Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM2014-0040STATE OF CALIFORNIA - NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND Cr. BROWN, JR., GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast District Office 200 Oceangate, IOth Floor Long Beach, California 90802-4416 7 :•^ PH (562),590-5071 FAX (562) 590-5084 Page 1 Date: June 4, 2014 Permit Application No.: 5-13-0429 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT On December 12, 2013 the California Coastal Commission approved Coastal Development Permit No. 5-13-0429, requested by Donald J. Gaspard and Scott F. Gaspard subject to the attached conditions, for development consisting of: Demolition of an existing two-story, single-family home, attached single - car garage, and the driveway, walkways, and brick patio on a waterfront lot. Construct a new two-story, 26 -foot tall, single-family residence with 2,197 square feet of living area and an attached two -car, 466 - square foot garage. The total structure will be 2,663 square feet. The project includes removal and replacement of the existing concrete seawall cap and steel tie -backs. The repaired seawall cap will be raised to the +9 foot level required by the City of Newport Beach: An existing cantilevered deck will be removed, stored, and reinstalled once the seawall repairs are complete. An existing concrete T -pile that supports the deck will be repaired. Four cracked and corroding 14" square concrete piles, which support a pier, gangway, and floating dock, will be wrapped in fiber reinforced polyurethane (FRP) jackets filed with high-strength epoxy. The project also includes drainage improvements. The project is more specifically described in the application file in the Commission offices. The development is within the coastal zone at 4004 Channel Place, Newport Beach, (Orange County) Issued on behalf of the .California Coastal Commission by CHARLES LESTER, Executive Direc Karl Schwing Coastal Program Manager ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide by all terms and conditions thereof. The undersigned permittee acknowledges that Government Code Section 818.4 which states in pertinent part of that: "A Public entity is not liable for injury caused by the issuance... of any permit..." applies to the issuance of this permit. IMPORTANT: THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNLESS AND UNTIL A COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION OFFICE. 14 Cal. Admin. Code Section 13158(a). Date: Signature Page 2 Date: June 4, 2014 Permit Application No.: 5-13-0429 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT STANDARD CONDITIONS: This permit is granted subject to the following standard conditions: 1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgment. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by. the Executive Director or the Commission. 4. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 5. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: This permit is granted subject to the following special conditions: Assumption of Risk, Waiver of Liability and Indemnity. By acceptance of this permit, the applicants acknowledge and agree (i) that the site may be subject to hazards ;from waves, erosion, storm conditions, liquefaction, flooding, and sea level rise; (ii) to assume the risks to the applicants and the property that is the subject of this permit of injury and damage from such hazards in connection with this permitted development; (iii) to unconditionally waive any claim of damage or liability against the Commission, its officers, agents, and employees for injury or damage from such hazards; and (iv) to indemnify and hold harmless the Commission, its officers, agents, and employees with respect to the Commission's approval of the project against any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, costs (including costs and fees incurred in defense of such claims), expenses, and amounts paid in settlement arising from any injury or damage due to such hazards. 2. Future Development. This permit is only for the development described in Coastal Development Permit No. 5-13-0429. Pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 13250(b)(6), the exemptions otherwise provided in Public Resources Code Section 30610(a) shall not apply to the development governed by Coastal Development Permit No. 5-13-0429. Accordingly, any future improvements to the single-family house, deck, patio, seawall, pier, gangway, and dock authorized by this permit, including but not limited to repair and maintenance identified as requiring a permit in Public Resources Section 30610(d) and Title 14 California Code of Regulations Sections 13252(a) -(b), shall require an amendment to Permit No. 5-13-0429 from the Commission or shall require an additional coastal development permit from the Commission or from the applicable certified local government. 3. Final Plans Conforming to GeotechnicaI & Engineering Recommendations. A. All final 'design and construction plans shall be consistent with the recommendations contained in the following geotechnical and engineering letters/reports: Preliminary Page 3 Date: June 4, 2014 Permit Application No.: 5-13-0429 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Foundation Soils Exploration at 4004 Channel Place, Newport Beach, California, prepared by Geo-Etka, Inc. of Orange, California, dated June 4, 2013; and the Alternate Foundation Design Recommendations contained in a September 5, 2013 memorandum from Geo-Etka, Inc. to Troedsson Design and Planning concerning 4004 Channel Place, Newport Beach; Noble Consultants -Field Report, Seawall and Pile Assessment, Proposed Single Family Residence, 4004 Channel Place, Newport Beach, CA, dated September 6, 2013; Noble Consultants -Project Memorandum on Seawall and Marine Pile Repairs, 4004 Channel Place, Newport Beach, CA, dated September 30, 2013; Email sent by Thomas Fischetti of Noble Consultants to C. Anders Troedsson, Subject: 4004 Channel Place— Coastal Commission Conference Call Response. No changes to the approved plan shall occur without a Commission amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is legally required. Monitoring of the condition of the seawall/bullchead shall be carried out as recommended in the preceding letters/reports. If an evaluation by a professional engineering consultant finds that maintenance of the seawall/bullchead is required, the permittee shall submit the inspection report and recommended repairs to the Commission to determine if a coastal development permit is required. B. