HomeMy WebLinkAbout15 - Withdrawal from the Central Net Operations AuthorityCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. is
November 26, 2003
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Fire Department
Fire Chief Tim Riley, (949) 644 -3101, triley @city.newport- beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: Withdraw from the Central Net Operations Authority
ISSUE:
Should the Fire Department cease its participation as a member of the Central Net
Operations Authority (CNOA); a Joint Powers Agency formed for the purpose of
administering dispatch and training activities for member agencies.
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct the City Manager to notify the secretary of CNOA prior to December 31, 2002,
that the City of Newport Beach intends to withdraw as a member of CNOA, effective
September 30, 2003.
DISCUSSION:
Background:
In 1989, the Fire Department ceased its emergency dispatch operations through the
Police Department and joined the cities of Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Seal
Beach and Westminster at their joint dispatch and training facility located in Huntington
Beach. At the time, this allowed our Department to operate in an emergency
communication center environment that was more compatible with fire operations than
law enforcement operations. As a value added benefit, we began using the training
center and participating in joint training activities as well. This gentleman's agreement
allowed us to jointly benefit from a system and facility that individually we could not
afford to operate. Shortly after our arrival, Seal Beach elected to disband their Fire
Department and contract with the Orange County Fire Department; thus ending their
participation in our joint venture.
Withdraw from the Central Net Operations Authority
November 26, 2002
Page 2
On July 1, 1992, the cities of Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Newport Beach and
Westminster formed CNOA; a joint powers of authority agency that formalized our
dispatch and training arrangement. At this time, the funding of CNOA was based upon a
formula using the population and assessed valuation of each city. As you might imagine
considering our assessed valuation, this formula had Newport Beach paying the highest
share of any single member and higher than Fountain Valley and Westminster
combined. Since my arrival as Fire Chief, we convinced the other member agencies that
a formula based upon actual incidents dispatched in the communication center for the
dispatch portion of the budget and the number of personnel being trained for the training
center portion of the budget was more representative of actual benefit. The 1993/94
budget reflected this new change and our share of the budget went from 39.20% of the
total to 23.139% of the total; a savings of $162,070 in the first year.
CNOA operated efficiently and provided a great deal of benefit to Newport Beach until
1995, when Westminster elected to disband their Fire Department and contract with the
Orange County Fire Department; thus ending their participation as a CNOA member.
Due to the large revenue loss from Westminster's departure and our perceived inability
to continue to operate our communications center and deliver adequate services, the
remaining agencies elected to discontinue the communication center portion of the JPA
and join with Anaheim, Fullerton, Garden Grove, and Orange to form the Metro Cities
Fire Authority and open a new communication center in Anaheim. We currently receive
emergency dispatch services through Metro Cities.
Value of Continued Participation in CNOA
Since 1995, we have continued to participate as a member of CNOA, operating the
Central Net Training Center (CNTC) and conducting some joint training activities. The
cities of Costa Mesa, and, to a lesser degree, Santa Ana also participate with us but are
not members and do not pay a proportionate share of the expenses. When asked to
join, they state that there is not enough value in it for them to justify the expense. Costa
Mesa has their own facility and Santa Ana believes it is geographically inefficient for
them to participate except on a limited basis. I believe we are in the same boat now. A
review of our actual operational activities, our current needs and our annual training
costs will demonstrate how the cost has risen to a point where we need to ask the
question "Is this the best way to spend our limited training funds ?" The remainder
of this report should answer that question.
Response Activitv versus Trainino Time
CNOA operated for the longest time on the premise that we should train together
because we operate together routinely through automatic and mutual aid response. We
have worked hard to develop common operational procedures so that when we do
respond together, our resources work together more effectively. However, a review of
the most recent response statistics show that we do not train routinely with the people
Withdraw from the Central Net Operations Authority
November 26, 2002
Page 3
we actually respond with. The table below shows the number of times we responded
into other jurisdictions during calendar year 2001 and number of times they responded
into our jurisdiction. While we participate in a training -JPA with Huntington Beach and
Fountain Valley, our actual activity is with Costa Mesa and Orange County Fire
Authority (Irvine). In fact, in 2001 we did not respond with Fountain Valley at all and a
limited number of times with Huntington Beach.
From Newport Beach-) Other Agency-) To Newport Beach
255 Costa Mesa 282
0 Fountain Valley 0
10 Huntington Beach 25
717 Orange County Fire 222
The numbers indicate we should be spending more time in joint training with Costa
Mesa and OCFA and less with our CNOA partners.
