Flood Control District (herein called DISTRICT) and the
cities of Aliso Viejo, Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Cypress, Dana Point,
Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Laguna Beach,
Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Lake Forest, La Habra, La Palma, Los
Alamitos, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, Orange, Placentia, Rancho Santa Margarita, San
Clemente,, San Juan Capistrano, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Stanton, Tustin, Villa Park,
Westminster, and Yorba Linda (herein called CITIES) restates the agreement provisions
made previously by the COUNTY, DISTRICT and CITIES with respect to compliance with the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) municipal stormwater permits
issued for Orange County and amends specified provisions to add three additional
cities, revises participant share calculations and allows participant share
calculations on a countywide and regional basis. The COUNTY, DISTRICT and CITIES may
be referred to collectively as PERMITTEES or individually as a PERMITTEE in this
AGREEMENT. _
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Congress in 1987 through the Water Quality Act (herein called WQA)
amended Section 402 of the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. 1342(p)) to require
the federal Environmental Protection Agency to promulgate regulations for applications
for permits for stormwater discharges; and
1
5 31-02 Final
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-
WHEREAS, these permit regulations will require the control of pollutants from
Istormwater discharges by requiring a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit which would allow the lawful discharge of stormwaters into waters of the United
States; and
WHEREAS, these EPA regulations require NPDES permits for discharges from
municipal storm sewers on a system -wide or jurisdiction -wide basis; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature, in enacting the Orange County Flood Control Act,
(created the Orange County Flood Control District to provide for the control of flood
and storm waters; and
WHEREAS, the powers. granted to the DISTRICT include carrying on technical and
other investigations, examinations, or tests of all kinds, making measurements,
collecting data, and making analyses, studies, and inspections pertaining to water
supply, control of floods, use of water, water quality, nuisance, pollution, waste,
and contamination of water, both within and without the DISTRICT; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY, the DISTRICT and the CITIES desire to develop an integrated
stormwater discharge management program with the objective of. improving water quality
in the County of Orange; and
WHEREAS, the California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) as des
Hof the EPA has delegated authority to the Regional Water Quality Control Boards -Santa
Ana Region (RWQCB -SAR) and San Diego Region (RWQCB- SDR)(collectively, the RWQCBS) for
administration of the NPDES stormwater permit application process within the
boundaries of their Regions; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY, DISTRICT and CITIES have been designated as PERMITTEES by
the RWQCBS; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY has been designated as the•Principal PERMITTEE on the
permits; and
2
531-02 Final
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-
WHEREAS, cooperation between the CITIES, the COUNTY and the DISTRICT to jointly
file applications for NPDES Stormwater permits and implement common programs, to the
extent feasible, is in the best interests of the CITIES, the COUNTY and the District;
hand
WHEREAS, the COUNTY is willing to share the expertise of its staff with the
CITIES so that they can join in seeking and implementing certain requirements of the
JNPDES Stormwater permits; and
WHEREAS, the PERMITTEES approved a Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement
memorialize program cooperation based on the above recitals on December 18, 1990
was subsequently amended on October 26, 1993 by Amendment No. 1 (the December 18, 1990
Agreement as Amended by Amendment No. 1 will be referred to collectively hereinafter
las the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT); and
WHEREAS, Section X of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provided that the ORIGINAL
AGREEMENT may be amended by consent of a majority of the PERMITTEES which represent a
majority of the percentage contributions as described in Section IV of the ORIGINAL
AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, Section VI of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT states that any city which becomes
signatory to this ORIGINAL AGREEMENT after the applications for the initial NPDES
stormwater permits have been approved shall comply with all of the provisions of the
ORIGINAL AGREEMENT; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections VI and X of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, the PERMITTEESI
approved Amendment No. 1 to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT (herein called AMENDMENT NO. 1) on
October 26, 1993 to add two newly incorporated cities, provide participant share
calculations based on thirty -three PERMITTEES and establish a Technical Advisory
Committee; and
WHEREAS, the PERMITTEES now desire to restate those provisions in the ORIGINAL
AGREEMENT that remain unchanged and amend specified provisions to add three additional
3
5-31 -02 Final
�t
i
Agreement D02 -048
1 cities, revise participant share calculations and allow participant share calculations
2 on a countywide and regional basis.