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall submit, for the Executive Director's review and approval, two full sets of plans with evidence that an appropriately licensed professional has reviewed and approved all final design and construction plans and certified that each of those final plans is consistent with all the recommendations specified in the above -referenced report. C. The permittee shall undertake development in accordance with the approved final plans. Any proposed changes to the approved final plans shall be reported to the Executive Director. No changes to the approved final plans shall occur without a Commission amendment unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is legally required. 4. Conformance with the submitted drainage, grading and erosion control plans. The applicants shall conform to the Drainage and Grading Plans received October 2; 2013 showing roof drainage and runoff from all impervious areas directed to downspouts, area drains, an underground drainage system, trench drains, and percolation pits. Any excess runoff will flow through a pipe beneath the sidewalk to the street. The Erosion Control Plan received November 14, 2013 calls for a double -layer of sandbags around the perimeter of the property during the construction phase. Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be reported to the Executive Director. No changes to the approved plans shall occur without a Commission amendment to this coastal . development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is legally required. 5. Eelgrass Survey(s) A. Pre -Construction Eelgrass Survey. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, a valid pre -construction eelgrass (Zostera marina) survey shall be completed during the period of active growth of eelgrass (typically March through October). The pre -construction survey shall be completed prior to the beginning of construction and shall be valid until the next period of active growth. The survey shall be prepared in full compliance with the "Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy" Page 4 Date: June 4, 2014 Permit Application No.: 5-13-0429 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERNUT Revision 8 (except as modified by this special condition) adopted by the National Marine Fisheries Service and shall be prepared in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The applicant shall submit the eelgrass survey for the review and approval of the Executive Director within five (5) business days of completion of each eelgrass survey and in any event no later than fifteen (15) business days prior to commencement of any development. If the eelgrass survey identifies any eelgrass within the project area which would be impacted by the proposed project, the development shall require an amendment to this permit from the Coastal Commission or a new coastal development permit. B. Post -Construction Eelgrass Survey. If any eelgrass is identified in the project area by the survey required in subsection A of this condition above, within one month after the conclusion of construction, the applicant shall survey the project site to determine if any eelgrass was adversely impacted. The survey shall be prepared in full compliance with the "Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy" Revision 8 (except as modified by this special condition) adopted by the National Marine Fisheries Service and shall be prepared in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The applicant shall submit the post -construction eelgrass survey for the review and approval of the Executive Director within thirty (3 0) days after completion of the survey. If any eelgrass has been impacted, the applicant shall replace the impacted eelgrass at a minimum 1.2:1 ratio on-site, or at another location, in accordance with the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy. All impacts to eelgrass habitat shall be mitigated at a minimum ratio of 1.2:1 (mitigation: impact). The exceptions to the required 1.2:1 mitigation ratio found within SCEMP shall not apply. Implementation of mitigation shall require an amendment to this permit or a new coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment or new permit is required. 6. Pre -construction Caulerpa Tirxifolia Survey A. Not earlier than 90 days nor later than 30 days prior to commencement or re- commencement of any development authorized under this coastal _development permit (the "project"), the applicant shall undertake a survey of the project area and a buffer area at least 10 meters beyond the project area to determine the presence of the invasive alga Caulerpa taxifolia. The survey shall include a visual examination of the substrate. B. The survey protocol shall be prepared in consultation with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. C. Within five (5) business days of completion of the survey, the applicant shall submit the survey: (1) for the review and approval of the Executive Director; and (2) to the Surveillance Subcommittee of the Southern California Caulerpa Action Team (SCCAT). The SCCAT Surveillance Subcommittee may be contacted through William Paznokas, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (858-467-4218) or Bryant Chesney, National Marine Fisheries Service (562-980-4037), or their successors. Page 5 Date: June 4, 2014 Permit Application No.: 5-13-0429 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT D. If Caulerpa taxifolia is found within the project or buffer areas, the applicant shall not proceed with the project until 1) the applicant provides evidence to the Executive Director that all C. taxifolia discovered within the project and buffer area has been eliminated in a manner that complies with all applicable governmental approval requirements, including but not limited to those of the California Coastal Act, or 2) the applicant has revised the project to avoid any contact with C. taxifolia. No revisions to the project shall occur without a Coastal Commission approved amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is legally required. 7. Drought Tolerant Landscaping, Non Invasive Plants. Vegetated landscaped areas shall only consist of native plants or non-native drought tolerant plants, which are non-invasive. No plant species listed as problematic and/or invasive by the California Native Plant Society (http://www;CNPS.org/), the California. Invasive Plant Council (formerly the California Exotic Pest Plant Council) (http://www.cal-ipe.orgn, or as may be identified from time -to time by the State of California shall be employed or allowed to naturalize or persist on the site. No plant species listed as a `noxious weed' by the State of California or the U.S. Federal Government shall be utilized within the property. All plants shall be low or very low water plants as identified by California Department of Water Resources for South Coastal Region.3. (See: http ://www. water. ca. g_ov/wateruseefficiency/docs/wacols00.12d_). 