Central Net Proximity
When we engage in training activities at CNTC, we program a certain number of units
out of service during their training and travel time (They remain in contact by radio but
are not recommended for first response by our computer dispatch system.) For a two -
hour class at CNTC, we need to have units out of service (and out of the city) for an
average of three hours due to the extended travel time. We balance this sacrifice of
good coverage against the value of the training that our fire personnel need to maintain
their professional competency. This has become increasingly difficult since the addition
of the Santa Ana Heights and Newport Coast stations. The table below shows the
round -trip distance and travel time from each of our stations:
TRAVEL TIME AND DISTANCE FROM FIRE STATIONS TO CNTC
Distance
Station 1 - 110 E. Balboa BI (I unit)
Station 2 - 475 32nd St (3 units)
Station 3 - 870 Santa Barbara Dr (4 units)
Station 4 - 124 Marine Av (i unit)
Station 5 - 410 Marigold Av (2 units)
Station 6 - 1348 Irvine Av (i unit)
Station 7 - 2301 Zenith Av (i unit)
Station 8 - 6502 Ridge Park Road (t unit)
Travel Time
19.64 miles
44 minutes
16.64 miles
28 minutes
24.58 miles
40 minutes
22.12 miles
46 minutes
27.5 miles
44 minutes
19.64 miles
44 minutes
18.06 miles
32 minutes
27.72 miles
42 minutes
Withdraw from the Central Net Operations Authority
November 26, 2002
Page 4
The average round -trip travel distance per unit is 22.16 miles and the average round -trip
travel time per unit is 40.5 minutes. In comparison, when we use Costa Mesa's fire
training center located at 2300 Placentia Av, the averages becomes 10.52 miles and
34.57 minutes round -trip. Finally, when we use Big Canyon Reservoir, the averages
become 7.46 miles and 17.84 minutes round trip respectively.
This illustrates that every time we elect to do training at the CNTC, as opposed to Costa
Mesa or within the city limits, we are reducing the availability of units to respond to
incidents in our city. Practically speaking, there are certain training tasks that we cannot
do without a training center designed for firefighting, such as the CNTC. Recognizing
this, we are limiting the times we do go to the CNTC and focusing on training
methodologies that can be done with units in their first -in response areas. We also
believe that we can better develop our training site at Big Canyon and further reduce the
times we travel out of the city to achieve our training objectives.
Cost versus Benefit
As mentioned earlier, when we joined the Huntington Beach dispatch center, we also
began to do some joint agency training with the cities of Fountain Valley, Huntington
Beach, Seal Beach and Westminster. As a CNOA member, you had to participate in
both functions: communications and training. Typically, the budget was divided between
the two major functions: 84% for Communications and 16% for Training. Therefore, of
the total $410,162 Newport Beach paid into CNOA in 1993/94, $78,678 went to training
and $330,826 went to emergency dispatch. As illustrated in the table below, our training
costs have risen 87.44% since 1992/93. In particular, our percentage cost rose
dramatically in 1996/97 when Westminster withdrew as a member and the remaining
agencies (Newport Beach, Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach) had to absorb some
of their share of the cost without actually increasing the benefit.
COST INCREASES OVER TEN YEAR PERIOD
Fiscal Year
Amount
% of total CNOA Budget
1993/94
$78,678
28.81
1994/95
$85,007
29.45
1995/96
$86,215
28.75
1996/97*
$115,569
35.63
1997/98
$117,193
36.33
1998/99
$120,438
35.90
1999/00
$123,854
35.61
2000/01
$131,574
35.74
2001/02
$160,243
35.74
2002/03
$147,477
38.00
* 1 s` budget year after Westminster left CNOA
Withdraw from the Central Net Operations Authority
November 26, 2002
Page 5
It is important to note that while our training expenses are rising, our actual use is going
down due to an increased need to train in the city and less of a need to use the CNTC.