3 NOW THEREFORE: The PERMITTEES hereto do mutually agree to add the cities of
4 Aliso Viejo, Laguna Woods and Rancho Santa Margarita as PERMITTEES under this
5 AGREEMENT, to restate those provisions in the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT that remain unchanged
6 and amend Sections II, III.A., III.B., III.C., IV, VIII, IX, XI and XV in their
7 entirety as follows:
$ I. FILING STATUS
g The COUNTY, DISTRICT and CITIES will file the applications for stormwater
10 permits as PERMITTEES. The COUNTY, the DISTRICT and each individual City
11 will be a PERMITTEE.
12 II. INCORPORATION OF FEDERAL GUIDELINES
13 The terms of all applicable Federal and State water quality regulations
14 and guidelines under the Clean Water Act and Water Quality Act, as
15 presently written or as changed during the life of this agreement are
16 hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT and
17. take precedence over any inconsistent terms of this AGREEEMENT.
18 III. DELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
19 The responsibilities of each of the parties shall be as follows:
20 A. The COUNTY, on a cost - shared basis, shall administer system
21 compliance by:
22 1. Preparing implementation and annual operating budgets. The
23 budget year shall coincide with the fiscal year of the COUNTY,
24 July 1 - June 30.
25 a. The participants shall be permitted to review and
26 approve the annual operating budget and work plan for
the forthcoming year. Criteria for approval shall be
4 5 -31-02 Fkwl
Agreement D02 -048
1
affirmative responses from a majority of the PERMITTEES
2
which represent a majority of the percentage
3
contribution as described in Section IV. The COUNTY and
4
the DISTRICT will represent one voting PERMITTEE with
5
their percentage contribution equal to the total of the
6
COUNTY and the DISTRICT as described in Section IV. The
7
review period shall be from January 1 to January 31 of
8
each year with approval of the final budget to be
9
completed by February 15.
10
b. The annual operating budget shall not be exceeded
11
without prior consent of the majority of the PERMITTEES
12
which represent a majority of the percentage
13
contribution.
14
2. Consulting with the city managers and any committees
15
established by the city managers when preparing budgets and
16
major program elements.
17
3. Preparing compliance reports to the Regional Board and
18
providing copies to the PERMITTEES.
19
4. Preparing a model system -wide Beat Management Practices (BMP)
20
Program report.
21
S. Monitoring the implementation and ensuring the effectiveness
22
of system -wide BMPS. This will include field reconnaissance to
23
evaluate structural and procedural BMPS. An annual report to
24
the RWQCBS will be prepared presenting the results of these
25
evaluations.
26
6. The COUNTY as Principal PERMITTEE may retain the services of
professional consultants and may fund, or contribute to
5 531 -02 Final
Agreement D02 -048
1
funding technical and /or economic studies conducted by.
2
professional organizations such as the American Public Works
3
Association
4
B. The
DISTRICT shall, to the maximum extent practicable, and on a
5
cost - shared basis except as set forth in subparagraph 4 below:
6
1.
Perform the water quality and hydrographic monitoring for
7
permit compliance.
6
2.
Administer the water pollution control program by enforcing
g
the Orange County Water Quality Ordinance.
10
3.
Develop uniform criteria for annual inspection of drainage
11
facilities.
12
4.
Perform inspections, at no cost to the CITIES or the COUNTY,
13
on those facilities owned by the DISTRICT and on municipal
14
separate storm sewers in unincorporated County. Contracts for
15
such inspections within CITIES may be undertaken at the sole
16
expense of the requesting city.
17
C. The
CITIES shall, to the maximum extent practicable, and at no cost
18
to
COUNTY or DISTRICT:
19
1.
Implement a facility inspection program in accordance with the
20
uniform criteria developed by the DISTRICT -, for all municipal
21
separate storm sewers as defined by the stormwater permit and
22
within the jurisdictional boundaries of that city.
23
2.
Submit to the COUNTY stormwater drain maps with periodic
24
revisions which reflect the modifications that were made to
25
the storm drain system.
26
3.
Prepare watershed characterizations, including:
a. zoning designations, and
6 5.31 -02 Final
Agreement D02 -04E
1
b. Identification of areas where hazardous materials
2
presently are or are suspected to have been stored,
3
manufactured, or disposed. This shall include sites at
4
which a hazardous material spill has occurred.
5
4. Review, approve, and implement system -wide BMPS.
6
S. Eliminate, or have eliminated, illegal /illicit connections to
7
the storm drain system.
6
6. Identify the legal authority for control of discharges to the
g
storm drain system.
10
7. Provide to the COUNTY annual reports (on forms provided by the
11
COUNTY) and any other information needed to satisfy annual
12
reporting requirements of the RWQCBS.