8. Storage of Construction Materials, Mechanized Equipment and Removal of Construction Debris The permittee shall comply with the following construction -related requirements:: (a) No demolition or construction materials, debris, or waste shall be placed or stored where it may enter sensitive habitat, receiving waters or a storm drain, or be subject to wave, wind, rain, or tidal erosion and dispersion. (b) No demolition or construction equipment, materials, or activity shall be placed in or occur in any location that would result in impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat areas, streams, wetlands or their buffers. (c) Any and all debris resulting from demolition or construction activities shall be removed from the project site within 24 hours of completion of the project. (d) Demolition or construction debris and sediment shall be removed from work areas each day that demolition or construction occurs to prevent the accumulation of sediment and other debris that may be discharged into coastal waters. (e) . All trash and debris shall be disposed in the proper trash and recyclingreceptaclesat the end of every construction day. (f) The applicant shall provide adequate disposal facilities for solid waste, including excess concrete, produced during demolition or construction. (g) Debris shall be disposed of at a legal disposal site or recycled at a recycling facility. If the .disposal site is located in the coastal zone, a coastal development permit or an amendment to this permit shall be required before disposal can take place unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment or new permit is legally required. (h) All stock piles: and construction materials shall be covered, enclosed on all sides, shall be located as far away as possible from drain inlets and any waterway, and shall not be stored in contact with the soil. (i) Machinery and equipment shall be maintained and washed in confined areas specifically designed to control runoff. Thinners or solvents shall not be discharged into sanitary or storm sewer systems. Page 6 Date: June 4, 2014 Permit Application No.: 5-13-042.9 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT {j) The discharge of any hazardous materials into any receiving waters shall be prohibited. (lc) Spill prevention and control measures shall be implemented to ensure the proper handling and storage of petroleum products and other construction materials. Measures shall include a designated fueling and vehicle maintenance area with appropriate berms and protection to prevent any spillage of gasoline or related petroleum products or contact with runoff. The area shall be located as far away from the receiving waters and storm drain inlets as possible. (1) Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Good Housekeeping Practices (GHPs) designed to prevent spillage and/or runoff of demolition or construction -related materials, and to contain sediment or contaminants associated with demolition or construction activity, shall be implemented prior to the on -set of such activity. (m) To minimize any impacts to marine resources, all work related to repair and replacement of the seawall cap and steel tie -backs shall be done from the landside of the property. (n) All BMPs shall be maintained in a functional condition throughout the duration of construction activity. 9. Deed Restriction. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall submit to the Executive Director for review and approval doe- u mentation demonstrating that the landowner(s) have executed and recorded against the parcel(s) governed by this permit a deed restriction, in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director: (1) indicating that, pursuant to this permit, the California Coastal Commission has authorized development on the subject property, subject to terms and conditions that restrict the use and enjoyment of that property; and (2) imposing the Special Conditions of this permit as covenants, conditions and restrictions on the use and enjoyment of the Property. The deed restriction shall include a legal description of the entire parcel or parcels governed by this permit. The deed restriction shall also indicate that, in the event of an extinguishment or termination of the deed restriction for any reason, the terms and conditions of this permit shall continue to restrict the use and enjoyment of the subject property so long as either this permit or the development it authorizes, or any part, modification, or amendment thereof, remains in existence on or with respect to the subject property. HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 644-3044 / Fax (949) 723-0589 HARBOR PERMIT/APPROVAL IN CONCEPT HARBOR PERMIT/APPROVAL IN CONCEPT BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH as required for permit application to the South Coast Regional Commission pursuant to California Administrative Code, Sections 13210 and 13211. General Description of Proposed Development: Remove and Replace seawall cap. Replace existing tie -backs. FRP jackets around four piles and one "T" pile. Address number must be stenciled on at least 1 bayward facing pile. Pier conditions must be signed by applicant prior to final approval. Proaerty Address: 4004 Channel Place Legal Description: Harbor Permit Number: 441-4004 Plan Check Number: Applicant: Don Gaspard Applicant's Mailing Address: 4004 Channel Place, Newport Beach, CA 92663 Phone Number: 323-254-4525 -Anders Troedsson I have reviewed the plans for the foregoing development including: 1. The general site plan, including any roads and public access to the shoreline. 2. The grading plan, if any. 3. The general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the area covered in the application. Page 1 of 2 And find "A They comply with the current adopted Newport Beach General Plan, Municipal Code, Title 17 and any applicable specific or precise plans or, ❑ That a variance of exception has been approved and final. A copy of any variance, exception, conditional use permit or other issued permit is attached together with all conditions of approval and all approved plans including approved tentative tract maps. On the basis of this finding, these plans are approved in concept and said approval has been written upon said plans, signed and dated. Should Newport Beach adopt an ordinance deleting, amending or adding to the Municipal Code or other regulations in any manner that would affect the use of the property or the design of a project located thereon, this Approval In Concept shall become null and void as of the effective date of this said ordinance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act or 1970, and state and local guidelines adopted thereunder, this development: X Has been determined to be ministerial or categorically exempt. ❑ Has received a final Exemption Declaration or final Negative Declaration (copy attached). ❑ Has received a Final Environmental Impact Report (copy attached). All discretionary approvals legally required of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a harbor permit and a building permit have been given and are final. The development is not subject to rejection in principal by Newport Beach unless a substantial change is proposed. This concept approval in no way excuses the applicant from complying with all applicable policies, ordinances, codes and regulations of Newport Beach. See attached Special Conditions. October 2, 2013 Attachments: Worksheet for Building Permit Application Drawing Page 2 of 2 Worksheet for Building Combo Permit Application F'nntprm .