Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout116-1012Dear Mr. Kniss: Subject: Proposed Dock, Pier, Ramp, and Piling for Steve Titus, 1.012 West Bay Avenue, Balboa, California 92661 The staff of the State Lands Commission has received your letter. dated September 23, 1986, and copies of the drawing for the proposed dock, pier, ramp, and piling to be located at 1012 West Bay Avenue in the city of Balboa. The tide and submerged lands over which the proposed project will extend are sovereign lands of the State of California that the Legislature granted in trust to the City of Newport Beach. Therefore, you need not apply to the State Lands Commission for project authorization. You should, however, apply to all other agencies having approval authority. This action does not constitute, nor shall it be construed as a waiver of any right, title, or interest by the State of California in any lands under its jurisdiction. Please contact Debbie Townsend at (916) 322-1219, if you should require additional assistance. Very truly yours, LESLIE H. GRIMES, Deputy Chief Division of Land Management and Conservation cc: Robert L. Wynn, City Manager City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92660 19651 L_ f VATE OF CALIiORP&A-W* MUXRCES A00-I CAUFORNIA COASTAL COMWS51ON SOUTH CO"T SAS WEST WOADWA7. mum M0 ` io•+G MACK CA 10M Qt� �>as� ate: Oct. 6, 1986 Steve Titus 172 S. Los Palmas Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90004 SUBJECT: Waiver of Coastal Development Permit Requirement/10prov90e11ts to Existing Single-family Residences or Structures -Section 30610 (a) (b) of the Coastal Act based on your project plans and information provided in your permit applica- tion for the development described below. the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission hereby wines the requirement for a Coastal Development Permit pursuant to Section 13250(c) or Section 13253(C), Title 14, California Administrative Code. If. at a later date, this information is found to be incorrect or the plans revised. this decision will become invalid; and, any development occurring must cease until a coastal development permit is obtained or any discrepancy is resolved in writing. WAIVER # 5-86-780 APPLICAXT: Steve Titus LOCATION: 1012 . West Bay Avenue Newport Beach PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Replace a residential dock consisting of dock pier and pilings. tATIDNALE: The project is compatible With the general area and is consistent with the Citv's LLP and the Coastal Act. This waiver will not become effective until reported to the Commission at their Nov. 12-14, 1986 meeting. If three (3) Cwmissioners ob;ect to this waiver of permit requirements, a`coastal development permit will b required. doom by TOM CRANDALL South Coast District Director cc: Coma►issioners/File (0770A)12 f 85 - NOTiCE_., ........... ENDIN- ... y ....... 1 � 3 ie r ,r"' V - 4 ,',y. •� : � £ } � � a,� ;,�rvr.k�':� �.Gr, �3^`� A"`j' 1���,�„+,,' �, .i�'�- .. "`�":-,� i, ?§ °r u �� M�y� WTE PPLIII y rr p�-'�.BEFOi FO: i• { 1 WN DD OPOSED a c .. replace a residential dock,..c+oiisd. t� ig # w�dt�c ,zpIjb,r,` nJf *' pilings LOCATION: 10I2 `desta'yvenz:e. - sK; Newport Beach 4 t TUS - � a PPLIC' �1T: -SIEVE 'Tl PP.LiCATION UEa r 1xa' $ a xbp amI 4 3 a x sad % Laq v aF�cti +ru W -; 'g OT —z•. 'Sts o-'�r RM rATIM F - 1 �{ ,$rK 'g t+ � :u 4 n ,i. "S 1p f`�' Y "'+" Ldku i ^•Y' +4.;�`,�, •tom -� � � y •ya+ A "+„ .� f xq.. d P � � ... L°'5,ya awg0 � .7',p►- z � }' y yx, • �` µ `.,a.