13
B. Adopt and enforce, or name DISTRICT as enforcer of a water
14
pollution control ordinance, which prohibits non -NPDES
15
permitted discharges to the municipal separate storm sewer
16
system.
17
D. The COUNTY shall, to the maximum extent practicable and at no cost
16
to the CITIES or the DISTRICT, undertake in the unincorporated areas
19
of the COUNTY all activities required above of the CITIES that are
20
not responsibilities of the DISTRICT as outlined in Section III. B.
21
E. The PERMITTEES hereby establish a Technical Advisory Committee
22
(herein called COMMITTEE) consisting of five members chosen by the
23
Orange County City Engineers Association, and one member
24
representing the COUNTY. The COMMITTEE shall prepare by -laws for the
25
Technical Advisory Committee and submit same to PERMITTEES for
26
approval. The COMMITTEE will act in an advisory role to the
7 5-31 -02 Final
I Nil
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-
PERMITTEES and implement policy previously established by the
PERMITTEES.
IV. PROGRAM COSTS
The responsibilities for payment of all shared costs of equipment,
services, contracted analytical services, and the cost of the .Regional
Board permits, shall be distributed among the COUNTY, DISTRICT, and CITIES
as follows:
Participants Percentage Contribution
DISTRICT 10
CITIES + COUNTY 90
The individual percentage contributions from each city and the COUNTY
shall be functions of their respective areas and population relative to
those of the entire County. Each area shall be calculated as one half of
the sum of the area and population fractions, multiplied by 90 %. Excluded
are national forests, state parks, airports, landfills, oceans, harbors,
tidal bays and military installations (Exhibit A- 1).The contribution of
the COUNTY shall be calculated from unincorporated areas and their
respective populations.
Share in percent for City #1 = { (Xi /Xcoc) + (Y1 /Ycoc) ) /2 x (90)
X = area
Y = population
tot = total population or area
90 = total percentage excluding Flood Control District contribution
8 5-31 -02 Final
Agreement D02 -041
1
The percentage share shall be calculated by the COUNTY Public Facilities
2
and Resources Department Environmental Resources Section from population
3
and area data. These calculations shall be completed by January 1 of each
4
year and shall be included in the annual budget proposal. The annual
5
budget proposal shall be recomputed for the thirty -six PERMITTEES based on
6
the following percentage share computation methods:
7
A. Countywide costs as provided in Exhibit B -1.
8
B. Regional costs specific to only one RWQCB permit as provided in
g
Exhibits B -2A and B -2B.
10
C. In the event of a regulatory directive issued to PERMITTEES, the COUNTY
11
shall provide immediate notice to the affected PERMITTEES and meet and
12
confer with them with respect to responding to the directive and
13
funding the immediate response.
14
15
Amended calculations and computation method for fiscal year 2002 -03 are
16
provided in Exhibits B -1, B -2A and B -2B, which are made a part hereof.
17
18
If at any time during a given fiscal year the program costs exceed the sum
19
of the deposits, the COUNTY shall submit invoices to the CITIES to recover
20
the deficit, following the approval process described in Section
21
III.A.i.b. above. The share for each city shall be prorated according to
22
the formula above. Each city shall pay the invoice within 45 days of the
23
billing date.
24
25
The COUNTY shall prepare a fiscal year end accounting within 60 days of
26
the end of the fiscal year. If the fiscal year end accounting results in
costs (net of interest earnings) exceeding the sum of the deposits, the
9 5.31 -02 Rnal
lk
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02 -04
COUNTY shall invoice each city for its prorated share of the excess cost.
Each city shall pay the billing within 45 days of the date of the invoice.
If the fiscal year end accounting results in the sum of the deposits
exceeding costs (net of interest earnings), the excess deposits will carry
forward to reduce the billings for the following year.
The COUNTY shall invoice each city for its annual deposit at the beginn
(July 1) of each fiscal year. Each city shall pay the deposit within 45
days of the date of the invoice. Each city's deposit shall be based on
their prorated share of the approved annual budget, reduced for any
surplus identified in the prior fiscal year end accounting.
Interest earned on the CITIES' deposits will not be paid to the CITIES,
but will be credited against the CITIES' share of the program costs.
upon termination of the program a final accounting shall be performed by
the COUNTY. If costs (net of interest earnings) exceed the sum of the
deposits, the COUNTY shall invoice each city for its prorated share of the
excess. Each city shall pay the invoice within 45 days of the date of the
invoice. If the sum of the deposits exceeds the costs, the COUNTY shall
reimburse to each city its prorated share of the excess, within 45 days of
the final accounting. Interest earnings are used to offset the CITIES'
share of program costs and will not be refunded to the CITIES.