�.,«,.._.,., City of Newport Beach - Building Department Please print 3 copies (`Building F- Grading FlDrainage ; ElecMIKE 4. Project Address (Not mailing address) uite No 4C04 C OjEL, Tenant Name(if Applicable 2. Descriptian of Work use ---T-- valuation $ Extg Building,SF! Devre Building SF AddtRewnstntct Bldg SF � � . _ .. ........ . ... _. .,; # Stories Extg Gar sf F Dema Garage sf AddtRecansin ct Garage sf t TOTAL BLDG SF�? � Cu Yd New Add Atter Dema .... ..... ... ..... : TOTAL GARAGE SF Cu Yd Fill P"•ia�..L h rar..ri.n'.�irs LY:.v #s..r If nrz3is.st�� 3. Owner`s Name Last. First Owner's Address Owner's E-mail Address city State �� Zip Telephone] 'K4. Architect0esigner's Nance Last First Lic. No. Architecti©esigner's Address ArehitecMesigner's E-mail Address Ciigs Slate i Lam. ZigTsephane€*'ZC}�.l{�1� 5. Engineer's Name Last First �� Uc No. Engineer's Address Engineer's E-mail Address City State' Zip Teiephone� r— 6. Contractor's Name Last; G r� first Lic. No. � DMCiass, .._ .. . _ Contractor's Address Contractor's E-mail Address City state _ ..... .... ....._..___ ...._....._._ ........_.__..... .... ZIP Telephone�q?_& OMCE USE ONLY F-NERGY P!C FEE $ PERMIT NO. r,RAtMW. Pfr: FPF .% FIRE PIC FEE S PLAN CHECK NO. _ I ..e�..ww... dtlW AIINIJN V 531AN 1 ai W 1011ULS AM ��Y- eM a'sse-soz (aw) d ocxe vo xs3um avn — evdm 'n 99006 \/'J "SBlBBUv BO's xa"-eox (ora) a ou Huls 'mrvww rx � 4' m. row tl IA S OOL4 s99as vo'8Qr3818OdA13N inrn a* �'CJ B0Y9A MB BB a5?l33NI`JN3 'IV2JRLofRILS `JNLLlf15N00 3ovw -oNxrxo wor pjedseE) }joa$ sjw ig •igg "x.AII `S3 v130sSV v � I�s" �i �' .�o�.da Uv 031v001 0v3H)nrkG TvMv38 iNv3nddv / a3NMo w ais= 3x1 oNr�aoaN13eNOSM41IS ZNVITIIM 1owaa .a z as,a < esu fill ON3€y x 14 is a exa s DUO e< sB lawAlt ggg €@a€e�gag 7 ea sg ns FBFs e g sgs<g gadti em Y �E��3 m € Wg +y ggz a s g Gg Y� ig gg E ` s e f ' "^"'4',¢ °e_ € ,` �✓ , .> vp F 01 _ $1 Cka 2 i�!111111H!Hjl 1;j Mi! 11 MH1 g ! �$asga agog s-gg g ga €a§ ggag 'F x _gig 6t���ra�g���U a34���"m��xu?� mg�..� i O �€.UEx W Wit c s g f v "d D c €a €egg g d yy €g5�gg� ggy3� � k ��� aS� aS 4455 i 3 J9 '3�@ ....V.H.C..e' €8 B I n ` R� o G 3 =x as=„5ax s§s�d9 .2 �a � a ? t F 9 g=a� dig a aaa gaae Faga_ �(&33p as <a� _ Fgs€ 1k3w as4assffiaa$���affie�E2geaaa�g�F3aeea� e;” a Aga�� a='ag6s m g< s aa" §= dags"a s Fg�� im; a�ypFzn�aF a FaW <��g < s&gs�� W1IN a ° day. �a<€ aga ¢ �� gaG a gym` § n cgsaa� >xaF" sg'aFgggse ycaspgb aeadaag<�";had b s�5�6$�Fg�g§F6g gggR` a� s °y g1„ �xg"s„€§mgt €gg g Z e i r�gB ggg:�g&gzgg-aFgam 0Fa J _ aaa� as NU =am aF e y ° s 3 a Aga sa =� " „ � 5 �s >a € :! 3 �Q�� a !a g sa Q oar s �. ° ea.rp° a� � �- g z a 3 'Re �2` ° �.. a=� _= ®`ZZs gg ��"fag j� smo"-� as ger s erg meager s " 3 € s $ _ €„ ��ab Wg -as s @� €g=go s g mgg> a gs a. a`<as s�`-t3� r �� a $° aF a`a ger s° mg eras @� ; e a s _. io a- d�as Z € ap`"s gad $ rya s@ k� a.gg "em rg� gg g F IN 3 11 ._ s 8 s Fa.2 s@W Via" € �`a s x� s° sWe s y="zz -� o ?°s§ sna p 8 & g sga�ea°e��e � a age una wi a €a waw gsm :„go3=gs tl �< a € m y u a �i c Ng,g § ' ” §m a erg=��� g v a @ �_ � � zs W �a�@ gg£�sa ��ms�"€aagptt�ag<e s aksGg @€aF xa€a�a R-61124 112 g < s „Fpg °R ere a °a �N gsagm ON Opt 0Ejj ��? ��, Fg g # g a � �- s€c e� �`F &egg p= lsh�� $ gmga.Fs os sus a° a� „@ g 512-1 as norma c g§q �l€ n.33g sg n?aa agars sgg @ " aa":y ds� d m -" R9 @a=g �m<�aG esao"ger J $=@� P. as �g �s y g a k� r10"� .-R'sga�. _xtig L, E� a RgN QB'net 8 Ap g a�� ��� € Q"s�`s�a§qg,.� mtoh�y�-€�m���£� Q s@saF" aa�gn=gg�''affi"ea'�g$aypeg3s =661 ere m§ o<gEN �� as �s u g�q a'�>Ussg a egg �'eq 9 aR°g4 ger=a zea n aY gg n erg so"asa®8 a 3m" i s"g� a= oa su� zlsa m a $m� � pg gas s 'agp sus g k Segs a`8l! ¢ 1 @�11`�@al" Aga grog a =sib �g N� yap° z s° =a s �$ee'ppa3 7 gff §=s az �� $ g a o s a asg s" u" @ y aW° aaa �" g sgOshggxea N z='�=s==gg s>����='=m.a=aa�=_"§ a@ n<ss` -rs fah 'gIEG FasRa - Mp ng E " 3<6 a a a"a o �a2a g.gg aa3 gag <g xsB»a s@ggg"< �.ff �<a:a W ��� � HN .9s.1���s � a��� a<gs<HIM;u ;,If i�§ �F��-="*F g " � , m : � „° m�m > x_ s,: �, . „ „ "a g� sus e c u./ �e S g a �3 a 3 "s c 9 03 5 2 g F a ° oe'„< 2 Rx "$ g as m tse s oga ze ser g, ` �. g 0r a z F p<s : a s- . a M sn"fag sg g$ °° s= 3<, ppa s g an ea € sFs'g� c g< �___ "s p £;@y -a�= 3� U a s `s g gaFa� gsF ' g a s � m a off@ F .a gsasg a s „ a sn 9 a. a s N%a€ =s" a a > Ni��? � a � 1a=a g om5 g�� s,g° aaxng�a i Y WGNI < @ =�4 " g 3g g gi<I g o � �gg��� � ��as erg ga�se� 4 � � �.�� ° � ge a aF s=`g � q` a'n � � �= Z PH I �gp ° F 7 p n g g 3� �y� a � ��ga -s � � : ; a _ �;°p z a msgFa as adg < naaa a �E# g €- g s' sas; ��g< W€ a as a a a g 3a� gaaF aa,g g o ;s Y ger n$`� naag<a. deg` g� az n� a sae iya y r 1 5001 H Y e ' ”€gj z g@ g g3 � e` °�g�a��� „ �g sg �� < > � g a - g '@nFa :fiq g` € goW`ss s ad a = �:g < � a Y e pagg s „hpg, a ge�am p 9ma Ra`3=_ as` " ere s er @ a Fa a°= g .6 a; a s ; zo a a. a �j€s �g aa<s MEN c �@ 6 ag�m� 8� �'�=a ss��fas ac �s �� �g "� a���sa � Mpg <�1""€e a��� s. 6� e= „g.4 a$ s er=ss= a g g# -;°a a �" g a m � 3b € g a3 �: a �$ g" ° m F� �s a�= < ❑ s a F3 t g g m $g� �agF € ma"a3€ �� $ Fspsn @ ger a< gip¢ a a m o s< ; g�sg� mat, „ z a €a �Faeg °g € g 4 s= „� i^a`a` eggn �� � s a sd �w �s F ere z as�gi ` a ger a`a a z a z g""a Aga»n gR �e RNE11,11 =g3� N..�FagF"aa a m 1st"€< s o ;a x 90 a a; � gg 3 a�°=Fag F fF a= 530 s51a 5 F J. °" §S@gg�@„a` a asar a gg$@a 1 F" mssg8t s, g° zz:gg"� a n a as=.m==agFaa # sn. m "€= aW € & g g _ erg az` @ yza s s° g >t �s nangx€ . a�Z ,tl #- a" �� 8s g� €s3gFF pg� a�ff Fgg3�g� m gs °s�" � g"=" •� @g v 0 �aa=$ <ea g a s g d ea a �< lege=gtaaga=a sb<$ s@m@ 5ara<aa neFgm3a gtsp�@e a ergs„ o=_gigs= < Eid 8 u` $ =a= 1 3a �a I yS d & 3 ey y erg 7E : W g=&y z - g =psi a I. g=a =e gs°a $n":a a` o ere s _ - sg 3: s_ err gee' = s g "<a €a :�„ ==g €gs s <g €� _ = - g § e a Jaz $ gx 9. — � erg g° & gy scass>ifflgi g sfg",a ,. �"4 s a g <?s ` „ s a n° W g� K!; o;g Fa s° gay Qs&€pro gg �=3agQgaaP. � ` „ a s� _ =a ° a=� �" �� � agsa "sss � g" � �� g`€ � a� g =s xag e= �F- ;mg2a�=g@=g`g" FaaGGg g aa� sx$ gi ng Aga sera ger s° asag�°a €d Mp 3° �wb=a S g� tl d 3 "; _; g p n �€ s $ as .erg§ as 3 as .