+,tea' y ,<� : ,. _ .rn.J n . } .s..t �_ 5 � T „e-,,;;t3 " i.. Pr vm, .;,# .r..k.SIN, DATE_ �'� 0 MAYOR 0 FIRE TO: 0 COUNCIL 0 GENERAL SERV. 0 MANAGER 0 LIBRARY 0 ASST. TO MGR. MARINE 0 EXEC. ASST. 0 PARKS & REC. E: ATTORNEY 0 PERSONNEL 0 BUILDING 0 _ PLANNING 0 CITY CLERK 0 POLICE 0 DATA PROCESS. 0 PUBLIC WORKS 0 DUPLICATING 0 PURCHASING 0 FINANCE 0 TRAFFIC 0 UTILITIES FOR: ❑�F�ACTION & DISPOSITION L�"FILE Vl' FORMATION ❑ REVIEW & COMMENT ❑ RETURN REMARKS: FROM: A&W Wt.1114;W�- . Steve Titus TO ��PRECEi y�o172 S. Los Palmas Avenue Ep�Aa►t � OCT8 tos -Angeles, CA 90004 C 1986 jh, 10J f7,Y OF SUBJECT: Waiver of Coastal Development Permit Requirement/Improvemt to POD Existing Single-family Residences or Structures -Section 30CALip (b) of the Coastal Act Based on your project plans and information provided in your permit applica tio ; n for he development described below, the Executive Director of the o f p Coastal Commission hereby wives the requirement for a Coastal Development Permit pursuant to Section 13250(c) or Section 13253(c), Title 14, California Administrative Code. If, at a later date, this information is found to be incorrect or the plans revised, this decision will become invalid; and, any development occurring must cease until a coastal development permit is obtained or any discrepancy is resolved in writing. WAIVER # 5-86-780 APPLICANT: Steve Titus LOCATION: 1012 West Bay Avenue Newport Beach PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Replace a residential dock consisting of dock_ pier and pilings RATIONALE: The project is compatible with the general area and is consistent with the City's LUP and the Coastal Act. This waiver will not become effective until reported to the Commission at their Nov. 12-14,1986 , meeting. If three (3) Commissioners object to this waiver of permit requirements, a coastal development permit will b required. ` ..� 4�,�.'rC /d by: TOM CRANDALL South Coast District Director cc: Commissioners/file (0770A)12/85 � � i4' � Ia � fd�1°1'".8' • P nv 7 = —, j A� cF �/' by ® ummrame► �� ®�� A 7� i b IS d.K' . � I —JC✓ tom,: `^' t ��~ �� �° �.° 7a ova mv4t, VI16a a 1"0TI f Y 1a 0 C �r&dP 01u77� wftr a Jerry WdScvPO� DAY,Cd�Z as`ra64.ncaJ® "y f a �A:. f..C' J • � � �J ` � �'Qifm-PP.TPsft}7.S ire �.+d/�'v�S'_6�a/ saga a��e+� Gie�9c�'° �awma+9rf� ��,� 84M S � ��®A✓Bf �C�®P�l G6i MA�C�iP' � A7 dA► �P✓Q SC�+'� �Q',S fib 6"fa®P�� �� r°PC✓� ���T�Xfa9f��fP/�✓ Ad �dv4 dP'CJYhfDKJ/ afis�0@^$ ���" GY�°i1�f/lgffPx4� APy ��irg ,�r�'C'�d6Pyw, c9�"Pti"f�au►�rPf �PS�; 6 °4 -47 -Jy I S S _ 5-86-779 PG:nw STATE OF CAIIFORNIA-TW RESOURCES AGENCY OlOROE OEtJ[MEJu►N, Q�rwpr CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST AREA cill-A iIS WEST, RROApWAY, itNTE 3Ro LONG REACH. CA !OR02 ' R»> MS071 1986 Oct. 6 TO: John & Vivian Webb 1020 West Bay Avenuea Newport Beach, CAeo�ra ACT. SUBJECT: Waiver of Coastal Development Permit Requirement/Imp :`ea�ents�1 10 986.E Ex sting Single—family Residences or Structures Secti 3pp c4� (b) of the Coastal Act :� CA. IF EACH. / Based on your project plans and information provided in your perms tion for the development described below. the Executive Director ofte -- . Coastal Commission hereby wives the requirement for a Coastal. Development Permit pursuant to Section 13250(c) or Section 13253(c), Title 14. California Administrative Code. If, at a later date, this information is found to be incorrect or the plans revised. this decision will become invalid; and, any development occurring must cease until a coastal development permit is obtained or any discrepancy is resolved in writing. WAIVER # 5-86-779 APPLICANT: John & Vivian Webb LOCATION: 1020 West Bay Avenue Newport Beach PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Replace a