Each city and the COUNTY shall bear the financial responsibility for
implementing the Program, within its jurisdictional boundaries, as
outlined in section III. C. and D.
10 5.31-02 Final
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02 -04
V. LIFE OF THE AGREEMENT
The life of the AGREEMENT shall be indefinite or as long as the WQA
mandates compliance.
VI. ADDITIONAL PARTIES
Any city which becomes signatory to this AGREEMENT after the applications
for the initial NPDES stormwater permits have been approved and any city
which becomes incorporated shall become a PERMITTEE on the NPDES
stormwater permit issued by its respective RWQCB and shall comply with all
of the provisions of this AGREEMENT. The date of initiation, for
determining participant costs for newly incorporated CITIES shall be the
date of incorporation, and for a city signing after NPDES stormwater
permit approval it shall be the date of the initial application for the
NPDES Stormwater permit. The costs for adding the additional parties to
the program, including additional permit and processing fees, shall be
paid by the added party. Monies to be reimbursed to the existing
PERMITTEES shall be credited to their respective annual program operating
fees for the following budget year.
VII. WITHDRAWAL FROM THE AGREEMENT
A participant may withdraw from the AGREEMENT 60 days subsequent to
written notice to the COUNTY. The COUNTY will notify the remaining
PERMITTEES within 10 business days of receipt of the withdrawal notice.
The withdrawing participant shall agree to file for a separate permit and
to comply with all of the requirements established by the RWQCB(s). In
addition, withdrawal shall constitute forfeiture of the withdrawing
participant's deposit for the budget year of withdrawal. The withdrawing
participant shall be responsible for all lawfully assessed penalties as a
11 531-02 Final
I\
Agreement D02 -04
1
consequence of withdrawal. The cost allocations to the remaining members
2
will be recalculated in the following budget year.
3
VIII. NON - COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
4
Any PERMITTEE found in non - compliance with the conditions of the permit
5
within their jurisdictional responsibilities shall be solely liable for
6
any lawfully assessed penalties, pursuant to Section 13385 of the Water
7
Code and the Federal Clean Water Act. Common penalties shall be calculated
6
according to the formula outlined in Section IV.
g
IX. LEGAL ACTION/ COSTS/ ATTORNEY FEES
10
Where any legal action is necessary to enforce any provision hereof for
11
damages by reason of an alleged breach of any provisions of this
12
AGREEMENT, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the
13
losing party all litigation and collection expenses, administrative costs,
14
witness fees and court costs including reasonable attorneys fees.
15
X. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT -
16
This AGREEMENT may be amended by consent of a majority of the PERMITTEES
17
which represent a majority of the percentage contributions as described in
16
Section IV. The COUNTY and the DISTRICT will represent one voting
19
PERMITTEE with a percentage contribution equal to the sum of the
20
individual contributions of the COUNTY and DISTRICT as described in
21
Section IV. No amendment to this AGREEMENT shall beeffective - unless it is
22
in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the
23
majority of PERMITTEES. - - -
24
XI. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORIES
25
The County Director of the Public Facilities and Resources Department and
26
the respective City Managers, shall be authorized to execute the
application(s) for NPDES municipal stormwater permit(s) and take all other
12 531.02 Final
l
im
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-04F
procedural steps necessary to file the application(s) for NPDES municipal
stormwater permit(s).
XII. NOTICES
All notices shall be deemed duly given if delivered by hand; or three (3)
days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid.
XIII. GOVERNING LAW
This AGREEMENT will be governed and construed in accordance with laws of
the State of California. If any provision or provisions of this AGREEMENT
.shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity,
legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not any way
be affected or impaired hereby.
XIV. CONSENT TO BREACH NOT WAIVER
No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused,
unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the
PERMITTEE to have waived or consented. Any consent by any PERMITTEE to, or
waiver of, a breach by the other, whether express or implied, shall not
constitute a consent to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or
subsequent breach.
Xv. APPLICABILITY OF PRIOR AGREEMENTS
This document restates and amends the provisions in prior agreements and
constitutes the entire AGREEMENT between the PERMITTEES with respect to
the subject matter; all prior agreements, representations, statements,
negotiations and undertakings are superseded hereby.
XVI. EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT.
This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterparts and the signed counterparts
shall constitute a single instrument.