@@ �g$€ S F ft - 9g° > psa dgs ash at g R g€ F s § g k a o me F� sg@s N� $� gYF§ $a g P9 g g asp e y w MI; ��_ � ��� ; �€j s 8� a �¢.� gQaw ajy as eg gmY g jaQy � �� � �g„roa �„ = s € �g I �.a� $ g mi a: a§$erg `"s g a¢¢�g W-1 a ger as Wgg�� gEg a�@x °g: god g�Qmn"a NMI sQ a a .11.2 gag$�na 8 §g@<�; ��g �=�R tl3�� s � es a �a �� ` � $.a¢a� g pw ea � '' sg es �F € e ° € z 9a a e s as ere arse @ a eag§ , gm N.aa=s��s baa s„ ggg ° gaga`„� a €tent° a �= g >r@, s � � �Imn."g" g c' g �g�s 7F sm gg aaag y°s;£a4g eF=@ a �a m s W�<aware 8"=<e # s4g 11'N"UH ger ger g s g a �, ��a �gjs € y, gl agg !sIg 'Igg” a° s k y 2h a g a .� l€"gE=l � m` g >s s 'a " 3 'I - g e s m y g gSgFg e € a`a $ yis s R. 9 e Fa " a"" a�aFa aaga gsgsg�Fs€�=a=@g �a F gea o URI! `s= @ ���= �g�s g�a a� F"a®�� sg_� s er �" 7g"".<a> a€ er g"ss. a g age �� a §sg am3zaamg SE s a'ass�' g"a =;�eaa ee o erg s affsa u D4 AM 1'! wesSe� g. " s a$aa�a =s apse she gy pap = g g y3 `agg ` Q g5 t3 @sag a€°a< g" § @g° as `_ §.. g� gaggsg § 111,3$3 $HINH IVINS115 IN <�HING .agg ser g F g gga ger g pas a g g €��an u � ; m .. •ee�osuy NOLLYA313 R NV Id 3115 -mz fe e) : i � �� rVtVco •,. -' 99006 vo sod 60YeAV MOIA BBS 00M pJBdSeE) 1100S -SAN IS JW 1.NV�flddV / d3NM0 sr�°~•« cswl , Sifl3N10N3 'M21IllOf12LL5 ONLLlf15N0O 'J.IVI `S3.L 3essd 9 �p Nose as ltvirrna lY1 ,a s" "� .,) " ; e) �, ItlriM r S 4-S seeze ro 'Novae iaoaMaN 3OV•Id 13NNYN0 VWV •1r aalv�o7 ar311X1ON01110AMMnsmvavas ONLLSIXa 3Nl ONptlOdNeltl oa a 0 Zt89,o,. > s is t� psps gg 2@g 1tH %�� s =R191, FMR sk£Mxif#I�l ` .i9ftid�xkHs'�gt�; ado H Mt Yet� �5'Hq � 3• s��c A� a ��pp' �I � F o p tl €tl @�H I8Y Pk i } UM iDfi bd[ X�;� t V Id Fi= I inj JR mn .azz i J •`� i I / 11 � I I1 'J'611 3 ,.Sb ,ZO .Ll N CT I e i_— I I ❑ I^�i ~ gg 2, m 7� z pp I v �I"• In �i 2 i I- ----I 0 fr-- - - - --I ,S4'61t 3 „Sb ,ZO .Ll N I I Aj{{t�H II I i I HiH}I II i -I NJI p I iHH p I g m� 1 H11LH �H H II i �Hj II iHJI II I I f 'tl Y W < p d < W F go J 7 m '^• "" m `"_' 99006 vo 0selesutl Sod 9UUBA MB OS tl IA S OOL4 piedseE) }40ag -SAN is -in 1NVOIlddV / 213NM0 svvtaa -002 c w) 0SE 3rva =10r� _WSrLL�r S 9NLLV1swo 3M �smw13Ossv 0p ROSJI�IIS Li[VITIIM ,S �? _, „�� �.:�'� 4t/4t/<0 w Z -S s903e Ya %OV38 -LaoVHOdM3N 3JYld l3NNYNo toot 1Y 031Y001 OY3HM7118/77YMY38 ONi81X3 3Xl DIOOeO�N13H M AO1+�,�d 4 ZtB9 — bg g rn y5 ftll8�3$ 2m I I $mQ : m n�Em�i Roo S g z F I I go= 777— gg� m' g gma N II ffF sed L4 Q z3r I 1 � u r gOg g G�s J I I gS€ 8 m ' W O 3 sA, Asa �w e;g� ���3�a 0 I 11 � ED n i a� 2 } m o m m a lz V� SAo -T.r 3 odea W C bm � m<3� 53 xbig cti go n, RR F �`a gba:a F z `m g$ 3 Sa'8Z O � S &€ g 3 8��8 12, UB@z S3 h an m $3 €8o 2 O W rv�33� v6 gg Q Wo LQ aW=Igoe W Q C w �� tma o%: d s AU �, __@ W g O W WIII ffi �o z F11Jo j 0 0 b� &m o h Nh xd W d F Z "��M-01; 5 ;5 . "fi Q08 NW? FY so N 0 W0 W FWirz x�a0 O WU LL j Q Z o 2dLLQ Z <W �QoU Wj -Fem POPONN Z Z W W� w 2 Z Q a K w a O W 0vaw �Zz zzFga= Z WNZ Zi WS -0 x aOd XOm-Qd~d f0,O wrda�0. w U, M.00 S£.£LN Z Q ,nY U n0 W J w Z a dOZ Z W z� a U Z W N oz aF'LLF �J U J' w' zas Q a� WR�W O W 2 0 Z:5 Z j 10 0 a c9 WNFo zzonwgx I�tE w�¢aaJa3w. J Z W j Z W OZ Q Z dr _g . Z o Ell jQWWO�Z r ¢ZK . C O'er } NWKZqzz a'OQJZ~ v'-" UJ xx Z W M F = W W Z`1 KW OH f 1:3 FO T N W J W OF woaa�aLw W lim it W a a j Z W OZ Q aKK' a� LL� x_ w� o,rx 0 j Q W LL W J Z 3 w ow�W��a Nrcox Z' } N ;22FNQN xx Z W M F = W W w =w W a'Ui W FO woaa�aLw a w Z a w waw w WHZ x o �' mooff°gawF�wo��z t O2 ��zoa a�waV'o--GO 3) 10 zxPF wm Za wmUw��ZO?wOwOaZZ rm Z'g'x¢>N��FH -LUoNU >Z O N-� o�3Ma.cYiNwarcw�� mminOoN... Q..� n.w.O e>.W Win Fa ,� W co N U U w m a w z w U Q J a J w Z Z Q U O a O U 3 LLJ Lp Y C) n Ce 9 u M O M N a -Ia .4T u3 k � k ZC W , 7 'y V M O M N a N. a) �� i - NOBLE CONSULTANTS, INC. To: C. Anders Troedsson FIELD REPORT 2201 DUPONT DRIVE, SUITE 830, IRVINE, CA 92612 (949) 752-1530 FACSIMILE (949)752-8381 Seawall and Pile Assessment Proposed Single Family Residence 4004 Channel Place Newport Beach, CA Job No. 1094-01 Troedsson Design and Planning From: Thomas Fischetti, PE Noble Consultants, Inc. Date: September 6, 2013 RE: Structural Assessment of Seawall and Piles Site Visit of August 11, 2013 cc: File 1094-01 An onsite investigation was conducted on the 23rd of August 2013 at 11:00 AM and 4:00 PM by Mr. Thomas Fischetti, PE, of Noble Consultants Inc. The project Architect, Mr. C. Anders Troedsson of Troedsson Design and Planning was in attendance in the morning visit and Mr. Jeff Rabin of the California Coastal Commission was in attendance during both site visits. The purpose of the site visit was to assess the structural integrity of the seawall, and render a professional opinion as to the necessity for its replacement prior to constructing a new residence on the property. When possible, we will provide recommendations for remedial repairs to the seawall that, once completed, render replacement of the seawall unnecessary at this time. Once on site, it became apparent that a pile supporting the deck at the rear of the property, two piles supporting the gangway and two guide piles supporting the dock were in varying conditions of disrepair and in need of maintenance. The representative of the Coastal Commission expressed concern over the structural integrity of these piles; Noble Consultants' scope for the project was expanded to include the assessment and recommendations for repair of these piles. In accordance with the agreement for engineering services provided by Noble Consultants for this work, the opinion expressed in this report are based on visual observations of exposed structural components. Mr. C. Anders Troedsson Structural Assessment of Seawall and Piles September 6, 2013 Page 2 Seawall The seawall consists of concrete sheet piles, an unknown portion of which extends into the ground along Large horizontal cracks are visible along the concrete seawall cap. The exposed tie -back hardware has corroded and deposited rust stains on the wall. Despite this obvious degradation to the cast -in- place portion of the wall, the precast sheet piles are free of cracks, show no signs of displacement and are closely adjoined. A small separation is visible between panels at the interfaces with the seawall on the property to the east. The absence of rust stains and concrete spalls on the seawall sheet piles is indicative of internal reinforcement free of excessive corrosion at this time. The long term durability of the seawall will require repair to the cap and tieback