residential dock, consisting of dock, pier and pilings. RATIONALE:The new dock system is compatible with the surrounding area and is consistent with the LUP and the Coastal Act This waiver will not become effective until reported to the Commission at their Nov. 12-14, 1986 . meeting. If three (3) Commissioners object to this waiver of permit requirements, a coastal development permit will be required. TOM CRANDALL South toast District Director cc: Commissioners/File (0770A)12/85 �,:� �. �� tiViY�, Cl r Y off' /i/�weaer Bexew �• ro 4v.vcock ar"fJ At 4 ��W ! vs.vrssr ?i wa o R T 0 • �cQo� it.tMp { 1 C-,' Cea.kw 'zr i� i vta ^.ae. �- V I C I& 1 TY S k ETCH War �Errr i �.�r 1)rrr- NEWPOar BAY cap loolkNIA _--- c.+ a / G' sbd /ridings are eAR. essCd r,s� fce orrcr drnofe dep fh s 19elOPW M&on CoW&P- Law Wafer. 1Ylax/.n+cl n range of fide Gpprax/+rr�+%IY !d f�af. .Ygr6Cs.- /riots ore ea�ab/r'ghod M 7 /h;S , secr<ias� OYrAe.,1011 Bar - _ - - - TOO,. �7b , ` -CWEV &0 3riw 44 � r i o o z4 j fn 3fI / �oz© I�/Z G j, rCAA 5 -r,� c.l L o r• etc, : T�e�+acr= Od �/aB ,.4aDL'ESS• �fl l S? CoA rwAcrox., rofvoo rr<ArtS: ©ArX �! m PARTMENT OF THE ARMY` , S SOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 2711 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053-2325 December 5, 1986 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: Office of the Chief Regulatory Branch Trautwein Brothers ATTENTION: Sam Kniss 2410 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92663-3798 Gentlemen: Thank you for your letter of September 23, 1986 notifying us of your intent to construct a private boat dock at 1012 West Bay Avenue • Your drawings have been reviewed and generally conform to the provisions of General Permit 004 for private boat docks in Newport Harbor Providing you have complied with State local laws you may proceed with the work. Your proposed work has been assigned General Permit No. GP 004-202 If you have any furthur questions, please feel free to call our Regulatory Branch at (213) 894-5606 and refer to this number. A copy of the General Permit is enclosed. Sincerely, Charles M. Holt, P.E. Chief, Regulatory. Branch Enclosure PIER AND DOCK AGREEMENT BETWEEN STEVE TITUS AND JOHN $ VIVIAN WEBB -,,—IT IS HERE IN AGREED THAT LOTH PARTIES WISH TO HAVE THEIR OWN WALIKs STAGING AREAS AND DOCKSt WHICH WILL REGIURE SEPERATE PIER PERMITS. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT TO MEET THE CITY CODE THE EXISTING WALK s STAGING AREA AND RAMPS MUST BE REMOVED IN VIEW OF THE REMOVAL PROCESS AND COST TUERE OF i IT IS AGREED THAT STEVE TITUS SHALL REMOVE THE PILINGS UNDER THE WALK AND STAGING AREA AND JOHN & VIVIAN WEBB SHALL REMOVE THE WOODEN DEN STRUCTURES, i . e . THE WALK AND STAGING AREA. ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS OF REMOVAL OFRAMPS i FLOATS 5 DOCKS OR PILINGS SHALL BE BORNE BY>THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE COSTS OF THE NEW STRUCTURES SHALL BE BORNE BY THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES. DATED. AUGUST1ST _ , 19: r. SIGNED: JfHN B. WEBB ;-- VIVIAN ,T ,.1EBE TEVE TITUS 2410 Newport Boulevard • Newport Beach, California 92663-3798 Telephone (714) 673-1960 WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION con+*ucton Lug No. 451559 September 23, 1986 FSANTA AIIA F-7G10141 California Regional Water ��`'� �AT�,,,,( Quality Control Board 6809 Indiana Avenue Riverside, CA 92504 Attn: Gary D. Stewart, P. E. j Associate WRC Engineer Re: New Dock Pier, Ramp & Piling tort'.