13
5-31 -02 Final
`c
WERIBIT A - 1
LAND AREA DEDUCTED FROM
Landfills Area Bg miles Jurisdiction
Olinda
0.89
County
Santiago
0.25
- County
Prima Descheca
2.34
County
Bee Canyon
1.13
County
Coyote Canyon
1.09
County
State Parks
Alamitos State Beach
0.002
Seal Beach
Bolsa Chica State Beach
0.27
Huntington Beach
Chino Hills State Park
4.09
County -
Corona Del Mar State Beach
0.05
Newport Beach
Crystal Cove State Park -
6.30 _
County
Doheney State Beach
0.40
Dana Point
Huntington State Beach
0.20
Huntington Beach
San Clemente State Beach -
0.18
San Clemente
Airports
Fullerton
0.11
Fullerton
John Wayne
0.7B
County
Military facilities
MCAS Tustin
2.40
- Tustin -
MCAS El Toro
6.25 _
County
LOS Alamitos Armed Svs. Center
2.07
- Los Alamitos
Seal Beach Weapons Station
2.17
Seal Beach
National Forests
Cleveland National Forest 86.75 County
49
xv
EXHIBIT S -1
Cost Sharing For Region Speck Elements
NPDES Permittee Shares of Revenue
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Permittee
Population'
Area (sq. mi.) °
WetgMa Average
Share of Revenue Ya)
Budget Share
FY 2002,2003
Aliso Viejo`
40,166
7.15
1.168548686
$70,114
Anaheim
336,300
49.761
9.005630974
$540,344
Brea
36,100
10.954
1.399038534
$83,943
Buena Park
80,100
10.064
2.007224432
$120,435
Costa Mesa
110,900
15.480
2.898146677
$173,891
Cypress
47,150
6.925
1.258634332
$75,519
Dana Point
35,800
6.440
1.046705013
$62,803
Fountain Valley
55,900
9.553
1.595652357
$95,740
Fullerton
129200
22.536
3.723143526
$223,391
Garden Grove
169,200
17.900
3.981247954
$238,877
Huntington Beach
193,700
27283
5.080856025
$304,855
Irvine
150,100
46.148
5.863400245
$351,811
La Habra
60,800
7.313
1.498466857
$89,909
La Palma
15,700
2.014
0.396615551
$23,797
Laguna Beach
24,150
7.820
0.973824935
$58,430
Laguna Hills
33,900
6.626
1.031809811
$61,909
Laguna Niguel
63200
15.003
2.127750971
$127,666
Laguna Woods"'
16,750
3.050
0.492569562
$29,554
Lake Forest
76,700
16.795
2.473428382
$146,407
Los Alamitos
11,750
4.256
0.508566627
$30,514
Mission Viejo
96,600
17.427
2.828184924
$169,693
Newport Beach
72,000
27.740
3.244247595
$194,657
Orange
132,800
23.329
3.839599305
$230,378
Placentia
47,600
6.606
1240082586
$74,460
Rancho Santa Margarita-
48,350
13.080
1.751218729
$105,074
San Clemente
52,500
17.697
2.170701556
$130243
San Juan Capistrano
34,600
14.054
1.614764803
$96,867
Santa Ana
348,100
27.349
7.460695499
$447,646
Seal Beach
24,500
10.660
1.197977061
$71,879
Stanton
38,300
3.131
0.830259739
$49,816
Tustin
69,200
10.992
1.911061605
$114,665
Villa Park
6,125
2.088
0.255047196
$15,303
Westminster
89,900
10.190
2.167659672
$130,061
Yorba Linda
60,000
19.918
2.45714216
$147,430
County of Orange
117,634
85.846
8.499136117
$509,953
OCFCD
0
0.000
10
$600,006
TOTALS
2,926,776
584.1T8
100A0000
$6,000A6'3
Source: State of California, Department of Finance, E1 City/County Population Estimates with Annual
Percent Change January 1, 2000 and 2001, Sacramento, California, May 2001.
Source: Public Facilities and Resources Department - Geomatics. Area was calculated in
miles using the dry land area figures and subtracting areas in each jurisdiction for national forests, state
parks, airports, landfills and military installations as determined in the NPDES Implementation Agreement.
"' Source: County of Orange will cover the program costs until the cities are added onto the Implementation
Agreement.
1II
EXHIBIT B - 2A
Santa Ana Region Water Quality Monitoring Element Cost Sharing
NPDES Pennittee Shares of Revenue
Fiscal Year 200212003
Permittee
Population
Area (sq. mi.)"