portions of the wall. The current condition of sheet piles in the seawall does not warrant replacement for continued service. The existing seawall cap height is to approximately elevation 7.70' (NAVD88). To support framing for the wood deck in the rear yard, which is nearly the elevation of the existing residence, 8" tall concrete masonry units were added to the top of the seawall. Including the masonry extension, the top of existing seawall is approximately elevation 8.33 NAVD88. With some minor modifications to the rear deck framing, the new cap could extend to elevation 9.0' (NAVD88) to comply the current City ordinance for seawalls. Figure 2: Concrete sheet piles and cast -in-place cap at seawall (background). Tee -pile supporting deck (foreground). Mr. C. Anders Troedsson Structural Assessment of Seawall and Piles September 6, 2013 Page 3 Pier/Gangway Piles A wooden deck flanks the rear of the property, extending approximately 8 -feet over the channel. The deck framing spans between the seawall and a timber beam. The beam is supported by the concrete cap to the east and cantilevers beyond a tee -head concrete pile support to the west. Both supports show evidence of distress due to the onset of corrosion. Cap repair for the seawall will include new hardware to support the beam. The structural integrity of the tee -pile could be supplemented with a new fiber reinforced jacket or wrap and epoxy. A pier extends from the wood deck at the rear of the property into the channel for gangway access to the floating dock. Two precast concrete piles that support the pier and gangway show a moderate degree of corrosion and decomposition. Without hesitation, FRP jacket repairs should be installed to suppress further deterioration of the piles. Guide Piles The floating dock at the rear of the property is held in position by two guide piles. The structural integrity of these piles has been compromised by moderate corrosion to internal reinforcement. The expansion of internal reinforcement caused by corrosion is fracturing the concrete guide piles and has reduced their capacity to support the dock. The loss of concrete cover increases exposure of the steel reinforcement in the concrete to the harsh marine environment, which accelerates the rate of corrosion. FRP jacket repairs can be installed to restore structural capacity of the piles and retard additional corrosion. Figure 3: Precast concrete piles supporting pier to gangway Figure 4: Dock Guide Piles Mr. C. Anders Troedsson Structural Assessment of Seawall and Piles September 6, 2013 Page 4 Summary of Findings Based on field observations, remedial repairs are needed to restore the structural integrity of the seawall and piles. Following repairs, a more rigorous maintenance program is need for continued service of the improvements. The concrete sheet piles making up the majority of the seawall structure are sound in their current condition. However, the same is not true for the cast -in-place concrete cap and steel tie -back hardware. The extent of cracking on the cap and corrosion in both the cap and tie -backs suggests repairs are needed for the continued satisfactory service of the seawall system. The piles supporting improvements over the channel and guide piles for the dock show signs of structural distress that will impact the longevity of their service. As is often the case, the observed pile damage was limited to the portion of the piles in the tidal zone. In their current condition the piles can be repaired using FRP jackets to rebuild the damaged areas. Recommendations The following recommendations outline the nature of remedial repairs needed at this time to restore the structural integrity of the seawall and piles. 1. The existing cap and tie -backs overtop the existing concrete sheet piles in the seawall should be removed and replaced. It may be possible to salvage the onshore portion of the tie -back and its anchorage into the soil since the corrosion of these components is sometimes arrested due to the oxygen depleted environment beneath the soil. To comply with current city ordinance, the top elevation of the seawall would need to rise to elevation 9.0' (NAVD88). 2. Two 14" square piles supporting the pier/gangway and two 14" guide piles for the dock should be repaired using FRP jackets and epoxy grout. For this repair, a preformed fiber reinforced polyurethane (FRP) jacket, about 2" larger than the original pile size is placed over the damaged pile and the annulus is filled with an epoxy bonding agent. The high strength epoxy bonds the FRP jacket to the pile. Generally these repairs run between the top of the pile and about 2' below the mud line. Pile hoops in the dock will need to be modified to accommodate the new pile jackets. 3. The tee -pile supporting the wood deck framing should also be repaired in a manner similar to the repair jackets described above. Rather than using a preformed jacket, however, flexible reinforcement cloth, coated with epoxy gel, can be wrapped around the pile to conform closely to the surface of the tee -pile. 4. In accordance with City of Newport Beach requirements, the detailed design of the seawall modifications must be performed by a professional engineer. There are a variety of material suppliers and contractors for FRP pile repairs; final design and plans used to secure permits, Mr. C. Anders Troedsson Structural Assessment of Seawall and Piles September 6, 2013 Page 5 bids and for construction should comply with the manufacturer's installation recommendations for the selected repair system. Limitations This report was developed following a limited visual investigation and evaluations performed using generally accepted engineering approaches and principles available at the time and the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by practicing Civil Engineers under similar circumstances. No warranty of the seawall or piles, expressed or implied, is included or intended in this report. Respectfully Submitted, Noble Consultants, Inc. /12�� Thomas Fischetti, PE Associate Engineer Walters, Lisa From: anders troedsson <catroedsson@sbcglobal.net> Sent: August 13, 2014 2:10 PM To: Walters, Lisa Cc: mfyazdi@msn.com; Scott Gaspard; Sara Gaspard Subject: Fw: [EXTERNAL] Fw: 4004 Channel Place Seawall Reinforcing (UNCLASSIFIED) Lisa, Please see the correspondence with Cori Farrar with the Army Corps of Engineers stating we will not need a permit. Please call with any questions or when the plans have been approved by you. Thank you. C. Anders Troedsson Troedsson Design and Planning 323.254.4525 On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:32 PM, "Farrar, Corice J SPL" <Corice.J.Farrar@usace.army.mil> wrote: Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE David If you work landward of our jurisdictional boundaries, you will not need a permit. Cori Farrar Chief, Orange & Riverside Counties Section South Coast Branch USACE Los Angeles District, Regulatory Division P: 213.452.3296 1 F: 213.452.4196 hftp://www.sr)l.usace.army.mil/Missions/Requlatory.asp From: anders troedsson [mailto:catroedsson@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:31 PM To: Farrar, Corice J SPL Cc: Estes, Stephen M SPL; mfyazdi@msn.com; Scott Gaspard; Sara Gaspard; Don Gaspard Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Fw: 4004 Channel Place Seawall Reinforcing (UNCLASSIFIED) Corri, 1 All the work will be done completely outside of both section 10 and section 404, jurisdictional boundaries. So, as I read it, no permit is required. Is this correct? If so, can you please forward a statement to that end. Thank you for your help. Best regards, C. Anders Troedsson Troedsson Design and Planning 323.254.4525 On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:22 AM, "Farrar, Corice J SPL" <Corice. J. Farrar(a-Dusace.army. mil> wrote: Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE David Thank you for your interest in our Regulatory Program. As we discussed last week, you are proposing to replace the cap along a seawall in Newport Harbor. As you know, certain activities require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit, while others do not. Specifically, a Corps of Engineers permit is required for the following types of activities, although most relevant to you are those in both items a and b below: a) structures or work in or affecting "navigable waters of the United States" pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Examples include, but are not limited to, (1) constructing a pier, revetment, bulkhead, jetty, aid to navigation, artificial reef or island, and any structures to be placed under or over a navigable water; (2) dredging, dredge disposal, filling and excavation; b) the discharge of dredged or fill material into, including any redeposit of dredged material other than incidental fallback within, "waters of the United States" and adjacent wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972. Examples include, but are not limited to, (1) creating fills for residential or commercial development, placing bank protection, temporary or permanent stockpiling of excavated material, building road crossings, backfilling for utility line crossings and constructing outfall structures, dams, levees, groins, weirs, or other structures; (2) mechanized landclearing, grading which involves filling low areas or land leveling, ditching, channelizing and other excavation activities that would have the effect of destroying or degrading waters of the United States; (3) allowing runoff or overflow from a contained land or water disposal area to re-enter a water of the United States; (4) placing pilings when such placement has or would have the effect of a discharge of fill material; c) the transportation of dredged or fill material by vessel or other vehicle for the purpose of dumping the material into ocean waters pursuant to Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972; d) any combination of the above. If you conduct your work completely outside of our both our section 10 and section 404 jurisdictional boundaries, i.e., landward of the.mean high water and high tide line, respectively, then no permit is required. Should you find you need to stockpile material, obtain equipment access, or do any work from the waterside of the retaining wall, then you will likely need a permit. For section 10, the Mean High Water (MHW) is defined as the average of all the high water heights observed over the National Tidal Datum Epoch. For stations with shorter series, comparison of simultaneous observations with a control tide station is made in order to derive the equivalent datum of the National Tidal Datum Epoch. For section 404 (the most landward boundary), the high tide line (HTL) is defined by our regulations (33 CFR §328.3(d)) as "The term high tide line means the line of intersection of the land with the water's surface at the maximum height reached by a rising tide. The high tide line may be determined, in the absence of actual data, by a line of oil or scum along shore objects, a more or less continuous deposit of fine shell or debris on the foreshore or berm, other physical markings or characteristics, vegetation lines, tidal gages, or other suitable means that delineate the general height reached by a rising tide. The line encompasses spring high tides and other high tides that occur with periodic frequency but does not include storm surges in which there is a departure from the normal or predicted reach of the tide due to the piling up of water against a coast by strong winds such as those accompanying a hurricane or other intense storm." Please note, when plotting the HTL, we ask that you plot a contour for a specific elevation based on maximum predicted annual tide for your location, i.e., Newport Harbor. The Corps uses MLLW = 0. Thus, when converting elevations referenced to NOAA station datum to MLLW, subtract 2.44 ft and when converting elevations referenced to NAVD88 datum to MLLW, add 0.19 ft. All work would need to occur above/landward of the HTL to avoid the need for a Corps permit. If you need a more conclusive, formal determination from the Corps, I will need to assign your request for a jurisdictional determination to one of my staff. A letter either stating permit required or no -permit -required would be the end product. Right now, I am very short-staffed, but we would put your request into our cue. Please advise what you would like to do. Should you need an application for a Department of the Army permit, it is available on our website at: http://www.spl.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re uq latory.aspx. Regards, Cori Farrar Chief, Orange & Riverside Counties Section South Coast Branch USACE Los Angeles District, Regulatory Division P: 213.452.3296 1 F: 213.452.4196 http://www.spl.usace.army.mii/Missions/Regulato[y.aspx From: anders troedsson[mailto:catroedsson(osbcglobal.