�V Steve Titus 1012 West Bay > Ave. Balboa, CA 92661 Dear Gary; Enclosed please find the discharge letter and drawing for the above referenced. I need your comments prior to submitting to the Corps of Engineers. Sincerely, TRAUTWEIN BROTHERS WATERFRONT NSTRUCTIO\ Samuel F. Kniss If standard .dock construction methods and materials are utilized, this project should not affect water quality. A statement has been submitted that there will be no waste discharged from the vessel(s) moored at this dock. Based on these assurances, clearance is provided. Water Qual' C tr 1 Board (714)782-4130 ar JD.Stt October 3, 1986 Seningineer JV California Regional Water Quality Control Board 6833 Indiana Ave. Suite 1 Riverside, California 92.506 Dear Sir: This letter is to assure the above agency that there will be no overnighot occupancy on vessels moored at the or000sed harbor installation and further that there will be no waste discharge from the vessel (s) moored at the proposed installation. Sincerely,�-- Stephen Titus 1012 West Bay Avenue Balboa, CA 92661 Copy to: Resources Agency of. California State Water Resources Control Boa-rd 1416 Ninth St., Room 1140 Sacramento, California Los Angeles District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 2711 Los Angeles, California 90053 r 2410 Newport Boulevard • uAoeo"'Tele Newpor! Beach, California 92663-3798 1* 673-19 , WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION cones,Uceino No.4s1&W - September 23, 1986 CaliforniaRegional Water Quality Control Board 6809 Indiana Avenue Riverside, CA 92504 Attn: Gary D. Stewart, P. E. Associate i`RC Engineer Re: New Dock, Pier, Ramp & Piling for: Steve Titus 1012 West Bay Ave. Balboa, CA 92661 Dear Gary; Enclosed please find the discharge letter and drawing for the above referenced. I need your comments prior to submitting to the Corps of Engineers. Sincerely, TRAUT`.,1EIN BROTHERS �dATERrRONTfBNSTRUCTION Samuel i . 'ttniss 2410 Newport Boulevard • Newport Beach, California. 91663-3798 Telephone (714), 673.196Q WATERFRONT C0NSTRUCTI0N c°^ Uc.I,. w. 4515W. September 23, 1986 State Lands Commission 180.7 13th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Attn: Judy Ludlow, Land Agent Re: New Dock, Pier, Ramp & Piling for: Steve Titus - 1012 West Bay Ave. Balboa, CA 92661 Dear Miss Ludlow; Enclosed please find two (2) copies of the permit drawing and letter of authorization for the above referenced. As I understand, I must have your agency's comments prior to approval by the Coastal Commission. I would appreciate your prompt response. Sincerely, TRAUTWEIN BROTHERS WATERFRONT CO TRUCTION Samuel F. Kniss 2410 Newport Boulevarck. llwa, _&` %�� Newport Beach, California 92663-3791� /�. 40&MU Telephone (714).6MI960 WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION ConUcenm *o.451 September 23, 1986. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch P.O Box 2711 Los Angeles, CA 90053 Attn: Cheryl Hill Re: New Dock, Pier, Ramp & Piling for: Steve Titus 1012 West Bay Ave Balboa, CA 92661 Dear Cheryl; Enclosed please find two (2) copies of the drawing for the above referenced. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, TRAUTWEIN BROTHERS WATERFRONT ONSTRUC�TI�O�N Ps. !I. Stanley Bent 416 South Pecan Street Los rnn`eles, California Bear M. Bent Thank yoti for your letter of September loth together with sketch of the proposed p-Ler to he built on your property at Newport Beach, and abi.atinC the west line of my property there, and which is to be jointly used by the two properties, although owned by you. The layout as sjjE2,ested meets with my approval, and I hope and relieve 'both families will be pleased with this arran€;ement, rather than to have the beach cluttered up with two piers. It is my understanding tl £at