Weighted Average
Share of Revenue (% )
Budget Share
FY 2002 -2003
Anaheim
336,300
49.761
11.50900704
$81,714
Brea
36,100
10.954
1.825103021
$12,958 -
Buena Park
80,100
10.064
2.553351287
$18,129
Costa Mesa
110,900
15.480
3.69761647
$26,253
Cypress
47,150
6.925
1.608166546
$11,418
Fountain Valley
55,900
9.553
2.047696569
$14,539
Fullerton
129,20D
22.536
4.780735697
$33,943
Garden Grove
169,200
17.900
5.040702925
$35,789
Huntington Beach
193,700
27.283
6.484102882
$46,037
Irvine -
150,100
46.148
7.651879999
.$54,328
La Habra
60,800
7.313
1.903863349
$13,517
La Palma
15,700
2.014
0.504619924
$3,584
Laguna Hills (1777% in BAR)
6,024
1.177
0.236215028
$1,677
Laguna Woods"' (51.97% in BAR)
8,705
1.585
0.329114592
$2,337
Lake Forest (68.68% in BAR)
52,678
11.535
2.195733065
$15,590
Los Alamitos
11,750
4.256
0.666605749
$4,733.
Newport Beach
72,000
27.740
4.259213593
$30,240
Orange
132,800
23.329
4.931287367
$35,012
Placentia
47,600
6.606
1.583054937
.$11,240
Santa Ana
348,100
27.349
9.374656128
$66,560
Seal Beach
24,500
10.660
1.577568779
$11,201
Stanton
38,300
3.131
1.044262359
$7,414
Tustin
69,200
10.992
2.447280658
$17,376
Villa Park
6,125
2.088
0.333769321
$2,370
Westminster
89,900
10.190
2.749617183
$19,522
Yorba Linda
60,000
19.918
3.213274703
$22,814
County of Orange (48.15% in BAR)
56,641
41.816
5.451300812
$38,704
OCFCD
0
0.000
10
$71,000
TOTALS
2,409,472
428.304
100.00000
$710,000
Source: State of California, Department of Finance, 61 City/County Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change,
January 1, 2000 and 2001, Sacramento, California, May 2001.
Source: Public Facilities and Resources Department - Geomatcs. Area was calculated in
miles using the dry land area figures and subtracting areas in each jurisdiction for national forests, state parks, airports,
landfills and military installations as determined in the NPDES stormwater Implementation Agreement.
"• Source: County of Orange will cover the program costs until the cites are added onto the Implementation Agreement.
lq
EXHIBIT B - 2B
San Diego Region Water Quality Monitoring Element Costs Sharing
NPDES Permittee Shares of Revenue
Fiscal Year 200212003
Permlitee
Population •
Area (sq. mL) "
Weighted Average
Share of Revenue ( %)
Budget Share
FY 2002 -2003
Aliso Viejo•••
40,166
7.15
5.564958394
$70,675
Dana Point
35,800
6.440
4.979452958
$63,239
Laguna Beach
24,150
7.820
4.362458062
$55,403
Laguna Hills (82.23% in SDR)
27,876
5.449
4.002565974
$50,833
Laguna Niguel
63,200
15.003
9.839674834
$124,964
Laguna Woods' (48.03% in SDR)
8,045
1.465
1.12410208
$14,276
Lake Forest (31.32% in SDR)
24,022
5.26D
3.612339217
$45,877
Mission Viejo
96,600
17.427
13.45055257
$170,622
Rancho Santa Margarita•'•
48,350
13.080
7.990217078
$101,476
San Clemente
52,500
17.697
9.684824286
$122,997
San Juan Capistrano
34,600
14.054
7.072980193
$891'827
County of Orange (51.85% in SDR)
60,993
45.030
18.31585436
$232,611
OCFCD
0
0.000
10
$127,000
TOTALS
516,303
155.874
t00
$1,270,OD0
Source: State of California, Department of Finance, E-1 City/County Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change,
January 1, 2000 and 2001, Sacramento, California, May 2001.
— Source: Public Facilities and Resources Department - Geomatice. Area was calculated in
miles using the dry land area figures and subtracting areas in each jurisdiction for national forests, state parks, airports,
landfills and military installations as determined in the NPDES stormwater Implementation Agreement
••• Source: County of Orange will cover the program costs until the cities are added onto the Implementation Agreement
�c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Date:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2002
By:
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
36
Agreement D02-04
5 -31-02 Final