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:33 AM To: Farrar, Corice J SPL Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fw: 4004 Channel Place Seawall Reinforcing Corri, Any update with the review of the plans? Lisa Walters emailed and asked for an update. Thank you. David Aspeitia Troedsson Design and Planning 323.254.4525 On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 10:19 AM, anders troedsson <catroedssonP-sbcglobal.net> wrote: Cord, Attached are the plans that were approved by the city of Newport Beach for the sea wall construction. You will see that all proposed work can be performed from the land side, that goes for staging as well. Please call with any questions. C. Anders Troedsson Troedsson Design and Planning 323.254.4525 On Tuesday, August 5, 2014 4:36 PM, Plamen Petrov <p_petrov(aD_wsase.com> wrote: Good afternoon Lisa, Hope that this e-mail finds you well. Attached is a PDF file containing drawings for the proposed seawall reinforcing of the existing seawall at 4004 Channel Place. The owner of the property has been advised to obtain an Army Corps of Engineers Permit for the proposed repair in order to get it approved by Harbor . Resources. It is a very typical tie -back and deadmen replacement done from the land side of the property which has never required Army Corps permit on the hundreds of similar jobs we have done in Newport Beach so far. Please take a moment to review the attached drawings and let us know whether Army Corps permit for this project is required or not? Thank you in advance and have a nice rest of the day!!! Regards, Plamen Petrov, P.E. Senior Project Manager William Simpson & Associates, Inc. Structural Engineers 23 Orchard, Suite 250 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Tel. -(949) 206-9929 ext 403 Fax: (949) 206-9955 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE „ WORKSHEET FOR BUILDING /FIRE PERMIT APPLICATION HARBOR RESOURCES DIV. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE 1.. PROJECT ADDRESS (NOT MAILING ADDRESS) FLOOR SUITE NO. t LEGAL DESCRIPTION No. UNITS LOT BLOCK . TRACT 2. DESCRIPTION OF WORK:; �; USE ? s # OF STORIES 4- -0( (0, VALUATION $ NEW ; F' ADD 0 Che k Appropriate Box ALTER DEMO ❑ SO FT -2—' (NEW/ADDED/EXTG) p, 3. OWNER'S NAME LAST FIRST OWNER'S ADDRESS OWNER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PHONE NO. 0 4. ARCHITECT/DESIGNER'S NAME LAST FIRST LIC. NO. ,X ARCHITECT/DESIGNER'S ADDRESS ARCHITECT/DESIGNER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PHONE NO. F1 5. ENGINEER'S NAME LAST FIRST STATE LIC. NO. ENGINEER'S ADDRESS ENGINEER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PHONE NO. 6. CONTRACTOR'S NAME BUSINESS LIC. STATE LIC. No. Class CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S E-MAIL ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PHONE NO. OFFICE USE ONLY PERMIT NO. r i TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK NO. PLAN CHECK FEE $ OCCUPANCY - GROUP PLAN CHECK ENG. FormsOdg_application 10-18-02 1 OWNER/ BUILDER: DR. DONALD GASPARD ADDRESS: 4004 CHANNEL PLACE NEWPORT BEACH, GA. 92663 TEL.# (949) 650-0995 SCOPE OF WORK: REMOVE EXISTING 2x6 DECKING AT EXISTING DECK AND EXISTING RAMP AND REPLACE WITH NEW 2x6 RDWD. DECKING. USE 3" LONG "DECKMATE" CORROSION -RESISTANT SCREWS AT NEW 2x6 RDWD. DECKING TO EXISTING 2xlO DECK JOISTS. REVISIONS BY Mr. Wendell Reece Corps of Engineers Post Cf Tice Box 2711 ,os zuigeles, California 90053 Dear Nendell: jAt May 28, 1971 :;nclosed are permit applications for Harbor Pewits No.'s: 109-1601, 133-11, 133-76, 240-4000, 536-1-507, 0113-2.01,. These -oermits have all been . approved by the City. in regard t6 the five harbor pe-rmits requiring City Council approval which I have previously forwarded to you, the following permLits have now received Council approval. 259-11&, 135-12111F 434-3407, 441-4004. .11arbor Per -mit No. 1.16-720 fro, -ti the Newport harbor Yacht Club is still being studied by the City Council and the Joint harbor Corm -mi -1 --tee. i do not expect a decision to be made on this per r-. i i t .r for approximat-elv one month. Yours truly, DONALD S. SANFORD harbor & Tidelands Aide DSS/db Enclosures CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH May 17, 1971 Item No. E-5 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Harbor and Tidelands Administrator SUBJECT: HARBOR PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 441-4004 APPLICATION TO: Construct a pier bayward of 4004 Channel Place. APPLICANT: Gene P. Gaspard RECOMMENDATION: If desired, approve Harbor Permit Application No. 441-4004. SITUATION: The existing harbor facilities bayward of 4004 Channel Place consist of a 4' x 17' pier, a ramp, and a 10' x 16' float. The existing bulkhead is located on Mr. Gaspard's property, 8' behind the established bulkhead line. DISCUSSION: A. This application is for the construction of a pier platform in the area between the established bulkhead line and the existing bulkhead, all of which is located on Mr. Gaspardd's property. B. The prior approval of the City Council is required because the proposed construction does not conform to the standard harbor drawings. C. Application has been made to the U. S. Corps of Engineers; however, the Corps of Engineers permit will be granted only after the proposed float receives the approval from the City Council. D. All bayfront residents within 300' of the proposed construc- tion were notified in writing on May 5, 1971. To date, no comment, either pro or con, have been received regarding Harbor Permit Application No. 441-4004. l G. M. DAWES GMD/db Attachment CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR PERF 7 PEltmISSCON is HEREBY GRANTED TO Cn-N57;-,UC-r AND MAINTAIN THE FAMITYSHot .jr-jr-4 ozq -:D, SUE�IECT 7a AT THE SITE INDMATZ THP HARBOR PERIMT POLAIZI.,E�3 OF i ANP ANY SPECIAL CCU MT.1c N-5TZ�D 0. IS NOT TRANISFE-9ZAELL THE CITY HAROOR RIGHTS GIVEN C' Tii fu R TZ -,.Es AND THIS PERMIT M",y S'� IN ACCORDANCE WITH G= THE' bW',"4ZC-f"AL CODE. CITY ray ,4141 — PERMIT NO. ATE AUTHORIZED By CITY COUNCIL CITY FLE-RK 1 i a y N O T I C E N O T I C N O T_I C E Harbor Permit Application 441-4004 Mr. Gene'P. Gaspard has applied for a permit to s construct a pier across his property and upland of the established Bulkhead Line hayward of 4004 Channel Place, Newport .Beach. The City Council will consider the application at its regular meeting commencing at 7.30 p.m.. on May .17, 1971.. Interested persons are invited to attend or to_cDmmiun.icate with the under- signed. May 28, 1971 Mr. Wendell Reece Corps of Engineers Post- office Box 2711 ljos Aligeles, California 90053 Dear Wendell: :;reclosed are permit- applications for Harbor Permits No.'s: 109-1601, 133-11, 133-76, 240 4000, 536 507, 0113-201. These 4- De C. have all been approved by the City. In -regard to the five harbor permits requiring City Council approval which I have previously forwarded to you, the following ne=,-lts have now received Council approvals— 259-118j, 135-121, 434-3407, 441-4004. harbor Permit No. 116-720 from the Newport harbor Yacht club is still being studied by the City Council and the Joint Harbor C Omzr!.-"L I.: I-- e e . I do not expect a decision to be made on this permit .Por aPproximately one month. Yours truly, DONALD S. STANFORD harbor & Tidelands Aide DSS/db Enclosures 3