I am to pay all e.dditional .expense over and above, the cost of the pier that you had intended to ulld for your own exclusive use. I of course also pay for my own float and ramp. It is further understood that we will jointly shate the expense of the upkeep of the pier proper, but both panties will individtially maintain their respcct�.ve floats. This letter is written to confirm our oral agreement covering the matter. Very truly, J. C. Titus UUcY Septernher 16, _..937 Ik rdr. James C. Titus 325 Rimpau Blvd., Los Angeles' Dear 1,�r. Titus In connection with joint ownership of pier facilities at Newport 7each2 in vievr of. .possible change of ownership, and for various other reasons I came to the conclusion that it would be inadvisable to have joint ownership of a float. After your telling me at�ol.at Mrs. Titus's suggestion ths- t we might have a common pier and serarate floats, I talked with Tyr. Neville and vie made various layouts in order to see just what mooring space would b.e available under such an arrangement. After working out what seemed to me the most logical plan, I went down to see TYr, Patterson at the City Hall. to make sure just what the City's attitude would be and whether or not in his opinion the City would ever require the pier to be moved in the event that a future owner of your property for instance should not be satisfied with the existing layout. yr. Patterson said if any arrangement between you and me was m,-de, the City would issue a joint permit covering the whole situation and his opinion was that when the pier was once built no one could require its removal except the pity and he 'did net think they would take any such action. When I shevreci ?.Zr. Patterson the sketch that I had in mind, he pointed out various objections to it, some of which I had already recognized, and some which I had not thought of. He' suggested aui to a different setup and. I could see m«ny advantages in his olan. I talked to 1vr. 1\?eville about it and he saw no difficulties from a construction point. of view, so T am surmitt;ing herewith a sketch which shows what Mr. Patterson suggested. I have assumed that you would build the same size float that I have in mind, but of course that is entirely '.ap to you. The princi.nal difference between what we would have sand what is ordinarily involved. in such matters would be that the platform from which the ramps tale off, would have to be a t least 24 fe e long in order to Five a 14 foot space between the two floats. In fact Mr. Neville thou`ht it might have to ba 2C feet long in order to have the ramps entirely clear the corner piers which anchor the floats. Just why;;Mr. Patterson suggested la feeu betvr :,n floats I don't know, and it might re advisable to have ever pore distance .ti-,a n that, although any addition there of course Would increase the length of the platform, so I would be inclined to accept his judgement on the 14 feet being. ample. I��r. James C. Titi .2 I relieve this sort of a layout would work cut, all right andf not involve any interference tiro t would to Objectionable course you would have to bear the addition in cost between the large, platf. orm. and the normal size one wh'ych built far 1 were putting the pier'In the Middle of my property . as ramp end float are, concerned, that would be entirely up to you as to design and size. Mr. Neville expects to start pier work neit Monday, so if there is to be any chapge from what I originally planned he will have to know it immediately. That is why I im'submitting this to you by mail rather than waiting to see yo" at the end of the week. hours truly, H. Stanley Bent I\