With this in mind, we took a liberal look at what our projected Central Net use for next
year would be and what it would cost if we withdrew as members and just paid their flat
rental rate like any other non - member fire agency. The table below illustrates our
current CNTC rental usage, the rental rate by use type, and the amount we would
spend for such use if we were a rental agency and not a member:
RENTAL COSTS FOR CURRENT CNTC USE
Activity
DaysNear
Cost/Day
Total
Wednesday Training
12
170
2,040
Multi- Company Night Drill
12
290
3,480
Multi- Company Evaluated Drill
9
290
2,610
Live Burns
12
350
4,200
Fire Technician'
6
220
2,640
Flashover Training
6
350
2,100
Fire Technician'
4
220
1,320
EMT Recertification
15
170
2,550
Daily Trainingrrower
50
350
17,500
Daily TraininglGrounds
50
230
11,500
TOTAL
166
49,940
required safety staff
As you can see, with a liberal eye towards usage, we would save almost $100,000 by
withdrawing as a member and just renting the CNTC when needed. We feel these
valuable training funds can be better utilized for local training activities and to better
develop the training area located at Big Canyon Reservoir. Based upon improving the
training area at Big Canyon Reservoir, the table below illustrates the projected use of
the CNTC and the annual rental costs:
RENTAL COSTS FOR PROJECTED CNTC USE
Activity
DaysNear
Cost/Day
Total
Physical Ability Test
4
230
920
Entry Level Academy
4
230
920
Live Burns
12
350
4,200
Fire Technician'
220
2,640
Flashover Training
6
350
2,100
Fire Technician'
220
1,320
Engineers Test
4
230
920
Daily Trainingrrower
25
350
8,750
Daily TraininglGrounds
25
230
5,750
TOTAL
80
27,520
required safety staff
Withdraw from the Central Net Operations Authority
November 26, 2002
Page 6
Clearly, either through the development of our own training area or simply withdrawing
as a member of CNOA and renting the CNTC (or comparable facility from another
agency) as needed, we would reduce our payments to CNOA by a considerable sum
and divert those funds into local training activities and facilities. In fact, we are already
working with Costa Mesa Fire on some joint training activities that include the use of
their training facility.
Alternatives
The Fire Department believes we can get more for our money by exploring a few
different alternatives to continued participation in CNOA. For many years, we have used
the open area at Big Canyon Reservoir, adjacent to the entrance to Pacific View
Memorial Park, to conduct fire apparatus operator training. This wide -open area,
somewhat isolated from neighbors, provides a great location to train. We have
consulted with the Utilities Department and they agree that we could further develop this
area by improving the driving surfaces and erecting a small training tower (approx
$200,000) to expand the use to other training activities. This center -of- the -city location
would be ideal in meeting our training needs and still keeping our units in close
proximity to their response areas.
We are in the process of identifying a site for a permanent fire station in Santa Ana
Heights. It is possible to expand the amount of land we acquire for the fire station and
add some basic training ground components. This is less than ideal due to its non -
central city location. It, too, would accommodate our training needs with minimal impact
to neighbors.
Finally, we could formally contract with Costa Mesa to use their training center. It would
meet our needs but is again remote to our station response areas.
Should the City Council act on our recommendation to withdraw effective September
30, 2003, we would begin addressing our future training solutions through the FY
2003/04 budget process.
Environmental Review:
This action requires no environmental review, because it is not a project pursuant to
CEQA..
Notice of Withdrawal:
Section 10.2 of the CNOA Joint Powers of Authority Agreement states:
"A Member may withdraw from the Authority and terminate its rights and
obligations pursuant to this agreement by giving written notice of its
intention to terminate to the Secretary of the Board no late than December
Withdraw from the Central Net Operations Authority
November 26, 2002
Page 7
31s' prior to the termination of the fiscal year in which the provider agency
intends to withdraw. The written notice shall be accompanied by a
resolution or minute order of the legislative body of the withdrawing
agency specifying its intent to withdraw from the authority. Withdrawal
shall be effective upon the expiration of the current fiscal year..."
The current CNOA fiscal year runs from October 1, 2002 through September 30. 2003.
This action, and subsequent letter of notification, meets the requirement of Section 10.2
of the Agreement.
Attachment: Letter of Withdrawal
Prepared by:
Submitted by:
Withdraw from the Central Net Operations Authority
November 26, 2002
Page 8
November 30, 2002
Chairman of the Board
Central Net Operations Authority
18301 Gothard Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
RE: Withdrawal from the Central Net Operations Authority
Pursuant to Section 10.2 of the Central Net Operations Authority Joint Powers of Authority
agreement, the City of Newport Beach is hereby giving notice of its withdrawal as a member of
the Authority, effective October 1, 2003. Attached you will find a copy of the minutes from the
November 26, 2002 City Council meeting documenting this action.
Our participation in CNOA has led to many mutually beneficial operational and training
improvements. However, with the continuing challenge of municipal finances, we must
continually reassess our spending priorities. In light of such an assessment, we believe that our
continued participation in CNOA is no longer the best way to spend our limited training funds.
Sincerely,
Homer L. Bludau
City Manager